alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 897 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the calculation 

of the reserve allowance for medical benefits of plans sponsored by 

bona fide associations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 25, 2005 

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the calculation of the reserve allowance for medical benefits of plans sponsored by bona fide associations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALLOWANCE OF RESERVE FOR MEDICAL BENE4 FITS OF PLANS SPONSORED BY BONA FIDE 

5 ASSOCIATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 419A(c) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to account limit) is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new para9 graph: 
2

•S 897 IS

1 ‘‘(6) ADDITIONAL RESERVE FOR MEDICAL BEN2 EFITS OF BONA FIDE ASSOCIATION PLANS.— 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An applicable account 

4 limit for any taxable year may include a reserve 

5 in an amount not to exceed 35 percent of the 

6 sum of— 

7 ‘‘(i) the qualified direct costs, and 

8 ‘‘(ii) the change in claims incurred, 

9 but unpaid, for such taxable year with re10 spect to medical benefits (other than post11 retirement medical benefits). 

12 ‘‘(B) APPLICABLE ACCOUNT LIMIT.—For 

13 purposes of this subsection, the term ‘applicable 

14 account limit’ means an account limit for a 

15 qualified asset account with respect to medical 

16 benefits provided through a plan maintained by 

17 a bona fide association (as defined in section 

18 2791(d)(3) of the Public Health Service Act 

19 (42 U.S.C. 300gg–91(d)(3))’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after De22 cember 31, 2004.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CEO

In connection with the Annual Report of Plains
Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C.
Flores, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 25, 2013



/s/ James C. FloresJames C. FloresChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex">
    <title>What Is Diabetic Neuropathy? - NIDDK</title>
    
<meta name="VIcurrentDateTime" content="638491923787439927" />
<meta name="VirtualFolder" content="/" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="/layouts/system/VisitorIdentification.js"></script>

</head>
<body>
    <div></div>
</body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, June 4, 2009, 8 a.m. to June 4, 2009, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 5, 2009, 74 FR 20712-70715.                 

The starting time of the meeting on June 4, 2009 has been changed to 1:30 p.m. until adjournment. The meeting date and location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: May 18, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. E9-12264 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.
1350, as adopted), Thomas C. Shull, the Chief Executive Officer of Hanover
Direct, Inc. (the "Company"), and Charles E. Blue, the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to their knowledge:

     1. The Company's Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended September 27, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as
Exhibit 32.1 (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
periods covered by the Quarterly Report and the results of operations of the
Company for the periods covered by the Quarterly Report.

     In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the
9th day of April, 2004.

/s/ THOMAS C. SHULL                       /s/ CHARLES E. BLUE
----------------------------------------  ------------------------------------
Thomas C. Shull, Chief Executive Officer     Charles E. Blue, Chief Financial
     (Principal Executive Officer)         Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arcadio N. Gonzalez, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 890]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated July 7, 2009 *(People v Gonzalez,*64 AD3d 615 [2009]), affirming a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, imposed September 19, 2007.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Eng, EJ, Mastro, Balkin and Chambers, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII (the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.











/s/Kenneth J. Cutillo


Kenneth J. Cutillo


Principal Executive Officer and


Principal Financial Officer


Arch Street VIII, Inc. as


Managing General Partner of


Boston Financial Tax Credits Fund VII,


A Limited Partnership








Date:  April 6, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 203 (Thursday, October 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 54595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25306]



[[Page 54595]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 17, 2009, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Athabasca University, Athabasca, Alberta, Canada; BPS 
Bildungsportal Sachsen GmbH, Chemnitz, Germany; and Levelland 
Independent School District, Levelland, TX have been added as parties 
to this venture.
    Also, University of North Carolina--Wilmington, Wilmington, NC; 
Angel Learning, Indianapolis, IN; Information Management Specialists, 
Montgomery, AL; eCollege.com, Denver, CO; Embanet, Toronto, Ontario, 
Canada; TIDIA Ae FAPESP Project, Sao Paulo, Brazil; Common Need, Inc., 
Alexandria, VA; and ACT, Iowa City, IA have withdrawn as parties to 
this venture.
    In addition, Norwegian eStandards Project has changed its name to 
The Norwegian Secretariat for Standardization Learning Technology 
(NSSL), Oslo, Norway.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283)
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 30, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on August 21, 2009 (74 FR 42330).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-25306 Filed 10-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2542 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men’s wading boots, valued 

over $30/pair, with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather, or composition 

leather and uppers of rubber or plastics whose height from the bottom 

of the outer sole to the top of the upper does not exceed 9 inches 

(22.86 cm). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Ms. CANTWELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men’s wading 

boots, valued over $30/pair, with outer soles of rubber, 

plastics, leather, or composition leather and uppers of 

rubber or plastics whose height from the bottom of the 

outer sole to the top of the upper does not exceed 9 

inches (22.86 cm). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2542 IS

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN’S WADING BOOTS, VALUED OVER 

2 $30/PAIR, WITH OUTER SOLES OF RUBBER, 

3 PLASTICS, LEATHER, OR COMPOSITION 

4 LEATHER AND UPPERS OF RUBBER OR PLAS5 TICS WHOSE HEIGHT FROM THE BOTTOM OF 

6 THE OUTER SOLE TO THE TOP OF THE UPPER 

7 DOES NOT EXCEED 9 INCHES (22.86 CM). 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

9 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

10 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

11 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Men’s wading boots, valued 

over $30/pair, with outer 

soles of rubber, plastics, 

leather, or composition leather and uppers of rubber or 

plastics whose height from 

the bottom of the outer sole 

to the top of the upper does 

not exceed 9 inches (22.86 

cm) (provided for in subheading 6402.91.90) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

14 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

15 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Ashworth, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Greg W. SlackGreg W. SlackChief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer
DENY and Opinion Filed October 7, 2021 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00801-CV 

IN RE FREDERICK ALTYMAN BROWN, JR., Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-20105 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Garcia 

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus asks that we compel the trial court to 

rule on a special appearance filed months after the court granted a summary 

judgment motion and on other matters pertaining to the court’s jurisdiction and 

recusal. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court 

has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. 

In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). 

Based on the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to 

show his entitlement to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny the petition for 

writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

 
 –2– 

Having denied the petition, we also deny relator’s motion for stay as moot. 

 

210801F.P05 

/Dennise Garcia/ 

DENNISE GARCIA 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2524 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2524

   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain 
  women's footwear, valued over $23/pair, with a coated or laminated 
                            textile fabric.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain 
  women's footwear, valued over $23/pair, with a coated or laminated 
                            textile fabric.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR, VALUED OVER $23/PAIR, WITH A 
              COATED OR LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRIC.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.78 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain women's footwear, 
valued over $23/pair, with a coated or laminated textile fabric) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20/pair'' and inserting ``$23/pair''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00298

- CR

Elvin Laron BURNES

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR5493

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED June 18, 2014.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
#### Exequiel Paganini, Respondent, v Congregation Eretz H’Chaim, Appellant.

[962 NYS2d 683]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated March 16, 2012, as denied those branches of its cross motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) and granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant failed to establish, prima facie, that it is entitled to the homeowners’ exemption under Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) *(see Lenda v Breeze Concrete Corp.,*73 AD3d 987, 989 [2010]).

The plaintiff established, prima facie, that the defendant violated Labor Law § 240 (1) when it provided him with a wet, unsecured ladder lacking rubber feet, and that the violation proximately caused the ladder to shift and the plaintiff to fall to the ground *(see Kaminski v 22-61 42nd St., LLC,*91 AD3d 606 [2012]; *Melchor v Singh,*90 AD3d 866, 867-868 [2011]). The plaintiff further established, prima facie, that the defendant is not entitled to the protection of the homeowners’ exemption under Labor Law § 240 (1) *(see DeSabato v 674 Carroll St. Corp.,*55 AD3d 656, 659 [2008]; *Morelock v Danbrod Realty Corp.,*203 AD2d 733 [1994]). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the defendant’s cross motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) pursuant to the homeowners’ exemption, and properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this Annual Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen C. Raffaele, Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 9, 2005
        By:
/s/ Stephen C.
RaffaeleStephen C. RaffaeleExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerSterling Bancshares, Inc.