alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------

                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
          10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
          report on Form 10-K of CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-5 (the
          "Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
          whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
          in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
          not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
          information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
          covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
          conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
          in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
          disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
          fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
          material respects; and

     5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
          criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
          reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
          asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
          accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
          13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
          except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
          of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
          this report on Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
     Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date:  March 25, 2008

       /s/ Steve Bailey
       -------------------------
       Steve Bailey
       Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
       (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
       Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP)
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K of Sona Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Monika Sagar, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: December 28, 2010                                                                  MONIKA SAGAR
 Monika Sagar
 Chief Accounting Officer,
 Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 -1-
# National Charter Schools Week, 2009 

Improving our schools is the collective responsibility of all Americans—business owners and workers, educators and parents, students and their communities.  We must ensure that all students receive a high-quality education that delivers the knowledge and skills needed to succeed, and that young men and women stay on the path to graduation and a life-long commitment to learning.

Many successful public charter schools across the Nation are working to meet these goals.  Founded by parents, teachers, and civic or community organizations, our Nation’s public charter schools enjoy broad leeway to innovate.

The best public charter schools and their students are thriving in States that have adopted a rigorous selection and review process to ensure that autonomy is coupled with greater accountability.  The growth of effective public charter schools benefits our children, and States have an important role to play in their expansion.

During National Charter Schools Week, we recognize these public charter schools for their dedication and commitment to achievement in education.  They are models of excellence and are promoting the interests of our children, our economy, and our Nation as a whole.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 3 through May 9, 2009, as National Charter Schools Week.  I commend our Nation’s successful public charter schools, teachers, and administrators, and I call on States and communities to support public charter schools and the students they serve.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

[FR Doc. E9-10860

Billing code 3195-W9-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10930]



[[Page 21837]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket Nos. 52-034-COL, ASLBP No. 09-886-09-COL-BD01, and 52-035-COL]


Luminant Generation Company, LLC; Establishment of Atomic Safety 
and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission dated December 29, 1972, 
published in the Federal Register, 37 FR 28,710 (1972), and the 
Commission's regulations, see 10 CFR 2.104, 2.300, 2.303, 2.309, 2.311, 
2.318, and 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and 
Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over the 
following proceeding:

Luminant Generation Company, LLC

(Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 and 4)

    This proceeding concerns a Petition to Intervene and Request for 
Hearing dated April 6, 2009 from the Sustainable Energy and Economic 
Development Coalition, et al., that was submitted in response to a 
February 5, 2009 Notice of Order, Hearing, and Opportunity To Petition 
for Leave To Intervene (74 FR 6177). Petitioners challenge the 
application filed by Luminant Generation Company LLC pursuant to 
subpart C of 10 CFR part 52 for a combined license for Comanche Peak 
Nuclear Power Plant, Units 3 and 4, to be located in Somervell County, 
Texas.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Ann Marshall Young, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001,
Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001,
Alice C. Mignerey, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule, which the NRC promulgated in 
August 2007 (72 FR 49,139).

    Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 4th day of May 2009.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. E9-10930 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### Robert Gassman et al., Appellants, v Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted March 30, 2009;

decided May 5, 2009

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against defendant The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against other defendants, dismissed upon the ground that as to *830said defendants, the Appellate Division order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00693

- CR Badesire BAHINDWA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR5024 Honorable Mark Luitjen, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 10, 2019
AFFIRMED Badesire Bahindwa pled true to violating the conditions of his deferred adjudication community supervision. The trial court adjudicated his guilt and sentenced him to four years’ imprisonment. Bahindwa’s court

- a ppointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes the appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Bahindwa with a copy of the brief and informed him of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85

- 86 (Tex.04

- 18

- 00693

- CR

- 2

- App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Bahindwa did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree th at the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. Nichols , 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Bahi ndwa wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, Bahindwa must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or Bahindwa must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for di scretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of: (1) the date of this opinion; or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 68.4. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chie f Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) delivers worldclass geospatial intelligence, or GEOINT, providing a decisive 

advantage to policymakers, warfighters, intelligence professionals 

and first responders. Both an intelligence agency and combat 

support agency, NGA enables the U.S. intelligence community and 

the Department of Defense to fulfill the president’s national security 

priorities. Hundreds of NGA employees serve on support teams at 

U.S. military, diplomatic, and allied locations around the world.

NGA established its Wounded Warrior Fellowship Program (WWFP) 

in support of the Intelligence Community Wounded Warrior Program 

in 2009. NGA’s WWFP provides wounded, sick, ill and injured 

active duty service members with meaningful work experiences 

intended to assist with their recuperation and transition into the 

workforce through NGA-wide internship opportunities.

The NGA WWFP fosters collaboration and integration throughout 

the agency in order to identify and place wounded warriors into 

internships based on their military or civilian skills sets and interests. 

Warriors are uniquely suited for working at NGA because our 

agency benefits from the operational and military perspective they 

bring to the job as they continue to serve our country.

