alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-922-09-1310-FI; COC69412] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

# SUMMARY:

                        Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC69412 from the following companies: (1) Whiting Oil & Gas Corp.,                               ( print page 4051)                            (2) Williams Prod Ryan Gulch, LLC, for lands in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Milada Krasilinec, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at 303-239-3767. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease COC69412 effective August 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                 

Dated: January 14, 2009. 

Milada Krasilinec, 

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. E9-1190 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Mandracchia, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 789]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered August 11, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]). Mastro, J.P, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., *concur.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6759

DESHAWN MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL HAYSI FACILITY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00111-gec-mfu)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

DeShawn Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: DeShawn Moore appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Moore v. Southwest Va. Reg'l Jail Haysi Facility , No. 7:09-cv-00111-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. Apr. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Valerie Sutton, Respondent, v Scott Burdick, as Executor of Wesley Burdick, Deceased, et al., Defendants, and Raymond Harvey, Appellant.

Submitted September 7, 2010;

decided October 21, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 14, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00132

- CV

James L. Hebert, Appellant

v.

April Marie Roberts Hebert, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 155TH DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JO N ES, JUSTICES PEMBERT ON AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLAN T ’ S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court appellant ’ s motion to dismiss the appeal in the

above cause, and the Court having fully considered said moti on, and being of the opinion that

same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant

p ay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision

be certified below for observance.
APRIL 2010 CALENDAR

The District Court of the 1st Judicial District. County of Lewis and Clark.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MARCH BECKER, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. BDC-2008-186 DECISION

On November 19, 2009, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence for the offense of Forgery, a felony, to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a period of twenty (20) years with fifteen (15) years suspended. The foregoing sentence shall run concurrently with the sentence imposed upon the defendant in Cause No. BDC-2008-221 of Lewis and Clark County.

On April 2, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present via videoconference and was represented by Kris Copenhaver. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there *24is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 2nd day of April, 2010.

DATED this 19th day of April, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5280-N-03] 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless. 

# DATES:

*Effective Date: January 23, 2009.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565 (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                     *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                 

Dated: January 15, 2009. 

Mark R. Johnston, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

 [FR Doc. E9-1250 Filed 1-22-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gexa Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Sarah Veach,Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Sarah Veach           |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Sarah Veach               |
| Chief Accounting  Officer |
| Dated: May 21,  2004      |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gexa Corp. andwill be retained by the Gexa Corp. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### Freddie Junior WELLS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Henry Dargan McMASTER, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-6868.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 3, 2006.

Freddie Junior Wells, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Freddie Junior Wells seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wells has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny *200a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
No. 756.

#### Stewart *v.*Davidson, Judge.

January 19, 1942.

J. *L. Stewart, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge,*and *Mr. Oscar A. Provost*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and motion for leave to proceed furthen *in forma pauperis,*denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2538 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Anthracenesulfonic acid, 

4-[[3-(acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxo-, 

monosodium salt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2009 

Mr. BURR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2- 

Anthracenesulfonic acid, 4-[[3- 

(acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro-9,10- 

dioxo-, monosodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-ANTHRACENESULFONIC ACID, 4-[[3- 

4 (ACETYLAMINO)PHENYL]AMINO]-1-AMINO5 9,10-DIHYDRO-9,10-DIOXO-, MONOSODIUM 

6 SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.02 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2538 IS

1 2-Anthracenesulfonic acid, 4-[[3- 

2 (acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro-9,10- 

3 dioxo-, monosodium salt) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

4 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

7 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 893 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 893

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2005

 Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
    the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To make technical corrections in the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 
                                 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.

    Section 102(41)(A) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
802(41)(A)), as amended by the Anabolic Steroid Control Act of 2004 
(Public law 108-358), is amended by--
            (1) striking clause (xvii) and inserting the following:
            ``(xvii) 13b-ethyl-17b-hydroxygon-4-en-3-one;''; and
            (2) striking clause (xliv) and inserting the following:
            ``(xliv) stanozolol (17a-methyl-17b-hydroxy-[5a]-androst-2-
        eno[3,2-c]-pyrazole);''.

            Passed the Senate April 25, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0178
CITY OF KALISPELL,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. GORDON THOMAS LEWIS ZUNDEL,

Defendant and Appellant. 

### AUG 0 9 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court Stato of Montana ORDER

Appellant Gordon Thomas Lewis Zundel appeals the Eleventh Judicial District Court's Order on Appeal in Flathead County Case No. DC-20-378(B). Zundel argues that the District Court erred by ruling that the Kalispell Municipal Court advised Zundel ofhis right to counsel and to court-appointed counsel where Zundel had no counsel present at any stage of his city court action—which resulted in Zundel being sentenced to 180 days of incarceration—and that the record doesnot demonstratethatZundel voluntarily, knowingly, intelligently, and unequivocally waived his right to counsel. The State has filed a Notice ofConcession that the District Court's order should be reversed, and this matter should be remanded tothe Kalispell Municipal Court fora newtrial with Zundel either having counsel or knowingly and voluntarilywaivinghisrighttocounsel on therecord. Without agreeing with all ofthe argumentsZundel has raised,the State agrees that in this case the record is insufficient to determine whetherthe Kalispell Municipal Court conducted a sufficient inquiry to establish that Zundel voluntarily, knowingly, intelligently, and unequivocally waived his right to counsel. Based on Zundel's opening brief and the State's concession, and good cause appearing, 08/09/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0178IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order on Appeal ofthe Eleventh Judicial District

Court, Flathead County, in its Case No. DC-20-378(B) is REVERSED, and the District Court is directed to remand the case to the Municipal Court for further proceedings. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord, to the Kalispell Municipal Court, to the Clerk of the Flathead County District Court, and to presidingjudge Honorable Robert B. Allison. Dated this ay ofAugust, 2022.

ChiefJustice

L i imo d o
(9 4 A

l J41. 1 Justices

2
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Events 
-  Grantee News 

# 2022 Grantee News Items

                - When Grandpa can’t hear words at a noisy holiday gathering, too many brain cells may be firing at once, say researchers Johns Hopkins Medicine  (12/22/2022)
                - Program that trains community health workers to deliver hearing care shows success among low-income older adults Johns Hopkins Medicine  (12/20/2022)
                - Research illuminates approaches for long-term hearing loss treatment Baylor College of Medicine  (12/08/2022)
                - How low-cost earbuds can make newborn hearing screening accessible University of Washington  (10/31/2022)
                - Mapping the path from smell to perception Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory  (10/27/2022)
                - Even fruit flies count Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory  (10/25/2022)
                - “That just sounds wrong”—New study shows how our brains tell us when a sound is off New York University  (10/24/2022)
                - OHSU scientists discover mechanism of hearing Oregon Health & Science University  (10/12/2022)
                - Researchers identify potential therapeutic targets to prevent hearing loss caused by antibiotics Indiana University School of Medicine  (09/26/2022)
                - UCI study IDs what brings our senses and thoughts together University of California, Irvine  (09/26/2022)
                - Stowers scientists use zebrafish to understand the connection between the immune system and regeneration Stowers Institute  (09/22/2022)
                - Unlocking the mystery of how mosquitoes smell humans Rockefeller University  (08/22/2022)
                - Whether speaking Turkish or Norwegian, the brain’s language network looks the same Massachusetts Institute of Technology  (07/18/2022)
                - Estimating hidden hearing loss: New word-score model leads to better evaluations of cochlear nerve damage Massachusetts Eye and Ear  (06/29/2022)
                - Study finds stuttering anticipation prompts unique activity in the brain New York University  (06/02/2022)

#### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast » 

## Media Inquiries

Contact the NIDCD press office at news@nidcd.nih.gov.

## Grantee News Archive

              - 2024 
              - 2023 
              - 2022 
              - 2021 
              - 2020 
              - 2019 
              - 2018 
              - 2017 
              - 2016 
              - 2015 
              - 2014 
              - 2013
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DEVONTE LAMAR WHITE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1602

[July 2, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Laura S. Johnson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-CF001761-AXXX-MB.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant 

Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, 

West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.