alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Martin G. Paravato, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IRIS International,Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such valuation. 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 11, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1-3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         209,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,411,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                   509,036
<INVENTORY>                                    618,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,043,229
<PP&E>                                      10,933,914
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,415,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,913,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,618,445
<BONDS>                                      6,578,052
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,089,638
<COMMON>                                       140,351
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,500,247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,913,586
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,894,014
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,653,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                43,503
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             242,572
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,186)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,186)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### Judith Bandler, Appellant, v Brian Bandler, Respondent.

[874 NYS2d 141]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lubell, J.), dated September 26, 2007, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to modify a previous order of pendente lite support, dated August 16, 2006, which directed him to make unallocated support payments to the plaintiff in the sum of $8,500 per month, to the extent of directing the defendant to make timely payment of the mortgage on the marital home, and related expenses, directly to the relevant payees.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In an order dated August 16, 2006, the Supreme Court directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff the sum of $8,500 per month in unallocated pendente lite support. The order itself and the hearing on which it was based make it clear that the plaintiff was to use a portion of the child support to pay the mortgage on the marital home, and related expenses.

*776Here, the defendant submitted evidence that the mortgage on the marital home was four months in default, and that the parties’ home equity line of credit account was past due. Further, he submitted an invoice from Con Edison, stating that the electric bill for the home had not been paid. He also submitted copies of checks he sent to the parties’ bank in order to cure the default and avoid foreclosure. The plaintiff failed to dispute the defendant’s evidence, and waived any right to an evidentiary hearing *(see Messinger v Messinger,*24 AD3d 631, 632 [2005]; *Rosenberg v Rosenberg,*155 AD2d 428, 432 [1989]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in modifying the August 16, 2006, pendente lite order to the extent of directing the defendant to make timely payment of the mortgage on the marital home, and related expenses, directly to the relevant payees. Fisher, J.E, Miller, Garni and Balkin, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 867 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 867

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 8200 South Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, as the 
      ``Sergeant First Class John Marshall Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 21, 2005

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 8200 South Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, as the 
      ``Sergeant First Class John Marshall Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 8200 
South Vermont Avenue in Los Angeles, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant First Class John Marshall Post Office 
Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant First Class John 
Marshall Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION

** **

Each ofthe undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, theAnnual Report of Ramp Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Ramp Corporation for the periods presented.

 

Date:April 14, 2004                                                             By:       /s/ Darryl R. Cohen                   

Darryl R. Cohen

Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

 

Date: April 14, 2004                                                             By:       /s/ Mitchell M. Cohen                

Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
#### State v. Sellars

Case below: 173 N.C. App. 235

No. 547P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA04-289)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. Def’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 15A-1443(a)(b)(c) and N.C.G.S. § 15A-954(a)(I)(4)(7)

5. Def’s Motion to Dissolve Stay

1. Allowed 360 N.C. 75

Stay dissolved 12/19/06

2. Denied 12/19/06

3. See Special Order Page 158

4. Dismissed 12/19/06

5. Dismissed as Moot 12/19/06
#### Baker *v.*The State.

There was no error in refusing to sustain the *certiorari*on any of the grounds set forth in the petition. *Judgment affirmed.*

April 16, 1894.

*Certiorari.*Before Judge Milner. Bartow superior court. January term, 1894.

*W.*I. Heyward and J. B. Conyers, for plaintiff in error. A. W. Fite, solicitor-general, *contra.*

On conviction of assault and battery in the city court of Cartersville, defendant carried the case to the superior court, where the conviction was sustained. Numerous grounds of error were assigned, a report of which would not be useful. The case seems to tui’n mainly upon the evidence, which, though conflicting, supports the conviction.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
New York Residential, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Kornstein, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Accounting and Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to New York
Residential, Inc. and will be retained by New York Residential, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.




/s/ Robert
      KornsteinRobert
      KornsteinPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
                  Acting
      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial
                  Officer)
      and SecretaryApril 14, 2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO FLORES-HERNA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72135

Agency No. A076-625-266

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 7, 2014** 

Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, BEA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Armando Flores-Herna petitions for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ decision denying Flores-Herna adjustment of status on account of his

2005 conviction for possessing a controlled substance “while armed with a loaded,

operable firearm.” See Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11370.1 (1996). Flores-Herna

FILED

OCT 17 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
argues his conviction is eligible for relief under the safe-harbor provision of the

Federal First Offender Act, which requires that a petitioner’s conviction be for

“possession of drugs, or an equivalent or lesser charge such as possession of drug

paraphernalia.” Ramirez-Altamirano v. Holder, 563 F.3d 800, 812 (9th Cir. 2009),

overruled on other grounds by Nunez-Reyes v. Holder, 646 F.3d 684 (9th Cir.

2011) (en banc); see also Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1074–75 (9th

Cir. 2013). On its face, Flores-Herna’s 2005 conviction requires more conduct

than mere possession of drugs; the conviction requires possession of drugs while

armed with a loaded and operable firearm. The conviction therefore cannot qualify

as “possession of drugs, or an equivalent or lesser charge.” Ramirez-Altamirano,

563 F.3d at 812.

DENIED. 

2
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




       In connection  with the Annual Report of Berkeley  Technology  Limited on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Ian K. Whitehead, as Chief Financial
Officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.



Date:  March 31, 2009                            By:    /s/  Ian K. Whitehead

                                                        Ian K. Whitehead
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
# College of Strategic Intelligence

### CSI

The College of Strategic Intelligence endeavors to improve the global and cultural awareness of military and civilian intelligence professionals to provide them frameworks and tools for critical analysis. We seek to instill in-depth knowledge of the Intelligence Community (IC) and its support of the national security policy process and to enhance their ability to consider the role and desired impact of intelligence at the strategic level, in addition to the role played by their particular agency. 

In addition to their academic experience, NIU students interact with students and faculty from other IC agencies and military branches and complete coursework and research at the Top Secret level.   

CSI students can earn aBachelor of Science in Intelligence (BSI) degree, aMaster of Science of Strategic Intelligence (MSSI) degree, or a Certificate in Intelligence Studies (CIS).  Students in the MSSI program study the global environment, frameworks of analysis, intelligence collection, national strategy and logical reasoning.  Students also have the opportunity to take elective courses ranging from regional concerns to transnational threats.  Students must also complete a graduate thesis.

The BSI is an undergraduate completion program where students complete 57 credits that focus entirely on intelligence. It includes the completion of a capstone project exploring a contemporary intelligence issue.

The Certificate in Intelligence Studies is offered in a range of topics including: Africa, China: Collection Concern, Counterintelligence, Strategic Intelligence in Special Operations, IC Leadership and Management, Russia/Eurasia, and Homeland Intelligence.

Apply Now for the CIS Program

**Note:**  All prospective NIU students must meet the **eligibility criteria** before applying.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 88 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 88

 To allow the psychiatric or psychological examinations required under 
chapter 313 of title 18, United States Code, relating to offenders with 
 mental disease or defect, to be conducted by a clinical social worker.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow the psychiatric or psychological examinations required under 
chapter 313 of title 18, United States Code, relating to offenders with 
 mental disease or defect, to be conducted by a clinical social worker.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Psychiatric and Psychological 
Examinations Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. EXAMINATIONS BY CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKERS.

     Section 4247(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended, in 
the first sentence, by striking ``psychiatrist or psychologist'' and 
inserting ``psychiatrist, psychologist, or clinical social worker''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Donald Schanbarger, Appellant.

Submitted November 30, 2009;

decided January 14, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal etc. dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5602).
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice TKH Declaration re PSAN Phase Out Compliance (10 Jan 2017)


Download file: TKH Declaration re PSAN Phase Out Compliance (10 Jan 2017)
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review R13.                    

*Date:*                         June 17, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary Kelly, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Inst.  of Dental & Craniofacial Research, NIH 6701 Democracy Blvd., room 672, MSC 4878, Bethesda, MD 20892-4878, 301-594-4809,                         *mary_kelly@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 11, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-11486 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P