alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Sterling.
 Dated: February 28, 2008
    /s/ Harold B. GilkeyHarold B. GilkeyChairman and Chief Executive Officer
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 116

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas high quality after school programs provide safe,

challenging, engaging, and fun learning experiences to

help children and youth develop their social, emotional,

physical, cultural, and academic skills;

Whereas high quality after school programs support working

families by ensuring that the children in such families are

safe and productive after the regular school day ends;

Whereas high quality after school programs build stronger

communities by involving the Nation’s students, parents,

business leaders, and adult volunteers in the lives of the

Nation’s youth, thereby promoting positive relationships

among children, youth, families, and adults;

Whereas high quality after school programs engage families,

schools, and diverse community partners in advancing the

well-being of the Nation’s children;

Whereas ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national celebration of

after school programs held on October 12, 2006, promotes the critical importance of high quality after school

programs in the lives of children, their families, and their

communities;

Whereas more than 28,000,000 children in the United States

have parents who work outside the home and 14,300,000
 †

2

SCON 116 ES

children in the United States have no place to go after

school; and

Whereas many after school programs across the United

States are struggling to keep their doors open and their

lights on: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress supports the goals and ideals

3 of ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’ a national celebration of after

4 school programs.

Passed the Senate September 21, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 116

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting ‘‘Lights On Afterschool!’’, a national

celebration of after school programs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PART 1 -
FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         329,599
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    356,531
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               904,058
<PP&E>                                         788,253
<DEPRECIATION>                               (207,581)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,702,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          344,270
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        98,059
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,333,781
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,229,074
<SALES>                                        189,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               189,446
<CGS>                                           71,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,918,363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,800,366)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,800,366)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,800,366)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
The District Court of the 8th Judicial District. County of Cascade.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. LORI TAYLOR, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. BDC-08-071 DECISION

On July 29, 2009, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of two (2) years, for the offense of Count I: Partner/Family Member Assault, a felony.

On April 2, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present via videoconference and was represented by Kris Copenhaver. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant *27acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 2nd day of April, 2010.

DATED this 19th day of April, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 20, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 23787]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11982]



[[Page 23785]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part II





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Memorandum of May 15, 2009--Assignment of Reporting Function Under the 
American Recovery And Reinvestment Act of 2009


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 20, 2009 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 23787]]

                Memorandum of May 15, 2009

                
Memorandum for the Chair of the Council On 
                Environmental Quality

                Assignment of Reporting Function Under the American 
                Recovery And Reinvestment Act of 2009

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I 
                hereby assign to you the authority to perform the 
                function conferred upon the President by section 
                1609(c) of Division A of the American Recovery and 
                Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5) of 
                providing specified reports to the Congress.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 15, 2009

[FR Doc. E9-11982
Filed 5-19-09; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3125-W9-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.1


                      CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF RESTATED
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          OMNIS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

        Omnis Technology Corporation, a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

        DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

        FIRST: That by unanimous written consent of the Board of Directors of
Omnis Technology Corporation (the "Corporation"), dated as of November 7, 2000,
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth proposed amendments of the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be
advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation for
consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as
follows:


        RESOLVED, that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
        Corporation be, and it hereby is, amended to restate Article First to
        read in full as follows:

                "FIRST. The name of the corporation is Raining Data
                Corporation."

        RESOLVED: That Article Fourth of the Restated Certificate of
        Incorporation of the Corporation be amended to read as follows:

                "FOURTH. This corporation is authorized to issue two classes of
stock to be designated, respectively, "common" and "preferred." The number of
common shares authorized is 30,000,000, each with a par value of $0.10. The
number of preferred shares authorized is 300,000, each with the par value of
$1.00."


        SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of
Directors, the stockholders of said Corporation took action by holding a special
meeting of the stockholders on November 29, 2000 pursuant to which the necessary
number of shares was voted in favor of the amendment.

        THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

        FOURTH: That the capital of said Corporation shall not be reduced under
or by reason of said amendment.

              [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK]



                                       1
<PAGE>   2

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this certificate to be
signed by Geoffrey Wagner, the Secretary of the Corporation this 29th day of
November 2000.


                                            BY: /s/ Geoffrey Wagner
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Geoffrey Wagner
                                               Secretary



                                       2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

 

I, John E. Rooney, the chief executive officer of United States Cellular Corporation, certify that (i) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United States Cellular Corporation.

 

 

 

/s/ John E. RooneyJohn E. Rooney
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Wayne P. Garten, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Direct,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

                               /s/ Wayne P. Garten
                      -------------------------------------
                                 Wayne P. Garten
                      President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 10, 2004
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 16, 2022

NO. 03

- 21

- 00580

- CR

Ex parte Verdell Brown, Jr.

APPEAL FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND TRIAN A
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court

. Having reviewed

the record, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdictio n over this appeal . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of juris diction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay

costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BRUCE A. HARTMAN and BLANCE M. HARTMAN,

Appellants,

v.

TOWER HILL SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-0853

July 3, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Emily A. 

Peacock, Judge.

Mark A. Nation and Paul W. Pritchard of The Nation Law Firm, 

Longwood, for Appellants. 

C. Ryan Jones, Scot E. Samis, and Brandon R. Christian of Traub 

Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry, LLP, Saint Petersburg, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, VILLANTI, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Carlton H. Baab, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Raining Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ended  June 30,2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchForm 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of Raining Data Corporation.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Carlton H. Baab                   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Carlton H. Baab                       |
|   | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Brian C. Bezdek, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Raining Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterlyperiod ended  June 30, 2004 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSBfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Raining Data Corporation.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brian C. Bezdek     |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Brian C. Bezdek         |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Carlton H. Baab, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Raining Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Raining DataCorporation.
|        | By:    |   | /s/ Carlton H. Baab                   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  |   | Carlton H. Baab                       |   |
|   | Title: |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Thomas Lim, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Raining Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for thequarterly period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of Raining DataCorporation.
|        | By:    |   | /s/ Thomas Lim          |   |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  |   | Thomas Lim              |   |
|   | Title: |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
#### Jemrock Realty Co. LLC, Respondent, v Jay Krugman, Appellant.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided October 19, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Court of Appeals does not have jurisdiction to entertain this motion for leave to appeal from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this proceeding commenced in the Civil Court of the City of New York *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]; CPLR 5602).
Exhibit
      32.2
 
 Form
      10-QSB
 Arête
      Industries,
      Inc.
 Quarter
      ended June
      30, 2006
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO
 18
      U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,
 AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO
 SECTION
      906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
      connection with
      the Quarterly Report of Arête Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Herzog, Interim Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:
 
 (1)
      The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
      The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: June
              22, 2006
            By:
            /s/
              John HerzogJohn
              Herzog, Interim Chief Financial Officer
# National Intelligence University

The Center of Academic Life for the Intelligence Community
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,077] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 2, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers of Janesville Acoustics, Norwalk, Ohio. 

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of April 2009. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9-11849 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Daniel Matos, Appellant, v Warden, Rikers Island Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[870 NYS2d 786]

Judgment (denominated order), Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ethan Greenberg, J.), entered July 17, 2007, denying the petition for a writ of ha-beas corpus and dismissing the proceeding, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As this Court has repeatedly held, failure to comply with the three-day limit for giving notice of parole violations does not affect the right to be restored to parole absent a showing of prejudice (People *ex rel. Wise v New York State Div. of Parole,*50 AD3d 303 [2008]; *People ex rel. Thompson v Warden of Rikers Is. Correctional Facility,*41 AD3d 292 [2007]; *People ex rel. Washington v New York State Div. of Parole,*279 AD2d 379 [2001]), which was not even claimed. In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to consider the other grounds urged for affirmance. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.