alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          360,382
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    151,000
<COMMON>                                    21,966,577
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,477,959)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         94,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,997
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  289,488
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (219,101)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (219,101)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (219,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11873]



[[Page 23893]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,757]


Corning, Incorporated, Blacksburg Virginia Plant, Environmental 
Products Division, Christiansburg, VA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 6, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by the United Steelworkers of America, Local 1022 on behalf of 
workers of Corning, Incorporated, Blacksburg Virginia Plant, 
Environmental Products Division, Christiansburg, Virginia.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of April, 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-11873 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Faye M. Eaton et al., Appellants, v Wayne Teachers Association et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 3, 2011;

decided February 24, 2011

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
#### State v. Simon

Case below: 185 N.C. App. — (7 August 2007)

No. 453P07

Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-1483)

Denied 10/11/07
Exhibit 31.1

                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Jim Miller, certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this quarterly  report on form 10-QSB/A of CNH
                  Holdings Company.

         2.       Based on my knowledge,  this quarterly report does not contain
                  any untrue  statement  of a  material  fact or omit to state a
                  material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light
                  of the  circumstances  under which such  statements were made,
                  not  misleading  with  respect to the  period  covered by this
                  quarterly report.

         3.       Based on my  knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other
                  financial  information  included  in  this  quarterly  report,
                  fairly   present  in  all  material   respects  the  financial
                  condition,  results  of  operations  and  cash  flows  of  the
                  registrant  as of,  and for,  the  periods  presented  in this
                  quarterly report;

         4.       I am responsible for establishing  and maintaining  disclosure
                  controls  and  procedures  (as defined in  Exchange  Act Rules
                  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a)       Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure
                  that  material   information   relating  to  the   registrant,
                  including its consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us
                  by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
                  period in which this quarterly report is being prepared.

         b)       Evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure
                  controls and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to
                  the filing  date of this  quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation
                  Date"); and

         c)       Presented in this quarterly  report our conclusions  about the
                  effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based
                  on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5.       I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the
                  registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
                  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
                  functions):

         a)       All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation of
                  internal   controls   which   could   adversely   affect   the
                  registrant's ability to record, process,  summarize and report
                  financial  data  and  have  identified  for  the  registrant's
                  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b)       Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management
                  or  other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the
                  registrant's internal controls; and


Date: February 26, 2004

/s/ Jim Miller
Jim Miller
Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dustin Nathaniel MILLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-14190

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 7, 2009.

Dustin Nathaniel Miller, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.

Steven E. Butler, Mobile, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before BIRCH, HULL and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Earl Shields, appointed counsel for Dustin Miller in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Miller’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathaniel Syville, Appellant.

Submitted December 21, 2009;

decided January 12, 2010

Reported below, 2009 NY Slip Op 73324(U).

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Order filed December 10, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00237-CR

____________

RYAN COLEMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1619943

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 10, 2019. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. On July 11, 2019, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record 

within 30 days. The complete record has not been filed with the court. Volumes 1, 

7, 9, and 10 are missing from the record. Because the complete reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.
We order Arlene Webb, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. No further extension will be 

entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are 

jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 35.3(c). If does not timely file the record as ordered, we may issue an 

order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the 

failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth Allen, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 335]

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), dated November 18, 2011, which denied, without a hearing, his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on February 25, 1999.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for a new determination of the defendant’s motion, in accordance herewith.

CPL 440.46 (3), provides, in pertinent part, that “[t]he provisions of section twenty three of chapter seven hundred thirty eight of the laws of two thousand four shall govern the proceedings on and determination of a motion brought pursuant to this section.” Section 23 of chapter 738 of the Laws of 2004 states, in pertinent part: “The court shall offer an opportunity for a hearing and bring the applicant before it. The court may also conduct a hearing, if necessary, to determine . . . any controverted issue of fact relevant to the issue of sentencing.” The defendant’s presence is not required where the court determines as a matter of law that a defendant is not entitled to relief pursuant to CPL 440.46 *(see People v Vaughan,*62 AD3d 122, 129 [2009]). However, here, the People conceded that the defendant met the statutory requirements for relief pursuant to CPL 440.46, and the question before the court was whether substantial justice dictated that the motion should be denied. Thus, the defendant is entitled to appear before the court and to be given an opportunity to be heard *(see People v Martin,*94 AD3d 637 [2012]; *People v Scarborough, 88*AD3d 585, 585-586 [2011]; *People v Jenkins,*86 AD3d 522, 523 [2011]; *People v Moreno,*58 AD3d 643, 644 [2009]; 7-75 New York Criminal Practice § 75.13-b). Since the defendant was not brought before the court, and there is no indication that he knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily relinquished that right *(cf. People v Benitez-Fernandez,*96 AD3d 1665, 1665-1666 [2012]), the order appealed from must be reversed, and the matter remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for a new determination of the defendant’s motion, to be made after affording him an opportunity to appear before the court, and, if necessary, conducting a hearing *(see People v Moreno,*58 AD3d at 644).

Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Leventhal and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
#### Pulver *against*M'Intyre.

eoSnis^ueá conrí,aJagaiMt defen tot, *°C-Jlt°Sie fm tHS~*"Mc^to lerve rests him during *suffer”i£a?Jgl*|Jtfe J1* wdya“tt'bo°exi t¿”ty0days.th>

UN ERROR, on *certiorari*to a justice’s court.

The plaintiff in error, who was also plaintiff in the court below, brought an action against the defendant, who was a constable, for the escape of one *Johnson,*ft appeared on the trial, that the plaintiff obtained judgment against Johnson, in a justice’s court, on the 9th of *May,*1815; that an execution was issued on the same day, and put into the hands of the defendant, whereon JoknsQnV?as arrested, and permitted by the defendant to go at large for nine days, upon one *Miller*undertaking that, at the expiration of nine days, *Johnson*should surrender himself to the defendant, which was done, and *Johnson*committed to-prison. A verdict, and judgment, was given in the court below for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

The judgment must be reversed. *The*constable permitting the defendant to go at large for nine days was a Voluntary escape, and the plaintiff’s cause of action accrued immediately upon the escape. Although a constable has thirty ■days in which to serve an execution against the body,' yet, if he does serve it within that time, he has no right to .permit the defendant to go at large;, and his having him in custody at the expiration of the thirty days, will not excuse the escape. The. present action was commenced while *Johnson*was at large, and before he surrendered himself to the constable, pursuant to hi? agreement.

Judgment reversed.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED,
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           The undersigned executive officers of the registrant hereby certify
that this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained herein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant.

                                            Parkvale Financial Corporation

Dated:  April 30, 2004

                                            By:  /s/ Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.
                                                -------------------------------
                                            Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.
                                            Director, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2485 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain machines for molding 

or forming pneumatic tires. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

machines for molding or forming pneumatic tires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MACHINES FOR MOLDING OR FORM4 ING PNEUMATIC TIRES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.84.10 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain machines for molding or forming pneumatic tires) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2485 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             129
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   129
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1105645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     750000
<COMMON>                                        291404
<OTHER-SE>                                     3166718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       129
<SALES>                                         967260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                967260
<CGS>                                           823028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1060693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                235665
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               32386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (93433)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (93433)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (1367439)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1460872)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.159)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Richard Aviles, Appellant, v Katty Villapando et al., Respondents.

[977 NYS2d 244]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered April 5, 2012, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the threshold issue of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

Defendants established prima facie through the affirmed reports of their expert physician and radiologist that the 25-year-old plaintiff had fully recovered from any sprains or strains sustained to his cervical and lumbar spine as a result of the accident, and that the MRI films of the allegedly injured body parts revealed a chronic preexisting condition and no radio-*535graphic evidence of trauma or causally related injury. The MRI reports prepared by plaintiffs radiologist following the accident confirmed the presence of diffuse degenerative disc disease, as well as bulging discs.

However, in opposition, plaintiff raised an issue of fact by submitting affirmations by the chiropractor who treated him after his accident and a radiologist. The chiropractor stated that plaintiff had significant measurable limitations in range of motion shortly after the accident, and upon recent examination. Regarding the evidence of plaintiffs preexisting degenerative changes, the chiropractor concluded that plaintiff was asymptomatic before the accident and, based on his examination of plaintiff and review of his medical records, that plaintiffs injuries were significant, and causally related to the accident, and not merely a preexisting, degenerative condition *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]; *McIntosh v Sisters Servants of Mary,*105 AD3d 672 [1st Dept 2013]). Plaintiffs radiologist concurred that the MRIs showed degenerative changes that may occur as a result of aging, but disagreed that there was no radiographic evidence of traumatic injury. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONCFO



In connection with the Annual Report of Exploration & Production Company (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen A. Thorington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



To the best of my knowledge, after
reasonable investigation:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 11, 2004.



/s/    Stephen A. ThoringtonStephen A. Thorington Chief Financial Officer




The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Louis A. Bianco, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CTI BioPharma Corp.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

| Dated: April 30, 2015 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Louis A. Bianco        |
|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|                  |   |   |   | Louis A. Bianco            |
|                  |   |   |   | Executive Vice President   |
|                  |   |   |   | Finance and Administration |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christian Bueno, Appellant.

Submitted August 16, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn W.L. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.