alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MICROTEST, INC.
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                       STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF COMMON
                          AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES

                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Year ended December 31,
                                                      -----------------------
                                                     1995       1996        1997
                                                     ----       ----        ----
<S>                                               <C>         <C>         <C>
Net income/(loss)                                 $  1,145    $(11,595)   $    323
                                                  ========    ========    ========

Common shares outstanding at end of period           8,095       8,131       8,159

Adjustment to reflect weighted average for
shares issued during period                            (22)        (27)        (20)


Adjustments for options and warrants calculated
under the treasury stock method:
         Options                                       461        --           110
         Warrants                                     --          --          --
                                                  --------    --------    --------

Common and equivalent shares outstanding             8,534       8,104       8,249
                                                  ========    ========    ========

Net income/(loss) per share                       $    .13    $  (1.43)   $    .04
                                                  ========    ========    ========
</TABLE>
                                                                              68
# IGINAI,



# ‘A u
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

BRADLEY K. STEVENS,

Petitioner,
v. PETE BLUDWORTH, Warden,

Respondent. OP 22-0654 

### DEC 06 2922 Bow , .:11 Greenwood C. ' t.v" Jurt

of tvinntana ORDER

Self-represented Petitioner Bradley K. Stevens has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, requesting his immediate release from prison because he "was granted parole on March 10th 2022[,]and [he is] still here in Shelby regional prison with 1 'A years clear conduct awaitingrelease." Stevens states that he cannot get a straight answer to why he is still incarcerated. Stevens provides little other information and no supporting documentation. The writ ofhabeas corpus allows "every person imprisoned or otherwise restrained of liberty
. . . to inquire into the cause ofimprisonment or restraint and, if illegal, to be delivered from the irnprisonment or restraint." Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. Available electronic records indicate that Stevens is serving sentences in three criminal cases from the Lake County and Butte-Silver Bow County District Courts. Stevens became parole eligible in 2017, and he has appeared before the Board ofPardons and Parole (Board). The Board, as Stevens provides, granted him parole on March 10, 2022. TheBoard,however, has since scheduled ahearingtorescind the grant ofparole for December 1, 2022. TheBoardhasauthority under its administrativerulesto rescindparole. "A hearing panel may conduct a hearing and rescind a previously granted parole ifthe offender has not left confinement or is on furlough status . . . ." Admin. R. M. 20.25.601(1) (2016). 12/06/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0654

### Stevens has not left the custody ofthe Shelby prison since March 2022. Stevens would

have received notice ofany violation pending his release to parole. Stevens would have also received notice of his hearing for rescission, even though he has not provided this Court with the documents. Stevens has not demonstrated illegal incarceration or restraint. Section 46-22- 101(1), MCA. He is not entitled to immediate release. Therefore, ITISORDEREDthat Stevens'sPetition for WritofHabeasCorpus isDENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to counsel of record and to Bradley K. Stevens personally. DATEDthis I L(‘::--

day ofDecember, 2022.

# (J•7-mgea

." j (#44--.- ustices / 1

2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 24891]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12145]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6633]


In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of Abu Nidal 
Organization Movement (ANO) and Palestinian Liberation Front--Abu Abbas 
Faction (PLF) and All Designated Aliases, as Foreign Terrorist 
Organizations Pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as Amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this 
matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 
2003 re-designation of the aforementioned organizations as foreign 
terrorist organizations have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designation and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation of the designations.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designations of the 
aforementioned organizations as foreign terrorist organizations, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 13 2009.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-12145 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of ARETE INDUSTRIES, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Herzog, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report full complies with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of
     the Securities Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ John Herzog
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           John Herzog, Interim Chief Financial
                                           and Accounting Officer

     Dated: August 22, 2005

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
     been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
     furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,154,000 
<SECURITIES>                                         0 
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,864,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                                   843,000 
<INVENTORY>                                 32,839,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            68,528,000 
<PP&E>                                      23,831,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,379,000 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,152,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,797,000 
<BONDS>                                      3,537,000 
<COMMON>                                        14,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<OTHER-SE>                                  70,669,000 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,152,000 
<SALES>                                     87,681,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            87,681,000 
<CGS>                                       52,734,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               75,733,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               267,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               378,000 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             341,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,681,000 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,520,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,161,000 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,161,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2471 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2471

 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of 
   manufacturing equipment entered on or after October 21, 1998, and 
                         before July 10, 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of 
   manufacturing equipment entered on or after October 21, 1998, and 
                         before July 10, 1999.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN MANUFACTURING 
              EQUIPMENT ENTERED ON OR AFTER OCTOBER 21, 1998, AND 
              BEFORE JULY 10, 1999.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520) or any other provision of law, 
not later than 90 days after the receipt of the request described in 
subsection (b), any article--
            (1) that was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
        consumption--
                    (A) on or after October 21, 1998; and
                    (B) before July 10, 1999; and
            (2) with respect to which heading 9902.84.81, 9902.84.83, 
        9902.84.85, 9902.84.87 (as in effect on December 31, 2001), 
        9902.84.89, or 9902.84.91 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 
        the United States would have applied if such article had been 
        entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on 
        December 31, 2001,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if heading 9902.84.81, 
9902.84.83, 9902.84.85, 9902.84.87 (as in effect on December 31, 2001), 
9902.84.89, or 9902.84.91, whichever is applicable, applied to such 
entry or withdrawal, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall 
refund any excess duty paid with respect to such entry.
    (b) Requests.--Liquidation or reliquidation may be made under 
subsection (a) with respect to any entry only if a request therefor is 
filed with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, not later than 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, that contains sufficient 
information to enable U.S. Customs and Border Protection--
            (1) to locate the entry; or
            (2) to reconstruct the entry if it cannot be located.
                                 <all>
```
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                          5
<LEGEND>
                                                        EXHIBIT 27.1

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements included in the Registration
Statement.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                                                            
                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                            180948
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       180948
<PP&E>                                            1886969
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2067917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  87114
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          2536
<OTHER-SE>                                             9485280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           2067917  
<SALES>                                           1301403
<TOTAL-REVENUE>                                        1301403
<CGS>                                                  118200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     118200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       458849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        724354
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      724354
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
        

</TABLE>
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 23

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 on any day from Sunday, March 20, 2005, through Sun4 day, April 3, 2005, on a motion offered pursuant to this

5 concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his des6 ignee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Mon7 day, April 4, 2005, or until such other time as may be

8 specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the

9 motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any re10 assembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolu11 tion, whichever occurs first; and that when the House ad12 journs on any day from Sunday, March 20, 2005, through

13 Monday, April 4, 2005, on a motion offered pursuant to

14 this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his

15 designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday,

16 April 5, 2005, or until the time of any reassembly pursu17 ant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

18 occurs first.
 †

2

SCON 23 ES

1 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

2 Speaker of the House, or their respective designees, acting

3 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the

4 Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify

5 the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to re6 assemble at such place and time as they may designate

7 whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall war8 rant it.

Passed the Senate March 20, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 23

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess

the House of Representatives.of the Senate, and a conditional adjournment of
#### The Board of Managers of Bridge Tower Place Condominium, Respondent, v Starr Associates LLP et al., Appellants.

[975 NYS2d 41]

*527Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered on or about December 12, 2012, which, in an action alleging legal malpractice, granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and dismissing defendants’ affirmative defenses of comparative fault, and denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This Court previously held that the stipulation drafted by defendants unambiguously stripped plaintiff of its right to amend its bylaws to attain a specific result in connection with the underlying action *(see Luzzi v Bridge Tower Place Condominium, 52*AD3d 290 [1st Dept 2008]). Under those circumstances, no expert testimony was necessary to establish that defendants’ conduct fell below the standards of the profession generally *(see S & D Petroleum Co. v Tamsett,*144 AD2d 849, 850 [3d Dept 1988]). Because the alternative to the stipulation was not, as defendants contend, to litigate the underlying action, but for plaintiff to exercise its right to amend the bylaws immediately, the motion court did not err in finding “but for causation” as a matter of law *(cf. Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP v Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc.,*10 AD3d 267, 271-272 [1st Dept 2004]).

Furthermore, although plaintiff’s president is an attorney, and did see drafts of the stipulation, the record does not raise a triable issue as to whether he arrogated to himself the role of drafting the stipulation, or micro-managed the negotiation. Rather, the record shows that plaintiff relied on counsel to effect the strategy of preserving in the stipulation the right to amend the bylaws. Accordingly, the defenses of comparative fault were properly dismissed *(see Mandel, Resnik & Kaiser, P.C. v E.I. Elecs., Inc.,*41 AD3d 386 [1st Dept 2007]). Concur— Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
#### B.B.C.F.D., S.A., et al., Plaintiffs, v Bank Julius Baer & Co., Ltd., et al., Respondents, and Baruch Ivcher et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (And Other Actions.)

Submitted December 7, 2009;

decided January 19, 2010

Reported below, 62 AD3d 425.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
MISSION

To save lives, prevent injuries, and reduce the costs of traffic crashes – 

among drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and bicyclists

MOTOR VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT

We are responsible for the safety of the design, 

manufacture and performance of motor vehicles 

and equipment – that includes cars, trucks, buses, 

ambulances, shuttles and any related equipment, 

including tires and car seats.

In doing our jobs,

• We crash-test cars; 

• We test cars and equipment for cybervulnerabilities, electrical defects, and other 

safety risks;

• We write regulations so that manufacturers can 

self-certify that they meet safety standards;

• We review thousands of safety complaints each 

month, and perform detailed investigations 

where warranted;

• We oversee safety recalls of motor vehicles and 

equipment;

• We perform research on new and emerging 

technologies and develop science-based test 

procedures; and

• We regulate how far a vehicle must travel on a 

gallon of fuel.
14268-042319-v3a

PEOPLE

We are charged by Congress to change human 

behaviors that can lead to traffic crashes. Those 

risky behaviors include: driving while impaired 

by alcohol or drugs, not wearing a seat belt in 

a vehicle, driving distracted, speeding, improper 

use or lack of using proper child restraints, 

and walking or riding a bicycle while impaired 

or distracted. 

• We develop public education campaigns to 

support safe decisions by drivers, passengers, 

bicyclists, and pedestrians. 

• We share information on vehicle, tire, 

car seat, and other equipment ratings so 

consumers can make informed purchasing 

decisions.

• Two-thirds of our budget goes to funding 

State traffic safety programs in public 

education, law enforcement, toxicology, 

and the judicial system. 

• We collect and analyze data from all of 

the States to build a national database of 

traffic risk.

• We investigate crashes to learn how human 

and vehicle factors contribute to crashes.

What role does NHTSA have in 

supporting first responders?

• We coordinate the national EMS system.

• We co-coordinate the national 911 system.
[944 NE2d 1135, 919 NYS2d 496]

#### East Hampton Union Free School District, Appellant, v Sandpebble Builders, Inc., Defendant, and Victor Canseco, Respondent.

Argued January 12, 2011;

decided February 22, 2011

*776APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP,*New York City *(Bernard J. Garbutt, III,*and *Marc Shanker*of counsel), for appellant.

*Esseks, Hefter & Angel, LLP,*Riverhead *(Theodore D. Sklar, Stephen R. Angel*and *Nancy Silverman*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In this litigation brought by a school district against a corporation it had hired to perform construction management services, the school district sought to pierce the corporate veil to hold Victor Canseco, the president and sole shareholder of the corporation, personally liable for alleged breaches of certain corporate obligations. In order for a plaintiff to state a viable claim against a shareholder of a corporation in his or her individual capacity for actions purportedly taken on behalf of the corporation, plaintiff must allege facts that, if proved, indicate that the shareholder exercised complete domination and control over the corporation and “abused the privilege of doing business in the corporate form to perpetrate a wrong or injustice” *(Matter of Morris v New York State Dept. of Taxation & Fin.,*82 NY2d 135, 142 [1993]). Since, by definition, a corporation acts through its officers and directors, to hold a shareholder/officer such as Canseco personally liable, a plaintiff must do more than merely allege that the individual engaged in improper acts or acted in “bad faith” while representing the corporation. In this case, plaintiff failed to allege any facts indicating that Canseco engaged in acts amounting to an abuse or perversion of the corporate form, much less that the school district was harmed as a result of such actions. Under the circumstances, the Appellate Division did not err in failing to direct that plaintiff be permitted to file an amended complaint as the record affords no basis to conclude that the deficiency could have been cured by repleading.

*777Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.