alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Greg Grosvenor, ChiefFinancial Officer, in connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of Angelo andMaxie’s, Inc. for the quarterly period March 29, 2004, hereby certify inaccordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)              The accompanying Report of Angelo andMaxie’s, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2004 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2)              The information contained in such Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Angelo and Maxie’s, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ GREG  GROSVENOR       |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Greg  Grosvenor           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer  |
|   | Dated:  May 13, 2004 |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toAngelo and Maxie’s, Inc. and will be retained by Angelo and Maxie’s, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 23

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate, and a 

conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2005

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. REID) submitted the following concurrent 

resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the 

Senate, and a conditional adjournment of the House 

of Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns 

3 on any day from Sunday, March 20, 2005, through Sun4 day, April 3, 2005, on a motion offered pursuant to this 

5 concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his des6 ignee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Mon7 day, April 4, 2005, or until such other time as may be 

8 specified by the Majority Leader or his designee in the 

9 motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any re10 assembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolu-
2

SCON 23 ATS 

1 tion, whichever occurs first; and that when the House ad2 journs on any day from Sunday, March 20, 2005, through 

3 Monday, April 4, 2005, on a motion offered pursuant to 

4 this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 

5 designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, 

6 April 5, 2005, or until the time of any reassembly pursu7 ant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever 

8 occurs first. 

9 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the 

10 Speaker of the House, or their respective designees, acting 

11 jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of the 

12 Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify 

13 the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to re14 assemble at such place and time as they may designate 

15 whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall war16 rant it.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF
THE TRUSTEE*
OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee Ann Anderson, Vice President and
Trust Officer of TexasBank, on behalf of TexasBank, the Trustee of the San Juan
Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust), not in its individual capacity but solely as
Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (as explained in Note 1 to the Trusts financial statements
contained in the Report, in accordance with Securities and Exchange
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September 16,
1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that
differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such
presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust. TEXASBANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THESAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy: /s/ Lee Ann AndersonName: Lee Ann AndersonTitle: Vice President and Trust OfficerDate: November 8, 2004
 * The Trust has no executive officers.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Isidro Rodriguez, Appellant.

Submitted August 23, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, ,New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Rivera, Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 876]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), rendered November 15, 2011, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of assault in the second degree, menacing in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of six months concurrent with five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The evidence supports inferences that defendant used a dangerous instrument, and that he had the intent to injure the victim. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
-  Home 
        -  Health Information 
        -  Healthy Moments Radio Broadcast 
        -  Healthy Moments Episodes 
        -  Improving Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Diseases for Communities of Color 

Healthy Moments Episodes
-  Improving Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Diseases for Communities of Color 

**@NIDDKgov on X**RSS Feed

# Improving Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Diseases for Communities of Color

Healthy Moments Episode:July 31, 2023
Health disparity studies may help prevent and treat chronic diseases in communities of color.

Listen Now

Download the MP3 audio file(MP3, 1.88 MB)**

## Transcript

**DR. RODGERS:**Health disparity studies may help prevent and treat chronic diseases in communities of color.

Hi, I’m Dr. Griffin Rodgers, a Director at the NIH.

My colleague, Dr. Eliseo Pérez-Stable, Director of the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities at NIH, explains.

**DR. PÉREZ-STABLE:**Some diseases disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minority groups. For example, African Americans and Latinos have higher rates of kidney disease, diabetes, and obesity. They have less access to quality food and health care and are more likely to live or work in conditions that raise their risk for worse health outcomes.

NIMHD funds research on the links between chronic disease and determinants of health – like behavior, physical and sociocultural environments, and health systems – to improve prevention and treatment approaches for those most affected by health disparities.

**DR. RODGERS: **Follow us  @NIDDKgov.

## Related Information

- Understanding Health Disparities Series

Share this page
FacebookXEmailWhatsAppLinkedInRedditPinterest
#### Siesel & Company *et al. v.*Wells *et al.*

There was no abuse of discretion in denying the prayer for injunction and receiver, nor in discharging the temporary receiver.

June 11, 1894.

Petition for injunction and receiver. Before Judge Smith. Dooly county. March' 17, 1894.

J. H. Blount, Jr., and Anderson & Anderson, for plaintiffs. J. W. Haygood and Gustin, Guerry & Hall,. for defendants.

*Judgment affirmed.*
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice Expert Report of Harold R. Blomquist, Ph.D.


Download file: Expert Report of Harold R. Blomquist, Ph.D.
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Carlton H. Baab, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Reportof Raining Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Raining Data Corporation.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/  Carlton H. Baab                   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Carlton  H. Baab                       |
|   | Title: | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Brian C. Bezdek, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Reportof Raining Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period endedJune 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Raining Data Corporation.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/  Brian C. Bezdek     |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Brian  C. Bezdek         |
|   | Title: | Chief  Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         224,677
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     60,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               309,844
<PP&E>                                          64,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 330,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           71,305
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,414
<OTHER-SE>                                     259,226
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   330,531
<SALES>                                        106,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,304
<CGS>                                           64,574
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  701,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (582,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (582,655)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (582,655)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard W. Koe, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of TigerLogic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of TigerLogic Corporation for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 12, 2009



By:

/s/    Richard W. KoeName:

Richard W. KoeTitle:

Interim President and Chief Executive Officer


I, Thomas Lim, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of TigerLogic Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of TigerLogic Corporation
for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 12, 2009



By:

/s/    Thomas LimName:

Thomas LimTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
#### Pamela B. Rodman, Respondent, v Robert H. Friedman, Appellant.

[978 NYS2d 127]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lori S. Sattler, J.), entered April 16, 2013, which denied defendant’s motion to suspend his child support obligation and to enforce payment by plaintiff of self-executing fines for missed parenting time, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to grant the motion to the extent of suspending defendant’s child support obligations until regular visits with the child are resumed, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s “deliberate frustration” of and “active interference” with defendant’s visitation rights warrant the suspension of child support payments *(see Ledgin v Ledgin,*36 AD3d 669, 670 [2d Dept 2007]; Domestic Relations Law § 241). On a prior appeal, we affirmed Supreme Court’s finding that plaintiff had alienated the child from defendant *(Rodman v Friedman,*33 AD3d 400 [1st Dept 2006], *lv dismissed*8 NY3d 895 [2007]). On the instant motion, the court found, based on plaintiffs own submissions, that “alienation ha[d] continued unabated” and that “[p]laintiff s conduct remains unchanged: she persists in her denigration of [defendant as a parent and as a person and refuses to accept responsibility for the escalating damage being inflicted on her daughter.” Under the circumstances, suspension of defendant’s child support obligation is necessary to enforce defendant’s reasonable rights of visitation.

Defendant’s argument that the court should have declared the child constructively emancipated was improperly raised for *538the first time on appeal *(see Matter of Matthew Niko M. [Niko M.],*85 AD3d 544 [1st Dept 2011]). In any event, at the time of defendant’s motion, the child was not of an “employable age,” being only 15 years old, so her abandonment of defendant could not be deemed to constitute constructive emancipation *(see Matter of Dobies v Brefka,*83 AD3d 1148, 1152 [3d Dept 2011] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

The court properly declined to enforce the self-executing fines for missed visitation time, since the part of the court’s 2006 order directing plaintiff to pay those fines was held in abeyance in March 2007, pending the determination of the parties’ motions. In May 2007, the court explicitly instructed defendant to renew his application for any relief that had been held in abeyance, which defendant failed to do until 2012. Defendant’s assertions that he has been “tracking” every visit with the child by the hour and that fines for missed visitation from 2006 until 2011 have reached $134,775 are unsubstantiated. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2468 

To suspend temporarily the duty on sound-isolating earphones. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on sound-isolating 

earphones. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SOUND-ISOLATING EARPHONES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2468 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sound-isolating earphones 

with multiple balanced armature speakers, each with nonporous slow-recovery black 

foam attachment sleeves, detachable cable, and with a repeatable frequency response 

of 20Hz or more but not over 

16kHz with a deviation of +/ 

¥3dB (provided for in subheading 8518.30.20) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 19, 2020

No. 04-20-00292-CR

Neil Howard MCGINNIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6777

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On August 10, 2020, we advised the court reporter that the records were late. On August 

17, 2020, court reporter Connie Calvert advised this court that counsel has not asked her to 

prepare the reporter’s records. 

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the 

date of this order that (1) Appellant has delivered a written request to prepare the reporter’s 

records to court reporter Connie Calvert that designates any exhibits to be included, see TEX. R.

APP. P. 34.6(b), and (2) either the arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or 

Appellant is entitled to free reporter’s records, see TEX. R. APP. P. 20.2. 

If Appellant fails to respond as ordered, Appellant’s briefs will be due within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in 

Appellant’s briefs that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(c). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
###### **EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

#### **Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

                In connection with the annualreport of Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc W. Eller, the Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

                1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

| Date:       March    9,2004        | s/ Marc W. Eller                                         Marc W. Eller    Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certificate of Chief
Executive Officer


Section 1350
Certification








In connection with the annual report of
Applied Nanotech Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas P. Baker, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2. The information contained in this
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and
results of operations of the Company.











Date:    March
      4, 2010
            /s/ Douglas P.
      BakerDouglas
      P. BakerChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 7, 2020

NO. 03-18-00514-CR

Ronaldo Zabaleta-Martinez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.