alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,458,000               4,458,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,477,000               4,477,000
<PP&E>                                         355,000                 355,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,912,000               8,912,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,815,000               5,815,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,234,000               1,234,000
<COMMON>                                         6,000                   6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,807,000               1,807,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,912,000               8,912,000
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,259,000              12,978,000
<CGS>                                       10,831,000              10,278,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,083,000               5,296,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0               1,300,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             552,000                 715,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,207,000)             (4,611,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,207,000)             (4,611,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,207,000)             (4,611,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.57)                   (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.57)                   (.57)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, William D. Hibbetts, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation (the
Company), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:



(1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                  
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: February 2, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    WILLIAM D.
HIBBETTS                       
|                        |  |  |  | William D. Hibbetts                              
|                        |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0003776

06-JAN-2017

08:26 AM
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 19, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50370

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAMON PARRA-PARRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-1585-2-DB

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ramon Parra-Parra appeals the 120-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction of conspiracy to possess

with intent to distribute marijuana and possession with intent to

distribute marijuana. He argues that the district court lacked

authority to enhance his sentence because the Information and

Amended Information filed by the Government did not satisfy the

requirements of 21 U.S.C. § 851.
No. 05-50370

-2-

For the first time on appeal, Parra challenges the

Information by arguing that the Government failed to properly

file and serve the document. Because Parra did not challenge the

Information in the district court on the basis he now asserts,

his argument is subject to plain error review. See United States

v. Dodson, 288 F.3d 153, 161-62 (5th Cir. 2002); see also United

States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993). 

A review of the rearraignment transcript indicates that the

Government filed and served the Information prior to the entry of

Parra’s guilty plea, as required by § 851. Additionally,

although the Information identified the wrong venue for the prior

conviction, the record establishes that Parra was not misled by

the erroneous venue designation. See United States v. Steen, 55

F.3d 1022, 1028 (5th Cir. 1995). Therefore, the error does not

negate the notice provided by the Information. See id.

Parra has not established plain error with regard to the

sufficiency of the Information. See Olano, 507 U.S. at 731-37. 

Because the original Information filed in this case was

sufficient under § 851, it is not necessary to address Parra’s

arguments regarding the sufficiency of the Amended Information. 

The district court did not lack authority to impose the

enhanced sentence. See Steen, 55 F.3d at 1025. Accordingly, the

judgment is AFFIRMED.
```

                               INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements  No.
333-32308 and 333-85483 of Medix  Resources,  Inc. on Forms S-3 and Registration
Statements  No.  333-31684,  333-57558  and 333-73578 on Forms S-8 of our report
dated March 19, 2002,  appearing in this amended  annual  report on Form 10-K of
Medix Resources, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                      /s/Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
                                         Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

May 23, 2002
Denver, Colorado
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Ventura, Appellant.

Submitted June 14, 2010;

decided June 24, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 819 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 819

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to reallocate costs of the 
 Pactola Dam and Reservoir, South Dakota, to reflect increased demands 
       for municipal, industrial, and fish and wildlife purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pactola Reservoir Reallocation 
Authorization Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) it is appropriate to reallocate the costs of the 
        Pactola Dam and Reservoir, South Dakota, to reflect increased 
        demands for municipal, industrial, and fish and wildlife 
        purposes; and
            (2) section 302 of the Department of Energy Organization 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 7152) prohibits such a reallocation of costs 
        without congressional approval.

SEC. 3. REALLOCATION OF COSTS OF PACTOLA DAM AND RESERVOIR, SOUTH 
              DAKOTA.

    The Secretary of the Interior may, as provided in the contract of 
August 2001 entered into between Rapid City, South Dakota, and the 
Rapid Valley Conservancy District, reallocate, in a manner consistent 
with Federal reclamation law (the Act of June 17, 1902 (32 Stat. 388, 
chapter 1093), and Acts supplemental to and amendatory of that Act (43 
U.S.C. 371 et seq.)), the construction costs of Pactola Dam and 
Reservoir, Rapid Valley Unit, Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, South 
Dakota, from irrigation purposes to municipal, industrial, and fish and 
wildlife purposes.

            Passed the Senate November 16, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 819

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to reallocate costs of the 
 Pactola Dam and Reservoir, South Dakota, to reflect increased demands 
       for municipal, industrial, and fish and wildlife purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             88,202
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         445
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   88,647
<PP&E>                                              2,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (349)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    328,292
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             458,879
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        7,805,377
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,935,964)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      328,292
<SALES>                                             8,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    8,035
<CGS>                                               7,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       7,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  6,757
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (8,194)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (8,194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (70,520)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (78,714)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Cassidy Sue R. Administration for Children’s Services et al., Respondents; Manuel (Emmanuel) R., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[870 NYS2d 799]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of abandonment, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Ruiz, J.), dated April 4, 2008, which denied his motion to vacate so much of an order of the same court dated January 2, 2008, as, after a fact-finding inquest held upon his default in appearing at the fact-finding hearing, determined that he had abandoned *745the subject child, terminated his parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to Mercy First and the Commissioner of Administration for Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

“The determination whether to relieve a party of an order entered upon his or her default is a matter left to the sound discretion of the Family Court” *(Matter of Francisco R.,*19 AD3d 502, 502 [2005] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; *see Matter of Tenisha Tishonda T.,*302 AD2d 534 [2003]). To vacate the order, the father was required to show that there was a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense *(see Matter of Francisco R.,*19 AD3d at 502). The father did not make the requisite showing *(id.).*Prudenti, EJ., Spolzino, McCarthy and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,686]


Pandora Manufacturing, LLC, Pandora, OH; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on March 26, 2009 in response 
to a petition filed by a United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural 
International Union, Region 2-B representative on behalf of workers of 
Pandora Manufacturing, LLC, Pandora, Ohio.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 22nd day of April 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-11864 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

RASHAAN LONDALE GREER,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 47 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW

, this 29 th day of August, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether a [c]ourt on appeal should rule on the merits of an existing appeal of a PCRA [court order] before remanding a case where a [PCRA petitioner] raised new/additional layered claims of PCRA counsel’s ineffectiveness pursuant to Commonwealth v. Bradley , [261 A.3d 381 (Pa. 2021)] for the first time before the appellate court, where there were issues of merit that could have been disposed of prior to remand for

new issues.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Scott Mebane, Appellant, v Darwin E. LaClair, as Superintendent of Franklin Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Submitted May 17, 2010;

decided June 29, 2010

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question *(see*CPLR 5601). Motion for leave to appeal denied.
Order entered October 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01106-CR

GERARDO ISRAEL STRAUSS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1733722-Q

ORDER

We GRANT Sharita Blacknall’s motion to withdraw as appellate counsel. We DIRECT the 

Clerk of the Court to remove Sharita Blacknall as counsel of record for appellant and to send a 

copy of this order and all future correspondence to Gerardo Israel Strauss, TDCJ No. 02222236, 

Telford Unit, 3899 Hwy 98, New Boston, Texas 75570. 

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00070-CR 

ANGEL HERNANDEZ, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 137th District Court 

Lubbock County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2018-414,729, Honorable John J. “Trey” McClendon III, Presiding 

 

July 17, 2019 

 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant Angel Hernandez appeals his conviction for assault on a public servant,1

enhanced, and sentence to thirty years’ confinement. The appellate record was originally 

due April 5, 2019. The clerk’s record was filed by this deadline, but the reporter’s record 

was not. We subsequently granted the reporter, Ms. Breann Hays, three extensions to 

file the reporter’s record. By letter of June 17, 2019, we admonished Ms. Hays that no 

further extensions would be granted and failure to file the reporter’s record by July 5 would 

 

1 TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b)(1) (West 2019).
2

result in the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further 

proceedings without further notice. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and 

Ms. Hays has not provided the Court with an explanation for her failure to file the record.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further 

proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c); 37.3(a)(2). On remand, the trial court shall 

determine the following:

1. what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter’s record;

2. why Ms. Hays has not completed the necessary tasks;

3. what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those 

tasks; and

4. whether Ms. Hays can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds 

reasonable.

Should the trial court determine that Ms. Hays will require more than thirty days to 

complete, certify, and file the reporter’s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter to 

do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the 

aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a

supplemental clerk’s record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by August 

16, 2019. Should further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be 

requested before August 16, 2019

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Order entered January 15, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01638-CV

WILLOW BEND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES, LTD., ET AL., Appellants

V.

PARAGON GENERAL CONTRACTORS, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-06-12931

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ January 13, 2014 motion for an extension of time to file the 

clerk’s record and reporter’s record. The records shall be filed on or before February 14, 2014.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Gary Fitzsimmons, 

Dallas County District Clerk, Sheretta Martin, Official Court Reporter for the 162nd Judicial 

District Court of Dallas County, Texas, and all counsel of record.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3836 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3836

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public 
                               Diplomacy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Advisory Commission on 
Public Diplomacy Reauthorization Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY COMMISSION ON PUBLIC 
              DIPLOMACY.

    Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553), as amended by section 410 of the Department of 
State and Related Agency Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-108; 
119 Stat. 2327), is amended by striking ``October 1, 2006'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2009''.

            Passed the Senate August 3, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3836

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on Public 
                               Diplomacy.
```
exv10w2



 





	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	1901 Mayview Road, PO Box A
Bridgeville, PA 15017

	

	 	 	 	412.221.3300

412.221.6585 FAX







September 29, 2004



	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	Certified Letter

7001 1940 0005 1353 7295







Ronald H. Scott and Frank J. Scott

t/d/b/a St. Clair Leasing Co.

1040 St. Mellion Drive

Nevillewood, PA 15142

Attn: Ronald H. Scott



Gentlemen:



     This letter is to provide St. Clair Leasing Company official notification
of our intent to exercise our option to renew our current lease as provided
under Section 33 as amended for an additional term of 42 months.



Regards,




/s/ Ted Nowlen




		
	Cc: 	Mark Christman, Esquire

Tom Murray, Esquire

Kirby Taylor
#### Sea Ranch Owners Ass’n v. Sea Ranch, II, Inc.

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 226

No. 338P06

1. Pit’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA05-1528, 1559, 1593)

2. Def’s Motion to Dissolve Stay and Renewal of Motion to Deny Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

1. Allowed 06/26/06

2. Denied 12/01/06

Martin, J., Recused
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-10370

Summary Calendar

 

In The Matter Of: ROY LATIMER 

 Debtor,

---------------------------

BEVERLY LATIMER, 

Appellant,

ROY LATIMER,

 Appellant,

versus

MELLON MORTGAGE COMPANY,

Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CV-193-A

- - - - - - - - - -

June 18, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal filed by

Roy and Beverly Latimer is DENIED. The appeal is frivolous and
No. 95-10370

- 2 -

it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. See also Brinkmann v.

Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.

1987). We caution the Latimers that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by them or on their behalf will invite the

imposition of sanctions. The Latimers are further cautioned to

review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously

decided by this court. 

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.