alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2506

MYRON BOGGS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTHEASTERN TIDEWATER OPPORTUNITY PROJECT,

a/k/a The Stop Organization,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-766-2)

Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 21, 1997

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Myron Boggs, Appellant Pro Se. James A. Gorry, III, Richard William

Zahn, Jr., TAYLOR & WALKER, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment to Defendant in this action alleging claims under 42

U.S.C. § 1985 (1994), and alleging violations of First Amendment

and privacy rights under the United States Constitution. We have

reviewed the record and conclude that this action is barred by res

judicata. See Keith v. Aldridge, 900 F.2d 736, 739 (4th Cir. 1990).

Accordingly, we affirm the ruling of the district court. Boggs v.

Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project, No. CA-96-766-2 (E.D.

Va. Sept. 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
II 

Calendar No. 77 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 839 

To repeal the law that gags doctors and denies women information and 

referrals concerning their reproductive health options. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 19, 2005 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To repeal the law that gags doctors and denies women information and referrals concerning their reproductive health 

options. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Access to Reproductive 

5 Health Information Act’’. 
2 

S 839 PCS 

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROVISION. 

2 Section 508(d) of division F of Public Law 108–447 

3 is hereby repealed. 

Calendar No. 77 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 839 

A BILL 

To repeal the law that gags doctors and denies 

reproductive health options. women information and referrals concerning their 

APRIL 20, 2005 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Mitsui Rail Capital, LLC (WB992-2—05/18/09), for permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of this request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration.

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.

*Contact:*                     Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.                

Kulunie L. Cannon,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. E9-11975 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
EXHIBIT 4(ii)

                     AMENDMENT TO THE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

                                  JULY 19, 2004

      The undersigned,  as a signatory to a subscription agreement with AlphaRx,
Inc., executed in conjunction with that certain offering of units, consisting of
one share of AlphaRx's  common stock and one warrant for one additional share of
AlphaRx's  common stock,  for up to $5,000,000  (the  "Agreement")  for good and
valuable  consideration,  the  adequacy  and  sufficiency  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged,  does hereby agree that the deadline for the final closing on page
3 of the Agreement is hereby amended from August 15, 2004 to September 30, 2004.

Agreed  and  Acknowledged,  this ____ day of July,  2004  Please  Print  Name of
Signatory to Subscription Agreement Below:


_________________________________

By:______________________________
Title:___________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,180,098
<SECURITIES>                                15,178,152
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,656,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,216,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            23,703,435
<PP&E>                                      21,871,242
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,402,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,172,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,501,747
<BONDS>                                        471,907
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,649,223
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,549,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,172,271
<SALES>                                      5,349,645
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,133,063
<CGS>                                        4,208,488
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,340,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             579,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,848,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,848,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,848,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.95)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.95)


</TABLE>
No. 890.

#### Minnec *v.*Hudspeth, Warden.

March 30, 1942.
#### Ramboot, Inc. v. Lucas

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 729

No. 155P07

Pits’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-357)

Denied 10/11/07
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2474 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires entered on or after 

September 7, 2005, and on or before August 15, 2006. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires entered on or after September 7, 2005, and on or before 

August 15, 2006. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF TRUCK TIRES ENTERED ON OR 

5 AFTER SEPTEMBER 7, 2005, AND ON OR BE6 FORE AUGUST 15, 2006. 

7 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION REQUIRED.— 

8 Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act 

9 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provi10 sion of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2474 IS

1 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

2 of this Act— 

3 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty each 

4 entry described in subsection (b) containing any 

5 merchandise which, at the time of original liquida6 tion, was merchandise eligible for duty-free treat7 ment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

8 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.); and 

9 (2) refund any duties and interest paid on such 

10 entries. 

