alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                              23
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    23
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      23
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          527,098
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,260,129
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,687,204)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        23
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    14
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     (45)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,223)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,249)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Joseph Casavecchia, Sr., Respondent, v William W. Mizrahi et al., Appellants.

Submitted April 13, 2009;

decided June 25, 2009

*897Motion, insofar as Hills of Heartland, LLC and Casa Mason Corp. seek leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order holding defendant William W. Mizrahi in contempt, dismissed upon the ground that said appellants are not aggrieved by such order; motion, insofar as William W. Mizrahi seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order holding him in contempt, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF STERLING BANCSHARES, INC.

The following is a list of the subsidiaries of Sterling
Bancshares, Inc.:



|                                                                                                                                    |  |                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Sterling Bancorporation, LLC. A Delaware corporation PO Box 631 Wilmington, Delaware 19899                                          |  | Sterling Bank A Texas state banking
association 2550 North Loop West, Suite 600 Houston, Texas
77092                 
|                                                                                                                                    | 
|Sterling Bancshares Statutory Trust One A Connecticut statutory business trust 2550 North Loop West, Suite 600 Houston, Texas 77092 |  | BOTH Capital Trust I A Delaware statutory business
trust 15000 Northwest Freeway Houston, Texas
77040                
|                                                                                                                                    | 
|Sterling Bancshares Capital Trust III A Delaware statutory business trust 15000 Northwest Freeway Houston, Texas 77040              |  | Sterling Bancshares Capital Trust IV A Delaware
statutory business trust 15000 Northwest Freeway Houston, Texas
77040
|                                                                                                                                    | 
|MBM Advisors, Inc. A Texas corporation 440 Louisiana, Suite 2600 Houston, Texas 77002                                               |  |
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, George Samenuk certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of McAfee, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of McAfee, Inc. By:
    /s/ GEORGE SAMENUKName:
    George SamenukTitle:
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer May 23, 2005 I, Eric F. Brown certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of McAfee, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for
the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of McAfee, Inc. By:
    /s/ ERIC F. BROWNName:
    Eric F. BrownTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer May 23, 2005
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Uroplasty, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David B. Kaysen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  May 25, 2011
 
 
 By/s/ David B. Kaysen
 David B. Kaysen
 President and Chief Executive Officer
  
  Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Uroplasty, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mahedi A. Jiwani, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:  May 25, 2011
 
 
 By /s/ Mahedi A. Jiwani
 Mahedi A. Jiwani
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Sidney Lawrence SIMS, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-4987.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 22, 2009.

Decided: May 5, 2009.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, William C. Ingram, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert Abert Ja-mison Lang, Assistant United States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sidney Lawrence Sims pled guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to possession of a firearm by a felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006). The conditional plea preserved Sims’s right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Sims was sentenced to seventy-five months’ imprisonment. Sims’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), certifying that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but alleging that the district court erred in denying Sims’s motion to suppress. Sims filed a pro se supplemental brief, reiterating the arguments raised in counsel’s brief. The Government did not file a reply brief. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

In reviewing the district court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we review the district court’s factual findings for clear error, and its legal determinations de novo. *167
      *United States v. Cain,*524 F.3d 477, 481 (4th Cir.2008). The facts are reviewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. *United States v. Jamison,*509 F.3d 623, 628 (4th Cir.2007).

With these standards in mind, and having reviewed the transcript of the suppression hearing, we conclude the district court did not err in denying Sims’s motion to suppress. *See United States v. Burton,*228 F.3d 524, 528 (4th Cir.2008) (finding that officers must have both reasonable suspicion of criminal activity as well as reason to believe suspect armed and dangerous in order to conduct constitutional frisk for weapons). In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. This court requires that counsel inform Sims, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Sims requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Sims. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Reed *v.*Dougherty.

One who has made a contract for the sale and conveyance of land, the agreed purchaser never having entered into possession nor taken a conveyance, has his election of two remedies, if the contract be binding upon the other party: he may either proceed by an equitable action for specific performance, or bring an action at law for damages for breach of the contract. But so long as the title is in himself, although he may have tendered a conveyance, he cannot maintain an action for the purchase money, or for a balance of the same when some of it has been paid. It follows that the present action, not being one for specific performance nor for damages for a breach of contract, but for purchase money, is not maintainable, the same being based on a contract signed by the plaintiff only, which contract is in the following terms: “ LaFayette, Ga., Jany. 29th, 1891. Beceived of A. H. Beed one hundred dollars in part payment for the following described lots: 35, 36, 37, 71, 72, 7th dist. and 4th section. Also 247, 144, 50, one half of 51, one half of 58, and forty acres (unknown), and 94 and 95 in 12th dist. 4th section, on the following terms: price $3.00 per acre, $5,400.00; payments to wit, $1,800.00 when deeds and abstracts are delivered, $200.00 in stock of the Northwestern Southern Investment Go., the balance $3,400.00 notes payable in 12 months at 6 interest, mtg. back to secure deferred payments ”; there being no *662evidence that the defendant ever took possession of the lands, or that any complete and final delivery of the conveyance tendered to him by the plaintiff was ever made, or that any notes or mortgage had been executed. *Judgment reversed.*

July 30, 1894.

Attachment. Before Judge Henry. Walker superior court. August term, 1898.

R. M. W. Glenn and Payne & Walker, for plaintiff in error. Copeland & Jackson and Lumpkin & Shattuck, *contra.*

The attachment was issued against Reed, a non-resident, and was levied on land. In his declaration plaintiff alleged, that Reed was indebted to him the sum for which the attachment was issued, for the purchase-money of a number of land lots; that defendant entered into a written contract (set out in the head-note) for the purchase of said land; that plaintiff had fully complied with all the conditions of the same; and that defendant had 'utterly failed to comply therewith, or to pay the purchase money or any of it. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled.
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION

 

I,Dean Elliott, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB ofJag Media Group, Inc.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this annual report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 

 

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andhave:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant'sdisclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date");and     

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors andthe audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant'sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant'sinternal controls; and

 

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I haveindicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes ininternal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.

 

Date: February 19, 2008

 

/s/ Dean Elliott

DeanElliott

Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZiLOG, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James M. Thorburn, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Perry Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that:

	(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

	(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: November 11, 2003 

/s/ James M. Thorburn_

Name:  James M. Thorburn

Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

Date: November 11, 2003

/s/ Perry J. Grace__

Name: Perry J. Grace

Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

**FORM 10-Q/A**

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended **September 24, 2005**

 

Commission file number **1-08056**

 

 

**HANOVER DIRECT, INC.**

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 
| **Delaware******                                     | **13-0853260******                |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State of incorporation)                             | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| ** **                                           | ** **                        |
| **1500 Harbor Boulevard, Weehawken, New Jersey****** | **07086******                     |
| (Address of principal executive offices)             | (Zip Code)                        |
|                                                 |                              |
| **(201) 863-7300**                                   |
| (Telephone number)                                   |

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 

Yes_  No X

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 

Yes_  No X

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) 

Yes_  No X

 

Common stock, par value $0.01****per share: 22,426,296 shares outstanding as of February 21, 2006.

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23716-23717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11552]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

Agency: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time: Tuesday, May 19, 2009, at 10 a.m.; Wednesday, May 20, 
2009, at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: These meetings will be closed to the public.

Items to be Discussed:  Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. 
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings 
or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters 
affecting a particular employee.
* * * * *

[[Page 23717]]


Person to Contact for Information: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-11552 Filed 5-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
|                                 |   |                                                               |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  March      16, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Bradley I. Meier                                          |
|                                 |   | Name:      Bradley I. Meier                                        |
|                                 |   | Title:   President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                 |   |                                                               |
|                                 |   |                                                               |
|                                 |   |                                                               |
|                                 |   |                                                               |
|                                 |   |                                                               |
| Date:  March      16, 2010 | By:    | /s/      James M. Lynch                                            |
|                                 |   | Name:      James M. Lynch                                          |
|                                 |   | Title:   Chief      Financial Officer               |
|                                 |   |                                                               |
NOVEMBER 2010 CALENDAR

The District Court of the 8th Judicial District. County of Cascade.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. PATRICK ADAMS, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. ADC-10-080 DECISION

On August 26, 2010, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years, for the offense of Count I: Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a Felony.

On November 4, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed hy the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 4th day of November, 2010.

DATED this 18th day of November, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Brown, Also Known as Robert Milton, Appellant.

[961 NYS2d 918]

—Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J), rendered April 20, 2011, as amended April 21, 2011, resentencing defendant to a term of 12 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful *(see People v Lingle,*16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

Concur— Gonzalez, EJ., Friedman, Abdus-Salaam, Román and Clark, JJ.