alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NGA’s Warfighter Support Office rapidly delivers disruptive GEOINT technology and capabilities to disadvantaged and 

dis-connected users. The office manages Odyssey, a forward-deployed system that provides browser-based access to 

applica-tions and theater GEOINT data hosted on local servers to support users at the edge in the event of disconnected ops.

Utilizing a combination of hardware, apps, data and products, Odyssey deployments are available via a web browser 

established on theater users’ networks and connected back to NGA. When communications to the continental U.S. are 

unreliable, the database and applications are as current as the last connection. When circuits are restored, database 

updates and technical refreshes resume.

Software Applications

iSpy. Locate, analyze and generate satellite imagery 

products. 

ESRI Portal. Create, maintain and disseminate geospatial 

data and visualizations. 

HiPERLOOK. Stream imagery and elevation data to analyze 

terrain, export for use on mobile devices or leverage in your 

favorite mapping software. 

EFD. Enterprise File Delivery. 

Approved for public release, NGA-U-2022-02162

For more information?

► JWICS: NGA-WarfighterSupport@coe.ic.gov

► SIPR: NGA-WarfighterSupport@nga.smil.mil

► NIPR: NGA-WarfighterSupport@nga.mil

ODYSSEY

Edge-Accessible GEOINT Data Tools

EUCOM Odyssey - 3 Sites

► Site A (SIPR): https://sitea.europeangeoint.nga.smil.mil

► Site B (JWICS): https://siteb.europeangeoint.nga.ic.gov

► Site C (SIPR): https://sitec.europeangeoint.nga.smil.mil

INDOPACOM Odyssey (SIPR)

https://koreangeoint.nga.smil.mil

AFRICOM Odyssey (SIPR)

https://site4a.africomgeoint.nga.smil.mil
**[PNCBANK Logo]****************Annual Statement of Compliance**Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Servicing Agreement dated as of March 9, 2007 (the "Agreement"), among PNC Bank, NA as servicer (the "Servicer"), Home Equity Mortgage Trust 2007-1 (the "Issuer"), and U.S. Bank National Association as indenture trustee (the "Indenture Trustee"). The undersigned hereby certifies that:   1. I, Neal J. Heiss, am an authorized officer of the Servicer A review of Servicer's activities, during the period from March 9, 2007, to December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period"), has been made under my supervision. 3. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. Date: March 7, 2008 /s/ Neal J. Heiss Neal J. Heiss Senior Vice President General Manager, Consumer & Business Loan Operations
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      March 6, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Jeffrey      J. Fessler                                 |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Jeffrey      J. Fessler                                          |
|                      |   | Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
|                      |   |                                                             |
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Kivean Deshai Coffey, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00218

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 276th District Court of Morris County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 10,751CR ). Opinion delivered by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cour t

. We note that the appellant, Kivean Deshai Coffey, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JU NE 13, 2014
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 31.2

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

** **

I, StephenM. Siedow, certify that:

1.      Ihave reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Petrocorp Inc.;

2.      Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer andhave:

            a.      Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b.      Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

            c.      Disclosedin this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; 

5.      Thesmall business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the smallbusiness issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

      a.      Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

      b.      Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: April 7, 2009

/s/ StephenM. Siedow 

     StephenM. Siedow

     CFO
955 A.2d 754

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Robert Craig TURNER, Respondent.

Misc. AG No. 8,

Sept. Term, 2008.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Sept. 3, 2008.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Robert Craig Turner, to suspend Respondent, by consent, from the practice of law.

The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 3rd day of September, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Robert Craig Turner, be, and he is hereby, suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for a period of ninety (90) days from the date of this Order; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Robert Craig Turner from the register of attorneys in this Court certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-773(d).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
July 29, 2004
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-11177 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SIDNEY JAMES BRASS, also known as Sid Brass,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(2:03-CR-81-ALL)

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *

Sidney James Brass appe a ls the 46-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for making false statements to

a bank. He contends the district court abused its discretion when

it upwardly departed from criminal history category II to criminal

history category V without setting forth the method ology for

departure. The district court’s decision to depart was permissible

under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e)(3)(A) & (B). U nited States v. Bell ,

___ F.3d ___, No. 03-20194 (5th Cir. 19 May 2004), 2004 WL 1114580 at2

*3. Therefore, we review the extent of the departure for abuse of

discretion and will affirm the sentence if the degree of the

departure is reasonable. I d .; United States v. Ashburn , 38 F.3d

803, 807 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc).

Although a district court is required to explain both why the

criminal history category as calculated und er the guidelines is

inappropriate and why the category it chooses is appropriate, it is

not required to engage in a mechanical, ritualistic approach of

specifying its reasons for rejecting each inte rmediate criminal

history category. United States v. Lambert , 984 F.2d 658, 662-63

(5th Cir. 1993)(en banc). The district court’s reasons for

rejecting the intermediate criminal history categories are implicit

in its rea sons for departing upward. I d

. at 663. Moreover,

departing from a guideline range of 21 to 27 months to 46 months’

imprisonment is reasonable when compared to other departures that

we have upheld. See United States v. Daughenbaugh , 49 F.3d 171,

174-75 (5th Cir. 1995); Ashburn , 38 F.3d at 809.

Bass also contends the district court erred by considering as

a ba sis for the departure: dissimilar conduct; and two previous

theft convictions which had already been used to comp ute his

criminal history category. These grounds were properly relied upon

for departure.

Bass has moved for leave to file a suppleme ntal brief

contending that his sentence violates Blakely v. Washington , ___3

U .S. ___ (24 June 2004), 2004 WL 1402687; the motion is G RANTED

.
Blakely does not apply to the United States Sentencing Guidelines.

United States v. Pineiro , ___ F.3d ___, No. 03-30437 (5th Cir. 12

July 2004), 2004 WL 1543170.

MOTION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF GRANTED; AFFIRMED
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 453 

To amend section 402 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity 

Reconciliation Act of 1996 to provide for an extension of eligibility 

for supplemental security income through fiscal year 2008 for refugees, 

asylees, and certain other humanitarian immigrants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2005 

Mr. SMITH (for himself, Mr. KOHL, Mr. LUGAR, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. 

BROWNBACK, Mr. LAUTENBERG, and Mr. FEINGOLD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend section 402 of the Personal Responsibility and 

Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 to provide 

for an extension of eligibility for supplemental security 

income through fiscal year 2008 for refugees, asylees, 

and certain other humanitarian immigrants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SSI Extension for El5 derly and Disabled Refugees Act’’. 
2 

•S 453 IS

1 SEC. 2. SSI EXTENSION FOR HUMANITARIAN IMMIGRANTS. 

2 Section 402(a)(2) of the Personal Responsibility and 

3 Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 

4 1612(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(M) SSI EXTENSION THROUGH FISCAL

7 YEAR 2008.— 

8 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—With respect to 

9 eligibility for benefits for the specified Fed10 eral program described in paragraph 

11 (3)(A), the 7-year period described in sub12 paragraph (A) shall be deemed to be a 9- 

13 year period during the period that begins 

14 on the date of enactment of the SSI Ex15 tension for Elderly and Disabled Refugees 

16 Act and ends on September 30, 2008. 

17 ‘‘(ii) ALIENS WHOSE BENEFITS

18 CEASED IN PRIOR FISCAL YEARS.— 

19 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on 

20 the date of the enactment of the SSI 

21 Extension for Elderly and Disabled 

22 Refugees Act, any qualified alien ren23 dered ineligible for the specified Fed24 eral program described in paragraph 

25 (3)(A) during fiscal years prior to the 

26 fiscal year in which such Act is en-
3 

•S 453 IS

1 acted solely by reason of the termi2 nation of the 7-year period described 

3 in subparagraph (A) shall be eligible 

4 for such program for an additional 2- 

5 year period in accordance with this 

6 subparagraph, if such alien meets all 

7 other eligibility factors under title 

8 XVI of the Social Security Act. 

9 ‘‘(II) PAYMENT OF BENEFITS.— 

10 Benefits paid under subparagraph (I) 

11 shall be paid prospectively over the 

12 duration of the qualified alien’s re13 newed eligibility.’’. 

Æ
LaSalle
      Bank N.A.135
      South LaSalle StreetSuite
      1625Chicago,
      IL 60603Global
      Securities and Trust Services






Annual
Compliance Statement
 
 VIA:
EMAIL
 
 Securitized
Asset Backed Receivables LLC
 200 Park
Avenue
 New York,
New York 10166
 
 Litton
Loan Servicing LP
 4828 Loop
Central Drive
 Houston,
Texas 77081
    Re:
              C-BASS Mortgage Loan
      Trust 2007-CB2C-BASS Mortgage Loan
      Asset-Backed Certificates, Series
2007-CB2
   Reference
is made to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as February 1, 2007 (the
“Agreement”), among Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC, as depositor,
Litton Loan Servicing LP, as servicer, Credit-Based Asset Servicing and
Securitization LLC, as seller, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee
(the “Trustee”)
 
 I,
Barbara L. Marik, a Senior Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
as Trustee hereby certify that:
 
 (1)
A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and
of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
supervision; and
 
 (2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
year or a portion thereof.
 
 
 Date:
February 27, 2008
 
 LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Trustee
 
 
 /s/
Barbara L. Marik
 Barbara
L. Marik
 Senior
Vice President
| | Exhibit 32.2
| | ------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jan E. Dulman, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:August 14, 2008
     
     /s/ Jan E. DulmanJan E. DulmanChief Financial Officer


---
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23195-23196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1830-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Minnesota; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Minnesota (FEMA-1830-DR), dated April 9, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 6, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Minnesota is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of April 9, 2009.

    Beltrami, Marshall, and Polk Counties for Individual Assistance 
(already designated for Public Assistance).
    The Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians for Public Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--

[[Page 23196]]

Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and 
Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance 
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant.)

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-11508 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Western New York Land Conservancy, Inc., Respondent, v John S. Cullen et al., Appellants.

Submitted May 3, 2010;

decided June 29, 2010

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*14 NY3d 705 (2010)].
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Videotron Ltee (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques Mallette,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: April 29, 2004
                                        /s/ Jacques Mallette
                            ----------------------------------------------------
                                            Jacques Mallette
                            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 601 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include combat pay in 

determining an allowable contribution to an individual retirement plan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2005 

Mr. CONRAD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to include 

combat pay in determining an allowable contribution to 

an individual retirement plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF COMBAT PAY IN DETERMINING 

4 ALLOWABLE IRA CONTRIBUTIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

6 219(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 

7 compensation) is amended by inserting ‘‘and any amount 

8 excluded from gross income by reason of section 112’’ 

9 after ‘‘section 401(c)(2))’’. 
2 

•S 601 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2003. 

Æ
#### Wendt v. Thomas

Case below: 174 N.C. App. 368

No. 486P06-2

Pit’s PWC to Review the Decision of the COA (COA04-1651)

Denied 05/03/07
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ivan Benjamin, Also Known as Irvin Benjamin, Appellant.

[869 NYS2d 912]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error co-ram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 22, 2003 *(People v Benjamin,*2 NY3d 737 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 11, 2002.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Rivera and Miller, JJ., concur.