alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terence W. Tsang, in my capacity as Executive Vice-President, Chief Operating
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Ashworth, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

      1. the Quarterly Report of the Registrant, on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended July 31, 2003 to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



Dated: September 12, 2003     /s/ Terence W. Tsang
       ------------------     -------------------
                              Terence W. Tsang
                              Executive Vice-President, Chief Operating Officer,
                              Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12438]



[[Page 25727]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP09-447-002]


Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC; Notice of Supplement to Tariff 
Compliance Filing

May 21, 2009.
    Take notice that on May 18, 2009, Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC 
(Monroe) filed a supplement to its tariff compliance filing submitted 
on May 4, 2009 in accordance with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission's Order Accepting and Suspending Tariff Sheets Subject to 
Refund and Further Review issued on April 14, 2009. In this filing, 
Monroe submitted substitute tariff sheets that supplement the 
electronic media of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, 
previously submitted on May 4, 2009 in Docket No. RP09-447-000.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a6c6f786965444643444f795f5a5a45585e6a4c4f5849044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91d7d4c3d2defffdf8fff4c2e4e1e1fee3e5d1f7f4e3f2bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, May 29, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12438 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, L. George
Klaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software
Corporation.



By:

/s/ L. George KlausL. George Klaus Chief Executive Officer




I, Michael A. Piraino, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



By:

/s/ Michael A. PirainoMichael A. Piraino Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
The District Court of the 13th Judicial District. County of Yellowstone.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, *13vs. SABAH O. MALLAK, Defendant.

*12CAUSE NO. DC-00-930 *13DECISION

On August 13, 2009, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence as follows: Count I: A commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a term of three (3) years for the offense of Burglary, a felony; and Count II: A commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a term of three (3) years for the offense of Witness Tampering, a felony. Counts I and II shall run concurrently with each other.

On February 4, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Marvin McCann who appeared via videoconference. The state was represented by Ann-Marie McKittrick, who appeared via videoconference.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 4th day of February, 2010.

DATED this 23rd day of February, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF STERLING BANCSHARES, INC.



The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Sterling Bancshares, Inc.:



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Sterling Bancorporation, Inc. A Delaware corporation PO Box 631 Wilmington, Delaware 19899  Sterling Bancshares Capital Trust I A Delaware statutory business trust 15000 Northwest Freeway Houston, Texas 77040  Sterling Bancshares Statutory Trust One A Connecticut statutory business
trust 2550 North Loop West, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77092  CMCR Holding Company A Delaware corporation 13100 Northwest Freeway Houston, Texas 77040 |  | Sterling Bank A Texas state banking
association 2550 North Loop West, Suite 600 Houston, Texas
77092  Sterling Bancshares Capital
Trust II A Delaware statutory business trust 15000 Northwest Freeway Houston, Texas 77040  Sterling Bancshares Capital Trust III A Delaware statutory business
trust 15000 Northwest Freeway Houston, Texas 77040  Plaza Bank A Texas state banking association 400 W. Houston Street San Antonio, Texas 78207
EX-10(C)(2)



 





Exhibit 10(c)
(2)




Executive
Officers of
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company

who are parties to form of

Employee Confidentiality, Noncompetition,

Nonsolicitation Agreement for employees

participating in The Scotts Company LLC

     Executive/Management Incentive Plan      




	 	 	 
	Name and Principal Position	 	Date of Employee Confidentiality,
	with The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company	 	Noncompetition, Nonsolicitation Agreement
	 
	 	 
	Denise
S. Stump, Executive Vice President, Global
Human Resources

	 	August 8, 2006
	 
	 	 
	David
C. Evans,
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer

	 	May 20, 2006
	 
	 	 
	Barry
W. Sanders, Executive Vice President, North America

	 	April 22, 2005
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 182 4

_____________________________
C ONSTANCE B UCHANAN , a s l egal
g uardian o f John Doe 3 , a f

ictitious n ame f or a m inor
, Appellant,

v.

C ROSSROADS U NITED M ETHODIST C HU RCH , I NC ., a Florida N on

- P rofit C orporation
, C AMPUS C RUSADE FOR C HRIST , I NC ., an d C HRISTOPHER R OBERT B ACCA , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Robert M. Dees , Judge

. June 20, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. Upon consideration of Appellee’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Appellant’s Response in Opposition, the Court has determined that the appeal must be dismissed because the “Order Granting Defendant’s Motion for Partial Final Judgment as to Count VIII” is not an appealable partial final judgment. See Jensen v. Whetstine , 985 So. 2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008)2 (“An order is not an appealable partial final order where there is a factual overlap between the pending claims and the claims resolved by the order.”) Cf. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k). “An appeal from an order dismissing a count of a complaint, where other counts against the same parties remain, is authorized only when the dismissed count arises from a separate and distinct transaction independent of the ot her pending, pleaded claims.” Biasetti v. Palm Beach Blood Bank, Inc. , 654 So. 2d 237, 238 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); see also Harrison v. J.P.A. Enters., LLC , 51 So. 3d 1217, 1219 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). Appellant’s complaint includes two pending counts alleging c laims against the same defendant for damages stemming from the same conduct as Count VIII. Therefore, the claims are interrelated and the order on Count VIII is not independently appealable as a partial final judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k).
The appeal is hereby D ISMISSED

.
R OWE , K ELSEY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Gerald B. Stewart, Jacksonville; Willie J. Walker of The Walker Law Offices, P.A., Jacksonville
, for Appellant.

Michael R. D' L ugo of Wicker Smith O’Hara McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee Campus Crusade for Christ

. No appearance for Appellees C rossroads United Methodist Church or Christopher Robert Bacca.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Walter Witoshkin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of
		QuantRx Biomedical Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
		not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
		fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
		which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
		covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
		statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
		present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
		and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
		report;

4. The registrants other certifying
		officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
		controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
		15d-15(e)):

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and
		procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
		under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
		registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
		others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
		report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
		registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
		report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
		procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
		evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
		the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
		during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
		fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
		affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
		internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
		officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
		control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
		audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
		performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
		material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
		financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
		registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
		information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
		involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
		registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 15, 2007



/s/ Walter WitoshkinWalter Witoshkin
				Chairman & CEO






---
#### N.C. Dep’t of Transp. v. County of Durham

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 346 (2 January 2007)

No. 063P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-283)

Denied 10/11/07

Hudson, J., Recused
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Plains Exploration & Production Company



|                               |  |                             
|------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary             |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|Arguello Inc.                  |  | Delaware                    
|Arroyo Grande Land Company LLC |  | Delaware                    
|Cane River Development LLC     |  | Delaware                    
|Latigo Petroleum, Inc.         |  | Delaware                    
|Lompoc Land Company LLC        |  | Delaware                    
|Montebello Land Company LLC    |  | Delaware                    
|Nuevo Energy Company           |  | Delaware                    
|Plains Acquisition Corporation |  | Delaware                    
|Plains Resources Inc.          |  | Delaware                    
|Plains Vietnam Ltd.            |  | Cayman Islands              
|Pogo Alberta, ULC              |  | Canada                      
|Pogo Finance, ULC              |  | Canada                      
|Pogo New Zealand               |  | New Zealand                 
|Pogo New Zealand Holdings, LLC |  | Delaware                    
|Pogo Partners Inc.             |  | Texas                       
|Pogo Producing Company LLC     |  | Delaware                    
|Pogo Vietnam Ltd.              |  | Cayman Islands              
|PXP Aircraft LLC               |  | Delaware                    
|PXP Gulf Coast LLC             |  | Delaware                    
|PXP Louisiana L.L.C.           |  | Delaware                    
|PXP Louisiana Operations LLC   |  | Delaware
exv4w1



 






Exhibit 4.1






	STOCK CERTIFICATE



 








 







	THE BOARD OF THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND
PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS
CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE
RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK AS WELL AS THE
DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES
THEN OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED. The following abbreviations, when used in the
inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in
full according to applicable laws or regulations: UTMA —  ___Custodian ___TEN
COM — as tenants in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT — as tenants by entireties under Uniform
Transfers to Minors JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of survivorship Act
___and not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be
used though not in above list. For value received ___hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE
NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the
within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said
stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
Dated ___X X NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT
OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
(SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION
PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE
STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE
NOT ACCEPTABLE.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0738. TURNER v. THE STATE. 

The state’s motion to dismissthe above-styled appeal is granted and the appeal

is hereby dismissed. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/19/2015

May 19, 2015
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Maria Bednarek, Respondent, v Caring Professionals Inc. et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 301]

McCarthy, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 6, 2012, which ruled that claimant sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of her employment.

Claimant was employed as a home attendant for the elderly and, on the day in question, worked two shifts with different clients. She fell and was injured while walking from the first client’s residence to the second client’s residence, and applied for workers’ compensation benefits. Following a hearing, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge determined that the injury arose out of and in the course of her employment. A divided panel of the Workers’ Compensation Board agreed, prompting the employer and its workers’ compensation carrier to seek full Board review as of right *{see*Workers’ Compensation Law § 23). The full Board affirmed, and the employer and carrier appeal.

We affirm. While “injuries sustained during travel to and from the place of employment” are generally not compensable under the Workers’ Compensation Law, an outside employee “who does not have a fixed worksite [ ] may be compensated for *998injuries sustained in the course of’ work-related travel *(Matter of Neacosia v New York Power Auth.,*85 NY2d 471, 475 [1995]). The employer and carrier contend that claimant was not an outside employee, but “[t]he distinguishing feature of outside employees is that they do not work at a fixed location and are required to travel between work locations” *(Matter of Bobinis v State Ins. Fund,*235 AD2d 955, 956 [1997]; *see Matter of Bennett v Marine Works, Inc.,*273 NY 429, 431 [1937]). The employer here assigned claimant to care for two clients in different locations and, thus, substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that she “became an outside employee when [s]he left” one work site and proceeded to another *(Matter of Marciniak v Berlitz School of Languages,*43 AD2d 509, 512 [1974], *appeal dismissed*34 NY2d 843 [1974]; *see Matter of Greene v City of New York Dept. of Social Servs.,*44 NY2d 322, 325 [1978]; *Matter of Egloff v Ob-Gyn Assoc. of N. N.Y.,*245 AD2d 965, 966 [1997]).

The remaining contentions of the employer and carrier have been examined and found to lack merit.

Peters, EJ., Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.