alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.2
                                                                          [logo]

Accountants and Business Advisors

             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Land America Tax and Flood Services, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria ("Management's
Report"), that Land America Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company")
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential and
commercial mortgage backed securities for which the Company served as
third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral (the
"Platform") as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria
1122(d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i)-(x)
and 1122(d)(4)(xiii)-(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to
the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the
Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Land America Tax and Flood Services,
Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

San Diego, CA
February 6, 2008

12340 El Camino Real
Suite 220
San Diego, CA 92130
T 858.704.8000
F 858.704.8099
W www.grantthornton.com

Grant Thornton LLP
US Member of Grant Thornton International
4/6/2015 TDCJ Offender Details 

### ggbd^M.iJjJ:LJ,i,iJ?n.iJ^iiJ,ii)Mmiuj[J3 iMew Offender Search TDCJ Home 

# Offender Information Details

Return to Search list

SID Number: TDCJ Number: Name: Race: Gender: DOB: Maximum Sentence Date: 

### Current Facility: Projected Release Date: 

### Parole Eligibility Date: Offender Visitation Eligible: 07375228 01929729 MENDEZ.ELISEO RUIZ H M 1989-07-15 2017-12-21 JESTER IV 2017-12-21 2014-12-21 CALL

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: 

### Scheduled Release Type: Scheduled Release Location: 

## Parole ReviewInformation Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Offense History: 

### Offense n««r,~« Sentence *„„„*, n^n &,„ Sentence (YY-MM

# Date °ffense Date County CaseNo- DD)
2007-01-09 AGG SEX ASLT CHILD 2008-10-22 HIDALGO CR-2990-07- A 5-00-00
2013-12-20 BURG HABIT 2014-05-27 HIDALGO CR-0607-14- A 4-00-00
http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=07375228 1/24/6/2015 TDCJ Offender Details Return to Search list



### The Texas Department ofCriminalJustice updates this information regularly to ensure that it is 

### complete and accurate, howeverthis information can change quickly. Therefore, the information on 

### this site maynot reflect the true current location, status, scheduled termination date, orother information regarding an offender. 

### For questions and comments, you may contact the Texas Department ofCriminalJustice, at (936) 295-6371 or webadmin(8)_tdcj.texas.gov. This information is made available to the public and law enforcementin the interest ofpublic safety. Any unauthorized use ofthis information is forbidden and subject to criminalprosecution. 

### New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page

http://offender.tdcj.state.tx.us/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=07375228 2/2
**EXHIBT 33.9**

**Report on Assessment of Compliance**

**with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**

1.         The undersigned authorized officer of LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the“Company”) is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as defined in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) (4) (xi) and 1122(d) (4) (xii) (the “Regulation AB Servicing Criteria”) for residentialand commercial mortgage backed securities for which the Company served as third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral (the “Platform”).  Except as set forth in the preceding sentence, the servicing criteria set forth in 17CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) are not applicable to the activities the Company performed with respect to the Platform. 

2.         The Company used the criteria in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) to assess the compliance withthe applicable Regulation AB Servicing Criteria.

3.         Under one of the services offered by the Company, some customers may elect to remit taxpayments directly to tax agencies without having the Company remit those property tax payments through our tax payment service.  We refer to these customers as “non-outsourced servicer customers.”  With respect to these non-outsourced customersand the services the Company delivered pursuant to the servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4)(xi), the Company’s assertion is strictly limited to its processing of tax payments submitted through the Company’s tax paymentservice. 

4.         With respect to servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4)(xii), theCompany’s assertion is strictly limited to its processing of property tax penalty payments.  The Company has determined that its servicer customers may also have access to systems that enable those servicers to process penalties through obligor escrowaccounts.  Management’s assessment of compliance does not relate to the actual or potential activities of other parties with access to obligor escrow accounts.

5.         Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended December31, 2007, the Company has complied in all material respects with the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria related to the servicing of the Platform taken as a whole.

6.         The registered public accounting firm of Grant Thornton, LLP, has issued an attestationreport on the Company’s assessment of compliance with the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

Date:  February 6, 2008

 

LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc.

 

 

 

 

By: /s/ Robert Ige

Name:  Robert Ige

Its:        Executive Vice President
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Michele Nakazawa, Chief Financial Officer of Telos Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telos Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors: 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: June 22, 2006 

 

 

45
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

[LOGO] CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.

                                  PRESS RELEASE

                              For immediate release

MONTREAL, OCTOBER 26, 2005 - CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC. (TSX: CCH, OTC BULLETIN
BOARD: CBLRF) announces that it has been granted an extension to November 25,
2005 of the initial order granted June 30th under the Companies' Creditors
Arrangement Act. Operations at the Copper Rand and Joe Mann mines are continuing
as well as exploration on the Corner Bay property.

Certain information contained in this release contains "Forward-Looking
Statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995 and is subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those "Risk
Factors" set forth in the Campbell's current Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
year ended December 31, 2003. Such factors include, but are not limited to:
differences between estimated and actual mineral reserves and resources; changes
to exploration, development and mining plans due to prudent reaction of
management to ongoing exploration results, engineering and financial concerns;
and fluctuations in the gold price which affect the profitability and mineral
reserves and resources of Campbell. Readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
hereof. Campbell undertakes no obligation to release publicly any revisions to
these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the
date hereof or to reflect unanticipated events or developments.

                                     - 30 -


<Table>
<Caption>

<S>                                                              <C>
FOR MORE INFORMATION :

CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.                                          Renmark Financial Communications Inc.
Andre Fortier, President and Chief Executive Officer             Henri Perron, hperron@renmarkfinancial.com
Tel.: 514-875-9037                                               John Boidman, jboidman@renmarkfinancial.com
Fax: 514-875-9764                                                Cynthia Lane-Filiatrault, clane@renmarkfinancial.com
afortier@campbellresources.com                                   Tel.: 514-939-3989
                                                                 Fax: 514-939-3717
                                                                 www.renmarkfinancial.com
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**WABCO HOLDINGS INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of WABCO Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacques Esculier, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that 

(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report. 

 

 

Dated: February 18, 2010
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7049

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LESLIE DIANE GIBSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-96-30056, CA-99-694-7) Submitted: February 22, 2001 Decided: February 28, 2001 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leslie Diane Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Leslie Diane Gibson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gibson , Nos. CR-96-30056; CA99-694-7 (W.D. Va. May 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 45 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.45

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the patient limitation on 
prescribing drug addiction treatments by medical practitioners in group 
                   practices, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OR DETOXIFICATION TREATMENT WITH CERTAIN 
              NARCOTIC DRUGS; ELIMINATION OF 30-PATIENT LIMIT FOR GROUP 
              PRACTICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 303(g)(2)(B) of the Controlled Substances 
Act (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(B)) is amended by striking clause (iv).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 303(g)(2)(B) of the Controlled 
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(B)) is amended in clause (iii) by 
striking ``In any case'' and all that follows through ``the total'' and 
inserting ``The total''.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the date of 
enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daniel Ufares, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 812]

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered February 18, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [b]), defendant contends that his purported waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal is unenforceable because County Court, during the plea colloquy, conflated the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited upon the plea of guilty *(see People v Sanborn,*107 AD3d 1457, 1458 [2013]), we nevertheless reject defendant’s challenge to the severity of the sentence. The record establishes that defendant has six prior felony convictions, including three for robbery, and that he was on parole when he committed the instant robbery. In addition, pursuant to the plea agreement, the People agreed not to seek persistent felony offender status for defendant, and defendant was not prosecuted in federal court, where he faced a more severe sentence. Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Garni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
##### 



FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of March, 2005 Commission File Number: 00-30082 Envoy Communications
Group
Inc.   
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No þ If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- o Signatures Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Envoy Communications Group Inc.(Registrant)By:/s/ Geoffrey B. GenoveseName: Geoffrey B. Genovese
Title: President, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
 Dated: May 10, 2005




---



##### 



Exhibit Index Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Envoy Communications Group Inc. Fiscal 2005 Second Quarter Results
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), I, Wm. Stacy Locke, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pioneer Drilling Company, a Texas corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

(1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: November 2, 2007 |  | /s/ Wm. Stacy Locke                  
|                        |  | Wm. Stacy Locke                      
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-87,625-01

EX PARTE ROBERT DOUGLAS YOAKUM, JR., Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 14070-A-1 IN THE 77 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM LIMESTONE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a

disabled individual and sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction.

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to

investigate the case. Applicant alleges that he lacked the necessarymental state for the crime alleged

and that the complainant was autistic with violent outburst so his action was necessary. He also

alleges that there was no bodily injury as a result of his action.
2

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: November 15, 2017
3

Do not publish