alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gexa Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Neil Leibman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

---------------------------------
Neil Leibman
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: May 12, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                         931,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               38,765,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,301,000
<INVENTORY>                                 34,344,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            77,459,000
<PP&E>                                      28,687,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,831,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,503,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,348,000
<BONDS>                                      3,840,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,199,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                93,503,000
<SALES>                                     63,488,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            63,771,000
<CGS>                                       38,850,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               56,923,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               389,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               323,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             315,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,144,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,427,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,717,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,717,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27


</TABLE>
#### Freddie Jenkins, Respondent, v Fieldbridge Associates, LLC, Appellant.

Decided November 24, 2009

Reported below, 65 AD3d 169.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2641 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2641

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on N,N-Hexane-1,6-diylbis(3-
           (3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenylpropionamide)).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on N,N-Hexane-1,6-diylbis(3-
           (3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenylpropionamide)).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. N,N-HEXANE-1,6-DIYLBIS(3-(3,5-DI-TERT-BUTYL-4-
              HYDROXYPHENYLPROPIONAMIDE)).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.23 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to N,N-Hexane-1,6-diylbis(3-
(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenylpropionamide))) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0505

_________________ JOEL WALBERG,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Respondent and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant t o the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Brenda Gilbert , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 8 2021

09/08/2021
Case Number: DA 20-0505
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Timothy P. Walbert, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IDM Pharma, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: August 10, 2007         /s/ Timothy P. Walbert   Timothy P. Walbert   President and Chief Executive Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

June 23, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-10022

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-00272-CV-CG-C

GREGORY FINCH, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

BP OIL COMPANY, INC., 

BOUCHARD TRANSPORTATION, INC., 

Defendants-Cross-ClaimantsCross-Defendants-Appellees, 

TUG RALPH E. BOUCHARD CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

_________________________

(June 23, 2005)
Before BIRCH, BARKETT and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After reviewing the district court’s order, we find this appeal

without merit. 

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6384

JERRY LEE HOLLARS, SR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL BELL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-01-248-1)

Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: July 31, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerry Lee Hollars, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerry Lee Hollars seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Hollars v. Bell, No. CA-01-248-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb.

8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      990
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,401
<PP&E>                                           5,549
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,805
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,938
<SALES>                                         52,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,415
<CGS>                                           42,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,048
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,672
<INCOME-TAX>                                       648
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
BOOKS-A-MILLION INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,909
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                       356
<INVENTORY>                                    151,312
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,426<F1>
<PP&E>                                         104,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,816<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,655
<BONDS>                                              0<F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F4>
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,311
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   245,816
<SALES>                                        324,762
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               324,762
<CGS>                                          238,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  297,602
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,588
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,241
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,969
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,969
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40<F5>
<FN>
<F1><OTHER CURRENT ASSETS>          3,914         OTHER CURRENT ASSETS
<F2><OTHER ASSETS>                  1,576         OTHER ASSETS
<F3><LONG TERM DEBT>               45,240         LONG TERM DEBT
<F4><DEFERRED INCOME TAXES>         1,436         DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
<F5>THE EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS
NO. 128 AND BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE HAVE BEEN ENTERED IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Rosanne M. Barker, Appellant

No. 06-22-00076-CV v.

Sam Houston State University, Appellee

Appeal from the 278th District Court of 

Walker County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1929437). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Chief Justice Stevens, Justice 

van Cleef and Justice Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Rosanne M. Barker, pay all costs incurred by reason 

of this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 22, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0102

_____________________________ G ERALD C ARTER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Br adford County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. April 3, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , R OBERTS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Gerald Carter, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCFO



In connection with the Annual Report of Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Thorington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 9, 2006.



/s/ Stephen A. ThoringtonStephen A. Thorington Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 18 - 0578

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. AUSTIN MICHAEL WHITE,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Purs uant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Elizabeth Best , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 16 2020

09/16/2020
Case Number: DA 18-0578
|   | 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February      16, 2009 | /s/ George Carpenter                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | George      Carpenter                                                        |
|                                    | Chief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive andFinancial      Officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2528 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2528

   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain 
women's footwear, valued over $23/pair, not covering the ankle, with a 
                  coated or laminated textile fabric.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on certain 
women's footwear, valued over $23/pair, not covering the ankle, with a 
                  coated or laminated textile fabric.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR, VALUED OVER $23/PAIR, NOT COVERING 
              THE ANKLE, WITH A COATED OR LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRIC.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.83 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain women's footwear, 
valued over $23/pair, not covering the ankle, with a coated or 
laminated textile fabric) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``$20/pair'' and inserting ``$23/pair''; 
        and
            (2) by striking the date in the effective column period and 
        inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank C. Condella, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Frank C. Condella, Jr.


Frank C. Condella, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer


November 4, 2010