alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 370 

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, 

join, or assist labor organizations, or to refrain from such activities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2005 

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. 

HATCH, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. THUNE, and Mr. WARNER) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL

To preserve and protect the free choice of individual employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations, or to 

refrain from such activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Right-to5 Work Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELA7 TIONS ACT. 

8 (a) RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES.—Section 7 of the Na9 tional Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 157) is amended 
2

•S 370 IS

1 by striking ‘‘except to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘au2 thorized in section 8(a)(3)’’. 

3 (b) UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES.—Section 8 of the 

4 National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘: Provided,

7 That’’ and all that follows through ‘‘retaining mem8 bership’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (b)— 

10 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or to 

11 discriminate’’ and all that follows through ‘‘re12 taining membership’’; and 

13 (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘covered 

14 by an agreement authorized under subsection 

15 (a)(3) of this section’’; and 

16 (3) in subsection (f), by striking clause (2) and 

17 redesignating clauses (3) and (4) as clauses (2) and 

18 (3), respectively. 

19 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT. 

20 Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152) 

21 is amended by striking paragraph Eleven.

Æ
Amendment to the employment agreement dated June 5, 1995 - Gary A. Rogers, Ph.D.



 Exhibit 10.83 
  
 AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 5, 1995, BETWEEN CORTEX PHARMACEUTICALS AND GARY A. ROGERS, Ph.D.

  
 This Amendment, effective as of January [1], 2004, hereby
amends Section 2 as follows: 
  
 “Effective January [1]
2004, you will receive a base annual salary of $210,000, paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll practices. You will also be entitled to vacation, coverage under the Company’s Group Health Plan and other benefits that the
Company provides to comparable employees. You will also be eligible to receive an incentive bonus of between 0% and 50% of your annual base salary based upon review of your performance and achievements by your immediate supervisor, and Company
performance, in the year under consideration. Whether such bonus shall be paid in any year and the amount of such bonus shall be the sole determination by your immediate supervisor, subject to review and approval by the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors. Such bonus shall accrue and be paid only if the Board of Directors in its sole discretion determines that the Company has sufficient financial resources to do so. 
  
 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement to be effective as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

	
	CORTEX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	  
 /s/ Roger G. Stoll


	Roger G. Stoll, Ph.D.
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	EXECUTIVE
	  
 /s/ Gary A. Rogers


	Gary A. Rogers, Ph.D.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

BENJAMIN MADDEROM, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2566 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed May 29, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Joseph A. Bulone, Judge. Benjamin Madderom, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Peter L. Donato, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: October 30, 2008 |  | /s/ Peter L. Donato    
|                       |  | Peter L. Donato        
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange
Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Martin G. Paravato, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 8, 2005



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/ MARTIN G. PARAVATO                    
|Martin G. Paravato Chief Financial Officer



This certification shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 66 Introduced in Senate (IS)]














109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 66

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 
  of services provided by nursing school clinics under State medicaid 
                               programs.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2005

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide for coverage 
  of services provided by nursing school clinics under State medicaid 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nursing School Clinics Act of 
2005''.

SEC. 2. MEDICAID COVERAGE OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY NURSING SCHOOL 
              CLINICS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396d(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (27), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating paragraph (28) as paragraph (29); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (27), the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(28) nursing school clinic services (as defined in 
        subsection (x)) furnished by or under the supervision of a 
        nurse practitioner or a clinical nurse specialist (as defined 
        in section 1861(aa)(5)), whether or not the nurse practitioner 
        or clinical nurse specialist is under the supervision of, or 
        associated with, a physician or other health care provider; 
        and''.
    (b) Nursing School Clinic Services Defined.--Section 1905 of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(y) The term `nursing school clinic services' means services 
provided by a health care facility operated by an accredited school of 
nursing which provides primary care, long-term care, mental health 
counseling, home health counseling, home health care, or other health 
care services which are within the scope of practice of a registered 
nurse.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1902(a)(10)(C)(iv) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(C)(iv)) is amended by inserting 
``and (28)'' after ``(24)''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall be 
effective with respect to payments made under a State plan under title 
XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) for calendar 
quarters commencing with the first calendar quarter beginning after the 
date of enactment of this Act.`
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11529]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Meetings; Sunshine Act

Agency Holding the Meeting: Federal Maritime Commission.

Time and Date: May 20, 2009--1:30 p.m.

Place: 800 North Capitol Street, NW., First Floor Hearing Room, 
Washington, DC.

Status: A portion of the meeting will be in Open Session and the 
remainder of the meeting will be in Closed Session.

Matters To Be Considered: 

Open Session

    1. Docket No. 02-15 Passenger Vessel Financial Responsibility--
Request of Commissioner Brennan.
    2. FMC Agreement No. 012067: U.S. Supplemental Agreement to HLC 
Agreement.
    3. Public Access to Number and Type of Filings in FMC's SERVCON 
System.
    4. FY 2009 Budget Status Update.

Closed Session

    1. Docket No. 08-07: Petition of Olympus Growth Fund III, L.P. and 
Olympus Executive Fund, L.P. for Declaratory Order, Rulemaking or Other 
Relief.
    2. Marine Terminal Agreements Exemption at 46 CFR 535.308.
    3. Proof of Financial Responsibility for Windstar Sail Cruises 
Limited.
    4. Investigative and Enforcement Matters.
    5. Internal Administrative Practices and Personnel Matters.

Contact Person For More Information: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, (202) 
523-5725.

Karen V. Gregory,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11529 Filed 5-13-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

s0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

147067

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147067

COA: 307498

Washtenaw CC: 09

- 001277

- FH

FAYDRA APRIL SPARKS

- ROSS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 7, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
---

EXHIBIT 15.1



August 1, 2005

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Genentech, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements pertaining to the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment Plan, the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1999 Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, and the 1991 Employee Stock Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37072) related to the resale of common shares deliverable upon the exchange of Liquid Yield Option Notes, and in the related Prospectuses, as applicable, contained in such Registration Statements of our report dated July 8, 2005 (except Note 7, as to which the date is August 1, 2005), relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Genentech, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.





| |  | Very truly yours,   
| |  | --------------------
| |  | /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP



---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard E. WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-2058.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted May 21, 2009.*

Decided May 22, 2009.

Jacqueline O. Stern, Attorney, Office of the United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard E. Warren, Bennettsville, SC, pro se.

Before WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge and DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge.

*

 After an examination of the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the briefs and the record. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER

Richard Warren used a classic Ponzi scheme in trying to defraud a hedge fund out of $25 million. The fund manager jumped at the chance to earn a return of 80 to 100 percent in a few weeks by investing in what Warren described as a no-risk program overseen by the Federal Reserve. The fund got its money back only after federal investigators intervened. Eventually a jury found Warren guilty on 11 counts of wire fraud, *see*18 U.S.C. § 1343, *460and the district court sentenced him to a total of 200 months in prison. Warren, who is pro se, argues in this direct appeal that the district court lacked both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction because he is a “citizen of GOD’s Kingdom and not of Earth.” He made the same frivolous argument 42 times in papers filed in the district court, to no avail. District courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over any indictment charging a federal crime, 18 U.S.C. § 3231; *United States v. Roberts,*534 F.3d 560, 568 (7th Cir.2008); *United States v. Hernandez,*330 F.3d 964, 977-78 (7th Cir.2003), as well as personal jurisdiction over any defendant brought before the court to answer an indictment, *United States v. Burke,*425 F.3d 400, 408 (7th Cir.2005); *United States v. Jones,*983 F.2d 1425, 1428 n. 6 (7th Cir.1993). And since Warren raises no other challenge to his convictions or sentence, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C U IT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. VANC E YUKIO INOUYE, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10510

D.C . No. 1:09-c r-00115-SOM -1 Distric t of Ha wa ii, Honolulu ORDER

B e fore : GR

AB ER , B YB EE, a

nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. The m andate issue d on M a rc h 23, 2016, is re c a lle d, a nd the m e m orandum disposition file d in this c a se on Fe brua ry 29, 2016, is withdra

wn. Am ic us’ s pe nding m otion to publish, file d M arc h 18, 2016, is de nie d a s m oot; a

publishe d opinion will follow. 

# F IL ED MAY10 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Cesar M. Garcia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 14, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cesar M. Garcia    
|Cesar M. Garcia        
|Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to IRIS International, Inc. and will be retained by IRIS International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4049 

To provide for the redeployment of United States forces from Iraq by July 

1, 2007. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2006 

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To provide for the redeployment of United States forces 

from Iraq by July 1, 2007. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDEPLOYMENT OF UNITED STATES FORCES 

4 FROM IRAQ. 

5 (a) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It is the policy of the 

6 United States to redeploy United States forces from Iraq 

7 by July 1, 2007, while maintaining thereafter in Iraq the 

8 minimal level of United States forces sufficient to engage 

9 directly in targeted counterterrorism activities, train Iraq 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 4049 IS

1 security forces, and protect United States infrastructure 

2 and personnel in Iraq. 

3 (b) REPORT.— 

4 (1) REPORT ON STRATEGY FOR REDEPLOY5 MENT.—Not later than 60 days after the date of the 

6 enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense and 

7 the Secretary of State shall jointly submit to Con8 gress a report setting forth the strategy of the 

9 United States for the redeployment of United States 

10 forces from Iraq by July 1, 2007, in accordance with 

11 the policy stated in subsection (a). 

12 (2) ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY.—The strategy 

13 set forth in the report under this subsection shall in14 clude the following: 

15 (A) A flexible schedule for redeploying 

16 United States forces from Iraq by July 1, 2007, 

17 in accordance with the policy stated in sub18 section (a). 

19 (B) An estimate of the number, size, and 

20 character of United States military units need21 ed in Iraq after July 1, 2007, for purposes of 

22 counterterrorism activities, training Iraq secu23 rity forces, or protecting United States infra24 structure and personnel in Iraq. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
3 

•S 4049 IS

1 (C) A strategy for managing the regional 

2 implications of the redeployment of United 

3 States forces from Iraq in accordance with the 

4 policy stated in subsection (a), including a de5 scription of proposed efforts to ensure a coordi6 nated diplomatic, political, and development 

7 strategy to accompany such redeployment of 

8 United States forces. 

9 (D) A strategy for ensuring the safety and 

10 security of United States forces in Iraq during 

11 the redeployment under the policy stated in 

12 subsection (a), and a contingency plan for ad13 dressing dramatic changes in security condi14 tions that may require a specified number of 

15 additional United States forces to remain in 

16 Iraq after July 1, 2007. 

17 (E) A strategy for repairing and strength18 ening United States forces to effectively engage 

19 and defeat global terrorist networks that threat20 en the United States. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS