alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          14,870
<SECURITIES>                                     5,926
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,128
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         203,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,825
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        135,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,824
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,770
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,903
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,294
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (727)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (727)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    663
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
        

</TABLE>
#### Gregory Leon YOUNG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. J. SULLIVAN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-56077.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 18, 2006.

Gregory Leon Young, Vacaville, CA, pro se.

Jonathan J. Kline, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Gregory Leon Young appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time-barred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Young contends that the district court erred by finding that he was not entitled to statutory tolling during the time period between the filing of his first and second state post-conviction petitions. Because the second petition contained numerous new claims, we conclude that it constituted a second round of filing. *See King v. Roe,*340 F.3d 821, 823 (9th Cir.2003) (per cu-riam). Accordingly, the district court did not err in finding that this period did not statutorily toll the statute of limitations under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).

Young also contends that the district court erred by not finding that he was entitled to equitable tolling during the time period that he mistakenly believed he had a direct appeal pending before the California Court of Appeal. We reject this contention because Young has not shown that his misunderstanding of the status of his appeal constituted an “extraordinary circumstance.” *See Pace v. DiGuglielmo,*544 U.S. 408, 418, 125 S.Ct. 1807, 161 L.Ed.2d 669 (2005). Furthermore, we *156agree with the district court that Young was not diligent in pursuing his rights once he became aware that no appeal had been filed. *See id.*

The motion of appellant’s counsel Shakti Murthy, Esq., to withdraw as appointed counsel is granted. Murthy shall serve this memorandum disposition on appellant Young and shall, within 14 days of the filing date of this order, file a proof of service with this court.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 655 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act with respect to 

the National Foundation for the Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

S 655 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS 

2 FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION; 

3 ACCEPTANCE OF VOLUNTARY SERVICES; 

4 FEDERAL FUNDING. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY FOR ACCEPTANCE OF VOLUNTARY

6 SERVICES; STRIKING TWO-YEAR LIMIT PER INDI7 VIDUAL.—Section 399G(h)(2)(A) of the Public Health 

8 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280e–11(h)(2)(A)) is amended by 

9 striking the second sentence and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘In the case of an individual, such Director may accept 

11 the services provided under the preceding sentence by the 

12 individual until such time as the private funding for such 

13 individual ends.’’. 

14 (b) REPORTS.—Section 399G(h)(7) of the Public 

15 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280e–11(h)(7)) is amend16 ed— 

17 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘, includ18 ing an accounting of the use of amounts provided 

19 for under subsection (i)’’ before the period; and 

20 (2) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting 

21 the following: 

22 ‘‘(C) The Foundation shall make copies of 

23 each report submitted under subparagraph (A) 

24 available— 

25 ‘‘(i) for public inspection, and shall 

26 upon request provide a copy of the report 
3 

S 655 RFH 

1 to any individual for a charge not to ex2 ceed the cost of providing the copy; and 

3 ‘‘(ii) to the appropriate committees of 

4 Congress.’’. 

5 (c) FEDERAL FUNDING.—Section 399G(i) of the 

6 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 280e–11(i)) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

9 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking 

10 ‘‘$500,000’’, and inserting ‘‘$1,250,000’’; and 

11 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘not 

12 more than $500,000’’ and inserting ‘‘not less 

13 than $500,000, and not more than 

14 $1,250,000’’; and 

15 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

16 ‘‘(4) SUPPORT SERVICES.—The Director of the 

17 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may 

18 provide facilities, utilities, and support services to 

19 the Foundation if it is determined by the Director 
4 

S 655 RFH 

1 to be advantageous to the programs of such Cen2 ters.’’. 

Passed the Senate July 27, 2005. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          18,590
<RECEIVABLES>                                  638,782
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          965,869
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            446,676
<PP&E>                                          14,066
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,112,624
<SHORT-TERM>                                   384,081
<PAYABLES>                                      71,568
<REPOS-SOLD>                                     4,157
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            762,263
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             351,090
<LONG-TERM>                                     21,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,112,624
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               37,796
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            39,062
<COMMISSIONS>                                   91,174
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   20,718
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   23,760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,618
<COMPENSATION>                                 124,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,592
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,657
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF

THE TRUSTEE*

OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Lee Ann Anderson, Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Compass Bank, on behalf of Compass Bank, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust), not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby
certify that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as explained in Note 1
to the Trusts financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 47, released September 16, 1982, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner
that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



COMPASS BANK, AS TRUSTEE OF THESAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTBy:

/s/ Lee Ann AndersonName:

Lee Ann AndersonTitle:

Vice President and Senior Trust OfficerDate: November 12, 2013




|* | The Trust has no executive officers.
|- | ------------------------------------
Amendment to Master Loan Agreement , dated November 28, 2001



 Exhibit 10.37 
  
 No. CF101C 
  
 AMENDMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT is entered into as of November 28, 2001, between CoBANK, ACB (“CoBank”) and PETROUS, L.L.C., Des Moines,
Iowa, (the “Company”). 
  
 BACKGROUND 

 
 CoBank and the Company are parties to a Master Loan Agreement dated
September 1, 1999, (such agreement, as previously amended, is hereinafter referred to as the “MLA”). CoBank and the Company now desire to amend the MLA. For that reason, and for valuable consideration (the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged), CoBank and the Company agree as follows: 
  
 1. Section
10(A) of the MLA is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 (A) The Company will have at the end of each quarter (1) an excess of current assets over current liabilities of not less than $2 million; (2) an excess of total assets over total liabilities of not less than $1.4
million (both as determined in accordance with GAAP consistently applied). 
  
 2.
Except as set forth in this amendment, the MLA shall continue in full force and effect as written. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the date shown above. 

 

									
	CoBANK, ACB	 	 	 	PETROUS, L.L.C.
					
	By:	 	 /s/
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert V. Johnson

	 Title:
	 	 Asst. Vice President
	 	 	 	 Title:
	 	 Treasurer
#### Kelvin L. GREENFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A.L. DUDLEY, Office at Kenansville Police Department; Chris Smith, Deputy at Duplin County Sheriff Department; Doug Pearson, District Attorney at Duplin County Courthouse, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-7087.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 22, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 24, 2006.

Kelvin L. Greenfield, Appellant Pro Se. Torin L. Fury, William L. Hill, Frazier, Franklin, Hill & Fury, RLLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Mark Allen Davis, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina; Gerald Patrick Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin L. Greenfield seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (I960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on April 17, 2006. The notice of appeal was signed and mailed on June 5, 2006. Because Greenfield failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we grant the Appellees’ motions to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral *486argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                         |  |                                            
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  | SOUTHWEST BANK, TRUSTEE FOR PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 7, 2017 |  |  |  | By:                                                     |  | /s/ RON E. HOOPER                          
|                       |  |  |  |                                                         |  | Ron E. Hooper,                             
|                       |  |  |  |                                                         |  | SVP Royalty Trust Management Southwest
Bank

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Permian Basin Royalty Trust and
will be retained by Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



1
##### 



Certification of Interim Filings during Transition Period I, Donald A. Stewart, the Chief Executive Officer of Sun Life Financial Inc., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument
52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings)of Sun Life
Financial Inc., (the issuer) for the interim period ending March 31, 2005;2.
    Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a
statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect
to the period covered by the interim filings; and3.
    Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the other financial
information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and
for the periods presented in the interim filings.  Date: April 28, 2005. /s/ Donald A. Stewart




---



##### 



Certification of Interim Filings During Transition Period I, Paul Derksen, the Chief Financial Officer of Sun Life Financial Inc., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument
52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings)of Sun Life
Financial Inc., (the issuer) for the interim period ending March 31, 2005;2.
    Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a
statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect
to the period covered by the interim filings; and3.
    Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the other financial
information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and
for the periods presented in the interim filings.  Date: April 28, 2005. /s/ Paul Derksen
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 21, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 3628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR


National Park System Concessions Management Advisory Board 
Reestablishment

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Reestablishment of the National Park Service 
Concessions Management Advisory Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior intends to administratively 
reestablish the National Park Service Concessions Management Advisory 
Board. This action is necessary and in the public interest in 
connection with the performance of statutory duties imposed upon the 
Department of the Interior and the National Park Service.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo Pendry, Chief, Commercial Services 
Program on 202-513-7156.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Park Service Concessions 
Management Advisory Board was established by Title IV, Section 409 of 
Public Law 105-391, the National Park Omnibus Management Act of 1998, 
November 13, 1998, with a termination date of December 31, 2008. 
Extension legislation was introduced in September 2008 that would have 
extended the Board for one year. We anticipate action on this issue 
during the 111th Congress, but cannot predict if or when that will 
occur.
    The advice and recommendations provided by the Board and its 
subcommittees fulfill an important need within the Department of the 
Interior and the National Park Service, and it therefore is necessary 
to administratively reestablish the Board to ensure that its work is 
not disrupted. The Board's six members will be balanced to represent a 
cross-section of disciplines and expertise relevant to the National 
Park Service mission. The administrative reestablishment of the Board 
comports with the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
as amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix), and follows consultation with the 
General Services Administration. The reestablishment will be effective 
on the date the charter is filed pursuant to section 9(c) of the Act 
and 41 CFR 102-3.70.
    Certification: I hereby certify that the administrative 
reestablishment of the National Park Service Concessions Management 
Advisory Board is necessary and in the public interest in connection 
with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of the 
Interior by the Act of August 25, 1916, 16 U.S.C. 1 et seq., and other 
statutes relating to the administration of the National Park System.

    Dated: January 12, 2009.
Dirk Kempthorne,
Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. E9-1082 Filed 1-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-53-P
#### Paul James KOUMJIAN, Petitioner-Appellant v. Nathaniel QUARTERMAN, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 06-51492

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 24, 2009.

See also 2002 WL 1397157.

Paul James Koumjian, Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division Estelle Unit, Huntsville, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Sallie Christian-Carnal, Office of the Attorney General, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and, HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Paul James Koumjian, Texas prisoner # 1039181, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as time barred. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2244. The district court found that Koumjian filed no state habeas applications before the expiration of the limitations period. However, there is a factual dispute regarding whether Koumjian filed a state habeas application in March 2003 in the state trial court, ease number 20010D00128-120-2. Because this application is not part of the state court record, a review of the record is not a sufficient *322means of resolving whether the instant § 2254 petition is untimely or, if it is untimely, whether equitable tolling would be warranted under the circumstances. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is VACATED and this case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

All outstanding motions are DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.