alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Byrne, Principal Financial Officer of Sterling, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sterling.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: March 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel G. Byrne                                                                                    
|                     |  |  |  | Daniel G. Byrne Executive Vice
President  Finance, Assistant Secretary and Principal Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Sterling for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sterling and will be retained by Sterling and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
           CONSENT OF COOPERS & LYBRAND, LLP, INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statement of General Surgical Innovations, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 
333-10305) of our report dated July 29, 1997, except for Note 14, as to which 
the date is September 29, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial 
statements and financial statement schedule of General Surgical Innovations, 
Inc. as of June 30, 1997 and 1996 and for the years ended June 30, 1997, 1996 
and 1995 which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 
year ended June 30, 1997.
 
                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND
 
San Jose, California
September 29, 1997
#### Octavio HERNANDEZ RAMIREZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-71033.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 13, 2009.*

Filed April 29, 2009.

Octavio Hernandez Ramirez, Santa Maria, CA, pro se.

*531CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Glen T. Jaeger, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. *531R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lead petitioner Octavio Hernandez Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Perez v. Mukasey,*516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hernandez Ramirez’s second motion to reopen. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (an alien who is subject to a final order of removal is generally limited to filing one motion to reopen).

To the extent Hernandez Ramirez challenges the BIA’s August 4, 2005 and September 30, 2005 orders, we lack jurisdiction because this petition is not timely as to those orders. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); *Singh v. INS,*315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
     **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATESCODE)**
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies with respect to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Companyfor the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”) that to his knowledge:
1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.   Date: March 22, 2004      /s/ Henry R. Mandell Henry R. Mandell Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Leeward Isles Resorts, Limited, Respondent, v Charles C. Hickox, Appellant.

Submitted August 31, 2009;

decided October 20, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 622.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to he appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.
January 21, 1997

Mr. Phil Wiland
Concepts Direct, Inc.
1351 South Sunset Street
Longmont, Colorado 80501-6549

RE:	New Concepts Direct Facility - Letter of Intent Notice to
Proceed with Earthwork

Mr. Wiland:

Per our previous discussions, this letter is to establish that Concepts
Direct, Inc. and Saunders Construction, Inc. propose, subject to the
conditions contained herein, to enter into an agreement for the
construction of a new facility for Concepts Direct on Lot 1, Block I of
Concepts Direct Filing Number I in Longmont, Colorado.  The final
pricing and terms of the agreement will be in general accordance with
Saunders Construction's preliminary proposal, but subject to the mutual
agreement of Concepts Direct, Inc. and Saunders Construction, Inc., and
will be finalized upon completion of construction documents prepared by
Intergroup Architects.  We are currently preparing mechanical and
electrical construction documents under our letter of December 10, 1996,
but in order to keep the project on schedule it is necessary to mobilize
the site, construct access roads and temporary utility services, rough
grade the site, and construct the building pad.

With your signature in the space provided on the following pace, this
letter will serve as our Notice to Proceed with this work.  The total
not-to-exceed cost for this work is itemized on the attached sheets.

It is understood by Concepts Direct and Saunders Construction, Inc. that
Concepts Direct may terminate this agreement at any time, however, if
this project is terminated for any reason the above costs will be
payable to Saunders Construction, Inc., less the value of any
uncompleted work at the point of termination.  It is agreed by both
parties that the intent of this letter is to allow the start of
construction prior to the execution of a formal contract.  Upon
execution of a formal contract, this letter will become null and void
and the above costs will become a cost of the executed contract.

Please signify your acceptance of these conditions by providing a dated
signature in the space provided below and returning to Saunders
Construction, Inc.. Saunders Construction, Inc. and Concepts Direct both
agree that this letter of intent and agreement is binding only as to the
specifics contained herein and neither party by this letter is obligated
to enter into, or execute any additional contract or agreement unless
mutually satisfactory to both parties and executed by both parties.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call. We
look forward to working with you on this project.

Sincerely,

SAUNDERS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
/s/ David F. Hoffman
David F. Hoffman
Chief Estimator

Accepted,
CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC.
/s/ Phillip A. Wiland
Phil Wiland
Chairman
Date  1-27-97

(Various tables follow in the original outlining the total anticipated costs
totaling $251,798.)
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
                                               OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Darin G. Billerbeck, as Chief Executive Officer of ZiLOG,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



|                        |                               
|----------------------- | ------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2009 | By:    /s/ Darin G. Billerbeck

| |                                                
| | -----------------------------------------------
| |                                                
| | Darin G. Billerbeck                            
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Perry J. Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of ZiLOG, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



|                        |                          
|----------------------- | -------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2009 | By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                     
| | Perry J. Grace                                      
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

BRUCE A. HARTMAN and BLANCE M. HARTMAN

,

Appellant s

,

v.

TOWER HILL SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 20 2 3

- 0853

July 3, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Emil y A.

Peacock , Judge.

Mark A. Nation and Paul W. Pritchard of The Nation Law Firm,

Longwood, for Appellant s.

C. Ryan Jones

, Scot E. Samis

, and Brandon R. Christian of Traub

Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, LLP, Saint Petersburg, for Appellee.

P ER C UR IAM

.

Affirmed.

K ELLY, VILLANTI, and L UCAS

, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision pr ior to offici al publicatio n.
Exhibit 31.1
Cronos Global Income Fund XIV
Rule 13a-14 Certifications
          I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
          1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV (the“Registrant”);
          2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;
          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport;
          4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of theRegistrant, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and wehave:
               (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; and
               (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
               (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
          5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
               (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theRegistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
               (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 24, 2005     /s/ DENNIS J TIETZ       Dennis J Tietz    President and Chief Executive Officer of CCC
O pinion filed June 26 , 2014



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 1 4

- 00 149

- CV

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF L.T.M ., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 2 6 6 th District Court

Erath County, Texas

T rial Court Cause No. C V32308

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant, Kristin Mack , filed a not ice of appeal in this court on May 28,
2014. In her notice, Appellant indicated a desire to appeal from an agreed order
signed by the trial court on February 4, 2014, and a protective order signed by the

trial court on March 5, 2014. Upon docketing this case

, the clerk of thi s court

issued a letter dated May 28, 2 01 4

, in which we noted that the notice of appeal
appeared to have been filed untimely. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.1, 26.3

. In the letter,

w e requested that Appellant respond on or before June 9 , 201 4 , and we informed
Ap pellant that this appeal w ould be subject to dismissal if s he failed to respond and2 show grounds to continu e the appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3. Appellant has not filed
a response. Consequently , we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c).

This appeal is dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

June 26 , 2014
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J., and Bailey , J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,271,688
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    192,586
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,644,252
<PP&E>                                         852,690
<DEPRECIATION>                               (269,794)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,315,698
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          933,703
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       107,174
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,480,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,315,698
<SALES>                                         11,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,803
<CGS>                                            9,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,845
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               637,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (635,399)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (0,06)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (635,399)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (635,399)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 3.(I).2

                            JERSEY FINANCIAL SERVICES
                                   COMMISSION

                           COMPANIES (JERSEY) LAW 1991

                                 CERTIFICATE OF
                         INCORPORATION ON CHANGE OF NAME
                           OF A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY

                                                         Registered Number 30810

                              I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT

                          LONDON PACIFIC GROUP LIMITED

a public company  incorporated  under the Companies  (Jersey)  Laws,  1861-1968,
having  changed its name by special  resolution,  has today been  entered on the
Register of Companies incorporated in Jersey as a public company having the name
of

                           BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LIMITED


Dated this 12th day of June 2003
                                                   Deputy Registrar of Companies


Under  Article  13 of the  Companies  (Jersey)  Law  1991,  as  amended,  Jersey
companies shall end (a) with the word "Limited" or the abbreviation "Ltd" or (b)
with the words "avec  responsabilite  limitee" or the  abbreviation  "a.r.l".  A
company  which  used (a) or (b) may,  in  setting  out or using its name for any
purpose under this law, do so in full or in the abbreviated form, as it prefers.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,365] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 25, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at International Automotive Components Group, North America, Dearborn, Michigan, and including workers at plants in Rochester Hills and Plymouth, Michigan. The workers at the subject facilities are engaged in employment related to the production of automotive components. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 27th day of April 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11852 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURUSANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grey Wolf, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the three period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Thomas P.
Richards, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
David W. Wehlmann, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly present, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Thomas P. RichardsThomas P. RichardsChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
 /s/ David W. WehlmannDavid W. WehlmannExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Date: August 9, 2004