alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. APP.), notice is  hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and  552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; Basic and Preclinical Sciences.                    

*Date:*                         June 14-16, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         6 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Peter Kozel, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, NCCAM, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892-5475, 301-496-8004,                          *kozelp@mail.nih.gov*.                    

Dated: May 15, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-12192 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10370 Summary Calendar

In The Matter Of: ROY LATIMER Debtor,

--------------------------- BEVERLY LATIMER,
Appellant, ROY LATIMER, Appellant, versus MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-193-A

- - - - - - - - - - June 18, 1996 Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by Roy and Beverly Latimer is DENIED. The appeal is frivolous andNo. 95-10370 - 2 - it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. See also Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). We caution the Latimers that any additional frivolous appeals filed by them or on their behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. The Latimers are further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court.
IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 37 

Honoring the life of Sister Dorothy Stang. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2005 

Mr. DEWINE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of Sister Dorothy Stang. 

Whereas Sister of Notre Dame de Namur Dorothy Stang 

moved to the Amazon 22 years ago to help poor farmers 

build independent futures for their families, and was 

murdered on Saturday, February 12, 2005, at the age of 

73, in Anapu, Para, a section of Brazil’s Amazon rain 

forest; 

Whereas Sister Dorothy, a citizen of Brazil and the United 

States, worked with the Pastoral Land Commission, an 

organization of the Catholic Church that fights for the 

rights of rural workers and peasants, and defends land 

reforms in Brazil; 

Whereas Sister Dorothy’s death came less than a week after 

her meeting with Brazil’s Human Rights Secretary about 
2 

•SCON 37 IS

threats to local farmers from some loggers and landowners; 

Whereas, after receiving several death threats, Sister Dorothy 

recently commented, ‘‘I don’t want to flee, nor do I want 

to abandon the battle of these farmers who live without 

any protection in the forest. They have the sacrosanct 

right to aspire to a better life on land where they can live 

and work with dignity while respecting the environment.’’; 

Whereas Sister Dorothy was born in Dayton, Ohio, entered 

the Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur community in 

1948, and professed final vows in 1956; 

Whereas, from 1951 to 1966, Sister Dorothy taught elementary classes at St. Victor School in Calumet City, Illinois, 

St. Alexander School in Villa Park, Illinois, and Most 

Holy Trinity School in Phoenix, Arizona, and began her 

ministry in Brazil in 1966, in Coroata, in the state of 

Maranhao; 

Whereas, last June, Sister Dorothy was named ‘‘Woman of 

the Year’’ by the state of Para for her work in the Amazon region, in December 2004, she received the ‘‘Humanitarian of the Year’’ award from the Brazilian Bar Association for her work helping the local rural workers, and 

earlier this year, she received an ‘‘Honorary Citizenship 

of the State’’ award from the state of Para; and 

Whereas Sister Dorothy lived her life according to the mission of the Sisters of Notre Dame: making known God’s 

goodness and love of the poor through a Gospel way of 

life, community, and prayer, while continuing a strong 

educational tradition and taking a stand with the poor, 

especially poor women and children, in the most aban-
3 

•SCON 37 IS

doned places, and committing her one and only life to 

work with others to create justice and peace for all: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That the Congress hereby honors the life and 

3 work of Sister Dorothy Stang. 

Æ
#### Vrooman *against*Lawyer.

vseowner of a itTMu¡aMe“or miytavecímí sStfel custnmea to do

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a justice’s court.

The defendant in error, who was plaintiff in the court below, brought, an action against the • plaintiff in error in .the court below, and proved that the bull of the latter had gored his horse; but there was no evidence that the bull -had ever before done similar acts, or that he had ever before been unruly. The justice gave judgment for the plaintiff below, the defendan t in error. >

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment ds clearly .wrong. If damage be done by any domestic animal, kept for use or convenience, the owner is not liable to an action on the ground of riegligence,. without proof that he knew that the animal was'accustomed to do mischief. *(1 Ld. Raym.*109, 2 *Ld. Raym.*1583. *Buxendin*v. *Sharp,*2 *Salk.*662.)

Judgment reversed, (a)

(a)

 1 *Chitty on Plead.*69.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3



     Effective as of December 27, 2000, the text of Section 10.2 of the
Partnership Agreement was designated as paragraph (a) of such Section, and a new
paragraph (b) was added to Section 10.2 reading in its entirety as follows:

               "(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article 10,
          a Unitholder may at any time sell or transfer its Units to any other
          Unitholder or the Managing General Partner in whole and not in part,
          and any Unitholder or the Managing General Partner may at any time
          purchase the Units of any other Unitholder, in each such case on such
          terms and provisions as such Unitholders or the Managing General
          Partner, as applicable, may mutually agree."
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 103 (Monday, June 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 26257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12584]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Zelmer, 
Inc., and Spencer Heights, L.L.C., civil case number 09-4072, was 
lodged with the United States District Court for the District of South 
Dakota, Southern Division on May 21, 2009.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Zelmer, Inc., and Spencer Heights, L.L.C., 
pursuant to the Clean Water Act (``CWA''), 33 U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d), 
to obtain injunctive relief from and impose civil penalties against 
Zelmer, Inc., and Spencer Heights, L.L.C., for violating the Clean 
Water Act by discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the 
United States, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a); for the violation of the conditions 
of the South Dakota General Permit for Storm Water Discharges 
Associated with Construction Activities; for the violations of orders 
issued to Defendants by the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency; and for failing to provide information in violation of 33 
U.S.C. 1318. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by 
requiring the Defendants to restore the impacted areas, perform 
mitigation, implement a storm water compliance program and to pay a 
civil penalty.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to: Alan D. 
Greenberg, 1961 Stout Street, 8th Floor, Denver, Colorado 80294 and 
refer to United States v. Zelmer, Inc., and Spencer Heights, L.L.C., DJ 
number 90-5-1-1-17707.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of South Dakota, Southern 
Division, 400 South Phillips Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD 57104. In 
addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Section Chief, Environment & Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. E9-12584 Filed 5-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2604 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2604

To suspend temporarily the duty on threaded stoppers, caps, and lids of 
  base metal with chromium or gold-plated finish, of a type and size 
 suitable for use on salt-and-pepper shakers, perfume bottles, and the 
                                 like.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on threaded stoppers, caps, and lids of 
  base metal with chromium or gold-plated finish, of a type and size 
 suitable for use on salt-and-pepper shakers, perfume bottles, and the 
                                 like.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THREADED STOPPERS, CAPS, AND LIDS OF BASE METAL WITH 
              CHROMIUM OR GOLD-PLATED FINISH, OF A TYPE AND SIZE 
              SUITABLE FOR USE ON SALT-AND-PEPPER SHAKERS, PERFUME 
              BOTTLES, AND THE LIKE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Threaded stoppers,  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        caps, and lids of                                                  31/2011.......
                        base metal with
                        chromium or gold-
                        plated finish, of
                        a type and size
                        suitable for use
                        on salt-and-
                        pepper shakers,
                        perfume bottles,
                        and the like
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8309.90.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2476 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires entered on or after 

April 19, 2006, and on or before August 23, 2006. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires entered on or after April 19, 2006, and on or before 

August 23, 2006. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF TRUCK TIRES ENTERED ON OR 

5 AFTER APRIL 19, 2006, AND ON OR BEFORE 

6 AUGUST 23, 2006. 

7 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION REQUIRED.— 

8 Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act 

9 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provi10 sion of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2476 IS

1 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act— 

3 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty each 

4 entry described in subsection (b) containing any 

5 merchandise which, at the time of original liquida6 tion, was merchandise eligible for duty-free treat7 ment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

8 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.); and 

9 (2) refund any duties and interest paid on such 

10 entries. 

11 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

12 subsection (a) are the following: 

Port Code Entry Number Date of Entry 

2704 EA1–0163366–0 04/19/2006 

2704 EA1–0163478–3 04/26/2006 

2704 EA1–0163598–8 05/03/2006 

2704 EA1–0163718–2 05/10/2006 

2704 EA1–0163834–7 05/17/2006 

2704 EA1–0163951–9 05/24/2006 

2704 EA1–0164080–6 05/31/2006 

2704 EA1–0164167–1 06/07/2006 

2704 EA1–0164329–7 06/14/2006 

2704 EA1–0164423–8 06/21/2006 

2704 EA1–0164517–7 06/28/2006 

2704 EA1–0165385–8 08/16/2006 

2704 EA1–0165491–4 08/23/2006. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Nos. 04-10-00160-CR & 04-10-00161-CR

Uriel MENDOZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2007CR5168 & 2007CR5169

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 10, 2010

DISMISSED

Uriel Mendoza filed notices of appeal seeking to appeal from sentences imposed in the

underlying causes on April 30, 2009. The judgments were in accordance with Mendoza’s plea

bargain agreements, and the records do not contain trial court’s certifications showing Mendoza has

the right of appeal. Accordingly, the appeals are dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
EX-10.3






ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY AND ESCROW

INSTRUCTIONS




THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY AND ESCROW
INSTRUCTIONS (this “Assignment”) dated as of November 15, 2007, is made and entered into by
and between TRIPLE NET PROPERTIES, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company (“Assignor”),
and NNN HEALTHCARE/OFFICE REIT NORTHMEADOW, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
(“Assignee”), with reference to the following Recitals:



R E C I T A L S




A. Assignor is “Buyer” under that certain Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property and
Escrow Instructions dated October 9, 2007 entered into by and between Northmeadow Parkway, LLC, a
Georgia limited liability company and Assignor, as amended by that certain First Amendment to
Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property and Escrow Instructions dated October 19, 2007
(collectively, the “Purchase Agreement”), wherein Assignor agreed to purchase certain real
property commonly known as Northmeadow Medical Center, 1357 Hembree Road, Roswell, County of
Fulton, Georgia, as more particularly described in the Purchase Agreement, on the terms and
conditions set forth in the Purchase Agreement.



B. Assignor desires to assign and transfer to Assignee, and Assignee desires to assume from
Assignor, all of Assignor’s right, title, claim and interest in, to and under the Purchase
Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals (which are incorporated herein by
this reference) and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee hereby agree as follows:



A G R E E M E N T




1. Assignment; Assumption. Assignor hereby assigns and transfers to Assignee all of
Assignor’s right, title, claim and interest as “Buyer” or otherwise in, to and under the Purchase
Agreement. By executing this Assignment, Assignee hereby accepts such assignment and expressly
agrees to assume and be bound by all of the provisions of the Purchase Agreement from and after the
date hereof.



2. Successors and Assigns. This Assignment shall inure to the benefit of, and be
binding upon, the successors, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns of the
parties hereto.



3. Counterparts. This Assignment may be executed in any number of counterparts with
the same effect as if all of the parties had signed the same document. All counterparts shall be
construed together and shall constitute one agreement.



[Signatures on next page]





1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Assignment to be executed by their
duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	ASSIGNOR:	 	TRIPLE NET PROPERTIES, LLC,
	 	 	a Virginia limited liability company
	
 
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Jeff Hanson

Name:Jeffrey T. Hanson

Title:Chief Investment Officer
	ASSIGNEE:	 	NNN HEALTHCARE/OFFICE REIT NORTHMEADOW, LLC,
	 	 	a Georgia limited liability company
	
 
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Shannon K S Johnson







	 	 	Authorized Signatory






2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Wayne P. Garten, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Direct,
Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

                               /s/ Wayne P. Garten
                      -------------------------------------
                                 Wayne P. Garten
                      President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 11, 2004

                                       35
No. 787.

#### Ralston *v.*Cox, U. S. Marshal.

January 12, 1942.

*Mr. J. Frank Kemp*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge,*and *Mr. Oscar A. Provost*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and motion for leave to proceed further *in forma pauperis,*denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2487 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on crotonic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on crotonic 

acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CROTONIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.10 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 crotonic acid) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2487 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS