alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                                      [LOGO]
                                     MISSION
                                    RESOURCES

Wednesday, January 30, 2002

Kent Rogers
Vice President - Houston Operations
Torch Energy Services
1221 Lamar Street, Suite 1600
Houston, TX 77010-3030

Kent:

Pursuant to paragraph 1 in our Restated and Amended Field Operating Services
Agreement, that was executed by you, on behalf of Torch Energy Services, Inc.
(TES) and Joe Nicknish, on behalf of Mission Resources Corporation (MSSN)
effective July 1, 2001, this letter will serve as formal 120 days notice of our
intent to terminate the agreement.

MSSN has enjoyed our relationship and appreciates the commitment that TES has
demonstrated over the last several months. We expect that same level of
commitment to continue through the termination date of our contract which is
06/30/2002.

As our termination date approaches, MSSN will evaluate operational needs and
respond accordingly.

Should you have any questions, please advise.

/s/ Stephen W. Turk
Stephen W. Turk
Operations Manager
Mission Resources Corporation

Cc     Doughlas Manner
       Jon Clarkson
       Joe Nicknish
       Kent Williamson
       Dan Foley
       Byron Yeatman
       Ann Kaesermann

                                      *
           1331 LAMAR, SUITE 1455  HOUSTON, TEXAS 77010-3039
      TEL (713) 495-3000 FAX (713) 652-2916 WWW.MISSIONRESOURCESCORP.COM
<PAGE>

                                      [LOGO]
                                     MISSION
                                    RESOURCES

February 1, 2002

Mr. J. P. Bryan
Torch Energy Advisors, Inc.
1221 Lamar, Suite 1600
Houston, Texas 77010

Dear J.P.:

Pursuant to Section 1 of the Restated and Amended Oil and Gas Administration
Services Agreement between Mission Resources Corporation and Novistar, Inc.,
Mission is electing to terminate such Agreement between Mission and Novistar.
The termination date is June 30, 2002. As required in the Agreement, the
termination date is at least 90 days from the date of notice. Since there will
be no Base or Variable Fees remaining in this Agreement, calculated from the
termination date, no termination fee is required. The termination of the
Agreement will relieve Mission of any and all future obligations associated with
the Agreement.

We appreciate the very professional and efficient execution of the Agreement by
Novistar over the past years.

Sincerely,

/s/ Jon Clarkson
Jon Clarkson
President

Acknowledged and Agreed
/s/ J.P. Bryan
--------------
J.P. Bryan

                                      *
           1331 LAMAR, SUITE 1455  HOUSTON, TEXAS 77010-3039
      TEL (713) 495-3000 FAX (713) 652-2916 WWW.MISSIONRESOURCESCORP.COM
EXHIBIT 15


                     (PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Letterhead)
                                (Minneapolis, MN)

November 11, 1999



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street N.W.
Washington D.C. 20549

Commissioners:

We are aware that our report dated November 8, 1999 on our reviews of the
interim consolidated financial information of Lund International Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
1999 and 1998, and included in the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended September 30, 1999, is incorporated by reference in the
Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-46263,
33-64083 and 33-37160).

Yours very truly,



/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


                                       24
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael Lee, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Forza Environmental
      Building Products, Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2010 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Forza Environmental Building Products,
Inc.                                                          

Dated: September 14, 2010



| | /s/
      Michael Lee                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Michael Lee                                                         
| | Chief Financial Officer                                             
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Forza
Environmental Building Products, Inc. and will be retained by Forza
Environmental Building Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George Samenuk certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Networks Associates, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Networks Associates, Inc.

By:
    
    /s/ George
SamenukName: George Samenuk
Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


I, Stephen C. Richards certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Networks Associates, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Networks Associates, Inc.

By:
    
    /s/ Stephen C.
RichardsName: Stephen C. Richards
Title: Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2204
In Re: JOHNNY WOODARD, JR.; In Re: CAROLYN J. WOODARD, Debtors.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOHNNY WOODARD, JR.; CAROLYN J. WOODARD, Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-mc-00025; 04-04082-8-JRL) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnny Woodard, Jr., Carolyn J. Woodard, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Johnny Woodard, Jr. and Carolyn J. Woodard appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for stay of the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing their Chapter 13 proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re: Woodard , Nos. 5:06-mc-0025; 04-04082-8-JRL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2006). We deny the motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, Senior District Judge for the U.S. **

District Court for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

TERRY LEE FRANKLIN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-50505

D.C. No. 2:07-cr-00967-PSG-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 12, 2012

Pasadena, California

Before: PREGERSON and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL, Senior

District Judge.** 

Terry Franklin appeals the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss for

post-indictment dely, the district court’s denial of his suppression motion, and his

FILED

DEC 18 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a). We affirm the district court on all three

matters.

Franklin’s motion to dismiss was based on the Sixth Amendment right to a

speedy trial. In this case, the length and reasons for delay do not excuse Franklin

from showing actual, non-speculative prejudice. See United States v. Beamon, 992

F.2d 1009, 1014 (9th Cir. 1993) (“[W]e must consider the amount of delay in

relation to particularized prejudice.”). Franklin cannot show that his trial’s delay

caused him such prejudice. As a result, the delay between Franklin’s indictment,

arrest, and trial did not violate his Sixth Amendment speedy-trial rights. We affirm

the district court’s denial of Franklin’s motion to dismiss.

We also affirm the district court’s denial of Franklin’s suppression motion. 

We find that the circumstances created reasonable suspicion for an “investigatory

stop,” or Terry stop, of Franklin. See Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.,

542 U.S. 177, 185 (2004). The accompanying frisk was appropriate under the

circumstances.

Finally, for the reasons enumerated by the district court, we affirm

Franklin’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a). United States v. Franklin, CR

07-967 PSG, 2011 WL 3424448 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011).

