alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    
    DECEMBER 1, 2005
 NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
 
 CANADA
    
    001-07260
    
    NOT APPLICABLE(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
 
 NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/  William J. DonovanWilliam J. DonovanSenior Vice-President, Human ResourcesBy:
    /s/  Anna VentrescaAnna VentrescaAssistant Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                             123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                      1,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   399
<PP&E>                                           6,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,824
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,262)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,019
<SALES>                                          3,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,483
<CGS>                                            2,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  45
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mayor's Jewelers, Inc.:

We consent to the inclusion in the registration statement on Form F-4 Amendment
No. 1, (Registration No. 333-126936) of Henry Birks & Sons, Inc. of our report
dated June 24, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Mayor's
Jewelers, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 26, 2005 and March 27, 2004, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the years ended March 26, 2005 and March 27, 2004, and the related
financial statement schedule, included herein and to the reference to our firm
under the headings "Experts" and "Selected Historical Financial Data of Mayor's"
in the registration statement.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Miami, Florida
September 8, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21808]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10828]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; Final 
Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the 
Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS 
decision to designate a class of employees at the Hood Building in 
Cambridge, Massachusetts, as an addition to the Special Exposure Cohort 
(SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation 
Program Act of 2000. On March 31, 2009, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 
7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS designated the following class of 
employees as an addition to the SEC:

    All employees of the DOE, its predecessor agencies, and their 
contractors and subcontractors who worked in the Hood Building in 
Cambridge, Massachusetts, from May 9, 1946 through December 31, 
1963, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, 
occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with 
work days within the parameters established for one or more other 
classes of employees included in the SEC.

    This designation became effective on April 30, 2009, as provided 
for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on April 30, 2009, 
members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, 
became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9f6faf8eaf9fafdfa97fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="551a161406151611167b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>.

Christine M. Branche,
Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9-10828 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Candida Fatima Ferreira y PAULO; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-70639.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 18, 2006.

Candida Fatima Ferreira y Paulo, N. Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

Leonor S. Ferreira y Paulo, N. Las Vegas, NV, pro se.

NVL-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Las Vegas, NV, Ronald E. Le-Fevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Ann Carroll Varnon, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*164Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Candida Fatima Ferreira Y Paulo (“petitioner”), and her daughter, Leonor S Fer-reira Y Paulo, both natives and citizens of Angola, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Rostomian v. INS,*210 F.3d 1088, 1089 (9th Cir.2000), and grant the petition and remand.

The IJ found that petitioner established past persecution because she was kidnaped and held by rebels for 14 years, and repeatedly raped and beaten during those years. Because the IJ found that petitioner established past persecution, she was entitled to a presumption of a well-founded fear of future persecution. *See Popova v. INS,*273 F.3d 1251, 1259 (9th Cir.2001); *see also Molina-Estrada v. INS,*293 F.3d 1089, 1096 (9th Cir.2002) (stating that “a State Department report on country conditions, standing alone, is not sufficient to rebut the presumption of future persecution when a petitioner has established past persecution”).

Because the IJ did not apply this presumption, we grant the petition and remand to determine whether, once this presumption is applied, petitioner is eligible for asylum and withholding of removal. *See INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 16, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam). We remand the petitioner’s CAT claim because it could be affected by any evidence of future harm presented by the parties. *See id.*

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Exhibit 35.1**
  **SERVICER
        COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)**
  RE: FIRST
        HORIZON ALTERNATIVE MORTGAGE SECURITIES TRUST 2007-FA2
  We,
        the
        undersigned authorized officers of First Horizon Home Loans, a division of
        First
        Tennessee Bank National Association, and First Tennessee Bank National
        Association, as successor by merger to First Tennessee Mortgage Services,
        Inc.
        (collectively, the “Servicer”), pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement,
        do hereby certify that:
  1.  A
        review
        of the Servicer’s activities during the period from March 1, 2007 and through
        December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer’s performance under the above described
        servicing agreement has been made under our supervision.
  2.  To
        the
        best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
        of
        its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
        respects throughout such period .
  Date:
        March 24, 2008
  First
        Horizon Home Loans, a
        division of First
 Tennessee
        Bank National Association
  By:
        /s/ Kim
        Yowell__
 Name:
        Kim
        Yowell
 Title:
        SVP, Servicing Manager
  First
        Tennessee Bank National Association,
 as
        successor by merger to First Tennessee
 Mortgage
        Services, Inc.
 By:
        /s/ Terry
        L.
        McCoy
 Name:
        Terry L. McCoy
 Title:
        Executive Vice President
**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.1350)**
The undersigned, Paul J. Liska, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the "Company"), has executed this certificationin connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commissionof the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter endedMarch 30, 2002 (the "Report").
The undersigned hereby certifies that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act    of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition     and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification asof the 1st day of August, 2002.    
/s/ Paul J. Liska______________Paul J. Liska
Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer

**
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00189-CR

Victor Manuel PEREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR6059

Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgments of 

conviction are AFFIRMED. 

SIGNED August 19, 2020.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.10

                       ACKNOWLEDGMENT, CONSENT AND RELEASE

         The undersigned Borrowers hereby acknowledge the foregoing Assignment,
and acknowledge and agree that the present unpaid principal balance of the Loan
Document Obligations (including, without limitation, the Loans) plus all accrued
interest through June 25, 1999 is $45,399,718.10 (plus $12,050.63 per day for
each day after June 25, 1999). The undersigned further acknowledge that the
Existing Lender shall have no further liability or obligation to the Borrowers
under, or in connection with, the Loan Documents, and Borrowers hereby release
and forever discharge the Existing Lender, and the Existing Lender's successors,
assigns, agents, shareholders, directors, officers, employees, agents,
attorneys, parent corporations, subsidiary corporations, affiliated
corporations, affiliates, participants and each of them, from any and all
claims, debts, liabilities, demands, obligations, costs, expenses, actions and
causes of action, of every nature and description, known and unknown, which
Borrowers now have or at any time may hold, by reason of any matter, cause or
thing occurred, done, omitted or suffered to be done prior to the date of this
Agreement. Borrowers each waive the benefits of California Civil Code Section
1542 which provides: "A general release does not extend to claims which the
creditor does not know or suspect to exist in his favor at the time of executing
the release, which if known by him must have materially affected his settlement
with the debtor."

                                   Borrowers:

                                   The Cerplex Group, Inc.

                                   By   /s/ Richard Alston
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Title     EVP & CEO
                                             ---------------------------



                                   Aurora Electronics Group, Inc.


                                   By   /s/ Richard Alston
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Title     EVP & CEO
                                             ---------------------------


                                  Cerplex, Inc.


                                   By   /s/ Richard Alston
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Title     EVP & CEO
                                             ---------------------------

                                   Cerplex Mass, Inc.


                                   By   /s/ Richard Alston
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Title     EVP & CEO
                                             ---------------------------


                                       4
Todd Spence

           Amendment to Employment Agreement


     This Amendment to the Employment Agreement by and
between MDI Technologies, Inc. (formerly Management-Data,
Inc.)(the "Company") and Todd Spence ("Employee"), effective
as of August 23, 2000, is made and entered into this 31st day
of January, 2003.

     WHEREAS, Employee is employed by the Company pursuant to
an Employment Agreement effective as of August 23, 2000; and

     WHEREAS, Employee and the Company desire to amend said
Employment Agreement as set forth herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
and promises contained in said Employment Agreement and
herein, the parties agree as follows:

     Paragraph 6.(d), termination upon the death of Employee,
is hereby eliminated in its entirety and a new paragraph
6.(d) is substituted as follows:

          (d) This Agreement shall terminate immediately (i)
upon the death of Employee or (ii) if Employee is unable to
perform his duties hereunder by reason of illness, injury or
incapacity for ninety (90) consecutive days (during which
time the ill, injured or otherwise incapacitated Employee
shall continue to be compensated as provided herein).  In
either such event, Employee or his personal representative or
his heirs shall be entitled to receive any benefits provided
under any benefit or similar plan or policy adopted by the
Company and applicable to Employee.


<PAGE>


If this Agreement terminates because of the death of
Employee, then in addition to any benefits to which Employee
or his personal representative or his heirs shall be entitled
under any benefit or similar plan or policy adopted by the
Company, Employee's spouse, if she survives Employee, or his
personal representative or his heirs, if Employee's spouse
predeceases Employee, shall be entitled to the sum of Five
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00), payable in five equal
annual installments.  The first payment shall be paid within
thirty (30) days of the date of Employee's death and each
subsequent installment shall be paid on the anniversary date
of the Employee's death until the amount due is paid in full.
Neither Employee or his personal representative or his heirs
shall accrue any additional rights or benefits pursuant to
the terms of this Agreement from the date of termination.

     Except as modified by this Amendment, the Todd Spence
Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this
Amendment to the Todd Spence Employment Agreement to be
executed as of the date and year first written above.

                           Company:



                           By: /s/ Thomas K. ___________
                           Its: CFO

                           Employee:


                           /s/ Todd Spence

<PAGE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4114 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require the use of 

generic drugs under the Medicare part D prescription drug program 

when available unless the brand name drug is determined to be medically 

necessary. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 8, 2006 

Mr. KOHL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require 

the use of generic drugs under the Medicare part D 

prescription drug program when available unless the 

brand name drug is determined to be medically necessary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Generics First Act of 

5 2006’’. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 4114 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRED USE OF GENERIC DRUGS UNDER THE 

2 MEDICARE PART D PRESCRIPTION DRUG 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–2(e)(2) of the So5 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–102(e)(2)) is amend6 ed by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(C) NON-GENERIC DRUGS UNLESS CER8 TAIN REQUIREMENTS ARE MET.— 

9 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Such term does 

10 not include a drug that is a nongeneric 

11 drug unless– 

12 ‘‘(I) no generic drug has been ap13 proved under the Federal Food, Drug, 

14 and Cosmetic Act with respect to the 

15 drug; or 

16 ‘‘(II) the nongeneric drug is de17 termined to be medically necessary by 

18 the individual prescribing the drug 

19 and prior authorization for the drug is 

20 obtained from the Secretary. 

21 ‘‘(ii) DEFINITIONS.—In this subpara22 graph: 

23 ‘‘(I) GENERIC DRUG.—The term 

24 ‘generic drug’ means a drug that is 

25 the subject of an application approved 

26 under subsection (b)(2) or (j) of secVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:42 Dec 14, 2006 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4114.IS S4114

jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 4114 IS

1 tion 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, 

2 and Cosmetic Act, for which the Sec3 retary has made a determination that 

4 the drug is the therapeutic equivalent 

5 of a listed drug under section 

6 505(j)(7) of such Act. 

7 ‘‘(II) NONGENERIC DRUG.—The 

8 term ‘nongeneric drug’ means a drug 

9 that is the subject of an application 

10 approved under— 

11 ‘‘(aa) section 505(b)(1) of 

12 the Federal Food, Drug, and 

13 Cosmetic Act; or 

14 ‘‘(bb) section 505(b)(2) of 

15 such Act and that has been de16 termined to be not therapeuti17 cally equivalent to any listed 

18 drug.’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 subsection (a) shall apply to drugs dispensed on or after 

21 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
#### CHRISTIAN EMERSON DYSART and MILDRED MAXWELL DYSART v. WILLIAM KENT CUMMINGS and KIMBERLY N. CUMMINGS

No. 132A07

(Filed 12 October 2007)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 181 N.C. App. 641, 640 S.E.2d 832 (2007), affirming entry of summary judgment for plaintiffs on 1 March 2006 by Judge Kenneth C. Titus in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 September 2007.

*Boyce & Isley, PLLC, by Philip R. Isley, for plaintiff-appellees.*

*John Walter Bryant for defendant-appellants.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice BRADY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
**Exhibit 99.1**

**AGGREGATE      SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS**

| Class   | Interest     | Principal     | Losses | Ending                Balance |
|---------|--------------|---------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| I-A-1   | 8,068,499.54 | 20,419,151.29 | -      | 173,431,978.70                |
| I-A-2   | 292,639.88   | 740,590.98    | -      | 6,290,279.02                  |
| I-A-R   | 1.12         | 100.00        | -      | -                             |
| II-A-1  | 2,854,146.28 | 5,322,669.03  | -      | 62,267,330.97                 |
| III-A-1 | 1,970,958.65 | 6,329,132.06  | -      | 39,303,867.94                 |
| III-A-2 | 71,481.96    | 229,542.52    | -      | 1,425,457.49                  |
| B-1     | 275,133.04   | 6,723.43      | -      | 6,210,276.58                  |
| B-2     | 86,916.73    | 2,123.97      | -      | 1,961,876.02                  |
| B-3     | 57,885.47    | 1,414.54      | -      | 1,306,585.45                  |
| B-4     | 28,986.99    | 708.37        | -      | 654,291.65                    |
| B-5     | 28,942.75    | 707.27        | -      | 653,292.73                    |
| B-6     | 28,994.61    | 708.55        | -      | 654,463.62                    |

----