alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          41,190
<SECURITIES>                                    22,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,017)
<INVENTORY>                                     40,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,462
<PP&E>                                          63,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                (27,494)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,506
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           63,251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,069
<OTHER-SE>                                     144,921
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,506
<SALES>                                        114,744
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,744
<CGS>                                           84,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   733
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,681)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (639)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,042)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,042)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
EX-10.2




EXHIBIT 10.2




Fiscal Year 2005 BioMeasurement Division Bonus Plan

of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated




Hutchinson Technology Incorporated (“HTI”) has a management bonus plan that covers an
executive officer and certain other management-level employees of its BioMeasurement Division. The
decision to pay out bonuses is made annually by the Compensation Committee of HTI’s Board of
Directors. The Committee’s decision is based on the BioMeasurement Division’s attainment of a
financial goal for the BioMeasurement Division for the fiscal year, certain milestones that
represent achievement of strategic division initiatives as well as other factors that may be
considered at the Committee’s discretion. Bonuses are paid in cash in the first quarter of the
following fiscal year.
#### Renee Springer, Respondent, v Veronica L. Cone, Also Known as Veronica L. Macri, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 818]

McCarthy, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ferradino, J.), entered May 18, 2012 in Saratoga County, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

As plaintiff was walking down the front steps of defendant’s house carrying defendant’s daughter, plaintiff allegedly caught her foot on artificial grass carpeting covering one of the steps, stumbled to the walkway, stepped into a crack in the concrete and fell. Plaintiff commenced this negligence action to recover for injuries allegedly sustained in her fall. Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, claiming, among other things, that she had no notice of a defective condition. Supreme Court denied the motion. Defendant appeals.

Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion. To prevail on her motion, defendant had the threshold burden of showing that she “maintained the premises in a reasonably safe condition and neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly dangerous condition” *(Candelario v Watervliet Hous. Auth.,*46 AD3d 1073, 1074 [2007]; *accord Raczes v Horne,*68 AD3d 1521, 1522 [2009]). Although defendant denied actual notice of any defect, she did not offer any proof that she maintained her property in a reasonably safe condition. She testified that two years before plaintiffs accident, defendant’s then-boyfriend removed the artificial grass carpeting from all but one step, as the carpeting was stuck to that step. Defendant admitted that she did not do anything to remove the carpeting from that one step, or do any other kind of maintenance or repair work on the steps since she moved into the home in 1996. She also acknowledged that the crack in the walkway was present since 1996. Viewing defendant’s submissions in the light most favorable to plaintiff, as the nonmovant *(see Candelario v Watervliet Hous. Auth.,*46 AD3d at 1074), defendant failed to satisfy her threshold burden.

*1227Even if defendant did meet her initial burden, plaintiff raised triable questions of fact. Plaintiff submitted photographs of the steps showing that the artificial grass carpeting may have created an uneven surface on the one step. In contrast to defendant’s assertion that the crack in the walkway was open and obvious, plaintiff presented her deposition testimony indicating that a rubber mat had previously been covering that area of the walkway; defendant denied having such a mat. The parties also presented contradictory testimony regarding whether defendant had instructed plaintiff to use a wheelchair and ramp rather than carrying defendant’s daughter down the stairs. These questions of fact should be presented to a jury to resolve. Accordingly, Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment.

Peters, PJ., Stein and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
NXPC - Specimen common stock certificate








EXHIBIT 4.1





NEXPLORE CORPORATION - Specimen Common Stock Certificate





NXPC STOCK CERTIFICATE - FRONT


	 
	 	 	 
	
      

    

NXPC STOCK CERTIFICATE - BACK
UNITED STATES
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                     Washington, D.C. 20549 

                           FORM 10-Q/A

          QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
               THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For Quarter Ended:  June 30, 1996   Commission File Number:        33-16653-A 

                         GOLDEN ORE, INC.
     (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

       DELAWARE                                 62-1320206
  (State or other jurisdiction                 (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization)             Identification No.)

             17 Hill Street, London, England W1X 7FB
       (Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip Code)

                       011-44-171-495-6669
       (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

            640 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10019
       (Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
                  if changed since last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
    subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
                         [ X  ]Yes [  ]No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer/s
    classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date:

                                        Number of Shares
Outstanding
Class                                        At June 30, 1996
Common Stock, Par Value                      25,357,143
$.0001
          Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.


                                        GOLDEN ORE, INC.
                                        (Registrant)


                                        By: /s/ Francis Joslin      
                                        Francis Joslin
                                        Director 

<PAGE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Events 
-  Grantee News 

# 2017 Grantee News Items

                - Fish use deafness gene to sense water motion: Researchers explore aquatic model for human hearing Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine  (12/21/2017)
                - Gene editing staves off deafness in mice: Technique to knock out mutant gene relies on fatty molecules to deliver CRISPR components to inner-ear cells Nature  (12/20/2017)
                - Unique sensory responses to the pediatric HIV medication Kaletra: The taste of personalized medicine Monell Center  (12/13/2017)
                - Scents and sensibility University of Florida  (12/12/2017)
                - A whole-body approach to understanding chemosensory cells Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) via Phys.org  (12/12/2017)
                - When the nose doesn’t know: Can loss of smell be repaired? Tufts University  (12/05/2017)
                - Low frequency brain stimulation improves cognition in Parkinson’s disease University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine  (11/28/2017)
                - Pitch imperfect? How the brain decodes pitch may improve cochlear implants University of Washington  (11/21/2017)
                - Quick—what’s that smell? Mammal brains identify type of scent faster than once thought NYU Langone Health  (11/16/2017)
                - Inner ear stem cells may someday restore hearing: Rutgers-led study shows promise and potential peril in reversing hearing loss Rutgers University  (11/06/2017)
                - Navigating the genome to cure deafness: Discovery of long-encoding RNAs in the auditory system may solve a piece of the deafness puzzle Tel Aviv University via EurekAlert!  (11/02/2017)
                - Case Western Reserve research advance may prevent a form of hereditary hearing loss: Four-fold improvement in hearing for a mouse model of deafness Case Western Reserve University  (10/26/2017)
                - Mistakes in how proteins of the ear are built contribute to early hearing loss University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine   (10/26/2017)
                - Brain training can improve our understanding of speech in noisy places Massachusetts Eye and Ear  (10/19/2017)
                - Her dizziness started after two days on a boat, and then it never went away Laureate Institute for Brain Research and Icahn School of Medicine via Washington Post   (09/30/2017)

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
- …
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast » 

## Media Inquiries

Contact the NIDCD press office at news@nidcd.nih.gov.

## Grantee News Archive

              - 2024 
              - 2023 
              - 2022 
              - 2021 
              - 2020 
              - 2019 
              - 2018 
              - 2017 
              - 2016 
              - 2015 
              - 2014 
              - 2013
#### In the Matter of Afton C., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Dutchess County Department of Social Services, Appellant; James C. et al., Respondents. (And Four Other Proceedings.)

Submitted February 22, 2011;

decided March 24, 2011

Motion by Saratoga County Department of Social Services et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About Us 
-  Organizational Structure And Staff 

# Division of Intramural Research

Lisa L. Cunningham, Ph.D., NIDCD Scientific Director

Elyssa Monzack, Ph.D., Deputy Scientific Director

### Advanced Imaging Core

Dennis C. Winkler, Ph.D., Staff Scientist

### Audiology Unit

Gayla L. Poling, Ph.D., Chief Research Audiologist

### Auditory Development and Restoration Program

Michael Hoa, M.D., Otolaryngology Surgeon-Scientist

### Genomics and Computational Biology Core

Robert Morell, Ph.D., Staff Scientist

### Inner Ear Gene Therapy Program

Wade Chien, M.D., FACS, Otolaryngology Surgeon-Scientist

### The Integrative Neuroscience of Communication Unit

Nadia M. Biassou, M.D., Ph.D., Senior Research Physician

### Intramural Research Administration Branch

Lynne Penn, Chief Administrative Officer

### Mouse Auditory Testing Core Facility

Tracy Fitzgerald, Ph.D., CCC-A, Staff Scientist

### Neurotology Branch

Ronna Hertzano, M.D., Ph.D., Senior Investigator

### Section on Developmental Neuroscience

Matthew W. Kelley, Ph.D., Senior Investigator

### Section on Human Genetics

Thomas B. Friedman, Ph.D., Senior Investigator

### Section on Neuronal Circuitry

Catherine Weisz, Ph.D., Tenure-Track Investigator

### Section on Sensory Cell Biology

Lisa L. Cunningham, Ph.D., NIDCD Scientific Director

### Section on Sensory Cell Development and Function

Katie Kindt, Ph.D., Senior Investigator

### Section on Sensory Cell Regeneration and Development

Doris K. Wu, Ph.D., Senior Investigator

### Section on Sensory Physiology and Biophysics

Angela Ballesteros, Ph.D., Stadtman Tenure-Track Investigator

### Section on Structural Cell Biology

Bechara Kachar, M.D., Senior Investigator

### Sinonasal and Olfaction Program

Joshua M. Levy, M.D., M.P.H., M.S., Clinical Director

### Veterinary Husbandry and Care Program

James McGehee, D.V.M., Supervisory Veterinary Medical Officer

March 14, 2024
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>


                                   EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   DILUTED COMPUTATION
              FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
AND 1998
                      (IN MILLIONS EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<CAPTION>

