alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,673
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,882)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,326
<PP&E>                                          38,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,026)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           29,734
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,270
<OTHER-SE>                                    (72,273)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,581
<SALES>                                         24,024
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,024
<CGS>                                           24,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,904)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 553

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for HOV-lane exemptions 

for low-emission and hybrid vehicles. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2005

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mr. ALLEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide for HOVlane exemptions for low-emission and hybrid vehicles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HOV-LANE EXEMPTION FOR LOW-EMISSION 

4 AND HYBRID VEHICLES 

5 Section 102(a)(2) of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended—

7 (1) by striking the first sentence and inserting 

8 the following: 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding para10 graph (1), a State may permit a vehicle with 
2

•S 553 IS 

1 fewer than 2 occupants to operate in high occu2 pancy vehicle lanes if the vehicle is—

3 ‘‘(i)(I) certified as meeting the inher4 ently low-emission vehicle evaporative emis5 sion standard under part 88 of title 40, 

6 Code of Federal Regulations (or a suc7 cessor regulation) (including a vehicle pro8 duced before or during the 2004 model 

9 year that meets that standard); and 

10 ‘‘(II) labeled in accordance with sec11 tion 88.312–93(c) of title 40, Code of Fed12 eral Regulations (or a successor regula13 tion); or 

14 ‘‘(ii) a motor vehicle that—

15 ‘‘(I) draws propulsion energy 

16 from onboard sources of stored energy 

17 produced or stored by—

18 ‘‘(aa) an internal combus19 tion or heat engine using com20 bustible fuel; and 

21 ‘‘(bb) a rechargeable energy 

22 storage system that provides at 

23 least 5 percent of the maximum 

24 available power; and 
3

•S 553 IS 

1 ‘‘(II) meets such other require2 ments or criteria as may be specified 

3 by the State.’’; and 

4 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘Such 

5 permission’’ and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(B) REVOCATION.—The permission under 

7 subparagraph (A)’’.

Æ
EX-35.1
(logo) AVELO MORTGAGE



Annual Compliance Statement

Re: The Flow Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"),
among Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and Avelo Mortgage, LLC and GSR Mortgage
Loan Trust 2007-2F.

1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Avelo") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007. This review was completed under
my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all
of its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:

Avelo acknowledges that for a period in 2007, bank accounts were not
reconciled in strict compliance with Reg. AB. To address this issue, Avelo
added additional staff to ensure timely reconciliations and compliance with
Reg. AB. As of the date of the audit, all bank account reconciliations were
current. No issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank
accounts.

Avelo also acknowledges that for a period in 2007, escrow funds were not
returned to the obligor within 30 calendar days of full repayment in compliance
with Reg. AB due to a system issue. A system enhancement erroneously affected
the refund check process. Once the issue was identified, the system was
corrected.

As of December 31, 2007, escrow fund refunds were returned to the obligor
within 30 calendar days of full repayment, and no issues were found or arose
from the delay in returning the funds to the account holders.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.


/s/ David M. Altshuler
Name: David M. Altshuler
Title: Vice President and CFO
Date: March 10, 2008



Avelo Mortgage, LLC     250 E. John Carpenter Fwy       Irving, Texas 75062
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

I, Richard W. Piacenti, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Mission Resources Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
    registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
        to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
        including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
        within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
        report is being prepared;

    (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
        of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
        over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
        recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
        case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
        likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
        financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
    the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

    (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting.

August 12, 2003

/s/ Richard W. Piacenti
-------------------------------
Richard W. Piacenti
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 21-5147 September Term, 2021

1:21-cv-01442-JDB

Filed On: October 1, 2021

Xiu Jian Sun, Spiritual Adam,

Appellant

v.

Barack Hussein Obama,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Tatel and Rao, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for

the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App.

P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 4, 2021, be

affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint with

prejudice for failure to comply with the pleading standards of Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 8(a). See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). That rule

requires “a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction” and “a short

and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,” see Fed. R.

Civ. P. 8(a), and appellant’s complaint states no discernible claim or basis for jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is

directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any

timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b);

D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy

Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit 99.1**
  **AGGREGATE
        SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST DISTRIBUTIONS TO CERTIFICATEHOLDERS**
 
 Class
              Interest
              Principal
              Losses
              Ending
                  Balance1A1
              2,139,775.00
              7,530,000.03
              -
              47,690,000.001A2
              3,586,344.88
              20,236,757.89
              -
              71,803,242.101A3
              177,570.00
              -
              -
              3,946,000.001A4
              1,503,855.00
              -
              -
              34,872,000.001A5
              2,911,360.84
              10,623,012.40
              -
              64,522,987.601A6
              203,568.70
              -
              -
              71,803,242.101A7
              -
              337,279.30
              -
              1,196,720.701A8
              782,264.43
              -
              -
              64,522,987.601A9
              459,720.00
              -
              -
              10,216,000.00110
              1,063,430.88
              3,764,999.97
              -
              23,845,000.00111
              298,244.10
              -
              -
              23,845,000.00112
              65,385.00
              -
              -
              1,453,000.001PO
              -
              48,255.68
              -
              1,771,080.311AR
              2.59
              100.00
              -
              -2A1
              386,186.53
              1,166,879.75
              -
              8,260,120.242PO
              -
              1,026.49
              -
              25,778.50B1
              408,079.90
              44,417.52
              -
              8,701,582.48B2
              153,974.81
              16,759.41
              -
              3,283,240.59B3
              107,782.37
              11,731.59
              -
              2,298,268.41B4
              69,288.67
              7,541.74
              -
              1,477,458.26B5
              53,891.21
              5,865.79
              -
              1,149,134.62B6
              52,742.00
              5,736.82
              55,954.34
              1,093,581.84
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      198,547
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      3,485
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          42,224
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        15,907
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 260,163
<COMMON>                                         5,949
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       58,788
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             30,327
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  95,064
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            87,158
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               7,836
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,838
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  61,467
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  260,163
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      195,200
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             6,355
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     170,802
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     177,157
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         18,043
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 524
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  18,567
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         6,089
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,478
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        383
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   12,095
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         4,770
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        4,688
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          38,497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.04
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12(a)


                    COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES
                    SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<S>

                              Twelve      Three
                              Months      Months
                              Ended       Ended
                              Apr. 3,     Apr. 3,                Year Ended
(millions, except ratios)     1999        1999    1998    1997    1996    1995    1994
                            (unaudited)  (unaudited)
                              <C>         <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>     <C>
                            
Fixed Charges
Interest and amortization
of debt discount and 
expense on all indebtedness   $1,381      $ 333   $1,423  $1,409  $1,365  $1,373  $1,279
  Add interest element 
   implicit in rentals           142         36      144     147     121     119     114  
                               1,522        369    1,567   1,556   1,486   1,492   1,393
Interest Capitalized               5          1        5       3       5       4       1 
Total fixed charges           $1,527      $ 370   $1,572  $1,559  $1,491  $1,496  $1,394

Income
  Income from continuing 
  operations                  $1,085      $ 146   $1,072  $1,188  $1,271  $1,025  $  857
  Deduct undistributed 
   net income of 
   unconsolidated companies       10          1       11     13        8       9      (7)
                               1,075        145    1,061  1,175    1,263   1,016     864
Add                    
  Fixed charges
  (excluding interest 
          capitalized)         1,522        369    1,567  1,556    1,486   1,492    1,393
  Income taxes                   767         92      766    912      834     703      614 
   Income before fixed 
   charges and                      
   income taxes               $3,364      $ 606   $3,394 $3,643   $3,583  $3,211  $ 2,871 
                    
Ratio of income to 
     fixed charges              2.20       1.64     2.16   2.34     2.40    2.15     2.06                    

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.2

                                    AGREEMENT


         AGREEMENT dated this first day of October 2004, by and between Creative
Solutions With Art, Inc. (hereinafter "CSA"), a Nevada Corporation, with offices
located at 32C Hadley Village Road, South Hadley, MA. 01075, Carla Santia,
President of CSA and Gary B. Wolff, P.C., counsel to CSA, with offices located
at 805 Third Avenue, New York, New York.

         WHEREAS, CSA has filed a Registration Statement with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter the "SEC") on Form SB-2 which
Registration Statement indicates in Part II, Item 25, offering expenses totaling
Fifty Six Thousand One Hundred Seven Dollars and Sixty Cents ($56,107.60) of
which Forty Five Thousand ($45,000) Dollars are indicated as legal fees and
expenses; and

         WHEREAS, CSA has agreed to pay all such costs as and when necessary and
required, or to otherwise accrue such costs on its books and records until it is
able to pay the full amount due, either from revenues or loans from its
President.

         NOW, THEREFORE, it is herewith agreed as follows: Absent sufficient
revenues to pay these amounts within three (3) months of the date of the CSA
prospectus, CSA's President agrees to loan CSA the funds to cover the balance of
outstanding professional and related fees relating to CSA's prospectus. If and
when loaned, the loan will be evidenced by a non-interest bearing unsecured
corporate note to be treated as a loan until repaid, if and when CSA has the
financial resources to do so.

         The parties hereto understand that the above constitutes a binding
Agreement and that the contents thereof are referred to in the aforesaid
Registration Statement, both in Risk Factor number 2 and in the subheading
entitled "Liquidity" as found in the Management's Discussion and Analysis or
Plan of Operation section.

<PAGE>

         The above constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties hereto.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed as of the 1st day of October 2004.



CREATIVE SOLUTIONS WITH ART, INC.

/s/      Carla Santia
By: ________________________________
         Carla Santia, President


/s/      Carla Santia
By: _________________________________
         Carla Santia, Individually


GARY B. WOLFF, P.C.

/s/      Gary B. Wolff
By:_________________________________
         Gary B. Wolff
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 23, 2015

p0416 

# Order

Clerk April 23, 2015

150683

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 150683

COA: 312409

Wayne CC: 11

- 008725

- FC

JIMMY EARL McCASKILL,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 18, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EX-34.1
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
214 N. Tryon Street
Ste 3600
Charlotte NC 28202
Telephone (704) 344 7500
Facsimile (704) 344 4100


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Bank of America, National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Assessment
Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Compliance
Statement"), that Bank of America, National Association (the "Company") complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions
involving commercial mortgage loan transactions that involved an offer or sale
of asset-backed securities that were required to be registered on or after
January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2007 and for the
year then ended, excluding the criteria which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the
Platform as indicated in Appendix A of the Compliance Statement. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset- backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Bank of America, National
Association complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for the Platform is fairly stated, in
all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P

February 28, 2008