alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,647] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 20, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Manitowac Cranes, Shady Grove, Pennsylvania. 

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of April 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11862 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000820526
<NAME> Lund International Holdings, Inc.
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                        1,355,179
<SECURITIES>                                 11,328,851
<RECEIVABLES>                                 9,340,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                    813,576
<INVENTORY>                                   6,735,151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             29,698,664
<PP&E>                                        7,333,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                3,476,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               40,841,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         4,564,750
<BONDS>                                       3,630,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        439,397
<OTHER-SE>                                   31,952,024
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 40,841,107
<SALES>                                      10,027,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             10,027,911
<CGS>                                         6,623,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                10,868,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 32,716
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               71,930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (767,016)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (248,233)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (518,783)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 86 

For the relief of Sung Jun Oh. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Sung Jun Oh. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

6 1101 et seq.), Sung Jun Oh shall be held and considered 

7 to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for 

8 permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of 

9 this Act upon payment of any necessary visa fees. 

10 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS. 

11 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Sung 

12 Jun Oh, as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State 
2 

•S 86 IS

1 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number 

2 during the current fiscal year the total number of immi3 grant visas available to natives of the country of the alien’s 

4 birth under section 202(e) of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

Æ
#### State of Mississippi *v.*Wyatt Hughes and Thomas Moore.

Criminal Law. *Larceny. Deeds. Oode*1892, §§1513, 1173, 1174.

A deed to land is the subject of larceny, under code 1892, §1513, providing that such a deed is itself personal property, and code 1892, §§1173, 1174, making all personal property the subject of larceny.

From the circuit court of Holmes county.

Hon. W. F. Stevens, Judge.

Hughes and Moore, appellees, were indicted for grand larceny, the stealing of a deed to land. They demurred to the indictment on the ground that the deed charged to have been stolen was not the subject of larceny. The demurrer was sustained, and the state appealed to the supreme court.

*Noel & Pepper*and *Mofvroe*McOlurg, Attorney-General, for appellant.

Under the statutes, code 1892, § 1513 and §§ 1173 and 1174, it is larceny to steal a deed to, land. The court below, therefore, erred in .sustaining the demurrer to the indictment, holding, in so doing, that a land deed is not the subject of larceny. The deed was certainly personal property. Oode 1892, § 1513. The stealing of any personal property is larceny. Oode 1892, §§ 1173, 1174.

No counsel appeared for appellees.

Whitfield, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The statute (§ 1513, code 1892) expressly declares a deed to land to be itself personal property, and §§ 1173, 1174, make all personal property the subject of larceny. It is obvious, therefore, that it was error to sustain the demurrer to the in*610dictment. It is true that at common law title deeds to land passed by deed, descent, or devise to tbe grantee, heir, or devisee; .but tbe deeds • themselves were even then a species of personal property. See Darlington, Pers. Prop., p. 13; 18 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, p. 409, II. (2). In Anderson, Law Diet., p. 598, it is said: “The property must be j>ersonalty. At common law, taking a tree, flower, fruit, or title deeds is a trespass upon tbe land. But if any sucb object was severed by tbe owner, or by tbe thief at another time, that act made it personalty. Statutes have made felonious, appropriations of many sucb articles as formerly constituted trespasses. Formerly, also, bonds, bills, notes, and other evidences of debt, having no intrinsic value, and not importing property in tbe possession of tbe bolder, were not subjects of larceny.” Our statute (§ 1176) makes “bonds, bills, notes,” etc., tbe subject of larceny. See, also, § 1179. Tbe refinements of tbe common law on this subject have undergone great and necessary statutory change. Under our law it is clear that a deed is personal property, and tbe subject of larceny. See 12 Am. *&*Eng. Enc. Law, p. 783; 2 Barb. Or. Law, p. 785 (2).

Reversed, *demurrer overruled, and cause remanded for trial.*
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50492

Summary Calendar

 

PAUL EARL DORSEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOHN E. STINE; D. MOYA;

MORGAN, Capt.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-95-CV-334

- - - - - - - - - -

October 30, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Paul Earl Dorsey, Texas prisoner # 642562, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as

frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), formerly § 1915(d). 

Dorsey argues that prison officials violated his due process

rights by imposing a lockdown without providing notice and a

hearing. Dorsey also argues that the meals he received during
No. 96-50492

- 2 -

the lockdown were nutritionally inadequate and did not contain

fresh fruit or condiments. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no abuse of discretion in the

reasoning of the district court. Dorsey v. Stine, No. W-95-CV334 (W.D. Tex. June 20, 1995). Dorsey’s conclusional allegations

of weight loss raised for the first time on appeal are not

supported by evidence in the record and therefore are

insufficient to show that the meals he received during the

lockdown were nutritionally inadequate. See United States v.

Flores, 887 F.2d 543, 546 (5th Cir. 1989)(court will not enlarge

the record on appeal to include matters not presented to the

district court). 

Dorsey’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because his appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th

Cir. R. 42.2. Dorsey is cautioned that any future frivolous

appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition

of sanctions. Dorsey is cautioned further to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11708]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMTB07900 09 L10100000.PH0000 LXAMANMS0000]


Notice of Public Meeting, Western Montana Resource Advisory 
Council Meeting

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the 
Western Montana Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The Western Montana RAC will meet June 18, 2009 at 9 a.m. The 
public comment period for the meeting will begin at 11:30 a.m. and the 
meeting is expected to adjourn at approximately 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Butte Field Office, 106 N. 
Parkmont, Butte, Montana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Abrams, Western Montana Resource 
Advisory Council Coordinator, Butte Field Office, 106 North Parkmont, 
Butte, Montana 59701, telephone 406-533-7617.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in western Montana. At the June 18 meeting, topics we plan to discuss 
include: Abandoned Mines Reclamation, public access issues, travel 
management implementation, Economic Stimulus Package Project Updates, 
and a review of Forest Service fee proposals.
    All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the Council. Each formal Council meeting will also have 
time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need 
special assistance, such as sign language interpretation, or other 
reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided below.

Richard M. Hotaling,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. E9-11708 Filed 5-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"National Intelligence University","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu","author_name":"ray.x.villarreal@odni.gov","author_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/author\/ray-x-villarrealodni-gov\/","title":"School of Science and Technology Intelligence","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"OfzBK2pfSa\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/school-of-science-and-technology-intelligence\/\">School of Science and Technology Intelligence<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/school-of-science-and-technology-intelligence\/embed\/#?secret=OfzBK2pfSa\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“School of Science and Technology Intelligence” — National Intelligence University\" data-secret=\"OfzBK2pfSa\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
EXHIBIT 24.6

 

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC.POWER OF ATTORNEY

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

            The undersigned, in hiscapacity as a director of SI Diamond Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), after reviewing the Company's Form 10-KSB, does herebyappoint Douglas P. Baker, his true and lawful attorney to execute in his name, place and stead, in his capacity as a Director ofsaid Company, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and all instruments necessaryor incidental in connection therewith, including all amendments, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Said attorney shall have the full power and authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any andall capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes asthe undersigned might or could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of said attorney.

            IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this instrument this 11th day of March, 2003.

                                        /s/ Dr. Zvi Yaniv                                                           Name: Dr. Zvi Yaniv
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-18 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
#### Dennis Green et al., Respondents, v Associated Medical Professionals of NY, PLLC, et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) Dennis Green et al., Respondents, v Syracuse Urology Associates, P.C., Appellant. (Action No. 2.) Dennis Green et al., Respondents, v Michael Joseph Kendrick, M.D., Appellant. (Action No. 3.)

(Appeal No. 2.)

[974 NYS2d 879]

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Deborah H. Karalunas, J.), entered October 2, 2012. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendants to dismiss the complaints.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motions are granted and the complaints are dismissed without prejudice.

Same memorandum as in *Green v Associated Med. Professionals of NY, PLLC*(111 AD3d 1430 [2013). Present — Smith, J.P, Centra, Fahey and Whalen, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection  with the Annual Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Ian K. Whitehead, as Chief Financial
Officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.

Date:  March 31, 2008                            By:    /s/  Ian K. Whitehead

                                                        Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 98 (Friday, May 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24034-24035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Institute of Electrical and Electronics 
Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, on May 1, 2009, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the

[[Page 24035]]

National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 
4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Institute of Electrical and Electronics 
Engineers (``IEEE'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
additions or changes to its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, IEEE has initiated 
12 new standards and is revising 6 existing standards. More detail 
regarding these PARS can be found at http://standards.ieee.org/standardswire/sba/03-19-09.html.
    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 9, 
2009. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 10, 2009 (74 FR 10298).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. E9-11768 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BancTec, Inc, a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, J.Coley Clark, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Coley Clark                         |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |
|                                   |
| August 14, 2006                        |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 USC Section1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 99.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code



I, J. Reid Porter, the Chief Financial Officer of IMC Global Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2002 of IMC Global Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of IMC Global Inc.





J. Reid PorterJ. Reid Porter



August ____, 2002



Return to IMC Global Inc. Form 10-Q