alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THIS DEED is made the 13th day of August 1997

BY  A.L.O.T. TRUSTEE LIMITED, a limited liability company incorporated in Jersey
whose registered office is situated at Pirouet House,  Union Street, St. Helier,
Jersey, Channel Islands (the "Trustee").

SUPPLEMENTAL to:-

(1)   a  settlement  made between BG Services  Limited and the Trustee  (therein
      called  "Agent  Loyalty   Opportunity  Trust")  dated  23  May  1997  (the
      "Settlement"); and

(2)   a deed of amendment dated 16 July 1997.

WHEREAS:

(1)   The Trustee is the present trustee of the Settlement.

(2)   By clause 22.2 of the  Settlement  the Trustee has power from time to time
      by  instrument  in  writing  to  revoke,  alter or amend all or any of the
      provisions of the Rules.

(3)   The Trustee is desirous of exercising  the power referred to above in such
      manner as hereinafter appears.

(4)   The Trustee has  consented to the exercise of the  Settlor's  power as set
      out above and has evidenced such consent by signing as a party hereto.

(5)   Where the context  permits  words and phrases  used herein  shall bear the
      same meaning as in the Settlement.


<PAGE>
NOW THIS DEED  WITNESSETH  that in exercise of the power  conferred upon them by
Clause 22.2 of the Settlement  the Trustee HEREBY  DECLARES that the Rules shall
be henceforth  read and construed as if the provision  specified in the Schedule
hereto was expressly incorporated into the Rules.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF this deed has been  executed by the parties the day and year
first above written.

<PAGE>
                                  THE SCHEDULE

After  sub-clause  9.3 of the  Rules  there  shall  be  inserted  the  following
additional sub-clause:

"9.4 On the  termination of the Award Holder's  Agency  Agreement,  vested Award
Units can be  exercised  in whole or in part for a period  of 90 days  after the
date of the Notice of Termination."

<PAGE>
THE COMMON SEAL of
A.L.O.T. TRUSTEE LIMITED
was hereunto affixed
in the presence of:-


/s/ C A C CHAPLIN
Director

/s/ R J PIROUET
Director
EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of A-Fem Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
Harvey, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                            /s/ Martin Harvey
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                Martin Harvey,
                                                Acting Chief Financial Officer

Date:    August 30, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

AURORA LOAN SERVICING, LLC,

Respondent

v.

CRYSTAL M. STEPHENS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 29 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of June, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 11752 and # 11753]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-1838-DR), dated 05/15/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe storms, flooding, mudslides, and landslides. *Incident Period:*
                         05/03/2009 and continuing. *Effective Date:*
                         05/15/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/14/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/15/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 05/15/2009, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Mingo, Wyoming. The Interest Rates are: PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500.Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000.
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 117526 and for economic injury is 117536. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Roger B. Garland, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-11979 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 27

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas more than a million Americans are demonstrating

their courage and commitment to freedom by serving in

the Armed Forces of the United States;

Whereas nearly 40 percent of the members of the Armed

Forces, when deployed away from their permanent duty

stations, have left families with children behind;

Whereas no one feels the effect of those deployments more

than the children of deployed service members;

Whereas as of March 31, 2005, approximately 1,000 of these

children have lost a parent serving in the Armed Forces

during the preceding 5 years;

Whereas the daily struggles and personal sacrifices of children of members of the Armed Forces too often go unnoticed;

Whereas the children of members of the Armed Forces are

a source of pride and honor to all Americans and it is

fitting that the Nation recognize their contributions and

celebrate their spirit;

Whereas the ‘‘National Month of the Military Child’’, observed in April each year, recognizes military children for

their sacrifices and contributes to demonstrating the Nation’s unconditional support to members of the Armed

Forces;
 †

2

SCON 27 ES

Whereas in addition to Department of Defense programs to

support military families and military children, a variety

of programs and campaigns have been established in the

private sector to honor, support, and thank military children by fostering awareness and appreciation for the sacrifices and the challenges they face;

Whereas a month-long salute to military children will encourage support for those organizations and campaigns established to provide direct support for military children and

families: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Senate—

3 (1) joins the Secretary of Defense in honoring

4 the children of members of the Armed Forces and

5 recognizes that they too share in the burden of pro6 tecting the Nation;

7 (2) urges Americans to join with the military

8 community in observing the ‘‘National Month of the

9 Military Child’’ with appropriate ceremonies and ac10 tivities that honor, support, and thank military chil11 dren; and

12 (3) recognizes with great appreciation the con13 tributions made by private-sector organizations that
 †

3

SCON 27 ES

1 provide resources and assistance to military families

2 and the communities that support them.

Passed the Senate April 14, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 27

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring military children during ‘‘National Month

of the Military Child’’.
Exhibit 31.2
I, James M. Lindstrom, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Centrue Financial Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b)  [intentionally omitted]  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: March 25, 2005 /s/ James M. Lindstrom  James M. Lindstrom Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11829]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Docket No. EPA-RO4-SFUND-2009-0320, FRL-8907-8]


Lilburn Mercury Spill Superfund Site; Lilburn, Gwinnett County, 
GA; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for 
reimbursement of past response costs concerning the Lilburn Mercury 
Spill Superfund Site located in Lilburn, Gwinnett County, Georgia for 
publication.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
June 19, 2009. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-RO4-
SFUND-2009-0320 or Site name Lilburn Mercury Spill Superfund Site by 
one of the following methods:
    <bullet> http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line 
instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/sf/enforce.htm.
    <bullet> E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d3d0c040319081f433d0c18010c2d081d0c430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d3d0c040319081f433d0c18010c2d081d0c430a021b">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: May 7, 2009.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. E9-11829 Filed 5-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
****   **** **EXHIBIT 32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Columbia Laboratories, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James
      A. Meer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





|(3) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(4) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/ James A. MeerJames A. MeerChief Financial OfficerAugust 8,
                2007




Page
          29 of
          29
Please note: The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) updated its report, 

“Current Efforts in Lyme Disease Research” in 2019. The most recent version of the report can be found 

at 

https://www.niaid.nih.gov/sites/default/files/NIAIDLymeReport.pdf.
#### DONATO v. PARKER PEN CO.

Civ. No. 21-532.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 23, 1945.

Howson & Howson, of New York City (William A. Gray, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, of New York City (Theodore Kiendl, William R. Meagher, and William H. Timbers, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

GALSTON, District Judge.

The motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial presents no matters that were not urged either during the trial or after the court’s charge. The court is of the same mind now as then. Accordingly the motion is in all respects denied. I must emphasize, however, that the pain*149staking and meticulous summation of defendant’s counsel was at all times addressed to the sound judgment of the jury and was not in any degree whatsoever either in •content or manner of argument addressed to the emotions of the jury. No unfair comment was made or sought to be made by counsel.

In respect to the plaintiff’s motion to costs and defendant’s counter-motion, the determination thereof is governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rules 50(b), and 80(a), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and the discretion of the court within the limitations of those rules. The •exercise of the latter factor makes necessary the consideration of the nature of the •case. The complaint greatly concerned the defendant not only because the plaintiff sought a recovery of $3,500,000, but also because it involved the fair name of the •defendant, a corporation having a long •established reputation. The defense in consequence in the best judgment of counsel required a thorough pre-trial preparation. The depositions taken were in the fair range of the issues. No objection was raised by the plaintiff in receiving notice of the taking thereof. The examination of the plaintiff before trial aided counsel in cross-examination by frequent reference to his deposition. That the depositions were not offered in evidence is no reason for disallowing costs in respect thereto. Also there was no undue expense in the preparation of the models produced. The motion of the plaintiff is denied. The long trial also required the attendance throughout the trial of key witnesses. The allowance by the clerk of mileage, attendance and subsistence fees was proper.

As to the counter-motion of the defendant: When the court ascertained that the defendant had ordered daily transcripts to be taken of the minutes, the court itself ordered the official stenographer to supply it with the original of the minutes transcribed for use during what gave every indication of being, and proved to be, a long trial. The counter-motion of the defendant is granted.

Settle orders on notice.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 24718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12243]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

18 CFR Chapter I

[Docket No. PL09-4-000]


Smart Grid Policy; Notice of Extension of Time

May 21, 2009.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of extension of time.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 19, 2009, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) issued a Proposed Policy Statement and Action Plan that, 
among other things, proposed an interim rate policy to encourage the 
development of smart grid systems. On May 19, 2009, the Commission 
issued a Notice Requesting Supplemental Comments regarding rate 
recovery for certain smart grid investments. The Commission is 
extending the date for filing these supplemental comments.

DATES: Comments are due June 2, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Ray Palmer (Technical Information), Office of Energy Policy and 
Innovation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, 
NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6569 .
    Elizabeth Arnold (Legal Information), Office of the General 
Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8818.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    On March 19, 2009, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(Commission) issued a Proposed Policy Statement and Action Plan 
(Proposed Policy Statement) in the above-captioned proceeding that, 
among other things, proposed an interim rate policy to encourage the 
development of Smart Grid systems.\1\ On May 19, 2009, the Commission 
issued a notice in this docket seeking supplemental comments regarding 
rate recovery for certain grid investments.\2\ The Commission is hereby 
extending the comment deadline established in the May 19 Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Smart Grid Policy, 126 FERC ] 61,253 (2009). As the Proposed 
Policy Statement described, Smart Grid advancements will apply 
digital technologies to the electric transmission system and enable 
real-time coordination of information from various resources to 
bring new efficiencies to the grid. Id. P 1.
    \2\ Smart Grid Policy, 127 FERC ] 61,139 (2009) (May 19 Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    By this instant notice, the date for filing supplemental comments 
is extended to and including June 2, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12243 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P