alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United StatesCode**

 

I,Steven T. Campbell, the chief financial officer of United States CellularCorporation, certify that (i) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe third quarter of 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of United States CellularCorporation.

 
|   | /s/  Steven T. Campbell |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Steven  T. Campbell     |
|   | November 5,  2008  |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 has been provided to United States Cellular Corporation and will beretained by U.S. Cellular and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE

President, National Intelligence University

John R. Ballard, Ph.D.

Dr. Ballard serves as the fourth President of the National Intelligence University. In this role, 

his responsibilities include leading faculty and staff, academic accreditation, budget and 

facilities, and the education and research programs. He is the primary representative of the 

university to the Intelligence Community and Federal Government leadership, academia,

and to private sector leaders and organizations. 

Dr. Ballard joined ODNI on July 31, 2023, from the Department of Transportation where he 

served as a member of the Senior Executive Service as Provost at the U.S. Merchant 

Marine Academy. Dr. Ballard was previously the Dean of the National War College within 

the Department of Defense and the Founding Dean of the National Defense College of the 

United Arab Emirates in Abu Dhabi. 

He earned his doctorate in history from the Catholic University of America, and is the author 

or co-author of seven books and numerous journal articles focused on national security, 

including: From Storm to Freedom, America’s Long War with Iraq; Triumph of SelfDetermination, United Nations Peacemaking in East Timor; From Kabul to Baghdad and 

Back, the US at War in Afghanistan and Iraq; and National Security Education: Developing 

Strategic Leaders for 21st Century Challenges. 

Dr. Ballard is the recipient of the Department of Transportation’s Bronze Medal, the 

Department of the Navy’s Meritorious Civilian Service Medal and several military awards 

including the Defense Superior Service Medal, the Legion of Merit and the Bronze Star. He 

is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, where he received the General Horace Porter 

Award in History.
Our Financial Managers formulate and execute budget resources; develop and allocate manpower 

resources; and provide guidance on implementing policy on cost, finance, and accounting.

Accounting

Accountants perform accounting and financial analyses and processes related to recording 

and reporting NGA’s financial activity. They establish and implement procedures; prepare 

reports; and ensure the quality and accuracy of data and agency compliance with federal laws, 

regulations, accounting standards, and policies. 

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES

TO QUALIFY

Relevant degrees include: accounting, 

business administration, finance, public 

administration or other related areas of 

study.

Relevant certification and/or experience 

may include: Certified Public Accounting 

or Certified Internal Auditing obtained 

through written examination, and 

experience that demonstrates the ability 

to successfully perform the duties 

associated with financial management.

KEY COMPETENCIES

Key competencies may include, but are 

not limited to: accounting concepts, 

policies, and principles; advising; budget 

concepts, policies, and principles; financial 

management; financial reporting; financial 

stewardship; and performance planning 

and monitoring.

EXPLORE NGA

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT CAREERS

THE POWER OF GEOINT

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency 

(NGA) is a U.S. intelligence and combat support 

agency that provides policymakers, warfighters, 

intelligence professionals and first responders 

key information and insights. Whether you’re 

implementing policy on cost, finance, accounting, 

or allocating manpower resources, a career with 

the NGA helps protect our nation and our world.

SEE YOURSELF IN NGA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT? APPLY AT intelligencecareers.gov/nga

• Accountant

• Financial Analyst

• Budget Analyst

Budget

Budget Analysts perform, advise, and supervise the planning, programming, budgeting, and 

the execution of the NGA’s financial program. They provide financial analysis, guidance, and 

recommendations to stakeholders concerning budget requests and justifications by utilizing 

Agency financial tools.

Finance

Financial Analysts research financial issues. They also evaluate financial operating statements 

and information to determine financial soundness and operating efficiency. They prepare and 

process financial transactions, to include computing entitlements such as pay, travel, and 

contractor/government invoices.

Approved for Public Release # 21-013
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 976 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

AN ACT 

Striking the Specific Privatization Criteria in ORBIT for 

Intelsat Separated Entities (New Skies) and Inmarsat 

and Other Technical Corrections. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 976 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SPECIFIC CRITERIA FOR INTELSAT SEPARATED 

2 ENTITIES AND INMARSAT MODIFIED. 

3 (a) AMENDMENT.—The Communications Satellite 

4 Act of 1962 (47 U.S.C. 701 et seq.) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking section 623 (47 U.S.C. 763b), 

6 and 

7 (2) in section 624 (47 U.S.C. 763c), by striking 

8 ‘‘In securing the privatizations’’ and all that follows, 

9 and inserting ‘‘In securing the privatization of 

10 Inmarsat required by section 621, and thereafter, 

11 the United States shall preserve space segment ca12 pacity of the GMDSS.’’ 

13 (3) in section 621 (5)(D)(ii) (47 U.S.C. 763), 

14 by striking ‘‘(I)’’ and by striking ‘‘, or (II) have any 

15 direct financial interest’’ and all that follows through 

16 the end of the subparagraph, and inserting ‘‘;’’. 

17 (4) in section 621 (5)(D)(iv) (47 U.S.C. 763), 

18 by striking ‘‘(I)’’ and by striking ‘‘, or (II) have any 

19 direct financial interest’’ and all that follows through 

20 the end of the subparagraph, and inserting ‘‘.’’. 

21 (b) SATELLITE SERVICE REPORT.—The Commission 

22 shall review competitive market conditions with respect to 

23 domestic and international satellite communications serv24 ices and shall include in an annual report an analysis of 

25 those conditions. Such analysis shall include an identifica26 tion of the number and market share of competitors in 
3 

S 976 RFH 

1 domestic and international satellite markets, including an 

2 analysis of whether there is effective competition in the 

3 market for domestic and international satellite services, 

4 and shall include a list of any foreign nations in which 

5 legal or regulatory practices restrict access to the market 

6 for satellite services in such nation in a manner that un7 dermines competition or favors a particular competitor or 

8 set of competitors. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (a) shall be effective as of the date of enact11 ment of this section. 

Passed the Senate April 29 (legislative day, April 

28), 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURUSANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grey Wolf, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2003
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, Thomas P. Richards, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and David W. Wehlmann, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly present, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas P. Richards
----------------------------------------------------
Thomas P. Richards
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


/s/ David W. Wehlmann
----------------------------------------------------
David W. Wehlmann
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:    August 13, 2003
#### The New Champion.

*(District Court, S. D. New York.*

July 15, 1883.)

1. Admiralty—JjIen—Supplies—Presumption.

Necessary supplies furnished to a vessel in a foreign port are presumptively furnished upon the'credit of the vessel as well as of her owners, and a lien on the vessel therefor will be sustained,- unless the evidence is sufficient to rebut this presumption. ...

2. Same—Owner’s Agreement.

The lien will not be-affected by an agreement between the owners and the captain that the latter should find the crew and provisions, where the seller had no knowledge or notice of the agreement. ■ •

In Admiralty-.

*Alexander & Ash,*for libelants.- .

*J. A. Hyland,*for claimant.

Brown, J.

The supplies -for which this action is Drought were provisions furnished, at Bergen Point, New Jersey, to the steward, in accordance with the master’s orders; and all belong to the class of necessaries. The captain was running the barge on an agreement with the owners that he should have $60 per month and find the crew and provisions. The libelants, who kept a grocery store at Bergen Point, had no knowledge or notice of this arrangement, as in the case of *The Wm. Cook,*12 Fed. Rep. 919, and hence were not bound by it. *The John Farron,*14 Blatchf. 24, reversing 7 Ben. 53; *The S. M. Whipple,*14 Fed. Rep. 355; *The India,*Id. 476.

The libelant testified that the supplies were furnished on the credit of the vessel; and upon all the circumstances I do not think there is sufficient evidence to rebut this testimony, or the legal presumption that the supplies, being furnished in a foreign port, were furnished upon the credit of the vessel, as well as of her owners. *The Secret,*15 Fed. Rep. 480; *The Plymouth Rock,*7 Ben. 448; *The E. A. Baisley,*13 Fed. Rep. 703; *The E. A. Barnard,*2 Fed. Rep. 712, 714; *The Grapeshot,*9 Wall. 129, 136.

The libelants must, therefore, have judgment for the value of the goods furnished, amounting with interest to $33.45, with costs.
#### IN THE MATTER OF A.S. and M.J.W., minor children

No. 140A07

(Filed 9 November 2007)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 181 N.C. App. 706, 640 S.E.2d 817 (2007), affirming in part and remanding in part adjudication judgments and dispositional orders entered 24 May 2006 by Judge Marvin P. Pope, Jr. in District Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 October 2007.

*Matthew J. Middleton for petitioner-appellant Buncombe County Department of Social Services.*

*Michael N. Ttiusey for appellant Guardian ad Litem.*

*Michael E. Casterline for respondent-appellee father.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
#### State v. Grant

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 565

No. 481P06

1. Def-Appellant’s NOA (Constitutional Question) (COA05-1295)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def-Appellant’s PDR

1. _

2. Allowed 01/25/07

3. Denied 01/25/07
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-19-00158-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 431st District Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. F17-2519-431

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Bassel and Womack, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

EX PARTE EVERETT MADURAI
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Applicant Everett Madurai raises one point arguing that the trial court erred by 

denying his application for writ of habeas corpus for bail pending trial. The trial court

revoked Applicant’s original bond in his initial offense involving family violence and

denied him a second bond after finding that Applicant had violated the conditions of

his initial bond by using drugs and by committing a new family-violence offense 

against the same victim as the prior offense.

