alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 19, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11640]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 90

[DA 09-621; WT Docket No. 04-344; FCC 08-208]


Maritime Communications

AGENCY: Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission published in the Federal 
Register of January 29, 2009, a document in the Automatic 
Identification Systems (AIS) proceeding, WT Docket No. 04-344, which 
included a Final Rules Appendix that reflected the amendments adopted 
of certain rules. This document corrects the amendment of one of those 
sections as set forth below.

DATES: May 19, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Tobias, Federal Communications 
Commission, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, 445 12th St. SW., 
Washington, DC 20554 at (202) 418-0620.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Communications Commission 
published a document in the Federal Register of January 29, 2009 (74 FR 
5117) regarding the adoption of changes to rules relating to AIS, an 
advanced marine vessel tracking and navigation technology that can 
significantly enhance our Nation's homeland security as well as 
maritime safety. The document amended a number of FCC rules governing 
the public safety pool. This document, released on March 18, 2009; DA 
09-621, corrects a certain rule in the document published in the 
Federal Register of January 29, 2009 (74 FR 5117). This document does 
not change any of the other rule amendments set forth in the document 
published in the Federal Register of January 29, 2009 (74 FR 5117).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR 90

    Communications equipment, radio.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.

Rules Changes

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications 
Commission corrects 47 CFR part 90 as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for part 90 continues to read as follows:

PART 90--PRIVATE LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICES

    Authority: Secs. 4(i), 11, 303(g), 303(r) and 332(c)(7) of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 161, 
303(r), and 332(c)(7).


0
2. In Sec.  90.20, revise the Table C heading in paragraph (g)(3)(iv) 
to read as follows:


Sec.  90.20  Public Safety Pool.

* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (iv) * * *
    Table C--Required Separation in Kilometers (Miles) of Base Station 
From Public Coast Stations
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-11640 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-19 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and coll ateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### May 3, 2006 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK, Petitioner - Appellant,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. No. 06-6010 (D.C. No. 05-CV-1195-R) (Western District of Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , Chief Judge, KELLYandHENRY , Circuit Judges. After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would notmaterially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted w ithout oral argument.2

The petitioner appeals the dismissal by the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma of his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We affirm. In the petition filed in the district court, the pe titioner challenged his conviction for aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base and the resulting sen tence entered by the United States District Court for the Western Distri ct of Texas. He alleged that he was deprived of his due process rights because he did not receive notice of a possible sentence enhancement for being a career criminal, that his sentence was enhanced without required findings by a jury, that he was sentenced under unconstitutional sentencing guideli nes, and that his guilty plea was involuntary. The district court dismissed
. Normally, “‘[a] petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 att acks the execution of a sentence rather than its validity and must be filed in the district where the prisoner is confined. A 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petit ion attacks the legality of detention, and must be filed in the district that i mposed the sentence.’” Haugh v. Booker , 210 F.3d 1147, 1149 (10th Cir.2000) (quoting Bradshaw v. Story , 86 F.3d 164, 166 (10th Cir.1996)). Section 2241 “is not an additional, alternative, or supplemental remedy to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.” Bradshaw , 86 F.3d at 166. Only if the petitioner shows that § 2255 is3

“inadequate or ineffective” to challenge the validi ty of a judgment or sentence may a prisoner petition for such a remedy under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Id . “Failure to obtain relief under § 2255 does not establish that the remedy so provided is either inadequate or ineffective.” Id . (quotation omitted). The petitioner has not established the inadequacy o r ineffectiveness of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Accordingly the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED . The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

PER CURIAM
#### State v. Parker

Case below: 185 N.C. App.-(21 August 2007)

No. 462P07

Defs’ Motion for Stay of Execution of the Judgment of Imprisonment (COA06-870)

Allowed 09/21/07
IRREVOCABLE ESCROW AGENT INSTRUCTIONS

                         KNIGHTSBRIDGE FINE WINES, INC.



September 24, 2004

Gottbetter & Partners, LLP
488 Madison Ave.
New York, New York 10022
Attn:  Adam S. Gottbetter, Esq.


