alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         862,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,171,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,471,000
<PP&E>                                      77,487,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,809,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,922,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,270,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       171,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       20,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,820,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,922,000
<SALES>                                     48,881,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,600,000
<CGS>                                       40,312,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,312,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,770,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,356,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (258,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (88,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (170,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (170,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.3
I, John A. Betts, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Centrue FinancialCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) [intentionally omitted] e) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and f) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
c) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and d) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 29, 2004 /s/ John A. Betts   John A. Betts   Corporate Controller
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,797
<SECURITIES>                                    60,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,465)
<INVENTORY>                                     37,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               165,828
<PP&E>                                          61,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                (26,443)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,491
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,062
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   215,939
<SALES>                                         65,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,790
<CGS>                                           50,410
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,068
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,765)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
#### Sharon Wechsler, Appellant, v Norman Wechsler, Respondent.

Submitted July 27, 2009;

decided October 15, 2009

Reported below, 58 AD3d 62.

*811Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 11, 2009 dismissal order denied *[see*12 NY3d 883 (2009)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice General Motors LLC, Withdrawal of Petition to Amend Takata DIR Schedule


Download file: General Motors LLC, Withdrawal of Petition to Amend Takata DIR Schedule
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
#### BOWLES v. D. LOVEMAN & SON et al.

Civ. No. 22359.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

Nov. 28, 1945.

W. J. Heddesheimer, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

David Ralph Hertz and Joseph G. Stashower, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

JONES, District Judge.

The Administrator instituted this action under the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., to recover treble damages for the sale of “quantities of steel to various purchasers” between February 18, 1944 and April 25, 1944, inclusive, at prices in excess of the maximum prices provided by Revised Price Schedule No. 49, as amended, (7 Fed.Reg. 1300). Defendants have moved for a more definite statement or, in the alternative, a bill of particulars.

As to the particulars requested in paragraphs (1) and (2) of defendants’ motion the motion will be overruled. Revised General Order No. 3 (8 F.R.8027) empowers Regional Enforcement Attorneys to authorize any attorney employed by the OPA to institute civil actions in the name of the Price Administrator. See Bowles v. Wheeler, 9 Cir., 152 F.2d 34. The District Enforcement Attorneys who signed the complaint were “authorized representatives” to institute actions of this type.

The Administrator pleaded the ultimate fact that “Revised Price Schedule No. 49, as amended, (7 Fed.Reg.1300)” was in effect during the period covered by the complaint. Under Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, that is sufficient. It is not necessary for the Administrator to list the specific actions which gave effect to the Schedule, by whom taken, when they were taken and the steps by which it was amended.

The motion will be granted as to the particulars requested in paragraph (3) thereof for the reasons discussed in Bowles v. Snyder Furniture Company, No. 22951.1

Accordingly, the motion for a more definite statement or a bill of particulars will be overruled as to the particulars requested in paragraphs (1) and (2) of the motion and granted as to the particulars requested in paragraph (3) thereof.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KENNY TANG a/k/a TANG KENNY,

Appellant,

v.

KNICKERBOCKER PROPERTIES, INC., d/b/a THE HAMPTONS ON 

HERON BAY XXXVI,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1691

[January 20, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Steven P. DeLuca, Judge; L.T. Case No. CONO-20-

018821.

Michael L. Buckner of Buckner Legal Self-Help Program, Inc., 

Coral Springs, for appellant.

Ryan R. McCain and Donna S. Barfield of Barfield McCain, P.A., 

Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§1350))

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, Leonard P. Shaykin, Chairman of the Board of
Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:



Date:
May 5, 2004

| |  | /s/LEONARD P. SHAYKINLeonard P. Shaykin
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Chief Executive Officer |  | 
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification "accompanies" the Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) to which it relates, is not deemed filed with
the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Cureton, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 916]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P Franczyk, J.), rendered May 23, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury verdict, of unlawful imprisonment in the second degree and criminal contempt in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a nonjury trial of, inter alia, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree (Penal Law § 135.05), defendant contends that the verdict with respect to that crime is against the weight of the evidence. Although we agree with defendant that “an acquittal would not have been unreasonable,” we conclude that, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime in this nonjury trial, “[biased on the weight of the credible evidence . . . [County Court] was justified in finding the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” *(People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]). The court was entitled to resolve credibility issues against defendant *(see People v Cuthrell,*13 AD3d 1224, 1225 [2004], *lv denied 4*NY3d 885 [2005]), and to reject his version of the events *(see People v McCoy,*100 AD3d 1422, 1422 [2012]). “[U]pon our review of the record, we cannot say that the court failed to give the evidence the weight that it should be accorded” *(People v Britt,*298 AD2d 984, 984 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 556 [2002]). Finally, defendant’s challenge to the legal*1458ity of the sentence of probation imposed on the unlawful imprisonment count has been rendered moot as a result of the revocation of his sentence of probation *(see generally People v Meli,*142 AD2d 938, 939 [1988], *lv denied*72 NY2d 921 [1988]).

Present—Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Sconiers, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1







Certificate of Chief
Executive Officer


Section 1350
Certification








In connection with the annual report of
Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas F. Bijou, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2. The information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and
results of operations of the Company.





Date:   February
      25, 2008
              /s/ Thomas F.
      BijouThomas
      F. BijouChairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Annual Report of Berkeley Technology Limited on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S.  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Ian K.  Whitehead,  as Chief Financial
Officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  March 23, 2005                            By:    /s/  Ian K. Whitehead

                                                        Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Hubbard, Appellant.

[961 NYS2d 795]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (J. Doyle, J.), rendered January 13, 2011, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the County Court erred in not affording him an opportunity to withdraw his plea before imposing an enhanced sentence that included both restitution and a prison sentence. However, when the defendant failed to comply with the condition of his plea agreement that he appear on the scheduled sentencing date, the court was no longer bound by the original plea agreement and had the right to impose a greater sentence *(see People v Figgins,*87 NY2d 840, 841 [1995]; *People v Marte,*85 AD3d 945, 946 [2011]; *People v White,*3 AD3d 543, 544 [2004]; *People v Delatorre,*306 AD2d 419, 420 [2003]). Thus, the court had the right to impose the enhanced sentence after the defendant absconded, without permitting him the option of withdrawing his plea *(see People v Akhtar,*13 AD3d 383, 384 [2004]; *People v Brooks,*250 AD2d 774 [1998]; *People v Brown,*244 AD2d 348, 349 [1997]).

Angiolillo, J.E, Balkin, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### Eugenia Brennan Heslin, as Administrator of the Estate of Egypt A. Phillips, Deceased, Appellant, v County of Greene, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Submitted November 9, 2009;

decided November 19, 2009

Reported below, 53 AD3d 996.

Motion by City of New York et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
-  Home 
        -  About NIDDK 
        -  Staff Directory 
        -  Division of Intramural Research 
        -  Metabolic Diseases Branch 

Division of Intramural Research
-  Office of Scientific Director 
-  Office of Clinical Director 
-  Fellowship Office 
-  Laboratory of Biochemistry & Genetics 
-  Laboratory of Biological Modeling 
-  Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry 
-  Laboratory of Cell & Molecular Biology 
-  Laboratory of Cellular & Developmental Biology 
-  Laboratory of Chemical Physics 
-  Laboratory of Endocrinology & Receptor Biology 
-  Laboratory of Molecular Biology 
-  Biomedical & Metabolic Imaging Branch 
-  Diabetes, Endocrinology, & Obesity Branch 
-  Digestive Disease Branch 
-  Genetics & Biochemistry Branch 
-  Kidney Diseases Branch 
-  Liver Diseases Branch 
-  Metabolic Diseases Branch 
-  Molecular & Clinical Hematology Branch 
-  Molecular Medicine Branch 
-  Phoenix Epidemiology & Clinical Research Branch 
-  Cores & Support Services 

Go to Staff Directory home

# Metabolic Diseases Branch

Select staff are listed in alphabetical order by last name. Read a description of the Metabolic Diseases Branch.

----

## Endocrine Signaling and Oncogenesis Section

Select staff are listed in alphabetical order by last name. Read a description of the Endocrine Signaling and Oncogenesis Section.

----

## Genetics and Endocrinology Section

Select staff are listed in alphabetical order by last name. Read a description of the Genetics and Endocrinology Section.

----

## Signal Transduction Section

Select staff are listed in alphabetical order by last name. Read a description of the Signal Transduction Section.

----

## Thyroid Tumors and Functional Thyroid Disorders

Select staff are listed in alphabetical order by last name. Read a description of the Thyroid Tumors and Functional Thyroid Disorders.
Drunk Driving                                  

# Alcohol Measurement Devices

Share:*Facebook**Twitter**LinkedIn**Mail*

#### **MODEL SPECIFICATIONS**

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in its effort to reduce alcohol impaired driving, has established Model Specifications for the following alcohol testing devices:
              - Evidential Breath Alcohol Measurement Devices (EBTs) 
              - Screening Devices to Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids (ASDs) 
              - Calibrating Units for Breath Alcohol Testers (CUs)   
              - Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices (BAIIDs) 2013 | 2015 

#### **CONFORMING PRODUCTS LISTS**

NHTSA also maintains a Conforming Products List (CPL) for the following devices, which have been tested and determined to be in conformance with the NHTSA Model Specifications:
              - Evidential Breath Alcohol Measurement Devices (EBTs) 2012 | 2017
              - Screening Devices to Measure Alcohol in Bodily Fluids (ASDs) 
              - Calibrating Units for Breath Alcohol Testers (CUs)   

#### Resources

              - U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Drug & Alcohol Policy & Compliance
              - Volpe Alcohol Countermeasures Laboratory