alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 30, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2278

Lower Tribunal No. F89-47305B

________________

George Calvin Delancy,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge.

Ana M. Davide, P.A., and Ana M. Davide, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, SCALES and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Carter v. State, 786 So. 2d 1173, 1181 (Fla. 2001) (“[A] 

sentence is ‘illegal’ if it ‘imposes a kind of punishment that no judge under 

the entire body of sentencing statutes could possibly inflict under any set of 

factual circumstances.’” (quoting Blakley v. State, 746 So. 2d 1182, 1187 

(Fla. 4th DCA 1999))); Taylor v. State, 573 So. 2d 173, 174 (Fla. 5th DCA 

1991) (“Pursuant to section 784.07, Florida Statutes (1988 Supp.), the 

attempted murder of a law enforcement official is a life felony, punishable as 

provided in section 775.0825 of the Florida Statutes (1987). Section 

775.0825 exempts convictions for the attempted murder of a law 

enforcement officer from the sentencing guidelines and imposes a 

mandatory minimum sentence of twenty-five years.”); Newton v. State, 603 

So. 2d 558, 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (upholding a life sentence with a 

minimum mandatory twenty-five-year sentence for the attempted murder of 

a law enforcement officer).
EXHIBIT 11.1

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(Thousands except                                  Three Months                       Six  Months
per share amounts)                                Ended June 30,                     Ended June 30,
                                                1997           1996                1997           1996
                                                ----           ----                ----           ----
<S>                                              <C>             <C>                <C>             <C>   
PRIMARY

     Average shares outstanding                  12,719          12,874             12,835          12,843

     Net effect of dilutive stock
       options--based on the
       treasury stock method
       using average market price                   413             557                404             515
                                                 ------        --------             ------        --------

                         TOTAL                   13,132          13,431             13,239          13,358
                                                 ======          ======             ======          ======

Net Income                                       $3,424          $2,784             $6,094          $5,683
                                                 ======          ======             ======          ======

Per share amount                                   $.26            $.21               $.46            $.43
                                                   ====            ====               ====            ====

FULLY DILUTED

     Average shares outstanding                  12,719          12,874             12,835          12,843

     Net effect of dilutive stock
      options--based on the treasury 
      stock method using the quarter-
      end market price, if higher than
       the average market price                     742             609                742             609
                                                -------        --------             ------        --------

                         TOTAL                   13,461          13,483             13,577          13,452
                                                 ======          ======             ======          ======

Net income                                       $3,424          $2,784             $6,094          $5,683
                                                 ======          ======             ======          ======

Per share amount                                   $.25            $.21               $.45            $.42
                                                   ====            ====               ====            ====
</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Residential Funding Company, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QS6 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the Series Supplement, dated as of April 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company, LLC, as master servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report
on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00322

- CR

IN RE Erica Dawn HAYWOOD
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 13, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND MOTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF ARE DENIED
On May 24, 2012, Relator Erica Dawn Haywood filed a petition for writ of mandamus
and motion for emergency relief, complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on various pro se
motions. However, counsel has been appointed to represent Relator in the criminal proceeding
pending in the trial court for which she is curren tly confined. A criminal defendant is not
entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App.

2007); Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal
duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the
defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson , 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011CR4672 , styled State of Texas v. Erica Dawn Haywood , pending in the 399th Judicial District Court
, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez

- Gardner presiding.04

- 12

- 00322

- CR

- 2

- court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on Relator’s pro se motions filed in the
criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus
and motion for emergency relief are denied. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8( a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
**EXHIBIT 18**
May 10, 2004
Sears, Roebuck and Co.3333 Beverly RoadHoffman Estates, IL 60179
Dear Sirs/Madams:
At your request, we have read the description included in your Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter endedApril 3, 2004, of the facts relating to your changes in accounting principlesfor determining the market-related value of plan assets and for recognizinggains and losses for your domestic pension and other postretirement benefitplans. We believe, on the basis of the facts so set forth and otherinformation furnished to us by appropriate officials of the Company, that theaccounting changes described in your Form 10-Q are to alternative accountingprinciples that are preferable under the circumstances.
We have not audited any consolidated financial statements of Sears, Roebuck andCo. and its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for any periodsubsequent to January 3, 2004. Therefore, we are unable to express, and we donot express, an opinion on the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form10-Q, on the related information furnished to us by officials of the Company,or on the financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of Sears,Roebuck and Co. and its consolidated subsidiaries as of any date or for anyperiod subsequent to January 3, 2004.
Yours truly,
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPDeloitte & Touche LLPChicago, Illinois
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank LaPetina, Appellant.

Submitted October 19, 2009;

decided November 24, 2009

Reported below, 34 AD3d 836.

*856Motion for reargument dismissed as untimely *(see*Rules of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.24 [bj) *[see*9 NY3d 854 (2009)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of SURFACE COATINGS, INC. on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ RICHARD PIETRYKOWSKI

Richard Pietrykowski CEO

Dated: March 2, 2010



/s/ RICHARD PIETRYKOWSKI

Richard Pietrykowski

CFO

Dated: March 2, 2010




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 75 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 75

 To permanently increase the maximum annual contribution allowed to be 
             made to Coverdell education savings accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

 Ms. Cantwell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To permanently increase the maximum annual contribution allowed to be 
             made to Coverdell education savings accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Education Savings for Students 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM ANNUAL CONTRIBUTION FOR COVERDELL EDUCATION 
              SAVINGS ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 530(b)(1)(A)(iii) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (defining Coverdell education savings account) is amended 
by striking ``$2,000'' and inserting ``$5,000''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 4973(e)(1)(A) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``$2,000'' and inserting 
``$5,000''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 We have issued our reports dated May 25, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Uroplasty, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Uroplasty, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-137410 and 333-137409 effective September 18, 2006 and File No. 333-107110 effective July 17, 2003) and on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-137128 effective September 6, 2006, File No. 333-128313 effective December 5, 2006, File No. 333-149141 effective February 11, 2008 and File No. 333-167274 effective June 3, 2010).
 
 
 /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
 
 Minneapolis, Minnesota
 May 25, 2011
Certifications

      I, Susan Mills, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to  be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-WFHE2 (the "Exchange Act periodic
reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,
do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to  make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
on Form 10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Date: March 28, 2008

/s/ Susan Mills
----------------------
Susan Mills
Vice President
(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the Depositor)
/**
 * @file
 * Javascript for the basic cards component.
 * Gives external links the ext class and aria-label despite having an image.
 */

(function ($, Drupal, window, document, cookies) {
  Drupal.behaviors.addCardLinkExternalLinkAttributes = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {

      //NIH External Links module gives external links rel="nofollow"
      $(".component_link_card a").filter("[rel*='nofollow']").each(function() {

        var aria_label_text = "External Link";
        var external_link_class = "ext";

        // Link cards with images need these attributes
        $(this).attr('aria-label', aria_label_text);
        $(this).addClass(external_link_class);

      });
    }
  };
})(jQuery, Drupal, this, this.document, window.Cookies);
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         513,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,721,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                   564,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,609,866
<PP&E>                                         855,687
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,500,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,192,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,683,904
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,420
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,179,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,192,417
<SALES>                                     66,506,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,506,044
<CGS>                                       49,238,483
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               49,238,483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,955,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,749
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,292,850
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (430,717)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,723,567
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,723,567
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.28


</TABLE>
#### Diane R. PURSER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WEINSTOCK & SCAVO, P.C., Louis R. Cohan, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 09-10635

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 27, 2009.

Robert Allen Kaiden, Cristina Isabel Kaiden, Kaiden *&*Kaiden, LLC, Smyrna, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Michael Weinstock, Matthew Robert Ro-senkoff, Weinstock & Scavo, P.C., Atlanta, GA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated in the district court’s dispositive order of January 8, 2009, we agree that appellant failed to state a claim for relief under the Fair Debt Collection Act. Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision *903not to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction and to dismiss appellant’s state law claims without prejudice.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit (11)

                    HILCOAST DEVELOPMENT CORP.

      Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Earnings
          (dollars in thousands, except par share value)



                                       Year Ended July 31,
                                ---------------------------------
                                   1996        1995        1994
                                ---------   ---------   ---------

Primary and Fully Diluted:

  Net income (loss) available
    to common stockholders        ($438)       $272       ($211)
                                   ====        ====        ====


  Weighted average common
    shares outstanding          2,362,320   2,362,127   2,352,320

  Common stock equivalents -
    stock options                    -        144,435        -
                                ---------   ---------   ---------
         Totals                 2,362,320   2,506,562   2,352,320
                                =========   =========   =========



  Net income (loss) per share     ($.19)       $.11       ($.09)
                                   ====        ====        ====
/**
 * @file
 * A JavaScript file for the section menu component.
 */
(function ($, Drupal, window, document, undefined) {
  Drupal.behaviors.subnav = {
    attach: function (context) {

      $('#component-submenu-toggle').on('click', function(e) {

        $('.component-section-menu').toggleClass('subnav-open');
        $('.subnav-inner-text span').toggle();

        e.preventDefault();
        return false;
      });
    }
  };

})(jQuery, Drupal, this, this.document);
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00412-CV

John Moya, and/or All Occupants of 1385 Pine Forest Crl, Round Rock, Texas 78665,

Appellants

v.

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 11-0563-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants’ brief was due on October 3, 2011. On November 14, 2011, this Court

notified appellants that their brief was overdue and that a failure to respond by November 28, 2011,

would result in the dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellants have not

filed a brief or a motion for extension of time. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of

prosecution.

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Henson, and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 2, 2012
#### Mitchell *v.*The State.

There was no abuse of discretion in denying a new trial on any or all of the grounds embraced in the motion.

June 4, 1894.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge GRices (motion for new trial before Judge Hansell). Berrien superior court. March term, 1894.

C. M. Hitch and J. A. Wilkes, for plaintiff in error.

J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and H. B. Peeples, solicitor-general, by Harrison & Peeples, *contra.*

*Judgment affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of DC Brands International, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Pearce,   Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard PearceChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)March 31, 2011
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    
    DECEMBER 1, 2005
 NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED
 
 CANADA
    
    000-30758
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
 
 NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:
    /s/  William J. DonovanWilliam J. DonovanSenior Vice-President, Human ResourcesBy:
    /s/  Anna VentrescaAnna VentrescaAssistant Secretary