alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Re: Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2007-HE4 (the "Trust"),
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-HE4, issued pursuant to
  the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2007, among
  Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Saxon Mortgage Services,
  Inc., as a Servicer, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, as a Servicer,
  WMC Mortgage Corp., as a Responsible Party, Decision One Mortgage Company,
   LLC, as a Responsible Party, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
  Trustee, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Custodian, Morgan
  Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust, Series 2007-HE4

  I, Steven Shapiro, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report"), and
    all reports on Form 10-D (collectively with this Annual Report, the
    "Reports") required to be filed in respect of period covered by this
    Annual Report, of the Trust;

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
    any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
    with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this Annual Report is included in the Reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this Annual Report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the Servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
    in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria required to be
    included in this Annual Report in accordance with Item 1122 of
    Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
    included as an exhibit to this Annual Report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this Annual Report. Any material instances of
    non-compliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    Annual Report.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, LaSalle Bank National
    Association as Custodian, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee and Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian.

Dated:    March  28, 2008



     /s/ Steven Shapiro
     Signature
     Steven Shapiro
     Vice President
     (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0082 CITY OF BILLINGS,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KATRINA LYNN HOFMAN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 27, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 21 2020

12/21/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0082
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 464 

To modify the project for navigation, Union River, Maine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2005 

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To modify the project for navigation, Union River, Maine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNION RIVER, MAINE. 

4 The project for navigation, Union River, Maine, au5 thorized by the first section of the Act of June 3, 1896 

6 (29 Stat. 215, chapter 314), is modified by redesignating 

7 as an anchorage area that portion of the project consisting 

8 of a 6-foot turning basin and lying northerly of a line com9 mencing at a point N 315,975.13, E 1,004,424.86, thence 

10 running north 61 degrees 27 minutes 20.71 seconds west 
2 

•S 464 IS

1 about 132.34 feet to a point N 316,038.37, E 

2 1,004,308.61. 

Æ
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: MARIA ELENA GAMBOA

NICDAO,

 Debtor,

________________________ 

MARIA ELENA GAMBOA NICDAO,

 Appellant,

 v.

CASH ALASKA II, LLC,

 Appellee.

No. 11-35102

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00151-TMB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

FILED

JAN 03 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-35102

Maria Elena Gamboa Nicdao appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing her second appeal from the bankruptcy court’s amended

judgment in her Chapter 7 adversary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo, Decker v. Tramiel (In re JTS Corp.), 617

F.3d 1102, 1109 (9th Cir. 2010), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Nicdao’s second appeal because, after

the bankruptcy court amended its judgment on remand following Nicdao’s first

appeal, there were no additional issues for the district court to review and it was

precluded from reconsidering previously decided issues. See Thomas v. Bible, 983

F.2d 152, 154 (9th Cir. 1993) (law of the case doctrine precludes reconsideration

of an issue that has already been decided by the same court, or a higher court, in

the identical case). Nicdao also failed to establish grounds based upon which the

district court could exercise its discretion not to apply the preclusive law of the

case doctrine and reconsider issues it had decided in the first appeal. See id. at 155

(discussing limited exceptions to the law of the case doctrine).

We do not address issues raised by Nicdao for the first time on appeal. See

Brown v. Gen. Tel. Co. of Cal., 108 F.3d 208, 210, n.1 (9th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
#### NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. v. TERRY DAVIS ARMWOOD, JR.; TERRY DAVIS ARMWOOD, SR., Individually and as Parent and Guardian for Terry Davis Armwood, Jr.; RAMONA ARMWOOD, Individually and as Parent and Guardian for Terry Davis Armwood, Jr.; JIMMY LEE BEST; and STELLA H. BOSTIC

No. 99A07

(Filed 12 October 2007)

Insurance— not-for-hire commercial vehicle — minimum liability coverage

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion that the minimum liability insurance coverage required by N.C.G.S. § 20-309(al) for not-for-hire commercial vehicles is not written into each policy as a matter of law.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 181 N.C. App. 407, 638 S.E.2d 922 (2007), affirming a judgment entered 13 July 2005 by Judge Howard E. Manning, Jr. in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 September 2007.

