alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Gregory Seibly, Chief Executive Officer of Sterling, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sterling.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                  
|-------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  | 
|April 30, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ J. Gregory Seibly                                            
|               |  |  |  |     |  | J. Gregory Seibly
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Sterling for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sterling and will be retained by Sterling
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------



                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-OA4
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-OA4


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                  Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                   ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Zoltek Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Zsolt
Rumy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: January 14, 2003                           By: /s/ Zsolt Rumy
      ----------------                               -----------------------
                                                            Zsolt Rumy
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
# Admissions

### Office of Admissions

The Office of Admissions is dedicated to supporting the University’s vision through targeted recruitment efforts and collaborative outreach initiatives aimed at attracting a diverse student population. The Admissions staff works closely with training and professional development officers throughout the Intelligence Community (IC) to recruit and enroll highly qualified candidates for NIU’s in-residence and non-residence programs.  

As the center of academic life for the IC, NIU offers accredited graduate and undergraduate degrees, as well as a graduate certificate and continuing education. The University’s academic programs are accessible to government and military intelligence professionals and offered in a variety of formats.

### Apply here

Select one of the programs below to learn more.

# Bachelor of Science in Intelligence 

# Master of Science of Strategic Intelligence 

# Master of Science and Technology Intelligence

# Certificate of Intelligence Studies  

# Continuing Education

**Note:**  All prospective NIU students must meet the **eligibility criteria** before applying.

### Want to Learn More?

Review the catalog to learn more about specific courses, concentrations, programs, and degree requirements.

NIU will be hosting virtual open house sessions in the coming months to discuss the application process, academic programs, and answer any questions. If you would like to receive invites for these sessions, please email NIU_Engagement@niu.odni.gov using your .gov/.mil email.

#### Contact Information

Office of Enrollment Management  – Bethesda  |  Phone: 301-243-2094  |  Fax: 301-227-7067 |NIU_Admissions@odni.gov
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-21 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4119 

To clarify the tax treatment of certain payments made to homeowners by 

the Louisiana Recovery Authority and the Mississippi Development Authority. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2006 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To clarify the tax treatment of certain payments made to 

homeowners by the Louisiana Recovery Authority and 

the Mississippi Development Authority. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF CER4 TAIN PAYMENTS MADE TO HOMEOWNERS BY 

5 THE LOUISIANA RECOVERY AUTHORITY AND 

6 THE MISSISSIPPI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY. 

7 For purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, 

8 if a taxpayer— 

9 (1) receives any amount during the taxable year 

10 from the Louisiana Recovery Authority or the MisVerDate Aug 31 2005 01:39 Dec 13, 2006 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4119.IS S4119

hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 4119 IS

1 sissippi Development Authority for the repair or re2 construction of such taxpayer’s primary residence 

3 due to damage sustained as the result of hurricanes 

4 occurring during 2005, and 

5 (2) in any preceding taxable year claimed a cas6 ualty loss deduction under section 165 of such Code 

7 with respect to such damage, 

8 such amount shall be disregarded in determining the al9 lowable portion of such casualty loss deduction and so 

10 much of such amount as does not exceed such casualty 

11 loss deduction shall be disregarded in determining the tax12 payer’s basis in such residence. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,530-01

EX PARTE VINCENT LAMON WILLIAMS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1420283-A IN THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to twenty-five

years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Williams v. State,

No. 14-15-00220-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 16, 2016). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

On September 9, 2019, the trial court entered an order designating issues. The district clerk

properly forwarded this application to this Court under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

73.4(b)(5). However, the application was forwarded before the trial court made findings of fact and

conclusions of law. We remand this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiary
investigation and make findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 21, 2021

Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 21.1****SUBSIDIARIES OF STERLING**Subsidiaries of Sterling Financial CorporationGolf Escrow CorporationGolf Savings BankKlamath First Capital Trust ILynnwood Financial Statutory Trust ILynnwood Financial Statutory Trust IISterling Capital Trust IISterling Capital Trust IIISterling Capital Trust IVSterling Capital Statutory Trust VSterling Capital Trust VISterling Capital Trust VIISterling Capital Trust VIIISterling Capital Trust IXSterling Savings BankTri-Cities Mortgage CorporationSubsidiaries of Sterling Savings BankAction Mortgage CompanyThe Dime Service CorporationEvergreen Environmental Development CorporationEvergreen First Service CorporationHarbor Financial Services, Inc. (a subsidiary of Evergreen First Service Corporation)Fidelity Service CorporationINTERVEST-Mortgage Investment CompanyMason-McDuffie Financial Corporation (a subsidiary of INTERVEST-Mortgage Investment Company)Source Capital CorporationPeter W. Wong Associates, Inc. (a subsidiary of Source Capital Corporation)Source Capital Leasing Corporation (a subsidiary of Source Capital Corporation)
## THE STATE OF TEXAS
MANDATE

TO THE 123RD DISTRIC T COURT OF PANOLA CO UNTY, GREETINGS:
Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 16th
day of June, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was determined;

and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

William Robert Parker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 15

- 00058

- CR

Trial Court No. 13,122

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed
for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.
We note that the appellant, William Robert Parker, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs o f appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this
behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of o ur said Court of Appeals, with
the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 14th day of October , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY

, Clerk
#### Casey & Hedges Manufacturing Co. *v.*Dalton Ice Co.

1. A declaration which alleges a contract between the plaintiff and defendant, by which the latter agreed to furnish to the former by a certain day one boiler complete, and a failure and refusal to deliver it whereby the plaintiff was damaged, sets forth a cause of action.

2. A special demurrer which complains that the declaration *“states*no item of damage,” is not good to a declaration which does state an item of damage but only needs further certainty and particularity. The demurrer should have pointed out this defect instead of complaining that no item of .damage was stated.

.3. The amendment to the declaration, properly construed, does not set up a new and distinct cause of action. While a declaration in attachment is amendable after the first term, damages cannot properly be laid either in the original or amended declaration at more than the amount claimed in the attachment.

March 19, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Action for damages. Before Judge Milner. "Whitfield superior court. April term, 1898.

The Dalton Ice Company sued out an attachment against the Casey & Hedges Manufacturing Company, and filed its declaration laying damages at $250. Defendant demurred on the grounds, that the declaration set forth no cause of action, and stated no item of damage. The declaration was amended, and the defendant demurred to the amendment on the grounds, that it set up a new and distinct cause of action and showed no cause of action or right to damages, and stated no item of damage, and was not filed at the first term. The demurrers were overruled. The declaration alleged, that *408in 1891 defendant contracted to furnish plaintiff' certain, machinery, to wit one boiler complete ; that relying upon the same, they made said contract, the machinery to be-delivered to them by the 8th of May, without which plaintiff could not operate its other machinei’y used in manufacturing ice for some of plaintiff’s customers, of which defendant had full notice; that defendant did not-deliver said machinery as it had engaged to do, but failed and refused to deliver it or any part of it; and that by reason of this failure and refusal plaintiff was unable to-operate its machinery or to manufacture ice, and had to-go to other parties and purchase the same and pay much more therefor. By reason of which it has been damaged $250. The amendment alleged, that defendant, from time to time, after the boiler was to be delivered, kept promising to deliver it and requesting plaintiff to-wait, and at such requests plaintiff did wait until July, 1891, when defendant refused to deliver the machinery; and that during said delay the reasonable profits arising from the running of plaintiff’s machinery used in making ice would have amounted to $500, at which sum plaintiff' fixes its damages for defendant’s failure. It was conceded that the words “ of which defendant had full notice” in the original declaration were interlined by plaintiff’s counsel at the time when the amendment, was written and dated.

John *W.*Akin, for plaintiff in error.

B. J. & J. McCamy, *contra.*
#### Skilled Investors, Inc., Plaintiff, v Bank Julius Baer & Co., Inc., et al., Defendants. Bank Julius Baer & Co., Ltd., Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v Menachem Ivcher et al., Defendants, and Baruch Ivcher et al., Appellants.

Submitted December 7, *2009;*

decided January 19, 2010

Reported below, 62 AD3d 424 (Case No. 31).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 11

- 00604

- CR

Andrew GARCIA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas , Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CR9712 Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez

- Gardner , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Delivered and Filed: September 21, 2011
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on July 5, 2011 . Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed August 4 , 20 11

. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on August 23, 2011

. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.3. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on August 8 , 20 11 , but appellant did not file a motion for extension of time. A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 52204

- 11

- 00604

- CR

- 2

- (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). A late notice of appeal may be considered timely so as to invoke a court of appeals’ jurisdiction if (1) it is filed withi n fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing, (2) a motion for extension of time is filed in the court of appeals within fifteen days of the last day allowed for filing the notice of appeal, and (3) the court of appeals grants the motion for extension of time. See id

. On August 22, 2011, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing within two weeks from the date of our order why th e appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See id .; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 80 2 S.W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (out

of

- time appeal from final felony conviction may be sought by filing a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure). This court noted that t he notice of appeal appeared to have been untimely filed, and no motion for extension of time was filed

. The court also noted a concern regarding the trial court’s certification. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2. Appellant’s attorney responded, acknowledging the problem with the trial court’ s certification, but did not address the jurisdictional issue. Because the record reflects that the notice of appeal was untimely filed, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Olivo , 918 S.W.2d at 522.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harold
R. Wolcott, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Harold R.
      WolcottHarold
      R. WolcottPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer)April
      13, 2010
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice Bikeability Checklist


Download file: Bikeability Checklist
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >