alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The District Court of the 8th Judicial District. County of Cascade.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MATTHEW ORTIZ, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. ADC-09-323 DECISION

On April 28, 2010, the defendant was sentenced as follows: Count I: Forty (40) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for the *63offense of Aggravated Burglary, a felony; and Count III: Twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Assault with a Weapon, a felony. Count III shall run concurrent with Count I, and this sentence shall run concurrent with any other sentence the Defendant is currently serving.

On August 5, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2010.

DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gordon Link,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of TapestryPharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: March 31, 2006
|        | /s/ GORDON LINK                                    |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Gordon Link                                        |
|   | Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# Academic Catalog

### NIU Academic Catalog 2023 - 2024

**Record for undergraduate and graduate programs, courses, academic policies and special program.**

The National Intelligence University Catalog is published annually. The NIU catalog documents undergraduate and graduate regulations, University policies, academic programs of study, and approved courses effective Fall 2023 for Academic Year 2023-24.

Students who matriculate at National Intelligence University (NIU) at the beginning of the 2023-24 academic year will use the 2023-24 National Intelligence University Catalog for the official description of policies they must follow and requirements they must satisfy in order to graduate.

Students may, however, elect to follow the curriculum requirements of a National Intelligence University Catalog published subsequent to the year of their matriculation. NIU reserves for itself and its departments the right to withdraw or change the announcements in this catalog. 

*A recent version of Adobe Acrobat is required to view catalog.*

### 2023 - 2024
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"National Intelligence University","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu","author_name":"ray.x.villarreal@odni.gov","author_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/author\/ray-x-villarrealodni-gov\/","title":"CaracristiInstitute","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"f1MT2d7AH8\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/ciir\/\">CaracristiInstitute<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/ciir\/embed\/#?secret=f1MT2d7AH8\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“CaracristiInstitute” — National Intelligence University\" data-secret=\"f1MT2d7AH8\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Strengthening National Capacity in Malaria and Other 
Infectious Disease Operations Research, Funding Opportunity 
Announcement (FOA), CK09-004, Initial Review

June 1, 2009.
    Correction: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
April 29, 2009, Volume 74, Number 81, page 19564. The original notice 
was published with an incorrect FOA number and incorrect date.
    Contact Person for More Information: Wendy Carr, PhD, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D60, 
Atlanta, GA 30333. Telephone (404) 498-2276.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: May 18, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-12328 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Name and Jurisdiction of Incorporation



|                                     |  |  |  |                  
|------------------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------
|CRS Retail Technology Group, Inc.    |  |  |  | United States    
|Epicor Software Argentina S.A.       |  |  |  | Argentina        
|Epicor Software (Asia) PTE Ltd.      |  |  |  | Singapore        
|Epicor Software (Aust) Pty. Ltd.     |  |  |  | Australia        
|Epicor Software Canada, Ltd.         |  |  |  | Canada           
|Epicor Software Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |  |  |  | Mexico           
|Epicor Software (North Asia) Ltd.    |  |  |  | Hong Kong        
|Epicor Software Nordic AB            |  |  |  | Sweden           
|Epicor Software (Taiwan) Limited     |  |  |  | Republic of China
|Epicor Software (UK) Limited         |  |  |  | UK               
|Epicor Limited                       |  |  |  | UK               
|Scala Business Solutions N.V.        |  |  |  | The Netherlands
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

INVENTIO AG, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR AMERICAS 

CORPORATION, 

THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, AND

THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR MANUFACTURING 

INCORPORATED, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

__________________________ 

2010-1525 

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0874, Judge Eduardo C. Robreno. 

__________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC 

__________________________ 

Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, BRYSON, 

LINN, DYK, PROST, MOORE, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit 

Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

 
INVENTIO AG V. THYSSENKRUPP 2

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge, dissents, without opinion, 

from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc. 

. 

O R D E R

A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by Defendants-Appellees, and a response thereto was invited by 

the court and filed by Plaintiff-Appellant. The petition for 

rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, 

and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and the 

response were referred to the circuit judges who are 

authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the 

appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The petition of Defendants-Appellees for panel rehearing is denied. 

(2) The petition of Defendants-Appellees for rehearing en banc is denied. 

(3) The mandate of the court will issue on September 

23, 2011. 

FOR THE COURT

September 16, 2011 

—————————— 

Date 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

—————————— 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

cc: Pierre R. Yanney, Esq. 

David E. Schmit, Esq.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-31183

Conference Calendar

 

HAI VAN NGUYEN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH P. YOUNG,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:04-CV-1458

--------------------

Before JONES, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Hai Van Nguyen (Nguyen), federal prisoner # 18720-018,

appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his

28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Nguyen was sentenced to 165 months in

prison based on convictions for racketeering, conspiring to

engage in racketeering, conspiring to interfere with commerce by

robbery, and interfering with commerce by robbery. Nguyen

attempted to challenge the method by which the Bureau of Prisons

(BOP) calculates good time credits, but the district court
No. 04-31183

-2-

dismissed the petition because Nguyen had failed to exhaust his

administrative remedies before filing his petition in federal

court.

Because Nguyen is a federal prisoner proceeding under 28

U.S.C. § 2241, he is not required to obtain a certificate of

appealability. See Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th

Cir. 2001). Nguyen concedes that he did not exhaust the threelevel administrative remedy process. He asserts, however, that

his failure to exhaust should be excused because pursuing

administrative relief would be futile and because he would suffer

irreparable harm by following the administrative process. Nguyen

has not established that the district court abused its discretion

in dismissing his petition without prejudice. See Fuller v.

Rich, 11 F.3d 61, 62 (5th Cir. 1994). The judgment is thus

AFFIRMED.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed May 28, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00834-CV

WON CHANG AND WONALEX CORPORATION D/B/A ONE ENERGY, Appellants

V.

ENERGIA CONSULTANTS, INC. AND RUBEN ALMAZAN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04394

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Francis, Murphy, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Murphy

This case was submitted on April 1, 2013. That same day, the Court received 

correspondence from appellees’ counsel that the parties were in the process of finalizing 

settlement papers. Three days later, the parties notified the Court that they had, in fact, reached a 

settlement. The parties were directed to file a proper motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a). On April 24, 2013, the Court contacted the parties regarding the status of the 

appeal and was informed that counsel for appellants was waiting for counsel for appellees to 

return a motion to dismiss with his signature. 
- 2 -

The Court did not receive any further communication, and by letter dated May 8, 2013, 

the Court instructed the parties to notify the Court regarding the status of the settlement and 

corresponding motion to dismiss within ten days. We cautioned that if no response was 

received, the Court would take whatever action it deems appropriate, including dismissing the 

appeal. As of today’s date, the Court has not received a response. Accordingly, we dismiss the 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). 

120834F.P05

/Mary Murphy/

MARY MURPHY

JUSTICE
- 3 -

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

WON CHANG AND WONALEX 

CORPORATION D/B/A ONE ENERGY, 

Appellants

No. 05-12-00834-CV V.

ENERGIA CONSULTANTS, INC. AND 

RUBEN ALMAZAN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-04394.

Opinion delivered by Justice Murphy. 

Justices Francis and Evans participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. We ORDER that 

each party bears its own costs of the appeal.

Judgment entered this 28th day of May, 2013.

/Mary Murphy/

MARY MURPHY

JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronald Wayne LEWIS, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ronald Wayne Lewis, Defendant—Appellant.

Nos. 09-6219, 09-6221.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 28, 2009.

Decided: May 14, 2009.

Ronald Wayne Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Christopher Nunnally, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Wayne Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting his motion for an independent firearms expert (No. 09-6219), and denying his motion for review of the status of counsel (No. 09-6221). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Lewis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss these appeals for lack of jurisdiction. Additionally, we deny Lewis’ motion for release on bond pending appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 9(A)(3), and deny his motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NeoStem, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robin Smith, M.D.,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended;
  and








(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
      and the results of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented.





Dated:  November
12, 2010





/s/
      Robin Smith, M.D.Robin
      Smith, M.D.Chief
      Executive Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q
or as a separate disclosure document.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NeoStem, Inc. and will be retained by NeoStem, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-102627, No. 333-107990, No. 333-115628, No. 333-117425 and No. 333-145004) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-141110) of Plains Exploration & Production Company of our report dated
February 25, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                              
|Houston, Texas                
|February 25, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Garrett E. PierceGarrett E. PierceVice Chairman and Chief Financial OfficerOctober 25, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 32
                                                                 ----------

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Zsolt Rumy, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.

Date:  January 12, 2004                       By: /s/ Zsolt Rumy
       ----------------                          ----------------------------
                                                      Zsolt Rumy
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
Data

# 
NHTSA provides data and a wide range of analytical and statistical support.

##### NCSA

NHTSA's National Center for Statistics and Analysis has been responsible for providing a wide range of analytical and statistical support to the highway safety community.

                        -  Publications, Data & Data Tools   
                        -  Traffic Records   
                        -  Crash Data Systems   
                        -  National Driver Register   
                        -  Regulatory Analysis   
                        -  About NCSA   

###    Data Modernization Project

   Better Data. Safer Roads.
Learn More

##### Datasets and APIs

NHTSA makes data and/or APIs available in support of open government directive.

                        -  Ratings API   
                        -  Recalls Data & APIs   
                        -  Recalls by Manufacturer Dashboard   
                        -  Takata Recall Completion Dashboard    
                        -  Investigations Data   
                        -  Complaints Data & API   
                        -  Manufacturer Communications Data   
                        -  Car Seat Inspection Locator API   

###    Compliance Test Reports

   Search test reports specific to select vehicle-related FMVSSs.
Learn More

##### Other Data Sources

                        -  Standing General Order on Crash Reporting   
                        -  Interpretation File Search   
                        -  AV Test   

###    Research

   Toward Reduction of vehicle crashes
Research

####         Comparación de Vehículos        

# Available Manufacturers

AcuraAudiBMWBMW MotorcyclesBRP Can-AmBuickCadillacChevroletChicago ScooterChryslerDodgeDucati MotorcyclesFerrariFIATFordFreightlinerFreightliner SprinterGenuine Scooters

GMCHarley-DavidsonHinoHondaHonda MotorcyclesHummerHyundaiInfinitiJaguarJeepKawasakiKiaKTM MotorcyclesLand RoverLexusLincolnMack TrucksMaserati

MazdaMercedes-BenzMercedes-Benz SprinterMercuryMINIMitsubishiNavistarNissanNova BusOldsmobilePolarisPolestarPontiacPorschePrevostProMasterRAMRivian

SaabSaturnScionSMARTSterlingSubaruSuzuki MotorcyclesTeslaThomas Built BusToyotaTriumphUnimogVolkswagenVolvoVolvo BusVolvo TrucksWestern StarYamaha Motorcycles