alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory Committee (TRANSTAC) will meet on November 5, 2009, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 6087B, 14th Street between Pennsylvania & Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to transportation and related equipment or technology.

*Agenda:*

1. Welcome and Introductions.

2. Review Status of Working Groups.

3. Proposals from the Public.

4. Closing Comments.

                    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at                     *Yspringer@bis.doc.gov*                     no later than October 29, 2009.                

The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent time permits, members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to Committee members, the Committee suggests that presenters forward the public presentation materials to Yvette Springer.

For more information contact Ms. Springer on (202) 482-2813.

Dated: October 15, 2009. 

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E9-25191 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
#### Albert Killian et al., Respondents, v Kevin Heiman, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 918]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered August 17, 2011. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant to dismiss the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order that, inter alia, denied his motion to dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice on the ground that one of the plaintiffs failed to appear at trial for a scheduled cross-examination. Defendant’s contention that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying that motion involves matters outside the record on appeal. We therefore are unable to determine the merits of defendant’s *1460contention, and defendant, “as the appellant, . . . must suffer the consequences” of submitting an incomplete record *(Matter of Santoshia L.,*202 AD2d 1027, 1028 [1994]; *see Matter of Rodriguez v Ward,*43 AD3d 640, 641 [2007]).

Present—Scudder, EJ., Peradotto, Sconiers, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.
CJnrb Burtrtct Court of State of Florida

Opinion filed DEC 2018 Not final until disposition of timoly filed motion for rehearing.

No. 18-2532

Lower Tribunal No. 18-1804

Alvaro Elias,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Diane V. Ward,

Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant

Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken,

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER DENYING POST-TRIAL RELEASE

PER CURIAM.
Alvaro Elias seeks review of the trial court's denial of Elias's Florida Rule of

Criminal Procedure 3.190(b) motion for post-trial release pending review of his

conviction and sentence. We have jurisdiction. SeeFla. R. App. P. 9.140(h)(4). In

denying Elias's motion for post-trial release, the trial court was required to enter

written order setting forth the factual basis on which the court reached its decision

and the reasons for its denial. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.691 (b); Fla. R. App. P.

9.140(h)(3). The lower court committed reversible error in failing to enter such

written order. See Metayer v. State, 52 So. 3d 691, 692 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010);

Montgomery v. State, 788 So. 2d 274, 275 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Buckhalter v. State,

416 So. 2d 862, 862 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Accordingly, we grant Elias's motion for

review, reverse the denial of Elias's motion for post-trial release, and remand for the

lower court to reconsider Elias's motion in accordance with the applicable criminal

and appellate rules within three days of the date of this opinion. If the lower court

again denies post-trial release, it must make the necessary written findings to support

the denial.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Events 
-  NIDCD Calendar of Events 

# Robert J. Wenthold Memorial Lectures

This lecture series honors the memory of Robert J. Wenthold, Ph.D., who passed away in 2009. Dr. Wenthold was an extraordinary scientist, mentor, and administrator within NIDCD and served as NIDCD’s scientific director from 1998 through 2008. He was a vital force in helping to build a strong research foundation in NIDCD’s intramural program in areas such as genetics, molecular and developmental biology, computational modeling, and brain imaging. This lecture series has concluded, but many previous lectures have been archived and can be viewed on videocast. We continue to honor Dr. Wenthold’s legacy and achievements.

## Upcoming Events

This event series has concluded. There are no upcoming events.

View all upcoming NIDCD events

## Previous Events

Planar Cell Polarity Signaling in Synaptic Function and Dysfunction
Nathalie Sans, Ph.D., Institute Francois Megendie, Universite de Bordeaux

Function, Dysfunction, and Restoration of Auditory Sensory Transduction Channels
Jeffrey R. Holt, Ph.D., F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital; Harvard Medical School

Sounds in Silence: How the Cochlea Promotes Refinement of Auditory Circuits before Hearing Onset 
Dwight Bergles, Ph.D., Johns Hopkins University

View all previous events for the Robert J. Wenthold Memorial Lectures
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       8,633,314
<SECURITIES>                                30,759,352
<RECEIVABLES>                                  322,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,841,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            41,814,215
<PP&E>                                      17,680,521
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,371,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,123,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,507,980
<BONDS>                                      1,198,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,339,225
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,077,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,123,457
<SALES>                                        932,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,957,214
<CGS>                                          539,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,967,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             405,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,913,868)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,913,868)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,913,868)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.67) 
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Shane Begor, Claimant, v Mark Holmes, Doing Business as Four Seasons Logging, et al., Respondents, and Brenner & McHugh, Inc., et al., Respondents, and American Zurich Insurance Company, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Submitted June 21, 2010;

decided September 2, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
   **Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
   In
connection with the annual report of Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas P, Baker, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
      March 7, 2005
    /s/
      Douglas P. Baker
      Douglas P. Baker
      Chief
      Financial Officer
#### Family M. Foundation Ltd., Respondent, v Ninotchka Manus, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Submitted June 21, 2010;

decided September 14, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
   NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-79622, 333-17521,
333-94269, 333-124821, 333-126817, 333-126823 and 333-159363) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-146235 and 333-159321) on
Form S-3 of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our reports dated March 11, 2010, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report
on Form 10-K of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Our report on the consolidated financial statements, refers to the Company's change in method of
accounting for fair value due to the adoption of new accounting standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standards
Board, as of January 1, 2008.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Princeton, New Jersey 
   March 11, 2010

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2014

t0127 

# Order

Clerk January 31, 2014

147801

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147801

COA: 301622

Wayne CC: 10

- 004848

- FC

PETER NORMAN DABISH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex">
    <title>Health Statistics - NIDDK</title>
    
<meta name="VIcurrentDateTime" content="638490765256397183" />
<meta name="VirtualFolder" content="/" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="/layouts/system/VisitorIdentification.js"></script>

</head>
<body>
    <div></div>
</body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Thornburg Mortgage, Inc.:

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-125125 and No. 333-128389), both on Form S-3 of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc., of our report dated February 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of
Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated income statement, statement of shareholders equity, and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and the related financial statement
schedule  mortgage loans on real estate, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP                             
|                                         
|KPMG LLP                                 
|Albuquerque, New Mexico February 28, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,210
<PP&E>                                           5,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,805
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,143
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,196
<SALES>                                         64,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,138
<CGS>                                           53,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,285
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,922
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,139
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,782
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of American Consolidated
Management Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Herschel J. Walker, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

  /s/ Herschel J. Walker
---------------------------
Herschel J. Walker
Chief Executive Officer
April 13, 2005
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40929 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID MEEKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:96-CR-26-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Meeks appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea

conviction for possession with the intent to distribute crack

cocaine. He argues that the disparate sentencing provisions for

crack cocaine and cocain powder contained in the Sentencing

Guidelines offend the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of

the Constitution. 
No. 97-40929

- 2 -

 We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and find no reversible error in Meeks’s sentence. See United

States v. Meeks, No. 6:96CR00026-001 (E.D. Tex. July 29, 1997). 

Because Meeks’s argument of error is wholly without merit, this

appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6973** 

MICHAEL S. GORBEY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:12

- cv
- 00667

- RAJ

- TEM )

Submitted : September 26 , 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael S. Gorbey, Appellant Pro Se. Rosemary Virginia Bourne, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding preceden t in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael S. Gorbey seeks to appeal the district court’s
denial of his appeal from the magistrate judge’s order
substituting the proper party as Respondent to his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2006) petition and directing him to remedy filing

deficiencies

. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (200 6 ), and certain interlocutory
and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (200 6 ); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

-
46 (1949). The order Gorbey seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

conte ntions are adequately prese nted in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20125

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARRY A. GRAVES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CR-H-95-243-1

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry Graves appeals from the district court’s denial of his

motion to reinstate his appeal from the dismissal of his appeal

from the magistrate judge’s ruling finding him guilty of

resisting arrest and parking violations on federal property. The

Government has filed in this court a motion to dismiss Graves’

appeal. 

In his two-page brief on appeal, Graves argues only the
No. 96-20125

- 2 -

sufficiency of the evidence that the Government presented at his

trial before the magistrate judge. The magistrate judge’s ruling

is not a final judgment from a district court necessary to invoke

this court’s jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. As Graves

provides no argument on the only appealable issue, whether the

district court erred by denying Graves’ motion to reinstate his

appeal from the magistrate judge’s ruling, the issue is deemed

abandoned. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir.

1993). With no appealable issue before the court, the

Government’s motion is GRANTED and Graves’ appeal is DISMISSED.

APPEAL DISMISSED.