alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.8
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated March 7, 2007 (the "Pooling and Servicing
Agreement") by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities
Corp., as Depositor, Capmark Finance Inc., as Master Servicer, Midland Loan
Services, Inc., as Primary Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee and
Paying Agent, ARCap Servicing, Inc., as Special Servicer, and LNR Partners,
Inc., as a Special Servicer for the Americold Portfolio Mortgage Loan

JPMCC 2007-CIBC18


I, Susan K. Chapman, a Vice President of LNR Partners, Inc. as Special Servicer
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, on behalf of the Special Servicer
and not in my individual capacity, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under the
   Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the period ending the end of the
   fiscal year 2007 (the "Reporting Period") and the Special Servicer's
   performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under
   my supervision; and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has
   fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all
   material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


LNR PARTNERS, INC.


By: /s/ Susan K. Chapman
Susan K. Chapman
Vice President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert W Ellsworth, Appellant.

Submitted August 24, 2009;

decided September 15, 2009

Reported below, 59 AD3d 989.

*772Motion for assignment of counsel granted and R. Thomas Rankin, Esq., care of Goodell & Rankin, 617 Washington Street, Jamestown, New York 14701 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Celia Hopkins 

Deputy, Associate Director for Capabillities &

Deputy, Component Acquisition Executive

Mrs. Hopkins serves as the Deputy Associate Director for Capabilities (ADC)

and Deputy, Component Acquisition Executive (CAE) at the National 

Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA). In this role, she supports the ADC in 

the oversight, synchronization, guidance, and development of NGA, National 

System for Geospatial Intelligence, and Allied System for Geospatial 

Intelligence strategic direction, future resource programming, capabilities 

planning, and oversees acquisition, innovation, research, and the adoption of 

new technologies supporting GEOINT requirements.

Prior to this assignment, Ms. Hopkins served as the Director of the GEOINT 

Enterprise Office (G), she was charged with executing GEOINT Functional 

Management in support of the Associate Director of Enterprise, NGA, as the 

GEOINT Functional Manager and DoD GEOINT Manager, which provides support and oversight of the 

National System for Geospatial Intelligence (NSG) and the Allied System for Geospatial Intelligence 

(ASG). 

Previously, Ms. Hopkins served as Director of the Office of Special Programs, Analysis Directorate and the 

Director of the Analysis and Production Directorates Office of Naval Intelligence/Naval Oceanographic Office 

NGA Support Team. She has more than 29 years of documented federal government service with experience 

organizing, directing, supervising, and managing programs for Production and IT activities within NGA and 

the Defense Mapping Agency (DMA). She has held a variety of positions: Enterprise Operations 

Directorates Technical Executive, Cartographer, Contracting Officers Technical Representative (COTR), 

Systems Engineer for several International programs, Program Manager for major IT programs.

Mrs. Hopkins holds a Masters Degree in Systems Engineering and Engineering Management and a 

Bachelors Degree in Computer Science. She has earned certificates in Systems Engineering is DAWIA 

Level III in Program Management, and is also a member of the Defense Acquisition Corp. Throughout her 

career, Mrs. Hopkins has been the recipient of several awards. In 2009, was presented with NGAs Woman of 

the Year Award and is a FY2019 Presidential Rank Award Recipient. 

Approved for public release, 22-344
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        OF MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the "FORM 10-Q") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of Mission Resources
Corporation (the "ISSUER").

I, Robert L. Cavnar, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

         Dated: August 12, 2003                           /s/ Robert L. Cavnar
                                                          --------------------

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 12th day of August 2003

/s/ Carmen M. Garcia
--------------------

Notary Public in and for the
State of Texas

My commission expires: May 15, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mission Resources Corporation and will be retained by Mission
Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 445 

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security Act, as added by 

the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act 

of 2003, to provide for negotiation of fair prices for Medicare prescription 

drugs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2005 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself, Mr. CARPER, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. 

