alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 639 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 639

To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age for receipt of 
military retired pay for nonregular service from 60 years of age to 55 
                             years of age.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2005

Mr. Corzine (for himself, Mr. Lautenberg, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
Reid, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, and 
  Mr. Dayton) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to reduce the age for receipt of 
military retired pay for nonregular service from 60 years of age to 55 
                             years of age.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN AGE FOR RECEIPT OF MILITARY RETIRED PAY FOR 
              NONREGULAR SERVICE.

    (a) Reduction in Age.--Section 12731(a)(1) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``at least 60 years of age'' and 
inserting ``at least 55 years of age''.
    (b) Application to Existing Provisions of Law or Policy.--With 
respect to any provision of law, or of any policy, regulation, or 
directive of the executive branch, that refers to a member or former 
member of the uniformed services as being eligible for, or entitled to, 
retired pay under chapter 1223 of title 10, United States Code, but for 
the fact that the member or former member is under 60 years of age, 
such provision shall be carried out with respect to that member or 
former member by substituting for the reference to being 60 years of 
age a reference to the age in effect for qualification for such retired 
pay under section 12731(a) of title 10, United States Code, as amended 
by subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the first day of the first month beginning on or after 
the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply to retired pay 
payable for that month and subsequent months.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jimmy SUOTH, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-71254.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2009.*

Filed May 26, 2009.

Kathleen S. Koh, Law Offices of Kathleen S. Koh, Alhambra, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jimmy Suoth, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992), and deny in part and grant in part the petition for review.

The agency denied Suoth’s asylum claim as time-barred. Suoth does not challenge this finding in his opening brief.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Suoth failed to establish past persecution by persons the Indonesian government was unable or unwilling to control. *See Castro-Perez v. Gonzales,*409 F.3d 1069, 1072 (9th Cir.2005).

The agency, however, failed to address Suoth’s contention that he established a clear probability of future persecution because he is a member of a disfavored group. *See Wakkary v. Holder,*558 F.3d 1049, 1068-69 (9th Cir.2009); *Sagaydak v. Gonzales,*405 F.3d 1035, 1040 (9th Cir.2005) (“the BIA [is] not free to ignore arguments raised by a petitioner.”). We therefore remand for the agency to address Suoth’s claim in the first instance. *See id.; see also INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam).

*627Suoth does not raise any challenge to the agency’s denial of CAT relief. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Shani L. Nielsen, Respondent, v 300 East 76th Street Partners, LLC, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 246]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered March 12, 2013, which, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion for summary judgment granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff was injured while working in a bar on premises leased from defendant. She testified that she was descending a ladder accessed through a hatch door behind the bar counter when she lost her balance, and when she reached up to grab the floor, the hatch door closed on her hand.

Defendant established prima facie that it was an out-of-possession landlord with no duty to perform non-structural repairs by submitting the lease *(see Devlin v Blaggards III Rest. Corp.,*80 AD3d 497 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*16 NY3d 713 [2011]). Further, defendant submitted its expert engineer’s findings that the wooden ladder was “firmly affixed and structur*415ally sound” and, “when fully open, . . . [was] held in the open position by gravity.”

It is undisputed that neither the ladder nor the hatch door violated any specific statutory provisions, and plaintiff submitted no evidence of another type of industry-wide standard applicable to this case *(see Hotaling v City of New York,*55 AD3d 396, 398 [1st Dept 2008], *affd*12 NY3d 862 [2009]). Thus, whether defendant had notice of a defective condition in either the ladder or the hatch door is immaterial *(see Devlin,*80 AD3d at 497-498).

Given the lease provisions, the evidence that there was an overlap in ownership between defendant and the bar’s corporate owner is insufficient to raise an issue of fact whether defendant was an out-of-possession landlord *(compare Brasby v Barra,*156 AD2d 530 [2d Dept 1989]). Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 D0 30 5 . MARQUI SE ALI ROBBI NS v . GREGORY C. DOZ I ER.

Aft er th e t ri al co u rt g ran t ed s u m m ary ju d g m en t t o t h e res po n den t , Pet i t i o n er M arq u i s e Ro b b i n s fi l ed a m ot i o n fo r reco n s i d e r at io n

. T h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e

m o ti o n o n J an u ary 9 , 2 0 2 0 , an d Ro b b i ns fi l ed th i s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew o n Feb ru ary 1 4 , 2 02 0

. W e l ack ju ri s d i c t i o n b ecau s e t h e ap p l i cat i o n i s

u n t i m el y

. Pret erm it t i n g wh et h er th e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er i s s u b ject t o ap p el l at e rev i ew, an ap p li cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f t h e en t ry o f t h e

o rd er o r ju d g m en t to b e ap p eal ed

. See OC G A § 5

- 6

- 3 5 (d ). Th e req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s d i ct i o n al , an d t hi s Co u rt can n o t accep t an ap pl i cat i o n fo r ap p eal n o t m ad e i n co m

p l i an ce t h erewi t h

. See Bo yl e v. S t at e , 1 9 0 Ga. Ap p

. 7 3 4 , 7 3 4 (3 8 0 SE2 d 5 7 ) (1 98 9 ). Here, Ro b b i n s fi l ed h i s ap p li cat i on 3 6 d ay s aft er t h e t ri al

co u rt ’ s o rd er was en t e red

. Hi s ap pl i cat i o n i s t h u s u n t i m el y , an d i t i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. March 06, 2020

03/06/2020
# Topographic Maps, Publications and Digital Products

          -  Home 
          -  Resources 
          -               Topographic Maps, Publications and Digital...            

The Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is the distributor of public sale NGA topographic maps, publications and digital products.

To order, contact:**USGS Branch of Information Services** Map and Book Sales Federal Center, Building 810 P.O. Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Phone: 888-ASK-USGS or 303-202-4700 Internet: http://www.usgs.gov **
EXHIBIT 10.2

                             SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT

SKRP 1, Inc.
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 310
Los Angeles, CA 90067

Attn: Glenn Krinsky, Chief Financial Officer

      Re: Prospectus, dated October __, 2004

Dear Mr. Krinsky:

The undersigned investor ("Investor") in this Subscription Agreement
("Agreement") hereby acknowledges receipt of the prospectus ("Prospectus"),
dated October __, 2004 of SRKP 1, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("SRKP"), and
subscribes for the following number of shares upon the terms and conditions set
forth in the Prospectus. The Investor agrees that this Agreement is subject to
availability and acceptance by SRKP.

The Investor hereby subscribes for ________________ shares of SRKP's common
stock ("Common Stock") at $0.17 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of
$____________. Enclosed is the Investor's check made payable to "City National
Bank/SRKP 1, Inc.'s Escrow Account" and has been forwarded to the escrow account
in the self-addressed stamped envelope that has been provided for convenience.
The Investor may also elect to submit his subscription funds to the escrow
account via wire transfer as provided in this Agreement.

The Investor hereby acknowledges that City National Bank is acting solely as
escrow holder in connection with the offering of Common Stock and makes no
recommendation with respect thereto. City National Bank has made no
investigation regarding the offering or any person or entity involved in the
offering.

              [Remainder of this page is left blank intentionally.]


<PAGE>

WIRING INSTRUCTIONS:                           ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

ABA # ______________________                   ---------------------------------
City National Bank                             Signature of Investor
A/C ________________________
f/f/c Trust account #  ___________             ---------------------------------
Account Name:  SRKP 1, Inc.                    Print Full Name
Attn:   ______________________
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Street Address

                                               ---------------------------------
                                               City, State, Zip

                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Area Code and Telephone Number

                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Social Security Number

                                               ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

                                               SRKP 1, Inc.

                                             By:
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Glenn Krinsky
| 1)     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2)     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
| Date: March 30, 2010 |                                                                                                                   |   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 | /s/ Jay Gottlieb                  |   |
|                 | Jay Gottlieb                                                                                                           |   |
|                 | Chairman of the Board, President, Secretary, Treasurerand Principal Executive Officer                                  |   |
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2021 ND 6 5

In the Interest of F.M.G.

Eduardo P. Yabut, MD, Petitioner and Appellee

v. F.M.G., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20210087

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mark T. Blumer , Judge.

AFFIRMED

.
Per Curiam

. Leo A. Ryan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted o n brief.

Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND

, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.1 Interest of F.M.G. No. 20210087

Per Curiam

. [¶1] F.M.G. appeals from the district court’s continuing treatment or der. F.M.G. argues the court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence that she is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1105 

BAYCHAR, INC. and BAYCHAR HOLDINGS LLC, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

SALOMON NORTH AMERICA, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

ON MOTION 

Before NEWMAN, RADER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

RADER, Circuit Judge. 

O R D E R

Salomon North America, Inc. moves to dismiss Baychar, Inc et al.’s (Baychar) 

appeal of the United States District Court for the District of Maine’s judgment in 

Baychar, Inc. v. Salomon North America, Inc., No. 04-CV-136 (Nov. 6, 2006), as 

untimely. Baychar has not responded. 

The district court’s docket sheet in reflects that judgment was entered on 

November 6, 2006. The docket sheet further reflects that Baychar filed its notice of 

appeal on December 11, 2006, 35 days after entry of judgment. On December 11, 

Baychar filed a motion in the district court requesting an extension of time to file its 

notice of appeal. The trial court denied that motion on January 2, 2007. We note that 

Baychar filed a renewed motion for an enlargement of time in the district court on 

January 29, 2007. 
A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after judgment is entered. See

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). An appeal not filed within that time must be dismissed. 

Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 61 (1982) (“It is well settled 

that the requirement of a timely notice of appeal is ‘mandatory and jurisdictional.’ ” 

(citation omitted)); Sofarelli Associates, Inc. v. United States, 716 F.2d 1395 (Fed. Cir. 

1983) (appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction where notice of appeal is 

untimely). Thus, the appeal is dismissed. 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 

 (1) The motion to dismiss is granted. 

 (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

 FOR THE COURT 

 March 1, 2007 /s/ Randall R. Rader 

 Date Randall R. Rader 

 Circuit Judge 

cc: John Kepler, III, Esq. 

James E. Hartley, Esq. 

s17 

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: _____________________________ 

2007-1105 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John B. Wood, Chief Executive Officer of Telos Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 20, 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer DrillingCompany, a Texas corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to my knowledge,that:

 

(1)           the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | November  5, 2004 |  /s/  Wm. Stacy Locke             |   |
|--------|-------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |              | Wm.  Stacy Locke                       |
|   |              | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group, Subcommittee J—Population and Patient-Oriented Training.                    

*Date:*                         June 17, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         7:45 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Alexandria Old Town, 1767 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ilda M. Mckenna, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Research Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8111, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-496-7481.                         *mckennai@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 11, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-11483 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P