alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                              61
<SECURITIES>                                     3,764
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   140
<PP&E>                                           8,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               98
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,585
<SALES>                                              1
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,321
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .158
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .158
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BSD Medical Corporation (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis
P. Gauger, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Dennis P.
      GaugerDennis
      P. GaugerChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer)April
      13, 2010
667 A.2d 188

#### NANCY STRUBE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS (T.I.L.) INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A THE TRAVELERS COMPANIES, WEBSTER M. GRIMM AND C.I.A.P.N.J., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Argued October 23, 1995 —

Decided December 6, 1995.

*Craig J. Hubert*argued the cause for appellant *{Brotman & Graziano,*attorneys; *Mr. Hubert*and *Dennis S. Brotman,*of counsel and on the brief).

*Michele M. Fox*argued the cause for respondent The Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, etc. *(Kenney & Kearney,*attorneys; *Ms. Fox*and *Ralph R. Smith, 3rd,*on the brief).

*C. Edward Speidel*argued the cause for respondent Webster H. Grimm, improperly pleaded as Webster M. Grimm *{Golden, Rothschild, Spagnola & DiFazio,*attorneys).

*Marc L. Dembling*argued the cause for respondent C.I.A.P.N.J. *{Berlin, Kaplan, Dembling & Burke,*attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 277 *N.J.Super.*236, 649 A.2d 624 (1994).

STEIN and COLEMAN, Justices,

dissenting.

We would reverse, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Kestin’s dissenting opinion, reported at 277 *N.J.Super.*236, 649 A.2d 624 (1994).

*For affirmance*— Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN and GARIBALDI-5.

*For reversal*— Justices STEIN and COLEMAN-2.
exv10w5



 





EXHIBIT 10.5



AFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY




                    This AFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY is made as of September 30, 2004, by the
undersigned (“Guarantor”) for the benefit of Comerica Bank (“Bank”).



RECITALS




                    Bank, ALLIANCE CONSULTING GROUP ASSOCIATES, INC. (“Consulting”) and
ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, INC. (“Holdings”; Consulting and Holdings are referred to
herein individually as a “Borrower” and collectively, the “Borrowers”) are
parties to that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 25,
2003, as amended from time to time, including without limitation by that
certain First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 12,
2003, that certain Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of
May 27, 2004, and that certain Third Amendment to Loan Documents dated as of
August 9, 2004 (collectively, the “Loan Agreement”). Guarantor executed for
the benefit of Bank an Unconditional Guaranty dated as of September 25, 2003
(the “Guaranty”), guarantying all amounts owing by Borrowers to Bank.
Borrowers and Bank propose to enter into a Fourth Amendment to Loan Documents
of even date herewith (the “Amendment”), which amends the Loan Agreement by,
among other things, extending additional credit. Bank has agreed to enter into
the Amendment provided, among other things, that Guarantor consents to the
entry by Borrowers into the Amendment and related documents and agrees that the
Guaranty will remain effective.



AGREEMENT




                    NOW, THEREFORE, Guarantor agrees as follows:



                    1.           Guarantor consents to the execution, delivery and performance by
Borrowers of the Amendment and the documents and instruments executed in
connection therewith, as well as all other amendments and modifications to the
Loan Agreement.



                    2.           The Guaranty is and shall remain in full force and effect with respect
to all of Borrowers’ Obligations (as defined in the Loan Agreement) as modified
by the Amendment and otherwise. Guarantor confirms that Guarantor has no
defenses against its obligations under the Guaranty.



                    3.           Guarantor represents and warrants that the Representations and
Warranties contained in the Guaranty are true and correct as of the date of
this Affirmation. Unless otherwise defined, all capitalized terms in this
Affirmation shall be as defined in the Guaranty.



                    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Guarantor has executed this
Affirmation of Guaranty as of the first date above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SAFEGUARD SCIENTIFICS, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Steve Grenfell
	

	 	 	 	
 
	

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President, Operations
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Kivean Deshai Coffey, Appellant

No. 06-13-00218-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 276th District Court of 

Morris County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

10,751CR). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Kivean Deshai Coffey, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 13, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Alan Campbell, Chief Financial Officer of Freescale Semiconductor
Holdings I, Ltd., certify, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Annual Report), which this statement
accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Freescale Semiconductor Holdings
I, Ltd.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 1350.

Dated: July 1, 2011



/s/ ALAN CAMPBELLAlan CampbellChief Financial Officer,Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd.
Exhibit
10.03


 


ARTISOFT,
INC.


 


Amendment
to 2004 Stock Incentive Plan


 


The 2004 Stock Incentive
Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), of Artisoft, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is
hereby amended as follows:


 


Section 4(a)
of the Plan is amended and restated as set forth below:


 


“(a)                            Number
of Shares.  Subject to adjustment
under Section 7 of the Plan, Awards may be made under the Plan for up
8,191,281 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the Company
(“Common Stock”).


 


If any Award
expires or is terminated, surrendered or canceled without having been fully
exercised or is forfeited in whole or in part (including, without limitation,
as the result of shares of Common Stock subject to such Award being repurchased
by the Company at the original issuance price pursuant to a contractual
repurchase right) or results in any Common Stock not being issued, the unused
Common Stock covered by such Award shall again be available for the grant of
Awards under the Plan, subject, however, in the case of Incentive Stock
Options, to any limitations under the Code. 
Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of
authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.”


 


Except to the extent
amended hereby, the Plan is in all respects hereby ratified and confirmed and
shall continue in full force and effect.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

                I, H. John Berens, anauthorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the“Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2007 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and betweenthe Depositor, the Servicer, LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, and Christiana Bank & Trust Company Delaware, as Delaware Trustee the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2007-OA3 for the 2007 fiscal year  (the“Relevant Year”):

 

1.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under mysupervision.

2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of March 1, 2008.

 

| /s/ H. John BerensName:  H. John Berens Title:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Updating Citrix for AUGUST 2020

Updating CITRIX for Chromebook

Table of ContentsIntroduction	1Option 1: Updating Citrix Workspace	2

# Option 1: Updating Citrix Workspace

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image5.png

# image6.png

# image7.png

# image8.png

# image9.png
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWABS, INC.
                  CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2007-3
                    ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-3


     The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i)  A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                 Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
#### Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Association/Fidelity New York FSB, Respondent, v Marilyn Lane, Appellant, and Frances Turner et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Submitted August 17, 2009;

decided October 15, 2009

Reported below, 64 AD3d 454.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
TED SCHWZNDEN, in his Official 

Capacity as Governor of the State 

of Montana; ET,LEN FEAVER, In her 

0ffici.al Capaci.ty as Director 

of Revenue of the State of 

Montana ; DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 

OF THE STATE OF MONTANA; MONTANA 

ASSOCIATION OF COIJNTIICS ; MONTANA 

LEA6UE OF CITIES AND TOWNS; URBAN 

COALITION; and MONTANA SCHOOL 

ROAKL7S ASSOCIATION, 

Plaintiffs, 

Prf endant. 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM: 

Daniels County, Enontam, hy and through its County 

Attorney, has filed herei.n a petition for interproktian air 

this Court's opi.n.iion in Schwinden v. Burl.ington Northern, 

Inca (Mont.. 19841, 691 P.2d 1.351, 41 S.t.Rep. 27.84, together 

with a statement of facts in support of its petition, 

-., ii IS ORDERED: 

I. Counsel Eor the Department. of Revenue of the State 

of Montana and counsel for Burlington Northern, Inc., are 

granted thirty days from the date hereof in which to prepare, 

fi.le and serve wri.tten re~po~~ses to the petitken for interpretati.nr fil.ed by L?aiiiels C:nunty, Montana, together with 

appropriate leya3. oiemoranila in support thereof. 
3. Tlrc Clerk is dil-rcted to mail a true copy hereof to 

the Daniels Cnunky Attorney, counsel for the Department of 

s- and to counsel Fnr Burlington Northern, Tnc, 

DATED this 7th day of November, 1986. 

For the Couri ,
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
   FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date: April 5, 2005 GOLDCORP INC. 
  Suite 1560, 200 Burrard St.
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3L6
CANADA
(Registrants Address) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of
Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes   o
    
    No   þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b):




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  GOLDCORP INC.By:
    /s/   R. Gregory LaingName:
    R. Gregory LaingTitle:
    Vice President, Legal Date:   April 5, 2005




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Business Acquisition Report
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Keith A. ELSESSER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-6512.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 4, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 18, 2006.

Gregory J. Rufo, The Rufo Law Firm, Canton, Ohio, for Appellant. Kenneth M. Smith, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Keith A. Elsesser seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal-ability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v.*Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Elsesser has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial data extracted from the consolidated
balance sheet and the  consolidated  statement of operations and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         69,206
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6,817
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               73,319
<PP&E>                                         1,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 74,319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,724,046
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          913,700
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        304,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,626
<CGS>                                          367,069
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  960,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               9,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             38,012
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (703,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (703,429)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (730,429)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1831-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2008-0018]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-1831-DR), dated April 21, 2009, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 1, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Disaster Assistance Directorate, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 21, 2009.

Dixie and Gilchrist Counties for Individual Assistance.

Hamilton and Madison Counties for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

Nancy Ward,

Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. E9-11507 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P