alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w6



 





EXHIBIT 10.6




	 	 	 
	Notice of Grant of Stock Option Agreement

	 	webMethods, Inc.
	

	 	Tax Id.: 54-1807654
	 
	 	 
	

	 	Option Number:
	

	 	Participant Id:






This Notice of Grant sets forth certain information regarding the Option for
Shares of Incentive Stock granted to you, the Participant named above, under
the webMethods, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, as amended (the
“Plan”), pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Stock Option Agreement
(the “Agreement”) between webMethods, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and you
distributed with this Notice of Grant. This Notice of Grant is an integral
part of the Agreement, which, with the Plan, is incorporated by reference into
the Agreement. Capitalized terms not defined in this Notice of Grant have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. Dates are in mm/dd/yyyy format, and
currency is in US Dollars.



Effective              (the Option Grant Date), you have been granted a stock
option to buy             shares of Incentive Stock at $          per share (the
Exercise Price per share). The total Exercise Price of the Incentive Stock
covered by this Option is $          .



Vesting Schedule: Based on your continuous employment for the Corporation or
any Subsidiary (or Parent, if any), the Option will become vested in increments
as shown below. Vesting shall cease upon your termination of employment. For
purposes of this Option, your Vesting Start Date is <VestStart> and your
option will expire at 5:00 pm, local time at the Corporation’s headquarters
office, on <Expiration>.




	 	 	 	 	 
	
	 	 	 	Date This Increment
	Number of
Shares

	 	Vest Type

	 	Is Fully Vested










This Option is [is not] intended to qualify as an “incentive stock
option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, or any successor provision.



BY SIGNING THIS NOTICE OF GRANT, PARTICIPANT (A) ACKNOWLEDGES READING AND
UNDERSTANDING THE AGREEMENT AND THE PLAN, (B) AGREES TO BE BOUND BY ALL
PROVISIONS OF THE AGREEMENT AND (C) AGREES THAT THIS NOTICE OF GRANT, TOGETHER
WITH THE AGREEMENT, SHALL GOVERN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE OPTION, THE
SHARES AND THE OTHER SUBJECT MATTER OF THE AGREEMENT, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS
OF THE PLAN. IN THE EVENT OF ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TERMS OF THIS NOTICE OF
GRANT AND THE AGREEMENT, THE AGREEMENT SHALL CONTROL.



IF YOU DO NOT RETURN TO THE CORPORATION SIGNED COPIES OF THIS NOTICE OF GRANT
AND THE AGREEMENT BY              (THE “RETURN DATE”) THIS OPTION WILL
AUTOMATICALLY EXPIRE AS OF THE DAY FOLLOWING THE RETURN DATE.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation and Participant have duly executed this
Notice of Grant to Stock Option Agreement as of the Option Grant Date.










webMethods, Inc.









	
	 	

	Authorized Officer

	 	










	 	 	 	 	 
	Date: _______________________

	 	Time: _______________________
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A p p e a l s F O R T H E D IS TR IC T O F C O L U M B IA C IRC U IT

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

### N o . 2 1 - 5 1 4 7 S e p t e m b e r T e r m , 2 0 2 1 1 : 2 1 - cv - 0 1 44 2 -J D B F il e d O n : O cto b e r

1 , 2 0 2 1 X i u J i a n S u n , S p i r i tu a l A d a m , A p p e l l a n t v . B a ra c k H u s s e i n O b a m a , A p p e l l e e O N A P P E A LF R O M T H E U N IT E D S T A T E S D IS T R IC T

C O U R T F O R T H E D IS T R IC T

O F C O L U M B IA B E F O R E : T a te l a n d Ra o , C i rc u i t J u d g e s , a n d S e n te l l e , S e n i o r C i rc u i t J u d g e J U DG M EN T T h i s a p p e a l w

a s co n s i d e re d o n t h ere c o rd fro m t h eU n i te d S ta te s D i s tr i ct C o u r t fo r th eD i s tr i ct o f C o l u m b i aa n d o n t h eb r i e f a n d a p p e n d i x fi l e d b y a p p e l l a n t. S e eF e d
. R
. A p p . P
. 3 4 ( a ) ( 2 ) ; D .C
. C i r . R u l e3 4 ( j)
. I t i s O R D E R E D A N D AD J U D G E D t h a t th ed i s tr i ct c o u r t’ s o rd e r fi l e d J u n e4 , 2 0 2 1 , b e a ffir m e d
. T h ed i s tr i ct c o u r t d i d n o t a b u s ei tsd i s c re ti o n i n d i s m i s s i n g t h eco m p l a i n t w i th p re ju d i c efo r fa i l u ret oco m p l y

wi th t h ep l e a d i n g s ta n d a rd s of F e d e ra l R u l eof C i v i l P ro c e d u re8 ( a )
. S e eC i ra l s ky v . C IA , 3 5 5F .3 d 6 6 1 , 6 6 8 - 7 1 ( D .C
. C i r . 2 0 0 4 )
. T h a t r u l e re q u i re s“ as h o r

t a n d p l a i n s ta te m e n t o f t h eg ro u n d sfo r t h eco u r t’ s j u r i s d i cti o n ” a n d “ as h o r t a n d p l a i n s ta te m e n t o f t h ec l a i m s h ow i n g t h a t th ep l e a d e r i s e n ti tl e d t ore l i e f,” s e eF e d
. R
. C i v . P
. 8 ( a ) , a n d a p p e l l a n t’ s co m p l a i n t s ta te s n od i s c e r n i b l ec l a i m o r b a s i s fo r j u r i s d i cti o n . P u rs u a n t toD .C
. C i rc u i t R u l e3 6 , th i s d i s p o s i ti o n wi l l n o t b ep u b l i s h e d
. T h eC l e r k i s d i re cte d t owi th h o l d i s s u a n c eof t h em a n d a teh e re i n u n ti l s e v e n d a ys a fte r r e s o l u ti o n of a n y ti m e l y p e ti ti o n fo r

re h e a r i n g o r

p e ti ti o n fo r

re h e a r i n g e n b a n c . S e eF e d
. R
. A p p . P
. 4 1 ( b ) ; D .C
. C i r . R u l e4 1
. P e r C u r ia m F O R

T H E C O U R

T : M a r k J
. L a n g e r , C l e r k B Y : /s/ D a n i e l J
. R e i d y D e p u ty C l e r k
#### In the Matter of Daniel Goldstein et al., Appellants, v New York State Urban Development Corporation, Doing Business as Empire State Development Corporation, Respondent.

