alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dated:    3/27/2008                                                                        By: /s/  E. Todd Whittemore                                                                  Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Lehman Mortgage Trust 2007-3 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications**(Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)Name:In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:Assurant Inc., as Sub-Contractor for Washington Mutual BankDeutsche Bank National Trust Company, as CustodianIndyMac Bank, F.S.B., as ServicerLaSalle Bank National Association, as CustodianNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and CustodianWashington Mutual Bank, as ServicerWestlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC
**Exhibit 31.1****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION**I, David G. DeWalt, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of McAfee, Inc.; and 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report.       /s/ David G. DeWalt     David G. DeWalt    Chief Executive Officer and President  April 29, 2008
The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. DONAVON SAILER, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-07-286 DECISION

On January 7, 2009, the defendant was sentenced for violations of the conditions of a deferred sentence to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term often (10) years, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Count I: Burglary, a felony.

On August 5, 2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2010.

DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Gabriel MALDONADO, a.k.a. Juan Gabrial Maldonado, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-14614

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 1, 2009.

Rick D. Collum, The Collum Law Firm, P.C., Moultrie, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Dean S. Daskal, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Columbus, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before BLACK, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rick Collum, appointed counsel for Juan Gabriel Maldonado in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Maldonado’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. Maldonado’s motion for appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED AS MOOT.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23389-23390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11614]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Kentucky Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the 
Kentucky Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene 
at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at 3:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 28, 2009, in 
Room 340, Gardiner Hall, University of Louisville, Louisville, 
Kentucky. The purpose of

[[Page 23390]]

the meeting is for the Committee to discuss its report on voting rights 
for ex-felons and discuss activity plans for 2010.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
address is 61 Forsyth St., SW., Suite 18T40, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. 
Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, present their comments at the 
meeting, or who desire additional information should contact Dr. Peter 
Minarik, Regional Director, at (404) 562-7000 or 800-877-8339 for 
individuals who are deaf, hearing impaired, and/or have speech 
disabilities or by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#20504d494e4152494b6055534343520e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7d7cacec9c6d5cecce7d2d4c4c4d589c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations 
of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, May 13, 2009.
Christopher Byrnes,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. E9-11614 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Skip to main content An icon that symbolizes the United States Department of Transportation logo. United States Department of Transportation
        Report a Safety Problem

  Toggle navigation
      National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationHomepage

    Ratings
                                Recalls
                                Risky Driving
                                Road Safety
                                Vehicle Safety
      
            More Info

                      Briefing Room
          
                        
            Importing a Vehicle
          
                                      
            
            Data
          
                        
            Research
          
                        
            Laws & Regulations
          
                    
                      Vehicle Manufacturers
                      State Governments
                      Enforcement & Justice Ford Motor Company Extension Request for PG 4-8 (Supplement to Nov. 30, 2017) and appendices


Download file: Ford Motor Company Extension Request for PG 4-8 (Supplement to Nov. 30, 2017) and appendices
 NHTSA Information
              
              About NHTSA
          Careers & Internships
          Contact Us
          Recall Information
          Report a Safety ProblemInformation For
              
              Vehicle Manufacturers
          State Governments
          Enforcement & JusticeNHTSA Sites
              
        SaferCar App
          TrafficSafetyMarketing.gov
          EMS.gov
          911.gov
            Website Information
              
        Web Policies & Notices
          Accessibility
          FOIA
          Privacy Policy
          Information Quality
          Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
          No Fear Act Data
          Ethics
          Civil Rights
          Office of Inspector General
          OIG Hotline
          BusinessUSA
          USA.gov
          WhiteHouse.gov

            National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration
              1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
                Washington, D.C. 20590
              888-327-4236888-275-9171 (TTY)
              Twitter
                LinkedIn
                Facebook
                Youtube
                Instagram
        Submit Feedback >
<PAGE>
 

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
 
                            UNIT INSTRUMENTS, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                       Three Months Ended                         Nine Months Ended
                                                       ------------------                         ------------------
                                                 02/28/98              03/01/97              02/28/98              03/01/97
                                               -----------            ----------           -----------           -----------
<S>                                            <C>                    <C>                  <C>                   <C>
 
