alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ending March 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James E. Deason, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



/s/ James E. Deason


James E. Deason
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003
The District Court of the 1st Judicial District. County of Lewis and Clark.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. TIMOTHY HARRIS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. CDC-2003-296 DECISION

On November 5,2009, the defendant was sentenced to five (5) years in the Montana State Prison for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the offense of Count I: Burglary, a felony.

On May 6,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Kara Docherty. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was farther advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is *43presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2010.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
Order filed December 12, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00971

- CR NO. 14

- 12

- 01011

- CR

____________ FRANKIE RAYSHAWN HIL L

- TURNER , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 10

- DCR

- 056063 & 10

- DCR

- 056064



### ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original s of State's exhibit 105, a DVD and Defendant's exhibit 1, a DVD.The clerk of the 434th Judicial District Court is directed to deliver to the

Clerk of this court the original s of State's exhibit 105, a DVD and Defendant's exhibit 1, a DVD, on or before Decembe r 31, 2013. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe th ese original exhibit s ; to deliver them to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original s of State's exhibit 105, a DVD and Defendant's exhibit 1, a DVD, to the clerk of the 434th Judicial District Court.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly  Report of CNH Holdings  Company on Form 10-QSB
for the period  ending  December  31,  2002,  as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  Charles  Stidham,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s Charles Stidham
Treasurer and Director
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
February 5, 2002
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Grants 
-  Funding Opportunities 

# Agriculture and Food Research Initiative - Water for Agriculture Challenge Area

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

This AFRI Challenge Area addresses critical water resources issues such as drought, excess soil moisture, flooding, quality and others in an agricultural context. Funding will be used to develop management practices, technologies, and tools for farmers, ranchers, forest owners and managers, public decision makers, public and private managers, and citizens to improve water resource quantity and quality. The long-term goal of the AFRI Water for Agriculture Challenge Area is to tackle critical water issues by developing both regional systems for the sustainable use and reuse, flow and management of water, and at the watershed and farm scales, water issues focused on production and environmental sustainability efforts. Project types supported within this Challenge area are multi-function Integrated Research, Education, and/or Extension Projects and Food and Agricultural Enhancement (FASE) Grants.

Apply For GrantDownload RFA

NIFA Language Access Services

AFRI Water for Agriculture Challenge Area

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (AFRI)

Environmental and Resource Economics Programs 

Water Programs 

Thursday, May 5, 2016

James P. Dobrowolski

Thursday, August 4, 2016

grantapplicationquestions@usda.gov

FY 2015 AFRI Water - March 31, 2015(pdf - 1.14 MB)

Natural Resources

Water
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20814

aster.kenea@nih.gov

October 2022

Back to Top
Form of Amendment No. 3 to Customer Agreement


 Exhibit 10.05(c) 
 FORM OF 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 TO 
 CUSTOMER AGREEMENT 
 WHEREAS, MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER WCM L.P., formerly known as Morgan Stanley Charter Millburn L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Customer”), and MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED, formerly
Morgan Stanley DW Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Commodity Broker”), have agreed to amend the Customer Agreement, dated as of the 13th day of November 2000, as amended and supplemented from time to time, (the “Customer
Agreement”), by and between the Customer and the Commodity Broker, to reflect the merger of Morgan Stanley DW Inc. into Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, and to amend the rate of interest income credited to the Customer’s account
by the Commodity Broker. Terms used and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Customer Agreement. 
 WHEREAS, all provisions contained in the Customer Agreement remain in full force and effect and are modified only to the extent necessary to provide for the amendments set forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby amend the Customer Agreement as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Morgan Stanley DW Inc. has been merged into Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and any references to “DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC.”, the predecessor to Morgan
Stanley DW Inc., shall mean “MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED”. 

  

	 	2.	The third sentence of Section 7 Investment of Customer Funds is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

 “The Commodity Broker will credit the Customer with interest income on the Customer’s funds on deposit with the Commodity Broker and its
affiliates at each month-end. Funds held by the Commodity Broker and its affiliates to meet the margin requirements on the Customer’s futures, forward, and option contracts will be credited with interest income at a rate approximately
equivalent to the rate the Commodity Broker and its affiliates pay other customers on margin deposits. Funds not required to meet such margin requirements will be credited with interest income at a rate equal to the monthly average of the 4-Week
U.S. Treasury bill discount rate during such month.” 
  

	 	3.	This Amendment No. 3 shall be governed and construed under the laws of the State of New York. 

  






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 3 to the Customer Agreement has been executed for and on
behalf of the undersigned as of the [    ] day of [    ] 2007. 
  

			
	MORGAN STANLEY CHARTER WCM L.P.
		
	By:	 	 Demeter Management Corporation,
 General
Partner

		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:


  

			
	MORGAN STANLEY & CO. INCORPORATED
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jermaine M. Kidd, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 601]

Stein, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered January 30, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

As part of an agreement resolving numerous charges against him, defendant pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging him with felony driving while intoxicated and waived his right to appeal. Defendant was advised that he would be subject to a prison term to be followed by a period of conditional discharge, but County Court did not make any further commitments with regard to sentencing beyond directing that the sentence run concurrently with that imposed upon another conviction. County Court ultimately sentenced defendant to a prison term of 1 to 4 years to be followed by a conditional discharge of three years. Defendant now appeals.

While we reject the People’s contention that certain of defendant’s arguments are unpreserved, we nevertheless affirm. *1268Inasmuch as defendant pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated, his participation in an alcohol and drug treatment program was not a mandatory component of his sentence *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [10] [a] [ii]), and we reject his claim that his plea was invalid based upon County Court’s failure to impose it. Moreover, defendant was made aware that a period of conditional discharge would be a component of his sentence, but he was not advised of the duration of that period *(see*Penal Law §§ 60.21, 65.05 [3] [a]; Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1193 [1] [c] [iii]). Contrary to defendant’s argument, that omission did not render his plea involuntary because County Court made no commitment as to the length of the conditional discharge to be imposed *(see People v Newman,*99 AD3d 1107, 1108 [2012]; *People v Cullen,*62 AD3d 1155, 1156-1157 [2009], *lv denied*13 NY3d 795 [2009]).

Peters, PJ., Spain and Garry, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carlton H. Baab, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of TigerLogic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of TigerLogic Corporation.



By:

/s/ Carlton H. BaabName:

Carlton H. BaabTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer


I, Thomas Lim, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of TigerLogic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of TigerLogic Corporation.



By:

/s/ Thomas LimName:

Thomas LimTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.5



SECOND AMENDMENT TO UNIMPROVED COMMERCIAL PROPERTY EARNEST MONEY CONTRACT



This Second Amendment to Unimproved Commercial Property Earnest Money
Contract (Second Amendment) dated as of December 4, 2002, is entered into between Vision Park Joint Venture (Seller) and Dynacq International, Inc. (Buyer).



| | A. | Buyer and Seller have entered into an Unimproved Commercial Property Earnest Money Contract, the effective date of which is August 30, 2002 (Agreement), with respect to
the purchase and sell of certain real property more fully described in the Agreement (the Property).
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B. | The Agreement originally called for the Buyer to purchase 6.00 acres, more or less, as described on the exhibit attached as Exhibit A to the Agreement. The Buyer has
requested and the Seller has agreed, that the Buyer shall purchase 4.00 acres, more or less, not 6.00 acres.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | C. | In consideration of $10.00 and other good valuable consideration, the Agreement is hereby amended to provide hat the Exhibit A attached hereto, describing 4.00 acres of
land, is hereby replaced as a description of the Property to be sold under the Agreement.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | D. | Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement and all rights and powers created thereby or hereunder remain in full force and effect.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | E. | Signatures hereon by facsimile transmission shall be considered as original.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



SELLER:VISION PARK JOINT VENTUREBy:

/s/    JIM GALLOWAY,
PRESIDENT




BUYER:DYNACQ INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:

/s/    CHANTELL PRESTON, VICE PRESIDENT OF
DEVELOPMENT
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory GORDON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-30664.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Nov. 2, 2006.

Robert William Piedrahita, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Middle District of Louisiana, Baton Rouge, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gregory Gordon, Port Allen, LA, pro se.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gregory Gordon has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gordon has filed a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, Gordon’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                       975
<INVENTORY>                                     17,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,610
<PP&E>                                          16,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,837
<SALES>                                         94,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,850
<CGS>                                           69,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   682
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    401
<INCOME-TAX>                                       451
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (852)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (852)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Arctic Research Commission

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Arctic Research Commission will hold its 89th meeting in Washington, DC on June 16-18, 2009. The Business Session, open to the public, will convene at 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, June 16, 2009 in Washington, DC. An Executive Session will follow adjournment of the Business Session.

The Agenda items include:

(1) Call to order and approval of the Agenda. 

(2) Approval of the Minutes of the 88th Meeting. 

(3) Commissioners and Staff Reports. 

(4) Discussion of USARC Goals and Activities. 

The focus of the meeting will be reports and updates on programs and research projects affecting the Arctic. 

Any person planning to attend this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     John Farrell, Executive Director, U.S. Arctic Research Commission, 703-525-0111 or TDD 703-306-0090.                 

John Farrell, 

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. E9-12519 Filed 5-29-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Exhibit 10.21

NAPRO BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.  Schedule Required by Instruction 2 to Item 601  of Regulation S-K

Name of Director or Officer Who Delivered Signed Waiver Letter

Date of Waiver LetterSterling K. Ainsworth

September 11, 2003Kai P. Larson

September 10, 2003Gordon Link

September 10, 2003Patricia A. Pilia, Ph.D.

September 10, 2003Leonard P. Shaykin

September 12, 2003




September             ,
2003

NaPro
BioTherapeutics, Inc.
4840 Pearl East Circle
Suite 300W
Boulder, Colorado 80301
Attn: VP, General Counsel

Gentlemen:

I
refer you to section 6(f) of the Agreement. Capitalized terms not defined in this letter have the meanings given them in the Agreement.

Please
be advised that the undersigned Executive hereby unconditionally waives any right to assert that he or she has Good Reason to resign from employment with the Company if the
Company fails to comply with section 6(f)(ii) of the Agreement. This waiver is limited in its application solely to the anticipation or occurrence of the company's announced agreement on
August 26, 2003 to sell its worldwide generic injectable paclitaxel business to Faulding Pharmaceuticals Co. and shall not apply to any other transaction that could be deemed to be a Change of
Control.

|Very truly yours, |  | 
|----------------- |  | 
|Executive         |  | 
|/s/               |  | 



QuickLinks
#### State v. Boyce

Case below: 175 N.C. App. 663

No. 129A06

1. Def’s NOA (Dissent) (COA05-279)

2. Def’s PDR as to Additional Issues

1. _

2. Allowed 03/08/07
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2570 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2570

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tetraethylthiuram.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tetraethylthiuram.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TETRAETHYLTHIURAM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.28 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Tetraethylthiuram) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```