*Young Moore and Henderson P.A., by R. Michael Strickland and Glenn C.*Raynor; *for plaintiff-appellant.*

*Law Offices of Frank A. Cassiano, by Frank A. Cassiano, for defendant-appellees Terry Davis Armwood, Sr. and Ramona Armwood, individually and as parents and guardians of Terry Davis Armwood, Jr.*

*Nexsen Pruet Adams Kléemeier, PLLC, by James W. Bryan and Daniel W. Koenig, for Trucking Industry Defense Association, amicus curiae.*

*Pinto Coates Kyre & Brown, PLLC, by David L. Brown, for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.*

*. Rachel Scott Decker for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.*

PER CURIAM.

*577For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this matter is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
For the convenience of concertgoers 

the Garden Cafe remains open until 6:oo pm.

The use of cameras or recording equipment during the 

performance is not allowed. Please be sure that cell phones,

pagers, and other electronic devices are turned off.

Please note that late entry or reentry of

the West Building after 6:30 pm is not permitted.

Music Department

National Gallery of Art

Sixth Street and Constitution Avenue nw

Washington, DC

Mailing address

2000b South Club Drive

Landover, md 20785

www.nga.gov

The Sixty-sixth Season of

The William Nelson Cromwell and F. Lammot Belin

Concerts

National Gallery ofArt

2,662nd Concert

Washington National Cathedral Choir

of Men and Girls

March 2, 2008

Sunday Evening, 6:30 pm

West Building, West Garden Court

Admissionfree
Program

Performed without intermission

Gregorio Allegri (1582-1652)

Miserere mei

Thomas Tallis (1505-1585)

Lamentations ofJeremiah, parts 1 and

Domenico Scarlatti (1685-1757)

Stabat Mater

Stabat Mater dolorosa

Cujus animam gementem

Quis non posset contristari

Eja materfans amoris

Sancta Mater, istud agas

Fac me vere tecumfere

Juxta crucem tecum stare

Infammatus et accensus

Fac ut animae donetur

Amen

The Musicians

The Washington National Cathedral Choir of Men and Girls was founded in

1997 and is currently among the few cathedral choirs in the United States

that have an affiliated school in the English tradition. The girls, who range

in age from eleven to eighteen, attend the National Cathedral School

for Girls. The men ofthe choir, who provide the countertenor, tenor, and

bass voices, are professional musicians from the greater Washington

and Baltimore areas.

The Choir of Men and Girls shares responsibility with the National

Cathedral Choir of Men and Boys to provide liturgical support for Cathedral 

services including daily weekday evensongs and Sunday services. Both

choirs have been extensively recorded and have been heard in radio broadcasts for Public Radio International. The Cathedral Choirs participate in

televised Cathedral services and those ofnational and ecumenical importance such as prayer services for the victims of Hurricane Katrina and 

the attacks of September 11, 2001. Among other televised performing

opportunities are the installation ofthe Presiding Bishop ofthe Episcopal

Church and state funerals, the most recent being the funeral service of

former President Gerald Ford.

The choirs have performed in cities throughout the United States

including Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Indianapolis, Los Angeles, Milwaukee,

New York, San Diego, San Francisco, Saint Louis, Sarasota, and Tampa.

Next Week at the National Gallery ofArt

Women ofthe National Gallery Vocal Arts Ensemble

Presented in honor ofWomen’s History Month 

March 5, 2008

Wednesday Afternoon, 12:10 pm

West Building Lecture Hall
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Boston Harbor Islands National Recreation Area Advisory Council will be held on Wednesday, June 3, 2009, at 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. at the Partnership Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA.

This will be the quarterly meeting of the Council. The agenda will include discussion of how to stimulate public participation in park planning and other management efforts, a park update and public comment.

The meeting will be open to the public. Any person may file with the Superintendent a written statement concerning the matters to be discussed. Persons who wish to file a written statement at the meeting or who want further information concerning the meeting may contact Superintendent Bruce Jacobson at (617) 223-8667.

# DATES:

June 3, 2009 at 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Partnership Office, 408 Atlantic Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Superintendent Bruce Jacobson, (617) 223-8667.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Advisory Council was appointed by the Director of the National Park Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 28 members represent business, educational/cultural, community and environmental entities; municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; Boston Harbor advocates; and Native American interests. The purpose of the Council is to advise and make recommendations to the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership with respect to the development and implementation of a management plan and the operations of the Boston Harbor Islands NRA.

Dated: May 4, 2009.

Bruce Jacobson,

Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.

[FR Doc. E9-11375 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-86-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0091

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

MARY DARLEAN WRIGHT,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Jon A. Oldenburg, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 28 2021

07/28/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0091
#### Jack MOORE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Sidney HARKLEROAD, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 09-6373.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 23, 2009.

Decided: May 5, 2009.

Jack Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Ap-pellee.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*158PER CURIAM:

Jack Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); *Reid v. An-gelone,*369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRUCE EZELL,

Appellant,

v.

SCOTT R. CRAWLEY,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00238-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2 

of Travis County, Texas1

(TC# C-1-CV-20-003262)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s agreed motion for voluntary dismissal

of the appeal, and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. 

We therefore dismiss the appeal. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, each will bear their own 

costs. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d). This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2021.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANTOS ESTELA FLORES, AKA Estela 

Santos-Flores, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 13-74012 

Agency No. A200-883-291 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 10, 2018**

Before: CANBY, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Santos Estela Flores, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUL 17 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 13-74012 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 

2006). We deny the petition for review in part, grant in part, and we remand.

In her opening brief, Flores does not challenge the agency’s dispositive 

determination that her asylum application was untimely. See Corro-Barragan v. 

Holder, 718 F.3d 1174, 1177 n.5 (9th Cir. 2013) (failure to contest issue in opening 

brief resulted in waiver). Thus, we deny the petition as to Flores’s asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Flores failed to show it is more likely than not that she will be tortured by or with 

the consent or acquiescence of the government of El Salvador. See Aden v. 

Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

As to withholding of removal, this court’s decision in Barajas-Romero v. 

Lynch, 846 F.3d 351, 356-60 (9th Cir. 2017), came down after the BIA’s decision. 

Thus, we grant the petition for review as to withholding of removal, and remand 

this claim to the BIA to determine the impact, if any, of this decision. See INS v. 

Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; 

REMANDED.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3928 

To provide for the Office of Domestic Preparedness of the Department of 

Homeland Security to provide grants to local governments for public 

awareness education relating to preparedness for natural disasters, terrorist attacks, and influenza pandemic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2006 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the Office of Domestic Preparedness of the 

Department of Homeland Security to provide grants to 

local governments for public awareness education relating 

to preparedness for natural disasters, terrorist attacks, 

and influenza pandemic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PUBLIC AWARENESS PREPAREDNESS GRANTS. 

4 Section 430 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

5 (6 U.S.C. 238) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 3928 IS

1 ‘‘(e) PUBLIC AWARENESS PREPAREDNESS

2 GRANTS.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Office of Domestic 

4 Preparedness may provide grants to local govern5 ments for the promotion of public awareness, 

6 through media campaigns and educational materials, 

7 relating to preparedness for natural disasters, ter8 rorist attacks, and influenza pandemic. 

9 ‘‘(2) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

10 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

11 as necessary to carry out this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLIDT000000.L11200000.DD0000.241A.00]


Notice of Public Tour, Twin Falls District Resource Advisory 
Council Tour, Idaho

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA), the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), and the 
Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act of 2004 (FLREA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Twin Falls 
District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will attend a tour as 
indicated below.

DATES: On June 12, 2009, the Twin Falls District RAC members will tour 
a number of projects within the Burley Field Office of the BLM. RAC 
members will meet at the Burley Field Office (15 East 200 South, 
Burley, Idaho 83318) at 8:30 a.m. The tour should conclude by 5:30 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Tiel-Nelson, Twin Falls 
District, Idaho, 2536 Kimberly Road, Twin Falls, Idaho 83301, (208) 
736-2352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member RAC advises the Secretary of 
the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in Idaho. During this tour, the Twin Falls District RAC members will 
learn about the Jim Sage chaining project on the Jim Sage Mountain near 
Almo, Idaho, the U.S. Geothermal Power Plant in the upper Raft River 
Valley and the BLM managed portion of the Castle Rocks Interagency 
Recreation Area. Additional topics may be added and will be included in 
local media announcements. More information is available at http://www.blm.gov/id/st/en/res/resource_advisory.3.html. RAC meetings and 
tours are open to the public. For further information about the tour, 
please contact Heather Tiel-Nelson, Public Affairs Specialist for the 
Twin Falls District, BLM at (208) 736-2352.

    Dated: May 12, 2009.
Jenifer Arnold,
District Manager (Acting).
[FR Doc. E9-11519 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P