alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION - CEO

In connection with the Annual Report of Plains Exploration & Production Company
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James C. Flores, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of
my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 27, 2007



/s/ James C. FloresJames C. FloresChief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex">
    <title>Community Health & Outreach - NIDDK</title>
    
<meta name="VIcurrentDateTime" content="638490770955942027" />
<meta name="VirtualFolder" content="/" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="/layouts/system/VisitorIdentification.js"></script>

</head>
<body>
    <div></div>
</body>
</html>
**Facebook****Email**Print**Facebook****EmailTải bản PDF

## Mang thai và cho con bú ảnh hưởng như thế nào đến xương của phụ nữ?

Phụ nữ có nhu cầu cao về canxi trong cả thời kỳ mang thai và cho con bú – vì canxi cần thiết để hỗ trợ sự tăng trưởng và phát triển của em bé trong bụng mẹ và sau khi sinh. 

Một số nhu cầu về canxi này được đáp ứng thông qua việc canxi di chuyển ra khỏi xương của người mẹ, đặc biệt là trong tam cá nguyệt thứ ba và trong thời gian cho con bú. 

## Phụ nữ mang thai và cho con bú cần bao nhiêu canxi để xương khỏe mạnh?

Lượng canxi mà phụ nữ cần không thay đổi khi họ mang thai hoặc cho con bú. Lượng khuyến nghị cho các bé gái trong lứa tuổi thiếu niên từ 14 đến 18 tuổi là 1.300 mg mỗi ngày. Phụ nữ trên 18 tuổi nên hấp thụ 1.000 mg canxi mỗi ngày.

Hấp thụ nhiều hơn lượng canxi được khuyến nghị từ thực phẩm hoặc chất bổ sung không ngăn ngừa việc mất đi canxi từ xương trong thời kỳ mang thai hoặc cho con bú. Vì vậy, lượng canxi bổ sung không ảnh hưởng nhiều đến khối lượng xương mà người phụ nữ mất đi vào thời điểm này trong đời. 

Phụ nữ mang thai và cho con bú đang cân nhắc dùng chất bổ sung canxi nên trao đổi với nhà cung cấp dịch vụ chăm sóc sức khỏe của mình.

Mặc dù giảm mật độ xương là một phần bình thường của quá trình mang thai và tiết sữa, nhưng trong những trường hợp rất hiếm gặp, phụ nữ mang thai và cho con bú có thể mắc bệnh loãng xương. Bệnh loãng xương khiến xương trở nên yếu và giòn, làm tăng nguy cơ gãy xương (xương bị gãy). 

Gãy xương ở những người phụ nữ này có thể xảy ra một cách tự nhiên hoặc do các hoạt động bình thường, với mức chấn thương hoặc căng thẳng rất nhỏ. Gãy xương cột sống phổ biến nhất ở phụ nữ mang thai hoặc cho con bú mắc bệnh loãng xương, nhưng các loại gãy xương khác cũng có thể xảy ra. Trong một số trường hợp, người mẹ có bệnh trạng đã xác định hoặc đang dùng thuốc làm tăng nguy cơ mắc bệnh loãng xương và gãy xương.  

## Những ảnh hưởng lâu dài của việc mang thai và cho con bú đối với xương là gì?

Giảm mật độ xương tạm thời là một phần bình thường của quá trình mang thai và cho con bú. Tuy nhiên, mật độ xương thường được phục hồi sau khi mang thai và trong/sau khi cai sữa.

Các nghiên cứu lớn gần đây cho thấy rằng việc mang thai và cho con bú không liên quan đến việc tăng nguy cơ mắc bệnh loãng xương hoặc gãy xương vào thời điểm sau này trong đời.

 

Nội dung này được Viện Viêm Khớp và Các Bệnh Cơ Xương và Da Quốc Gia (NIAMS) tạo ra nhờ sự đóng góp từ:
                          - Viện Lão Hóa Quốc Gia  (bằng tiếng Anh)
                          - Viện Tiểu Đường và Các Bệnh về Tiêu Hóa và Thận Quốc Gia  (bằng tiếng Anh)
                          - Văn Phòng Nghiên Cứu về Sức Khỏe Phụ Nữ của NIH  (bằng tiếng Anh)

**Facebook****Email**Print**Facebook****EmailTải bản PDF

#### Related Information

Canxi và Vitamin D: Quan Trọng đối với Sức Khỏe của Xương (Calcium and Vitamin ...

Trẻ Em và Xương của Trẻ Em (Kids and Their Bones)

#### View/Download/Order Publications

Download this topic as a PDF

**Facebook****Email**Print**Facebook****Email

Last Reviewed:             May 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         325,056
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               325,056
<PP&E>                                          22,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,660)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,861,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          281,845
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,278,792
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,676,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,861,277
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (3,252,637)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (39,470)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,292,107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,292,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              $(3,292,107)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $(.278)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
4.6


 


Düsseldorf,
January 2nd 2004


 


 


 


Reappointment: Mr Ottmar C. Küsel
as member of the executive board and chief executive officer


 


 


 


Dear Mr Barnes,


Dear Mr Heldler,


 


The term of office for the chief executive
officer, Ottmar C. Küsel, expires on 31.12.2004.


 


We have already discussed on the telephone
that Mr Küsel should be reappointed for a further three years, that is for the
period from January 1st 2005 until December 31st 2007, as member of the
executive board and chief executive officer. You have already informed me in a
telephone conversation that you will not be objecting to a written vote in line
with paragraph 10 section 1, sentence 2 of our
corporate articles.


 


Please find enclosed the proposed resolution
with the form for your vote. I would appreciate it if you could return your
vote to me at your earliest possible convenience.


 


Thank you very much.


 


 


Yours sincerely,


 


/s/ Dr. Volker Triebel


(Dr. Volker Triebel)


 


Dr. Volker Triebel


Chairman of the Rosenthal AG Supervisory
Board
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Joe Willie HOOKS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-10262.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 15, 2009.

Filed May 4, 2009.

Howard David Sukenic, Esquire, Assistant U.S., USPX-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David S. Eisenberg, Esquire, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: D.W. NELSON and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and KING,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

*562MEMORANDUM **

Joe Willie Hooks appeals his sentence-modification granted under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Hooks challenges the manner in which the district court modified his sentence, contending that it violated § 3582(c)(2)’s requirement to “consider[] the factors set forth in section 3553(a) to the extent that they are applicable.” We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1), and we affirm.

*United States v. Lowe,*136 F.3d 1231, 1233 (9th Cir.1998), does not bar review. Hooks is not challenging the district court’s exercise of discretionary power to lower a sentence under § 3582(c). Rather, he is seeking remand by arguing that the court failed to comply fully with § 3582(c)(2)’s procedures. Thus, jurisdiction is proper under § 3742(a)(1). See *United States v. Gonzalez,*365 F.3d 796, 798 & n. 1 (9th Cir.2004).

The district court complied with § 3582(c)(2). The court is not required to “mechanically ... list every consideration of § 3553(a).” *United States v. Aguilar-Ayala,*120 F.3d 176, 179 (9th Cir.1997) (quotation marks omitted). The court had before it (1) an amended Presentence Report discussing factors such as Hooks’s prison disciplinary record, health, and family situation; (2) exhibits and written argument from Hooks’s appointed counsel regarding some § 3553(a) factors, including disparities in crack cocaine ratios; and (3) the benefit of first-hand knowledge from the extensive prior sentencing proceedings. Similar to what it did with the original sentence, the court chose the high-end of the revised Guideline range, thereby exercising discretion and reducing Hooks’s sentence by fifty-two months. Given this record, we are “satisfied that the district court’s decision rests on pertinent considerations.” *Id.*As this court stated in *United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc),

> adequate explanation in some cases may ... be inferred from the PSR or the record as a whole.

> The district court need not tick off each of the § 3553(a) factors to show that it has considered them. We assume that district judges know the law and understand their obligation to consider all of the § 3553(a) factors, not just the Guidelines.

*Id.*at 992.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000890575
<NAME> HILCOAST DEVELOPMENT
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                             794<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          25,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,627)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,595
<SALES>                                         31,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,030
<CGS>                                           26,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,569
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,359<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (675)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (237)<F3>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
<FN>
<F1>$773 OF $794 REPRESENTS RESTRICTED CASH.
<F2>$2,359 REPRESENTS NET INTEREST EXPENSE (NET OF $2,959 OF CAPITALIZED
  INTEREST).
<F3>$237 REPRESENTS AN INCOME TAX BENEFIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Mineral.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, vs. Plaintiff, MICHAEL COLVIN, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-08-31 DECISION

On March 9, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of ten (10) years, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Mischief, a Felony.

On November 4, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Jori Frakie. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 4th day of November, 2010.

DATED this 18th day of November, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12378]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than June 11, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Robb B. Kahl, Monona, Wisconsin; as trustee of the Glenn A. 
Solsrud Revocable Trust Concerning Caprice Corporation, to acquire 
voting shares of Caprice Corporation, Augusta, Wisconsin, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Unity Bank North, Red Lake Falls, 
Minnesota.
    2. Robb B. Kahl, Monona, Wisconsin; as trustee of the Glenn A. 
Solsrud Revocable Trust Concerning Augusta Financial Corporation, to 
acquire voting shares of Augusta Financial Corporation, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Unity Bank, both of Augusta, 
Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 22, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-12378 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.126
                                   DEMAND NOTE

$260,000.00                                                  New York, New York
                                                             December 1, 1998

        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th Floor,
New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand Note may
designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United States of
America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of Two Hundred
Sixty Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($260,000.00), together with interest on the
unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from time to time from
the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate of interest of 8.5%
plus 3.0%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever shall be less.

        The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be
payable on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from
the date hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest
rate as specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to
pay interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to
the stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law,
whichever shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the
basis of a 360 day year.

        Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

        Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

        Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

        This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

        All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the
holder under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and
assigns, and all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the
holder of this Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

        This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York
and shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the
laws of the State of New York.

                                         Wilshire Technologies, Inc.

                                         By:   /s/ James W. Klingler
                                         ---------------------------- 
                                         Name: James W. Klingler
                                         Title: Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:

[74 FR 1734, January 13, 2009].

# Status: 

Closed Meeting. 

# Place:

 100 F Street, NE.,  Washington, DC. 

# Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting:

 Thursday, January 15, 2009 at 1 p.m. 

# Change in the Meeting:

 Additional Item. 

The following item has been added to the Thursday, January 15, 2009 Closed Meeting agenda: 

A matter related to a financial institution. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(c)(7), (8) (9)(B) and and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(7), (8) and (9)(B) permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, determined that Commission business required the above change and that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: January 15, 2009. 

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-1241 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P