alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended **April 1, 2006**

 

Commission file number **1-08056**

 

 

**HANOVER DIRECT, INC.**

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 
| **Delaware******                                     | **13-0853260******                |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State of incorporation)                             | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| ** **                                           | ** **                        |
| **1500 Harbor Boulevard, Weehawken, New Jersey****** | **07086******                     |
| (Address of principal executive offices)             | (Zip Code)                        |
|                                                 |                              |
| **(201) 863-7300**                                   |
| (Telephone number)                                   |

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 

Yes X  No _

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): 
| Large accelerated filer __ | Accelerated filer __ | Non-accelerated filer X |
|----------------------------|----------------------|-------------------------|

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) 

Yes_  No X

 

Common stock, par value $0.01****per share: 22,426,296 shares outstanding as of May 16, 2006.

 

----
Certification Accompanying Periodic Report

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of International Barrier Technology Inc.

(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"), I, David Corcoran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ David Corcoran

David Corcoran

Chief Financial Officer

December 27, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 995 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 995

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate the La Entrada al Pacifico Corridor in the State of Texas 
      as a high priority corridor on the National Highway System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2005

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mrs. Hutchison) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
to designate the La Entrada al Pacifico Corridor in the State of Texas 
      as a high priority corridor on the National Highway System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO CORRIDOR, TEXAS.

    Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 
Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(46) In the State of Texas, the La Entrada al Pacifico 
        Corridor consisting of any portion of a highway in a corridor 
        on 2 miles of either side of the center line of the highway 
        and--
                    ``(A) State Route 349 from Lamesa to the point on 
                that highway that is closest to 32 degrees, 7 minutes, 
                north latitude, by 102 degrees, 6 minutes, west 
                longitude;
                    ``(B) the segment of any roadway extending from the 
                point described by subparagraph (A) to the point on 
                Farm-to-Market Road 1788 closest to 32 degrees, 0 
                minutes, north latitude, by 102 degrees, 16 minutes, 
                west longitude;
                    ``(C) Farm-to-Market Road 1788 from the point 
                described by subparagraph (B) to its intersection with 
                Interstate Route 20;
                    ``(D) Interstate Route 20 from its intersection 
                with Farm-to-Market Road 1788 to its intersection with 
                United States Route 385;
                    ``(E) United States Route 385 from Odessa to Fort 
                Stockton, including those portions that parallel United 
                States Route 67 and Interstate Route 10; and
                    ``(F) United States Route 67 from Fort Stockton to 
                Presidio, including those portions that parallel 
                Interstate Route 10 and United States Route 90.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6790

ALANON B. GERMANY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus W. J. TOWNLEY; RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-158-7) Submitted: August 30, 2000 Decided: September 7, 2000 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alanon B. Germany, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alanon B. Germany appeals the district court’s order signed May 23, 2000, and entered May 24, 2000 dismissing his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Germany failed to sign his notice of appeal. The unsigned notice of appeal did not confer jurisdiction on this Court. See Covington v. Allsbrook , 636 F.2d 63, 63-64 (4th Cir. 1980). Moreover, the thirty-day appeal period prescribed by Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1), and the additional thirty-day period prescribed by Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) for seeking an extension of the filing period, have both expired. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NUMBER 13

- 1 8

- 00 366

- CV


### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

LEONARD ALVAREZ, IND IVIDUALLY, A PPELLANT , AND AS NEXT FRIEND O F CASEY ALVAREZ, MINOR CHILD ,

v.

BROOKE R. SALAZAR

- DA VIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IKE DAVIS JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF GABRIEL DAVIS, MI NOR CHILD , A PPELLEES

.

On a ppeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas.



### ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and J ustices Rodriguez and Benavides Order Per Curiam

Currently before the Court is appellant’s opposed motion to abate premature
appeal. Appellant states the motion for summary judgment granted on April 24, 20182

did not dispose of all claims and is not final and appealable. Appellant has filed a motion
with the trial court to sever and abate the remaining claim against appellees and a hearing
on the motion is scheduled for September 11, 2018.
Texas Rule of Appe llate Procedure 27.2 provides that appellate courts “may allow
an appealed order that is not final to be modified so as to be made final and may allow
the modified order and all proceedings relating to it to be included in a supplemental

record.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 27.1. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and ABATE the
appeal

. Appellant shall, within 60 days after the date of this order
, take action to cure
the jurisdictional defect and to file a supplemental clerk's record containing a severance

of t he remaining claims against appellees. If such supplemental clerk's record is not filed
in this Court, we will dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 4th day of September, 2018.
Exhibit 21.1

                           Subsidiaries of Casino Magic Corp.

                              State of                    Other Names
                              Incorporation               Under Which
Subsidiary                             or Organization             Business is
Conducted

Atlantic-Pacific Corp.                                   South Dakota
                                 Goldiggers
Biloxi Casino Corp.                                      Mississippi
                                    Casino Magic - Biloxi
Boston Casino Corp.                                     Massachusetts
                                None
Bucks County Casino Corp.                          Pennsylvania
                            None
Casino Magic (Europe) B.V.                        Netherlands
                            Casino Magic (Europe)
Casino Magic American Corp.                     Minnesota
                           Dakota Magic
Casino Magic Finance Corp.                        Mississippi
                              None
Casino Magic Neuquen S.A.                        Argentina
                             Casino Magic - Argentina
Casino One Corporation                               Mississippi
                                 None
Kansas Magic Corp.                                     Minnesota
                                  None
Mardi Gras Casino Corp.                              Mississippi
                                 Casino Magic - Bay St. Louis
St. Louis Casino Corp.                                  Missouri
                                     None
Jefferson Casino Corp.                                  Louisiana
                                     None

Subsidiary of Jefferson Casino Corp.

Casino Magic of Louisiana Corp.                  Louisiana
                              Casino Magic - Bossier City
Exhibit 24.1
 UROPLASTY, INC.
 
 Power of Attorney of Director
 
 Each of the undersigned directors of Uroplasty, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, hereby constitutes and appoints each of David B. Kaysen and Mahedi A. Jiwani, acting individually or jointly, their true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power to act for them and in their name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to do any and all acts and execute any and all documents which either such attorney and agent may deem necessary or desirable to enable Uroplasty, inc. to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereof, in connection with the filing with the Commission of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Uroplasty, Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, including, without limitation, power and authority to sign the names of the undersigned directors to the Annual Report on Form 10-K and to any instruments and documents filed as part of or in connection with the Form 10-K or any amendments thereto; and the undersigned hereby ratify and confirm all actions taken and documents signed by each said attorney and agent as provided herein.
 
 The undersigned have set their hands this 25th day of May, 2011.
 
 /s/ R. Patrick MaxwellR. Patrick Maxwell/s/ Thomas E. JamisonThomas E. Jamison/s/ Lee A. JonesLee A. Jones/s/ Robert C. KillRobert C. Kill/s/ James P. StaunerJames P. Stauner/s/ Sven A. WehrweinSven A. Wehrwein
#### Dominika Zakrzewska, Respondent, v The New School, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Decided September 22, 2009

*See*574 F3d 24.

Certification of a question by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.27), accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1403

___________ Handson Asuma Nyambariga, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General * of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: September 23, 2010 Filed: September 30, 2010

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Handson Asuma Nyambariga petitions for re view of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his Ju ly 2009 motion to reopen a prior decision. We conclude that the BIA acted within its discretion. See Clifton v. Holder , 598 F.3d 486, 490–91 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of revi ew). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

______________________________
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  News & Events 
-  NIDCD News 

# 2016 News Items

                - Hearing loss prevalence declining in U.S. adults aged 20 to 69   (12/15/2016)
                - NIDCD observes International Stuttering Awareness Day  (10/20/2016)
                - Researchers develop a new method to understand how the nose knows to process odors  (07/06/2016)
                - NIDCD’s Amy Donahue receives HLAA’s 2016 James B. Snow Award  (06/28/2016)
                - Statement on National Academies’ Hearing Health Care Report by NIDCD Director James F. Battey, Jr., M.D., Ph.D.  (06/02/2016)
                - NIDCD scientist Katie Kindt receives Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) at White House ceremony  (05/09/2016)
                - Mice with human mutation show signs of stuttering  (04/15/2016)
                - Researchers study strategies to preserve hearing  (04/10/2016)
                - April 26 speaker series talk: “From natural history to clinical trial: The role of audiology in understanding and treating Niemann-Pick disease type C”  (04/08/2016)
                - At the NIH Clinical Center: Kelly King is a research audiologist (Lab TV)  (03/21/2016)
                - NIDCD launches enhanced website  (03/04/2016)
                - More than 1 in 20 U.S. children have dizziness and balance problems  (01/27/2016)

## Media Inquiries

Contact the NIDCD press office at news@nidcd.nih.gov.

## News Archive

              - 2024 
              - 2023 
              - 2022 
              - 2021 
              - 2020 
              - 2019 
              - 2018 
              - 2017 
              - 2016 
              - 2015 
              - 2014 
              - 2013
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grey Wolf, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David
W. Wehlmann, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ David W. Wehlmann
-------------------------------------------------
David W. Wehlmann
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date:    August 13, 2002
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED M ICHAEL E. SMITH, JR. , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 783 LT Case No. 2015

- CF

- 2902

- B

- Z S TATE OF FLORIDA , A ppellee

.

______ __________________________/ D ecision filed May 9, 2023 3.850 Appeal from t he Circuit Court for Marion County , Anthony M. Tatti , Judge. Michael E. Smith, Jr., Mayo, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.

P ER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.

JAY , HARRIS and BOATWRIGHT , JJ. , co ncur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              Financial Data Schedule Q1 2000
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         319379
<NAME>                        PSC Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                4,077
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        43,121
<ALLOWANCES>                            971
<INVENTORY>                          27,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     77,650
<PP&E>                               28,271
<DEPRECIATION>                       27,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      226,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                49,431
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               1
<COMMON>                                122
<OTHER-SE>                           48,754
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        226,226
<SALES>                              61,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     61,439
<CGS>                                37,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        24,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        (9)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    3,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (4,489)
<INCOME-TAX>                        (1,339)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (3,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        (3,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (0.26)



</TABLE>
Rule 1920.76. Form of Divorce Decree

.

A decree in divorce shall be substantially in the following form:

(Caption)

DECREE

AND NOW, ______________________________, [ 19 ] 20 __________, it is ordered and decreed that ______________________________, plaintiff, and ______________________________, defendant, are divorced from the bonds of matrimony.

The parties shall reaffirm or change the beneficiary status on any life insurance policies, annuity contracts, pensions, profit sharing plans

, or other

con tractual arrangements providing for payment to a spouse if it is the intention of one of the parties to keep or change the other party as a beneficiary. Failure to do so may result in revocation of the beneficiar y designation pursuant to 20 P a .C.S. §

6111.2 (E ffect of D ivorce or P ending D ivorce on D esignation of B eneficiaries )

.

The court retains jurisdiction of any claims raised by the parties to this action for which a final order has not yet been entered.

Any existing spousal support order shall h ereafter be deemed an order for alimony pendente lite if any economic claims remain pending.

BY THE COURT:

[ Note: ] Comment: Act 106 of 2022 amended 23 Pa.C.S. § 3323(b.1) to require the additional statement and warning to the form decree.

The court may add any other provisions which it deems necessary.

[ EXPLANATORY COMMENT

-- 1983 See Explanatory Comment following Rule 1920.73

.

EXPLANATORY COMMENT

-- 1988

The amendment to Rule 1920.76 revises the form of divorce decree so that the court will no longer be required to list the claims as to which a final order has not been

entered at the time of entry of the final divorce decree. Rather, the decree will simply state that the court retains jurisdiction over unresolved issues. ]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-02-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,909
<PP&E>                                         148,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,270
<BONDS>                                         59,018
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            83
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,297
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,186
<SALES>                                         38,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,812
<CGS>                                           12,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,047
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,629)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,320)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,309)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,309)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)
        

</TABLE>