alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
BALANCE SHEET OF ARETE INDUSTRIES, INC. AS OF September 30, 1999 AND THE RELATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIODS ENDED September 30,
1999 AND 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          81,163
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,561
<PP&E>                                          46,079
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          744,748
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                     7,277,895
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,788
<SALES>                                        252,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               252,786
<CGS>                                          363,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  509,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,016
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (257,296)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (257,296)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 15


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington D.C. 20549

RE:       Lund International Holdings, Inc.
          Registrations on Form S-8

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated April 27, 1999 on our reviews of the interim
consolidated financial information of Lund International Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") for the three month periods ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, and
included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended March 31, 1999, is incorporated by reference in the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-78140, 333-46263, 33-64083 and
33-37160).



                                   /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                   PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 14, 1999


                                       19
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS—ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8, No. 333-97063) pertaining to the 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8, No. 333-51382) pertaining to the 2000 EmployeeStock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8, No. 333-06419) pertaining to the 1996 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8, No. 333-06415) pertaining to Key Employee Restricted Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-28259) pertaining to the Key EmployeeRestricted Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8, No. 333-46393) pertaining to Key Employee Options and FocusSoft Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8, No. 333-41321) pertaining to the 1997 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and Platinum Software Corporation ClienteleIncentive Plan, (Form S-8, No. 333-67841 pertaining to the 1998 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8, No. 333-70855) pertaining to DataWorks 1995 Equity Incentive Plan, DataWorks 1995 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, Interactive 1997Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, Interactive 1995 Stock Option Plan, and Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreements, Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement,  (Form S-8, No. 333-85105) pertaining to the 1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan and 1999 MergerTransition Nonstatutory Stock Plan, and (Form S-8, No. 333-91505) pertaining to the Key Employee Nonqualified Option Agreement and in the Registration Statements and related prospectuses (Form S-3, No. 333-38105) pertaining to the registration of450,000 shares of common stock, and (Form S-3, No. 333-46395) pertaining to the registration of 2,474,794 shares of common stock, of our report dated January 26, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of EpicorSoftware Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2000, included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

                                                                                                                              /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Orange County, California March 25, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11694 and #11695]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of North Dakota (FEMA-1829-DR), dated 03/24/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms and Flooding.                     

*Incident Period:*                         03/13/2009 and continuing.                     

*Effective Date:*                         05/13/2009.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/26/2009.                     

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/24/2009.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of North Dakota, dated 03/24/2009, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster. 

*Primary Counties:*                     Rolette, Sheridan, The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indian Reservation.                 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11881 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM C. ROUTENBERG, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3549

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed July 12, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Joseph A. Bulone, Judge.

William C. Routenberg, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, NORTHCUTT, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133757 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133757 

 COA: 272002 
 Wayne CC: 99-001336-01

HUBERT MARSHALL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 14, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk
#### The Cartersville Land Company *v.*Pratt *et al.*

This case falls within the general rule that the first grant of a new trial will not be reversed.

July 30, 1894.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Henry. Bartow superior court. July term, 1893.

John W. Akin and Neel & Swain, for plaintiff.

R. J. McCamy, J. H. Wikle and W. I. Heyward, for defendants.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### Alamin Hassan O., Appellant, v Benjamin Bates et al., Defendants. Verizon, Nonparty Respondent.

Submitted June 14, 2010;

decided September 2, 2010

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 2009 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the letter of the Clerk’s Office of the Appellate Division, Second Department, dismissed upon the ground that the letter appealed from is neither a judgment nor an order from which a motion to the Court of Appeals may be made *(see*CPLR 5512 [a]; 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6764

GARY B. WASHINGTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD HUTCHINSON, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-3973-WDQ) Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 29, 2005 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Howard Margulies, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gary B. Washington seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Washington has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
February 20, 1997

Mr. Phil Wiland
Concepts Direct, Inc.
1351 South Sunset Street
Longmont, Colorado 80501-6549

RE:	New Concepts Direct Facility - Letter of Intent
Notice to Proceed with Material Pre-orders & Structural Work

Mr. Wiland:

Per our previous discussions, this letter is to establish that Concepts
Direct, Inc. and Saunders Construction, Inc. propose, subject to the
conditions contained herein, to enter into an agreement for the
construction of a new facility for Concepts Direct on Lot 1, Block I of
Concepts Direct Filing Number I in Longmont, Colorado.  The final
pricing and terms of the agreement will be in general accordance with
Saunders Construction's preliminary proposal, but subject to the mutual
agreement of Concepts Direct, Inc. and Saunders Construction, Inc., and
will be finalized upon completion of construction documents prepared by
Intergroup Architects.  In order to keep the project on schedule it is
necessary to pre-order long lead items, begin the shop drawing process
on structural components, install all underground piping and utilities
at the building pad, and begin the construction of the foundations,
slab-on-grade and exterior wall panels.

With your signature in the space provided on the following page, this
letter will serve as our Notice to Proceed with this work.  The total
not-to-exceed cost for this work is itemized on the attached sheets.
Please note that this cost does not include plan check and permit fees
or water and sewer fees which will be paid directly by Concepts Direct.

It is understood by Concepts Direct and Saunders Construction, Inc. that
Concepts Direct may terminate this agreement at any time, however, if
this project is terminated for any reason the above costs will be
payable to Saunders Construction, Inc., less the value of any
uncompleted work at the point of termination.  It is agreed by both
parties that the intent of this letter is to allow the start of
construction prior to the execution of a formal contract.  Upon
execution of a formal contract, this letter will become null and void
and the above costs will become a cost of the executed contract.

Please signify your acceptance of these conditions by providing a dated
signature in the space provided below and returning a copy to Saunders
Construction, Inc.. Saunders Construction, Inc. and Concepts Direct both
agree that this letter of intent and agreement is binding only as to the
specifics contained herein and neither party by this letter is obligated
to enter into or execute any additional contract or agreement unless
mutually satisfactory to both parties and executed by both parties.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call. We
look forward to working with you on this project.
Sincerely,

SAUNDERS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
/s/ David F. Hoffman
David F. Hoffman
Chief Estimator

Accepted,
CONCEPTS DIRECT, INC.
/s/ Phillip A. Wiland
Phillip A. Wiland
Chairman

(Various tables follow in the original outlining the total anticipated costs
totaling $1,977,676.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1996 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR
THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         3862958
<SECURITIES>                                   2908370
<RECEIVABLES>                                 53409454
<ALLOWANCES>                                    429000
<INVENTORY>                                    5776350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              68215182
<PP&E>                                        16508494
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6826000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                87634002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         25729954
<BONDS>                                        2901785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      47535271
<OTHER-SE>                                     9711657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  87634002
<SALES>                                      254887550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             254887550
<CGS>                                        182442369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                182442369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              57208006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              224236
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               15617778
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6248279
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9369499
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9369499
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Morris Dwayne TURNER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-40693

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 30, 2009.

Milton Andrew Stover, U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Texas, Plano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John Timothy Borah, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Morris Dwayne Turner has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Turner has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Turner’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” *United States v. Cantwell,*470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Turner’s response discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Turner’s motion to remove counsel and proceed pro se is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
LaSalle
      Bank N.A.135
      South LaSalle StreetSuite
      1625Chicago,
      IL 60603Global
      Securities and Trust Services






Annual
Statement of Compliance
 
 VIA:
EMAIL
 
 Bear
Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC
 383
Madison Avenue
 New York,
New York 10179
 regabnotifications@bear.com
 
 EMC
Mortgage Corporation
 2780 Lake
Vista Drive
 Irving,
Texas 75067
 
 Re:           Bear
Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2007-SL2
 
 
 Reference
is made to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2007 (the
“Agreement”), among Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, as Depositor,
EMC Mortgage Corporation, as Seller and Master Servicer, and LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Trustee.
 
 I,
Barbara L. Marik, a Senior Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
as Trustee hereby certify that:
 
 (1)
A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and
of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
supervision; and
 
 (2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
year or a portion thereof.
 
 
 Date:
February 27, 2008
 
 LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Trustee
 
 
 /s/
Barbara L. Marik
 Barbara
L. Marik
 Senior
Vice President
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement of Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended March
31, 2007 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Garrett E. Pierce

Garrett E. PierceVice Chairman and Chief Financial
OfficerApril 26, 2007
  31