alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7339

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL DANIEL HAMMONDS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock 

Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (0:02-cr-00535-CMC-1)

Submitted: March 29, 2022 Decided: March 31, 2022

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Daniel Hammonds, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Daniel Hammonds appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s denial of 

a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Kibble, 

992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the 

record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion and sufficiently 

explained the reasons for the denial. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188-91 (4th 

Cir. 2021) (discussing amount of explanation required for denial of compassionate release 

motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMS Industries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian R. Gamache,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Brian R. Gamache
------------------------
Brian R. Gamache
Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2003



                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMS Industries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott D.
Schweinfurth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott D. Schweinfurth
Scott D. Schweinfurth
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
    provided to WMS Industries Inc. and will be retained by WMS Industries Inc.
    and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
    request.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Robert Brice Daugherty, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00040

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 6th District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 25886 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice

Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Robert Brice Daugherty, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED September 3 , 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### In the Matter of Imani M., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Dutchess County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Derrick J., Appellant.

Submitted May 26, 2009;

decided June 30, 2009

*908Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-90890 of Allied Healthcare International Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration
Statement No. 333-49387 of Allied Healthcare International Inc. on Form S-8 of
our report dated December 10, 2003, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Allied Healthcare International Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2003.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Jericho, New York
December 26, 2003










                                       2
# 

          -  Home 
          -  Resources 
          -               CRADA            

## Cooperative Research and Development Agreements

**What is a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement?**
              -                  - A written agreement created under the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-502).
                - It allows federal agencies and non-federal partners to  optimize  their resources, share  technical  expertise and  intellectual  property and speed up the  commercialization  of federally developed technology. 
                - A means to pursue  joint Research and Development  goals for shared benefit. 

The proliferation of commercial imagery analysis, geographic information system technologies, and standardized data formats, creates opportunities for collaborative R&D between the private sector and NGA to enhance national scientific and technical GEOINT capabilities. Particular emphasis is placed on R&D initiatives that are consistent with the National System for Geospatial Intelligence technical reference model and associated standards in the NSGI technical architecture, which may be found on the NGA homepage.

It is DoD policy to use technology transfer activities to strengthen the industrial base and make the best use of national scientific and technical capabilities to enhance the effectiveness of DoD forces and systems. NGA uses CRADAs for its technology partnerships, and actively seeks commercial and academic research collaborators.​
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CITY OF HARRISBURG,

Respondent

v.

JOSHUA PRINCE, ESQ.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 388 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of November, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Does the City of Harrisburg’s creation of a spreadsheet to 

show the receipt of funds from donors to the “Protect 

Harrisburg Legal Defense Fund” constitute a “financial record” 

as defined in 65 P.S. § 67.102?
|                                                     |                                                    |                  |   |   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Name                                                     |                                                    | Percentage      Owned |   |   |   |   |
|                                                     |                                                    |                  |   |   |   |   |   |
| American      Spring Pharmaceutical, Inc.                | 100%                                                    |                  |   |   |   |   |
| Gansu      Dasheng Biotechnology Company                 | 100%                                                    |                  |   |   |   |   |
| Yangling      Elemiss Foods Company, Ltd.                | 60%      (owned by Gansu Dasheng Biotechnology Company) |
| Hainan      Lüshen Biology Technology Company  | 80%      (owned by Gansu Dasheng Biotechnology Company) |
|                                                     |                                                    |                  |   |   |   |   |   |
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 0049 8

- CR

Tyler Namon Payne

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 396th District Court

o f Tarrant C ounty ( 1253994 D )

August 8, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. I t is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ Justice Anne Gardner
#### Victor J. Runner, Respondent, v New York Stock Exchange, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Decided June 24, 2009

Certification of questions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.27), accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument *[see*568 F3d 383 (2009)].

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,275
<PP&E>                                         109,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,870
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,737
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,274
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           173
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,737
<SALES>                                          5,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,891
<CGS>                                            3,490
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,087
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (455)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (803)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (803)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
================================================================================

                                    FORM 6-K


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER

                    PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         For the month of February 2006

                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                               (Registrant's Name)

                          1155, University, Suite 1405,
                                Montreal, Quebec
                                 Canada H3B 3A7
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

                        Form 20-F [x]       Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                              Yes [ ]       No [x]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-

================================================================================

<PAGE>


Filed with this Form 6-K is the following which are incorporated herein by
reference:

99.1   Press Release -- February 21, 2006: Corner Bay - Update


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES


          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                            CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.



                                            /s/  Lucy Brun
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Lucy Brun
                                            Executive Vice-President and
                                            Chief Administrative Officer


DATE: February 21, 2006



<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


99.1  Press Release -- February 21, 2006:  Corner Bay - Update
Exhibit
31.02




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE
13a-14




I, George G. Chachas, certify
that:




1.           I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Anoteros, Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:





(a)         Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;





(b)         Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)         Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and




5.           I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




(a)         All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b)         Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.








Date:
March 27, 2008
  Signature
  By:
George G. Chachas
 Its:  Chief
Financial Officer
EXPLORE NGA

CONTRACT SPECIALIST CAREERS

PROCURE THE TOOLS TO 

SECURE THE FUTURE

The National Geospatial-Intelligence 

Agency (NGA) is a U.S. intelligence and 

combat support agency that provides 

policymakers, warfighters, intelligence 

professionals and first responders 

key information and insights. Through 

the implementation of innovative and 

cutting-edge contracting capabilities, a 

career with NGA helps protect our nation 

and our world. 

TO QUALIFY

Possess a bachelor’s degree from an 

accredited educational institution authorized 

to grant baccalaureate degrees. Courses 

of study may include but are not limited 

to: accounting, business administration, 

contracts, economics, finance, law, 

purchasing, English, communications, or 

other relevant areas of study.

Relevant certification and/or experience may 

include: DAWIA Certification in Contracting 

within 24 months of appointment, as 

appropriate for the band level.

KEY COMPETENCIES

Key competencies may include, but are 

not limited to: acquisition management 

systems, acquisition planning, contract 

management, cost/price analysis, 

ethics/standards of conduct law, quality 

assurance, and researching.

CONTRACTS OPPORTUNITIES

Our Contract Officers interact with customers to develop and implement an acquisition 

strategy, solicit and evaluate proposals, and negotiate and award contracts on behalf 

of NGA. 

CONTRACT SPECIALIST

Contract Specialists act as “business advisors” to customers across the entire NGA 

enterprise. They plan and manage acquisitions to procure a variety of products 

and services for NGA. They interact with customers to develop and implement an 

acquisition strategy, solicit and evaluate proposals, and negotiate and award contracts. 

They also administer contracts, including monitoring contractor performance, preparing 

modifications, resolving problems, and terminating and closing out contracts and help 

NGA meet its small business prime and subcontracting goals. They may also hold a 

warrant which would authorize them to obligate the Government subject to limitations 

expressed on their warrant.

SEE YOURSELF IN NGA CONTRACTS? APPLY AT intelligencecareers.gov/nga

Approved for Public Release # 21-468
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY P ROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2) , SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH C AROLINA In The Supreme Court

Brandon H. Eaton, Respondent,

v.

State of South Carolina, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2017

- 001973

O N WRIT OF CERTIORARI

A ppeal f rom Spartanburg County

R. Ferrell Cothran Jr., Circuit Court Judge

M emorandum Opinion No. 2019 -MO- 016

Submitted February 15, 2019

– Filed April 3, 2019

CE RTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY

GRANTED

At tor ney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Johnny Ellis James Jr., both of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Respondent.PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the post

- conviction relief (PCR) court's grant of Brandon H. Eaton's application for PCR. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
#### MAGNOLIA MANUFACTURING OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE, ERIE INSURANCE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY, and ERIE INSURANCE GROUP

No. 525A06

(Filed 26 January 2007)

Insurance— business policy — loss from roof collapse — exclusion from coverage

The Court of Appeals’ decision that summary judgment was improperly entered in favor of defendant insurer in plaintiff’s action to recover under a business insurance policy for loss of business income as a result of a roof collapse during replacement was reversed for ithe reasons stated in the dissenting opinion that the undisputed evidence showed that plaintiff’s losses were caused by a poorly maintained roof and during work to repair or replace it, and that losses from collapse caused by faulty or inadequate maintenance or during construction were expressly excluded from coverage under the policy.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 179 N.C. App. 267, 633 S.E.2d 841 (2006), affirming in part and reversing in part an order granting summary judgment for defendants and denying summary judgment for plaintiff entered on 20 April 2005 by Judge Michael R. Morgan in Superior Court, Orange County, and remanding for further proceedings. Heard in the Supreme Court 10 January 2007.

*The Brough Law Firm, by Robert E. Homik, Jr., for plaintiff - appellee.*

*Bailey & Dixon, L.L.R, by David S. Coats, for defendant-appellants.*

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Chief Justice PARKER and Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22153]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10983]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393), the Salmon-Challis 
National Forest's Central Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will 
conduct a business meeting which is open to the public.

DATES: Thursday, May 21, 2009, beginning at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Salmon-Challis N.F. South Zone Office, Highway 93, Challis, 
Idaho.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda topics will include review and 
approval of project proposals, and an open public forum.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William A. Wood, Forest Supervisor and 
Designated Federal Officer, at 208-756-5111.

    Dated: May 5, 2009.
Lyle Powers,
Acting Forest Supervisor, Salmon-Challis National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9-10983 Filed 5-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M