alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 750 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 750

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow look-through 
      treatment of payments between related foreign corporations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 11, 2005

    Mr. Kyl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow look-through 
      treatment of payments between related foreign corporations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LOOK-THROUGH TREATMENT OF PAYMENTS BETWEEN RELATED 
              CONTROLLED FOREIGN CORPORATIONS UNDER THE FOREIGN 
              PERSONAL HOLDING COMPANY RULES.

    (a) In General.--Section 954(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to foreign personal holding company income) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(6) Look-thru rule for related controlled foreign 
        corporations.--For purposes of this subsection, dividends, 
        interest, rents, and royalties received or accrued from a 
        controlled foreign corporation which is a related person shall 
        not be treated as foreign personal holding company income to 
        the extent attributable or properly allocable (determined under 
        rules similar to the rules of subparagraphs (C) and (D) of 
        section 904(d)(3)) to income of the related person which is not 
        subpart F income. For purposes of this paragraph, interest 
        shall include factoring income which is treated as income 
        equivalent to interest for purposes of paragraph (1)(E). The 
        Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as may be 
        appropriate to prevent the abuse of the purposes of this 
        paragraph.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years of foreign corporations ending after January 1, 2005, 
and to taxable years of United States shareholders with or within which 
such taxable years of foreign corporations end.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 3.1.3

<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                  OF THE RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                RAMP CORPORATION

         Pursuant  to the  provisions  of Section  242 of the  Delaware  General
Corporation Law, the undersigned executes the following Certificate of Amendment
of  the  Restated   Certificate  of   Incorporation  of  Ramp  Corporation  (the
"Corporation"):

         1. The name of the corporation is Ramp Corporation.

         2. The Restated  Certificate of Incorporation  of the  Corporation,  is
         hereby amended by adding the following paragraph  immediately after the
         first paragraph of ARTICLE IV, Section 1 thereof:

                  "Effective upon the filing of this Certificate of Amendment of
                  the Restated  Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation,
                  every  sixty (60)  shares of Common  Stock of the  Corporation
                  issued  and  outstanding  or  held  in  the  treasury  of  the
                  Corporation automatically shall be combined into one (1) share
                  of  Common  Stock  of  the  Corporation.  There  shall  be  no
                  factional shares issued. Each holder of shares of Common Stock
                  who otherwise would be entitled to receive a fractional  share
                  shall be entitled to receive a cash payment in lieu thereof at
                  a price  equal to the  fraction  to which  such  holder  would
                  otherwise  be  entitled to receive  multiplied  by the closing
                  price of Common  Stock as reported in The Wall Street  Journal
                  on  the  last   trading  day  prior  to  the  filing  of  this
                  Certificate  of  Amendment  of  the  Restated  Certificate  of
                  Incorporation  of the  Corporation,  or, if such  price is not
                  available, the average of the last bid and asked prices of the
                  Common  Stock  on such  day,  or such  other  price  as may be
                  determined by the Board of Directors of the Corporation."

                                      -2-
<PAGE>

         3. The foregoing  amendment was duly adopted pursuant to Section 242 of
         the Delaware General  Corporation Law by unanimous consent of the Board
         of Directors of the  Corporation at a meeting held on November 18, 2004
         and by the  consent of a majority of the  outstanding  shares of common
         stock of the  Corporation  at the Annual Meeting of  Stockholders  that
         took place on November 18, 2004.



Date: November 30, 2004
                                                /s/ Andrew Brown
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name:  Andrew Brown
                                                Title: President and
                                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                      -3-
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code), I, William D. Hibbetts, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)           theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:February 5, 2004 |  /s/ William  D. Hibbetts                    |   |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   | William D. Hibbetts                               |
|                   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
STATE OF LOUISIANA 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

STATE OF LOUISIANA 

VERSUS 

CHAZ LESEAN BROWN 

In Re: Chaz Lesean Brown, applying 

22nd Judicial District Court, 

No. 605914. 

NO. 2022 KW 1358 

FEBRUARY 1, 2023 

for supervisory writs, 

Parish of St. Tammany, 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT 

FOR THE COURT 

JMG 

EW 

SMM
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 487 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 487

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide leave for members of 
  the Armed Forces in connection with adoptions of children, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2005

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. Smith, Ms. Landrieu, and Mr. 
   Jeffords) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide leave for members of 
  the Armed Forces in connection with adoptions of children, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADOPTION LEAVE FOR MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES ADOPTING 
              CHILDREN.

    (a) Authority.--Section 701 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(i)(1) Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, 
a member of the armed forces adopting a child in a qualifying child 
adoption is entitled to 21 days of leave to be used in connection with 
the adoption.
    ``(2) For the purpose of this subsection, an adoption of a child by 
a member is a qualifying child adoption if the member is eligible for 
reimbursement of qualified adoption expenses for such adoption under 
section 1052 of this title.
    ``(3) In the event that two members of the armed forces who are 
spouses of each other adopt a child in a qualifying child adoption, 
only one such member shall be entitled to leave under this subsection. 
Such members shall elect which such member shall be entitled to such 
leave.
    ``(4) Leave under paragraph (1) is in addition to other leave 
provided under other provisions of this section.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (i) of section 701 of title 10, 
United States Code (as added by subsection (a)), shall take effect on 
October 1, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4112 

To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect to certain 

firefighters as exempt payments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mrs. BOXER, and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To treat payments by charitable organizations with respect 

to certain firefighters as exempt payments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallen Firefighters As5 sistance Tax Clarification Act of 2006’’. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 4112 IS

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENTS BY CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS WITH 

2 RESPECT TO CERTAIN FIREFIGHTERS TREAT3 ED AS EXEMPT PAYMENTS AND EXCLUDED 

4 FROM GROSS INCOME OF THE RECIPIENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986— 

7 (1) payments made by an organization de8 scribed in section 501(c)(3) of such Code by reason 

9 of the death, injury, wounding, or illness of any fire10 fighter incurred as the result of the October 2006 

11 Esperanza Incident fire in southern California, and 

12 before June 1, 2007, shall be treated as related to 

13 the purpose or function constituting the basis for 

14 such organization’s exemption under section 501 of 

15 such Code if such payments are made in good faith 

16 using a reasonable and objective formula which is 

17 consistently applied; 

18 (2) in the case of a private foundation (as de19 fined in section 509 of such Code), any payment de20 scribed in paragraph (1) shall not be treated as 

21 made to a disqualified person for purposes of section 

22 4941 of such Code; and 

23 (3) the receipt of any payment described in 

24 paragraphs (1) or (2), or any payment from any 

25 Federal, State, or local government, or agency or in26 strumentality thereof, by reason of the death, injury, 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 4112 IS

1 wounding, or illness of any firefighter incurred as 

2 the result of the October 2006 Esperanza Incident 

3 fire in southern California, shall not be treated as 

4 gross income under such Code. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply to 

6 payments made on or after October 26, 2006. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 13 (Thursday, January 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4029-4030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1126]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL09-28-000]


City of Pasadena, CA; Notice of Filing

January 2, 2009.
    Take notice that on December 23, 2008, the City of Pasadena, 
California filed its fourth annual revision to its Transmission Revenue 
Balancing Account Adjustment, to become effective January 1, 2009.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the

[[Page 4030]]

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#14525146575b7a787d7a71476164647b666054727166773a737b62"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a7c7f687975545653545f694f4a4a55484e7a5c5f4859145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 22, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-1126 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  I, Michael Huddy, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of International Barrier Technology Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  /s/ Michael Huddy Michael Huddy President/CEO October 06, 2006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sergio CANTU-RUELAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41631.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Sergio Cantu-Ruelas (Cantu) appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction of illegally reentering the United States after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Cantu contends that the district court erred in treating his prior Texas conviction of burglary of a habitation as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). As he concedes, this argument is foreclosed. *See United States v. Valdez-Maltos,*443 F.3d 910, 911 (5th Cir.2006), *cert. denied,*2006 WL 2094539 (U.S. Oct.2, 2006) (No. 06-5473); *United States v. Garcia-Mendez,*420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir. 2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1398, 164 L.Ed.2d 100 (2006).

Citing *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Cantu challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. This issue is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Cantu contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Cantu properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350Certification**

** **

In connection with thisannual report of ML Systematic Momentum FuturesAccess LLC, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, themanager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 31, 2009      |                  |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                           |                  |   |
| By                             | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis              |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer       |                  |
| (Principal  Financial Officer) |                  |

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Billups, Also Known as Muhammad Haqq, Appellant.

[869 NYS2d 780]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County *426(Arlene R Silverman, J.), entered on or about August 15, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant, who was assessed 20 points more than the threshold for a level three adjudication, received a downward departure to level two, and the court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a further departure to level one *(see People v Guaman, 8*AD3d 545 [2004]). The departure to level two sufficiently addressed the mitigating factors cited by defendant. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Nardelli, Buckley, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
#### The City of Columbus *v.*Sims.

1. A city which is under no statutory obligation to light its streets, is not, as matter of law, bound when lighting them voluntarily to do it in such a manner as to enable persons using them to see any obstruction that the city may have placed in the street, irrespective of whether the obstruction, such as a water-plug, was a reasonable and proper one, or not.

*4842. Taking the whole charge of the court together, it was free from substantial error save in that part of it which related to lighting the streets. *Judgment reversed.*

April 9, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

Action for damages. Before Judge Butt. Muscogee superior court. May term, 1893.

Worrill & Little, for plaintiff in error.

McNeill & Levy, *contra.*

Sims sued the city for injuries sustained by him by driving his buggy at night against a water-plug or hydrant in one of the streets. He claimed that the city had caused this plug to be placed in the roadway used for vehicles (the usual place for locating such plugs being in the center of the streets), and that there were no lights at or near the place and nothing to give warning of the location of the plug, he being ignorant of the same. He obtained-a verdict, and defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled. The material ground of the motion is, that the court erred in charging the jury thus: “The city having undertaken to light its streets, it was their duty, after they undertook to light that street, to have lighted the street in such a manner as parties could see any obstruction in the street.”