alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dennis Bradley, Controller (Principal Financial Officer) of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                             /s/ Dennis Bradley
                                             --------------------------------
                                             Dennis Bradley
                                             Controller (Principal Accounting
                                             Officer)
                                             January 16, 2007
(October 10, 2013)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Weston Coote, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 263]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael R. Sonberg, J.), rendered May 12, 2010, as amended May 28, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 6V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s assault conviction stems from the events that took place in a bar on October 15, 2009, when defendant struck the victim in the head with a “pint glass,” causing numerous lacerations to the victim’s neck, ear and scalp.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence as to the element of serious physical injury. The element of serious physical injury was satisfied by evidence supporting the conclusion that the wounds inflicted by defendant caused serious disfigurement to the victim *(see People v McKinnon,*15 NY3d 311, 315-316 [2010]). The victim testified that, at the time of trial, six months after the attack, he had scars on the left side of his face, on the front and back of his neck, and on his skull behind his ear. He also testified that he had grown a beard to “blend [the scar on his neck] in so it won’t be that noticeable.” The treating physician testified that, on the day of the trial, he observed that the scar on the victim’s neck “appeared to be hypertrophic,” which, he explained, means “a bulky scar that’s red and almost looks piled up with scar tissue.” The testimony of the victim and his treating physician, viewed as a whole, and especially considering the prominent location of the wound on the face, support the inference that at the time of trial the scars remained seriously disfiguring under the *McKinnon*standard.

*486The court properly adjudicated defendant a second violent felony offender based upon his 2002 guilty plea conviction to assault in the second degree. Defendant’s bald assertion that he had not been informed of the postrelease supervision component of his sentence at the time of his plea does not satisfy the burden of establishing that his prior conviction was unconstitutionally obtained. It was incumbent on defendant to come forward to prove his claim (CPL 400.21 [7] [b]), and the trial court did not err by relying on the presumption of regularity (see *People v Hodges,*194 AD2d 484 [1st Dept 1993], *lv denied*82 NY2d 720 [1993]).

Finally, we find that defendant’s sentence, which was less than the maximum, was not excessive in light of his significant record and the fact that this was a senseless act of violence that could have easily resulted in more severe injuries than it did. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.
EXHIBIT 35.3

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QH3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the period from and including
March 29, 2007 through and including  September  24, 2007 and of the  Servicer's
performance  under the  applicable  servicing  agreement  has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects  throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
#### In re M.E.H.

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 175

No. 165P07

Respondent’s (Cynthia H.) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-1349)

Denied 10/11/07
Exhibit 33.2

                       Report on Assessment of Compliance

                      with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria

1. The undersigned authorized officer of LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. (the "Company") is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria as defined in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)
(4) (xi) and 1122(d)(4) (xii) (the "Regulation AB Servicing Criteria") for
residential and commercial mortgage backed securities for which the Company
served as third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral
(the "Platform"). Except as set forth in the preceding sentence, the servicing
criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) are not applicable to the
activities the Company performed with respect to the Platform.

2. The Company used the criteria in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) to assess
the compliance with the applicable Regulation AB Servicing Criteria.

3. Under one of the services offered by the Company, some customers may elect to
remit tax payments directly to tax agencies without having the Company remit
those property tax payments through our tax payment service. We refer to these
customers as "non-outsourced servicer customers." With respect to these
non-outsourced customers and the services the Company delivered pursuant to the
servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4)(xi), the
Company's assertion is strictly limited to its processing of tax payments
submitted through the Company's tax payment service.

4. With respect to servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section
1122(d)(4)(xii), the Company's assertion is strictly limited to its processing
of property tax penalty payments. The Company has determined that its servicer
customers may also have access to systems that enable those servicers to process
penalties through obligor escrow accounts. Management's assessment of compliance
does not relate to the actual or potential activities of other parties with
access to obligor escrow accounts.

5. Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2007, the Company has complied in all material respects with
the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria related to the servicing of the Platform
taken as a whole.

6. The registered public accounting firm of Grant Thornton, LLP, has issued an
attestation report on the Company's assessment of compliance with the Regulation
AB Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Date: February 6, 2008

LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.

By: /s/ Robert Ige

Name: Robert Ige
Its:  Executive Vice President
exv10w21



 





Exhibit 10.21



AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT





    This Amendment dated this 8th day of March, 2004, covers the
    Employment Agreement dated November 1, 2002 between
    Edelbrock Corporation, a Delaware corporation
    (“Edelbrock”) and Aristedes Feles
    (“Employee”).





Section 3.     Term and Termination



			
	 	3.1 	
    Employee’s term of employment shall be amended to cover the
    period October 31, 2005 through June 30, 2009.





All other provisions of the November 1, 2002 Agreement
shall remain unchanged and be in full force and effect.



		
	
    EMPLOYEE	 
	 
	
    /s/ Aristedes Feles


	 
	
    Aristedes Feles	 
	 
	
    EDELBROCK CORPORATION	 





			
	By: 	
    /s/ O. Victor Edelbrock Jr.	 



		
	
    
	 





			
	Its: 	
    President & C.E.O.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              Financial Data Schedule Q2 1999
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         319379
<NAME>                        PSC Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-02-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                5,464
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                        38,308
<ALLOWANCES>                          1,554
<INVENTORY>                          21,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     68,630
<PP&E>                               27,101
<DEPRECIATION>                       20,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      168,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                51,039
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               1
<COMMON>                                120
<OTHER-SE>                           49,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        168,473
<SALES>                             117,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    117,146
<CGS>                                67,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        37,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         88
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    4,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       8,576
<INCOME-TAX>                          2,997
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   5,579
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          5,579
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.41



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Sean Hamilton, Appellant, v Richard Brown et al., Respondents.

Submitted September 21, 2009;

decided November 24, 2009

Reported below, 54 AD3d 760.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the issues presented have become moot.
Schedule to Form of Indemnification Agreement



 Exhibit 10.25 
  
 Schedule to Form of Indemnification Agreement between 
 Ryerson Tull, Inc. and the following parties: 
  
  
  
 Jameson A. Baxter 
 Richard G. Cline 
 Russell M. Flaum 

James A. Henderson 
 Gregory P. Josefowicz

 Jerry K. Pearlman 
 Neil S.
Novich 
 Martha Miller de Lombera 
 Anré D. Williams 
  
 Jay M. Gratz 
 Gary J. Niederpruem 
 James M. Delaney

 Stephen E. Makarewicz
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the
Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the
trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.



|                   |  |                                                                                                         
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST                                          
|                   | 
|Date: May 10, 2012 |  | By: /s/ RON E.
HOOPER Ron E. Hooper, Senior Vice President and Trust Administrator
Bank of America, N.A.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Permian Basin Royalty Trust
and will be retained by Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. flag
        An official website of the United States government
          Here’s how you know
        Here’s how you know **Official websites use .mil**
              A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization.
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
              A **lock** (A locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.




Menu


close site.logo-mark-desc
 Home
          
        AboutAbout UsNGA LocationsHistoryMissionStrategyNGA KidsPolicies and ProgramsNext NGA WestNewsNewsContract Announcements2023 Industry Strategy Summit2023 DoDIIS Worldwide Conference2024 Esri Federal GIS Conference2024 GEO Resilience SummitCareersYour CareerHiring ProcessBenefits & PayStudent OpportunitiesSenior Executive PositionsMilitary Career OpportunitiesWork With UsIndustryAcademiaGovernmentInternationalWork With UsResourcesOffice of the Inspector GeneralProducts & ServicesMoonshot LabsPublic ReleaseContact Us Facilities Operating Status
          Employee Resources Search small
        Search Site


Reports and Publications


HomeResources
					OIGReports and Publications


Files
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab
 Download Open in a New Tab


Contact the OIG
 
 **Phone:** (800) 380-7729, (Voice,TTY) (312) 547-4849, (DSN, TTY)
 **Email:**IG@nga.mil





Home
              HomeAbout
							  About UsNGA LocationsHistoryMissionStrategyNGA KidsPolicies and ProgramsNext NGA WestNews
							  NewsContract Announcements2023 Industry Strategy Summit2023 DoDIIS Worldwide Conference2024 Esri Federal GIS Conference2024 GEO Resilience SummitCareers
							  Your CareerHiring ProcessBenefits & PayStudent OpportunitiesSenior Executive PositionsMilitary Career OpportunitiesWork With Us
							  IndustryAcademiaGovernmentInternationalWork With UsResources
							  Office of the Inspector GeneralProducts & ServicesMoonshot LabsPublic ReleaseContact Us
							  Contact Us
 Connect With Us


nga.mil
          An official website of the
            National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency
          7500 GEOINT DriveSpringfield, VA 22150 About NGAAccessibility supportFOIA requestsNo FEAR Act dataOffice of the Inspector GeneralPerformance reportsPrivacy policyPrivacy program Looking for U.S. government information and services?
        Visit USA.govLast Site Build: 2024-04-19 07:09 UTC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN IT ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                             449
<SECURITIES>                                     2,969<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                       760
<INVENTORY>                                      5,738
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,840
<PP&E>                                          12,038
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,677
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,341
<BONDS>                                         12,614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           323
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,966
<SALES>                                          7,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,973
<CGS>                                            5,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,163<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   245
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    381
<INCOME-TAX>                                       140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       235
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
<FN>
<F1>Represents retained interest in transferred credit card receivables
<F2>Represents the sum of selling and administrative expense,
depreciation and amortization expense
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Brown, administrator, *v.*Story.

One who purchases land from a person in possession who has no title but who has made with the owner a parol contract to purchase, (whether such second purchaser pays his vendor the agreed price or not), acquires no title and no equity as against the owner; but he can, after obtaining a conveyance from his immediate vendor, protect himself as against any claim by the owner for purchase money, if the latter executes and delivers a conveyance to his own immediate vendee. The mere execution, however, of such a conveyance, without completing delivery thereof, will afford no protection. In the present case the action being brought to recover the land because of the non-payment of a part of the purchase money, the controlling and decisive question is whether there was an actual and complete delivery by the plaintiff’s intestate of the deed which purported to convey the land to the defendant’s vendor. Let this question alone be tried and determined by the jury on the next trial.

August 14, 1894.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Fish. Dooly superior court. March term, 1898.

Busbee & Crum, by brief, for plaintiff.

J. H. Martin, for defendant.

Simmons, Justice.

Bedgood bought from Brown a lot of land in Dooly county, and gave his promissory notes for the purchase money, but received no deed or other contract in writing from Bi’own. Bedgood subsequently sold the land to Story. The present action was brought by the administrator of Brown to recover the land because of the non-payment of a part of the purchase mouey. It appears that when Story purchased the land from Bedgood, the latter was in possession, but, as stated, had no title, having gone into possession under a parol agreement on the part of Brown to convey him the land, and not having paid the purchase money. Story, therefore, acquired no title and no equity as against Brown by his purchase from Bedgood. It was contended, however, *289that Story was protected by a deed subsequently made by Brown to Bedgood. There was some dispute as to whether there was an actual and complete delivery of this deed, or whether Bedgood got the deed without such a delivery. If Brown executed and delivered a ■conveyance of the land to Bedgood, Story, after obtaining a conveyance from Bedgood, would be protected against any claim of Brown for the purchase money; hut the mere execution of the deed from Brown to Bed-good, without a complete delivery thereof, would afford no protection. The evidence failed to show an actual and complete delivery of the deed. This being the controlling and decisive question in the case, the court did not err in granting a second new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to law and the evidence; and we affirm the judgment, with direction that this question alone be tried and determined on the next trial ■of the case. *Judgment affirmed, with direction.*
**Exhibit 99.1**

** **

**Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**By**

**Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**

**Regarding Facts and Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings**

  

  

Dated – May 9, 2003 

  

  

            In accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, Kshitij Mohan and John Y. Caloz, hereby certify that the periodic report, to which this Statement is attached, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the periodic report to which this Statement is attached, fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. 

  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Statement as of the date first written above. 

  /s/  Kshitij Mohan                                         

Kshitij Mohan 

President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Elko Ventures Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Matt Wayrynen, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: June 9, 2008                  By: /s/ Matt Wayrynen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Matt Wayrynen
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.