alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
English Translation of Supplementary Agreement dated July 18, 2007



 Exhibit 10.8 
 Supplementary Agreement 
 SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT 
 ChinaEDU Corporation and Xie Changqing entered into this Supplementary Agreement as of July 18, 2007 in accordance with Section 10.3 of the Amended and Renewed
Loan Agreement entered into by the Parties as of July 12, 2005 after friendly negotiation, the Parties agree to make the following amendments to the Amended and Renewed Loan Agreement: 
  

	1.	Section 2.4 of the Amended and Renewed Loan Agreement shall be amended as: “Lender and Borrower hereby agree and acknowledge that, in the event that relevant laws permit,
Borrower may transfer the Borrower’s Equity Interest in the Company in whole to Lender or Lender’s designated persons (legal or natural persons), and shall use the income of the transfer to repay the loan”. 


 

	2.	Section 2.7 of the Amended and Renewed Loan Agreement shall be amended as: “Interest of the Loan. Lender and Borrower hereby agree and acknowledge that, unless otherwise
stipulated by this Agreement, the Loan shall be interest-free; however, in the event that the income of Borrower from the transfer of the Borrower’s Equity Interest in the Company in whole to Lender or Lender’s designated persons (legal or
natural persons) is higher than the principal of the Loan, the difference shall be deemed the interest of the Loan under relevant laws then effective and shall be paid by Borrower to Lender.” 

 The Parties hereby also agree: 
  

	1.	Other clauses of the Amended and Renewed Loan Agreement shall remain the same. 

  

	2.	This Supplementary Agreement shall be effective upon being signed and/or affixed the official seals by the Parties. This Supplementary Agreement is made in two copies with equal
legal validity, each Party holding one copy. 

  

	3.	The validity of this Supplementary Agreement shall be retroacted to July 12, 2005. 

  

			
	 ChinaEDU Corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Huang Bo

	Name:	 	Huang Bo
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Xie Changqing

	Name:	 	Xie Changqing
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV (the
Registrant) on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dennis J.
Tietz, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., the
General Partner of the Registrant, certify, based on my knowledge, that:

|               |  |                                                                                                                                                        | 
|-------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|(i)            |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                                 
|               |  |                                                                                                                                                       
|(ii)           |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Registrant.
|               |  |                                                                                                                                                       
|March 25, 2003

|   |  |                                      
|-- |  | -------------------------------------
|By |  | /s/ Dennis J. Tietz                  
|   |  |                                      
|   |  | Dennis J. Tietz,                     
|   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|   |  | Cronos Capital Corp.,                
|   |  | General Partner of the Registrant    



---

|* |  | This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be
filed with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations
promulgated by the Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Virginia Albizu, Respondent, v Jose Duval, Appellant.

Submitted October 19, 2009;

decided November 24, 2009

Reported below, 57 AD3d 384.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*13 NY3d 752 (2009)].
Exhibit 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-6867 of DEVELOPED TECHNOLOGY RESOURCE, INC. on Form S-8 of our report dated
January 2, 1997, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of DEVELOPED
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCE, INC. for the year ended October 31, 1996.

/s/ Lurie, Besikof, Lapidus & Co., LLP
LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP
                           
Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 27, 1997
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201800012

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

ETHAN A. AUGSBURGER

Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Forrest W. Hoover, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Headquarters and 

Support Battalion, School of Infantry-East, Training Command, 

Camp Lejeune, NC.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Major Nicholas A. Martz, 

USMC.

For Appellant: Captain Scott F. Hallauer, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 22 May 2018

_________________________

Before HUTCHISON, FULTON, and GEIS, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

 For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
English Translation of Supplementary Agreement dated July 18, 2007



 Exhibit 10.10 
 Supplementary Agreement 
 SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT 
 ChinaEDU Corporation and Yang Xueshan entered into this Supplementary Agreement as of July 18, 2007 in accordance with Section 10.3 of the Amended and Renewed
Loan Agreement entered into by the Parties in June 2005 after friendly negotiation, the Parties agree to make the following amendments to the Amended and Renewed Loan Agreement: 
  

	1.	Section 2.4 of the Amended and Renewed Loan Agreement shall be amended as: “Lender and Borrower hereby agree and acknowledge that, in the event that relevant laws permit,
Borrower may transfer the Borrower’s Equity Interest in the Company in whole to Lender or Lender’s designated persons (legal or natural persons), and shall use the income of the transfer to repay the loan”. 


 

	2.	Section 2.7 of the Amended and Renewed Loan Agreement shall be amended as: “Interest of the Loan. Lender and Borrower hereby agree and acknowledge that, unless otherwise
stipulated by this Agreement, the Loan shall be interest-free; however, in the event that the income of Borrower from the transfer of the Borrower’s Equity Interest in the Company in whole to Lender or Lender’s designated persons (legal or
natural persons) is higher than the principal of the Loan, the difference shall be deemed the interest of the Loan under relevant laws then effective and shall be paid by Borrower to Lender.” 

 The Parties hereby also agree: 
  

	1.	Other clauses of the Amended and Renewed Loan Agreement shall remain the same. 

  

	2.	This Supplementary Agreement shall be effective upon being signed and/or affixed the official seals by the Parties. This Supplementary Agreement is made in two copies with equal
legal validity, each Party holding one copy. 

  

	3.	The validity of this Supplementary Agreement shall be retroacted to June, 2005. 

  

			
	ChinaEDU Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Huang Bo

	Name:	 	Huang Bo
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Yang Xueshan

	Name:	 	Yang Xueshan
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10K FOR THE
PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                       593
<INVENTORY>                                      4,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,512
<PP&E>                                          10,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,691
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,596
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,056
<SALES>                                         42,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,759
<CGS>                                           20,020
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    10
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,218)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       103
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,321)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          117
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,438)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>              2,589,714
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                     0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                       0
<EQUITIES>                            2,035
<MORTGAGE>                           36,882
<REAL-ESTATE>                         8,644
<TOTAL-INVEST>                    2,863,527
<CASH>                               92,727
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                        0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>              139,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    6,031,401
<POLICY-LOSSES>                   2,757,500
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                   1,972
<POLICY-OTHER>                       38,319
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                69,247
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                     550,923
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                         254,127
<COMMON>                                301
<OTHER-SE>                          181,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      6,031,401
<PREMIUMS>                          459,158
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                 369,052
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                   14,068
<OTHER-INCOME>                       37,717
<BENEFITS>                          541,762
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>          79,291
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                625,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (424,628)
<INCOME-TAX>                         (3,369)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (421,259)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (441,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (15.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (15.23)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                            0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                       0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                         0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                        0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                          0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                           0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                   0


</TABLE>
#### Fieldstone Capital, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiffs, v Loeb Partners Realty, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[963 NYS2d 120]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered November 29, 2012, which denied plaintiffs-appellants’ motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion granted to the extent of ordering that defendants-respondents are enjoined from continuing to act or purporting to act as plaintiffs-appellants’ agent and property manager for the listed properties, and directing that the accounts in dispute be frozen and their contents held in escrow pending determination of this action.

In the 1990s, the parties entered into written contracts pursuant to which defendants agreed to act as agent and property manager with respect to certain properties owned by plaintiffs. In 2011, plaintiffs notified defendants that their agency was being terminated. Defendants took the position that the termination was ineffective given their residuary interests in the properties. Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking, among other things, an order enjoining defendants from continuing to purport to act as an agent for plaintiffs and requiring defendants to relinquish control over relevant bank and investment accounts. Several months later, plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction seeking the same relief.

*560The court improvidently exercised its discretion in failing to issue a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from continuing to assert that they are agents of plaintiff owners with respect to the specified properties. Plaintiff owners have a probability of success on the merits with respect to the effectiveness of their termination of their agent, have shown that they are suffering irreparable injury to the extent the properties they own continue to be managed by an agent they do not desire, and the balance of the equities weighs in their favor *(see e.g. Archdiocese of Ethiopian Orthodox Church in U.S. & Can. v Yesehaq,*232 AD2d 332 [1st Dept 1996]).

To the extent plaintiff owners also seek a preliminary order requiring defendants to turn over to their possession and control the contents of bank accounts that are contested by the parties, the circumstances presented in this case are not of such an extraordinary nature so as to warrant mandatory preliminary relief upsetting the status quo *(see St. Paul Fire & Mar. Ins. Co. v York Claims Serv.,*308 AD2d 347, 349 [1st Dept 2003]). However, in order to preserve the status quo, the contested accounts should be frozen and the funds held in escrow pending a determination as to the rights of the parties *(see e.g. Banana Kelly Community Improvement Assn, v Schur Mgt. Co., Ltd.,*34 Misc 3d 1207[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 50013[U] [Sup Ct, Bronx County 2012]).

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.R, DeGrasse, AbdusSalaam, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3411

___________

Kenyatta Williams, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 *

Dora Schriro, Dir. of Dept. of Corr.; *

Michael Bowersox, Superintendent; * Appeal from the United States

Linda Wilkson, Functional Unit * District Court for the

Manager; James M. Ruman, Regional * Eastern District of Missouri. 

Administrator; Steve Long, Dir., Div. *

Adult Institutions; Paul Delo, Former * [UNPUBLISHED]

Superintendent; Allen Luebbers, *

Former Asst. Superintendent; Deanna *

L. Hutchinson, Director of Nurses; *

Pedro Cayabyab, Doctor, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: February 5, 1999

 Filed: February 11, 1999 

___________

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. 

___________
The Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

PER CURIAM.

Kenyatta Williams appeals the district court’s order granting summary

1

judgment to defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he claimed that

defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth

Amendment, and that he was subjected to a sexual assault while being examined.

Upon a thorough review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude summary

judgment was proper and reject Mr. Williams’s additional arguments on appeal. 

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Mr.

Williams’s motions on appeal for appointment of counsel and an injunction.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
/**
 * @file
 * A JavaScript file for the theme.
 *
 * In order for this JavaScript to be loaded on pages, see the instructions in
 * the README.txt next to this file.
 */



// JavaScript should be made compatible with libraries other than jQuery by
// wrapping it with an "anonymous closure". See:
// - https://drupal.org/node/1446420
// - http://www.adequatelygood.com/2010/3/JavaScript-Module-Pattern-In-Depth
(function ($, Drupal, window, document) {
  'use strict';

  Drupal.behaviors.events = {
    attach: function (context) {
       var breakpoint = {};
        breakpoint.refreshValue = function () {
          this.value = window.getComputedStyle(document.querySelector('body'), ':before').getPropertyValue('content').replace(/\"/g, '');
        }; 

        
      $('.speakerCard').mouseover(function () {
        $(this).removeClass('cardImage')
               .addClass('cardBio');
      }).mouseout(function () {
        $(this).removeClass('cardBio')
               .addClass('cardImage');
      });
      
    }
  };
// To understand behaviors, see https://drupal.org/node/756722#behaviors
})(jQuery, Drupal, this, this.document);
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

JUNE 15, 2004                                           [FIRST STATE BANK LOGO]

                                                        FIRST STATE BANK
Mr. Thomas W. Wright, Chairman of the Board             Corey J. Coughlin
First State Bank                                        President & CEO
                                                        (941) 330-1865 Direct
                                                        (727) 542-7103 Cell

Dear Tom,

At your direction, I am writing this letter to confirm our agreement regarding
some elements of my compensation.

STOCK OPTIONS

I currently have options to purchase 30,000 shares of First State Financial
Corporation common stock at $5.25. These options vest evenly over a five-year
period at 6,000 shares a year, or at such time there is a change of control,
whichever comes first. As of this writing, I am presently vested in 12,000
shares, with an additional 6,000 shares vested by December 31, 2004.

PERFORMANCE BONUS

The profit plan for the year ended December 31, 2004 calls for after tax
earnings of $1.5 million and an ending asset level of $250 million. Should the
bank achieve this level of assets and create this level of profitability, I will
have earned a performance bonus of 30% of my base earnings. Should the bank grow
more than the plan, or earn more than the plan, I will earn a larger bonus. The
amount of this bonus will be at the discretion of the Chairman of the Board,
however, the bonus will be paid before the end of the month following the end of
the year.

I trust this letter is in agreement with your understanding. If that is the
case, please execute the original and copy of this letter and send back to me.

Sincerely,                              ACCEPTED BY:

/s/ Corey J. Coughlin                   /s/ Thomas W. Wright
---------------------------------       ----------------------------
Corey J. Coughlin                       Thomas W. Wright, Chairman
President and CEO                       First State Bank
First State Financial Corporation
First State Bank

TWWright06-15-2004

                                EXECUTIVE OFFICE:
                     22 5, Links Avenue, Sarasota, FL 34236
                        (941) 925-9000 (941) 951-6189 FAX

                                                              [MEMBER FDIC LOGO]