alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 12, 2021

s0209b 

# Order

Clerk February 12, 2021

161854

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 161854

COA: 345989

Genesee CC: 17

- 041035

- FH

MUNJEL SHARROD AYERS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2020 judgment

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Genesee County Prosecuting

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this

order.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 19, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23393-23394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11670]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Application(s) for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Instruments

Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific and Cultural 
Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89-651, as amended by Pub. 
L. 106-36; 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301), we invite comments on the 
question of whether instruments of equivalent scientific value, for the 
purposes for which the instruments shown below are intended to be used, 
are being manufactured in the United States.
Comments must comply with 15 CFR 301.5(a)(3) and (4) of the regulations 
and be postmarked on or before June 8, 2009. Address written comments 
to Statutory Import Programs Staff, Room 3720, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230. Applications may be examined between 
8:30 A.M. and 5:00 P.M. at the U.S. Department of Commerce in Room 
3720.
    Docket Number: 09-022. Applicant: Princeton University, Department 
of Chemical Engineering, A217 Engineering Quadrangle, Princeton, NJ 
08544. Instrument: SWAXS Dual 1D Position-Sensitive-Detector (PSD) 
System. Manufacturer: Hecus X-Ray System GmbH, Austria. Intended Use: 
The instrument will be used to acquire information regarding block 
copolymer microstructures. The dual system allows simultaneous 
acquisition of time resolved small-angle and wide-angle x-ray 
scattering data, which provides information regarding the morphology of 
both amorphous and semi-crystalline block copolymers. Justification for 
Duty-Free Entry: Use of any other detector system would potentially 
require considerable reconfiguration of the entities current x-ray 
system. Application accepted by Commissioner of Customs: April 28, 
2009.


[[Page 23394]]


    Dated: May 13, 2009.
Christopher Cassel,
Acting Director, IA Subsidies Enforcement Office.
[FR Doc. E9-11670 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 652 Referred in House (RFH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 652

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2005

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin 
   Franklin National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the 
 development of an exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the 
                      birth of Benjamin Franklin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
Commemoration Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior may provide a grant to the Franklin 
Institute to--
            (1) rehabilitate the Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
        (including the Franklin statue) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; 
        and
            (2) develop an interpretive exhibit relating to Benjamin 
        Franklin, to be displayed at a museum adjacent to the Benjamin 
        Franklin National Memorial.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act $10,000,000.
    (b) Required Match.--The Secretary of the Interior shall require 
the Franklin Institute to match any amounts provided to the Franklin 
Institute under this Act.

            Passed the Senate November 16, 2005.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 691 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 691

  To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of 
 certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial 
                                 names.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2005

  Mr. Domenici (for himself, Mr. Nelson of Florida, Mr. Santorum, Mr. 
Ensign, Mr. Martinez, Mr. Allen, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Lautenberg, and Mr. 
   Bunning) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of 
 certain rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial 
                                 names.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION.

    Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Related Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in section 101(b) of division A 
of Public Law 105-277; 112 Stat. 2681-88) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``by a designated national''; and
                    (B) by inserting before the period ``that was used 
                in connection with a business or assets that were 
                confiscated unless the original owner of the mark, 
                trade name, or commercial name, or the bonafide 
                successor-in-interest has expressly consented'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``by a designated 
        national or its successor-in-interest'';
            (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e);
            (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall apply only 
if the person or entity asserting the rights knew or had reason to know 
at the time when the person or entity acquired the rights asserted that 
the mark, trade name, or commercial name was the same as or 
substantially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name that 
was used in connection with a business or assets that were 
confiscated.''; and
            (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by striking ``In 
        this section:'' and all that follows through ``(2) The term'' 
        and inserting ``In this section, the term''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification







Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of China Jianye Fuel, Inc.
(the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           The
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2008
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:  October
      29, 2008
              By:
      /s/ Jianye WangMr.
      Jianye Wang
 Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Martin G. Paravato, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | 3. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 11, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Martin G. Paravato 
|Martin G. Paravato     
|Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to IRIS International, Inc. and will be retained by IRIS International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### City of New York et al., Plaintiffs, v Thomas A. Maul, Defendant. L.J. et al., Intervenors-Respondents, v John B. Mattingly, as Commissioner, New York City Administration for Children’s Services, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Submitted December 7, 2009;

decided December 15, 2009

Reported below, 59 AD3d 187.

Motion by Advocates for Children of New York et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent, v Nydia Rivera et al., Appellants.

Submitted March 6, 2009;

decided April 2, 2009

Motion by New York State Trial Lawyers’ Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 457

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I

No. CV-15-82

UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT

PINE BLUFF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE

CLAIMS DIVISION

APPELLANT

V.

RONNIE WHITTY

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 9, 2015

APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS

WORKERS’ COMPENSATOIN

COMMISSION

[NO. G106432]

AFFIRMED

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge

Ronnie Whitty suffered a compensable back injury on July 28, 2011, when he was

using an auger at work; the auger got tangled and threw him to the ground. He worked as

a groundskeeper for the University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff (UAPB) at the time of his injury. 

UAPB did not initially controvert his claim but did later when he sought additional benefits

for surgery and anatomical impairment. The administrative law judge (ALJ) denied his claim,

concluding that he did not prove his entitlement to the requested benefits. The Commission

reversed the ALJ’s decision. The employer appeals from the Commission’s decision,

contending that it is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm.