NET LOSS APPLICABLE TO
COMMON STOCK HOLDERS                           $(5,076,000)           $ (900,000)          $(4,153,000)          $(3,456,000)
                                               ============           ===========          ============          ============
 
 
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
------------------------             
 
Weighted average number
of shares outstanding                            4,192,334             4,370,325             4,394,334             4,375,794
 
Net loss per share                             $     (1.21)           $    (0.21)          $     (0.95)          $     (0.79)
                                               ------------           -----------          ------------          ------------
 
 
EARNINGS PER SHARE ASSUMING FULL DILUTION
-----------------------------------------
Weighted average number
of shares outstanding                            4,192,334             4,370,325             4,394,334             4,375,794

Common share equivalents, assuming
exercise of stock options                                                                                                   
and warrants                                            -0-                   -0-                   -0-                   -0-
                                         ------------------    ------------------    ------------------    ------------------
Average shares used in computing
earnings per share                               4,192,334             4,370,325             4,394,334             4,375,794
                                               ============           ===========          ============          ============
Net loss per share                             $     (1.21)           $    (0.21)          $     (0.95)          $     (0.79)
                                               ============           ===========          ============          ============
</TABLE>
Opinion filed June 26, 2014

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

No. 11-14-00149-CV

__________

IN THE INTEREST OF L.T.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV32308

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, Kristin Mack, filed a notice of appeal in this court on May 28, 

2014. In her notice, Appellant indicated a desire to appeal from an agreed order 

signed by the trial court on February 4, 2014, and a protective order signed by the 

trial court on March 5, 2014. Upon docketing this case, the clerk of this court

issued a letter dated May 28, 2014, in which we noted that the notice of appeal 

appeared to have been filed untimely. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. In the letter, 

we requested that Appellant respond on or before June 9, 2014, and we informed 

Appellant that this appeal would be subject to dismissal if she failed to respond and 
2

show grounds to continue the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellant has not filed 

a response. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 42.3(c). 

This appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

June 26, 2014

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
**EXHIBIT32.02**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

In connection withthis annual report of ML Systematic Momentum FuturesAccess LLC, (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I,Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 31,  2010     |                  |
|--------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                           |                  |
| By                             | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis               |
| Chief Financial  Officer       |
| (Principal  Financial Officer) |
|                                |                       |  |

 

2

----
The District Court of the 11th Judicial District. County of Flathead.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JOHNATHAN VANZANDT, Defendant.

CAUSE NO. DC-04-534C DECISION

On May 26, 2010, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years, to run consecutively to the sentence imposed in Cause No. DC-09-530C, for the offense of Assault With a Weapon, a felony. A net sentence of seven (7) years with two (2) years suspended. It is the recommendation of the Court that the Defendant be placed at the T.S.C.T.C. (Boot Camp), followed by placement at an appropriate Pre-Release Center.

On August 5,2010, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence *68was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 5th day of August, 2010.

DATED this 13th day of August, 2010.

Chairperson, Hon. Blair Jones, Member, Hon. Richard Simonton and Member, Hon. Ray Dayton.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8043

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (3:03-cv-03299-MJP)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Owen Harriot, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Owen Harriot seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); 

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Harriot has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 0F THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WMS Industries Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
D. Schweinfurth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. sections 1350, as adopted pursuant to sections 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Scott D. Schweinfurth
-------------------------
Scott D. Schweinfurth
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     Sterling Financial Corporation    Spokane, Washington     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the    Registration Statements on    Form S-3(No. 333-136001    and    333-130512)    and    Form S-8(No. 33-136000,333-139490,333-111802,333-105723,33-61452,333-44078,    and    333-69481)    of Sterling Financial Corporation, of our reports dated    February 28, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial    statements, and the effectiveness of Sterling Financial    Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting,    which appear in this    Form 10-K.     BDO Seidman, LLP    Spokane, Washington    February 28, 2007
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

As of the date hereof, I, Steven G. Mihaylo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Inter-Tel, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Inter-Tel, Incorporated. This written statement is being furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit accompanying this report and
shall not be deemed filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | By: /s/ Steven G. Mihaylo     
| |                               
| | Name: Steven G. Mihaylo       
|
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer
|
| | Dated: November 14, 2003
# FY 2023 Grant Funding Table

                                                                          Download file:                       FY 2023 Grant Funding Table