alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24.6

                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned  constitutes and appoints
Vince  Hren his true and  lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent with full power of
substitution  and  resubstitution,  for him/her and in his/her name,  place, and
stead, in any and all capacities,  to sign the Annual Report on Form 10K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, for filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Microtest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all
amendments to such Form 10K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and
all  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  granting to such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them,
full  power  and  authority  to do and  perform  each and  every  act and  thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming  all that such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


DATED: 3/26/99

                                                  /s/  Kent C. Mueller
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Kent C. Mueller
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

supriya.vartak@nih.gov

## Media Resources

High Resolution Image

## Research Statement

Dr. Vartak works on regulation of transcription factors in B cells, and their role in maintenance of genome architecture and stability. 

October 2022

Back to Top
The District Court of the 2nd Judicial District. County of Silver Bow.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. STACY MCKNIGHT, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-07-140 DECISION

On March 26, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years in the Montana Women’s Prison, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Theft, a felony. In light of the Defendant’s significant substance abuse problem, the Court would recommend that Defendant be required to complete the treatment program at the Elkhorn Treatment Center should the Montana Department of Corrections determine that such placement would be beneficial and appropriate for her.

*77On October 8,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Richard Phillips. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 8th day of October, 2010.

DATED this 21st day of October, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
#### In the Matter of Randolph W., Appellant, v Commissioner of Social Services, on Behalf of Ana B., Respondent.

[961 NYS2d 773]

Order, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about April 30, 2012, which denied petitioner father’s objection to a prior order, same court (Robert Ross, S.M.), entered on or about March 19, 2012, marking as withdrawn the father’s petition to modify or vacate an order setting the amount of child support arrears at $714, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There is no basis for modifying the May 2001 arrears order. The father failed to submit evidence showing that his income was less than or equal to the poverty income guidelines prior to the issuance of the order (Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [g]). The letter from the Social Security Administration, dated November 2010, confirms only that he had been receiving $761 in supplemental social security income as a disabled individual since September 2010, more than nine years after the order. Further, the cash withdrawals from the bank account that he held jointly with the mother, which the father claims prove that she received payments to care for the child, are dated from approximately October 2004 to September 2006, well after the relevant time period of the arrears determination. Moreover, this is not a case where application of the statutory prohibition against modification of an arrears determination would result in a grievous injustice (Family Ct Act § 451 [1]; *see Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v Gomez,*221 AD2d 39, 42 [1st Dept 1996]; *see also Matter of Dox v Tynon,*90 NY2d 166, 173-174 [1997]).

The record shows that, at the March 19, 2012 proceeding, the Support Magistrate adequately advised the father of his right to consult or retain a lawyer, or to request an adjournment for that purpose. The Magistrate was not required to advise the father of the dangers of proceeding pro se, since he was not entitled to counsel *(see*Family Ct Act § 262; *cf. Matter of Storelli v Storelli,*101 AD3d 1787 [4th Dept 2012]).

We have considered the father’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,812
<ALLOWANCES>                                       683
<INVENTORY>                                     31,031
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,845
<PP&E>                                         101,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                (36,866)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,613
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,487
<BONDS>                                         51,421
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            71
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   131,613
<SALES>                                         99,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,371
<CGS>                                           88,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,320
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,287
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,033
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,033
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 24.5

                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned  constitutes and appoints
Vince  Hren his true and  lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent with full power of
substitution  and  resubstitution,  for him/her and in his/her name,  place, and
stead, in any and all capacities,  to sign the Annual Report on Form 10K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, for filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Microtest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all
amendments to such Form 10K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and
all  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  granting to such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them,
full  power  and  authority  to do and  perform  each and  every  act and  thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming  all that such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


DATED: 3/26/99

                                                  /s/  Richard G. Meise
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Richard G. Meise
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. George Klaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Annual Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                     |  |                                                 |  |                    
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date: March 14, 2011 |  | By:                                             |  | /s/ L. George Klaus
|                     |  | L. George Klaus                                
|                     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  

I, Michael Pietrini, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Epicor Software Corporation on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                     |  |                                                                                                            |  |                     
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|Date: March 14, 2011 |  | By:                                                                                                        |  | /s/ Michael Pietrini
|                     |  | Michael Pietrini                                                                                          
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President
Finance and Administration (Principal Financial Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: VICTORY ROCK TEXAS, LLC,

Relator. '

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 16

- 00349

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Victory Rock Texas, L.L.C., ha s filed a mandamus petition asking that we issue

the writ of mandamus against the Honorable Robert E. Cadena , Judge of the 83rd District Court

of Pecos County , Texas, ordering Respondent to vacate an order which denied in part and

granted in part Relator’s Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion to Compel Arbitration, and:

(1) grant Relator’ s Motion to Dismiss; or (2), alternatively, grant its Motion to Compel

Arbitrat ion as to all claims between Relator and the Real Party in Interest, Triple S Materials.

Relator has also filed a motion for emergency relief asking that we stay a ll proceedings in the

trial court pending resolution of the mandamus

. We deny both the moti on for emergency relief

and the petition for writ of mandamus.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator generally must meet two requirements. First,

the relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance

Company of America , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate- 2

-

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id . at 136. Based on the record before us, we

conclude that Relator has failed to establish it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we

deny the motion for emergency relief and the petition for writ of mandamus.

January 11, 2017

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ

.
-  Home 
        -  About NIDDK 
        -  Staff Directory 
        -  Executive Office 
        -  Ethics Office 

Executive Office
-  Office of the Director Administrative Management Branch 
-  Extramural Administrative Management Branch 
-  Intramural Administrative Management Branch 
-  Acquisitions & Property Branch 
-  Computer Technology Branch 
-  Ethics Office 
-  Office of Financial Management & Analysis 
-  Office of Management & Policy Analysis 
-  Office of Workforce Development & Engagement 

Go to Staff Directory home

# Ethics Office

Select staff are listed in alphabetical order by last name. Read a description of the Ethics Office.
,


### THE ATTORNEY GESER~U. OF TEXAS OPINION 1 O-6839

- _ WAS WITHDRAWN. WASNEVER ISSUED OK
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMPUTER INTEGRATION CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,654,663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               61,102,532
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 15,220,977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            82,552,555
<PP&E>                                       2,314,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,269,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       61,704,659
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         19
<COMMON>                                         6,993
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,421,805
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,269,424
<SALES>                                    306,088,342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           306,088,342
<CGS>                                      275,226,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,001,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,630,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,770,490)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,079,505)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,690,985)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Hartford/North Bailey Homeowners Association, by Frank S. Pasztor, its President, Appellant, v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Amherst et al., Respondents. (And Another Proceeding.)

Submitted November 9, 2009;

decided December 17, 2009

Reported below, 66 AD3d 1504; 63 AD3d 1721.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM A-FEM
MEDICAL CORPORATION'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         55
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   880
<PP&E>                                           1,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (619)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         72
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                         537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,435
<SALES>                                              9
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9
<CGS>                                               63
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       63
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   417
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (429)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (429)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
# Comments for National Intelligence University

The Center of Academic Life for the Intelligence Community
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,745] 

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 3, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a United Auto Workers Local 651 Union representative on behalf of workers of Delphi Corporation, Flint, Michigan. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11872 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act Of 2002 
 On
August 18, 2005, Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
year ended December 31, 2004 (the Form 10-K) with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
following certifications are being made to accompany the Form 10-K: 
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that: (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
August 18, 2005
    
    /s/ JAMES L. FARESJames L. FaresChief Executive Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. Certification of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that: (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated:
August 18, 2005
    
    /s/ JAMES L. FARESJames L. FaresActing Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.