                               Three months ended         Six months ended
                                    June 30,                  June 30,
                                ----------------         -----------------
                               1999         1998         1999         1998
                               ----         ----         ----         ----
<S>                        <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>

 Basis for computation of
 diluted earnings per share:

   Earnings from continuing
    operations before
    extraordinary item and
    cumulative effect of a
    change in accounting
    principle              $      52.2  $      56.9  $     120.4  $     111.6
   Earnings from
    discontinued operations          -         30.1            -         23.4
   Extraordinary charge -
    debt retirement                  -            -            -         (2.7)
   Cumulative effect of a
    change in accounting
    principle                        -            -         (7.5)           -
                           -----------  -----------  -----------  -----------
   Net earnings applicable
    to common stock        $      52.2  $      87.0  $     112.9  $     132.3
                           ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========
Number of shares:

   Weighted average shares
    outstanding            114,353,541  114,259,700  114,323,038  114,132,765
   Common stock equivalents    280,407      745,281      312,721      755,554
                          ------------  -----------  -----------  -----------
   Total common and common
    equivalent shares
    assuming dilution      114,633,948  115,004,981  114,635,759  114,888,319
                           ===========  ===========  ===========  ===========

Diluted earnings per share:

   Earnings from continuing
    operations before
    extraordinary item and
    cumulative effect of a
    change in accounting
    principle              $     0.46  $      0.50   $     1.06  $      0.98
   Earnings from
   discontinued operations          -         0.26            -         0.20
   Extraordinary charge -
    debt retirement                 -            -            -        (0.02)
   Cumulative effect of a
    change in accounting
    principle                       -            -        (0.07)           -
                          -----------  -----------   ----------- -----------

   Net earnings           $      0.46  $      0.76   $      0.99 $      1.16
                          ===========  ===========   =========== ===========


This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item
601(b)(11).

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-102627 and No. 333-107990) and Form S-3 (No. 333-112027) ofPlains Exploration & Production Company of our report dated March 10, 2004, except for Note 2, as to which the date is June 11, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Houston, Texas 

June 14, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arête Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Herzog, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







February 2, 2011
By:
/s/ John HerzogJohn Herzog, Interim Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Arête Industries, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Limited (the Company) is filing
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual
report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report).

I, HE Tao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (iii) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and                          
| | ----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (iv)  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                             
| |  | --------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ He Tao                                  
| |  |                                             
| |  | HE Tao
Chief Financial Officer
June 24, 2003

82
#### In the Matter of Johnny H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 738]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about January 25, 2013, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied suppression of appellant’s statement to the police. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations. The record establishes that appellant was not questioned until after the police gave *Miranda*warnings to both appellant and his mother, that the police complied with the requirements of Family Court Act § 305.2 (7), and that the statement was voluntary *(see Matter of Jimmy D.,*15 NY3d 417 [2010]).

The court properly denied appellant’s motion to suppress identification evidence. There was nothing suggestive about the police photo array. We find no basis for suppression in the fact that there may have been a civilian-arranged single-photo identification, made prior to the police procedure and without any police involvement *(see Perry v New Hampshire,*565 US —, 132 S Ct 716 [2012]; *People v Marte,*12 NY3d 583, 587 [2009], *cert denied*559 US 941 [2010]). In any event, the identification was reliable and the court’s findings of independent source are also supported by the record. Appellant’s assertion that the victim did not see who stabbed him is meritless because immediately after the stabbing, the victim turned and saw appellant wielding a knife and being restrained by other persons.

The court’s fact-finding determination was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). The evidence included both reliable identification testimony and appellant’s voluntary confession.

The placement was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion *577that constituted the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection *(see Matter of Katherine*W., 62 NY2d 947 [1984]), particularly in light of the extreme seriousness of appellant’s attack on the victim. Concur — Friedman, J.E, Renwick, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Veronica P., Respondent, v Radcliff A., Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 522]

Appeal from order, Family Court, New York County (Ivy I. Cook, Ref.), entered on or about February 4, 2011, which after a hearing, determined that respondent had committed acts that constituted harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26), and granted petitioner a two-year order of protection directing appellant to, inter alia, stay away from her home, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

Because the order of protection has expired, this appeal is moot *(see Matter of Diallo v Diallo,*68 AD3d 411 [1st Dept 2009], *lv dismissed*14 NY3d 854 [2010]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Khalaire Allah, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York Street Department of Cor*1342rections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 836]

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered April 16, 2013) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule.

It is hereby ordered that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot *(see Matter of Free v Coombe,*234 AD2d 996 [1996]). Present — Centra, J.P, Fahey, Garni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.