alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 916 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 916

 To provide for the release of certain land from the Sunrise Mountain 
 Instant Study Area in the State of Nevada and to grant a right-of-way 
  across the released land for the construction and maintenance of a 
                         flood control project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2005

 Mr. Reid (for himself and Mr. Ensign) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the release of certain land from the Sunrise Mountain 
 Instant Study Area in the State of Nevada and to grant a right-of-way 
  across the released land for the construction and maintenance of a 
                         flood control project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Orchard Detention Basin Flood 
Control Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) County.--The term ``County'' means Clark County, 
        Nevada.
            (2) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map entitled ``Orchard 
        Detention Basin'' and dated March 18, 2005.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. RELEASE OF CERTAIN LAND IN THE SUNRISE MOUNTAIN INSTANT STUDY 
              AREA.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that the land described in subsection 
(c) has been adequately studied for wilderness designation under 
section 603 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 
U.S.C. 1782).
    (b) Release.--The land described in subsection (c)--
            (1) is no longer subject to section 603(c) of the Federal 
        Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1782(c)); and
            (2) shall be managed in accordance with--
                    (A) land management plans adopted under section 202 
                of that Act (43 U.S.C. 1712); and
                    (B) cooperative conservation agreements in 
                existence on the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Description of Land.--The land referred to in subsections (a) 
and (b) is the approximately 65 acres of land in the Sunrise Mountain 
Instant Study Area of the County that is--
            (1) known as the ``Orchard Detention Basin''; and
            (2) designated for release on the map.
    (d) Right-of-Way.--The Secretary shall grant to the County a right-
of-way to the land described in subsection (c) for the construction and 
maintenance of the Orchard Detention Basin Project on the land.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24


                                 CELEBRITY, INC.
                       FISCAL 2000 MANAGEMENT BONUS PLAN


The Celebrity, Inc. Fiscal 2000 Management Bonus Plan (the "Plan") will be
effective only for fiscal 2000.

Bonuses under this Plan will be based on the consolidated net after-tax earnings
of Celebrity, Inc. (the "Company") for fiscal 2000, after recording an accrual
for the bonuses due pursuant to the Plan, and excluding extraordinary items
("After-Tax Earnings"), which determination will be made in the sole judgment of
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee").

If the Company attains After-Tax Earnings in any of the ranges set forth below,
approximately 8 employees will participate in bonus payments at the average and
ranges listed below, with such percentage applied to their effective annual base
salary at June 30, 2000. The Committee shall approve the participants in the
Plan.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                  After-Tax Earnings (000 omitted)
---------------------------------------------------------------
<S>          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
From         $1,000     $2,001     $3,001     $4,001       over
To           $2,000     $3,000     $4,000     $5,000     $5,000
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Bonus as a percentage of effective annual base salary:
<S>            <C>        <C>      <C>       <C>        <C>
From          10.0%      20.0%     50.0%     75.0%     100.0%
To            15.0%      25.0%     60.0%     90.0%     125.0%
Average       12.5%      22.5%     55.0%     82.5%     112.5%
</TABLE>


The bonus will be computed based upon final audited results of operations for
fiscal 2000, with payout no later than September 1, 2000. To be eligible, the
participant must satisfactorily perform his or her job functions and management
duties throughout fiscal 2000, with continuing employment through the payment
date.

In the event a participant's employment with the Company is terminated for any
reason other than death, disability or retirement prior to the payment date, all
rights to any bonus under the Plan will be forfeited. In case of death,
disability or retirement, the bonus under the Plan will be calculated on a pro
rata basis in accordance with the time spent in service to the Company.
Importing a Vehicle                                  

# Importation and Certification FAQs

Share:*Facebook**Twitter**LinkedIn**Mail*

			   Other FAQs		OverviewAll Vehicles Motorcycles and ScootersTrailers and Heavy TrucksEquipmentImport Eligibility PetitionsRelated Government AgenciesAbbreviations DefinedAppendix
The Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance (OVSC) has expanded the current Importation and Certification Division web site to include a section entitled “Frequently Asked Questions.” In this section we have attempted to address some common questions and concerns that the office deals with on a regular basis. If your question has not been addressed, please refer to *Related Government Agencies* for further assistance.

### Motor Vehicle Exportation

####                     As a U.S. manufacturer, what do I have to do export motor vehicles to Canada?                    **

Transport Canada may require evidence that a U.S. motor vehicle manufacturer has complied with U.S. regulations before permission is granted to import the vehicle into Canada. To assist these manufacturer’s, NHTSA will verify receipt of the manufacturer’s submission of information, as required by 49 CFR Parts 565 and 566. We will also review a manufacturer’s certification label to verify compliance with the requirements of 49 CFR Parts 567 and 568.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard J. Galasso, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 919]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, Thomas P. Franczyk, J.—Violation of Probation).

Present—Scudder, PJ., Centra, Carni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
S. 904

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1560 Union

Valley Road in West Milford, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Brian P. Parrello Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRIAN P. PARRELLO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 1560 Union Valley Road in West Milford, New

Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Brian P. Parrello

Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Brian P. Parrello Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              The Schedule contains summary financial 
                              information extracted from the financial
                              statements for Summit Insured Equity L.P. II and 
                              is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                              financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000820590
<NAME>                        SUMMIT INSURED EQUITY L.P. II.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,259,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,765
<PP&E>                                      21,381,669
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,665,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,982,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          560,098
<BONDS>                                      1,357,507
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,064,671
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,982,276
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               597,756
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               486,807
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 86,996
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    86,996
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         635,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  750,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                   235,000
<INVENTORY>                                    205,999
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,606,680
<PP&E>                                         711,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                 198,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,435,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          975,508
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,390
<OTHER-SE>                                     927,830
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,435,849
<SALES>                                      4,463,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,613,162
<CGS>                                        3,213,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,431,637
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (52,548)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                234,073
<INCOME-TAX>                                   125,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (126,983)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (30,166)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (157,149)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John B. Wood, Chief Executive Officer of Telos Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: June 22, 2006 

 

 

44
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 813

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate for lower 

prices for medicare prescription drugs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 15, 2005

Mr. SPECTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act to authorize the Secretary of Health and Human 

Services to negotiate for lower prices for medicare prescription drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NEGOTIATING FAIR PRICES FOR MEDICARE 

4 PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–11 of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–111) is amended by strik7 ing subsection (i) (relating to noninterference) and by in8 serting the following: 
2

•S 813 IS 

1 ‘‘(i) AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE PRICES WITH MAN2 UFACTURERS.—In order to ensure that beneficiaries en3 rolled under prescription drug plans and MA–PD plans 

4 pay the lowest possible price, the Secretary shall have au5 thority similar to that of other Federal entities that pur6 chase prescription drugs in bulk to negotiate contracts 

7 with manufacturers of covered part D drugs, consistent 

8 with the requirements and in furtherance of the goals of 

9 providing quality care and containing costs under this 

10 part.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 this section shall take effect as if included in the enact13 ment of section 101 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 

14 Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 

15 108–173; 117 Stat. 2066). 

16 (c) HHS REPORTS COMPARING NEGOTIATED PRE17 SCRIPTION DRUG PRICES AND RETAIL PRESCRIPTION

18 DRUG PRICES.—Beginning in 2007, the Secretary of 

19 Health and Human Services shall regularly, but in no case 

20 less often than quarterly, submit to Congress a report that 

21 compares the prices for covered part D drugs (as defined 

22 in section 1860D–2(e) of the Social Security Act (42 

23 U.S.C. 1395w–102(e)) negotiated by the Secretary pursu24 ant to section 1860D–11(i) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

25 1395w–111(i)), as amended by subsection (a), with the 
3

•S 813 IS 

1 average price a retail pharmacy would charge an indi2 vidual who does not have health insurance coverage for 

3 purchasing the same strength, quantity, and dosage form 

4 of such covered part D drug.

Æ
#### Teague v. N.C. Dep’t of Transp.

Case below: 177 N.C. App. 215

No. 281P06-2

1. Pit’s MAR (COA05-522)

2. Pit’s Motion for Writ of Mandamus

3. Pit’s Motion for Writ of Supersedeas

4. Pit’s Motion for Writ of Mandamus

1. Dismissed 01/25/07

2. Denied 01/25/07

3. Denied 01/25/07

4. Denied 01/25/07
O rder filed October 4 , 2016



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 11 3

- CR

__________

RUSSELL FRANCES HUERTAS , Appellant

V.

THE S TATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 161 st District Court

Ector County, Texas
Tri al Court Cause No. B

- 4 4 , 756

O R D E R

T h is appeal has be come stalled due to the failure of Joel Rodriguez , the court
reporter for the 161 st District Court, to prepare and file in this court the reporter’s

record

. T he reporter’s record was originally due on May 23 , 2016

. Rodriguez has

filed four requests for extensions, two of which w ere granted and t wo of which were granted in part

. We granted Rodriguez’s fourth request on A ugust 26 , 2016 , and we2

directed that the reporter’s re cord be filed on or before September 21 , 2016

. As of
today, Rodriguez has not filed t he reporter’s record in this cause

. By this order, Joel Rodriguez i s ORDERED to file the reporter’s record

in this cause on or before 5:00 p.m. on October 2 0 , 201 6

. If the reporter’s record

has not been filed by that time, Rodriguez may be required to appear in person before
the Eleventh Court of Appeals to explain the delay.

PER CURIAM

October 4 , 2016
Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J., and Bailey, J.
## 2003 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
4-4-2003 

# U SA v . S he a r d
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t 02-2149

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2003

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2003 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du
. 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" U SA v . S he a r d " (2003). 2003 D e cisio n s . P ape r 666. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2003/666

## NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No: 02-2149 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. BRYANT SHEARD, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania D.C. Criminal No. 01-cr-00338-1 District Judge: Honorable Edmund V. Ludwig Submitted pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

March 31, 2003 Before: McKee, Smith & Cowen, Circuit Judges

(Filed April 4, 2003) OPINION OF THE COURT McKee, Circuit Judge
. Bryant Sheard appeals from the judgment of sentence that was entered following the district court’s acceptance of Sheard’s guilty plea pursuant to a written plea agreement. Defense counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967) in which counsel avers that, “after a conscientious examination of the record, [he] could find no non-frivolous issues for appeal.” Appellant’s Br. at 17. Accordingly, we will affirm the judgment of sentence.

## 2



## TO THE CLERK: Please file the foregoing not precedential opinion

. By the Court /s/ Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge

## 3
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. PE DRO A RAUJ O- QU I NO NEZ, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10073 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 7 8 9 - RCC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J a c k Z ouha ry , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r14, 2010 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an d C L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P edro A rauj o-Q ui no nez app ea l s f rom the 50 -m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f ori m port a t i on of

c oc a i ne , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U .S .C . § § 9 5 2 ( a ) , 9 6 0 ( a ) ( 1 ) a n d ( b ) ( 1 ) ( B ) ( ii) , a n d p o s s e s s io n w ith in te n t to 

# FI LED JAN 05 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10073 2 d is tr ib u te c o c a in e , in v io la tio n o f 2 1 U .S .C . § 8 4 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) a n d ( b ) ( 1 ) ( A ) ( ii) ( I I ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. A r auj o- Q ui none z c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d by f a i l i ng t o gr a ntam i nor - r ol e a dj us tm e nt . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d note rrbyde ny i ng th e a d ju s tm e n t. Se e U

n ite d S ta te s v . Ca n tr e ll , 43 3 F . 3d 12 69 , 12 82 -83 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 6 ) . A r auj o- Q ui none z a l s o c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d bynotgr a nt i ng h im ad e p a rtu r e f

o rab e rr a n t b e h a v io r . A r au jo - Q u in o n e z ’s a r g u m e n t la c k s m e r it. Se e U ni te d State s v . D al lm an , 53 3 F . 3d 75 5, 76 0-62 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). AF F I RME D.