alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 31 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 31

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of H.R. 1268, an Act making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2005, and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives 
is hereby authorized and directed to correct section 502 of title V of 
division B so that clause (ii) of section 106(d)(2)(B) of the American 
Competitiveness in the Twenty-first Century Act of 2000 (Public Law 
106-313; 8 U.S.C. 1153 note), as amended by such section 502, reads as 
follows:
                    ``(ii) Maximum.--The total number of visas made 
                available under paragraph (1) from unused visas from 
                the fiscal years 2001 through 2004 may not exceed 
                50,000.''.

            Passed the Senate May 10, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 31

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

                To correct the enrollment of H.R. 1268.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6961
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANDREW JON TACAWY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR01-285-PJM; CA-03-2338-PJM) Submitted: September 16, 2004 Decided: September 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Jon Tacawy, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Andrew Jon Tacawy seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tacawy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

 

I, Emanuel N. Hilario, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer, in connection with the Report on Form10-Q of Angelo and Maxie’s, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003,hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)     The accompanying Report of Angelo andMaxie’s, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934  and

2)     The information contained in such Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Angelo and Maxie’s, Inc.

 

 
|   | /s/ EMANUEL  N. HILARIO                     |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Emanuel N.  Hilario                         |   |
|   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | Dated:  August 13, 2003                |   |

 

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toAngelo and Maxie’s, Inc. and will be retained by Angelo and Maxie’s, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or**

**Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 
  SIMMONS BANK, TRUSTEE FOR PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTDate: May 8, 2019  By: /s/ RON E. HOOPER   Ron E. Hooper,   SVP Royalty Trust Management   Simmons Bank
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Permian Basin Royalty Trust andwill be retained by Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**
EXHIBIT 10-2

                  SUMMARY OF STOCK OPTION TO THOMAS P. RAABE
                         GRANTED AUGUST 10, 1998

Based upon contribution of extraordinary services performed over and above the 
ordinary duties of a chief exective officer, including performing extraordinary 
legal work in connection with the shareholders' meeting, the hostile 
shareholder's law suit and preparation of the proxy statement and annual 
reports, which legal work would have cost the Company a substantial amount 
of legal fees, Mr. Raabe was awarded a compensatory stock option to purchase 
five million common shares for $0.005 per share or $25,000.  Shares underlying 
the option were included in shares previously registered under Form S-8 filed 
in April, 1998.
COPD and Smoking:

My Plan to Quit
Did you know?

Chronic obstructive 

pulmonary disease 

(COPD) gets worse 

over time.

Quitting smoking 

slows the progression 

of the disease. It’s the 

best way to live better 

with COPD.

Not smoking is a key 

part of your treatment 

plan — like taking 

prescribed medicines, 

eating well, being 

physically active, and 

getting vaccines.

Quitting is hard, but 

it’s worth it! There are 

resources to help.
Quitting smoking 

has immediate 

health benefits.

After 20 minutes:

Heart rate returns 

to normal

After 24 hours:

Nicotine is 

gone from your 

bloodstream

After 1–3 

months:

COPD symptoms 

are reduced

After 1 year:

Breathing with 

COPD is stronger

Over time, quitting lowers 

the risk of cardiovascular 

disease, cancer, and other 

respiratory diseases.
My COPD 

Treatment Plan

Ask your healthcare provider 

to help fill out your plan to 

manage COPD.

Medications Food choices

Physical 

activity

Ways to stay 

smoke-free
What is my 

“why?”

My reasons for quitting 

smoking:

To make breathing easier

To get the most out of my 

COPD treatment

To slow down my COPD

To live a longer life

To save money

To protect my family and 

friends from secondhand 

smoke

To

My quit date:
Helpful Resources

You don’t have to quit 

smoking alone. These free 

resources can help.

CDC Office on Smoking & 

Health

cdc.gov/tobacco/ 

about/osh

CDC Quitline: 

1-800-QUIT-NOW

FDA Center for Tobacco 

Products 

fda.gov/tobacco-products

National Cancer Institute: 

Smokefree

Smokefree.gov

HHS BeTobaccoFree

BeTobaccoFree.gov

To learn more about COPD, 

visit nhlbi.nih.gov/BreatheBetter

February 2024 

NIH Publication No. 24-HL-8222
EXHIBIT 12.2

STERLING FINANCIAL CORPORATION

COMPUTATION OF
RETURN ON AVERAGE ASSETS

For the Year Ended December 31, 2009



|                 |  |              |                 |   
|---------------- |  | ------------ | --------------- | --
|                 |  | Total Assets |                
|                 |  | YTD          |                
|12/31/2008       |  |              | 12,790,716,000  |   
|01/31/2009       |  |              | 12,711,922,000  |   
|02/28/2009       |  |              | 12,756,734,000  |   
|03/31/2009       |  |              | 12,819,627,000  |   
|04/30/2009       |  |              | 13,049,525,000  |   
|05/31/2009       |  |              | 13,170,561,000  |   
|06/30/2009       |  |              | 12,399,775,000  |   
|07/31/2009       |  |              | 12,167,026,000  |   
|08/31/2009       |  |              | 12,250,845,000  |   
|09/30/2009       |  |              | 11,873,490,000  |   
|10/31/2009       |  |              | 11,723,773,000  |   
|11/30/2009       |  |              | 11,389,328,000  |   
|12/31/2009       |  |              | 10,877,423,000  |   
|                 | 
|                 |  |              |                 |   
|                 |  |              | 159,980,745,000 |   
|                 |  |              |                 |   
|                 | 
|Number of Months |  |              | 13              |   
|                 |  |              |                 |   
|                 | 
|Average          |  |              | 12,306,211,154  |   
|                 |  |              |                 |   
|                 | 
|Net Income       |  | $            | (838,094,000    | ) 
|                 | 
|ROA              |  |              | (6.81           | )%
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-11094

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OLFAR JULIAN PUERTO ARIAS, 

a.k.a Puerto, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 1:18-cr-20236-JEM-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-11094 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 02/16/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-11094

Before WILSON, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant 

to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. 

See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1351 (11th Cir. 1993) 

(sentence appeal waiver will be enforced if it was made knowingly 

and voluntarily); United States v. Boyd, 975 F.3d 1185, 1192 (11th 

Cir. 2020) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced where “it was 

clearly conveyed to the defendant that he was giving up his right

to appeal under most circumstances” (quotation marks and brackets omitted)); United States v. Howle, 166 F.3d 1166, 1169 & n.5 

(11th Cir. 1999) (an appeal waiver may waive difficult or debatable 

legal issues but could be reviewable in extreme circumstances).

USCA11 Case: 22-11094 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 02/16/2023 Page: 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 24830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12041]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, 
Scientific Advisory Board

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice is published in accordance with Section 10(a)(2) 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). The topic of 
the meeting on June 9-10, 2009 is to review new start and continuing 
research and development projects requesting Strategic Environmental 
Research and Development Program funds in excess of $1M. This meeting 
is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, 
or file statements with the Scientific Advisory Board at the time and 
in the manner permitted by the Board.

DATES: Tuesday, June 9, 2009 from 8 a.m. to 5:15 p.m. and Wednesday, 
June 10, 2009 from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Allen/Mcghee/Page meeting room of the Washington Duke Inn, 
3001 Cameron Blvd., Durham, NC 27705.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jonathan Bunger, SERDP Office, 901 
North Stuart Street, Suite 303, Arlington, VA or by telephone at (703) 
696-2126.

Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9-12041 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
FORM 10-QSB/A - Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                               UNITED STATES
                    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                          WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

                                FORM 10-QSB/A

[ X ] Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
For the period ended           September 30, 1997                          

                              or
[   ] Transition Report Pursuance to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange act of 1934.
For the transition period from                   to                        

Commission File Number             33-16820-D                              

                       TRAVIS INDUSTRIES, INC.                             
          (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                Colorado                        84-1063149                 
     (State or other jurisdiction of           (I.R.S. Employer
      incorporation or organization            Identification No.)

  3415 W. Broadway,  Council Bluffs, IA                  51501               
     (Address of principal executive offices)          (Zip Code)

                            (712) 328-3040                                 
           (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                                     None                                  
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed
                            since last report.)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                                 [ X ] Yes   [  ] No
 
       APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
                     DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

     Indicated by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents
and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of
securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

                                 [ X ] Yes   [  ] No

                   APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
     
As of September 30, 1997, Registrant had 127,808,864 shares of common
stock, no par value, outstanding.                                

                               					                             SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                 Travis Industries, Inc.



Date  APRIL 2, 1998             By:  JEFFREY R. SKINNER
<PAGE>
                                    Exhibit 10.2
                                          

     On September 29, 1998, the Board of Directors of Richey Electronics, Inc.,
approved, subject to certain conditions, termination of the Service and
Management Agreement dated December 18, 1990 by and among RicheyImpact
Electronics, Inc., Palisades Associates, Inc. and Saunders Capital Group, Inc.,
as assumed and amended pursuant to the Agreement to Assume and Amend the Service
and Management Agreement among Brajdas Corporation, Palisades Associates, Inc.
and Saunders Capital Group, Inc. dated as of April 6, and as modified pursuant
to the Modification Agreement among the Richey Electronics, Inc, Palisades
Associates, Inc. and Saunders Capital Group, Inc. dated as of January 2, 1995,
and the Modification Agreement by and between Richey Electronics, Inc. and
Palisades Associates, Inc. dated as of February 21, 1995, and the acceleration
of all remaining payments thereunder to the date of termination.

     This arrangement is not set forth in any formal document but is summarized
in the minutes of the September 29, 1998 meeting of the Board of Directors,
which in relevant part provides:

          The Board then discussed the termination of the
          Corporation's service contract with Palisades Associates,
          Inc.  Thereupon, after full discussion and upon motion made
          by Mr. Blumenthal and seconded by Mr. Zimmerman, the
          following resolution was unanimously adopted, Mr. Rosenbaum
          abstaining, pursuant to a roll call taken by Mr. Berger:
                    
          RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors hereby approves,
          subject to the execution and delivery of the Merger
          Agreement and the Corporation's stockholders' approval of
          the transactions contemplated thereby, the termination of
          the Service and Management Agreement between Palisades
          Associates, Inc., Saunders Capital Group, Inc. and RI
          Acquisition Corp., dated as of December 18, 1990, as assumed
          by the Corporation and amended, and the acceleration of all
          remaining payments thereunder to the date of termination.
#### The Oneida Indian Nation, a Sovereign Nation, Appellant, v Hunt Construction Group, Inc., Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 830]

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered January 8, 2013. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to dismiss the second through sixth counterclaims of defendant.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on September 16 and 17, 2013,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed *1313without costs upon stipulation. Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Garni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
#### SHAFIR et al. v. WABASH R. CO.

No. 4847.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

Oct. 2, 1947.

*468Joseph Koralchik, of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Sam B. Sebree and Sebree, Shook, Hardy & Hunter, all of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.

REEVES, District Judge.

The motion for a more definite statement in this case does not involve a clarification of the issues or of the averments because vague or ambiguous but simply seeks information.

For instance, the first request is to require the plaintiffs, “To set out in paragraph numbered 2 of their petition the property described in the bill of lading alleged to have been issued by the defendant.” The second specification is that the plaintiffs be required, “To set out in said petition whether or not the property alleged to have been shipped had been sold at the time of shipment, and if so, the date and terms of any such sale or sales, and if more than one sale, the quantity sold in each sale.” The third request for a specification is, “To set out in paragraph numbered 4 of said petition the date of said alleged assignments and the actual consideration therefor.”

1. Adverting to paragraph (e) of Rule 12, Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, which amendment is now effective, it will be noted that the motion “for Bill of Particulars” has been deleted. The present provision of the Rule is: “If a pleading to which a responsive pleading is permitted is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading, he may move for a more definite statement before interposing his responsive pleading.” The part quoted is an amendment to the former Rule. The motion for a more definite statement and the motion for a bill of particulars as a rule are substantial equivalents, one of the other. The courts have so held. When the courts abolished the motion for a bill of particulars it did at the same time amend the rule with respect to a more definite statement so as to limit the cases where such a motion might be interposed. The reason for the abolition of the bill of particulars and for' the limitation upon the motion for a more definite statement is that the rules of discovery are available to elicit details. To maintain the rule for a bill of particulars would have the effect to nullify Rule 8(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, by expanding pleadings rather than condensing them.

2. Paragraph (a) of Rule 8 pre-scribes what a complaint shall contain. Its averments must be in general terms, namely, “(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, * ** *."*

In this case plaintiffs have complied with the provisions of this rule. The information sought by the defendant may be obtained by a request for admissions, by interrogatories, or by a deposition.

It should be here stated that the courts had practically annulled the rule for bills of particulars long before the Supreme Court accepted a recommendation for the abolition or deletion of said rule.

It follows from the foregoing that the motion for a more definite statement should be overruled and it will be so ordered.