alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          11,731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,749
<PP&E>                                          55,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,659,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          852,860
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,032
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,659,985
<SALES>                                         24,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,000
<CGS>                                          100,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                (100,366)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (100,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (100,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00536-CV

John Albert HUTTO, Individually and d/b/a Utopia Ranch Realty,

Appellant

v.

Robert L. CLODFELTER,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-07-028210-CV

Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 6, 2013

JOINT MOTION TO VACATE AND DISMISS GRANTED; VACATED AND DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion stating they have fully resolved and settled all issues 

in dispute. The parties ask that we vacate the trial court’s judgment, dismiss the case with 

prejudice, and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A); 43.2(e). The motion does 

not recite any agreement of the parties as to costs.
04-12-00536-CV

- 2 -

We grant the motion. The judgment of the trial court is vacated without reference to the 

merits, the case is dismissed with prejudice, and this appeal is dismissed as moot. All costs of 

this appeal are taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

zaya.ayush@nih.gov

## Summary

Dr. Ayush is a board-certified dermatologist from Mongolia. He worked as a post-doctoral fellow in Dr. Nagao’s laboratory in the Dermatology Branch at the NIAMS, and now continues to participate in research as a special volunteer.

## Research Statement

Dr. Ayush’s current research focuses on skin immunology and hair follicle interactions. She studied atopic dermatitis and hair disorders extensively on alopecia in Mongolia.

## Scientific Publications

###             Glutamine up-regulates MAPK phosphatase-1 induction via activation of Ca(2+)→ ERK cascade pathway.        

7().

###             Glutamine suppresses DNFB-induced contact dermatitis by deactivating p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase via induction of MAPK phosphatase-1.        

133(3).

###             Biphasic late airway hyperresponsiveness in a murine model of asthma.        

160(2).

###             Glutamine suppresses airway neutrophilia by blocking cytosolic phospholipase A(2) via an induction of MAPK phosphatase-1.        

189(11).

## Education

Dr. Ayush obtained her M.D. in 2011 and Ph.D. in 2014 from Chonbuk National University Medical School, South Korea. She completed her B.S in Medical Science from Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences, Mongolia.

## Experience

Dr. Ayush worked as a lecturer of Dept. of Dermatology at Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences and trained in dermatology residence in 2005-2006. She obtained her clinical fellowship of Dermatology at Severance Hospital in 2014 in Seoul, Korea. Her research interests are on hair disorders and skin immunology.

March 2024

Back to Top
----

| 1. | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at and for the year ended December 31, 2008. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| March 31, 2011       |   | /s/ Dana C. Gavenda                             |   |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   | Dana C. Gavenda                                      |   |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                |   |
|                 |   |                                                 |   |
| March 31, 2011  |   | /s/ Kevin D. Maroney                                 |   |
|                 |   | Kevin D. Maroney                                     |   |
|                 |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2269** 

GLENN HENDERSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. DAVID LOAR MCKENZIE; SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT; KIM RUSSO; SCHMID & VOILES; KATHLEEN MCCOLGAN, Esq.; ROSEN & SABA, LLP; JAMES ROSEN, Esq.; ADELA CARRASCO, Esq. , Defendants

– Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:14

- cv - 00029

- FL )

Submitted : April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Glenn Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. David Loar Mckenzie, SANDS ANDERSON PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Glenn Henderson appeals the district court’s orders imposing a pre

- filing injunction and denying Henderson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that order. We have

re viewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the pre

- filing injunction. See Cromer v. Kraft Foods N.A., Inc. , 390 F.3d 812, 817

- 18 (4th Cir. 2004) (setting forth standard of review and four factors used t o evaluate propriety of a pre

- filing injunction). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Henderson v. Mckenzie , No. 5:14

- cv - 00029

- FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2 & Oct. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts an d legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Harry A. CAPLEN and/or National Products Co., a corporation, and/or National Fixtures and/or Louis and Sophie Caplen, Harry A. Caplen, Trustee and/or H. *J.*N. Corp. and W. F. Dougherty & Sons, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Raymond Wilson STURGE and Black Sea and Baltic General Insurance Company Limited of London, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. PIONEER OIL COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant and Fourth-Party Plaintiff, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, Fourth-Party Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 29644.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Feb. 5, 1964.

*177David S. Malis, Malis, Malis & Malis, Philadelphia Pa., for plaintiff.

Joseph B. Erwin, John B. Martin, Philadelphia, Pa., for Raymond Wilson Sturge & Black Sea & Baltic Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. of London.

Joseph L. McGlynn, Jr., Blank, Rudenko, Klaus & Rome, Philadelphia, Pa., for third-party defendant, Pioneer Oil Co.

Joseph Head, Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, Philadelphia, Pa., for Maryland Cas. Co.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

(1)

The defendant, some 22 months after filing its answer, moved to join Pioneer Oil Company as third party defendant in this action. Leave was granted on September 18, 1963, and the third party complaint was served on September 30, 1963. On October 15, 1963, the third party filed its answer and demanded a jury trial, and on October 23, 1963, it sought and obtained leave to join Maryland Casualty Company as a fourth party defendant. The present motion was filed on November 22, 1963, nine days after the fourth party defendant had moved to vacate the order granting leave to join it.

The plaintiff has not objected to the lateness of the joinder of the third party defendant. It is true that the defendant did not comply with Rule 19(a) of this court requiring such motions to be made within six months after filing an answer, but, even if this rule is anything more than a guide for the discretion of the Court, the third party defendant in this action has completely waived any objections to its joinder by filing an answer demanding a jury trial, and joining a fourth party defendant. The motion of the third party defendant is, therefore, denied.

(2)

 The only reason advanced for vacating the order joining the fourth party defendant is that its joinder will complicate the issues. This ground is not well taken. The pretrial or trial judge may order a severance of the trials or use a special verdict, or employ pretrial procedure to simplify the issues at the trial. I do not think that at this stage of the proceeding I am justified in vacating the joinder simply on the apprehension that the trial may be complicated. The motion is, therefore, denied.
PML, INC.
Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Years Ended May 31,
                                                         1997             1996
                                                    --------------   --------------
<S>                                                 <C>              <C>
Net  income                                         $     669,371    $     206,001
Preferred stock dividends accreted                        (48,587)         (49,500)
                                                    --------------   --------------
Net income after accretion of dividends             $     620,784    $     156,501
                                                    ==============   ==============


Average number of common shares outstanding             1,776,816        1,594,826
Average number of Class B common stock outstanding        211,551          211,511
Average effect of common stock equivalents                 71,890               -
                                                    --------------   --------------

Average number of total shares outstanding              2,060,257        1,806,337
                                                    ==============   ==============


Net  income per common share                        $        0.30    $        0.09
                                                    ==============   ==============

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11.1

EARNINGS PER SHARE
DILUTED COMPUTATION
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND 1997
(IN MILLIONS EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS)


                                 Three months ended          Nine months ended
                                    September 30,              September 30,
                                 ------------------          -----------------
                                 1998         1997         1998        1997
                                 ----         ----         ----        ----
Basis for computation of 
 diluted earnings per share:				
				
Earnings before 
    extraordinary item        $      37.8  $    26.7   $     172.8  $    154.1
Extraordinary charge -
    debt retirement                   0.9        -             3.6         3.3
                              -----------  ----------  -----------  ----------
Net earnings applicable 
    to common stock           $      36.9  $     26.7  $     169.2  $    150.8
                              ===========  ==========  ===========  ==========
				
Number of shares:				
				
Weighted average shares 
    outstanding               114,283,410  92,852,684  114,189,503  93,986,819
   Common stock equivalents       344,318     911,974      708,075     934,238
                              -----------  ----------  -----------  ----------
Total common and common 
 equivalent shares 
 assuming dilution         114,627,728  93,764,658  114,897,578  94,921,057
                              ===========  ==========  ===========  ==========
				
Diluted earnings per share:				
				
Earnings before 
 extraordinary item        $      0.33  $     0.28  $      1.50  $     1.62
Extraordinary charge - 
    debt retirement                 (0.01)       -           (0.03)      (0.03)
                              -----------  ----------  -----------  ----------
Net earnings                  $      0.32  $     0.28  $      1.47  $     1.59
                              ===========  ==========  ===========  ==========

This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(b) 
(11).
#### JAMES TALCOTT CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. P&D LAND ENTERPRISES, a joint venture consisting of NDI, INC., a Montana corporation, STERLING INVESTMENTS, INC., a Montana Corporation, and BVL/WHITEFISH, a California Corporation, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. 05-103.

Submitted on Briefs January 11, 2005.

Decided June 27, 2006.

Withdrawn August 1, 2006

2006 MT 136.

332 Mont. 368.

ORDER

On June 27, 2006, this Court entered an Opinion in this case, wherein we held, *inter alia,*that P&D Land Enterprises, NDI (hereinafter P&D) owed James Talcott Construction, Inc. (hereinafter Talcott) pre-judgment interest, but not post-judgment interest dating from the date the original judgment was entered, on the sum of $10,000 that was wrongly withheld by P&D from Talcott. Rather, we said that the $10,000 figure would bear interest only from the date that judgment was entered in the district court following remand. Talcott has filed a Petition for Rehearing, seeking reconsideration of this facet of our decision, as well as with respect to our order of remand to the district court on the issue of attorney fees. We find merit in the former argument regarding interest, but not in the latter argument regarding attorney fees. We will amend our opinion to correct our error. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Talcott’s petition for Rehearing is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that our opinion in this case, *Talcott Construction, Inc. v. P&D Land Enterprises,*2006 MT 136, is withdrawn. An amended Opinion will follow.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record, the District Court, the Pacific Reporter and the Montana Reports.

