alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         319379            
<NAME>                        PSC Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-04-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                1,897
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        27,099
<ALLOWANCES>                          1,382
<INVENTORY>                          18,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     49,884
<PP&E>                               36,599
<DEPRECIATION>                       10,030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      171,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                43,785
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                112
<OTHER-SE>                           12,909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         13,021
<SALES>                             101,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    101,537
<CGS>                                60,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        37,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    6,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (3,748)
<INCOME-TAX>                         (1,383)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (2,360)
<DISCONTINUED>                          571
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         (1,789)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (0.16)
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 7, 2022

No. 04-21-00470-CV

Lakshmana VISWANATH,

Appellant

v.

THE CITY OF LAREDO,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CVK001492D1

Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by January 21, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion 

for extension of time has been filed. Appellant is therefore ORDERED to file, no later than 

February 17, 2022, her brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) her failure to 

timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to 

timely file a brief. If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written response by February 

17, 2022, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); see 

also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with 

court order).

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of February, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS OF
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST AS OF MARCH 31, 1998, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME AND CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS FOR THE
THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      $1,778,358
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            $1,778,358
<PP&E>                                     $10,975,216
<DEPRECIATION>                              $7,530,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $5,222,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $1,778,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  $3,444,230
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $5,222,588
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $5,263,835
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $124,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $5,139,406
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         $5,139,406
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                $5,139,406
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Diatect International Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      Andrus, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











December
                31, 2007
            /s/
                David
                AndrusDavid
                S. AndrusPrincipal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Financial Officer
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Letterhead

XXXX-XXX-X (XXX) (office symbol)					DD/MM/YYYY

MEMORDANDUM FOR:  Office of Admissions, National Intelligence University

SUBJECT: **(NAME OF ORGANIZATION)** Nomination(s) for the **(NAME OF PROGRAM)** for Academic Year **(XXXX-XXXX)**

1. The **(NAME OF ORGANIZATION)** submits the following individual(s)s for consideration.

2. The point of contact for this memorandum is XXXX at (e-mail address), unclassified (XXX) XXX-XXXX, or secure XXX-XXXX.

						Signature Block (authorizing personnel)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

MARIE R. ALEXANDRE , Appellant,

v.

SCRIBNER VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MARIE R

. AL EXANDRE, UNKNOWN TENANT IN POSSE SSION #1 and UNKNOWN TENANT IN POSSESSION #2 , Appellee s

.

No. 4D15

- 1514

[ March 30, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Howard H. Harrison

, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 502014CA008370XXXXMB

.

James Jean

- Francois of Law Offices of James Jean

- Franc ois, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee

.

D AMOORGIAN , J

.
Marie Alexandre appeals the order denying her motion to stay the clerk’s issuance of a writ of possession and/or to set aside a foreclosure sale following the entry of final judgment in a foreclosure action. We

reverse.

Scribner Village Homeowners Association (the “HOA”) obtained a final judgment of foreclosure against Appellant on its lien for unpaid assessments. The judgment set Appellant’s property for a public sale.
B efore the sale was set to occur, Appellant filed a suggestion of bankruptcy in the circuit court reflecting that Appellant filed a petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the federal bankruptcy court. The suggestion stated that by virtue of her petition, “t his action has been stayed by the operation of 11 U.S.C. Section 362 .” Despite Appellant’s filing, the sale proceeded and the clerk of court issued a certificate of sa le to HOA as the highest bidder as well as a certificate of title. Following the HOA’s request for a writ of possession, Appellant filed a motion asking the court to stay any issuance2

of a writ of possession and set aside the final judgment of foreclosure and certificate of title. The trial court denied Appellant’s motion. This appeal follows.

“The filing of a bankruptcy petition automatically stays the commencement or continuation of an action against the debtor ’ s property.” In re Clarke , 373 B.R. 769, 771 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2006) ( citing 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) ). Accordingly, it is error for a court to enforce a judgment of foreclosure on property owned by the debtor when an automatic stay is in place. Heritage Family Pub

, Inc. v. First Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass’n of Clearwater , 315 So. 2 d 558 , 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975) (holding that trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to vacate foreclosure sale and cancel certificate of sale when sale was conducted after the defendant filed a petition for bankruptcy thus creating an automatic sta y prior to the sale). As Appellant filed a petition for bankruptcy before the foreclosure sale, the sale should not have proceeded until the stay was lifted. Id .; 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) . Accordingly, the trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to se t aside the sale and everything that flowed from it.

Reversed and remanded

.

M AY and G ERBER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Deoines Monroe, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Submitted October 19, 2009;

decided December 1, 2009

Reported below, 59 AD3d 836.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Battles, Appellant.

Submitted January 4, 2010;

decided January 12, 2010

Reported below, 65 AD3d 1161.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION

 

I, Luke M. Beshar, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Date: February 20, 2015 |                                                                      |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                                      |
|                         | /s/   Luke M. Beshar                                                      |
|                         | Luke   M. Beshar *Executive Vice President and Chief   Financial Officer* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Edward L.
Williams, Chief Financial Officer of Telos Corporation (the Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2003, (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                           
|----------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|November 19, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ EDWARD L. WILLIAMS                                                    
|                  |  |  | 
|                  |  |  |  | Edward L. Williams, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
#### State v. Finney

Case below: 175 N.C. App. 795

No. 093PA06

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA05-850)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 02/23/06 Stay Dissolved 05/03/07

2. Denied 05/03/07

3. Allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration in light of the deceisions of this Court in *State v. Blackwell,*361 N.C. 41, and *State v. Hurt,*361 N.C. 325, -S.E.2d -, (2007)
```

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-90890 of Allied Healthcare International Inc. and subsidiaries (the
"Company") on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-112628 of the Company on
Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-49387 of the Company on Form S-8 of
our report dated December 21, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of the Company for the year ended September 30, 2004.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Jericho, New York
December 21, 2004
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-64302, 333-104071, 333-118992, 333-123364, 333-132492, 333-141264, 333-149756,
333-157964, and 333-159753) of our report dated March 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of MoSys, Inc.,
which appears in MoSys, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/
Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.

San
Jose, California
March 26, 2010

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 15

November 4, 2003

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Sears, Roebuck and Co.

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial information of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for the 13-week
and 39-week periods ended September 27, 2003 and September 28, 2002, as
indicated in our report dated November 4, 2003; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 2-64879, 2-80037,
33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485, 33-43459, 33-45479, 33-55825, 33-58851, 33-64345,
and 333-08141 of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Registration Statement No. 333-92082
of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck Acceptance Corp.; Registration
Statement Nos. 33-64775, 333-18591, and 333-43309 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and
Sears, Roebuck and Co. Deferred Compensation Plan; Registration Statement No.
333-102114 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears 401(K) Savings Plan
(formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees and the Sears
401(K) Profit Sharing Plan) and Lands End, Inc. Retirement Plan; Registration
Statement No. 33-44671 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears DC Corp.;
Registration Statement No. 333-38131 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears
Associate Stock Ownership Plan; Registration Statement No. 333-52056 of Sears,
Roebuck and Co. and the 2000 Employee Stock Plan; Registration Statement No.
333-72514 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2001 Broad-Based Stock Option Plan;
and Registration Statement No. 333-87942 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2002
Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Chicago, Illinois
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 652 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 239
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 652

                          [Report No. 109-147]

To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin 
   Franklin National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the 
 development of an exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the 
                      birth of Benjamin Franklin.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2005

  Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Santorum) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                            October 19, 2005

              Reported by Mr. Domenici, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin 
   Franklin National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the 
 development of an exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the 
                      birth of Benjamin Franklin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
Commemoration Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior may provide a grant to the Franklin 
Institute to--
            (1) rehabilitate the Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
        (including the Franklin statue) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 
        and
            (2) develop an interpretive exhibit relating to Benjamin 
        Franklin, to be displayed at a museum adjacent to the Benjamin 
        Franklin National Memorial.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act $10,000,000.
    (b) Required Match.--The Secretary of the Interior shall require 
the Franklin Institute to match any amounts provided to the Franklin 
Institute under this Act.
                                                       Calendar No. 239

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 652

                          [Report No. 109-147]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin 
   Franklin National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the 
 development of an exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the 
                      birth of Benjamin Franklin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 19, 2005

                       Reported without amendment`
# FILED
June 10, 1999 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) Appellee, ) C. C. A. NO. 02C01-9810-CC-00326 ) vs. ) HARDIN COUNTY ) EARL RA

Y LEGANS, ) No. 7518 ) Appellant. )

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court u pon the state’s motion to affirm the tr ial court judgment by order pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The appellant is appealing the trial court’s rev ocation of his probation. On Ma y 8, 1997, the appellant pled guilty to robbery and theft of property and received concurrent four and three year sentences. The trial court ordered super vised probation after the appellant served six

months continuous confinement. On September 17, 1998, the appellant’s supervised probation was revoke d.

After a heari ng, the tri al court found that the appel lant viol ated the terms and conditions of his probation by 1) failing to report to his probation officer, 2) changing residences w ithout notifying his pr

obation officer, and 3) failing to report new arrests for assa ult. The appe llant and his pro bation off icer testified at the hearing.

A trial court may rev

oke probation and order the impos ition of the original sentence upon a finding by a pr eponderance of the evidence that the person has violated a condition of probation. T.C.A. § 40-35-311(e ). The decision to revoke probation rests withi n the sound discretion of the tri al court. State v. Mitchell , 810 S.W.2d 733, 735 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1991). Revoc ation of probation is subject t o an abuse of discretion standard of rev iew, rather than a de nov o standard. State v. Harkins , 811 S.W.2d 79 (Tenn. 1991). Discretion is abused only if the record co ntains2

no substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the tr ial court that a viol ation of probation has occurred. Id. ; State v. Gregory , 946 S.W.2d 829, 832 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1997). Proof of a violation need n ot be established beyond a re asonable doubt, and the evidence need only sho w that the trial judg e exercised a conscientious and intelligent judgment, r

ather than acting arbitr arily. Gregory , 946 S.W.2d at 832; State v. Leach , 914 S.W.2d 104, 10 6 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1995).

On appeal, the appellant contends onl y that the trial court

abused its discretion in revoking his probation. He argues that “if he had another chance he would be able to conform his conduct to the rules of prob ation.” Having reviewed the record in light of the appellant’s argument, we find that the evidence fu lly supports the trial court’s action. The appellant has simply failed to show how the tr ial court abused its discretion.
Accordingly, the st

ate’s motion is granted. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgement of the trial court i s affirmed in accordance with Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Costs of this appeal shall be assess ed to the state.

______________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, JUDG E

______________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

______________________________ JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE