alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Phillis Lu Simpson, Esq., Appellant, v The Village Voice, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[870 NYS2d 302]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered August 16, 2007, which granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As to the city defendants, the complaint failed to meet the pleading requirements in CPLR 3016 (a), and further failed to allege the time and manner of and persons to whom the publication was made *(Seltzer v Fields,*20 AD2d 60, 64 [1963], 14 NY2d 624 [1964]). In any event, any statements allegedly made by those defendants were protected by qualified privilege, and plaintiff failed to defeat that defense by alleging malice *(see Foster v Churchill,*87 NY2d 744, 751-752 [1996]).

As to the Village Voice defendants, the allegedly defamatory statements were either privileged under Civil Rights Law § 74 *(see Freeze Right Refrig. & A.C. Servs. v City of New York,*101 AD2d 175 [1984]) or truthful *(Silverman v Clark,*35 AD3d 1, 12-13 [2006]), or constituted pure opinion *(Mercado v Shustek,*309 AD2d 646 [2003]; *see Gross v New York Times Co.,*82 NY2d 146 [1993]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ. *[See*2007 NY Slip Op 32532(U).]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,221
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,094
<PP&E>                                         219,970
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,611
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,342
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           326
<OTHER-SE>                                    (80,943)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,611
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,454
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,155
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (326)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,163
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,818
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (376)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

I, David A. Rane, Chief Financial Officer of World Waste Technologies, Inc.
certifies that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of World Waste Technologies,
Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

            (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

            (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005                   /s/ David A. Rane
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name: David A. Rane
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00052-CV

Jimmy Justin

v.

Valley Grande Institute for Academic Studies

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 6 of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CL-17-3051-F

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 29, 2021
Christopher M. Condron
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           AXA Financial, Inc.
                                           1290 Avenue of the Americas
                                           New York, NY 10104


                                                              September 27, 2004


Mr. Stanley B. Tulin

RE:      AXA'S PERFORMANCE UNIT PLAN

Dear Stan:

       This is to confirm that, notwithstanding the terms of AXA's Performance
Unit Plan for 2004 and any subsequent years' performance unit or other long-term
incentive global equity plan established by AXA (collectively, the "Plan"), upon
your retirement (whether on or after the normal or any early retirement date)
from AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company ("AXA Equitable") under The Retirement
Plan for Employees, Managers and Agents, or any successor plan in which you are
then participating, AXA Equitable hereby agrees that you will be entitled to
cash payments (net of any applicable tax withholding) equal to the cash payments
you would have received under the Plan with respect to any performance or other
equity units initially granted to you that are forfeited under the Plan as a
result of such retirement.

       Such cash payments (1) shall be made at the time and in the amount that
the cash payments with respect to any such forfeited performance or other equity
units would have otherwise been made if you had continued in the employ of AXA
Equitable until the end of the relevant vesting period for any such performance
or other equity units and (2) shall not be considered compensation or salary for
purposes of any of the benefit plans of AXA Equitable and its affiliates.

                                                    Very truly yours,

                                                    /s/ Christopher M. Condron
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Christopher M. Condron

<PAGE>

Acknowledged, Accepted and Agreed
to this 27 day of September, 2004

By:  /s/ Stanley B. Tulin
     ---------------------------
         Stanley B. Tulin
EXHIBIT 32.2

Officers Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation, (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Lorne E. Phillips, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report is in full compliance with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 5, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Lorne E. Phillips                               
|                      |  |  |  | Lorne E. Phillips                                   
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EX-34.12
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 1500
191 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30303-1943
USA

Tel: +1 404 220 1500
www.deloitte.com


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors of
LNR Partners Inc.
Miami Beach, Florida

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB
Servicing Criteria, that LNR Partners Inc. (the "Company") complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities
transactions for which the Asserting Party served as special servicer, that
were completed on or after January 1, 2006, and that were registered with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria
229.1122(d)(1)(iii), (3)(i)(C), (3)(i)(D), (3)(ii), (3)(iii), (3)(iv), (4)(v),
(4)(ix), (4)(x), (4)(xi), (4)(xii), (4)(xiii) and (4)(xv), which management
has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company
with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were
limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have
included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included
in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period
specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 for the commercial mortgage-backed securities Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
February 22, 2008


Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
#### Marshall *v.*The State.

1. There was no error in overruling the motion for a continuance on the ground that one of the movant’s counsel was sick, the movant being represented by four others, and it not appearing that the one indisposed was his leading counsel.

2. In order to prove that cotton baskets found at the scene of the burglary, some of which the accused admitted belonged to him, were similar to other baskets found on the premises of the accused which he also admitted were his, it was not necessary to produce any of the baskets to the jury and submit them to their inspection.

3. In so far as the requests to charge the jury were pertinent and legal, the substance of them was embraced in the general charge.

*4.*Although the lower story of a gin-house may be open and accessible to all comers, yet if cotton be stored in the upper stories and they are closed so as to exclude entrance otherwise than through a hole necessary for a band to occupy in working the machinery, and this hole is neither intended nor used for ingress or egress and is inaccessible save by climbing to it in an unusual and intrusive manner, entrance through it by pushing aside the band to make room for the body may be a burglarious-entry, without any breaking except that involved in this proceeding.

-5. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no error in denying a new trial.

April 16, 1894.

Indictment for burglary. Before Judge Fish. Sumter superior court. November term, 1898.

Fort & Watson and Wallis & Winchester, for plaintiff in error. J. M. DuPree, solicitor-general, by L. J, Blalock, *contra.*

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### In the Matter of Claude Nelson Stuart, a Suspended Attorney.

Decided June 24, 2010

*736Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
Exhibit 32.01




Section 1350 Certification




In connection with this report of Systematic Momentum FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  March 19, 2012











By  /s/ Justin C. Ferri


Justin C. Ferri


Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager


(Principal Executive Officer)
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 0405

_____________________________
J OSE N. V AZQUEZ F IGUEROA , Appellant,

v.

H ON

. D ANIEL D. R AULERSON , in his Capacity as a Candidate ; C RAIG L ATIMER , in his Official Capacity as Supervisor of Elections of Hillsborough County, Florida; K RISTY R EID B RONSON , in her Official Capacity as Chief of Bureau of Election Records, Division of Elections, State of Florida ; and K EN D ETZNER , in his Official Capacity a s Secretary of Fl orida Department of State
, Appellee s

.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Charles W. Dodson , Judge

. July 9, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See McPherson v. Flynn , 39 7 So. 2d 665, 667

- 68 (Fla. 1981) (holding cour ts have no jurisdiction after an election to determine an ind ividual’s right to hold office); Norman v.2 Ambler , 46 So. 3d 178, 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (holding that circuit court was without power to entertain defeated candidate’s challenge to primary oppo nent’s qualification for state senate based on alleged inaccuracies in financial disclosure forms because primary had already occurred).

L EWIS , K ELSEY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and

a uthorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jose N. Vazquez Figueroa, pro se
, Appellant.

Emmett Mitchell, IV, Roger N. Beaubien, and Richard E. Coates, Coates Law Firm, PL, Tallahassee, for Appellee Daniel D. Rau lerson; David A. Fugett, General Counsel
, and Jesse Dyer, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of State, Tallahassee, for Appellees Ken Detzner and Kristy Reid Willis f/k/a Kristy Reid Bronson ; Mary Helen Farris, General Counsel
, and Robert E. Bra zel, Chief Assistant County Attorney, Office of the County Attorney, Tampa, for Appellee Craig Latimer.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                        1,876,806
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        21,605,442
<DEPRECIATION>                10,842,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                12,753,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         522,067
<BONDS>                       9,859,357
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    2,372,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  12,753,455
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              2,448,596
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 1,107,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              715,056
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            631,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (5,545)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.69)
        

</TABLE>
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
    2007-2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as Servicer, LaSalle Bank,
    National Association, as Custodian, Newport Management Corporation, as
    Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC, U.S. Bank National Association,
    as Custodian, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee and Paying Agent and
    Westlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan
    Services LLC.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    E. Todd Whittemore

    Executive Vice President
    (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan
    Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)

   Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Kenneth Wayne Cook, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00005

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR13

- 029 ).

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Jus tice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Ken neth Wayne Cook, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 3, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk