alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

EPICOR SOFTWARE, INC.

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                                   |  |      |        |     |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |     |  |      |        |  |  |   |        | 
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | --- | ---- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | --- |  | ---- | ------ |  |  | - | ------ | 
|                                                   |  | 2010 |        |     | 2009 |   |        | 2008 |  |   | 2007   |     |  | 2006 |       
|Income (loss) before income taxes                  |  | $    | (6,781 | )   |      | $ | (4,581 | )    |  | $ | (4,046 | )   |  | $    | 38,539 |  |  | $ | 38,607 | 
|Fixed charges:                                     |  |      |        |     |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |     |  |      |        |  |  |   |        | 
|Interest expense                                   |  |      | 20,020 |     |      |   | 22,363 |      |  |   | 22,522 |     |  |      | 12,464 |  |  |   | 9,274  | 
|Portion of rent expense representative of interest |  |      | 1,391  |     |      |   | 1,486  |      |  |   | 1,661  |     |  |      | 1,885  |  |  |   | 1,751  | 
|Amortized capitalized expenses                     |  |      |       |     |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |     |  |      |       |  |  |   |       | 
|                                                   |  |      |        |     |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |     |  |      |        |  |  |   |        | 
|Total earnings                                     |  | $    | 14,630 |     |      | $ | 19,268 |      |  | $ | 20,137 |     |  | $    | 52,888 |  |  | $ | 49,632 | 
|                                                   |  |      |        |     |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |     |  |      |        |  |  |   |        | 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                 |  |      | 0.68   | (1) |      |   | 0.81   | (2)  |  |   | 0.83   | (3) |  |      | 3.69   |  |  |   | 4.50   | 



|(1) | Deficiency in earnings totaled $6,781 in 2010.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------

|(2) | Deficiency in earnings totaled $4,581 in 2009.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------

|(3) | Deficiency in earnings totaled $4,046 in 2008.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------
|   | 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February      14, 2010 | /s/      George Carpenter                             |   |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    | George      Carpenter                                      |   |
|                                    | Chief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                                    |                                                       |   |
|                                    | /s/      Paul Buck                                    |   |
|                                    | Paul      Buck                                             |   |
|                                    | Chief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2527 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2527

To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain men's 
 footwear, valued over $23/pair, covering the ankle, whose height from 
the bottom of the outer sole to the top of the upper does not exceed 8 
           inches, with a coated or laminated textile fabric.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain men's 
 footwear, valued over $23/pair, covering the ankle, whose height from 
the bottom of the outer sole to the top of the upper does not exceed 8 
           inches, with a coated or laminated textile fabric.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN'S FOOTWEAR, VALUED OVER $23/PAIR, COVERING THE 
              ANKLE, WHOSE HEIGHT FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE OUTER SOLE TO 
              THE TOP OF THE UPPER DOES NOT EXCEED 8 INCHES, WITH A 
              COATED OR LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRIC.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.60 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain men's footwear, 
valued over $23/pair, covering the ankle, whose height from the bottom 
of the outer sole to the top of the upper does not exceed 8 inches, 
with a coated or laminated textile fabric) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20/pair'' and inserting ``$23/pair''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective column period and 
        inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 3(i)
                                                                   
                                                                   

                                 
                   CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                 
                                OF
                                 
                       METTLER-TOLEDO, INC.
                                 

          Mettler-Toledo, Inc., a corporation organized and

existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, does hereby

certify:

          FIRST:   The name of the Corporation is

                   METTLER-TOLEDO, INC.

          SECOND:  The address of the Corporation's registered

office in the State of Delaware is Corporation Trust Center, 1209

Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle.

The name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation

Trust Company.

          THIRD:   The purpose of the Corporation is to engage in

any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized

under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

          FOURTH:  The total number of shares of stock which the

Corporation shall have authority to issue is One Thousand (1,000)

shares of Common Stock, and the par value of each such share is One

Dollar ($1.00).

          FIFTH:   Elections of directors need not be by ballot

unless the By-Laws of the Corporation shall so provide.

          SIXTH:   The Board of Directors of the Corporation may

make By-Laws and from time to time may alter, amend or repeal By-

Laws.

          SEVENTH: To the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware

General Corporation Law as the same exists or may hereafter be

amended, a Director of the Corporation shall not be liable to the

Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of

fiduciary duty as a Director.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 99-1809

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Hector Lizandro Rios-Ramirez, * also known as "Musico," * [UNPUBLISHED] also known as "Oscar," * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 19, 1999 Filed: November 4, 1999

___________ Before BOWMAN, LAY, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________
PER CURIAM. Hector Lizandro Rios-Ramirez ("Rios-Ramirez") was charged in a four count indictment. Count One charged him with conspiring to distribute cocaine from May 12 through May 19, 1998, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(B); Counts Two and Three charged him with distributing cocaine on May 12 and May 13, 1998, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C); and Count Four charged him with distributing cocaine on May 19, 1998, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and1 The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge of the United States District

Court for the District of Minnesota, presiding. -2- 841(b)(1)(B). A jury trial was held. 1 At trial Rios-Ramirez asserted an entrapment defense, arguing that he was wrongfully induced by a government informant and that he lacked the predisposition to engage in any of the illegal transactions. The trial court instructed the jury on the entrapment defense. Rejecting this defense, the jury found Rios -Ramirez guilty on all four counts. Rios-Ramirez was thereafter sentenced to a term of seventy months imprisonment. The sole issue on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence for each of the four counts.
The standard of review for sufficiency of the evidence is whether, in the light most favorable to the government, and giving the government the benefit of all reasonable inferences that may be drawn from the evidence, there is substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict. United States v. Gaines , 969 F.2d 692, 696 (8th Cir. 1992). We have carefully reviewed the record in this case and find that there is substantial evidence that the government informant did not induce Rios-Ramirez to commit the offenses and that there is substantial evidence supporting the government's proof that Rios-Ramirez was predisposed to commit the charged offenses. Additionally, the jury was instructed as to the entrapment defense and, after deliberating and considering all of the evidence, properly rejected it. On the basis of the record presented and the arguments made, we affirm the judgment of conviction. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-11-00349-CR

Appeal from the

396th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1229914D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
#### Erica Daniels, Respondent, v Frances A. Rumsey, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[974 NYS2d 862]

— Ap*1408peal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Gerald J. Whalen, J.), entered May 15, 2012. The order, inter alia, denied that part of the motion of defendant Frances A. Rumsey to compel a physical examination of plaintiff by an orthopedic specialist.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Daniels v Rumsey*([appeal No. 2] 111 AD3d 1408 [2013]). Present — Scudder, PJ., Fahey, Peradotto, Lindley and Valentino, JJ.
#### Rodolfo VELASQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-71964.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 4, 2006.*

Filed Dec. 8, 2006.

*693Howard R. Davis, Davis Miller & Neumeister, Van Nuys, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Robert J. Branman, U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rodolfo Velasquez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). To the extent we have jurisdiction it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing legal conclusions de novo and factual findings for substantial evidence, *Ochoa v. Gonzales,*406 F.3d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir.2005), we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review Velasquez’s contention that he is eligible for asylum and withholding of removal based on a theory of hazardous political neutrality because Velasquez failed to raise that argument before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004).

Velasquez also contends he was threatened and attacked by guerrillas on account of a political opinion they imputed to him based on his refusal to join them. We agree with the agency’s conclusion that the record contains no evidence that the guerrillas imputed any political opinion to Velasquez or that they were motivated, even in part, by any imputed political opinion. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 482-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38*694(1992). Accordingly, Velasquez has failed to establish eligibility for asylum or withholding of removal. *See Ochoa,*406 F.3d at 1171-72.

