alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of QuantRx Biomedical Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sasha
      Afanassiev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                      Sasha AfanassievSasha
                      AfanassievCFO, Treasurer & VP of
                    Finance




Date:
      August 14, 2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,435,746
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,088,237
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 27,934,974
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      19,839,678
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        20,055,364
<LOANS>                                     91,276,434
<ALLOWANCE>                                    568,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,724,441
<DEPOSITS>                                 105,278,292
<SHORT-TERM>                                14,500,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,270,688
<LONG-TERM>                                 16,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,675,461
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             147,724,441
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,074,649
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,675,351
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,750,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,039,036
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,720,297
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,029,703
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   48,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             220,223
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,581,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,953,914
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,953,914
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,264,914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.89
<LOANS-NON>                                    769,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               686,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  166,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              568,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           461,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        107,000



</TABLE>
#### Harrison v. City of Sanford

Case below: 177 N.C. App. 116

No. 251P06

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-1001)

Denied 12/14/06
J

- A10018

- 15

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 S.B.B. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant

v. J.E.B.

- S. Appellee No. 2037 MDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered November 4 , 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County

Civil Division at No(s): 09

- 20, 268

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., MUNDY, J., and JENKINS, J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY MUNDY, J.: FILED APRIL 01, 2015 Appellant, S.B.B. (Mother), appeals pro se from the November 4, 2014 order, granting Appellee, J.E.B.

- S. (Father)’s motion for attorney’s fees in the amount of $4,651.50. 1 After careful review, we dismiss this appeal. Generally, appellate br iefs are required to conform to the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Pa.R.A.P. 2101. “ This Court may ... dismiss an appeal if the appellant fails to conform to the requirements set forth in the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure.” In re Ullman , 99 5 A.2d 1207, 1211 (Pa. Super. 2010) (citation omitted), appeal denied , 20 A.3d 489 (Pa.

____________________________________________ 1 This Court has held that orders awarding attorney’s fees for vexatious, obdurate, or dilatory conduct are final and appealable. Kulp v. Hrivnak , 765 A.2d 796, 799 (Pa. Super. 2000).J

- A10018

- 15

- 2

-

2011). Generally, this Court will construe pro se materials liberally, but “ pro

se status confers no special benefit on an appellant.” Id. at 1211

- 1212. In this case, Mother purports to raise 23 issues on appeal. Mother’s Brief at 4

- 5. However, the bulk of Mother’s argument consists of reproducing various transcripts and court filings verbatim without discussing how they fit into any of the 23 issues Mot her’s presents on appeal. See generally id. at 9

- 35. We note that Mother has included one paragraph which contains some citations to various statutes in the Adoption Act but, this paragraph contains nothing more than one

- sentence conclusions, without any development or explanation as to why the trial court erred. See id. at 21. It is axiomatic that this Court will not consider issues where the appellant has not developed her issue in any meaningful way. In re Estate of Whitley , 50 A.3d 203, 209 (Pa. Su per. 2012), appeal denied , 69 A.3d 303 (Pa. 2013). Furthermore, “[t]his Court will not act as counsel and will not develop arguments on behalf of an appellant.” Commonwealth v.
Kane , 10 A.3d 327, 331 (Pa. Super. 2010) (citation omitted), appeal denied , 2 9 A.3d 796 (Pa. 2011). Based on the foregoing, we conclude the defects in Mother’s brief are substantial and preclude this Court from conducting any meaningful appellate review. Accordingly, we elect to exercise our discretion pursuant to Rule 2101 and d ismiss this appeal. Appeal dismissed.J

- A10018

- 15

- 3

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 4/1/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41313

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GELDER ARQUETA-REGALADO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-544

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gelder ArquetaRegalado has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arqueta-Regalado has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 2, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41313 Document: 00513216263 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/02/2015
No. 14-41313

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-41313 Document: 00513216263 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/02/2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0175

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

NATALIE AMANDA RICH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 5, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 26 2021

03/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0175
#### In the Matter of Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Appellant, v Assessor of Town of Newburgh et al., Respondents.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided October 19, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not an order of the type provided for in CPLR 5602 (a) (2).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting for EAC Board of Advisors.

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, June 2, 2009, 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m. and Wednesday, June 3, 2009, 8 a.m.-5 p.m. and Thursday, June 4, 2009, 9 a.m.-12 Noon.

# Place:

Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel, Oasis Room at the Sphinx Club, 1315 K Street, Washington, DC 20005, phone number (202) 682-0111.

# Purpose:

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Board of Advisors, as required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002, will meet to receive updates on EAC program activities. The Board will receive updates on comments received regarding the Elections Operation Assessment Project. The Board will receive updates on the proposed next iteration of the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines. The Board will discuss proposed updates and improvements to the 2005 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines. The Board will discuss and consider a committee recommendation on the proposed Draft EAC Report to Congress on Election Day Data Grants Program. The Board will hear committee reports, elect officers and consider other administrative matters.

This Meeting will be open to the public.

# Person to Contact for Information:

                        Bryan Whitener,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 566-3100.                    

Gracia M. Hillman,

Vice-Chair, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. E9-11987 Filed 5-19-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Abdul- Jabbor Malik, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Decided October 20, 2009

Reported below, 58 AD3d 1042.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question. Moreover, here, there is no order of the Appellate Division granting appellant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of American Metals  Service,  Inc. for the nine months ended May 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                             0000319016
<NAME>                                            AMERICAN METALS SERVICE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                    SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                            2,147
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2,147
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 4
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             20
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,147
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     79
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        55
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      24
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  24
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                         24
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .01
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<ARTICLE>                                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                          JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                36,600
<SECURITIES>                                          103,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                         509,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                          11,800
<INVENTORY>                                           652,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      1,406,800
<PP&E>                                                6,157,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                        2,476,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        6,741,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 1,942,800
<BONDS>                                               1,639,100
<COMMON>                                              125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                            1,912,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          6,741,100
<SALES>                                               1,898,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,898,600
<CGS>                                                 1,431,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         1,598,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      8,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    83,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       208,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                          73,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   135,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       2,700
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                          132,300
<EPS-PRIMARY><F1>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED><F1>                                     1.16

<FN>
<F1>
Earnings per share has been calculated in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 128, "Earnings Per Share," and is,
therefore, stated on a basic and diluted basis.
</FN>

        

</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIMETRA BRICE; et al.,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

v. SEQUOIA CAPITAL OPERATIONS, LLC; et al.,
Defendants,

and
7HBF NO. 2, LTD.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellants. No. 19

- 17477

D.C. No. 3:19

- cv
- 01481

- WHO

MEMORANDUM ∗

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Horsley Orrick, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 16, 2020 San Francisco, California
Before: W. FLETCHER, FORREST ** , and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge W . FLETCHER

∗ This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** Formerly known as Danielle J. Hunsaker. 

# FILED

SEP 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Defendant s
- appellants 7HBF NO. 2, LTD et al. appeal from the district

court’s denial of their motio n to compel arbitration. 1 We have jurisdiction under 9
U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(A), (C), and we reverse and remand with instructions to stay the
case and compel arbitration. We resolve this case for t he reasons set forth in Brice

v. Plain Green , No. 19

- 15707, __ F.3d __ ( 9th Cir

. Sept. 16 , 2021 ) , a companion
case involving different defendants but the same Borrowers , materially similar loan
agreements, and the same underlying dispute over the enforceab ility of the
arbitration agreements contained in Borrower s ’ lo an agreements.
Here, as in Plain Green , we conclude that the parties agreed to arbitrate both
their substantive disputes and any gateway questions regarding the arbitration

agreement ’s “validity, enforceability , or scope

. ” See

__ F.3d at __ ; slip op. at 31 ; see

also Rent

- A

- Center
, W est , Inc. v. Jackson , 561 U.S. 63 (2010)

. The latter

agreement

— the delegation provision

— does not prevent Borrower s from
challenging enforceability based on pr ospective waiver or otherwise waive their
rights to pursue federal statutory remedies. See Am. Exp ress Co. v. Italian Colors

Rest. , 570 U.S. 228, 235 (2013)

. Therefore, we conclude that the delegation
provision is not itself invalid as a prospective waiver and that it is for an arbitrator,

1 This case was originally consolidated with another similar appeal, Brice v. Sequoia Capital Operations LLC , No. 19

- 1 7414, but the parties to that appeal settled after oral argument . The appeals were then severed , and N o. 19

- 17414 was dismissed

.3 not the court, to decide whether the parties’ arbitration agreement is enforceable.
REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions to stay the case and
compel arbitration.Bric e v . 7HBF N o.2 , No. 19-17477

W . FLETC HER , C i rc uit Judge , disse nting:

For the re a s ons give n in m y disse nt in Bric e v

. Plain Gre e n , No. 19-15707, ___ F.3d ___ (9th C ir. 2021), I strongly but re s pe c tfully disse nt. 

# FIL ED

SEP 16 2021

M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S

. CO URT O F APPEALS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James D. Carlton, Appellant.

Submitted December 13, 2010;

decided February 22, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal denied upon the ground that an appeal lies as of right *(see*CPLR 5601 [a]).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 885 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 885

To authorize funding for the American Prosecutors Research Institute's 
    National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse and the American 
  Prosecutors Research Institute's National Child Protection Training 
                   Center at Winona State University.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 21, 2005

  Mr. Dayton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize funding for the American Prosecutors Research Institute's 
    National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse and the American 
  Prosecutors Research Institute's National Child Protection Training 
                   Center at Winona State University.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated for grants pursuant to 
section 214A of the Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 
13003) for technical assistance and training programs (in addition to 
amounts previously authorized)--
            (1) $4,500,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 
        2010 to the American Prosecutors Research Institute's National 
        Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse; and
            (2) $3,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2006 through 
        2010 to the American Prosecutors Research Institute's National 
        Child Protection Training Center at Winona State University.
                                 <all>
```