*369DATED this 1st day of August, 2006.

JUSTICES COTTER, WARNER, NELSON, LEAPT!ART and RICE concur.

[New Opinion at 333 Mont. 107]
VI 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4099 

For the relief of Perlat Binaj, Almida Binaj, Erina Binaj, and Anxhela 

Binaj. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 7, 2006 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Perlat Binaj, Almida Binaj, Erina Binaj, 

and Anxhela Binaj. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR PERLAT 

4 BINAJ, ALMIDA BINAJ, ERINA BINAJ, AND 

5 ANXHELA BINAJ. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Perlat Binaj, Almida Binaj, Erina 

9 Binaj, and Anxhela Binaj shall be eligible for issuance of 

10 immigrant visas or for adjustment of status to that of 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 4099 IS

1 aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil2 ing applications for issuance of immigrant visas under sec3 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

4 permanent resident. 

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Perlat Binaj, 

6 Almida Binaj, Erina Binaj, and Anxhela Binaj enter the 

7 United States before the filing deadline specified in sub8 section (c), Perlat Binaj, Almida Binaj, Erina Binaj, and 

9 Anxhela Binaj shall be considered to have entered and re10 mained lawfully in the United States and shall be eligible 

11 for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immi12 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date 

13 of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

15 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap16 plications for issuance of immigrant visas or the applica17 tions for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate 

18 fees not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment 

19 of this Act. 

20 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

21 Upon the granting of immigrant visas or adjustment of 

22 status to that of aliens lawfully admitted for permanent 

23 residence to Perlat Binaj, Almida Binaj, Erina Binaj, and 

24 Anxhela Binaj, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 

25 proper officer to reduce by 4, during the current or next 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 4099 IS

1 following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 

2 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

3 aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 

4 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the 

5 total number of immigrant visas that are made available 

6 to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under section 

7 202(e) of such Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 879 

To make improvements to the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 21, 2005 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To make improvements to the Arctic Research and Policy 

Act of 1984. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Arctic Research and 

5 Policy Amendments Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHAIRPERSON OF THE ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMIS7 SION. 

8 (a) COMPENSATION.—Section 103(d)(1) of the Arctic 

9 Research and Policy Act of 1984 (15 U.S.C. 4102(d)(1)) 

10 is amended in the second sentence by striking ‘‘90 days’’ 
2 

•S 879 IS 

1 and inserting ‘‘, in the case of the chairperson, 120 days, 

2 and, in the case of any other member, 90 days,’’. 

3 (b) REDESIGNATION.—Section 103(d)(2) of the Arc4 tic Research and Policy Act of 1984 (15 U.S.C. 

5 4102(d)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘Chairman’’ and in6 serting ‘‘chairperson’’. 

7 SEC. 3. COMMISSION AWARDS FOR EXCELLENCE IN RE8 SEARCH. 

9 (a) AUTHORITY.—Section 104 of the Arctic Research 

10 and Policy Act of 1984 (15 U.S.C. 4103) is amended— 

11 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub12 section (c); and 

13 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol14 lowing new subsection: 

15 ‘‘(b) COMMISSION AWARDS FOR EXCELLENCE IN RE16 SEARCH.— 

17 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Each year, the Commission 

18 may make a cash award to any person in recognition 

19 of excellence in Arctic research conducted by such 

20 person or outstanding support of Arctic research 

21 provided by such person. 

22 ‘‘(2) AMOUNT.—The amount of a cash award 

23 made to a person under paragraph (1) shall be fixed 

24 by the Commission and shall not exceed $1,000. 
3 

•S 879 IS 

1 ‘‘(3) INELIGIBILITY OF COMMISSION MEM2 BERS.—An individual who is or has been a member 

3 of the Commission shall be ineligible to receive an 

4 award under paragraph (1).’’. 

5 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Section 104 of such 

6 Act, as amended by subsection (a), is further amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘DUTIES OF COMMISSION.—’’ 

8 before ‘‘The Commission’’ in subsection (a); and 

9 (2) by inserting ‘‘REPORT.—’’ before ‘‘Not later 

10 than’’ in subsection (c). 

11 SEC. 4. REPRESENTATION AND RECEPTION ACTIVITIES. 

12 Section 106 of the Arctic Research and Policy Act 

13 of 1984 (15 U.S.C. 4105) is amended— 

14 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

15 (4); 

16 (2) by striking the period at the end of para17 graph (5) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

18 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

19 ‘‘(6) expend for representation and reception 

20 expenses each fiscal year not more than 0.2 percent 

21 of the amounts made available to the Commission 

22 under section 111 for such fiscal year.’’. 

Æ