alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,711]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 31, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of Cadmus Communications, Easton, Maryland.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of April 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10889 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Amy L. Roberts et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents, v Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants.

Submitted August 3, 2009;

decided August 27, 2009

Reported below, 62 AD3d 71.

Motion by Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Three copies of the brief must be served and an original and 24 copies filed within seven days.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                        1,928,205
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 000
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        21,605,442
<DEPRECIATION>                10,483,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                13,182,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         489,232
<BONDS>                       9,915,731
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    2,777,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  13,182,394
<SALES>                       804,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              841,633
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 310,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              242,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            211,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>               000
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           000
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  77,997
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .79
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF

THE
TRUSTEE*

OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee Ann Anderson, Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Compass Bank, on behalf of Compass Bank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust), not in its
individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 1 to the Trusts financial statements contained
in the Report, in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September 16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting
principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THESAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:

/s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:

Lee Ann AndersonTitle:

Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: May 12, 2014




|* | The Trust has no executive officers.
|- | ------------------------------------
[920 NE2d 90, 891 NYS2d 686]

#### Verizon New York, Inc., Appellant, v Paul J. Garvin, Respondent, et al., Defendant. (And Another Action.)

Decided November 24, 2009

*852APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Cosgrove Law Firm,*Buffalo *(Timothy J. Flynn*of counsel), for appellant.

*Barth Sullivan Behr,*Buffalo *(Pierre A. Vincent*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Defendant landowner was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Verizon New York, Inc. for property damages arising from a fire that originated on defendant’s premises. Defendant came forward with evidence that, less than a year before the fire, he installed smoke detectors that were inspected and deemed operable by a municipal inspector, contradicting plaintiff’s claim that he negligently failed to install or maintain smoke detectors. In response, plaintiff did not raise a triable issue of fact by submitting proof in admissible form that the smoke detectors did not work on the day of the fire or that, prior to the incident, defendant had actual or constructive notice that they were not operable.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS



### UNITED STATES ) No. ACM 40066

Appellee ) )

v. ) ) ORDER Allan L. BROWN ) Air Force Cadet ) U.S. Air Force )

Appellant ) Special Panel

Appellant’s general court

- martial took place on 29 August 2019 and 5

– 16
October 202 0 . The original record of trial was docketed with this court on 15April 2021. Volume 1 of the original record of trial includes one disc that contains audio recordings of the closed proceedings of the court

- martial, and two discs that contain audio recordings of the open proceedings on 29 August 2019
and 5

– 9 October 2020. However, recordings of the open proceedings from 10

– 16 October 2020 are not included. A certified verbatim written transcript of the proceedings is atta ched to the record.

Rule for Courts

- Martial (R.C.M.) 1112(b) provides that “[t]he record of trial in every general and special court

- martial shall include: (1) A substantially verbatim recording of the court

- martial proceedings except sessions closed for
d eliberations and voting . . . .”

Appellant’s brief to this court, the Government’s answer, and Appellant’s reply brief did not address the omitted recordings. On 6 October 2022, this court issued an order to the Government to show good cause as to why this
court should not return the record of tria l for correction of the record in accordance with R.C.M. 1112(d). On 19 October 2022, the Government submitted its timely answer to the court’s order. The Government agreed with the court that the recorded pro ceedings for 1 0

– 16 October 2020 are “missing” from the record.However, the Government contends remand is unnecessary because the attached verbatim transcript of the entire proceedings enables this court to perform its Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866, review. Nevertheless, we find remand appropriate in order to cor rect this substantial deficiency in the record of Appellant’s court

- martial.

According ly

, it is by the court on this 25 th day of October , 2022

, ORDERED :United Stat es v. Brown , No. ACM 40066

2 Pursuant to R.C.M. 1112(d), the record of trial is returned to the military judge for correction of th e deficiency identified above

— the omission of the substantially verbatim recording of multiple days of the court

- martial proceedings. Thereafter, the record of trial will be returned to the court for completion of appellate review under Article 66, UCMJ. A ppellate counsel for the Government shall inform the court not later than 15 December 2022 , in writing, of the status of compliance with the court’s order unless the record of trial has been returned to the court prior to that date.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11323]



[[Page 22977]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD


Membership of the Merit Systems Protection Board's Senior 
Executive Service; Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the members of the Performance 
Review Board.

Dates: May 15, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marion Hines, Human Resources 
Director, Office of Financial and Administrative Management, Merit 
Systems Protection Board, 1615 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20419.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Merit Systems Protection Board is 
publishing the names of the new and current members of the Performance 
Review Board (PRB) as required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). An-Ming 
``Tommy'' Hwang, formerly a member of the PRB, will serve as Chair of 
the PRB. William L. Boulden and William D. Spencer will serve as new 
members. Gail T. Lovelace, formerly a member of the PRB, will serve as 
an advisory member.

    Dated: May 11, 2009.
William D. Spencer,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-11323 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400-01-P
**Wilshire Credit Corporation****[Wilshire Logo]********Payments**P.O. Box 105344; Atlanta, GA 30348-5344 or P.O. Box 7195; Pasadena, CA 91109-7195 Exhibit T Correspondence  P.O. Box 8517; Portland, OR 97207-8517 Phone March 12, 2008 (503) 952-7947 (888) 502-0100 Fax (503) 952-7476 Web Site US Bank - Corporate Trust Services  www.wcc.ml.comEP-MN-WS3D 60 Livingston Ave St. Paul, MN 55107-1419 Attn: Diane Reynolds Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc 250 Vesey Street 4 World Financial Center, 10th Floor New York, NY 10080 Attn: Ketan Parekh Re:  Annual Officer's Certificate (Wilshire Pool 1415) Pooling & Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2007 between Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., Depositor, Wilshire Credit Corporation, Servicer, and U.S. Bank National Association, Trustee for the Specialty Underwriting and Residential Finance Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2007-AB1 I, Ken Frye, Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing of Wilshire Credit Corporation (the "Servicer"), hereby certify that: (i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during such preceding calendar year and of the performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, and (ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or a portion thereof Wilshire Credit Corporation, as Servicer Certified By: /s/ Ken Frye Name: Ken Frye Title: Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Inter-Tel,  Incorporated and subsidiaries  financial  statements for the quarter
ended June 30,  2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           29170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    75291
<ALLOWANCES>                                     15066
<INVENTORY>                                      29977
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                168044
<PP&E>                                           68881
<DEPRECIATION>                                   34555
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  247606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            88896
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        107280
<OTHER-SE>                                       27350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    247606
<SALES>                                         197452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                197452
<CGS>                                           117863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   117863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  4013
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (57070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (21687)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (35383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (35383)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.34)


</TABLE>
#### Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gaskill

Case below: 176 N.C. App. 408

No. 268P06

Def s (Lester R. Mitchum) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-538)

Denied 12/14/06
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM****To the Board of Directors of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc.:**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-27453 and 333-41170) of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. of our report dated March 26,2008, related to the consolidated balance sheets of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. andsubsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements of income,stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the annualreport on Form 10-K of Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ RAMIREZ INTERNATIONAL
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                      SPATIALIZER AUDIO LABORATORIES, INC.
 
                         COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 DECEMBER 31, 1998
                                                     ------------------------------------------
                                                        1998           1997            1996
                                                     -----------    -----------    ------------
<S>                                                  <C>            <C>            <C>
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE:
Net Loss for the Year..............................  $(5,792,061)   $(4,719,821)   $(25,395,170)
Preferred Stock:
  Dividends in Arrears.............................     (148,750)            --              --
  Effective Dividend Feature.......................     (371,450)            --              --
                                                     -----------    -----------    ------------
Adjusted Net Loss for the Year.....................  $(6,312,281)   $(4,719,821)   $(25,395,170)
                                                     ===========    ===========    ============
Weighted Average Common Shares.....................   22,180,180     20,604,095      12,644,751
                                                     ===========    ===========    ============
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE...............................        (0.29)         (0.23)          (2.01)
                                                     ===========    ===========    ============
DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE:
Net Loss for the Year..............................  $(5,792,061)   $(4,719,821)   $(25,395,170)
Weighted Average Common Shares.....................   22,180,180     20,604,095      12,644,751
Effect of Dilutive Securities:
  Options..........................................           --      1,113,015         829,856
  Warrants.........................................           --         86,889          15,076
  Preferred Stock..................................   33,155,075
                                                     -----------    -----------    ------------
                                                      55,335,255     21,803,999      13,489,683
                                                     ===========    ===========    ============
DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE.............................        (0.10)         (0.22)          (1.88)
                                                     ===========    ===========    ============
</TABLE>
UNCLASSIFIED

National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
7500 GEOINT Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22150

2021-01879 SEP 0 2 202
Memorandum for: NGA Workforce
Subject: Cooperation with the Office of Inspector General

1. Each of you has made a commitment to serve your country. You are among the finest the
Nation, Intelligence Community, and Department of Defense have to offer. I know you bring
your best to work each day, and I am honored to work with you. As public servants, we all have
a responsibility to act when circumstances and situations may compromise the high standards we
ascribe to. Accordingly, I ask that each of you become familiar with the functions of the NGA
Office of Inspector General (OIG) and fully cooperate with the work it does.

2. OIG’s role is vital to mission success. The Intelligence Authorization Act designated the NGA
IG as a statutory JG in 2010. Our JG is one of 75 across the Federal Government who derive their
authority from the IG Act of 1978, as amended, and provide independent oversight of their
agencies. OIG conducts audits, inspections, and investigations to prevent and detect fraud, waste,
and abuse; ensuring mismanagement and misconduct are discovered and addressed quickly.
NGA’s IG reports to the Director and Congress, with no intermediary.

3. You play a critical part in ensuring the success of OIG’s efforts by providing your unqualified
cooperation and assistance. If you see something amiss or become aware of something you feel
needs to be looked into, please contact OIG promptly by calling or emailing its office hotlines:

Open: 1-800-380-7729 SBU: IG Hotline (IGHotline@nga.mil)
Secure: 578-4849 NGANéet: #NGA IG Hotline (IG@nga.ic.gov)

Whether you report anonymously or identify yourself, you can be sure that OIG will remain
objective and maintain your confidentiality. If an OIG staff auditor or investigator contacts you,
please give your full cooperation; this is a duty incumbent upon every member of the workforce.

4. OIG is authorized to access all records and materials related to NGA programs and operations.
Agency personnel can be assured that OIG treats all information it accesses in accordance with
applicable security and legal requirements.

5. I trust the IG to provide us with an independent perspective that is unbiased and impartial. In
closing, I charge each of you to support OIG completely. Our mission success depends upon it.

6, NGA’s OIG point of contact is Cardell K. Richardson Sr., Inspector General, who may be
reached at 571-557-7600 or Cardell.K.Richardson@nga.mil.

HiA_he—

Robert D. Sharp
VADM, USN
Director

Know the Earth ... Show the Way ... Understand the World

UNCLASSIFIED
#### Gregorio Pascual MARTINEZ-ZALDIVAR, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72511.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 17, 2006.

Law Offices of Norma M. Molinar, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Genevieve Holm, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is construed as a motion for summary disposition in part and a motion to dismiss in part. So construed, the motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United*
      *761
      *States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, *858 (9th*Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review in part for lack of jurisdiction is granted. *See Ekimian v. INS.,*303 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir.2002).

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in PART and DISMISSED in PART.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.