alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [CO-922-09-1310-FI; COC69437] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of oil and gas lease COC69437 from Westcliff Resources, LLC, for lands in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Milada Krasilinec, Land Law Examiner, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at 303-239-3767. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessee has agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $5.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee has paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessee has met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Section 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral  Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease COC69437 effective August 1, 2008, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                 

Dated: January 14, 2009. 

Milada Krasilinec, 

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. E9-1188 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Justin C. Collier, Appellant.

[961 NYS2d 803]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), rendered January 23, 2012, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

s0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

144190

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144190

COA: 305176

Monroe CC: 98-029618-FH;

99-030238-FH

DERRICK MITCHELL-EL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 7, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"National Intelligence University","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu","author_name":"ray.x.villarreal@odni.gov","author_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/author\/ray-x-villarrealodni-gov\/","title":"NIU History","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eOemHBY0Lx\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/niu-history\/\">NIU History<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/niu-history\/embed\/#?secret=eOemHBY0Lx\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“NIU History” — National Intelligence University\" data-secret=\"eOemHBY0Lx\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 13 (Thursday, January 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 4037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1195]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 16, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston, Massachusetts 02106-2204:
    1. NewStar Financial, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of 
Southern Commerce Bank, National Association, Tampa, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 15, 
2009.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-1195 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


         The Board of Directors and Stockholders
         Fritz Companies, Inc.:

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
         (No. 33-78472), (No. 33-57238), (No. 33-93070), (No. 333-15921) and
         (No. 333-07639) on Forms S-8 and (No. 33-70674) on Form S-4 of Fritz
         Companies, Inc. of our report dated June 28, 2000 relating to the
         consolidated balance sheets of Fritz Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries
         as of May 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related consolidated statements of
         operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash
         flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
         May 31, 2000, and the related schedule, which report appears in the
         May 31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Fritz Companies, Inc.







                                                                   /s/ KPMG LLP
         San Francisco, California
         August 8, 2000


<PAGE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent-Appellant, v Santos Quinto, Appellant-Respondent.

Submitted December 20, 2010;

decided January 6, 2011

*729Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn W.L. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant-respondent on the appeal herein.
#### In the Matter of Anthony Correnti, Appellant, v Albert Prack, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[962 NYS2d 829]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connolly, J.), entered July 10, 2012 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review that part of a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision finding petitioner guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting solicitation.

The underlying facts of this case are more fully set out in our prior decision in this matter (93 AD3d 970 [2012]). Briefly, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating facility correspondence procedures and soliciting sex acts. At the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner pleaded guilty to the facility correspondence violation and was found guilty of solicitation. Petitioner’s administrative appeal was unsuccessful, prompting him to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging only that part of the determination finding him guilty of solicitation. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding following joinder of issue, and petitioner now appeals.

Petitioner contends in his petition that his actions in writing to a non-inmate are not encompassed by the rule prohibiting solicitation and that, to the extent the rule does include such conduct, it runs afoul of the First Amendment. Respondent concedes, and we agree, that the determination finding petitioner guilty of soliciting a sex act cannot be sustained. Inasmuch as a loss of good time was imposed, the matter must *1241be remitted to the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision for a redetermination of the penalty imposed *(see Matter of Linnen v Prack,*92 AD3d 986, 987 [2012], *lv dismissed*20 NY3d 905 [2012]).

Peters, P.J., Mercure, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, petition granted and matter remitted to the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             898,153
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      181,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,068,163
<PP&E>                                              27,177
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,095,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              191,489
<BONDS>                                             13,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            54,032
<OTHER-SE>                                         836,917
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,095,340
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    14,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     10,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 10,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        10,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF
THE TRUSTEE*
OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 1
to the Trusts financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September
16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from
generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other
royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:
    Lee Ann AndersonTitle:
    Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: May 11, 2009 
 *
    
    The Trust has no executive officers.
##### 



Exhibit 23.2 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  KPMG LLP The Board of Directors
Uroplasty, Inc.: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements (Nos. 333-107110 and
333-30372) on Form S-8 of Uroplasty, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated July 26, 2004, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Uroplasty, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive
loss and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the March 31, 2005, annual
report on Form 10-KSB of Uroplasty, Inc. /s/ KPMG LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 29, 2005
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chiu M. Chan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: July 30, 2004



/s/    CHIU M. CHANChiu M. ChanPresident and Chief Executive Officer Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.
#### Petra A. JULIO, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2006-3336.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Sept. 22, 2006.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kurt R. Kneip, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Inter-Tel, Incorporated.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation, andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing equivalent functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: August 6, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ Kurt R. KneipName:
    
    Kurt R. KneipTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2007-4
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-4


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an
officer of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans
Servicing LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant
to Section 3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                    Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
##### 



EXHIBIT 99(a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned, Alan J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President
and Chief Executive Officer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the Company), has
executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 28, 2002 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of November, 2002.

/s/ Alan J.
Lacy
Alan J. Lacy
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer