alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent
to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-158561 on Form S-3, in Registration Statements Nos. 333-140617, 333-136659, 333-46345 and 333-86487 on Forms S-4 and in Registration Statements Nos. 33-75444, 33-75442, 33-84398,
33-85624, 333-16719, 333-57171, 333-102544, 333-105307 and 333-116132 on Forms S-8 and the related Prospectuses, of our reports dated February 23, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. and
subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Sterling Bancshares Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009.

LOGO

Houston, Texas

February 23, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import Bank of the United States to Congress.

# DATES:

*Time and Place:*                         Wednesday, May 27, 2009 from 9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.                    

*Agenda:*                         Agenda items include a focus on the congressionally mandated Competitiveness Report, which focuses on how Ex-Im Bank's programs compared with their major G-7 ECA counterparts during 2008.                    

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting will be open to public participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance process into the building, and you may contact Susan Houser to be placed on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to May 25, 2009, Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3232 or TDD (202) 565-3377.                    

*Further Information:*                         For further information, contact Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3232.                    

Kamil P. Cook,

General Counsel (Acting).

[FR Doc. E9-11327 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM A-FEM
MEDICAL CORPORATION'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       45
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         53
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   367
<PP&E>                                           1,044
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (635)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         72
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                         146
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       928
<SALES>                                             18
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    18
<CGS>                                              118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (869)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (869)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel PADRON-RAMIREZ, true name Jose Alberto Ceballos-Mar-tinez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41502.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw from representation of Manuel Padron-Ramirez and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Padron-Ramirez has not responded to counsel’s motion and brief. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw *673is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IN THE MATTER OF PEGGY GONSALVES, ) an incapacitated and disabled person

. ) No. SD36795 ) FILED: December 29, 2020

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR TRANSFER
(Before Rahmeyer, P.J., Scott, J., and Francis, J. )

PER CURIAM. Arika seeks rehearing or transfer, claiming a right to assert

that Peggy’s appointed counsel was ineffective

. Our opinion’s note 6 observation still holds: A rika “fails to show how she

was aggr i e ved by anything of which she complains

. ” It would not harm Arika for
anyone else’s lawyer to underperform, except perhaps to the extent their interests
align ed , which Arika does not and could not claim here

– her self

- dealing was
among the reasons Peggy n eeded and was granted the court’s protection.
Standing “ asks whether the persons seeking relief have a right to do so

. ”

Fa rmer v. Kinder , 89 S.W.3d 447, 451 (Mo. banc 2002)

. We must find standing

before reaching substantive issues , and cannot waive that requirement

. Id

. We deny r ehearing or transfer. 1

1 Arika also fleetingly argues that our references to Whittaker and Walker “ as support for dismissing this appeal on the grounds that Arika lacks standing ... are contrary to our supreme court holding in [ In re ] Beyersdorfer [ , 59 S.W.3d 523 (Mo. banc 2001)] .” She is wrong. The Beyersdorfer appellant was a spouse. 59 S.W.3d at 524 & n.2. As such, he had § 472.160 standing that Arika does not and cannot claim. Se e Opinion, note 6

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
consolidated balance sheets and statements of income for Telos Corporation and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            424,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  58,179,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,361,000
<INVENTORY>                                    14,497,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               75,260,000
<PP&E>                                         38,828,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 22,324,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                111,747,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          39,841,000
<BONDS>                                        52,923,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          44,298,000
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (37,556,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  111,747,000
<SALES>                                        87,710,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              180,435,000
<CGS>                                          77,115,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 154,565,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,551,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (96,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (96,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (96,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                     SUBSIDIARIES OF HA-LO INDUSTRIES, INC.

The following is a list of all direct and indirect subsidiaries of the
registrant as of March 15, 2000. The state or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization is indicated in parentheses following each
subsidiary's name. The names of the divisions or other business units of each
subsidiary are indented and listed below the relevant subsidiary's name.

Creative Concepts in Advertising, Inc. (Michigan)
Lee Wayne Corporation (Illinois)
HA-LO Sports, Inc. (Illinois)
Promotional Marketing LLC. d/b/a UPSHOT (Illinois)
UPSHOT (New York), Inc. (New York)
Lipson Associates, Inc. d/b/a LAGA (Ohio)
Premier Promotions and Marketing, Inc. (California)
UPSHOT Direct Inc. (Virginia)
CF Napa Design Inc. d/b/a Collonna Farrell (California)
Market USA, Inc. (Illinois)
Marusa Marketing, Ltd. (Canada)
HA-LO Canada, Inc. (Canada)
HMK International Holdings, Inc. (Netherlands)
     Formula Marketing Limited (United Kingdom)
     HA-LO Belgium, N.V. (Netherlands)
         HA-LO Europe (Belgium)
     Hogberg International AS (Norway)
     Joking, Spa. (Italy)
     Parsons International S.A.(France)
     Parsons International Hong Kong Ltd. (Hong Kong)
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
F. Whalen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date: February 18, 2003                      By: /s/ James F. Whalen
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                       James F. Whalen
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [ER08-1588-000; EL09-6-000]
 Kentucky Utilities Company
Docket No. ER08-1588-000.Frankfort Electric and Water Plant Board
Docket No. EL09-6-000.City of Barbourville, KentuckyCity of Bardstown, KentuckyCity of Bardwell, KentuckyCity of Benham, KentuckyCity of Berea, KentuckyCity of Corbin, KentuckyCity of Falmouth, KentuckyCity of Madisonville, KentuckyCity of Nicholasville, KentuckyCity of Paris, KentuckyCity of Providence, KentuckyComplainantsv.Kentucky Utilities CompanyRespondent
 On May 6, 2009, Kentucky Utilities Company and the Kentucky Municipals [1]
                    
                     submitted a joint Motion to Brief the Commission on an Outstanding Issue in the above-captioned proceeding. The Commission provides notice that it will allow the parties to file briefs with the Commission. Initial briefs are due to the Commission by June 1, 2009; reply briefs are due to the Commission by July 1, 2009. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         The Kentucky Municipals are the Frankfort Electric and Water Plant Board, and the Cities of Barbourville, Bardstown, Bardwell, Benham, Berea, Corbin, Falmouth, Madisonville, Nicholasville, Paris, and Providence, Kentucky. Back to Citation


[FR Doc. E9-11340 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"National Intelligence University","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu","author_name":"ray.x.villarreal@odni.gov","author_url":"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/author\/ray-x-villarrealodni-gov\/","title":"Certificate-Program","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"KB27zgXCZd\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/certificates\/\">Certificate-Program<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.ni-u.edu\/certificates\/embed\/#?secret=KB27zgXCZd\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"“Certificate-Program” — National Intelligence University\" data-secret=\"KB27zgXCZd\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n<\/script>\n"}
#### Steven ALLRED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-17203.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 25, 2006.

Jeffrey Milam, Esq., Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Mark A. Win, Esq., Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appel-lee.

*826Before: BRUNETTI, O’SCANNLAIN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Steven Allred appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of his applications for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits, under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, respectively. Allred argues that substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s finding that Allred failed to meet the requirements of the applicable five-step sequential analysis. In addition, Allred challenges the ALJ’s conclusions regarding Allred’s credibility and the conflicting medical record. We affirm.

The ALJ did not err in finding Allred failed to satisfy steps three and five of the five-step sequential analysis. *See*20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1520, 416.920. Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s determination that Allred’s impairment did not match Listings 12.02 (Organic Mental Disorders) and 12.05 (Mental Retardation), and that Allred could work in the national economy. Moreover, the ALJ properly considered Allred’s obesity at each stage of its analysis. See Social Security Ruling 02-lp.

The ALJ’s evaluation of Allred’s credibility and the conflicting medical record is supported by substantial evidence. The ALJ’s adverse credibility determination was supported by the opinions of Allred’s treating physicians, and Allred’s refusal to take medication. *Lester v. Chater,*81 F.3d 821, 830 (9th Cir.1996); *Fair v. Bowen,*885 F.2d 597, 603 (9th Cir.1989). The ALJ sufficiently reviewed discrepancies in All-red’s medical record.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 700 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 700

          To reduce temporarily the duty on potassium sorbate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 5, 2005

Mr. Lautenberg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To reduce temporarily the duty on potassium sorbate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POTASSIUM SORBATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of Chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``    9902.29.11    Potassium         1.4%              No change         No change         On or before 12/
                     Sorbate (CAS                                                            31/2008          ''
                     No. 24634-61-5)                                                                           .
                     (provided for
                     in subheading
                     2916.19.10)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS OF
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST AS OF MARCH 31, 2000, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME AND CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS FOR THE
THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,056,411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,056,411
<PP&E>                                      10,975,216
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,163,762
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,867,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,056,411
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,811,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,867,864
<SALES>                                      6,373,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,389,886
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               123,821
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,266,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,266,065
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,266,065
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>