alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 62 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 52 

[Report No. 109–43] 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a parcel of real property 

to Beaver County, Utah. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2005 

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MARCH 30, 2005 

Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of March 17, 2005, by 

Mr. DOMENICI, without amendment 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a parcel 

of real property to Beaver County, Utah.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE TO BEAVER COUNTY, UTAH. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—As soon as practicable after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall, without consideration and subject to valid existing 
2

•S 52 RS

1 rights, convey to Beaver County, Utah (referred to in this 

2 Act as the ‘‘County’’), all right, title, and interest of the 

3 United States in and to the approximately 200 acres de4 picted as ‘‘Minersville State Park’’ on the map entitled 

5 ‘‘S. 2285, Minersville State Park’’ and dated April 30, 

6 2004, for use for public recreation. 

7 (b) RECONVEYANCE BY BEAVER COUNTY.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsection 

9 (a), Beaver County may sell, for not less than fair 

10 market value, a portion of the property conveyed to 

11 the County under this section, if the proceeds of 

12 such sale are used by the County solely for mainte13 nance of public recreation facilities located on the re14 mainder of the property conveyed to the County 

15 under this section. 

16 (2) LIMITATION.—If the County does not com17 ply with the requirements of paragraph (1) in the 

18 conveyance of the property under that paragraph— 

19 (A) the County shall pay to the United 

20 States the proceeds of the conveyance; and 

21 (B) the Secretary of the Interior may re22 quire that all property conveyed under sub23 section (a) (other than the property sold by the 

24 County under paragraph (1)) revert to the 

25 United States. 

Calendar No. 62 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 52 

[Report No. 109–43] 

A BILL

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a 

parcel of real property to Beaver County, Utah. 

MARCH 30, 2005 

Reported without amendment
<PAGE>
                                                       Exhibit 11

                The Advest Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                                   
              Computation of Net Income Per Common Share
                                   
                              For the quarters ended December 31,
                                                           Assuming
In thousands, except                   Primary          Full Dilution
per share amounts                   1996     1995       1996     1995

Net income                         $3,292   $3,132     $3,292   $3,132

Interest expense
     on debentures, net                --      --         203      250

Net income applicable to
     common stock                  $3,292   $3,132     $3,495   $3,382

Average number of common
     shares outstanding
     during the period              8,407    8,385      8,407    8,385

Additional shares assuming:
     Exercise of stock options        236      388        262      401
     Conversion of debentures          --       --      1,515    1,515

Average number of common
     shares outstanding             8,643    8,773     10,184   10,301

Net income per share                 $.38     $.36       $.34     $.33
#### Leonard Eidlisz, Respondent, v New York University et al., Appellants.

Submitted July 21, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 473.

Motion for a stay granted.
The National Gallery of Art is a 501(c)(3) organization. 

The amount of your contribution that is deductible for federal 

income tax purposes is limited to the excess of the value of the 

contribution over the value of the benefits made available in return. 

The value of benefits made available is estimated to be: $1,000 for 

Exhibition Circle membership; $750 for Patron membership; $500 

for Sustaining membership; $250 for Supporting membership; and 

$150 for Contributing membership.

vincent van gogh 

Green Wheat Fields, Auvers (detail), 1890

oil on canvas

National Gallery of Art, Washington

Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mellon 

For more information, 

please visit us at 

www.nga.gov/support

or contact the Circle office.

The Circle

National Gallery of Art

Washington, dc

Mailing address

2000b South Club Drive

Landover, md 20785

(202) 842-6450

circle@nga.gov
Join The Circle of the 

National Gallery of Art

You may make your gift by visiting www.nga.gov/

support or by returning this enrollment form.

Please accept my/our gift of $ 

In the form of: 

check credit card stock/securities 

At the following level: 

Exhibition Circle ($20,000 or more)

Patron ($10,000 to $19,999)

Sustaining ($5,000 to $9,999)

Supporting ($2,500 to $4,999)

Contributing ($1,000 to $2,499)

Names (please print)

Address

Telephone 

E-mail address(es) 

Circle members are acknowledged in 

selected National Gallery of Art publications. 

Please indicate how you wish to be listed: 

 I/We cannot join The Circle at this time but

 wish to offer my/our support for the Gallery 

through the following tax-deductible gift: 

$500 $250 $100 other $ 

Checks should be made payable to the 

National Gallery of Art. 

Please charge my credit card:

Visa MasterCard 

American Express Discover

Card number

Card expiration date

Name as it appears on card

Signature

 I/We wish to deduct my/our full contribution 

and waive benefits of membership.

If you wish to make a gift of stock/securities, 

please contact the Circle office for instructions: 

(202) 842-6450 or circle@nga.gov.

