alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
IEA Income Fund VIII
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, John Kallas, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund VIII (the“Partnership”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005   /s/ JOHN KALLAS     John Kallas  Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer of CCC
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 

# 2023 NIFA Update Archives

###### Share

Print FriendlyEmailTwitterFacebook

#### December

                  - December 13, 2023
                  - December 6, 2023

#### November

                  - November 29, 2023
                  - November 15, 2023
                  - November 8, 2023
                  - November 1, 2023

#### October

                  - October 25, 2023
                  - October 18, 2023
                  - October 11, 2023
                  - October 4, 2023

#### September

                  - September 27, 2023
                  - September 20, 2023
                  - September 13, 2023
                  - September 6, 2023

#### August

                  - August 30, 2023
                  - August 23, 2023
                  - August 16, 2023
                  - August 9, 2023
                  - August 2, 2023

#### July

                  - July 26, 2023
                  - July 19, 2023
                  - July 12, 2023
                  - July 5, 2023

#### June  

                  - June 28, 2023
                  - June 21, 2023
                  - June 14, 2023
                  - June 7, 2023

#### May  

                  - May 31, 2023
                  - May 24, 2023
                  - May 17, 2023
                  - May 10, 2023
                  - May 3, 2023

#### April  

                  - April 26, 2023
                  - April 19, 2023
                  - April 12, 2023
                  - April 5, 2023

#### March  

                  - March 29, 2023
                  - March 22, 2023
                  - March 15, 2023
                  - March 8, 2023
                  - March 1, 2023

#### February  

                  - February 22, 2023
                  - February 15, 2023
                  - February 8, 2023
                  - February 1, 2023

#### January  

                  - January 25, 2023
                  - January 18, 2023
                  - January 11, 2023
                  - January 4, 2023

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

funding opportunityNew Beginning for Tribal Students Program

funding opportunityResearch Facilities Act Program

funding opportunityAgriculture and Food Research Initiative - Education and Workforce Development

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postProtecting Our Water

postNumber of AFRI FY 2024 Commodity Board Co-Funding Topics Breaks Record; Expands Focus on Nutrition 

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

## Latest Updates

            - Latest Funding Opportunities
            - Latest Blogs
            - Latest Impacts

postTropical Birds Could Tolerate Warming Better Than Expected 

postCultivating the Future: Agricultural Innovations for Climate Resilience

postNevada Researcher Aims to Improve Sorghum Hybrids for Dairy Cattle Feed
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 8.1 LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES, JOINTLY CONTROLLED ENTITIES AND
ASSOCIATED COMPANIES OF BRILLIANCE CHINA AUTOMOTIVE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2006.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF COMPANIES                                                   JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
-----------------                                                   -----------------------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
SUBSIDIARIES
Shenyang Brilliance JinBei Automobile Co., Ltd.                                   China
Ningbo Yuming Machinery Industrial Co., Ltd.                                      China
Shenyang XingYuanDong Automobile Component Co., Ltd.                              China
Shenyang Jianhua Motors Engine Co., Ltd.                                          China
Ningbo Brilliance Ruixing Auto Components Co., Ltd.                               China
Mianyang Brilliance Ruian Automotive Components Co., Ltd.                         China
Shenyang JinBei Automotive Industry Holdings Company Ltd.                         China
Shenyang XinJinBei Investment and Development Co., Ltd.                           China
Shenyang Brilliance Dongxing Automotive Component Co., Ltd.                       China
Shenyang Jindong Development Co., Ltd.                                            China
Shenyang Chenfa Automobile Component Co., Ltd.                                    China
Shanghai Hidea Auto Design Co., Ltd.                                              China
Shenyang Brilliance Power Train Machinery Co., Ltd.                               China
China Brilliance Automotive Components Group Limited                             Bermuda
Southern State Investment Limited                                                  BVI
Beston Asia Investment Limited                                                     BVI
Pure Shine Limited                                                                 BVI
Key Choices Group Limited                                                          BVI
Brilliance China Automotive Finance Ltd.                                           BVI
Brilliance China Finance Limited                                                   BVI

JOINTLY CONTROLLED ENTITIES
Mianyang Xinchen Engine Co., Ltd.                                                 China
Shenyang Xinguang Brilliance Automobile Engine Co., Ltd.                          China
BMW Brilliance Automotive Ltd.                                                    China

ASSOCIATED COMPANIES
Shenyang Aerospace Mitsubishi Motors Engine Manufacturing Co., Ltd.               China
Shenyang JinBei Vehicle Dies Manufacturing Co., Ltd.                              China
</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18

- 1622

_____________________________

A NTWAN J ENKINS ,
Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

October 21, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and R OBERTS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Alexander Scott Whitlock, Assistant Public Defender, Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee

, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.
#### Anita A. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 08-1340.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 2009.

Decided: May 12, 2009.

William Lee Davis, III, Lumberton, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Jay C. Hinsley, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anita A. Thompson appeals the district court’s order entering judgment for the Commissioner in this action challenging the denial of disability insurance benefits. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Thompson v. Barnhart,*No. 7:06-cv-00117-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 20, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1045

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. David K. Feddersen, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 25, 2003 Filed: September 30, 2003

___________ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. David K. Feddersen challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he entered a plea under North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25, 37 (1970), to threatening to use anthrax to assault or kill federal employees, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 115(a)(1)(B). At sentencing, the district court denied Feddersen an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction and sentenced him to 36 months imprisonment to be followed by one year supervised release.-2- On appeal, counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court erred in denying an acceptance-o f-responsibility reduction, given that the shortcomings in Feddersen’s guilty plea “reasonably appeared to be a product of [his] mental illness.” After careful review of the record,we find that the district court did not clearly err in denying the acceptance-ofresponsibility reduction. See United States v. Arellano , 291 F.3d 1032, 1034 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review). Upon reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we have found no non-frivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2575 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2575

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethyl 3-amino-4,4,4-
                          trifulorocrotonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 30, 2009

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Ethyl 3-amino-4,4,4-
                          trifulorocrotonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETHYL 3-AMINO-4,4,4-TRIFULOROCROTONATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Ethyl 3-amino-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          4,4,4-                                                             31/2011.......
                          trifulorocrotonat
                          e (CAS No. 372-29-
                          2) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2922.49.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (“PESI”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Form 10-K”), I, Dr. Louis F. Centofanti, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and
  (2) The
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  Dated:
March 12, 2010
  /s/ Louis F.
    CentofantiDr.
      Louis F. CentofantiPresident
      andChief
      Executive Officer
 
 This
certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for
purpose of 18 U.S.C. §1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,
and not for any other purpose.
Nos. 659 and 660.

#### Moloney Electric Co. *v.*Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

January 12, 1942.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment
No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Tube, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, David A. Owen, Chief
Financial Officer of Wolverine Tube, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Wolverine Tube, Inc.
and will be retained by Wolverine Tube, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ David A. OwenDavid A. OwenSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryNovember 12, 2008
EX-10.4






Exhibit 10.4




SMART ONLINE, INC.




Cash Bonus Program




(Approved, November 2007)




The Cash Bonus Program of Smart Online, Inc. (the “Company”) is designed to award and motivate
employees for acting as partners with the Company to achieve financial success during a fiscal
year. All employees of the Company, including named executive officers, would be eligible to
receive annual cash bonus awards.



Pursuant to the program, each fiscal year commencing with fiscal 2008, a cash bonus pool for awards
shall be established based upon the Company’s net profit as of the fiscal year end once a threshold
net profit number of $300,000 is met by the Company. If the threshold net profit number is met as
of December 31 of the fiscal year, a cash bonus pool of 10% of the actual net profit as of that
date shall be allocated for distribution to employees based on the recommendations of management
and approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board. The bonuses would be awarded after the
fiscal year audit is complete, and each intended bonus recipient must be an employee at the time
the bonus awards are paid out in order to be eligible to receive an award.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Holiday RV Superstores,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended July 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
Anthony D. Borzillo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                       /s/ Anthony D. Borzillo
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Anthony D. Borzillo
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       September 23, 2002
[942 NE2d 300, 917 NYS2d 91]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick R. Ashley, Appellant.

Decided January 6, 2011

*726APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*D.J. & J.A. Cirando,*Syracuse *(John A. Cirando*of counsel), for appellant.

*Derek P. Champagne, District Attorney,*Malone *(Jennifer M. Hollis*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s challenge to his adjudication as a second violent felony offender and the sentence that was originally imposed is moot because County Court resentenced him as a first felony offender in a postjudgment CPL 440.20 proceeding that is not a subject of this appeal. Defendant failed to preserve his argument that the guilty plea became involuntary after he was subsequently resentenced for a prior, unrelated criminal offense. Defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Jones concur; Judge Pigott taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**
**NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP**
Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 provides that if any part of aregistration statement, when such part became effective, contained an untruestatement of a material fact, or omitted to state a material fact required tobe stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading,any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration statement (unlessit is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of suchuntruth or omission) may sue, among others, every accountant who has consentedto be named as having prepared or certified any part of the registrationstatement, with respect to the statement in such registration statement,report, or valuation, which purports to have been prepared or certified by theaccountant.
On March 18, 2002, we dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP (Arthur Andersen) as ourindependent auditors. Prior to the date of filing this Form 10-K, ArthurAndersen ceased operations. After reasonable efforts, we have been unable toobtain Arthur Andersen’s written consent to the incorporation by reference ofArthur Andersen’s audit report with respect to our financial statements as ofSeptember 30, 2001 and for the years ended September 30, 2001 and 2000 into ourRegistration Statements (Reg. Nos. 33-66980, 33-86230, 333-01874, 333-03865,333-22943, 333-28717, 333-45991, 333-60321, 333-62576, 333-70354, 333-73201,333-82879, and 333-88114). Such audit report is included in this Form 10-K.
Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act of 1933 permitsus to file this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the abovelisted registration statements, without a written consent from Arthur Andersen.However, as a result, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability underSection 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untrue statements of a materialfact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or anyomissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, youwould be unable to assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a)of the Securities Act. We believe, however, that other persons who are liableunder Section 11(a) of the Securities Act, including our officers anddirectors, may still rely on Arthur Andersen’s audit reports as being made byan expert under the due diligence defense provision of Section 11(b) of theSecurities Act. The law in this area remains unsettled, however, and noassurance can be given that a court will find such reliance to be justified.