alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

|  | (i) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (ii) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                at the dates and for the periods                presented. |
|--|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                JAIME RIVERA          |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   | Jaime                Rivera              |
|   | *Chief                Executive Officer* |

----
Exhibit 31.1
------------

CERTIFICATION
-------------

 I, David Vozick, Co-Principal Executive Officer of AFP Imaging Corporation,
certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging
     Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
             disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
             supervision, to enable that material information relating to the
             registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
             to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
             period in which this report is being prepared;

         b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
             and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
             the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
             the end of the period covered by this report based on such
             evaluation; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
    the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
             or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
             reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
             record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
             other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
             internal controls over financial reporting.









Date: November 15, 2004                       ___________/s/______________
                                                      David Vozick
                                                  Chairman of the Board
                                              Co-Principal Executive Officer




                                       13
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, RESPODENT

v. KELVIN MONSANTO, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : No. 289 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 6th day of October, 2014, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is DENIED
.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 17, 2014

NO. 03-14-00126-CV

Soorena Sharifi, Appellant

v.

Sonia Danielle Sharifi, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

VACATED AND REMANDED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the district court on January 21, 2014. The parties 

have filed a joint motion requesting that we reverse the district court’s judgment and remand the 

cause for entry of judgment in accordance with their Mediated Settlement Agreement. Having 

considered the motion, the Court agrees that the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court 

grants the parties’ motion, sets aside the district court’s judgment without regard to the merits, 

and remands the case to the district court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the 

parties’ agreement. Each party shall pay the costs of the appeal incurred by that party, both in 

this Court and the court below.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Southern Bella, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned President,
Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on his knowledge and belief:  1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Viola
Heitz


President,
Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 813 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 813

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize 
   the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate for lower 
                prices for medicare prescription drugs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 15, 2005

  Mr. Specter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize 
   the Secretary of Health and Human Services to negotiate for lower 
                prices for medicare prescription drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEGOTIATING FAIR PRICES FOR MEDICARE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1860D-11 of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395w-111) is amended by striking subsection (i) (relating to 
noninterference) and by inserting the following:
    ``(i) Authority To Negotiate Prices With Manufacturers.--In order 
to ensure that beneficiaries enrolled under prescription drug plans and 
MA-PD plans pay the lowest possible price, the Secretary shall have 
authority similar to that of other Federal entities that purchase 
prescription drugs in bulk to negotiate contracts with manufacturers of 
covered part D drugs, consistent with the requirements and in 
furtherance of the goals of providing quality care and containing costs 
under this part.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the enactment of section 101 of the Medicare 
Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public 
Law 108-173; 117 Stat. 2066).
    (c) HHS Reports Comparing Negotiated Prescription Drug Prices and 
Retail Prescription Drug Prices.--Beginning in 2007, the Secretary of 
Health and Human Services shall regularly, but in no case less often 
than quarterly, submit to Congress a report that compares the prices 
for covered part D drugs (as defined in section 1860D-2(e) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-102(e)) negotiated by the 
Secretary pursuant to section 1860D-11(i) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-
111(i)), as amended by subsection (a), with the average price a retail 
pharmacy would charge an individual who does not have health insurance 
coverage for purchasing the same strength, quantity, and dosage form of 
such covered part D drug.
                                 <all>
```
#### Bagley *et al. v.*Kennedy.

1. The execution of a lost deed embracing lands in two counties cannot be proved, as to land in one of the counties wherein the was never recorded, by a certified copy from the record of the other county, in which it was duly recorded. And without first proving the execution of an original deed, a copy of the same taken from the records of a county in which the land in controversy is not situate, cannot be received in evidence.

2, The evidence as to execution or genuineness of the alleged original deed was insufficient to make a *prima fade*case, and the court did not err in granting a nonsuit. *Judgment affirmed.*

July 30, 1894.

*652Ejectment. Before Judge Hutchins. Gwinnett superior court. September term, 1898.

Sam. J. Winn, for plaintiffs.

T. M. Peeples, for defendant.

This case has been to the Supreme Court three times before. 81 *Ga.*721; 85 *Ga.*703; 92 *Ga.*230. Essential to make a *prima facie*case for the plaintiffs was proof of execution of an instrument the original of which •was lost, purporting to have been executed On April 4, 1849, conveying lands in Forsyth and Gwinnett counties 'to Dorcas Hardin for her life, with remainder to her children by James Hardin. It was admitted that the records of Gwinnett county were destroyed by fire in 1871. Plaintiffs offered in evidence a certified copy from the records of Forsyth, county, purporting to be a copy of the instrument in question. It was rejected, and a nonsuit was granted.
an order granting the motion and directing that Cody be immediately 

released from Spring Mountain Youth Camp pending further order of this 

court. 

The State of Nevada has now filed a motion for withdrawal of 

our September 30, 2015, order, as well as a motion for leave to supplement 

its motion for withdrawal. Additionally, Cody has now filed a petition for 

a writ of mandamus directing the district court to "exercise its jurisdiction 

and release Cody S. from juvenile detention and place him with his uncle 

pending appeal"; this petition has been assigned Docket No. 6893. 

We conclude that the arguments raised in the writ petition are 

more appropriately addressed in the pending appeal, rather than in a 

separate writ proceeding. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition in Docket 

No. 68933. 

As for respondent's motion for withdrawal, we elect to treat it 

as a motion to reconsider our September 30, 2015, order. See NRAP 27(b) 

("A party adversely affected by the court's. . . action may file a motion to 

reconsider, vacate or modify that action."). Further, we grant respondent's 

motion for leave to supplement the motion for withdrawal to the extent 

that we will consider the arguments within it in resolving the motion for 

reconsideration. Appellant shall have until 4 p.m. on October 9, 2015, to 

file an opposition to the motion for reconsideration, and within that 
arraguirre 

opposition may include the arguments previously presented in its now 

dismissed writ petition. Respondent shall have until 4 p.m. on October 12, 

2015, to file a reply. 1 

It is so ORDERED. 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. William 0. Voy, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

1Documents submitted in this matter shall be filed personally, 

electronically, or by facsimile transmission with the clerk of this court in 

Carson City. See NRAP 2; NRAP 25(a)(2)(B); NRAP 25(a)(4). For 

purposes of this petition, we suspend application of NRAP 25(a)(2)(B)(ii) - 

(iv) and NRAP26(b)(1)(B).
EXHIBIT 32.2  SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  In connection with the Annual Report of International Barrier Technology Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Corcoran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ David Corcoran David Corcoran CFO/Director September 28, 2007
#### East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. *v.*McClure.

In view of the fact that the plaintiff, shortly after receiving the injury, joined in a sworn report of the facts, in which it was stated that the occurrence was an accident and that no employee of the company was to blame; and there being abundant evidence that the plaintiff knew the contents of the report and voluntarily took *659it to the notary who administered the oath to him, the verdict was contrary to the evidence as a whole, studying it carefully from an honest and impartial standpoint; and the court having erred in charging the jury with reference to the use of the Carlisle tables, a new trial should have been granted. *Judgment reversed.*