Because the only issues advanced by UAPB challenge the sufficiency of the evidence

supporting the Commission’s decision, and the Commission’s opinion adequately explains 
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 457

the decision, we affirm by memorandum opinion pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of our per

curiam In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985).

Affirmed.

HARRISION and KINARD, JJ., agree.

Robert H. Montgomery, Public Employee Claims Division, for appellant.

No Response.

2 CV-15-82
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Sona Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ajeeta Pinheiro, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the   Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated: December 10, 2009


AJEETA PINHEIRO


Ajeeta Pinheiro


Chief Executive Officer,


President and Director














-1-
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 466 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 466

    To deauthorize a certain portion of the project for navigation, 
                        Rockland Harbor, Maine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 18, 2005

   Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To deauthorize a certain portion of the project for navigation, 
                        Rockland Harbor, Maine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROCKLAND HARBOR, MAINE.

    As of the date of enactment of this Act, the portion of the project 
for navigation, Rockland Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of June 
3, 1896 (29 Stat. 202, chapter 314), consisting of a 14-foot channel 
located in Lermond Cove and beginning at a point with coordinates N. 
99977.37, E. 340290.02, thence running easterly about 200.00 feet to a 
point with coordinates N. 99978.49, E. 340490.02, thence running 
northerly about 138.00 feet to a point with coordinates N. 100116.49, 
E. 340289.25, thence running westerly about 200.00 feet to a point with 
coordinates N. 100115.37, E. 340289.25, thence running southerly about 
138.00 feet to the point of origin, is not authorized.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 643 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 643

   To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 to reauthorize State 
                          mediation programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 2005

Mr. Roberts (for himself and Mr. Harkin) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 to reauthorize State 
                          mediation programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF STATE MEDIATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 506 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 5106) 
is amended by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2010''.
                                 <all>
```
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | October 24, 2013 |   | MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   | By: | /s/ David J. Schramm |
|   |   |   |   | David J. Schramm |
|   |   |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|   |   |   |   |   |
| Date:  | October 24, 2013 |   | By: | /s/ Kevin S. Royal |
|   |   |   |   | Kevin S. Royal |
|   |   |   |   | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|   |   |   |   | Treasurer and Secretary |
|   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4044 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4044

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To clarify the treatment of certain charitable contributions under 
                     title 11, United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Liberty and Charitable 
Donation Clarification Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CONTRIBUTIONS IN BANKRUPTCY.

    Section 1325(b)(3) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, other than subparagraph (A)(ii) of paragraph (2),'' after 
``paragraph (2)''.

            Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day, September 
      29), 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4044

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To clarify the treatment of certain charitable contributions under 
                     title 11, United States Code.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 1996 and the consolidated statement
of operation for the period ended September 30, 1996, and is qualified in it's
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          38,259
<SECURITIES>                                 2,553,102
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,868,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                   338,160
<INVENTORY>                                  4,568,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,220,471
<PP&E>                                       5,104,677
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,152,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              36,933,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,575,325
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,897
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                36,933,874
<SALES>                                     12,293,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,270,999
<CGS>                                        7,664,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,664,634
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,836,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             248,060
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,233,577)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,540,771)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,692,806)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.90)
        

</TABLE>
#### Collins *v.*Collins.

On the allegations in the petition, and on the facts set forth in the answer and in the affidavits submitted at the hearing for temporary alimony, there was no abuse of discretion in granting a monthly allowance for such alimony, and a stated sum for attorney’s fees. *Judgment affirmed.*

April 16, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

Application for alimony. Before Judge Butt. Taylor ■county. August 28, 1893.

The parties were married on June 23, 1892, lived together for two months, and separated. The husband was eighty years of age; the wife a young woman. On ■July 1, 1893, she brought her petition for alimony and ■counsel fees; and the court allowed $12 per month as *491temporary alimony, and $50 as counsel fees. For petitioner it appeared, that the respondent had a widowed daughter of violent temper living in the house with him, who did all she could to make petitioner’s married life miserable and to bring about a separation; that the respondent took no steps to prevent or remedy this, and although he had promised to provide a separate qdaee for the daughter to live in, failed to keep the promise; that by this daughter’s conduct petitioner was forced to leave respondent’s house and return to the home of her mother, and respondent had neglected to furnish her any support, though so requested, and refused to pay the medical bill for attendance upon her at the birth of their child, March 23, 1893 ; that he owned about 1,500 acres of valuable lands, besides considerable personal property, and was well able to support her and her child; that he had falsely stated the child was not his; etc. For respondent the evidence conflicted with that of petitioner, and tended to show that she abandoned him without cause and in spite of all his persuasions,' and had since refused to return to him though urged to do so; that he had not furnished her with money or provisions since the separation, but was still doing all in his power to induce her to return; that he had proposed to her that they live separate from the rest of his family, but she required him to turn his daughter adrift and build another house, which he could not do; that his laud is poor, his taxable property not over $1,800, and he is in debt over $700; that he always treated his wife kindly and did all in his power to make her happy and contented; and that the allegations as to her ill treatment by his daughter were unfounded.

W. S. Wallace, G. J. Willis and W. P. Edwards, for plaintiff in error. C. C. West, O. M. Colbert and Thornton & McMichael, *contra.*