alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1   

   **Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a)**  

I, Douglas A. Pertz, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IMC Global Inc., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IMC Global Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: May 7, 2004

  

      Douglas A. Pertz                   Douglas A. PertzChairman and Chief Executive OfficerIMC Global Inc.

*Return to IMC Global Inc. Form 10-Q*
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 14, 2014. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 14, 2014 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A0152. EZRA SWIFT v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
#### CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting By and Through its BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS v. ITT GRINNELL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; Martin E. Eby Construction Co., Inc., a Kansas corporation; Insurance Company of North America, a Pennsylvania corporation; Federal Insurance Company, a New Jersey corporation; and Northwest Pipe & Casing Co., an Oregon corporation.

Civ. A. No. 83-C-1049.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

Feb. 13, 1985.

Wayne D. Williams, Henry V.S. Hall, Oscar Goldberg, Richard P. Slivka, David L. Dain, Bosworth & Slivka, Denver, Colo., for plaintiff.

Arthur Downey, Kenneth Gulley, David 6. Palmer, Peter C. Houtsma, Paul D. Rula, Denver, Colo., John R. Trigg, Chris Mattison, Hall & Evans, Denver, Colo., for defendants.

ORDER

CARRIGAN, District Judge.

By order of October 5, 1984 I struck the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of Magistrate Schauer’s order of August 3, 1984 as untimely. Plaintiff has moved for reconsideration asserting that the motion was timely under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) (1982). The plaintiff continues to misread the statute.

Section 636(b)(1) has two distinct parts. Subsection 636(b)(1)(A) permits non-dispositive pretrial matters to be referred to a magistrate for *determination.*Local Rule 602C governs *motions for reconsideration*of such determinations. Subsection 636(b)(1)(B) permits dispositive matters to be referred to a magistrate for the submission of *proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition*to a judge. Local Rule 603 governs *objections*to such proposed findings and recommendations.

Plaintiff asserts that the following paragraph of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) applies to motions for reconsideration under subsection 636(b)(1)(A) as well as to objections under subsection 636(b)(1)(B):

> “Within ten days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate. The judge may also receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate with instructions.”

*260Although the paragraph is typeset in such a way as to make it appear to apply to both subsections 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), by its language it very clearly refers only to *objections to proposed findings and recommendations.*The explicit language of the provision prevails over the placement of the margin.

Local Rule 602 C, therefore, is not inconsistent with the statute. Under that rule, the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration was untimely.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of this court’s order of October 5, 1984 is denied.
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-49297, 333-51795, 333-43572, 333-41964,
333-69301, 333-63627, 333-61369, 333-88399, 333-80829, and 333-54024) and Form
S-3 (File No. 333-51897) of Networks Associates, Inc. of our reports dated
January 24, 2001, except as to Note 3, which is as of May 17, 2002, relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appear in this Form 10-K/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
June 26, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Nursing Research Initial Review Group.                    

*Date:*                         June 18-19, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 10 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20817.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Weiqun Li, MD, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Ste. 710, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-5966,                         *wli@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 19, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-12240 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,315]

                    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 19, 2009 in response to a worker                           ( print page 21831)                        petition filed by workers of Davis International, West Point, Mississippi.                

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of April 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10905 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          75,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     99,757
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,535
<PP&E>                                          69,370
<DEPRECIATION>                                (31,898)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 308,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           104656
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,414
<OTHER-SE>                                     204,072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   308,728
<SALES>                                         48,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,265
<CGS>                                           18,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  265,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (190,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (190,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6405

TAVON HILTON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Mark S. Davis , District Judge. ( 2:18

- cv - 00093

- MSD

- RJK )

Submitted : August 7, 2018 Decided: August 16, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tavon Hilton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tavon Hilton seeks to appeal the district court’s order ado pting in part the recommendation of the magist rate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as successive . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012) ; Jones v. Braxton , 392 F.3d 683, 688 (4th C ir. 2004) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by de monstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the
district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We hav e independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hilton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1998
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1998
[CASH]                                           5,412
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  141,859
[ALLOWANCES]                                  (12,690)
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             1,708,459
[PP&E]                                         135,987
[DEPRECIATION]                                (92,193)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               2,743,952
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          592,284
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                         8,058
[OTHER-SE]                                   2,109,983
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 2,743,952
[SALES]                                        440,942
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                             1,750,623
[CGS]                                          361,449
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                1,753,060
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               386,088
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                           (202,027)
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              (186,498)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                          (186,498)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 (186,498)
[EPS-BASIC]                                    (.23)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                    (.23)
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF

THE
TRUSTEE*

OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joshua R. Peterson, Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Compass Bank, on behalf of Compass Bank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust),* not in its
individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (as explained in Note 1 to the Trusts financial statements
contained in the Report, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally
accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THESAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:

/s/ Joshua R. PetersonName:  Joshua R. PetersonTitle:    Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: August 9, 2016




|* | The Trust has no executive officers.
|- | ------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 24.5


                            SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned constitutes and appoints Vince Hren, or the Chief Financial
Officer of Microtest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and each of them, his true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place, and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 1999, for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
Microtest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with any and all amendments to
such Form 10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting to such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done in and about the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes
as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.


DATED: 3/2/00
                                                      /s/  Kent C. Mueller
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Kent C. Mueller
Exhibit 99.2

 

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant toSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

            I, J. Reid Porter, the Chief Financial Officer of IMC Global Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period endedSeptember 30, 2002 of IMC Global Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of IMC Global Inc.

 

               *J. Reid Porter                  * J. Reid Porter

 

November 13, 2002

*Return to IMC Global Inc. Form 10-Q*
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE

DAVID PURYEAR. JUSTICE

BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE

MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE

SCOn- K. FIELD, JUSTICE

CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE

The Honorable Velva L. Price

Criminal District Clerk

Travis County Courthouse

P.O.Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Court of Appeals Number

Trial Court Case Number:

Style: Jason DeLosSantos

v. The State of Texas

Court of Appeals

Third District of Texas

P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547

www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx

(512) 463-1733

/2-

March/. 2015 /

03-13-00339-CR

D-l-DC-12-204039

JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

Dear Honorable Velva L. Price:

The Third Court of Appeals has issued the mandate in this cause. Therefore, I am returning

the following original exhibits:

Supplemental Clerk's Record with State's exhibit 1 (DVD).

Very truly yours,

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Filed InThe District Court

of Travis County^Je^cas

on

at

Velva L. Price, District Clerk

ict Court

M. /£