alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1-3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                              68,046
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,275,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                       367,244
<INVENTORY>                                        707,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,011,869
<PP&E>                                          10,650,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,328,209
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,820,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,739,909
<BONDS>                                          6,388,668
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,089,638
<COMMON>                                           139,436
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,127,152)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,820,052
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,185,127
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,177,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   184,220
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 620,929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,529,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,529,602)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,529,602)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
Vice Admiral Frank Whitworth 

Director, NGA 

Vice Admiral Frank Whitworth is the eighth Director of the 

National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency. He leads and 

directs NGA under the authorities of the Secretary of 

Defense and Director of National Intelligence. He became 

NGA’s director on June 3, 2022. 

Whitworth is a 1989 graduate of Duke University Durham, 

North Carolina, with a Bachelor of Arts in Political 

Science. He holds a Master of Arts in National Security 

Studies from Georgetown University, Washington, District 

of Columbia, as well as a diploma from the Naval War 

College in Newport, Rhode Island. 

Whitworth’s command tours included commander, Joint 

Intelligence Center Central; commanding officer, Navy Element of U.S. Central 

Command; and commanding officer, Kennedy Irregular Warfare Center. 

Whitworth’s operational tours included director of Intelligence for The Joint Staff, 

director of intelligence for U.S. Africa Command, director of Intelligence for Joint Special 

Operations Command, director of Intelligence and deputy director of Maritime 

Operations Center for Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. Fifth 

Fleet; director of Intelligence for a Special Operations Task Force in Afghanistan during 

three deployments supporting Operation Enduring Freedom; director of Intelligence for 

Naval Special Warfare Development Group; special assistant for Political-Military Affairs 

at U.S. Sixth Fleet during Operation Allied Force; indications and warning officer at U.S. 

Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. Fifth Fleet, in support of Operation Desert Storm; 

and intelligence officer for Fighter squadron 31 during USS Forrestal’s deployment in 

support of Operation Provide Comfort. 

Whitworth’s shore-based tours included the National Security Agency, chief of targets 

for the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility; Navy federal executive fellow to 

American Enterprise Institute; senior duty officer at the White House Situation Room; 

intelligence briefer for the Chief of Naval Operations and Secretary of the Navy; and 

intelligence watch analyst at the Office of Naval Intelligence and the National Military 

Joint Intelligence Center. 

Whitworth is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. His decorations include the 

Defense Superior Service Medal (three awards), Legion of Merit, Bronze Star (four 

awards), Defense Meritorious Service Medal (four awards), as well as the Edwin T. 

Layton Leadership Award, Vice Admiral Rufus L. Taylor Leadership Award, the Army’s 

Knowlton Award for excellence in intelligence, the Republic of France’s Médaille de la 

Défense nationale (Gold), and the Defense Intelligence Agency Director's Award.
#### Terry COOPER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. K. MILLER, Sergeant, individually and in his official capacity; Nurse McDougal, individually and in her official capacity; Edward J. Turmell, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 08-8466.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 20, 2009.

Decided: May 12, 2009.

Terry Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Edward A. Love, Willeox, Buyck *&*Williams, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appel-lees.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terry Cooper appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Cooper v. Miller,*No. 3:08-cv-01006-CMC, 2008 WL 4833085 (D.S.C. filed Oct. 31, 2008 & entered Nov. 3, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11732 and #11733]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1831-DR), dated 04/28/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straight-line Winds.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/26/2009 through 05/05/2009.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         05/11/2009.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/29/2009.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/28/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

      ( print page 23455)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Florida, dated 04/28/2009 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                    Leon, Levy, Wakulla                

*Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Florida: Citrus, Marion

Georgia: Grady, Thomas

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11603 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
(October 22, 2013)

#### In the Matter of Kenneth Jennings, Respondent, v Dennis Walcott, as Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, et al., Appellants.

[973 NYS2d 170]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alexander W. Hunter, Jr., J.), entered on or about March 15, 2012, granting the petition to declare arbitrary and capricious respondents’ policy of deferring in educational decisions to the parent with primary physical custody, and ordering respondents to include petitioner as a joint legal guardian on his child’s school file, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition denied, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 dismissed.

It is the policy of respondent Department of Education to take direction from the parent with primary physical custody where, as here, the divorced parents of a student have joint legal custody of the student and are unable to agree on a decision as to the student’s education, and there is no court order specifying who is entitled to make educational decisions. Respondent adopted this policy to avoid becoming entangled in custody disputes. Given the options available to the Department of Education for resolving such a disagreement, it cannot be said that the policy is without a rational basis in the record and is therefore arbitrary and capricious *(see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale*
      *539
      *& Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 231 [1974]). Nor does the policy affect petitioner’s legal rights as a parent with joint legal, but not primary physical, custody. Petitioner is free to pursue a modification of his judgment of divorce to provide for joint decision-making as to the child’s education.

Since petitioner failed to raise his argument that respondent’s policy violates the City Administrative Procedure Act (New York City Charter § 1041 *et seq.)*in his petition, we decline to consider it *(see Matter of Cherry v Horn,*66 AD3d 556 [1st Dept 2009]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                      <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUN-30-1997              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JUL-01-1996              JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              0                    2,246
<SECURITIES>                                        0                   60,550
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0                   32,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0                  (5,781)
<INVENTORY>                                         0                   44,423
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0                  157,397
<PP&E>                                              0                   54,033
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0                 (23,231)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      0                  335,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0                   56,725
<BONDS>                                             0                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                        0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                        0
<COMMON>                                            0                   13,397
<OTHER-SE>                                          0                  263,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        0                  335,428
<SALES>                                        33,639                   43,432
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               33,639                   43,432
<CGS>                                          26,547                   32,315
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  26,547                   32,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,844                    6,282
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   62                      304
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (1,790)                       81
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (69,729)                  (7,243)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (27,510)                  (2,752)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (42,219)                  (4,491)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 67,257                   22,224
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                        0
<CHANGES>                                           0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                   25,038                   17,733
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.04                     0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.04                     0.70
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michele Nakazawa, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) forthe registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and to the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF

THE
TRUSTEE*

OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee Ann Anderson, Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Compass Bank, on behalf of Compass Bank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust), not in its
individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 1 to the Trusts financial statements contained
in the Report, in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September 16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting
principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:

/s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:

Lee Ann AndersonTitle:

Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate:

May 11, 2015




|* | The Trust has no executive officers.
|- | ------------------------------------
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04

- 13

- 00267

- CR Evaristo Antonio SANTOS Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2013

- CR

- 1104 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: June 5, 2013
DISMISSED The trial court ’ s certification in this appeal states that “ this criminal case is a plea

- bargain

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. ” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that an appeal “ must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record under th ese rules. ” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The clerk ’ s record, which was filed electronically, contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, t he clerk ’ s record supports the trial court ’ s certification04

- 13

- 00267

- CR

- 2

- that defendant has no right of appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 25.2(a)(2). In addition, appellant ’ s counsel has filed a letter in which he states that he has reviewed the electronic clerk ’ s record an d can find no right of appeal for Appellant; counsel concedes that the trial court’s certification stating the defendant has no right of appeal is correct. In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant ’ s counsel that the defendant has no right of appeal ; therefore, Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH