alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Nicholas C. Bluhm, Chief Financial Officer, of GelStat Corporation, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of GelStat Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in one case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

                                                           /s/ Nicholas C. Bluhm
                                                               Nicholas C. Bluhm
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                                                  April 14, 2005
Exhibit 32.02




Section 1350 Certification




In connection with this report of Systematic Momentum FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  March 19, 2012







By  /s/ Barbra E. Kocsis


Barbra E. Kocsis


Chief Financial Officer and Vice President


(Principal Financial Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donald McKinnon, Appellant.

Submitted December 7, 2009;

decided December 15, 2009

Reported below, 63 AD3d 426.

Motion for assignment of counsel and waiver of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals granted only to the extent that Stanley E. Neustadter, Esq., Cardozo Law School, Criminal Ap*892peals Clinic, 55 Fifth Ave., New York, NY 10003 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Belarus Capital Corp. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Sanford Leavitt,
      Chief Executive Officer, and Neil Roth, Financial Officer, certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 that:




(1)
      This
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Sanford Leavitt
            
            
            /s/
                Neil RothSanford
                Leavitt
              Chief
                Executive Officer
            
            
            Neil
                Roth
              Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
                April 14, 2008
            
            
            Date:
                April 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF

THE TRUSTEE*

OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee
Ann Anderson, Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Compass Bank, on behalf of Compass Bank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust), not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as
explained in Note 1 to the Trusts financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September 16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial
statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:

/s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:

Lee Ann AndersonTitle:

Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate:

May 10, 2012




|* | The Trust has no executive officers.
|- | ------------------------------------
#### Edwin Johnny Locke, Respondent, v Sikamdar Ali Buksh et al., Appellants.

[872 NYS2d 148]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Balter, J.), dated December 5, 2007, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the defendants failed to meet their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). In support of their motion, the defendants relied upon, inter alia, the affirmed medical report of their examining orthopedic surgeon. In his report he noted the existence of significant limi*699tations in the plaintiffs lumbar spine range of motion *(see Hurtte v Budget Roadside Care,*54 AD3d 362 [2008]; *Jenkins v Miled Hacking Corp.,*43 AD3d 393 [2007]; *Bentivegna v Stein,*42 AD3d 555 [2007]; *Zamaniyan v Vrabeck,*41 AD3d 472 [2007]). Under the circumstances, it is unnecessary to consider the sufficiency of the plaintiffs opposition papers *(see Hurtte v Budget Roadside Care,*54 AD3d 362 [2008]; *Coscia v 938 Trading Corp.,*283 AD2d 538 [2001]). Skelos, J.E, Dillon, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
#### Dwayne MORRISON, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 08-1922.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 2, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

Dwayne Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Morrison appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on his retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000).* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. *See Morrison v.*Nicholson, No. 4:07-cv-00003-RAJ-JEB (E.D. Va. filed July 11, 2008; entered July 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 Although Morrison’s complaint also asserted that he was unlawfully terminated because of his race, Morrison withdrew this discrimination claim during the course of proceedings before the district court,
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,855
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (109,855)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          22,933
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,933)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Southridge Enterprises Inc. - Exhibit 10.2






ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT




THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 19th day of July, 2004

BETWEEN: 


  
    
      
         SOUTHRIDGE ENTERPRISES INC., a Nevada corporation having
          an office at 18523 – 98th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta,
          T5T 3E6 

        (hereinafter called the "Assignor") 

      

    

  



OF THE FIRST PART 

AND: 


  
    
      
        SOUTHRIDGE EXPLORATION INC., a British Columbia company
          having its registered and records office at Suite 1880, 1055 West Georgia
          Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E, 3P3 

         (hereinafter called the "Assignee") 

      

    

  



 OF THE SECOND PART 


WHEREAS: 

 A.                   By
  an agreement dated May 17, 2004 (the "Purchase Agreement") between Larry R.
  W. Sostad (the "Vendor") and the Assignor, the Vendor sold to the Assignor a
  100% undivided interest in two mineral claims known as the Hilltop Claims (the
  "Property") described in Schedule "A" to the Purchase Agreement; 

 B.                   The
  Assignee wishes to acquire all of the Assignor's right, title and interest in
  Purchase Agreement. 


NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSES THAT in consideration of the sum of $1.00 paid by the Assignee to the Assignor, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

ASSIGNMENT

 1.                   The
  Assignor assigns to the Assignee all of its right, title and interest in the
  Property and in the Purchase Agreement and all benefits to be derived therefrom.










CONSIDERATION 

 2.                   The
  consideration for the Assignor assigning to the Assignee the Assignor's interest
  in the Property and the Purchase Agreement shall be the sum of $1.00 the receipt
  of which is hereby acknowledged. 


FURTHER ACTS 

 3.                   The
  parties shall do such further and other acts and execute such further and other
  documents as may be necessary to carry out the true intent and purposes of this
  Agreement fully and effectively. 


ENUREMENT 

 4.                   This
  Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties, their
  respective successors and assigns. 

 COUNTERPART EXECUTION

 5.                   This
  Agreement may be executed in several parts in the same form and such parts as
  so executed shall together constitute one original agreement, and such parts,
  if more than one, shall be read together and construed as if all the signing
  parties hereto had executed one copy of this Agreement. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by the parties
  hereto as of the day and year first above written. 

	SOUTHRIDGE ENTERPRISES INC. 

      by its authorized signatory: 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ Vernon Samaroo 	 
	VERNON SAMAROO, President 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	SOUTHRIDGE EXPLORATION INC. 

      by its authorized signatory: 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ Vernon Samaroo 	 
	 VERNON SAMAROO, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,399
<ALLOWANCES>                                       120
<INVENTORY>                                      5,054
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,651
<PP&E>                                          47,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,416
<SALES>                                         32,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,969
<CGS>                                           27,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (569)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                924
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       924
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
<FN>
<F1>Net Assets of Discontinued Operations-4,940
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                    Exhibit 10.1
        

     On July 21, 1998, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of
Richey Electronics, Inc., approved, subject to certain conditions, certain
payments to William Cacciatore, the Company's Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer, Richard N. Berger, the Company's Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, Norbert W. St. John, the Company's Executive
Vice President - Marketing.

     This arrangement is not set forth in any formal document but is summarized
in the minutes of the July 21, 1998 meeting of the Compensation Committee, which
in relevant part provides:

          Mr. Rosenbaum led a discussion of the status of employment
          contracts.  He noted that the contracts of Messrs.
          Cacciatore, St. John, Berger and Mann run to April, 1999 and
          will automatically extend another two years unless the
          Company gives notice of termination at least 180 days prior
          thereto.  Mr. Rosenbaum noted that the contracts provide
          termination benefits equal to the greater of one year's
          compensation or the amount of time remaining until
          termination.  Given the potential for a transaction
          involving the sale of the Company during 1998, the Committee
          considered the need for incentives to senior managers
          involved in the transaction process, in addition to their
          contractual rights under employment agreements, to assist in
          negotiating and closing a transaction and manage the Company
          through a smooth transition to new ownership.  As a result,
          the Committee, on a motion duly made and seconded,
          unanimously approved the payment of "stay" bonuses, or
          change in control payments, to Mr. Cacciatore, Mr. Berger
          and Mr. St. John, in the amounts of $1,000,000, $450,000 and
          $250,000, respectively, in the event such a transaction was
          agreed to prior to the automatic two-year renewal of their
          employment agreements.
EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dennis Bradley, Controller (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Dennis Bradley
        `                               ------------------
                                        Dennis Bradley
                                        Controller (Principal Financial Officer)
                                        April 14, 2006
Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diatect International Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the "Report"), I,
Jay W. Downs, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/ Jay W. Downs

Jay W. Downs
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
May 19, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Neil Tucker, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 593]

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed June 9, 2011, upon *1068his conviction of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, the resentence being a period of postrelease supervision in addition to a determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on July 29, 2002.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his resentencing to a term which included the statutorily required period of post-release supervision did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law since, at the time he was resentenced, he had not yet completed the sentence of imprisonment originally imposed upon him *(see People v Lingle,*16 NY3d 621, 630 [2011]; *People v Riley,*103 AD3d 818 [2013]; *People v Quinones,*103 AD3d 756 [2013]; *People v Lovett,*102 AD3d 812 [2013]; *People v Davis,*102 AD3d 808, 809 [2013]; *People v Harpe,*100 AD3d 657 [2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 1011 [2013]).

Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.