alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 98 (Friday, May 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 24019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11994]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control, Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Prevention of Health Risk Behaviors Among Youth 
With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (U01), FOA DD09-004

    Notice of Cancellation: This notice was published in the Federal 
Register on April 30, 2009, Volume 74, Number 82, pages 19970-19971. 
The meeting originally scheduled to convene on May 15, 2009 has been 
cancelled. The meeting will be re-scheduled at a future date, to be 
announced.
    Contact Person for More Information: Brenda Colley-Gilbert, 
Designated Federal Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop 
K92, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-6295. The Director, 
Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the 
authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements 
of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and 
the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: May 15, 2009.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9-11994 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### Paul Palmieri, Respondent, v Town of Babylon, Appellant.

Submitted September 9, 2009;

decided October 20, 2009

Reported below, 56 AD3d 740.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied. Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied *[see*12 NY3d 909 (2009)].
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1778** 

SAKIMA IBAN SALIH EL BEY, a/k/a Francis Marion Savall, a/k/a Iban Salih El Bey Sakim , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LIEUTENANT DAVIS; JOE SHAW, Mayor, City of Lancaste r; HARLEAN HOWARD, Chief of Police, Lancaster Police Department; NIKKI HALEY, Governor, State of SC; OFFICER FIREBAUGH , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Solomon Blatt, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 0:11

- cv - 01026

- SB )

Submitted : October 13, 2011 Decided: October 17, 2011

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Sakima Iban Salih El Bey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sakima Iban Salih El Bey appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint without prejudice . The district court referred this case to a magi strate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. A. § 636(b)(1)(B) ( West 200 6 & Supp. 2011 ). The magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed and advised El Bey that failure to timely file specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been war ned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). El Bey has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
#### Scidmore *against*Smith.

An action on the case lies for setouring the set-*thet*°pia!S,°f thepenaityndgn-concLning' ast *vmtl<*(2 wr.*á cumulative rc“edy‘

IN ERROR, bn *' certiorari*to a iüstioe’s court.

*Smith,*the defendant in error,

brought ■ an action of *trespass*(as was-stated in the return) in the court below, , against the plaintiff in error, to recover'damages for séducing and harbour?* ing his man servant. It was objected that the action should have been *debt,*uncfer;the‘ 15th section of the “me,¿concerning slaves,and servants,” ( 2 N. *R. L.*206,,) but the exception was overruled, and, judgment was given for the defendant in error.'

*Per*Curiam.

The statute penalty for harbouring slaves or ‘servants, is'cumulative, and. does-not destroy the common law remedy.

Judgment affirmed.(a)

(a)

*Almy*v. *Harris,*5 *Johns. Rep.*175, *Farmer's Turnpike Company*v. Coventry, 10 *Johns. Rep.*389.
**Facebook****Email**Print**Facebook****EmailPDF 다운로드

                  -                  개요, 증상, & 원인               
                  -                  진단, 치료, & 취해야 할 단계               
                  -                  더 많은 정보               

## 통풍에 관해 기억해야 할 사항

                            - 통풍은 관절에 통증과 부종을 일으키는 일종의 관절염이며 보통, 1주 또는 2주 동안 지속하다가 사라지는 발작입니다.
                            - 조기 진단, 치료, 그리고 생활양식의 변화를 통해, 통풍은 가장 관리가 가능한 형태의 관절염 중 하나입니다.
                            - 통풍의 가장 흔한 증상은 엄지발가락 같은 통풍이 생긴 관절의 통증입니다.
                            - 담당의사는 통풍의 원인을 관리하고 활동성 통풍 발작을 치료하기 위한 약물 복용을 권유할 수 있고, 식단과 생활양식 변경을 권유할 수 있습니다.

## 통풍이란 무엇인가요?

통풍은 관절에 통증과 부종을 일으키는 일종의 관절염이며 보통, 1주 또는 2주 동안 지속하다가 사라지는 발작입니다. 통풍 발작은 흔히 엄지발가락이나 하지에서 시작합니다.  

통풍은 혈청 요산염으로 불리는 높은 수치의 물질이 몸안에 축적될 때 일어납니다. 이런 일이 일어나면 바늘 모양의 결정체들이 관절 내부와 주위에 형성됩니다. 이것은 관절의 염증과 관절염을 초래합니다. 그러나 혈청 요산염 수치가 높은 대부분 사람들은 통풍이 생기지 않습니다.

조기 진단, 치료, 그리고 생활양식의 변화를 통해, 통풍은 가장 관리가 가능한 형태의 관절염 중 하나입니다. 

## 누가 통풍에 걸리나요? 

많은 사람들이 통풍에 걸립니다. 
                          - 통풍은 여성보다 남성에 더 흔합니다. 
                          - 보통, 통풍은 중년에 생기며 여성들은 보통, 폐경 전에는 통풍이 생기지 않습니다.  
                          - 젊은 사람들이 통풍에 걸리는 경우는 드물지만, 걸리는 경우에는 더 나빠지는 경향이 있습니다.

## 통풍의 증상은 무엇인가요?

통풍의 가장 흔한 증상은 엄지발가락 같은 통풍이 생긴 관절의 통증입니다. 통풍 발작은 흔히 밤에 갑자기 시작하며, 심한 통증 때문에 잠에서 깰 수 있습니다.  또한, 관절의 부종, 발적, 열감, 그리고 뻣뻣함을 느낄 수 있습니다.

통풍 발작은 보통, 하나의 관절에서 일어납니다. 발작은 다음과 같은 것에 의해 초래될 수 있습니다.
                            - 특정한 식품.
                            - 알코올.
                            - 특정한 약물.
                            - 신체적 외상.
                            - 특정한 질병.

일반적으로, 발작은 1주 또는 2주에 걸쳐 좋아집니다. 보통, 발작 사이에는 증상이 없습니다. 어떤 사람들은 빈번한 발작이 있을 수 있는 반면에, 어떤 사람들은 수년간 재발이 없을 수도 있습니다. 그러나, 치료를 받지 않고 방치하는 경우, 시간이 지나면 발작이 더 오래 지속할 수 있고 더 자주 일어날 수 있습니다. 

통풍이 있는 일부 사람들은 다른 질병이나 합병증(특히 심장 및 신장)이 생길 수 있는 가능성이 더 높아질 수 있습니다. 

## 통풍을 일으키는 것은 무엇인가요?

통풍은 요산염이 몸안에 축적되어 관절에 바늘 모양의 결정체를 형성할 때 일어납니다.  이것은 다음과 같은 것을 초래합니다.
                            - 통증.
                            - 부종.
                            - 발적
                            - 통풍이 생긴 관절을 움직이고 사용하는 방법의 변화. 

다음과 같은 요인들 때문에 통풍이 생길 가능성이 더 높아질 수 있습니다. 
                            - 높은 요산염 수치; 그러나 수치가 높다고 해서 모든 사람에게 통풍이 생기는 것은 아닙니다. 
                            - 통풍의 가족력.
                            - 나이가 많아 짐. 
                            - 음주.
                            - 요산염으로 분해되는 물질(보통, 동물 공급원에서 얻는)인 푸린이 풍부한 식품 섭취.
                            - 소다수 같은 고과당 옥수수 시럽이 함유된 음료수 섭취.
                            - 과체중이나 비만, 고혈압, 그리고 만성 신장 질환 등 일부 질병.
                            - 일부 약물.

**Facebook****Email**Print**Facebook****EmailPDF 다운로드

#### Learn about Research

Find a Clinical Trial  

#### View/Download/Order Publications

Download this topic as a PDF

**Facebook****Email**Print**Facebook****Email

Last Reviewed:             July 2020
III 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 2

To extend the life of the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies and the provisions of S. Con. Res. 93 and S. Con. Res. 94 

of the One Hundred Eighth Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 4, 2005

Mr. FRIST (for himself, Mr. REID, Mr. LOTT, and Mr. DODD) submitted the 

following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To extend the life of the Joint Congressional Committee 

on Inaugural Ceremonies and the provisions of S. Con. 

Res. 93 and S. Con. Res. 94 of the One Hundred Eighth 

Congress.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That effective from January 3, 2005, the 

3 joint committee created by Senate Concurrent Resolution 

4 94 (108th Congress), to make the necessary arrangements 

5 for the inauguration, is hereby continued with the same 

6 power and authority provided for in that resolution. 

7 SEC. 2. Effective from January 4, 2005, the provi8 sions of Senate Concurrent Resolution 93 (108th Con-
2

•SCON 2 ATS 

1 gress), to authorize the rotunda of the United States Cap2 itol to be used in connection with the proceedings and 

3 ceremonies for the inauguration of the President-elect and 

4 the Vice President-elect of the United States, are contin5 ued with the same power and authority provided for in 

6 that resolution.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 936 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 936

              To ensure privacy for e-mail communications.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 2005

 Mr. Leahy (for himself and Mr. Sununu) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To ensure privacy for e-mail communications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``E-Mail Privacy Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF INTERCEPT.

    Section 2510(4) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``through the use of any electronic, mechanical, or other 
device.'' and inserting ``contemporaneous with transit, or on an 
ongoing basis during transit, through the use of any electronic, 
mechanical, or other device or process, notwithstanding that the 
communication may simultaneously be in electronic storage;''.
                                 <all>
```
Third Department,

November, 2013

(November 7, 2013)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dupray A. Jordan, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 181]

Egan Jr., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Cawley, J.), rendered February 22, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of assault in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of assault in the second degree and, in conjunction therewith, was to receive a sentence of time served. County Court advised defendant, however, that if he were arrested for any reason prior to the scheduled sentencing date, the court no longer would be bound by the sentencing commitment. Thereafter, while on release pending sentencing, defendant was arrested on unrelated charges and, following a jury trial, was convicted of burglary in the second degree and menacing in the second degree. Defendant subsequently ap*971peared at a combined sentencing proceeding and, insofar as is relevant to this appeal, was sentenced upon the assault conviction to a prison term of four years, followed by three years of postrelease supervision.* Defendant now appeals.

Defendant’s sole contention upon appeal is that the enhanced sentence was harsh and excessive and should be reduced in the interest of justice. We disagree. Although defendant’s prior criminal history was not extensive, the underlying assault conviction involved a serious act of violence, and County Court clearly warned defendant that his failure to abide by the no-arrest restriction could result in a greater sentence. “In view of defendant’s disregard of this condition, coupled with the fact that the enhanced sentence was less than the statutory maximum, we find no extraordinary circumstances justifying a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice” *(People v Douglas,*2 AJ)3d 1050, 1051 [2003], *Iv denied*2 NY3d 761 [2004] [citation omitted]; *see People v White,*24 AD3d 817, 817 [2005]). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Rose, J.E, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*

 With respect to the burglary and menacing convictions, which are the subject of a separate appeal *(People v Jordan,*111 AD3d 971 [2013] [decided herewith]), defendant was sentenced to an aggregate prison term of four years with five years of postrelease supervision — said sentence to run consecutively to the sentence imposed upon the assault conviction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UTILX CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                       284
<INVENTORY>                                      9,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,864
<PP&E>                                          33,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,198
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               72
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,361
<SALES>                                         39,501
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,501
<CGS>                                           35,765
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    66
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (587)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (588)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (588)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 (McGLADREY & PULLEN LOGO)  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
333-121064) of our report dated March 8, 2005, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Centrue Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004.  -s- McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLPChampaign, Illinois
March 25, 2005
    
    McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
  McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International -
an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.
#### In the Matter of Will V., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 390]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J., at fact-finding hearing; Sidney Gribetz, J., at disposition), entered on or about January 10, 2013, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree and assault in the third degree, and placed him on enhanced supervised probation for a period of 15 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order, same court (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about November 28, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the order of disposition.

While the better practice would have been to adjourn the matter for one day, especially where the Presentment Agency joined the request for an adjournment, based on this record the court did not violate appellant’s right to be present when it ordered a portion of the fact-finding hearing to continue in appellant’s absence. The record establishes that although appellant was aware of the time and date for his continued fact-finding hearing, at which a civilian witness was scheduled to testify, appellant chose to be elsewhere. Accordingly, this constituted a deliberate absence, resulting in a forfeiture of the right to be present *(see People v Sanchez,*65 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1985]). We note that appellant did not appear in court until the next day, and offered no explanation for his absence *(compare Matter of Joelin V.,*107 AD3d 511 [1st Dept 2013]).

The record demonstrates that appellant’s counsel, whose ability to conduct a defense was impaired by her client’s absence, pursued a “protest strategy” *(People v Aiken,*45 NY2d 394, 399 [1978]) or “strategy of silence” *(United States v Sanchez,*790 F2d 245, 254 [2d Cir 1986], *cert denied*479 US 989 [1986]). We conclude that counsel’s strategic decisions regarding nonparticipation during appellant’s absence were objectively reasonable, and did not cause appellant any prejudice *(see People v Ben*
      *426
      *evento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]). We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining claims of ineffective assistance.

Appellant did not preserve his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the physical injury element of third-degree assault, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. The victim sustained swelling to his eye that lasted for three to four days. In addition, his jaw, which he iced twice a day for four days, was swollen for a week and caused him difficulty in eating and talking. This provided ample evidence of physical injury *(see generally People v Chiddick,*8 NY3d 445, 447 [2007]; *People v Guidice,*83 NY2d 630, 636 [1994]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Richter and Feinman, JJ.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 958

AN ACT

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the

Star-Spangled Banner Trail in the States of Maryland

and Virginia and the District of Columbia as a National

Historic Trail.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Star-Spangled Banner

5 National Historic Trail Act’’.
 †

2

S 958 ES

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION OF TRAIL.

2 Section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16

3 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing:

5 ‘‘(25) STAR-SPANGLED BANNER NATIONAL HIS6 TORIC TRAIL.—

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Star-Spangled

8 Banner National Historic Trail, a trail con9 sisting of water and overland routes totaling ap10 proximately 290 miles extending from southern

11 Maryland through the District of Columbia and

12 Virginia, and north to Baltimore, Maryland,

13 commemorating the Chesapeake Campaign of

14 the War of 1812 (including the British invasion

15 of Washington, District of Columbia, and its

16 associated feints and the Battle of Baltimore in

17 summer 1814), as generally depicted on the

18 maps contained in the report entitled ‘Star19 Spangled Banner National Historic Trail Feasi20 bility Study and Environmental Impact State21 ment’, and dated March 2004.

22 ‘‘(B) MAP.—A map generally depicting the

23 trail shall be maintained on file and available

24 for public inspection in the appropriate offices

25 of the National Park Service.
†

3

S 958 ES

1 ‘‘(C) ADMINISTRATION.—Subject to sub2 paragraph (E)(ii), the trail shall be adminis3 tered by the Secretary of the Interior.

4 ‘‘(D) LAND ACQUISITION.—No land or in5 terest in land outside the exterior boundaries of

6 any federally administered area may be ac7 quired by the United States for the trail except

8 with the consent of the owner of the land or in9 terest in land.

10 ‘‘(E) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.—The Sec11 retary of the Interior shall—

12 ‘‘(i) encourage communities, owners of

13 land along the trail, and volunteer trail

14 groups to participate in the planning, de15 velopment, and maintenance of the trail;

16 and

17 ‘‘(ii) consult with other affected land18 owners and Federal, State, and local agen19 cies in the administration of the trail.

20 ‘‘(F) INTERPRETATION AND ASSIST21 ANCE.—Subject to the availability of appropria22 tions, the Secretary of the Interior may provide

23 to State and local governments and nonprofit

24 organizations interpretive programs and serv25 ices and, through Fort McHenry National
†

4

S 958 ES

1 Monument and Shrine, technical assistance, for

2 use in carrying out preservation and develop3 ment of, and education relating to the War of

4 1812 along, the trail.’’.

Passed the Senate November 16, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 958

AN ACT

To amend the National Trails System Act to desof Columbia as a National Historic Trail. States of Maryland and Virginia and the District ignate the Star-Spangled Banner Trail in the
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                                           
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 21, 2006 |  | /s/ Chiu M. Chan                                                          
|                         |  | Chiu M. Chan President and Chief Executive
Officer Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.