alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Barry McLENDON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-6661.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 31, 2006.

Decided: Nov. 3, 2006.

John Barry McLendon, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Scott Broyles, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

John Barry McLendon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and his motion for reconsideration filed under Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e). The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McLendon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**THETRUSTEE***

**OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 andfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joshua R. Peterson, Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Compass Bank, on behalf of Compass Bank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust(the “Trust”),* not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (as explained in Note 1 to the Trust’s financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, FinancialStatements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust. 

 
COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THESAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy: /s/ Joshua R. PetersonName: Joshua R. PetersonTitle: Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: August 9, 2018
* The Trust has no executive officers. 
**
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 789 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 789

    To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Device panel 
      assemblies for use in Liquid Crystal Device projection type 
                              televisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 2005

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
        referred to the Committee on FinanceYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on Liquid Crystal Device panel 
      assemblies for use in Liquid Crystal Device projection type 
                              televisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIQUID CRYSTAL DEVICE PANEL ASSEMBLIES FOR PROJECTION 
              TELEVISIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.22        Liquid Crystal Device   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           (LCD) panel                                                       31/08            ''
                           assemblies for use in                                                               .
                           Liquid Crystal Device
                           projection type
                           televisions (provided
                           for in subheading
                           9013.80.90)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11720 and #11721]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Indiana (FEMA-1832-DR), dated 04/22/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         03/08/2009 through 03/14/2009.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         05/13/2009.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/22/2009.                     

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/22/2010.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Indiana, dated 04/22/2009 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster: 

*Primary Counties:*                     (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Daviess, Lawrence, St Joseph.                

*Contiguous Counties:*                     (Economic Injury Loans Only):                

Indiana: Dubois, Greene, Jackson, Knox, Martin, Monroe, Orange, Pike, Washington.

Michigan: Cass.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11880 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6907
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY VANZETTI THOMAS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-87-175-A) Submitted: October 24, 1995 Decided: May 24, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Vanzetti Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas , No. CR-87-175-A (E.D. Va. May 3, 1995). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      23,100,628
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  941,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,725,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,677,590
<PP&E>                                     145,330,557
<DEPRECIATION>                              35,949,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             205,987,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,033,834
<BONDS>                                    103,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   103,652,658
<OTHER-SE>                                (33,265,420)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               205,987,898
<SALES>                                     30,714,472
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           236,041,996
<CGS>                                       32,250,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              119,464,148
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           141,841,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,838,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (34,263,849)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   794,188
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (35,058,037)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (35,058,037)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.79)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Michael Huddy, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of International Barrier Technology Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Michael Huddy Michael Huddy President/CEO September 28, 2007
#### In the Matter of Sonya Latimore (Admitted as Sonya Whitten Latimore), a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Respondent.

Submitted December 21, 2009;

decided January 14, 2010

Reported below, 2009 NY Slip Op 74563(U).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
The District Court of the 7th Judicial District. County of Dawson.

#### *9STATE OF MONTANA, vs. Plaintiff, ROBERT HOPE, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-09-002 DECISION

On September 2, 2009, the defendant was sentenced as follows: Counts I - Ill: Ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison on each Count, to run consecutively with each other and with Count IV, for the offenses of Sexual Intercourse Without Consent, felonies; and Count IV: Fifteen (15) years in the Montana State Prison, to ran consecutively with Counts I - III, for the offense of Sexual Intercourse Without Consent, a felony.

On February 4, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 4th day of February, 2010.

DATED this 23rd day of February, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Hon. Ray Dayton, and Alternate Member Hon. John Warner.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, César M. Garcia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2007 
|                       
|/s/ CÉSAR M. GARCÍA    
|César M. García        
|Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 839 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                        Calendar No. 77
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 839

 To repeal the law that gags doctors and denies women information and 
        referrals concerning their reproductive health options.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 19, 2005

Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                             April 20, 2005

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To repeal the law that gags doctors and denies women information and 
        referrals concerning their reproductive health options.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Reproductive Health 
Information Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROVISION.

    Section 508(d) of division F of Public Law 108-447 is hereby 
repealed.




                                                        Calendar No. 77

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 839

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To repeal the law that gags doctors and denies women information and 
        referrals concerning their reproductive health options.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 20, 2005

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar`
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               (7,400)
<SECURITIES>                                         70,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                        234,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7,900
<INVENTORY>                                          571,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     933,600
<PP&E>                                               4,241,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,860,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       3,485,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                351,000
<BONDS>                                              656,800
<COMMON>                                             101,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           1,224,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         3,485,200
<SALES>                                              1,269,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,269,000
<CGS>                                                929,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,043,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     78,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   25,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      121,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                         44,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  77,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      8,100
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         69,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .73


</TABLE>