alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 533 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that a NADBank 

guarantee is not considered a Federal guarantee for purposes of determining the tax-exempt status of bonds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2005 

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

that a NADBank guarantee is not considered a Federal 

guarantee for purposes of determining the tax-exempt 

status of bonds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN GUARANTEES NOT CONSIDERED FED4 ERAL GUARANTEES FOR PURPOSES OF DE5 TERMINING TAX-EXEMPT STATUS OF BONDS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 149(b)(3)(A)(i) of the In7 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain insur-
2 

•S 533 IS

1 ance programs) is amended by inserting ‘‘the North Amer2 ican Development Bank,’’ after ‘‘Corporation,’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply with respect to any bond issued 

5 before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>  
                                                 Three Months Ended        Six Months Ended
                                               -----------------------   -----------------------
                                                 11/30/95     11/30/94     11/30/95     11/30/94
                                               ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
<S>                                            <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
INCOME FROM CONTINUING
 OPERATIONS                                    $  968,000   $  160,000   $1,684,000   $  256,000
                                               ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
 
NET INCOME                                     $2,568,000   $  750,000   $3,888,000   $  893,000
                                               ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
 
Earnings Per Share
------------------
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                              4,125,928    4,215,815    4,191,050    4,215,214
 
Common share equivalents,
assuming exercise of stock
options and warrants                              312,901      113,469      279,501      102,745
                                               ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
Average shares used in com-
puting earnings per share                       4,438,829    4,329,284    4,470,551    4,317,959
                                               ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
 
Net income per share from                      $      .22   $      .04   $      .38   $      .06
continuing operations                          ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
 
Net income per share                           $      .58   $      .17   $      .87   $      .21
                                               ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
 
 
Earnings Per Share-Assuming Full Dilution
-----------------------------------------
Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                              4,125,928    4,215,815    4,191,050    4,215,214
 
Common share equivalents,
assuming exercise of stock
options                                           312,901      113,469      300,900      102,745
                                               ----------   ----------   ----------   ----------
Average shares used in com-
puting earnings per share                       4,438,829    4,329,284    4,491,950    4,317,959
 
Income from continuing
operations per share                           $      .22   $      .04   $      .38   $      .06
                                               ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
 
Net income per share                           $      .58   $      .17   $      .87   $      .21
                                               ==========   ==========   ==========   ==========
</TABLE>

                                       16
<PAGE>

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Frank J. Drohan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report for the period ended
September 30, 2003 on Form 10-QSB of Alfa International Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14
and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared; and

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date");
and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

<PAGE>

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls.

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not
there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.

Date: November 19, 2003

/s/ Frank J. Drohan
-------------------
Frank J. Drohan
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

The originally executed copy of this Certification will be
maintained at the Company's offices and will be made available
for inspection upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23869]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11828]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases Special Grants Review Committee.
    Date: June 2-3, 2009.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Helen Lin, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, 
NIH/NIAMS/RB, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Plaza One, Bethesda, 
MD 20817, 301-594-4952, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#14787d7a7c255479757d783a7a7d7c3a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b575255530a7b565a525715555253155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 14, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-11828 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARVIN ERICK VARGAS GARCIA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-70250 

Agency No. A074-798-801 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 19, 2021**

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Marvin Erick Vargas Garcia, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to 

reopen and remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-70250 

BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen and remand for abuse of discretion. Movsisian 

v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Vargas Garcia’s motion to 

reopen and remand based on changed country conditions where he failed to 

establish prima facie eligibility for relief. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); RamirezMunoz v. Lynch, 816 F.3d 1226, 1228 (9th Cir. 2016) (the BIA may deny a motion 

to reopen for failure to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought); 

Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) (possibility of persecution 

“too speculative”). We reject as unsupported by the record Vargas Garcia’s

contention that the agency ignored evidence, misstated the record, or otherwise

erred in its analysis of his motion.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1999 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE ISSUER AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         342,573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,335
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               480,395
<PP&E>                                          67,682
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 492,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,972
<OTHER-SE>                                     492,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   492,207
<SALES>                                        146,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,187
<CGS>                                           74,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  322,115
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (167,928)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (167,928)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (167,928)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (167,928)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
### cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Terrence Terrell Hatcher Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 

### 2
(0) 947A 400 

## re l - SirkidusS Lliar,--A;3 '
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony SNIPE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-7372.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 20, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 3, 2006.

*197Anthony Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. John Charles Duane, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamar Snipe seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537*U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Snipe has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 722 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the tax on beer 

to its pre-1991 level. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 6, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the tax on beer to its pre-1991 level. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF 1990 TAX INCREASE ON BEER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 5051(a) 

5 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposi6 tion and rate of tax on beer) is amended by striking ‘‘$18’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘$9’’. 
2 

•S 722 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact3 ment of this Act. 

Æ
2:55 PM - 3:00 PM 

 

Celiac Disease-Focused Autoimmune Disease Coordinating

Committee (ADCC) Meeting Agenda

Teleconference/Videoconference

May 29, 2020

1:00 PM – 1:10 PM Welcome and Introductions

Ellen Goldmuntz, M.D., Ph.D.

Annette Rothermel, Ph.D.,

Division of Allergy Immunology and Transplantation,

NIAID

1:10 PM – 1:25 PM Updates from Federal Agencies, Private Organizations

and Foundations

1:25 PM – 1:40 PM Unmet Need in Celiac Disease - Patients’ Views

Marilyn Geller, CEO, Celiac Disease Foundation

1:40 PM – 2:05 PM Basic Research, Unmet Needs and Opportunities

Bana Jabri, M.D, Ph.D., Professor of Pediatrics, The

University of Chicago

2:05 PM – 2:30 PM Clinical-Translational Research: Gaps and

Opportunities in Prevention and Diagnosis

Joseph A. Murray, M.D., Professor of Medicine, The Mayo

Clinic

2:30 PM – 2:55 PM Non-dietary treatments for celiac disease: Why? Who?

What?

Ciarán P. Kelly, M.D., Professor of Medicine, Harvard

Medical School

Wrap up and Discussion of Future Meetings

Ellen Goldmuntz, M.D., Ph.D.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned executive officers of the registrant hereby certify that
this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained herein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant.

                                        Parkvale Financial Corporation

Dated: January 25, 2007


                                        By: /s/ Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.
                                            Director, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Dated: January 25, 2007


                                        By: /s/ Timothy G. Rubritz
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Timothy G. Rubritz
                                            Vice President-Treasurer and
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       22
## **Exhibit 21**

##### **Subsidiaries of the Company**

 

 

| Subsidiary                                                         |   | State of Incorporation |   | Doing Business        under the Following Names                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |   |                   |   |                                                               |
| Sign Builders of           America, Inc.  |   | Delaware               |   | Sign Builders of           America, Inc.  |
|                                                               |   |                   |   |                                                               |
| Applied Nanotech, Inc.                                             |   | Delaware               |   | Applied Nanotech, Inc.                                             |
|                                                               |   |                   |   |                                                               |
| Electronic Billboard          Technology, Inc. |   | Delaware               |   | Electronic Billboard          Technology, Inc. |
|                                                               |   |                   |   |                                                               |
|                                                               |   |                   |   |                                                               |
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135908 & (16) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 135908 COA: 281631 Ingham CC: 00-076224-FH MICHAEL ERNEST TROFATTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 3, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion for appeal bond is DENIED.

p0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk