alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 80 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 80

 To restore the traditional day of observance of Memorial Day, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To restore the traditional day of observance of Memorial Day, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF TRADITIONAL DAY OF OBSERVANCE OF MEMORIAL 
              DAY.

    (a) Designation of Legal Public Holiday.--Section 6103(a) of title 
5, United States Code, is amended by striking ``Memorial Day, the last 
Monday in May.'' and inserting the following:
            ``Memorial Day, May 30.''.
    (b) Observances and Ceremonies.--Section 116 of title 36, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``The last Monday in 
        May'' and inserting ``May 30''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph 
                (3);
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph 
                (5); and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (3) the following 
                new paragraph (4):
            ``(4) calling on the people of the United States to observe 
        Memorial Day as a day of ceremonies for showing respect for 
        American veterans of wars and other military conflicts; and''.
    (c) Display of Flag.--Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``the last Monday in May;'' and inserting ``May 
30;''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,163,535
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,513,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,708,523
<PP&E>                                       9,579,207
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,512,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,719,822
<BONDS>                                        929,487
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,607
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,360,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,512,512
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,296,421
<CGS>                                          316,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,932,425
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             4,120,862
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,220,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,410,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,810,340
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,663,832
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.80


</TABLE>
## Contact Information

Bethesda MD20892

brian.leggs@nih.gov

July 2023

Back to Top
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Melendez, Appellant.

Submitted July 6, 2010;

decided August 26, 2010

*790Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 98 (Friday, May 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11959]

[[Page 23995]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: 2009 NOAA Coastal Services Center Coastal Resource 
Management Customer Survey.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0308.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 31.
    Number of Respondents: 500.
    Average Hours per Response: 15 minutes.
    Needs and Uses: In continuing compliance with Executive Order 
12862, Setting Customer Service Standards, this survey will be used by 
the NOAA Coastal Services Center to obtain information from our 
customers--State and territorial coastal resource managers--regarding 
their information needs based on their coastal resource management 
responsibilities, technology and information management capabilities, 
and critical resource management issues, in order to make quality 
improvements to the Center's products and services.
    Frequency: Once every three years.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: David Rostker, (202) 395-3897.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0266, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
[email protected]).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to David Rostker, OMB Desk Officer, FAX number (202) 395-7285, or 
[email protected].

    Dated: May 18, 2009.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-11959 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JE-P
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BILAL AHDOM, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

S. LOPEZ, Chief Medical Officer at Kern 

Valley State Prison; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-16831 

D.C. No. 1:09-cv-01874-AWIBAM 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, 

Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Bilal Ahdom appeals pro se from the district court’s 

order denying his motions for a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining 

order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We review for an 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

FILED

MAY 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-16831 

abuse of discretion. Religious Tech. Ctr., Church of Scientology Int’l, Inc. v. Scott, 

869 F.2d 1306, 1309 (9th Cir. 1989). We affirm. 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ahdom’s requests 

for preliminary injunctive relief because Ahdom failed to demonstrate that he 

would likely suffer irreparable harm in the absence of the requested relief. See id. 

(“[A]n injunction cannot issue merely because it is possible that there will be an 

irreparable injury to the plaintiff; it must be likely that there will be.” (citation 

omitted)); Stuhlbarg Int’l Sales Co. v. John D. Brush & Co., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 

(9th Cir. 2001) (standards for issuing a temporary restraining order and a 

preliminary injunction are “substantially identical”). 

We reject as unsupported by the record Ahdom’s various contentions 

regarding alleged perjury committed by defendant Dr. Ashby. 

AFFIRMED.
#### In re W.R.

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 642

No. 560P06

AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA05-1602)

Allowed 10/26/06
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63**

**of Title 18 of the United StatesCode**

 

I,John E. Rooney, the chief executive officer of United States CellularCorporation, certify that (i) the quarterly report on Form 10-Q forthe third quarter of 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of United States CellularCorporation.

 
|   | /s/  John E. Rooney   |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | John  E. Rooney       |
|   | November 5, 2008 |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 has been provided to United States Cellular Corporation and will beretained by U.S. Cellular and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Fritz Companies, Inc.:

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 33-78472), (No. 33-57238), (No. 33-93070), (No. 333-15921) and (No.
333-07639) on Forms S-8 and (No. 33-70674) on Form S-4 of Fritz Companies, Inc.
of our report dated July 16, 1997 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Fritz Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of May 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the years ended May 31, 1997 and 1996, the five months ended May 31,
1995, and for the year ended December 31, 1994, and the related schedule, which
report appears in the May 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Fritz
Companies, Inc.




                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

San Francisco, California

July 30, 1997
#### ASPARAGUS v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO.

Civ. No. 5700.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, Western Division.

June 19, 1947.

Carl J. Gugler, of Gabon, Ohio, for plaintiff.

J. S. Rhinefort, of Toledo, Ohio, for defendant.

KLOEB, District Judge.

This is an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. Defendant has filed a motion for a Bill of Particulars. In view of the peculiar circumstances involved herein, viz., that two separate accidents occurred, for both of which plaintiff is claiming damages, the Court feels that he should sustain the motion of the defendant.

The plaintiff may have 15 days in which to file a Bill of Particulars.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS OF SAN
JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME AND CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS FOR THE
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,662,256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,662,256
<PP&E>                                     133,275,528
<DEPRECIATION>                              86,409,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,488,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,662,256
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,866,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,488,293
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,249,034
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               747,712
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,501,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         20,501,322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                20,501,322
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Darryl Alladice, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents.

[974 NYS2d 437]

*478Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stall-man, J.), entered June 14, 2012, which denied petitioner’s motion for leave to file an untimely notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s application for leave to file a late notice of claim was properly denied. Respondent the City of New York is an out-of-possession landlord that does not have responsibility for the allegedly hazardous condition of the subway platform, and therefore, petitioner’s claim against it lacks merit *(see Arteaga v City of New York,*101 AD3d 454, 454 [1st Dept 2012]). In addition, contrary to petitioner’s contention, law office failure does not constitute a reasonable excuse for failing to timely serve the notice of claim *(see Matter of Santiago v New York City Tr. Auth.,*85 AD3d 628, 628-629 [1st Dept 2011]).

Although the absence of a reasonable excuse does not compel denial of the motion *(see Matter of Brennan v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.,*110 AD3d 437 [1st Dept 2013]), petitioner also fails to demonstrate that respondents had actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within the statutory 90-day period or within a reasonable time thereafter *(see id.; Gonzalez v City of New York,*92 AD3d 619 [1st Dept 2012]). Petitioner’s assertion that respondents’ employees observed his fall is speculative since he averred in his affidavit that no one came to his aid and he does not suggest that an employee acknowledged witnessing the accident *(see e.g. Lemma v Off Track Betting Corp.,*272 AD2d 669, 671 [3d Dept 2000]; *Burns v New York City Tr. Auth.,*213 AD2d 300, 300-301 [1st Dept 1995]).

Lastly, petitioner’s unsupported assertion that the condition which caused his accident has remained unchanged since his fall is insufficient to demonstrate the lack of any prejudice to NYCTA from his delay *(see Matter of Santiago v New York City Tr. Auth.,*85 AD3d 628, 628-629 [1st Dept 2011]). Concur— Gonzalez, PJ., Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.
Exhibit 10.103

February 11, 2008

Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent

WA1-501-32-37

800 5th Avenue, Floor 32

Seattle WA 98104

Attention: Brenda H. Little



|Re: | Credit Agreement (as amended, modified and supplemented from time to time, the Credit Agreement) dated as of December 16, 2007 among Epicor Software
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Borrower), the Guarantors identified therein, the Lenders identified therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent (in such capacity, the Administrative
Agent)
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings provided in the Credit Agreement.

The Borrower hereby
notifies the Administrative Agent that pursuant to Section 2.01(c) of the Credit Agreement the Borrower is exercising its right to increase the Aggregate Revolving Commitment by $50 million with additional Revolving Commitments from
banks and other financial institutions that qualify as Eligible Assignees.



EPICOR SOFTWARE CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporationBy:

/s/ JOHN D. IRELANDName:

John D. IrelandTitle:

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Philip S. Chan, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 23, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Philip S. Chan                                  
|                         |  |  |  | Philip S. Chan                                      
|                         |  |  |  | Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|                         |  |  |  | Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.
#### Aixa PEREZ-LANG, on her own behalf as personal representative of the estate of Edward Lang-Correa and as mother and natural guardian of her daughters, Diana Camila Lang and Sofia Lang, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CORPORACION DE HOTELES, S.A., d.b.a. Hotel Casa De Campo, Corporacion De Hoteles Casa De Campo Casa De Campo, Central Romana Corporation, ABC Corporation, et al., Defendants, Premier World Marketing, Inc., Premier Resorts & Hotels Group, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-15661

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 20, 2009.

Cherie K. Durand, Hulsey Litigation Group, L.L.C., Charleston, SC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Helaine S. Goodner, Fowler White Burnett, P.A., Miami, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before CARNES, WILSON, and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The district judge, in a well-reasoned order, reviewed all of the assertions and facts developed in the proceedings before him, He also considered and thoughtfully weighed the proper authorities and precedents. He gave due deference to the plaintiffs choice of forum and countervailing interests. Nevertheless, the district judge granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss this case on the basis of the doctrine of *forum non conveniens,*without prejudice to the plaintiff.

We have carefully reviewed the record and the order. We find no reversible error. We affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of International Barrier Technology Inc., a company organized under the British Columbia Company Act (the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David Corcoran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ David Corcoran

David Corcoran, Chief Financial Officer





Date: December 28, 2004