22924 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Notices 

collected via a mechanism known as the 

Hazardous Waste Report for the 

required reporting year [EPA Form 

8700–13 A/B](also known as the 

Biennial Report). Both RCRA Sections 

3002 and 3004 require EPA to establish 

standards for recordkeeping and 

reporting of hazardous waste generation 

and management. Section 3002 applies 

to hazardous waste generators and 

Section 3004 applies to hazardous waste 

treatment, storage, and disposal 

facilities. The implementing regulations 

are found at 40 CFR 262.40(b) and (d); 

262.41(a)(1)–(5), (a)(8), and (b); 

264.75(a)–(e) and (j); 265.75(a)–(e) and 

(j); and 270.30(l)(9). This is mandatory 

reporting by the respondents. 

This ICR renewal includes several 

changes to the RCRA Subtitle C Site 

Identification Form (EPA Form 8700– 

12) in order to implement two new final 

rules: The Revisions to the Definition of 

Solid Waste, promulgated on October 

30, 2008 (73 FR 64668); and the 

Standards Applicable to Generators of 

Hazardous Waste; Alternative 

Requirements for Hazardous Waste 

Determination and Accumulation of 

Unwanted Material at Laboratories 

Owned by Colleges and Universities and 

Other Eligible Academic Entities 

Formally Affiliated With Colleges and 

Universities, promulgated on December 

1, 2008 (73 FR 72912). 

Burden Statement: The reporting 

burden is estimated to average 16.4 

hours per respondent, and includes time 

for reviewing instructions, gathering 

data, completing and reviewing the 

forms, and submitting the report. The 

record keeping requirement is estimated 

to average 2.3 hours per response and 

includes the time for filing and storing 

the Biennial Report submission for three 

years. 

Burden means the total time, effort, or 

financial resources expended by persons 

to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose 

or provide information to or for a 

Federal agency. This includes the time 

needed to review instructions; develop, 

acquire, install, and utilize technology 

and systems for the purposes of 

collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 

requirements which have subsequently 

changed; train personnel to be able to 

respond to a collection of information; 

search data sources; complete and 

review the collection of information; 

and transmit or otherwise disclose the 

information. 

The ICR provides a detailed 

explanation of the Agency’s estimate, 

which is only briefly summarized here: 

Estimated total number of potential 

respondents: 13,000. 

Frequency of response: Once. 

Estimated total average number of 

responses for each respondent: 50. 

Estimated total annual burden hours: 

700,000 hours. 

Estimated total annual costs: $70,000 

annualized capital or O&M costs. 

What Is the Next Step in the Process for 

This ICR? 

EPA will consider the comments 

received and amend the ICR as 

appropriate. The final ICR package will 

then be submitted to OMB for review 

and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 

1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue 

another Federal Register notice 

pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to 

announce the submission of the ICR to 

OMB and the opportunity to submit 

additional comments to OMB. If you 

have any questions about this ICR or the 

approval process, please contact the 

technical person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Dated: February 26, 2009. 

Matt Hale, 

Director, Office of Resource Conservation and 

Recovery. 

[FR Doc. E9–11410 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8593–5] 

Environmental Impact Statements and 

Regulations; Availability of EPA 

Comments 

Availability of EPA comments 

prepared pursuant to the Environmental 

Review Process (ERP), under section 

309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 

102(2)(c) of the National Environmental 

Policy Act as amended. Requests for 

copies of EPA comments can be directed 

to the Office of Federal Activities at 

202–564–7146. 

An explanation of the ratings assigned 

to draft environmental impact 

statements (EISs) was published in FR 

dated April 17, 2009 (74 FR 17860). 

Draft EISs 

EIS No. 20090052, ERP No. D–NRS– 

H38001–IA, Clarke County Water 

Supply Project, To Construct a 

Multiple-Purpose Structure that 

Provides for Rural Water Supply and 

Water Based Recreational 

Opportunities, Clarke County, IA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about stream 

and wetland impacts and mitigation. 

Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090064, ERP No. D–FTA– 

K54031–CA, Silicon Valley Rapid 

Transit Corridor Project, Proposes to 

Construct an Extension of the Bay 

Area Rapid Transit (BART) Rail 

System from Warm Spring Station in 

Fremont to Santa Clara County, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about impacts 

to water quality, noise impacts, and 

environmental justice. EPA also 

recommended that the project sponsors 

ensure coordination with other transit 

service in the area. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090076, ERP No. D–SFW– 

K91016–CA, Paiute Cutthroat Trout 

Restoration Project, Eradication of 

Non-Native Trout Species from 11 

Stream Miles of Silver King Creek, 

Alpine County, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed concerns 

about the environmental impacts of 

piperonyl butoxide, and recommended 

further consideration of physical 

treatment combined with chemical 

treatment options. Rating EC2. 

EIS No. 20090082, ERP No. D–AFS– 

K65359–CA, Salt Timber Harvest and 

Fuel Hazard Reduction Project, 

Proposing Vegetation Management in 

the Salt Creek Watershed, South Fork 

Management Unit, Hayfork Ranger 

District, Shasta-Trinity National 

Forest, Trinity County, CA. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about the 

treatment prescriptions, naturally 

occurring asbestos, air quality, and 

climate change. Rating EC2. 

Final EISs 

EIS No. 20090041, ERP No. F–TVA– 

E65073–IN, Watts Bar Reservoir Land 

Management Plan, Amend and 

Update the 2005 Plan, Guide Land 

Use Approvals, Private Water Use 

Facility, and Resource Management 

Decisions, Loudon, Meigs, Rhea and 

Roane Counties, TN. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns because the 

preferred alternative Modified B is not 

as environmental protective as the 

Modified C alternative. 

EIS No. 20090073, ERP No. F–USN– 

D11044–00, Virginia Capes 

(VACAPES) Range Complex, 

Proposed action is to Support and 

Conduct Current and Emerging 

Training and RDT & E Operations, 

Chesapeake Bay, DE, MD, VA and NC. 

Summary: EPA expressed 

environmental concerns about the 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Notices 22925 

deposition of expended training 

materials into the marine environment 

and its potential impact over time. 

EIS No. 20090074, ERP No. F–FAA– 

F51051–OH, Port Columbus 

International Airport/(CMH) Project, 

Replacement of Runway 10R/28L, 

Development of a New Passenger 

Terminal and other Associated 

Airport Projects, Funding, City of 

Columbus, OH. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about PM2.5 

emissions, and how they will be 

minimized. 

EIS No. 20090081, ERP No. F–AFS– 

L65559–OR, BLT Project, Proposed 

Vegetation Management Activities, 

Crescent Ranger District, Deschutes 

National Forest, Deschutes County, 

OR. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed action. 

EIS No. 20090089, ERP No. F–AFS– 

K65338–AZ, Warm Fire Recovery 

Project, Removal of Fire-Killed Trees 

Reforestation, Fuel Reduction and 

Road Reconstruction of Wildland Fire 

Burn Portion, Coconino County, AZ. 

Summary: EPA continues to have 

environmental concerns about potential 

impacts to water resources and wildlife 

habitat from erosion. 

EIS No. 20090093, ERP No. F–FHW– 

H40193–IA, I–29 Improvements in 

Sioux City, Construction from 

Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail 

Road (BNSF) Bridge over the Missouri 

River to Existing Hamilton Boulevard 

Interchange, Woodbury County, IA. 

Summary: While EPA does not object 

to the proposed action, it requested 

clarification of water and sanitary sewer 

line relocation and abandonment issues. 

EIS No. 20090096, ERP No. FS–COE– 

G34043–LA, Inner Harbor Navigation 

Canal (IHNC) Lock Replacement 

Project, Proposal for Relieving 

Navigation Traffic Congestion 

Associated with IHNC Lock, Located 

between the St. Claude Avenue and 

North Claibone Avenue Bridge, 

Orleans, LA. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

preferred alternative. 

EIS No. 20090103, ERP No. FS–NOA– 

K91008–00, Amendment 18 to the 

Fishery Management Plan, Pelagic 

Fisheries of the Western Pacific 

Region, Management Modifications 

for the Hawaii-based Shallow-set 

Longline Swordfish Fishery, Proposal 

to Remove Effort Limits, Eliminate the 

Set Certificate Program and 

Implement New Sea Turtle Interaction 

Caps. 

Summary: EPA does not object to the 

proposed project, but suggests that the 

conservation recommendations outlined 

in the Biological Opinion be included in 

the Record of Decision. 

Dated: May 12, 2009. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–11398 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[ER–FRL–8593–4] 

Environmental Impacts Statements; 

Notice of Availability 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal 

Activities, General Information, (202) 

564–7167 or http://www.epa.gov/ 

compliance/nepa/. 

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact 

Statements filed 05/04/2009 through 

05/08/2009 pursuant to 40 CFR 

1506.9. 

EIS No. 20090150, Revised Draft EIS, 

FHW, IN, I–69 Evansville to 

Indianapolis, Indiana Project, Section 

2, Revised to Update the Stream 

Impacts, Oakland City to Washington, 

(IN–64 to US 50), Gibson, Pike and 

Daviess Counties, IN, Comment 

Period Ends: 06/29/2009, Contact: 

Janice Osadczuk, 317–226–7486. 

EIS No. 20090151, Draft EIS, NPS, CA, 

Prisoners Harbor Coastal Wetland 

Restoration Project, Proposes to 

Restore a Functional, Self-Sustaining 

Ecosystem at a Coastal Wetland Site, 

Channel Islands National Park, Santa 

Cruz Island, Santa Barbara County, 

CA, Comment Period Ends: 07/13/ 

2009, Contact: Paula Power, 805–658– 

5784. 

EIS No. 20090152, Draft EIS, BLM, UT, 

Mona to Oquirrh Transmission 

Corridor Project and Draft Pong 

Express Resource Management Plan 

Amendment, Construction, Operation, 

Maintenance and Decommissioning a 

Double-Circuit 500/345 Kilovolt (Kv) 

Transmission Line, Right-of-Way 

Grant, Rocky Mountain Power, Juab, 

Salt Lake, Tooele and Utah Counties, 

UT, Comment Period Ends: 08/03/ 

2009, Contact: Mike Nelson, 801–977– 

4300. 

Dated: May 12, 2009. 

Robert W. Hargrove, 

Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office 

of Federal Activities. 

[FR Doc. E9–11395 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S. 

[Public Notice 114] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request, Marketing Fax 

Back Response Form 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank 

invites the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to comment on the 

proposed information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. The Marketing Fax Back 

Response Form will be used to collect 

basic trade information about United 

States companies. This information will 

be provided to the Export-Import Bank’s 

finance consultants nationwide to assist 

in providing counsel to exporters. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before July 14, 2009 to be considered. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all comments and 

requests for additional information to 

Stephen Maroon, Export-Import Bank of 

the U.S., 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565–3901, 

or stephen.maroon@exim.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title and Form Number: Marketing 

Fax Back Response Form EIB 05–01. 

OMB Number: 3048–. 

Type of Review: Regular. 

Need and Use: This form will provide 

basic trade information about U.S. 

Companies and will provide the ExportImport Bank’s trade finance consultants 

nationwide the ability to provide 

counsel to exporters. 

Affected Public: The form affects 

entities involved in the export of U.S. 

goods and services. 

Estimated Annual Respondents: 

1,500. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 5 

minutes. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 125 hours. 

Frequency of Reporting or Use: Once. 

BILLING CODE 6690–01–P