alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 44 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 44

  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
    honor Constantino Brumidi on the 200th anniversary of his birth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 2005

   Mrs. Clinton (for herself, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Kennedy, and Ms. Snowe) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
               the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to 
    honor Constantino Brumidi on the 200th anniversary of his birth.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on July 26, 
2005, for a ceremony to honor Constantino Brumidi on the 200th 
anniversary of his birth. Physical preparations for the ceremony shall 
be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the Architect of 
the Capitol may prescribe.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          64,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,560
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,388)
<INVENTORY>                                     40,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,302
<PP&E>                                          51,846
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,498)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,330
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,412
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,286
<SALES>                                        109,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,638
<CGS>                                           68,591
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   505
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,961
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,745
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                (13,669)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,547
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
31, 2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Garrett E. PierceGarrett E. PierceVice Chairman and Chief Financial OfficerApril 29, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2612 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2612

 To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 
                 measuring approximately 70 mm or more.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 2, 2009

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight digital camera lenses 
                 measuring approximately 70 mm or more.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIGHTWEIGHT DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES MEASURING APPROXIMATELY 70 
              MM OR MORE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Lenses designed     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        for digital                                                        31/2011.......
                        cameras, the
                        foregoing with a
                        focal length
                        measuring
                        approximately 70
                        mm or more but
                        not over 200 mm
                        and weighing
                        between 1,535 and
                        1,545 grams
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        9002.11.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of John O’Shaughnessy, Petitioner, v New York State Comptroller et al., Respondents.

[963 NYS2d 751]

Mercure, J.P.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s application for performance of duty disability retirement benefits.

*1198Petitioner, a correction officer, was injured in 2006 while subduing an inmate who attacked another officer. Although petitioner attempted to return to work at full duty, he continued to have pain and lost time, and was eventually placed on light duty. Thereafter, petitioner filed an application for performance of duty disability retirement benefits. Following a hearing, the Hearing Officer denied the application on the basis that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from the performance of his duties as a correction officer. Upon review, respondent Comptroller upheld the determination, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

In order to establish entitlement to performance of duty disability retirement benefits, petitioner was required to demonstrate that, at the time his application was filed, he was permanently incapacitated from performing his job duties as a correction officer *(see*Retirement and Social Security Law § 363; *Matter of Savio v Hevesi,*27 AD3d 1002, 1003 [2006]; *Matter of Capparella v McCall,*7 AD3d 875, 875 [2004]). In that regard, petitioner presented his own testimony as well as that of his treating physician, who opined that petitioner suffered pain and permanent loss of range of motion in his neck and low back, resulting in a permanent disability that prevented him from performing his job duties. In contrast, a physician who examined petitioner and reviewed the relevant medical records on behalf of respondent New York State and Local Employees’ Retirement System testified that, at the time of his examination, petitioner did not suffer any disability rendering him unable to perform the regular duties of a correction officer. Inasmuch as resolution of conflicts in the medical evidence rests with the Comptroller, who reasonably credited the opinion of the Retirement System’s expert after considering all of the medical evidence, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Comptroller’s determination *(see Matter of Savio v Hevesi,*27 AD3d at 1003; *Matter of Zindell v Hevesi,*27 AD3d 996, 997 [2006]; *Matter of Capparella v McCall,*7 AD3d at 876).

Rose, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Dajahn M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 248]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, Dajahn M. appeals from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated April 13, 2012, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated February 2, 2012, made after a hearing, finding that he committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated February 2, 2012.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as placed the appellant on probation for a period of 12 months is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from so much of the order of disposition as placed the appellant on probation for a period of 12 months has been rendered academic, as the period of placement has expired. However, because there may be collateral consequences resulting from the adjudication of delinquency, the appeal from so much of the order of disposition as adjudicated the appellant a juvenile delinquent, and which brings up for review the fact-finding order, has not been rendered academic *(see*Family Ct Act § 783; *Matter of Dorothy D.,*49 NY2d 212 [1980]).

*813Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, the appellant’s identity as the person who committed the acts complained of *(see Matter of Kalexis R.,*79 AD3d 755, 756 [2010]; *Matter of Rodolfo M.,*79 AD3d 752 [2010]; *Matter of Brooklyn B.,*77 AD3d 934, 935 [2010]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see Matter of Danielle B.,*94 AD3d 757, 758 [2012]; *Matter of Hasan C.,*59 AD3d 617, 617-618 [2009]; *cf.*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see Matter of Leonel T.,*78 AD3d 1188, 1189 [2010]; *Matter of Brooklyn B.,*77 AD3d at 935). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the Family Court’s fact-finding determination with regard to the appellant’s identity was not against the weight of the evidence *(see Matter of Kalexis R.,*79 AD3d at 756; *Matter of Rodolfo M.,*79 AD3d at 752; *Matter of Brooklyn B.,*77 AD3d at 935). Rivera, J.P., Lott, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### Foster and another *against*Garnsey, *Gent., one of the Attorneys, &c.*

The *pmugc-of*attorneys being ceptDdSgCthe the court,) by statute. *<1N. R. l-mourns.*‘hey W be arrested anti held to ¡.ail, like other persons; íííeLmeground", ?i3c’osta,rISdecif ing term, and less than 50 dollars is recover-liable to/cost*0.

