alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.a

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Nelson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007,
   of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the "Company");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
   of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
   statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
   were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
   the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company
   as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I, in my capacity as the Company's certifying officers, am responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
    information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary,
    is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
    period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
    report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) Presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
    disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
    Evaluation Date;

5. I, in my capacity as the Company's certifying officers, have disclosed,
   based on my most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit
   committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the
   equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
    controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
    Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls;
    and

6. I, in my capacity as the Company's certifying officers, have indicated
   in this report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
   or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
   subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
   corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
   weaknesses.


Date: May 14, 2007                  /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                      -------------------
                                      David A. Nelson, Chief Executive
                                      Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

MoSys, Inc.
Sunnyvale, California

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-64302, 333-104071,
333-118992, 333-123364, 333-132492, and 333-141264) of MoSys, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 2007, relating to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of MoSys, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and for the two years ended December 31, 2006 appearing in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/
BDO Seidman, LLP

San
Francisco, California
March 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Crenshaw, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 884]

— Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Fresent — Scudder, EJ, Smith, Centra, Sconiers and Whalen, JJ.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
                                               OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James Thorburn, as Chief Executive Officer of ZiLOG,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



|                      |                             
|--------------------- | ----------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 | By:    /s/ James M. Thorburn

| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| |                                     
| | James M. Thorburn                   
| | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Perry J. Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of ZiLOG, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



|                      |                          
|--------------------- | -------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006 | By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| |                                           
| | Perry J. Grace                            
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 7, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41196

Summary Calendar

 

ERIC A. SHARPE,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES ARMY; STEVE LANGFORD,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CV-344

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eric Sharpe is serving a 20-year sentence following a 

court-martial conviction for drug trafficking. He filed a

habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 seeking to overturn his

conviction and to recover compensatory damages including back-pay

and allowances. The district court transferred the action to the

Court of Federal Claims. Sharpe seeks to appeal the transfer

order.
No. 03-41196

-2-

The transfer order is not an appealable final judgment under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, nor a certified appealable interlocutory order

under 28 U.S.C. 1292. See Persyn v. United States, 935 F.2d 69,

72 (5th Cir. 1991). Neither is it appealable under the

collateral order doctrine. See Brinar v. Williamson, 245 F.3d

515, 516-18 (5th Cir. 2001); Stelly v. Employers Nat’l Ins. Co.,

431 F.2d 1251, 1253 (5th Cir. 1970). We therefore lack appellate

jurisdiction, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

DISMISSED.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF

THE
TRUSTEE*

OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joshua R. Peterson, Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Compass Bank, on behalf of Compass Bank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust), not in its
individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (as explained in Note 1 to the Trusts financial statements
contained in the Report, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally
accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THESAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:

/s/ Joshua R. PetersonName:

Joshua R. PetersonTitle:

Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: May 10, 2016




|* | The Trust has no executive officers.
|- | ------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                            NETWORKS ASSOCIATES, INC.
                 Consolidated Subsidiaries at December 31, 2000

1.       Network Associates, GmbH
2.       Network Associates, S.A.
3.       Network Associates, S.r.l.
4.       Network Associates, A.G.
5.       Network Associates International, B.V.
6.       Network Associates Software Development GmbH
7.       Network Associates International, Ltd.
8.       Network Associates Canada Ltd.
9.       NA Combination Company, Inc.
10.      Networks Associates Technology, Inc.
11.      Network Associates Holding Company, Inc.
12.      Nihon Network Associates K.K.
13.      Network Associates Australia Pty. Ltd.
14.      Network Associates (Hong Kong) Ltd.
15.      Network Associates Software (Singapore) Pte Ltd.
16.      Network Associates (NS) ULC
17.      Network Associates FSA (NS) ULC
18.      Network General Barbados, Inc.
19.      Network Associates Do Brazil Ltda
20.      Network Associates Software de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
21.      Network General Canada, Ltd
22.      Network Associates N.V.
23.      Network Associates International Holdings BV
24.      Network General Italy SARL
25.      Network Associates, S.A.
26.      McAfee.Com Corporation
27.      Network Associates (Israel) Limited
28.      Dr Solomon's Ltd.
29.      Network Associates (Denmark) ApS
30.      NA NetTools Holding Company
31.      NetTools Company Ltd.
32.      Net Tools Network Associates (Pty) Ltd.
33.      NA Network Associates OY
34.      Dr Solomon's Group Ltd.
35.      Dr. Solomon's Software Ltd.
36.      Dr Solomon's Software, Inc.
37.      QA Information Security Holding AB
38.      Network Associates N.A. AB
39.      Network Associates N.A. Sweden AB
40.      QA Information Security OY
41.      McAfee.com Ltd.
42.      myCIO.com, Inc.
43.      myCIO.com Canada Corporation
44.      Net Tools, Inc.
45.      CyberMedia, Inc.
46.      Network Associates Hong Kong Ltd., Beijing R.O.
47.      Network Associates Software (Singapore) Pte Ltd., Philippines R.O.


                                      -96-
<PAGE>   2

48.      Dr. Solomon's Ltd.
49.      McAfee.com Delaware Holding I
50.      McAfee.com Delaware Holding II
51.      McAfee.com Canada Corporation
52.      McAfee.com Canada Corporation (NS ULC)
53.      McAfee.com International Ltd.
54.      CSB Consulenzia Software di Base Srl
55.      TuFans, Inc.


                                      -97-
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     By
    
    /s/ David B. KaysenDavid B. KaysenPresident and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     By
    
    /s/ Mahedi A. JiwaniMahedi A. JiwaniVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,310)
<INVENTORY>                                        428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,377
<PP&E>                                         148,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,159)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 169,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              726
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,752     
<OTHER-SE>                                      84,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   169,428
<SALES>                                         35,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,975
<CGS>                                           28,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                       662
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
The District Court of the 1st Judicial District. County of Lewis and Clark.

#### *41STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MICHAEL GERHARDT, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. BDC-08-365 DECISION

On February 11,2010, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a period of five (5) years, for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs (hydrocodone), a felony. The Department may place the defendant into an appropriate community-based program, facility, or a state correctional institution, with the Court’s recommendation that the defendant be placed at the MASC program.

On May 6,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 6th day of May, 2010.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro RODRIGUEZ-LINARES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-30777

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2006.

Larry James Regan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Camille Ann Domingue, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Lafayette, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rebecca L. Hudsmith, Federal Public Defender, Robert M. Marin, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA, for Defendant Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramiro Rodriguez-Linares (Rodriguez) has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rodriguez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s *609brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cut. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Fritz Companies, Inc.:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-78472), (No. 33-57238), (No. 33-93070), (No. 333-15921) and (No.
333-07639) on Forms S-8 and (No. 33-70674) on Form S-4 of Fritz Companies, Inc.
of our report dated June 30, 1998 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Fritz Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 1998 and 1997, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended May 31, 1998, and the
related schedule, which report appears in the May 31, 1998 annual report on Form
10-K of Fritz Companies, Inc.
 
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
San Francisco, California
July 17, 1998
#### State v. Battle

Case below: 172 N.C. App. 335

No. 422P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA03-484)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 359 N.C. 853

Stay dissolved 12/19/06

2. Denied 12/19/06

3. See Special Order Page 148
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 8 , 2019 

# Order

Clerk August 8 , 2019

15 9884

- 9 (6 7 )

VITA S. SHANNON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

SC: 159884

- 9

v COA: 339944, 343213, 343886,

344356, 344418 & 346344

Oakland CC: 2017

- 852916

- DC

ARON L. RALSTON,

Defendant

- Appellee

. _________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellee to extend the time

for filing h is answer is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if

submitted on or before August 23 , 2019.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Michelle D. Viner, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Bear Stearns ARM Trust 2007-3 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 30, 2009


    /s/  Michelle D. Viner
    Signature

     Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51402 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. JOSE GUADALUPE VARGAS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:07-CR-407-ALL Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Guadalupe Vargas raises arguments that are foreclosed by Al mendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), whic h held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. PinedaArrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 4, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51402

2 The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.