alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Annual Report of Gurata Gold, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shaun P. Davis, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











/s/Shaun
P. Davis


Shaun P.
Davis


Chief
Executive Officer






September
10, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  November 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Dennis  Bradley,  Controller  (Principal  Financial  Officer)  of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Dennis Bradley
                                        ------------------
                                        Dennis Bradley
                                        Controller (Principal Financial Officer)
                                        January 17, 2006
EXHIBIT 12(a)


COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO FIXED CHARGES
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<S>

                           Twelve    Three
                           Months    Months
                           Ended     Ended
                           July 3,   July 3,             Year Ended
(millions, except ratios)  1999      1999   1998   1997  1996    1995   1994
                      (unaudited) (unaudited)
                     <C>       <C>     <C>    <C>    <C>   <C>    <C>
Fixed Charges
 Interest and amortization
  of debt discount and
  expense on all
  indebtedness        $1,333     $647   $1,423 $1,409 $1,365 $1,373 $1,279

 Add interest element
   implicit in rentals   137       72      144    147    121    119    114
                       1,470      719    1,567  1,556  1,486  1,492  1,393
Interest Capitalized       5        2        5      3      5      4      1
Total fixed charges   $1,475     $721   $1,572 $1,559 $1,491 $1,496 $1,394

Income
 Income from continuing
  operations          $1,080     $477   $1,072 $1,188 $1,271 $1,025 $  857
 Deduct undistributed
  net income
  of unconsolidated
  companies               10        3       11     13      8       9   (7)
                       1,070      474    1,061  1,175  1,263   1,016   864
Add
 Fixed charges
  (excluding interest
  capitalized)         1,470      719    1,567  1,556  1,486  1,492 1,393
 Income taxes            753      301      766    912    834    703   614
  Income before fixed
   charges and
   income taxes       $3,293   $1,494   $3,394 $3,643 $3,583 $3,211$2,871

Ratio of income to fixed
 charges                2.23     2.07     2.16   2.34   2.40   2.15  2.06

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Kevin Leandrew THORPE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-6951.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 17, 2009.

Decided: May 7, 2009.

Kevin Leandrew Thorpe, Appellant Pro Se. Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael Cornell Wallace, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Leandrew Thorpe appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction in his sentence and request for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, *188we affirm for the reasons set forth by the district court. *United States v. Thorpe,*No. 3:05-cr-00340-JRS (E.D.Va. May 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZiLOG, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), James M. Thorburn, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Perry Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, respectively, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  |                                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 13 2004  |  |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES M. THORBURN
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                         
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Title:             |  | James M. Thorburn Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   
|Date: February 13, 2004 |  |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    PERRY J. GRACE   
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                         
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Title:             |  | Perry J. Grace Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Edward Antonio ROSE, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-7119.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 23, 2006.

Edward Antonio Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens Norman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Edward Antonio Rose seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rose has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
1

 Honorable Charles L. Nail, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Court, District of

South Dakota.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 09-6005

________________

In re: *

*

Rodney Arthur Johnson, *

*

Debtor. *

*

Rodney Arthur Johnson, *

* Appeal from the United States

Plaintiff - Appellant, * Bankruptcy Court for the District of

* South Dakota

v. *

*

Gregory County Auditor, *

*

Defendant - Appellee *

_____

Submitted: February 25, 2009

Filed: March 11, 2009

_____

Before FEDERMAN, MAHONEY, and VENTERS, Bankruptcy Judges.

_____

VENTERS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This is an appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order denying a motion for a default

judgment and dismissing an adversary complaint seeking damages for alleged

violations of the automatic stay or discharge injunction.1

 We dismiss the appeal.
2

Although the caption names the Debtor, Rodney Arthur Johnson, as the

Plaintiff-Appellant, Mr. Johnson is not a party to this appeal, nor was he a party to the

adversary proceeding, because he died before the complaint was filed in September

2008. Douglas Kettering, the attorney who represented the Debtor in his bankruptcy

case prior to his death, filed the underlying adversary proceeding as well as this

appeal. 

Mr. Kettering has not shown that he has any authority or standing to pursue this

appeal, or to bring the underlying adversary action, after the death of his client. The

attorney-client relationship between Mr. Kettering and the Debtor terminated upon the

Debtor’s death. 7A C.J.S. Attorney & Client § 274 (2008). See also Kasting v.

American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 196 F.R.D. 595, 598 (D. Kan. 2000).

An attorney cannot file a suggestion of death on behalf of a former client, let alone

initiate an adversary proceeding or pursue an appeal. Id.; In re Klein, 36 B.R. 390,

392 (Bankr. E.D. N.Y. 1984). 

In the absence of any proof that Mr. Kettering has been appointed as the

attorney or representative of the Debtor’s probate estate, Mr. Kettering does not have

standing to pursue this appeal (nor did he have standing to initiate the underlying

adversary action). We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Jones

v. Gale, 470 F.3d 1261, 1265 (8th Cir. 2006) (standing is a prerequisite to subject

matter jurisdiction).

Appeal dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10888]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,707]

Paragon Store Fixtures, Big Lake, MT; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 31, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Paragon 
Store Fixtures, Big Lake, Montana.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of April 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10888 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,728]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 1, 2009 in response to a petition filed by the Shop Ironworkers, Local 790 on behalf of workers of NCI Group, Incorporated doing business as Robertson Ceco Corp, Lockeford, California.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

      ( print page 21834)    
Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of April 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10891 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
+
Ney, Get your GEOINT Data On!

The Aero Browser - ACES
(Aeronautical Content
Exploitation System)

Access multiple geospatial intelligence and
aeronautical information databases

Learn more:
https://aerodata.nga.mil/AeroBrowser

Custom Media
Fulfills tailored media requests for geospatial
intelligence data to disadvantaged users.

