alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             290
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,849
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,906
<PP&E>                                         148,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,773
<BONDS>                                         24,002
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           117
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,132
<SALES>                                         39,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,344
<CGS>                                           11,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    326
<INCOME-TAX>                                       101
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       225
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
#### Caldwell v. Branch

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 107 (2 January 2007)

No. 077P07

Def’s (Branch) PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA06-94)

Denied 11/08/07
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

farooqus@mail.nih.gov 

October 2022

Back to Top
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection  with the Annual Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Arthur I.  Trueger,  as Executive
Chairman of the registrant,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.

Date:  March 31, 2008                            By:    /s/  Arthur I. Trueger

                                                        Arthur I. Trueger
                                                        Executive Chairman
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 31, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 31, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0544. IN THE INTEREST OF L.P., A CHILD (FATHER) .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

1800083 1800134
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

oneillcg@nih.gov

## Summary

Christopher O’Neill received a B.A. in Biology and Music at the University of Virginia. As an undergraduate, he researched the role of programmed death-1 (PD-1) as expressed by regulatory T cells (Tregs) and its effects on other immune and nonimmune cells during acute kidney injury (AKI). Christopher currently works as a Postbaccalaureate IRTA Fellow in the Laboratory of Skin Biology at the NIAMS, studying the cellular and molecular dynamics underlying dysregulated wound healing. In the future, he intends to pursue a medical degree.

## Research Statement

Chronic nonhealing wounds are complex, multifactorial diseases that affect over 6.5 million people annually in the U.S. alone. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), a common complication of diabetes, are a leading cause of lower-limb amputations worldwide. Christopher’s research focuses on using genomics, mouse, and human models to determine the transcriptional networks and mechanisms by which SRY-box transcription factor 2 (SOX2) reverses this complication. The goal is to identify novel therapeutic targets that can reprogram DFUs into healing-competent wounds.

## Education

**University of Virginia**B.A., Biology and Music (2021)

## Experience

**Undergraduate Researcher, Dr. Rahul Sharma**University of Virginia, VA (2019-2021)

October 2022

Back to Top
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-1148

ALLAN G. EDWARDS, JR.,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

GLEN A. BARTON, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Richard G. Stearns, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Boudin, Chief Judge,

Selya and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

Allan G. Edwards, Jr. on brief pro se.

Louis M. Ciavarra, James P. Hoban and Bowditch & Dewey, LLP,

on brief for appellees.

September 26, 2001
Per Curiam. Appellant Allan G. Edwards, Jr. appeals

from the dismissal of his complaint filed against

Caterpillar Corporation, the Chairman and C.E.O. of

Caterpillar, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, and

three employees of Caterpillar Financial Services. After

carefully reviewing the record and the briefs of the

parties, we affirm the judgment of the district court for

essentially the reasons stated in its Memorandum and Order,

dated November 28, 2000. We add only that there is clearly

no specific personal jurisdiction over any of the appellees

– the events in question in the appellant's suit all

occurred at distant locations – and that the record

contains no facts upon which a claim of general personal

jurisdiction might be premised.

Affirmed. See Local Rule 27(c).
Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition Dismissed as Moot ,

Motion to Stay Denied as Moot, and Memorandum Opinion filed September 25 , 2014

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00711

- CR
NO. 14

- 14

- 00712

- CR

IN RE KHAI LE , Relator

OR IGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND WRIT OF PROHIBITION

County Criminal Court at Law No

. 13 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1881713



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 3 , 2014, relator Khai Le filed a petition for writ of mandamus
and writ of prohibition in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator seeks relief by a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable Don Smyth, presiding judge of the County Criminal Court at Law2

Number 13 of Harris Cou nty, to vacate a directive issued by the Harris County District Clerk purportedly recalling the entry of an order dismissing the underlying proceedings. Relator further seeks relief by a writ of prohibition to prevent Judge Smyth from taking any additional action s in the underlying proceedings. Also on September 3 , 2014, relator filed a motion to stay the underlying proceedings, pending the disposition of her petition by this court.
On September 9, 2014, Judge Smyth signed an order withdrawing the challenge d directive. In that order, Judge Smyth further stated that all pleadings and actions taken in the underlying proceedings following the trial court’s order
dated February 18, 2014 dismissing the case are void for want of jurisdiction. Judge Smyth’s Septemb er 9 order renders moot relator’s request for mandamus and prohibition relief i n this court. Accordingly, we dismiss as moot relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and writ of prohibition. We further deny as moot relator’s motion to stay the underlying pr oceedings.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Donovan

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### Raymond Sturino, Respondent, v Nino Tripicchio & Son Landscaping et al., Appellants.

Submitted December 14, 2009;

decided January 19, 2010

Reported below, 65 AD3d 1327.

*936Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 384 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]






                                                         Calendar No. 6
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 384

 To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial 
       Government Records Interagency Working Group for 2 years.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2005

Mr. DeWine (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and ordered to be placed on the 
                                calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial 
       Government Records Interagency Working Group for 2 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF WORKING GROUP.

    Section 802(b)(1) of the Japanese Imperial Government Disclosure 
Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-567; 114 Stat. 2865) is amended by striking 
``4 years'' and inserting ``6 years''.