Submitted September 14, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 64 AD3d 168.

Motion by City of New York for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-23 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
Exhibit 35.3

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

                           Homecomings Financial, LLC

             Home Equity Loan Trust 2007-HSA2 (the "Issuing Entity")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the period from and including
April 27, 2007 through and including  September  24, 2007 and of the  Servicer's
performance  under the  applicable  servicing  agreement  has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 5.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Cargill, Incorporated


We consent to the use of our report dated September 29, 2004, with respect to
the combined balance sheet of North Star Steel Minnesota, North Star Steel Iowa,
North Star Steel Kentucky, Inc., North Star Steel Texas, Inc. and Cargill Wire
(North Star) as of May 31, 2004, and the related combined statement of earnings,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended May 31, 2004, included
herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the
prospectus.



/s/ KPMG LLP
-----------------------
KPMG LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 4, 2004
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 663 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow self-employed individuals to deduct health insurance costs in computing self-employment taxes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. ISAKSON, and Mr. BURNS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow selfemployed individuals to deduct health insurance costs 

in computing self-employment taxes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equity for Our Na5 tion’s Self Employed Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR HEALTH INSURANCE COSTS IN 

7 COMPUTING SELF-EMPLOYMENT TAXES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 162(l) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to special rules for health 
2 

•S 663 IS

1 insurance costs of self-employed individuals) is amended 

2 by striking paragraph (4) and by redesignating paragraph 

3 (5) as paragraph (4). 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
<PAGE>

================================================================================

                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                September 9, 2005

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346


                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                          Form 20-F [X]    Form 40-F [ ]

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _____________


     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _____________

     Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                Yes [ ]    No [X]

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- _____________

================================================================================

<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<Table>
<Caption>

Exhibit            Description
-------            -----------
<S>                <C>
99.1               Press Release, dated September 8, 2005, regarding Hollinger Inc.
                   Status Update.
</Table>


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  September 9, 2005


                                        HOLLINGER INC.

                                    By  /s/  Randall C. Benson
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Name:  Randall C. Benson
                                        Title: Chief Restructuring Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1999 for Hallwood Energy  Corporation and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000319019
<NAME>                        Hallwood Energy Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         7,119
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  19,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,015
<PP&E>                                         755,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                 581,299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,674
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    21,386
<COMMON>                                       100
<OTHER-SE>                                     53,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   75,102
<SALES>                                        38,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               38,993
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                   182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,102
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,102
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .05



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Karen Eileen Gorton, Respondent.

[961 NYS2d 817]

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1992, was suspended by this Court’s order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts *(see*22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peter, P.J., Rose, Lahtinen, Stein and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
Exhibit 31.2 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, James Mackaness, certify that: 

 

1.            I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Invuity, Inc.; and

 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: March 20, 2017 

 

|   | By:    |   | /s/ James Mackaness           |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |   |   | James Mackaness               |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50622

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID ARIAS-SETINA, also known

as David Arias-Setin,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-719-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, David AriasSetina raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2269

GLENN HENDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DAVID LOAR MCKENZIE; SONY PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT; KIM RUSSO; 

SCHMID & VOILES; KATHLEEN MCCOLGAN, Esq.; ROSEN & SABA, LLP; 

JAMES ROSEN, Esq.; ADELA CARRASCO, Esq.,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:14-cv-00029-FL)

Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 27, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. David Loar Mckenzie, SANDS 

ANDERSON PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Henderson appeals the district court’s orders 

imposing a pre-filing injunction and denying Henderson’s Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend that order. We have 

reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not 

abuse its discretion in imposing the pre-filing injunction. See

Cromer v. Kraft Foods N.A., Inc., 390 F.3d 812, 817-18 (4th Cir. 

2004) (setting forth standard of review and four factors used to 

evaluate propriety of a pre-filing injunction). Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Henderson v. Mckenzie, No. 5:14-cv-00029-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2 & 

Oct. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 21.01
<PAGE>   2

                              LIFE RE CORPORATION

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            NAMES UNDER WHICH
                     NAME OF                        JURISDICTION OF           THE SUBSIDIARY
                    SUBSIDIARY                       INCORPORATION            DOES BUSINESS
                    ----------                      ---------------         -----------------
<S>                                                 <C>                <C>
TexasRe Life Insurance Company....................  Texas              TexasRe Life Insurance
                                                                         Company
Life Reassurance Corporation of America...........  Connecticut        Life Reassurance Corporation
                                                                         of America
Reassure America Life Insurance Company...........  Illinois           Reassure America Life
                                                                         Insurance Company
Life Re International, Ltd........................  Bermuda            Life Re International, Ltd.
AML Acquisition Company...........................  Delaware           AML Acquisition Company
American Merchants Life Insurance Company.........  Illinois           American Merchants Life
                                                                         Insurance Company
Mission Life Insurance Company....................  Texas              Mission Life Insurance
                                                                         Company
</TABLE>