NGA’S PRIMARY OFFICE LOCATIONS

• Springfield, VA

• St. Louis, MO

• Arnold, MO

Additional locations are available on a 

case-by-case basis.

NGA internships are a win-win for recovering 

service members and the federal government; 

warriors participate in career development 

workshops, gain valuable work experience, 

develop additional job skills and explore 

permanent employment opportunities, while 

participating agencies benefit from the various 

talents and leadership abilities of service members.

ELIGIBILITY

In order to participate in the WWFP and NGA, you must:

• Be a wounded, sick, ill or injured active-duty service member, 

mobilized reservist or National Guard member assigned to a 

military treatment facility; or be an active-duty service 

member in, or soon to be in, the Integrated Disability 

Evaluation System

• Receive approval from your chain of command

• Successfully complete a security background investigation, 

counterintelligence scope polygraph examination and 

drug screening

• Have a desire to continue to serve the nation and match 

your interests and military skills to a career field

Whatever your field, NGA has opportunities 

around the world that will challenge you 

as you make substantial contributions to 

protecting our national security. If you meet 

the eligibility requirements and are interested 

in participating in a NGA internship, please 

email WoundedWarriorFP@nga.mil.

Please note that participation in an NGA internship does not guarantee a permanent position. 

Approved for public release, 17-775

OCC 211014-012
**Exhibit
      10.8**


**Notice
      of Patent Security Agreement**







**NOTICE
      OF PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT**




WHEREAS,
      AFP Imaging Corporation, a New York corporation (the “Grantor”), is the owner of
      the patents and the registrations therefor and the patent application in the
      United States Patent and Trademark Office as set forth on **Schedule
      A** annexed
      hereto and made a part hereof (collectively, the “Patents”); and




WHEREAS,
      the Grantor has entered into that certain Collateral Agreement of even date
      herewith (the “Collateral Agreement”), by and among the Grantor, certain of its
      affiliates and ComVest Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
      “Secured Party”); and




WHEREAS,
      pursuant to the Collateral Agreement, the Grantor has agreed to grant to the
      Secured Party a continuing security interest in, and a continuing lien on,
      all
      of the Grantor’s right, title, and interest in and to the Patents (and any
      patent which may be issued upon the application set forth on **Schedule
      A** );




NOW,
      THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
      acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby assign and grant to the Secured Party
      a
      continuing security interest in and a continuing lien on the Patents, as
      security for the payment and performance of the Obligations as defined in the
      Collateral Agreement.




IN
      WITNESS
      WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this Notice of Security Agreement to be duly
      executed by its authorized officer or agent as of April 13, 2007.




AFP
                IMAGING CORPORATION
              
              By:
                /s/David
                VozickName:
                David VozickTitle:
                Chairman of the Board
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50088

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO CASARES-MELENDEZ, also 

known as Tony Casares, also known

as Antonio Melendez Casares,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-02-CR-459

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Antonio Casares-Melendez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Casares-Melendez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have
No. 03-50088

-2-

been alleged in his indictment. Casares-Melendez maintains that

he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence

exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be

imposed for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Casares-Melendez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit
15.1











CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by
reference in Registration Statement No. 333-153274 on Form F-3 of our reports
dated February 4, 2010, relating to the consolidated and combined financial
statements of Capital Product Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating
to: 1) the formation of Capital Product Partners L.P. and the preparation of
the  combined financial statements attributable to the period through
April 4, 2007 from the separate records maintained by Capital Maritime &
Trading Corp., 2)  the preparation of the portion of the combined financial
statements attributable to the Ross Shipmanagement Co., Baymont Enterprises
Incorporated, Forbes Maritime Co., Mango Finance Co., and Navarro International
S.A.,  prior to the vessels’ acquisition by the Partnership, from the
separate records maintained by Capital Maritime & Trading
Corp.,  and 3) the retroactive adjustments to previously issued
combined financial statements resulting from transactions between entities under
common control) and management’s report on the effectiveness of the
Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Partnership for the year ended December 31,
2009.








/s/
Deloitte. Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.








Athens,
Greece


February
4, 2010
EXHIBIT
13.1








Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Capital Product Partners L.P.,
a master limited partnership organized under the laws of the Republic of The
Marshall Islands (the "Company"), for the period ending December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:
March 27,2009








By:           
/s/ Ioannis E.
Lazaridis


Name:       Ioannis
E. Lazaridis


Title:         Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40707

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO TORRES-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-191-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro TorresRodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Torres-Rodriguez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-40707 Document: 00513080068 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
No. 14-40707

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-40707 Document: 00513080068 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
SCWC-18-0000454

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

CELESTE BAKER, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000454; CASE NO. 1DTC-17-035154)

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: Pollack, J.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court, 

filed March 13, 2020, is corrected as follows:

On page 28, in the first and second sentences, replace 

“January 28, 2018” with “January 29, 2018”. 

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all 

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these

changes. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 20, 2020.

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Associate Justice

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000454

20-MAY-2020

11:59 AM