alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Samuel Carlos Milton WILDER, Sr., Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 08-2358.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

Samuel Carlos Milton Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Carlos Milton Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action without prejudice for failure to comply with the district court’s local rule that requires pro se litigants to keep a current address on file. On appeal, Wilder has failed to raise any arguments relevant to the district court’s reasoning for dismissing the action. Thus, those claims have been abandoned. *Edwards v. City of Goldsboro,*178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir.1999); *see*4th Cir. R. 34(b). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 78 

To make permanent marriage penalty relief. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. BUNNING, 

Mr. BURNS, Mr. HAGEL, and Mr. ENSIGN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To make permanent marriage penalty relief. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Permanent Marriage 

5 Penalty Relief Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET ON MARRIAGE PENALTY RE7 LIEF. 

8 Title IX of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Rec9 onciliation Act of 2001 (relating to sunset of provisions 
2 

•S 78 IS

1 of such Act) shall not apply to sections 301, 302, and 303 

2 of such Act (relating to marriage penalty relief). 

Æ
WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in Judge Edmondson's opinion. The an titrust issues were addressed early in this case through a decision on setting aside a preliminar y injunction in and expanded on in a concurring opinion authored by then Chief Judge Tjoflat, 887 F.2d 1535, 1539 (11th Cir. 1989) (Tjoflat, C.J., concurring). There were contested issues as to whether defendants possessed market power in a relevant market for temporary nursing services. The jury decided the contested relevant issue on which plaintiffs had the burden. There were conteste d issues as to whether defendants had monopoly "control over access to an essential element of comp etition" by means of the arrangement. Plaintiffs had the burden to prove this and they failed in this burden. Judge Edmondson points out, as Judge Tjofla t previously did in this case, that Northwest Whole Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co. , 472 U.S. 284 (1985), is key, and it "prohibits the application of the per se rule to cooperative buying arrangements unless a court has made certain preliminary findings of fact." Id. Northwest held that "[a]bsent a showing [of market
power or exclusive access to an element essentia l to effective competiti on] with respect to a cooperative buying arrangement, courts should apply a rule-of-reason analysis." Northwest , 472 U.S. at 297, quoted in All Care Nursing Service , 887 F.2d at 1539; see also Areeda & Havenkamp,
Antitrust Law(1989 Supp.) ¶ 1511 (discussing Northwest and suggesting that plaintiffs must establish market power of defendant be fore the court should finally decide per se or rule of reason application). In addition, this circuit has indicated that "[ t]he presumption in cases brought under section 1 of the Sherman Act is that the rule-of-reason standard applies." Seagood Trading Corp. v. Jerrico,Page 2 Nos. 95-4714/5218 All Care v. Bethesda Inc. , 924 F.2d 1555, 1567 (11th Cir. 1991). We observed in that case, moreover, that "[t]he Supreme Court has made it clear that the per se label should be applied infrequently and with caution." Id. The majority opinion has covered all of the questions in this case; I merely emphasize the application of the rule-of-reason principle under the circumstances.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John B. Wood, Chief Executive Officer of Telos Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2006
II 

Calendar No. 263 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 761 

[Report No. 109–162] 

To rename the Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area in 

the State of Idaho as the Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey 

National Conservation Area in honor of the late Morley Nelson, an 

international authority on birds of prey, who was instrumental in the 

establishment of this National Conservation Area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 12, 2005 

Mr. CRAIG (for himself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

OCTOBER 27, 2005 

Reported by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To rename the Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area in the State of Idaho as the Morley Nelson 

Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area 

in honor of the late Morley Nelson, an international 

authority on birds of prey, who was instrumental in 

the establishment of this National Conservation Area, 

and for other purposes. 
2 

•S 761 RS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Morley Nelson Snake 

5 River Birds of Prey National Conservation Area Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RENAMING OF SNAKE RIVER BIRDS OF PREY NA7 TIONAL CONSERVATION AREA. 

8 (a) RENAMING.—Public Law 103–64 is amended— 

9 (1) in section 2(2) (16 U.S.C. 460iii–1(2)), by 

10 inserting ‘‘Morley Nelson’’ before ‘‘Snake River 

11 Birds of Prey National Conservation Area’’; and 

12 (2) in section 3(a)(1) (16 U.S.C. 460iii– 

13 2(a)(1)), by inserting ‘‘Morley Nelson’’ before 

14 ‘‘Snake River Birds of Prey National Conservation 

15 Area’’. 

16 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg17 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

18 States to the Snake River Birds of Prey National Con19 servation Area shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

20 Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey National Con21 servation Area. 

22 (c) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.—Public Law 103–64 

23 is further amended— 
3 

•S 761 RS

1 (1) in section 3(a)(1) (16 U.S.C. 460iii– 

2 2(a)(1)), by striking ‘‘(hereafter referred to as the 

3 ‘conservation area’)’’; and 

4 (2) in section 4 (16 U.S.C. 460iii–3)— 

5 (A) in subsection (a)(2), by striking ‘‘Con6 servation Area’’ and inserting ‘‘conservation 

7 area’’; and 

8 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘Visitors 

9 Center’’ and inserting ‘‘visitors center’’. 
Calendar No. 263 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 761 

[Report No. 109–162] 

A BILL 

To rename the Snake River Birds of Prey National 

for other purposes. lishment of this National Conservation Area, and birds of prey, who was instrumental in the estabMorley Nelson, an international authority on tional Conservation Area in honor of the late Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey NaConservation Area in the State of Idaho as the 

OCTOBER 27, 2005 

Reported without amendment
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM): Average Fuel Economy Standards Passenger Cars and Light Trucks


Download file: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM): Average Fuel Economy Standards Passenger Cars and Light Trucks
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 801 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 446
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 801

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 300 North Hogan 
   Street, Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson 
                      United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 2005

  Mr. Nelson of Florida (for himself and Mr. Martinez) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

                              May 24, 2006

               Reported by Mr. Inhofe, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse located at 300 North Hogan 
   Street, Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson 
                      United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse located at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``John 
Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Milton 
Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.
                                                       Calendar No. 446

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 801

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the United States courthouse located at 300 North Hogan 
   Street, Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson 
                      United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 24, 2006

                       Reported without amendment
```
The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. *37FRANCISCO CORTEZ, Defendant.

*36CAUSE NO. DC-09-311 DECISION

*37On February 24,2010, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of ten (10) years, with eight (8) years suspended, for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence, for the offense of Count I: Custodial Interference, a felony.

On May 6,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are Insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 6 th day of May, 2010.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
The Strategic Initiatives section of the Office of the Director
                  - Identifies emerging scientific opportunities and scientific knowledge gaps that merit further research.
                  - Creates opportunities for researchers through the development of new science initiatives, tools, and public resources to accelerate progress in NIAMS-related research.
                  - Facilitates partnerships with other NIH institutes and centers, other government agencies, non-profit and commercial entities.
                  - Advises NIAMS Director on key strategic goals.
                  - Evaluates NIAMS programs and activities.

## Initiatives

Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Program: Autoimmune and Immune-Mediated Diseases (AMP® AIM)

Accelerating Medicines Partnership® (AMP®) RA/Lupus Program

AMP RA/Lupus Lessons Learned

Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Research Program

Bespoke Gene Therapy Consortium (BGTC)

NIH Strategic Plan for Data Science

Osteoarthritis Initiative

PROMIS

Pediatric Patient Reported Outcomes in Chronic Diseases (PEPR) Consortium

Restoring Joint Health and Function to Reduce Pain (RE-JOIN) Consortium

NIH Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Task Force

NIH Pediatric Research Consortium (N-PeRC)

**Susana A. Serrate-Sztein, M.D.**
Associate Director for Strategic Initiatives

Susana.Serrate-Sztein@nih.gov 

**Kriti Sharma, M.D., M.P.H. **
Senior Program Manager

kriti.sharma@nih.gov

July 2022

Back to Top
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Written Statement of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ David W. ThompsonDavid W. ThompsonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 14, 2006
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 7 The People &c., Respondent, v. Zachary T. Guerin, Appellant.

Submitted by appellant, pro se. Submitted by William Preston Marshall, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Defendant Zachary T. Guerin challenges his conviction for trespassing on private property in violation of Environmental Conservation Law § 11-2113 (1). The law requires that the property be posted with warning signs bearing the name and address of the property owner (ECL § 11-2111 [2]). Since
- 1 -- 2 - No. 7

defendant did not raise below his specific challenge that the People's evidence of the location of 32 compliant signs is deficient, this claim is unpreserved and beyond our review (see People v Hines, 97 NY2d 56, 62 [2001]). To the extent defendant argues that evidence of one noncompliant sign undermined the People's case, the claim is similarly not within our powers of review (CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]). * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur. Judge Wilson took no part.
Decided February 9, 2017

- 2 -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Pursuant to the provisions of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 1:30 p.m. on Friday, May 22, 2009, to consider the following matters: 

*Summary Agenda:*                     No substantive discussion of the following item is anticipated. This matter will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the Board of Directors requests that the item be moved to the discussion agenda.                 

Disposition of minutes of previous Board of Directors' meetings. 

*Discussion Agenda:*                     Memorandum and resolution re: Final Rule on Special  Assessment.                 

The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC. 

                    This Board meeting will be Webcast live via the Internet and subsequently made available on-demand approximately one week after the event. Visit                     *http://www.vodium.com/​goto/​fdic/​boardmeetings.asp*                     to view the event. If you need any technical assistance, please visit our Video Help page at:                     *http://www.fdic.gov/​video.html.*

The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees needing such assistance should call (703) 562-6067 (Voice or TTY), to make necessary arrangements. 

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at (202) 898-7043. 

Dated: May 15, 2009. 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 

Robert E. Feldman, 

Executive Secretary.

 [FR Doc. E9-11784 Filed 5-15-09; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE P