alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 775

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 123 W. 7th Street in Holdenville, Oklahoma,

as the ‘‘Boone Pickens Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 775 ES

1 SECTION 1. BOONE PICKENS POST OFFICE.

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

3 Postal Service located at 123 W. 7th Street in Holdenville,

4 Oklahoma, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Boone

5 Pickens Post Office’’.

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Boone Pickens Post

10 Office’’.

Passed the Senate June 29, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 775

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Holdenville, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Boone Pickens al Service located at 123 W. 7th Street in
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James McRae, Appellant.

Decided December 17, 2009

Reported below, 65 AD3d 1382.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no civil appeal lies from the order of the Appellate Division entered in this criminal action *(see*NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b]; CPLR 5601; CPL 450.90).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        2,363,690
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                               0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                 0
<EQUITIES>                                      2,008
<MORTGAGE>                                     20,032
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              2,609,587
<CASH>                                        141,636
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                  0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                        113,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3,288,148
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             2,633,963
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             2,814
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 46,769
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          73,411
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                               279,646
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                   271,952
<COMMON>                                          303
<OTHER-SE>                                   (119,289)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3,288,148
<PREMIUMS>                                    338,874
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                           257,600
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (502)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 34,066
<BENEFITS>                                    377,587
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    45,056
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                          178,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (172,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   28,709
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (200,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (200,712)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (7.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.44)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Emanuel A. Towns (Admitted as Emanuel Alexander Towns), an Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Respondent.

Decided September 21, 2010

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Judge Jones taking no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            915852
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     181019
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1114699
<PP&E>                                             55177
<DEPRECIATION>                                     24000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1145876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             200795
<BONDS>                                            17602
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           54032
<OTHER-SE>                                        873447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1145876
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   36908
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (29908)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (29908)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.01)
        


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a)
AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)
  1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Henry R. MandellHenry R. MandellChairman of the Board and Secretary
 51
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION

I, Brent Kelton, certify that:

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment #1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, of Ameri Holdings, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                           
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|     
|-----
|     
|Date:
|     
|
EXHIBIT 31.2

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John W. Swatek, certify that: 

 
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hanover Direct, Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b.    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
|  

 

/s/ John W. Swatek

John W. Swatek

Senior Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

 

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: February 21, 2006
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

EF/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DASHON LAVAR RICHARDSON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-50453

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00322-R

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Dashon Lavar Richardson appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 168-

month sentence for distribution of cocaine base in the form of crack cocaine, in

FILED

JAN 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
EF/Research 2 08-50453

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), Richardson’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for

relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. The appellant has

filed a pro se supplemental brief and a pro se motion to “consolidate issues and

facts within his motion.” The government has filed a motion to summarily affirm

the conviction and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

The government’s motion is DENIED. See United States v. Jacobo

Castillo, 496 F.3d 947, 957 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc). The appellant’s pro se

motion is also DENIED. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED. However, we REMAND sua sponte for the limited

purpose of correcting the judgment to reflect that the term of supervised release is

five years for Count 4 and three years for Count 7, to run concurrently. See

18 U.S.C. § 3583(b); 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)-(C).
#### Gardner *v.*The Waycross Air-Line Railroad Company.

The declaration, as amended, set forth a cause of action, and it was error to dismiss the same on general demurrer.

April 30, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

*Judgment reversed.*

Action for damages. Before Judge Sweat. Ware superior court. April term, 1893.

The declaration alleged, that plaintiff' entered defendant’s passenger-train at Waycross at the regular and usual place of receiving passengers, just before the usual time for the train to start. No engine was then attached to the train ; and desiring to speak to the conductor about being put off' the train at a point just beyond Waltertown, a station on said railroad, plaintiff went into the baggage-car for that purpose, and while thus engaged with the conductor, defendant’s agents and servants, without any notice or warning to plaintiff and without the exercise of ordinary and reasonable care, negligently turned loose an engine at the upper end of the yard, and said car came down the track and •struck the car i'n which plaintiff' was standing, throwing him to the floor and injuring him in a manner described. He had not purchased a ticket, as they sold none at that time. He had money with which to pay his fare, and Lad entered the train as a passenger with the intention •of traveling just beyond the river at Waltertown. Before he left the passengei’-coach and entered the baggage-car, he looked out and saw that there was no engine at or near the train; and with the exercise of ordinary and reasonable care on the part of the defendant’s agents and employees the accident could have been .averted.

The defendant demurred on the ground that the declaration set out no cause of action; whereupon the plaintiff amended “by striking the allegation that a car *539was turned loose from the upper end of the yard,” and making the declaration read: “an engine with car attached was run down on the track with great and unnecessary force and speed, striking the car in which petitioner was standing, thereby violently throwing him down and injuring him as aforesaid.” lie further alleged, that the engine then in use was an old one, without the usual and necessary appliances and improvements to its proper and careful handling in the coupling and drilling of cars and trains; and that the engine and cars then in use by defendant were old and without the needful appliances of air or automatic brakes and automatic couplers and safety buffers, such as are usual and necessary to make the handling of passenger-trains and the carrying of passengers safe. It was necessary for him to go into the baggage-car to see the conductor, and it was usual for passengers so to do, and there were no restrictions on the part of defendant against their so doing. v

Hitch & Myers, for plaintiff.

John C. McDonald, for defendant.
#### Diane G. REED, Real party in Interest, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF ARLINGTON, Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee.

No. 08-11098.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 22, 2011.

Todd Alan Hoodenpyle (argued), Larry A. Levrick, Singer & Levick, P.C., Addison, TX, for Reed.

Michael A. McConnell (argued), Marianne Marsh Auld, Matt David Stayton, Kelly, Hart & Hallman, L.L.P., Fort Worth, TX, Denise V. Wilkerson, Asst. *770City, Atty., Arlington, TX, for City of Arlington.

Stephen W. Sather, Barbara M. Barron, Barron, Newburger & Sinsley, P.L.L.C., Austin, TX, for Commercial Law League of America, Amicus Curiae.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.1

1

. Judge Graves did not participate in the poll.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,

It is ordered that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Bruce Kaiserman, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of CSMC Mortgage-Backed Trust 2007-3 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, LaSalle Bank, National
    Association as Custodian, Universal Master Servicing, LLC as Servicer,
    Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. as Servicer, Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Trust Administrator and Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A. as Custodian.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ Bruce Kaiserman
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 12.1



I, Michael Huddy, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of

International Barrier Technology Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the

statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements

were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this

Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial

information included in this report, fairly present in all material

respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures

[as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)] for the company

and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such

disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,

to ensure that material information relating to the company, including

its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within

those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is

being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and

procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the

effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end

of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control

over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the

annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to

materially affect, the companys internal control over financial

reporting; and



5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to

the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of

directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or

operation of internal control over financial reporting which are

reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record,

process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other

employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control

over financial reporting.





Date: January 06, 2006



Michael Huddy__________

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 15




                     (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Letterhead)
                                (Minneapolis, MN)

May 10, 2000



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated April 25, 2000 on our reviews of the interim
consolidated financial information of Lund International Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") for the three-month periods ended April 2, 2000 and March 31, 1999,
and included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended April 2, 2000, is incorporated by reference in the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-46263, 33-64083 and 33-37160).

Yours very truly,



/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


                                       20