alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11510]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1833-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Georgia; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1833-DR), dated April 23, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 7, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of April 23, 2009.

    Camden County for Individual Assistance. Ben Hill, Montgomery, 
and Tattnall Counties for Individual Assistance (already designated 
for Public Assistance).
    Lee, McIntosh, and Seminole Counties for Public Assistance.
    Brantley County for Public Assistance (already designated for 
Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-11510 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 447 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Resources 

AN ACT 

To authorize the conveyance of certain Federal land in the 

State of New Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jornada Experimental 

5 Range Transfer Act of 2005’’. 
2 

S 447 RFH 

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

2 In this Act: 

3 (1) BOARD.—The term ‘‘Board’’ means the 

4 Chihuahuan Desert Nature Park Board. 

5 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

6 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

7 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO CHIHUAHUAN DESERT 

8 NATURE PARK BOARD. 

9 (a) CONVEYANCE.—The Secretary may convey to the 

10 Board, by quitclaim deed, for no consideration, all right, 

11 title, and interest of the United States in and to the land 

12 described in subsection (b). 

13 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land re14 ferred to in subsection (a) consists of not more than 1000 

15 acres of land selected by the Secretary— 

16 (1) that is located in the Jornada Experimental 

17 Range in the State of New Mexico; and 

18 (2) that is subject to an easement granted by 

19 the Agricultural Research Service to the Board. 

20 (c) CONDITIONS.—The conveyance of land under sub21 section (a) shall be subject to— 

22 (1) the condition that the Board pay— 

23 (A) the cost of any surveys of the land; 

24 and 

25 (B) any other costs relating to the convey26 ance; 
3 

S 447 RFH 

1 (2) any rights-of-way to the land reserved by 

2 the Secretary; 

3 (3) a covenant or restriction in the deed to the 

4 land described in subsection (b) requiring that— 

5 (A) the land may be used only for edu6 cational purposes; 

7 (B) if the land is no longer used for the 

8 purposes described in subparagraph (A), the 

9 land shall, at the discretion of the Secretary, re10 vert to the United States; and 

11 (C) if the land is determined by the Sec12 retary to be environmentally contaminated 

13 under subsection (d)(2)(A), the Board shall re14 mediate the contamination; and 

15 (4) any other terms and conditions that the 

16 Secretary determines to be appropriate. 

17 (d) REVERSION.—If the land conveyed under sub18 section (a) is no longer used for the purposes described 

19 in subsection (c)(3)(A)— 

20 (1) the land shall, at the discretion of the Sec21 retary, revert to the United States; and 

22 (2) if the Secretary chooses to have the land re23 vert to the United States, the Secretary shall— 

24 (A) determine whether the land is environ25 mentally contaminated, including contamination 
4 

S 447 RFH 

1 from hazardous wastes, hazardous substances, 

2 pollutants, contaminants, petroleum, or petro3 leum by-products; and 

4 (B) if the Secretary determines that the 

5 land is environmentally contaminated, the 

6 Board or any other person responsible for the 

7 contamination shall remediate the contamina8 tion. 

Passed the Senate July 27, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 October 27, 2005
 BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
   Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
    
    001-31524
(Commission File Number)
    
    37-1446709
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
  12865 Pointe Del Mar
Suite 200
Del Mar, California
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
    
    92014
(Zip Code)
 (858) 481-8500
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
   BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ SHANE D. PEARSONShane D. PearsonSecretary
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-0405

_____________________________

JOSE N. VAZQUEZ FIGUEROA,

Appellant,

v.

HON. DANIEL D. RAULERSON, in 

his Capacity as a Candidate;

CRAIG LATIMER, in his Official 

Capacity as Supervisor of 

Elections of Hillsborough 

County, Florida; KRISTY REID

BRONSON, in her Official 

Capacity as Chief of Bureau of 

Election Records, Division of 

Elections, State of Florida; and 

KEN DETZNER, in his Official 

Capacity as Secretary of Florida 

Department of State,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Charles W. Dodson, Judge.

July 9, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See McPherson v. Flynn, 397 So. 2d 665, 667-68 

(Fla. 1981) (holding courts have no jurisdiction after an election 

to determine an individual’s right to hold office); Norman v. 
2

Ambler, 46 So. 3d 178, 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (holding that 

circuit court was without power to entertain defeated candidate’s 

challenge to primary opponent’s qualification for state senate 

based on alleged inaccuracies in financial disclosure forms 

because primary had already occurred).

LEWIS, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jose N. Vazquez Figueroa, pro se, Appellant.

Emmett Mitchell, IV, Roger N. Beaubien, and Richard E. Coates, 

Coates Law Firm, PL, Tallahassee, for Appellee Daniel D. 

Raulerson; David A. Fugett, General Counsel, and Jesse Dyer, 

Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of State, 

Tallahassee, for Appellees Ken Detzner and Kristy Reid Willis

f/k/a Kristy Reid Bronson; Mary Helen Farris, General Counsel,

and Robert E. Brazel, Chief Assistant County Attorney, Office of 

the County Attorney, Tampa, for Appellee Craig Latimer.
EXHIBIT 31
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  Date: August 9, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonLee Ann AndersonVice President and Senior Trust Officer,
Compass Bank
[932 NE2d 876, 906 NYS2d 520]

#### Leonard Eidlisz, Respondent, v New York University et al., Appellants.

Argued June 1, 2010;

decided June 24, 2010

*731APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Office of General Counsel, New York University,*New York City *(Nancy Kilson*of counsel), for appellants.

*Orans Elsen Lupert & Brown LLP,*New York City *(Robert L. Plotz*and *Leslie A. Lupert*of counsel), for respondent.

*Hogan & Hartson, LLP,*New York City *(R. Brian Black*and *Martin Michaelson*of counsel), *Ada Meloy,*Washington, D.C., and *Jessie Brown*for American Council on Education and others, amici curiae.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and, as so modified, affirmed.

In this breach of contract action, plaintiff seeks an order compelling defendants to award him a degree. Defendants maintain that this action should have been brought as a CPLR article 78 proceeding and is therefore time-barred. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment granting him specific performance, and defendants cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court denied plaintiffs motion, granted defendants’ cross motion, and dismissed the complaint. The court concluded that the case should have been brought as an article 78 proceeding and was untimely. The Appellate Division reversed, denied defendants’ cross motion, granted plaintiffs motion, and directed defendants to award plaintiff a degree, diploma and any authorizations necessary to allow him to take the dental boards. This Court granted defendants leave to appeal.

The lower courts erred in reaching their respective conclusions. On this record, defendants have not established that they are entitled to the benefit of the statute of limitations defense applicable to an article 78 proceeding. Further, contrary to the determination of the Appellate Division, there are issues of fact

*732as to whether defendants’ decision to deny plaintiff a degree was based on purely financial considerations, or whether academic considerations were involved. More information is necessary in order to ascertain whether there was an implied contract between the parties and, if so, whether the parties satisfied their respective obligations under such implied agreement. If, however, defendants’ decision was in fact based upon plaintiffs academic performance, the action should have been brought as a proceeding under article 78, subject to review solely for arbitrariness or irrationality *(see Matter of Olsson v Board of Higher Educ. of City of N.Y.,*49 NY2d 408, 413-414 [1980]), and would be untimely.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

Order modified, etc.
EXHIBIT 32.2


STATEMENT OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., chief accounting officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:
 
 The Company’s Form 10-K/A Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Sam H. Lindsey, Jr.,
 Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Accounting Officer
 Dated: January 22, 2014
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders ofSears, Roebuck and Co.

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by theAmerican Institute of Certified Public Accounts, of the unaudited interimcondensed consolidated financial information of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for the13-week and 26-week periods ended June 29, 2002 and June 30, 2001, as indicatedin our report dated August 5, 2002; because we did not perform an audit, weexpressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in yourQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 13-week period ended June 29, 2002, isincorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 2-64879, 2-80037,33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485, 33-43459, 33-45479, 33-55825, 33-58851, 33-64345,333-08141, and 333-52056 of Sears, Roebuck and Co; Registration Statement No.333-92082 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck Acceptance Corp.;Registration Statement Nos. 33-64775, 333-18591, and 333-43309 of Sears, Roebuckand Co. and Sears Roebuck and Co. Deferred Compensation Plan; RegistrationStatement No. 333-56272 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears 401(K) SavingsPlan (formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees and theSears 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan); Registration Statement No. 33-44671 of Sears,Roebuck and Co. and Sears DC Corp; Registration Statement No. 333-72514 ofSears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2001 Broad-Based Stock Option Plan; andRegistration Statement No. 333-87942 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2002Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c)under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the RegistrationStatement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared orcertified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

| /s/   DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, IllinoisAugust 5, 2002 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            9124
<RECEIVABLES>                                   698044
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  1
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           397277
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             244534
<PP&E>                                           13987
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1387901
<SHORT-TERM>                                    159938
<PAYABLES>                                      204315
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                             367278
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              144778
<LONG-TERM>                                      45985
<COMMON>                                           109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      119535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1387901
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                33560
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             52005
<COMMISSIONS>                                    98883
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    29276
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    24724
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               30155
<COMPENSATION>                                  137563
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  21510
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Wayne P. Garten, certify that: 

 
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Direct, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|  

 

/s/ Wayne P. Garten

Wayne P. Garten

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: February 21, 2006
#### Daniels v. Metro Magazine Holding Co.

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 533

No. 582P06

1. Pit’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-1336)

2. Def’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. _

2. Allowed 11/08/07

3. Denied 11/08/07