alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FORM 10-KSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                             167
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      305
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                      1,222
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,007
<PP&E>                                           3,436
<DEPRECIATION>                                     407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,371
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,912
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,767)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,903
<SALES>                                          2,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,691
<CGS>                                            3,551
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     4
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,218
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,687)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,688)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,688)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.36)


</TABLE>
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

pratti@mail.nih.gov

October 2020

Back to Top
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

dundascm@mail.nih.gov 

December 2023

Back to Top
#### The People *against*The Judges, &c. of the General Sessions of the peace of the county of Genesee.

On an sauit ami b” ttenot be stayed because a *civil*ifattSi,thTMdg? “Sn,f may°be dSu» or'thS suit’.

ON the 14th of *May*last, at the court of general sessions of the peace, of *Genesee*county, *Henry Markham*was indicted for an assault and battery, and having pleaded not guilty, and the . , i? ° 7 ° •' trial being brought on by the attorney of the district, *Markham?s*counsel objected to the trial proceeding, on the ground that a private suit had been brought against him, in the court of common pleas, to recover damages for the same assault and battery, which suit was still pending and undetermined. On this ground, *86the court below refus.ed to allow the trial of the indictment to proceed, and the attorney of the people now applied for a *mcmdamns,*to be directed to the court of .general session?, command|ne them to proceed in the trial, Of the cause.

*Per*Curiam.

This is an application for a *mandamus ,*to the eburtof general sessions of the county of *Genesee,,*to: compel them to proceed, to the trial Of *Henry Markham',*upon an indictment for an assault and battery. The affidavit of the district attorney states, that the co.urt refused: to proceed to tlie trial of *Markham,*solely on the ground- that a private suit had been commenced, dnd was then pending-against him, by the prosecú-. tor. ," This Was. not-a sufficient reason for ■pbstponifig-'thé. trial of the-indictment. It might be good cause for suspending j.udg-; ment, if the defendant should be found .guilty, in order, in some measure, *to*regulate the discretion of the court in: imposing the punishment. We' think, however, that the application for- a *mandamus*ought not to- be granted at this lime. The indictment was found at the same term in whijeli-the public prosecutor _ moved to. bring on the trial. Tlie .delay, therefore, has. not, as yet, been- unreasonable... tThe' court-of, general'sessions, from What is stated by the district -attorney, were,, .probably*- misled by what is said in *Espinass’cds Digest,. ,(1*Esp. part. 2 184.*) that it . is the practice in New-¥oricfiti-such'Cages,'-to stay the criminal suit Until a, decision in the .private action-. We are not aware of any such practice,, ñor do We think it Warranted,.if pny thing more is intended than á stay' of judgment after conviction. The rules and principies which govern the granting of informations, are not applicable to the trial of indictments.. Should the. court, hereafter, postpone. the trial of the indictment, solely on the ground bf the'pendency Of the private suit, it might become necessafy and proper for this court to interfere by-m«ndá»íMs. But,’ Under the circumstances attending the case, as-' now presented to üs,.. we think the application ought to be denied. . -

Motibn- denied.

*

 Gould's edit. 2 Burr. 919.
#### In re A.L.P.

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 528

No. 214P07

Respondent’s (Father) PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA06-1382)

Denied 11/08/07
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 938

To amend title 37, United States Code, to require that members of the 

National Guard and Reserve called or ordered to active duty for a 

period of more than 30 days receive a basic allowance for housing 

at the same rate as similarly situated members of the regular components 

of the uniformed services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 28, 2005

Mr. LEAHY (for himself and Mr. BOND) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To amend title 37, United States Code, to require that 

members of the National Guard and Reserve called or 

ordered to active duty for a period of more than 30 

days receive a basic allowance for housing at the same 

rate as similarly situated members of the regular components of the uniformed services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Guard and 

5 Reserves Housing Equity Act of 2005’’. 
2

•S 938 IS 

1 SEC. 2. BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING FOR RESERVE 

2 MEMBERS. 

3 (a) EQUAL TREATMENT OF RESERVE MEMBERS.—

4 Paragraph (3) of subsection (g) of section 403 of title 37, 

5 United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting after ‘‘(3)’’ the following new 

7 sentence: ‘‘The rate of basic allowance for housing 

8 to be paid to a member of a reserve component who 

9 is called or ordered to active duty for a period of 

10 more than 30 days shall be equal to the rate in ef11 fect for similarly situated members of a regular com12 ponent of the uniformed services.’’; and 

13 (2) by striking ‘‘less than 140 days, unless the 

14 call or order to active duty is in support of a contin15 gency operation’’ and inserting ‘‘30 days or less’’. 

16 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT REGARDING MEM17 BERS WITHOUT DEPENDENTS.—Paragraph (1) of such 

18 subsection is amended— 

19 (1) by striking ‘‘in support of a contingency op20 eration’’ both places it appears; and 

21 (2) by inserting ‘‘for a period of more than 30 

22 days’’ after ‘‘active duty’’ both places it appears.

Æ
EXHIBIT 24.2

 

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC.POWER OF ATTORNEY

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

            The undersigned, in hiscapacity as a director of SI Diamond Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), after reviewing the Company's Form 10-KSB, does herebyappoint Douglas P. Baker, his true and lawful attorney to execute in his name, place and stead, in his capacity as a Director ofsaid Company, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and all instruments necessaryor incidental in connection therewith, including all amendments, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Said attorney shall have the full power and authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any andall capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes asthe undersigned might or could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of said attorney.

            IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this instrument this 11th day of March, 2003.

                                        /s/ RonBerman                                                                  Name: Ron Berman
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                    10,411
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              2,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                               27,878
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          40,799
<PP&E>                                     4,487
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            44,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     25,300
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      75
<OTHER-SE>                                18,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              44,168
<SALES>                                   44,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          44,441
<CGS>                                     37,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             37,123
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            2,106
<INCOME-TAX>                                 821
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          821
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,285
<EPS-BASIC>                                .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .18


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-1999             JUL-30-1999
<CASH>                                            5253                    5253
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    73997                   73997
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      31769                   31769
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                115380                  115380
<PP&E>                                          759655                  759655
<DEPRECIATION>                                  481690                  481690
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  453320                  453320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            61486                   61486
<BONDS>                                         200000                  200000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      191834                  191834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    453320                  453320
<SALES>                                         127206                  242640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                127206                  242640
<CGS>                                           123624                  231513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   123624                  231513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6731                   13938
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5629                   11658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8778)                 (14469)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8778)                 (14469)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8778)                (14,469)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.24)                  (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)                  (0.39)


</TABLE>
#### State v. Winchester

Case below: 184 N.C. App.-(19 June 2007)

No. 353P07

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA06-1505)

2. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Dismissed *ex mero motu*10/11/07

2. Denied 10/11/07
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

*Notice of Cancellation:*                     This notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 30, 2009, Volume 74, Number 82, pages 19970-19971. The meeting originally scheduled to convene on May 15, 2009 has been cancelled. The meeting will be re-scheduled at a future date, to be announced.                

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Brenda Colley-Gilbert, Designated Federal Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K92, Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-6295. The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: May 15, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-11994 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Adedayo Ilori, Appellant.

[870 NYS2d 784]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered May 7, 2007, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of forgery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reducing the sentence to a term of 2 to 4 years, and otherwise affirmed.

As the People concede, since the plea agreement did not contain a no-arrest or no-misconduct condition; or any other conditions, the court erred in enhancing, on the basis of a subsequent crime, the sentence it had promised defendant at the time of his plea (see *People v Spina,*186 AD2d 9 [1992]). Therefore, the court should have imposed the promised sentence or granted defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea. Accordingly, we reduce the sentence to the term to which defendant had agreed. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Maria M. Almonte, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Decided March 31, 2011

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
#### Eugene Palladino, Appellant, v CNY Centro, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And Another Action.)

Submitted November 15, 2010;

decided January 11, 2011

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the consolidated actions within the meaning of the Constitution.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**

| **Name and Jurisdiction of Incorporation** |   |                   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|                                            |   |                   |
| Epicor Software Argentina S.A.             |   | Argentina              |
| Epicor Software (Asia) PTE Ltd.            |   | Singapore              |
| Epicor Software (Aust) Pty Ltd             |   | Australia              |
| Epicor Software B.V.I. Limited             |   | British Virgin Islands |
| Epicor Software Canada, Ltd.               |   | Canada                 |
| Epicor Software France S.A.                |   | France                 |
| Epicor Software Deutschland GmbH           |   | German                 |
| Epicor Software (Ireland) Limited          |   | Ireland                |
| Epicor Software (Holdings)                 |   | Ireland                |
| Epicor Software Mexico, S.A. de C.V.       |   | Mexico                 |
| Epicor Software Nederland BV               |   | Netherlands            |
| Epicor Software (NZ) Limited               |   | New Zealand            |
| Epicor Software (North Asia) Limited       |   | Hong Kong              |
| Epicor Software Nordic AB                  |   | Sweden                 |
| Epicor Software (Taiwan) Limited           |   | Republic of China      |
| Epicor Software (UK) Limited               |   | UK                     |
| Epicor Limited                             |   | UK                     |
| Interactive (UK) Limited                   |   | UK                     |
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, David W. Wehlmann, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Form 10-Q of Grey Wolf, Inc; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986];  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s quarter ended June 30, 2004 that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 9, 2004 By:  /s/ David W. Wehlmann    David W. Wehlmann    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grey Wolf, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004 (the
Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, Thomas P. Richards, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and David W. Wehlmann, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly present, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Thomas P. RichardsThomas P. RichardsChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ David W. WehlmannDavid W. WehlmannExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date: November 9, 2004