alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shelter Properties II (the "Partnership"), forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification is furnished with thisReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall notbe deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Each of the undersigned, Alan J. Lacy, Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Sears, Roebuck and Co. (the
Company), and Glenn R. Richter, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, has executed this certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 2, 2004 (the
Report). Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. November 8, 2004  /s/ Alan J. LacyAlan J. LacyChairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Glenn R. RichterGlenn R. RichterExecutive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS OF
PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME AND CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS FOR THE
THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,116,478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,116,478
<PP&E>                                      10,975,216
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,127,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,963,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,116,478
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,847,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,963,971
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,070,016
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               106,898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,963,118
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,963,118
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,963,118
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Seth M. and Another, Infants. Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Margo B., Appellant.

Submitted November 23, 2009;

decided January 12, 2010

Reported below, 66 AD3d 1448.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                 August 31, 2004

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346

                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

           Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will
             file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
              as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
              as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

    Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
     this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to
              the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
                        Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ] No [X]

 If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
                in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT LIST
<Table>
<Caption>
Exhibit       Description
-------       -----------
<S>           <C>
99.1          Press Release, dated August 30, 2004 regarding Hollinger Inc.
              Provides Status Update.
</Table>
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 31, 2004

                                   HOLLINGER INC.

                                   By  /s/ Peter G. White
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Peter G. White
                                       Title: Co-Chief Operating Officer
                                              and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 449 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 449

To facilitate shareholder consideration of proposals to make Settlement 
Common Stock under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act available to 
  missed enrollees, eligible elders, and eligible persons born after 
               December 18, 1971, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2005

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To facilitate shareholder consideration of proposals to make Settlement 
Common Stock under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act available to 
  missed enrollees, eligible elders, and eligible persons born after 
               December 18, 1971, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO ALASKA NATIVE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ACT.

     Section 36(d)(3) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 
U.S.C. 1629b) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(d)(3)'' and inserting ``(3)'';
            (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``of this section'' and inserting ``or an amendment to articles 
        of incorporation under section 7(g)(1)(B)'';
            (3) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking ``, or'' and inserting ``; or''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``such resolution'' and inserting 
                ``the resolution or amendment to articles of 
                incorporation''; and
            (4) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``such resolution'' 
        and inserting ``the resolution or amendment to articles of 
        incorporation''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer
 Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the month of February, 2006
 Commission File Number: 00-30082
 Envoy Communications Group Inc.
  172 John Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 1X5
   þ o
 o
 o
  o þ
 o




---



##### 



Signatures
  Envoy Communications Group Inc.
(Registrant)By:
    /s/ Geoffrey B. GenoveseName:
    Geoffrey B. GenoveseTitle:
    President, Chairman andChief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders99.2
    
    Management Information Circular99.3
    
    Form of Proxy99.4
    
    Voting Instruction Form
#### In the Matter of Kathy Tahat, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Submitted September 14, 2009;

decided November 24, 2009

Reported below, 58 AD3d 921.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance, dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5602).
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 23189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11437]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than June 11, 2009.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. Castle Creek Capital Partners III LP, Castle Creek Capital III 
LLC, Eggemeyer Capital LLC, Ruh Capital LLC, and Legions IV Advisory 
Corp., all of Rancho Santa Fe, California; to acquire up to 19.9 
percent of the voting shares of Guaranty Bancorp, and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Guaranty Bank and Trust Company, 
both of Denver, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 12, 2009.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E9-11437 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

RESPODENT

 v.

KELVIN MONSANTO,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 289 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### Mid-Valley Oil Company, Inc., Appellant, and Westport Insurance Corporation, as Subrogee of Mid-Valley Oil Company, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff, v Hughes Network Systems, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. North Star Video, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Submitted March 30, 2009;

decided June 11, 2009

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying a motion for leave to amend the complaint, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3906 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3906

To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to make individuals 
  employed by the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission 
              eligible to obtain Federal health insurance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2006

Ms. Collins (for herself and Mr. Harkin) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, to make individuals 
  employed by the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission 
              eligible to obtain Federal health insurance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEALTH INSURANCE.

    Section 8901(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (H), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (I), by inserting ``and'' after the 
        semicolon; and
            (3) by inserting before the matter following subparagraph 
        (I) the following:
                    ``(J) an individual who is employed by the 
                Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission and 
                is a citizen of the United States,''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Melvin DeWayne SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Up CHILDRESS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-41313

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 2006.

Melvin DeWayne Smith, Beaumont, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Melvin DeWayne Smith, federal prisoner # 66584-079, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise to possess with intent to distribute controlled substances. Smith’s motion for supplementation of brief is granted.

Smith argues that his sentence violated his Sixth Amendment rights as set forth in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because it was enhanced based upon facts not alleged in the indictment, mentioned in the plea agreement, admitted by him, or proven to a jury. The decision in *Booker*does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review, and a *Booker*claim does not satisfy the test for filing a § 2241 petition under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *Padilla v. United States,*416 F.3d 424, 427 (5th Cir.2005).

For the first time on appeal, Smith argues that his conviction was improper under *Richardson v. United States,*526 U.S. 813, 119 S.Ct. 1707, 143 L.Ed.2d 985 (1999), and that this claim may be brought in a § 2241 petition under the savings clause of § 2255. This newly raised legal claim is not reviewable for the first time on appeal. *See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co.,*183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir.1999). Smith raised his *Richardson*claim in this court in his appeal from the denial of his previous § 2241 petition. We warn Smith that filing future repetitive appeals will subject him to sanctions.

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTATION OF BRIEF GRANTED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         185,306                 185,306
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  594,632                 594,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               779,938                 779,938
<PP&E>                                      22,495,419              22,495,419
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,445,275              19,445,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,830,082               3,830,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,177                   7,177
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,822,905               3,822,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,830,082               3,830,082
<SALES>                                        420,976               1,105,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               422,242               1,107,996
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,087                 563,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,155                 544,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            172,155                 544,835
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   172,155                 544,835
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        


</TABLE>
#### Kareemah BELL-BOSTON, Appellant v. Mazza Gallerie MALL, Appellee.

No. 09-7017.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 6, 2009.

*3Kareemah Bell-Boston, Landover Hijls, MD, for Kareemah Bell-Boston.

BEFORE: SENTELLE, Chief Judge; and HENDERSON and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 27, 2009, 2009 WL 222786, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, *see*28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.