alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 55 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.55

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

                                 An Act

 
 To adjust the boundary of Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of 
                                Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rocky Mountain National Park 
Boundary Adjustment Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
        (1) Federal parcel.--The term ``Federal parcel'' means the 
    parcel of approximately 70 acres of Federal land near MacGregor 
    Ranch, Larimer County, Colorado, as depicted on the map.
        (2) Map.--The term ``map'' means the map numbered 121/80,154, 
    dated June 2004.
        (3) Non-federal parcels.--The term ``non-Federal parcels'' 
    means the 3 parcels of non-Federal land comprising approximately 
    5.9 acres that are located near MacGregor Ranch, Larimer County, 
    Colorado, as depicted on the map.
        (4) Park.--The term ``Park'' means Rocky Mountain National Park 
    in the State of Colorado.

SEC. 3. ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) Exchange of Land.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall accept an offer to convey 
    all right, title, and interest in and to the non-Federal parcels to 
    the United States in exchange for the Federal parcel.
        (2) Conveyance.--Not later than 60 days after the date on which 
    the Secretary receives an offer under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
    shall convey the Federal parcel in exchange for the non-Federal 
    parcels.
        (3) Conservation easement.--As a condition of the exchange of 
    land under paragraph (2), the Secretary shall reserve a perpetual 
    easement to the Federal parcel for the purposes of protecting, 
    preserving, and enhancing the conservation values of the Federal 
    parcel.
    (b) Boundary Adjustment; Management of Land.--On acquisition of the 
non-Federal parcels under subsection (a)(2), the Secretary shall--
        (1) adjust the boundary of the Park to reflect the acquisition 
    of the non-Federal parcels; and
        (2) manage the non-Federal parcels as part of the Park, in 
    accordance with any laws (including regulations) applicable to the 
    Park.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32

                          ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

                   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

     To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2006, containing financial statements for the quarter then ended,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of
1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aspen
Exploration Corporation for the periods presented.


November 13, 2006



/s/ Robert A. Cohan
-----------------------------------------
Robert A. Cohan, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 649 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 649

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to make 
 volunteer members of the Civil Air Patrol eligible for Public Safety 
                        Officer death benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2005

  Mr. Allard introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to make 
 volunteer members of the Civil Air Patrol eligible for Public Safety 
                        Officer death benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Air Patrol Homeland Security 
Benefits Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF CIVIL AIR PATROL FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER DEATH 
              BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1204(8) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(8)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (B);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) a volunteer civilian member of the Civil Air 
                Patrol who is engaged in--
                            ``(i) active service, if such service is--
                                    ``(I) rendered in performance or 
                                support of operational missions of the 
                                Civil Air Patrol under the direction of 
                                the Department of the Air Force; and
                                    ``(II) pursuant to, and is 
                                performed consistent with, written 
                                authorization from competent authority 
                                that specifies a finite assignment and 
                                a finite period of time for such 
                                assignment; or
                            ``(ii) travel to or from such service.''.
    (b) Consultation.--Section 1205 of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796c) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(d) Consultation.--In making determinations under section 1201 
with respect to the eligibility of a volunteer civilian member of the 
Civil Air Patrol, the Bureau may consult with the Secretary of the Air 
Force and, if consulted, the Secretary of the Air Force shall provide 
to the Bureau such assistance and information as the Bureau considers 
necessary.''.
                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M UH AM M AD PARVEZ , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 70161 A ge nc yN o. A 046- 988- 737 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M uha m m a d P a rve z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of P a ki s t a n, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) o r d e rf in d in g P a rv e z r e m o v ab le a n dd e n y in g h is



# FI LED JU N 08 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 70161 2 appl i c a t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1186a ( c ) ( 4) ( B ) f orw a i ve rof

the j oi nt - f

i l i ng r e qui r e m e ntt o r e m ove the c ondi t i ona l ba s i s of hi s l a w f ul pe rm a ne ntr e s i de nt st atus. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for s ub st ant i al e v id e n c e th e a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f th e w a iv e r , O ropeza-W on g v. G on zales , 406 F . 3d 1 1 3 5 , 1 1 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) , a n dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he IJfoun d P arvez notcr edi bl e bas ed on i ncon si st enci es betw ee n P arvez a nd hi s e x- w i f

e ’ s t e s t i m onyr e ga r di ng the na tur e a nd num be rof the i rm a rr i a ge cerem o n i es an dth e co n su m m at i o n o f th ei r m arri ag e. B ecau se th ese i nc ons i s t e nc i e s go t o the he a rtof w he the rthe m a rr i a ge w a s e nt e r e d i nt o i n good f a ith , s ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e d e n ia l o f P a rv e z ’s w a iv e rap p lic a tio n . See id. a t1148. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**As        Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| (i)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ii)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                      |                                               |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                                                                                                                                                             | /s/                XIANFU                HAN  |
|   | Xianfu                  Han                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | Chief                  Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal                  Executive Officer and Interim Principal Financial and Accounting                  Officer) |

----
#### In the Matter of Kha’Sun Creator Allah, Appellant, v Albert Prack, Director, S.H.U./Inmate Disciplinary Programs, New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[964 NYS2d 55]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), dated September 19, 2011. The order denied the request of petitioner for expungement and directed that a new disciplinary hearing be conducted.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Present—Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 16, 2010

s1209 

# Order

December 16, 2010

141457

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141457 COA: 289540 Grand Traverse CC: 08-010647-FH STEVEN DANIEL SMOOT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered. We DIRECT the Grand Traverse County Prosecuting Attorn ey to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecu tor shall pay particul ar attention to the defendant’s contention that the trial pr osecutor engaged in pervasive misconduct.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4317



#  J OSE G UADALUPE R ODRIGUEZ
M ONTOYA , Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.

James C. Fox, Senior District Judge.

(CR-00-112) Submitted: November 20, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, Anne M.Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Scott L. Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Jose Guadalupe Rodriguez-Montoya, a native and citizen of Mexico, pled guilty to one count of re-entry by a deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C.A. § 1326 (West 1999). The district court found that Rodriguez-Montoya had been convicted of a prior aggravated felony, making the statutory maximum a twenty-year term of imprisonment. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1326(b)(2). Rodriguez-Montoya contends that he should have been sentenced under the provisions of § 1326(a), which provides a maximum sentence of two years, because the Government did not charge a violation of § 1326(b)(2) in the indictment. As Rodriguez-Montoya did not raise this objection below, we review his claim for plain error. Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b); United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 731-32 (1993). Because the Supreme Court has held that § 1326(b)(2) sets forth a sentencing factor rather than an element of the offense, this claim is without merit. See Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Moreover, we reject Rodriguez-Montoya’s assertion that Almendarez-Torres was overruled by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). See United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001); United States v. Gatewood , 230 F.3d 186, 192 (6th Cir. 2000).We accordingly affirm Rodriguez-Montoya’s sentence and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. R ODRIGUEZ -M ONTOYA
**Exhibit 31.2****SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION**I, Keith S. Krzeminski, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of McAfee, Inc.; and 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report.       /s/ Keith S. Krzeminski     Keith S. Krzeminski    Chief Accounting Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance  April 29, 2008
**Form 52-109F1 — Certification of Annual Filings**     I, Geoffrey B. Genovese, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of EnvoyCommunications Group Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed the annual filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109*Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’ Annual and Interim Filings*) of Envoy Communications GroupInc. (the issuer) for the period ended September 30, 2005;2. Based on my knowledge, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement notmisleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the periodcovered by the annual filings;3. Based on my knowledge, the annual financial statements together with the other financialinformation included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periodspresented in the annual filings;4. The issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for the issuer,and we have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to theissuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared;(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused it to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with the issuer’s GAAP; and(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures as of theend of the period covered by the annual filings and have caused the issuer to disclose inthe annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by the annual filings based on suchevaluation; and5. I have caused the issuer to disclose in the annual MD&A any change in the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent interim period thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: December 23, 2005      Signed by Geoffrey B. Genovese
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2000, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: August 31, 2005                   David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the Annual Report of Allied Healthcare International
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Charles F. Murphy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as at and for the year ended September 30, 2003.

Dated:  May 14, 2004

                                    /s/ Charles F. Murphy
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Charles F. Murphy
                                   Chief Financial Officer of the Company
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, César M. García, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Dated: May 9, 2007      |  | 
|                        | 
|/s/ CÉSAR M. GARCIA     |  | 
|César M. García         |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer |  | 

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUD GMENT RENDERED DECEM BER 30 , 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00745

- CV

Continental Homes of Texas, LP, Appellant

v.

Scofield Villas Condominium Community, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAV IS COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AND BOURLAND
DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on N ovember 11, 2015. Appellant has

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal

.

A ppellant shall pay all costs rel ating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.