alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 10, 2009, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Semiconductor Test Consortium, 
Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Advanced 
Inquiry Systems, Inc., Hillsboro, OR; Rasco GmbH, Kolbermoor, GERMANY; 
Geotest-Marvin Test Systems, Irvine, CA; Aeroflex Test Solutions, 
Stevenage Hertfordshire, UNITED KINGDOM; and Tom Jackson (individual 
member), Merrimack, NH have been dropped as parties to this venture. 
Also, Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. has changed its name to Panasonic 
Electric Works Co., Ltd., Tsu Mie, JAPAN.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On May 27, 2003, Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 17, 2003 (68 FR 35913).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 21, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on February 26, 2009 (74 FR 8812).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-11825 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         The undersigned, Thomas C. Shull, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Hanover Direct, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that to his knowledge
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2002 of the
Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company for the period specified.

         Signed at the City of Edgewater, in the State of New Jersey, this 8th
day of November, 2002.

                                        /s/ Thomas C. Shull
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Thomas C. Shull
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 19, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11647]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 80

[WT Docket No. 04-344; FCC 08-208]


Maritime Communications

AGENCY: Final rule; announcement of effective date.

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (Commission) announces 
that a certain rule adopted in its Automatic Identification Systems 
(AIS) proceeding in WT Docket No. 04-344 published in the Federal 
Register of January 29, 2009, to the extent it contained an information 
collection requirement that required approval by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) was approved, April 8, 2009.

DATES: The amendment adding Sec.  80.231, published January 29, 2009 
(74 FR 5117) is effective May 19, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Tobias, Federal Communications 
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20554 at (202) 418-0620.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    1. On January 29, 2009 at 74 FR 5117, the Commission published in 
the Federal Register, the summary of a Second Report and Order (2nd 
R&O) in WT Docket No. 04-344; FCC 08-208. In that 2nd R&O, the 
Commission stated that, upon OMB approval, it would publish in the 
Federal Register a document announcing the effective date of 47 CFR 
80.231.
    2. On April 8, 2009, OMB approved the public information collection 
associated with this rule change under OMB Control No. 3060-1124.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-11647 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 869 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to prohibit the Secretary of 

Agriculture from basing minimum prices for Class I milk on the distance 

or transportation costs from any location that is not within a marketing 

area, except under certain circumstances, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Adjustment Act to prohibit the 

Secretary of Agriculture from basing minimum prices 

for Class I milk on the distance or transportation costs 

from any location that is not within a marketing area, 

except under certain circumstances, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Milk Mar5 keting Reform Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 869 IS

1 SEC. 2. LOCATION ADJUSTMENTS FOR MINIMUM PRICES 

2 FOR CLASS I MILK. 

3 Section 8c(5) of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 

4 U.S.C. 608c(5)), reenacted with amendments by the Agri5 cultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (A)— 

7 (A) in clause (3) of the second sentence, by 

8 inserting after ‘‘the locations’’ the following: 

9 ‘‘within a marketing area subject to the order’’; 

10 and 

11 (B) by striking the last 2 sentences and in12 serting the following: ‘‘Notwithstanding sub13 section (18) or any other provision of law, when 

14 fixing minimum prices for milk of the highest 

15 use classification in a marketing area subject to 

16 an order under this subsection, the Secretary 

17 may not, directly or indirectly, base the prices 

18 on the distance from, or all or part of the costs 

19 incurred to transport milk to or from, any loca20 tion that is not within the marketing area sub21 ject to the order, unless milk from the location 

22 constitutes at least 50 percent of the total sup23 ply of milk of the highest use classification in 

24 the marketing area. The Secretary shall report 

25 to the Committee on Agriculture of the House 

26 of Representatives and the Committee on Agri-
3 

•S 869 IS

1 culture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate 

2 on the criteria that are used as the basis for the 

3 minimum prices referred to in the preceding 

4 sentence, including a certification that the min5 imum prices are made in accordance with the 

6 preceding sentence.’’; and 

7 (2) in paragraph (B)(c), by inserting after ‘‘the 

8 locations’’ the following: ‘‘within a marketing area 

9 subject to the order’’. 

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sue Ann Paivanas, Appellant, v The Resource Center et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Submitted January 10, 2011;

decided February 22, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice Data Collection and Reporting of Underride Crashes by Law Enforcement


Download file: Data Collection and Reporting of Underride Crashes by Law Enforcement
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
#### LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Petitioner v. CHARLES G. COUCH, JR.; JOE C. YOUNG, TRUSTEE, U/A DATED DECEMBER 24, 1992 WITH WAYNE T. UPCHURCH AND ELIZABETH C. UPCHURCH, KNOWN AS THE BARRY UPCHURCH TRUST; JOE C. YOUNG, TRUSTEE, U/A DATED DECEMBER 24, 1992 WITH WAYNE T. UPCHURCH AND ELIZABETH C. UPCHURCH, KNOWN AS THE GRAVES UPCHURCH TRUST, Respondents

No. 412PA06

(Filed 9 November 2007)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 178 N.C. App. 390, 631 S.E.2d 237 (2006), affirming a judgment entered on 30 March 2005 and an order entered on 26 May 2005, both by Judge Timothy L. Patti in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 October 2007.

*Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, by Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Mark P. Henriques, and Sarah A. Motley, for petitioner-appellant.*

*James, McElroy & Diehl, P.A., by Bruce M. Simpson, for respondent-appellees.*

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 938 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 938

 To amend title 37, United States Code, to require that members of the 
   National Guard and Reserve called or ordered to active duty for a 
 period of more than 30 days receive a basic allowance for housing at 
 the same rate as similarly situated members of the regular components 
                       of the uniformed services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 28, 2005

  Mr. Leahy (for himself and Mr. Bond) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 37, United States Code, to require that members of the 
   National Guard and Reserve called or ordered to active duty for a 
 period of more than 30 days receive a basic allowance for housing at 
 the same rate as similarly situated members of the regular components 
                       of the uniformed services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard and Reserves Housing 
Equity Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING FOR RESERVE MEMBERS.

    (a) Equal Treatment of Reserve Members.--Paragraph (3) of 
subsection (g) of section 403 of title 37, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting after ``(3)'' the following new sentence: 
        ``The rate of basic allowance for housing to be paid to a 
        member of a reserve component who is called or ordered to 
        active duty for a period of more than 30 days shall be equal to 
        the rate in effect for similarly situated members of a regular 
        component of the uniformed services.''; and
            (2) by striking ``less than 140 days, unless the call or 
        order to active duty is in support of a contingency operation'' 
        and inserting ``30 days or less''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment Regarding Members Without Dependents.--
Paragraph (1) of such subsection is amended--
            (1) by striking ``in support of a contingency operation'' 
        both places it appears; and
            (2) by inserting ``for a period of more than 30 days'' 
        after ``active duty'' both places it appears.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit31.1    

**CertificationRequired by Rule 13a-14(a)**

I, Douglas A. Pertz, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of IMC Global Inc., certify that:

1.   I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMC Global Inc.;

2.   Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.   Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

4.   The registrant'sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5.   The registrant'sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

a)   All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)   Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant's internal controls over financialreporting. 

Date: August 5, 2004

 

      DouglasA. Pertz                  Douglas A. PertzChairman and Chief Executive OfficerIMC Global Inc.

*Return to IMC Global Inc. Form 10-Q*
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.106


                                  DEMAND NOTE

$250,000.00                                                   New York, New York
                                                              January 7, 1998

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Wilshire Technologies, Inc. a
California corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Borrower"), hereby
unconditionally PROMISES TO PAY to the order to TRILON DOMINION PARTNERS, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company ("Lender"), at 245 Park Avenue, 28th
Floor, New York, NY 10167, or at such other place as the holder of this Demand
Note may designate from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United
States of America and in immediately available funds, the principal amount of
Two Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100, DOLLARS ($250,000.00), together with
interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Demand Note outstanding from
time to time from the date hereof, at a rate per annum equal to the Prime rate
of interest of 8.5% plus 3.75%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever
shall be less.

     The principal amount of the indebtedness evidenced hereby shall be payable
on demand. Interest thereon shall be paid when principal is paid from the date
hereof until such principal amount is paid in full at such interest rate as
specified above. Following failure to pay on demand, Borrower agrees to pay
interest on any overdue payment of principal at a rate per annum equal to the
stated interest rate plus 5%, or the highest rate permitted by law, whichever
shall be less. All interest calculations shall be computed on the basis of a 360
day year.

     Demand, presentment, protest and notice of nonpayment and protest are
hereby waived by Borrower.

     Borrower shall have no right to make any off-set against or deduct from
any payment due under this Demand Note.

     Principal and interest may be prepaid at any time without penalty.

     This Demand Note may not be changed orally, but only by an agreement in
writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement of such change is
sought.

     All covenants of Borrower in this Demand Note and all rights of the holder
under this Demand Note shall bind Borrower and its successors and assigns, and
all such covenants and rights shall inure to the benefit of the holder of this
Demand Note and its successors and assigns.

     This Demand Note has been delivered and accepted at New York, New York and
shall be interpreted, governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws
of the State of New York.


                                        Wilshire Technologies, Inc

                                        By: /s/ James W. Klingler
                                            -----------------------
                                        Name: James W. Klingler
                                        Title: VP & CFO
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin IBARRA-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50205.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.

Filed Oct. 23, 2006.

Orlando B. Gutierrez, USSD-Offiee of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gordon S. Brownell, Esq., St. Helena, CA, Martin Ibarra-Garcia, California City, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Martin Ibarra-Garcia appeals from the judgment imposed following a jury-trial *778conviction for being an alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Ibarra-Garcia’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Ibarra-Garcia filed a *pro se*supplemental brief, and the Government filed an answering brief.

Our independent review of the briefs and the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80-81,109 S.Ct. 346,102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Arete  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Thomas
P. Raabe, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas P. Raabe
-------------------
Thomas P. Raabe,
Interim Chief Financial Officer
August 19, 2002