alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Richard Beyer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd., certify, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Annual Report), which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Freescale Semiconductor
Holdings I, Ltd.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 1350.

Dated: February 11, 2011



/s/ RICHARD BEYERRichard BeyerChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd.
FI LED U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT Jul y 12, 2006 T HOM AS K. KAHN CL E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]
I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 06- 11281 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D
. C
. D ocketN o. 04 -022 74 -C V -A R -M D O N N I E A R R I N G T O N , P la in tif f
- A p p e lle e , v ersu s C HA R L E S C L I F T ON , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t, C H A S E J E N K I N S , in d iv id u a llya n din h is offi ci al capaci ty a s an o ff i ce r of the C i ty of R a in b o w C ityP o lic e D e p a rtm e n t, e t a l., D efen d an t s.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( Ju l y 12, 2006) B efo re B L A C K , B A R K E T T an d H IL L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M:2

O ne of the defendant s, C harl es C l i ft on , appeal s the order of the di stri ctcourt denyi ng hi m qu al i fi ed i m m un i ty. T he tri al j ud ge foun d thatthe fa ct s are no t , at thi s s t a ge , undi s put e d. W e h a v e r e v ie w e d th e b r ie f s , r e c o r da n dth e o r d e ro f th e d is tr ic t ju d g e . W e ag ree th atq u est i o n s o f fact , h o t l y d i sp u t ed , p rev en tg ran to f q u al i fi ed i m m u n i ty. AF F I R ME D.
#### Ruby Emanuel, Plaintiff, v Sheridan Transportation Corp. et al., Defendants. Kenneth Heller, Appellant, v Jacoby & Meyers, *LLP,*Respondent.

Submitted June 22, 2009;

decided September 3, 2009

Reported below, 58 AD3d 583.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit 32.3



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, (the "Report"), I Elise
Nissen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.







/s/ Elise Nissen
----------------
Elise Nissen,
Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2004


                                       20
### The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, District Judge, United States 1 

### District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, adopting th e report and recommendation of the Honorable Celeste F. Bremer , Chief Magi strate Judge, United States District Court for the Souther n District of Iowa. ____________ No. 95-3820

____________ Albert W. Ware, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa Department of Corrections, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

____________ Submitted: May 16, 1996 Filed: July 10, 1996

____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

____________
PER CURIAM.
Albert Wayne Ware, an inmate of the Union Correctional Institution in Ralford, Florida, held under authority of the Iowa Department o f Cor rections, appeals from a final judgment entered in the United State s District Court for the Southern District of Iowa denying his petition for 1
a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Ware v. Iowa Dept. o f Corrections , No. 4-93-70771 (S.D. Iowa Oct. 6, 1995) (order adopting repor t and recommendation). For reversal, Ware argues the district court erred in (1) denying his due process claim that the state had suppresse d exculpatory evidence; (2) denying his due process claim that the state ha d knowingly offered perjured testimony; (3) denying his due process

### -2-

claim of bias by the trial judge; (4) holding th at the trial court had not erred in denying his motion for a continuance; ( 5) denying his ineffective assista nce of counsel claim; and (6) holding that he was procedurall y barred from challengi ng on federal habeas review an alleged ex post facto violation by the Iowa Supreme Court, the admissi bility of the testimony of his alleged common-la w wife at trial, and the denial of his motions for a severed trial and a change of venue.
After careful review of the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude that the decision of the dis trict court is correct and that an extended opinion by this court would add nothing of substantia l value to the thorough opinions already written by the magistrate judge and the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court i s affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Marc L. Baker, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Marc L. Baker





Marc L. Baker


Acting Chief Financial Officer


Dated: October 13, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22921-22922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER09-1075-000]


Falcon Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

May 8, 2009.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Falcon Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC, 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is May 28, 2009.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC, 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the

[[Page 22922]]

Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the 
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance 
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a9efecfbeae6c7c5c0c7ccfadcd9d9c6dbdde9cfccdbca87cec6df"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4929186979bbab8bdbab187a1a4a4bba6a094b2b1a6b7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>. 
or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11341 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-35.3
(logo) CAPMARK

Annual Statement as to Compliance
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007


J.P. MORGAN CHASE COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
Series 2007-CIBC18


Pursuant to Section 11.09 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the
referenced transaction, I hereby attest that:

i. A review of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. as Master Servicer during
the period, and of its performance under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
has been made under my supervision.

ii. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capmark Finance Inc. as
Master Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under
this Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the period.


Capmark Finance Inc.


/s/ Mark E. McCool

By: Mark E. McCool
Title: Managing Director
Date: February 20, 2008



Real Estate Finance, Investments, Services

Capmark Finance Inc.
116 Welsh Road
Horsham, Pa 19044
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Shelter Properties II Limited Partnership 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000319723
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,804
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,495   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,913   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          8,447     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,829    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,913    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,905    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,517    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 390    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       388     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.96<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, May 20, 2009 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.

The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be: The Commission will consider whether to propose changes to the federal proxy rules to facilitate director nominations by shareholders.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

May 12, 2009.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-11380 Filed 5-12-09; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 443 

To improve the investigation of criminal antitrust offenses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2005 

Mr. DEWINE (for himself, Mr. KOHL, and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To improve the investigation of criminal antitrust offenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Antitrust Criminal In5 vestigative Improvements Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF PREDICATE CRIMES FOR AUTHOR7 IZATION FOR INTERCEPTION OF WIRE, ORAL, 

8 AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS. 

9 Section 2516(1) of title 18, United State Code, is 

10 amended— 
2 

•S 443 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (q), by striking ‘‘or’’ after 

2 the semicolon; 

3 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (r) as sub4 paragraph (s); and 

5 (3) by adding after subparagraph (q) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(r) any criminal violation of section 1 (relating 

8 to illegal restraints of trade or commerce), 2 (relat9 ing to illegal monopolizing of trade or commerce), or 

10 3 (relating to illegal restraints of trade or commerce 

11 in territories or the District of Columbia) of the 

12 Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1, 2, 3); or’’. 

Æ
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2306

_____________________________

KELLY KOON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Paul S. Bryan, Judge.

October 23, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the revocation of his probation, arguing 

that the trial court failed to conduct an adequate admission 

colloquy. The state properly concedes error. The record does not 

show that the trial court conducted any colloquy with Appellant. 

It merely accepted defense counsel’s representations that 

Appellant was admitting the violations. Therefore, we reverse the 

revocation of Appellant’s probation, vacate the sentence imposed, 

and remand for further proceedings. See Donaldson v. State, 219 

So. 3d 996 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). 

REVERSED and REMANDED.

RAY, C.J., and WINOKUR, J., and SHARRIT, MICHAEL S., ASSOCIATE 

JUDGE, concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Baya Harrison, Monticello, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 58 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former members of the 

Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total 

to travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same 

extent as retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to travel 

on such aircraft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit former 

members of the Armed Forces who have a service-connected disability rated as total to travel on military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent as 

retired members of the Armed Forces are entitled to 

travel on such aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 58 IS 

1 SECTION 1. TRAVEL ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT OF CERTAIN 

2 DISABLED FORMER MEMBERS OF THE 

3 ARMED FORCES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 53 of title 10, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1060b 

6 the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 1060c. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled 

8 former members of the armed forces 

9 ‘‘The Secretary of Defense shall permit any former 

10 member of the armed forces who is entitled to compensa11 tion under the laws administered by the Secretary of Vet12 erans Affairs for a service-connected disability rated as 

13 total to travel, in the same manner and to the same extent 

14 as retired members of the armed forces, on unscheduled 

15 military flights within the continental United States and 

16 on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility 

17 Command. The Secretary of Defense shall permit such 

18 travel on a space-available basis.’’. 

19 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

20 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

21 after the item relating to section 1060b the following new 

22 item: 

‘‘1060c. Travel on military aircraft: certain disabled former members of the 

armed forces.’’. 

Æ
Exhibit 10.26.3

                AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
                                February 27, 2004

         Reference is made to that certain  Registration  Rights Agreement dated
December 30, 2003 (the  "Agreement")  made by INYX,  Inc., a Nevada  corporation
(the  "Company")  and Laurus Master Fund,  Ltd. (the  "Purchaser"  or "Laurus").
Capitalized  terms  used  herein  without  definition  shall  have the  meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.

         WHEREAS,  the Company and Laurus have agreed to amend  certain terms of
the Agreement and the Company desires to make such changes; and

         WHEREAS,  the  Company  and Laurus  agree  that on the date  hereof the
Company is in compliance with all the terms and provisions of the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE,  in consideration for the execution and delivery by the
Company of this amendment,  and for other good and valuable  consideration,  the
receipt and  sufficiency  of which is hereby  acknowledged,  the parties  hereto
agree as follows:

         1.       The definition of "Filing Date"  contained in Section 1 of the
                  Agreement is hereby  deleted in its entirety and the following
                  inserted in its stead:

                  ""Filing  Date"  means,  with  respect  to  each  Registration
         Statement  required  to be filed  hereunder,  no later than thirty days
         following  the  funding by  Purchaser  of (1) the Loans on the  initial
         funding date and (2) each $2,000,000 tranche of Loans thereafter."


         2.       The  foregoing  amendment  shall be  effective  as of the date
                  hereof.

         3.       There are no other amendments to the Agreement, and all of the
                  other forms,  terms and provisions of the Agreement  remain in
                  full force and effect.

         4.       The Company  hereby  represents and warrants to Laurus that as
                  of  the  date  hereof  all   representation,   warranties  and
                  covenants made by the Company in connection with the Agreement
                  are  true  correct  and  complete  and  all of  the  Company's
                  covenants requirements have been met.


<PAGE>

         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  each of the  Company  and Laurus has caused  this
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Rights Agreement signed in its name effective as
of this 25th day of February, 2004.


                                             INYX, INC.


                                             By:________________________________
                                                Name:
                                                Title:



                                             LAURUS MASTER FUND, LTD.


                                             By:________________________________
                                             Name:
                                             Title: