alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Richard P. Weinheimer II, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner.

[972 NYS2d 924]

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991. He maintains an office for the practice of law in the Village of Fort Plain, Montgomery County.

By decision dated October 27, 2011, this Court suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of one year, which suspension was conditionally stayed *(Matter of Weinheimer,*88 AD3d 1245 [2011]). Respondent now moves for termination of the stayed suspension and provides a supporting affidavit indicating that the conditions of the stay have been fully complied with. Petitioner does not oppose the motion, which we now grant.

Lahtinen, J.P., Stein, McCarthy and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s motion is granted, and the stayed suspension imposed by this Court’s decision dated October 27, 2011 is terminated, effective immediately.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

s1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145468

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145468

COA: 296158

Chippewa CC: 08

- 008674

- FH

DERMAINE ANTONIO RIOS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, John B. Wood, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) forthe registrant and we have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 19, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 44 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 44

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the amount of the 
           military death gratuity from $12,000 to $100,000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Hagel (for himself, Mr. DeWine, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
 Lautenberg, and Mr. Salazar) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase the amount of the 
           military death gratuity from $12,000 to $100,000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Death Benefit Improvement 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEATH GRATUITY PAYABLE WITH RESPECT TO MEMBERS OF 
              THE ARMED FORCES.

    (a) Amount of Death Gratuity.--Section 1478(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``$12,000'' and inserting 
``$100,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to deaths occurring on or after November 16, 2001, 
the date of Executive Order 13235, relating to National Emergency 
Construction Authority.
    (c) Funding.--
            (1) Source of funds.--Amounts for the payment during fiscal 
        year 2005 of death gratuities by a Secretary concerned under 
        sections 1475 through 1477 of title 10, United States Code, as 
        amended by subsection (a), shall be derived from amounts made 
        available for such fiscal year in an Act making emergency 
        supplemental appropriations for defense and for the 
        reconstruction of Iraq.
            (2) Secretary concerned defined.--In this subsection, the 
        term ``Secretary concerned'' has the meaning given such term in 
        section 101(a)(9) of title 10, United States Code.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

p1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145569 & (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145569

COA: 309213

Wayne CC: 10

- 009822

- FC

MICHAEL LEE MORT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2012 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is

DENIED.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Bruce Kaiserman, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of CSMC Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-2 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, LaSalle Bank, National
    Association as Custodian, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Servicer, Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Trust Administrator and Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ Bruce Kaiserman
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration # 11716 and # 11717] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Amendment 2. 

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida (FEMA-1831-DR), dated 04/21/2009. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straight-line Winds.                     

*Incident Period:*                         03/26/2009 through 05/05/2009.                     

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         05/05/2009.                     

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/22/2009.                     

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/21/2010.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Florida, dated 04/21/2009, is hereby amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 03/26/2009 and continuing through 05/05/2009. 

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

 [FR Doc. E9-11290 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 0120 Lower Tribunal No s. CF 20

- 5591

- XX and CF20

- 7975

- XX

_____________________________ A NTONIOUS W HITE , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County

. J. Kevin Abdoney , Judge. August 30, 2024
PER CURIAM

. In this Anders appeal, we affirm the trial court’s revocation and termination of Antonious White’s probation without further comment

. 1 We remand for the correction of two scrivener’s errors, both of which White raised in a motion to
correct sentence on which the trial court did not rule

. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)

. First, although the trial court orally recognized that White had been

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967)

. This case was transferred from the Second District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023

.2 previously adjudicated guilty, the sentencing paperwork reflects a redundant adjudication. See § 948.06(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (2021) (“If such probation . . . is revoked, the court shall adjudge the probationer or offender guilty of the offense charged and proven or admitted, unless he or she has previously been adjudged guilty

. . . . ”) (emphasis added) . Second, even though the trial court terminated White’s probation, the sentencing paperwork require s him to pay costs of supervision. See id. § 948.09(1)(a) 1 . (requiring payment of costs of supervision by, among others, probationers as condition of placement). White need not be present when the trial court makes these ministerial c orrections

. AFFIRMED and REMANDED. TRAVER, C.J., and BROWNLEE, J. , and LAMBERT, B.D., Associate Judge , concur.
Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Daniel Muller , Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
McAfee Associates, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-80272, 33-80260, 33-80258,
33-96586 and 333-11155) of our reports dated January 20, 1997, except for the
matters discussed in Note 11 for which the date is March 1, 1997, on our audits
of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of
McAfee Associates, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which reports
are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



San Jose, California
March 28, 1997
II 

Calendar No. 309 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 648 

[Report No. 109–190] 

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 

to extend the authority for drought assistance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. SMITH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 8, 2005 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of November 18, 2005, 

by Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief 

Act of 1991 to extend the authority for drought assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE RECLAMATION STATES 

4 EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF ACT OF 1991. 

5 Section 104(c) of the Reclamation States Emergency 

6 Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) is amend-
2 

•S 648 RS

1 ed by striking ‘‘September 30, 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep2 tember 30, 2010’’. 

Calendar No. 309 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 648 

[Report No. 109–190] 

A BILL 

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency 

ity for drought assistance. Drought Relief Act of 1991 to extend the authorDECEMBER 8, 2005 

Reported without amendment
/**
 * @file
 * This file overrides the way jQuery UI focus trap works.
 *
 * When a focus event is fired while a CKEditor 5 instance is focused, do not
 * trap the focus and let CKEditor 5 manage that focus.
 */

(($) => {
  $.widget('ui.dialog', $.ui.dialog, {
    // Override core override of jQuery UI's `_allowInteraction()` so that
    // CKEditor 5 in modals can work as expected.
    // @see https://api.jqueryui.com/dialog/#method-_allowInteraction
    _allowInteraction(event) {
      return event.target.classList.contains('ck') || this._super(event);
    },
  });
})(jQuery);
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         755,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,457,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                   815,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,819,809
<PP&E>                                       1,240,848
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,901,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,920,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,424,831
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,102
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,096,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,920,770
<SALES>                                     83,798,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,798,680
<CGS>                                       64,025,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               64,025,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,059,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             135,907
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                685,045
<INCOME-TAX>                                   129,241
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            528,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   528,804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 25

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Guy Clairmont, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20210219

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough , Judge.

AFFIRMED

.
Per Curiam

.
Robert C. Vallie and Nicholas S. Samuelson, Assistant State’s Attorneys, Fargo, ND

, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Richard E. Edinger, Fargo, ND

, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.1 State v. Clairmont No. 20210219

Per Curiam

. [¶1] Guy Clairmont appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Clairmont argues the district court erred in denying his N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion because sufficient evidence d id not exist to support the conviction. He also argues the State violated Brady v. Maryland

, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)

, because it made no effort to obtain certain exculpatory evidence

.
[¶2] The district court did not err in denying Clairmont’s N.D.R.Crim.P. 29
motion , and the State did not violate Brady

. An analysis under Brady is appropriate only when the State suppresses evidence that has been collected and preserved. State v. Schmidt , 2012 ND 120, ¶ 1 3 , 817 N.W.2d 332. In
Schmidt , at ¶ 13, the State did not violate Brady because the State did not collect the evidence sought by the defendant. Here, similar to Schmidt , the State did not collect the evidence sought by Clairmont. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).

[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeW

alle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                       353
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,398
<PP&E>                                          10,870
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,843
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           58,190
<PREFERRED>                                        451
<COMMON>                                           290
<OTHER-SE>                                    (58,011)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,181
<SALES>                                          2,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,337
<CGS>                                            1,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 419
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (86)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (86)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     93
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,759)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)
        

</TABLE>