alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         146,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    570,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               800,060
<PP&E>                                       1,057,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                 770,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,260,546
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          449,491
<BONDS>                                        170,532
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       161,770
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,834)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,260,546
<SALES>                                        265,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               620,917
<CGS>                                          266,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,538,938
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (915,519)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (915,519)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (915,519)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip S. Chan, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                                                            
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 21, 2006 |  | /s/ Philip S. Chan                                                                         
|                         |  | Philip S. Chan Vice President  Finance and Chief
Financial Officer Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.
EXHIBIT 24.2

                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned  constitutes and appoints
Vince  Hren his true and  lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent with full power of
substitution  and  resubstitution,  for him/her and in his/her name,  place, and
stead, in any and all capacities,  to sign the Annual Report on Form 10K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, for filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission by Microtest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all
amendments to such Form 10K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and
all  documents  in  connection  therewith,  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission,  granting to such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them,
full  power  and  authority  to do and  perform  each and  every  act and  thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming  all that such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


DATED: 3/26/99

                                                  /s/  Roger C. Ferguson
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Roger C. Ferguson
950 A.2d 86

#### In re ADOPTION/GUARDIANSHIP OF TRACY K.

No. 139,

Sept. Term, 2007.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

June 11, 2008.

George E. Meng (Meñg & Alpert, LLC, on brief), Upper Marlboro, for appellant.

David K. Hayes, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen., on brief), Baltimore, for appellee.

Argued before BELL, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE, MURPHY, IRMA S. RAKER (Retired, Specially Assigned), and DALE R. CATHELL (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.

PER CURIAM

ORDER

For reasons to be stated later in an opinion to be filed, it is this 11th day of June, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the judgment of the Orphans’ Court for Prince George’s County be, and it is hereby, affirmed. Costs to be waived. Mandate to be issued forthwith.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7049

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LESLIE DIANE GIBSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-96-30056, CA-99-694-7)

Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 28, 2001

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leslie Diane Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Leslie Diane Gibson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. United States v. Gibson, Nos. CR-96-30056; CA99-694-7 (W.D. Va. May 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 99.1**

**AGGREGATE      SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS**

|   | Class  |   Interest | Principal      | Losses   | Ending Balance       |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------|----------------|----------|----------------------|--------|
|   | I-A-1  | 5,051,123.16    | 21,778,805.34  | -        |  93,221,194.67  |   |
|   | I-A-2  | 7,512,737.90    | 33,680,448.99  | -        |  144,164,551.00 |   |
|   | I-A-3  | 318,629.66      | -              | -        |  153,776,061.48 |   |
|   | I-A-4  | 500,877.36      | 2,245,489.51   | -        |  9,611,510.48   |   |
|   | I-A-R  | 0.55            | 100.00         | -        | -                    |   |
|   | II-A-1 | 997,376.24      | 5,615,686.27   | -        |  17,263,313.74  |   |
|   | II-A-2 | 66,523.72       | 374,559.08     | -        |  1,151,440.92   |   |
|   | B-1    | 561,972.34      | 37,140.41      | -        |  11,371,859.58  |   |
|   | B-2    | 172,941.10      | 11,429.57      | -        |  3,499,570.43   |   |
|   | B-3    | 129,693.49      | 8,571.36       | -        |  2,624,428.63   |   |
|   | B-4    | 86,445.90       | 5,713.16       | -        |  1,749,286.84   |   |
|   | B-5    | 69,156.74       | 4,570.53       | -        |  1,399,429.47   |   |
|   | B-6    | 60,534.38       |  4,001.10 | 1,792.79 |  1,223,355.90   |   |
**R E P O R T   O N   A S S E S S M E N T   O F   C O M P L I A N C E   W I T H****1 1 2 2 ( d ) ( 2 ) ( v i ) ,    1 1 2 2 ( d ) ( 4 ) ( x i )   a n d    1 1 2 2 ( d ) ( 4 ) ( x i i )****o f   R E G U L A T I O N   A B   S E R V I C I N G   C R I T E R I A****F O R   T H E   R E P O R T I N G   P E R I O D****J A N U A R Y   1 ,   2 0 0 7   T O   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,   2 0 0 7**American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (formerly, "Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.") (collectively, the "Asserting Party") is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth in 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing  activities it performs with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "P latform Transactions"). The Asserting Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of noncompliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. Specifically, the Asserting Party did not have, during the Reporting Period, sufficient policies and procedures to capture the information with respect to the Platform Transactions necessary to determine compliance with 1122(d)(4)(xii). The Asserting Party has concluded that, with the exception of the aforementioned material instance of noncompliance, the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period. **American Security Insurance Company Standard Guaranty Insurance Company TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.**(formerly, "Safeco Financial Institution Solutions, Inc.") /s/ John Frobose By: John Frobose Senior Vice President Date: February 19, 2008
Opinion issued October 1 9 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 21
- 00290
- CV

——————————— KEITH MUSE , Appella nt

V. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, BERTHA MARIA CABRERA, ESTATE OF HUGH T . BALDWIN, HUGHE T. BALDW I N II A/K/A HUGH T. BALDWIN, CHRISTOPHER D. BALDWIN, SHAJUANA POPE A/K/A SHAJUANA BALDWIN, FREDERICK BALDWIN, BONI ROSS THOMPSON A / K /

A BONI BALDWIN, IMA INVESTMENTS CASH ADVANCE CAPITAL INVESTMENTS LLC , AND JALET INVESTMENTS, LLC , Appel l e e s
On Appeal from the 61st Distr ict Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2020
- 38932

MEMORANDU M OPINION Appellant Keith Muse fi led a motion to dismiss h i s app e a l , representing that2

the parties r eached a settlement agree ment resolvi n g their u nderlying dispute

. Although the motion does not contain a certif icate of conference , it has been on file
with the Court f

or more than ten days and a ppellee s ha ve not responded or
otherw i se expresse d oppositio n to the motion. S ee T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 10.3(a)(2 )

. No cross appeal has been filed an d no opinion has issued

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42. 1 ( c )

. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 42 .1( a)(1), 43.2(f )

. We d ismiss any p en d i ng motions as moot. P ER CURIA M
Pa nel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Ju stice s Rivas

- Molloy and Guerra.
<PAGE>   1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors
Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report incorporated herein by reference in the
registration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-12035) and on Form S-8 (No.
33-98168) on the consolidated balance sheets of Spatializer Audio Laboratories,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which
report appears in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of
Spatializer  Audio Laboratories, Inc.

                                                     /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 15, 1998
Ralph Baughman
                         International Fumigators, Inc.
                                 P.O. Box 263550
                             Houston, TX 77207-3550


September 24, 2004


Board of Directors
eFoodSafety.com, Inc.
1370 St. George Circle
Prescott, AZ 86301


To the Board of Directors:

         I, Ralph  Baughman,  Director  hereby  inform the Board of Directors of
eFoodSafety.com,  Inc.  that as of this date I resign  from the Board  effective
immediately.

         I wish everyone the best of luck in their future endeavors.


Very truly yours,




/s/
Ralph Baughman





cc:      Clarence W. Karney via facsimile
         Richard  Speidell via facsimile
         Pat Gruden via facsimile
         Bill Nelson via facsimile
         Robert Bowker via facsimile
         Mark Taggatz via facsimile
         Berkshire Capital via facsimile
#### Alejandro Rosa, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted October 13, 2009;

decided November 24, 2009

Reported below, 63 AD3d 1383.

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it is untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [a]). Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20814

craig.barr@nih.gov

July 2020

Back to Top
EXHIBIT 31.1
IEA Income Fund VIII
Rule 13a-14 CERTIFICATION
     I, Dennis J. Tietz, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IEA Income Fund VIII (the“Partnership”);
     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the Partnership as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;
     4. The other certifying officer of Cronos Capital Corp. (“CCC”), the General Partner of thePartnership, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Partnership and wehave:
          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Partnership, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;and
          (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, based on our evaluation; and
          (c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Partnership’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Partnership’s most recent fiscal quarter (thePartnership’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financialreporting.
     5. CCC’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the Partnership’s auditors and the Audit Committeeof Partnership’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
          (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thePartnership’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
          (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005   /s/ DENNIS J TIETZ     Dennis J Tietz  President of CCC  (Chief Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 775 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 775

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 29, 2005

             Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 123 W. 7th Street in Holdenville, Oklahoma, as the ``Boone Pickens 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOONE PICKENS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 123 W. 7th Street in Holdenville, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Boone Pickens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Boone 
Pickens Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate June 29, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
EXHIBIT 15


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington D.C.  20549

RE:           Lund International Holdings, Inc.
              Registrations on Form S-8


We are aware that our report dated October 30, 1998 on our reviews of the
interim consolidated financial information of Lund International Holdings, Inc.
(the Company) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 1998 and
1997, and included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine
months ended September 30, 1998, is incorporated by reference in the Company's
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-46263, 33-64083 and
33-37160). Pursuant to Rule 436(c), under the Securities Act of 1933, this
report should not be considered part of the Registration Statements prepared or
certified by us within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 of that Act.



                                             /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                             PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 16, 1998
##### 



Exhibit 10.16

Consulting Agreement between Uroplasty, Inc. and Executive Advisory Group (EAG)
dated April 1, 2003.

CONSULTING AGREEMENT

The following contains the terms of the Executive Advisory Group (EAG)
consulting agreement with Uroplasty, Inc. (the Company), which shall be for a
period of one (1) year effective as of April 1, 2003 and supersedes all other
understandings between them:

1.     EAG shall perform Services for and on behalf of the Company, as directed by
the Company and which are generally described in Exhibit A.

2.     In rendering Services to the Company, EAG shall act as an independent
contractor and not as an employee of the Company. EAG will pay all taxes and be
responsible for all employer obligations.

3.     EAGs compensation for rendering Services to the Company is set forth in
Exhibit B.

4.     The Company or EAG may terminate this Agreement after one (1) year from the
effective date upon ninety (90) days written notice.The Agreement can be
renewed Sixty (60) days prior to each anniversary date for additional one year
periods.

5.     This Agreement may only be amended or waived in writing. No failure or
delay in enforcing any right will be deemed a waiver.

Executive Advisory Group
7913 Wyoming CT.
Bloomington, MN. 55438

|                        |  |              
|----------------------- |  | -------------
|                        |  | April 1, 2003
|                        |  | Date         
|Sam B. Humphries        |  |              
|President               |  |              
|                        |  |              
|ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO: |  |              
|                        |  |              
|Uroplasty, Inc.         |  |              
|                        |  |              
|By: Daniel G. Holman    |  | April 1, 2003
|                        |  | Date         
|Its: CEO                |  |              

Page 46





---



##### 



EXHIBIT A

Description of Services

In general the work that will be performed by EAG will include:

1. General management advice and guidance
2. Strategic and tactical planning,
3. Financing activities
4. Business development
5. Organizational development
6. Clinical and regulatory support,
7. Board and investor relations strategy

During the term of this agreement, EAG will directly interface and obtain
direction from the CEO of the Company.

EXHIBIT B

EAG will be compensated for consulting services as follows:

1. A consulting fee of $ 4,000.00/mo., which will cover approximately two days per month.

2. Additional time, if needed, will result in additional compensation based on discussion and prior agreement with the CEO of the company.

3. A stock option grant of 50,000 shares.

4. Reimbursement for all reasonable expenses incurred.

> Consulting fees will be paid quarterly, on the first day of each quarter,
beginning April 1, 2003

Page 47
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-73112 on FormS-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-126928, 333-126929, 333-112175, 333-49297, 333-51795,333-43572, 333-41964, 333-69301, 333-63627, 333-61369, 333-88399, 333-80829, 333-54024, 333-71404,333-66586, 333-99611, 333-91422, 333-110257, 333-41337 and 333-121740 on Form S-8 of our reportsdated February 28, 2006, relating to the 2005 and 2004 financial statements and financial statementschedule of McAfee, Inc. and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, (which report expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness), appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of McAfee, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPSan Jose, California