Learn more:
https://custommedia.om.east.paas.nga.mil/#/cmg
s/customer/3ca0efe8-3dif-47 1d-bc02-35e06716f3
filportal

GEOINT Search and Retrieval (GSR)

Search and retrieval of GEOINT and
Non-GEOINT content internal or external to NGA

Learn more:
https://gsr.nga.mil/

GRID (Geospatial Repository and
Data Management System)
Management and dissemination of elevation data.
Learn more:

https://grid.nga.mil/grid

IC GIS Portal

A collaborative geospatial content management
system

Learn more:
https://portal.geo.nga.mil/portal/home/

Map of the World

An environment for GEOINT analysis and
exploitation, providing access to foundation data,
mission data and visualizations.

Learn more:

https://map.nga.mil/

MSI (Maritime Safety Information)
Provides global maritime geospatial intelligence

Learn more:
http://msi.nga.mil/NGAPortal/MSI.portal

NGA Globe
Discovery of geospatial content, tools and
services that provide insight into global events.

Learn more:
https://globe.nga.mil/

NOME (NSG Open Mapping
Enclave)
Acommunity of screened users can edit existing

content and contribute new features to maps
throughout the world.

Learn more:
https://nome.vgihub.geointservices.io/

Print on Demand (POD)

Provides mil-spec and commercial print-quality
PDFs of all standard NGA map and chart
products.

Learn more:
https:/Awww.geo.nga.mil/products/print_on_dema
nd/index.php

Approved for Public release, NGA-2022-02162


PerTitle 10 U.S. Code §467, GEOINT consists of imagery, imagery intelligence, and geospatial information.

Geospatial information is information that identifies the geographic location and characteristics of natural or
constructed features and boundaries on or about the earth.

Examples of geospatial information

> Vectors and attributes: Descriptive information about a location such as points, lines and polygons

> Point clouds: A collection of co-located charted points that can be re-contexturized as 3D models
Raster and satellite imagery: High-resolution images of our world, taken from above
Census data: Released census data tied to specific geographic areas, for the study of community trends

Cell phone data: Calls routed by satellite, based on GPS location coordinates

vvvy

Drawn images: CAD images of buildings or other structures, delivering geographic information as well as
architectural data

v

Social media data: Social media posts that data scientists can study to identify emerging trends around the earth

Approved for Public release, NGA-2022-02162
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41459 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CARLOS SOTO

- ARANJO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 827

- 1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Soto

- Aranjo
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Soto

- Aranjo h a s not filed a respo nse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 27, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41459 Document: 00513736924 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/27/2016No. 15

- 41459

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41459 Document: 00513736924 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/27/2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of World Waste Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, David Rane, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
              or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


March 30, 2007                                          /s/ David Rane
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        David Rane
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Alesha P. and Another, Infants. Oswego County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Audrey B., Respondent, and Michael B., Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 508]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Kimberly M. Seager, J.), entered April 3, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, insofar as appealed from, determined that respondent Michael B. had abused his stepchildren.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent-appellant (respondent) appeals from an order of fact-finding determining that he sexually abused his two stepdaughters. Contrary to respondent’s contention, Family Court’s findings of sexual abuse are supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; *Matter of Teonia B.,*37 AD3d 1101, 1101 [2007]). “We accord great weight and deference to [the c]ourt’s determinations, ‘including its drawing of inferences and assessment of credibility,’ and we will not disturb those determinations where, as here, they are supported by the record” *(Matter of Arianna M. [Brian M.],*105 AD3d 1401, 1401 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 862 [2013]; *see Matter of Peter C.,*278 AD2d 911, 911 [2000]; see *generally Matter of Irene O.,*38 NY2d 776, 777 [1975]).

Respondent further contends that the court abused its discretion in excluding him from the courtroom during his stepdaughters’ testimony. We reject that contention. “The court properly balanced the respective interests of the parties and, based upon the hearing testimony, reasonably concluded that the [stepdaughters] would suffer substantial emotional trauma if [they] were compelled to testify in open court” *(Matter of Lynelle W.,*177 AD2d 1008, 1009 [1991]; *see Matter of Q. L. H.,*27 AD3d 738, 739 [2006]). Moreover, the court properly based its decision to exclude respondent from the courtroom “on the social worker’s affidavit that respondent’s abuse of the child[ren] compromised [their] ability to give clear and accurate testimony in respondent’s presence” *(Matter of Hadja B.,*302 AD2d 226, 226 [2003]; *see Matter of Moona C. [Charlotte K.],*107 AD3d 466, 467 [2013]). Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
##### 



CP SHIPS ANNOUNCES REDEMPTION OF SENIOR NOTES
 SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS AND APPOINTMENT OF NEW DIRECTORS
 GATWICK, UK
 Redemption of 10 3/8% Senior Notes Due 2012
  .
    1/4




---



##### 



Special Meeting of Shareholders and Amalgamation
   2/4




---



##### 



Appointment of New Directors
  New Financing Arrangements
   About CP Ships
 Forward Looking Information
 3/4




---



##### 



CONTACTS
 
 4/4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                          94,829
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,990,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                    65,732  
<INVENTORY>                                  1,707,718
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,114,557
<PP&E>                                       4,449,135
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,584,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,129,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,127,115
<BONDS>                                      1,061,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    666,378
<COMMON>                                        19,920
<OTHER-SE>                                     254,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,129,717
<SALES>                                      6,965,496
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,965,496
<CGS>                                        4,292,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,292,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,441,785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,251
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,007
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,607
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,607
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>