alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Gold
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Drury J.
Gallagher, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


 Dated: August 14, 2006


                                                   By: /s/ Drury J. Gallagher
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Drury J. Gallagher
                                                       Chairman, Chief Executive
                                                       Officer and Treasurer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grey Wolf, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 (the "Report"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Thomas
P. Richards, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Thomas P. Richards
-----------------------------------------------
Thomas P. Richards
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 13, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11760]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. Copies of the agreement are 
available through the Commission's Web site (http://www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f1b1d0e0b0a0e010e03161c061c2f09020c41080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bacec8dbdedfdbd4dbd6c3c9d3c9fadcd7d994ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201201.
    Title: Port of Seattle/Terminal Operator Agreement.
    Parties: Port of Seattle; Eagle Marine Services, Ltd; SSA Terminals 
LLC; SSA Terminals (Seattle), LLC; and Total Terminals International, 
LLC.
    Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.; Sher & Blackwell LLP; 1850 M 
Street, NW.; Suite 900; Washington, DC 20036; C. Jonathan Benner; Esq.; 
Troutman Sanders LLP; 401 9th Street, NW.; Suite 1000; Washington, DC 
20004.
    Synopsis: The agreement would authorize the parties to discuss, 
exchange information, and reach agreement regarding various matters 
pertaining to operations at the Port of Seattle.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: May 15, 2009.
Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11760 Filed 5-19-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,965
<SECURITIES>                                    14,109
<RECEIVABLES>                                      649
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         312,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        219,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   318,694
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,764
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,849
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,073
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,193
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,193
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,193
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Vertex Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Benjamin P. Cowart, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








March 31, 2011

/s/ Benjamin P. CowartBenjamin P. CowartChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel Fernando MONARREZ-LOZANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50842

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 2006.

*586Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Luis E. Islas, El Paso, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Miguel Fernando Monarrez-Lozano (Monarrez) appeals his most recent sentence following his jury-trial convictions for conspiracy to import cocaine, importation of cocaine, conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. He argues that, under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), his Sixth Amendment rights were violated when the district court sentenced him based on 3.9 kilograms of cocaine. He avers that the amount of drugs should have been limited to the amount found by the jury, i.e., 500 grams or more of cocaine. Following *Booker,*this court still reviews the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo and reviews factual findings for clear error. *See United States v. Villegas,*404 F.3d 355, 359 (5th Cir. 2005); *United States v. Villanueva,*408 F.3d 193, 203 *&*n. 9 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 268, 163 L.Ed.2d 241 (2005).

Monarrez’s argument is untenable. *Post-Booker*“[t]he sentencing judge is entitled to find by a preponderance of the evidence all the facts relevant to the determination of a Guideline sentencing range and all facts relevant to the determination of a non-Guidelines sentence.” *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 43,163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005).

Moreover, the parties stipulated that the amount of drugs involved was 3.9 kilograms of cocaine. That stipulated amount was recited in the presentence report. Monarrez does not dispute that he entered into the stipulation. Given that the amount was stipulated to and because Monarrez offered no evidence to rebut the presentence report’s reliance on that amount in calculating his offense level, the district court did not clearly err in its finding of the drug quantity. *See United States v. Caldwell,*448 F.3d 287, 291 n. 1 (5th Cir.2006); *see also United States v. Holmes,*406 F.3d 337, 364 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 375, 163 L.Ed.2d 163 (2005). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
consolidated balance sheets and statemens of income for Telos Corporation and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                             141,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,450,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       780,000
<INVENTORY>                                     10,024,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,673,000
<PP&E>                                          38,738,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,592,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,548,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,144,000
<BONDS>                                         40,761,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           38,297,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            79,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (39,986,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,548,000
<SALES>                                         34,346,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,503,000
<CGS>                                           32,235,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,115,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,316,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (217,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (811,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,028,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,028,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Anthony M. Grandinette, on Behalf of Jose Holguin, Petitioner, v. Michael J. Sposato et al., Respondents.

[972 NYS2d 525]

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Nassau County indictment No. 1425N-13.

