alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No.6 to Radian Group Inc. Saving Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.3 
 Radian Group Inc. Savings Incentive Plan 
 Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1997 

 Amendment No. 6 
 WHEREAS, Radian Group Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the Radian Group Inc. Savings Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) amended and restated in its entirety effective January 1, 1997 for the benefit of its eligible employees
and the eligible employees of the Participating Companies; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company, pursuant to the provisions of Section 11.1 of
the Plan, has the ability to amend the Plan by action of its Board of Directors; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as
necessary to revise the eligibility criteria for the 2007 Employer Transition Credit and Discretionary Contributions, and to modify the Plan’s allocation formula for the Employer Discretionary Contribution. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the following respects, effective as of the date indicated: 
  

	1.	Effective October 1, 2007, Section 2.1 of the Plan is amended by adding the following new paragraph to the end thereof to read as follows: 

 “Notwithstanding the above language, for any Employer Discretionary Contributions or Transition Credit Contributions made on account of the 2007 Plan
Year, a Participant shall be deemed to have satisfied the last day of the Plan Year employment requirement if they are employed by a Participating Company on October 1, 2007.” 
  

	2.	Effective January 1, 2007, Section 3.5(c) is amended to read as follows: 

 “(c) Discretionary Contributions. The Company may contribute to the Plan such discretionary amounts as the Board of Directors shall determine annually in its sole and absolute discretion. Such contribution
may be made without regard to the existence or nonexistence of net profits of the Company. The contribution, if any, may be fixed in terms of dollars, percentage of net profits, percentage of Compensation, or any other method determined by the Board
of Directors. Any such contributions will be allocated to the Discretionary Contribution Account of each eligible Participant (as defined in Section 2.1) as a uniform flat dollar amount.” 







 WITNESS WHEREOF, Radian Group Inc. has caused this Amendment No. 6 to be executed by its duly authorized party on
this 7th day of November, 2007. 
  

			
	Radian Group Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert E. Croner

	Title:	 	EVP, Human Resources
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<CIK>          0000821172
<NAME>         MEDIZONE INTERNATIONAL 
       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                19,750
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0 
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      19,750
<PP&E>                                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        19,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 10,000
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               1,150
<OTHER-SE>                                             8,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          19,750
<SALES>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      10,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (10,811)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
          

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 15 February 11, 2005 Sears, Roebuck and Co.
3333 Beverly Road
Hoffman Estates, IL 60179 We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for
the thirteen week and twenty-six week periods ended July 3, 2004 and June 28, 2003, as indicated in
our report dated August 10, 2004, December 1, 2004 as to Note 10, February 11, 2005 as to Note 15
(which report includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the restatements discussed in Note 10 and
15); because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the quarter ended July 3, 2004, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 2-80037, 33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485, 33-45479, 33-55825, 33-58851, 33-64345, 333-08141,
333-113532, and 333-121776 of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Registration Statement No. 333-92082 of
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck Acceptance Corp.;
Registration Statement Nos. 33-64775, 333-18591,
333-43309, and 333-120219 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck and Co. Deferred
Compensation Plan; Registration Statement No. 333-102114 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears
401(K) Savings Plan (formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees and the Sears
401(K) Profit Sharing Plan) and Lands End, Inc. Retirement Plan; Registration Statement No.
33-44671 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears DC Corp.; Registration Statement No. 333-38131 of
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears Associate Stock Ownership Plan; Registration Statement No.
333-52056 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2000 Employee Stock Plan; Registration Statement No.
333-72514 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2001 Broad-Based Stock Option Plan; and Registration
Statement No. 333-87942 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan. We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act
of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and
11 of that Act. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
**Exhibit 32.2**

**** 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United States Code**

 

 

I, Steven T. Campbell, the chief financial officer of United States Cellular Corporation, certify that (i) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United States Cellular Corporation.

 

/s/ Steven T. CampbellSteven T. Campbell
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,711,158
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,033,932 
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,667,983)
<INVENTORY>                                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0 
<PP&E>                                                   0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,349,391 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0 
<BONDS>                                        101,136,489 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               30,000 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                         1,095,286 
<OTHER-SE>                                               0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,849,391 
<SALES>                                                  0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,082,938 
<CGS>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   756,609 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   225,000 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,994,331 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,106,998 
<INCOME-TAX>                                       655,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,451,998
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .06
        


</TABLE>
# Vision, Mission, and Values

## Vision 

The center of academic life for the Intelligence Community – preparing today’s Intelligence Community leaders for tomorrow’s challenges.

## Mission

NIU advances the intelligence profession through a holistic, integrative, contextual approach to education that promotes dynamic teaching, engaged learning, original research, academic outreach, analytical problem solving, rigorous research methods, collaborative processes, and lifelong learning.

## Values

## Learning

Students, faculty, and staff embrace a culture of continuous learning. Every new challenge presents the opportunity for growth; and every interaction presents the opportunity for the acquisition of new knowledge.

## Diversity

NIU embraces the principle that students, faculty, and staff have the academic freedom to explore significant and controversial questions as an essential precondition to fulfilling the mission of educating students and advancing knowledge.

## Integrity

NIU holds a special public trust. We practice careful stewardship of our resources, both financial and human. We will not just say the right thing, we will do the right thing and remain accountable to ourselves, and ultimately to the American people.

## Academic Freedom

NIU embraces the principle that students, faculty, and staff have the academic freedom to explore significant and controversial questions as an essential precondition to fulfilling the mission of educating students and advancing knowledge.

## Collaboration

NIU embraces the spirit of collegiality; the mission is only accomplished if we work as a team. Students, faculty, and staff must have the character and conviction to lead and the strength to follow.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of James William Jones, Respondent, v Uninsured Employers’ Fund, Appellant, and American Site Developers LLC et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[977 NYS2d 432]

Egan Jr., J.

Appeals from two decisions of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 20, 2011 and December 13, 2012, which, among other things, ruled that Erie County was not liable for workers’ compensation benefits under Workers’ Compensation Law § 56.

In October 2006, a number of trees located within recreational areas owned by Erie County were damaged during a heavy snow storm, prompting the County to enter into a written agreement with American Site Developers LLC to cut the damaged branches and place them along the nearby rights-of-way for removal. American, in turn, subcontracted the work to Ray Debris Removal, and Ray further subcontracted the work to claimant’s employer, Rhonda Hartley Construction (hereinafter RHC). Claimant was injured in January 2007 when he fell while trimming tree limbs in one of the affected parks.

Claimant subsequently filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits, and his case was established for injuries to his right leg, upper lumbar spine and lower thoracic spine. Following extended proceedings, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge determined, insofar as is relevant here, that RHC, Ray and *1091American were uninsured for workers’ compensation purposes, thereby imposing liability for claimant’s benefits and medical expenses upon the Uninsured Employers’ Fund. The Fund appealed, primarily contending that the County should be liable as an owner of timber pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 56. The Workers’ Compensation Board disagreed, and the Fund now appeals.

We affirm. Workers’ Compensation Law § 56 provides, in relevant part, that “[a]n owner of timber other than farm lands, who contracts with another to carry on or perform work or service in connection therewith, which work or service is, involves or includes a hazardous employment, shall for the purposes of this section be deemed a contractor, and such other a subcontractor.” Although the parties debate whether the Board erred in refusing to extend the definition of “timber” to include storm-damaged tree limbs, this issue need not detain us. Regardless of whether the County qualifies as an “owner of timber” within the meaning of the statute, the record makes clear that the County did not have a contract with RHC *for*the branch-removal work. Absent the requisite contractual relationship, liability may not be imposed upon the County under Workers’ Compensation Law § 56 *(see Employer: Carlos Echevia,*2010 WL 3577308, *2 [2010], 2010 NY Wrk Comp LEXIS 7581, *4 [WCB No. 3070 6658, Sept. 9, 2010]; *see also Reynolds v International Paper Co.,*249 AD2d 727, 729 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 808 [1998]; *Matter of Gray v Aldrich,*39 AD2d 492, 493 [1972], *affd*34 NY2d 553 [1974]). The Fund’s remaining arguments on this point have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Peters, EJ., Lahtinen and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decisions are affirmed, without costs.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. § 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Cronos Global Income Fund XIV (the
Registrant) on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, John
Kallas, the Chief Financial Officer of Cronos Capital Corp., the General Partner
of the Registrant, certify, based on my knowledge, that:

|               |  |                                                                                                                                                        | 
|-------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|(i)            |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 
|               |  |                                                                                                                                                       
|(ii)           |  | The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Registrant.
|               |  |                                                                                                                                                       
|March 25, 2003

|                                     | 
|------------------------------------ | 
|/s/ John Kallas                     
|                                    
|John Kallas, Chief Financial Officer
|Cronos Capital Corp.,               
|General Partner of the Registrant   



---

*          This certification, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, other than as required by Section 906, shall not be deemed to be filed
with the Commission or subject to the rules and regulations promulgated by the
Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or to the
liabilities of Section 18 of said Act.
**Exhibit 31(a)**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Alan J. Lacy, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this amendment to quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures,or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures tobe designed under oursupervision, to ensurethat material informationrelating to theregistrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us byothers within thoseentities, particularlyduring the period in whichthis report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosurecontrols and proceduresand presented in thisreport our conclusionsabout the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controlsand procedures, as of theend of the period coveredby this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this reportany change in theregistrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting that occurredduring the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) thathas materially affected,or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, theregistrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significantdeficiencies and materialweaknesses in the designor operation of internalcontrol over financialreporting which arereasonably likely toadversely affect theregistrant’s ability torecord, process, summarizeand report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involvesmanagement or otheremployees who have asignificant role in theregistrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting.
Date: December 1, 2004   /s/ Alan J. LacyAlan J. LacyChairman of the Board of Directors,  Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of  Sears,Roebuck and Co.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1302

In re: ALVIN GLASGOW, a/k/a Buju,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:15-cr-00222-LO-1; 1:19-cv-00082-LO)

Submitted: May 16, 2019 Decided: May 20, 2019

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Glasgow, Petitioner Pro Se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Glasgow petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the 

district court to reinstate his exhibits to his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and to hold 

an evidentiary hearing. We conclude that Glasgow is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. 

Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available 

only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re Norfolk S. Ry. Co.,

756 F.3d 282, 294 (4th Cir. 2014). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. 

In re Lockheed Martin Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by 

Glasgow is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny Glasgow’s

petition for writ of mandamus. We further deny Glasgow’s request that Chief Judge 

Gregory review his mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

lei.zhu3@nih.gov

October 2019

Back to Top
#### In the Matter of Mercedes Casado et al., Respondents, v Marvin Markus, as Chair of the New York City Rent Guidelines Board, et al., Appellants.

Submitted August 2, 2010;

decided October 26, 2010

Motion by the Rent Stabilization Association of NYC, Inc., et al. for leave to appear as amici curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the affidavit is accepted as filed, and for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.