alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53718-53719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-25189]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

Information Systems Technical Advisory Committee: Notice of 
Partially Closed Meeting

    The Information Systems Technical Advisory Committee (ISTAC) will 
meet on November 4, 2009, 9 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, 
Room 3884, and November 5, 2009, 9 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover 
Building, Room 3407, 14th Street between Constitution and Pennsylvania 
Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the 
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on technical questions 
that affect the level of export controls applicable to information 
systems equipment and technology.

Wednesday, November 4

Public Session

    1. Welcome and Introduction.
    2. Working Group Reports.
    3. Microprocessors with Encryption.
    4. Intel Technology Roadmap.

[[Page 53719]]

    5. FIPS-140 (NIST)

Thursday, November 5

Closed Session

    6. Discussion of matters determined to be exempt from the 
provisions relating to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 section 
10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
[email protected], no later than October 28, 2009.
    A limited number of seats will be available for the public session. 
Reservations are not accepted. To the extent time permits, members of 
the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The public may 
submit written statements at any time before or after the meeting. 
However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to 
Committee members, the Committee suggests that public presentation 
materials or comments be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. Springer.
    The Assistant Secretary for Administration, with the concurrence of 
the delegate of the General Counsel, formally determined on May 19, 
2009, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 section (10)(d)), that the portion of the 
meeting concerning trade secrets and commercial or financial 
information deemed privileged or confidential as described in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(4) and the portion of the meeting concerning matters the 
disclosure of which would be likely to frustrate significantly 
implementation of an agency action as described in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt from the provisions relating to public 
meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 section 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The 
remaining portions of the meeting will be open to the public.
    For more information, call Yvette Springer at (202) 482-2813.

    Dated: October 15, 2009.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-25189 Filed 10-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P
```
**SI  Diamond Technology, Inc.3006 Longhorn Blvd., Suite 107, Austin, TX 78758  Phone (512) 339-5020, Fax (512) 339-5021,  WWW.CARBONTECH.NET**

** **Exhibit 10.2

 Amendment to Employment Agreement originally dated May  31, 1996 between the Company and   Dr. Zvi Yaniv

 April 29, 1999

To: Zvi Yaniv

From: Doug Baker

Re: Compensation

Your salary had been adjusted to an annual rate of $175,000 retroactive to  January 1, 1998 in accordance with Marc’s instructions and as a result of a  prior agreement between the two of you.

Your salary going forward will be at an annualized rate of $175,000. In  addition, the Company will provide you with a leased Subaru Forester under a  three year lease commencing April 22, 1999. This new arrangement supercedes  all prior salary and bonus arrangements including that set forth in the July  31, 1998 agreement which called for an increase to an annual rate of $200,000  if the Company were to achieve profitability.

If you agree with this summary, please sign below.

 

 

Agreed            //s//   Zvi Yaniv                                                                   Zvi Yaniv
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this notice announces the Small Business Administration's intentions to request approval on a new and/or currently approved information collection.

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before December 21, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

Send all comments regarding whether this information collection is necessary for the proper performance of the function of the agency, whether the burden estimates are accurate, and if there are ways to minimize the estimated burden and enhance the quality of the collection, to Cynthia Pitts, Director, Disaster Administrative Services, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Cynthia Pitts, Director, Disaster Administrative Services 202-205-7570                         *cynthia.pitts@sba.gov*                         Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030                         *curtis.rich@sba.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Disaster loans are authorized upon terms and conditions to (1) assure proper use of proceeds, (2) comply with established record keeping requirements, and (3) assure sound credit positions. Record-keeping requirements provide a basis to assure proper use of proceeds and satisfy loan conditions.

*Title:*                     “Borrower's Progress Certification.”                

*Description of Respondents:*                     Recipients of Disaster Loans.                

*Form Number:*                     1366.                

*Annual Responses:*                     12,078.                

*Annual Burden:*                     11,312.                

Jacqueline White,

Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. E9-25226 Filed 10-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




     In connection with the Annual Report of Berkeley Technology Limited on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the U.S.  Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Arthur I. Trueger, as Executive Chairman
of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted by ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  March 23, 2005                            By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25571-25572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12427]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Cancellation of Customs Broker Licenses

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: General notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and the Customs Regulations (19 CFR 111.51), the 
following Customs broker licenses and all associated permits are 
cancelled without prejudice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Name                License No.          Issuing port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Cheng..................           09053  New York.
Christa Ciaccio..............           09229  New York.
James Cheer..................           09666  Los Angeles.
Robert H. Chamberlin.........           06146  Los Angeles.
Lily N. Tsong................           13325  Los Angeles.
Gary M. Teller...............           11855  Atlanta.
Edgar Cook...................           03771  Portland, Maine.
Alberto del Cerro............           04324  Miami.
Philip T. Hill...............           13123  Miami.
Vision Companies, Inc........           23103  Los Angeles.
Vantage International                   92003  Los Angeles.
 Forwarding, Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 25572]]

    Dated: May 20, 2009.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. E9-12427 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
#### Jackson, *ex dem.*Erving and others, *against*Bushnell.

after’3mal18©; Sra ’’of'íiie ^ere'tofants!10 cottseTMmc *pTo iunc‘*

*HENRY*

moved, that the lessors of the plaintiff file security ^or costs> *nunc pro tunc.*The lessors were infants, and that fact was l£nown to the attorney of the plaintiffs when the suit was commenced. The cause had been tried, and a verdict found for the defendant.

Parker, contra.

*Per Curiam.*

This *motion*must he denied. The defendant comes too late, after verdict, to ask for security for costs. Had the application been made before trial, the court would have ordered the proceedings stayed until security for costs was filed. But we can find no practice to warrant us in directing it to be done in this stage of the cause, *nunc pro tunc.*

Motion denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Richard P. Story, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard P. Story

Richard P. Story
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
March 9, 2004
#### Penfield *against*Carpender.

improper evp dence Should not *be*admitted .to sufficient oft”?* yards, t°’direct

ant,*!6 ‘a'jut ■|s° imp¿peí’: to which6 accrued ?£epíaintifE of

IN.ERROR, on *certiomri*to a jus.tice?s .court,

» mi . * . V , • i v 1 ne action,- in-the court below, .was .to. recover; damages 101? sbcep,'belonging to the plaintiff, killed by the--defendant’s dbg.' At the trial, a witness was called,- on behalf of the defendant., te» á con'Versatihh between him and the defendant,/ in which die latter.had denied that he was the owner of the dog;, the tesfimony, was objected to, but the- .justice decided .that the witness might go,through with his 'testimony, aind that he Would then in--. form't-hq. jury what part' was admissible,,and what not.'; And the justice informed ¡the, juiy that - the testimony' was inadmissible, and that' they ought not to take any notice.of it; aá. testimony; Another witness was, in .the same manner,, permitted to s»wéar as ,tq hearsay respecting the o.whership Of the-dog;; .shd-the-jus-. ticp then tpld-the jury,- as before; that what the witness had sworn was hot evidence. *A*verdict was found for the defendant; and the • justice included in the defendant’s, judgrneñt all the costs which had .accrued On-the párt of the plaintiff,-viz. summons, constable’s fees, .swearing plaintiff’s witnesses,,&c.

*.Per-Curiam.*

The admission of such testimony, was illegal and dangerous, and no subsequent caution or advice by the justice,-that the jury ought to. disregard'what the witnesses had sworn', can cure .the irregularity. • The law forbids such testimo;ny, hecaiise it mayAaiie anánfluence upon honest jurors, .who aré unconscious of the impressions which- they retain, inotwith^ standing;.the'effort of the court to obliterate-then}.' V. "

The tazation 'of costs .was alsoillegab

Judgmeht-reversedt-
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 11 

Honoring the Tuskegee Airmen for their bravery in fighting for our freedom 

in World War II, and for their contribution in creating an integrated 

United States Air Force. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2005 

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself and Mr. SHELBY) submitted the following 

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Honoring the Tuskegee Airmen for their bravery in fighting 

for our freedom in World War II, and for their contribution in creating an integrated United States Air Force.

Whereas the United States is currently combating terrorism 

around the world and is highly dependent on the global 

reach and presence provided by the Air Force; 

Whereas these operations require the highest skill and devotion to duty from all Air Force personnel involved; 

Whereas the Tuskegee Airmen proved that such skill and devotion, and not skin color, are the determining factors in 

aviation; 

Whereas the Tuskegee Airmen served honorably in the Second World War struggle against global fascism; and 
2

•SCON 11 IS

Whereas the example of the Tuskegee Airmen has encouraged 

millions of Americans of every race to pursue careers in 

air and space technology: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 

3 United States Air Force should continue to honor and 

4 learn from the example provided by the Tuskegee Airmen 

5 as it faces the challenges of the 21st century and the war 

6 on terror.

Æ
#### SMITH v. WASHINGTON GAS LIGHT CO.

Civil Actions Nos. 1134—47, 1264—47.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

Feb. 2, 1948.

Mary R. Day, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

John J. Wilson, of Whiteford, Hart, Carmody & Wilson, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

SCHWEINHAUT, Justice.

On December 22, 1946, escaping gas in their residence killed the mother and father of the plaintiff. The Gas Light Company immediately launched an investigation and learned that the cause of the accident was failure of a pipe which was imbedded in the ground under the front porch of the house. On December 28, two memoranda were prepared for the company by servicemen, Leroy Schnopps and E. M. Fowler, who had made the investigation. Safety Engineer, H. L. Leonard, also participated in the investigation and helped prepare the memoranda.

One suit was filed on March 14, 1947, and the other suit on March 25, 1947. On March 31, 1947, at the request of the Claims Agent of the Gas Company, Leonard prepared and signed a three page memorandum containing a resume of the facts, together with some analysis and observations.

The plaintiff seeks the production of the three memoranda. Counsel for the defendant agrees to produce the memoranda of Schnopps and Fowler and in any event the motion for their production should be and is granted. The application for the Leonard memorandum of March 31, 1947, is-,, denied as having been prepared some; months after the accident and the investigation thereof and subsequent to the institution of the suit. It was prepared by? him for use of counsel and is therefore privileged. Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S, 495, 67 S.Ct. 385. See this Court’s memorandum in Newell v. Capital Transit Co., D.C., 7 F.R.D. 732.

An appropriate order will be signed.
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, David W. Wehlmann, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-Q of Grey Wolf, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986];  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s quarter ended March 31, 2004 that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 9, 2004 By:  /s/ David W. Wehlmann    David W. Wehlmann    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[S. 816 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 816

    To establish the position of Northern Border Coordinator in the 
                    Department of Homeland Security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 15, 2005

 Mr. Reid (for Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following bill; which was 
   read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To establish the position of Northern Border Coordinator in the 
                    Department of Homeland Security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NORTHERN BORDER COORDINATOR.

    (a) In General.--Title IV of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 
U.S.C. 201 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in section 402--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraph (8) as paragraph 
                (9); and
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (7) the following:
            ``(8) Increasing the security of the border between the 
        United States and Canada and the ports of entry located along 
        that border, and improving the coordination among the agencies 
        responsible for maintaining that security.''; and
            (2) in subtitle C, by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 431. NORTHERN BORDER COORDINATOR.

    ``(a) In General.--There shall be within the Directorate of Border 
and Transportation Security the position of Northern Border 
Coordinator, who shall be appointed by the Secretary and who shall 
report directly to the Under Secretary for Border and Transportation 
Security.
    ``(b) Responsibilities.--The Northern Border Coordinator shall be 
responsible for--
            ``(1) increasing the security of the border, including 
        ports of entry, between the United States and Canada;
            ``(2) improving the coordination among the agencies 
        responsible for the security described under paragraph (1);
            ``(3) serving as the primary liaison with State and local 
        governments and law enforcement agencies regarding security 
        along the border between the United States and Canada; and
            ``(4) serving as a liaison with the Canadian government on 
        border security.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.) is amended by 
inserting after the item relating to section 430 the following:

``Sec. 431. Northern Border Coordinator.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Catherine Rice, Respondent, v Michael E. Mills, Appellant.

[964 NYS2d 55]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Kimberly M. Seager, J.), entered February 21, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded petitioner unsupervised visitation with the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Carni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.