alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 571 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 571

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Congresswoman 
              Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 9, 2005

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Congresswoman 
              Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSWOMAN SHIRLEY A. CHISHOLM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Congresswoman Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Congresswoman Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Torrance Dickerson, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[962 NYS2d 823]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of possession of contraband, smuggling, possession of drugs and violating facility visiting procedures. The determination was affirmed on administrative review with a modified penalty, prompting the commencement of this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

When petitioner requested that a fellow inmate testify at the disciplinary hearing, the Hearing Officer merely noted that the witness had informed petitioner’s employee assistant that he refused to testify. Such a notation by the Hearing Officer, without any attempt to determine the reason for the witness’s refusal, is not a sufficient basis upon which to deny petitioner’s right to call the witness *(see Matter of Pitts v Fischer,*98 AD3d 762, 762 [2012]; *Matter of McFadden v Bezio,*92 AD3d 988, 989 [2012]). Inasmuch as this constitutes a regulatory violation, the appropriate remedy is to remit the matter for a new hearing *(see Matter of McFadden v Bezio,*92 AD3d at 989-990; *Matter of Alvarez v Goord,*30 AD3d 118, 121 [2006]; *Matter of Martinez v Goord,*15 AD3d 737, 738 [2005]). In light of our determination, we need not address petitioner’s remaining claims.

Peters, PJ., Stein, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is annulled, without costs, and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Elko Ventures Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended February 29, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Matt
Wayrynen, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 27, 2008                  By: /s/ Matt Wayrynen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Matt Wayrynen
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paris Simmons, Appellant.

Submitted October 13, 2009;

decided October 15, 2009

Reported below, 66 AD3d 292.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3637 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 514
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3637

To require the submittal to Congress of any Presidential Daily Briefing 
 relating to Iraq during the period beginning on January 20, 1997, and 
                       ending on March 19, 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2006

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read the first 
                                  time

                             July 12, 2006

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the submittal to Congress of any Presidential Daily Briefing 
 relating to Iraq during the period beginning on January 20, 1997, and 
                       ending on March 19, 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS OF CERTAIN PRESIDENTIAL DAILY 
              BRIEFINGS ON IRAQ.

    (a) In General.--The Director of National Intelligence shall submit 
to the congressional intelligence committees any Presidential Daily 
Briefing (PDB), or any portion of a Presidential Daily Briefing, of the 
Director of Central Intelligence during the period beginning on January 
20, 1997, and ending on March 19, 2003, that refers to Iraq or 
otherwise addresses Iraq in any fashion.
    (b) Congressional Intelligence Committees Defined.--In this 
section, the term ``congressional intelligence committees'' means--
            (1) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and
            (2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the 
        House of Representatives.
                                                       Calendar No. 514

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3637

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To require the submittal to Congress of any Presidential Daily Briefing 
 relating to Iraq during the period beginning on January 20, 1997, and 
                       ending on March 19, 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 12, 2006

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telos Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report), we, John B. Wood and Michele Nakazawa, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to our knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|November 21, 2005      
|                       
|/s/ John B. Wood       
|John B. Wood           
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ Michele Nakazawa   
|Michele Nakazawa       
|Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

 

 

I, George E. Crapple, the Co-Chief Executive Officerof Millburn Ridgefield Corporation, the General Partner of The Millburn GlobalOpportunity Fund L.P. (the “Fund”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of theFund on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Fund.

 

 
| Date:  | March, 28, 2003 |                       |   |
|--------|-----------------|----------------------------|--------|
|   |            |
|   | /s/             | George E. Crapple          |   |
|   |            | George E. Crapple          |
|   |            | Co-Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 24.1**

**Form of**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that I,                     , a member of the board of Directors of WABCO Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”) hereby constituteand appoint the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, the Treasurer, the Controller, the Secretary, the Assistant Secretary and the Chief Human Resources Officer, and each of them, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, withfull power of substitution and resubstitution for me and in my name, place and stead, to sign the Form 10-K Annual Report for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and all amendments thereto, and to file the same with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and the appropriate securities exchange, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, or their substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite ornecessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, or their substitutes, may lawfullydo or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This Power of Attorney shall be effective until such time as I deliver a written revocation thereof to the above-named attorneys-in-fact and agents.
#### State v. Gwynn

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 343

No. 158P07

AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA06-403)

