alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-451 (Second Review)]

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Termination of review.

# SUMMARY:

On April 6, 2009, the U.S. Department of Commerce published notice of the revocation of its antidumping duty order on gray portland cement and cement clinker from Mexico and termination of the sunset review of the order (74 FR 15435). Accordingly, the Commission gives notice that its antidumping duty review concerning gray portland cement and cement clinker from Mexico (Investigation No. 731-TA-451 (Second Review)) is terminated.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         April 1, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jim McClure (202-205-3191 or via e-mail                         *james.mcclure@usitc.gov*), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (                        *http://www.usitc.gov*). The public record for these investigations may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at                         *http://edis.usitc.gov*.                    

Authority:This investigation is being terminated under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.40 of the Commission's rules (19 CFR 207.40).

By order of the Commission.

Issued: May 20, 2009.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9-12261 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Henry R. Mandell certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Spatializer AudioLaboratories, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant weaknesses and deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date: March 22, 2004      /s/ Henry R. Mandell Henry R. Mandell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30194

Conference Calendar

 

L.C. CARTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT RICHLAND PARISH; ET AL.,

Defendants,

SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT RICHLAND PARISH;

X INSURANCE COMPANY; WILLIE ROBINSON;

LORELL GRAHAM, Individually and as Sheriff

of Richland Parish,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-2237

- - - - - - - - - -

October 21, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

L.C. Carter appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment for the appellees. Carter argues that the district

court should have conducted an evidentiary hearing to determine
No. 97-30194 

-2-

when his cause of action accrued on his claims for false arrest,

false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution under 42 U.S.C. 

§§ 1983, 1985, and 1988. Since Carter did not raise this

argument before the district court, we review for plain error. 

Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Assn., 79 F.3d 1415, 1428 (5th

Cir. 1996)(en banc). Because Carter failed to adduce any

evidence concerning his knowledge, despite being put on notice by

the defendants that his claims might have prescribed, the court

did not commit plain error in its determination that there was no

material fact question on this issue. We have reviewed the

record and the parties briefs and AFFIRM the district court’s

judgment for essentially the same reasons set forth by the

district court. Carter v. Richland Parish Sherriff’s Dept., 95-

CV-2237 (W.D. La. Jan. 29, 1997). 

 AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  November 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Hyrum A. Mead, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ Hyrum A. Mead
                                         -----------------
                                         Hyrum A. Mead
                                         President (Principal Executive Officer)
                                         January 17, 2006
JOIN OUR

TEAM!

The Office of 

Contract Services 

is seeking 

entry-level and 

experienced 

professionals

with exceptional 

analytical and 

decision-making 

capabilities. 

“WE ARE THE 

AGENCY’S 

BUYERS” FOR:

 Innovative software 

and capabilities

 Data

 GEOINT products 

and services

 Commercial 

imagery

 Cutting-edge 

IT equipment

and services

 ... and more!

Contract specialists plan and manage acquisitions 

to procure a variety of products and services for NGA. 

They work with a team to satisfy customer requirements 

by developing and implementing acquisition strategies, 

soliciting and evaluating proposals, negotiating with 

vendors, and awarding contracts. Contract specialists are 

also responsible for administering contracts, monitoring 

contractor performance, preparing modifications, resolving 

problems, terminating contracts and performing closeouts.

SKILLS AND REQUIREMENTS

All Contract specialists require a bachelor’s degree in 

any field that includes, or has been supplemented by, at 

least 24 semester hours (or the equivalent) of coursework 

in a business-related field such as accounting, business, 

finance, law, contracts, purchasing, economics, industrial 

management, marketing, quantitative methods, and 

organization and management.

Entry Level

(Students, Pay Band 2)

 Experience in sales, marketing, finance, accounting, etc. 

 Ability to understand and analyze customer needs

 Problem-solving, negotiating and strong writing skills

Experienced Professionals

(Pay Bands 3, 4, 5)

 Demonstrate increased ability in developing and 

implementing innovative approaches and/or creative 

solutions within government regulations

 Proficiently lead customer interactions 

 Experience with a wide range of acquisitions for 

supplies and services

 Demonstrated experience with complex government 

contracts is preferred

APPLY NOW 

www.IntelligenceCareers.gov/NGA

Approved for public release, 19-006

OCC 180312-031
----

**EXHIBIT        11**

**NANO-PROPRIETARY,        INC. **

**COMPUTATION        OF (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE**

|                                          |   | Three                  months ended December 31, |        | Year                  ended December 31, |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|-------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                          |   | 2006                                             |        | 2005                                     |   | 2004 |   | 2006 |   | 2005 |   | 2004 |   |
|                                          |   |                                             |        |                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net                  income (loss) applicable |   |                                             |        |                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| to                  common shareholders       |   | $                                                | (1,483,105  | )                                        | $      | (1,560,500 | ) | $ | (1,768,636 | ) | $ | (6,593,892 | ) | $ | (5,818,816 | ) | $ | (7,139,109 | ) |
|                                          |   |                                             |        |                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted                  average number      |   |                                             |        |                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| of                  common shares             |   |                                             | 102,148,882 |                                     |   | 99,634,507 |   |   | 96,018,127 |   |   | 100,895,795 |   |   | 98,957,812 |   |   | 96,609,237 |   |
|                                          |   |                                             |        |                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net                  income (loss) per        |   |                                             |        |                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| per                  share                    |   | $                                                | (0.01       | )                                        | $      | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.07 | ) |
EXHIBIT
32.1 EARTHWORKS ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
 
 Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section
906 of the Sarbones-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 I, Peter
Keefe, Chief Executive Officer, and President "principal executive officer") of
Earthworks Entertainment, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of
my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended December 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the "Report"):
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)[15(d)] of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Dated:
      May 18, 2005
    /s/
      PETER
      KEEFEPeter
      KeefeChief
      Executive Officer, and President
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Events 
-  NIDCD News 

# 2017 News Items

                - NIH study uncovers clues about why common cancer drug causes hearing loss  (12/18/2017)
                - Snapshots of life: making sense of smell  (11/16/2017)
                - NIH researchers find a better way to study epithelial cell junctions  (10/30/2017)
                - New law to strengthen early hearing screening program for infants and children  (10/23/2017)
                - Hearing healthcare featured in MedlinePlus Fall 2017 Magazine  (10/19/2017)
                - Learn about stuttering on International Stuttering Awareness Day  (10/19/2017)
                - Researchers help uncover a root cause of childhood deafness in the inner ear using animal model   (10/10/2017)
                - October Is National Protect Your Hearing Month  (09/29/2017)
                - NIH awards nearly $100 million for Autism Centers of Excellence program  (09/07/2017)
                - Statement on over-the-counter hearing aid law by NIDCD Director James F. Battey, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.  (08/21/2017)
                - Retirement symposium for Barry Horwitz set for September 8  (08/18/2017)
                - NIH scientists find “missing mutation” linked to inherited form of hearing loss  (08/15/2017)
                - Experimental treatment for Niemann-Pick disease type C1 appears safe, effective  (08/11/2017)
                - Aphasia featured in MedlinePlus Spring 2017 Magazine  (06/07/2017)
                - NIH researchers show protein in inner ear is key to how cells that help with hearing and balance are positioned  (05/23/2017)

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-  Next pageNext › 
-  Last pageLast » 

## Media Inquiries

Contact the NIDCD press office at news@nidcd.nih.gov.

## News Archive

              - 2024 
              - 2023 
              - 2022 
              - 2021 
              - 2020 
              - 2019 
              - 2018 
              - 2017 
              - 2016 
              - 2015 
              - 2014 
              - 2013
Andre J. Twitty, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Eric Holder et aI., 

Respondents. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

JAN 2 9 2010 

Clerk, U.S. District and 

Bankruptcy Courts 

10 0174 

Petitioner Andre J. Twitty has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a pro 

se petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The application will be granted and the petition will be 

dismissed. 

Twitty is a prisoner under sentence imposed by the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Georgia. He is currently incarcerated at the United States Penitentiary in 

Florence, Colorado. His incoherent petition briefly references several legal topics such as 

jurisdiction, estoppel, and the breadth of the writ of habeas corpus, but does not indicate how 

these subjects relate to his case. Conclusorily stating that it is the "courts themselves that have 

rendered all of petitioner's prior attempts 'inadequate and ineffective,'" he alleges generally that 

his conviction was fraudulently obtained. Pet. at 3. Twitty concludes that he has "presented 

more than enough evidence to establish his actual innocence that entitles him to immediate 

release." Id. at 5 (punctuation altered). 

As a federal prisoner, Twitty's challenge to his conviction and detention must first be 

exhausted as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 lodged with the sentencing court; only thereafter, 
and only if the prisoner can show that the remedy under § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective, the 

challenge may be brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus lodged 

in the district court that has personal jurisdiction over the prisoner's immediate custodian. See 

28 U.S.C. § 2255; Wilson v. Office a/Chairperson, Dist. a/Columbia Bd. a/Parole, 892 F. 

Supp. 277, 279 (D.D.C. 1995) ("[A] decision on a § 2255 motion is ordinarily required before a 

federal court will entertain a habeas petition."); Chatman-Bey, 864 F.2d at 810 "[A] district court 

may not entertain a habeas corpus action unless it has personal jurisdiction over the custodian of 

the prisoner. ... It is also well settled that the appropriate defendant in a habeas action is the 

custodian of the prisoner.") (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). It appears that 

Twitty is well aware of these remedies. See Twitty v. Wiley, 332 Fed. Appx. 523 (10th Cir. 2009) 

(noting that since his conviction by jury in 1999, "Twitty has ... filed numerous petitions for 

relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2255."). As this Court does not have personal jurisdiction 

over Twitty's immediate custodian, it does not have jurisdiction over this habeas petition. 

Accordingly, the petition will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

A separate order of companies, this memorandum opinion. 

Date: ~. ,g) d..OjD ~ K~- Jb.7JI 

United States District Judge F) '7 

- 2 -
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2486 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2486

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-Dichlorotoluene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-Dichlorotoluene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,6-DICHLOROTOLUENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.82 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,6-Dichlorotoluene) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen C. Raffaele, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |                                                                     
|                     |  | 
|Dated: March 9, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Stephen C. Raffaele                                          
|                     |  |  |  |                                                                     
|                     |  |  |  | Stephen C. Raffaele Chief Financial Officer Sterling Bancshares, Inc

_







.
#### Waterman *against*Van Benschotten.

*f. .?<> f«■^oredlSt'o this “TMM,thep“aintiff here recovers less than '* *fifty*dollars damages» he is entitled to no more costs than damages. (1 ¿7. R, *L,*344» *Sets,*36. *ch. 96.-sect. 37.)*

THIS was an action of' *slander,*commenced in the court' of common pleas of *Otsego*couniy, and removed into this court by *habeas corpus,*in which the. plaintiff here recovered *ten*dollars damages only, and the recorder of *Albany*had taxed the costs , . j nclt t6Il aoliars*

*426*Starkweather,*for the plaintiff,

applied for, a re-taxation of the costs.

*Campbell,*contra.

*Per Curiam.*

The motion must be denied. The *six th*section of the act (1 *N.*R. *L.*344.) declares, that in all actions of slander prosecuted in the supreme court, if the jury shall assess the ■damages under *fifty*dollars, the plaintiff shall recover no more posts than damages» There is no saving here, as is to be found in the *fourth*section, with respect to causes removed froth inferior courts. Tt is probably a *casus omissus;*but as costs are only given by statute, We have no discretion to allow them against thp express provision pf the act $ nor can wé construe the word *prosecute*as applying only to such suits as are originally epinmenced in this court. The same word is used; in' the *fourth*section,, yet the *saving,*was deemed necessary as to causes removed from the courts of common pleas. Besides, the last proviso of the fourth section declares, that nothing contained in that section, shall extend to certain actions, mentioned, among which is that pf s}ander; so 'that we must, construe the sixth section by itself, or as if the fourth section had not beeh insert-, pd in the act. If so, there Pan be no ground for any distinction. between ¡actions originally .commenced here, arid those removec} from an inferior court by *habeas gorpus, •*

MPtipn dpnied,