alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bull Run Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarterly period ended November 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his individual knowledge and belief:  (1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:
    
    January 11, 2005Signed:
    
    /s/ FREDERICK J. ERICKSONFrederick J. Erickson
Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                              Exhibit 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Transworld HealthCare, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-30283 and 333-29785)
and Form S-8 (File No. 33-50876) of our report dated November 24, 1997 on our 
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statements 
schedule as of September 30, 1997 and October 31, 1996 and for the eleven
months ended September 30, 1997 and for each of the two years in the period
ended October 31, 1996, which report is included in this 1997 Transition Report
on Form 10-K.


New York, New York
December 22, 1997
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tyrone SMITH, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-7113.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

*228Tyrone Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Craig Jon Jacobsen, I, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. *United States v. Smith,*No. 7:01-cr-00092-jct-1, 2008 WL 2522618 (W.D.Va. June 24, 2008). *See United States v. Hood,*556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Smith’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
S. 571

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1915 Fulton

Street in Brooklyn, New York, as the ‘‘Congresswoman Shirley A. Chisholm

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSWOMAN SHIRLEY A. CHISHOLM POST OFFICE

BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, New York, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Congresswoman Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the Congresswoman Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Form
S-3 (Nos. 333-73112) and S-8 (Nos. 333-49297, 333-51795, 333-43572, 333-41964,
333-69301, 333-63627, 333-61369, 333-88399, 333-80829, 333-54024, 333-71404,
333-66586, 333-99611 and 333-91422) of Networks Associates, Inc. of our report
dated October 31, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
October 31, 2003
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 607 

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to early retirement benefits, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2005 

Mr. HARKIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act 

of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with 

respect to early retirement benefits, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROTECTION OF SUBSIDIZED EARLY RETIRE4 MENT BENEFITS IN CORPORATE MERGERS 

5 AND ACQUISITIONS. 

6 (a) AMENDMENT TO ERISA.—Section 208 of the 

7 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 

8 U.S.C. 1058) is amended by— 
2

•S 607 IS

1 (1) striking ‘‘A pension plan’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—A pension plan’’; and 

3 (2) adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(b) PROTECTION OF PRO-RATA SHARE OF EARLY

5 RETIREMENT SUBSIDY.—If— 

6 ‘‘(1) an employee, following the sale of a cor7 poration or a corporate division, liquidation, merger, 

8 consolidation, or other similar transaction, continues 

9 employment in the same trade or business with the 

10 employer that acquires the trade or business in such 

11 transaction (referred to in this subsection as the 

12 ‘successor employer’), and 

13 ‘‘(2) the successor employer does not continue 

14 to maintain any pension plan in which the employee 

15 was a participant before such transaction, 

16 then, solely for the purpose of determining eligibility 

17 for any subsidized early retirement benefit provided 

18 by such plan, there shall be taken into account any 

19 periods of service with the successor employer that 

20 would have been taken into account had such trans21 action not occurred.’’. 

22 (b) AMENDMENT TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE

23 CODE.—Section 414(l) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

24 1986 (relating to mergers and consolidations of plans) is 

25 amended by adding at the end the following: 
3

•S 607 IS

1 ‘‘(3) PROTECTION OF PRO-RATA SHARE OF

2 EARLY RETIREMENT SUBSIDY.—If— 

3 ‘‘(A) an employee, following the sale of a 

4 corporation or a corporate division, liquidation, 

5 merger, consolidation, or other similar trans6 action, continues employment in the same trade 

7 or business with the employer that acquires the 

8 trade or business in such transaction (referred 

9 to in this paragraph as the ‘successor em10 ployer’), and 

11 ‘‘(B) the successor employer does not con12 tinue to maintain any pension plan in which the 

13 employee was a participant before such trans14 action, 

15 then, solely for the purpose of determining eligibility 

16 for any subsidized early retirement benefit provided 

17 by such plan, there shall be taken into account any 

18 periods of service with the successor employer that 

19 would have been taken into account had such trans20 action not occurred.’’.

Æ
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

L.M.N., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3136 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed March 28, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court forHillsborough County; Barbara TwineThomas, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Karen M. Kinney, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**THETRUSTEE***

**OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 andfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joshua R. Peterson, Head of Trust Real Assets & Mineral Resources and Senior Vice President of BBVA USA, on behalf of BBVA USA, the Trustee ofthe San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the “Trust”),* not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (as explained in Note 1 to the Trust’s financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, FinancialStatements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust. 

 

BBVA USA, AS TRUSTEE OF THE

SANJUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
By: 
/s/ Joshua R. Peterson
Name: Joshua R. PetersonTitle: Head of Trust Real Assets & Mineral Resources and Senior Vice PresidentDate: August 10, 2020
 
*
The Trust has no executive officers. 
**
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Network Associates, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-80272, 33-80272, 33-80260,
33-80258, 33-96586 and 333-11155) of our report dated March 31, 1999 appearing
on page 55 of this Form 10-K.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial
Statement Schedule, which appears on page 86 of this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Jose, California
March 31, 1999, except for the matters
discussed in Note 17 as to which 
the date is April 7, 1999.

                                                                              89
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 669 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat natural gas distribution 

lines as 15-year property for purposes of depreciation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. SMITH (for himself, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. THOMAS, and Mr. DORGAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat natural gas distribution lines as 15-year property for purposes of depreciation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATURAL GAS DISTRIBUTION LINES TREATED 

4 AS 15-YEAR PROPERTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (E) of section 

6 168(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

7 to classification of certain property) is amended by strik8 ing ‘‘and’’ at the end of clause (v), by striking the period 
2

•S 669 IS

1 at the end of clause (vi) and by inserting ‘‘, and’’, and 

2 by adding at the end the following new clause: 

3 ‘‘(vii) any natural gas distribution 

4 line.’’. 

5 (b) ALTERNATIVE SYSTEM.—The table contained in 

6 section 168(g)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

7 1986 (relating to special rule for certain property assigned 

8 to classes) is amended by inserting after the item relating 

9 to subparagraph (E)(vi) the following:

‘‘(E)(vii) .................................................................................. 35’’. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

12 the date of the enactment of this Act, in taxable years 

13 ending after such date.

Æ
#### State v. Woody

Case below: 147 N.C. App. 790

No. 301P07

Def’s Motion for “Petition for Plain Error Review Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-23” (COA01-188)

Dismissed 08/23/07
EXHIBIT 4(II)

                     AMENDMENT TO THE SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
                                  JULY 19, 2004


      The undersigned,  as a signatory to a subscription agreement with AlphaRx,
Inc., executed in conjunction with that certain offering of units, consisting of
one share of AlphaRx's  common stock and one warrant for one additional share of
AlphaRx's  common stock,  for up to $5,000,000  (the  "Agreement")  for good and
valuable  consideration,  the  adequacy  and  sufficiency  of  which  is  hereby
acknowledged,  does hereby agree that the deadline for the final closing on page
3 of the Agreement is hereby amended from August 15, 2004 to September 30, 2004.


Agreed and Acknowledged, this ____ day of July, 2004

Please Print Name of Signatory to Subscription Agreement Below:

------------------------------------------


By:
   ---------------------------------------


Title:
      ------------------------------------
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXA S

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00149

- CV

In the Interes t of A.D.C. and J.D.C.,

Children §

§

§

§ From the 16th District Court

o f Denton County (2011

- 10917

- 16 )

October 3, 2013

Opinio n by Chief Justice Livingsto n



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ C hief Justice Terrie Livingston
Page 1
Exhibit 3.01
                                  A0540276

                                                 ENDORSED - FILED
                                      in the office of the Secretary of State
                                            of the State of California
                                                 FEB 14 2000
                                             Bill Jones, Secretary of State

                     CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
                      ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                    DIATECT INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

The undersigned, George H. Henderson and John L. Runft, hereby certify that:

1.     They are, respectively, the duly elected President and Secretary of
       Diatect International Corporation, a California corporation (the
       "Corporation").

2.     Article III of the Articles of Incorporation shall be, and hereby is,
       amended to read as follows:

                              ARTICLE III

       This Corporation is authorized to issue only one class of shares which
       shall be designated as "Common Stock" or "Common Shares."  The total
       authorized number of such shares which may be issued is fifty million
       (50,000,000).

3.     The foregoing amendment has been approved and adopted by resolution of
       the Corporation adopted at a meeting of the directors held on November
       17, 1999.

4.     In accordance with Section 603 of the California Corporations Code, the
       foregoing amendment was approved by written consent of shareholders of
       the corporation representing in excess of fifty-one percent (51%) of
       the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation,
       which shareholders would be entitled to vote upon said resolution at a
       formal meeting of the shareholders of the corporation held for the
       purpose of acting upon such resolution.  The total number of
       outstanding shares of the corporation is 19,535,231.  The number of
       shares voting in favor of the amendment exceeded the vote required.
       The percentage vote required was more than 50%.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned under penalty of perjury hereby
       declare that the statements contained in this Certificate of Amendment
       are true of their own knowledge and have executed this Certificate of
       Amendment on this 14th day of February, 2000.

/S/ George H. Henderson, President of
    Diatect International Corporation

/S/ John L. Runft, Secretary of
    Diatect International Corporation
Exhibit 32.1

Officers Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C 1350)

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation, (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report is in full compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 7, 2009 |  | /s/ Wm. Stacy Locke                  
|                   |  | Wm. Stacy Locke                      
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Paul D. Middlemiss, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 602]

Rose, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Demarest, J.), entered March 3, 2005 in St. Lawrence County, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Defendant pleaded guilty to sodomy in the third degree in 1994 and he was classified in 1996 as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act *(see*Correction Law art 6-C). In 2005, he was afforded a rehearing pursuant to the stipulation in *Doe v Pataki*(3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]). The People again sought classification of defendant as a risk level III sex offender and Supreme Court found “nothing that has been shown that would indicate that your level [of] offender [classification] should be changed in any way.” Defendant now appeals.

The People concede that defendant is entitled to a new hearing because Supreme Court treated the 2005 rehearing as one for modification, as opposed to classification *(compare*Correction Law § 168-n *with*Correction Law § 168-o). As the People now acknowledge, they bore the burden of establishing the determination sought by clear and convincing evidence *(see*Correction Law § 168-n [3]; *see e.g. People v Callan,*62 AD3d 1218, 1218 [2009]; *People v Dickison,*24 AD3d 980, 981 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 709 [2006]). Inasmuch as the record here reflects that the burden was placed on defendant to demonstrate suf*1269ficient evidence warranting a departure from the risk level III classification *(see*Correction Law § 168-0 [2]), we remit for a new hearing *(see People v Zayas,*57 AD3d 1179, 1180 [2008]; *People v Freeman,*43 AD3d 1246, 1246-1247 [2007]). Defendant’s remaining claims of error are rendered academic.

Lahtinen, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25

                                2005-2 AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                                    STEELCASE
                       BENEFIT PLAN FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS
                         (EFFECTIVE AS OF MARCH 1, 1999)

                        --------------------------------

                  This 2005-2 Amendment to the STEELCASE BENEFIT PLAN FOR
OUTSIDE DIRECTORS ("Plan") is adopted by STEELCASE INC., to be effective as of
August 1, 2004.

                  Pursuant to Section 1.3 of the Plan, Steelcase Inc. amends the
 Plan as follows:

                                       A.

                  Section 8.7(u) as most recently amended by the 2004-2
Amendment, is revised by adding the following:

                  Zyban, nicotine patches, nicotine inhalers and nicotine nasal
spray ("Smoking Cessation Drugs") are considered eligible prescription drugs for
purposes of this subsection. Coverage is available for Smoking Cessation Drugs
that are prescription legend drugs or over-the-counter drugs. However, to be
covered, the Smoking Cessation Drug must be provided to the prescription order
of a Physician.

                                       B.

                  Article IX(u)(xii) is amended to read as follows:

                  Smoking cessation drugs except as otherwise expressly covered
by the Plan.

                                       C.

                  Section 10.4(q) is amended to read as follows:

                           (q) Dental expenses for a Dependent who is entitled
         to benefits as an employee or former employee of the Company or as a
         Dependent of two individuals who are active or retired Outside
         Directors or employees;

                                       D.

                  In all other respects, the Plan shall be unchanged.




<PAGE>

                  IN WITNESS OF WHICH, Steelcase Inc. has executed this 2005-2
Amendment to the Plan.

                                     STEELCASE INC.


Dated: June 24, 2004                 By          /s/  Nancy W. Hickey
            --                         -----------------------------------------

                                       Its Sr. Vice President, Global Strategic
                                        Resources & Chief Administrative Officer



                                      -2-