alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-25 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
U.S. flag
        An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know **Official websites use .mil**
              A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization.
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
              A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.




Menu


close site.logo-mark-desc
 Home
          
        AboutAbout UsNGA LocationsHistoryMissionStrategyNGA KidsPolicies and ProgramsNext NGA WestNewsNewsContract Announcements2023 Industry Strategy Summit2023 DoDIIS Worldwide Conference2024 Esri Federal GIS Conference2024 GEO Resilience SummitCareersYour CareerHiring ProcessBenefits & PayStudent OpportunitiesSenior Executive PositionsMilitary Career OpportunitiesWork With UsIndustryAcademiaGovernmentInternationalWork With UsResourcesOffice of the Inspector GeneralProducts & ServicesMoonshot LabsPublic ReleaseContact Us Facilities Operating Status
          Employee Resources Search small
        Search Site


NOME


Home
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
						
							
							
							Resources
								
							
						
					
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				
				NOME


NOME is an NGA online capability where a community of screened users can edit existing content and contribute new features to maps throughout the world. The approach is called Volunteered Geographic Information and it vastly improves the quality of foundation map data ensuring that all users within the NOME community have immediate access to the latest content. Find out if you can join the NOME community! ​Contact the VGI Team at VGITeam@nga.mil​.





Home
              HomeAbout
							  About UsNGA LocationsHistoryMissionStrategyNGA KidsPolicies and ProgramsNext NGA WestNews
							  NewsContract Announcements2023 Industry Strategy Summit2023 DoDIIS Worldwide Conference2024 Esri Federal GIS Conference2024 GEO Resilience SummitCareers
							  Your CareerHiring ProcessBenefits & PayStudent OpportunitiesSenior Executive PositionsMilitary Career OpportunitiesWork With Us
							  IndustryAcademiaGovernmentInternationalWork With UsResources
							  Office of the Inspector GeneralProducts & ServicesMoonshot LabsPublic ReleaseContact Us
							  Contact Us
 Connect With Us


nga.mil
          An official website of the
            National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
          7500 GEOINT DriveSpringfield, VA 22150 About NGAAccessibility supportFOIA requestsNo FEAR Act dataOffice of the Inspector GeneralPerformance reportsPrivacy policyPrivacy program Looking for U.S. government information and services?
        Visit USA.govLast Site Build: 2024-04-19 07:09 UTC
TED SCHWZNDEN, in his Official Capacity as Governorof the State of Montana; ET,LEN FEAVER, Inher 0ffici.alCapaci.tyas Director of Revenue of the State of Montana; DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA; MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF COIJNTIICS;MONTANA LEA6UE OF CITIES AND TOWNS;URBAN COALITION; and MONTANA SCHOOL ROAKL7S ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs,

Prfendant.

ORDER

PER CURIAM: Daniels County, Enontam, hy and through its County Attorney, 

### has filed herei.n 

### a petition for interproktian air this Court's opi.n.iion in Schwinden v. Burl.ington Northern, Inca (Mont.. 19841, 691 P.2d 1.351, 41 S.t.Rep. 27.84,together with 

### a statement of facts in supportof itspetition, 

# -., ii IS ORDERED: 

### I. Counsel Eor the Department.of Revenue of the State 

### of Montana and counsel for Burlington Northern, Inc., are granted thirty days 

### from the date hereof in which to prepare, fi.le and serve wri.ttenre~po~~ses to the petitken for interpretati.nr fil.ed by L?aiiiels C:nunty, Montana, together 

### with appropriate leya3.oiemoranila in support thereof.3. Tlrc Clerk is dil-rcted to mail 

### a true copy hereof to 

### the Daniels Cnunky Attorney, counsel for the Department of
s- and to counsel Fnr Burlington Northern, Tnc, DATED this 7th day of November, 1986. For the Couri

## ,
EXHIBIT 23
                  
                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference in the Registration
Statement  of  Sportmart,  Inc. on Form S-8 (reference # 333-16389) of
our  report  dated  March 28, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated
financial  statements of Sportmart, Inc. And Subsidiary as of February
2,  1997  and January 28, 1996, and for each of the three fiscal years
in  the  period  ended  February  2,  1997, as included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
     

                              COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Chicago, Illinois
May 2, 1997 
<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of Ignacio Reynoso, Appellant, v George B. Alexander, as Chair of the Division of Parole, Respondent.

Decided January 12, 2010

Reported below, 65 AD3d 1405.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right from the unanimous order of the Appellate Division absent the direct involvement of a substantial constitutional question (CPLR 5601). CPLR 5515 does not provide a jurisdictional basis to appeal as of right. Additionally, contrary to appellant’s assertion, the Court of Appeals did not grant him leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals.
Amendment to employment agreement with Dr. Brown



 Exhibit 10.34 
  
 

 
  
 STRICTLY PRIVATE &
CONFIDENTIAL 
  
 9 June 2003 
  
  
 Scott Brown

 Director, Research & Technology 
 CDT 
  
 Dear Scott, 
  
 I write to confirm that your notice period will be increased to 12 months’. Your employment therefore may be terminated by 12
months’ notice in writing by either side. We reserve the right to pay salary in lieu of notice. 
  
 These changes to your contract of employment will be effective from 9 June 203. 
  
 All other terms and conditions remain unchanged by this amendment to your notice period. 
  
 I would be grateful if you could sign the attached copy of this letter as confirmation of your acceptance of this change to your terms and
conditions of employment. 
  
 Yours sincerely, 
  
 /s/    David
Fyfe             
 David Fyfe 
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
  
 I accept the
change to my terms and conditions of employment with CDT Ltd, as detailed above. 
  

									
	Signed	  	 /s/ Scott Brown

	  	Date	  	 20 October 2003

	  	 
	 	  	 Scott Brown
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                     |  |                                                         |  |                             
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                     |  | SOUTHWEST BANK, TRUSTEE FOR PERMIAN
BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
|                     |  |                                                        
|Date: August 9, 2017 |  | By:                                                     |  | /s/ RON E. HOOPER           
|                     |  |                                                         |  | Ron E. Hooper,              
|                     |  |                                                         |  | SVP Royalty Trust Management
|                     |  |                                                         |  | Southwest Bank              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Permian Basin Royalty Trust and
will be retained by Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### RENZHANG LIU, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73442.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*613Submitted May 12, 2009.*

Filed May 22, 2009.

Renzhang Liu, Alhambra, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, David B. Edwards, Esquire, FDIC-Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Dallas, TX, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Theodore Charles Hirt, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Renzhang Liu, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review.

The agency determined that Liu’s failure to submit his fingerprints was a sufficient reason to deny his application for relief. The agency, however, did not have the benefit of our intervening decision in *Cui v. Mukasey,*538 F.3d 1289, 1292-95 (9th Cir.2008) (holding IJ’s denial of petitioner’s request for a continuance constituted an abuse of discretion where law governing fingerprint requirement was unclear and uncertain, and IJ did not warn petitioner that failure to submit new fingerprints in advance of merits hearing could result in pretermission of her claims); *see also Karapetyan v. Mukasey,*543 F.3d 1118, 1129-32 (9th Cir.2008) (reaching same result as in *Cui).*We therefore grant the petition for review and remand for the BIA to reconsider Liu’s appeal. *See Cui,*538 F.3d at 1292-95.

In light of our disposition, we need not address Liu’s due process contention.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: 

We consent to incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 33-79622, 333-17521, 333-94269, 333-124821, 333-126817 and 333-126823) on Forms S-8 and (Nos. 333-41758, 333-106770, 333-108612, 333-117219, 333-127756 and 333-131273) on Forms S-3 of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of ourreports dated February 28, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity(deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

Salt Lake City, Utah 

February 28, 2006
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TAREZ ASQUITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1959

[April 20, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Robert L. Pegg, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2019CF002533A.

Robert David Malove of The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 31
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




---



##### 



Date: August 11, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Lee Ann AndersonLee Ann AndersonVice President and Senior Trust
Officer, Compass Bank
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of REGENT  TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on  Form  10-Q  for  the period  ended March 31, 2011  as  filed with
the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the  date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned  does hereby  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   May 11, 2011

/s/ David A. Nelson
--------------------------------------------------------
David A. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
CERTIFICATION
OF OFFICERS


PURSUANT
TO 18 USC & 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY


ACT
OF 2002





I hereby
certify that the accompanying report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2008, and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
“Report”) by our Company fully complies with the requirements of that
section.





I further
certify that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
company.





March 30,
2009





/s/ James
Moses


James
Moses, President





/s/ James
Moses


James
Moses, Interim Chief Financial Officer





_________________________________________
#### Turning Point Indus. v. Global Fum., Inc.

Case below: 183 N.C. App.-(1 May 2007)

No. 263P07

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-1154)

Denied 08/23/07
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00355

- CR

Rhonda Lorene Ladon

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the Criminal District Court No. 3

o f Tarrant County (1374235D )

December 4, 2014

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the re cord on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dism issed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
Exhibit
13.1








Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the annual report on
Form 20-F of Capital Product Partners L.P., a master limited partnership
organized under the laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands (the
“Company”), for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
February 4, 2010








By:           /s/ Ioannis E.
Lazaridis


Name:      Ioannis
E. Lazaridis


Title:        Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Writ of Prohibition Dismissed as Moot, 

Motion to Stay Denied as Moot, and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 25, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00711-CR

NO. 14-14-00712-CR

IN RE KHAI LE, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND WRIT OF PROHIBITION

County Criminal Court at Law No. 13

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1881713

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 3, 2014, relator Khai Le filed a petition for writ of mandamus 

and writ of prohibition in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator seeks relief by a writ of mandamus to compel 

the Honorable Don Smyth, presiding judge of the County Criminal Court at Law 
2

Number 13 of Harris County, to vacate a directive issued by the Harris County 

District Clerk purportedly recalling the entry of an order dismissing the underlying 

proceedings. Relator further seeks relief by a writ of prohibition to prevent Judge 

Smyth from taking any additional actions in the underlying proceedings. Also on 

September 3, 2014, relator filed a motion to stay the underlying proceedings, 

pending the disposition of her petition by this court.

On September 9, 2014, Judge Smyth signed an order withdrawing the 

challenged directive. In that order, Judge Smyth further stated that all pleadings 

and actions taken in the underlying proceedings following the trial court’s order 

dated February 18, 2014 dismissing the case are void for want of jurisdiction.

Judge Smyth’s September 9 order renders moot relator’s request for mandamus 

and prohibition relief in this court.

Accordingly, we dismiss as moot relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

writ of prohibition. We further deny as moot relator’s motion to stay the 

underlying proceedings. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Donovan.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 09 -0 00 04 -C V

______________________________ TRACY BIRCHER, Appellant

V. MANAGEMEN T TRAI

NI NG CORPORATI ON, A C ORPOR

AT I ON , M S. F LAN

NA GA N, PAR OLE O F F I CER , MR. TI MOTHY SCHOMP, PAROL E HEARI NG OF FI CER, AND DR. J OHNSON, DENTI ST, Appellees
On Appea l from the 4th Judicial District Court

Rusk County , Texas Trial Court No. 2008-293

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by J ustice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON Th is i s an a

pp e a l f ile d p ro se by

Tr a cy Birc he r f

ro m th e tr ia l c ourt ' s o rd e r d ism iss inghis
causeof ac tion ag ainst defe ndant Mana g ement Tra ining Corpor ation. Th e or de r e nte re d in

thi s a pp e a l, h ow e ve r, do e s n ot dis po se of de fe nd ants Ms. Rachel F lannag an, Mr. Timothy Schomp, or Dr. Johnson. The g ener al rule is that a f inal and appealable judgme nt must determine the entire controve rsy , disposing of all the par ties and issues in a ca se. N. E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v . Aldridge , 400 S.W. 2d 89 3, 89 5 ( Te x. 19 66 ); W agner v. W

arnasch , 156 Tex. 334, 295 S.W.2d 890, 892 (1956). Be cause the trial cour

t's order dismissing this suit did not dispose of all def endants, it is not fi n al , an d th i s i s ani nt er l o cut o ry

ap p ea l fr o ma n o n ap p ea l ab l e j u d gm en t . Ac co rd i n gl y , Bi rc h er 's appea l is dism issed for wa nt of jurisdiction.

Ba iley C. Moseley J ustice Date Submitted: J anuar y 22, 2009 Date D ecide d: J anuar y 23, 2009