alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Aisha C., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Eleanor C., Appellant; Leake & Watts Services, Inc., Respondent.

[871 NYS2d 112]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. Hoffman, J.), entered on or about July 25, 2007, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent’s parental rights to the subject child and committed custody of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Administration for Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The finding of permanent neglect was supported by clear and convincing evidence of respondent’s failure to plan for the child’s future, notwithstanding the petitioning agency’s diligent efforts (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; *see Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368 [1984]). The agency referred respondent for alcohol abuse treatment, mental health services and parenting *472skills training, provided letters to assist her in having her name added to the lease on the apartment she shared with her adult son, scheduled weekly visitation, changed the visitation location to accommodate her, and met with her to review her service plan and discuss the importance of compliance *(see Matter of Lady Justice L,*50 AD3d 425 [2008]; *Matter of Gina Rachel L.,*44 AD3d 367 [2007]). Respondent failed to maintain contact with the child through consistent and regular visitation, which alone constitutes permanent neglect *(see Matter of Kimberly Carolyn J.,*37 AD3d 174 [2007], *lv dismissed*8 NY3d 968 [2007]; *Matter of Lamikia Shawn S.,*276 AD2d 279 [2000]). In addition, respondent failed to complete mental health and alcohol abuse programs, attend a parenting skills class, and secure adequate housing after her attempt to be added to her son’s lease proved unsuccessful *(see Lady Justice L., supra; Matter of Racquel Olivia M.,*37 AD3d 279 [2007], *lv denied*8 NY3d 812 [2007]).

A preponderance of the evidence supported the finding that it was in the child’s best interests to terminate respondent’s parental rights and transfer custody and guardianship of the child to the agency and free her for adoption by her foster mother, in whose home she had resided since 2003 and was doing well *(see Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 147-148 [1984]; *Matter of Travis Devon B.,*295 AD2d 205, 205-206 [2002]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
Exhibit 10.22


 


REDACTED


 


AMENDMENT TO ENERGY
MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment (“Amendment”) to Energy Management Agreement is entered
into by and between KGen Hinds LLC (“Owner”) and Fortis Energy Marketing &
Trading GP, successor in interest to The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company
(“Energy Manager”).


 


WHEREAS, Owner and Energy Manager are parties to that certain Energy
Management Agreement dated August 17, 2004 (the “Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to extend the term of the Agreement and
to revise the Monthly Management Fee under the Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement as provided
herein.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the agreements herein made
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as
follows:


 


1.                         Section
2.2, Term, is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“The term of this
Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date, shall continue in effect for
three (3) years from the Effective Date (the “Initial Term”), and shall be
extended for an additional period (“Term Extension”) through and including
August 31, 2010. The parties shall agree on further Term Extensions at least
forty-five (45) days prior to the end of any Term Extension.”


 


2.                         Section
6.1, Management Fees, is amended by adding the following sentence
between the parenthetical phrase, “(the “Monthly Management Fee”)” and the
word, “Payment”:


 


“Notwithstanding the
foregoing, effective as of September 1, 2007, the Monthly Management Fee shall
be equal to the greater of (i) [***] (“Fixed Dollar Portion”) or (ii) [***] of
the monthly Generation Margin.”


 


3.                         Except as
amended hereby, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.


 


 






*** Certain information on this
page has been omitted and filed separately with the SEC.  Confidential treatment has been requested
with respect to the omitted portions.


 


1

















 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Energy Management
Agreement in multiple originals, effective as of July 25, 2007.


 


	
  KGen
  Hinds LLC

  	
  Fortis
  Energy Marketing & Trading GP

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ James H. Sweeney

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ William David Duran

  	
   

  
	
  Name:

  	
  James H. Sweeney III

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  William David Duran

  	
   

  
	
  Title:

  	
  Senior Vice President –
  

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Managing Director

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Energy Management

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Frank Vickers

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Frank Vickers

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Managing Director

  	
   

  



 


2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory McGail GARDNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-7060.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 20, 2006.

Gregory McGail Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Joseph Rossi, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Gregory McGail Gardner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for a credit against his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3585 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Gardner,*No. l:99-cr-00443-TSE (E.D.Va. May 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal *460contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Burton Lamar Turner v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00858

- CR

Trial court case number: 1448052

Trial court: 337th District Court of Harris County

On December 10, 2015, we issued an order, abating the appeal and directing the trial

court to correct the certification of the defendant’s right to appeal. On January 5, 2016, a

supplemental clerk’s record was filed, containing a certification ind icating defendant has the

right to appeal.

We reinstate the appeal on the active docket. Appellant’s brief is due 30 days from the

date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 12, 2016
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2





---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IEA Income Fund VIII on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John Kallas,
Chief Financial Officer and Director of Cronos Capital Corp. (CCC) and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer of the CCC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i)  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                              
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.
|
| |      |  | August 13, 2002                                                                                                                                    

| |                                                                                                                                    |                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
| |                                                                                                                                    | /s/ John Kallas
| |                                                                                                                                   
| | John Kallas
Chief Financial Officer and
Director of Cronos Capital Corp.
(CCC)
Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer of CCC
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

gudapatik2@nih.gov

## Summary

Kaavya graduated from the Georgia Institute of Technology in May 2022 with a Bachelor of Science in Neuroscience and minors in psychology, health, and medical sciences. Her research background is in neuroscience and biomedical engineering. At Georgia Tech, she worked in the Pardue Lab to investigate blast injuries to the brain based on varying helmet configurations used in combat. Additionally, she evaluated signs of Alzheimer’s through the visual system to enable earlier detection and treatment. At the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Florida, Kaavya worked with Dr. Prasanna Vibhute to develop a novel method to biopsy a petrous apex lesion in the brain. Through her experiences as a medical assistant intern at Good Samaritan Health Center and volunteering with Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta throughout college, Kaavya has grown in her dedication to becoming a physician.

## Research Statement

Kaavya is working with Dr. Pravitt Gourh at the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases to investigate scleroderma, a rare autoimmune disease prevalent among African Americans. She aims to understand disease-associated genetic variants using techniques such as RNA-seq. As part of the Health Disparities Unit, the Gourh Lab works to understand scleroderma in a larger context by evaluating environmental and sociological triggers that lead to pathology. 

## Scientific Publications

###             Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats.        

(164).

###             Dependence of visual and cognitive outcomes on animal holder configuration in a rodent model of blast overpressure exposure.        

188().

## Education

**Georgia Institute of Technology**B.S., Neuroscience (2022)

## Experience

**Clinical Researcher**Mayo Clinic (2022)

**Undergraduate Researcher**Pardue Lab, Georgia Institute of Technology (2018-2021)

August 2023

Back to Top
#### American Transit Insurance Company, Appellant, v Maria Marte-Rosario et al., Defendants, and Empire Acupuncture, PC, et al., Respondents.

[974 NYS2d 411]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered December 24, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against defendants Multiple Medical Health Services, EC. and Infinite Chiropractic, PLLC, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion granted, and it is declared that plaintiff owes no coverage duty to said defendants.

Plaintiff established its entitlement to summary judgment by submitting an affidavit of service demonstrating that the notices scheduling independent medical examinations (IMEs), in connection with a no-fault insurance claim filed by Maria MarteRosario, were properly mailed to her and her counsel, and the doctor’s affidavit establishing Marte-Rosario’s failure to appear at the scheduled IMEs *(see American Tr. Ins. Co. v Solorzano,*108 AD3d 449 [1st Dept 2013]). The affidavit of service raised a presumption that a proper mailing occurred, which defendants failed to rebut by submitting a returned letter to Marte-Rosario from her counsel, with the name of her street apparently misspelled; in any event, there is no evidence rebutting the showing that the notices were served on Marte-Rosario’s counsel *(see Matter of Ariel Servs., Inc. v New York City Envtl. Control Bd.,*89 AD3d 415 [1st Dept 2011]). As it is undisputed that MarteRosario’s appearance at scheduled IMEs was a condition precedent to coverage, plaintiff was entitled to deny the claim *(see Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Bayshore Physical Therapy, PLLC,*82 AD3d 559 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 705 [2011]). Defendant Empire Acupuncture, PC (Empire), which has not appealed from the order, requests modification of the order to deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against it and grant Empire’s motion for summary judgment against plaintiff. Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the court’s reference to a *443“default” by Empire does not render the portion of the order pertaining to Empire nonappealable pursuant to CPLR 5511, since Empire opposed plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against it *(see Spatz v Bajramoski,*214 AD2d 436, 436 [1st Dept 1995]). However, although we are empowered to search the record and grant the relief sought by Empire under these circumstances *(see generally Merritt Hill Vineyards v Windy Hgts. Vineyard,*61 NY2d 106 [1984]; *Brewster v FTM Servo, Corp.,*44 AD3d 351 [1st Dept 2007]), we have considered and rejected Empire’s arguments on the merits. Concur — Tom, J.P, Andrias, Friedman, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
Opinion issued October 19, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-21-00290-CV

———————————

KEITH MUSE, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, BERTHA MARIA CABRERA, ESTATE OF 

HUGH T. BALDWIN, HUGHE T. BALDWIN II A/K/A HUGH T. 

BALDWIN, CHRISTOPHER D. BALDWIN, SHAJUANA POPE A/K/A 

SHAJUANA BALDWIN, FREDERICK BALDWIN, BONI ROSS 

THOMPSON A/K/A BONI BALDWIN, IMA INVESTMENTS CASH 

ADVANCE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC, AND 

JALET INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2020-38932

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Keith Muse filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, representing that 
2

the parties reached a settlement agreement resolving their underlying dispute. 

Although the motion does not contain a certificate of conference, it has been on file 

with the Court for more than ten days and appellees have not responded or 

otherwise expressed opposition to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2). No 

cross appeal has been filed and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c).

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 

43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Rivas-Molloy and Guerra.
June 8, 2022              BASIC            

Vittorio Sartorelli, M.D.

|

Laboratory of Muscle Stem Cells and Gene Regulation

|

## Description

Fibro-adipogenic progenitor cells (FAPs) and muscle stem cells (MuSCs) play critical roles in muscle repair and regeneration. Successful isolation of these cells is important to studying their biological functions. Moreover, low yields of FAPs and MuSCs have hindered efforts to understand their biological functions and downstream applications. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), this study describes a new method for simultaneous isolation and culture of pure and viable populations of FAPs and MuSCs derived from mouse muscles. 

## What is exciting about this article?

Sources of muscle stem cells are limited and growing these cells in the lab is currently an inefficient and challenging process. This article describes a new method for the simultaneous isolation of FAPs and MuSCs from adult mice. This method may help overcome the challenges to understanding the biological roles of these cells in muscle regeneration. When applied to human samples, this protocol may aid stem cell therapy for regenerating muscle tissue to treat individuals with muscle injury and debilitating muscular dystrophies.

## How does this fit into the larger NIAMS portfolio?

NIAMS supports research in muscle biology and investigating the causes, treatment, and prevention of musculoskeletal diseases.This article describes a method to isolate and culture MuSCs and FAPs, making them suitable for biological studies and downstream applications. This will help scientists to better understand the role of these two populations in the regeneration of the skeletal muscle in physiological and pathological conditions.

## Grant support

AR041126

Research Areas:
Cell BiologyDevelopmental BiologyMuscle BiologyStem Cell Biology

CORE Facilities:

Flow Cytometry Section

Reference:

###             FACS-isolation and Culture of Fibro-Adipogenic Progenitors and Muscle Stem Cells from Unperturbed and Injured Mouse Skeletal Muscle.        

(184).

Research reported in this publication was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIHʼs National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases.

Previous

See All Advances

Next

## Recent Advances

Selected recent highlights of NIAMS intramural research:

October 3, 2023

The Transcription Factor STAT4 Controls the Fate of Cytotoxic Innate Lymphocytes

September 26, 2023

Genetic Variants of PLCG2 Cause Immune Dysregulation Through Either Increased or Decreased Function

September 26, 2023

The Microbiomes of People with Recombination-Activating Gene (RAG) Deficiency Have Distinct Features, Including Antimicrobial Resistance Signatures 

September 23, 2023

Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Trigger Pathogenic Inflammation and Bone Loss in Periodontitis

September 22, 2023

Possible Mechanism of a Rare Bone Overgrowth Disease Identified

Back to Top
s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 12, 2015

No. 04-15-00127-CV

EL CABALLERO RANCH, INC, et al,

Appellant

v.

GRACE RIVER RANCH, L.L.C.,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-04-00108-CVL

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellants filed a “Motion for Emergency Stay of Temporary Injunction Challenged in 

Interlocutory Appeal” on March 11, 2015, requesting that the enforcement of the injunctive relief 

granted in the trial court’s “Partial Summary Judgment” order signed on March 3, 2015 be stayed 

pending resolution of this interlocutory appeal. The trial court’s order expressly states that it is 

effective on March 13, 2015. After due consideration, appellants’ motion to stay is GRANTED. 

The enforcement of the injunctive relief granted in the trial court’s “Partial Summary Judgment”

order signed on March 3, 2015 is STAYED pending resolution of this interlocutory appeal or 

further order of the Court. TEX. R. APP. P. 29.3.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of March, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED, PURSUANT
                             TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned executive officers of the registrant hereby certify that
this Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained herein fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant.


                                           Parkvale Financial Corporation

Dated: February 17, 2004

                                           By: /s/ Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Robert J. McCarthy, Jr.
                                               Director, President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer


                                       22
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Name and Jurisdiction of Incorporation



|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |                                                                                                                 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|CRS Retail Technology Group, Inc. Epicor Software
Argentina S.A. Epicor Software (Asia) PTE Ltd. Epicor Software
(Aust) Pty. Ltd. Epicor Software Canada, Ltd. Epicor Software
Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Epicor Software (North Asia) Ltd. Epicor
Software Nordic AB Epicor Software (Taiwan) Limited Epicor
Software (UK) Limited Scala Business Solutions N.V. |  | United States Argentina Singapore Australia Canada Mexico Hong Kong Sweden Republic of
China UK The Netherlands |  |
#### In the Matter of Afton C., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Dutchess County Department of Social Services, Appellant; James C. et al., Respondents. (And Four Other Proceedings.)

Submitted February 14, 2011;

decided February 17, 2011

Motion by Chemung County Department of Social Services for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### James Drummond, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Decided January 19, 2010

Reported below, 2009 NY Slip Op 86835CU).

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601).