alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
                                               OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Darin G. Billerbeck, as Chief Executive Officer of ZiLOG,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



|                        |                               
|----------------------- | ------------------------------
|Date: February 12, 2008 | By:    /s/ Darin G. Billerbeck

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Darin G. Billerbeck    
| | Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Perry J. Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of ZiLOG, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



|                        |                          
|----------------------- | -------------------------
|Date: February 12, 2008 | By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                     
| | Perry J. Grace                                      
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
#### Law Offices of David J. Sutton, P.C., Respondent, v NYC Hallways and Lobbies, Inc., Defendant, and Nami Shin, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 392]

In an action, inter alia, to recover on an account stated, the defendant Nami Shin appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), entered January 13, 2012, which, upon an order of the same court dated September 30, 2011, granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability under an invoice dated March 11, 2011, is in favor of the plaintiff and against her in the amount of $47,535.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, a law firm, demonstrated its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on its cause of action to re*1011cover on an account stated for legal fees by submitting evidence that the appellant received and retained, without objection, the invoices that the plaintiff sent to her seeking payment for professional services rendered *(see Pryor & Mandelup, LLP v Sabbeth,*82 AD3d 731, 732 [2011]; *Ziskin Law Firm, LLP v Bi-County Elec. Corp.,*43 AD3d 1158, 1159 [2007]; *Thaler & Gertler v Weitzman,*282 AD2d 522, 523 [2001]). In opposition, the appellant’s unsupported and conclusory allegations were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Ziskin Law Firm, LLP v Bi-County Elec. Corp.,*43 AD3d at 1159; *Thaler & Gertler v Weitzman,*282 AD2d at 523; *Sullivan v REJ Corp.,*255 AD2d 308 [1998]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability under an invoice dated March 11, 2011.

The appellant’s contention that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover its legal fees due to an alleged conflict of interest is improperly raised for the first time on appeal, and accordingly, has not been considered *(see Pauyo v Pauyo,*102 AD3d 847 [2013]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

** OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Consolidation Services, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Polep, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  February 1, 2012

/s/ Richard Polep

 

By:  Richard Polep

 

Its:  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Consolidation Services, Inc. and will be retained by Consolidation Services, Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,031,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,552,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,278,500
<INVENTORY>                                     31,679
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,535,762
<PP&E>                                       5,057,627
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,859,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,711,600
<BONDS>                                        788,473
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,235
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,323,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,859,589
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,771,949
<CGS>                                          263,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,616,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,045,988
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             117,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,593,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (573,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,020,285)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,059,195)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 As of the date hereof, I, Kurt R. Kneip, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of Inter-Tel, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Inter-Tel, Incorporated. This written statement is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit accompanying this report and
shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. By:
    
    /s/ Kurt R. KneipName:
    
    Kurt R. KneipTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDated:
    
    August 6, 2004
<PAGE>   1
 
                      SPATIALIZER AUDIO LABORATORIES, INC.
 
                            SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES
                           EXHIBIT 21.1 TO FORM 10-K
                               DECEMBER 31, 1998
 
Spatializer Audio Laboratories, Inc. (Delaware)
20700 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 140
Woodland Hills, California 91364
 
     Wholly owned subsidiaries:
 
     1. Desper Products, Inc. (California)
        453 Ravendale Drive, Unit C
        Mountain View, California 94043
 
     2. MultiDisc Technologies, Inc. (Delaware)
        20700 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 140
        Woodland Hills, California 91364
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-49297, 333-51795, 333-43572, 333-41964,
333-69301, 333-63627, 333-61369, 333-88399, 333-80829, and 333-54024) of
Networks Associates, Inc. of our reports dated January 24, 2001, relating to the
financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form
10-K.


                                         PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California


March 30, 2001



                                      -98-
#### State v. Winston

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 238

No. 624P06

Def’s Motion for PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-129)

Denied 01/25/07
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 5, 2018

t0226 

# Order

Clerk March 5, 2018

155751

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155751

COA: 335968

Wayne CC: 92

- 000261

- FH

GENE ARTHUR BRIDGES,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 29, 2017 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the d efendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).

W ILDER , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00127

- CV

EX PARTE LEONARDO NUNCIO

,

From the County Court At Law No 1, We bb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017 CVJ 002365

- C1 Honorable Hugo Martinez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk ’ s n otification of late record is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to March 19, 2018.

_________________________________ Sandee Bry an Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 14th day of March, 2018

.

_________________________________ __ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.2
  CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT
    TO SECTION 302(A) OF THE
  SARBANES-OXLEY
    ACT OF 2002
    1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on
    Form 10-QSB
    of Golf Rounds.com, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this report;4.
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    for the registrant and have:  (a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
    supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
    registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
    known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
    the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
    controls and procedures and presented in this report our
    conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
    and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
    report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
    registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
    report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
    materially affect, the registrants internal control over
    financial reporting; and  5.
    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
    internal control over financial reporting, to the
    registrants auditors and the audit committee of
    registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
    equivalent functions):  (a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
    design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
    which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
    registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
    report financial information; and(b)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
    other employees who have a significant role in the
    registrants internal control over financial reporting.  Date: July 11, 2008

/s/  Robert
    H. DonehewName: Robert H. DonehewTitle: President (Principal Executive Officer)
    and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>





                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-73112) and S-8 (Nos. 333-112175, 333-49297,
333-51795, 333-43572, 333-41964, 333-69301, 333-63627, 333-61369, 333-88399,
333-80829, 333-54024, 333-71404, 333-66586, 333-99611, 333-91422, 333-110257 and
333-112175) of Networks Associates, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2004
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 8, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RODNEY SANCHEZ LOPEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 000 0 9

- CR

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 13

- 08

- 0779 8

- CRR )

O R D E R

The Court on its own motion ORDERS the Court Reporter for the 143rd District Court of

Reeves County to prepare and e

- file a supplemental record containing State’ s Exhibit 11

- A and

State’s Exhibit 11

- B ( “DVD OF DASH CAM VIDEO” )

. The supplemental record is due with

this Court on or before December 12 , 201 6

.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 201 6

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes , JJ.
#### Debra H., Appellant, v Janice R., Respondent.

Submitted November 23, 2009;

decided December 15, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 460.

*888Motion by National Center for Lesbian Rights et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**GREGORY RICHARD SPENCE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 16 WAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 24th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1833-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1833-DR), dated April 23, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 1, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 23, 2009.

Calhoun, Cook, Crisp, Dodge, Irwin, Jeff Davis, Monroe, Pulaski, Tattnall, Telfair, Thomas, Turner, Upson, Wayne, and Wilcox Counties for Public Assistance.

Brooks, Decatur, Dougherty, Lanier, Miller, Tift, Wheeler, and Worth Counties for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Nancy Ward,

Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-11504 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### In the Matter of Serota Brown Court II, LLC, et al., Respondents, v Town of Hempstead et al., Appellants. Town Board of Town of Hempstead et al., Nonparty Appellants.

Submitted August 31, 2009;

decided October 27, 2009

Reported below, 62 AD3d 715; 2009 NY Slip Op 77779(U).

Motion by respondents Town of Hempstead, the Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, and the Department of Buildings of the Town of Hempstead, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the judgment of Supreme Court granting the petition, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2009 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion by the Town Board of the Town of Hemp-stead, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that, among other things, denied its motion to *833intervene, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the judgment of Supreme Court granting the petition, dismissed upon the ground that movant is not a party to this proceeding. Motion by Oceanside Cove Homeowners Association and the Alhambra Condominium for leave to intervene herein denied. Motion by Oceanside Cove Homeowners Association and the Alhambra Condominium, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2009 Appellate Division order that, among other things, denied their motion to intervene, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order affirming the judgment of Supreme Court granting the petition, dismissed upon the ground that movants are not parties to this proceeding.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1570. VIRILIO NIEVES v. THE STATE.

This appeal was docketed in this Court on April 7, 2015. The appellant’s brief,

including enumeration of errors, was due to be filed no later than April 28, 2015.

Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a). To date, appellant has not filed a brief and

enumeration of errors, and no extension of time for filing has been granted or

requested. Accordingly, Case Number A15A1570 is hereby DISMISSED for

appellant’s failure to file a brief and enumeration of errors in support of his appeal.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

06/01/2015

June 01, 2015