alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4115 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4115

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to increase the effectiveness of 
                physician assistance for drug treatment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 8, 2006

    Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Levin, Ms. Collins, and Mr. Biden) 
 introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read 
                       the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to increase the effectiveness of 
                physician assistance for drug treatment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Effective Physician Assistance for 
Drug Treatment Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT AMENDMENTS.

    Section 303(g)(2) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
823(g)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)(iii), by striking ``except that 
        the'' and inserting the following: ``unless, not sooner than 1 
        year after the date on which the practitioner submitted the 
        initial notification, the practitioner submits a second 
        notification to the Secretary of the need and intent of the 
        practitioner to treat up to 100 patients. A second notification 
        under this clause shall contain the certifications required by 
        clauses (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph. The''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (J)--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking ``thereafter'' and 
                all that follows through the period and inserting 
                ``thereafter.'';
                    (B) in clause (ii), by striking ``Drug Addiction 
                Treatment Act of 2000'' and inserting ``Effective 
                Physician Assistance for Drug Treatment Act''; and
                    (C) in clause (iii), by striking ``this paragraph 
                should not remain in effect, this paragraph ceases to 
                be in effect'' and inserting ``subparagraph (B)(iii) 
                should be applied by limiting the total number of 
                patients a practitioner may treat to 30, then the 
                provisions in such subparagraph (B)(iii) permitting 
                more than 30 patients shall not apply, effective''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kurt R. Kneip, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Inter-Tel, Incorporated.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation, andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and audit
committee of the registrants board of directors:  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls
over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 10, 2004
    By:
    /s/  Kurt R. KneipName:
    Kurt R. KneipTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer 38
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

SterlingFinancial Corporation 

Spokane, Washington 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-136001, 333-130512, 333-156568 and 333-160701) and Form S-8 (No. 333-144956, 333-141006, 333-136000, 333-139490, 333-111802, 333-105723,333-61452, 333-44078, and 333-69481) of Sterling Financial Corporation, of our reports dated March 16, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of Sterling Financial Corporation’s internal control overfinancial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. 

BDO Seidman, LLP 

Spokane, Washington 

March 16, 2010
FILED

June 10, 1999

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

)

Appellee, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9810-CC-00326

)

 vs. ) HARDIN COUNTY

)

EARL RAY LEGANS, ) No. 7518

)

Appellant. )

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the state’s motion to affirm the trial

court judgment by order pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

The appellant is appealing the trial court’s revocation of his probation. On May 8, 1997,

the appellant pled guilty to robbery and theft of property and received concurrent four

and three year sentences. The trial court ordered supervised probation after the

appellant served six months continuous confinement. On September 17, 1998, the

appellant’s supervised probation was revoked.

After a hearing, the trial court found that the appellant violated the terms

and conditions of his probation by 1) failing to report to his probation officer, 2)

changing residences without notifying his probation officer, and 3) failing to report new

arrests for assault. The appellant and his probation officer testified at the hearing.

A trial court may revoke probation and order the imposition of the original

sentence upon a finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the person has

violated a condition of probation. T.C.A. § 40-35-311(e). The decision to revoke

probation rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. State v. Mitchell, 810

S.W.2d 733, 735 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991). Revocation of probation is subject to an

abuse of discretion standard of review, rather than a de novo standard. State v.

Harkins, 811 S.W.2d 79 (Tenn. 1991). Discretion is abused only if the record contains
2

no substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the trial court that a violation of

probation has occurred. Id.; State v. Gregory, 946 S.W.2d 829, 832 (Tenn. Crim. App.

1997). Proof of a violation need not be established beyond a reasonable doubt, and

the evidence need only show that the trial judge exercised a conscientious and

intelligent judgment, rather than acting arbitrarily. Gregory, 946 S.W.2d at 832; State v.

Leach, 914 S.W.2d 104, 106 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).

On appeal, the appellant contends only that the trial court abused its

discretion in revoking his probation. He argues that “if he had another chance he would

be able to conform his conduct to the rules of probation.” Having reviewed the record in

light of the appellant’s argument, we find that the evidence fully supports the trial court’s

action. The appellant has simply failed to show how the trial court abused its discretion.

Accordingly, the state’s motion is granted. It is hereby ORDERED that the

judgement of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 20, Rules of the Court of

Criminal Appeals. Costs of this appeal shall be assessed to the state.

______________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

______________________________

 JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

______________________________

JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7642** 

BERNARD MCFADDEN , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. SIMON MAJOR, Director of SLRDC in his individual and personal capacity; D. SCOTT COOK, Dietician of S LRDC in his individual and personal capacity , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv
- 01941

- TMC )

Submitted : February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Bernard McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel Steve Hughes, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columb ia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Bernard McFadden appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
McFadden v. Major , No. 1:10

- cv
- 01941

- TMC (D.S.C. Nov. 22, 2011)

. We dispense with oral argument bec ause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice Recall 15E-042 - PSPI-L Inflator


Download file: Recall 15E-042 - PSPI-L Inflator
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James Thorburn, as Chief Executive Officer of ZiLOG, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



Date: August 5, 2005/s/    JAMES M. THORBURNJames M. ThorburnChairman and Chief Executive Officer




This certification accompanies
the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by ZiLOG, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Perry J. Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of ZiLOG, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



Date: August 5, 2005/s/    PERRY J. GRACEPerry J. GraceVice President and Chief Financial Officer




This certification accompanies
the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by ZiLOG, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the amended Annual Report of China Wind Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shouquan Sun, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  August 13, 2009








By:       /s/ Shouquan Sun


Shouquan Sun


Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v STEVEN WRIGHT, Appellant.

[870 NYS2d 785]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), rendered on or about September 28, 2007, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record *524and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised ón this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Maz-zarelli, J.P, Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on May 1, 2009, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the                           ( print page 24035)                        National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (“IEEE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, IEEE has initiated 12 new standards and is revising 6 existing standards. More detail regarding these PARS can be found at                     *http://standards.ieee.org/​standardswire/​sba/​03-19-09.html.*

                    On September 17, 2004, IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 9, 2009. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 10, 2009 (74 FR 10298).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. E9-11768 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION OF
THE TRUSTEE*
OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 1
to the Trusts financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September
16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from
generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other
royalty trusts); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE
SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:
    
    Lee Ann AndersonTitle:
    
    Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: August 9, 2011
 
 *
    
    The Trust has no executive officers.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RUBA KUMAR SELVARAJ

, Appellant,

v.

CELINE SHAKILA SELVARAJ

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 591

[ February 22, 2018 ]

Appeal and cross

- appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth

Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Timothy L. Bailey , Judge; L.T. Case No.

FMCE13

- 014877 (42)

.

Gene Reibman, Plantation

, for appellant.

Catherine L. Roselli, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., G ROSS and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 634 

To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 

2000 to clarify allowable payment terms for sales of agricultural commodities and products to Cuba. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 16, 2005 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To amend the Trade Sanctions Reform and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 to clarify allowable payment terms 

for sales of agricultural commodities and products to 

Cuba. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF PAYMENT TERMS FOR 

4 SALES OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES 

5 AND PRODUCTS TO CUBA. 

6 Section 908(b)(1)(A) of the Trade Sanctions Reform 

7 and Export Enhancement Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 

8 7207(b)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting before the period 
2 

•S 634 IS

1 at the end the following: ‘‘, which in this subsection means 

2 the payment by the purchaser of an agricultural com3 modity or product and the receipt of the payment by the 

4 seller prior to— 

5 ‘‘(i) the transfer of title of the com6 modity or product to the purchaser; and 

7 ‘‘(ii) the release of control of the com8 modity or product to the purchaser.’’. 

Æ