alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2079-063]

On March 26, 2009, the Commission issued Placer County Water Agency, licensee for the Middle Fork Hydroelectric Project No. 2079, a Statement of Annual Charges for U.S. Lands for fiscal year (FY) 2009. On April 26, 2009, the licensee filed a request for rehearing of the FY 2009 annual charge bill and on May 6, 2009, the licensee filed a timely appeal of its FY 2009 annual charge bill, which is still pending.

                    Pursuant to section 11.20 of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          if the licensee believes its annual charges bill is incorrect, the licensee may seek an appeal of its bill with the Chief Financial Officer within 45 days after the bill's rendition. Subsequently, the licensee may seek rehearing within 30 days after the Chief Financial Officer's decision on the appeal. As noted above, the licensee's appeal for its FY 2009 annual charge bill is still pending. Therefore, the licensee's request for rehearing is dismissed as premature.                

This notice constitutes final agency action. Request for rehearing of this dismissal notice must be filed within 30 days of the date of issuance of this notice, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.713 (2008).

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 11.20 (2008).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E9-12213 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
exv10w75



 





Exhibit 10.75




SEPTEMBER 2007 AMENDMENT OF JULY 2007 SECURED 

PROMISSORY NOTE ISSUED BY IRVINE SENSORS CORPORATION

AND HELD BY LONGVIEW FUND L.P. 




     This Agreement entered into effective as of September 30, 2007 (the “September 2007 Amendment
of July 2007 Secured Promissory Note”) by and among IRVINE SENSORS CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation (hereinafter called “Company”), and LONGVIEW FUND L.P. (“Holder”). The Company and
Holder are entering into this September 2007 Amendment of July 2007 Secured Promissory Note to
amend certain provisions of certain Secured Promissory Note issued July 19, 2007 (each a “Secured
Promissory Note”), issued by the Company pursuant to a Loan Agreement dated as of July 19, 2007
(the “Loan Agreement”).



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and other agreements contained in this
Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is acknowledged, the Company
and the Holder hereby agree as follows:



     1. The Principal Amount and interest due on the Secured Promissory Note shall be due and
payable on December 31, 2009, subject to acceleration as described in the Secured Promissory Note,
Loan Agreement and other agreements made in connection therewith. Interest shall compound monthly.



     2. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Secured Promissory Note Loan Agreement and all
other agreements made in connection therewith and all terms thereof shall remain in full force and
effect.



     3. This September 2007 Amendment of July 2007 Secured Promissory Note may be executed in two
or more counterparts, all of which when taken together shall be considered one and the same
agreement and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered
to any other party, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. In
the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile or electronic transmission, such signature
shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such
signature is executed) same with the same force and effect as if such signature were an original
thereof.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Company and Holder hereby execute this September 2007 Amendment of July
2007 Secured Promissory Note as of the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	IRVINE SENSOR CORPORATION

“Company”

 	 
	 	By:  	/S/ JOHN C. CARSON
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John C. Carson 	 
	 	 	Title:  	President & CEO 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	LONGVIEW FUND, L.P.

“Holder”

 	 
	 	By:  	/S/ S. MICHAEL RUDOLPH
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	S. Michael Rudolph 	 
	 	 	Title:  	CFO -- Investment Adviser
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                    4,012
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             7,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                              63,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         75,774
<PP&E>                                   15,897
<DEPRECIATION>                            2,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           95,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    65,985
<BONDS>                                  10,339
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                     76
<OTHER-SE>                               19,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             95,602
<SALES>                                  83,888
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         83,888
<CGS>                                    70,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            70,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        2,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              17
<INCOME-TAX>                                 57
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (40)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                (40)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (.01)


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Johnson, Appellant.

[870 NYS2d 919]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), rendered March 20, 2007, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal *(see People v Ramos,*7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the Supreme Court’s denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence *(see People v Kemp,*94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; *People v Cardona,*51 AD3d 941 [2008]; *People v Castillo,*49 AD3d 777 [2008]; *People v DeAngelo,*40 AD3d 656 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11858]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,616]


Tensolite d/b/a Carlisle Interconnect Company, Vancouver, WA; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 16, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of the workers at Tensolite, d/b/a Carlisle 
Interconnect Company, Vancouver, Washington.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of April 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-11858 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<PAGE>
   EXHIBIT 21


                   SUBSIDIARIES OF STERLING BANCSHARES, INC.

The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Sterling Bancshares, Inc.:

Sterling Bancorporation, Inc.           CaminoReal Bancshares of Texas, Inc.
A Delaware corporation                  A Texas corporation
PO Box 631                              PO Box 200010
Wilmington, Delaware 19899              San Antonio, Texas 78220

Sterling Bancshares Capital Trust I     CaminoReal Delaware, Inc.
A Delaware statutory business trust     A Delaware corporation
15000 Northwest Freeway                 PO Box 200010
Houston, Texas 77040                    San Antonio, Texas 78220

Sterling Bancshares Capital Trust II    CaminoReal Bank, NA
A Delaware statutory business trust     A national banking association
15000 Northwest Freeway                 403 S. W.W. White Road
Houston, Texas 77040                    San Antonio, Texas 78220

Sterling Bancshares Capital Trust III
A Delaware statutory business trust
15000 Northwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77040

Sterling Bank
A Texas state banking association
15000 Northwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77040

CMCR Holding Company
A Delaware corporation
13100 Northwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77040

CMCR Holding Company is the parent company of Sterling Capital Mortgage Company,
an originator and servicer of one-to-four single family residential mortgage
loans.  Sterling Capital Mortgage Company originates a significant portion of
its mortgage business through twenty-five subsidiary entities.


                                       1
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group. Population Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: June 18-19, 2009.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Madison, 1177 15th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892. (301) 435-6898. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c2b5a3aeaeb1a182afa3abaeecacabaaeca5adb4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e196808d8d9282a18c80888dcf8f8889cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 15, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-12207 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1Cronos Global Income Fund XIVRule 13a-14 Certifications     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV (the“Partnership”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Partnership’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 16, 2007   /s/ DENNIS J. TIETZ   Dennis J. Tietz  President and Chief Executive Officer of CCC
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 5, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David A. Owen, Chief Financial Officer of
Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.





Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Wolverine Tube, Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





/s/
      David A. OwenDavid
      A. OwenSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryDate:  August
      17, 2009
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A1734. MONALETA D. ALLEN v. THE STATE.

In 1995, Monaleta D. Allen was sentenced to life imprisonment after pleading

guilty to murder, armed robbery, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm

during the commission of a crime. In February 2022, Allen filed a motion for out-oftime appeal. The trial court dismissed the motion, and Allen filed a notice of appeal

to this Court. We lack jurisdiction.

Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over

“[a]ll cases in which a sentence of death was imposed or could be imposed.” See Ga.

Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8). Because a penalty of death can be

imposed for the crime of murder, jurisdiction is proper in the Supreme Court. See

OCGA § 16-5-1 (e) (1); Neal v. State, 290 Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012)

(Hunstein, C. J., concurring); see also State v. Thornton, 253 Ga. 524, 524 (1) (322

SE2d 711) (1984) (directing this Court to transfer “all cases in which either a

sentence of death or of life imprisonment has been imposed upon conviction of

murder”), overruled in part on other grounds asrecognized in Elliott v. State, 305 Ga.

179, 205 (III) (C) (i) (824 SE2d 265) (2019). The Supreme Court’s jurisdiction over

murder cases includes appeals from orders resolving post-judgment motions in such

cases. See Simpson v. State, 292 Ga. 764, 765 (740 SE2d 124) (2013) (appeal from

denial of a motion in arrest of judgment attacking murder convictions as void).

July 27, 2022
Accordingly, this appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/27/2022
#### AMERICAN OPTICAL CO. v. NEW JERSEY OPTICAL CO.

No. 1583.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

June 19, 1946.

See also 58 F.Supp. 601.

Brooks Potter, John L. Hall, Richard Wait and Marcien Jenckes (all of the firm of Choate, Hall & Stewart), and Hector M. Holmes, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Charles B. Rugg, John M. Russell, Edward B. Hanify (all of Ropes, Gray, Best, Coolidge & Rugg), all of Boston, Mass., and Daniel V. Mahoney and Morris D. Jackson, both of New York City, for defendant.

SWEENEY, District Judge.

The plaintiff has filed, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 34, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c, a motion for an order requiring the defendant to produce for inspection, copying and photographing, a list of 10 groupings of documents. I will adopt the enumeration in their motion.

Objections to items 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 10 are sustained. Objections to items 1, 2, 5, and 9 are overruled. The basis of this decision is that such inspections as are alowed should be sufficient for the plaintiff’s legitimate purpose. To have allowed all of the items would have admitted too much duplication of results and possible unjust harassment.

The defendant has called for the production, for inspection, copying or photographing, of some 118 items. Objections to these are grouped into three categories. The objections to items 1 through 113 are overruled. It appears that the defendant has not the original documents, and the fact that he has what he thinks may prove *83to be copies of the original papers called for, is not good argument why these objections should be sustained but, rather, argues that the comparison should be made to establish whether or not they are real copies. I am satisfied that the parties can find a much shorter cut to establish this matter should they desire to so do. The objection to item 115 is unnecessary to pass upon since the defendant is going to compile a record of the royalties paid from its own books, and ask the plaintiff to agree that such a statement is correct. If they cannot come to agreement on this matter I reserve the right to pass further upon this item. The objection to item 117 is overruled, the new affidavit of counsel for the defendant showing the materiality and the purpose of these catalogs.
#### In the Matter of John Dalton, Appellant, v Andrea Evans, as Chair of the Division of Parole, Respondent.

Submitted December 27, 2010;

decided February 15, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
EXHIBIT
        32.1 EARTHWORKS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
 
 Certification
        of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section
        906 of the Sarbones-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 I,
        Peter
        Keefe, Chief Executive Officer, and President "principal executive officer")
        of
        Earthworks Entertainment, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best
        of
        my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
        the
        period ended June 30, 2005 of the Registrant (the "Report"):
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)[15(d)] of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Dated:
                  August 10, 2005
              By:/s/ PETER KEEFEPeter
                  Keefe
                Chief
                  Executive Officer,
                and
                  President
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George
Ecker, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Octus Inc.  for the year ending December 31,
2009  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Octus Inc. of
Nevada.





Date:
      April 15, 2010
            
            /s/
      George EckerGeorge
      Ecker
              Chief
      Financial Officer