alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              SEP-28-1998
<CASH>                                            210
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                   2,444
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     1,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,966 
<PP&E>                                        104,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                 43,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 84,498
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19,491
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          118
<OTHER-SE>                                     59,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   84,498
<SALES>                                        37,018 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               37,018
<CGS>                                          12,336         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  37,454 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (153)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (476)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    (476)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 84 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain sightseeing 

flights from taxes on air transportation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

certain sightseeing flights from taxes on air transportation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SIGHTSEEING FLIGHTS EXEMPT 

4 FROM TAXES ON AIR TRANSPORTATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4281 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to small aircraft on nonestab7 lished lines) is amended by adding at the end the following 

8 new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of this section, an aircraft 

9 shall not be considered as operated on an established line 
2 

•S 84 IS

1 if such aircraft is operated on a flight the sole purpose 

2 of which is sightseeing.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply with respect to transportation be5 ginning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

6 but shall not apply to any amount paid before such date. 

Æ
<Page>

                                                           EXHIBIT 3.1 (3)


                                STATE OF DELAWARE

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
                    RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                          CHART HOUSE ENTERPRISES, INC.

     Chart House Enterprises, Inc. (the "Corporation"), a corporation organized
and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:     The Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of the
Corporation is hereby amended by replacing Article FIRST thereof in its entirety
with the following:

       "FIRST:  The name of the corporation is Angelo and Maxie's, Inc. (the
       "Corporation")."

     SECOND:    The foregoing amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

     THIRD:     The foregoing amendment shall become effective on the filing
date of this Certificate.

     This Certificate is executed on this 30th day of July, 2002.

CHART HOUSE ENTERPRISES, INC.


By:  /s/ Kenneth R. Posner
   -------------------------------
     Kenneth R. Posner
     President
#### The New-York African Society for Mutual Relief *against*James Varick and others.

In debt on a bond to *the committee of a corporation solvendum*to the corporation by its true name, the corporation may declare in that own name and may allege, that the bond was made up to them by the description of *the committce,*&c.

THIS was an action of debt’ on bond, and came before the courj on a general demurrer to the second count in the plaintiffs’ declaration.

This count stated, that the defendants, by their certain writing obligatory, acknowledged themselves to be held and firmly bound unto the-plaintiffs, by the description of the standing committée of the *New York African Society for Mutual Relief*in ‘ *39the sum of, &c., to be paid to the plaintiffs when the defendants should be thereunto afterwards requested, with condition, that if *Daniel Barry,*one of the defendants, should well and truly observe and perform the duties enjoined upon him as treasurer. of the *New-York'African Society for Mutual Relief*he having been appointed treasurer for one year, then the said obligation was to be void : the breach averred was, that *Barry*embezzled 800 dollars which he had received as treasurer, and absconded with it.

*Riker,*in support of the demurrer,

cited *Gould*v. Barnes, 3 *Taunt. Rep,*503. *Taft*v. *Brewster,*9 *Johns. Rep.*334.

*Anihon,*contra.

He cited *Kyd on Corp.*287. 6 *Co. 65. a.*10 *Co.*125. *b. 3 Wils.*184. *Wilks's Rep, 557.*

*Per Curiam.*

This case comes before the court on a ds.piurrer to the second count in the de'claration. The action is debt, upon a .bond given by the defendants to the plaintiffs, for the faithful discharge of the duties of treasurer of the society, by *Daniel Barry.*The declaration sets out the condition of the bond, with .an averment of a breach. The second count states, that the defendants acknowledged themselves to be held and firmly bound unto the plaintiff, by the description of the standing committee of the *New York African Society for Mutual Relief, Sec.,*to be paid to the plaintiff, &g. The ground upon which this demurrer was placed by the defendants’ counsel, was, that the suit should haye been in the name of the trustees, or Committee, and not in the name of the corporation. From the demurrer books, it does not appear that any trustees are named. There is no *oyer*of the bond; and the most that can be col},ected from thp pleadings, is a misnomer of the corporation. By the declaration, however, it appears that the *solvendum*is to the plaintiff by the true corporate ríame, and this is sufficient. (3 *Wils.*184.) Where a deed is made *to,*a corporation, by a name .varying from the true name, ;the plaintiffs may sue in their true name, and aver ip the declaration, that the defendant made the deed to them, by the name mentioned in the deed. Thp allegation in the declaration, that the defendants acknowledged themselves to be bound *unto the plaintiffs, by the description,*&c., j,s equiyalent to such an averment. (10 Co. 125. *b.*1 *Kyd**40*on Corp.*287.) The demurrer is, therefore, not well taken, and the plaintiff is entitled: to judgment..

Judgment for plaintiffs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,729,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  381,756
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,276)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,170,262
<PP&E>                                       1,808,851
<DEPRECIATION>                               (693,674)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,296,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,067,570
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        92,540
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,136,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,296,904
<SALES>                                      1,850,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,850,142
<CGS>                                          971,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  971,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,462,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (21)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,528,390)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,528,390)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,528,390)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3694

_____________________________
T ERRELL D ANIELS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

. April 24, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , B ILBREY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Terrell Daniels, pro se
, A ppellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF  THE TRUSTEE*  OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 1
to the Trusts financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September
16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from
generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other
royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:
    Lee Ann AndersonTitle:
    Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: August 9, 2007 
 *
    
    The Trust has no executive officers.
#### Marshall *against*Mott.

In collateral matters arising In the progress of a suit, as on a motion for a commission to examine witnesses abroad, affidavits taken before magistrates or publicofficer* out of the state, may be read»

*GARR,*for the plaintiff,

nfoved for a commission to take the examination of witnesses ahfBad, in this cause. He offered to read an affidavit for this purpose, taken before the chief judge of the court of sessions for *Suffolk*county, in the state of *Massachusetts.*

*Weyman,*contra,

objected, that the affidavit not being before a proper officer, could not be read in this court.

*Per Curiam.*

Where the party resides out of the state, we have been liberal in allowing affidavits taken abroad to be read in all collateral matters arising in the progress of a cause. Affidavits taken before the mayor of *Philadelphia,*before *Ame* rican*consuls, and other public agents in foreign countries, have been often read in this court, in support of similar applications.

Motion granted.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                            A-FEM MEDICAL CORPORATION
                       CALCULATIONS OF NET LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                   For the three months ended
                                                                             March 31,
                                                                  ----------------------------
                                                                     2000             1999
                                                                  -----------      -----------
<S>                                                               <C>              <C>
Actual weighted average shares outstanding for the period           9,563,225        9,471,875

Dilutive common and preferred stock, options and
   warrants using the treasury stock method(1)                             --               --
                                                                  -----------      -----------

Total shares used in per share calculations                         9,563,225        9,471,875
                                                                  -----------      -----------

Net loss                                                          $  (428,939)     $  (696,115)
                                                                  -----------      -----------

Basic and diluted net loss per share                              $     (0.04)     $     (0.07)
                                                                  ===========      ===========
</TABLE>

(1)  Preferred stock, warrants and options outstanding are not included, as the
     effect would be anti-dilutive.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Carlton H. Baab, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Raining
Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Raining Data
Corporation.

| |  | By:    | /s/ Carlton H. Baab                                            
| |  | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  | Carlton H. Baab                                                
| |  | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer (Chief Executive Officer)

I,
Brian C. Bezdek, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Raining
Data Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Raining Data
Corporation.

| |  | By:    | /s/ Brian C. Bezdek                                                               
| |  | ------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  | Brian C. Bezdek                                                                   
| |  | Title: | Vice President, Finance Corporate Controller & Secretary (Chief Financial Officer)

---

QuickLinks
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 8, 2021

NO. 03-19-00420-CV

In re Commitment of David Delacruz

APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED ON MOTION FOR REHEARING -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment and order of civil commitment signed by the trial court on 

March 21, 2019. The Court’s opinion and judgment dated December 16, 2020 are withdrawn. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the judgment and order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s

judgment and order of civil commitment. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, 

no adjudication of costs is made.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         196,598
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      743
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,755
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               273,633
<PP&E>                                          67,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                (52,870)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 299,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,056
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        76,414
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,181,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   299,363
<SALES>                                         25,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,935
<CGS>                                           13,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,652)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (75,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (75,652)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 12 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGESSEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited) ThreeMonths
    
    For the Fiscal Year EndedEnded(millions, except ratios)
    
    4/3/04(unaudited)
    
    2003
    
    2002
    
    2001
    
    2000Fixed ChargesInterest and amortization of debt discountand expense on all indebtedness
    
    $
    76
    
    
    $
    1,816
    
    
    $
    1,143
    
    
    $
    1,415
    
    
    $
    1,248Add interest element implicit in rentals
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    167
    
    
    
    157
    
    
    
    161
    
    
    
    136113
    
    
    
    1,983
    
    
    
    1,300
    
    
    
    1,576
    
    
    
    1,384Interest capitalized
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    4Total fixed charges
    
    $
    113
    
    
    $
    1,984
    
    
    $
    1,303
    
    
    $
    1,587
    
    
    $
    1,388IncomeIncome
(loss) before income taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    
    
    ($25
    )
    
    $
    5,449
    
    
    $
    2,453
    
    
    $
    1,223
    
    
    $
    2,223Deduct undistributed net income (loss)of unconsolidated companies
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    17(27
    )
    
    
    5,441
    
    
    
    2,433
    
    
    
    1,211
    
    
    
    2,206AddFixed charges (excluding interest capitalized)
    
    
    113
    
    
    
    1,983
    
    
    
    1,300
    
    
    
    1,576
    
    
    
    1,384Income before fixed charges andincome taxes
    
    $
    86
    
    
    $
    7,424
    
    
    $
    3,733
    
    
    $
    2,787
    
    
    $
    3,590Ratio of income to fixed charges
    
    
    (A
    )
    
    
    3.74
    
    
    
    2.86
    
    
    
    1.76
    
    
    
    2.59
  (A)
    
    As a result of the loss for the three months ended April 3, 2004, earnings did not cover fixed charges by $27 million. Total fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    113Income before fixed charges andincome taxes
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    86deficit
    
    $
    27