alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Kenneth E. ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lawrence M. SOLOMON, RespondentAppellee. In re: Kenneth E. Robinson, Petitioner.

Nos. 06-6982, 06-7081.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 6, 2006.

Kenneth E. Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin William Keller, Jr., North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

*223No. 06-6982 dismissed; No. 06-7081 petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

In No. 06-6982, Kenneth E. Robinson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to Respondent and dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal in No. 06-6982.*

Robinson petitions for a writ of mandamus in No. 06-7081, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his § 2254 petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because the district court rendered a final order in the case, we find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition in No. 06-7081. We also deny Robinson’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 06-6982, *DISMISSED;*No. 06-7081, *PETITION DENIED.*

*

 We also note that Robinson’s § 2254 petition is a successive petition. Robinson filed a prior § 2254 petition in the District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina.
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

damn@mail.nih.gov 

January 2022

Back to Top
Download Image(613.25 KB)

Download MediumDownload Small

Section of mouse skin tumor stained for Total-STAT3 (green), KRT5 (red) and nuclei counterstained with Dapi (blue).
EXHIBIT 4.4


TENNESSEE VALLEY AGRI-ENERGY, LLC


RESOLUTION
OF THE


BOARD OF MANAGERS


June 9, 2006


WHEREAS, the Board
of Managers of Tennessee Valley Agri-Energy, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the “Company”), has determined that it is in the best interests of the
Company to adopt the following Unit Transfer Policy pursuant to Section 10.2 of
the Company’s Operating Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the following
Unit Transfer Policy is hereby adopted:


UNIT TRANSFER POLICY


No sales of units will be allowed until thirty days
after the Company’s ethanol plant has achieved substantial completion and met
performance guarantees.  Transfers of
units upon death, transfers made without consideration to related
parties for estate planning or gifting purposes, and transfers made under
hardship or extraordinary and unusual circumstances that otherwise do not
interfere with the business purposes of the Company, each as determined in the
sole and absolute discretion of the Board of Managers, are excepted from the
foregoing transfer restriction.  All
transfers of units must be approved by the Board of Managers and otherwise made
in accordance with the Company’s Operating Agreement.


CERTIFICATE


The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the
President of Tennessee Valley Agri-Energy, LLC, a limited liability company
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware; that the
foregoing is a true and correct copy of the resolution duly adopted by action
of the Board of Managers of Tennessee Valley Agri-Energy taken as of 06/09,
2006; that the passage of said resolution was in all respects legal and proper;
and that said resolutions are in full force and effect.


	
  Dated:    06/09/, 2006

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
    /S/ Bartt R.
  McCormack

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Bartt R. McCormack, President

  
	
   

  	
  Tennessee Valley Agri-Energy, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  (NO CORPORATE SEAL)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24863-24864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12069]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for the Limited Competition Review RFA 
HS 08-004 (R18) are to be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. These 
discussions are likely to reveal personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the applications. This information is 
exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-cited statutes.

    SEP Meeting on: Limited Competition Review RFA HS 08-004 (R18)
    Date: June 23, 2009 (Open on June 23 from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting)
    Place: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, John 
Eisenberg Building, Conference Center, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the non confidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.


[[Page 24864]]


    Dated: May 15, 2009.
Carol M. Clancy,
Director.

[FR Doc. E9-12069 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2514 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2514

         To suspend temporarily the duty on o-Dichlorobenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on o-Dichlorobenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. O-DICHLOROBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       o-Dichlorobenzene   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (CAS No. 95-50-1)                                                  31/2011.......
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2903.61.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6759

DESHAWN MOORE, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL HAYSI FACILITY, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District 

Judge. (7:09-cv-00111-gec-mfu) 

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

DeShawn Moore, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

DeShawn Moore appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Moore v. Southwest Va. Reg'l Jail Haysi Facility, No. 

7:09-cv-00111-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2009). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Leroy Hoover, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 19, 2009;

decided December 15, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie from the order of the individual Justice of the Appellate Division *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602).
#### In the Matter of Claude Mays, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[963 NYS2d 604]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with creating a disturbance, stalking and interference with an employee after he was observed leaning out of a line waiting to go through a metal detector in order to stare at a female correction officer. After petitioner was overheard making an inappropriate remark, the ensuing disturbance delayed the security processing of inmates in the line. Petitioner was found guilty of all but the stalking charge at the conclusion of a tier III disciplinary hearing. That determination was affirmed upon petitioner’s administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

*1284We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officer who authored the report, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Amaker v Bezio,*98 AD3d 1146, 1146 [2012]; *Matter of Shields v Fischer,*95 AD3d 1574, 1574 [2012]). While petitioner denied committing the conduct alleged in the report, this created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Spikes v Fischer,*100 AD3d 1231, 1231 [2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 862 [2013]).

Peters, EJ., Rose, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,730,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,173,515
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,904,019
<PP&E>                                      52,798,896
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,575,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,562,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,562,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,562,941
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,755,171
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,454,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,495,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
-  Home 
        -  About NIDDK 
        -  Offices & Divisions 
        -  Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, & Metabolic Diseases 

Offices & Divisions
-  Office of the Director 
-  Executive Office 
-  Office of Communications & Public Liaison 
-  Office of Scientific Program & Policy Analysis 
-  Technology Advancement Office 
-  Office of Obesity Research 
-  Division of Intramural Research 
-  Division of Extramural Activities 
-  Division of Digestive Diseases & NutritionShow child pages    -  Liver Disease Research Branch 
-  Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, & Metabolic Diseases 
-  Division of Kidney, Urologic, & Hematologic Diseases 
-  Office of Minority Health Research CoordinationShow child pages    -  Diabetes Education in Tribal Schools (DETS) Curriculum 
-  Organizational Chart 

# Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, & Metabolic Diseases

William T. Cefalu, M.D.

The Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases (DEM) provides research funding and support for basic and clinical research in the areas of type 1 and type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders, including cystic fibrosis; endocrinology and endocrine disorders; obesity, neuroendocrinology, and energy balance; and development, metabolism, and basic biology of liver, fat, and endocrine tissues. DEM also provides funding for the training and career development of individuals committed to academic and clinical research careers in these areas.

## Division Staff

View staff and contact information.

## Research Programs

The Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, & Metabolic Diseases (DEM) supports research in:

              - Diabetes
              - Endocrine and Metabolic Disease
              - Obesity
              - Research Training and Career Development
              - Small Business

For a list of all NIDDK programs, including these, visit Research Programs and Contacts.

## Related Links

          -    Funding Opportunities from NIDDK 
          -    NIDDK Strategic Plans and Reports
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892-4872

chenf1@mail.nih.gov 

May 2021

Back to Top
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Owen Steward, Appellant.

Submitted September 7, 2010;

decided September 16, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          89,261
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             135
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,878
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    359,127
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         166,112
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           164,743
<LOANS>                                      1,194,981
<ALLOWANCE>                                   (13,187)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,959,480
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,415,551
<SHORT-TERM>                                   362,332
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             18,304
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           28,750
<PREFERRED>                                         89
<COMMON>                                        26,030
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,424
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,959,480
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                100,075
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               19,730
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 3,816
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               123,621
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              29,756
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,132
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           88,489
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    8,643
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 78,026
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,088
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      31,088
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,423
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.09
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,501
<LOANS-PAST>                                       351
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   218
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 24,483
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,829
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,120
<RECOVERIES>                                       835
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               13,187
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,581
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          4,606


</TABLE>
#### 6214 S. Blvd., LLC v. City of Charlotte

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 562

No. 450P06

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-1477)

Denied 01/25/07
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12510]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration 11756 and 11757]

California Disaster CA-00134

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of California dated 05/21/2009.
    Incident: Jesusita Fire.
    Incident Period: 05/05/2009 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 05/21/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/20/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/22/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties:
    Santa Barbara.
Contiguous Counties:
    California: Kern, San Luis Obispo, Ventura.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere...................      4.875
Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere................      2.437
Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere...................      6.000
Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11756 5 and
  for economic injury is 11757 0.

    The State which received an EIDL Declaration  is 
California.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: May 21, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-12510 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```