alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMPUTER INTEGRATOIN CORP. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                    2,457,117
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                            62,096,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                              20,562,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         86,895,173
<PP&E>                                    6,667,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          106,274,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    66,379,109
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                      19
<COMMON>                                      6,957
<OTHER-SE>                               10,678,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            106,274,667
<SALES>                                 207,190,207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        207,190,207
<CGS>                                   185,607,107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            18,178,436
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2,581,008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             823,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                395,936
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                427,720
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .05
        

<FN>
                         20
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dean Pacquette, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 343]

—Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), imposed July 21, 2010, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, after remittitur from this Court for resentencing *(see People v Pacquette,*73 AD3d 1088 [2010], *affd*17 NY3d 87 [2011]), the resentence being a determinate term of imprisonment of 15 years followed by a five-year period of postrelease supervision.

Ordered that the resentence is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the resentence imposed from a determinate term of imprisonment of 15 years followed by a five-year period of postrelease supervision to a determinate term of imprisonment of 10 years followed by a five-year period of postrelease supervision.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly considered a charge of which he was acquitted as a basis for imposing resentence is without merit *(see People v Khan,*89 AD3d 750, 751 [2011]; *People v Morgan,*27 AD3d 579, 580 [2006]; *People v Robinson,*250 AD2d 629 [1998]). However, under the circumstances of this case, the resentence imposed was excessive to the extent indicated *(see People v Suitte,*90 *977AD2d 80 [1982]).

Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                D. Bradly Olah      |   |   |        |
| D.                Bradly Olah          |   |   |        |
| Chief                Executive Officer |   |   |        |
| April                17, 2007          |   |   |   |

|                                   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Kevin M. Greer      |   |   |        |
| Kevin                M. Greer          |   |   |        |
| Chief                Financial Officer |   |   |        |
| April                17, 2007          |   |   |   |

----
#### Alston v. Britthaven, Inc.

Case below: 177 N.C. App. 330

No. 302P06

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-385)

Denied 01/25/07
**EXHIBIT 23.01**
**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-3 Nos. 33-93580, 333-34460, 333-57176, 333-76750, 333-87934,333-102937, 333-106953 and 333-108825) and in the related Prospectus and theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-79222, 333-27671, 333-46949,333-84317, 333-52298, 333-74092, 333-85856, 333-87016 and 333-105555) of MartekBiosciences Corporation of our report dated December 12, 2003, except for Note19, as to which the date is January 26, 2004, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Martek Biosciences Corporation included in its AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2003.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP                  
McLean, Virginia
Vehicle Manufacturers                                  

# Foreign Recalls and Campaigns

Share:*Facebook**Twitter**LinkedIn**Mail*

Foreign Recalls and CampaignsOverviewSearch Foreign CampaignsSubmitting DataSupport & Search

													Foreign Recalls and Campaigns													

                - Overview
                - Search Foreign Campaigns
                - Submitting Data
                - Support & Search

# Overview

Federal regulations mandate that vehicle and vehicle equipment manufacturers comply with Early Warning Reporting requirements. One of the EWR requirements is that all manufacturers of motor vehicles or motor vehicle equipment, including low volume, tires, trailers, and child restraints, submit to NHTSA any determination of a foreign safety recall or other foreign safety campaign if an identical or substantially similar vehicle, trailer, item of equipment, tire, or child restraint is sold or offered for sale in the United States. 

			   MORE EWR INFO		EWR OverviewEWR FAQsManufacturer Communications
Manufacturers should submit the foreign recall or campaign determination to NHTSA within five working days of the determination to conduct a foreign recall or campaign. 

Recall communications for recalls conducted in the United States should be submitted using the recall portal.

# Search Foreign Campaigns

# Submitting Data

Manufacturers can submit their foreign recalls and campaign by email to frecalls@dot.gov. The recall or campaign determination should be submitted along with the foreign model (make, model, model years or identifying information for equipment), similar model sold in the United States (make, model, model years or identifying information for equipment), and rationale as to why the recall was not conducted in the United States. 

Manufacturers will receive a confirmation email with the NHTSA foreign recall campaign identification number shortly after submitting the determination. If a confirmation email does not arrive within a week, please contact us.

# Support & Search

### Assistance in Reporting

Manufacturers with questions should contact the EWR help desk at mfrewrhelpdesk@dot.gov. 

For more information on the substantially similar vehicle listing annual submission, due no later than November 1 each year, visit our EWR section.

### Support Documents

We have support documents available for setting up a manufacturer account, training materials, legal interpretations, and confidentiality requests.