Dear Mr. Gottbetter:

         Reference  is  made to  that  certain  Escrow  Agreement  (the  "Escrow
Agreement"),  dated as of June 22, 2004, by and among  Knightsbridge Fine Wines,
Inc., a Nevada  corporation (the "Company"),  Armadillo  Investments,  Plc. (the
"Purchaser") and Gottbetter & Partners,  LLP (the "Escrow  Agent"),  pursuant to
which the Company has deposited  2,222,222 Ordinary shares of the Purchaser (the
"Ordinary  Shares")  with the  Escrow  Agent.  This  letter  shall  serve as our
irrevocable authorization and direction to you (provided that you are the Escrow
Agent  pursuant to the Escrow  Agreement  at such time) to release the  Ordinary
Shares and Stock Powers  and/or any proceeds of the sale of the Ordinary  Shares
to the  Purchaser  or any  other  person  pursuant  to the  terms of the  Escrow
Agreement,  at any time that such Ordinary Shares,  Stock Powers and/or proceeds
are available for release from escrow to the Company, to the following person:

                           Warren W. Garden, P.C.
                           100 Crescent Court
                           Suite 490
                           Dallas, Texas  75201
                           Attn:  Warren W. Garden, Esq.


         Please be advised that Gryphon  Master Fund,  L.P. is relying upon this
letter as an  inducement  to enter into a certain Debt  Restructuring  Agreement
and,  accordingly,  Gryphon  Master Fund,  L.P. is a third party  beneficiary to
these instructions.

         Please execute this letter in the space  indicated to acknowledge  your
agreement  to act in  accordance  with these  instructions.  Should you have any
questions concerning this matter, please contact me at (203) 801-9684.







                                       1
<PAGE>


                                        Very truly yours,

                                        Knightsbridge Fine Wines, Inc.


                                        By:
                                            -----------------------------
                                             Name:  Jake Shapiro
                                             Title:   President and CEO




ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

Gottbetter & Partners, LLP


By:
    --------------------------------
         Name: Adam S. Gottbetter
         Title:   Managing Partner
















                                       2
#### Louis E. Thyroff et al., Appellants, v Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al., Respondents.

Decided June 30, 2009

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-182-CR

WILLIAM JOSEPH BELL	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	William Joseph Bell is attempting to appeal his deferred adjudication community supervision for possession of methamphetamine.  Appellant’s notice of appeal was due on February 4, 2004,2 but was not filed until April 19, 2004, and appellant did not file a motion to extend his filing deadline.  See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3.  Therefore, the notice was untimely, and we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.  Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  Further, appellant has not responded to our jurisdiction letter.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: July 1, 2004
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                            For the month of May 2005

                        Commission File Number 333-101591

                          GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION


                       4221 W. Boy Scout Blvd., Suite 600
                              Tampa, Florida 33607

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
                      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                          Form 20-F [ ]   Form 40-F [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

  Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
 Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
 Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange
                                  Act of 1934.

                                Yes [ ]   No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
                  connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________


<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Exhibit        Description
     -------        -----------
     <C>            <S>
       99.1         Financial Statements for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
                    2005 prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP

       99.2         Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005

       99.3         Certifications pursuant to Canadian law
</TABLE>



<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  May 10, 2005

                                    GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION


                                    By:    /s/ Robert E. Lewis
                                           -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Robert E. Lewis
                                    Title: Vice-President, General Counsel and
                                           Corporate Secretary
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

s1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

145598 & (14)(19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145598

COA: 307620

Wayne CC: 83-000839

KEITH CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to add issue and the motion to add appendices 

are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the June 8, 2012 order of the Court 

of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the 

burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel; Review R13.
    Date: June 17, 2009.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Mary Kelly, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Inst. of Dental & Craniofacial 
Research, NIH 6701 Democracy Blvd., room 672, MSC 4878, Bethesda, MD 
20892-4878, 301-594-4809, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97faf6e5eec8fcf2fbfbeed7f9feffb9f0f8e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a676b787355616f6666734a646362246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: May 11, 2009.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-11486 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2013

s0826

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2013

147067

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147067

COA: 307498

Washtenaw CC: 09-001277-FH

FAYDRA APRIL SPARKS-ROSS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 7, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Ortiz, Appellant.

Submitted April 13, 2009;

decided April 30, 2009

*811Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
** **

UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM10-Q**

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number0-10256

 

**SHELTER PROPERTIESII**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen Earl COOK, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50605.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 18, 2006.

Lee S. Arian, Esq., Becky S. Walker, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Stephen Earl Cook, Los Angeles, CA, pro se.

Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Stephen Earl Cook appeals from the district court’s order revoking his super*153vised release and imposing a one-year term of imprisonment.

Cook’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she finds no meritorious issues for review.

When Cook completed his sentence upon revocation of supervised release, there ceased to be a case or controversy. *See United States v. Palomba,*182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999). Accordingly, this appeal is moot. *See Spencer v. Kemna,*523 U.S. 1, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998); *Palomba,*182 F.3d at 1123 & n. 3.

We GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *153courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
(f ») Join us!
Daily demonstrations and discussions

[e)
WEDNESDAY SESSIONS Sean me for details
NGA Booth #921 Demo Schedule Breakout and Panel Sessions (Room: D135-136)
December 13 December 13
9:30-10:00 am Common Operations Release Environment 11:00-12:00 pm Chief Information Officer Panel
(CORE) Mark Chatelain
10:00-10:30 am Joint Regional Edge Node (JREN) & Odyssey Chief Information Officer and Director, Chief
10:30-11:00 am Multiple Cloud Information Office and IT Services
11:00-11:30 am Zero Trust Compciaty
12:00-1:00 pm The Way of Al 1:30-2:30 pm ODNI Cloud Breakout Session
1:00-1:30 pm NGA Disconnected Applications (MAGE, Delivery of Cloud Services to the Edge -
MapCache and Marlin) \C angaloaare)
1:30-2:00 pm IC GIS Portal - Making Waves Jim Long E
2:00-2:30 pm Open Engagements Director, GEOINT Services Office

SSeS. Chuck Bellinger
2:30-3:00 pm NGA Globe Chief, NGA Edge Capabilites

3:00 78:20 BCORE 4:30-5:30 pm ODNI Cloud Breakout Sessi
A :30-5:30 pm joud Breakout Session
3:30-4:00 pm JREN & Odyssey Rapidly Emerging Technologies Panel

4:00-4:30 pm Multiple Cloud Discussion
AllDay Small Business Office Jim Long
AllDay Industry Engagement Director, GEOINT Services Office

‘Approved for public release, NGA-U-2023-02734


9:00-9:30 am
9:30-10:00 am
10:00-12:00 pm
12:00-12:30 pm

12:00-1:00 pm
1:00-1:30 pm
1:30-2:00 pm
2:00-2:30 pm
2:30-3:00 pm
3:00-3:30 pm
3:30-4:00 pm
4:00-4:30 pm
All Day

All Day

THURSDAY SESSIONS

NGA Booth #921 Demo Schedule

December 14

Zero Trust
The Way of Al
Open Engagements

NGA Disconnected Applications (MAGE,
MapCache and Marlin)

IC GIS Portal - Making Waves
NGA Globe

Open Engagements

The Way of Al

Zero Trust

CORE

JREN & Odyssey

Multiple Cloud

Small Business Office
Industry Engagement

Breakout and Panel Sessions

8:00-9:00 am

8:00-9:00 am
10:00-11:00 am
11:00-12:00 pm

Approved for public release, NGA-U-2023-02734

December 14

The Road to Zero Trust Is a Shared Journey:
IC and DoD Panel (Room: D135-136)

Evan Kehayias
Division Chief, Cybersecurity Engineering

Multiple Cloud (Room: E141-143)
JREN & Odyssey (Room: E141-143)
CORE (Room: E141-143)