Adjudged that the writ is sustained, without costs or disbursements, and bail on Nassau County indictment No. 1425N-13 is reduced to the sum of $1,500, which may be posted in the form of an insurance company bail bond in that sum or by depositing that sum as a cash bail alternative; and it is further,

Ordered that upon receipt of a copy of this decision, order and judgment together with proof that the defendant has given an insurance company bail bond in the amount of $1,500 or has deposited that sum as a cash bail alternative, the Warden of the facility at which the defendant is incarcerated, or his or her agent, is directed to immediately release the defendant. Rivera, J.E, Skelos, Chambers and Hall, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Raymond B. Grimm, Respondent.

Submitted June 14, 2010;

decided June 24, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Jan Perlin, Esq., PO Box 134, Oak Hill, New York 12460 assigned as counsel to the respondent on the appeal herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS OF
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST AS OF JUNE 30, 1998, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME AND CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS FOR THE SIX-MONTH
PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        $271,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              $271,758
<PP&E>                                     $10,975,216
<DEPRECIATION>                              $7,563,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              $3,683,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         $271,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  $3,411,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                $3,683,129
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            $6,870,453
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $273,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $6,597,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         $6,597,451
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                $6,597,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99(a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Alan J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the
Company), has executed this certification in connection with the filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2003 (the Report).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of
the 8th day of May, 2003.

|                                                                                                         |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Alan J. Lacy

Alan J. Lacy
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sears, Roebuck and Co. and will be retained by Sears, Roebuck and
Co. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### In the Matter of David Sweedler et al., Appellants, v DSJS, Inc., Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 247]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered April 23, 2013, which, inter alia, denied the petition to permanently stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioners failed to raise an issue of fact to justify a stay of the arbitration provided for in the parties’ Commission Agreement *(see Matter of Commercial Union Ins. Cos. [Pouncy],*120 AD2d 382 [1st Dept 1986]). Indeed, the petition is predicated solely on the fact that petitioners are not signatories to the agreement. By its own terms, the agreement is binding upon the signatory, Windpost Apparel Group, LLC “and all of its parents, subsidiaries, affiliates and divisions.” The evidence of petitioners’ relationship with Windpost supports the determination dismissing the petition. Concur — Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 571 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 571

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Congresswoman 
              Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONGRESSWOMAN SHIRLEY A. CHISHOLM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Congresswoman Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
Congresswoman Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building.

            Passed the Senate June 29, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 571

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Congresswoman 
              Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building''.
```
#### Hicks *v.*Otto and others.

*(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.*

July 25, 1883.)

Patents for Inventions—Amendments.

' Motion for an amendment to answer, and commission to take testimony in a foreign country to prove wlio is the original inventor of a patent, will not be allowed wlien the affidavits filed by plaintiff show that there is no evidence to sustain the amendment.

In Equity.

*Von Briesen & Steele,*for defendants.

*Frost & Coe,*for orator.

Wheeler, J.

The motion of defendants, now heard, for an amendment of the answer, and a commission to take the testimony of Den-ton, in London, to show that he, and not Peroni, is the original inventor of improvements in thermometers, patented to the orator as assignee of Peroni, must he denied. While such motions are granted with liberality, some prospect is required that there is evidence to support the amendment which can be had. Here, the affidavit of Denton, filed by the orator in opposition to the motion, stating that he does not claim to be and is not, and that Peroni is, the original inventor, and his refusal to make an affidavit for the defendants to the contrary, on their application, show that there is no such prospect. Motion denied.
#### Marc S. Kirschner, as Trustee of the Refco Litigation Trust, Appellant, v KPMG LLP et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Decided January 19, 2010

Certification of questions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.27), accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument *[see*590 F3d 186 (2009)].

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO FURNISHED PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. § 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MoSys, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Leonard Perham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
James W. Sullivan, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ LEONARD PERHAM Leonard Perham President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 13, 2009/s/ JAMES W. SULLIVAN James W. Sullivan Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 13, 2009


This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks