alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Jenna L. Kemp, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-AC3 (the
    "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Fifth
    Third Mortgage Company as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
    Trustee.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Jenna L. Kemp
    Signature

    Executive Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00067

- CR

FELIPE DIAZ
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 130th District Court of Matagorda County , Texas Trial Cause No. 10

- 319

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 23, 2014
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-97063, 333-06419, 333-41321, 333-67841, 333-85105, and333-107738 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-114475, 333-38105, 333-46395 and 333-104277 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 16, 2005 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Epicor SoftwareCorporation and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Epicor Software Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

March 16, 2005
|                                                      |   | Three      months ended December 31, |        |   | Year      ended December 31, |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|-------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                                      |   | 2007                                 |        |   | 2006                         |   |   | 2005 |   |   | 2007 |   |   | 2006 |   |   | 2005 |   |
|                                                      |   |                                 |        |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      income (loss) applicable                         |   |                                 |        |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|      to      common shareholders |   | $                                    | (921,307    | )      |                         | $      | (1,483,105 | ) |   | $ | (1,560,500 | ) |   | $ | (4,256,891 | ) |   | $ | (6,593,892 | ) |   | $ | (5,818,816 | ) |
|                                                      |   |                                 |        |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Weighted      average number                              |   |                                 |        |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|     of      common shares             |   |                                 | 107,173,549 |   |                         |   | 102,148,882 |   |   |   | 99,634,507 |   |   |   | 106,321,400 |   |   |   | 100,895,795 |   |   |   | 98,957,812 |   |
|                                                      |   |                                 |        |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net      income (loss) per                                |   |                                 |        |   |                         |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|     per      share                    |   | $                                    | (0.01       | )      |                         | $      | (0.01 | ) |   | $ | (0.02 | ) |   | $ | (0.04 | ) |   | $ | (0.07 | ) |   | $ | (0.06 | ) |
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARY GRIFFIN WEBER,

Appellant,

v.

PATRICK CLARK WEBER,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3379

[October 5, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Paul B. Kanarek, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312012DR1252.

Stephen D. Fromang, Vero Beach, for appellant.

Patrick Clark Weber, Fort Pierce, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## & ^ 

### X

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

JOEY FAUST, Appellant FILED IN COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS March 24,20l£ ABELACOSTA, CLERK v. § NO. PD-0893-14 

### THE STATE OFTEXAS, Appellee § RAMON MARROQUIN, Appellant § § NO. PD-0894-14 THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee §

ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF CAUSE NUMBERS 02-13-00222-CR and 02-13-00223-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPELLANTS' POST-SUBMISSION BRIEF

(- J. SHELBY SHARPE State Bar No. 18123000 

### utlawman@aol.com 6100 Western Place, Suite 1000 FortWorth, Texas 76107 

### (817) 338-4900/Fax (817)332-6818 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTSSTATEMENT OF HELPFULNESS OF POST-SUBMISSIONBRIEF 

### During oral argument several questions were asked about other court opinions related to certain issues before the Court in this appeal. A post

### submission brief provides the Court with answers to those questions citing 

### pertinent language from the opinions the Court inquired about. Furthermore, the sincere questions ofthe Court indicate a desire to fully understandthe relationship ofFirst Amendment speech protection as it applies to proper law enforcement to protectpublictranquility and safety. 

### WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellants Joey Faust and 

### Ramon Marroquin respectfully pray that the Court grant leave to file Appellant's Post-Submission Brief. 

### Respectfully submitted,
/s/J. Shelby Sharpe J. SHELBY SHARPE State BarNo. 18123000 

### utlawman@aoI.com 6100 Western Place, Suite 1000 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 

### Telephone: (817) 338-4900 Facsimile: (817) 332-6818 ATTORNEYFOR APPELLANTS JOEYDARRELL FAUSTAND RAMONMARROQUINCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### A true and correct copy of Appellant's Motion for Leave to File PostSubmission Briefhas been served on Charles M. Mallin, Assistant Tarrant County 

## DistrictAttorney, 401 W. Belknap St.,FortWorth, Texas 76196-0201, onthis 23rd day ofMarch, 2015, viaelectronic mail.
/s/J. Shelby Sharpe J. Shelby Sharpe
#### Christopher Scott, Appellant, v Rockaway Pratt, LLC, Respondent.

Submitted February 22, 2011;

decided March 24, 2011

Motion for poor person relief granted.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Randy Raynor, Claimant, v Landmark Chrysler et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Decided October 26, 2010

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal granted.
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

In connection with this Annual
Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Zach L. Wasson, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 13, 2009 |  | by: |  | /s/ Zach L. Wasson                                  
|                      |  |     |  | Zach L. Wasson                                      
|                      |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  |     |  | Sterling Bancshares, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-05-1998
<CASH>                                          54,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                       366
<INVENTORY>                                     31,190
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,330
<PP&E>                                         429,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                 223,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 352,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,660
<BONDS>                                        280,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     25,000
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                    (33,880)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   352,050
<SALES>                                         98,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,107
<CGS>                                           81,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,020
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (59,454)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,702)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,752)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,752)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

       We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts-Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and to the use of our
report dated October 20, 2004 in the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement (File No. 333-119743) and related Prospectus of Claymore Securities
Defined Portfolios, Series 198.


                                             /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                             ----------------------
                                             GRANT THORNTON LLP


Chicago, Illinois
October 20, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
June 26, 2000 Form 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-25-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-26-2000
<CASH>                                            376
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,957
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                6,093
<PP&E>                                         99,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                 38,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 90,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,379
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          118
<OTHER-SE>                                     54,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   90,564
<SALES>                                        68,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               68,672
<CGS>                                          22,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  41,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              1,212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,313)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,313)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,313)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.11)


</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**159 CAF 14-00145**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF RAECHEL S. CONNELL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

ALAN PETTEYS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

------------------------------------- CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

JULIE B. HEWITT, MAYVILLE, FOR APPELLANT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Judith S. Claire, J.), entered October 17, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order dismissed the objection of the Chautauqua County Department of Health and Human Services and affirmed the order of the Support Magistrate.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs ( see Matter of Chautauqua County Dept. of Health & Human Servs. v Matteson , ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 20, 2015]).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carlton H. Baab, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Raining Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Raining Data Corporation.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/CARLTON H. BAAB                                             
| |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Carlton H. Baab                                                
| |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Chief Executive Officer)

I,
Brian C. Bezdek, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Raining
Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Raining Data
Corporation.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/BRIAN C. BEZDEK                                                                 
| |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Brian C. Bezdek                                                                    
| |  | Title: |  | Vice President, Finance. Corporate Controller & Secretary (Chief Financial Officer)

---

QuickLinks
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-66964) pertaining to the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
and 1992 Stock Option Plan of Concepts Direct, Inc. of our report dated January
31, 1997, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Concepts
Direct, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado
February 27, 1997
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zsolt Rumy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 1, 2013
By:
/s/ ZSOLT RUMYZsolt RumyChief Executive Officer
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JOCQUI TENAZ RICHARDSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-447

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 2, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; J. Frank Porter, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### Indryas Lemma WOLDIE, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-1145.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 16, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 25, 2006.

Stephen T. Chema II, Ritzert & Leyton, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, James A. Frederick, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 86(c).

PER CURIAM:

Indryas Lemma Woldie, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s decision, which denied his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

In his petition for review, Woldie challenges the determination that he failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” *INS v. Elias-Zacañas,*502 U.S. 478, 483-84, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Woldie fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he seeks.

We therefore deny the petition for review.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*

*

 Woldie does not challenge the denial of his requests for withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture in his petition for review. He has therefore waived appellate review of these claims. See *Edwards v. City of Goldsboro,*178 F.3d 231, 241 n. 6 (4th Cir.1999).