alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1358

MISS CATHERINE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

US ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 15-1411

CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General, Dept. of Justice,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District 

of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. 

(1:15-cv-00916-ELH; 1:15-cv-00982-ELH)

Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 22, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2
PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph 

appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her complaints

for failing to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)

(2012). We have reviewed the records and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals as frivolous for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Randolph v. Attorney 

Gen., No. 1:15-cv-00916-ELH (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2015); Randolph v.

Lynch, No. 1:15-cv-00982-ELH (D. Md. filed Apr. 9, 2015; entered 

Apr. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,900
<SECURITIES>                                    35,831
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,131
<ALLOWANCES>                                        47
<INVENTORY>                                      1,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,550
<PP&E>                                           2,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                     688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,062
<SALES>                                          4,090
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,986
<CGS>                                          (2,385)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (2,385)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,015
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,538
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,876)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

     ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a corporation organized and existing under
and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify:

     1.   That the Board of Directors of the Corporation, by unanimous written
consent dated August 10, 1996, adopted resolutions setting forth a proposed
amendment to Article First of the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation (the "Amendment"), declaring said Amendment to be advisable and
calling for its submission to those shareholders of the Corporation of record on
August 15, 1996 (the "Shareholders").  The Amendment approved by resolution by
the Board of Directors is as follows:

          FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is The Ackerley Group, Inc.

     2.   That pursuant to such resolutions of the Board of Directors,
Shareholders holding a majority of the outstanding stock entitled to vote have
voted in favor of the Amendment by written consent to action of shareholders in
lieu of a meeting pursuant to Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.

     3.   That the Corporation provided written notice of the adoption of the
Amendment to those Shareholders who did not consent in writing to the adoption
of the Amendment in accordance with Section 228(d) of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware.

     4.   That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State
of Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ackerley Communications, Inc. has caused this
certificate to be signed by William N. Ackerley, President, and attested by
Denis M. Curley, Secretary, this 1st day of October, 1996.

                              ACKERLEY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                              By: /s/ William N. Ackerley
                                  -----------------------
                                  William N. Ackerley, President

Attest:


/s/ Denis M. Curley
-------------------
Denis M. Curley, Secretary
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Elko Ventures Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lou Schiliro, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 26, 2009                  By: /s/ Lou Schiliro
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lou Schiliro
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shalL not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered September 17, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01424-CR

SAWEAT JINTANONT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-45928-I

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On July 28, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the trial court’s finding that: (1) appellant filed his notice 

of appeal with this Court on October 17, 2014; (2) the copy of the notice filed with this Court 

was not file-stamped by the District Clerk until April 10, 2014; (3) the trial court did not know 

the case was on appeal; and (4) the trial court has now appointed George Conkey to represent 

appellant on appeal.

We DIRECT the Clerk to list George Conkey as appellant’s attorney of record.

We note the trial court expressed concern regarding jurisdiction over the appeal due to 

the late receipt of the notice of appeal by the Dallas County District Clerk. Texas Rule of 
Appellate Procedure 25.2(c)(1) provides that if a notice of appeal is filed with the clerk of the 

court of appeals, that clerk shall immediately record on the notice the date it was received and 

send the notice to the trial court clerk. In Taylor v. State, 424 S.W.3d 39, the court of criminal 

appeals concluded the appellate court had jurisdiction over the appeal when the notice of appeal 

was filed by the clerk of the appellate court and forwarded to the clerk of the trial court and filed 

there within ten days of its due date. Id. at 41. At issue in Taylor was the application of the 

mailbox rule, not the impact of a delay in forwarding a notice of appeal from the appellate court

to the trial court clerk. See id. 41–47.

In this case, the Court has no explanation for the six-month delay in the receipt of the 

notice of appeal by this Court and the file-stamped date showing receipt by the Dallas County 

District Clerk. We decline to attribute that delay to appellant given that his notice of appeal was 

filed in this Court within seven days of his sentencing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1), 26.2(a)(1). 

Accordingly, we conclude we have jurisdiction over the appeal.

The clerk’s and reporter’s records have been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to 

file his brief within FORTY-FIVE DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 19, 2008   | By:    | /s/                Patrick J. Gainer                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          |   | Patrick                J. GainerChief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 7.1

                                 VIDEOTRON LTEE

                          FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

                  SCHEDULE OF VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                   (Amounts in thousands of Canadian dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Balance,         Charged to
                                                     beginning of       costs and                           Balance, end
                                                         year          expenses(1)       Deductions(2)         of year
                                                   --------------    ---------------    ---------------    --------------
<S>                                                  <C>               <C>               <C>                <C>
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable
 Year ended December 31:
         2001                                          $   7,522         $  10,160          $   9,341          $  8,341
         2002                                              8,341            11,084              8,210            11,215
         2003                                             11,215            14,562             10,542             7,195
</TABLE>

-------------
Notes:

(1) Represents increase in allowance for doubtful accounts receivable charged to
expense.

(2) Represents the accounts receivable written-off against the allowance for
doubtful accounts receivable.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 785 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 785

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the small refiner 
               exception to the oil depletion deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 14, 2005

Mr. Lott (for himself and Mrs. Lincoln) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the small refiner 
               exception to the oil depletion deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF SMALL REFINER EXCEPTION TO OIL DEPLETION 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 613A(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitations on application of 
subsection (c)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) Certain refiners excluded.--If the taxpayer or 1 or 
        more related persons engages in the refining of crude oil, 
        subsection (c) shall not apply to the taxpayer for a taxable 
        year if the average daily refinery runs of the taxpayer and 
        such persons for the taxable year exceed 75,000 barrels. For 
        purposes of this paragraph, the average daily refinery runs for 
        any taxable year shall be determined by dividing the aggregate 
        refinery runs for the taxable year by the number of days in the 
        taxable year.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued September 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01

- 13

- 00735

- CR

——————————— IN RE WILLIAM H. WAR D , Relator

O riginal Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, William H. Ward , has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus requesting that we compel the trial court to rule on a “Motion to Vacate

. ” 1

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle

.

1 The underlying case is cause no. 9508871, in the Harris County Criminal Court at Law No. 5, the Hon. Margaret Harris presiding.2

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

                    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the Kentucky Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 28, 2009, in Room 340, Gardiner Hall, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky. The purpose of                           ( print page 23390)                        the meeting is for the Committee to discuss its report on voting rights for ex-felons and discuss activity plans for 2010.                 

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The address is 61 Forsyth St., SW., Suite 18T40, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, present their comments at the meeting, or who desire additional information should contact Dr. Peter Minarik, Regional Director, at (404) 562-7000 or 800-877-8339 for individuals who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech disabilities or by e-mail to                     *pminarik@usccr.gov.*

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting. 

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.                 

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA. 

Dated in Washington, DC, May 13, 2009. 

Christopher Byrnes, 

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit. 

[FR Doc. E9-11614 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 775 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 775

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 123 W. 7th Street in Holdenville, Oklahoma, as the ``Boone Pickens 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 2005

Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. Coburn) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 123 W. 7th Street in Holdenville, Oklahoma, as the ``Boone Pickens 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BOONE PICKENS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 123 W. 7th Street in Holdenville, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Boone Pickens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Boone 
Pickens Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis Dwayne MACKEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51414.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kimberly S. Keller, The Keller Group, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Curtis Dwayne Mackey has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Mackey has filed a response in which he requests the appointment of new counsel. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the record, and Mackey’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cíe. R. 42.2. Mackey’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 801

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located at 300

North Hogan Street, Jacksonville, Florida, as the ‘‘John

Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 801 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

2 The United States courthouse located at 300 North

3 Hogan Street, Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and

4 designated as the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson United

5 States Courthouse’’.

6 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

7 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

8 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

9 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

10 to be a reference to the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson

11 United States Courthouse’’.

Passed the Senate June 27, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 801

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse located

States Courthouse’’.ida, as the ‘‘John Milton Bryan Simpson Unitedat 300 North Hogan Street, Jacksonville, Flor-
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOLSTATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS^U,. 

### ©FF8C8AL BUSSNESS wv®mzz®s <?** "^ Q^'K^^SS^ fXgg f't^rBam STATE OF TEXAS 

### PENALTYFOR \ |3 

# 2/4/2015 "WVATEUSE ^;Wf HARGROVE, MARCUS WAY^JB ,Tr,CtT5o.112-180-CR-A ' nrNzi bowes 02 1R 3 0002003152 FEB09 2015 MAILED FROM ZIP CODE 7 8 701 WR-81,965-04 ss 

### The Court has dismissed your application for wnt,ofhabeas corpus without written order; the sentence has been discharged SeeExparteHarrington, 310 S.W 3d 452 (Tex. Crim.App. 2010). ' ' 

## W

Abel Acosta, Clerk (i

N3B MARCUS WAYNE HARGROVE u tf #1920120

\\