alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.26

AMENDMENT

TO

LETTER
AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT(the Amendment) is made December 31, 2008, by and between WABCO Expats Inc.
(the Company) and Kevin Tarrant (the Executive).

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into that certain
letter agreement dated June 28, 2007 (the Letter Agreement);

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the
Letter Agreement to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code as provided herein.

NOW, THEREFORE,for good and valuable
consideration, the sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:



|1. | The section of the Letter Agreement entitled International Assignment shall be amended by adding the following new paragraph at the end of such section:
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All benefits, reimbursements and other payments made or paid in connection with your assignment shall be done in a manner that complies with the
requirements of Section 409A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). If WSW reimburses you for the amount of any such benefit, such reimbursement will be made not later than the last day of your taxable
year following the year in which the related expense was incurred (subject to your providing any required supporting documentation); provided, however, that the timing for reimbursements of any tax equalization payments shall be as set forth below.
Any reimbursement payments due to you pursuant to this letter shall not be subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit and the amount of such expenses eligible for reimbursement or such benefits that you receive in one taxable year shall
not affect the expenses eligible for reimbursement or the amount of such benefits that you will receive in any other taxable year.

Any amounts
payable to you pursuant to any tax equalization agreement (within the meaning of Treas. Reg. Section 1.409A-1(b)(8)(iii)) shall be made to you not later than the last day of your second taxable year following the year in which your U.S. Federal
income tax return is required to be filed (including any extensions) for the year to which the compensation subject to the tax equalization payment relates, or, if later, your second taxable year following the latest such taxable year in which your
foreign tax return or payment is required to be filed or made for the year to which the compensation subject to the tax equalization payment relates.



|2. | All other terms of the Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This instrument, together with the Letter Agreement, contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first written above.



By:

/s/ Arielle van der PerrenWABCO EXPATS INC/s/ Kevin Tarrant Kevin Tarrant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JOSH TAI LOR, SR.

, 1

Respondent Below,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF SERVICES FOR

CHILDREN, YOUTH AND THEIR

FAMILIES,

Petitioner Below,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 276, 2019

Court Below: Family Court

of the State of Delaware

File No. 18

- 11

- 06TN

Petition No. 18

- 34790

Submitted: February 5, 2020

Decided: February 14 , 2020

Corrected: February 17, 2020

Before SEITZ , Chief Justice; VAUGHN and MONTGOMERY

- REEVES

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 17 th day of February 2020 , the Cour t having considered this matter on

the briefs filed by the parties has determined that the final judgment of the Family

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Family

Court in its order dat ed May 30, 2019

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the

Family Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, May 20, 
2009 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be: The Commission will 
consider whether to propose changes to the federal proxy rules to 
facilitate director nominations by shareholders.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    May 12, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11380 Filed 5-12-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
#### Shavitz v. City of High Point

Case below: 177 N.C. App. 465

No. 336P06

1. Def’s (High Point) NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-571)

2. Def’s (Guilford Bd. of Ed.) Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s (High Point) PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31

1. _

2. Allowed 06/27/07

3. Denied 06/27/07
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                        LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

Below is a list of all of Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd.'s "significant
subsidiaries", as defined in rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.

1.   Ainsworth Engineered Corp., wholly owned. Incorporated under the laws of
     Nova Scotia, Canada.

2.   Ainsworth Engineered (USA), LLC, wholly owned. Incorporated under the laws
     of Delaware, U.S.A.

3.   Ainsworth Engineered Canada Limited Partnership, wholly owned. Formed under
     the laws of British Columbia.

4.   Ainsworth Corp., wholly owned. Incorporated under the laws of Minnesota.


                                       1
Order entered June 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01299-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.C., ET AL

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-76-08723-V

ORDER

Because appellant’s brief does not meet the general requirements of Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure 9 and 38, we STRIKE the brief filed June 2, 2015. We ORDER appellant 

to file, no later than July 9, 2015, a brief that conforms with rules 9 and 38 including the 

requirement that it not exceed 15,000 words if computer-generated and 50 pages if not and the 

requirements that it contain (1) a table of contents indicating the subject matter of each issue or 

point, or group of issues or points; (2) an index of authorities arranged alphabetically and 

indicating the pages of the brief where the authorities are cited; (3) a concise statement of the 

case, the course of proceedings, the trial court’s disposition of the case, and the facts supported 

by record references; (4) appropriate citations to authorities and the record in the argument 

portion; and, (5) a certificate of compliance regarding word count if computer-generated. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(i)(2)(B),(3); 38.1. Additionally, any documents which contain sensitive data 

such as a child’s name and which are included in the appendix must be redacted by using the 
letter “X” in place of each omitted item or by removing the sensitive data in a manner indicating 

the data has been redacted. See id. 9.9(a),(c). 

We caution appellant that failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this 

appeal without further notice.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
West Building East Building

Main Floor
SEAS 13th- to 16th-Century italian 35-35A, 1Sth- to 1é6th-Century EERE 18th- andearly9th-century Ss Modem and
Paintings and Sculptures 38-414 Netherlandish and German French Paintings and Sculptures Contemporary Art
SPER t6th-Century italian, French and Paintings and Sculptures 57-59,64 British Paintings and Sculptures Special Exhibitions
Spanish Paintings, Sculptures, 225 17th-century DutchandFlemish ‘American Paintings and Scul
passa Keo a semen = —
‘ Public Space
47th- to 18th-Century Italian, SQSCtsth- and 19th-Century Spanish a -
on a Spanish, and French Paintings and French Paintings BES 13th-Century French Paintings GEEEEEEENE chsed tothe public

72-79 Special Exhibitions

Tower Level

Upper Level

Ground Floor
(64S69;629%) 19th-and 20th-century RREEEEE Photographe/Prints and Drawings
Sculptures and Paintings @42-G43 © American Decorative
Gt-6BA 17th- and 1eth-Century Arts and Paintings, Ground Level
cca Public Space
610, sei |, Renaissance, OSC Closed to the Public
National Mall and Baroque Sculptures
and Decorative Arts
Facilities @
0 Men [?) Information @ Elevator Please do not touch works of art
(¢) Women U7] Listening device G exalator Dirt, moisture, and other contaminants
3 < present on hands can stain orcorrode
@ Single stall 8 Braille transcripts 2 Moving walkway the surfaces. Help us protect theworks
8 Lactation room iS] ATM 6 Stairs of artand preserve our common heritage
8 Changing room e Accessible = Exterior entrance for future generations. Concourse
© checkroom @® water fountain We're improving our facilities and
oO Dining adding art Installations, so some of our
galleries may temporarily be closed.
Learn more at aga.gov/renovations.

Foor
Concourse
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      182,013
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      1,130
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          82,083
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        14,162
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 279,388
<COMMON>                                         5,768
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       55,768
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             24,125
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  85,661
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            70,752
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              40,965
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       71,200
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,600
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                      1,581
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   429
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  71,981
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  279,388
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       64,038
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,392
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      11,374
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      20,403
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          6,355
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (47)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   6,308
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,870
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,438
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        174
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    4,264
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,552
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        1,520
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (7,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.74
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Abdullah Y. Salahuddin, Appellant, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Submitted June 8, 2009;

decided June 30, 2009

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see 12*NY3d 812 (2009)].
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22901-22902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11351]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2009-OS-0066]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Information Systems Agency, DoD.

[[Page 22902]]


ACTION: Notice to Delete 3 Systems of Records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Information Systems Agency is deleting three 
systems of records notices in its existing inventory of records systems 
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
June 15, 2009 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Defense Information Systems Agency, 
5600 Columbia Pike, Room 933-I, Falls Church, VA 22041-2705.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jeanette M. Weathers-Jenkins at 
(703) 681-2103.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Information Systems Agency 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register 
and are available from the address above.
    The Defense Information Systems Agency is deleting three systems of 
records notices in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed 
deletions are not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy 
Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission 
of a new or altered system report.

    Dated: May 12, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletions:
K890.06
    Card File for Forwarding Mail of Departed Personnel (February 22, 
1993, 58 FR 10562).

Reason:
    The program is non-operational, all records have been destroyed in 
accordance with the National Archives and Records Administration 
records retention schedule. The DISA Mailroom does not process any 
personal mail, nor do they maintain a card file for departed personnel.
KDEC.07
    601-11 Duty Rosters (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10562).

Reason:
    These records are now covered under the System of Records Notice 
Recall Roster/Locator Records (July 6 2005, 70 FR 38892).
KDEC.08
    101-06 Requests and Authorization for Temporary Duty Travel 
(February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10562).

Reason:
    The program is non-operational, all records have been destroyed in 
accordance with the National Archives and Records Administration 
records retention schedule.

[FR Doc. E9-11351 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
II 

Calendar No. 308 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 435 

[Report No. 109–189] 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the 

Farmington River and Salmon Brook in the State of Connecticut for 

study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers 

System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2005 

Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 8, 2005 

Reported under authority of the order of the Senate of November 18, 2005, 

by Mr. DOMENICI, with an amendment 

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

a segment of the Farmington River and Salmon Brook 

in the State of Connecticut for study for potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, 

and for other purposes. 
2 

•S 435 RS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lower Farmington 

5 River and Salmon Brook Wild and Scenic River Study Act 

6 of 2005’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ADDITIONAL SEGMENT OF FARM8 INGTON RIVER AND SALMON BROOK IN CON9 NECTICUT FOR STUDY FOR POTENTIAL ADDI10 TION TO NATIONAL WILD AND SCENIC RIV11 ERS SYSTEM. 

12 (a) DESIGNATION.—Section 5(a) of the Wild and 

13 Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by add14 ing at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(139) LOWER FARMINGTON RIVER AND SALMON

16 BROOK, CONNECTICUT.—The segment of the Farmington 

17 River downstream from the segment designated as a rec18 reational river by section 3(a)(156) to its confluence with 

19 the Connecticut River, and the segment of the Salmon 

20 Brook including its mainstream and east and west 

21 branches.’’. 

22 (b) TIME FOR SUBMISSION.—Not later than 3 years 

23 after the date of enactment of on which funds are made 

24 available to carry out this Act, the Secretary of the Inte25 rior shall submit to Congress a report containing the re-
3 

•S 435 RS

1 sults of the study required by the amendment made by 

2 subsection (a). 

3 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

4 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec5 essary to carry out this Act. 
Calendar No. 308 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 435 

[Report No. 109–189] 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to desposes. and Scenic Rivers System, and for other pur- study for potential addition to the National Wild Salmon Brook in the State of Connecticut for ignate a segment of the Farmington River and 

DECEMBER 8, 2005 

Reported with an amendment
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 29, 2015

No. 04-14-00689-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.G. II,

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-01552

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Our opinion in this appeal issued on March 11, 2015. Accordingly, appellant’s motion 

for rehearing was due March 26, 2015. On April 21, 2015, appellant filed a motion for extension 

of time to file a motion for rehearing. Rule 49.8 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

states that a court of appeals may extend the time for filing a motion for rehearing if a party files 

a proper motion for extension of time to file the rehearing “no later than 15 days after the last 

date for filing the motion.” The last date for filing the motion for rehearing was March 26, 2015.

Thus, per Rule 49.8, appellant’s extension of time to file a motion for rehearing had to be filed in 

this court no later than April 10, 2015. Because appellant did not file his motion for extension of 

time until April 21, 2015, the motion is untimely. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion 

for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
| (3)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (4)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                                          |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |                                          |   |
| March 31, 2010  | By:    | /s/ Johnson Kachidza                     |   |
|                 |   | Johnson Kachidza                              |   |
|                 |   | President, CFO & Co-Executive Chairman    |   |
|                 |   | (Principal Financial & Accounting Officer |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1473

JAMES T. BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT M. DORAN; K. KEELEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen,

District Judge. (CA-02-1019-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James T. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Paula

Keyser Speck, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,

D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James T. Brown appeals from the district court’s orders

dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s memorandum and opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Brown v. Doran, No. CA-02-1019-1 (M.D.N.C.

Dec. 3, 2003 & Feb. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED