alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    25151
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2228
<INVENTORY>                                      17635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 46997
<PP&E>                                           21054
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  137620
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            70825
<BONDS>                                           3110
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           541
<OTHER-SE>                                       60674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    137620
<SALES>                                          86424
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 86424
<CGS>                                            61150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    83786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   126
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4118
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (52)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1327)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         2,993,925
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                           87,330
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                             89,759
<EQUITIES>                                      20,867
<MORTGAGE>                                     256,998
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   23,522
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               3,646,197
<CASH>                                          39,464
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              64,773
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         268,356
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,833,733
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              3,461,356
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             15,445
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  44,878
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           40,429
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                210,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           32,864
<PREFERRED>                                    249,670
<COMMON>                                           286
<OTHER-SE>                                     595,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,833,733
<PREMIUMS>                                     348,090
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            213,563
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               1,257
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   6,132
<BENEFITS>                                     267,312
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     52,877
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            97,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                123,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                    45,418
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,383
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,372
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    82,365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.67
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 125,706
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             63,673
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (6,816)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              19,057
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                36,435
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                128,149
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry HILL, Sr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-4424.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 4, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 26, 2006.

Charles A. Gavin, Blackburn, Conte, Schilling & Click, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Sara E. Flannery, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Henry Hill, Sr., appeals the 188-month sentence imposed by the district court on resentencing in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We affirm.

Counsel contends that Hill’s sentence is unreasonable. In resentencing Hill post-*Booker,*the district court considered the advisory sentencing guidelines range and the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp.2006). *See United States v. Moreland,*437 F.3d 424, 432 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2054, 164 L.Ed.2d 804 (2006). Although Hill asserts that the district court did not recite facts to support each § 3553(a) factor, the court need not “robotically tick through § 3553(a)’s every subsection” or “explicitly discuss every § 3553(a) factor on the record.” *United States v. Johnson,*445 F.3d 339, 345 (4th Cir.2006). “This is particularly the case when the district court imposes a sentence within the applicable Guidelines range.” *Id.*(citation omitted).

Here, the sentence imposed by the district court is within the advisory guidelines range and below the twenty-year statutory maximum set forth in 21 U.S.C.A. *254§ 841(b)(1)(C) (West Supp.2006). “[A] sentence within the proper advisory Guidelines range is presumptively reasonable.” *Johnson,*445 F.3d at 341. We have carefully considered Hill’s arguments on appeal and conclude that he has failed to rebut the presumption of reasonableness. Thus, we find the sentence reasonable.

Accordingly, we affirm Hill’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMS Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian R. Gamache, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Brian R. Gamache   
|Brian R. Gamache       
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 10, 2006           

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WMS Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott
D. Schweinfurth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Scott D. Schweinfurth
|Scott D. Schweinfurth    
|Chief Financial Officer  
|May 10, 2006
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D 20 2 4

- 0304 Lower Tribunal No. 2 02 2

- DP

- 448

_____________________________ In the Interest of A.S. and K.K ., children

. S.S., Appellant ,

v.
D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMIL I ES , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County

. Greg A. Tynan , Judge. July 23, 2024

PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. NARDELLA , WHITE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur

.

David J. Joffe, of J offe Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee. Kelley Schaeffer, Appellate Counsel , of Children’s Legal Services, Bradenton, for Appellant.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMEL Y FILED
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11502]



[[Page 23197]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1831-DR] Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018


Florida; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1831-DR), dated April 21, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 1, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of April 21, 2009.

    Escambia, Franklin, Gadsden, Leon, and Wakulla Counties for 
Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-11502 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


University of Utah, Consortium for Astro-Particle Research, 
Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific 
Instruments

This is a decision pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, 
Scientific, and Cultural Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-
651, as amended by Pub. L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301). 
Related records can be viewed between 8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. in Room 
3705, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and Constitution Ave, NW, 
Washington, D.C.
Comments: None received. Decision: Approved. We know of no instruments 
of equivalent scientific value to the foreign instruments described 
below, for such purposes as this is intended to be used, that was being 
manufactured in the United States at the time of its order.
Docket Number: 09-007. Applicant: University of Utah, Consortium for 
Astro-Particle Research, Salt Lake City, UT 84111. Instrument: Electron 
Light Source (ELS) accelerator. Manufacturer: University of Tokyo, 
Japan. Reasons: The instrument will be used as a component of a large 
ground Telescope Array, which will allow the scientists to calibrate 
the telescopes by generating a particle beam that accurately simulates 
a cosmic ray shower. Specifically, this instrument generates a precise 
amount of air fluorescence for the calibration of the Telescope Array's 
fluorescence telescopes. A unique feature of this instrument is that it 
must be able to calibrate the telescope with well time and energy 
characteristics of a cosmic ray generated extensive air shower and must 
be measured and stable at the 2-3% level.

    Dated: May 13, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director, Subsidies Enforcement Office, Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-11646 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telos Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, John B. Wood and Michele Nakazawa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 13, 2010/s/ John B, WoodJohn B. WoodChief Executive OfficerDate: August 13, 2010/s/ Michele NakazawaMichele NakazawaChief Financial Officer




43
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hyrum
A. Mead, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  
 /s/ Hyrum A.
      MeadHyrum
      A. MeadPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer)January
      9, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Thomas C. Shull, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Direct,
Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.       The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

                    /s/ Thomas C. Shull
                  ------------------------
                      Thomas C. Shull
             President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 7, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 16 July 29, 2004 Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549 Ladies and Gentlemen: We served as the principal accountants for Uroplasty, Inc. and, under the date
of July 26, 2004, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of
Uroplasty, Inc. as of and for the years ended March 31, 2004 and 2003. On June
4, 2004, we informed Uroplasty, Inc. that we declined to stand for reelection
and that the client-auditor
relationship with KPMG LLP would cease upon completion of our audit of
Uroplasty, Inc.s consolidated financial statements as of and for the year
ended March 31, 2004, and the issuance of our report thereon. We have read
Uroplasty, Inc.s statements included under Item 8 of its Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2004, and we agree with such statements. Very truly yours, /s/ KPMG LLP
#### Reliance Construction Ltd., Doing Business as RCG Group, Inc., Respondent, v Jim Kennelly, Also Known as James E Kennedy, et al., Appellants.

Submitted July 19, 2010;

decided September 23, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution *(see Burke v Crosson,*85 NY2d 10, 18 n 5 [1995]).
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Request for Partial Extension of Priority Group 10 Sufficient Supply and Launch Deadline


Download file: Mercedes-Benz USA LLC, Request for Partial Extension of Priority Group 10 Sufficient Supply and Launch Deadline
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
EXHIBIT 15


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington D.C. 20549

RE:     Lund International Holdings, Inc.
        Registrations on Form S-8 and Form S-3


We are aware that our report dated May 14, 1998 on our reviews of the interim
consolidated financial information of Lund International Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) for the three month periods ended March 31, 1998 and 1997, and included
in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
1998, is incorporated by reference in the Company's Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-46263, 33-64083 and 33-37160). Pursuant to Rule
436(c), under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered
part of the Registration Statements prepared or certified by us within the
meaning of Section 7 and 11 of that Act.



                                        /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Minneapolis, Minnesota
May 14, 1998