alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM 10-QSB/A - Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)
	of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

	                      UNITED STATES
	              SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
	                    WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

	                        FORM 10-QSB/A

[ X ] Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934.
For the period ended           December 31, 1997                           
or
[   ] Transition Report Pursuance to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange act of 1934.
For the transition period from                   to                        

Commission File Number             33-16820-D                              

                       TRAVIS INDUSTRIES, INC.                             
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                Colorado                         84-1063149                 
     (State or other jurisdiction of           (I.R.S. Employer
      incorporation or organization            Identification No.)

  3415 W. Broadway,  Council Bluffs, IA              51501               
(Address of principal executive offices)	   	      (Zip Code)

                            (712) 328-3040                                 
 	(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                                     None                                  
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed
	since last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports 
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the 
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to 
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

	                    	 [ X ] Yes	[   ] No
 
	APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
	DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicated by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents 
and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of 
securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

                     					[ X ] Yes	[   ] No

	            APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

As of December 31, 1997, Registrant had 127,808,864 shares of common stock, 
no par value, outstanding.
<PAGE>

                     					SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on 
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                    Travis Industries, Inc.



Date  March 31, 1998               	By: JEFFREY R. SKINNER, CFO, Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,630,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,822,841
<ALLOWANCES>                                   129,961
<INVENTORY>                                  1,751,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,565,721
<PP&E>                                       4,177,084
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,533,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,282,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,900,925
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       230,108
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,982,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,282,847
<SALES>                                     11,493,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,641,809
<CGS>                                        2,993,384
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,504,795
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,049
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,307,933
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,072,511)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,380,444
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,380,444
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Alaa Agina, Respondent.

Submitted November 1, 2010;

decided November 17, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New *902York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the respondent on the appeal herein.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-111784) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-128389) of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. of our report dated March 6, 2006 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule,management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Los Angeles, CA 

March 6, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [ER-FRL-8593-7]

Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 202-564-7146.

An explanation of the ratings assigned to  draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated  April 17, 2009 (74 FR 17860).

## Draft EISs

*EIS No. 20090054, ERP No. D-AFS-K65358-CA*, Stanislaus National Forest Motorized Travel  Management (17305) Plan, Implementation, Stanislaus National Forest, CA.                

*Summary:*                     EPA expressed environmental concerns about  adverse impacts on water quality, sensitive  species and habitat. Additional information is  needed on seasonal closures, monitoring, and  enforcement commitments. Rating EC2.                

*EIS No. 20090062, ERP No. D-FRC-E05104-00*, Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2232), Application for Hydroelectric License, Catawba and Wateree Rivers in Burke, McDowell, Caldwell, Catawba, Alexander, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Lincoln and Gaston Counties, NC and  York, Lancaster, Chester, Fairfield and Kershaw  Counties, SC.                

*Summary:*                     EPA expressed environmental concerns impacts to aquatic  species. Rating EC1.                

## Final EISs

*EIS No. 20090110, ERP No. F-USN-C11023-NJ*, Laurelwood Housing Area, Access at Naval Weapons  Station Earle, Lease Agreement, Monmouth County, NJ.                

*Summary:*                     No formal comment letter was sent to the  preparing agency.                

Dated: May 19, 2009.

Ken Mittelholtz,

Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. E9-12011 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
No. 831.

#### Morante *v.*New York.

February 9, 1942.

*Messrs. Joseph F. Rutherford*and *Hayden C. Covington*for petitioner. *Mr. Frank H. Myers*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the County Court, Westchester County, New York, denied.
667 A.2d 670

#### IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY J. CABELO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

November 21, 1995.

ORDER

ANTHONY J. CABELO of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court dated September 20, 1995, and who remains suspended at this time, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTHONY J. CABELO is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics may transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund the attorney account funds held in any financial institution by ANTHONY J. CABELO, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of September 20, 1995, and it is further

*590ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.
NO. 07-06-0328-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	JANUARY 23, 2007

	______________________________

	DEAN EUDELL HOHNSTEIN, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 51,406-B; HONORABLE JOHN BOARD, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Pursuant to a plea of guilty, Appellant, Dean Eudell Hohnstein, was convicted of possession of marihuana, enhanced, and sentenced to twenty years confinement.  On August 3, 2006, Appellant filed Notice of Appeal, attached to which was the Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal, signed August 2, 2006, indicating that the appeal was “not a plea-bargain case, and the [Appellant] has the right of appeal.”  On November 9, 2006, the Reporter’s Record was filed.  A review of the Reporter’s Record revealed that this was a plea-bargain case where Appellant waived his right of appeal.  Because the certification before the Court was inconsistent with the record, it was defective.  Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005).  A request for a corrected certification resulted in  the District Clerk forwarding a Trial Court Certification, dated July 13, 2006, indicating no right of appeal, and a letter from the Trial Court confirming that fact. 

	By letter dated January 4, 2007, this Court notified counsel that the certification indicated no right of appeal and requested a response by January 18, 2007.  The Court also noted that failure to file an amended certification showing a right of appeal or failure to provide other grounds for continuing the appeal would result in dismissal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2) & (d).  No response has been filed and no amended certification reflecting a right of appeal has been made a part of the record. 

	Consequently, this appeal is dismissed. 

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice

Do not publish.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 20, 2009 / Presidential Documents 23607 

Proclamation 8382 of May 15, 2009 

Small Business Week, 2009 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

The entrepreneurial spirit lies at the core of our Nation’s economy and 

identity. If Americans with good ideas can work hard, put their plan to 

the test, and succeed, the American economy will continue to create jobs 

and lead the world in innovation and productivity. During National Small 

Business Week, we honor the entrepreneurs and small business owners 

who are the engine of our economy. Their ingenuity and hard work are 

critical to our Nation’s prosperity. 

Small businesses are the lifeblood of cities and towns across the country. 

Over the last decade, small businesses created 70 percent of new jobs, 

and they are responsible for half of all jobs in the private sector. They 

also help enhance the lives of our citizens by improving our quality of 

life and creating personal wealth. Small businesses will lead the way to 

prosperity, particularly in today’s challenging economic environment. 

My Administration is committed to economic policies that encourage enterprise and make America the best place in the world to do business. To 

support the free flow of credit, I have worked to increase loan guarantees, 

reduce borrowing fees, quicken loan processing, and unlock the secondary 

markets that support small business lending, among other measures. I also 

support tax policies that promote investment in small businesses, as well 

as health care reform that will help these businesses provide more workers 

with quality health care services. 

Our Nation’s success depends on America’s small businesses and entrepreneurs. Their contributions are necessary to rebuild our economy so that 

it once again offers the opportunity to succeed to all who seek it. This 

week we thank small business owners, entrepreneurs, and employees for 

helping America achieve that promise. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 17 through May 

23, 2009, as National Small Business Week. I call upon Government officials, 

industry leaders, and advocates across the Nation to encourage our citizens 

to celebrate the achievements of small business owners and encourage the 

creation of new businesses. 

23608 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 20, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day 

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third. 

[FR Doc. E9–11920 

Filed 5–19–09; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


OB#1.EPS</GPH>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40791 Conference Calendar

FRANTZ OSCAR, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus ERNEST V. CHANDLER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CV-121

-------------------- October 29, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Frantz Oscar, federal prisoner No. 25832-083, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his convictions and life sentences for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise (CCE). Oscar argues that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 savings clause authorizes him to seek relief under § 2241 because defects in the indictment deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to convict him of the CCE charges. Oscar’s jurisdictional argument isNo. 01-40791 -2-

** 530 U.S. 466 (2000). without merit. See United States v. Cotton , 122 S. Ct. 1781, 1785-86 (2002); United States v. Longoria , 298 F.3d 367 (5th Cir.) (en banc), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. Oct. 10, 2002) (No. 02-6898). Oscar argues that Apprendi v. New Jersey ** dictates that he is actually innocent of the CCE charges because the indictment did not allege quantities of drugs adequate to support a conviction and sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 848(b)(2)(A). Oscar’s arguments concerning § 848(b)(2)(A) are irrelevant because he was not convicted of violating that section of the CCE statute. Oscar was convicted of engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of § 848(a), (c), and of two counts of murder in furtherance of a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of § 848(e)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Oscar’s life sentences do not violate Apprendi because they are within the statutory maximum for his CCE convictions. United States v. Keith , 230 F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1182 (2001); see § 848 (a), (e)(1)(A). Furthermore, Apprendi does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review and an Apprendi claim does not satisfy the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2255's savings clause. See Wesson v. U.S. Penitentiary, Beaumont, TX , 305 F.3d 343 (5th Cir. 2002).No. 01-40791 -3-

*** 526 U.S. 813 (1999). We note that Oscar has abandoned any argument that he is entitled to § 2241 relief based on Richardson v. Unites States
. ***
See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
# NIU Library

### NIU Library

The National Intelligence University Library plays a key role in enhancing the competence of intelligence professionals by providing research assistance, instruction, and comprehensive academic collections and tools that support the curriculum of the University and the analytic needs of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.  Access to the Library and its resources is**limited** to NIU and ODNI only.

Discovery Tools

Books, E-books, Audiobooks

Library Databases

News

Additional Resources

#### Contact Information

##### Library Services – Bethesda  |  301-243-2100   |NIU_Library@odni.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       4712984
<OTHER-SE>                                   (4712984)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 978.

#### Pennsylvania ex rel. Maurice *v.*Smith, Warden, et al.

March 30, 1942.

*Alfred Maurice, pro se.*

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis,*denied.
#### In the Matter of Carlos Abreu, Appellant, v Hawley Vonce, as Correction Nurse, et al., Respondents.

Decided January 18, 2011

*735Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mitchell SMALLS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-6807.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 19, 2006.

Mitchell Smalls, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham II, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Mitchell Smalls seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” *28 U.S.C.*§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smalls has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Smalls’ notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. *See United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.2003). However, because Smalls’ claims do not satisfy the statutory requirements for obtaining authorization, we deny his application. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*