alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-65,043] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 30, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Local Lodge 726, on behalf of workers of Daramic, LLC, Owensboro, Kentucky. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 30th day of April 2009. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11847 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Written Statement of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
  (a)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ David W. ThompsonDavid W. ThompsonChairman and Chief Executive OfficerOctober 25, 2005
**Exhibit 10.2**FIRST AMENDMENT     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) dated as of June 1, 2006 to the CreditAgreement referenced below is by and among Orbital Sciences Corporation, a Delaware corporation(the “Borrower”), the Lenders identified on the signature pages hereto and Bank of America,N.A., as administrative agent (the “Administrative Agent”).W I T N E S S E T H     WHEREAS, $50 million in credit facilities have been established in favor of the Borrowerpursuant to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, modified and supplemented fromtime to time, the “Credit Agreement”) dated as of December 29, 2004 among the Borrower, theGuarantors identified therein, the Lenders identified therein and the Administrative Agent; and     WHEREAS, the Borrower has requested certain modifications to the Credit Agreement and theRequired Lenders have agreed to the requested modifications on the terms and conditions set forthherein.     NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:     1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined hereinshall have the meanings provided to such terms in the Credit Agreement.     2. Amendments.     2.1 In Section 8.01 of the Credit Agreement, the “and” at the end of clause (t) is deleted,the “.” at the end of clause (u) is amended to read
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11720 and <greek-i>11721]


Indiana Disaster Number IN-00030

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Indiana (FEMA-1832-DR), dated 04/22/
2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/08/2009 through 03/14/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/13/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/22/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/22/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the Presidential disaster 
declaration for the State of Indiana, dated 04/22/2009 is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Daviess, 
Lawrence, St Joseph.
Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Indiana: Dubois, Greene, Jackson, Knox, Martin, Monroe, Orange, 
Pike, Washington.
    Michigan: Cass.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-11880 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
###### **EXHIBIT 99.2**

### **CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

 

The undersigned hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results ofoperations of the SI Diamond Technology, Inc.

 

| Date:       March 14, 2003 |    /s/ Douglas P. Baker                    Douglas P. Baker Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|----------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Cesar Alvarado, Respondent, v Giovanni Culotta, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Submitted October 13, 2009;

decided December 1, 2009

Reported below, 65 AD3d 504.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               1,600
<SECURITIES>                                         52,900
<RECEIVABLES>                                        232,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7,700
<INVENTORY>                                          514,400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     876,000
<PP&E>                                               4,171,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,821,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       3,386,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                328,700
<BONDS>                                              717,800
<COMMON>                                             98,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           1,075,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         3,386,300
<SALES>                                              603,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     603,600
<CGS>                                                448,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        504,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     39,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   15,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      45,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         16,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  28,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      7,500
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         21,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .23


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 24.1

 

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC.POWER OF ATTORNEY

SI DIAMOND TECHNOLOGY, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB

            The undersigned, in hiscapacity as a director of SI Diamond Technology, Inc. (the "Company"), after reviewing the Company's Form 10-KSB, does herebyappoint Douglas P. Baker, his true and lawful attorney to execute in his name, place and stead, in his capacity as a Director ofsaid Company, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and all instruments necessaryor incidental in connection therewith, including all amendments, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Said attorney shall have the full power and authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any andall capacities, every act whatsoever requisite or necessary to be done in the premises, as fully and to all intents and purposes asthe undersigned might or could do in person, the undersigned hereby ratifying and approving the acts of said attorney.

            IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this instrument this 11th day of March, 2003.

                                        /s/ ChuckBailey                                                          Name: Chuck Bailey
#### In the Matter of Afton C., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Dutchess County Department of Social Services, Appellant; James C. et al., Respondents. (And Four Other Proceedings.)

Submitted February 14, 2011;

decided February 17, 2011

Motion by Steuben County Department of Social Services for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 96-30452

Summary Calendar

_______________________

CHARLES ERNEST VINCENT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JACK STEVENSON, Sheriff, St. Bernard Parish;

FORREST BETHANY, Warden, St. Bernard Parish Prison;

SGT SHOGAN, Head of Medical,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(94-CV-3066 J)

______________________________________________________________________________

January 13, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Charles Ernest Vincent, Louisiana prisoner

#109156, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. §

1983 action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I).

Vincent argues that the defendants violated his constitutional

rights by delaying medical treatment after he reinjured his right

leg while getting out of the shower, that the defendants did not
2

take him to his medical appointments at Charity Hospital, that the

defendants assigned him to an upper bunk without a ladder, and that

the defendants did not provide hand rails or adequate mats in the

shower area of the prison. In the district court, Vincent sought

only injunctive relief requiring the defendants to provide any

necessary medical treatment. While his action was pending, Vincent

was transferred from St. Bernard Parish Prison to Hunt Correctional

Center. Vincent’s transfer to another prison rendered his claim

for injunctive relief against the defendants moot. See Cooper v.

Sheriff, Lubbock County, Tex., 929 F.2d 1078, 1084 (5th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, the district court’s dismissal of Vincent’s § 1983

action is affirmed because his action is now moot. See United

States v. McSween, 53 F.3d 584, 687 n.3 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

____ U.S. ____, 116 S. Ct. 199 (1995).

AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Events 
-  Multimedia Library 

# Hearing: A Gateway to Our World

Share this on: 

Hearing is more than just listening. The human ear is capable of telling us a world of information. Hearing loss can affect your quality of life. Learn more about caring for your hearing health.

## Embed this multimedia on your website

Copy and paste this code to embed the content in your website, blog, or other distribution channels. Information on our website is in the public domain, but we appreciate when you link to the source and when credit is given to the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/UdIEcZn5O6A" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe><p>Hearing is more than just listening. The human ear is capable of telling us a world of information. Hearing loss can affect your quality of life. Learn more about caring for your hearing health.</p>

 

May 9, 2022

## Language

          - English
          - Español

## Media Inquiries

Contact the NIDCD press office at news@nidcd.nih.gov.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from SHELTER
PROPERTIES  II 2000 Third  Quarter  10-QSB and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0000319723
<NAME>                                SHELTER PROPERTIES II
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      849
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               180
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   27,295
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (18,664)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           10,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                   7,918
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                2,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             10,722
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          4,815
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             3,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                958
<EPS-BASIC>                                               34.47 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Anselmo Soto, Jr., Appellant, v Brian Fischer, Respondent.

Submitted August 17, 2009;

decided September 22, 2009

Reported below, 60 AD3d 1074.

*793Motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 25, 2009 dismissal order denied *[see*12 NY3d 900 (2009)].
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3



                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                  SECOND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                         PLATINUM SOFTWARE CORPORATION,
                             A DELAWARE CORPORATION

        (Pursuant to Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law)

        PLATINUM SOFTWARE CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing
under and by virtue of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "Corporation"),
does hereby certify:

        FIRST: That at a duly held meeting of the Board of Directors of the
Corporation, the Board of Directors of the Corporation duly adopted resolutions
setting forth a proposed amendment to the Second Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and
directing that said amendment be submitted to the stockholders of the
Corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:

                      RESOLVED, that Article One of the Corporation's Second
        Restated Certificate of Incorporation be amended to read as follows:

          "The name of the Corporation is Epicor Software Corporation."

        SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of
Directors, a meeting of the stockholders of the Corporation was duly called and
held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as
required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

        THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by Perry Tarnofsky, its duly authorized Vice President
this 29th day of April, 1999.


                                        Platinum Software Corporation,
                                        a Delaware corporation


                                        By:
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                   Perry Tarnofsky
.lazyloaded:not(.elementor-motion-effects-element-type-background),.lazyloaded>.elementor-motion-effects-container>.elementor-motion-effects-layer,.lazyloaded>[class*=-wrap]>.elementor-motion-effects-container>.elementor-motion-effects-layer,body.e-lazyload .e-con.lazyloaded:before,body.e-lazyload .lazyloaded,body.e-lazyload .lazyloaded .elementor-background-overlay{--e-bg-lazyload-loaded:var(--e-bg-lazyload)}
#### Ross *against*Dole.

in1aspecíáiadbión on the casé Ip?” e?eot?h| a nuisance,, fnd thim beilg no certificate; of the judge, that the title to 'land came', in Quea*. tiori, it-wás held thatthe plaintiff1 could not repoTer .costs, but jniistpay costd to the defendant.

*DSut the plaintiff' was allowed tó *set offih&damagts.*recovered, against theucostaj 'notwHbátaDáibg *nüj iien*which, the defeüdantVáttornéy'biáimedtQihftyépaíbecósts'/ / ' ' ' ■ * / v.

THIS. ftas'. .a1 special aetión-. on the,,case, for. erecting, a. ■* - - _ - _ ^ • i i't nuisance-, in which the plaintiff recovered, fofty-fiYe dollars 1 . v ^ ’ : • quéstr<?n on the presentijiotion was* whether ,thé.plaípti'ff cpuld recover costs, of-must .pay- cosfs.

*Ross.,*for the plaintiff.

*Buel,*contra.

*307*Per Curiam.*

This was a special-action on the case for erecting a nuisance. The plaintiff has recovered 45 dollars, and the question now is, whether he is entitled to recover costs, or is bound to pay costs to the defendant. No certificate has been procured from the judge who tried the cause, that the title to land came in question. Nor, indeed, is it a case in which the title to lands could come in question. Although the defendant might have a claim to the house occupied by the plaintiff, he has no right to endeavour to drive him out, by erecting a nuisance. He must try his right in a regular course of judicial proceedings. And this we know he once attempted to establish, but failed. The offer of the defendant to show a title was properly overruled by the judge. The motion, on the part of the plaintiff, for costs, must be denied. He is bound to pay costs to the defendant, but the plaintiff has a right to set off the damages recovered against the costs, notwithstanding the lien which the defendant’s attorney claims to have on these costs, *(a)*

(a)

 See *Porter*v. *Lane,*8 *Johns. Rep.*357,
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 678 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to exclude 

communications over the Internet from the definition of public communication. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

exclude communications over the Internet from the definition of public communication.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF PUBLIC 

4 COMMUNICATION. 

5 Paragraph (22) of section 301 of the Federal Elec6 tion Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431(22)) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘Such 

8 term shall not include communications over the Internet.’’.

Æ