alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>    5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>   USD
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,413
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,367
<INVENTORY>                                      4,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,008
<PP&E>                                          18,803
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,860
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,778
<SALES>                                        155,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,309
<CGS>                                           97,192
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,997
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,153
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,153
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

I, Thomas L. Collins, Chief Executive Officer of World Waste Technologies, Inc.
certifies that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of World Waste Technologies,
Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

            (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

            (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005                   /s/ Thomas L. Collins
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name: Thomas L. Collins
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John B. Wood, Chief Executive Officer of Telos Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 22, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Darin G. Billerbeck, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ZiLOG, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |                               
|----------------------- | ------------------------------
|Date: February 12, 2008 | By:    /s/ Darin G. Billerbeck

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Darin G. Billerbeck    
| | Chief Executive Officer

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MICHAEL E. SMITH, JR., 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D23-783

LT Case No. 2015-CF-2902-B-Z

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed May 9, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Marion County, 

Anthony M. Tatti, Judge.

Michael E. Smith, Jr., Mayo, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

JAY, HARRIS and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
#### State v. Morrison

Case below: 168 N.C. App. 730

No. 289P06-2

Def’s PWC to Review Decision of COA CCOA04-798)

Denied 08/23/07
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dynacq Healthcare, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip S. Chan, Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                                                            
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Philip S. Chan                                                                         
|                         |  | Philip S. Chan Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer Dynacq Healthcare, Inc.
#### Biaggi & Biaggi, Appellant, v 175 Medical Vision Properties, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[961 NYS2d 806]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (O. Bellantoni, J), entered May 27, 2011, which granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to cancel a notice of pendency affecting real property known as Burling Lane, New Rochelle, New York, Section 4, Block 1208, Lot 18, and (2) an amended order of the same court entered July 20, 2011, which granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to cancel notices of pendency affecting real properties known as (a) Burling Lane, New Rochelle, New York, Section 4, Block 1208, Lot 18, (b) 175 Memorial Highway, New Rochelle, New York, Section 4, Block 1207, Lot 5, and (c) 47 Lockwood Avenue, New Rochelle, New York, Section 4, Block 1211, Lot 13.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered May 27, 2011, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the amended order entered July 20, 2011; and it is further,

*790Ordered that the amended order entered July 20, 2011, is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendants.

The Supreme Court properly canceled the *notices of*pendency filed by the plaintiff in connection with the recovery of its payment for completed legal services, as this lawsuit does not “affect the title to, or the possession, use or enjoyment of, real property” (CPLR 6501; *see Homespring, LLC v Hyung Young Lee,*55 AD3d 541, 542 [2008]; *Shkolnik v Krutoy,*32 AD3d 536, 537 [2006]; *Felske v Bernstein,*173 AD2d 677, 678 [1991]).

Skelos, J.E, Angiolillo, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Motion by the respondents, inter alia, on appeals from an order and an amended order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered May 27, 2011, and July 20, 2011, respectively, to dismiss the appeals on the ground that they have been rendered academic. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 8, 2012, that branch of the respondents’ motion which was to dismiss the appeals as academic was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeals for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeals, it is

Ordered that the branch of the motion which was to dismiss the appeals on the ground that they have been rendered academic is denied.

Skelos, J.E, Angiolillo, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
About NHTSA                                  

# NHTSA Budget Information

Share:*Facebook**Twitter**LinkedIn**Mail*

 

NHTSA's budget information is posted on the U.S. Department of Transportation's website.

To see NHTSA's budget estimates:
              - navigate to the  year ,
              - select  Budget Estimate s, then
              - select  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) .
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               81,961
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           749,555
<OTHER-SE>                                        (831,516)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,223)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.00)
        


</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3847

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Michael Todd Smithey, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 29, 1999

Filed: May 4, 1999

___________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Todd Smithey appeals his conviction and sentence for transporting or causing to be transported in interstate commerce securities worth more than $5,000 and takenby fraud. Smithey contends the evidence is insufficient to support the jury's verdict. Smithey also raises an argument about his sentence. We reject Smithey's contentions and conclude that an extended discussion of the issues presented by his appeal will serve no useful purpose. First, the record contains substantial evidence on whic h the jury reasonably could have found Smithey guilty of the charge. Second, the district court correctly determined Smithey's guidelines sentence. Se e United States v. Jackson , 155 F.3d 942, 948 (8th Cir.) (estimate of intended loss need only be plausible-2-

in light of record as whole), cert. denied , 119 S. Ct. 627 (1998); UnitedStates v. Van Chase , 137 F.3d 579, 583 (8th Cir. 1998) (two-level role increase is warranted when defendant organized or directed another's participation). We thus affirm Smithey's conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          54,294
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,866
<INVENTORY>                                        428
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,944
<PP&E>                                         324,991
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,349)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,127
<BONDS>                                        174,139
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              305
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,154
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,081
<SALES>                                         76,046
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,046
<CGS>                                           62,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   655
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (200)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,710
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,356
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,354
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,354
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

** OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Amendment No. 2 to Annual Report of Consolidation Services, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Polep, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  February 9, 2012

/s/ Richard Polep

 

By:  Richard Polep

 

Its:  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Consolidation Services, Inc. and will be retained by Consolidation Services, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|