alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 897 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 897

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the calculation 
  of the reserve allowance for medical benefits of plans sponsored by 
                        bona fide associations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2005

 Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Grassley, and Mr. Baucus) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the calculation 
  of the reserve allowance for medical benefits of plans sponsored by 
                        bona fide associations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOWANCE OF RESERVE FOR MEDICAL BENEFITS OF PLANS SPONSORED 
              BY BONA FIDE ASSOCIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 419A(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to account limit) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Additional reserve for medical benefits of bona fide 
        association plans.--
                    ``(A) In general.--An applicable account limit for 
                any taxable year may include a reserve in an amount not 
                to exceed 35 percent of the sum of--
                            ``(i) the qualified direct costs, and
                            ``(ii) the change in claims incurred, but 
                        unpaid, for such taxable year with respect to 
                        medical benefits (other than post-retirement 
                        medical benefits).
                    ``(B) Applicable account limit.--For purposes of 
                this subsection, the term `applicable account limit' 
                means an account limit for a qualified asset account 
                with respect to medical benefits provided through a 
                plan maintained by a bona fide association (as defined 
                in section 2791(d)(3) of the Public Health Service Act 
                (42 U.S.C. 300gg-91(d)(3))''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years ending after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Padraic Keating, Appellant.

Submitted January 3, 2011;

decided January 6, 2011

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lauren G. Klein, Esq., PO Box 2042, Nantucket, Massachusetts 02584 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Emar Abrams, Appellant.

Submitted July 19, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Mitchell S. Kessler, Esq., 63 Pike Creek Drive, Cohoes, New York 12047 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of Centrue Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, James M. Lindstrom, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ James M. Lindstrom
James M. Lindstrom
Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2005
**Exhibit31.1**

# **Certificate of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

I, Marc W. Eller, certify that:

1.             I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Nano-Proprietary, Inc. (“NNPP”);

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present, in all materialrespects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of NNPP as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport.

4.             NNPP’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inthe Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for NNPP and have:

a.                Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to NNPP, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                Evaluated the effectiveness ofNNPP’s disclosure control’s and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.                Disclosed in this report anychange in NNPP’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during NNPP’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, NNPP’s internal control over financial reporting;and

5.             NNPP’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to NNPP’s auditors and the audit committee of NNPP’s board of directors:

a.                All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect NNPP’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.                Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in NNPP’s internal control over financialreporting.            

 

Date:    March 9, 2004  

_______/s/ Marc W. Eller                                     Marc W. Eller, Chairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk August 13, 2012 

# Order

August 13, 2012

144238(59)

HAFEZ M. BAZZI,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 14 4238

v COA: 299239

Oakland CC: 2009

- 762325

- DP

ANNE ELIZABETH MACAULAY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_______________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the joint motion for extension of the time for filing

supplemental briefs is considered and it is granted.
The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. SAVANNA STICKNEY, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-09-364 DECISION

On June 22, 2010, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence as follows: Count I: A commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of ten (10) years with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Criminal Mischief, a felony. The Court recommends that the Defendant enter into and complete the Elkhorn Program followed by a pre-release setting and the Intensive Supervision Program.

On October 8,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Richard Phillips. The state was not represented.

*82Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 8th day of October, 2010.

DATED this 21st day of October, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
Exhibit 23.4

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

We hereby consent to the references in this Form 10-K of
Plains Exploration & Production Company, as well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in such Form 10-K, to our reserve reports to the interest of Plains Exploration & Production Company and its
subsidiaries (collectively the Company), relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the Companys proved reserves of oil and gas and present values thereof for certain periods. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of such reports in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-102627, No. 333-107990, No. 333-115628, No. 333-117425 and No. 333-145004) and Form S-3 (No. 333-141110) of Plains Exploration & Production
Company.



Miller and Lents, Ltd.By:

/s/ Carl D. RichardCarl D. RichardSenior Vice President


Houston, Texas

February 25, 2009
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 965 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the recognition 

period for built-in gains for subchapter S corporations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2005 

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mrs. LINCOLN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the recognition period for built-in gains for subchapter 

S corporations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCED RECOGNITION PERIOD FOR BUILT-IN 

4 GAINS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (7) of section 1374(d) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to defini7 tions and special rules) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(7) RECOGNITION PERIOD.—The term ‘rec9 ognition period’ means the 7-year period beginning 

10 with the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which 
2

•S 965 IS

1 the corporation was an S corporation. For purposes 

2 of applying this section to any amount includible in 

3 income by reason of distributions to shareholders 

4 pursuant to section 593(e), the preceding sentence 

5 shall be applied without regard to the duration of 

6 the recognition period in effect on the date of such 

7 distribution.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

9 (1) GENERAL RULE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to any recognition period in 

11 effect on or after the date of the enactment of this 

12 Act. 

13 (2) SPECIAL APPLICATION TO EXISTING PERI14 ODS EXCEEDING 7 YEARS.—Any recognition period 

15 in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, 

16 the length of which is greater than 7 years, shall end 

17 on such date.

Æ
#### Sisk v. City of Greensboro

Case below: 183 N.C. App. - (5 June 2007)

No. 305P07

1. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-1253)

2. Def’s Motion to Strike Pit’s Amendment to PDR

3. Pit’s Second Amendment to PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31(c)

1. Denied 08/23/07

2. Allowed 08/23/07

3. Dismissed *ex mero motu*08/23/07
#### Steven D. Bernstein, Respondent, v Joseph P. Geiss, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 168]

In an action to recover unpaid rent, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County *775(Colabella, J.), entered November 26, 2012, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate a judgment of the same court dated February 1, 2012, entered against him upon his failure to appear at an inquest on October 6, 2008.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

For a party to succeed in vacating a judgment entered upon his or her failure to appear on a scheduled court date, the party must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a potentially meritorious cause of action or defense (see *Thomas v Avalon Gardens Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr.,*107 AD3d 694 [2013]; *Vardaros v Zapas,*105 AD3d 1037, 1038 [2013]; *Sganga v Sganga,*95 AD3d 872 [2012]; *Marrero v Crystal Nails,*77 AD3d 798, 799 [2010]). “A motion to vacate a default is addressed to the sound discretion of the motion court” *{Braynin v Dunleavy,*109 AD3d 571, 571 [2013]). Here, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate the subject judgment. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear at the inquest. Therefore, we need not reach the issue of whether the defendant demonstrated the existence of a potentially meritorious defense *(see Vardaros v Zapas,*105 AD3d at 1038; *Sganga v Sganga,*95 AD3d at 873).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are without merit or have been rendered academic in light of our determination. Dillon, J.E, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Cohen, JJ., concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 902 

To amend the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act to clarify 

the exemption for recreational vessel support employees, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 26, 2005 

Mr. MARTINEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To amend the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act to clarify the exemption for recreational vessel 

support employees, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recreational Marine 

5 Employment Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF RECREATIONAL VESSEL WORK7 ER EXEMPTION. 

8 The Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation 

9 Act (33 U.S.C. 901 et seq.) is amended as follows: 
2

•S 902 IS

1 (1) Section 2 (33 U.S.C. 902) is amended— 

2 (A) in paragraph (3)— 

3 (i) so that subparagraph (C) reads as 

4 follows: 

5 ‘‘(C) individuals employed by or at, or en6 gaged in the construction or maintenance of, a 

7 recreational marine facility or structure;’’ and 

8 (ii) so that subparagraph (F) reads as 

9 follows: 

10 ‘‘(F) individuals employed primarily to 

11 build, repair, test, maintain, accommodate, buy, 

12 sell, store, restore, transport by land, or dis13 mantle a recreational vessel;’’; and 

14 (B) by redesignating paragraph (22) as 

15 paragraph (24) and inserting after paragraph 

16 (21) the following new paragraphs: 

17 ‘‘(22) The term ‘recreational marine facility or 

18 structure’ means a place used primarily to build, re19 pair, test, maintain, accommodate, buy, sell, store, 

20 restore, or dismantle recreational vessels. 

21 ‘‘(23) The term ‘recreational vessel’ means a 

22 vessel manufactured primarily for pleasure use.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Terence W. Tsang, in my capacity as Executive Vice-President, Chief Operating
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Ashworth, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

     (1) the Quarterly Report of the Registrant, on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended April 30, 2003 to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



Dated: June 13, 2003                    /s/ Terence W. Tsang
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Terence W. Tsang
                                        Executive Vice-President,
                                        Chief Operating Officer,
                                        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         535,430
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  193,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               729,245
<PP&E>                                       9,996,683
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,483,669
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,242,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,242,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,242,259
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               827,365
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  490,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   437,528
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 Written Statement of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ David W. ThompsonDavid W. ThompsonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 24, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Order No. 1622] 

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u) (the Act), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

Whereas, the Board of Harbor Commissioners of the Port of Long Beach, grantee of FTZ 50, has requested authority under Section 400.28(a)(2) of the Board's regulations on behalf of Phoenix MC, Inc. d/b/a Phoenix Motorcars, Inc., to assemble light-duty passenger electric vehicles under FTZ procedures within FTZ 50—Site 2, Ontario, California (FTZ Docket 40-2008, filed 6-13-2008); 

                    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (73 FR 34916, 6-19-2008);                 

Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that approval of the application is in the public interest; 

                    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for the assembly of light-duty passenger electric vehicles within FTZ 50 for Phoenix MC, Inc. d/b/a Phoenix Motorcars, Inc., as described in the application and                     **Federal Register**                     notice, subject to the Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of May 2009. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Attest: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-12404 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P