                                                         Calendar No. 6

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 384

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial 
       Government Records Interagency Working Group for 2 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 15, 2005

          Read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar`
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. George Klaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/L. George Klaus
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | L. George Klaus        
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, Michael A. Piraino, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 31, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael A. Piraino
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Michael A. Piraino                                                                               
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
JPMMT 2007-A2 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS MASTER SERVICER 1123 CERTIFICATION **Re: Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series****2007-IQ13**Pursuant to the pooling and servicing agreement, the undersigned Officer, to the best of his/her knowledge, hereby certifies to the following obligations as set forth in Item 1123 of Regulation AB applicable to it: (A) a review of such party's activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof and of such party's performance under this Agreement, or such other applicable agreement in the case of a Servicing Function Participant, has been made under such officer's supervision and, (B) to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such party has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement, in all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and Certificate Registrar __/s/: Karen R. Beard_________ Name:  Karen R. Beard Title:    Vice President Date: March 1, 2008
#### State v. Sings

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 162

No. 169P07

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA06-554)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. _

2. Allowed 08/23/07

3. Denied 08/23/07
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

I, Robert L. Cavnar, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Mission Resources Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
    registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
        to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
        including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
        within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
        report is being prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
        of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
        over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
        recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
        case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
        likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
        financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
    the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting.

August 12, 2003

/s/ Robert L. Canvar
-------------------------------
Robert L. Cavnar
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                            |                        | Doing      Business                             |
|-------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
| Subsidiary                                      | State of      Incorporation | under the Following      Names                  |
|                                            |                        |                                            |
|                                            |                        |                                            |
| Sign      Builders of America,      Inc.        | Delaware                    | Sign      Builders of America, Inc.             |
|                                            |                        |                                            |
| Applied      Nanotech, Inc.                     | Delaware                    | Applied      Nanotech, Inc.                     |
|                                            |                        |                                            |
|                                            |                        |                                            |
| Electronic      Billboard Technology,      Inc. | Delaware                    | Electronic      Billboard Technology,      Inc. |
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOSEPH WIENDL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4527 ) 2D19-145 STEPHANIE WIENDL, ) ) CONSOLIDATED Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 13, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Wesley D. Tibbals, Judge. Joseph Wiendl, pro se. Robert M. Brush of Brush & Coyle, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
National Intelligence University
						The Center of Academic Life for the Intelligence Community
																									About UsMenu Toggle
Office of the President
	Board of Visitors
	Vision and Mission
	Locations
	Accreditation
	NIU History
AcademicsMenu Toggle
Degrees
	Certificate in Intelligence Studies
	Schools
AdmissionsMenu Toggle
Apply Here
	Admission FAQs
StudentsMenu Toggle
Academic Calendar
	Academic Catalog
	NIU Library
	Graduation Information
	Student Senate
	Blackboard Login
	NIU Online Store
ResearchMenu Toggle
Caracristi Institute
	Caracristi Monographs
	Intelligence Jumpstart Podcast
	NI Press
	NIU Library
	Research Fellows Program
AlumniMenu Toggle
NIU Online Store
	Thesis Requests
	Transcript Requests
Contact Us
				Search for:
		Search
			Search 
National Intelligence University
						The Center of Academic Life for the Intelligence Community
																									Main Menu StudentsPromotional Video
				
				Check out the video to learn more about who we are.
		Academic Resources
				
				Explore the tools, that are designed to help you thrive both in and outside of the classroom.
		U-View Login
				Blackboard Login
				Academic Calendar
				Academic Catalog
		Contact Us
				NIU Library
				Facebook
				LinkedIn
		6-38-TO1036
 About UsMenu Toggle
Office of the President
	Board of Visitors
	Accreditation
	Vision and Mission
	Location
	History
AcademicsMenu Toggle
Degree
	Certificate Of Intelligence Studies
	Schools
AdmissionsMenu Toggle
Apply here
	Admissions FAQs
StudentsMenu Toggle
Academic Calendar
	Academic Catalog
	NIU Library
	Graduation Information
	Student Senate
	Blackboard Login
	NIU Online Store
ResearchMenu Toggle
Caracristi Institute
	Caracristi Monographs
	Intelligence JumpStart Podcast
	NI Press
	NIU Library
AlumniMenu Toggle
NIU Online Store
	Thesis Requests
	Transcript Request
Contact Us
 Quick Links:Apply Now2023/24 NIU Academic Catalog
Academics:Bachelor of Science in Intelligence DegreeMaster of Science of Strategic IntelligenceMaster of Science and Technology Intelligence DegreeCertificate in Intelligence Studies
School:College of Strategic IntelligenceSchool of Science and Technology Intelligence
					Office of Admissions:Roberdeau HallWashington, DC 20511
Phone: (301) 243-2094Fax: (301) 227-7067Email:  NIU_Admissions@niu.odni.gov
Office of the Registrar:Phone: (301) 243-2093Fax: (301) 227-7067Email: NIU_Enrollments@niu.odni.gov
Accessibility / Section 508
ODNI Privacy Policy Web Policies
NI-U.edu Web Policies
External Links Disclaimer
						National Intelligence University © 2024
#### Barry Northcross PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G. GREELEY, Dr.; S. Goldsmith, Apo, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-15235.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 20, 2009.

Filed April 29, 2009.

Bennett Evan Cooper, Steptoe *&*Johnson, LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Barry Northcross Patterson, Florence, AZ, pro se.

Paul Edward Carter, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Tucson, AZ, for Defendants-Ap-pellees.

*542Before: WALLACE, FARRIS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Barry Northcross Patterson, an Arizona prisoner, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, as required under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLEA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Patterson concedes that *Ngo v. Woodford,*539 F.3d 1108 (9th Cir.2008), forecloses the argument in his opening brief that he satisfied the exhaustion requirement. As to Patterson’s claim that prison officials frustrated his ability to grieve, his conclusory pleadings and submissions are insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Patterson failed to link any alleged obstruction to his ability to grieve with the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim at issue in this action.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.