11 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

12 subsection (a) are the following: 

Port Code Date of Entry Entry Number 

5301 09/07/2005 669–2816633–0 

5301 09/13/2005 669–2816686–8 

5301 04/03/2006 669–2818113–1 

5301 04/11/2006 669–2818162–8 

5301 04/18/2006 669–2818213–9 

5301 05/02/2006 669–2818340–0 

5301 05/23/2006 669–2818507–4 

5301 05/30/2006 669–2818627–0 

5301 06/06/2006 669–2818626–2 

5301 06/14/2006 669–2818677–5 

5301 06/15/2006 669–2818697–3 

5301 06/20/2006 669–2818734–4 

5301 06/27/2006 669–2818808–6 

5301 07/04/2006 669–2818852–4 

5301 07/11/2006 669–2818914–2 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2474 IS

Port Code Date of Entry Entry Number 

5301 07/19/2006 669–2818961–3 

5301 07/25/2006 669–2819019–9 

5301 08/01/2006 669–2819088–4 

5301 08/08/2006 669–2819135–3 

5301 08/15/2006 669–2819205–4. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2543 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2543

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's wading boots, valued 
   over $30/pair, with textile outer soles and uppers of leather or 
 composition leather whose height from the bottom of the outer sole to 
       the top of the upper does not exceed 9 inches (22.86 cm).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's wading boots, valued 
   over $30/pair, with textile outer soles and uppers of leather or 
 composition leather whose height from the bottom of the outer sole to 
       the top of the upper does not exceed 9 inches (22.86 cm).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN'S WADING BOOTS, VALUED OVER $30/PAIR, WITH 
              TEXTILE OUTER SOLES AND UPPERS OF LEATHER OR COMPOSITION 
              LEATHER WHOSE HEIGHT FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE OUTER SOLE TO 
              THE TOP OF THE UPPER DOES NOT EXCEED 9 INCHES (22.86 CM).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Men's wading        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        boots, valued                                                      31/2011.......
                        over $30/pair,
                        with textile
                        outer soles and
                        uppers of leather
                        or composition
                        leather whose
                        height from the
                        bottom of the
                        outer sole to the
                        top of the upper
                        does not exceed 9
                        inches (22.86 cm)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6405.20.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. PR08-17-000] 

Take notice that the Commission will convene a staff panel in the above-referenced proceeding on Thursday, February 26, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. (EDT), in a room to be designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 

This Staff Panel will review the factual basis for Bay Gas's 2008 annual adjustment to its Lost And Unaccounted For (LAUF) gas tracker/true-up mechanism. A previous Commission Order in this docket, 126 FERC ¶ 61,018 (January 12, 2009), ordered this Staff Panel to gather evidence in order to determine whether the updated LAUF recovery percentages reflected in Bay Gas's petition are fair and equitable. 

                    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please send an e-mail to                     *accessibility@ferc.gov*                     or call toll free                           ( print page 6284)                        (866) 208-3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with the required accommodations.                 

                    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further information please contact Vince Mareino at (202) 502-6167 or e-mail                     *Vince.Mareino@ferc.gov.*

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-2525 Filed 2-5-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Bernard J. DOLENZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. R.D. MILES, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-40130.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

Bernard J. Dolenz, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Bernard J. Dolenz, federal prisoner # 31480-077, filed an action in the district court invoking 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Because Dolenz’s action attacked the legality of the conviction and sentence for mail fraud, the district court construed the action as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissed it as an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion. Dolenz has appealed the judgment and the district court’s order denying Dolenz’s motion under Fed.R.CivP. 59(e). Dolenz’s contention that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because of defects in the indictment is foreclosed by *United States v. Cotton,*535 U.S. 625, 122 S.Ct. 1781, 152 L.Ed.2d 860 (2002). *See Wesson v. United States Penitentiary Beaumont, TX,*305 F.3d 343, 346 (5th Cir.2002). Dolenz has not shown that the savings clause of § 2255 applies to his claim of actual innocence. *See id.; Reyes-Requena v. United States,*243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir.2001).

Dolenz asserts for the first time on appeal that his sentence is illegal in light of *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This argument implicates the Court’s decision in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). *Booker*claims do not fall under the savings clause of § 2255. *See Padilla v. United States,*416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir.2005); *see also Wesson,*305 F.3d at 348.

Dolenz’s contention that the savings clause violates the Suspension Clause of the United States Constitution is foreclosed. *See Wesson,*305 F.3d at 347.

Because Dolenz has not shown that the district court erred in determining that he could not assert his claims in a § 2241 proceeding under the savings clause of § 2255, Dolenz’s contentions that his restitution order and prison sentence violate the constitutional prohibition against cruel *476and unusual punishment and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel have not been considered. The judgment is affirmed. Because Dolenz has not shown that the interests of justice require appointment of counsel, *see Schwander v. Blackburn,*750 F.2d 494, 502 (5th Cir. 1985), his motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 22, 2015

s1214

Order 

Clerk

December 22, 2015

150949

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150949

COA: 323819

Wayne CC: 96-004081-FC

DANIEL F. JONES, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

Montgomery v Louisiana, cert gtd __ US __; 135 S Ct 1546; 191 L Ed 2d 635 (2015), is 

pending before the United States Supreme Court, and that the decision in that case may 

resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the 

application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
-  Home 
        -  Health Information 
        -  For Health Professionals 
        -  Diabetes Discoveries & Practice Blog 
        -  Archive Results 

Diabetes Discoveries & Practice Blog

## Archive Results

                Results 1 - 1 of 1 for:                     **April 2020**

## New Technologies in Diabetes Care and Management

April 15, 20200 Comments
              - New Technologies
              - Research Advancements
              - Type 1 Diabetes

            Learn about NIH-funded technology breakthroughs advancing the science of diabetes.            Read more

## Blog Tools

### Subscribe

Subscribe to get blog updates.

### Share this page

FacebookXEmailWhatsAppLinkedInRedditPinterest

### Search

### About

**Diabetes Discoveries and Practice Blog**

### Tags

Patient Communication64

Research Advancements45

Complications of Diabetes35

Medication and Monitoring29

Practice Transformation25

Diabetes Prevention24

Patient Self-Management22

Obesity and Weight Management20

Social Determinants of Health19

New Technologies17

Diabetic Kidney Disease15

Type 1 Diabetes15

Nutrition12

Shared Decision-Making12

Community Health8

### Archive

April 20241

March 20241

Feb. 20241

Jan. 20241

Dec. 20231

Nov. 20231

Oct. 20231

Aug. 20231

July 20231

June 20232

May 20231

April 20231

March 20231

Feb. 20231

Jan. 20232

Dec. 20221

Nov. 20222

Oct. 20222

Sept. 20222

Aug. 20223

July 20222

June 20222

May 20222

April 20222

March 20222

Feb. 20222

Jan. 20222

Dec. 20212

Nov. 20211

Oct. 20212

Sept. 20212

Aug. 20212

July 20212

June 20213

May 20212

April 20212

March 20212

Feb. 20212

Jan. 20211

Dec. 20202

Nov. 20202

Oct. 20204

Sept. 20205

Aug. 20204

July 20203

June 20202

May 20202

April 20201

March 20202

Feb. 20203

Jan. 20202

Dec. 20193

Nov. 20192

Oct. 20192

Sept. 20193

Aug. 20193

July 20193

June 20192

May 20194

April 20192

March 20192

Feb. 20191

Jan. 20192

Dec. 20182

Nov. 20184

Oct. 20184

Sept. 20182

Aug. 20185

July 20183

June 20184

May 20185

April 20184

March 20183

Feb. 20184

Jan. 20183

Dec. 20173

Nov. 20174

Oct. 20172

Sept. 20174

### Disclaimer

We welcome comments; all comments must follow our comment policy.

Blog posts written by individuals from outside the government may be owned by the writer and graphics may be owned by their creator. In such cases, it is necessary to contact the writer, artist, or publisher to obtain permission for reuse.
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Lawrence A. Gyenes, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:




























/s/ Lawrence A.
Gyenes
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

As of the date hereof, I, Kurt R. Kneip, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of Inter-Tel, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Inter-Tel, Incorporated. This written statement is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit accompanying this report and
shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | By: /s/ Kurt R. Kneip         
| |                               
| | Name: Kurt R. Kneip           
|
| | Title: Chief Financial Officer
|
| | Dated: November 14, 2003