National Intelligence University
						The Center of Academic Life for the Intelligence Community
																									About UsMenu Toggle
Office of the President
	Board of Visitors
	Vision and Mission
	Locations
	Accreditation
	NIU History
AcademicsMenu Toggle
Degrees
	Certificate in Intelligence Studies
	Schools
AdmissionsMenu Toggle
Apply Here
	Admission FAQs
StudentsMenu Toggle
Academic Calendar
	Academic Catalog
	NIU Library
	Graduation Information
	Student Senate
	Blackboard Login
	NIU Online Store
ResearchMenu Toggle
Caracristi Institute
	Caracristi Monographs
	Intelligence Jumpstart Podcast
	NI Press
	NIU Library
	Research Fellows Program
AlumniMenu Toggle
NIU Online Store
	Thesis Requests
	Transcript Requests
Contact Us
				Search for:
		Search
			Search 
National Intelligence University
						The Center of Academic Life for the Intelligence Community
																									Main Menu Research ShortsArchive  Research Shorts & Notes
				
				Research Shorts and Notes are brief publications. Research Shorts are a cross between conventional intelligence products and the shorter academic papers published by universities and think tanks. Research Notes fuse current events with a research insight. Though most of our Research Shorts and Research Notes appear within government channels, those below have cleared for public release.
				2024Why Define Intelligence?March 28, 2024

For more than a half-century, government leaders, intelligence 
practitioners, and scholars have sought to define and redefine 
intelligence in the national security sense. The effectiveness of the US 
Intelligence Community (IC), without consensus on this basic term,
begs the question: Does defining intelligence matter? The answer is an
emphatic yes. Defining intelligence is critical for the IC and the 
nascent intelligence studies discipline. Achieving agreement on what 
intelligence is would better focus IC missions, authorities, resources, 
and oversight. Moreover, understanding what it should be is essential
to envisioning and achieving an efficacious future intelligence 
enterprise to enable sound decisions in a rapidly changing world.
				
				Integrating GenAI and Strategic  Foresight for 21st Century  National SecurityMarch 14, 2024

Today’s political leaders are using military force as a go-to solution for 
geopolitical disputes in Ukraine, Gaza, and beyond. This assertiveness is 
not confined to isolated regions; it is an emergent global phenomenon. 
Victory in these and future conflicts requires pivoting to a foresight-based 
approach that informs strategies rooted in a deep understanding of 
complex global dynamics. Building a generative-artificial intelligence
(GenAI)-powered “cognitive operating system” to navigate uncertainty 
can harness GenAI’s ability to synthesize vast arrays of data into 
coherent, actionable insights. Integrating GenAI with strategic foresight 
will bolster the US national security ecosystem’s capacity to think, act, 
and adapt in an unpredictable, ever-changing global landscape.
				
				Blind Spots: Preventing Will-To Fight Intelligence FailureFebruary 27, 2024

Recent US failures to accurately evaluate “will to fight” in Afghanistan 
and Ukraine are said to derive from IC analytic deficiencies and a US 
military culture that prioritizes weapons and technology. However, they
are rooted more in how the United States projects influence globally and 
structures its government. Intelligence customers and producers focus 
on military capabilities of friends and foes and on the intentions of 
foreign leaders, while focusing less on the will of the military forces and 
local populace. Ongoing efforts to improve analytic methods will not 
prevent recurring failures. Only institutional reforms within the national 
security and foreign policy communities to prioritize human influence 
and greater IC assertiveness in initiating long-term, in-depth collection 
and analysis on the human aspect will resolve this institutional blind spot.
				2023Pursuing Geopolitical Advantage?  China’s Search for Military AlliesNovember 14, 2023

