Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 94 / Monday, May 18, 2009 / Notices 23213 

APPENDIX—TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 4/27/09 AND 5/1/09—Continued 

TA–W Subject firm 

(petitioners) Location Date of institution 

Date of 

petition 

65869 ................. Chatsworth Products, Inc. (Wkrs) ................ New Bern, NC .............................................. 04/29/09 04/22/09 

65870 ................. Samuel Aaron International (Wkrs) .............. Long Island City, NY .................................... 04/30/09 04/24/09 

65871 ................. Sherwood Valve, LLC (USWA) .................... Washington, PA ............................................ 04/30/09 04/30/09 

65872 ................. Aaron’s Automotive Products, Inc. (Wkrs) ... Springfield, MO ............................................. 04/30/09 04/29/09 

65873 ................. Tyco Electronics (Wkrs) ............................... Greensboro, NC ........................................... 05/01/09 04/17/09 

65874 ................. Fielder Electric Motor Repair, Inc. (Comp) .. Galax, VA ..................................................... 05/01/09 04/30/09 

65875 ................. Eastern Display (Comp) ............................... Providence, RI .............................................. 05/01/09 04/30/09 

[FR Doc. E9–11429 Filed 5–15–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 

period of April 27 through May 1, 2009. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A), all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. the sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B), both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. there has been a shift in production 

by such workers’ firm or subdivision to 

a foreign country of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles which 

are produced by such firm or 

subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. the country to which the workers’ 

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. there has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) the workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) either— 

(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and 

the component parts it supplied for the 

firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) a loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
23214 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 94 / Monday, May 18, 2009 / Notices 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–65,461; Woodgrain Millworks, 

Inc., Leased Workers Mid Oregon 

Personnel Services, Prineville, OR: 

March 2, 2008 

TA–W–65,506; Mel Bernie and 

Company, dba 1928 Jewelry 

Company, Burbank, CA: January 29, 

2008 

TA–W–65,095; Commercial Carving 

Company, Thomasville, NC: 

February 2, 2008 

TA–W–65,151; Starlume, Inc., d/b/a 

Illume, Adecco and Aerotek, Sun 

Valley, CA: February 4, 2008 

TA–W–65,449; Kamin, LLC, Formerly 

J.M. Huber Corporation, Leased 

Workers From Precision Staffing, 

Sandersville, GA: February 26, 2008 

TA–W–65,654; Lear Corporation, 

Southfield, MI: February 24, 2008 

TA–W–65,659; Eagle Sewing Company, 

San Francisco, CA: March 13, 2008 

TA–W–65,697; Robin-Lynn Mills, Inc., 

Fort Payne, AL: March 25, 2008 

TA–W–65,762; Chrysler LLC, Sterling 

Heights Assembly, Sterling Heights, 

MI: March 8, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–64,826; Thomasville Furniture 

Industries, Inc., Thomasville, NC: 

January 6, 2008 

TA–W–64,827; Thomasville Furniture 

Industries, Ind.—Plant E, 

Thomasville, NC: January 6, 2008 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–65,521; KB Alloys LLC— 

Wenatchee Plant, Malaga, WA: 

March 6, 2008 

TA–W–65,638; Greenfield Research, 

Inc., Die Cut Department, 

Greenfield, OH: March 28, 2009 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. The firm does not have a 

significant number of workers 50 years 

of age or older. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

None. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–64,725; Weather Shield 

Manufacturing, Inc., Corporate 

Office, Medford, WI. 

TA–W–64,855; Federal-Mogul 

Corporation, Powertrain Sealing 

Bearings Div., Frankfort, IN. 

TA–W–65,139; Weather Shield 

Manufacturing, Inc., Custom 

Products Division, Medford, WI. 

TA–W–65,140; Fred Whitaker Company, 

Roanoke, VA. 

TA–W–65,276; The Mitchell Gold 

Company, Leased Workers From 

Brigette’s Staffing, Taylorsville, NC. 

TA–W–65,294; Iowa Precision 

Industries, Mestek, Inc., Cedar 

Rapids, IA. 

TA–W–65,524; Volvo Truck North 

America, New River Valley Plant, 

Dublin, VA. 

TA–W–65,556; Samsung Austin 

Semiconductor, FAB 1 Division, 

Austin, TX. 

TA–W–65,568; Metal Powder Products, 

Ford Road Division, St. Marys, PA. 

TA–W–65,746A; Plum Creek Northwest 

Plywood, Inc., A Subsidiary of Plum 

Creek Timber Company, Columbia 

Falls, MT. 

TA–W–65,746; Plum Creek Northwest 

Plywood, Inc., A Subsidiary of Plum 

Creek Timber Company, Kalispell, 

MT. 

TA–W–65,283; Product Action 

International, LLC, Working On-Site 

at Toyota Manufacturing Indiana, 

Princeton, IN. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–65,673; APAC Customer 

Services, Inc., Cedar Rapids, IA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of April 27 through May 1, 2009. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room N–5428, U.S. Department 

of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20210 during normal 

business hours or will be mailed to persons 

who write to the above address. 

Dated: May 8, 2009. 

Certifying Officer, Division Of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E9–11430 Filed 5–15–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES