alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
periodic report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric K. Chan, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                           
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 22, 2013 |  | /s/ Eric K. Chan                                                          
|                      |  | Eric K. Chan President and
Chief Executive Officer Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
		1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
		2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
		QuantRx Biomedical Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
		period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
		Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sasha Afanassiev,
		Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
		as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
		knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the
		requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
		and

2. The information contained in the Report
		fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
		of operations of the Company.



/s/ Sasha AfanassievSasha Afanassiev
				CFO, Treasurer & VP of
				  Finance


Date: May 15, 2007

A signed original of this written statement
		required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
		by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
		staff upon request.





---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2541 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethanesulfonic acid, 2- 

[[[2,5-dichloro-4-[(2-methyl-1H-indol-3-yl)azo]phenyl]sulfonyl]amino]-, 

monosodium salt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Ethanesulfonic acid, 2-[[[2,5-dichloro-4-[(2-methyl-1Hindol-3-yl)azo]phenyl]sulfonyl]amino]-, monosodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHANESULFONIC ACID, 2-[[[2,5-DICHLORO-4- 

4 [(2-METHYL-1H-INDOL-3- 

5 YL)AZO]PHENYL]SULFONYL]AMINO]-, MONO6 SODIUM SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.98 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 Ethanesulfonic acid, 2-[[[2,5-dichloro-4-[(2-methyl-1HVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:38 Nov 03, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2541.IS S2541

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2541 IS

1 indol-3-yl)azo]phenyl]sulfonyl]amino]-, monosodium salt) 

2 is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/ 

3 31/2011’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

6 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Independent auditors' report


To the Board of Directors
Of Momo S.p.A.

We have audited the accompanying combined and consolidated balance sheet of the
Momo group as of 30 June 1997 and the related combined and consolidated income
statement, retained earnings and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the management of Momo S.p.A. Our
responsibility is to express on opinion on the financial statements based on our
audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Momo Group as of 30 June 1997,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles as defined in the
United States.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick
KPMG Peat Marwick
Milan, 25 July 1997
#### In the Matter of the Claim of David W. Howard, Respondent, v Stature Electric, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Submitted September 13, 2010;

decided November 18, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
exv10w13



 





Exhibit 10.13




Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers



Base salary information for our executive officers for 2008 is set forth in the table below.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Title	 	Base Salary
	C. Richard Harrison	 	Chief Executive Officer and President
	 	$520,000
	 
	Barry F. Cohen	 	Executive Vice President, Strategic Services and Partners
	 	$415,000
	 
	Paul J. Cunningham	 	Executive Vice President, Worldwide Sales
	 	$415,000
	 
	Anthony DiBona	 	Executive Vice President, Global Maintenance Support
	 	$338,000
	 
	James E. Heppelmann	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Product Officer
	 	$487,000
	 
	Cornelius F. Moses	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	$415,000
	 
	Aaron C. von Staats	 	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Clerk
	 	$300,000





Compensatory arrangements relating to other aspects of our executive compensation program are
included as exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended September 30,
2007. In addition, further information about compensation of our executive officers is found in our
proxy statements on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as in our periodic
Current Report on Form 8-K filings.
Dated:  March 27, 2008                                                                       By: /s/         Ken Frye                                                           Title:Senior Vice President, Loan ServicingI, Ken Frye, certify that:1.  I, or persons under my supervision, have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Specialty Underwriting and Residential Finance Trust, Series 2007-AB1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.Ken Frye**Exhibit 31 : Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)Name:In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the Trustee, U.S. Bank National Association, an unaffiliated party.Wilshire Credit Corporation, as Servicer
#### Mohammad Javaid ABDULRAFI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Bill LOCKYER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-16926.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 17, 2006.

Filed Oct. 25, 2006.

See also, 121 FedAppx. 226.

*825Rebecca Sullivan Silberte, Esq., FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office, Oakland, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Atty. General-CAS, Office of the Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: BRUNETTI, O’SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Petitioner Mohammad Abdulrafi appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition raised in connection with his conviction for lewd and lascivious acts on a child. We affirm.

Abdulrafi claims his defense counsel was constitutionally ineffective because he turned over to the prosecution investigative reports containing damaging evidence. The clearly established federal law governing our review is set forth in *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); see 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). To succeed on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Abdulrafi must show any deficiency in his trial counsel’s performance was prejudicial to his defense. *Strickland,*466 U.S. at 692,104 S.Ct. 2052. Prejudice is shown if “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” *Id.*at 694,104 S.Ct. 2052.

Abdulrafi failed to show his attorney’s disclosure of the investigative reports prejudiced his defense. The two witnesses whose testimony mirrored the information included in the investigative reports were identified in earlier police reports. Because the prosecutor received the police reports before the prehminary hearing, the prosecutor was aware of the witnesses before defense counsel’s disclosure. Abdul-rafi did not show a reasonable probability that he would have been acquitted if defense counsel had not given the investigative reports to the prosecution.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2497 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of manufacturing equipment entered on or after May 11, 1997, and before October 

21, 1998. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

entries of manufacturing equipment entered on or after 

May 11, 1997, and before October 21, 1998. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT ENTERED ON 

5 OR AFTER MAY 11, 1997, AND BEFORE OCTO6 BER 21, 1998. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections 514 and 

8 520 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520) 

9 or any other provision of law, not later than 90 days after 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2497 IS

1 the receipt of the request described in subsection (b), any 

2 article— 

3 (1) that was entered, or withdrawn from ware4 house for consumption— 

5 (A) on or after May 11, 1997; and 

6 (B) before October 21, 1998; and 

7 (2) with respect to which heading 9902.84.79 

8 (as in effect on December 31, 2001), 9902.84.85, or 

9 9902.84.91 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

10 the United States would have applied if such article 

11 had been entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 

12 consumption, on December 31, 2001, 

13 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if heading 

14 9902.84.79 (as in effect on December 31, 2001), 

15 9902.84.85, or 9902.84.91, whichever is applicable, ap16 plied to such entry or withdrawal, and U.S. Customs and 

17 Border Protection shall refund any excess duty paid with 

18 respect to such entry. 

19 (b) REQUESTS.—Liquidation or reliquidation may be 

20 made under subsection (a) with respect to any entry only 

21 if a request therefor is filed with U.S. Customs and Bor22 der Protection, not later than 180 days after the date of 

23 enactment of this Act, that contains sufficient information 

24 to enable U.S. Customs and Border Protection— 

25 (1) to locate the entry; or 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2497 IS

1 (2) to reconstruct the entry if it cannot be lo2 cated. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Ex-10.1 Amendment No.1 to Employment Agreement



 





Exhibit 10.1









September 21, 2007




Pat Murphy Kerstein

1940 Jamaica Way

Punta Gorda, FL 33950




Re: Employment Contract




Dear Pat,



This
letter confirms our recent conversations about your contract. As we discussed, we have
agreed to accelerate the Conversion Date from Executive Vice President to Consultant. The
Conversion Date will be October 1, 2007. Despite the acceleration of the Conversion Date, your
compensation shall remain as set forth in the Agreement.



Also, as we discussed, the Company continues to work on its commitment to provide you with
continued healthcare, for life. We anticipate that this plan will be in place in the next six to
eight months.



Please indicate your acceptance of this change in your contract by signing where indicated below
and returning the original signed letter to me in the enclosed self-addressed envelope.



Thank you very much and please feel free to call me with any questions.




Very truly yours,






Sandy Rhodes

Senior Vice President — General Counsel




AAR/ml




cc: Scott Edmonds, CEO









CHICO’S FAS INC. — 11215 METRO PARKWAY — FORT MYERS, FL 33966 — (239) 277-6200
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the ManTech International Corporation (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, George J. Pedersen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ronald R. Spoehel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This certificate is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person or for any reason other than as specifically required by law.



By:

/s/    George J. PedersenName: Title:

George J. Pedersen Chairman of the Board of Directorsand Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/    Ronald R. SpoehelName: Title:

Ronald R. Spoehel Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer




Date: March 16, 2005
#### State v. Broadnax

Case below: 145 N.C. App. 204

No. 293P07

1. Def’s Motion for NOA Under Sec. 7A-30(1) (Constitutional Question) (COA00-1103)

2. Def’s Motion for PDR Under Sec. .7A-31 (c) (1) & (2)

1. Dismissed *ex mero moiu*08/23/07

2. Dismissed 08/23/07
#### Leron J. Williams, Appellant, v Cynthia Estelle Zamora et al., Respondents.

[961 NYS2d 589]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), dated January 18, 2012, which *735granted the motion of the defendant Falk Mexhuani for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and that branch of the separate motion of the defendants Cynthia Estelle Zamora and Yinaina Dominguez which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the motion of the defendant Falk Mexhuani for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and that branch of the separate motion of the defendants Cynthia Estelle Zamora and Yinaina Dominguez which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, are denied.

The defendants, moving separately but relying on the same evidence and arguments, met their respective prima facie burdens of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the plaintiff did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]). In opposition, however, the plaintiff submitted evidence raising triable issues of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]). Thus, the Supreme Court should have denied the motion of the defendant Falk Mexhuani for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and that branch of the separate motion of the defendants Cynthia Estelle Zamora and Yinaina Dominguez which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Skelos, J.E, Chambers, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.23

PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY

DIRECTORS DEFERRAL ELECTION FORM

EFFECTIVE YEAR



|                |  |  |  |                   |  | 
|--------------- |  |  |  | ----------------- |  | 
|Directors Name |  |  |  | Social Security # |  | 

I hereby elect to defer all Restricted Stock Awards to which I may become entitled for my services in
             as a member of the board of directors (the Board) of Plains Exploration & Production Company (the Company).

In lieu of payment or transfer to me of Restricted Stock Awards, an equivalent number of Restricted Stock Units will be credited to an account for me. The Restricted
Stock Units credited to my account will become fully vested and non-forfeitable upon my completion of the earlier of (i) one full year of service as a member of the Board commencing on the date of grant or (ii) the next annual meeting of
the Companys stockholders. I will forfeit all rights to any unvested Restricted Stock Units should I leave or be removed from the Board for any reason prior to vesting. All vested Restricted Stock Units in my Restricted Stock Unit Account will
be distributed to me in the form of Company common stock as soon as administratively feasible (but no later than 60 days) after the date of my complete separation from service as a member of the Board.

I acknowledge that I have received sufficient information to make an informed election and that I have had answered to my satisfaction any questions that I may have had.
I further understand that my choice to defer compensation involves both a financial and tax risk and that neither the Company, nor any of its employees, is providing any assurances of returns, preservation of principle, or specific tax treatment on
any amounts deferred.

This election does not limit in any way the right of the Company or its Stockholders to terminate my board service in accordance
with the Articles and Bylaws of the Company. The Company retains the right to amend or terminate this agreement in whole or in part at any time, but no such amendment or termination shall affect my rights to, or the distribution of, amounts deferred
as of the date of such amendment or termination.



|                                        |  |                    |  |                    |  | 
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | 
|DIRECTOR                                |  |                   
|                                        |  |                   
|                                        |  | Date: December 31, |  |                   
|                                       
|PLAINS EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION COMPANY
|                                        |  |                    | 
|By:                                     |  |                    |  | Date: December 31, |  |
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2001

_____________________________

LESKIS ANN FINKLEA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Coleman Lee Robinson, Judge.

August 16, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Jasmine Dixon, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JEFFREY ZIMMERLY

,

A ppellant

,

v

.

DIANNE STANISLAWSCYK, AS

EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF

JOAN HITCHCOCK,

A ppellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 1 78

- CV

Appeal from the

Probate Court No. 1

of El Paso County, T exas

(TC# 2011

- 01120P )

MEMO RANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to d etermin e whether it should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that the Appellant ’s brief has not been filed, we

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

On October 21 , 2015 , the Clerk notified Appellant that his brief was past due and no

motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended

to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and

showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)(1). Ne ither the brief nor a

motion for extension of time in which to file the brief has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss- 2

-

the appeal for want of prosecution.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

November 13, 2015

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.