alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                         837,533
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,969)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,418,863
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,352,413
<PP&E>                                         786,344
<DEPRECIATION>                               (697,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,467,836
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,265,093
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       169,257
<OTHER-SE>                                     915,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,467,836
<SALES>                                        168,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               300,824
<CGS>                                           89,776
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  923,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               209,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (800,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (800,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (800,193)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Sugarman *v.*Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Co.

A declaration, brought by a father to recover “for the services,” during its minority, of a minor child negligently killed by a railway company, in which it was alleged “ that as she advanced in years her services would have become of great value to him,” though it does not distinctly aver that at the time of the killing the child was capable of rendering services of any value, is amendable by alleging that the child was old enough to render and did in fact render certain specified services, and the same were, at the time of her death, of a stated value per month. *Judgment reversed,.*

June 18, 1894.

Action for damages. Before Judge Van Epps. City court of Atlanta. January term, 1894.

Defendant demurred to the declaration for want of a cause of action alleged. Plaintiff offered an amendment which the court declined to allow, and dismissed the case. It appeared from the declaration that the plaintiff’s child, a girl not quite five years old, was killed by the negligent running of defendant’s car on "Whitehall street in Atlanta. Plaintiff alleged, that as the child advanced in years she would have become of great value to him; that his wife was by occupation a hair-dresser, and he intended to prepare his child, had she lived, for the same calling; and that his suit was for the services of the child during her minority up to the age of twenty-one. The offered amendment alleged, that the child was old enough to, and did, render service to him in nursing his younger child, and in waiting upon and attending to various wants of his wife in connection with *605the discharge of her duties to the household and'family, which service at the time of the homicide was of the value of $5 per month, and would have greatly increased in value, etc.

Smith & Pendleton and Morris Macks, for plaintiff.

N. J. & T. A. Hammond, for defendant.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Michael Francis Palma v. Harris County Appraisal Review

Board

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 005 0 6

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 1 8

- 17668

Trial court: 157 t h District C ourt of Harris County

The Clerk of this Court’s June 26, 2018 notice requested that the district clerk file

the indigent clerk’s record. Then, after the district clerk’s July 23, 2018 original clerk’s

record on indigence contained several documents, but not the appellant’s affidavit of

indigence, the Clerk of this Court’s July 26, 2018 notice requested that the district clerk

file a supplemental indigent clerk’s record to include that document. On August 8, 2018,

the district clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing the pro se appellant Michael

Francis Palma’s affidavit of indigence, filed on March 16, 2018, but neither indigent clerk’s

record contained any objection or trial court’s order overruling appellant’s indigence claim.

The court reporter’s August 9, 2018 info sheet stated that there was no reporter’s record

and t he original clerk’s record was filed on August 13, 2018.

Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1 provid e s t h a t a p a r t y who fil e s such a S tatement

in the t r i a l cou r t “is not required to p a y c osts in t h e a p p e l l a te c ourt unless the tri a l c ourt

ov e r rul e d the p a r t y ’s c laim of ind i g e n c e in an order that complies with Texas Rule of Civil

Procedure 145.” T EX

. R

. A PP

. P

. 20.1 ( b) ( 1). Because appellant’s indigence claim was not

overruled by an order with detailed findings of fact that complies with Rule 145, appellant

is not required to pay costs. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P

. 20.1 ( b) ( 1); T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a), (f)(1).

Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to mark appellant indigent in this

Court’s records and allowed to proceed without advance payment of the appellate filing

and clerk’s and reporter’s record fees. B ecause appellant is proceeding pro se, the Court

ORDERS the distric t clerk to mail the clerk’s , indigent clerk’s, and supplemental clerk’srecords to the appellant, at no cost to appellant, within 20 days of the date of this order,

and shall certify the delivery date within 3 0 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

_______________________________

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: August 16, 2 018
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40656

Conference Calendar

__________________

EDWARD LEE WILLIAMS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

J.B. SMITH, Smith County, TX Sheriff;

SMITH COUNTY JAIL; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT,

Medical Department of Smith County Jail,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:94-CV-1014

- - - - - - - - - -

March 1, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edward Lee Williams appeals the dismissal, as frivolous, of

his civil rights suit. Williams argues that he was subjected to

cruel and unusual punishment when he was placed in a tank housing

homosexual inmates and that the jail's guards were indifferent to

his safety once he was placed in the tank. He argues for the

first time on appeal that he was placed in the tank without being

given the procedural protections normally afforded a prisoner 
No. 95-40656

-2-

facing a disciplinary action. We do not address this issue. See

Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 322 (5th Cir. 1991).

 We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM for

essentially the reasons given by the magistrate judge.
Motion Granted; Order filed September 5, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00205-CR

____________

FRED BOAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court No. 3

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MD-0377095

ORDER

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, Greg Russell. Appellant’s 

brief was originally due May 28, 2019. We have granted a total of 90 days to file 

appellant’s brief until August 28, 2019. When we granted the last extension, we 

noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. 

No brief was filed. On August 28, 2019, counsel filed a further request for extension 

of time to file appellant’s brief alleging a medical excuse. 
We grant the request for extension and issue the following order.

Accordingly, we order Greg Russell to file a brief with the clerk of this court 

on or before September 25, 2019. If counsel does not timely file appellant’s brief as 

ordered, the court may issue an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court 

to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the brief and the 

consideration of sanctions, appointment of new counsel, or other appropriate relief.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Wise and Hassan.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4044 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 4044

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 13, 2006

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To clarify the treatment of certain charitable contributions under 
                     title 11, United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Liberty and Charitable 
Donation Clarification Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CONTRIBUTIONS IN BANKRUPTCY.

    Section 1325(b)(3) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``, other than subparagraph (A)(ii) of paragraph (2),'' after 
``paragraph (2)''.

            Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day, September 
      29), 2006.

            Attest:

                                             EMILY J. REYNOLDS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### Berryhill v. Shelton

Case below: 182 N.C. App.-(17 April 2007)

No. 232P07

Def’s (Alvin Berryhill) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-697)

Dismissed 10/11/07
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2532

SAMUEL B. DAVIS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD W. HUDGINS; MCKINLEY SIMMONS; HOWARD

C. ANDLETON; JAMES M. DIXON; TIMOTHY L.

DALTON; JAMES STEPHEN ELLENSON; CLYDE M.

WEAVER; LAWRENCE J. REDDING, III; ROBERT D.

HICKS; RANDELL C. OGG; J. W. HORNSBY, JR.;

UNKNOWN CONSPIRATORS,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 96-1126

SAMUEL B. DAVIS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD W. HUDGINS; MCKINLEY SIMMONS; HOWARD

C. ANDLETON; JAMES M. DIXON; TIMOTHY L.

DALTON; JAMES STEPHEN ELLENSON; CLYDE M.

WEAVER; LAWRENCE J. REDDING, III; ROBERT D.

HICKS; RANDELL C. OGG; J. W. HORNSBY, JR.;

UNKNOWN CONSPIRATORS,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District

Judge. (CA-94-163-4)

Submitted: May 7, 1996 Decided: June 14, 1996

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel B. Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Franklin, III, Brian

Nelson Casey, TAYLOR & WALKER, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia; James

Stephen Ellenson, Newport News, Virginia; Robert William McFarland,

Richard Joshua Cromwell, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Norfolk,

Virginia; William Mark Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond,

Virginia; Willard Montellous Robinson, Jr., Newport News, Virginia;

Robert D. Hicks, Gloucester, Virginia; Randell C. Ogg, SHERMAN,

MEEHAN & CURTIN, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing

his complaint alleging violations of the Racketeering Influenced

and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961-1968 (West 1985

& Supp. 1995), and civil rights statutes 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985,

1986, 1988 (1988), and imposing FED. R. CIV. P. 11 sanctions. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Davis v. Hudgins, No. CA-94-163-4 (E.D. Va. Aug. 7

& Dec. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND> THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
         FROM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, CONDENSED
         CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND NOTES TO CONDENSED
         CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
         ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     JUL-04-1999
<CASH>                                             54,689
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      26,761
<ALLOWANCES>                                          323
<INVENTORY>                                        27,812
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  118,394
<PP&E>                                            415,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                    263,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    284,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              67,796
<BONDS>                                           280,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                        25,000
<COMMON>                                              402
<OTHER-SE>                                       (103,815)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      284,944
<SALES>                                           115,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  115,248
<CGS>                                              80,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      80,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   15,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 14,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (27,765)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (28,265)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (28,265)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.00



</TABLE>
[Capmark Logo] Annual Statement as to Compliance For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Title Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. S e r i e s   2 0 0 7 -   I Q 1 3  RREEF Portfolio Pari Passu Loan serviced under MSCII Series 2007-HQ11(the "HQ11 Transaction") Pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the HQ11 Transaction (the "Lead Servicing Agreement"), dated as of February 1, 2007, by and among, Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Capmark Finance Inc., as Master Servicer (in such capacity the "Lead Servicer"), and the other parties party thereto.  I hereby attest that:  **i.******A review of the activities of the Lead Servicer during the above referenced period,  and of its performance under the Lead Servicing Agreement, has been made under my supervision. **ii.******To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Lead Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under this the Lead Servicing Agreement throughout such period. Capmark Finance Inc. /s/ Mark E. McCool By:  Mark E, McCool Title: Managing Director Date: February 20, 2008 .inv 759 lib A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

__________________________________________________________________

No. DA 18-0578

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

AUSTIN MICHAEL WHITE,

Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including August 14, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s reply brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

July 28 2020

07/28/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0578
Order entered January 28 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00745

- CR
RABYL RIYAZ NATHOO, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380

- 82434

- 2017



### O RDER
The reporter’s record was filed October 23, 2018. Included in the record were seven mp4
files labeled “SX 66

- 1” through “ SX 66

- 7” and over two hundred mp4 files lab eled “ part 27” through “part 231.” Because the files marked “part 27” through “part 231” were not properly
identified or described with respect to an exhibit offered and admitted at trial, we contacted the court reporter and instructed her to re file those exhibits with proper descriptions

. On January 16, 2019, a supplemental reporter’s record was filed containing State’s Exhibit 66, parts 8 through
231

. In light of this, we STRIKE the mp4 files labeled “part 27” through “part 231 ” filed October 23, 2018

.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,598,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,215,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                   713,177
<INVENTORY>                                 28,057,323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            60,718,512
<PP&E>                                       7,190,249
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,433,953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              92,219,007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,873,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    976,755
<COMMON>                                       106,238
<OTHER-SE>                                  65,534,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,345,740
<SALES>                                     96,591,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            96,591,813
<CGS>                                       67,962,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               67,962,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,783,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             782,516
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,908,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,773,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,134,915
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,134,915
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11507]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1831-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]


Florida; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-1831-DR), dated April 21, 2009, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: May 1, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance 
Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of April 21, 2009.

    Dixie and Gilchrist Counties for Individual Assistance.
    Hamilton and Madison Counties for Public Assistance (already 
designated for Individual Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Nancy Ward,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E9-11507 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P