alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                      16,900,000
<SECURITIES>                                 4,152,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,803,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,000
<INVENTORY>                                 20,073,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,399,000
<PP&E>                                     146,341,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             101,821,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              95,111,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       33,938,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   124,240,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  79,634,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                95,111,000
<SALES>                                     54,533,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,533,000
<CGS>                                       45,413,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,413,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,194,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             981,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,538,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,538,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,538,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.60)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.60)
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of this Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Cesar M. Garcia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 11, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cesar M. Garcia    
|Cesar M. Garcia        
|Chief Executive Officer
The HONORABLE R. E. LONGSTAFF, United States District Judge for the 1 Southern District of Iowa. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1934

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Leobardo Urista-Coronado, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 5, 1997 Filed: December 29, 1997

___________ Before LOKEN, HEANEY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Leobardo Urista-Coronado pleaded guilty to unlawfully reentering the Unite d States without the permission of the Unite d States Attorney General, after having been previou sly convicted of a felony and deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) , (b)(2 ). The district court sentenced Urista-Coronado at the bottom of the applicable 1 Guidelines range t o 77 months imprisonment, to be followed by two years supervised-2-

release. In this appeal counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising a sentencing error. We affirm. At sentencing, Urista-Coronado asked the court to depart downward from th e Guidelines range by two levels on the basis that he agreed to be deported, and that he would s uffer “collateral consequences” during imprisonment as a result of his alie n status. The governmen t resisted any departure. After expressing concern that UristaCoronado had been deported three times before, and especially that he had a histor y of violence and criminal conduct, the district court denied the request for departure
. Counsel argues in the Anders brief that the district court erred in refusing to depart.
We conclude the district court & s decision not to depart was an exercise o f discretion, which we do not review. See United States v. Field , 110 F.3d 587, 591 (8th Cir. 1997); United States v. Payne , 81 F.3d 759, 764-65 (8th Cir. 1996). Afte r reviewing the remaining record on appeal, we also conclude there are no othe r nonfrivolous issues for appeal. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of CLASSIC COSTUME COMPANY,
INC.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (“Report”), I, Carl
Oberg, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting/Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
April 22, 2008





/s/Carl
Oberg





Carl Oberg,
President


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial/Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                              68
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      990
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                       1381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   283
<PP&E>                                            5354
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2331
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3508
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2923)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3658
<SALES>                                           2859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2859
<CGS>                                             2145
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (16)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     33
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 33
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        33
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cubic  Energy,  Inc.  (the
     "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
     with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
     "Report"),  I, CEO,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted
     pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.

     Date: February 14, 2007               Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Calvin A. Wallen, III, CEO
Mandamus Proceeding Reinstated and Order filed March 26, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00795-CV

IN RE CATHALEEN MONTELONGO

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

257th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-48430

ORDER

On Monday, September 10, 2018, relator Cathaleen Montelongo filed a 

petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see 

also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the 

Honorable Judy Warne, presiding judge of the 257th District Court of Harris County,

to reinstate the underlying case on the jury trial docket.

Respondent ceased to hold the office of Judge of the 257th District Court of 

Harris County, Texas, after the institution of this action. On January 3, 2019, we 

abated this mandamus proceeding to permit Judge Warne’s successor, the Honorable 
Sandra Peake, to reconsider the decision regarding relator’s request for relief. See

Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b). 

On March 4, 2019, Judge Peake notified this court as follows:

I have had an opportunity to review the docket and court notes in the above 

referenced matter.

After a thorough review, I am not inclined to reconsider Judge Warne’s 

decision to remove the case from the court’s jury trial docket.

Accordingly, we order as follows:

1. The mandamus proceeding is reinstated.

2. The court requests Jorge Valdez, the real party in interest, to file a response 

to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before April 15, 2019. 

PER CURIAM
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Nortel
Networks Corporation, a Canadian corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to such
officers knowledge, that: The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 18, 2005
    /s/ WILLIAM A. OWENSWILLIAM A. OWENSVice Chairman andChief Executive OfficerDated: March 18, 2005
    /s/ PETER W. CURRIEPETER W. CURRIE
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1998
<CASH>                                      16,835,000
<SECURITIES>                                 8,413,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,288,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,000
<INVENTORY>                                 25,387,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            62,377,000
<PP&E>                                     144,954,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              99,181,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             108,357,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,890,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   124,213,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (70,450,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               108,357,000
<SALES>                                     27,746,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,746,000
<CGS>                                       19,892,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,892,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,566,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             500,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,354,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,354,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,354,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.16
 QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 EQUITY PLAN




---



##### 



QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 EQUITY PLAN
 SECTION
    
    PAGE1.
    
    Purpose
    
    
    12.
    
    Term
    
    
    13.
    
    Definitions
    
    
    14.
    
    Units Available Under Plan
    
    
    65.
    
    Options
    
    
    66.
    
    Appreciation Rights
    
    
    77.
    
    Restricted Units
    
    
    98.
    
    Phantom Units
    
    
    109.
    
    Performance Units and Performance Bonuses
    
    
    1110.
    
    Awards to Eligible Directors
    
    
    1211.
    
    Transferability
    
    
    1312.
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    1313.
    
    Fractional Units
    
    
    1414.
    
    Withholding Taxes
    
    
    1415.
    
    Administration of the Plan
    
    
    1416.
    
    Amendments and Other Matters
    
    
    1517.
    
    Governing Law
    
    
    16




---



##### 



QUICKSILVER GAS SERVICES LP
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 EQUITY PLAN
  Purpose
 Term
 Definitions
 Affiliate
 Appreciation Right
 Award
 Board
 Change in Control




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



Code
 Committee
 Company
 Consultant
 Date of Grant
 Deferral Period
 DER
 Eligible Director
 Employee
 Evidence of Award
 3




---



##### 



Exchange Act
 Grant Price
 Incumbent Directors
 Incumbent Quicksilver Directors
 IPO Date
 Management Objectives i.e.
  4




---



##### 



Market Value per Unit
 Option
 Option Price
 Participant
 Performance Bonus
 Performance Period
 Performance Unit
 Person
 Phantom Units
 Restricted Units
 Rule 16b-3
 Spread
 5




---



##### 



UDR
 Unit
 Voting Securities of the Company
 Units Available Under Plan
 Options
    6




---



##### 



Appreciation Rights
 7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



Restricted Units
   rd
    9




---



##### 



Phantom Units
  rd
    10




---



##### 



Performance Units and Performance Bonuses
       11




---



##### 



Awards to Eligible Directors.
    12




---



##### 



rd
   Transferability
 Adjustments
  13




---



##### 



Fractional Units
 Withholding Taxes
 Administration of the Plan
    14




---



##### 



Amendments and Other Matters
     15




---



##### 



Governing Law
 16
EXHIBIT 10.2



 





[LETTERHEAD OF COMPUTER ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.]




September 22, 2004


By Overnight Delivery




John Cooney, Esq.

Davis Polk & Wardwell

450 Lexington Avenue

New York, NY 10017


Dear Jack:




     This is in reference to the letter of August 26, 2004,
from Lewis S. Ranieri to your client, Mr. Sanjay Kumar,
regarding certain matters with respect to his resignation as
an employee of Computer Associates International, Inc.



     This letter shall constitute the sixty-day notice to Mr.
Kumar that the Company, for good cause, has determined to
revoke the benefits referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the
letter.



	 	 	 
	

	 	Very truly yours,
	 
	 	 
	

	 	/S/ Kenneth V. Handal
	

	 	Kenneth V. Handal
	

	 	Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4073 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4073

   To designate the outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans 
    Affairs located in Farmington, Missouri, as the ``Robert Silvey 
          Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2006

 Mr. Talent (for himself and Mr. Bond) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To designate the outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans 
    Affairs located in Farmington, Missouri, as the ``Robert Silvey 
          Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT SILVEY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT 
              CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located in Farmington, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Robert Silvey Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Silvey Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.
                                 <all>
```
EX-35.2
(logo) EMC
Mortgage Corporation
Proven Performance

ITEM 1123 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION


I, Mark T. Novachek and Michelle Viner as Officers of EMC Mortgage Corporation
("EMC") as Master Servicer pursuant to the Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities
I Trust 2007-AC3 (the "Agreement") hereby certify that:

1. A review of EMC Master Servicing activities during the period from and
   including March 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (the
   "Reporting Period") and EMC's Master Servicing performance under the
   Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, EMC Master Servicing has
   fulfilled all of its obligation under the Agreement in all material respects
   throughout the Reporting Period in all material respects.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
14th day of March 2008.


/s/ Mark T. Novachek
Mark T. Novachek
Senior Vice President


/s/ Michelle Viner
Michelle Viner
Manager - Vice President



(logo) MBA
Member
Mortgage Bankers Association of America


800 State Highway 121 Bypass, Lewisville, TX 75067-4180
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 293150, Lewisville, TX 75029-3150
#### State v. Corey

Case below: 173 N.C. App. 444

No. 539P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA04-736)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. Def’s Motion to'Dissolve Stay

1. Allowed 360 N.C. 68

2. Allowed 12/19/06

3. Allowed 12/19/06

4. Dismissed as Moot 12/19/06
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT LAR R Y B ANKS, Pe titione r - Appe lla nt, v. C ONNIE GIPSON, W arde n, R

e sponde nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-17371

D.C . No. 1:11-c v-02067-LJO-M JS M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Lawre nc e J. O’ Ne ill, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Argue d a nd Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 10, 2016 San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : THOM AS, C hie f Judge and SC HR OEDER and NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. Larry B anks a ppe a ls the distric t c ourt’ s orde r de ny ing his ha be a s pe tition. B anks wa s c o nvic te d of the M ay 10, 1977 first de gre e m

urde r of Susa

n Va llin. B anks c onte nds tha

t the tria l c ourt e rre d in instruc t ing the jury tha t it c ould c onside r e vide n c e of a

n unc ha rge d se xua l a ssa

ult to show prope

nsity to c om m it the 

# FIL ED FEB 22 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.c ha

rge d m urde r. His the ory

is tha t m urde r is not a

c rim e sim ila

r to the unc ha

rge d se xua l offe nse . The c ha l le nge d instruc t ion dire c t e d the jury to re ga rd the se xua l a ssa

ult e vide nc e a s re le va

nt to thefe l ony

m urde r c ha rge . Tha t c ha rge d offe nse wa s not dissimila r to se xua l offe n se s. The sta te c ourt fully

instruc t e d the jury

re ga rding the e le m e nts of theoffe nse and the a ppropria t e burde ns of proof. Se e Me nde z v . K now le s , 556 F.3d 757, 768–70 (9th C ir. 2009). The distric t c ourt the re fore c orre c tly he ld tha t unde r 28 U.S.C . § 2254(d) the re wa s no unre a sona ble a pplic ation of Supre m e C ourt la w whe n the sta

te c ourt de te rm ine d tha

t the prope n sity

instruc tion did not viola

te due proc e s s or re nde r his tria l funda m e nta l ly unfa ir. AFFIRM E D .

2
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00048-CR

ROSS WILLIAMS CARNEAL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 355th District 

Court

of Hood County (CR13415)

October 24, 2019

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete the $15 

assessed for “Motion to Proceed/Revoke Fee,” leaving total court costs of $75. It is 

ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM