alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed December 12, 2013. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00971-CR

NO. 14-12-01011-CR

____________

FRANKIE RAYSHAWN HILL-TURNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 10-DCR-056063 & 10-DCR-056064

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the originals of State's exhibit 105, a 

DVD and Defendant's exhibit 1, a DVD.
The clerk of the 434th Judicial District Court is directed to deliver to the 

Clerk of this court the originals of State's exhibit 105, a DVD and Defendant's 

exhibit 1, a DVD, on or before December 31, 2013. The Clerk of this court is 

directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe these original exhibits; to deliver them

to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, 

to return the originals of State's exhibit 105, a DVD and Defendant's exhibit 1, a 

DVD, to the clerk of the 434th Judicial District Court.

PER CURIAM
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"National Intelligence University","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu","author_name":"ray.x.villarreal@odni.gov","author_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/author\/ray-x-villarrealodni-gov\/","title":"NIU Web Policies","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"WPB7ptjhWQ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/policies\/\">NIU Web Policies<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/policies\/embed\/#?secret=WPB7ptjhWQ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NIU Web Policies” — National Intelligence University\" data-secret=\"WPB7ptjhWQ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of
Martek Biosciences Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | a) the annual report on Form 10-K of
    the Company for the period ended October 31, 2004 filed on
    the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
    (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
    of 1934; and
|
| | b) information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                  



| |    |                       
| | -- | ----------------------
| | By | /s/ Henry Linsert, Jr.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Henry Linsert, Jr.     
| | Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 13, 2005

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Martek Biosciences Corporation and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### *Spafford*against Griffen.

A person who holder ais fresfmprisonméfiitm issufn|outUof°a although .fe réntincounty“’ wh”h tfejudgment was renclered.

But the justice’srefusal to endorse, the defendant’s expoeundi/oriSrt“ wM»g the Judgement.

IN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a justice’s court. ■

? Judgment having beéri given in the coni^t below: against tne plaiptiiT in error,. he claimed exemption from’ imprisonment: ori. the' ground-that he had a family, and was'.not a freeholder ¿. but, appearing that'he was an inhabitant of another county, the justice refused to'grant it, and execution: was issued agdinst him in tlie usual form. ■ - ' .. - . - - ; ■'

*Per Curiam.*

The -proviso in the- 11th -section of the act, *(1*N. *R. L.*393.,) provides, “ that if the defendant shall, on the .‘hearing-bf-the- Cause, prove that he has a family in this state, for. which he provides, and is. not a.freehblder, then the justice shall, at the time of. issuing execution, endorsé such proof thereon,” which shall exempt the defendant from Imprisonment, upon his paying'by monthly instalments, &c, */*

It appears that the justice, -id this casé, improperly refused to endorsé that proof upon the execution; but his mistake, or misconduct, in not making thát endorsement, is no ground, for " reversing the judgment. ' Whether an action will lie against the justice, or the plaintiff below, for that omission, is-a question not now before us,. *(Percival*v. Jones, 2 *Johns. Cas.*49.,) • - ,

Judgment aiFfrnied.
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCFO



In connection with the Annual Report of Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Thorington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after
reasonable investigation:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 4, 2005.



/s/    Stephen A. ThoringtonStephen A. Thorington Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|                                                               |   | Three      months ended December 31, |        |   | Year      ended December 31, |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|-------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                                               |   | 2008                                 |        |   | 2007                         |   |   | 2006 |   |   | 2008 |   |   | 2007 |   |   | 2006 |   |
|                                                               |   |                                 |        |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      income (loss) applicable to      common shareholders |   | $                                    | (518,670    | )      |                         | $      | (921,307 | ) |   | $ | (1,483,105 | ) |   | $ | (2,685,867 | ) |   | $ | (4,256,891 | ) |   | $ | (6,593,892 | ) |
|                                                               |   |                                 |        |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number of      common shares                 |   |                                 | 107,372,191 |   |                         |   | 107,173,549 |   |   |   | 102,148,882 |   |   |   | 107,292,686 |   |   |   | 106,321,400 |   |   |   | 100,895,795 |   |
|                                                               |   |                                 |        |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      income (loss) per per      share                          |   | $                                    | (0.01       | )      |                         | $      | (0.01 | ) |   | $ | (0.01 | ) |   | $ | (0.03 | ) |   | $ | (0.04 | ) |   | $ | (0.07 | ) |
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 74 

To designate a portion of the White Salmon River as a component of the 

National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate a portion of the White Salmon River as a 

component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Upper White Salmon 

5 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UPPER WHITE SALMON WILD AND SCENIC RIVER. 

7 Section 3(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 1274(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 
2 

•S 74 IS

1 ‘‘ ( ) WHITE SALMON RIVER, WASHINGTON.— 

2 The 20 miles of river segments of the main stem of 

3 the White Salmon River and Cascade Creek, Wash4 ington, to be administered by the Secretary of Agri5 culture in the following classifications: 

6 ‘‘(A) The approximately 1.6-mile segment 

7 of the main stem of the White Salmon River 

8 from the headwaters on Mount Adams in sec9 tion 17, township 8 north, range 10 east, down10 stream to the Mount Adams wilderness bound11 ary as a wild river. 

12 ‘‘(B) The approximately 5.1-mile segment 

13 of Cascade Creek from its headwaters on Mount 

14 Adams in section 10, township 8 north, range 

15 10 east, downstream to the Mount Adams Wil16 derness boundary as a wild river. 

17 ‘‘(C) The approximately 1.5-mile segment 

18 of Cascade Creek from the Mount Adams Wil19 derness boundary downstream to its confluence 

20 with the White Salmon River as a scenic river. 

21 ‘‘(D) The approximately 11.8-mile segment 

22 of the main stem of the White Salmon River 

23 from the Mount Adams Wilderness boundary 

24 downstream to the Gifford Pinchot National 

25 Forest boundary as a scenic river.’’. 
3 

•S 74 IS

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

3 as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ
1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-1045

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Northern

* District of Iowa.

David K. Feddersen, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: September 25, 2003

 Filed: September 30, 2003

___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

David K. Feddersen challenges the sentence the district court1

 imposed after

he entered a plea under North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37 (1970), to

threatening to use anthrax to assault or kill federal employees, in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B). At sentencing, the district court denied Feddersen an

acceptance-of-responsibility reduction and sentenced him to 36 months imprisonment

to be followed by one year supervised release.

 
-2-

On appeal, counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), arguing that the district court erred in denying an acceptance-of-responsibility

reduction, given that the shortcomings in Feddersen’s guilty plea “reasonably

appeared to be a product of [his] mental illness.” After careful review of the record,

we find that the district court did not clearly err in denying the acceptance-ofresponsibility reduction. See United States v. Arellano, 291 F.3d 1032, 1034 (8th Cir.

2002) (standard of review). 

 Upon reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We also

grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

 ______________________________
Order filed August 12, 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00173

- CV

____________ MICHAEL SLEEMAN , Appellant

V.
ESTHER LAVERNE CHUDL EIGH, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 29742



### O R D E R
Appellant’ s brief was due July 30, 2014

. No brief or motion for extension of
time has been filed.
Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before September 9,
2014 , the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-102627, No. 333-107990, No. 333-115628 and No. 333-117425) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-121452) of Plains Exploration & Production Company of our report dated February 27, 2007relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Houston, TX 

February 27, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                ------------



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kevin Schott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements
                           of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                           Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the
                           Company.

Date: December 29, 2004                     By: /s/ Kevin Schott
                                               --------------------------------
                                                       Kevin Schott
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 59 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 59

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize certain disabled 
  former prisoners of war to use Department of Defense commissary and 
                            exchange stores.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize certain disabled 
  former prisoners of war to use Department of Defense commissary and 
                            exchange stores.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORES BY CERTAIN DISABLED 
              FORMER PRISONERS OF WAR.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 54 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 1064 the following new section:
``Sec. 1064a. Use of commissary and exchange stores by certain disabled 
              former prisoners of war
    ``(a) In General.--Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of 
Defense, former prisoners of war described in subsection (b) may use 
commissary and exchange stores.
    ``(b) Covered Individuals.--Subsection (a) applies to any former 
prisoner of war who--
            ``(1) separated from active duty in the armed forces under 
        honorable conditions; and
            ``(2) has a service-connected disability rated by the 
        Secretary of Veterans Affairs at 30 percent or more.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) The term `former prisoner of war' has the meaning 
        given that term in section 101(32) of title 38.
            ``(2) The term `service-connected' has the meaning given 
        that term in section 101(16) of title 38.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
1064 the following new item:

``1064a. Use of commissary and exchange stores by certain disabled 
                            former prisoners of war.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**
 **OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
 
 I, Fred Wilkinson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Columbia Laboratories, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
 
 c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors:
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
 
 6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Date: November 3, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Fred Wilkinson
Fred Wilkinson
Chief Executive Officer


---