Allowed 04/04/07
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 130759 & (19) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130759 COA: 264258 Kent CC: 00-003077-FC RICK TERRY ALLEN REAMSMA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 3, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

s0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-60656 Summary Calendar

ALLAN PLOTKIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:94-CV-553-WS

- - - - - - - - - - May 6, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Allan Plotkin appeals the judgment upholding the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying a period of disability and disability-insurance benefits. The ALJ did not err by determining that Plotkin’s depression and headaches were not severe limitations, and the ALJ applied the correct legal standard to determine the severity of these limitations. See Anthony v. Sullivan , 954 F.2d 289, 293 (5th Cir. 1992). The ALJdid not err by not considering Plotkin’s testimony regarding his

impairments, pain, and limitations to be credible. See id . at 296. There was substantial evidence to support the ALJ’s determinations, and the ALJ did not err as a matter of law. See Fraga v. Bowen , 810 F.2d 1296, 1302 (5th Cir. 1987). To the extent that Plotkin argues that: 1) the ALJ erred in his findings regarding Plotkin’s respiratory impairment; 2) the ALJ did not consider additional medical evidence; 3) the vocational expert improperly characterized Plotkin’s former employment as light, skilled work, instead of medium, skilled work; and 4) the ALJ failed in his responsibility to develop the record after Plotkin’s good-faith effort to retrieve treatment records for the relevant period of disability, these issues were only mentioned, and not properly argued in Plotkin’s initial brief. Plotkin argued the majority of these issues in his reply brief. This court will not consider these issues. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993) (an appellant must brief issues in initial brief to preserve them for appeal and cannot raise them for the first time in a reply brief).
AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000319124
<NAME> APPLIED EARTH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,523
<PP&E>                                       4,705,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                 207,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,199,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,641,829
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,703,458
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,528,232)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,199,258
<SALES>                                        543,129
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               564,644
<CGS>                                          264,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  821,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,654
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (621,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (93,210)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (528,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.035)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.035)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 As of the date hereof, I, Steven G. Mihaylo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Inter-Tel, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Inter-Tel, Incorporated. This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit
accompanying this report and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. By:
    
    /s/ Steven G. MihayloName:
    
    Steven G. MihayloTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDated:
    
    May 10, 2005
 44
# International

          -  Home 
          -  Work With Us 
          -               International            

          - Industry 
          - Academia 
          - Government 

## The Allied GEOINT Enterprise

***Foundations***

Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States - often referred to as the "Five Eyes" (FVEYs) partners - enjoy an especially close intelligence-sharing alliance.

***The Allied System for Geospatial Intelligence (ASG)***

The ASG is the governance model to manage the GEOINT-sharing relationship of the allied partners:
                  - Australian Geospatial-Intelligence Organisation
                  - Canadian Forces Intelligence Command
                  - GEOINT New Zealand
                  - National Centre for Geospatial Intelligence
                  - National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

The ASG Senior Management Council (ASMC) provides the vision and strategic direction. The ASMC Coordination Executive (ACE) develops and implements the strategy and synchronizes efforts.

***We Unite the GEOINT Enterprise***

Functional and mission management are the building blocks of the ASG.

Mission management involves learning through trust, demonstrating progress and conducting pilot projects that show results for partners' mutual benefit.

Functional management enables partners to share and surge their talent and resources for combat support and crisis response.

Working together, the FVEY partners provide each other global, regional and civil GEOINT support.

This arrangement enables the partners to collectively manage risk and overcome challenges relating to professional talent, big data and integration of commercial GEOINT while anticipating and defending against complex threats.

***Strategy***

The ASG builds an integrated and mutually supportive allied GEOINT enterprise to meet individual and collective warfighting and intelligence needs.

To fulfill this mission, the partners marshal talent and resources around three goals:
                  - People:  Enhance the GEOINT profession
                  - Interoperability : Create a common allied GEOINT environment
                  -   Integration : Mission sharing to deliver GEOINT

The strategy encourages ASG members to define problems in the same way and develop common approaches to problem-solving. Solutions are more easily replicated to fit the needs of all partners as a result. Together, they keep GEOINT at the forefront of intelligence and defense missions.

 

          -
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of REGENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned
does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated:   August 14, 2012

/s/ David A. Nelson David A. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0 041 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAMES MICHAEL PARKER,

Defendant and Appellant .**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee ’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including July 18 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its response brief .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 9 2023

06/09/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0041
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 60 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 

for Members of Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay 

adjustments for Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) 

6 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 

7 31) is repealed. 

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

9 Section 601(a)(1) of such Act is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’; 
2 

•S 60 IS

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

2 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

3 and 

4 (3) by striking ‘‘as adjusted by paragraph (2) 

5 of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘adjusted as pro6 vided by law’’. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

8 on February 1, 2007. 

Æ