THE defendant, who is an attorney of this court, was sued by a bill in *assumpsit,*and gave a *cognovit actionem*in the cause, for 35 dollars and 83 cents, beside costs. The plaintiff entered up judgment for the amount of damages confessed, and for , r *J °*° ... the costs, taxed by the recorder of *Albany,*as m this court, to 39 dollars and 42 cents.

*De Witt,*for the defendant;

now moved that the judgment, so far as respects the costs, should be amended, and that the execution, as regarded costs, should be set aside.

*Per Curiam.*

In *Snell v. Brooks,*and in *Baird*v. *Vanderlyn*which came before the court at the last term, the question arose how far, and in what cases, attorneys were liable for costs, when parties in a suit. Many of the cases heretofore decided on that question, are inapplicable, as the law now stands. Attorneys, like other persons, are liable to be arrested on *mesne*process, (except during the actual sitting of the court,) and held to com* mon or special bail. (1 *N. R. L.*418.) Their privilege, therefore, is substantially,, taken away; and being put on the. same footing with other persons, as to arrests, th.ey ought fo. *466stand on the. sanie'ground in regard to costs. It- ought not fo ]eft f-p ¿ie option of a,plaintiff',, td make-ah attorney pay the cos.ts of this court, by electing to sue him, by bill, in'term-time. Whether, therefore, attorneys- are sued by bill lor writ; they must be. placed iu the same situation as other persons, as to the payment of costs. ' " - \

Motion granted^
**EXHIBIT 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-114166, 333-102988, 333-85160, 333-61866, 333-25661, 333-32159, 333-23085, 333-17501,333-03507, 333-107755, and 333-134879) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-116624, 333-30558, 333-46990, 333-81243, 333-105694, 333-105693, and 333-134878), pertaining tothe 1992 Stock Option Plan, the 1993 Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Incentive Plan, the 2000Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the 2004 Non-EmployeeDirectors’ Equity Incentive Plan and the 2006 Equity Incentive Award Plan of QuestcorPharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the financial statementsand schedule of Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for theyear ended December 31, 2007./s/ ODENBERG, ULLAKKO, MURANISHI & CO. LLPSan Francisco, California
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATION**I, Hervé Duchesne de Lamotte, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IDM Pharma, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: November 14, 2006         /s/ Hervé Duchesne de Lamotte   Hervé Duchesne de Lamotte   Acting Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
#### Joseph B. Sitts, Appellant, v Allison L. Sitts, Respondent.

Submitted August 30, 2010;

decided September 16, 2010

*834Motion to dismiss appeal dismissed as academic upon the ground that the appeal has been withdrawn.
EXHIBIT 32.2 EARTHWORKS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
         (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, William H. Campbell,  Chief  Financial  Officer of Earthworks  Entertainment,
Inc. (the "Registrant"),  certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004
of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)[15(d)]
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.


Dated: August 11, 2004        /s/ WILLIAM H. CAMPBELL
                              -----------------------
                              William H. Campbell
                              Acting Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                        JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                              68,237
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       4,069,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (20,000)
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    4,297,130
<PP&E>                                              382,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (303,079)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      8,778,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               5,908,059
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         750,000
<COMMON>                                            304,292
<OTHER-SE>                                          3,314,934
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        8,778,866
<SALES>                                             3,658,092
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    3,686,102
<CGS>                                               3,312,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       4,476,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    1,070,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  93,118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (790,721)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (790,721)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0

        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 

                                 EXHIBIT 23.3
                                 ------------

                    Consent of Certified Public Accountants

Re:  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-54986) 
     Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-54988) 
     Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-54990) 
     Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-73350) 
     Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-22423)  

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
referenced above of BREED Technologies, Inc. of our report dated 25 July 1997
relating to the combined and consolidated statements of earnings, retained
earnings, and cash flows of the Momo Group as of and for the year ended 30 June
1997 which report appears in the amended 30 June 1997 annual report on Form 10-
K/A of BREED Technologies, Inc.

/s/ KPMG, S.p.A.
Milan, Italy
28 September 1998