### Data Search

The EWR Search Engine will allow searches of current and past manufacturer EWR Data submitted to NHTSA for a specific manufacturer, report type, and reporting period.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6076
WADE LEE DAMRON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT J. MCCABE, Sheriff; M. D. LATNEY, Director of Norfolk Community Hospital, Defendants - Appellees, and NORFOLK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; GAVIN, Assistant Administrative Director for the Norfolk City Hospital/Norfolk City Jail; MEDIC TAYLOR, Medic for Norfolk City Jail; DEPUTY BATES, Deputy of Norfolk City Jail, Defendants.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-96-228-3) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.2 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wade Lee Damron, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Robert Dion, HUDGINS, CARTER & COLEMAN, Alexandria, Virginia; Carolyn Porter Oast, Deborah Sue Hudler, HEILIG, MCKENRY, FRAIM & LOLLAR, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Damron v. McCabe , No. CA-96-228-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Fred Wilkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



                                                     /s/ Fred Wilkinson
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Fred Wilkinson
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     November 13, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               11,000
<SECURITIES>                                         42,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                        323,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         9,100
<INVENTORY>                                          681,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,117,300
<PP&E>                                               4,277,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,897,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       3,675,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                503,500
<BONDS>                                              760,200
<COMMON>                                             101,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           1,172,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         3,675,100
<SALES>                                              1,933,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,933,800
<CGS>                                                1,422,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,600,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     112,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   38,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      182,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         66,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  116,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      8,100
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         108,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        1.13


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Cistera  Networks,  Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2007,  as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Derek  Downs,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/    Derek P. Downs
----------------------------
Derek P. Downs
President
(Principal Executive Officer)


August 14, 2007


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 936 

To ensure privacy for e-mail communications. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. SUNUNU) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To ensure privacy for e-mail communications. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘E-Mail Privacy Act 

5 of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF INTER7 CEPT. 

8 Section 2510(4) of title 18, United States Code, is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘through the use of any electronic, 

10 mechanical, or other device.’’ and inserting ‘‘contempora11 neous with transit, or on an ongoing basis during transit, 

12 through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other de-
2 

•S 936 IS

1 vice or process, notwithstanding that the communication 

2 may simultaneously be in electronic storage;’’. 

Æ
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                           Subsidiaries of the Company



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Doing Business
Subsidiary                         State of Incorporation          under the Following Names
----------                         ----------------------          -------------------------
<S>                                <C>                           <C>
Sign Builders of
    America, Inc.                   Delaware                     Sign Builders of America, Inc.

Diamond Tech One, Inc.              Delaware                     Diamond Tech One, Inc

SDI Acquisition Corp.               Texas                        SDI Acquisition Corp.

Plasmatron Coatings and                                          Plasmatron Coatings and
     Systems, Inc.                  Pennsylvania                   Systems, Inc.

Field Emission Picture
     Element Technology, Inc.       Delaware                     FEPET, Inc.

Electronic Billboard                                             Electronic Billboard
     Technology, Inc.               Delaware                       Technology, Inc.
</TABLE>


                                    Page 61
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6028

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANDRE SHAWN GREEN, a/k/a Andre Greene, a/k/a Dre,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior

District Judge. (5:08-cr-00944-MBS-10)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Shawn Green, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley D. Ragsdale, John 

David Rowell, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Andre Shawn Green appeals the district court’s order 

denying Green’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a 

sentence reduction. On appeal, Green asserts that the Fair 

Sentencing Act (“FSA”) should apply to lower the statutory 

mandatory minimum term to which he was originally sentenced 

because his direct appeal was pending at the time the FSA became 

effective. However, as Green was sentenced prior to August 3, 

2010, the effective date of the FSA, he is not entitled to 

application of the reduced penalties. See United States v. 

Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 248-49 (4th Cir.), cert. denied 132 S. 

Ct. 356 (2011) (FSA does not apply retroactively to cases 

pending on direct appeal where defendant was sentenced prior to 

effective date of the Act). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Smith *against*Sharp.

SecelSy^tS04 fendantthw¡£hdeá brdniyavuhna ch°angtogrthe declaration ontered,ayateaSy confirm to the

THE COURT.

in this case, said, that where the *venue*in á cause *5 changed, it is not necessary,to servé the defendant with a copy °f a new declaration, but it is sufficient to servé- him with a certified copy of the rulé for changing the- *venue;*and he is bound.to plead, as if the *venue*had'been chariged. . The plaintiff, however.,.ought to alter the declaration on file, so as to make it conformable to the rule; and we will- order this to be done, at any. tíme, so as to make the pleadings on file regular. The defendant may proceed, on his part, in the same manner precisely as if .the alteration, had been made ; and he cannot avail- hitn-1 self of the want of. the alteration as an excuse, or ground of irregularity. ' ....
EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QuantRx Biomedical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sasha Afanassiev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                              /s/ Sasha Afanassiev
                              -------------------------------
                                  Sasha Afanassiev
                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date:    November 15, 2006


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                      25,779,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,508,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,000
<INVENTORY>                                 11,058,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,290,000
<PP&E>                                      48,359,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,633,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              59,851,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       42,358,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   130,517,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (121,533,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,851,000
<SALES>                                     32,145,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,145,000
<CGS>                                       18,546,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,546,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,074,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             265,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,182,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   159,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,023,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,023,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>