N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT

DEVIN ANDRIC H,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,

v. JOSEPH M . AR

PAIO, She riff, individually

and in his offic i a l c a

pa c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, na

m e d a s John Doe Ja il C om m ande r of Lowe r B u c ke y e Ja i l, individually

and in his offic i a l c a

pa c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, na

m e d a s John Doe R a d iologist, Assigne d to Lowe r B uc k e y e Ja il, individua

lly and in his offic ia l c a pa c i ty ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, na

m e d a s John Doe /Ja

ne Doe Phoe n ix Fa c ility He a lth Administra

tor, individua

lly and in his offic ia l c a

p a c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TIES, nam e d

a s John Doe /Ja

ne Doe IX, e m ploy e d to W ork for She riff Jose ph Arpa io a nd/or C orre c tiona l He a lth Se rvic e s, individually

and in the ir offic ia l c a pa c i ty ; C OR IZON HEALTH, INC

. ; C ORREC TIONAL HEALTH SER VIC ES, individually

and in its offic ia l c a

pa c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, na

m e d a s John Doe /Ja ne Doe , Tuc son Fa c ility

He a lthc are Adm inistra

tor, individua

lly and in his/her No. 20-15950

D.C . No. 2:16-c v-02111-DJH-JZB
M EM O R ANDUM * 

# FIL ED

SEP 10 2021 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.offic ia l c a

pa c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, nam e d a s John DoeDe ntist, De ntist Assigne d to Lowe r B uc ke y e Ja il, individually

and in his offic i a l c a

pa c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, na

m e d a s John Doe Doc tor Assigne d to Lowe r B uc ke y e Ja il, individually

and in his offic i a l c a

pa c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, na

m e d a s Ja ne Doe Doc tor Assigne d to Alha

m bra Prison, individually

and in his offic i a l c a

pa c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, na

m e d a s Ja ne Doe Doc tor Assigne d to ADC ’ s Tuc son Prison, individually

and in he r offic ia l c a

pa c ity ; JESSE C OONS, pre viously nam e d a s Doc tor John DoeC o ons Assigne d to ADC ’ s Sa fford Prison, individua lly and in his offic ia l c a

p a c ity / Dr.; UNKNOW

N PAR TIES, nam e d

a s John Doe /Ja

ne Doe XI-XX Em

ploy e d by C oriz on, individua

lly and in his/her offic ia l c a

pa c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, na

m e d a s John Doe , Phy s ic a l The ra

p i st, Assigne d to ADC ’ s Sa fford Prison. individua lly and in his offic ia l c a pa c ity ; UNKNOW

N PAR TY, nam e d a s De fe nda

nt XYZ, a

n Entity Inc orporate d, individually and in its offic ia l c a pa c ity ; ANN M ULLEN, fa c ility he a lth a dm inistra

t or; UNKNOW

N PAR TIES, nam e d

a s John/Ja

ne Doe He a lth Adm inistra

tor; M AR IC OPA C OUNTY; SUSAN OSR IC H, NP; C ONSTANC E M UHAM M A ED, R

N; KETUB AH VOLPE, NP; C OR IZON, LLC ; LISA ANN EASTM AN; LISA LYON, a ssista nt fa c ility he a lth a dm inistra

tor; PENNY FISHER , c linic a l c oordina tor; SANDR

A SEAB O UR

N E, m e dic a l re c ords
2supe rvisor; GLEN B AB IC H, Dr., re giona l

m e d ic a l dire c tor; W INFR ED W ILLIAM S, Dr., re giona l m e dic a l dire c tor; JUSTIN W EISS, Dr., form e r ra diologist; SC OTT ELLIS, Dr., orthope dic surge o n; UNKNOW

N PAR TIES, nam e d a s John Doe /Ja ne Doe I-X, De fe nda nts-Appe lle e s. Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na D ia ne J. Hum e te wa , Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 9, 2021 **

B e fore : FER

NANDEZ, SILVER

M AN, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s De vin Andric h a

ppe a l s the distric t c ourt orde r granting sum m ary judgm e nt in fa vor of the c ounty

de fe nda nts in his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 c ivil rights ac tion

a lle ging a Fourte e nth Am e ndm e nt pre tria l de ta ine e de nta l c are c la i m . W e have jurisdic tion pursua

nt to 28 U.S.C . § 1291 a

n d re vie w de novo. Gordon v . C nty . of Orange , 888 F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th C ir. 2018). W e a ffirm

. Sum m a ry judgm e nt wa s prope r for the c ounty de fe nda nts. Andric h fa ile d to

e sta blish tha t the de fe nda

nts a c te d with obje c t ive de libe rate indiffe re nc e to se rious

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2). 3de nta l ne e ds or put Andric h at a substa ntia l risk of suffe ring se rious ha rm . Se eid

. at 1124-25 (se tting forth the e le m e nts of a

Fourte e nth Am e ndm e nt pre tria l de ta ine e
m e dic a l c are c la im ). This c a s e is not like P e ralta v . Dillard , 744 F.3d 1076, 1081 (9th C ir. 2014) (e n ba

nc ), whe re the prison c ontinue d to de ny c are for se ve re , e m e rge n c y

de nta l proble m s while the inm ate e xpe rie nc e d se ve re pa in. At m ost, Andric h e sta

blishe d a diffe re nc e of opinion re ga rding his denta l c are . Se eGordon , 888 F.3d a

t 1125 (re quiring “ s om e thing a kin to re c kle ss disre ga

rd” ); Toguc hi v

. C hung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1058 (9th C ir. 2004) (holding tha t a diffe re nc e of opinion

re ga rding tre atm e nt doe s not riseto the le ve l of de libe rate indiffe re nc e ). AFFIRM E D.

4