alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                      | 1)     |                                                               | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                               |                                                                                                                                                                |
|                      | 2)     |                                                               | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|                      |   |                                                               |                                                                                                                                                                |   |
| Date:      April 15, 2009 |   |                                                               |                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                      |   | /s/ Greggory Schneider                                             |                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                      |   | Greggory      Schneider                                            |                                                                                                                                                                |   |
|                      |   | Director,      Chief Financial andPrincipal      Financial Officer |                                                                                                                                                                |   |
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11882]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11746 and <greek-i>11747]


Mississippi Disaster <greek-i>MS-00030

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-
1837-DR), dated 05/12/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 03/25/2009 through 03/28/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/12/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/13/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 02/12/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to : U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 05/12/2009, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Amite, Greene, Jackson, Lawrence, Lincoln, Simpson, 
Stone, Walthall, Wayne, Wilkinson.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             4.500
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 11746B 
and for economic injury is 11747B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-11882 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### State v. Roberson

Case below: 174 N.C. App. 840

No. 707P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA04-1645)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 360 N.C. 294

Stay dissolved 12/19/06

2. Denied 12/19/06

3. See Special Order Page 157

4. Denied 12/19/06
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TAREZ ASQUITH

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 1959

[ April 20, 202 3 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Robert L. Pegg , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2019CF002533A

.

Robert David Malove of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A.,

Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano,

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Dickson *v.*Morgan.

There being sufficient evidence to . sustain the verdict and no question of law being involved, there was no abuse of .discretion in refusing to grant a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

March 26, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

*701Complaint on note. Before Judge Henry. Walker superior court. February term, 1892.

R. M. W. Glenn, McCutchen *&*Shumate and J. W. Maddox, for plaintiff in error.

Lumpkin & Shattuck, *contra.*

The suit was upon a note for $800 with certain credits. Defendant pleaded *non est factum;*that he purchased of plaintiff land for which he was to pay $800, of which $200 and interest was to fall due in the same year, which he paid before maturity; that he executed his note payable to plaintiff, on which he had made payments aggregating the amount of the credits on the note sued upon; and that the note was for $600, and plaintiff had raised it, for the purpose of defrauding him, by altering 6 to 8 so that the note would read $800. The evidence was directly, conflicting. The verdict was for the plaintiff, and defendant moved for a new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law and evidence. The motion was overruled.
**EXHIBIT23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**     **To the Board of Directors Of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc.:**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-27453 and 333-41170) of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. of our report dated February 24,2006, related to the consolidated balance sheets of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income,stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the two-yearperiod ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the annual report on Form 10-K ofSpatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ FARBER HASS HURLEY MCEWEN, LLPCamarillo,CaliforniaMarch 19,2007
49
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 617 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 617

To direct the Secretary of the Army to carry out the dredging project, 
       Menominee Harbor, Menominee River, Michigan and Wisconsin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2005

Mr. Levin (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of the Army to carry out the dredging project, 
       Menominee Harbor, Menominee River, Michigan and Wisconsin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROJECT FOR NAVIGATION, MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MICHIGAN 
              AND WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Menominee Harbor and 
River, Michigan and Wisconsin, deauthorized on April 15, 2002, in 
accordance with section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), shall be carried out by the 
Secretary of the Army in accordance with section 101 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482) at full Federal expense.
    (b) Costs and Benefits.--The Secretary of the Army shall carry out 
the project described in subsection (a) regardless of whether the 
benefits of the project exceed the estimated costs of the project.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Robert G. Houle

,

Appellant,

v.

Capital One Bank (USA), N. A.

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 234

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2015

- CCV01442 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s Motion to Reestablish the Appellate Timetable.

Therefore the Court ORDERS this appeal to continue, the appellate timetable

suspension is lifted, and the Appellant’s brief is due in this Court on or before February 16, 2017.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 17 th day of January, 2017

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 604 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize expansion 

of medicare coverage of medical nutrition therapy services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2005 

Mr. CRAIG (for himself, Mr. BINGAMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BURR, Mr. DURBIN, and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize 

expansion of medicare coverage of medical nutrition therapy services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Medical Nu5 trition Therapy Act of 2005’’. 
2

•S 604 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING EXPANSION OF MEDICARE COV2 ERAGE OF MEDICAL NUTRITION THERAPY 

3 SERVICES. 

4 (a) AUTHORIZING EXPANDED ELIGIBLE POPU5 LATION.—Section 1861(s)(2)(V) of the Social Security 

6 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(s)(2)(V)) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating clauses (i) through (iii) as 

8 subclauses (I) through (III), respectively, and in9 denting each such clause an additional 2 ems; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘in the case of a beneficiary 

11 with diabetes or a renal disease who—’’ and insert12 ing the following: 

13 ‘‘in the case of a beneficiary— 

14 ‘‘(i) with diabetes or a renal disease 

15 who—’’; 

16 (3) by adding ‘‘or’’ at the end of subclause (III) 

17 of clause (i), as so designated; and 

18 (4) by adding at the end the following new 

19 clause: 

20 ‘‘(ii) who is not described in clause (i) 

21 but who has another disease, condition, or 

22 disorder for which the Secretary has made 

23 a national coverage determination (under 

24 section 1869(f)(1)(B)) for the coverage of 

25 such services;’’. 
3

•S 604 IS

1 (b) COVERAGE OF SERVICES FURNISHED BY PHYSI2 CIANS.—Section 1861(vv)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

3 1395x(vv)(1)) is amended by inserting ‘‘, physician,’’ after 

4 ‘‘a registered dietician’’. 

5 (c) NATIONAL COVERAGE DETERMINATION PROC6 ESS.—In making a national coverage determination de7 scribed in section 1861(s)(2)(V)(ii) of the Social Security 

8 Act, as added by subsection (a)(4), the Secretary of 

9 Health and Human Services, through the Director of the 

10 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, shall— 

11 (1) consult with dietetic and nutrition profes12 sional organizations in determining appropriate pro13 tocols for coverage of medical nutrition therapy serv14 ices for individuals with different diseases, condi15 tions, and disorders; and 

16 (2) consider the degree to which medical nutri17 tion therapy interventions prevent or help prevent 

18 the onset or progression of more serious diseases, 

19 conditions, or disorders. 

20 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall apply to services furnished on or after 

22 January 1, 2006.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of QuantRx Biomedical Corporation (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Sasha Afanassiev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|  |          |                                                                                                                       |
|--|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|  | /s/ Sasha Afanassiev            Sasha AfanassievCFO, Treasurer & VP of Finance |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date:    August 14, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 

I, James W. Sullivan, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MoSys, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015;

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      [Intentionally omitted]

 

4.                                      [Intentionally omitted]

 

5.                                      [Intentionally omitted]

 
| Date:   April 29, 2016                             |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                    |   |
| /s/   JAMES W. SULLIVAN                                 |   |
| James   W. Sullivan                                     |   |
| *Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,732] 

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 2, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Essilor Laboratories of America, Joe's Creek Processing Center, St. Petersburg, Florida.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

      ( print page 23890)    
Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of April 2009.

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11871 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EX-10.1




EXHIBIT 10.1




Fiscal Year 2005 Management Bonus Plan

of Hutchinson Technology Incorporated




Hutchinson Technology Incorporated (“HTI”) has a management bonus plan that covers executive
officers and certain other management-level employees. The decision to pay out bonuses is made
annually by the Compensation Committee of HTI’s Board of Directors. The Committee’s decision is
based on HTI’s attainment of a financial goal for the fiscal year as well as certain milestones
that represent achievement of strategic company initiatives. Bonuses are paid in cash in the first
quarter of the following fiscal year.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1622

_____________________________

ANTWAN JENKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

October 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Alexander Scott Whitlock, Assistant Public Defender, 

Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Julian E. Markham, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Pritchett, adm’r, *v.*Commissioners of Bartow County.

Where a case was argued in this court on the 31st day of January, 1894, during the October term, 1893, and the plaintiff in error died on the 7th day of February, 1894, and this court, without being in*732formed of this fact, rendered a judgment of reversal in the case on the 4th day of June, 1894, during the March term, 1894, and after the *remittitur*was transmitted to the court below but before it was filed therein or entered on the minutes of that court the death of the plaintiff in error was suggested in this court, it is within the power of this court, at any time before the final adjournment of the March term, 1894, to pass an order declaring that the judgment of reversal shall be of force and effect as of January 31st, 1894, when the case was argued and submitted for decision, and to order a withdrawal of the *remittitur*first issued, and the issuing of a new *remittitur*in accordance with the facts above recited. *Mayor etc.*v. *Dasher,*90 *Qa.*195; Mitchell *v.*Overman, 103 U. S. 62, and cases cited.

August 31, 1894.

Judge Joseph H. Lumpkin, of the Atlanta Circuit, presiding in the place of Chief Justice Bleckley, disqualified.

*Ordered accordingly.*
## Exhibit 10.iii.(a)

## 

## 

## MEMORANDUM

Date:                February 10, 2003

From:               Stephen P. Malia

To:                   Richard L. Thomas, Chairman, Compensation Committee                        Raymond F. Bentele, Chairman, Executive Committee

In December, Dick and I briefly spoke about making a "technical correction" to Doug Pertz's Agreement.  Specifically, in 2001 his Agreement was amended to provide a payment of three times (3x) the MICP target in case of a Severance Event, instead ofthree times the highest actual award in the past three years (see Article III, Section 1(d)2).  This change made his Agreement consistent with the Executive Agreements on this point, though they provide a 2x payment in severance situations.

We failed, however, to make a similar change to Doug's Agreement in the case of Change in Control (See Article V, Section 7 (c)(ii)).  Doug's Agreement still calls for a payment of three times the highest award, instead of 3 x the MICP target.  The otherExecutive Agreements were changed to pay 3x the MICP target and we believe the approach and language should be common on this point.

Attached is a copy of Doug's Agreement, as amended, for reference.  We request that this "technical correction" be approved and the attached Addendum be signed to document this change.

Sincerely,

Stephen P. Malia

cc:        D. A. Pertz

**ADDENDUM**

The following was agreed to on February 17, 2003 as an addendum to the Employment Agreement, as amended and restated, dated October 24, 2000, between Douglas A. Pertz and IMC Global.

Article V Change in Control

Section 7 (c) (ii).  The current Agreement is amended as follows:

            (ii)  An amount equal to three times the target award under the Company's Management Incentive Compensation Program, or successor annual bonus plan in effect; and

Agreed to:

IMC Compensation Committee

By ________________________________                          _________________________            Richard C.Thomas                                                                 Date

IMC Executive Committee

By: _______________________________                            _________________________            Raymond F.Bentele                                                               Date

Executive

By: _______________________________                            _________________________            Douglas A.Pertz                                                                     Date

 

*Return to IMC Global Inc. Form 10-Q*