alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   |                          |                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | LaSalle      Bank N.A.        |
|   | 135      South LaSalle Street |
|   |                          | Suite      1625                           |
|   |                          | Chicago,      IL 60603                    |
|   |                          |                                      |
|   |                          |                                      |
|   |                          | Global      Securities and Trust Services |

| 1.   | A      review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding      calendar year and of      the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement has been made      under my supervision;      and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has      fulfilled all its      obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such      year or a portion      thereof. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Date: March 12, 2008                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                      |
|   | LaSalle      Bank National Association, as MasterServicer |
|   |                                                      |
|   | By: /s/ Tammy Spriggs                                     |
|   |                                                      |
|   | Name: Tammy      Spriggs                                  |
|   | Title:   First      Vice President         |

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 21.1 MCAFEE, INC.
Direct Subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 Foreign and Domestic CoreKT Security Systems, Inc.
Entercept Security Technologies Europe Ltd.
Foundstone, Inc.
Inversiones NAI Guatemala S.A.
McAfee.com Canada Corp. (NS) ULC)
McAfee Consolidated, Inc.
McAfee.com Holdings Corporation
McAfee.com Limited
MyCIO.com, Inc.
NAI International Holdings Corp.
NA NetTools Holding Company
McAfee A.G.
McAfee Software de Mexico S.A. de C.V.
McAfee, GmbH
Network Associates Holding Company, Inc.
McAfee (Hong Kong) Ltd.
McAfee, S.r.l.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 62 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 62

                   For the relief of Jim K. Yoshida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Jim K. Yoshida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VETERAN STATUS.

    (a) Entitlement to Status.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, Jim K. Yoshida of Honolulu, Hawaii, is deemed to be a veteran for 
the purposes of all laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs.
    (b) Treatment of Service.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the service of Jim K. Yoshida of Honolulu, Hawaii, as a volunteer 
member of the United States Army during the period beginning on July 2, 
1950, and ending on January 17, 1951, shall be deemed to be active 
military service from which Jim K. Yoshida was discharged under 
honorable conditions for the purposes of all laws administered by the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
    (c) Prospective Applicability.--No benefits may be paid or 
otherwise provided to Jim K. Yoshida of Honolulu, Hawaii, by reason of 
the enactment of this Act with respect to any period before the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2439

MICHAEL STAR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL CHAPMAN, Sheriff of Loudoun County,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:18-cv-01047-LO-IDD)

Submitted: March 27, 2019 Decided: April 16, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Star, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & 

FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Star appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Star v. Chapman, No. 

1:18-cv-01047-LO-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 29, 2018 & entered Oct. 30, 2018). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1

               Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)
                    under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1.   I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form 10-K and all  reports  on Form 10-D
     required  to be filed in respect of the  period  covered by this  report on
     Form 10-K of Home Equity Loan Trust  2007-HSA2  (the "Exchange Act periodic
     reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
     do not contain any untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a
     material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in light of the
     circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading with
     respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based  on my  knowledge,  all  of the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
     information  required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
     by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.   I am responsible  for reviewing the  activities  performed by the servicers
     and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing
     the servicer compliance  statements required in this report under Item 1123
     of  Regulation  AB, and except as  disclosed  in the  Exchange Act periodic
     reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
     agreements in all material respects; and

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing  criteria for
     asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
     of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed  securities required
     to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
     and Exchange  Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been  included as an exhibit
     to this report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
     instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided to me by the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  LaSalle Bank  National
Association.

Date:  March 24, 2008


By:    /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title: Managing Director
(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         282,713
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  952,970
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,052,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,360,107
<PP&E>                                       1,361,234
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,057,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,721,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          603,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,377,969
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,721,464
<SALES>                                      1,594,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,594,401
<CGS>                                        1,039,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,592,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. certify that the Annual Report of NPS
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



|                     |  |                                                               
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2007 |  | /s/ N. ANTHONY COLES                                          
|                     |  | N. Anthony Coles,                                             
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                         
|                     | 
|Date: March 14, 2007 |  | /s/ GERARD J. MICHEL                                          
|                     |  | Gerard J. Michel,                                             
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President, Corporate Strategy

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, David J. Mazzo,PhD, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc.; and





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: May 6, 2016





/s/ David J. Mazzo, PhD


Name: David J. Mazzo, PhD


Title: Chief Executive Officer of Caladrius Biosciences, Inc.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has been provided to Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. and will be retained by Caladrius Biosciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. *v.*Powell.

The evidence of the plaintiff in his own behalf being in conflict with, that of the sole witness for the defendant as to a physical fact somewhat material, to wit, whether there was a curve, or whether the line was straight at the scene of the injury, there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for a new trial, the jury having found consistently with the plaintiff’s evidence, and that, together with the legal presumption in his favor, arising under section 3033 of the code, being sufficient to warrant the verdict.

April 23, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Action for damages. Before Judge Smith. Dodge superior court. March term, 1893.

Powell sued the railroad company for the killing of two mules by the running of a freight-train, and obtained a verdict. The company moved on the general grounds for a new trial, and the motion was overruled. The testimony of plaintiff showed, that the mules broke *525out of his inclosure (which was in good condition) at night, and were found next morning lying dead by the railroad track about ten steps from the mouth of a cut. The track ran through his field, and was straight for •about 400 yards. The mules’ tracks indicated that they ran about half that distance before they were struck by the train. Both freight and passenger-trains were running at night. Nor defendant, the fireman on the engine which killed the mules (the engineer being no longer in its employment) testified that the train was about 50 yards from the mules when he first saw them. They could not have been seen nearer; they were around a curve. When they were seen, the engineer blew down brakes, reversed the engine, blew the alarm whistle and tried to stop the train. It ran 800 or 400 yards before it stopped, and could not have been stopped in a shorter distance. The accident could not have been avoided. It was dark and foggy. Being on a curve, the headlight shone but a short distance on the track. The train was running at schedule speed, about twenty miles an hour, when the mules were seen. ■ They remained on the track when the whistle blew. On a straight track the light would not have shone more than 200 or 300 yards, etc.

DeLacy & Bishop, for plaintiff in error.

Roberts & Smith and W. M. Clements, *contra.*
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 22, 2010 

0114 

Order 

 

January 22, 2010 

139787 

ELIZABETH A. BANASZAK, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139787 

 COA: 263305 

Wayne CC: 02-200211-NO 

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, COUNTY OF 

WAYNE, and HUNT CONSTRUCTION 

GROUP, INC., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 21, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the decision of the Court of 

Appeals and we REINSTATE the ruling of the Wayne Circuit Court granting summary 

disposition to defendant Northwest Airlines, Inc. on the plaintiff’s premises liability 

claim. The Court of Appeals erred by reinstating the premises liability claim in this 

construction site injury case. Ordinarily a landowner is not responsible for injuries 

caused by a carefully selected contractor to whom he has delegated the task of erecting a 

structure. Funk v General Motors Corp, 392 Mich 91, 101 (1974). Northwest Airlines, 

as controller of the premises, did not have a duty to protect the plaintiff, an employee of 

an independent contractor hired to perform construction work on the owner’s premises, 

from the construction site hazardous condition that caused the plaintiff’s injury. Perkoviq 

v Delcor Homes-Lake Shore Pointe, Ltd, 466 Mich 11, 18-20 (2002). On remand, the 

plaintiff’s common work area claim against Northwest Airlines as a general contractor 

and as an owner with retained control may proceed in accordance with the Court of 

Appeals decision. 

 HATHAWAY, J., would deny leave to appeal.
U.S. flag
        An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know **Official websites use .mil**
              A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization.
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
              A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.




Menu


close site.logo-mark-desc
 Home
          
        AboutAbout UsNGA LocationsHistoryMissionStrategyNGA KidsPolicies and ProgramsNext NGA WestNewsNewsContract Announcements2023 Industry Strategy Summit2023 DoDIIS Worldwide Conference2024 Esri Federal GIS Conference2024 GEO Resilience Summit2024 GEOINT SymposiumCareersYour CareerHiring ProcessBenefits & PayStudent OpportunitiesSenior Executive PositionsMilitary Career OpportunitiesWork With UsIndustryAcademiaGovernmentInternationalWork With UsResourcesOffice of the Inspector GeneralProducts & ServicesMoonshot LabsPublic ReleaseContact Us Facilities Operating Status
          Employee Resources Search small
        Search Site


Updating Citrix Workspace


Home
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
						
							
							
							Resources
								
							
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				Updating Citrix Workspace


Associated Document(s)
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab





Home
              HomeAbout
							  About UsNGA LocationsHistoryMissionStrategyNGA KidsPolicies and ProgramsNext NGA WestNews
							  NewsContract Announcements2023 Industry Strategy Summit2023 DoDIIS Worldwide Conference2024 Esri Federal GIS Conference2024 GEO Resilience Summit2024 GEOINT SymposiumCareers
							  Your CareerHiring ProcessBenefits & PayStudent OpportunitiesSenior Executive PositionsMilitary Career OpportunitiesWork With Us
							  IndustryAcademiaGovernmentInternationalWork With UsResources
							  Office of the Inspector GeneralProducts & ServicesMoonshot LabsPublic ReleaseContact Us
							  Contact Us
 Connect With Us


nga.mil
          An official website of the
            National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
          7500 GEOINT DriveSpringfield, VA 22150 About NGAAccessibility supportFOIA requestsNo FEAR Act dataOffice of the Inspector GeneralPerformance reportsPrivacy policyPrivacy program Looking for U.S. government information and services?
        Visit USA.govLast Site Build: 2024-05-06 07:07 UTC
The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, District Judge, United States 1

District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, adopting the

report and recommendation of the Honorable Celeste F. Bremer, Chief

Magistrate Judge, United States District Court for the Southern

District of Iowa.

____________

No. 95-3820

____________

Albert W. Ware, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa

Department of Corrections, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

____________

 Submitted: May 16, 1996

 Filed: July 10, 1996

____________ 

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Albert Wayne Ware, an inmate of the Union Correctional Institution

in Ralford, Florida, held under authority of the Iowa Department of

Corrections, appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States

District Court for the Southern District of Iowa denying his petition for 1

a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Ware v. Iowa Dept. of

Corrections, No. 4-93-70771 (S.D. Iowa Oct. 6, 1995) (order adopting report

and recommendation). For reversal, Ware argues the district court erred

in (1) denying his due process claim that the state had suppressed

exculpatory evidence; (2) denying his due process claim that the state had

knowingly offered perjured testimony; (3) denying his due process 
-2-

claim of bias by the trial judge; (4) holding that the trial court had not

erred in denying his motion for a continuance; (5) denying his ineffective

assistance of counsel claim; and (6) holding that he was procedurally

barred from challenging on federal habeas review an alleged ex post facto

violation by the Iowa Supreme Court, the admissibility of the testimony of

his alleged common-law wife at trial, and the denial of his motions for a

severed trial and a change of venue.

After careful review of the briefs of the parties and the record on

appeal, we conclude that the decision of the district court is correct and

that an extended opinion by this court would add nothing of substantial

value to the thorough opinions already written by the magistrate judge and

the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.