AFFIRM.
##### 



Exhibit 15 February 11, 2005 Sears, Roebuck and Co.
3333 Beverly Road
Hoffman Estates, IL 60179 We have made a review, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financial information of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for
the thirteen week and thirty-nine week periods ended October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, as
indicated in our report dated November 8, 2004, December 1, 2004 as to Note 10, February 11, 2005
as to Note 14 (which report includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the restatements discussed
in Note 10 and 14); because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information. We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the quarter ended October 2, 2004, is incorporated by reference in Registration
Statement Nos. 2-80037, 33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485, 33-45479, 33-55825, 33-58851, 33-64345,
333-08141, 333-113532, and 333-121776 of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Registration Statement No.
333-92082 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck Acceptance Corp.; Registration Statement
Nos, 33-64775, 333-18591, 333-43309, and 333-120219 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Deferred Compensation Plan; Registration Statement No. 333-102114 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the
Sears 401(K) Savings Plan (formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees and the
Sears 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan) and Lands End, Inc. Retirement Plan; Registration Statement No.
33-44671 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears DC Corp.; Registration Statement No. 333-38131 of
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears Associate Stock Ownership Plan; Registration Statement No.
333-52056 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2000 Employee Stock Plan; Registration Statement No.
333-72514 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2001 Broad-Based Stock Option Plan; and Registration
Statement No. 333-87942 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan. We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act
of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and
11 of that Act. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of the WMS Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Brian R. Gamache, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Brian R. GamacheBrian R. GamacheChief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2005
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of the WMS Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Scott D. Schweinfurth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Scott D. SchweinfurthScott D. SchweinfurthChief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2005
 33
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John B. Wood, Chief Executive Officer of Telos Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 16, 2005
Overview

The Globe is NGA’s online connection to geospatial knowledge and services. It integrates 

geospatial content, tools and intelligence to provide context to information about global 

events. The Globe is NGA’s online portal for all geospatial products and services for our 

customers. The Globe provides easy access to over 22+ million products and services, 

including GEOINT Notes, NGA Cables, NGA Intelligence Briefs (NIBs), Cedalion, GETS 

Reports and NGA’S GEOINT Summaries.

What are some of The Globe’s best features?

► Daily Subscription of recent GEOINT

► Customizable home page

• Landing page data based on user-built search

• Map of the World features

Notional GLOBE Screenshot

What 

is The 

GLOBE?

The Globe is 

NGA’s storefront 

for geospatial 

content, services, 

tools, and 

intelligence to 

provide context 

to information 

about global 

events.

Approved for public release, NGA-U-2022-02170
► Quick links to

• Location

• GEOINT Summaries

• Topic

► Country/Event Crisis pages

► Discovery Catalog – a collection of geospatial resources to allow for quick discovery of content (ex. 

websites), services (ex. map layers), and tools (ex. GDP)

► Wide range of data types and historical date ranges

► m.Globe for low bandwith users

► NGA Support Teams points of contact information

How can I access The Globe?

The Globe is available on all three domains, CAPnet 

and low bandwidth Globe: 

► NIPRnet: http://globe.nga.mil

► SIPRnet: https://globe.nga.smil.mil

► JWICS/COE: https://globe.nga.ic.gov

► CAPnet JWICS/COE: https://capnet.nga.ic.gov

► Low Bandwidth Globe: https://m.globe.nga.

smil.mil

How do I get more information?

For more information or training contact The Globe 

customer team: 

► NIPRnet: globecustomerteam@nga.mil

► SIPRnet: globecustomerteam@nga.smil.mi

► JWICS/COE: globecustomerteam@coe.ic.gov

Approved for public release, NGA-U-2022-02170
#### Lemeki KURIVASU; Miriama Navunisaravi Vakacabeooli, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-74483.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 6, 2006.*

Filed Nov. 14, 2006.

Alison Dixon, Law Office of Alison Dixon, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Lemeki Kurivasu, Glen Allen, CA, pro se.

Miriama Navunisaravi Vakacabeooli, Glen Allen, CA, pro se.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, *666Mala Malhotra, U.S. DOJ, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before LEAVY, GOULD, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lemeki Kurivasu and his wife Miriama Navunisaravi Vakacabeooli, natives and citizens of Fiji, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying Kurivasu’s applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Kozulin v. INS,*218 F.3d 1112, 1115 (9th Cir.2000), and deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Kurivasu did not establish eligibility for asylum. Kurivasu testified that he fled Fiji after his manager at work threatened him for reporting the manager’s human smuggling activities to the authorities. Contrary to Kurivasu’s contention, the evidence does not compel the conclusion that his manager threatened him or would harm him on account of a statutorily protected ground. *See id.*at 1116-17. Kurivasu also testified that on various occasions villagers threatened him, told him to leave his village, and once assaulted him on the grounds that he had illegitimate birth status, spoke out against the Fijian political system, and remained neutral with respect to a split in the Methodist church. Neither his testimony nor any other evidence in the record compels the conclusion that this mistreatment rose to the level of persecution or that he has an objectively reasonable fear of being persecuted in the future. *See Kumar v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 520, 524-25 (9th Cir.2006).

Because Kurivasu failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the higher burden for withholding of removal. *See id.*at 525.

The agency denied CAT relief on the ground that Kurivasu failed to present evidence that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured by Fijian officials or anyone acting with their acquiescence. The record does not compel a contrary finding. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Nos. 333-64302, 333-104071, 333-118992, 333-123364, 333-132492, 333-141264, and 333-149756) of our reports
dated March 13, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of MoSys, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the two
years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which appear in MoSys, Inc.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

/s/
Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP

San
Jose, California
March 13, 2009

---



QuickLinks