alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
**Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act Of 2002**
     OnMarch 31, 2005, Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2004 (the “Form 10-K”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thefollowing certifications are being made to accompany the Form 10-K:
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:
(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated:March 31, 2005 /s/ JAMES L. FARES   James L. Fares Chief Executive Officer
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
**Certification of Principal Accounting Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:
(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated:March 31, 2005 /s/ BARBARA J. MCKEE   Barbara J. McKee Principal Accounting Officer
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# Dictionary Definition: bladder

                  - bladder
                  - The balloon-shaped organ inside your lower abdomen that stores urine.
#### Womack Newspapers, Inc. v. Town of Kitty Hawk

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 1

No. 082P07

1. Defs’ (Harris, et al.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-1650)

2. Defs’ (Harris, et al.) Motion to Withdraw Petition

1. _

2. Allowed 03/08/07
EXHIBIT 11.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            A-FEM MEDICAL CORPORATION
                       CALCULATIONS OF NET LOSS PER SHARE

                                          For The Three Months               For The Nine Months
                                           Ended September 30                Ended September 30
                                    --------------------------------  --------------------------------
                                          2001              2000            2001              2000
                                    ---------------  ---------------  ---------------  ---------------
<S>                                 <C>              <C>              <C>               <C>
Actual weighted average
   shares outstanding for the period    10,127,839        9,596,558        9,808,096          9,579,892
Dilutive common and preferred stock,
   options and warrants using the
   treasury stock method(1)                     --                -               --                  -
                                    ---------------  ---------------  ---------------   ----------------

Total shares used in per
   share calculations                   10,127,839        9,596,558        9,808,096          9,579,892

Net loss                               $  (192,956)     $  (486,417)     $  (768,352)      $ (1,355,135)

Basic and diluted net loss per share$  $     (0.02)     $     (0.05)     $     (0.08)      $      (0.14)
                                    ===============  ===============  ===============   ================
</TABLE>





(1)      Preferred stock, warrants and options outstanding are not included, as
         the effect would be anti-dilutive.
#### Hy-Tech Constr., Inc. v. Wake Cty. Bd. of Educ.

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 389

No. 419P06

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-884)

Denied 01/25/07

Hudson, J., Recused
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United StatesCode**

 

I,Steven T. Campbell, the chief financial officer of United States CellularCorporation, certify that (i) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe second quarter of 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of United States CellularCorporation.

 
|   |   | /s/  Steven T. Campbell |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Steven  T. Campbell     |
|   |   | August 7,  2008    |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 has been provided to United States Cellular Corporation and will beretained by U.S. Cellular and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
August 16, 2022              BASIC            

Vittorio Sartorelli, M.D.

|

Laboratory of Muscle Stem Cells and Gene Regulation

|

## Description

This study investigated the molecular and epigenetic mechanisms that lead to the formation of muscle and neuronal cells from embryonic stem cells (ESCs) at the single-cell level. The report identifies regions of the genome called enhancers that control genes critical for muscle and neuronal cell differentiation.

## What is exciting about this article?

This study identified the underlying mechanisms that regulate the differentiation of ESCs into muscle and neuronal cells. These findings have the potential to provide important insights into muscle regenerative medicine through “in-a-dish” modeling of muscle disease, drug screening, and cell therapeutics.

## How does this fit into the larger NIAMS portfolio?

This paper provides valuable data for understanding how muscle cells are specified and committed, and for generating muscle progenitors starting from ESCs or induced pluripotent stem cells.

## Grant support

AR041164

Research Areas:
Computational BiologyDevelopmental BiologyGenetics and GenomicsMuscle BiologyStem Cell Biology

CORE Facilities:

Biodata Mining and Discovery Section

Genomic Technology Section

Reference:

###             Transcriptomics, regulatory syntax, and enhancer identification in mesoderm-induced ESCs at single-cell resolution.        

40(7).

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIHʼs National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

Previous

See All Advances

Next

## Recent Advances

Selected recent highlights of NIAMS intramural research:

October 3, 2023

The Transcription Factor STAT4 Controls the Fate of Cytotoxic Innate Lymphocytes

September 26, 2023

Genetic Variants of PLCG2 Cause Immune Dysregulation Through Either Increased or Decreased Function

September 26, 2023

The Microbiomes of People with Recombination-Activating Gene (RAG) Deficiency Have Distinct Features, Including Antimicrobial Resistance Signatures 

September 23, 2023

Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Trigger Pathogenic Inflammation and Bone Loss in Periodontitis

September 22, 2023

Possible Mechanism of a Rare Bone Overgrowth Disease Identified

Back to Top
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6593

ROBERT MORGAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GEORGE TRENT, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District

Judge. (CA-93-740-5)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 29, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. Silas Bent Taylor, Deputy Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. Appellant's case was

referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

(1988). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and

advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court

order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We

accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 9, 2021 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00032-CV 

E-SYSTEMS CORPORATION, RONALD FINLAYSON, AND DAVID 

ZISSKIND, Appellants 

V. 

LIQUID CAPITAL EXCHANGE, INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-16142 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Garcia 

Opinion by Justice Garcia 

We reinstate this appeal. In July 2018, we abated this case due to David 

Zisskind’s bankruptcy. See TEX.R. APP. P. 8.2. The Court conducted an independent 

review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system 

which shows the bankruptcy case associated with this appeal was terminated on 

October 15, 2018, effectively dissolving the automatic stay. 

We notified the parties by letter dated May 7, 2021, requesting they inform 

the Court of the status of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the 
 –2– 

failure to respond would result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. 

See id. 42.3(b),(c). To date, no party has responded. 

Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this 

appeal. See id. 42.3(b), (c); The Tex. Ranger Oil Co. v. Alamo Fluids, Inc., 2021 WL 

1731795, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas May 3, 2021, no pet. h.) (mem. op.). 

180032F.P05 

 

/Dennise Garcia/ 

DENNISE GARCIA 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

E-SYSTEMS CORPORATION, 

RONALD FINLAYSON, AND 

DAVID ZISSKIND, Appellants 

No. 05-18-00032-CV V. 

LIQUID CAPITAL EXCHANGE, 

INC., Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 14th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-16142. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia. 

Justices Myers and Partida-Kipness 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered June 9, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             924
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,292
<PP&E>                                         113,793
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  96,623
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,578
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           173
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    96,623
<SALES>                                         11,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,226
<CGS>                                            7,465
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,524
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,670)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,243)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,427)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

p0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

148240

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148240

COA: 315618

Midland CC: 00

- 009445

- FH

DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES III

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE No. 2024-03 

January 24, 2024 

Contact 

Media Relations 

Phone: (571) 557-5450 

Email: mediarelations@nga.mil

NGA launches National GEOINT Operations Center 

SPRINGFIELD, Virginia – The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency opened a new 24/7 

operations center to provide geospatial intelligence to the nation's policymakers and military 

forces around the world Jan. 24. 

NGA’s round-the clock “watch floor” has been in operation since the National Imagery and 

Mapping Agency, an NGA predecessor organization, was formed in 1996. Building on lessons 

learned from more than two decades of expertise and fusing multiple watch functions, the 

National GEOINT Operations Center delivers distinct visual products and geospatial information 

to military and national-level decision makers in an expanded and continuous mission-focused 

watch center. 

In many ways, the NGOC is parallel to the National Security Operations Center operated by the 

National Security Agency, said NGA Director Vice Adm. Frank Whitworth. 

Multiple watch teams are organized and led by senior-level officers to keep watch and provide 

time-critical decision advantage. The NGOC will drive NGA’s indicators and warning and global 

situational awareness mission from the watch floor. 

“Today we unite both our watches with a shared mission under one name, the National GEOINT 

Operations Center – the NGOC – for better warfighting, stronger communications and improved 

visibility,” said Whitworth, at the NGA Washington launch ceremony. 

The motto of the NGOC is “We own the night!” 

# # # 

About NGA 

NGA delivers world-class geospatial intelligence that provides a decisive advantage to policymakers, 

warfighters, intelligence professionals and first responders. 

NGA is a unique combination of intelligence agency and combat support agency. It is the world leader in 

timely, relevant, accurate and actionable geospatial intelligence. NGA enables the U.S. intelligence 

community and the Department of Defense to fulfill the president’s national security priorities to protect 

the nation. 

For more information about NGA, visit us online at nga.mil, Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook and X/Twitter.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12508]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11758]


California Disaster <greek-i>CA-00135 Declaration of Economic 
Injury

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of California, dated 05/21/2009.
    Incident: California Salmon Fishery Closure 2009.
    Incident Period: 04/08/2009 and continuing.
    Effective Date: 05/21/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/22/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for economic injury 
disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:
Primary Counties:
    Del Norte, Mendocino, Monterey, San Mateo, Santa Cruz, Sonoma.
Contiguous Counties:
California:
    Alameda, Fresno, Glenn, Humboldt, Kings, Lake, Marin, Napa, San 
Benito, San Francisco, San Luis Obispo, Santa Clara, Siskiyou, Solano, 
Tehama, Trinity.
Oregon:
    Curry, Josephine.
    The Interest Rate is: 4.000.
    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 117580.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are 
California, Oregon.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59002)

    May 21, 2009.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-12508 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned  constitutes and
appoints Richard G. Meise and Richard R. Douglas, and each of them, his true and
lawful   attorney-in-fact   and  agent  with  full  power  of  substitution  and
resubstitution,  for  him  and in his  name,  place  and  stead,  in any and all
capacities,  to sign the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
December 31, 1996,  for filing with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission by
Microtest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to
such  Form  10-K,  and to file  the  same  with all  exhibits  thereto,  and all
documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting to such  attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to all intents and purposes
as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.


         DATED:   February 22, 1997


                                                     /s/  William C. Turner
                                                     ----------------------
                                                       William C. Turner


STATE OF ARIZONA                    )
                                    ) ss.
County of Maricopa                  )


         On this 22nd day of February,  1997, before me, the undersigned  Notary
Public,  personally  appeared  William C.  Turner,  known to me to be the person
whose name is  subscribed  to the within  instrument  and  acknowledged  that he
executed the same for the purposes therein contained.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.


                                                     /s/  LaVonne L. Lindall
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Notary Public

My commission expires 6-5-98
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Vernon BRYANT, a/k/a Raymond Jackson, a/k/a Cully, a/k/a Samual Barry, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-6340.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 2009.

Decided: May 11, 2009.

Vernon Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appel-lee.

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Vernon Bryant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated *196by the district court. *United States v. Bryant,*No. 3:97-cr-00352-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Foster v. Crandell

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 152

No. 073P07

Defs’ Motion for Temporary Stay (COA05-1140)

Allowed 02/09/07