alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1  


SPECIMEN
COMMON STOCK CERTIFICATE 



	COMMON STOCK	 	 	 	COMMON STOCK
	

[GRAPHIC]	
 	

[WEIDA LOGO]	
 	

[GRAPHIC]
	

NUMBER	
 	

 	
 	

NUMBER
	

WCI	
 	

WEIDA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.	
 	

 
	

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY	
 	

 	
 	

SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

CUSIP 948599 10 5






THIS
IS TO CERTIFY THAT 


is
the owner of 


FULLY
PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES, NO PAR VALUE, OF THE CAPITAL STOCK OF 


WEIDA
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 


[GRAPHIC] 


transferable
only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid
unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent. 


        WITNESS
the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 


        Dated:




	 	 	[GRAPHIC]	 	 
	

/s/  JOSEPH ZUMWALT      
 SECRETARY	
 	

 	
 	

/s/  MITCHELL SEPANIAK      
 CHAIRMAN






COUNTERSIGNED:




NORTH
AMERICAN TRANSFER CO.

(FREEPORT, NEW YORK 11520) 




        TRANFER
AGENT 


        AUTHORIZED
SIGNATURE 


1







 

        The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or
regulations: 



	TEN COM	 	—	 	as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-	 	Custodian	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
	 	

	TEN ENT	 	—	 	as tenants by the entireties	 	 	(Cust)	 	(Minor)
	JT WROS	 	—	 	as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors

Act                                    

(State)




Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 


For
value received,                          hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 


PLEASE
INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

    IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 












Please print or typewrite name and address including postal zip code of assignee 



	    
	 	Shares





represented
by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocable constitute and appoint 





        Attorney
to transfer the said shares on the books of the within-named Company with full power of substitution in the premises. 



	 	 	    
	Shares





Dated,







	 	 	 	 	

	 	 	NOTICE:	 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.





	Signature(s) Guaranteed:	 	 	 	 
	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	
 THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBRO- KERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.	 	 	 	 




2
EXHIBIT 32.2

Officers Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation, (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Lorne E. Phillips, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report is in full compliance with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 6, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Lorne E. Phillips                               
|                   |  |  |  | Lorne E. Phillips                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,839
<SECURITIES>                                    11,429
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,481
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         255,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        179,832
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      88,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,436
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,205
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,759
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,759
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,759
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.18
        

</TABLE>
The District Court of the 13th Judicial District. County of Yellowstone.

#### *30STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. SUSAN YOUNG, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-95-408 DECISION

On April 28, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of ten (10) years, all suspended, for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, jfor the offense of Forgery, Common Scheme, a felony. This sentence shall run concurrently with the sentence imposed in Criminal Cause No. DC-96-223.

On April 2, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was not present. Kris Copenhaver was present and stated that she is counsel of record for the defendant. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, Ms. Copenhaver informed the Division that the defendant’s case is still pending before the District Court for determination of an appropriate credit for time served and requested that the application for review of sentence be continued pending the outcome of the decision of the District Court.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Division that the Application for Review of Sentence shall be continued until the next available hearings in October 2010.

Done in open Court this 2nd day of April, 2010.

DATED this 19th day of April, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
EXHIBIT 15





To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
of Sears, Roebuck and Co.

We have made a review, in accordance with standards
established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for the 13-week
and 26-week periods ended July 3, 1999 and July 4, 1998,
as indicated in our report dated August 2, 1999; because
we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is
included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
13-week and 26-week periods ended July 3, 1999 and July 4,
1998, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 2-64879, 2-80037, 33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485, 33-43459,
33-45479, 33-55825,  33-58851, 33-64345, 333-8141, and
333-38131 of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Registration Statement
Nos. 33-58139, 333-9817, 33-64215, 333-30879, and 333-62847
of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears Roebuck Acceptance
Corp.; Registration Statement Nos. 33-64775, 333-18591,
and 333-43309 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears,
Roebuck and Co. Deferred Compensation Plan; Registration
Statement Nos. 33-57205, 333-11973, and 333-53149 of
Sears, Roebuck and Co. for the Sears 401(k) Profit
Sharing Plan (formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing
Fund of Sears Employees); and Registration Statement
No. 33-44671 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears
DC Corp.

We are also aware that the aforementioned report,
pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of
1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or
a report prepared or certified by an accountant within
the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.




Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chicago, Illinois
August 2, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6199

JOHN D. SIMPSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-99-980-7)

Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 4, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John D. Simpson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John David Simpson seeks to appeal the district court's orders

(1) denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999), as time-barred, and (2) denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Simpson v.

Angelone, No. CA-99-980-7 (W.D. Va. Dec. 29, 1999; Feb. 3, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Mary Hsiao Yung Wang, Respondent, v Chei Fong Lee, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 256]

In an action to determine ownership of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), entered April 21, 2011, which, inter alia, denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s untimely motion for summary judgment in view of her failure to offer any explanation for not serving the motion within 120 days after the filing of the note of issue, as required by CPLR 3212 (a) *(see Brill v City of New York,*2 NY3d 648 [2004]; *Soltes v 260 Waverly Owners, Inc.,*42 AD3d 565 [2007]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or without merit. Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
CMF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0407

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL BRANDON BREAREY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including September 14, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 6 2020

08/06/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0407
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      192,738
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,428
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          66,845
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        14,995
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,006
<COMMON>                                         5,905
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       57,896
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             25,831
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  89,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,400
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            72,887
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              38,170
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,724
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  67,193
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  278,006
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       67,942
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,249
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      19,383
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      21,632
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          6,371
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 175
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   6,546
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,004
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,403
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        139
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    4,403
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,574
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        1,490
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Terrell Gilford, Appellant.

Submitted June 21, 2010;

decided June 24, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Richard M. Greenberg, Esq., Office of the Appellate Defender, 11 Park Place, Suite 1601, New York, NY 10007 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gregory L. Paige, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gregory L. Paige





Gregory L. Paige


Chief Executive Officer


Dated: September 24, 2012





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### KB2S, INC., an Arkansas corporation qualified to do business in CA; KCW Consulting, Inc., a California corporation, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, California, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 07-55225.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 14, 2009.

Filed May 7, 2009.

Jeff Gerard Harmeyer, Esq., McAtee & Harmeyer, San Diego, CA, William J. Davis, Esq., Davis & Company, Los Ange-les, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Glenn Spitzer, Esq., City Attorney’s Office, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appel-lee.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, and MILLS,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM**

Given the early stage of KB2S’s proposed development, any injury that the City of San Diego caused to KB2S is too speculative to support standing for KB2S’s claim under the Fair Housing Act. *Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife,*504 U.S. 555, 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130, 119 L.Ed.2d 351 (1992).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**THETRUSTEE***

**OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 andfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joshua R. Peterson, Senior Vice President and Trust Officer of BBVA USA, on behalf of BBVA USA, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the“Trust”),* not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (as explained in Note 1 to the Trust’s financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, FinancialStatements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust. 

 

BBVA USA, AS TRUSTEE OF THE

SANJUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
By: /s/ Joshua R. PetersonName: Joshua R. PetersonTitle: Senior Vice President and Trust OfficerDate: August 9, 2019
* The Trust has no executive officers. 
**
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

GASTON, HOUTZ, and MYERS

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Matthew A. MOSLEY

Midshipman, U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 202100070

Decided: 22 November 2021

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Roger E. Mattioli (arraignment)

Jonathan T. Stephens (trial)

Sentence adjudged 13 November 2020 by a general court-martial 

convened at Washington Navy Yard, Washington, D.C., consisting of a 

military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment:

confinement for 20 months and a dismissal.

For Appellant: 

Major Brian L. Farrell, USMC

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.
United States v. Mosley, NMCCA No. 202100070

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.1

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

 

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

497 

CA 12-01914 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

JAMES PANZARELLA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAREN PANZARELLA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

HOGAN WILLIG PLLC, AMHERST (STEVEN G. WISEMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD C. SLISZ, BUFFALO (RICHARD C. SLISZ OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M.

Siwek, J.), entered June 12, 2012. The order granted the cross motion

of plaintiff to vacate the provisions of the parties’ Stipulation of

Settlement providing for child support. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiff’s cross

motion seeking to vacate the provisions of the parties’ Stipulation of

Settlement (stipulation) concerning plaintiff’s child support

obligations on the ground that the stipulation failed to comply with

Domestic Relations Law § 240 (1-b) (h). The stipulation “failed to

include recitals stating that the parties were aware that following

the [Child Support Standards Act] guidelines would result in the

presumptively correct amount of support; . . . failed to set forth the

presumptively correct amount of support that would have been fixed

pursuant to the guidelines; and . . . failed to articulate the reason

the parties chose to deviate from the guidelines. Consequently, [the

stipulation] was invalid and unenforceable” (Warnecke v Warnecke, 12

AD3d 502, 503-504; see Bushlow v Bushlow, 89 AD3d 663, 664; Jefferson

v Jefferson, 21 AD3d 879, 880-881). 

Entered: May 3, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court