alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 443 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 250
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 443

      To improve the investigation of criminal antitrust offenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2005

   Mr. DeWine (for himself, Mr. Kohl, and Mr. Leahy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

                            October 20, 2005

               Reported by Mr. Specter, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To improve the investigation of criminal antitrust offenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Antitrust Criminal Investigative 
Improvements Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF PREDICATE CRIMES FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR 
              INTERCEPTION OF WIRE, ORAL, AND ELECTRONIC 
              COMMUNICATIONS.

    Section 2516(1) of title 18, United State Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (q), by striking ``or'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (r) as subparagraph (s); 
        and
            (3) by adding after subparagraph (q) the following:
            ``(r) any criminal violation of section 1 (relating to 
        illegal restraints of trade or commerce), 2 (relating to 
        illegal monopolizing of trade or commerce), or 3 (relating to 
        illegal restraints of trade or commerce in territories or the 
        District of Columbia) of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1, 2, 3); 
        or''.
                                                       Calendar No. 250

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 443

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

      To improve the investigation of criminal antitrust offenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 20, 2005

                       Reported without amendment
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 664 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 664

      To adjust the boundaries of Green Mountain National Forest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2005

   Mr. Leahy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To adjust the boundaries of Green Mountain National Forest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Green Mountain National Forest 
Adjustment Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. GREEN MOUNTAIN NATIONAL FOREST ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) In General.--The boundaries of the Green Mountain National 
Forest are modified to include all parcels of land depicted on the 
forest maps entitled ``Green Mountain Expansion Area Map I'' and 
``Green Mountain Expansion Area Map II'', each dated February 20, 2002, 
which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the 
Office of the Chief of the Forest Service, Washington, District of 
Columbia.
    (b) Management.--Federally owned land delineated on the maps 
acquired for National Forest purposes shall continue to be managed in 
accordance with the laws (including regulations) applicable to the 
National Forest System.
    (c) Land and Water Conservation Fund.--For the purposes of section 
7 of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460 l-
9), the boundaries of the Green Mountain National Forest, as adjusted 
by this Act, shall be considered to be the boundaries of the national 
forest as of January 1, 1965.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-11-00822-CR

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 10CR1217

Style: Thomas Wayne Florence

v The State of Texas

Date motion filed*: August 27, 2013

Type of motion: Motion to add attachments

Party filing motion: Appellant, Thomas Wayne Florence

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? YES NO

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: 

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: 

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Bland.

Date: September 26, 2013
#### Sandy Mush Props., Inc. v. Rutherford Cty.

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 224

No. 067P07

1. Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. ! (COA06-68) 7A-31

2. Def’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of its decision in light of *Robins v. Town of Hillsborough,*361 N.C. 193, 639 S.E.2d 421 (2007) 08/23/07

2. Dismissed as moot 08/23/07
#### State v. Apple

Case below: 182 N.C. App. - (3 April 2007)

No. 195P07

1. Def’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas (COA06-652),

2. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question

3. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

4. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Denied 08/23/07

2. _

3. Allowed 08/23/07

4. Denied 08/23/07
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the annual report of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Sanford Leavitt, Chief Executive Officer, and Neil Roth, Chief Financial
Officer, certify. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ Sanford Leavitt
            
            /s/ Neil RothChief
      Executive Officer
            
            Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      February 8, 2010
            
            Date:
      February 8, 2010
----

----

|   | 1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Advanced Construction Materials Group, Inc. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: September 23, 2011                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |
| /s/Jeremy Goodwin                                        |
| Jeremy GoodwinPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer |

----

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
                                               OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Darin G. Billerbeck, as Chief Executive Officer of ZiLOG,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



|                       |                               
|---------------------- | ------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2007 | By:    /s/ Darin G. Billerbeck

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Darin G. Billerbeck    
| | Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Perry J. Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of ZiLOG, certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.



|                       |                          
|---------------------- | -------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2007 | By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| |                                           
| | Perry J. Grace                            
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**THETRUSTEE***

**OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2023and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ross C. Durr, Senior Vice President and Mineral Interest Director of PNC Bank, National Association, on behalf of PNC Bank, National Association,the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the “Trust”),* not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (as explained in Note 1 to the Trust’s financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, FinancialStatements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust. 

 

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE OF THE

SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
By: 
/s/ Ross C. Durr
Name: Ross C. Durr, J.D., RPLTitle: 
Senior Vice President

Mineral InterestDirector
Date: November 14, 2023
 
*
The Trust has no executive officers. 
**
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF

THE
TRUSTEE*

OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 and filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joshua R. Peterson, Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Compass Bank, on behalf of Compass Bank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust),* not
in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (as explained in Note 1 to the Trusts financial statements
contained in the Report, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, Financial Statements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally
accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THE SAN
JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:

/s/ Joshua R. Peterson


Name:

Joshua R. PetersonTitle:

Vice President and Senior Trust Officer


Date:

November 9, 2016




|* | The Trust has no executive officers.
|- | ------------------------------------
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Brian O’Neal WADDELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-7096.

United States Court *of*Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

Claire J. Rauscher, Executive Director, Tanzania Cannon-Eckerle, Federal Defenders of Western North Carolina, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, Matthew R. Se-gal, Federal Defenders of Western North Carolina, Inc., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Brian O’Neal Waddell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. *United States v. Waddell,*No. 5:02-cr-00034-RLV-5 (W.D.N.C. June 17, 2008). *See United States v. Hood,*556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Waddell’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Loquan Bruzzley, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 578]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), rendered June 16, 2011, as amended June 27, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 13 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly granted the People’s *reverse-Batson*application (Ba*tson v Kentucky,*476 US 79 [1986]; *People v Kern, 75*NY2d 638 [1990], *cert denied*498 US 824 [1990]). The record supports the court’s express and implied findings *(see People v Payne,*88 NY2d 172, 185 [1996]) that the race-neutral reasons provided by defense counsel for the peremptory challenges at issue were pretextual. Since these findings are based primarily on the court’s assessment of counsel’s credibility, they are entitled to great deference *(see Snyder v Louisiana, 552 US 472,*477 [2008]; *People v Hernandez, 75*NY2d 350, 356 [1990], *affd*500 US 352 [1991]). To the extent that defendant is challenging the adequacy of the court’s findings or explanations of its reasoning, and alleging that the court did not follow the three-step *Batson*procedure, those claims are unpreserved *(see People v Richardson,*100 NY2d 847, 853 [2003]), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject his arguments on the merits, as the court followed proper *Batson*procedures *(see Payne,*88 NY2d at 184).

Concur— Tom, J.P, Sweeny, Saxe, Román and Feinman, JJ.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 24

- 11631

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________

PAUL WALDE,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus SHARON KERI, Process Manager, JOHN DOE, Unnamed defendant person of DMV over see license suspension, PERSON OF DMV DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES,

Defendants

- Appellees. USCA11 Case: 24-11631 Document: 10-1 Date Filed: 07/03/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 24

- 11631

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District o f Florida D.C. Docket No. 4:23

- cv

- 00412

- RH

- MAF

____________________
Before R OSENBAUM , G RANT , and L UCK , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. Paul Walde, proceeding pro se , appeals the district court’s February 26, 2024 final order and judgment. The statutory time limit required him to file a notice of appeal on or before April 11, 2024, 30 days after the district court’s March 12, 2024 order denying his timely motion to r econsider the final order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)

. However, he did not file his instant notice of appeal until May 20, 2024, and thus, it cannot invoke our jurisdiction. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Hamer

v. Neighborhood Hous. Servs. of Chi. , 138 S. Ct. 13, 21 (2017)

. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 24-11631 Document: 10-1 Date Filed: 07/03/2024 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         184,041
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  482,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               666,468
<PP&E>                                      22,494,773
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,382,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,778,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,884
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,768,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,778,823
<SALES>                                        684,510
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               685,754
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  313,074
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                372,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            372,680
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   372,680
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.W.1

                             AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE
                             SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO THE
                               EL PASO CORPORATION
                           EMPLOYEE SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

      Exhibit A of Supplement No. 1 to the El Paso Corporation Employee
Severance Pay Plan effective as of January 1, 2003, as amended (the "Supplement
No. 1"), is hereby amended, as attached, to remove certain individuals who are
no longer eligible to be covered by Supplement No. 1 effective as of October 1,
2003.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on the 1st day of October, 2003.

                                                EL PASO CORPORATION

                                                By: /s/ GARY J. KONNIE
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Gary J. Konnie
                                                    Its Senior Vice President
                                                    Human Resources

Attest:

  /s/ DAVID L. SIDDALL
------------------------
  Corporate Secretary

<PAGE>

                                    Exhibit A
              Eligible Employees Covered by Supplement No. 1 to the
                     El Paso Corporation Severance Pay Plan
                             (as of October 1, 2003)

Robert W. Baker
Jeffery I. Beason
Rodney D. Erskine
Douglas L. Foshee
Peggy A. Heeg
Robert G. Phillips
D. Dwight Scott
John W. Somerhalder II

Acknowledged and Accepted effective the 1st day of October, 2003.

By: /s/ GARY J. KONNIE
    ----------------------------
    Gary J. Konnie
    Its Senior Vice President
    Human Resources
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Drury J. Gallagher, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)        The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                 amended; and

      (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company.





August 19, 2002         By: /s/  Drury J. Gallagher
                                 -----------------------------------------------
Date                             Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer