T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he part i es consent ed t o the j uri sdi ct i on of the m agi stra t e j ud ge. ** T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** * w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DO NN A L . WOR T H, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C I T Y O F K A L I S P E L L , am u n ic ip a l c o rp .; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 35587 D . C. N o . 9 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 1 4 5 - J CL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na J e r e m i a h C . L y nc h, M a gi s tr a t e J udge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d J ul y19, 2010 *** B efo re: B . F L E T C H E R , R E IN H A R D T , an dW A R D L A W , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D on na W orth app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s orderdenyi ng her m ot i on for r ec on si dera t i on or other r el i ef fr om sum m ary j ud gm enti n h er 

# FI LED AU G 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 35587 2 e m p lo y m e n t d is c r im in a tio n a c tio n . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on f

orr e c ons i de r a t i on, M a cD o n a ld

v . G r a c e Ch u r c h Se a ttle , 457 F . 3d 1079, 1081 ( 9th C i r . 2006) , a nd f or r e lie f f r o m ju d g m e n t u n d e rF e d e r a l R u le o f C iv il P r o c e d u r e 6 0 ( b ) , Caseyv. A lbert son’s I nc. , 3 6 2 F. 3 d1 2 5 4 , 1 2 5 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng r e c ons i de r a t i on of s um m a ryj udgm e nton W orth’ s ge nde rdi s c r i m i na t i on a nd r e t a l i a t i on c l a i m s f or f a ilu r e to e x h au s t u n d e rT itle V I I o f th e C iv il R ig h ts A c t o f 1 9 6 4 . See B . K. B v. M a u i P o lic e D e

p t. , 276 F . 3d 1099 ( 9th C i r . 2002) . E ve n w he n l i be r a l l yc ons true d, th e f a c ts a n dc ir c u m s ta n c e s a lle g e din s u p p o rt o f W o rth ’s c h a r g e o f

d is ab ility d is c r im in a tio n d idn o t e n c o m p a s s h e rg e n d e rd is c r im in a tio n a n dr e ta lia tio n c la im s . Se e i d. a t1100 ( e xhaus t i on l i m i t e d t o a l l e ga t i ons of di s c r i m i na t i on i n ac om pl a i nt thatar e “ l i ke or re as on abl y r el at ed t o” al l egat i on s c on t ai ned i n the charge) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng r e c ons i de r a t i on of sum m ary j ud gm enton W orth’ s di sabi l i ty di sc ri m i nat i on cl ai m s f or fa i l ure t o fi l e a tim e lyc h a r g e o f

d is c r im in a tio n u n d e rth e A m e r ic a n s w ith D is ab ilitie s A c t. Sa n ta M a r ia v . P a c . B e ll , 202 F . 3d 1170, 1176 ( 9th C i r . 2000) . E ve n unde rac ont i nui ng v io la tio n s o rh o s tile w o rke n v ir o n m e n t th e o ry , W o rth h a dto f ile h e rc h a r g e w ith in 3 0 0 d ay s o f h erterm in atio n . 4 2 U .S .C . § § 2 0 0 0 e- 5 (e )( 1 ) a n d1 2 1 1 7 (a ). W o rth ’s09- 35587 3 a r gum e nttha ts he f

i r s tl e a rne d aboutde f

e nda nt s ’ di s abi l i tydi s c r i m i na t i on dur i ng a rb itr a tio n is u n p e r s u a s iv e , a n dd e f e n d a n ts ’ a lle g e du n r e la te df r au da ls o d idn o t to ll th e lim ita tio n s p e r io d . Se e Sa n ta M a r ia , 2 0 2 F .3 da t 1 1 7 6 - 7 7 , 1 1 7 9 ( e q u itab le to llin g in ap p lic ab le if

p la in tif f k n o w s o f

p o s s ib le c la im a n de q u itab le e s to p p e l o n ly ap p lic ab le if

d e f e n d a n ts c o n c e a l f

a c ts c o n c e rn in g d is c r im in a tio n c h a r g e ) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng r e c ons i de r a t i on of su m m ary j u d g m en to n W o rth ’ s p o l i t i cal affi l i at i o n d i scri m i n at i o n cl ai m s b ecau se the r e i s no f

e de r a l j ur i s di c t i on ove runf a i rl aborpr a c t i c e s c l a i m s r e l a t e d t o uni on ac t i vi ty broug htby an em pl oyee of a pol i t i ca l subd i vi si on of a s t at e or aci ty und er th e N a tio n a l L ab o rR e la tio n s A c t. Se e I n t’ l U n io n o f O p e r a tin gE n g 'rs v . C o u n ty of P lum as , 5 5 9 F .3 d1 0 4 1 , 1 0 4 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . T he di s tr i c tc ourta l s o di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng r e l i e f f r om j ud gm entbecause W orth fai l ed t o est abl i sh grou nd s f or such re l i ef

un der F eder al R u le o f C iv il P r o c e d u r e 6 0 ( b ) . Se e S E Cv . C o ld ic u tt , 25 8 F . 3d 93 9, 94 2 (9th C i r. 20 01 ) ( di sc ussi ng R ul e 60(b) requi re m ent s) . W orth’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve, and w e do n otconsi der is s u e s o re v id e n c e r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. Se e Fo ti v . C ityo f Me n lo P a rk , 1 4 6 F .3 d6 2 9 , 6 3 8 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 8 ) . A FFI R M ED .