alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNECE TO SUCH FORM 10-QSB AND THE ACCOMPANYING NOTES
THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1995
<CASH>                                              48
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      524
<ALLOWANCES>                                        93
<INVENTORY>                                      1,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,190
<PP&E>                                           1,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                     817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,659
<BONDS>                                          7,295
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,071
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,412)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,613
<SALES>                                          2,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,377
<CGS>                                            1,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,008
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 598
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,230)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (438)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.59)
        

</TABLE>
NO. 12-13-00040-CR

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

GARY HALLIGAN, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant, Gary Halligan, pleaded guilty to the offense of burglary of a vehicle. 

Appellant and his counsel signed written plea admonishments, an agreement to stipulate 

testimony, a judicial confession, and a plea bargain agreement that included an agreed punishment 

recommendation. The trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for five years, and 

certified that this “is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal[.]” The trial 

court’s certification is signed by the trial court, Appellant, and Appellant’s counsel. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2) limits a defendant’s right to appeal in a plea 

bargain case when he pleads guilty and his punishment does not exceed the punishment 

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. Under those 

circumstances, the defendant may appeal only (1) matters raised by written motion and ruled on 

before trial or (2) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal. Id. Here, the trial court 

sentenced Appellant in accordance with the agreed recommendation by the State. The trial court 

did not give Appellant permission to appeal, and the clerk’s record does not contain any pretrial 
2

motions. Therefore, we conclude that the certification of the right of appeal filed by the trial court 

is supported by the record and that Appellant has no right to appeal because he was sentenced 

pursuant to the agreed terms of a plea bargain and did not satisfy either of the exceptions stated in 

Rule 25.2(a)(2).1 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal “without further action.” See Chavez v. 

State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Opinion delivered April 24, 2013.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

 

1 Appellant also expressly waived his right to appeal. 
3

COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

APRIL 24, 2013

NO. 12-13-00040-CR

GARY HALLIGAN,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

 

 Appeal from the 7th Judicial District Court

 of Smith County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 007-1417-12)

 

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being 

considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
#### State v. Parmaei

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 179

No. 618P06

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-120)

Denied 05/03/07
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

IMPRENTA SERVICES, INC., MIKE SANCHEZ, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

NICHOLAS PATRICK KARLL, ECO PACKAGING 

SOLUTIONS, 

Defendants-Appellees

______________________

2023-2157

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Central District of California in No. 2:20-cv-06177-GWPVC, Judge George H. Wu.

______________________

O R D E R

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same 

hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

Case: 23-2157 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 03/07/2024
2 IMPRENTA SERVICES, INC. V. KARLL 

FOR THE COURT

March 7, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: March 7, 2024

Case: 23-2157 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 03/07/2024
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 797

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 

to clarify the status of certain communities in the western Alaska community development quota program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2005

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL

To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 

Management Act to clarify the status of certain communities in the western Alaska community development 

quota program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CDQ Community Pres5 ervation Act’’. 
2

•S 797 IS 

1 SEC. 2. WESTERN ALASKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 

2 QUOTA PROGRAM. 

3 (a) ELIGIBLE COMMUNITIES.—Section 305(i)(1) of 

4 the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Manage5 ment Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)) is amended adding at the 

6 end the following: 

7 ‘‘(E) A community shall be eligible to partici8 pate in the western Alaska community development 

9 quota program under subparagraph (A) if the com10 munity was— 

11 ‘‘(i) listed in table 7 to part 679 of title 

12 50, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on 

13 January 1, 2004; or 

14 ‘‘(ii) approved by the National Marine 

15 Fisheries Service on April 19, 1999.’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Such section is fur17 ther amended, in paragraph (B), by striking ‘‘To’’ and 

18 inserting, ‘‘Except as provided in subparagraph (E), to’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Downey Bridgwater, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (Section )1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March 14, 2003                     /s/ J. Downey Bridgwater
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           J. Downey Bridgwater
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23
                                                                  ----------

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-83160 and 33-06565) of Zoltek Companies,
Inc. of our report dated December 19, 2003, except for Note 2, which is
as of January 13, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Zoltek Companies, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report dated December 19, 2003
relating to the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears in this Form
10-K.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
St. Louis, Missouri

January 13, 2004
Exhibit 35.2

 

**Certification**

 

Re:  Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Series Supplement (the “**Agreement**”) dated February 15, 2007 made between Commonwealth Bank of Australia ABN 48 123 123 124, Homepath Pty Limited ABN 35 081 986 530,  Securitisation Advisory Services Pty Limited ABN 88 064 133 946 (the “**Manager**”) and Perpetual Trustee Company Limited ABN 42 000 001 007. 

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

| 1. | I, Craig Carland, am an authorised officer of the Manager. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | A review of the Manager’s activities during the period from February 27, 2007 (date of issuance of the Medallion 2007-1G Series Trust) through June 30, 2007 (the “**Reporting Period**”), and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Manager has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:     19 September 2007      

 

/s/ Craig Carland                    

Craig Carland

Company Director

Securitisation Advisory Services Pty Ltd
Exhibit 10.2


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


AMENDED AND RESTATED
REVOLVING NOTE


FROM


THE J. JILL GROUP, INC.


TO


CITIZENS BANK OF
MASSACHUSETTS


 


                This First
Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Note from The J. Jill Group, Inc.
to Citizens Bank of Massachusetts is dated as of September 30, 2004.


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


                Reference is made
to that certain Amended and Restated Revolving Note dated as of June 26, 2003
from The J. Jill Group, Inc. to Citizens Bank of Massachusetts in the face
amount of Twenty-Seven Million Dollars ($27,000,000) (the “REVOLVING NOTE”).


 


                NOW, THEREFORE,
for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the REVOLVING NOTE is hereby amended by deleting the date “June
1, 2005” set forth in the second paragraph of the REVOLVING NOTE and
substituting therefor the words “the Termination Date.”


 


                Except as modified
hereby, the REVOLVING NOTE remains in full force and effect and is hereby
confirmed and republished.


 


                EXECUTED as an
instrument under seal as of September 30, 2004.


 


	
   

  	
  THE J. JILL GROUP, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Olga L. Conley

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Olga L. Conley

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  EVP/CFO

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  CITIZENS BANK OF MASSACHUSETTS

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Lori B. Leeth

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Lori B. Leeth

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Senior Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 11 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 11

  Honoring the Tuskegee Airmen for their bravery in fighting for our 
  freedom in World War II, and for their contribution in creating an 
                  integrated United States Air Force.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2005

   Mr. Sessions (for himself and Mr. Shelby) submitted the following 
  concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Honoring the Tuskegee Airmen for their bravery in fighting for our 
  freedom in World War II, and for their contribution in creating an 
                  integrated United States Air Force.

Whereas the United States is currently combating terrorism around the world and 
        is highly dependent on the global reach and presence provided by the Air 
        Force;
Whereas these operations require the highest skill and devotion to duty from all 
        Air Force personnel involved;
Whereas the Tuskegee Airmen proved that such skill and devotion, and not skin 
        color, are the determining factors in aviation;
Whereas the Tuskegee Airmen served honorably in the Second World War struggle 
        against global fascism; and
Whereas the example of the Tuskegee Airmen has encouraged millions of Americans 
        of every race to pursue careers in air and space technology: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the United States Air Force 
should continue to honor and learn from the example provided by the 
Tuskegee Airmen as it faces the challenges of the 21st century and the 
war on terror.
                                 <all>
```
#### BARON v. LEO FEIST, Inc., et al.

Civ. 30-112.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct 21, 1946.

Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin & Krim, of New York *City*(Paul Martinson, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Julian T. Abeles, of New York City, for defendants.

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Defendant Leo Feist, Inc., has propounded written interrogatories to three witnesses in Trinidad. Under Rule 31(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. A. following section 723c, plaintiff may within 10 days after receipt of these direct interrogatories serve cross-interrogatories on defendant.

Plaintiff, on this application seeks to deviate from this rule and requests the court for leave to serve cross-interrogatories after the receipt of the answers to the direct interrogatories.

This is a copyright infringement suit and the interrogatories propounded by defendant are the usual ones, in this type of case. Plaintiff pleads unusual circumstances in urging that the court deviate from the accepted practice.

While courts have on occasion varied from the regular practice, I am reluctant in this instance to do so, inasmuch as it may lead to a complete upset of the accepted practice in copyright cases as well as in other matters. The cross-interrogatories will be propounded in accordance with rule *7231 and the answers to both the direct and cross-interrogatories are to be filed simultaneously with the court. However, in view of the alleged difficulty which plaintiff complains to be under, the court will allow plaintiff, after the filing of the answers to the direct and cross-interrogatories, if he so desires, to propound additional cross-interrogatories within five days thereafter.

With respect to the alternative relief requested to permit oral examination of the witnesses at the expense of the defendant, the same is denied. Houghton Mifflin Co. v. Stackpole Sons, Inc. et al, D.C., 1 F.R.D. 506, 507.

• Settle order on two days notice.
-  Home 
        -  News 
        -  Media Library 
        -  Media Asset Details 

Return to Media Library Search Results

# Healthy Living Tips to Feel Better Illustration

View full-sized image
                Download Media **Please credit each image as: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

## Description

                    A series of healthy living tips to follow.                 

## Alternate Text

Make sleep a priority. Try a relaxing activity. Focus on positivity. Eat healthy, regular meals and stay hydrated.

## Diseases or Conditions

Weight Management

## File Size

63 KB | 1200 x 675

## File Type

JPEG

## Related Keywords

English labelsInfographics, charts, and graphsEating

Share this page
FacebookXEmailWhatsAppLinkedInRedditPinterest
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          89,632
<SECURITIES>                                 2,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,648
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,655,980
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,768,260
<PP&E>                                         622,551
<DEPRECIATION>                               (335,121)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,917,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,544,413
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,459,755
<COMMON>                                        10,023
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,733,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,917,914
<SALES>                                      1,565,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,782,184
<CGS>                                           36,205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,460,167
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             264,237
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,038
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,038
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .005
        


</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, David E. Pearson, Chief Financial Officer of Telos Corporation, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Telos Corporation; 

 

2.    Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and we have: 

 

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and 

 

c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a)    all significant deficiencies inthe design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and 

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6.    The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: August 14, 2003