alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 13, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22490-22491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11189]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2008-0755; FRL-8900-9]


Texas: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Texas has applied to EPA for final authorization 
of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource 
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant final 
authorization to the State of Texas. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' 
section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the changes by an 
immediate final rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior to the 
immediate final rule because we believe this action is not 
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have 
explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the 
immediate final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
authorization during the comment period, the immediate final rule will 
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose 
this action, we will withdraw the immediate final rule and it will not 
take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final 
rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for 
comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this 
time.

DATES: Send your written comments by June 12, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the 
materials submitted by the State of Texas during normal business hours 
at the following locations: EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, 
Texas 75202-2733, phone number (214) 665-8533; Texas

[[Page 22491]]

Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), 12100 Park S. Circle, 
Austin TX 78753-3087, (512) 239-6079. Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please follow the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the immediate final 
rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
immediate final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations''section 
of this Federal Register.

    Dated: April 22, 2009.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E9-11189 Filed 5-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Name and Jurisdiction of
Incorporation



|                                     |  |                  
|------------------------------------ |  | -----------------
|CRS Retail Technology Group, Inc.    |  | United States    
|Epicor International, Inc.           |  | Bermuda          
|Epicor Retail Solutions, Inc.        |  | Canada           
|Epicor Software Argentina S.A.       |  | Argentina        
|Epicor Software (Asia) PTE Ltd.      |  | Singapore        
|Epicor Software (Aust) Pty. Ltd      |  | Australia        
|Epicor Software Canada, Ltd          |  | Canada           
|Epicor Software Mexico, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico           
|Epicor Software (North Asia) Ltd.    |  | Hong Kong        
|Epicor Software Nordic AB            |  | Sweden           
|Epicor Software (Taiwan) Limited     |  | Republic of China
|Epicor Software (UK) Limited         |  | United Kingdom   
|Epicor Software Venezuela S.A.       |  | Venezuela        
|Epicor Software Deutschland GmbH     |  | Germany          
|Epicor Software (Thailand) Co., Ltd  |  | Thailand         
|Scala Business Solutions N.V.        |  | The Netherlands
Events          

# Advisory Committee on Underride Protection

Wed, 04/24/2024

Share:*Facebook**Twitter**LinkedIn**Mail*

Event Details:

### Location

Virtual Event

----

NHTSA will hold the next virtual public meeting of the Advisory Committee on Underride Protection on **April 24, 2024, from 12:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET.**

**REGISTER NOW -->**

The committee was established to provide advice and recommendations to the Secretary of Transportation on safety regulations to reduce underride crashes and fatalities relating to underride crashes. More information is available on the overview page for the Advisory Committee on Underride Protection.

*NHTSA is committed to providing equal access to this event for all participants. People with disabilities who need accommodations should send a request to**NHTSA.Communication@dot.gov**by March 8, 2024.*
Exhibit (10)(xxvi)



                                             July 12, 1996



Mr. Alvin Wilensky
Chairman of the Board
CV Reit, Inc.
100 Century Blvd.
West Palm Beach, FL  33417

          RE:  Consulting and Advisory Agreement
               ("Advisory Agreement"), dated July
               31, 1992

Dear Mr. Wilensky,

     This letter confirms that the above-referenced Advisory
Agreement between CV Reit, Inc. and Hilcoast Advisory Services,
Inc. is hereby extended through July 31, 1997 under the same
terms and conditions set forth in the Advisory Agreement.


                              Very truly yours,

                                /s/ Jack Jaiven

                              Jack Jaiven
                              Executive Vice President


Agreement Acknowledged:

CV REIT, Inc.

       /s/ Alvin Wilensky
By:______________________________________
    Alvin Wilensky, Chairman of the Board

Dated:    August 8, 1996
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANH VIET THAI

No. 7PA06

(Filed 29 June 2007)

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 175 N.C. App. 249, 623 S.E.2d 89 (2005), finding no prejudicial error in defendant’s conviction which resulted in a judgment entered 28 May 2004 by Judge James E. Lanning in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, but remanding for resentencing. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 May 2007.

*420
      *Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Q. Shanté Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.*

*Isabel Scott Day, Mecklenburg County Public Defender, by Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for defendantappellee.*

PER CURIAM.

To the extent the Court of Appeals ordered remand of defendant’s case for resentencing, we reverse and remand to that court for reconsideration in light of *State v. Blackwell,*361 N.C. 41, 638 S.E.2d 452 (2006), *cert.*denied, -U.S. -, -L. Ed. 2d -, 75 U.S.L.W. 3609 (2007). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned  constitutes and
appoints Richard G. Meise and Richard R. Douglas, and each of them, his true and
lawful   attorney-in-fact   and  agent  with  full  power  of  substitution  and
resubstitution,  for  him  and in his  name,  place  and  stead,  in any and all
capacities,  to sign the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
December 31, 1996,  for filing with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission by
Microtest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to
such  Form  10-K,  and to file  the  same  with all  exhibits  thereto,  and all
documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting to such  attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to all intents and purposes
as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.


         DATED:   February 25, 1997


                                                     /s/  Steven G. Mihaylo
                                                     ----------------------
                                                      Steven G. Mihaylo


STATE OF ARIZONA                    )
                                    ) ss.
County of Maricopa                  )


         On this 25th day of February,  1997, before me, the undersigned  Notary
Public,  personally  appeared  Steven G.  Mihaylo,  known to me to be the person
whose name is  subscribed  to the within  instrument  and  acknowledged  that he
executed the same for the purposes therein contained.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and official seal.


                                                     /s/  Lonnie Barrett
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Notary Public

My commission expires 11-18-97
#### Putnam County Savings Bank, Respondent, v Matthew Mastrantone, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[975 NYS2d 684]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Matthew Mastrantone and Janine Mastrantone appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), entered April 3, 2012, as, upon an order of the same court dated January 5, 2012, granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint, is in favor of the plaintiff and against them.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff met its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by producing the mortgage, the unpaid note, and evidence of the appellants’ default *(see Bank of Smithtown v 219 Sagg Main, LLC,*107 AD3d 654 [2013]; *Solomon v Burden,*104 AD3d 839 [2013]; *Citibank, N.A. v Van Brunt Props., LLC,*95 AD3d 1158 [2012]). In opposition, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact relating to any bona fide defense to foreclosure *(see Bank of Smithtown v 219 Sagg Main, LLC,*107 AD3d at 655; *Solomon v Burden,*104 AD3d at 839-840; *Baron Assoc., LLC v Garcia Group Enters., Inc.,*96 AD3d 793 [2012]). With respect to their affirmative defense of lack of personal jurisdiction on the basis of improper service of process, the appellants failed to move to dismiss the complaint on that ground within 60 days after serving their answer and, therefore, they waived that defense *(see JP Morgan Chase Bank v Munoz,*85 AD3d 1124, 1126-1127 [2011]; CPLR 3211 [e]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                                      319379
<NAME>                        PSC INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-03-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,476
<INVENTORY>                                     18,670
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,726
<PP&E>                                          36,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,631
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                           112
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,767
<SALES>                                        154,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               154,728
<CGS>                                           91,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    287
<INCOME-TAX>                                       105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                182
<DISCONTINUED>                                     571
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 85 

For the relief of Ricke Kaname Fujino of Honolulu, Hawaii. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Ricke Kaname Fujino of Honolulu, Hawaii. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPENSATION PAYMENT. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any 

5 previous order or dismissal of an order, the Secretary of 

6 the Treasury is authorized and directed to pay, out of any 

7 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to 

8 Ricke Kaname Fujino, of Honolulu, Hawaii, in full satis9 faction of all of his claims against the United States for 

10 the taking of property of Ricke Kaname Fujino under 

11 Vesting Order No. 2724 issued under the authority of the 
2 

•S 85 IS

1 Trading with the Enemy Act (50 U.S.C. App. 1 et seq.) 

2 on December 3, 1943, a sum equal to the lesser of— 

3 (1) the fair market value of that property on 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act; or 

5 (2) $8,000,000. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION. 

7 Notwithstanding any contract to the contrary, it shall 

8 be unlawful to pay or deliver to any agent or attorney, 

9 and for any agent or attorney to receive, on account of 

10 services rendered in connection with the claims paid under 

11 section 1, any amount exceeding 10 percent of the amount 

12 so paid. Violation of the provisions of this section is a mis13 demeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $1,000. 

Æ
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice Ford IP Decision 01192021


Download file: Ford IP Decision 01192021
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         100,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     443,000,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (75,000,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             437,400,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 204,100,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               437,400,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,900,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,100,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,700,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,900,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,200,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,700,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,700,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Henry R. Mandell certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant weaknesses and deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: March 22, 2005     /s/ Henry R. Mandell   Henry R. Mandell   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
46
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed November 30 , 2016
. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 16
- 01271
- CV
IN RE METHODIST HOSP ITALS OF DALLAS D/B/A METHODIST RICHARDSON MEDICAL C ENTER , Relator Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 4 Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 004
- 01349
- 2016



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Fillmore Before the Co urt is relator’s November 21, 2016 motion to dismiss for mootness in which relator states that the issue raised in this original proceeding has been resolved by a subsequent
trial court order and is now moot

. We grant the motion, lift the Court’s October 26, 2016 order staying the trial court’s October 20, 2016 order compelling appellant to respond to plaintiff’s interrogatory no. 5, and dismiss this original proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a).

161271F.P05 / Robert M. Fillmore/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
#### Western New York Land Conservancy, Inc., Respondent, v John S. Cullen et al., Appellants.

Decided December 17, 2009

Reported below, 66 AD3d 1461.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.