alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Golf  Rounds.com,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  November 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Dated: January 12, 2004           /s/ John F. McCarthy, III
                                  _________________________
                                  John F. McCarthy, III
                                  Chairman and Secretary
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: January 12, 2004           /s/ Robert H.Donehew
                                  _________________________
                                  Robert H. Donehew
                                  President and Treasurer
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of Carl H. Smith, a Disbarred Attorney.

[975 NYS2d 680]

— Motion by Carl H. Smith for reinstatement to the bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Mr. Smith was admitted to the bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on November 16, 1988. By opinion and order of this Court dated May 9, 2005, Mr. Smith was disbarred upon his resignation, effective immediately, and his name was stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at law *(see Matter of Smith,*19 AD3d 61 [2005]). By decision and order on motion of this Court dated February 11, 2013, Mr. Smith’s motion for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on Mr. Smith’s current fitness to be an attorney.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness and the exhibits annexed thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that, effective immediately, Carl H. Smith is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Carl H. Smith to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Eng, EJ., Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, based on our knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                            |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2010 |  |  |  | MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | By:                        |  | /s/ David J. Schramm                           
|                     |  |  |  |                            |  | David J. Schramm                               
|                     |  |  |  |                            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer          
|                     |  |  |  |                            |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 6, 2010 |  |  |  | By:                        |  | /s/ Kevin S. Royal                             
|                     |  |  |  |                            |  | Kevin S. Royal                                 
|                     |  |  |  |                            |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
|                     |  |  |  |                            |  | Treasurer and Secretary                        
|                     |  |  |  |                            |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
II 

Calendar No. 250 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 443 

To improve the investigation of criminal antitrust offenses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2005 

Mr. DEWINE (for himself, Mr. KOHL, and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

OCTOBER 20, 2005 

Reported by Mr. SPECTER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To improve the investigation of criminal antitrust offenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Antitrust Criminal In5 vestigative Improvements Act of 2005’’. 
2 

S 443 RS 

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF PREDICATE CRIMES FOR AUTHOR2 IZATION FOR INTERCEPTION OF WIRE, ORAL, 

3 AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS. 

4 Section 2516(1) of title 18, United State Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (q), by striking ‘‘or’’ after 

7 the semicolon; 

8 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (r) as sub9 paragraph (s); and 

10 (3) by adding after subparagraph (q) the fol11 lowing: 

12 ‘‘(r) any criminal violation of section 1 (relating 

13 to illegal restraints of trade or commerce), 2 (relat14 ing to illegal monopolizing of trade or commerce), or 

15 3 (relating to illegal restraints of trade or commerce 

16 in territories or the District of Columbia) of the 

17 Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1, 2, 3); or’’. 

Calendar No. 250 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 443 

A BILL 

To improve the investigation of criminal antitrust 

offenses. 

OCTOBER 20, 2005 

Reported without amendment
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3916 

To expand the boundaries of the Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2006 

Mr. SESSIONS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To expand the boundaries of the Cahaba River National 

Wildlife Refuge, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cahaba River National 

5 Wildlife Refuge Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) REFUGE.—The term ‘‘Refuge’’ means the 

9 Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge and the 

10 lands and waters in such refuge in Bibb County, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 3916 IS

1 Alabama, as established by the Cahaba River Na2 tional Wildlife Refuge Establishment Act (Public 

3 Law 106–331). 

4 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

5 the Secretary of the Interior. 

6 SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF BOUNDARIES. 

7 (a) EXPANSION.—The boundaries of the Refuge are 

8 expanded to include land and water in Bibb County, Ala9 bama, depicted as ‘‘Proposed National Wildlife Refuge Ex10 pansion Boundary’’ on the map entitled ‘‘Cahaba River 

11 NWR Expansion’’ and dated March 14, 2006. 

12 (b) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The Secretary shall 

13 make the map referred to in subsection (a) available for 

14 inspection in appropriate offices of the United States Fish 

15 and Wildlife Service. 

16 SEC. 4. ACQUISITION OF LAND AND WATER IN EXPANDED 

17 BOUNDARIES. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the Sec19 retary may acquire by donation, purchase with donated 

20 or appropriated funds, or exchange the land and water, 

21 and interests in land and water (including conservation 

22 easements), within the boundaries of the Refuge as ex23 panded by this Act. 

24 (b) MANNER OF ACQUISITION.—All acquisitions of 

25 land or waters under this section shall be made in a volVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:09 Sep 23, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3916.IS S3916

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•S 3916 IS

1 untary manner and shall not be the result of forced 

2 takings. 

3 (c) INCLUSION IN REFUGE; ADMINISTRATION.—Any 

4 land, water, or interest acquired by the Secretary under 

5 this section— 

6 (1) shall be part of the Refuge; and 

7 (2) shall be administered by the Secretary in 

8 accordance with— 

9 (A) the National Wildlife Refuge System 

10 Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd 

11 et seq.); 

12 (B) the Cahaba River National Wildlife 

13 Refuge Establishment Act; and 

14 (C) this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          87,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,699
<PP&E>                                           6,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,794
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       137,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (46,581)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,213
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,022
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (22,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (22,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (22,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRIAN M. CASEY

, Appellant,

v.

JULIE JONES

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1757

[November 16, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Martin County ; Barbara W. Bronis , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16

- 1158

- CA

.

Brian M. Casey, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael COLSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-10545

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 13, 2009.

Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender, Tallahassee, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before CARNES, WILSON and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Michael Colson in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Colson’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Denied and Opinion Filed February 1 6 , 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00155
- CV IN RE GREGORY DUNCAN , Relator Original Proceeding from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 13
- 08535 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans Before the Court is relator’s February 14, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus in whic h he complains of the trial court’s February 1, 2017 sanctions order. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential In s. Co. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig . proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus.

170155F.P05 /s/David Evans/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                         MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                                Certification of
                             Chief Financial Officer
                        of Mission Resources Corporation

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
(the "Form 10-Q") for the period ended March 31, 2003 of Mission Resources
Corporation (the "Issuer").

I, Richard W. Piacenti, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that:

           (i)  the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                and

           (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Issuer.

           Dated: May 14, 2003              /s/ RICHARD PIACENTI
                                            --------------------

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 14 day of May 2003

/S/ CARMEN M. GARCIA
----------------------------
Notary Public in and for the
State of Texas

My commission expires: May 15, 2006

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Mission Resources Corporation and will be retained by Mission
Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
EX-35.1
(logo) CWCapital
Asset Management

March 12, 2008



TRUSTEE:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045-1951
Attn: Corporate Trust Services (CMBS)
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2007-C30

DEPOSITOR:
Wachovia Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc.
301 South College Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28288
Attn: Charles L. Culbreth, H. Royer Culp, Jr.,
Elizabeth K. Stinson and Lars A. Carlsten,

RATING AGENCIES:
Moody's Investors Service, Inc.
7 World Trade Center
250 Greenwich Street, 25th Floor
New York, NY 10007

CONTROLLING CLASS REPRESENTATIVE:
Cadim TACH Inc.
c/o CDP Capital Real Estate Advisors
CDP Capital Center
1000 Jean-Paul-Rjopelle Place, Suite A-300
Montreal, Quebec H2Z 2B6, Canada
Attention: Corporate Secretary

RE: WBCMT 2007-C30 Officer's Certificate

Dear Representatives:

In accordance with the requirements detailed in Section 3.13 of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement ("Agreement") for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital
Asset Management LLC ("CWCAM"), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is
providing this Officer's Certificate with respect to the following:

(A) a review of CWCAM's activities during the period 3/28/2007 - 12/31/2007 and
    of CWCAM's performance under this Agreement has been made under my
    supervision; and

(B) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all
    its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout
    the period noted above.







701 13th Street, NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC  20005
www.cwcapital.com


(page)


Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,
CWCapital Asset Management LLC


/s/ David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone
Managing Director
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Kimber Resources Inc. - Exhibit 4.h




20F ITEM 19 Exhibit 4.h

Kimber Resources Inc.

  400 - 789 West Pender Street,

  Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 1H2

Tel: (604) 669-2251   Fax: (604) 669-8577   Email:
  kimber1@kimberresources.com



March 15, 2002

ROBERT V. LONGE 

  4762 The Highway

  West Vancouver

  British Columbia

  V7W 1J5



Dear Mr. Longe,

As you are aware, Kimber Resources Inc. (the “Company”) proposes
  to carry out an initial public offering (an “IPO”) and become listed
  on the Canadian Venture Exchange (the “CDNX”). You have been employed
  by and/or have provided on-going management services to the Company since March
  30, 1995 and currently hold the position of Director and President of the Company.

This letter will serve to confirm that we wish to continue your services to
  the Company upon the following terms: 

	 	(a)	You will continue to be employed as the President
        and Chief Executive Officer of the Company during the term of this agreement
        or until such position is changed by mutual agreement in writing.

	 	 	 
	 	(b)	During the term of this agreement you will devote
        your full working time to the affairs of the Company and commencing on
        the date the Company closes its IPO on the CDNX, you will be paid the
        amount of $5000 per month, provided however, if the Company lacks adequate
        funding and has no reasonable expectations of obtaining the necessary
        funding to continue its exploration and development activities, this amount
        may be reduced unilaterally by the Company effective upon 30 days notice
        in writing to you.

	 	 	 
	 	(c)	You will be entitled to 15 days of paid vacation
        in each calendar year to be taken at a time or times reasonably acceptable
        to the Company.

	 	 	 
	 	(d)	This agreement will become effective on the date
        the Company closes its IPO and shall continue for a term of two (2) years
        thereafter.









	 	(e)	The term of this agreement shall be reviewed annually
        and may be amended and/or extended from time to time by the mutual agreement
        of the parties in writing.

	 	 	 
	 	(f)	 Notwithstanding the term of this agreement, you
        may at any time terminate this agreement by giving not less than 90 days
        notice in writing to the Company.



If the terms of this letter are acceptable to you would you please sign and
  return the enclosed copy of this letter.



  Yours truly,

  Kimber Resources Inc.

 

per: “Luard Manning”

  Luard Manning, Director





Accepted and agreed this 18 day of April, 2002



 “R.V. Longe”

Robert Longe
#### Parada v. Custom Maint., Inc.

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 653

No. 612P06

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. (COA06-89) 7A-31

Denied 06/27/07
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Chief Executive Officer of PSC, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that
to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1) the Company's 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2002 fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2) the information contained in the Company's 10-Q for the quarter ended
        September 29, 2002 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                               /s/ EDWARD J. BOREY
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   Edward J. Borey
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 18, 2002
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed 

December 3, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00722-CV

IN RE DEBRA MCLEOD, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

County Court at Law

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-08-26306

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 22, 2020, relator Debra McLeod filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Carol 

Chaney, presiding judge of the County Court at Law of Waller County, to vacate 

her October 5, 2020 order denying relator’s plea in abatement.
2

Because relator has not shown she is entitled to mandamus relief, we deny 

her petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.
#### Moshe Steinmetz, Respondent, v Samuel-Rozenbaum USA, Inc., Appellant.

[965 NYS2d 405]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered September 23, 2010, after a nonjury trial, awarding plaintiff $130,000 plus interest in the amount of $23,880.82, and costs and disbursements in the amount of $1,025.00, unanimously modified, on the facts, to reduce the principal amount of the award from $130,000 to $75,000, and to remand the matter for the calculation of interest, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The trial court properly allowed plaintiff to substitute a correct copy of the contract at issue from the court file for a poorly photocopied copy, since plaintiff promptly authenticated the correct copy *(see Matter of Khatibi v Weill,*8 AD3d 485 [2d Dept 2004]).

There is no basis for disturbing the court’s finding, which rested largely on credibility determinations, that the purported *679November 2005 agreement was not genuine *(see Nagel v Nagel,*85 AD3d 559 [1st Dept 2011]). The document is riddled with anomalies (the court said it looked “cut and pasted”), and plaintiff testified that he had never signed it.

The contract stated that plaintiff could be fired only for cause during the first two years of the three-year employment term, and thereafter for any reason upon 30 days’ notice. Plaintiff was terminated approximately nine months into the contract term. Thus, his damages equal his lost wages from that date until the end of the two-year period, plus one month for notice, or 15 months *(see Bogy v Berlage,*265 App Div 249 [1st Dept 1942]; *Delvecchio v Bayside Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle,*271 AD2d 636, 638-639 [2d Dept 2000]). Based on the record evidence of plaintiffs net monthly salary, the amount of his lost wages for 15 months is $75,000.

Concur—Acosta, J.E, Moskowitz, Renwick, Freedman and Clark, JJ.