alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6899

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CARLYLE EDGAR COLEMAN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-20, CA-96-840-R) Submitted: June 30, 1998 Decided: July 13, 1998 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Carlyle Edgar Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Carlyle Edgar Coleman seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and his motion for reconsideration, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Coleman , Nos. CR-93-20; CA-96-840-R (W.D. Va. May 16 & May 28, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officers of Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Limited (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officers' knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007, as
amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A (the "Report") of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 17, 2008                 By: /s/ QI Yumin
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            QI Yumin
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Date: November 17, 2008                 By: /s/ QIAN Zuming
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            QIAN Zuming
                                            Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Limited, and will be
retained by Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Limited and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     This certification will not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability
of that section. This certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 even if the document with which it is submitted to the
Securities and Exchange Commission is so incorporated by reference.
1 ... S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 1. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORTWORTH NO. 2- 08 - 10 2- CR L UT HOR DA L E S I M P S ON AP P E L L ANT V . THE STATE OF TE XA S STATE

----- ----- F ROM CR I M I NALDI ST RI CT COURT NO. 3 OF T ARR ANT COUNTY

----- ----- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON AND JUDGM E NT 1 

### ON P E R M ANE NT ABAT E M E NT OFAP P E AL

----- ----- W e h a v e c o n s i d e re d a p p e l l a n t’s " M o ti o n T o P e rm a n e n tl yA b a te A p p e a l .” A co pyo ft he c e rt i f i c a t e o fd e a t h s t a t e s t ha ta pp e l l a ntd i e d on M a y 24, 2008 . T h e d e a t h o fa n a p p e lla n td u r in g t h e p e n d e n c yo fa n a p p e a l d e p r iv e s t h is c o u rt o f j u ri s d i c ti o n . Mo l ito r v. S tate , 862 S . W . 2d 615, 616 ( Tex. C r i m . A pp. 199 3) . Undert hes e c i r cum st anc es , t he app r op ri a te di sp os i t i on i s t he p e rm a n e n t a b a te m e n t o f th e a p p e a l . S eeT EX . R . A PP . P . 7 .1 (a )(2 ).2

N o d e c is io n o ft h is c o u rt h a v in g b e e n d e liv e r e d p r io r t o t h e re c e ip to ft h is m ot i on, t he cou rtf i nds t he m ot i on t o per m ane nt l y aba t e t he app ea l sh oul d be g r a n t e d . Itis t h e r e f o r e o r d e r e d , a d ju d g e d , a n d d e c r e e d t h a tt h e a p p e a l is per m ane nt l y a bat ed.
P E R CU R I AM
PA N EL: M C C O Y, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d L I V I N G STO N , J. DO NO T P UBLI SH TEX . R. A PP. P. 47. 2( b) DEL I VERE D: Aug us t26, 2008
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Brian D. Niebur, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,2003 of Spectre Gaming, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this annual report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 24, 2004 /s/  Brian D. Niebur  By: Brian D. Niebur   Chief Financial Officer  
36
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20636

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FRANCISCO CASTILLO ZAPATA, also known as Francisco Castillo, also known

as Francisco Castillo-Zapata,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-218-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Francisco Castillo

Zapata has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Zapata has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 19

- 00388

- CR No. 02

- 19

- 00389

- CR

_________________________ __

On Appeal from the 78th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Cour t No s . 55,989

- B, 59,144

- B
Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Pe r Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### R OBERT 

### E. C O LLINS 

### II, Appellant

V



### . T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Robert E. Collins II , appearing pro se on appeal, attempts to appeal
his convictions fo r ag gravated promotion of prostitution, co nspiracy to commit aggravated promotion of prostitution , compelling p rostitution of a v i ctim under seventeen years of age, trafficking of a person, and “ B ail J umping and Fail to A ppear
F elony

. ” Appellant pleaded guilty to each offense pu rsuant to plea bargain s , and the
trial court sentenced him on each of fense in accordanc e with the plea bargain s . Consistent with Appellant ’ s plea s , the “Trial Court’s Certification o f
Defendant’s Ri ght of Appeal” in each case states that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Based on the certificat ion s , we notified Appellant that his appeal s would be dismissed unles s , within ten days, he or any party desiring to continue the appeal s filed a response showing grounds for continuing the se appeal s . See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 44.3. Appellant filed a
response cha llenging the vol u ntarine ss of his plea s , and we requested the record

. At the hearing on the plea bargains , A ppellant seem ed hesitant to enter his guilty pleas and to agree that h e ha d waived his right to appeal in each case , but t he

rec ord does n o t conta in any reasons for A ppellant’s hesit ation

. Rather, A ppellant went on to expressly acknowledge that he had waived his right to appeal as part of
each plea bargain, and the record contains waivers signed by A ppellan t
. There fore, it
appear s that the waiver of appeal in each case is valid

. See Monreal v. State , 9 9 S.W.3d 615, 617 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (stating that a valid waiver of the right to appeal3 must be made voluntarily, knowingly, and in telligently). A valid waiver will prevent
th e defendant from a ppe aling any issue unl ess the trial court consents to th e appeal.
Id. Here, the trial court did not give Appellant permission to appeal

. Appellant therefore has no right of appeal. See Tex . R. App. P. 25. 2(a)(2), (d). Accordingly, we dismiss the se appe al s in conformity with the trial court’s
certification s . See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State , 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Along with the appeal s , we dismi ss all pending mot ions

. 1
Per Curiam
Do Not Publ ish Tex. R. App. P . 4 7.2(b)
Delivered: March 12, 2020

1 Prior to our recei pt of the record, Appellant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty pleas , and the following month, he filed a “Notice to Di smiss ” his a ppeals

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2,205,705
<SECURITIES>                                      2,254,606
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,078,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          0
<PP&E>                                            2,315,212
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,450,937)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   15,710,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     0
<BONDS>                                           1,073,398
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             8,750,000
<PREFERRED>                                          11,400
<COMMON>                                            454,229
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,926,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     15,710,678
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8,534,265
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  8,734,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    100,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   83,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (383,506)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (130,392)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (253,114)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (253,114)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.23)     
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.23)
        


</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2489 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Chloro-6-(methylthio)toluene. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Chloro-6- 

(methylthio)toluene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-CHLORO-6-(METHYLTHIO)TOLUENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Chloro-6- 

(methylthio)toluene (CAS No. 

82961–52–2) (provided for in 

subheading 2930.90.29) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2489 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Research 
-  Clinical Studies 
-  Clinical Studies: Information For The Public And Potential Volunteers 

# Clinical Studies at the NIDCD (Intramural)

The NIDCD funds numerous clinical studies in the normal and disordered processes of hearing, balance, taste, smell, voice, speech, and language. Our intramural research program conducts clinical studies at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, Maryland. These studies are listed below.

| Status                          | ** Recruiting |
|---------------------------------|---------------|
| Wade Chien                      |
| Hearing and balance             |
| NIDCD                           |
| 20-DC-0047                      |
| NCT04501081                     |
| Marcia Mulquin** (301) 496 1601 |

| Status                           | ** Recruiting |
|----------------------------------|---------------|
| Thomas Friedman                  |
| Hearing and balance              |
| NIDCD                            |
| 0H-93-DC-016                     |
| NCT00341874                      |
| Thomas Friedman** (301) 496 7882 |

| Status                        | ** Recruiting |
|-------------------------------|---------------|
| Michael Hoa                   |
| Hearing and balance           |
| NIDCD                         |
| 000141-DC                     |
| NCT04806282                   |
| Anna Centeno** (301) 451 1215 |

| Status                          | ** Recruiting |
|---------------------------------|---------------|
| Michael Hoa                     |
| Hearing and balance             |
| NIDCD                           |
| 001126-DC                       |
| NCT05670496                     |
| Marcia Mulquin** (301) 496 1601 |

June 1, 2023

## NIH Clinical Research Trials and You

It’s your involvement that helps researchers to ultimately uncover better ways to treat, prevent, diagnose and understand human disease. Learn more about participating.

## NIDCD Clinical Trial Videos

            - Balance Research at the NIH Clinical Center  	NIDCD researchers at the NIH Clinical Center Audiology Unit study normal and disordered processes of balance.
            - Niemann-Pick Disease Type C1: The NIH Clinical Center Audiology Unit's Progress  	Children with Niemann-Pick disease talk about participating in NIH clinical trials, with support from the Clinical Center Audiology Unit.
            - The Audiology Unit at the NIH Clinical Center  	NIDCD research audiologists at the NIH Clinical Center's Audiology Unit study and help to treat young patients with a rare disease.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 112 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 112

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill, S. 3693, the Secretary of the 
Senate shall insert ``or reentries'' after ``States, reentry'' in 
section 212(a)(9)(C)(iii)(II) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 
as added by section 6(b)(1)(C) of the bill.

            Passed the Senate July 20, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 112

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Relating to correcting a clerical error in the enrollment of S. 3693.
```
#### Hall v. Cohen

Case below: 186 N.C. App.-(18 September 2007)

No. 486P07

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-1531)

Denied 10/11/07

Hudson, J., Recused
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 695 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 695

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
         To suspend temporarily new shipper bonding privileges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New Shipper Review Amendment Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF NEW SHIPPER BONDING PRIVILEGES.

    Clause (iii) of section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(a)(2)(B)(iii)) shall not be effective during the 3-year 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

    Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Secretary of the 
Treasury, the United States Trade Representative, and the Commissioner 
of Customs and Border Protection, shall submit to the Committee on 
Finance of the Senate and the Committee on Ways and Means of the House 
of Representatives a report containing--
            (1) recommendations on whether the suspension of the 
        effectiveness of section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Tariff Act of 
        1930 should be extended beyond the date provided in section 2 
        of this Act; and
            (2) assessments of the effectiveness of any administrative 
        measures that have been implemented to address the difficulties 
        giving rise to section 2 of this Act, including--
                    (A) problems in assuring the collection of 
                antidumping duties on imports from new shippers;
                    (B) administrative burdens imposed on the 
                Department of Commerce by new shipper reviews; and
                    (C) the use of the bonding privilege by importers 
                from new shippers to circumvent the effect of 
                antidumping duty orders.

            Passed the Senate November 16, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 695

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

         To suspend temporarily new shipper bonding privileges.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UTILX CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,273
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                       276
<INVENTORY>                                      6,248
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,528
<PP&E>                                          31,693
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,757
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,438
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            72
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,706
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,216
<SALES>                                         46,990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,990
<CGS>                                           38,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    33
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,993
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (932)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,925
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
        

</TABLE>