alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Events 
-  Multimedia Library 

# EARssentials 2020: Dr. Gwenaëlle S. Géléoc

Share this on: 

Gwenaëlle S. Géléoc, Ph.D., presents on hair cells and mechanotransduction in this video from the NIDCD's 2020 EARssentials course.

## Embed this multimedia on your website

Copy and paste this code to embed the content in your website, blog, or other distribution channels. Information on our website is in the public domain, but we appreciate when you link to the source and when credit is given to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/o_g0S8eFwNY" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe><p>Gwenaëlle S. Géléoc, Ph.D., presents on hair cells and mechanotransduction in this video from the NIDCD's 2020 EARssentials course.</p>

 

July 20, 2022

## Media Inquiries

Contact the NIDCD press office at news@nidcd.nih.gov.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 797 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 797

 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
  to clarify the status of certain communities in the western Alaska 
                  community development quota program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 2005

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Stevens) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
  to clarify the status of certain communities in the western Alaska 
                  community development quota program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CDQ Community Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. WESTERN ALASKA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT QUOTA PROGRAM.

    (a) Eligible Communities.--Section 305(i)(1) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1855(i)) is 
amended adding at the end the following:
            ``(E) A community shall be eligible to participate in the 
        western Alaska community development quota program under 
        subparagraph (A) if the community was--
                    ``(i) listed in table 7 to part 679 of title 50, 
                Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 
                2004; or
                    ``(ii) approved by the National Marine Fisheries 
                Service on April 19, 1999.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Such section is further amended, in 
paragraph (B), by striking ``To'' and inserting, ``Except as provided 
in subparagraph (E), to''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of QuantRx Biomedical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sasha
Afanassiev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Sasha AfanassievSasha
      AfanassievCFO,
      Treasurer & VP of Finance


Date: August
14, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Xiao-Lan Ma, Respondent, v Anthony Valance Washington, Appellant.

[978 NYS2d 285]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Lebwohl, J.), dated December 21, 2012, as denied, as untimely, his objections to three orders of the same court (Stein, S.M.), each dated September 18, 2012, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed him to pay child support to the mother.

Ordered that the order dated December 21, 2012, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Objections to an order of a support magistrate must be filed within 35 days after the date on which the order is mailed to the objecting party *(see*Family Ct Act § 439 [e]; *Matter of Hodges v Hodges,*40 AD3d 639 [2007]; *Matter of Miller v Smith,*7 AD3d 629 [2004]; *Matter of Mayeri v Mayeri,*279 AD2d 473 [2001]). Here, since the father did not timely file written objections to the Support Magistrate’s orders, the Family Court properly denied the father’s objections to those orders as *958untimely and refused to consider them *(see Matter of Roberts v Gray,*89 AD3d 951 [2011]; *Matter of Bruckstein v Bruckstein,*78 AD3d 694 [2010]; *Matter of Hodges v Hodges,*40 AD3d at 639; *Matter of Herman v Herman,*11 AD3d 536 [2004]; *Matter of Miller v Smith,*7 AD3d at 629; *Matter of Chambers v Chambers,*305 AD2d 672, 673 [2003]; *Matter of Mayeri v Mayeri,*279 AD2d at 473). Mastro, J.E, Rivera, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A

               QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the Quarter Ended                                   Commission File Number
---------------------                                   ----------------------  
   June 30, 1996                                              33-16757-D
                             MEDIZONE CANADA LIMITED
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


            Utah                                                 87-0431771
(State or other jurisdiction                                  (I.R.S. Employer
       of incorporation                                      Identification No.)
       or organization)


                              123 East 54th Street
                                    Suite 7B
                            New York, New York 10022
                                 (212) 421-0303

    (Address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code of
                   registrant's principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the  preceding 12 months (or for such  shorter  period that the  registrant  was
required  to file  such  reports),  and  (2) has  been  subject  to such  filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                           Yes  |X|        No  | |

At August 9, 1996, there were outstanding  36,493,333 shares of the registrant's
common stock.



























                                Page 1 of 3 pages

<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                             MEDIZONE CANADA LIMITED
                             -----------------------
                                  (Registrant)


                              /s/Arthur P. Bergeron
                              ---------------------
                               Arthur P. Bergeron
                                 Vice President
                           and Chief Financial Officer

October 2, 1996












                                Page 2 of 3 pages

<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of Vidal Whitley, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[962 NYS2d 921]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

*1233Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules stemming from his alleged involvement in a melee. The Attorney General has informed this Court that the determination has been reversed administratively, all references thereto expunged from petitioner’s institutional record, and the mandatory surcharge refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. Petitioner has thus received all the relief to which he is entitled and, as such, the proceeding is dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Horace v Fischer,*98 AD3d 1157, 1157 [2012]).

Mercure, J.P, Rose, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
#### In re D.S.M.

Case below: 182 N.C. App.-(17 April 2007)

No. 236P07

Respondent’s (Juvenile) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-1245)

Denied 08/23/07
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23750]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11701]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Correction

    In FR Doc. E9-11077 for Monday, May 11, 2009, (73 FR 21839) in the 
second column of the Sunshine Act Notice make the following correction:
    Revise the sixth line of the third paragraph to read: ``The 
proposed amendments are designed to''.

    Dated: May 14, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11701 Filed 5-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group; Health, Behavior, and Context Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         June 15-16, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michele C. Hindi-Alexander, PhD, Division Of Scientific Review, National Institutes Of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room, 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20812-7510, (301) 435-8382,                         *hindialm@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 15, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-12195 Filed 5-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT 10.7**

**MERIT INCREASE CRITERIA SET**

In December 2006, the Board of Directors of WMS Industries Inc. (the“Corporation”), upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved criteria for merit increases to annual base salary for executive officers named in our proxy statement, including Brian R. Gamache, Orrin J. Edidin, Scott D.Schweinfurth, Kathleen McJohn and Patricia Barten, based on specific financial goals to be achieved at or during the twelve months ending September 30, 2007. The potential merit increase to the annual base salary for each officer ranges from 0%to 10% of his or her annual base salary depending on the Corporation’s financial performance against the goals set by the Board of Directors and will be effective January 1, 2008.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ARTIS KELLY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-0029

[August 30, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 76-4008CF10B.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jesse W. Isom, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Rogers v. State, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1493, D1494 (Fla. 4th 

DCA July 5, 2017). 

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-102627, No. 333-107990, No. 333-115628, No. 333-117425, No. 333-145004 and No. 333-166830) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-165263) of Plains
Exploration & Production Company of our report dated February 23, 2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                              
|Houston, Texas                
|February 23, 2012
Mr. A. C. Turner, Chairman Opinion No. C-471

Board of Pardons & Paroles Austin, Texas Re: Whether the Board of Pardons and Paroles has the authority to recommendand the Governor the power to grant a posthumousFull pardon to a deceased convicted felon on applicationof a relaDear Mr. Turner: tlve or other interested party. Your recent letter requests our opinion as to the above matter. This questionhas been Foreclosedby Runnicutt v. State, 18 Tex.Ct.App.498 (1885), in which it was held that:

11

. . . '1st. A pardon, in order to be complete,must, in contemplation OF law, be deliveredand accepted.' 2d. 'The principlesapplicableto the delivery of a pardon and an ordinarydeed must be consideredanalogous,and in either case Its delivery is complete when the grantor has parted with his entire control or dominion over the instrument,with the intentionthat it shall pass to the grantee or obligee, and the latter assents to it either by himself or agent;
. . .I' Language to the effect that a pardon must be accepted Is also Found In Rx Parte Rice, 72 Tex.Crim. 587, 162 S.W.

Rx Parte Redwlne, 91 Tex.Crim. 83, 236 S.W. 96 Rx Parte Frazier, 91 Tex.Crim.475, 239 S.W. 972 also Attorney General'sOpinion No. O-2413 (1940). Thus, the pardon not being delivered to the convict during his lifetime, It could not be acceptedby him. Even had he appointedan agent to accept the pardon during his lifetime, his death would have the effect of terminatingsuch relationship. Primm v. Stewart, 7 Tex. 178 (1851).

-2235-Mr. A. C. Turner, Page 2 (C-471)

SUMMARY The Board OF Pardons and Paroleshas no authority to recommendand the Governor no power to grant a posthumousFull pardon to a deceased convictedFelon on application of a relative or other interestedparty. Yours very truly, WAGGONER CARR AttorneyGeneral bf Texas

By: Assistant'Attorney General CBS/lbh APPROVED: OPINION COmITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Pat Bailey Gordon Cass Brady Coleman Sam Kelley APPROVEBFOR THE ATTORNEYGENERAL BY: Hawthorne Phillips

-2236-
**Exhibit 99.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer of BordenChemicals and Plastics Limited Partnership**

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 and accompanies theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, of Borden Chemicals and Plastics Limited Partnership (the “Issuer”).  I, Mark J. Schneider, the Chief Executive Officer of theIssuer, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)   the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii)        the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Issuer.

| Dated:    November 14,  2002 |  
 
   
 
 
/s/  Mark J. Schneider

 
 
 
 
 
 
**Mark J. Schneider Chief Executive Officer**

  
 
 
 
  |
|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN JOSE SACCHE, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 16-71545 

Agency No. A095-805-609 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2022**

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Juan Jose Sacche, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 19 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-71545 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C § 1252. We review for substantial 

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 

(9th Cir. 2008). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Sacche does not raise and therefore waives any

challenge to the BIA’s determination that his asylum application was untimely. 

See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not 

specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). Thus, we 

deny the petition for review as to Sacche’s asylum claim.

Sacche also does not raise and therefore waives any challenge to the BIA’s 

determination that the harm he suffered did not rise to the level of persecution. See 

id. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Sacche failed to 

establish a clear probability of future persecution because he did not demonstrate 

that he could not reasonably relocate within Guatemala. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1208.16(b)(2)-(3); Lanza v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 917, 934-35 (9th Cir. 2004). 

Thus, Sacche’s withholding of removal claim fails. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Sacche failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or with the 

consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guatemala. See Aden v. 

Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009). 
3 16-71545 

We lack jurisdiction to consider Sacche’s contentions regarding political 

opinion, cancellation of removal, adjustment of status, and other discretionary 

relief because these issues were not presented to the agency. See Barron v. 

Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (petitioner must exhaust issues or 

claims in administrative proceedings below). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

TONY JOHNSON

NO. 2024 KW 0236

MAY 13, 2024

In Re: Tony Johnson, applying for supervisory writs, 21st

Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 

1701099. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., CHUTZ AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

JMG

WRC

WIL

URT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT