# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17

- 1335 V

UNPUBLISHED

LINDSEY DENWIDDIE

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: September 14, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury

Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Heather Varney Menezes, Shaheen & Gordon, P.A., Manchester, NH , for petitioner.

Ronalda Elnetta Kosh , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On September 26, 2017

, Lindse y Denwiddie filed a petition for compensation

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 ( the “Vaccine Act” )

. Petitioner alleges that she suffered from a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) which meets the Table def inition or , in the alt ernative,

was caus ed

- in

- fact by the influenza vaccine she received on October 2, 2014 . Petition at ¶¶ 3, 19 ; Stipulation

, fil ed at Sept. 1 1, 2020

, ¶¶ 1

- 2, 4

. Petitioner further alleges she

received the vaccin ation in the Unite d States , that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil

action or received compensation for her injury , alleged as vaccine caused . Petit ion at ¶¶
3, 14

- 16 ; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3

- 5

. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner ’ s alleged shoulder injury, or any other injury; and denies that her current condition is a sequelae of a v accine

- related injury. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact
medical or other information, the disclosure of w hich would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 6 60, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2

Nevertheless, o n September 11, 2020

, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set

forth therein.

Pursuant to the term s stated in the attached Stipulation

, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $ 130,000.00 in the form of a check payable to P etitioner

. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages

that wo uld be available under Section 15 (a). Id

.

I approve the requested amount for P etitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filin g of notice renouncing the right to seek review.