alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SECOND QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,863
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             377
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                76,776
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      9,500
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         228,169
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           229,648
<LOANS>                                        582,524
<ALLOWANCE>                                     13,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 905,709
<DEPOSITS>                                     800,858
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,202    
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,902
<LONG-TERM>                                     20,699
<COMMON>                                         3,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 905,709
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,458
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               10,662
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                33,120
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              19,268
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,058
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,062
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      334
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,646
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,646
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,325
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.96
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,300
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                13,136
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       58
<RECOVERIES>                                       120
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               13,532
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               334
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrance Daum, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 886]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 26, 2000 *(People v Daum,*278 AD2d 505 [2000]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered February 3, 1997.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Eng, PJ., Rivera, Balkin and Austin, JJ., concur.
# Dictionary Definition: gene

                  - gene
                  - A trait passed from parent to child.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment
No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David A. Owen, Chief
Financial Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc.
and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ David A. OwenDavid A. OwenSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryDecember 23, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                              3,021,607
<SECURITIES>                        1,824,029
<RECEIVABLES>                       1,198,510
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            0
<PP&E>                              2,376,960
<DEPRECIATION>                      1,639,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     14,471,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                               919,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                            11,400
<COMMON>                            1,100,286
<OTHER-SE>                          9,953,755
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       14,471,453
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   10,104,688
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    9,862,116
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     77,480
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       165,092
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   165,092
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          165,092
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .01
                                   


</TABLE>
#### Lord *against*Kenny.

chattel,“it ¡s *£*greed that the ie"dor may. ®w« re“¡c®. ir^eturí condition3 ¿“at í¡verymandf the wards,' rescindí and ret”TM the vendor, who receives it with— out objection, and gives back t«e price, the latter is cod-c^ded^bj^ins TMTMji'inid|a.nTM ‘¡¡® l"t“iofr°aI tionofthe<chattel not arising ¡jTMry.a secre* Where, aflefr the» salo rtf a

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a justice’s court.

The defendant in error brought an action in the court below *°*against the plaintiff in error, for miury done to a horse.

The plaintiff below had agreed to sell the horse to the defendant, and received his note for 120 dollars as the price of the horse; but it was, afterwards, agreed that the defendant might, if he chose, within a reasonable time, deliver back the horse to the plaintiff, in as good condition as when he received him, and take up his note. The defendant below, accordingly, did, afterwards, rescind the contract, by redelivering the horse, •* ® which the plaintiff took without objection as to the condition in ... 7 , . i t - i mt which he then was, and gave up his note to the defendant. The ° A , plaintiff below, afterwards, brought the present action to recover damages, on the ground that the horse, when returned, Was not in as good plight as when sold, and obtained judgment.

*Per Curiam.*

*As*the deterioration, in the value of the horse, was not on account of any *secret*injury, and as the plaintiff below voluntarily took back the horse, and delivered up the note to the defendant, without any objection or reservation, as to the condition in which the horse then was, the law holds the plaintiff concluded by that act, because he thereby rescinded the contract of sale unconditionally.

If he had, then, set up the claim which he now attempts to enforce, the defendant might have chosen to keep the horse, and abide by the first contract, which he had a right to do.

Injustice has been, done, and the judgment ought to be reversed.

Judgment reversed.
**Facebook****Email**Print**Facebook****Email

 

## NIAMS Director

Lindsey A. Criswell, M.D., M.P.H., D.Sc.

## Deputy Director

Robert H. Carter, M.D.

## Associate Director for Management & Operations

Rick Phillips, M.B.A.

## Scientific Director of Intramural Research

John O’Shea, M.D.

## Clinical Director of Intramural Research

Robert A. Colbert, M.D., Ph.D.

## Director of the Division of Extramural Research

Gayle Lester, Ph.D.

## Director of the Division of Extramural Activities

Darren Sledjeski, Ph.D.

## Chief Diversity Officer

Robert Walker, Jr., Ph.D.

## Associate Director for Strategic Initiatives

Susana A. Serrate-Sztein, M.D.

June 2023

Back to Top
#### In the Matter of the Estate of James E. Selvy, Deceased. Allan Selvy, Appellant; Valerie Taylor et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 24, 2009;

decided October 20, 2009

Reported below, 2008 NY Slip Op 79883(U).

Motion for reargument denied [see 11 NY3d 865 (2009)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         841,638
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,305,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (96,468)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      97,252,142
<DEPRECIATION>                            (47,866,716)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,074,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,085,791
<BONDS>                                     58,213,701
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,775,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               108,074,565
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,941,427
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,494,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,078,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,117,941)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,117,941)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,117,941)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (11.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (11.81)
        

</TABLE>
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ INVENTIO AG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR AMERICAS CORPORATION, THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, AND

THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellees.

__________________________ 2010-1525

__________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for theDistrict of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0874, Judge Eduardo C. Robreno.

__________________________ ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

__________________________ Before R ADER , Chief Judge , N EWMAN , L OURIE , B RYSON , L INN , D YK , P ROST , M OORE , O’M ALLEY , and R EYNA , Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM

.INVENTIO AG V. THYSSENKRUPP 2

O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judge , dissents, without opinion, from the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

. O R D E RA petition for rehearing en banc was filed by Defendants-Appellees, and a response thereto was invited by the court and filed by Plaintiff-Appellant. The petition for rehearing was referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc and the response were referred to the circuit judges who are authorized to request a poll of whether to rehear the appeal en banc. A poll was requested, taken, and failed. Upon consideration thereof,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :(1) The petition of Defendants-Appellees for panel rehearing is denied.(2) The petition of Defendants-Appellees for rehearing en banc is denied. (3) The mandate of the court will issue on September 23, 2011.

F OR T HE C OURT

September 16, 2011

—————————— Date /s/ Jan Horbaly

—————————— Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Pierre R. Yanney, Esq. David E. Schmit, Esq.
#### In the Matter of Anonymous, an Applicant for Admission to the Bar.

Decided December 17, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 1214.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       7,934,671
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,861,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                   140,522
<INVENTORY>                                  1,844,962
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,605,667
<PP&E>                                       4,320,849
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,710,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,284,939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,725,375
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       226,473
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,122,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,284,939
<SALES>                                      5,492,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,588,287
<CGS>                                        1,452,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,080,397
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,265
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                563,458
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (562,951)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,126,409
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,126,409
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
## COURT OF APPEALS SECO ND DISTRICT OF T EXAS FORT WORTH

N O
. 2
- 1 0
- 0 5 7
- C R

I S S A C D E J E S U S R A M I R E Z A P P E L L A N T V
. T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S S T A T E

- - - - - - - - - - - - F R O M T H E 3 9 6 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T O F T A R R A N T C O U N T Y

- - - - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 1

- - - - - - - - - - - - P u r s u a n t t o a p l e a b a r g a i n , a p p e l l a n t I s s a c D e J e s u s R a m i r e z p l e d g u i l t y t o t h e o f f e n s e o f s e x u a l a s s a u l t o f a c h i l d u n d e r s e v e n t e e n i n e x c h a n g e f o r a
s e n t e n c e o f t w o y e a r s ’ c o n f i n e m e n t . S e e T e x . P e n a l C o d e A n n . § 2 2
. 0 1 1 ( V e r n o n S u p p . 2 0 0 9 )
. T h e t r i a l c o u r t ’ s c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f a p p e l l a n t ’ s r i g h t o f

a p p e a l s t a t e s t h a t t h i s i s “ a p l e a - b a r g a i n c a s e , a n d t h e d e f e n d a n t h a s N O r i g h t

o f a p p e a l
. ” A p p e l l a n t f i l e d a p r o s e r e s p o n s e t o t h i s c o u r t ’ s i n q u i r y i n t o i t s

1  S e e T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 4 7
. 4
.j u r i s d i c t i o n , a l l e g i n g t h a t h e o n l y t o o k t h e p l e a b a r g a i n b e c a u s e h i s a t t o r n e y

f a l s e l y t o l d h i m t h a t t h e r e “ w a s a b s o l u t e l y n o w a y f o r [ h i m ] t o r e c e i v e a p r o b a t e d s e n t e n c e . ” A p p e l l a n t ’ s r e s p o n s e i s n o t g r o u n d s f o r c o n t i n u i n g t h e
a p p e a l , h o w e v e r . S e e T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 2 5
. 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ; C h a v e z v . S t a t e , 1 8 3 S
. W
. 3 d 6 7 5 , 6 8 0 ( T e x . C r i m . A p p . 2 0 0 6 ) ( h o l d i n g t h a t i f a p p e l l a n t f a i l s t o m e e t a n y o f

e x c e p t i o n s i n r u l e 2 5
. 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) , “ n o i n q u i r y i n t o e v e n p o s s i b l y m e r i t o r i o u s c l a i m s

m a y b e m a d e . ” )
. A c c o r d i n g l y , w e d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l
. S e e T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 2 5
. 2 ( d ) , 4 3
. 2 ( f ) ; C h a v e z , 1 8 3 S
. W
. 3 d a t 6 8 0
.

P E R C U R I A M P A N E L : L I V I N G S T O N , D A U P H I N O T , a n d G A R D N E R , J J
. D O N O T P U B L I S H T e x . R
. A p p . P
. 4 7
. 2 ( b ) D E L I V E R E D : M a r c h 1 8 , 2 0 1 0

2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 98 (Friday, May 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 24074]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Mitsui 
Rail Capital, LLC (WB992-2--05/18/09), for permission to use certain 
data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this request 
may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, 
and Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.

Kulunie L. Cannon,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-11975 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000821243
<NAME> INNOVET, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,108
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,486
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        18,657
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (90,035)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (71,378)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Carillon Assisted Living, LLC v. N.C. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs.

Case below: 175 N.C. App. 265

No. 054A06

Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal Based Upon Settlement By The Parties (COA05-135)

Allowed 01/04/07
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of QuantRx Biomedical Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter
Witoshkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Walter
      WitoshkinWalter
      WitoshkinChairman
      & CEO





Date:    August
6, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.