alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 10, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 10, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0246. WAYNE D. REID, II v. GINGER B. REID.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

1118115
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,730]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 1, 2009 in response to a petition filed by three workers on behalf of the workers at Bridgestone APM Plant 1, Carey, Ohio.

The petitioners requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of April 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10922 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD JUNE 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         481,502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               605,729
<PP&E>                                       7,098,943
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,457,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,247,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,247,034
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,247,034
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               269,120
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  198,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   126,941
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information   extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  and  consolidated  statements  of  income  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS     
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997  
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997 
<CASH>                                           429,278
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     22,046 
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                      128,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0 
<PP&E>                                           599,901 
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,755,519 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       976,221 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,755,519 
<SALES>                                          121,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,102,312
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    705,416
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 120,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                39,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  705,416
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              705,416 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     705,416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.69
        


</TABLE>
#### David J. Smith, Respondent, v Niagara Frontier Transit Metro System, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Submitted November 15, 2010;

decided January 18, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of QuantRx Biomedical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Sasha Afanassiev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Sasha AfanassievSasha
      AfanassievCFO,
      Treasurer & VP of
Finance





Date:    November
16, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1 McGladrey & Pullen
Certified Public Accountants Consent of Independent Auditors We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (No. 333-104912) pertaining to the 2003 Stock Incentive Plan of
Centrue Financial Corporation and Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No.
33-51950) pertaining to the Centrue Bank 401(k) Savings Plan, of our report
dated February 24, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
of Centrue Financial Corporation incorporated by reference in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP Champaign, Illinois
March 29, 2004 McGladrey & Pullen, LLP is a member firm of RSM International 
an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities.
fsb2ex10iv_goldvale.htm


    WARREN
      ROBB

    12607-215
      Street

    Maple
      Ridge, British Columbia

     

    CONSENT
      OF AUTHOR

     

    
      	
              To:

            	
               United
                States Securities and Exchange
                Commission

            


    

     

    I,
      Warren
      Robb, P.Geo, do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities
      referred to above, of the technical report titled “Geology Report on Goldvale
      Property” dated September 2006 (the “Technical Report”) and to the written
      disclosure of the Technical Report and of extracts from or a summary of the
      Technical Report in the written disclosure in any Offering Memorandum, other
      offering documents, or an Annual Information Form of Goldvale Resources
      Inc.

     

    I
      hereby
      certify that I have read Goldvale’s Form SB-2 and I do not have any reason to
      believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from
      the Technical Report in the written disclosure in the Offering Memorandum,
      other
      offering documents, or an Annual Information Form of Goldvale Resources
      Inc.

     

    
      	
              I
                hereby consent to the use of my name as a consultant to the
                Company.

            


    

     

    Dated:
      November 7, 2007

     

    
      	
              /s/
                Warren Robb   

            


    

    WARREN
      ROBB
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Barbara Kowaleski, Appellant, and New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

Decided December 17, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 1081.

*902Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that portion of Supreme Court’s judgment that denied appellant’s motion to amend the petition, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal, insofar as taken from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, retained.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Written Statement of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March
31, 2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ David W. ThompsonDavid W. ThompsonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerApril 25, 2008
#### Patrick J. Flavin et al., Plaintiffs, v Salvatore Parisi, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Patrick J. Flavin et al., Appellants, v Salvatore Parisi, Defendant, and Francis P. Sweeney et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

[977 NYS2d 402]

In two related actions to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Smith, J.), dated August *88728, 2012, as granted that branch of the motion of Francis E Sweeney, a defendant in action No. 2, which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him and, upon searching the record, directed the dismissal of the complaint in action No. 2 insofar as asserted against the defendant Salvatore Leone.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Francis E Sweeney which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in action No. 2 insofar as asserted against him. Sweeney met his prima facie burden of establishing that the ownership of a hunting cabin as tenants in common by Sweeney and the defendants Salvatore Farisi and Salvatore Leone did not constitute a partnership as defined by the New York Fartnership Law because the ownership of the cabin was for recreational use only and was not a business for profit *(see*Partnership Law §§ 10 [1]; 11 [2]). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether a partnership existed.

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are either without merit or improperly raised for the first time on appeal.

In light of the foregoing, the Supreme Court also properly searched the record and awarded summary judgment to Leone *(see*CELE 3212 [b]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1



                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO:

                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Omagine, Inc. on Form
10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, the undersigned certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Omagine, Inc.