BINGAMAN, and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend part D of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act, as added by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, to provide 

for negotiation of fair prices for Medicare prescription 

drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Prescription 

5 Drug Price Reduction Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 445 IS

1 SEC. 2. NEGOTIATING FAIR PRICES FOR MEDICARE PRE2 SCRIPTION DRUGS. 

3 Section 1860D–11 of the Social Security Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 1395w–111) is amended by striking subsection (i) 

5 (relating to noninterference) and by inserting the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(i) AUTHORITY TO NEGOTIATE PRICES WITH MAN8 UFACTURERS.—In order to ensure that each part D eligi9 ble individual who is enrolled under a prescription drug 

10 plan or an MA–PD plan pays the lowest possible price 

11 for covered part D drugs, the Secretary shall have author12 ity similar to that of other Federal entities that purchase 

13 prescription drugs in bulk to negotiate contracts with 

14 manufacturers of covered part D drugs, consistent with 

15 the requirements of this part and in furtherance of the 

16 goals of providing quality care and containing costs under 

17 this part.’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James Thorburn, as Chief Executive Officer of ZiLOG, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.

 

Date: November 9, 2004

 

_________________________

James M. Thorburn

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by ZiLOG, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZiLOG, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Perry J. Grace, as Chief Financial Officer of ZiLOG, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZiLOG, Inc.

 

Date:  November 9, 2004

 

______________________

Perry J. Grace

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by ZiLOG, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darryl P., Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 904]

Appeal from an adjudication of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), *1440rendered November 2, 2009. The adjudication revoked defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

It is hereby ordered that the adjudication so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant was adjudicated a youthful offender based upon his plea of guilty of aggravated criminal contempt (Penal Law § 215.52) and was sentenced to five years of probation. Defendant appeals from an adjudication revoking the sentence of probation and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 1 to 3 years of incarceration. Contrary to the People’s contention, we conclude that this appeal is not moot *(cf. People v Mackey,*79 AD3d 1680, 1681 [2010], *lv denied*16 NY3d 860 [2011]).

Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his request for an adjournment *(see People v Aikey,*94 AD3d 1485, 1486 [2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 956 [2012]). Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the determination of the court that he violated the terms of his probation is not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Garries,*299 AD2d 858, 858 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 558 [2002]; *see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).

Present—Smith, J.P, Fahey, Peradotto, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           7,344
<SECURITIES>                                    82,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,624)
<INVENTORY>                                     38,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,413
<PP&E>                                          50,695
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,064)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 255,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,796
<OTHER-SE>                                     204,837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   255,357
<SALES>                                         40,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,842
<CGS>                                           22,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,265
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,802
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,463
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,463
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>
#### Lester *v.*The Savannah Guano Company.

1. There was no error in refusing to allow an amendment to a motion for a new trial by adding a ground which was palpably without any merit whatever

2. The evidence warranted the verdict, and there was no error in denying a new trial. *Judgment affirmed,.*

August 14, 1894.

Complaint on notes. Before Judge Guerry. Randolph superior court. May term, 1898.

The notes sued on were given by Travis Johnson and Mrs. Lester for fertilizer. He did not defend; she pleaded that she was a married woman with a separate estate, and that she signed the notes merely as surety and received no benefit therefrom. Her husband testified in support of this plea; while the testimony for plaintiffs was, that the fertilizer was delivered to Johnson on Mrs. Lester’s order and charged to her for him, that he received it on her wagon and carried the notes to her to be signed, that the credit was given to her and not to Johnson, and plaintiffs would not have sold to him. From other testimony it appeared that she rentéd him land, stock and tools at a stipulated price in cash, furnishing him no supplies to carry on his farming operations. After verdict for plaintiff", defendant moved for a new trial on the general grounds. At the hearing of the motion, counsel for movant proposed to amend the same by showing that since the verdict it had come to his knowledge that Johnson had been subpoenaed by plaintiff" to prove by him that the guano was sold on the credit of Mrs. Lester, that the notes were her contract and she was not merely security on them; but that *711plaintiff’s counsel refused to introduce Johnson as a witness, because he would not so testify, and his testimony would he in support of defendant’s plea. The ■court declined to allow the amendment, and overruled the motion for a new trial.

B. H. Lester, for plaintiff in error.

W. C. Worrill, *contra.*
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 648

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief

Act of 1991 to extend the authority for drought assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 648 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF THE RECLAMATION STATES

2 EMERGENCY DROUGHT RELIEF ACT OF 1991.

3 Section 104(c) of the Reclamation States Emergency

4 Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) is amend5 ed by striking ‘‘September 30, 2005’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep6 tember 30, 2010’’.

Passed the Senate December 16, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 648

AN ACT

To amend the Reclamation States Emergency

ity for drought assistance.Drought Relief Act of 1991 to extend the author-
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 02, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 02, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16D0091. JOSHUA LEWIS HUFF v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2010CR00327
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 643 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.643

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
   To amend the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 to reauthorize State 
                           mediation programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF STATE MEDIATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 506 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1987 (7 U.S.C. 5106) 
is amended by striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2010''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EX-35.11
(logo) MIDLANDLOANSERVICES

March 1, 2008

Ms. Karen A. Merson
Compliance Specialist
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045-1951

JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2007-LDP10
Pooling and Servicing Agreement

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified to the Depositor thereunder that on
behalf of Midland Loan Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"), (i) a review of the
Servicer's activities during the reporting period and of its performance under
the Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's supervision; (ii) to
the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the
Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the reporting period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and (iii) the Servicer has not received any notice regarding
qualification, or challenging the status, of any REMIC formed pursuant to the
Agreement from the IRS or any other governmental agency or body.

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC.
/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
President and Chief Operating Officer

A Member of the PNC Financial Services Group
P.O. Box 419127 Kansas City Missouri 64141-6127
www.midlandls.com 913 253 9000 T 913 253 9001 F
#### Thomas Burke, Respondent, v County of Erie, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 779]

*1462Appeal, by permission of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered October 12, 2012. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendant to compel and for a protective order.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting that part of the motion to compel a second deposition of the nonparty witness and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this Labor Law action, plaintiffs counsel served a nonparty witness subpoena on the only eyewitness to the accident demanding that he appear for a deposition. The nonparty witness had commenced a separate Labor Law action arising from a different construction site accident and retained plaintiffs counsel to represent him in that lawsuit. Plaintiffs counsel asked the nonparty witness various questions about plaintiffs accident, and then defendant’s counsel asked the nonparty witness questions that established that plaintiff and the nonparty witness were both carpenters in the same union, they both had pending lawsuits involving the same employer, and they both retained the same attorneys. When defendant’s counsel asked if plaintiff was going to be a witness in the nonparty witness’s case, plaintiffs counsel objected and directed the nonparty witness not to answer. Plaintiffs counsel further objected and directed the nonparty witness not to answer when defendant’s counsel asked the nonparty witness whether plaintiffs counsel was representing him in connection with the deposition. Thereafter, the deposition was discontinued.

Defendant moved, inter alia, for an order compelling a second deposition of the nonparty witness and prohibiting plaintiff’s counsel from interfering with that deposition. Supreme Court denied the motion, and we now modify the order by granting that part of the motion seeking to compel a second deposition of the nonparty witness. The questions asked by defendant’s counsel were relevant with respect to the nonparty witness’s bias or motive *(see generally*CPLR 3101 [a]; *Salm v Moses,*13 NY3d 816, 818 [2009]). Thus, the questions should have been “ ‘freely permitted and answered’ ” *(Roggow v Walker,*303 AD2d 1003, 1004 [2003]). In any event, we agree with defendant that it is entitled to a second deposition of the nonparty witness in order to cross-examine the witness regarding the cir*1463cumstances of the accident. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
EX-35.2
(logo) CHASE


SUBSERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

RE: GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-2F: This Assignment, Assumption and Recognition
Agreement made this 1st day of March 2007, (this "Assignment Agreement") is
among JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association ("JPMorgan"), as servicer (in
such capacity, the "Servicer"), GS Mortgage Securities Corp., as assignee (the
"Assignee") and Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company ("GSMC"), as assignor (the
"Assignor")

The undersigned, each a duly authorized officer of Chase Home Finance LLC
("CHF"), do hereby certify that:

(1)  CHF is a Subservicer under the Agreement

(2)  A review of the activities of CHF during the calendar year ending December
31, 2007 and of the performance of CHF under the Agreement has been made under
our supervision; and

(3)  To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, CHF has fulfilled all
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
year.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned
in the Agreement.

Date: 02/28/2008

Chase Home Finance LLC,
as Subservicer
By: /s/ Kim Greaves
Name: Kim Greaves
Title: Senior Vice President
Servicing Manager

By: /s/ Jim Miller
Name: Jim Miller
Title: Senior Vice President
Default Servicing Manager