alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
Honorable Forrbstsr Senoook, Page 2 

Xn rim of the language matained In Article 8, 

%otian 20 of the Constitution an4 tii eeli3 Artfale 7166, 

it lo.our opinion that the term wtrue and full valueP a6 

used in ths first seotion o? Article 7165, hvleed Cfrll 

:Ttatutea, meem the ARFAO thing as "actuel aesh velueP aa 

ueed In Artlale 7166 and "fair oash market ralue" (LB used 

in ml4 Constitutional pre~leiens~ In a oountg where 

property is required to be arseased at 100% of Its adtual 

cash value, eaoh share in a national bank rbould be taxed 

only for the dlffarenas between ita aotual cash ralua and 

the proportionate amount per share at which the bank'e 

real estate is aseesced, a6 prwided by Article 7166. We 

enclose copy or out ~plnion 20. O--21*06 whloh inbiaates the 

method of arrivin,~; at the peopar valuation of such ahares 

it a aountp where the 3oar4 of Equdiisetion systemetlaally 

aBneasei3 property at a peroantage 16sa then tht, full value. 

GB belleve this will eufficiently ansmr your questions. 

Your8 rsry Oruly
#### State v. Stewart

Case below: 183 N.C. App.-(5 June 2007)

No. 319P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-731)

Denied 08/23/07
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 100 (Wednesday, May 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 25260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12194]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Race-Based Social Stress and 
Health in the MADICS Longitudinal Study, University of Michigan at 
Ann Arbor.
    Date: June 16, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, PhD, Division of 
Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy 
Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 
1600 Executive Boulevard, Rm. 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
8382, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 15, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-12194 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1992-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         121,831
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               312,120
<PP&E>                                         5,579,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,030,753)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,860,378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,925
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,853,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,860,378
<SALES>                                        847,196
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               849,546
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  364,888<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                376,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            376,995
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   376,995
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation and
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1  I, Thomas A. Daiber, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004of Centrue Financial Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; and3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport.        Date:  May 11, 2006 /s/ Thomas A. Daiber   Thomas A. Daiber   Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Written Statement of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) The undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Orbital Sciences Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, on the date hereof:  (a)
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended March
31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David W. ThompsonDavid W. ThompsonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerApril 25, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
#### Elzey Frederick JONES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bronald S. BURKE, Jr., Department of Veterans Affairs, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-1882.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 2, 2006.

Elzey Frederick Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*176PER CURIAM:

Elzey Frederick Jones, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we modify the dismissal of Jones’ claim to be without prejudice and affirm as modified for the reasons stated by the district court. *Jones v. Burke,*No. 1:05-cv02358-JFM, 2006 WL 1892272 (D.Md. June 21, 2006). We deny Jones’ motions for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.*
#### Northrop *against*Minturn.

A *note*given *for the use of a billard table, is not illegal, unless it appear to whom the note was given kept a tavern (1 N. R. L. 178, 179.)*

ERROR, on a *certiorari*to a justice’s court.

*Minturn*brought a suit against Northrop, on a promissory note given by *Northrop*to Minturn, for 25 dollars. The defence was, that the note was given for a gaming debt. In support of the plea, the defendant below produced a witness, who swore, “ that, at the time when the note was given, *Minturn*admitted that 8 dollars of the note was for a ball-bill, and the residue for the use of a *billiard table:*but that he knew nothing of *Northrop’s*gaming.”

There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff below, foF the whole amount of the note.

*Per Curiam.*

Supposing the true construction of the evidence to be, that part of the consideration of the note was for the use of a billiard table, *in playing billiards at the house of Minturn ;*yet, as there is no evidence that *Minturn*then *kept a*tavern, it was not an unlawful contract; there being no evidence that it was for money lost at play.

The judgment below must fee affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Andre M. Hilliou, Chief Executive Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 2, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ ANDRE M. HILLIOU   
|                     |  |     |  | Andre M. Hilliou       
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Full House Resorts, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) I, Mark Miller, Chief Financial Officer of Full House Resorts, Inc.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Full House Resorts, Inc.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 2, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ MARK MILLER        
|                     |  |     |  | Mark Miller            
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
June 23, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FAHD SAAD TANASH, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00463-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Specimen Stock Certificate





Exhibit 4.1


	Number  	  	Shares  
	  
	PAW SPA, INC. 
	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF 
	NEVADA 100,000,000 SHARES COMMON STOCK AUTHORIZED, 
	$0.00001 PAR VALUE 
	  
	  	  	CUSIP _______ 
	  	  	SEE REVERSE  
	  	  	FOR  
	This  	  	CERTAIN  
	certifies  	  	DEFINITIONS  
	that  	  	  
	is the owner of  	  	  
	  
	  
	FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE 
	SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF 
	  
	  
	PAW SPA, INC. 
	transferable on the books of the corporation in person or by duly 
	authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly 
	endorsed. This certificate and the shares represented hereby 
	are subject to the laws of the State of Nevada, and to the 
	Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, 
	as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid 
	unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent. WITNESS 
	the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the signature 
	of its duly authorized officers 
	  
	 
	 
	   
	 
	 
	  
	  
	PRESIDENT  	[SEAL]  	SECRETARY  









     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations.


	TEN COM  	as tenants in common  	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT  ______________	Custodian  ______________
	TEN ENT  	as tenants by the entireties  	                        (Cust)  	            (Minor)  
	JT TEN  	as joint tenants with the right of  	                                                   Act_________________________________  
	  	survivorship and not as tenants  	  	(State)              
	  	in common  	  	  




Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


	For value received,  __________________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto  
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER                                                           
	  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE                                                            
	  
	  
	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
	 
	  
	 
	 
	  
	 
	 
	________________________________________________________________________________________ shares of  
	the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint  
	 
	______________________________________________________________________________________, Attorney to  
	transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the  
	premises.  	  
	 	
	Dated __________________________________
	 
	X _______________________________________________________________________________________
	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN  
	EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE  
	GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions)  
	  
	 
	 
	SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:  	  
	 	
	 	
	  
	TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY
# CJnrb**Burtrtct Court** **of State** **of Florida** 

# Opinion**filed DEC** **2018 Not** **final until** **disposition of** **timoly filed** **motion for** **rehearing. No.** **18-2532**

### Lower**Tribunal No.** **18-1804**

### Alvaro**Elias, Appellant,** **vs.**

### The**State of** **Florida, Appellee.** 

### An**Appeal from** **the Circuit Court** **for Miami-Dade** **County, Diane** **V. Ward,** **Judge.**

### Carlos**J. Martinez,** **Public Defender,** **and Natasha** **Baker-Bradley, Assistant** **Public Defender,** **for appellant.** 

### Pamela**Jo Bondi,** **Attorney General,** **and Gabrielle** **Raemy Charest-Turken,** **Assistant Attorney** **General, for** **appellee. Before** **LOGUE, SCALES** **and LINDSEY,** **JJ.**

### ON**MOTION TO** **REVIEW ORDER** **DENYING POST-TRIAL** **RELEASE PER** **CURIAM.**

### Alvaro**Elias seeks** **review of the** **trial court's** **denial of** **Elias's Florida** **Rule of** **Criminal Procedure** **3.190(b) motion** **for post-trial** **release pending** **review of his** **conviction and** **sentence. We** **have jurisdiction.** **SeeFla. R.** **App. P.** **9.140(h)(4). In** **denying Elias's** **motion for** **post-trial release,** **the trial** **court was** **required to** **enter written** **order setting** **forth the** **factual basis** **on which** **the court** **reached its** **decision and** **the reasons** **for its** **denial. See** **Fla. R.** **Crim. P.** **3.691 (b);** **Fla. R.** **App. P.** **9.140(h)(3). The** **lower court** **committed reversible** **error in** **failing to** **enter such** **written order.** **See Metayer** **v. State,** **52 So.** **3d 691,** **692 (Fla.** **4th DCA** **2010); Montgomery** **v. State,** **788 So.** **2d 274,** **275 (Fla.** **4th DCA** **2000); Buckhalter** **v. State,** **416 So.** **2d 862,** **862 (Fla.** **1st DCA** **1982). Accordingly,** **we grant** **Elias's motion** **for review,** **reverse the** **denial of** **Elias's motion** **for post-trial** **release, and** **remand for** **the lower** **court to** **reconsider Elias's** **motion in** **accordance with** **the applicable** **criminal and** **appellate rules** **within three** **days of** **the date** **of this** **opinion. If** **the lower** **court again** **denies post-trial** **release, it** **must make** **the necessary** **written findings** **to support** **the denial.** **Reversed and** **remanded for** **further proceedings** **consistent with** **this opinion.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                            1,074,556
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       146,802
<ALLOWANCES>                        (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                           4,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  1,272,145
<PP&E>                            1,059,303
<DEPRECIATION>                     (508,975)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    1,857,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               594,987
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             49,917
<OTHER-SE>                        1,206,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      1,857,784
<SALES>                           2,296,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,296,335
<CGS>                             1,315,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,315,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  3,445,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (77,452)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (2,506,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (2,506,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                     (2,506,875)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.71)



</TABLE>
#### State v. Blackwell

Case below: 361 N.C. 41

No. 490PA04-2

Def’s Motion to Stay Issuance of Mandate and to Withdraw the Court’s Slip Opinion (COA03-793)

Denied 01/03/07
RECEIVED <Zou/i\r ^ Afi/at-fe

5 DEBRA SPISAX. CLERK . JUN 29 2015

>tfc> £>& -/#-o&a^4 -<tj£

RECEIVED IN

fitted UtefJtr &*** A/)/?dr//^

ApperJ/n^r /<ro&iQ HfA-f kU /!OA Inns h b& £/*

~fe> /impeded -Hie: jM&m&AJ)'dXJuk\ s>/)/^/0 hy 3i**s&ce Lee- Q^Ai^l

to/f/t A)£tf)/y Oisc&oeA EviAe&xcjs: "M*{- jsWo i4iidr /fo&d&cLtdifr

fd/k/ ifc£&>n.As jL>u3 ftt&f" He /fype/fasf- c/id/&* f" 5/po Her
Oteio /I20H u5ke& Hd& &>x&&«s)r fa S&hzeJ*^ -(&*lh^ u^ols S/£/o&J

fiA^ U%y>/<z>/-/o3, '

lOd/i1 U«±ii[ /Nnfe& /Jd{etiLO/&& i&ytccf Ht& -fatter, d^ /81S~~J/>sn. ,

LOLtte Her /%<£> sM<^ H*ff~lt& Ch^s^ASf fe> S£*fc4. fe^^t mugf

SBV///sd c>^r /f/0>cL d'/yfo b£-Q>f££: Pt^^f^a^ efissfS&ciwtsG'

npfieS/#&\ Lhz yh*r( /e-J A<z&/oy ^ A2Gte> **-/ coetlr Iik

Appz/Mtif Asks, 'Hits (3ociJC\- b> <S*4*vf Htte A7ofia% d9

(3

/4&Sp6<di(Ll'fyy %cJ>m*$/**s.

X
Appe/Jm^ hzflzbyy der&jrCy Hitf* Ji&-.smiled oro.

^
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 98 (Friday, May 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 24007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-8593-7]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. 
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
Federal Activities at 202-564-7146.
    An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental 
impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 17, 2009 (74 
FR 17860).

Draft EISs

EIS No. 20090054, ERP No. D-AFS-K65358-CA, Stanislaus National Forest 
Motorized Travel Management (17305) Plan, Implementation, Stanislaus 
National Forest, CA.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about adverse impacts 
on water quality, sensitive species and habitat. Additional information 
is needed on seasonal closures, monitoring, and enforcement 
commitments. Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20090062, ERP No. D-FRC-E05104-00, Catawba-Wateree 
Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2232), Application for Hydroelectric 
License, Catawba and Wateree Rivers in Burke, McDowell, Caldwell, 
Catawba, Alexander, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Lincoln and Gaston Counties, 
NC and York, Lancaster, Chester, Fairfield and Kershaw Counties, SC.
    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns impacts to aquatic 
species. Rating EC1.

Final EISs

EIS No. 20090110, ERP No. F-USN-C11023-NJ, Laurelwood Housing Area, 
Access at Naval Weapons Station Earle, Lease Agreement, Monmouth 
County, NJ.

    Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.

    Dated: May 19, 2009.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E9-12011 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P