alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COMPUTER INTEGRATION CORP. FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,019,165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               63,284,965
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 25,226,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            91,471,272
<PP&E>                                       2,636,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,120,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       66,102,134
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         19
<COMMON>                                         6,915
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,897,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,904,264
<SALES>                                    232,708,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           232,708,946
<CGS>                                      210,692,516
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,135,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,317,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,563,807
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,496,799
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,067,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 24.4

                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

           The undersigned constitutes and appoints Vincent Hren and William
Crowell, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with
full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place,
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, for filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission by Microtest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with
any and all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits
thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting to such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of
them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

           DATED:    March 26, 2001



            /s/ William C. Turner
           --------------------------

           William C. Turner
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michele Nakazawa, Chief Financial Officer of Telos Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors:

 

a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 21, 2005
Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Garrett E. PierceGarrett E. PierceVice Chairman and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 5, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11707 and #11708]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of North Dakota (FEMA-1829-DR), dated 04/10/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe storms and flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/13/2009 and continuing.                    

      ( print page 24051)    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         05/15/2009.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/09/2009.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/11/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of North Dakota, dated 04/10/2009 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*

Benson, Cavalier, Eddy, Mclean, Pembina, Rolette, Wells.

*Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Minnesota: Kittson.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Roger B. Garland,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11976 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Sloan *against*Wattles.

The attorney *fat ancí'^ñtum*tefo°eru%Csívvthe’sheriir.is aUstructed’by the attorney, to alter the return day, ni case theeerrvedanbeforee the ^iteration! men! or‘\ppearance is-ehilgrsed,

*N. WILLIAMS,*for the- defendant,

moved to set aside the *capias*in this cause,‘on the ground that the sheriff had altered the return day of the writ.

It appeared that-the plaintiff’s attorney, on sending the writ to the sheriff, had instructed him, that in case he did not receive . . . ' - 1 , , . the writ in time to be served before the'return day, to alter it. - . J T^e sheriff served the writ, and was about taking a bond-for appearance, when he discovered that the return day was passed‘; he then altered the return day, and served the writ anew, '

7. *Hamilton,*contra.

*Per Cúriam.*

- /The attorney'might ha-ve altered the, test a nd .return of a writ before it had been served; and the sheriff was fully authorized, by. the attorney, to -make the alteration in case it should be-necessary. .vWe think.the-'sheriff, in this'case, had not proceeded so far hut that he might exercise the power,•given* to 'him/by- the attorney, and that the motion, therefore, fought to he-denied.

Motion-denied.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KENNY TANG a/k/a TANG KENNY, Appellant,

v.

KNICKERBOCKER PROPERTIES, INC.

, d/b/a THE HAMPTONS ON

HERON BAY XXXVI
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1691

[ January 20, 2022 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Steven P. De L uca , Judge; L.T. Case No. CONO

- 20

- 018821

.

Michael L. Buckner of Buckner Legal Self

- Help Program, Inc., Coral Springs, for appellant.

Ryan R. McCain and Donna S. Barfield of Barfie ld McCain , P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1 2 3 4

5

6 7

8 9

10 11

12 13

14 15 16 17

18 19

20

21

22

23

24 25 26

27 28

29

ACROSS5 “Father of modern imagery analysis”

6  NGA has a headquarters location in this “gateway” city

8  Eisenhower-era NGA predecessor combined CIA and DOD assets

9  WWII aerial intelligence pioneer and Vogue fashion photographer 

10  “Monuments Men” team for captured German WWII maps and  geodetic data 

14  New NGA St. Louis facility, which broke ground November 2019

15  This system of Cold War reconnaissance satellites shares a nickname with Sesame Street avian

20  Groundbreaking oceanographic cartographer that produced the comprehensive map of the world’s ocean floor 

21  13-day, 1962 Cold War event credited with birth of the imagery analysis discipline

22  Sinking of this ship led to a blockbuster film and creation of an international patrol to locate and track icebergs

23  Digital mapmaking of Balkans facilitated 1995 peace agreement named for birthplace of aviation

24  Joint NASA and National Imagery and Mapping Agency mission to acquire elevation data for 80%+ of Earth’s land mass

25  U.S. president, surveyor, NGA "Employee #1"

26  Timekeeping, ATMs and navigation rely on this government-owned system

27  Pakistan compound modeled by NGA that led to capture of Osama bin Laden

28  Author of 1866’s “The New American Practical Navigator", which is updated by NGA

29  First generation of photo reconnaissance satellites

DOWN1  "Pathfinder of the Seas" known for expertise in marine analysis and  bathymetry

2  1860 photograph of this East Coast city credited as first aerial photograph in U.S.

3  ShortINT version of geospatial intelligence

4  Beginning in 1957, NGA predecessors collected photographic data on this natural satellite to aid the U.S. space program

5  Joint USGS and NASA effort to acquire satellite imagery of the Earth’s surface since 1972

7  Chief aeronaut of the Union Army Balloon Corps during the Civil War

11  NGA Director from 2010-14, first woman to head a major U.S. intelligence agency

12  For this pivotal June 1944 WWII engagement, the Army Map Service produced nearly 70 million copies of 3,000 different maps.

13  Group commissioned by President Thomas Jefferson to explore and map lands west of the Mississippi River

16  This reconnaissance aircraft first flew in 1964 and was designed to avoiding interception with tremendous speed and high altitude

17  Charts produced by NGA and DOD Joint Personnel Recovery Agency to help downed pilots survive and safely navigate

18  Self-taught son of a freed slave, helped survey boundaries of the original District of Columbia

19  NGA predecessor established in 1996

#NationalCrosswordPuzzleDay

Approved for public release, 20-173
##### 



Exhibit 12.2
 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of
Videotron ltd.
pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Commission Releases
Nos.33-8238 (June 5, 2003) and 33-8618 (September 22, 2005)];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
  /s/ Yvan GingrasName:
    Yvan GingrasTitle:
    Executive Vice President, Finance and Operations, and Chief Financial Officer
#### Tyrone HURT, Appellant v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, Appellee.

No. 06-5276.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 30, 2006.

Rehearing En Banc Denied Jan. 9, 2007.

Tyrone Hurt, Washington, DC, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and ROGERS and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court *901for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 31, 2006, be affirmed. Dismissal with prejudice is justified when a district court determines that “ ‘allegation of other facts consistent with the challenged pleading could not possibly cure the deficiency.’” *Firestone v. Firestone,*76 F.3d 1205, 1209 (D.C.Cir. 1996) (quoting *Jarrell v. United States Postal Serv.,*753 F.2d 1088, 1091 (D.C.Cir. 1985) (other quotations omitted)). The district court correctly dismissed with prejudice appellant’s action against the United States Supreme Court. *See In re Marin,*956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam) (denying mandamus petition against Clerk of Supreme Court for lack of jurisdiction), *cert. denied,*506 U.S. 844, 113 S.Ct. 131, 121 L.Ed.2d 85 (1992); *Panko v. Rodak,*606 F.2d 168, 171 n. 6 (7th Cir. 1979) (“[I]t seems axiomatic that a lower court may not order the judges or officers of a higher court to take an action.”), *cert. denied,*444 U.S. 1081, 100 S.Ct. 1034, 62 L.Ed.2d 765 (1980).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           25875
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1504
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      75904
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           31711
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             32488
<LOANS>                                         382188
<ALLOWANCE>                                       5382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  539949
<DEPOSITS>                                      461657
<SHORT-TERM>                                      9050
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              14190
<LONG-TERM>                                       3058
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          6953
<OTHER-SE>                                       45041
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  539949
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  25514
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 5468
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   188
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 31170
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               12442
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               12841
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            18329
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      825
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  14590
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8086
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        5460
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5460
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   8.810
<LOANS-NON>                                        968
<LOANS-PAST>                                      1254
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  5062
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      665
<RECOVERIES>                                       160
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 5382
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              5382
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
4.10


PROMISSORY
NOTE EXTENSION


Principal Amount:                $1,000,000                                                              Original
Note Date:  April 1, 2004


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, PHOTONIC PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., a
New Jersey corporation (hereinafter called “Issuer”), hereby promises to pay to
the order of CLAREX, Ltd. and its successors and assigns (hereinafter called
the “Holder”), at such address as the Holder may designate in writing to
Issuer, the principal sum of ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) plus all accrued
interest owing hereunder in lawful money of the United States of America on or
before the Maturity Date (as defined below). 
For purposes of this Note, “Maturity Date” shall be extended from March
31, 2007 to March 31, 2008.


At the option of CLAREX, Ltd., the note and all
accrued interest owing at the time of maturity may be repaid in lawful money of
the United States of America and/or a combination of shares of the Common Stock
of Photonic Products Group, Inc. as proscribed under the terms of the Note.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Issuer has caused this Note
Extension to be signed in its name by its duly authorized officer and its
corporate seal to be affixed hereto.


	
  

  	
  PHOTONIC PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/William J.
  Foote

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
  March 26, 2007