During the pendency of this appeal, Applicant was convicted. Because 

Applicant has been convicted, the appeal is now moot. See Ex parte Tucker, 3 S.W.3d 

576, 576 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) (“The appellant having been tried during the 

pendency of this appeal, the question of his pre-trial bond is moot.”); Armendarez v. 

State, 798 S.W.2d 291, 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) (holding that an issue regarding 

pretrial bail was moot because the appellant was legally confined pursuant to a 

conviction in the underlying case); Ex parte Villareal, No. 04-96-00588-CR, 1996 WL 

729936, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 18, 1996, no pet.) (not designated for 

publication) (dismissing appeal as moot). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as 

moot.1

Dabney Bassel

Justice

 1

Based on our disposition of the appeal, we deny as moot the State’s motion 

for extension of time to file a brief.
3

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: August 22, 2019
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 668 

To provide enhanced criminal penalties for willful violations of occupational 

standards for asbestos. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To provide enhanced criminal penalties for willful violations 

of occupational standards for asbestos.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asbestos Standards 

5 Enforcement Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENHANCED CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR WILLFUL 

7 VIOLATIONS OF OCCUPATIONAL STANDARDS 

8 FOR ASBESTOS. 

9 Section 17(e) of the Occupational Safety and Health 

10 Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 656(e)) is amended— 
2

•S 668 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘Any’’ and inserting ‘‘(1) Ex2 cept as provided in paragraph (2), any’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(2) Any employer who willfully violates any standard 

5 issued under section 6 with respect to the control of occu6 pational exposure to asbestos, shall upon conviction be 

7 punished by a fine in accordance with section 3571 of title 

8 18, United States Code, or by imprisonment for not more 

9 than 5 years, or both, except that if the conviction is for 

10 a violation committed after a first conviction of such per11 son, punishment shall be by a fine in accordance with sec12 tion 3571 of title 18, United States Code, or by imprison13 ment for not more than 10 years, or both.’’.

Æ
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2

IEA Income Fund VIII

CERTIFICATIONS
Rule 13a-14

I, John Kallas, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund
VIII (the Registrant);

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC), the
General Partner of the Registrant, and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this quarterly report is being prepared; and

(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

5.     CCs other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of Registrants Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2003

/s/ JOHN KALLAS
John Kallas
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of CCC
Highway Safety Grants Program                                  

# FY 2020 Grant Funding Table

Share:*Facebook**Twitter**LinkedIn**Mail*

FY 2020 Grant Funding TableFY 2020 State Grant Determinations

													FY 2020 Grant Funding Table													

                - FY 2020 State Grant Determinations

# FY 2020 State Grant Determinations

Resource

Printable FY2020 Grants Determination Table 
Download

Section 4010 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, P.L. 114-94, requires NHTSA to post on a public website information about grant determinations under the National Priority Safety Programs (23 U.S.C. 405). Specifically, 60 days after making grant award determinations, NHTSA must identify:
                  - the States that received grant awards,
                  - the States that applied for but did not receive grant awards, and
                  - the States that did not apply for grants.

For those States that applied for but did not receive grant awards, NHTSA must additionally provide a list of deficiencies that made the States ineligible for award.

The tables below address these FAST Act requirements. The first table identifies items #1 through #3 above. Subsequent tables, broken out by grant program, identify some of the significant deficiencies that prevented a State from receiving an award. NHTSA reviewed State laws based on the legal citations provided by States in their application package. While we exercised due diligence in that effort, inaccurate or incomplete legal citations in some State applications may have affected NHTSA’s review.

In order to make timely award determinations and notifications to the States, once a determination was made that a State did not meet the mandatory requirements listed in the “Deficiencies” tables, NHTSA did not proceed with further evaluation. As a result, the list of deficiencies in the tables below should not be viewed as comprehensive. Any interested State may obtain a detailed debriefing by contacting the NHTSA Regional Office by November 15, 2019.

As always, NHTSA remains available to provide a review of proposed bills as individual States pursue legislative efforts to achieve compliance with these important grant programs. We will do our best to provide fast turnaround guidance in those situations, including telephone discussions at a State’s request when its legislative process is moving rapidly. It is our hope that the information provided below will assist States in their legislative efforts.

#           FY 2020 Section 405 Grant Determination Results        

#           Summary Table        

# 
Ignition Interlock Law Grant (Deficiencies in State Application) 

# 
24-7 Sobriety Program Grant (Deficiencies in State Application)

# 
Comprehensive Distracted Driving Grant (Deficiencies in State Application) 

# 
 Motorcyclist Safety Grant (Deficiencies in State Application)

# 
Graduated Driver Licensing Law Grant (Deficiencies in State Application)
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF
THE TRUSTEE*
OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 1
to the Trusts financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September
16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from
generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other
royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ Lee Ann Anderson

Lee Ann AndersonTitle:
    
    Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate:
    
    November 21, 2008
 
 *
    
    The Trust has no executive officers.