China’s leaders apparently see their partnership-focused foreign policy
strategy as adequate, but that view may not hold indefinitely. Strategic 
competition with the United States and its allies, even now, is beginning 
to expose the limitations of Beijing’s partnerships. If, as many theorize,
China were to attack Taiwan, would it not be best prepared for 
success by seeking military alliances beyond its sole current ally,
North Korea? This Research Short provides theory-driven indicators to 
raise awareness among decisionmakers in Washington and elsewhere 
about the conditions that could lead China to seek new military allies—
for military adventurism focused on Taiwan, or something else.
Understanding these alliance formation conditions offers opportunities
to counter China’s efforts to expand its hard power
				(Re)defining WarningAugust 9, 2023
This Research Short looks to reignite debate on how the IC defines warning and several terms associated with it in the context of intelligence. The term has been used inconsistently over time and across intelligence organizations, and past definitions have often presented limited views of the concept. To ground the discussion, this Short will note problems arising from how the IC has defined the term across history and then identify key themes that distinguish warning as a distinct intelligence discipline. It will then propose two definitions of warning for consideration by intelligence practitioners and scholars as part of an ongoing research effort.
				Foreign Language for National Security: Let’s Act, Not ReactJuly 27, 2023

 The IC requires the utmost capability to meet increasingly complex national security threats. Having sufficient foreign language-qualified personnel should be the least of its worries. Yet, we face the same challenges year after year in meeting foreign language demand. Let’s be proactive and reframe our approach. We can create an intentional and dynamic foreign language strategy that adapts to new requirements, is immune from resource constraints, mandates the skill-set visibility 
needed to optimize talent, and harnesses ever-emerging new technologies to supercharge human capabilities.
				Cultivating Communities of Practice To Support Analytic CollaborationApril 25, 2023

Informal communities of practice (CoPs) already help analysts 
collaborate across the IC, and their expertise is often levied against threats that do not fit neatly into existing organizations. CoPs are typically formed organically by analysts, and while they may briefly thrive independently, these groups face long-term challenges including the lack of resources, visibility, and authority. A CoP may collapse when a key individual leaves, or the U.S. national security enterprise may create an entirely new CoP that can disrupt, displace, or dilute the existing information-sharing patterns.
				Understanding and Mitigating  the Long-Term Risks of AI OperationalizationMarch 1, 2023

State-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI) systems are almost certain to transform how the IC executes its mission, but the risks that accompany the use of such powerful tools are not well understood. Before any AI system is deployed, the IC should focus on understanding AI decision making processes to ensure that they are explainable, align with human ethical standards, and are controllable.
				Intelligence Integration War Stories  Can Teach InclusionFebruary 7, 2023

 An inclusive culture can help integrate the unique talents of a diverse intelligence workforce, but the inclusion process is not well understood. The greatest knowledge gap is behavioral—what actions can intelligence officers take to include their colleagues and ensure they are an integral part of the mission? After the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act (IRTPA) of 2004 mandated the IC integrate across diverse job functions and organizational cultures, intelligence officers learned firsthand that subtle actions can include—or exclude—diverse team members. Their integration war stories can help the IC understand the small but high-impact behaviors that build inclusive intelligence teams.
				2022Flipping the Script: How Can the IC Recast Its Story?August 17, 2022

 Most Americans experience the Intelligence Community through works of fiction—stories told on the silver screen, in powerful prose, and through conspiratorial overtures. These stories influence their thoughts about the mysterious entity that provides a critical national security function but is rarely seen or heard. Thoughts become beliefs, and beliefs form biases, making it incredibly difficult to convince the average person that the NSA doesn’t listen to their phone calls and that CIA doesn’t have a dossier on every American.
				Using Complex Systems Practice To  Assess the Youth Bulge in the SahelSeptember 14, 2022

 U.S. intelligence analysts sometimes mirror-image their own sense of time—how they relate to the past, present, and future—onto actors of national security interest, creating misunderstandings that can skew judgments. This Research Short offers a conceptual framework of temporal complexity that analysts can use to consider how these actors perceive their place in time and, thus, to better understand the actors’ mindsets.
				How Analysts Attain Insight:  The Benefits and OpportunitiesMarch 28, 2022
Policymakers call upon intelligence analysts to deliver insightful 
assessments, yet consistent success has faltered due to a lack of understanding of the insight process and insufficient institutional emphasis on insight. This Research Short reports the results of a  scientific study that explains the IC analysts’ insight process and its benefits, and provides opportunities for overcoming these dilemmas.
				Weighing Taiwan’s Economic Take Aways from Russia-Ukraine WarNovember 2, 2022

Asia watchers have been exploring what lessons Taiwan might take 
from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to bolster Taipei’s ability to deter 
or defend against a Chinese attack. They have focused on global 
political engagement and military preparedness. But what are the
economic steps Taipei might take to increase its global posture and encourage the world’s developed democracies to come to Taiwan’s defense? This Research Short will explore the economic tools Taipei might use to strengthen its global standing and their implications for the United States.
				Integrating Nonstate Intelligence: Ukraine Shows How It Might WorkDecember 7, 2022

The war in Ukraine has seen nonstate actors, including private 
corporations and NGOs, assume a prominent role collecting, 
producing, and distributing intelligence—directly impacting military operations. Although these “intelligence auxiliaries” have helped Ukraine defend itself, the absence of an overall coordinating mechanism for interoperability with state actors presents a risk that state and nonstate actors will find themselves at cross purposes on the battlefield. Today, the United States and its allies have an opportunity to structure interactions with intelligence auxiliaries under a durable, legal framework with a division of labor that can ensure nonstate 
intelligence actors contribute effectively to IC priorities in future fights.
				2021Measuring the Influence of China’s  Belt and Road InitiativeFebruary 16, 2021

The prevailing narrative among observers in academic, policy, and intelligence circles is that China’s effort to expand its international influence through aggressive outward foreign direct investment, including under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), will diminish U.S. global diplomatic power. By measuring China’s geopolitical influence longitudinally—through alignment in United Nations General Assembly voting and affinity expressed in foreign public opinion polling over time—this study finds that China’s relative influence appears to be in decline. This raises the possibility that the IC may overestimate the importance of China’s foreign direct investment initiatives, including the BRI.
				From a Whisper to a Shout:  The IC Should Use Its Outside VoiceJune 23, 2021

National security is the U.S. Government’s most basic responsibility, laid out in the first sentence of the Constitution’s preamble: provide for the common defense. But what was once the exclusive domain of the public sector now depends on a range of actors, individuals, corporations, and entities who—unlike government—are not beholdento the public interest. Their voices are noisy, voluminous, and—because they know little about how the government protects them and even less about the role of the Intelligence Community in national security—often ill-informed. Their increased willingness to challenge government authorities means that, unless the IC finds its voice within this rising cacophony, its silence will facilitate its demise and, along with it, thesafety and security of the nation it is sworn to protect and defend.
				Rethinking Time: Adopting a Mindset for Interpreting Threats and Imagining OpportunitiesDecember 14, 2021

 U.S. intelligence analysts sometimes mirror-image their own sense of time—how they relate to the past, present, and future—onto actors of national security interest, creating misunderstandings that can skew judgments. This Research Short offers a conceptual framework of temporal complexity that analysts can use to consider how these actors perceive their place in time and, thus, to better understand the actors’ mindsets.
				Islamic State Resurgence in  the Era of COVID-19March 17, 2021

One year after U.S.-led coalition operations liberated ISIS-held 
territories in Iraq and Syria and killed ISIS core leader Abu Bakr alBaghdadi, ISIS is resurging. Taking a page from its old playbook, the organization is capitalizing on social unrest and a rapidly deteriorating security environment—exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic—to reconstitute in permissive areas of Iraq and Syria. This Short examines ISIS’s pandemic-era ground and information operations through the lens of its state- and nation-making efforts to help analysts and decisionmakers better understand the imminence and scope of the threat. ISIS is rapidly overcoming U.S.-supported counterterrorism gains and, 
without direct pressure to reverse these advances, is poised for recovery.
				Taiwan: Coronavirus as a Catalyst  for Self-DeterminationFebruary 23, 2021

Taiwan’s success in containing coronavirus infections—with only 77 domestic cases out of 942 total and 9 deaths as of February 22, 2021— gives Taipei a rare opportunity to showcase its leadership in biotech and cybersecurity, push for greater inclusion in multilateral organizations, and establish itself as a sovereign entity separate from mainland China.Citizens’ record-high identification as Taiwanese instead of Chinese and 
their strong public support for President Tsai suggest she has a mandate for pursuing further sovereignty. These ripening conditions for independence have prompted Beijing to up overt threats against Taipei, making consistent U.S. support for Taiwan’s integration into the global community critical to the island’s pursuit of autonomy.
				2020Anticipatory Intelligence and  Adaptive Influence: A New Paradigm  for Foreign Policy DevelopmentJuly 10, 2020

Complexity theory reveals a nation is not just a people with a 
government: it arises from competition and the compromises. 
continually being made by the many groups at many levels within it. Anticipatory intelligence that combines this complex system perspective with today’s powerful computational tools can provide the deeper insights needed to advance U.S. foreign policies, particularly promoting democracy, to adaptively influence the behavior of foreign.
populations.
				Complexity, COVID, and the Failure of Strategic IncrementalismOctober 1, 2020

The speed, scope, and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on both the real and virtual world underline how today’s complexity is truly unprecedented. Nonetheless, evidence suggests the national security community remains ambivalent about the magnitude of the change. This ambivalence is problematic because it breeds incremental measures that are inadequate to the fundamentally new and different nature of the challenge.
				Russia’s New Arctic Policy 2035:  Implications for Great Power Tension  Over the Northern Sea RouteJuly 21, 2020

Russia’s new Arctic policy principles illustrate the significance of the Northern Sea Route (NSR) to Moscow’s Arctic national interests and could lead to increased great power tension over the NSR. Russia and other states—including the United States—dispute whether the NSR traverses international waters or Russia’s internal waters. This Research Short analyzes the policy principles underlying Russia’s new 15-year Arctic strategy and its implications for the NSR and great power tension.
 About UsMenu Toggle
Office of the President
	Board of Visitors
	Accreditation
	Vision and Mission
	Location
	History
AcademicsMenu Toggle
Degree
	Certificate Of Intelligence Studies
	Schools
AdmissionsMenu Toggle
Apply here
	Admissions FAQs
StudentsMenu Toggle
Academic Calendar
	Academic Catalog
	NIU Library
	Graduation Information
	Student Senate
	Blackboard Login
	NIU Online Store
ResearchMenu Toggle
Caracristi Institute
	Caracristi Monographs
	Intelligence JumpStart Podcast
	NI Press
	NIU Library
AlumniMenu Toggle
NIU Online Store
	Thesis Requests
	Transcript Request
Contact Us
 Quick Links:Apply Now2023/24 NIU Academic Catalog
Academics:Bachelor of Science in Intelligence DegreeMaster of Science of Strategic IntelligenceMaster of Science and Technology Intelligence DegreeCertificate in Intelligence Studies
School:College of Strategic IntelligenceSchool of Science and Technology Intelligence
					Office of Admissions:Roberdeau HallWashington, DC 20511
Phone: (301) 243-2094Fax: (301) 227-7067Email:  NIU_Admissions@niu.odni.gov
Office of the Registrar:Phone: (301) 243-2093Fax: (301) 227-7067Email: NIU_Enrollments@niu.odni.gov
Accessibility / Section 508
ODNI Privacy Policy Web Policies
NI-U.edu Web Policies
External Links Disclaimer
						National Intelligence University © 2024