July 30, 1894.

Action for damages. Before Judge Milner. Whitfield superior court. April term, 1893.

The suit was under the law of Alabama, providing for the recovery by á workman injured while in the service of a corporation, by reason of the negligence of any servant of the employer, to whose order or direction the workman at the time was bound to conform, and when his injury resulted from having so conformed. The injuries resulted from a fall by plaintiff as he was trucking freight from a car across two skids to a platform. It was raining, and the skids and car-floor were wet. Plaintiff had been employed on the train under the direction of Smith, the conductor, about six months. The skids were of suitable length, nearly level, properly placed and in good condition; nothing wrong about them. The car-floor was slippery. Plaintiff testified, that he had started backward with a loaded truck from the car to the platform. The trucks had mounted the skids. That was the usual way of unloading. He had got out on the skids, about half way from car to platform, thought he felt one of the skids slip, and stopped. He could not see the end of the skids. Smith was in the car checking freight. He looked up and said, “All right; go ahead.” He was in a position to see the ends of the skids. Plaintiff started again; the skids slipped off the edge of the car; he fell and the truck fell upon him. The evidence for defendant tended to show that the injury was caused simply by accident, and that plaintiff so swore in a written report to the company as to how the accident happened. Smith denied telling plaintiff to go ahead, it was all right. There was testi*660mony for plaintiff", contradicted by that for defendant, tending to show that he was not aware of the contents of the written report when he signed it, and that the oath was not administered to him. After verdict for plaintiff", defendant moved for a new trial on the general grounds, and for error in the court’s charge as to permanent injury and the use of the Carlisle mortality table, there being no reference in the charge as to the decrease in capacity to earn money as plaintiff" grows older, and no direction as to how to find the present cash value of his lessened capacity to labor, except by reference to this table.

McCutchen & Shumate, for plaintiff" in error.

B,. J. & J. McCamy, *contra.*
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements No.
333-12241 and 333-24659 of Medix Resources, Inc. (formerly International Nursing
Services, Inc.) on Forms S-3 of our report dated April 2, 1999 appearing in this
annual  report  on Form  10-KSB  of Medix  Resources,  Inc.  for the year  ended
December 27, 1998.



April 12, 1999
Denver, Colorado

                                         /s/ Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
                                             Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS**OIP\"El{a:(j)~I5JQ.&S<Jl:.@!$®--** STATION, 

### AVST.lli,.li;:M;> 78711

. STATE OF TEXAS 0**~ k~**  U.S.POSTAGE))PJTNEYBOWES 

### PENALTY FOR

.......

### ~. PRIVA TIE US IE**~,=/}IJ./=~ ~~_5**  

### ==

### ~lr~~701 

# $**(0)(0)(0).~(8)5**
MW:C:ll' 0001401603MAY. 19. 2015.



### Abel Acosta, Clerk**~~"";.·** i

### l!:.l~LWlliJ.!E; 

## •I; Ill'· :1 1 

## 11!S7:"tilmJ!tt'rt .-- ·
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hyrum
A. Mead, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ Hyrum A. Mead
                                         ------------------
                                         Hyrum A. Mead
                                         President (Principal Executive Officer)
                                         July 15, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                       DIRECTOR NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION

      This stock option ("Stock Option") has been granted this ____ day of
________, 2004 ("Grant Date"), by MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, with its principal office in Houston, Texas ("Company"), to
_____________ ("Optionee"), a Non-Employee director, under the Mission Resources
Corporation 2004 Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan"). The Optionee is entitled to
purchase ______ shares of the Company's Common stock, $0.01 par value ("Common
Stock"), at an option price of $_____ per share, pursuant to the Plan as in
effect on the date hereof. The options shall vest 100% on the first business day
following the annual meeting of the Company stockholders (which shall be the
grant date). Upon exercise of this Stock Option, the Optionee shall pay to the
Company, in full, the option price for the shares of Common Stock issuable
pursuant to such exercise with cash or Common Stock (valued at fair market value
on the date of such exercise). The terms of the Plan, a copy of which has been
given to Optionee, are incorporated herein by reference and are hereby made a
part of this Stock Option.

                                           MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION

                                           By: ______________________________

AGREED AND ACCEPTED BY:
_______________________________
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6897

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FORREST STEPHEN BLACK, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilly, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-277-WS, CA-97-615-6) Submitted: December 30, 1998 Decided: January 19, 1999 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Forrest Stephen Black, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Forrest Stephen Black seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Black , Nos. CR-90-277- WS; CA-97-615-6 (M.D.N.C. May 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of TJS Wood Flooring, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brandi Iannelli, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: March 26, 2008 /s/ Brandi Iannelli Brandi Iannelli Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer