alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 422 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 422

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore equity and 
   complete the transfer of motor fuel excise taxes attributable to 
motorboat and small engine fuels into the Aquatic Resources Trust Fund, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2005

  Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Kohl) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore equity and 
   complete the transfer of motor fuel excise taxes attributable to 
motorboat and small engine fuels into the Aquatic Resources Trust Fund, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sportfishing and Boating Equity Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ALL MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAXES ATTRIBUTABLE TO MOTORBOAT AND SMALL 
              ENGINE FUELS AVAILABLE FOR TRANSFER TO AQUATIC RESOURCES 
              TRUST FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 9503(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to certain taxes not transferred to Highway Trust Fund) 
is amended by adding ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B), by striking 
``, or'' at the end of subparagraph (C) and inserting a period, and by 
striking subparagraph (D).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxes received in the Treasury after September 30, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Each of the undersigned, Alan J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the
Company), and Glenn R. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of an amendment to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 3, 2004 (the Report). Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. December 1, 2004 /s/ Alan J. Lacy

Alan J. Lacy
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer
 /s/ Glenn R. Richter

Glenn R. Richter
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
665 A.2d 386

#### IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY W. BURNS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 20, 1995.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on June 8, 1995, concluding that JEFFREY W. BURNS of LAKEWOOD, who was admitted to the bar of this state in 1991, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months for violation of *RPC*8.4(b), respondent, having admitted the commission of three incidents of knowing and unlawful burglary of an automobile, two incidents of theft by unlawful taking, and one incident of unlawful possession of burglary tools;

And respondent having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JEFFREY W. BURNS is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, retroactive to May 27, 1994, and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is immediately eligible to apply for reinstatement to practice; and it is further

ORDERED that JEFFREY W. BURNS be and hereby is restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended, disbarred or resigned attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that JEFFREY W. BURNS reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, William Augustin IV, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2007-SD2 (the
    "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: EMC
    Mortgage Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 30, 2008


    /s/ William Augustin IV
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Johnny R. Thomas, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Consolidation Services, Inc. (the Registrant);



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and;



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 27, 2008



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Johnny R. Thomas                                   
|Johnny R. Thomas                                       
|Chief Executive Officer of Consolidation Services, Inc.
**Exhibit 31(b)**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
  I, Glenn R. Richter, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this amendment to quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sears, Roebuck and Co.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures,or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures tobe designed under oursupervision, to ensurethat material informationrelating to theregistrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us byothers within thoseentities, particularlyduring the period in whichthis report is beingprepared;   (b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosurecontrols and proceduresand presented in thisreport our conclusionsabout the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controlsand procedures, as of theend of the period coveredby this report based onsuch evaluation; and   (c) Disclosed in this reportany change in theregistrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting that occurredduring the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) thathas materially affected,or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, theregistrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting; and 
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significantdeficiencies and materialweaknesses in the designor operation of internalcontrol over financialreporting which arereasonably likely toadversely affect theregistrant’s ability torecord, process, summarizeand report financialinformation; and   (b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involvesmanagement or otheremployees who have asignificant role in theregistrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting. 
Date: December 1, 2004
/s/ Glenn R. RichterGlenn R. RichterExecutive Vice President and     Chief Financial Officer of     Sears, Roebuck and Co.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of BSD  Medical  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Hyrum A. Mead, President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2) the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.


                                         /s/ Hyrum A. Mead
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Hyrum A. Mead
                                         President (Principal Executive Officer)
                                         January 14, 2005
#### In the Matter of Saul Sabino, Petitioner, v William F. Hulihan, Superintendent, Mid-State Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[963 NYS2d 897]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County [Samuel D. Hester, J], entered March 1, 2012) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a Tier II hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Petitioner seeks a review of the determination, following a tier II hearing, that he violated inmate rules 113.22 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [xii] [using or possessing authorized property in an unauthorized area]) and 122.10 (270.2 [B] [23] [i] [smoking in an unauthorized area]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report and the testimony of the author of that report constitute substantial evidence to support the charges *(see Matter of Foster v Coughlin,*76 NY2d 964, 966 [1990]). Petitioner’s contention that he was not smoking at the alleged time and place raised an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer *(see id.).*The record does not support petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer was biased against him *(see Matter of Colon v Fischer,*83 AD3d 1500, 1501-1502 [2011]). Petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to his remaining contentions by failing to raise them on his administrative appeal, and this Court has no discretionary power to reach those contentions *(see id.*at 1502).

Present—Scudder, EJ., Smith, Centra, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PL03-3-008]


Argus Media, Inc.; Notice of Filing

May 7, 2009.
    Take notice that on December 30, 2008, Argus Media, Inc. (Argus) 
filed a request for the Commission to determine that the methodology 
for developing price indices contained in Argus North American Natural 
Gas meets all or substantially all of the requirements set forth in the 
Policy Statement on Natural Gas and Electric Price Indices (Policy 
Statement).\1\ On May 1, 2009, Argus filed a supplement to its initial 
request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Policy Statement on Natural Gas and Electric Price Indices, 
104 FERC ] 61,121, at P 33 (2003) (Policy Statement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest these filings must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#01474453424e6f6d686f64527471716e737541676473622f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f0b6b5a2b3bf9e9c999e95a38580809f8284b096958293de979f86">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, May 18, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11331 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 68 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 68

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 100 percent 
  reimbursement for medical assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian 
through a federally-qualified health center or a Native Hawaiian health 
                              care system.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 100 percent 
  reimbursement for medical assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian 
through a federally-qualified health center or a Native Hawaiian health 
                              care system.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Native Hawaiian Medicaid Coverage 
Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. 100 PERCENT FMAP FOR MEDICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO A NATIVE 
              HAWAIIAN THROUGH A FEDERALLY-QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER OR A 
              NATIVE HAWAIIAN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM UNDER THE MEDICAID 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Medicaid.--The third sentence of section 1905(b) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) is amended by inserting ``, and with 
respect to medical assistance provided to a Native Hawaiian (as defined 
in section 12 of the Native Hawaiian Health Care Improvement Act) 
through a federally-qualified health center or a Native Hawaiian health 
care system (as so defined) whether directly, by referral, or under 
contract or other arrangement between a federally-qualified health 
center or a Native Hawaiian health care system and another health care 
provider'' before the period.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies to 
medical assistance provided on or after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Outstanding Transport, Inc., Appellant, v Interagency Council of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Inc., Doing Business as Interagency Transportation Solutions, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 91]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demurest, J.), dated January 13, 2012, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“[W]hen parties set down their agreement in a clear, complete document, their writing should as a rule be enforced according to its terms. Evidence outside the four corners of the document as to what was really intended but unstated or misstated is generally inadmissible to add to or vary the writing” *(W.W.W.*Assoc. *v Giancontieri,*77 NY2d 157, 162 [1990]). Thus, “before looking to evidence of what was in the parties’ minds, a court must give due weight to what was in their contract” *(id.*at 162). “A contract should be read as a whole to ensure that undue emphasis is not placed upon particular words and phrases” *(Consedine v Portville Cent. School Dist.,*12 NY3d 286, 293 [2009]). “Whether a contract is ambiguous is a question of law and extrinsic evidence may not be considered unless the document itself is ambiguous” *(South Rd. Assoc., LLC v International Bus. Machs. Corp.,*4 NY3d 272, 278 [2005]). “Moreover, courts may not by construction add or excise terms, nor distort the meaning of those used and thereby make a new contract for the parties under the guise of interpreting the writing” *(Bailey v Fish & Neave,*8 NY3d 523, 528 [2007] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Vermont Teddy Bear Co. v 538 Madison Realty Co.,*1 NY3d 470, 475 [2004]).

Here, the plaintiff failed to show any ambiguity in the subject contract that would permit consideration of the preferred extrinsic evidence of an alleged oral agreement to clarify the meaning of the term “preference” as used in the contract. Moreover, the interpretation advanced by the plaintiff would result in an unreasonable result, which should be avoided *(see TriMessine Constr. Co. v Telesector Resources Group,*287 AD2d 558 [2001]; *Campos v 7 Hallock Landing Corp.,*166 AD2d 549, 550 [1990]; *Hsieh v Pudge Corp.,*122 AD2d 198, 199 [1986]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit.

*1050The Supreme Court therefore properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action, which sought to recover damages for breach of contract. Mastro, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur. [Prior Case History: 34 Misc 3d 1211(A), 2012 NY Slip Op 50046(U).]