alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting.

*Time and Date:*                         10 a.m.-12 p.m., June 4, 2009 (Closed).                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with provisions set forth in section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.                    

*Matters To Be Discussed:*                         The meeting will include the initial review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to “CDC Grants for Public Health Research Dissertation, Panel K, FOA PAR07-231.”                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Susan B. Stanton, D.D.S., Scientific Review Officer, Office of the Director, Office of the Chief Science Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D72, Atlanta, GA 30333,                         *Telephone:*                         (404) 639-4640.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Dated: May 13, 2009.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E9-11601 Filed 5-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ABITIBIBOWATER INC. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                |  | 
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: February 29, 2012 |  | /s/ Richard Garneau                           
|                         |  | Name: Richard Garneau                         
|                         |  | Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging
or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to AbitibiBowater Inc. and will be retained by AbitibiBowater
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

In connection with the
Annual Report of Esmark Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James P. Bouchard, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.



|                    |  |  |  |                         
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Dated: May 20, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES P. BOUCHARD
|                    |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer 

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
Exhibit to

this report and should not be considered filed as a part of this report.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Triple A Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  March 30, 2010





/s/ P. Morgan McCune





Name: P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  March 30, 2010


/s/ P. Morgan McCune





Name: P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-168358) and Form S-3 (No. 333-170327) of our reports dated March 15, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of MoSys, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which appear in MoSys, Inc.'s Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

/s/
Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.

San
Jose, California
March 15, 2011

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Triple A Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended Dsecember 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   Dated:  April 6, 2008  /s/ P. Morgan McCune Name: P. Morgan McCune Title:  Chief Executive Officer    Dated:  April 6, 2008  /s/ P. Morgan McCune Name: P. Morgan McCune Title:  Chief Financial Officer
WWW.NGA.MIL/KIDS

www.nga.mil/kids

VISIT US ONLINE FOR 

MORE MAPS, ACTIVITIES 

& VIDEOS, ABOUT NGA 

AND OUR AWESOME 

MISSION!

SEND THE IMAGES BACK DOWN TO EARTH! CONNECT THE DOTS AROUND THE GLOBE!

CAN YOU SPOT THE 5 DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THESE PICTURES?
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3973 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3973

  To ensure local governments have the flexibility needed to enhance 
        decision-making regarding certain mass transit projects.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2006

  Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Specter, Mr. Cornyn, 
    Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Kerry, Mrs. Dole, and Mr. Bond) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure local governments have the flexibility needed to enhance 
        decision-making regarding certain mass transit projects.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transit System Flexibility 
Protection Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. GENERAL AUTHORITY.

    Section 5307(b)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subparagraph (E) and inserting the following:
                    ``(E) operating costs of equipment and facilities 
                for use in public transportation in an urbanized area 
                with a population of more than 200,000, if such public 
                transportation system operates less than 100 buses on 
                fixed-route service during peak service hours; and''.
                                 <all>
```
S. 4092

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To clarify certain land use in Jefferson County, Colorado.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF CERTAIN LAND USE IN JEFFERSON

COUNTY, COLORADO.

Notwithstanding any applicable State or local land use or condemnation laws or regulations, and subject to all applicable Federal

laws and regulations, any person that holds an approved Federal

Communications Commission permit to construct or install either

a digital television broadcast station antenna or tower, or both,

located on Lookout Mountain in Jefferson County in the State

of Colorado, may, at such location, construct, install, use, modify,

replace, repair, or consolidate such antenna or tower, or both,

and all accompanying facilities and services associated with such

digital television broadcasts, if such antenna or tower is of the

same height or lower than the tallest existing analog broadcast

antenna or tower at such location.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Feliks VISHEVNIK, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 09-5117.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 21, 2009.

Feliks Vishevnik, Alexandria, VA, pro se.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and GRIFFITH and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(3). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 2, 2009, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The sua sponte dismissal without leave to amend was appropriate because it is clear “the claimant cannot possibly win relief.” *Razzoli v. Federal Bureau of Prisons,*230 F.3d 371, 377 (D.C.Cir.2000) (citations omitted).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00760-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K. E. H., a Child

From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 03-10-16641-CV

Honorable Kelley Kimble, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 27, 2019

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 

Brian Griffin seeks to appeal the trial court’s September 18, 2019 order modifying Griffin’s 

child support obligation. Griffin’s notice of appeal was due October 18, 2019, thirty days after the 

order was signed, or a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due fifteen days 

later. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. Griffin mailed his notice of appeal to the trial court clerk, 

where it was received and filed stamped October 25, 2019. The envelope containing the notice of 

appeal bears a postmark date of October 22, 2019. A document filed by mail is timely only if it is 

deposited in the mail on or before the last day for filing. TEX. R. CIV. P. 5; TEX. R. APP. P.

9.2(b)(1)(C). Griffin did not file a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal. 

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good 

faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen-day grace 
04-19-00760-CV

- 2 -

period provided by rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 

S.W.2d 615, 615 (1997). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to 

file the notice of appeal timely. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C). 

On November 8, 2019, we ordered Griffin to file a response by December 2, 2019, offering 

a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely. We advised Griffin that a 

“reasonable explanation” is any plausible statement of circumstances indicating that failure to 

timely file was not deliberate or intentional, but was the result of inadvertence, mistake or 

mischance. See Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886-87 (Tex. 2003). Our order also advised 

Griffin that if he failed to respond within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed. 

Griffin has not filed a response to our November 8, 2019 order. We therefore dismiss this 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 532

To reduce temporarily the duty on palm fatty acid distillate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 4, 2005

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL

To reduce temporarily the duty on palm fatty acid distillate.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF DUTY ON PALM FATTY ACID 

4 DISTILLATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.39.40 Monocarboxylic fatty acids derived 

from palm oil (provided for in subheading 3823.19.2000) ...................... 1% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2007 ’’. 
2

•S 532 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,750]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 6, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Chick Machine Co., Inc., Butler, Pennsylvania.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of April 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10894 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Rhymes, Appellant.

[964 NYS2d 56]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied.

Present—Scudder, EJ, Centra, Fahey, Carni and Whalen, JJ.
#### Humphreys & Harding, Inc., Respondent, v Universal Bonding Insurance Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Welch Construction Corp. et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Submitted March 9, 2009;

decided April 2, 2009

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*11 NY3d 920 (2009)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
#### Volger v. Branch Erections Co.

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 457

No. 128A07

1. Def’s (N.C. Ins. Guaranty Ass’n.) Notice of Appeal (Dissent) (COA06-288)

2. Def’s (Branch Erections Co.) Petition for Discretionary Review Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31

1. _

2. Allowed 06/27/07
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>






       <ARTICLE> 5
       <MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                           <C>


       <PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
       <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      MAY-31-2000
       <PERIOD-START>                                         JUN-01-1999
       <PERIOD-END>                                           MAY-31-2000
       <CASH>                                                 55,481
       <SECURITIES>                                           0
       <RECEIVABLES>                                          505,060
       <ALLOWANCES>                                           19,381
       <INVENTORY>                                            0
       <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       568,760
       <PP&E>                                                 221,018
       <DEPRECIATION>                                         110,810
       <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         825,232
       <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  425,514
       <BONDS>                                                0
       <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
       <PREFERRED>                                            0
       <COMMON>                                               366
       <OTHER-SE>                                             273,989
       <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           825,232
       <SALES>                                                0
       <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,612,691
       <CGS>                                                  0
       <TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,580,164
       <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       (4,045)
       <LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
       <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     10,392
       <INCOME-PRETAX>                                        26,180
       <INCOME-TAX>                                           8,755
       <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    17,425
       <DISCONTINUED>                                         0
       <EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
       <CHANGES>                                              0
       <NET-INCOME>                                           17,425
       <EPS-BASIC>                                          .48
       <EPS-DILUTED>                                          .47




</TABLE>
#### Yoko Hense, Respondent, v Michael A. Hense, Appellant.

Decided June 25, 2009

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.