Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Notices 25723 

mission and functions. Written 

statements may be submitted at any 

time or in response to the stated agenda 

of planned meeting of the Committee. 

All written statements shall be 

submitted to the Designated Federal 

Officer for the Committee, and this 

individual will ensure that the written 

statements are provided to the 

membership for their consideration. 

Contact information for the Department 

of Defense Audit Advisory Committee’s 

Designated Federal Officer can be 

obtained from the GSA’s FACA 

Database—https://www.fido.gov/ 

facadatabase/public.asp. 

The Designated Federal Officer, 

pursuant to 41 CFR 102–3.150, will 

announce planned meetings of the 

Committee. The Designated Federal 

Officer, at that time, may provide 

additional guidance on the submission 

of written statements that are in 

response to the stated agenda for the 

planned meeting in question. 

Dated: May 20, 2009. 

Morgan E. Frazier, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. E9–12500 Filed 5–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army; Corps of 

Engineers 

Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplement 

No. 2 to the Final Environmental 

Impact Statement for the West 

Tennessee Tributaries (WTT) General 

Reevaluation 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent. 

SUMMARY: The draft supplement no. 2 

will be prepared in conjunction with a 

general reevaluation report (GRR) and 

will supplement the ‘‘Final Supplement 

to the Final Environmental Impact 

Statement, West Tennessee Tributaries 

Project (Obion-Forked Deer River 

Basin),’’ filed with the Environmental 

Protection Agency on February 25, 

1983. A general reevaluation study will 

be conducted for the entire WTT project 

area to determine if there is still a 

federal interest in pursuing a flood risk 

management project and, if so, 

recommend a plan of improvement. The 

GRR and draft supplement no. 2 to the 

final environmental impact statement 

(FEIS) will focus on methods that 

reduce flood risks within the Obion and 

Forked Deer watersheds by restoring 

natural floodplain functions and 

reducing sedimentation that could cause 

channel blockages. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Michael Thron, telephone (901) 544– 

0708, CEMVM–PM–E, 167 N. Main, 

Room B–202, Memphis, TN 38103, email—john.m.thron@usace.army.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

1. Proposed Action: The project study 

consists of determining flood risk 

management solutions in the Obion and 

Forked Deer watersheds in west 

Tennessee. The project is authorized by 

Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 

June 30, 1948 (Pub. L. 80–858, 62 Stat. 

1171, 1175, 1178), and amended and 

modified by Section 207 of the Rivers 

and Harbors Act of November 7, 1966 

(Pub. L. 89–789, 80 Stat. 1405), and 

further amended by Section 3 of the 

Water Resources Development Act of 

March 7, 1974 (Pub. L. 93–251, 88 Stat. 

12, 14) and Section 183 of the Water 

Resources Development Act of October 

22, 1976 (Pub. L. 94–587, 90 Stat. 2917). 

Construction began in 1961. The initial 

project environmental impact statement 

(EIS) was filed with the Council on 

Environmental Quality (CEQ) on 

February 3, 1971. The federal court 

determined in 1973 that the 1971 EIS 

prepared by the Corps did not meet 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA) standards and enjoined the 

Corps from further construction on 

March 2, 1973. The Corps filed a revised 

EIS with CEQ on July 21, 1975, entitled, 

‘‘Final Environmental Impact Statement 

West Tennessee Tributaries Project;’’ 

however, the federal court in its 

decision of January 27, 1978 again 

determined that the FEIS was not 

sufficient to meet NEPA standards and 

directed that it be supplemented. A final 

supplement to the FEIS was filed with 

the Environmental Protection Agency 

on February 25, 1983 (Record of 

Decision signed August 8, 1983), 

entitled, ‘‘Final Supplement to the Final 

Environmental Impact Statement, West 

Tennessee Tributaries Project.’’ The 

final supplement to the FEIS included 

the addition of certain soil erosion 

control and timber, fish, and wildlife 

conservation features to the flood 

control plan. Construction resumed in 

1985 after the issuance of a consent 

order (Civil Action Number C–70–349) 

stating the Corps was allowed to 

proceed provided they follow a protocol 

in the acquisition of the 32,000 acres of 

mitigation lands authorized by Section 

3 of the Water Resources Development 

Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93–251, 88 Stat. 12, 

14). However, in June of 1987, the State 

of Tennessee denied water quality 

certification for the next item of work 

and construction was again suspended. 

All attempts to resolve the denial were 

unproductive. By April of 1990, the 

Corps had acquired 13,527 acres of 

mitigation lands for the project. Several 

demonstration projects were pursued 

between 1992 and 2008. Most notably, 

a limited reevaluation was performed in 

1996 for a demonstration project in the 

Middle Fork Forked Deer River and a 

demonstration project in the Stokes 

Creek watershed. However, the costs of 

compliance with the consent order were 

too great to pursue the demonstration 

projects. By letter dated December 23, 

2008, the State of Tennessee requested 

that a general reevaluation study be 

conducted for the entire project area to 

determine if there is still a federal 

interest in pursuing a flood risk 

management project and, if so, 

recommend a plan of improvement. 

2. Reasonable Alternatives: A wide 

range of alternatives will be examined 

for the study. Alternatives will focus on 

methods that control sediment entering 

the Obion and Forked Deer watersheds, 

restore natural floodplain functions, and 

comply with the consent order while 

achieving the authorized project 

purpose of flood risk management. 

Comparisons will be made among the 

alternative plans, including the ‘‘no 

action’’ alternative. 

3. The Scoping Process: The purpose 

of this notice is to advise all interested 

parties of the intent to supplement the 

‘‘Final Supplement to the Final 

Environmental Impact Statement, West 

Tennessee Tributaries Project (ObionForked Deer River Basin)’’ and to solicit 

comments and information concerning 

the study. A public involvement 

program has been initiated and will be 

maintained throughout the study to 

solicit input from individuals and 

interested parties and to identify any 

concerns or significant issues related to 

the project. This notice is being 

circulated to federal, state, and local 

environmental resource and regulatory 

agencies; Indian Tribes; nongovernmental organizations; and the 

general public. All interested parties are 

encouraged to participate in the scoping 

process. A public scoping meeting will 

be held on June 23, 2009, 7 p.m., at the 

Temple Baptist Church, 9105 East Van 

Hook, Milan, Tennessee. It is 

anticipated that the draft supplement 

no. 2 to the FEIS will be available for 

public review during the fall of 2014. A 

public meeting will be held during the 

review period to receive comments and 

address questions concerning the draft 

report. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

25724 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Notices 

Dated: May 22, 2009. 

Thomas P. Smith, 

Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Engineer, 

Memphis District. 

[FR Doc. E9–12567 Filed 5–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–KS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID DOD–2009–OS–0072] 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: National Security Agency/ 

Central Security Service, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice to Alter a System of 

Records. 

SUMMARY: The National Security 

Agency/Central Security Service is 

proposing to alter an exempt system of 

records to its existing inventory of 

record systems subject to the Privacy 

Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 

amended. 

DATES: This proposed action would be 

effective without further notice on June 

29, 2009 unless comments are received 

which result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the 

National Security Agency/Central 

Security Service, Office of Policy, 9800 

Savage Road, Suite 6248, Ft. George G. 

Meade, MD 20755–6248. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Anne Hill at (301) 688–6527. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

National Security Agency’s record 

system notices for records systems 

subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 

U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been 

published in the Federal Register and 

are available from the address above. 

The proposed system report, as 

required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the 

Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, was 

submitted on May 21, 2009, to the 

House Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform, the Senate 

Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs, and the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

pursuant to paragraph 4c of Appendix I 

to OMB Circular No. A–130, ‘Federal 

Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining 

Records About Individuals,’ dated 

February 8, 1996 (February 20, 1996, 61 

FR 6427). 

Dated: May 21, 2009. 

Morgan E. Frazier, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

GNSA 10 

SYSTEM NAME: 

NSA/CSS Personnel Security File 

(February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10531). 

CHANGES: 

* * * * * 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

Delete entry and replace with 

‘‘Records relevant to access classified 

information, assignment and 

reassignment, foreign official and 

unofficial travel, access to NSA/CSS 

spaces or facilities, access to NSA’s 

Intranet, and other personnel actions 

where security represents a relevant and 

valid element of the determination. 

Records may consist of name, Social 

Security Number (SSN), home address, 

home phone number, security file 

number, statement of personal history, 

photograph, fingerprint data, 

agreements with respect to specific 

security processing procedures, security 

processing forms and records, 

investigative and polygraph reports, 

appeal records, incident and complaint 

reports, unsolicited information when 

relevant, reports by domestic law 

enforcement agencies when relevant, 

clearance data, access authorization, 

foreign travel data, security secrecy 

agreements and financial data’’. 

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF SYSTEM: 

Delete entry and replace with ‘‘50 

U.S.C. Sections 831–835, Personnel 

Security Procedures in the National 

Security Agency; E.O.10450, as 

amended, Security Requirements for 

Government Employment; E.O.10865, as 

amended, Safeguarding Classified 

Information Within Industry, E.O.12968, 

Access to Classified Information; and 

E.O 9397 (SSN)’’. 

PURPOSE(S): 

Delete entry and replace with ‘‘The 

records are used for the purpose of 

determining suitability, eligibility, or 

qualification for civil employment, 

federal contracts, or access to classified 

information and/or NSA/CSS spaces 

and facilities; to determine access to 

NSA’s Intranet, to determine and ensure 

continued eligibility for access to 

classified information; to record 

adjudicative actions and 

determinations; to record processing 

steps taken; to document due process 

actions taken; to make determinations 

on official and unofficial foreign travel; 

to make determinations on assignment 

and reassignment and other actions 

where security represents a relevant and 

valid element of the determination’’. 

ROUTINE USE OF THE RECORDS MAINTAINED IN

THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS

AND THE PURPOSE OF SUCH USES: 

Delete entry and replace with ‘‘In 

addition to those disclosures generally 

permitted under 5 U.S.C. 552a(b) of the 

Privacy Act of 1974, these records 

contained therein may specifically be 

disclosed outside the DoD as a routine 

use pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as 

follows: 

To agencies outside DoD, to include 

but not limited to other clearance holder 

agencies or agencies charged with 

making clearance determinations, 

government agencies involved with 

national security or clearance 

investigations, other government 

agencies and private contractors 

requiring clearance status information 

and authorized to receive same; the 

Director National Intelligence (DNI) and 

his General Counsel in the event of 

litigation or anticipated litigation with 

respect to unauthorized disclosures of 

classified intelligence or intelligence 

sources and methods and related court 

actions; judicial branch elements 

pursuant to specific court orders or 

litigation. 

In addition, other government 

agencies or private contractors may be 

informed of information developed by 

NSA which bears on assignee’s or 

affiliate’s status at NSA with regard to 

security considerations. 

To local law enforcement (county and 

state) and other federal, state, or local 

agencies or departments for hiring 

purposes. 

To any entity or individual under 

contract with NSA/CSS for the purpose 

of providing security-related services. 

To any party, council, representative, 

and/or witness in any legal proceeding, 

where pertinent, to which DoD is a 

party before a court or administrative 

body (including, but not limited to, the 

Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission and Merit System 

Protection Board). 

The DoD ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ set 

forth at the beginning of the NSA/CSS’ 

compilation of systems of records 

notices apply to this system’’. 

POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING, 

RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND

DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

STORAGE: 

Delete entry and replace with ‘‘Paper 

in file folders and electronic storage 

media’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES