alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 52 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.52

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
   To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a parcel of real 
                    property to Beaver County, Utah.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE TO BEAVER COUNTY, UTAH.

    (a) In General.--As soon as practicable after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall, without consideration 
and subject to valid existing rights, convey to Beaver County, Utah 
(referred to in this Act as the ``County''), all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the approximately 200 acres 
depicted as ``Minersville State Park'' on the map entitled ``S. 2285, 
Minersville State Park'' and dated April 30, 2004, for use for public 
recreation.
    (b) Reconveyance by Beaver County.--
        (1) In general.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), Beaver County 
    may sell, for not less than fair market value, a portion of the 
    property conveyed to the County under this section, if the proceeds 
    of such sale are used by the County solely for maintenance of 
    public recreation facilities located on the remainder of the 
    property conveyed to the County under this section.
        (2) Limitation.--If the County does not comply with the 
    requirements of paragraph (1) in the conveyance of the property 
    under that paragraph--
            (A) the County shall pay to the United States the proceeds 
        of the conveyance; and
            (B) the Secretary of the Interior may require that all 
        property conveyed under subsection (a) (other than the property 
        sold by the County under paragraph (1)) revert to the United 
        States.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Town of Caroga, Respondent, v Joseph Herms, Appellant.

Submitted December 7, 2009;

decided January 14, 2010

Reported below, 62 AD3d 1121.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*13 NY3d 708 (2009)].

Judge Graffeo taking no part.
#### Brett Anthony PELCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael YARBOROUGH, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-56050.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 7, 2009.

Filed May 21, 2009.

*608Kenneth M. Stern, Esq., Law Offices of Kenneth M. Stern, Woodland Hills, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Brett Anthony Pelch, Folsom, CA, pro se.

Gary A. Lieberman, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: RYMER, KLEINFELD and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Brett Anthony Pelch appeals the denial of his habeas petition and dismissal with prejudice. We affirm.

The performance of Pelch’s trial counsel was not deficient. *See Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). There was a low probability that a motion to suppress would succeed, because the state trial court was unlikely to find that the pretrial publicity created a “very substantial likelihood” of misidentifieation. *Neil v. Biggers,*409 U.S. 188, 198-99, 93 S.Ct. 375, 34 L.Ed.2d 401 (1972). The evidence against Pelch was so overwhelming that Pelch was not prejudiced, even if there had been any inadequacy in trial counsel’s not moving to suppress the identifications. *Strickland,*466 U.S. at 691, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052. Trial counsel would not have rendered ineffective assistance even if there would have been “nothing to lose” from making such a motion. *Knowles v. Mirzayance,*556 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1411, 1419-22, 173 L.Ed.2d 251 (2009).

The performance of Pelch’s appellate counsel was neither deficient nor prejudicial under *Strickland. See Smith v. Robbins,*528 U.S. 259, 285, 120 S.Ct. 746, 145 L.Ed.2d 756 (2000). It was reasonable for appellate counsel not to argue that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to seek exclusion of the identification evidence. As explained above, trial counsel was not deficient in this respect, so this claim would not have provided grounds for reversal. Appellate counsel could reasonably conclude that raising this argument might do more harm than good by detracting from other arguments. *Jones v. Barnes,*463 U.S. 745, 752-54, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987 (1983).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
October 1 2004 8K Exhibit 4.4






                                                                                              Exhibit 4.4



8x8, Inc.

2445 Mission College Boulevard

Santa Clara, CA  95054



 

September 30, 2004


 

Riverview Group, LLC

   666 Fifth Avenue, 8th Floor

   New York, New York  10103


Reference is made to (a) that certain Securities
Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 21, 2004 (the "Securities Purchase
Agreement"), by and among 8x8, Inc. (the "Company") and Riverview Group, LLC
(the "Buyer") and (b) that certain Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock,
dated as of June 21, 2004 (the "Warrant"), issued to the Buyer in accordance
with the terms and conditions of the Securities Purchase Agreement.  Any
capitalized term used herein and not defined herein shall have the meaning
assigned to it in the Securities Purchase Agreement or in the Warrant.


Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the
Warrants, the Company and the Buyer hereby agree to the following clarifications
and amendments:



1)Principal Market Regulation.  Section 11(b)
of the Warrant is hereby deleted in its entirety.



2)Certain Adjustments.  Section 9(a) of the
Warrant is hereby amended by adding the following to the end thereof:


"(vii)Minimum Exercise Price.  Until such
time as the Company receives any necessary stockholder approval, no adjustment
pursuant to this Section 9(a) shall cause the Exercise Price to be less than
$2.46, as adjusted for any stock dividend, stock split, stock combination,
reclassification or similar transaction."



 

 



Except as specifically modified by this letter, all
other terms and conditions of the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect.
This letter may be executed in counterparts.



 
Very truly yours,



 

 

8X8, INC.



 

By: ___________________________

Name:  

Title:



 













ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED

ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2004



 

RIVERVIEW GROUP, LLC



 

By: ___________________________

Name:  

Title:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE **

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |                            |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Date:              February 21, 2008 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | /s/              Jason G. Weiss |
|                                 | Name:                  Jason G. WeissTitle:                   Chief                  Executive Officer and Secretary(Principal                  Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial                  Officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2613 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2613

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require that a voluntary 
    agreement with respect to commercial air tour operations over a 
  national park considers the well-being of communities overflown by 
     aircraft involved in such operations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2023

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require that a voluntary 
    agreement with respect to commercial air tour operations over a 
  national park considers the well-being of communities overflown by 
     aircraft involved in such operations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Communities Before Air Tourism 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PARK PROTECTION.

    Section 40128(b)(7) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``or the air traffic 
        control system'' and inserting ``, the air traffic control 
        system, or the well-being of communities overflown by aircraft 
        involved in such commercial air tour operations''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C) by inserting ``any community whose 
        lands are, or may be, and'' before ``any Indian tribe''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5              
                        
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         300,825
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,474,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                   200,000
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,738,290
<PP&E>                                         422,731
<DEPRECIATION>                                 232,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,657,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,338,052
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                       320,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     781,291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,657,667
<SALES>                                        4,661,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,661,222
<CGS>                                          2,968,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,968,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,121,707
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (425,682)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (39,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (373,561)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (373,561)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.012)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.012)
        


</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 53 

To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior 

to issue separately, for the same area, a lease for tar sand and a 

lease for oil and gas, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue separately, for the same 

area, a lease for tar sand and a lease for oil and gas, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMBINED HYDROCARBON LEASING. 

4 (a) SPECIAL PROVISIONS REGARDING LEASING.— 

5 Section 17(b)(2) of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 

6 226(b)(2)) is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 
2 

S 53 IS 

1 ‘‘(B) The Secretary may issue under this Act for the 

2 same area, separately— 

3 ‘‘(i) a lease for exploration for and extraction of 

4 tar sand; and 

5 ‘‘(ii) a lease for exploration for and development 

6 of oil and gas. 

7 ‘‘(C) A lease issued under subparagraph (B)(ii) shall 

8 not be further subject to the Combined Hydrocarbon Leas9 ing Act of 1981 (30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.). 

10 ‘‘(D) A lease issued for tar sand shall be issued using 

11 the same bidding process, annual rental, and posting pe12 riod as a lease issued for oil and gas, except that the min13 imum acceptable bid required for a lease issued for tar 

14 sand shall be $2 per acre. 

15 ‘‘(E) The Secretary may waive, suspend, or alter any 

16 requirement under section 26 that a permittee under a 

17 permit authorizing prospecting for tar sand must exercise 

18 due diligence, to promote any resource covered by a com19 bined hydrocarbon lease.’’. 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

21 17(b)(1)(B) of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 

22 226(b)(1)(B)) is amended in the second sentence by in23 serting ‘‘, subject to paragraph (2)(B),’’ after ‘‘the Sec24 retary’’. 
3 

S 53 IS 

1 (c) REGULATIONS.—Within 45 days after the date of 

2 the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

3 shall issue final regulations to implement this section. 

Æ
#### Eugene Miniero et al., Appellants, v City of New York et al., Respondents. (And Other Actions.)

Submitted November 2, 2009;

decided January 12, 2010

Reported below, 65 AD3d 861.

Motion by plaintiffs Sblendido, Parisi and Hernandez for leave to appeal denied. Motion by plaintiffs Miniero, Pepitone, Wilhelm, DePalma and Carroll, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal against defendant Mine Safety Appliances Company, dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]; *Matter of Haverstraw Park v Runcible Props.,*33 NY2d 637 [1973]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 576 

To restore the prohibition on the commercial sale and slaughter of wild 

free-roaming horses and burros. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2005 

Mr. BYRD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To restore the prohibition on the commercial sale and 

slaughter of wild free-roaming horses and burros. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SALE OF WILD FREE-ROAMING HORSES AND 

4 BURROS. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 3 of Public Law 92–195 

6 (16 U.S.C. 1333) (as amended by section 142(a) of Public 

7 Law 108–447 (118 Stat. 3070)) is amended by striking 

8 subsection (e) and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(e) PROHIBITION OF SALE OF WILD FREE-ROAMING

10 HORSES AND BURROS.—No wild free-roaming horse or 
2 

•S 576 IS

1 burro or the remains of a wild free-roaming horse or burro 

2 may be sold or transferred for consideration for processing 

3 into commercial products.’’. 

4 (b) CRIMINAL PROVISIONS.—Section 8(a)(4) of Pub5 lic Law 92–195 (16 U.S.C. 1338(a)(4)) (as amended by 

6 section 142(b) of Public Law 108–447 (118 Stat. 3071)) 

7 is amended by striking ‘‘except as provided in section 

8 3(e),’’. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4115 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4115

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to increase the effectiveness of 
                physician assistance for drug treatment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Effective Physician Assistance for 
Drug Treatment Act''.

SEC. 2. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT AMENDMENTS.

    Section 303(g)(2) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 
823(g)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)(iii), by striking ``except that 
        the'' and inserting the following: ``unless, not sooner than 1 
        year after the date on which the practitioner submitted the 
        initial notification, the practitioner submits a second 
        notification to the Secretary of the need and intent of the 
        practitioner to treat up to 100 patients. A second notification 
        under this clause shall contain the certifications required by 
        clauses (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph. The''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (J)--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking ``thereafter'' and 
                all that follows through the period and inserting 
                ``thereafter.'';
                    (B) in clause (ii), by striking ``Drug Addiction 
                Treatment Act of 2000'' and inserting ``Effective 
                Physician Assistance for Drug Treatment Act''; and
                    (C) in clause (iii), by striking ``this paragraph 
                should not remain in effect, this paragraph ceases to 
                be in effect'' and inserting ``subparagraph (B)(iii) 
                should be applied by limiting the total number of 
                patients a practitioner may treat to 30, then the 
                provisions in such subparagraph (B)(iii) permitting 
                more than 30 patients shall not apply, effective''.

            Passed the Senate December 8, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4115

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to increase the effectiveness of 
                physician assistance for drug treatment.
```
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    
    OCTOBER 29, 2004
 NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED 
  CANADA
    
    000-30758
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
    Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation
of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below): o  Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) o  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) o  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On October 29, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation issued a press release (the
Press Release), attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, announcing, among other
things, that the registrant obtained a new waiver from Export Development
Canada (EDC), the terms and conditions of which are
summarized in the Press Release which is incorporated by reference
herein. A copy of the letter
agreement containing the waiver and related amendments to the EDC Support
Facility (as defined in the Press Release) is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.2. Nortel Networks Corporation owns all of the registrants common shares and the
registrant is Nortel Networks Corporations principal direct operating
subsidiary. Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits (c) Exhibits 99.1      Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on October 29, 2004. 99.2     
Letter Agreement dated October 29, 2004 between the registrant and EDC.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ William R. KerrWilliam R. KerrChief Financial Officer By:
    /s/ Blair F. MorrisonBlair F. MorrisonAssistant Secretary Dated: November 2, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on October 29, 2004.99.2
    
    Letter Agreement dated October 29, 2004 between the registrant and EDC.