My gift will be matched by: 

(Please include your company’s matching gift form.)

 I/We would like information about how to include 

the National Gallery of Art in my/our estate plans 

and become a member of The Legacy Circle.

 I/We would like information on children’s programs 

at the National Gallery of Art. 

Children’s names and ages:
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00169-CV

CHESTER AND CAROLYN WILDER,

Appellants

V.

JOHNSTON CUSTOM HOMES, INC. AND 

JEROLD B. JOHNSTON, Appellees

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 3

of Tarrant County (2017-005058-3)

July 30, 2019

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 5, 2016

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-2081

Lower Tribunal No. 15-10548

________________



### Eugene Rudoy

, Petitioner,

vs.



### Denis Rudoy

, Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction

– Prohibition.

Eugene Rudoy, in proper person.

Anna C. Fernandez, for respondent.

Before LAGOA, EMAS, and LOGUE, JJ.

LAGOA, J.

Petitioner, Eugene Rudoy, seeks a writ of prohibition to disqualify the trial

court judge. We deny the petition.On October 21, 2015, Petitioner moved to disqualify the trial court judge

based on comments made at a July 9, 2015 hearing. The motion was denied by the

trial court judge on November 4, 2015. Rudoy filed the instant petition with this

Court on September 9, 2016.

Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(e) states that “[a] motion to

disqualify shall be filed within a reasonable time not to exceed 10 days after

discovery of the facts constituting the grounds for the motion and shall be

promptly presented to the court for an immediate ruling.” Because the motion to

disqualify was not timely filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration

2.330(e), the petition for writ of prohibition is denied. See State v. Oliu

, 183 So.

3d 1161, 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Sherman v. Town of Bay Harbor Islands

, 939

So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

Petition denied.

2
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Miguel Alemany, Respondent.

Submitted September 28, 2009;

decided October 20, 2009

Reported below, 56 AD3d 251.

*815Motion to strike granted and the material contained in appellant’s brief and reply brief to which objection is taken is deemed stricken.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
EX-35.5
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Re: The servicing agreement dated as of July 1, 2003 (as amended, the
"Agreement"), among Washington Mutual Bank, as Servicer and Bank of America,
National Association as Owner the following with respect to Banc of America
Funding Corporation, Series 2007-3 ("BAFC 2007-3") (the "Securitization").


I, H. John Berens, a Senior Vice President of Washington Mutual Bank (formerly
known as Washington Mutual Bank, FA) (the "Servicer"), certify to the Owner,
the Depositor and the Master Servicer under the Securitization, the following
for the 2007 fiscal year (the "Relevant Year"):


1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of
performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Relevant Year.



Dated as of March 1, 2008



/s/ H. John Berens
Name: H. John Berens
Title: Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Perry J. Grace, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly on Form 10-Q of ZiLOG, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or person performing the
equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |                          
|---------------------- | -------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2006 | By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace

| |                                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| |                                           
| | Perry J. Grace                            
| | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.16

                             English translation of
                      AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT

BETWEEN:

      Autocam France, a limited liability company with capital of #eu#
2,200,000, having its registered office at Zone Industrielle des Pchons, 294
Promenade de l'Arve, 74300 Thiez, registered in the Registry of Companies and
Commerce of Bonneville under no. B 420 291 411, represented by John C. Kennedy,
duly authorized,

                                                      hereinafter, "the Company"

                                                              in the first part,

                                                                             AND

      Bruno Le Sech, a French national, born on June 25, 1962 at Saint Germain
en Laye (78), residing at La Boulaie, 72100 Beaufray,

                                                     hereinafter, the "Employee"

                                                             in the second part.

This amendment is intended to clarify and complete the contents of Article 5.4
of the employment contract for Mr. Le Sech concerning the reimbursement of
various costs by SARL Autocam France. It is agreed that SARL Autocam France will
pay all relocation costs for Mr. Le Sech, including:

      -     costs of lodging and food at Marnaz, as well as weekly travel costs
            to visit his family so long as they have not yet moved, until July
            31, 2002 at the latest;

      -     moving costs, on presentation of appropriate receipts;

      -     realtors costs, on presentation of appropriate receipts; and

      -     notarial fees, including the provisions for purchase costs and a
            mortgage, on presentation of appropriate receipts.


Done in three copies at Thyez
June 4, 2002

For Autocam France SARL
/sgn/                                                /sgn/
John Kennedy                                         Bruno Le Sech
Manager
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 571 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, New York, as the ‘‘Congresswoman 

Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 9, 2005 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, New York, 

as the ‘‘Congresswoman Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSWOMAN SHIRLEY A. CHISHOLM 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1915 Fulton Street in Brooklyn, 

7 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Con8 gresswoman Shirley A. Chisholm Post Office Building’’. 
2 

•S 571 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the Congresswoman Shirley 

5 A. Chisholm Post Office Building. 

Æ
1 ... S ee Te x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SEC OND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 35 1- CV HUB E R T J ONE S , I I I AP P E L L ANT V . D O N D . O TI S A PPELL EE

----- ----- FR O M CO UN TY CO URT AT LAW NO . 2 OF DENTON CO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- -- O n Se pt e m be r 3, 2008 , Se pt e m be r15, 2008 , a nd Se pt e m be r26, 2008 , w e n o ti fi e d a p p e l l a n t, i n a c c o rd a n c e w i th ru l e o f a p p e l l a te p ro c e d u re 4 2 .3 (c ), th a t w e w o u l d d i s m i s s th i s a p p e a l u n l e s s th e $ 1 7 5 fi l i n g fe e w a s p a i d . S ee T e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .3 (c ). A p p e l l a n t h a s n o t p a i d th e $ 1 7 5 fi l i n g fe e . S ee Tex. R . A p p . P . 5 , 1 2 .1 (b ).2 ... S ee S u p re m e C o u rt o f T e x ., O rde r R eg a rd in g Fe e s Ch a r

g e d i n C ivil C ases i n the S uprem e C our tand the C our ts of A ppeal s and Before the Judi ci al Pa n e l o n Multi

d i s tr i c tL iti g a tion , M i s c . Doc k e t No. 07- 9138 ( Aug. 28, 2007 ) (l i s ti n g fe e s i n c o u rts o f a p p e a l s ). 2 Beca us e app el l ant has f ai l ed t o com pl y w i t h a r equ i r em entoft he r ul es of a pp e l l a t e p r oc e du r e a nd t he Te xa s Su pr e m e Cou r t ’ s o r de ro f Aug us t 28, 2007 , 2
w e d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S ee T e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .3 (c ), 4 3 .2 (f). A ppel l ant shal l pay al l cost s of t hi s appeal , f orw hi ch l et execut i on i ssue. S ee Te x. R. App . P. 43. 4.

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: W A LKER, J. ; CA YC E, C. J. ; an d M C C O Y, J. DEL I VERE D: Oct ob e r16, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 652 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.652

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
 To provide financial assistance for the rehabilitation of the Benjamin 
   Franklin National Memorial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the 
 development of an exhibit to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the 
                       birth of Benjamin Franklin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
Commemoration Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. BENJAMIN FRANKLIN NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior may provide a grant to the Franklin 
Institute to--
        (1) rehabilitate the Benjamin Franklin National Memorial 
    (including the Franklin statue) in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
        (2) develop an interpretive exhibit relating to Benjamin 
    Franklin, to be displayed at a museum adjacent to the Benjamin 
    Franklin National Memorial.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act $10,000,000.
    (b) Required Match.--The Secretary of the Interior shall require 
the Franklin Institute to match any amounts provided to the Franklin 
Institute under this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Yonkers Rib House, Inc., et al., Respondents, v 1789 Central Park Corp. et al., Appellants.

[869 NYS2d 908]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a promissory note, the defendants appeal from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered July 13, 2007, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court entered September 21, 2007, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $314,883.84.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to set forth the factors considered and the reasons for its determination with respect to the plaintiffs’ request for an award of an attorney’s fee, and the appeals are held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, West-chester County, shall file its report with all convenient speed.

While the plaintiffs are entitled to an attorney’s fee award pursuant to the subject promissory note, “[a]n award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to such a contractual provision may only be enforced to the extent that the amount is reasonable and warranted for the services actually rendered” *(Kamco Supply Corp. v Annex Contr.,*261 AD2d 363, 365 [1999]). The record as to the attorney’s fee awarded to the plaintiffs, however, is not sufficiently developed to permit appellate review. We therefore remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for the purpose of setting forth the factors considered in determining the award of an attorney’s fee to the plaintiffs and the reasons therefor *(see Matter of Gamache v Steinhaus,*7 AD3d 525, 527 [2004]; *Gutierrez v Direct Mktg. Credit Servs.,*267 AD2d 427, 427-428 [1999]; *Matter of Rahmey v Blum,*95 AD2d 294 [1983]). Fisher, J.E, Balkin, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SURFACE COATINGS,
INC. on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|/s/ RICHARD PIETRYKOWSKI

Richard Pietrykowski CEO
        Dated: December 14, 2011
        
        /s/ RICHARD PIETRYKOWSKI
        Richard Pietrykowski
        CFO
        Dated: December 14, 2011
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.