alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11295]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration 11732 and 11733]

Florida Disaster Number FL-00040

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1831-DR), dated 04/28/
2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straight-line 
Winds.
    Incident Period: 03/26/2009 through 05/05/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/06/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/29/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/28/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Florida, dated 04/28/2009 is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
03/26/2009 and continuing through 05/05/2009.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-11295 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,757,217
<SECURITIES>                                   3,521,904
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,280,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                   195,000
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         2,533,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,457,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,703,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        1,861,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    8,761,400
<COMMON>                                       454,209
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,386,688
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,703,618
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,199,353
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,417,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             31,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (250,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (100,353)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (149,924)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (149,924)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.089)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, L. George Klaus, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-K/A for
the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 14, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/L. George Klaus
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | L. George Klaus        
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                    |  | Chief Executive Officer

I, Michael A. Piraino, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Epicor Software Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Epicor Software Corporation.



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: April 14, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael A. Piraino
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Michael A. Piraino                                                                               
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 10.e

Guyana

      County of Demerara

                                    AGREEMENT

      BY THIS AGREEMENT made at Georgetown, Demerara, Republic of Guyana, this
4th day of April, 2002, BETWEEN:-

SHEIKH SHAHABUDEEN HASSAN of 17 Courida Park (East) East Coast Demerara,
aforesaid (the Licensor).

And

NORTH AMERICAN RESOURCES INCORPORATED LIMITED of 88

C&D Barrack Streets, Kingston, Georgetown, aforesaid (the Licensee).

      NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH AS FOLLOWS:-

      1.    In consideration of the Licensee keeping and strictly observing the
            several covenants herein contained, the Licensor hereby grants to
            the Licensee an exclusive and irrevocable right to enter upon,
            prospect and/or work the areas (the Permitted Areas) covered by the
            17 Prospecting Permits (Medium Scale) more fully described and set
            out in the Schedule hereto (the PPMS') for so long as the Permittee
            shall hold the PPMS'.

      2.    The Licensee hereby covenants not to do or omit to be done anything
            upon or within the Permitted Areas whereby all or any of the PPMS'
            may be forfeited and/or cancelled by the State of Guyana.

      3.    The Licensee shall from the date hereof have sole responsibility for
            doing or causing to be done anything upon or within the Permitted
            Areas which may be required to be done by the Licensor under the
            laws of Guyana so as to maintain all or any of the PPMS' in good
            standing with the State of Guyana.


                                        1
<PAGE>

      4.    The Licensee hereby undertakes to indemnify the Licensor in full and
            to hold him harmless against all or any liability of whatsoever type
            or description which may accrue to him as a consequence of being the
            holder of all or any of the PPMS'.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have hereunder set their hands on the date
first above written in the presence of the subscribing witnesses hereto.


                                        ---------------------
                                        The Licensor


                                        ---------------------
                                        The Licensee

As Witnesses:


1.
  -----------------------


2.
  -----------------------


                                       2
<PAGE>

                                    Schedule

PPMS No.

PPMS/O166/2001

PPMS/0167/2001

PPMS/O168/2001

PPMS/0169/2001

PPMS/O170/2001

PPMS/0171/2001

PPMS/O172/2001

PPMS/O173/2001

PPMS/0174/2001

PPMS/O175/2001

PPMS/0176/2001

PPMS/0177/2001

PPMS/O178/2001

PPMS/0179/2001

PPMS/O180/2001

PPMS/Ol81/2001

PPMS/226/2002


                                       3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose RAMIREZ-MEDINA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 09-50100.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2009.*

May 21, 2009.

William Allen Hall, Jr., Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jennifer Lynn Coon, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., Carey Gorden, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*486Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without ofal argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Ramirez-Medina appeals from the 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Ramirez-Medina contends that the district court erred at sentencing by improperly relying upon factors not included in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), and that the resulting sentence is unreasonable. We conclude that the district court did not err, *see United States v. Simtob,*485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.2007), and that the sentence is substantively reasonable, *see United States v. Carty,*520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.2008) (en banc).

Ramirez-Medina next contends that his sentence violates *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because the sentence was not supported by facts alleged in an indictment or proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. This contention fails. *See United States v. Huertar-Pimental,*445 F.3d 1220, 1221 (9th Cir.2006).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-102-CV

IN RE DAVID M. DIFFLEY, M.D. AND	RELATORS

RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF TARRANT

COUNTY, P.A.

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

	Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL B:	LIVINGSTON, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 18, 2005
**Exhibit 7.1**

 

**Videotron Ltd.**

 

**Statement Regarding Calculation of Ratio ofEarnings to Fixed Charges as Disclosed inVideotron Ltd.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Year Ended December 31,2008**

 

For the purpose of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed chargesdisclosed in Videotron Ltd.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,2008, (i) earnings consist of net (loss) income plus non-controllinginterest in a subsidiary, income taxes, fixed charges, amortized capitalizedinterest, less interest capitalized, and (ii) fixed charges consist ofinterest expensed and capitalized, excluding interest on QMI subordinatedloans, plus amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses relating toindebtedness and an estimate of the interest within rental expense.

 

----
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

alice.fike@nih.gov

## Summary

Commander Alice Fike obtained a Baccalaureate of Science in Nursing from Syracuse University. After serving as a Peace Corps health volunteer in rural Burkina Faso, she obtained a Master’s Degree in Nursing at the University of California, San Francisco as a nurse practitioner. Her career focus is providing care for marginalized communities. CDR Fike is a U.S. Public Health Service officer with training and experience in infectious disease surveillance, TB control, prevention of vertical transmission of HIV, and mass immunization campaigns and is fluent in French and Spanish. She holds an advanced practice certification in rheumatology and has worked with NIAMS in the Office of the Clinical Director since 2009 with a two year tour in Niger at the U.S. Embassy from 2016-2018. Her research interests include health disparities and applied epidemiology as related to marginalized populations with rheumatic diseases.

## Research Statement

Commander Fike has a distinguished record of service as the lead nurse practitioner in the NIAMS Community Health Clinic. Her portfolio includes inpatient and outpatient rheumatology consults and leadership in patient safety and quality improvement.

April 2023

Back to Top
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 10593 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Diana Lopez**

**- Figueroa,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 10

- 1

Before **Jones, Clement,** and **Haynes,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Diana Lopez

- Figueroa has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez

- Figueroa has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 7, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-10593 Document: 00515854175 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/07/2021No. 20

- 10593

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
wit hdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R. 42.2**

. Case: 20-10593 Document: 00515854175 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/07/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1997 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1997 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          80,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,029,427<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,110,284
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,610,284<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,726,700
<OTHER-SE>                                  78,877,484<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                81,610,284
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,825,522<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,779,441
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,747,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,747,841
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.03
<FN>
<F1>RECEIVABLES ARE DUE FROM AFFILIATED COMPANIES.
<F2>INVESTMENT IN PREFERRED SHARES OF CHIEFTAIN INTERNATIONAL (U.S.) INC., AT COST,
IS $78,500,000.
<F3>ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL OF $14,998,000 (ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK) AND
$60,676,203 (ATTRIBUTABLE TO PREFERRED STOCK) HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN OTHER
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.
<F4>REVENUES ARE EARNED EXCLUSIVELY FROM TRANSACTIONS WITH PARENT COMPANY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Jeanie I. KWON, Appellant v. James H. BILLINGTON, Librarian of Congress, Appellee.

No. 05-5205.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 19, 2006.

Richard L. Swick, Swick *&*Shapiro, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

R. Craig Lawrence, Michael Joseph Ryan, Kenneth L. Wainstein, Darrell C. Valdez, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before: TATEL and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the District Court in *Kwon v. Billington,*370 F.Supp.2d 177 (D.D.C. 2005) be affirmed. With regard to Kwon’s claims that the Library of Congress discriminated against her by not selecting her for the Librarian Cataloger position and that it retaliated against her by not selecting her for the Reference Librarian position, we affirm the District Court’s order of summary judgment for the reasons given in its opinion. *Id.*at 184-86, 187-88. With regard to Kwon’s claim that the Library retaliated against her by not selecting her for the Librarian Cataloger position, we affirm the District Court’s order of summary judgment for the reasons given in footnote six of its opinion. *Id.*at 187 n. 6.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P.41(b);D.C.CIR.R.41.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derrick McCorkle, Appellant.

[873 NYS2d 127]

Appeal by the defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), all rendered January 25, 2006, convicting him of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny under indictment No. 5100/01, burglary in the third degree and attempted petit larceny under indictment No. 7942/ 01, and burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 8512/ 05, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court improperly refused to dismiss his felony charges in violation of the plea agreements is unpreserved for appellate review, because the defendant did not raise this contention at sentencing and did not move to withdraw his pleas or vacate the judgments on this ground *(see People v Rooney,*299 AD2d 565 [2002]).

In any event, contrary to the defendant’s contention, he violated the terms of his plea agreements by failing to successfully complete the Treatment Alternatives to Street Crimes program, and by being rearrested. Accordingly, the defendant is not entitled to specific performance of the plea agreements *(id.).*

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Henry,*95 NY2d 563 [2000]; *People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708 [1998]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137 [1981] ).

The sentences imposed were not excessive *(see People v Kaz-epis,*101 AD2d 816, 817 [1984]; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 86 [1982] ). Dillon, J.E, Santucci, Dickerson and Chambers, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:

/s/  Martin P. HughesMartin P. HughesChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Order entered July 13, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01383
- CV
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. AND E NTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPERATING LLC, Appellant s V. ENERGY TRANSFER PART NERS, L.P. AND ENERG Y TRANSFER FUEL , L.P., Appellee s On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11
- 12667 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s July 9, 2015 unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no lat er than August 19, 2015

.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Christina Victoria Cruz, * From the 29 th District Court

of Palo Pinto County

Trial Court No. 16065B.

Vs. No. 11

- 18

- 000 94

- CR * November 15 , 2018

The Sta te of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J.,

Willson, J

. , and Wright, S.C.J., sitting

by assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.