alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 202 (Wednesday, October 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54049-54050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25323]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreements are 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2d6d0c3c6c7c3ccc3cedbd1cbd1e2c4cfc18cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d393f2c29282c232c21343e243e0d2b202e632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 54050]]


    Agreement No.: 011383-042.
    Title: Venezuelan Discussion Agreement.
    Parties: Hamburg-S[uuml]d, Seaboard Marine Ltd., King Ocean Service 
de Venezuela, and SeaFreight Line, Ltd.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The amendment would add Compania Sud Americana de Vapores 
S.A. as a party to the agreement.

    Agreement No.: 012083.
    Title: Hanjin/APL Mediterranean Space Charter Agreement.
    Parties: American President Lines, Ltd.; and Hanjin Shipping Co., 
Ltd.
    Filing Parties: Eric C. Jeffrey, Esq.; Goodwin Procter LLP; 901 New 
York Avenue, NW.; Washington, DC 20001.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes Hanjin to charter space to APL 
in the trade between the U.S. East Coast and ports in Italy and Spain.

    Agreement No.: 012084.
    Title: HLAG/Maersk Line Gulf-South America Slot Charter Agreement.
    Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S and Hapag-Lloyd AG.
    Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036.
    Synopsis: The agreement authorizes Hapag-Lloyd to charter space to 
Maersk Line in the trade between U.S. Gulf Coast ports and ports in 
Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: October 16, 2009.
Tanga S. FitzGibbon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-25323 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Weinberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    DAVID L. WEINBERGDavid L. Weinberg Chief Financial OfficerMay 10, 2004
#### In the Matter of Lynik Jomae E., an Infant. Lynik Jomae E., Appellant; Harlem Dowling Children’s Services, Respondent.

[976 NYS2d 389]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Clark V Richardson, *514J.), entered on or about June 7, 2012, which, following a fact-finding hearing, inter alia, determined that respondent father was a notice father whose consent was not required for the adoption of the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There exists no basis to disturb the court’s determination that respondent’s consent to the adoption of the child was not required. The record supports the findings that respondent had not provided a “fair and reasonable sum” toward the child’s support, although he had the means, and that he did not communicate with the child on a regular basis (Domestic Relations Law § 111 [1] [d]). Respondent’s incarceration did not absolve him of these parental obligations *(see Matter of Jaden Christopher W.-McC. [Michael L. McC.],*100 AD3d 486 [1st Dept 2012], *Iv denied*20 NY3d 858 [2013]), and his testimony concerning previous support provided to the child was not consistent *(see Matter of Aaron B,*61 AD3d 448 [1st Dept 2009]).

We have considered respondent’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Friedman, J.P, Acosta, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
#### Debra H., Appellant, v Janice R., Respondent.

Submitted November 23, 2009;

decided December 15, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 460.

Motion by American Civil Liberties Union et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
EXHIBIT 3.2

                          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     OF

                    RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                     OF

                        THE MULTICARE COMPANIES, INC.

                          (a Delaware Corporation)

     It is hereby certified that:

            1.   The  name  of  the  corporation  (hereinafter  called  the
     "Corporation") is The Multicare Companies, Inc.

           2.    The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation
     is  hereby amended by striking out Article IV thereof by substituting in
     lieu of said Article the following new Article IV:

                "The total number of shares which the Corporation shall  have
     authority  to  issue  is  Seventy-seven  Million  (77,000,000)   shares,
     consisting  of Seven Million (7,000,000) shares of Preferred  Stock,  of
     the  par  value  of  One  Cent  ($.01)  per  share  (hereinafter  called
     "Preferred  Stock"), and Seventy Million (70,000,000) shares  of  Common
     Stock, of the par value of One Cent ($.01) per share (hereinafter called
     "Common Stock")."

           3.    The  amendment of the Restated Certificate of  Incorporation
     herein certified has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
     of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     Signed on May 8, 1996.

                         By:  /S/ DANIEL E. STRAUS
                              ________________________________________
                              Daniel E. Straus
                              President and Co-Chief Executive Officer

     ATTEST:

     By:  /S/ BRADFORD C. BURKETT
          _______________________________________________
          Bradford C. Burkett
          Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
#### In the Matter of Richard Padilla, Appellant, v Raymond Kelly, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Submitted June 28, 2010;

decided September 14, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
EXHIBIT 24.3

 

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC.POWER OF ATTORNEY

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

            The undersigned, in hiscapacity as a director of SI Diamond Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), after reviewing the Company's Form 10-KSB, does herebyappoint Douglas P. Baker, his true and lawful attorney to execute in his name, place and stead, in his capacity as a Director ofsaid Company, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and all instruments necessaryor incidental in connection therewith, including all amendments, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Said attorney shall have the full power and authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any andall capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes asthe undersigned might or could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of said attorney.

            IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this instrument this 11th day of March, 2003.

                                        /s/ EddieLee                                                        Name: Eddie Lee
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 997 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 997

 To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain land in the 
Beaverhead-Deerlodge Forest, Montana, to Jefferson County, Montana, for 
                           use as a cemetery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2005

   Mr. Burns introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain land in the 
Beaverhead-Deerlodge Forest, Montana, to Jefferson County, Montana, for 
                           use as a cemetery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Montana Cemetery Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO JEFFERSON COUNTY, MONTANA.

    (a) Conveyance.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act and subject to valid existing rights, the 
Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in this Act as the 
``Secretary''), acting through the Chief of the Forest Service, shall 
convey to Jefferson County, Montana, for no consideration, all right, 
title, and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of land 
described in subsection (b).
    (b) Description of Land.--The parcel of land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the parcel of National Forest System land (including 
any improvements on the land) known as the Elkhorn Cemetery, which 
consists of 10 acres in Jefferson County located in SW1/4 Sec. 14, T. 6 
N., R. 3 W.
    (c) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions for the conveyance under 
subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 13 (Thursday, January 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1241]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:  [74 FR 1734, 
January 13, 2009].

Status: Closed Meeting.

Place:  100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Date and Time of Previously Announced Meeting:  Thursday, January 15, 
2009 at 1 p.m.

Change in the Meeting:  Additional Item.
    The following item has been added to the Thursday, January 15, 2009 
Closed Meeting agenda:
    A matter related to a financial institution.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(c)(7), (8) (9)(B) and and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(7), (8) 
and (9)(B) permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed 
Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, determined that Commission 
business required the above change and that no earlier notice thereof 
was possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: January 15, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-1241 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### The Warren.1

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

May 19, 1883.)

Admiralty—Wreckage—Private Bale without Notice or Appraisement.

Where a boiler removed from the wreck of a vessel injured by collision was sold at private sale without the knowledge of those sought to be charged with its value, and without appraisement, the commissioner appointed to fix the amount of the damages credited the libelant with the full value of the boiler, as proved on the reference, instead of the price so realized; and, on excejfiions to the commissioner’s report, his finding was sustained.

In Admiralty.

*Jas. K. Hill, Wing & Shoudy,*for libelant.

*Beebe, Wilcox é Hobbs,*for claimants.

1

 Reported by R. D & Wyllys Benedict, of the New York bar«

Benedict, J.

The commissioner’s report as to the value of the libelant’s boat was made after hearing the testimony given by many witnesses, and upon a serious conflict of evidence. I have examined the evidence, and am unable to conclude that any injustice will be done to either party by confirming the report of the commissioner in that particular.

In regard to the value of $3,500 put by the commissioner upon the boiler removed from the wreck and sold by the libelant at private sale for $1,700,1 should be induced to take the price realized for the boiler as its value, instead of the sum reported by the commissioner, if the libelant had given the claimants notice of his intention to sell the boiler, or afforded them an opportunity to examine it and determine. its value. But the sale was a private sale, made without the knowledge of the parties who were to be charged with its value, and without any appraisement, and the sum realized is proved by the libel-ant himself to be less than the intrinsic value of the boiler, which he says was as good as new.

Upon such facts the finding of the value of th'e boiler to be $3,500 is justified. • The exceptions of both sides are, therefore, overruled, and the report confirmed.

See *The Warren,*11 Fed. Rep. 443.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-4213

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEMETRIUS ALVIN BANKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cr-00061-TDS-1)

Submitted: February 17, 2021 Decided: March 2, 2021

Before WYNN, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amos G. Tyndall, AMOS TYNDALL PLLC, Carrboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. 

Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney, Anand P. Ramaswamy, Assistant United 

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Demetrius Alvin Banks appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised 

release and sentencing him to 20 months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Banks seeks to 

challenge the legality of the search and seizure that led to the discovery of his supervised 

release violation, arguing that, in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights, law 

enforcement obtained certain incriminating evidence that was used against him in the 

revocation proceeding. Thus, according to Banks, the district court should have suppressed 

this evidence.

Generally, under the exclusionary rule, the prosecution is prohibited from 

introducing at a criminal trial “evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s Fourth 

Amendment rights.” United States v. Stephens, 764 F.3d 327, 335 (4th Cir. 2014) (internal 

quotation marks omitted). However, “the exclusionary rule does not apply in federal 

supervised release revocation proceedings.” United States v. Armstrong, 187 F.3d 392, 

393 (4th Cir. 1999). Because the disputed evidence was used in a revocation proceeding, 

not a criminal prosecution, we conclude that Armstrong forecloses Banks’ attempt to 

suppress the evidence supporting the revocation of his supervised release. 

Accordingly, we affirm Banks’ revocation judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 21

                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC.


         NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                  JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
         ------------------                  -----------------------------

      Deadwood Gulch Resort and                        South Dakota
             Gaming Corp.

      Full House Subsidiary, Inc.                      Delaware

      Full House Subsidiary of                         Nevada
             Nevada, Inc.

      Full House Subsidiary of                         Delaware
             Oregon, Inc.

      Full House Joint Venture                         New York
           Subsidiary, Inc.

     Gaming Entertainment L.L.C.*                      Delaware

         Gaming Entertainment                          Delaware
          (Delaware) L.L.C.*

        Gaming Entertainment                           Delaware
          (Michigan) L.L.C.*

        Gaming Entertainment                           Delaware
         (California) L.L.C.*

      Greenhouse Management, Inc.                      Michigan

        *50% owned
       **85% owned
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Full House Resorts, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael P.  Shaunnessy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Michael P. Shaunnessy   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
| Michael P. Shaunnessy       |
| Chief Financial Officer     |
|                        |
| Date:   April 29, 2003 |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1     I, Thomas A. Daiber, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Centrue Financial Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [intentionally omitted]  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: March 23, 2006 /s/ Thomas A. Daiber     Thomas A. Daiber  Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.5






Exhibit 10.5




SMART ONLINE, INC.




Equity Award Program




(Approved, November 2007)




The Equity Award Program of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) is designed to encourage the
Company’s employees to focus on its long-term performance and provide an opportunity for employees
to increase their stake in the Company. All employees of the Company, including named executive
officers, would be eligible to receive annual cash bonus awards.



The equity pool of shares of restricted stock available for award under the program is equal to the
number of shares resulting from subtracting from 1,000,000 shares the following: (1) the number of
outstanding shares of restricted stock as of December 12, 2007, and (2) the number of shares
issuable upon exercise or exchange of outstanding options. The resulting pool of restricted shares
is to be distributed over the next five years in equal annual amounts. The chief executive officer
of the Company will provide recommendations for such restricted stock awards at the board of
director’s meeting held during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, with awards to be granted as
of January 1 of the following fiscal year. The restrictions on the shares of restricted stock
granted to an employee would lapse as to 50% of such shares on the second anniversary of the grant
date, as to 25% of such shares on the third anniversary of the grant date, and as to 25% of such
shares on the fourth anniversary of the grant date.