Because Velasquez has not presented arguments specific to his CAT claim, we decline to consider that claim. *Cf. Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (issues which are not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF WOLVERINE TUBE, INC. FOR THE
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 1, 2000 AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET OF WOLVERINE TUBE, INC. AT OCTOBER 1, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<CASH>                                          18,538
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,106<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    105,891
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               242,220
<PP&E>                                         209,508<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 575,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,255
<BONDS>                                        228,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           142
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   575,289
<SALES>                                        528,430
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               528,430
<CGS>                                          461,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  461,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,601
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,751
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,850
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.59
<FN>
<F1>THE VALUES FOR THE TAGS RECEIVABLES AND PP&E ARE SHOWN NET OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
ALLOWANCE ACCOUNTS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Howard Thomson, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Terrace Ventures Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the
      fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                          



| | By:    |                            
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        | /s/
      Howard Thomson   
| | Name:  | HOWARD THOMSON             
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  |                            
| |        | March
      12, 2009       



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6076

WADE LEE DAMRON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT J. MCCABE, Sheriff; M. D. LATNEY,

Director of Norfolk Community Hospital,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

NORFOLK COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; GAVIN, Assistant

Administrative Director for the Norfolk City

Hospital/Norfolk City Jail; MEDIC TAYLOR,

Medic for Norfolk City Jail; DEPUTY BATES,

Deputy of Norfolk City Jail,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.

(CA-96-228-3)

Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 6, 1997

Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
2

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wade Lee Damron, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Robert Dion, HUDGINS,

CARTER & COLEMAN, Alexandria, Virginia; Carolyn Porter Oast,

Deborah Sue Hudler, HEILIG, MCKENRY, FRAIM & LOLLAR, Norfolk,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel

and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Damron v. McCabe, No. CA-96-228-3 (E.D. Va. Dec. 23, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Natalia Cokinos Oakes, Individually and as Successor Trustee of the Herbert C. Oakes Living Trust, as Assignee of Herbert C. Oakes, Jr. and Another, and as Guardian of Leopold V. Oakes, an Infant, Respondent, v Betty O. Muka, Appellant.

Submitted December 6, 2010;

decided January 11, 2011

Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 19, 2010 dismissal order denied *[see*15 NY3d 867 (2010)].
-  Home 
        -  Research & Funding 
        -  Current Funding Opportunities 
        -  Notice of Special Interest: Advancing Research in Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in People with Neurodevelopmental Disorders 

View Current Funding Opportunities

# Notice of Special Interest: Advancing Research in Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in People with Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Gastrointestinal (GI) complications in children and adults with neurodevelopmental disorders have drawn attention to gaps in understanding their causes and treatment. GI dysfunction is particularly common in individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism, Fragile X syndrome, and Rett syndrome, as well as chromosomal disorders such as Down syndrome. GI disorders in these conditions can include gut malformations present at birth (such as pyloric stenosis or Hirschsprung disease) but also functional issues such as feeding problems, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), cyclic vomiting, delayed gastric emptying, diarrhea, bloating, celiac disease, irritable bowel symptoms, and constipation leading to encopresis, incontinence, and stool impaction. These GI issues may be associated with severe nutritional deficiencies, weight loss, and failure to thrive. GI symptoms are reported in between 23-70% of individuals with autism, a rate ~ 8 times higher than in the general population, with similar rates in individuals with other less common forms of intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) (Holingue et al., Autism Res 2018:11:24-36). Unfortunately, mechanisms to accurately diagnose GI conditions in this population are limited, and tailored treatments to address them are almost nonexistent, particularly since clinical trials for IDD populations are rare.

### Funding Opportunity Details

Full Announcement:NOT-DK-21-024Related Notices or Announcements:                None            

Program Contact:Terez Shea-Donohue, Ph.D.

R01 - Research Project Grant

### Key Dates

Open Date:            Read full announcement        

Letter of Intent Due Date:            Read full announcement