alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,184
<SECURITIES>                                    13,631
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,481
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         302,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 321,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        221,527
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   321,243
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,085
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,084
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,587
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,587
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,587
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo ORTIZ-RIOS, also known as Jose Mata, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40464.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alfredo Ortiz-Rios (Ortiz) appeals his guilty-plea conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by being found in the United States without permission after deportation. He argues, in light of *Ap-prendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that the 36-month term of imprisonment imposed in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury.

Ortiz’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although he contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Ortiz properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit *652precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 35.3


[LOGO] MIDLANDLOANSERVICES

March 1, 2008

Mr. Mario Fegan
IMPAC Funding Corporation
1401 Dove St
Newport Beach, CA 92660

                           Impac Secured Assets Corp.
                       Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
                                  Series 2007-2
                               Servicing Agreement

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Servicing Agreement (the
"Agreement"), it is hereby certified to the Depositor thereunder that on behalf
of Midland Loan Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"), (i) a review of the Servicer's
activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's supervision; (ii) to the
best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the reporting period or, if there has been a failure to
fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such failure known to
the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are set forth below;
and (iii) the Servicer has not received any notice regarding qualification, or
challenging the status, of any REMIC formed pursuant to the Agreement from the
IRS or any other governmental agency or body.

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

                                        MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, INC.


                                        /s/ Steven W. Smith
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Steven W. Smith
                                        President and Chief Operating Officer




A Member of the PNC Financial Services Group
P.O. Box 419127  Kansas City Missouri 64141-6127
www.midlandls.com 913 253 9000 T  913 253 9001 F
##### 

\

Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Each of the undersigned, Alan J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the
Company), and Glenn R. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of an amendment to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2004 (the
Report). Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. December 1, 2004  /s/ Alan J. LacyAlan J. LacyChairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Glenn R. RichterGlenn R. RichterExecutive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 6, 2019

No. 04-19-00045-CV

IN RE BERTETTI HEALTHCARE, INC. 

d/b/a Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - West San Antonio

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On January 24, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On January 28, 2019, 

relator filed a motion to abate the mandamus proceeding. After considering the petition, this court 

concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The motion to abate the mandamus 

proceeding is DENIED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on February 6, 2019.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of February, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018-CI-08563, styled John Zepeda, Individually and as Administrator of 

the Estate of Concepcion Zepeda, Deceased and on Behalf of All Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Concepcion Zepeda 

Deceased v. Bertetti Healthcare, Inc. d/b/a Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - West San Antonio, pending 

in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
#### Harry WALKER, a/k/a Musa Aquil, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Morgan E. SCOTT, Jr.; Brett Braum-baugh, Postal Inspector; Virginia Police Department, South Boston; Mr. Grant, New York District Attorney in charge of case 552-95; R.S. Pulliam, Major; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-6966.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 25, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 18, 2006.

Harry Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Bugbee Winn, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia; Carlene Booth Johnson, Perry Law Firm, PC, Dill-wyn, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Harry Walker appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named*
      *448
      *Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Walker v. Scott,*No. 7:05-cv-00010-jct, 2006 WL 1288315 (W.D.Va. May 4, 2006). Walker’s motions for general relief are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 14, 2014

NO. 03-11-00413-CR

Kenneth Sashington, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court on April 28, 2011. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was 

no reversible error in the court’s judgments of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the 

trial court’s judgments of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no 

adjudication of costs is made.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the month of August, 2004 Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. (Translation of Registrants Name Into English)
  Canadian Pacific Tower, Ste 1600, 100 Wellington Street W., Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, Canada (Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.) Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.) Yes   o
    
    No   þ
 (If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-. This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant:     Form S-8 No. 333-13960.    Page 1 of 2 Pages
Exhibits Index appears on Page 3




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
                    (Registrant)Date: August 25, 2004
    By:
    /s/   Thomas C. GriffithsName:
    Thomas C. GriffithsTitle:
    Assistant Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibits Index The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form
6-K. Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibits99.1
    
    Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Acquires Remaining Interest In Management Company
Exhibit 4.2


 


	
  

  	
  DEAN HELLER

  Secretary of State

  204 North Carson Street, Suite 1

  Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299

  (775) 684 5708

  Website: secretaryofstate.biz

  



 


	
  Certificate of Amendment

  	
   

  
	
  (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390)

  	
   

  



 


 


	
  Important: Read attached instructions
  before completing form.

  	
   

  	
  ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

  



 


Certificate of Amendment to Articles of
Incorporation


For Nevada Profit Corporations


 


(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After
Issuance of Stock)


 


1. Name of corporation:


Cascade Sled Dog Adventures,
Inc.


 


2. The articles have been
amended as follows (provide article numbers, if available):


Article number 1 of the
Articles of Incorporation are hereby amended as follows:


 


“1.   Name of
Corporation:  Sunset Brands, Inc.”


 


 


 


 


 


3. The vote by which the
stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise at
least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting
power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may
be required by the provisions of the * articles of incorporation have voted in
favor of the amendment is greater than 50%.


 


	
  4. Effective
  date of filing (optional):

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  (must not be later than 60 days after the certificate is filed)

  



 


	
  5. Officer
  Signature (required):

  	
  /s/ TODD SANDERS

  



 










* If any proposed amendment
would alter or change any preference or any relative or other right given to
any class or series of outstanding shares, then the amendment must be approved
by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the
holders of shares representing a majority of the voting power of each class or
series affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on
the voting power thereof.


 


IMPORTANT:
Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper fees may
cause this filing to be rejected.


 


	
  This form must be accompanied by
  appropriate fees. See attached fee schedule.

  	
  Nevada Secretary of State AM [ILLEGIBLE] Amend 2003

  Revised on: 11/03/03
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4045 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4045

To designate the United States courthouse located at the intersections 
  of Broad Street, Seventh Street, Grace Street, and Eighth Street in 
  Richmond, Virginia, as the ``Spottswood W. Robinson III and Robert 
                       Merhige Jr. Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 30 (legislative day, September 29), 2006

 Mr. Allen (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the United States courthouse located at the intersections 
  of Broad Street, Seventh Street, Grace Street, and Eighth Street in 
  Richmond, Virginia, as the ``Spottswood W. Robinson III and Robert 
                       Merhige Jr. Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPOTTSWOOD W. ROBINSON III AND ROBERT MERHIGE JR. 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The United States courthouse, located at the 
intersections of Broad Street, Seventh Street, Grace Street, and Eighth 
Street in Richmond, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 
``Spottswood W. Robinson III and Robert Merhige Jr. Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the United States 
courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Spottswood W. Robinson III and Robert Merhige Jr. 
Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (FormS-8 No. 333-144906 & No. 333-148972) of WABCO Holdings Inc. of our report dated February 22, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of WABCO Holdings Inc. for the year ended December 31,2006, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York 

February 23, 2009
**Exhibit 31(a)**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Alan J. Lacy, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures,or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures tobe designed under oursupervision, to ensurethat material informationrelating to theregistrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us byothers within thoseentities, particularlyduring the period in whichthis report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosurecontrols and proceduresand presented in thisreport our conclusionsabout the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controlsand procedures, as of theend of the period coveredby this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this reportany change in theregistrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting that occurredduring the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) thathas materially affected,or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, theregistrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significantdeficiencies and materialweaknesses in the designor operation of internalcontrol over financialreporting which arereasonably likely toadversely affect theregistrant’s ability torecord, process, summarizeand report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involvesmanagement or otheremployees who have asignificant role in theregistrant’s internalcontrol over financialreporting.
Date: November 8, 2004
 /s/ Alan J. Lacy
S. 55

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To adjust the boundary of Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of Colorado.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rocky Mountain National Park

Boundary Adjustment Act of 2005’’.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

In this Act:

(1) FEDERAL PARCEL.—The term ‘‘Federal parcel’’ means

the parcel of approximately 70 acres of Federal land near

MacGregor Ranch, Larimer County, Colorado, as depicted on

the map.

(2) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map numbered 121/

80,154, dated June 2004.

(3) NON-FEDERAL PARCELS.—The term ‘‘non-Federal parcels’’ means the 3 parcels of non-Federal land comprising

approximately 5.9 acres that are located near MacGregor

Ranch, Larimer County, Colorado, as depicted on the map.

(4) PARK.—The term ‘‘Park’’ means Rocky Mountain

National Park in the State of Colorado.

SEC. 3. ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

(a) EXCHANGE OF LAND.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall accept an offer to

convey all right, title, and interest in and to the non-Federal

parcels to the United States in exchange for the Federal parcel.

(2) CONVEYANCE.—Not later than 60 days after the date

on which the Secretary receives an offer under paragraph (1),

the Secretary shall convey the Federal parcel in exchange for

the non-Federal parcels.

(3) CONSERVATION EASEMENT.—As a condition of the

exchange of land under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall

reserve a perpetual easement to the Federal parcel for the

purposes of protecting, preserving, and enhancing the conservation values of the Federal parcel.

(b) BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT; MANAGEMENT OF LAND.—On

acquisition of the non-Federal parcels under subsection (a)(2), the

Secretary shall—

(1) adjust the boundary of the Park to reflect the acquisition

of the non-Federal parcels; and
S. 55—2

(2) manage the non-Federal parcels as part of the Park,

in accordance with any laws (including regulations) applicable

to the Park.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.