alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              32
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    32
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      32
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1130693
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     750000
<COMMON>                                        291404
<OTHER-SE>                                     3166718
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        32
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (25145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.003)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                   ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James F. Whalen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  January 14, 2003                          By: /s/ James F. Whalen
       ----------------                              -------------------------
                                                          James F. Whalen
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1








Certification of Chief Executive Officer of


Borden Chemicals and Plastics Limited
Partnership





This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform
and Investor Protection Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, of Borden Chemicals and Plastics Limited Partnership (the Issuer). I,
Mark J. Schneider, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:





| | (i) |  | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Date: December 18, 2002

/S/    MARK J. SCHNEIDERMark J. SchneiderChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Gexa Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March
31, 2005 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, I, Neil M. Leibman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.         The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and 2.         The  information
 contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial
 condition  and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Neil M. LeibmanNeil M.
LeibmanChief Executive OfficerDated: May 12, 2005 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gexa Corp. and will be retained by
the Gexa Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
    <meta name="robots" content="noindex">
    <title>News Archive - NIDDK</title>
    
<meta name="VIcurrentDateTime" content="638490771591973877" />
<meta name="VirtualFolder" content="/" />
<script type="text/javascript" src="/layouts/system/VisitorIdentification.js"></script>

</head>
<body>
    <div></div>
</body>
</html>
#### Calhoun v. WHA Med. Clinic, PLLC

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 585

No. 479P06

1. Pits’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-1345)

2. Def’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Denied 03/08/07

2. Dismissed as Moot 03/08/07
No. 870.

#### Bernstein *v.*United States.

March 2, 1942.

*Mr. Herbert*
      *812
      *Zelenko*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Fahy*and *Assistant Attorney General Berge*for the United States.

*811Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Holiday RV
Superstores, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended July 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Amendment), I, Casey L. Gunnell, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Amendment fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

| |  |                                                             
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Casey L. Gunnell                                        
| |  |                                                             
| |  | Casey L. Gunnell
Acting Chief Executive Officer
June 2, 2003
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER(pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C.§1350))**

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, LeonardP. Shaykin, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer ofTapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify, to hisknowledge, that:

(a)          the Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 28, 2005 of the Company (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(b)         theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 22,2006

|        |       | /s/  LEONARD P. SHAYKIN             |
|--------|------------|-------------------------------------|
|   | ** ** | Leonard P.  Shaykin                 |
|   | ** ** | Chairman of the  Board of Directors |
|   | ** ** | and Chief  Executive Officer        |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and will be retained by Tapestry Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. Thiscertification “accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, isnot deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference intoany filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after thedate of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing.

----
Order issued October5, 2012

In The 

## <!rnurt nf App.eals 111iftq 1llistrict nf W.exas at 1llallas No. 05-11-00996-CR RICHARD GOMEZ, Appellant 

# v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

### ORDER Appellant's motion for oral argument is DENIED. The State's motion for extension oftimeto file briefis GRANTED and the brief tendered on August 20, 2012 is ORDERED filed as ofthe date ofthis order.
Order filed, January 09, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 01065

- CV

____________ RAMESH KAPUR D/B/A A IC MANAGEMENT COMPAN Y , Appellant

V.
HARRIS COUNTY, LINEB ARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON LLP

AND CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 269th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 71264



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due December 30, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend ti me for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cantrece Addison , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal wit hin 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesus Pratts, Appellant.

Submitted October 25, 2010;

decided November 17, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Kankakee Bancorp, Inc (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), I, Ronald J. Walters,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

 /s/ Ronald J. Walters
---------------------------
Ronald J. Walters,
Principal Financial Officer

March 26, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               FOR THE                  FOR THE                  FOR THE
                                             YEAR ENDED               YEAR ENDED               YEAR ENDED
                                            June 30, 1999            June 30, 1998            June 30, 1997
                                            -------------            -------------            -------------
<S>                                          <C>                      <C>                      <C>
NET INCOME                                   $3,183,000               $3,051,000               $2,319,000
                                             ==========               ==========               ==========
BASIC EPS:
     WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING      2,188,014                2,176,893                2,247,021
                                             ----------               ----------               ----------
     BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE                     $1.45                    $1.40                    $1.03
                                                  =====                    =====                    =====
DILUTED EPS:
     WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING      2,188,014                2,176,893                2,247,021
     DILUTIVE EFFECT OF EMPLOYEE STOCK
      OPTIONS                                   106,310                  135,496                   78,637
                                             ----------               ----------               ----------
     DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
      OUTSTANDING                             2,294,324                2,312,389                2,325,658
                                             ----------               ----------               ----------

     DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE                   $1.39                    $1.32                    $1.00
                                                  =====                    =====                    =====
</TABLE>
---------------------
(1) NUMBER OF SHARES AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE EFFECTS OF
    THREE-FOR-TWO STOCK SPLIT PAID ON JANUARY 16, 1998.
#### Bella Gubenko, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Felix Equities, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent/Fourth-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Nico Asphalt Paving, Inc., Fourth-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 431]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered June 21, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the City’s motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Although defendants’ motions were made after the 60-day time limit set by the motion court for summary judgment motions (CPLR 3212 [a]), the court properly considered the motions because they sought relief nearly identical to that sought in third-party and fourth-party defendants Felix Equities, Inc.’s and Nico Asphalt Paving, Inc.’s timely motions *(see Filannino v Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth.,*34 AD3d 280, 281 [1st Dept 2006], *appeal dismissed*9 NY3d 862 [2007]; *see also Conklin v Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth.,*49 AD3d 320, 321 [1st Dept 2008]).

Con Edison established prima facie that it did not cause or create the condition that caused plaintiff’s accident. Its employee testified that the four excavations, or “cuts,” made on Murray Street were outside the area where plaintiff testified her foot got caught in a “deep crack” or hole *(see Jones v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc.,*95 AD3d 659 [1st Dept 2012]; *Robinson v City of New York,*18 AD3d 255 [1st Dept 2005]). Plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition, since she did not address the record evidence of the location of the work performed.

The City failed to establish its entitlement to summary judgment since it submitted no evidence indicating that it had no notice of the defective condition in the street *(see Gonzalez v City of New York,*268 AD2d 214 [1st Dept 2000]). Contrary to the City’s sole contention on the motion, plaintiffs description of the defective condition in the street was sufficient to identify *472the cause of her fall; any ambiguity in her testimony, given through a translator, goes to the weight of her evidence, and does not require dismissal of the complaint *(see Alvarez v New York City Hous. Auth.,*295 AD2d 225, 226 [1st Dept 2002]; *Garcia v New York City Tr. Auth.,*269 AD2d 142 [1st Dept 2000]). Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.
----

**EXHIBIT        21**

**Subsidiaries        of the Company**

|                                    |   |                                    |   | Doing                  Business                 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Subsidiary                              |   | State                  of Incorporation |   | under                  the Following Names      |
|                                    |   |                                    |   |                                            |
| Sign                  Builders of       |   | Delaware                                |   | Sign                  Builders of America, Inc. |
| America,                  Inc.          |   |                                    |   |                                                 |
|                                    |   |                                    |   |                                            |
| Applied                  Nanotech, Inc. |   | Delaware                                |   | Applied                  Nanotech, Inc.         |
|                                    |   |                                    |   |                                            |
| Electronic                  Billboard   |   | Delaware                                |   | Electronic                  Billboard           |
| Technology,                  Inc.       |   |                                    |   | Technology,                  Inc.               |
|                                    |   |                                    |   |                                            |
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gexa Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Neil Leibman,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Neil Leibman         |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Neil Leibman             |
| Chief Executive  Officer |
| Dated: May 21,  2004     |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gexa Corp. andwill be retained by the Gexa Corp. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      Exhibit 11

                              WOLVERINE TUBE, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Three-month period ended:     Nine-month period ended:
                                              -------------------------     ------------------------

                                            September 27,   September 28,  September 27, September 28,
                                                1997            1996           1997          1996
                                                ----            ----           ----          ----
<S>                                           <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>     
Income before extraordinary
  item .................................      $  7,289       $  9,580       $ 23,189       $ 30,277
Extraordinary item, net of
  tax ..................................            --             --         (4,738)            --
Preferred dividends ....................           (70)           (70)          (210)          (210)
                                              --------       --------       --------       --------
Net income applicable to
  Common shares ........................      $  7,219       $  9,510       $ 18,421       $ 30,067
                                              ========       ========       ========       ========

Weighted average common
  shares outstanding ...................        14,057         13,824         14,018         13,744
Common equivalent shares
  outstanding ..........................           183            391            209            447
                                              --------       --------       --------       --------
Weighted average common
  and common equivalent shares
  outstanding ..........................        14,240         14,215         14,227         14,191
                                              ========       ========       ========       ========

Earnings Per Share:
Income before extraordinary
  item .................................      $    .51       $    .67       $   1.61       $   2.12
Extraordinary item .....................            --             --           (.33)            --
                                                             --------       --------       --------
Net income per common
  share ................................      $    .51       $    .67       $   1.28       $   2.12
                                              ========       ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>









--------------------
(1) Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options based upon the
treasury stock method using the average market price per share. As fully diluted
shares outstanding are the same as primary shares outstanding for all periods
presented, net income per common share on a fully-diluted basis is not
separately presented.







                                       19