alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 37 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.37

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer research for 2 
                                 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER 
              RESEARCH.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2007''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, based
on our knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                            |  |                 |  |                                                                           
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 9, 2006 |  |  |  | MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|                  |  |  |  |                           
|                  |  |  |  |                            |  | By:             |  | /s/ Richard D. Balanson                                                   
|                  |  |  |  |                            |  |                 |  | Richard D. Balanson                                                       
|                  |  |  |  |                            |  |                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                                     
|                  |  |  | 
|Date: May 9, 2006 |  |  |  | By:                        |  | /s/ Tim T. Hart
|                  |  |  |  |                            |  |                 |  | Tim T. Hart                                                               
|                  |  |  |  |                            |  |                 |  | Vice President  Finance, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
<PAGE>

================================================================================


                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer


                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                  June 10, 2005
                         Commission File Number: 0-22346


                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
                  reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                          Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
          as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____________


  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
          as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____________

    Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
  this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ] No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- _____________


================================================================================

<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

<S>            <C>
99.1           Press Release, dated June 8, 2005, regarding Hollinger Inc.
               Court Order Removing Peter G. White as a Director.


</TABLE>



<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  June 10, 2005

                                        HOLLINGER INC.


                                        By    /s/ Robert J. Metcalfe
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Robert J. Metcalfe
                                           Title: Executive Vice President,
                                                  Chief Operating Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 674 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 674

   To provide assistance to combat HIV/AIDS in India, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2005

  Mr. Corzine introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide assistance to combat HIV/AIDS in India, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSISTANCE TO COMBAT HIV/AIDS IN INDIA.

    Section 1(f)(2)(B)(ii)(VII) of the State Department Basic 
Authorities Act of 1956 (22 U.S.C. 2651a(f)(2)(B)(ii)(VII)) is amended 
by inserting ``India,'' after ``Haiti,''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    In addition to any amounts otherwise available for such purpose, 
there is authorized to be appropriated to the President such sums as 
may be necessary for fiscal years 2006 through 2008 to provide 
assistance to India pursuant to the United States Leadership Against 
HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 (22 U.S.C. 7601 et 
seq.) and the amendments made by that Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1

                           NETWORKS ASSOCIATES, INC.
                    Direct Subsidiaries at December 31, 2003


CoreKT Security Systems, Inc.
Cybermedia, Inc.
Deersoft, Inc.
Dr. Solomon's Software, Inc.
Entercept Security Technologies Europe Ltd.
Inversiones NAI Guatemala S.A.
McAfee.com Canada Corp. (NS) ULC)
McAfee.com Delaware Holdings, Inc.
McAfee.com Delaware Holdings II, Inc.
McAfee.com Holdings Corporation
McAfee.com International Ltd.
McAfee.com Limited
MyCIO.com, Inc.
NAI International Holdings Corp.
NA NetTools Holding Company
Network Associates A.G.
Network Associates Australia Pty, Ltd.
Network Associates de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
Network Associates, GmbH
Network Associates Holding Company, Inc.
Network Associates (Hong Kong) Ltd.
Network Associates International B.V.
Network Associates New Zealand Limited
Network Associates, S.r.l.
Network Associates Technology, Inc.
Network General Barbados
Neoworx, Inc.
Traxess, Inc.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4011 

To amend the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization 

Act of 2003 to restore State authority to waive the application of the 

35-mile rule to permit the designation of a critical access hospital in 

Cass County, Minnesota. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Mr. COLEMAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, 

and Modernization Act of 2003 to restore State authority 

to waive the application of the 35-mile rule to permit 

the designation of a critical access hospital in Cass County, Minnesota. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 4011 IS

1 SECTION 1. RESTORING STATE AUTHORITY TO WAIVE AP2 PLICATION OF 35-MILE RULE TO PERMIT DES3 IGNATION OF A CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL 

4 IN CASS COUNTY, MINNESOTA. 

5 Section 405(h) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, 

6 Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 

7 108–173; 117 Stat. 2269) is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following new paragraph: 

9 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION.—The amendment made by 

10 paragraph (1) shall not apply to the certification by 

11 the State of Minnesota on or after January 1, 2006, 

12 under section 1820(c)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Social Se13 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i–4(c)(2)(B)(i)(II)) of a 

14 hospital in Cass County, Minnesota, as a necessary 

15 provider of health care services to residents in the 

16 area of the hospital.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
#### Gary BIVINS, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE.

No. 08-4115.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action

Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 March 19, 2009.

Filed: April 23, 2009.

Gary Bivins, Frackville, PA, pro se.

Before: McKEE, FISHER and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On June 19, 2003, this Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), dismissed as frivolous appellant Gary Bivins’ appeal from the District Court’s dismissal of his original case for lack of merit. Bivins, *144proceeding pro se, then filed on August 25, 2008, a motion for reconsideration of and a return of the filing fees paid to both the District Court and this Court in his original case. In his motion, he argued that the filing fee provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) did not apply to “habeas corpus challenges to the parole procedures, such as the one petitioner filed” in his original case. The District Court denied his motion on September 2, 2008, noting that this Court had held that Bivins’ original complaint was, in fact, a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, and not a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. Bivins then filed the instant appeal on October 3, 2008, and this Court granted his IFP motion.

We have appellate jurisdiction over this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and review it for possible dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). An appeal must be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) if it has no arguable basis in law or fact. *Neitzke v. Williams,*490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). Because we determine that the appeal is lacking in arguable legal merit, we will dismiss it under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).

The District Court is correct that this Court determined Bivins’ original complaint was a § 1983 action. In our per curiam opinion, this Court stated: “Bivins argues that the District Court misconstrued his complaint and argues that the District Court ‘sought to evade ... the real nature’ of his cause of action by labeling it either a § 1983 or a § 2254 action. We disagree ... Here, the substance of Bivins’ complaint indicates that the District Court properly construed it as filed pursuant to § 1983.” Furthermore, 28 U.S.C. § 1915 makes clear that filing fees shall be assessed, and makes no provision for a refund of such fees. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(l)(“[I]f a prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee.”).

As a result, we determine that Bivins’ appeal is lacking in arguable legal merit, and will dismiss it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Starnes, Appellant.

[869 NYS2d 907]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered August 29, 2006, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third and fourth degrees, and unlawful possession of marijuana, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender whose prior felony conviction was a violent felony, to an aggregate term of six years and a fine of $50, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility, including its evaluation of minor discrepancies in the accounts of the People’s witnesses, and its rejection of defendant’s account of how he came into possession of a bag containing a supply of drugs. Concur—Tom, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Vertex Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Benjamin
P. Cowart, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








March
      30, 2010
            /s/
      Benjamin P. CowartBenjamin
      P. CowartChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
#### In the Matter of Simeon F., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Ahshella G., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Simeon F., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Lawrence F., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[872 NYS2d 731]

Mercure, J.

Appeals from two orders of the Family Court of St. Lawrence County (Potter, J.), entered June 21, 2007, which, among other things, granted petitioner’s applications, in two proceedings pursuant to Family Ct Act article 10, to adjudicate respondents’ child to be neglected.

Respondents, Ahshella G. (hereinafter the mother) and Lawrence F. (hereinafter the father), are the parents of two children, the younger of whom (born in 2005) is the subject of these neglect proceedings. The petitions alleged that both respondents have histories of mental illness, including hospitalizations and a lack of cooperation with treatment and taking medication as prescribed, as well as histories of homelessness and transient living. Indeed, the mother was an inpatient at a hospital mental health unit throughout the majority of her pregnancy and at the time of the child’s birth. Following fact-finding and dispositional hearings, Family Court found the child to be neglected by both respondents within the meaning of Family Ct Act § 1012, and ordered that the child’s placement with petitioner continue.

Respondents separately appeal,* and both have since voluntarily surrendered their parental rights. Respondents have not filed notices of appeal in connection with their surrender of parental rights; indeed, no challenges to the voluntariness of those surrenders have been brought to our attention. Accordingly, these appeals are moot *(see Matter of Vivian OO.,*44 AD3d 1104, 1105 [2007]; *Matter of Raychael L.W.,*298 AD2d 829, 829 *1082[2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 504 [2002]; *Matter of Gerrod BB.,*284 AD2d 584, 585 n [2001]; *cf. Matter of Matthew C.,*227 AD2d 679, 680-681 [1996]), and we are unpersuaded that the exception to the mootness doctrine applies under the circumstances presented here *(see Matter of Vivian OO.,*34 AD3d 1084, 1085 [2006]; *Matter of Norbert YY.,*28 AD3d 815, 815 [2006]; *cf. Matter of Melinda D.,*31 AD3d 24, 27-28 [2006]).

Cardona, EJ., Lahtinen, Malone Jr. and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, as moot, without costs.

*

 Although the mother’s notice of appeal is misdated, we treat it as valid in the interest of justice *(see*CPLR 5520 [c]).
EXPLORE NGA

FOUNDATION CAREERS

SEE YOURSELF IN NGA FOUNDATION? APPLY AT intelligencecareers.gov/nga

INTELLIGENCE ON, 

ABOVE, AND BENEATH 

EARTH’S SURFACE

The National Geospatial-Intelligence 

Agency (NGA) is a U.S. intelligence and 

combat support agency that provides 

policymakers, warfighters, intelligence 

professionals and first responders key 

information and insights. Whether you’re 

working with global positioning, mapping, 

or navigation, a career with NGA helps 

protect our nation and our world. 

Aeronautical Analysis Occupation

Analyze and exploit worldwide aeronautical 

source and imagery to support safety of 

navigation as well as national intelligence goals 

and requirements.

Geographic Science Occupation

Apply mapping, charting, and geographic 

principles and techniques (e.g., cartography, 

human geography, etc.) to create GEOINT 

products and services.

Maritime Analysis Occupation

Acquire, analyze, compile, and disseminate 

maritime safety information to populate and 

update nautical databases, charts,

and publications.

Applied Science Occupation

Develop and apply advanced analytical and 

scientific techniques, tools, algorithms, and 

methodologies to enhance the analysis of GEOINT 

data sources.

• Aeronautical Analyst • Cartographer 

• Human Geographer

• Human Geography Linguist

• Maritime Analyst 

• Bathymetrist

• Geodetic Earth Scientist

• Geodetic Orbit Scientist

• Geodetic Surveyor

• Photogrammetrist

TO QUALIFY

Relevant degrees may include: astronomy, 

cartography, geodesy, geographic 

information systems, geology, geophysics, 

linguistics, mathematics, photogrammetry, 

physical science, remote sensing, 

surveying or other related area of study.

Relevant experience may include: 

cartography, civil engineering, geography, 

geotechnical analysis, GIS tools, research 

methodology or work in a closely related 

area that may be considered in lieu of a 

relevant degree.

KEY COMPETENCIES

Key competencies may include, but 

are not limited to: data analysis, 

data/information management, 

extraction and attribution, geodetic 

and geophysical analysis, grids, 

projections, datums, and systems, 

GIS skills and application, quality 

assurance, source evaluation and 

management.

FOUNDATION OPPORTUNITIES

Approved for Public Release # 20-201
#### In the Matter of Elias H. Attea, Jr., Appellant, v Tax Appeals Tribunal et al., Respondents.

Decided October 27, 2009

Reported below, 64 AD3d 909.

*831Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry GRIFFITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-30428.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 23, 2006.

Stephanie J. Lister, Esq., USSP — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Terence M. Ryan, Esq., Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Terry Griffith appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Griffith contends that the district court erred by failing to discuss all of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), omitting a discussion of the kinds of sentences available. However, “[a] district court is not required to refer to each factor listed in § 3553(a).” *United States v. Mix,*457 F.3d 906, 912 (9th Cir.2006). Further, the record reflects that the district court accurately calculated the applicable Guidelines range, and “gave thoughtful attention to factors recognized in § 3553(a).” *United States v. Marcial-Santiago,*447 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2006). We conclude that the sentence imposed on Griffith, at the low end of the applicable Guidelines range, was not unreasonable in light of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). *See Mix,*457 F.3d at 914.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *787courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

NORTH AMERICAN ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2012

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

I, Clinton W. Coldren, certify that

 

- I am the Chief Executive Officer of North American Energy Resources, Inc.
- Attached to this certification is Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2012,a periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains financial statements.
- I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
The periodic report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
The information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the issuer for the periods presented.

 

 

July 12, 2012 /s/ Clinton W. Coldren 

Clinton W. Coldren

Chief Executive Officer