alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
INTER-TEL, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           66691
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    41723
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4096
<INVENTORY>                                      18493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                142263
<PP&E>                                           48163
<DEPRECIATION>                                   22714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  189952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            39713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        100856
<OTHER-SE>                                       41056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    189952
<SALES>                                         136374
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                136374
<CGS>                                            71115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    71115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7239)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2638)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4601)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4601)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
2000,  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  738,000
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           149,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                             246,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,207,000
<PP&E>                                                  988,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          353,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        2,003,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 2,135,000
<BONDS>                                               1,541,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                 16,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           (1,775,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          2,003,000
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,461,000
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         3,136,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       35,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,710,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,710,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,710,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.11)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Reginald Hannah, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole et al., Respondents.

Submitted September 21, 2009;

decided November 24, 2009

Reported below, 2009 NY Slip Op 71990(U).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 10.1
                               AMENDMENT TO THE
                                HANOVER DIRECT
                         SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT PLAN

        WHEREAS, Hanover Direct, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the Hanover
Direct Savings and Retirement Plan (the "Plan"); and

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.01 of the Plan, the Company has the
right to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time; and

        WHEREAS, the Plan has been amended from time to time and was most
recently amended and restated in its entirety effective January 1, 1989; and

        WHEREAS, the Company now desires to further amend the Plan in certain
respects;

        NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended by the addition of a new
Appendix C to the end thereof, to read in its entirety as follows:

               "HANOVER DIRECT SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT PLAN

APPENDIX C: SPECIAL VESTING RULES FOR EMPLOYEES OF LWI HOLDINGS, INC.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in Section 7.01 of the
Plan, the vested percentage of each Participant who is a 'Continuing Employee'
(as such term is defined in Section 3.12 (a) of the Asset Purchase Agreement
among the Company, LWI Holdings, Inc., HSN LP, HSN Improvements, LLC and HSN
Catalogue Services, Inc., dated as of June 13, 2001, as amended (the 'Asset
Purchase Agreement')) in such Participant's Matching Employer Contribution
Account and Discretionary Employer Contribution Account under this Plan shall
be




<PAGE>   2



100%, effective as of the 'Closing Date' (as such term is defined in Section
1.4 of the Asset Purchase Agreement)."

        Except to the extent hereinabove set forth, the Plan shall remain in
full force and effect without change or modification.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as evidence of the adoption of the foregoing,
the Company has cause this instrument to be executed by a duly authorized
officer as of this 29th day of June, 2001.


                                                   HANOVER DIRECT, INC.

                                                   By:
                                                      ------------------------
                                                   Name:
                                                         ---------------------
                                                   Title:
                                                          --------------------
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1999
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1999
[CASH]                                         193,319
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               774,184
[PP&E]                                         125,078
[DEPRECIATION]                                (89,917)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 779,345
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          298,839
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                         8,058
[OTHER-SE]                                     457,497
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   779,345
[SALES]                                         48,900
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                             1,150,373
[CGS]                                           41,450
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                1,212,908
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                             1,300,296
[LOSS-PROVISION]                               649,288
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                            (60,183)
[INCOME-PRETAX]                            (1,951,936)
[INCOME-TAX]                                     9,147
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                        (1,961,083)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                               (1,961,083)
[EPS-BASIC]                                   (2.43)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (2.43)
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1      EARTHWORKS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

     Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Peter Keefe,  Chief Executive  Officer,  and President  "principal  executive
officer") of Earthworks Entertainemnt, Inc. (the "Registrant"),  certify that to
the best of my knowledge,  based upon a review of the  Quarterly  Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

           (1) The  Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of  Section
           13(a)[15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

           (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Registrant.


Dated: February 5, 2004              /s/ PETER KEEFE
                                     ---------------------
                                     Peter Keefe
                                     Chief Executive Officer, and President
#### State v. Rivers

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 656

No. 569P06

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-90)

Denied 03/08/07
EX-10(K)(2)



 





Exhibit 10(k)(2)




[Grantee]

[Address]

[Address]



Dear [Grantee]:




     This letter agreement amends the Restricted Stock award granted to you on [Grant Date]
pursuant to the terms of The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company 2003 Stock Option and Incentive Equity
Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company 2003 Stock
Option and Incentive Equity Plan Award Agreement for Nondirectors (the “Award Agreement”). This
amendment shall be effective as of October 30, 2007 (the “Amendment Effective Date”). Unless
otherwise defined in this letter agreement, capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings
provided to them in the Award Agreement.



     As provided in your Award Agreement, your Restricted Stock will vest on [vesting date] (the
“Vesting Date”), subject to the terms of the Plan and the Award Agreement, as amended by this
letter agreement. This letter agreement clarifies that, if your employment terminates (as defined
in the Plan) for any reason prior to the Vesting Date, any unvested shares of your Restricted Stock
will be forfeited as of the date of your termination, and supersedes in its entirety
Section 1.01[1] of your Award Agreement.



     Additionally, the Committee has determined, and the Plan has been amended to provide, that a
reasonable rate of interest will be calculated with respect to certain cash dividends held in
escrow during the Restriction Period (as defined in the Plan) relating to your shares of Restricted
Stock. Accordingly, the following paragraph is hereby added to the Award Agreement:




“A reasonable rate of interest, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, will
be credited to you and held by the Company in escrow during the Restriction Period (as
defined in the Plan) with respect to any cash dividends that were or are declared and paid
in respect of your shares of Restricted Stock during the period that began on December 20,
2006 and that ends on the Vesting Date. At the end of the Restriction Period, such interest
will be distributed to you if all restrictions and conditions relating to your shares of
Restricted Stock are met or will be forfeited if those restrictions and conditions have not
been met.”



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

	 	 






Acknowledged and agreed,

effective as of the Amendment

Effective Date:




	 	 	 
	 

Grantee’s Signature
The District Court of the 15th Judicial District. County of Sheridan.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. ROWDY ANDERSON, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-46-1994-969 DECISION

On December 15, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to fifteen (15) years in the Montana State Prison for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, for the offense of Issuing Bad Checks, a common scheme, a felony.

On May 6,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division *34that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2010.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terence G. Jordan, Appellant.

Submitted December 21, 2009;

decided January 12, 2010

Reported below, 65 AD3d 428.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
EXHIBIT 24.6
 

  SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC.  POWER OF ATTORNEY

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

             The undersigned, in his capacity as a director of SI Diamond  Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), after reviewing the Company's Form 10-KSB,  does hereby appoint Douglas P. Baker, his true and lawful attorney to execute in his  name, place and stead, in his capacity as a Director of said Company, the  Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,  2001, and all instruments necessary or incidental in connection therewith,  including all amendments, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange  Commission. Said attorney shall have the full power and authority to do and  perform, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all  capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the  premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or  could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of  said attorney.

             IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument this  13th day of March, 2002.

                                              /s/ Chuck Bailey                                            Chuck Bailey
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 823 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 823

 To provide for the establishment of summer health career introductory 
             programs for middle and high school students.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2005

   Mr. Burns introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the establishment of summer health career introductory 
             programs for middle and high school students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUMMER HEALTH CAREER INTRODUCTORY PROGRAMS.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
            (1) the success of the health care system is dependent on 
        qualified personnel;
            (2) hospitals and health facilities across the United 
        States have been deeply impacted by declines among nurses, 
        pharmacists, radiology and laboratory technicians, and other 
        workers;
            (3) the health care workforce shortage is not a short term 
        problem and such workforce shortages can be expected for many 
        years; and
            (4) most States are looking for ways to address such 
        shortages.
    (b) Grants.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting 
through the Bureau of Health Professions of the Health Resources and 
Services Administration, may award not to exceed 5 grants for the 
establishment of summer health career introductory programs for middle 
and high school students.
    (c) Eligibility.--To be eligible to receive a grant under 
subsection (b) an entity shall--
            (1) be an institution of higher education (as defined in 
        section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
        1001(a)); and
            (2) prepare and submit to the Secretary of Health and Human 
        Services an application at such time, in such manner, and 
        containing such information as the Secretary may require.
    (d) Duration.--The term of a grant under subsection (b) shall not 
exceed 4 years.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section, such sums as may be necessary 
for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2009.
                                 <all>
```
#### Crawford *against*Millspaugh.

If the holder of a note after the time ct payment, and after a suit has beea commenced agaiDst the endorser, release the maker by writing, not under seal, and withou* consideration, such release is void, and is no defence in the action against the endorser.

THIS was an action of *assumpsit,*brought by the plaintiff, as Second endorsee, against the defendant, as second endorser of a promissory note, drawn by *Charles Lindsey,*for 700 dollars, payable to one *Jackson,*or order. The cause jvas tried at the *Orange*circuit, in *September,*1815, before his honour the chief justice.

The defendant pleaded, *puis darrein continuance,*that the plaintiff released *Lindsey,*the maker of the note, and' in support of the plea, produced, on the trial, the following writing : “ It being represented to me that0. *Charles Lindsey*is insolvent, I do hereby release him from a certain note of 700 doílars, drawn by him, and endorsed by *Joseph H. Jackson and Peter A.*Mills*pqugh,*of which note I am the holder,'not, however, relinquishing my right to recover from any, Or all of the endorsers, upon said note. Dated *September*23d, 1814. *A'. Crawford.V*

A verdict was taken for the plaintiff, for the amount of the note, with interest, subject to the opinion of the court. The ease was submitted without argument.

*Per Curiam.*

It is evident, from the facts in this' case, that. the writing set up by the defendant, was made and executed 'some time after the note had become due; indeed, after the commencement of this action, and, consequently, at a period when the defendant was liable for the amount as endorser, so that, if this note, in the hands of the plaintiff, as endorsee, could even be considered, or treated, as a parol agreement, it appears that the promise, on the part of the endorser, was broken, and could not be discharged by a new agreement, without satisfaction, unless it be by deed. The writing upon which this defence is grounded, is not under seal, and. is .without consideration; it must be deemed a mere *nudum pactum. (Harrison*v. *Close,*2 *Johns. Rep.*450.) It is, therefore, unnecessary to advert to the conditions showing the intention of the party, as stated in the writing itself, to decide whether it could be controlled by such condition, admitting it to be sufficient in other respects, *88heeáuse.enough appears, from the facts in the case, to show that jt cannot affect the right of the plaintiff to x’ecover.

Judgment must be entered for. the plaintiff..
Amendment to Bylaws of SAFLINK Corporation



 EXHIBIT 4.3 
  

AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS 
 OF

 SAFLINK CORPORATION 
  
 (as adopted by the Board of Directors on September 30, 2004) 
  
 Article 2, Section 2.2 of the Bylaws is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “2.2    Number and Term of Office.    The number of
directors shall be between five (5) and nine (9), the specific number to be set by the Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority of the total number of authorized directors (whether or not there exist any vacancies in
previously authorized directorships at the time any such resolution is presented to the Board for adoption). All directors shall hold office until the expiration of the term for which elected and until their respective successors are elected, except
in the case of the death, resignation or removal of any director.”
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 112 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.112
                                         Agreed to July 29, 2006        

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill, S. 3693, the Secretary of the 
Senate shall insert ``or reentries'' after ``States, reentry'' in 
section 212(a)(9)(C)(iii)(II) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
as added by section 6(b)(1)(C) of the bill.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```