alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Wayne P. Garten, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Direct, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

|  

 

/s/ Wayne P. Garten

Wayne P. Garten

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: November 13, 2006
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of BLS Media, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Brittany Prager, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to BLS Media, Inc., and will be retained by BLS Media, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.










/s/ Brittany Prager


Brittany Prager


Chief Executive Officer


April 13, 2010
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 5150** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TRACIE WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Patrick Michael Duffy, Senior District Judge. ( 2:04

- cr - 00848

- PMD

- 4 )

Submitted : August 19, 2010 Decided: November 8, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opini on . H. Stanley Feldman, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellant. Michael Rhett DeHart, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in t his circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tracie Lashaun Williams appeals the district court’s judgment revoking her pro bation and imposing three months’ imprisonment. Williams’ attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting the re are no meritorious grounds for appeal but raising the issue of whether Williams’ sentence was unreasonable. Williams was informed of her right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. Because Williams has been discharged from federal c ustody, because her sentence did not include a term of supervised release, and because there are no continuing collateral consequences from the district court’s judgment on revocation of probation, Williams’ appeal is moot. See Spencer v. Kemna , 523 U.S. 1, 10 (1998). In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record and found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore dismiss Williams’ appeal as moot. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of her right to pet ition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument3 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 Federal Maritime Commission. 

# Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 

74 FR 22929 (May 15, 2009). 

# Previously Announced Time and Date of the Meeting: 

May 20, 2009—1:30 p.m. 

# Change: 

Withdrawal of Item 3 in the Closed Session. 

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 Federal Maritime Commission. 

# Time and Date:

 May 20, 2009—1:30 p.m. 

# Place:

 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, Washington, DC. 

# Status: 

A portion of the meeting will be in Open Session and the remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

                                                        ( print page 23719)    

## Open Session 

1. Docket No. 02-15: Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility—Request of Commissioner Brennan. 

2. FMC Agreement No. 012067: U.S. Supplemental Agreement to HLC Agreement. 

3. Public Access to Number and Type of Filings in FMC's SERVCON System. 

4. FY 2009 Budget Status Update. 

## Closed Session 

1. Docket No. 08-07: Petition of Olympus Growth Fund III, L.P. and Olympus Executive Fund, L.P. for Declaratory Order, Rulemaking or Other Relief. 

2. Marine Terminal Agreements Exemption at 46 CFR 535.308. 

3. Proof of Financial Responsibility for Windstar Sail Cruises Limited. 

4. Investigative and Enforcement Matters. 

5. Internal Administrative Practices and Personnel Matters. 

# Contact Person For More Information:

 Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 523-5725. 

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

FR Doc. E9-11814 Filed 5-18-09; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 3354

_____________________________
J OHN W ALTER P IPPIN , III
, Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County

. Melissa G. Olin
, Judge

. May 8, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , W INOKUR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Lucas J. Taylor of Sellers, Taylor & Morrison, P.A., Live Oak; Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Ross S. Haine II
, Assistant Public D efender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

As of the date  hereof,  I, Steven G.  Mihaylo,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Inter-Tel,  Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal  quarter  ended March 31, 2003 fully  complies with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material  respects the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of
Inter-Tel, Incorporated.

                                        By: /s/  Steven G. Mihaylo
                                            ------------------------------------

                                        Name: Steven G. Mihaylo
                                              ----------------------------------

                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                               ---------------------------------

                                        Dated: May 12, 2003
                                               ---------------------------------
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Child Restraint Systems


Download file: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Child Restraint Systems
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

_______ ____________________ No. 02

- 19

- 0 0158

- CR

____ ____________ ___________

On Appeal fro m the 431st District Court Dento n County, Te xas Trial Co urt No. F17

- 2519

- 431

Before Su dderth, C.J.; Bassel and Womack , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel 

### E X PARTE 

### E VERETT 

### M ADURAI2 MEMORAND UM OPINION App licant Everett Madurai raises one point arguing that the trial court err ed by denying his ap plication fo r writ of ha beas corp us for bail pending trial . The tr ial court
revok ed Applican t ’ s origi nal bond in his initial offense involving family violence a nd
denied him a second bond after finding that Applicant had violated the c on dition s of
his i ni tial bond by using drugs and by c ommitting a new family

- viol ence offense against t he same victim as the prior off ense . During the pendency of this app eal, App licant was convicted

. Because App li cant has been convicted, t he appeal is n ow moot. See Ex parte Tucker , 3 S.W.3d 576, 576 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) ( “ The appellant having been tried during the pendency of this appeal, the question of his pre

- trial bond is moot. ” ) ; Armendarez v.
State , 798 S.W.2d 291, 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990) (ho lding that an issue regarding
pr e trial bail was moot because the a ppellant was legally confined pursuan t to a conviction in the underlying case); Ex parte Villa real , No. 04

- 96

- 00588

- C R, 1 996 WL
729936 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— San A n tonio Dec. 18, 1 996, no pet.) ( not designated for publication) (dismissing appe al as moot). Acc ordingly , w e di smiss this appeal a s

moot. 1 Dabney Bassel Justice

1 Based on our disposition of the appeal , we deny as moot the S t ate ’ s motion for extension of time to file a brief.3 Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
D elivered: August 22 , 2019
EXHIBIT 10.7

                            SHARES FOR DEBT AGREEMENT

      This Shares For Debt Agreement (the  "Agreement") is made and entered into
as of June 22, 2004, by and between  Innovative  Card  Technologies,  a Delaware
corporation,  (the "Company") and Brad Ross (the  "Creditor")  with reference to
the following facts:

                                    RECITALS

      WHEREAS,  the Company desires to pay Creditor amounts due for a portion of
the  outstanding  services  provided  to the Company as of March 31, 2004 in the
amount of $135,000 (the "Outstanding Debt"); and

      WHEREAS,  the Company has agreed to issue and the  Creditor  has agreed to
accept preferred shares of the Company's Series A Convertible Preferred Stock as
full and complete settlement of the Outstanding Debt.

      NOW  THEREFORE,  in  consideration  of the mutual  covenants  and promises
contained herein, and for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which  are  hereby  mutually   acknowledged,   the  parties  to  this  Agreement
(collectively "parties" and individually a "party") agree as follows:

                                    AGREEMENT

1.   The Company  agrees to issue and the Creditor  agrees to accept one hundred
     and  thirty  five  thousand  (135,000)  shares  of the  Company's  Series A
     Convertible Preferred Stock at a deemed price of $1.00 per share as payment
     for the  Outstanding  Debt (the "Debt  Shares").  The Debt Shares  shall be
     issued to in the name of Brad Ross.

2.   The  parties  shall  hereafter  execute  all  documents  and do all that is
     necessary,  convenient or desirable in the reasonable  opinion of the other
     party to effect the provisions of this Agreement.

3.   For the  convenience  of the  parties,  this  Agreement  may be executed by
     facsimile signatures and in counterparts that shall together constitute the
     agreement of the parties as one and the same  instrument.  It is the intent
     of the parties that a copy of this  Agreement  signed by any party shall be
     fully enforceable against that party.



<PAGE>


     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date
first above written.

INNOVATIVE CARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
a Delaware corporation


BY: /s/ Alan Finkelstein
    ---------------------
    Alan Finkelstein
    Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Bradley Ross
---------------------------
Name: Bradley Ross
Exhibit
3.2





CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

GELSTAT
CORPORATION





GelStat Corporation (the
“Company”), a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Delaware
General Corporation Law”), hereby certifies as follows::



1.	The Company was incorporated by the
filing of a Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware on August 13, 2010.



2.	Pursuant to Section 228 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted, in writing without a meeting, the amendment herein set
forth.



3.	Pursuant to a resolution
of the Board of Directors and to Section 141(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the shareholders of the Company holding
the requisite number of shares of common stock required by law also approved, in writing without a meeting, the amendment herein
set forth. Prompt notice has been given as provided by Section 228 of the Delaware General Corporation Law to all shareholders
who did not consent.



4.	Article 4 of the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Company is amended to read as follows:



The Company shall have
the authority to issue:



| | (a) | 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share with such rights, preferences, and limitations as may be set from time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors
and the filing of a certificate of designation as required by the Delaware General Corporation Law.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



5.	This Certificate of Amendment to
Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted and approved in accordance with Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation as of the 12th day of May 2011.





GELSTAT CORPORATION





By: /s/ Gerald Kieft

Gerald Kieft, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

In connection with this Annual
Report of Sterling Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Downey Bridgwater,
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |     |  |                                                                         
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 29, 2008 |  | by: |  | /s/ J. Downey Bridgwater                                                
|                         |  |     |  | J. Downey Bridgwater                                                    
|                         |  |     |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerSterling Bancshares, Inc.
EXHIBIT 23.3


To the Directors and Stockholders of
Foodmaster Kyiv:


              Consent of Independent Auditors


We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the
registration statement No. 33-6867 on Form S-8 of Developed
Technology  Resource, Inc. of our report  dated  April  16,
1999,  relating to the balance sheet of Foodmaster Kyiv  as
of   December  31,  1998  and  the  related  statements  of
operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders'  equity
for the eight month period then ended, which report appears
in  the  December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-KSB  of
Developed Technology Resource, Inc.

Our  report  dated April 16, 1999, contains an  explanatory
paragraph  that  states  that the Company  has  suffered  a
significant  loss  in  1998 and as  of  December  31,  1998
current  liabilities exceed current assets by  USD  39,558.
These  matters, combined with the uncertainty  due  to  the
year  2000  issue and the current economic  environment  in
Ukraine,   raise  substantial  doubt  about  the  Company's
ability  to  continue  as  a going concern.  The  financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.


/s/ KPMG Ukraine Ltd.

September 1, 1999