alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas P. Richards, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-Q of Grey Wolf, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986];  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s quarter ended June 30, 2004 that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 9, 2004 By:  /s/ Thomas P. Richards    Thomas P. Richards    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Tasha M., an Infant. Monroe County Department of Human Services, Respondent; Tracy G.-O., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

Submitted August 3, 2009;

decided October 15, 2009

Reported below, 63 AD3d 1628.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-117]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigations No. 731-TA-1140 (Final)]


Uncovered Innerspring Units From China

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Additional scheduling date for the subject investigations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Effective Date: January 5, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Merrill (202-205-3188), 
Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E 
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 
information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need 
special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact 
the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information 
concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its 
Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for these 
investigations may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective July 30, 2008, the Commission 
established a schedule for the conduct of the final phase of the 
subject investigations (73 FR 49219, August 20, 2008). Subsequently, 
the Department of Commerce extended the date for its final 
determination in the investigation on China to December 19, 2008 (73 FR 
50932, August 29, 2008).\1\ Accordingly, the Commission is, hereby, 
issuing its additional scheduling date with respect to the antidumping 
duty investigation concerning China as follows: A supplemental brief 
addressing only Commerce's final antidumping duty determination is due 
on January 8, 2009. The brief may not exceed five (5) pages in length.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Effective October 21, 2008, Commerce issued its final 
antidumping duty determinations for South Africa (73 FR 62481) and 
Vietnam (73 FR 62479).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For further information concerning these investigations see the 
Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and 
part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

    Authority: These investigations are being conducted under 
authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 
published pursuant to section 207.21 of the Commission's rules.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 5, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E9-117 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Amendment to 1993 Stock Incentive Plan and 2002 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
  
 Section 11 of the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan and 2002 
 Stock Incentive Plan shall be amended to add the following 
 paragraphs at the end thereof: 
  
 If the outstanding shares of Common Stock shall be changed into or exchangeable for a different number or kind of shares of stock or other securities of the Company or another corporation, or cash or other property, whether through
reorganization, reclassification, recapitalization, stock split-up, combination of shares, merger or consolidation, then there shall be substituted for each share of Common Stock subject to any then outstanding stock option, and for each share of
Common Stock which may be issued under the Plan but which is not then subject to any outstanding stock option, the number and kind of shares of stock or other securities into which each outstanding share of the Common Stock shall be so changed or
for which each such share shall be exchangeable, and in the case of outstanding options, the additional number and kind of shares of stock or other securities equivalent to any additional cash or other property received in such transaction.

  
 In case of any adjustment or substitution with respect to
outstanding options as provided for in this Section 11, the aggregate option exercise price for all shares of Common Stock subject to each then outstanding stock option prior to such adjustment or substitution shall continue to be the aggregate
option exercise price for all options on shares of stock or other securities (including any fraction and including any additional shares of stock or other securities equivalent to the cash or other property received in such transaction) to which
such shares shall have been adjusted or which shall have been substituted for such shares. 
  
 * * * *
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RICHARD NEWBERRY,

Appellant,

v.

THE COUNTY OF EL PASO,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00176-CV

Appeal from the

243rd District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019DCV1411)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on its own motion to dismiss this appeal for want of 

jurisdiction and concludes the appeal should dismissed. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want 

of jurisdiction. We further order Appellant pay all costs of this appeal, and this decision be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2020.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

I, Don M. Bailey, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule 15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and

(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 23, 2011



/s/ DON M. BAILEYDon M. Bailey,
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



Name and Jurisdiction of Incorporation



|                                     |  |                  
|------------------------------------ |  | -----------------
|Epicor Software Argentina S.A.       |  | Argentina        
|Epicor Software (Asia) PTE Ltd.      |  | Singapore        
|Epicor Software (Aust) Pty. Ltd.     |  | Australia        
|Epicor Software Canada, Ltd.         |  | Canada           
|Epicor Software Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico           
|Epicor Software (North Asia) Ltd.    |  | Hong Kong        
|Epicor Software Nordic AB            |  | Sweden           
|Epicor Software (Taiwan) Limited     |  | Republic of China
|Epicor Software (UK) Limited         |  | UK               
|Epicor Limited                       |  | UK
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 69 

For the relief of Donald C. Pence. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

For the relief of Donald C. Pence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF OF DONALD C. PENCE. 

4 (a) RELIEF.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall 

5 pay, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise ap6 propriated, to Donald C. Pence, of Sanford, North Caro7 lina, the sum of $31,128 in compensation for the failure 

8 of the Department of Veterans Affairs to pay dependency 

9 and indemnity compensation to Kathryn E. Box, the now10 deceased mother of Donald C. Pence, for the period begin11 ning on July 1, 1990, and ending on March 31, 1993. 
2 

•S 69 IS 

1 (b) LIMITATION ON FEES.—Not more than a total 

2 of 10 percent of the payment authorized by subsection (a) 

3 shall be paid to or received by agents or attorneys for serv4 ices rendered in connection with obtaining such payment, 

5 any contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Any person 

6 who violates this subsection shall be fined not more than 

7 $1,000. 

Æ
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH DUPEROUX,

Appellant,

v.

PHILIPPE SYMONOVICZ,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-784

[February 2, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carlos A. Rodriguez, Judge; L.T. Case No. 18-16018 (14).

Joseph Duperoux, Lauderdale Lakes, pro se.

Philippe Symonovicz of the Law Offices of Philippe Symonovicz, Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1157
CALVIN EARL BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM C. GRIFFIN, JR.; CLIFTON M. EVERETT, JR.; THOMAS S. PAYNE III, Clerk of Court; VICKY EVERETT, Clerk of Superior Court; NATIONSBANK OF NORTH CAROLINA, N.A., Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-150) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, * Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Calvin Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Jerome Murray, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Leslie Calkins O'Toole, Alex John Hagan, SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm thedistrict court's order granting Appellees' motion for summary judgment because the record reveals that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). JT / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R AV I ND E R S I NG H, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74075 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 551- 134 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary16, 2010 ** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R a vi nde rS i ngh, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s uantt o 8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on 

# FI LED FEB 26 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSJ T / Res ea r ch 07- 74075 2 th e d e n ia l o f

am o tio n to r e o p e n . P er ezv. Mukasey , 51 6 F . 3d 77 0, 77 3 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in c o n s tru in g S in g h ’s th ir dm o tio n to r e ope n a s s e e ki ng r e ope ni ng of i t s J anuary26, 2005, or de r , and de ny i ng the m ot i on a s u n tim e lyf

ile dan dn u m b e r - b arr e d . See 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) . S in g h ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s ar e u n a v a ilin g . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 9, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D20-1409 Lower Tribunal No. F97-23350

________________ 

### Yosvany Hernandez, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge. Yosvany Hernandez, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before HENDON, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

1

District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3930

___________

Leland F. Erickson, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Commissioner of the Internal Revenue * District of Minnesota.

Service; District Director, Internal *

Revenue, District of St. Paul; Cassandra * [Unpublished]

Black, Revenue Agent; Rebecca Olson, *

Group Manager, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: June 5, 1997 

 Filed: July 9, 1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Leland F. Erickson appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to quash 1

Internal Revenue Service summonses. After reviewing the record and the parties' 
-2-

submissions, we find that the district court did not clearly err in denying Erickson's

motion. See Fortney v. United States, 59 F.3d 117, 119 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly,

we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The Union Cotton Manufactory *against*Lobdell and another.

Acountindebt tract, may be joined in the t?o£e w!mlara¿ ^judgment^aia^e d1frerent.eas

Causes of action, which admit of the same plea, and of the same judgment, may be joined in the same declaration.

THIS was an action ofdebt. The declaration contained several counts : 1. On a iudgment recovered in this court by the , jo i i i plaintiffs against the defendants; and, *2**Counts for goods sold, money lent and advanced to, and money paid, laid out, and expended for, the defendants, and money had and received. To this declaration there was a general demurrer, and joinder *m*demurrer. - -

*463
      *Cady,*in support of the demurrer.

He cited 1 *Chitty Pl.*197.

*Henry,*contra.

He cited *Gilb. Hist. C. P.*6, 7. 1 *Chitty Pl.*197.

*Per Curiam.*

The rule is *invariable,*that causes of action, which admit of the *same plea*and the *same*judgment, may be joined; but the converse of this proposition is not invariably true. Debt on specialty, or debt on judgment, may be joined with debt on simple contract, although they require different pleas* (1 *Chit. Plead.*197. 2 *Saund.*117. *note*2.)

Judgment for the plaintiffs.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11746 and #11747]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1837-DR), dated 05/12/2009. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         03/25/2009 through 03/28/2009.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         05/12/2009. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/13/2009. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         02/12/2010.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to : U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road,  Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 05/12/2009, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties:  Amite, Greene, Jackson, Lawrence, Lincoln, Simpson, Stone, Walthall, Wayne, Wilkinson. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
4.500Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11746B and for economic injury is 11747B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E9-11882 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 652 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 652

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin 
   Franklin National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the 
 development of an exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the 
                      birth of Benjamin Franklin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
Commemoration Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior may provide a grant to the Franklin 
Institute to--
            (1) rehabilitate the Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
        (including the Franklin statue) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 
        and
            (2) develop an interpretive exhibit relating to Benjamin 
        Franklin, to be displayed at a museum adjacent to the Benjamin 
        Franklin National Memorial.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act $10,000,000.
    (b) Required Match.--The Secretary of the Interior shall require 
the Franklin Institute to match any amounts provided to the Franklin 
Institute under this Act.

            Passed the Senate November 16, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 652

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin 
   Franklin National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the 
 development of an exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the 
                      birth of Benjamin Franklin.
```