/s/Frank J. Drohan
------------------
Frank J. Drohan
Chief Executive & Financial Officer


May 11, 2009

The originally executed copy of this certification will be
maintained at the Registrant's offices and will be made
available for inspection upon request.
<PAGE>
 
   EXHIBIT 21


                   SUBSIDIARIES OF STERLING BANCSHARES, INC.
                                        
The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Sterling Bancshares, Inc.:

Sterling Bancorporation, Inc.
A Delaware corporation
PO Box 631
Wilmington, Delaware 19899

Sterling Bancshares Capital Trust I
A Delaware statutory business trust
15000 Northwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77040

Sterling Bank
A Texas state banking association
15000 Northwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77040

Clear Lake National Bank
A national banking association
15000 Northwest Freeway
Houston, Texas 77040

Sterling Capital Mortgage Corporation
A Texas corporation
13100 Northwest Freeway Suite 200
Houston, Texas 77040
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00493-CV

In re Joshua Early

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition is denied. See Tex. R. App. P.

52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field

Filed: August 14, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS OF
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME AND CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS FOR THE
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      $2,227,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $2,227,400
<PP&E>                                     $10,975,216
<DEPRECIATION>                              $7,964,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $5,238,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $2,227,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  $3,010,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $5,238,108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           $11,713,618
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $308,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            $11,404,643
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        $11,404,643
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               $11,404,643
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
[Ryder Scott Company Letterhead]



Exhibit No. 23.3



Consent of Ryder Scott Company, L.P.



As independent oil and gas consultants, Ryder Scot Company, L.P. hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plains
Exploration & Production Company, as well as in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in such Form 10-K, of information from our reserve reports for Plains Exploration and Production Company and subsidiaries (collectively,
the Company) as of December 31, 2003, December 31, 2002, and December 31, 2001, and for 3TEC Energy Corporation as of December 31, 2002, and December 31, 2001, relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the Companys proved reserves of
oil and gas and undiscounted and discounted future net income there from for the specific periods cited. We further consent to references to our firm under the headings Oil and Gas Reserves and Supplemental reserve information
(unaudited).



/s/    Ryder Scott Company, L.P.RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.




Houston, Texas

March 11, 2004
1. a sum equivalent to six (6) months of On Target Earnings (OTE), consisting of base pay andbonus, and,2. if you are then covered by the Company health care plan, six (6) months of COBRA coverage, whichwill be paid to you by McAfee, grossed up for taxes3. for the initial 45,000 new hire stock options, subject to grant approval by the Board ofDirectors and/or its Compensation Committee as noted above, the Company will accelerate theirvesting by 12 months, the exerciseability of which will remain subject to the terms of the OptionPlan and any blackout which might then exist.It is not the intention for any payment under this Agreement to create or constitute a“nonqualified deferred compensation plan” within the meaning of Section 409A of the InternalRevenue Code of 1986 (as amended). Should it be reasonably determined that any payment hereunderfalls within the purview of Section 409A thus subjecting you to additional tax liability, theCompany shall be entitled on written request by you, to defer such payment until the expiry of sixmonths following the date of termination of employment. If such payment is deferred as providedfor herein, upon conclusion of the period of deferral, such amounts shall be paid in a lump sum,less all appropriate withholdings.If you choose to accept this offer, your employment with McAfee, Inc. will be voluntarily enteredinto and will be for no specified period. As a result, you will be free to resign at any time, forany reason or for no reason, as you deem appropriate. McAfee, Inc. will have a similar right andmay conclude its employment relationship with you at any time, with or without cause. Uponseparation from the company for any reason, you also agree to return to the Company any equipmentthat has been provided to you or reimburse the Company the cost for such equipment. The Companyreserves the right to deduct such costs from any final payments made to you in accordance withstate and federal laws.Definition
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3411

___________ Kenyatta Williams, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Dora Schriro, Dir. of Dept. of Corr.; * Michael Bowersox, Superintendent; * Appeal from the United States Linda Wilkson, Functional Unit * District Court for the Manager; James M. Ruman, Regional * Eastern District of Missouri. Administrator; Steve Long, Dir., Div. * Adult Institutions; Paul Delo, Former * [UNPUBLISHED] Superintendent; Allen Luebbers, * Former Asst. Superintendent; Deanna * L. Hutchinson, Director of Nurses; * Pedro Cayabyab, Doctor, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 5, 1999 Filed: February 11, 1999

___________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________The Honorable Terry I. Adelman, United States Magistrate Judge for th e 1 Eastern Dis trict of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition b y consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2- PER CURIAM. Kenya ttaWilliams appeals the district court’s order granting summary 1 judgmen t to defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he claimed tha t defendants were deliberately indif ferent to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendmen t, and that he was subjected to a sexual assault while being examined

. Upon a thorough review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude summar y judgment was proper and reject Mr. Williams’s additional arguments on appeal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirme d. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Mr. Williams’s motions on appeal for appointment of counsel and an injunction. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.