alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Michael Hendricks J. RINGLING, a/k/a Michael Hendricks Jaysen, a/k/a John Kasell, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-6082.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 28, 2009.

*248Michael Hendricks J. Ringling, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Hendricks J. Ringling appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). Ringling contends that he was entitled to the reduction under Amendment 706 of the *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*(“USSG”), which lowered the base offense levels for drug offenses involving cocaine base. *See*USSG § 2Dl.l(c) (2007 & Supp.2008); USSG App. C Amend. 706. Because Ringling was sentenced on the basis of his status as a career offender and not on the basis of the drug quantity attributed to him, *wé*find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ringling’s motion. *See United States v. Sharkey,*543 F.3d 1236, 1238-39 (10th Cir.2008).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Annual Report of Berkeley Technology Limited on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the U.S.  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"),  I, Ian K.  Whitehead,  as Chief Financial
Officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  March 23, 2007                            By:    /s/  Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
-  Home 
        -  Research & Funding 
        -  Research Programs & Contacts 
        -  Diversity Programs 
        -  Helping to Accelerate Research Potential (HARP) 

Diversity Programs
-  Diversity Supplement Program 
-  Network of Minority Health Research InvestigatorsShow child pages    -  NMRI Mentor/Mentee Program 
  -  NMRI Boards 
  -  NMRI Event Photos 
  -  NMRI Community/Faith Based Research Subgroup 
  -  Suggested Resources 
  -  NMRI Newsletters & Directory 
  -  NMRI History & Mission 
-  Travel & Scholarship AwardsShow child pages    -  NIH/National Medical Association Travel Award 
  -  NIH/Latino Medical Student Association LIDEReS in Research Travel Award 
-  Research & Training Opportunities for StudentsShow child pages    -  Short-Term Research Experience Program to Unlock Potential (STEP-UP) 
  -  Diversity Summer Research Training Program 
-  BRIDGES Consortium 
-  DiabDocs National K12 Physician Scientist Career Development Program 
-  Investigator Award to Support Mentoring of Early Career Researchers from Diverse Backgrounds 
-  NIDDK Partnerships with Professional Societies 
-  Helping to Accelerate Research Potential (HARP) 

# Helping to Accelerate Research Potential (HARP)

## Program Description

The overarching goal of the Helping to Accelerate Research Potential (HARP) UE5 program is to complement and/or enhance the training of a workforce to meet the nation’s biomedical, behavioral and clinical research needs. The main objective of the HARP UE5 program is to provide opportunities and mentorship for NIDDK-funded scholars, especially postdoctoral scholars and junior faculty from diverse backgrounds, to enhance their skills in areas that are critical for establishing and maintaining successful independent academic research careers. HARP program sites are expected to provide professional development and enhance the professional networks of the HARP scholars conducting research in areas specific to the mission of the NIDDK.

 

RFA-DK-22-002

## Active Sites

## 

### HARP - MGH

**Principal Investigators**: Fatima Cody Stanford, M.D. and Takara Stanley, M.D.

**Institution**: Massachusetts General Hospital

**Funded**: 2023

### HARP - UCSF

**Principal Investigator**: Elena Flowers, Ph.D.

**Institution**

**Funded**

### HARP - UM 

**Principal Investigators**: Ranjith Ramasamy, M.D. and Alessia Fornoni, M.D., Ph.D.

**Institution**

**Funded**

### HARP - MUSC 

**Principal Investigator**: Don Rockey, M.D.

**Institution**

**Funded**

### HARP - UAB 

**Principal Investigators**: Jose Fernandez, Ph.D. and James Hill, Ph.D.

**Institution**

**Funded**: 2023

NIDDK Program Staff 

Katrina Serrano, Ph.D.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Saul 
Ewing on behalf of Trinity Industries, Inc. (WB605-5--05/04/09) for 
permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill 
Samples. A copy of the request may be obtained from the Office of 
Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, 
Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of 
the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are 
codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.

Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. E9-12313 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### In the Matter of Daniel Holmes, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 914]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered August 3, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment denied the petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs *(Matter of Robles v Evans,*100 AD3d 1455, 1455 [2012]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Garni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 776 

To designate certain functions performed at flight service stations of the 

Federal Aviation Administration as inherently governmental functions, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 13, 2005 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mr. THUNE, Mr. DAYTON, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. 

KENNEDY, and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL

To designate certain functions performed at flight service 

stations of the Federal Aviation Administration as inherently governmental functions, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Federal Aviation 

5 Safety Security Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INHERENTLY GOVERNMENTAL DETERMINATION. 

7 For purposes of section 2(a) of the Federal Inventory 

8 Activities Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2382), the functions per-
2

•S 776 IS

1 formed by air traffic control specialists at flight service 

2 stations operated by the Federal Aviation Administration 

3 are inherently governmental functions and must be per4 formed by Federal employees. 

5 SEC. 3. ACTIONS VOIDED. 

6 Any action taken pursuant to section 2(a) of the Fed7 eral Inventory Activities Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2382), 

8 or any other law or legal authority with respect to func9 tions performed by air traffic control specialists at flight 

10 service stations operated by the Federal Aviation Adminis11 tration is null and void.

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Claim of David S. Malone, Appellant, v VRD Decorating et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Submitted June 7, 2010;

decided July 1, 2010

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*14 NY3d 825 (2010)].
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION 1
  1.
 2.
  /s/ Timothy P. Walbert
    
    /s/ Robert J. De VaereTimothy P. Walbert
    
    Robert J. De VaerePresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration

and Chief Financial Officer
 
 1
    
    This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which
it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of IDM Pharma, Inc.
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the ManTech International Corporation (the
Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, George J. Pedersen, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Kevin M. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/    George J. PedersenName:

George J. PedersenTitle:

Chairman of the Board of Directorsand Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/    Kevin M.
PhillipsName:

Kevin M. PhillipsTitle:

Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 9, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
L. Weinberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                             /s/ David L. Weinberg
                                             ---------------------
                                             David L. Weinberg
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             August 4, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

I, Don M. Bailey, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 22, 2012

/s/ DON M. BAILEYDon M. Bailey,President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Louis F. Ortiz, Appellant, v Varsity Holdings, LLC, et al., Respondents.

Submitted September 13, 2010;

decided September 16, 2010

Motion by Defense Association of New York, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40062 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GARY PAUL HOCKLESS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-86-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 19, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Gary Paul Hockless has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief, Hockless’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMPUTER INTEGRATION CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,367
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,166
<PP&E>                                           2,204
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,480
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,607
<SALES>                                        112,770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,770
<CGS>                                          103,057
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,794)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (718)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,076)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
#### IN THE MATTER OF C.B., J.B., Th.B., and Ti.B., minor children

No. 586A06

(Filed 4 May 2007)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 180 N.C. App. 221, 636 S.E.2d 336 (2006), reversing and remanding an adjudication order entered 17 May 2005 by Judge Phyllis Gorham in District Court, Pender County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 April 2007.

*No brief for petitioner.*

*Deana K. Fleming, Associate Counsel for North Carolina Guardian ad Litem Program, and R. Kent Harrell, GAL Attorney Advocate, for appellant Guardian ad Litem.*

*Sofie W. Hosford for respondent-appellee father.*

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision in this case.
----

|                                       |                   | Doing      Business                        |
|--------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Subsidiary                                 | State of Incorporation | under the FollowingNames                   |
|                                       |                   |                                       |
|                                       |                   |                                       |
| Sign      Builders of America, Inc.        | Delaware               | N/A                                        |
|                                       |                   |                                       |
| Applied      Nanotech, Inc.                | Delaware               | Applied      Nanotech, Inc.                |
|                                       |                   |                                       |
| Electronic      Billboard Technology, Inc. | Delaware               | Electronic      Billboard Technology, Inc. |
|                                       |                   |                                       |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM LIFSCHULTZ
INDUSTRIES,  INC.  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                                  994,000
<SECURITIES>                                          1,105,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2,535,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                           3,466,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      8,534,000
<PP&E>                                                3,052,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       12,808,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 2,036,000
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           10,681,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         12,808,000
<SALES>                                               3,871,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      3,871,000
<CGS>                                                 2,268,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         3,627,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       10,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         244,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                             29,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     215,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            215,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0.16


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Bryant Evans, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chair of the New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[869 NYS2d 922]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered June 6, 2008 in Franklin County, as amended by a judgment entered June 16, 2008 in Franklin County, which partially granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release.

In 1983, petitioner was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. He was sentenced, respectively, to prison terms of SVs to 25 years, 5 to 15 years and *21/z*to 7 years, with the first and third sentences ordered to run consecutive to each other and concurrent with *999the second sentence. In January 2007, petitioner appeared before the Board of Parole and was denied release to parole supervision. He thereafter exhausted his administrative remedies and commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the Board’s determination. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court found that the Board failed to consider petitioner’s sentencing minutes and granted the petition to the extent of annulling the determination and directing that the Board conduct a de novo hearing. Petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. Inasmuch as Supreme Court annulled the Board’s determination denying petitioner parole release and granted him a de novo hearing, petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled (see *Matter of Oberoi v Dennison,*55 AD3d 1033 [2008]). To the extent that petitioner requests future review of the Board’s determination following the de novo hearing, that is not a proper subject of this proceeding.

Cardona, P.J., Her cure, Peters, Spain and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.