alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Wells Fargo Logo] **Wells Fargo Bank, NA****Document Custody**1015 - 10th Ave SE Minneapolis, MN 55014**ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA**Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows: Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the company provides document custody services, excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").  Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set fo rth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform. Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period"). With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria: 1.The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. 2.The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. 3.Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.  **WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION**By: /s/ Shari Gillund****Its: Senior Vice President Dated: February 29, 2008
<PAGE>

                                    FORM 6-K


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER

                    PURSUANT TO RULE 14a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE
                         SECURITY EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         For the month of November 2005

                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                               (Registrant's Name)

                          1155, University, Suite 1405,
                                Montreal, Quebec
                                 Canada H3B 3A7
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

                          Form 20-F x     Form 40-F

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                  Yes     No x

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-


<PAGE>


Filed with this Form 6-K is the following which are incorporated herein by
reference:

99.1      Press Release - November 25, 2005: Campbell Resources is Granted an
          Extension

99.1      Press Release - November 28, 2005: Corner Bay - Increased Potential at
          Depth - Substantial Increase of Resources


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                               CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.



                                               /s/  Lucy Brun
                                               Lucy Brun
                                               Executive Vice-President and
                                               Chief Administrative Officer


DATE: November 28, 2005

<PAGE>




                                  Exhibit Index


99.1      Press Release - Press Release - November 25, 2005: Campbell Resources
          is Granted an Extension

99.1      Press Release - November 28, 2005: Corner Bay - Increased Potential at
          Depth - Substantial Increase of Resources
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 13 (Thursday, January 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 3987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-1113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board


Correction: Adopted Proposal for Available Alternative Site-
Designation and Management Framework

    The Federal Register notice published on January 12, 2009 (74 FR 
1170-1173) describing the proposal adopted by the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board for an Alternative Site-Designation and Management Framework is 
corrected as follows. For the element numbered as ``9'' in the 
description of the final proposal (regarding ``sunset'' limits on 
magnet and usage-driven sites), the third sentence of the paragraph 
should read as follows: ``However, each grantee would have the option 
of proposing permanent FTZ designation for one magnet site and the FTZ 
Board could take a range of factors into account in determining the 
appropriate sunset period for a given site (e.g., nature of the site, 
public ownership of the site).''

    Dated: January 14, 2009.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-1113 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Calabria v. N.C. State Bd. of Elections

No. 625P06

1. Pit’s Motion to Bypass the Court of Appeals (COAP06-995)

2. Pit’s PWC

3. Pit’s Motion for Temporary Stay

4. Pit’s Motion to Expedite Consideration of Writ

5. Pit’s Alternative Motion to Suspend the Rules

1. Denied 12/19/06

2. Dismissed as Moot 12/19/06

3. Dismissed as Moot 12/19/06

4. Dismissed as Moot 12/19/06

5. Dismissed as Moot 12/19/06

Parker, C.J., Martin, J., and Timmons-Goodson, J., Recused
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2001, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: September 12, 2005
                                        David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




I, Gary
Spaniak, President and Chief Executive Officer of Classic Costume Company,
Inc.,  (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1)    the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is
attached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)    the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Dated:
March 31, 2009




/s/ Gary SpaniakGary
      SpaniakPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive
Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Thursday, May 14, 
2009 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    The Commission will consider custody-related matters, including 
whether to propose amendments to rule 206(4)-2 under the Investment 
Advisers Act of 1940 and related forms and rules. The proposed 
amendments would enhance the protections provided advisory clients when 
they entrust their funds and securities to an investment adviser. If 
adopted, the amendments would require investment advisers having 
custody of client funds and securities to obtain a surprise examination 
by an independent public accountant, and, unless the client assets are 
maintained with an independent custodian, obtain a review of custodial 
controls from an independent public accountant.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: May 7, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11077 Filed 5-7-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of FLM Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Xin Chen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   
| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 27thday of February, 2009.

XIN CHENXin ChenChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer












---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re L.D.H. and J.J.R.G.

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00130

- CV

Trial court case number: 2015

- 01818J

- A

Trial court: 313th District Court of Harris County

Relator

, An gela Cantu , ha s filed a n unopposed motion to abate this original proceeding “while the parties pursue their resolution of th is case

. ” We grant the motion
and abate the proceeding

. Unless the parties file, no later than July 1 5 , 2019, a motion to reinstate and dismiss or otherwise dispose of relator’s petition

, a motion to reinstate and proceed with this original proceeding, or a report advising the Court of the status of the trial court proceedings, th is original proceeding may be reinstated and dismissed without further
notice.

Th is C ourt’s February 2 6 , 2019 order staying the trial court’s February 22, 2019

order lifting “[t]he prior ‘no movement order’” and permitting t he Department of Family and Protective Services “to place the children with relatives in Panama” continues to
remain effective until disposition of relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus or further

order of this Court.

The original proceeding is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this
Court’s active docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Julie Countiss

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ April 23, 2019

____
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose L. YANEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-2653.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided Oct. 19, 2006.

*718Darilyn Knauss, Office of the United States Attorney, Peoria, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jose L. Yanez, Greenville, IL, pro se.

Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judges.

Order

We remanded this case to the district court with instructions to apply Amendment 591 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Retroactive application of a specially designated amendment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is not a collateral attack, so Yanez does not require permission under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 U 8.

The district court concluded on remand that Amendment 591 does not afford Ya-nez any relief. Amendment 591 requires district judges to start with the guideline applicable to the offense of conviction under the table in the Manual, and it may reduce the sentences imposed after a district judge started with some other Guideline. The district court found that it had started with the appropriate Guideline.

Yanez argues to the contrary—but not based on anything in Amendment 591 or the Guidelines Manual. Instead he maintains that, under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and its successors, his maximum sentence was lower than the one the district court used in its calculations, because the jury had not found the facts needed to increase his sentencing range. But Amendment 591 is not designed to reopen federal sentences for retroactive application of *Apprendi.*Yanez has filed and lost one collateral attack; he is not entitled to wage another under the cover of Amendment 591. The *only*argument properly open now is one based on § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 591. The district judge properly concluded that these do not require a reduction of Yanez’s sentence.

Affirmed.
#### Samuels *v.*Briscoe, executor.

Some o£ the errors assigned in the petition for *certiorari*being that-the judgment of the magistrate was contrary to law and evidence, and the parties havingbeen at issue in a justice’s court on matters of fact, a review of the judgment would necessarily involve a revision of these matters. Consequently the remedy of the losing party was appeal and not *certiorari,*and the superior court did not err in dismissing the *certiorari*for this reason. *Judgment affirmed.*

March 26, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

*426
      *Certiorari.*Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. March term, 1893.

Dean & Smith and A. G. Ewing, for plaintiff in error.

J. B. F. Lumpkin, *contra.*

Suit was brought in a justice’s court by attachment for the purchase money of a mule. Plaintiff obtained judgment of the justice for $95 with interest and cost. Defendant carried the case to the superior court by *certiorari,*alleging that the justice erred, in sustaining plaintiff’s motion to strike the plea that the vendor’s purchase money debt had been satisfied; in giving judgment for plaintiff, contrary to law and evidence, in that the testimony of defendant of a former suit was received without objection, and yet judgment was given for plaintiff; in giving judgment for plaintiff, contrary to law and evidence, in that the testimony introduced by plaintiff showed that she was not defendant’s vendor, and that his vendor had his purchase money debt satisfied by plaintiff paying said vendor a valuable consideration on the purchase money note, without holding the vendor liable in the event the note was not paid by the maker (defendant); and in giving judgment for plaintiff, contrary to law and evidence, in that it appeared from the testimony for the plaintiff that she did not sell the mule to defendant, and therefore she could not sustain her attachment for purchase money. In the superior court the *certiorari*was dismissed on plaintiff’s motion, because there should have.been an appeal, the amount involved being over $50, and there being a disputed question of fact. Defendant assigned this judgment as error, because, (1) “there was no question of disputed facts involved in the certiorari”; and (2) “there was an unmixed proposition of law, the adjudication of which would have completely and finally overruled the justice’s judgment* and disposed of the case.”
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

THOMAS ADAMS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 689 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
|   | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1), of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d); and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 2, 2012 | By:    | /s/ Lawrence J. LeBon, IIILawrence J. LeBon, IIIChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|-------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |                                                                                                         |
|        |   |                                                                                                         |
| May 2, 2012 | By:    | /s/ John LeBlancJohn LeBlancSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer                           |

| Note: | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
          10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
          report on Form 10-K of CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-J2 (the
          "Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
          whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
          information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
          covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
          conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
          in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
          disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
          fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
          material respects; and

     5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
          criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
          reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
          asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
          accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
          13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
          except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
          of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
          this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
     Bank of New York, as Trustee, Wachovia Mortgage Corporation and
     Washington Mutual Bank, FA.

   Date:  March 25, 2008

          /s/ Steve Bailey
          -------------------------
          Steve Bailey
          Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
          (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
          Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plasticon International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James N. Turek, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that: 

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 
|   | /s/ James N. Turek |  
---------------------------

 
 

James N. Turek,

 
 

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|