alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 15 February 11, 2005 Sears, Roebuck and Co.
3333 Beverly Road
Hoffman Estates, IL 60179 We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
information of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for the thirteen-week periods ended April 3, 2004 and March
29, 2003, as indicated in our report dated May 10, 2004, December 1, 2004 as to Note 10, February
11, 2005 as to Note 15 (which report includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the restatements
discussed in Note 10 and Note 15); because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
that information. We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A for the quarter ended April 3, 2004, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 2-80037, 33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485, 33-45479, 33-55825, 33-58851, 33-64345, 333-08141,
333-113532, and 333-121776 of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Registration Statement No. 333-92082 of
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck Acceptance Corp.;
Registration Statement Nos. 33-64775, 333-18591,
333-43309, and 333-120219 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck and Co. Deferred
Compensation Plan; Registration Statement No. 333-102114 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears
401(K) Savings Plan (formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears Employees and the Sears
401(K) Profit Sharing Plan) and Lands End, Inc. Retirement Plan; Registration Statement No.
33-44671 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears DC Corp.; Registration Statement No. 333-38131 of
Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears Associate Stock Ownership Plan; Registration Statement No.
333-52056 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2000 Employee Stock Plan; Registration Statement No.
333-72514 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2001 Broad-Based Stock Option Plan; and Registration
Statement No. 333-87942 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan. We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act
of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and
11 of that Act. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Chicago, Illinois
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-04-1998
<CASH>                                              33
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1117
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                       1462
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   223
<PP&E>                                            5731
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5030
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3824
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2950)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4140
<SALES>                                           9757
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9757
<CGS>                                             7013
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (25)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  63
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (24)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (24)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (24)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### Jose Luis CABRERA CONTRERAS, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-72701.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 13, 2009.*

Filed May 12, 2009.

Robert Bradford Jobe, Esquire, Law Offices of Robert B. Jobe, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Kristin A. Cabral, Esquire, Richard M. Evans, Esquire, Assistant Director, Oil, Thankful Townsend Vanderstar, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: REINHARDT, NOONAN and MeKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Cabrera Contreras (“Cabrera”) filed a timely Motion to Reopen his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture on March 10, 2005. [AR 38-40] In his motion, Cabrera argued *577that he is eligible for asylum due to past persecution based on his sexual orientation, which he was previously unable to present because of the overwhelming nature of the childhood sexual abuse he experienced in Mexico and his chronic Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.

The decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) entirely failed to address Cabrera’s claim. The decision cited an inapplicable section of the federal regulations—8 C.F.R. § 1003(e)(3)(ii), which only applies to untimely motions to reopen—and asserted that Cabrera had not demonstrated “that the conditions in (his] native Mexico have changed so that he now has a well-founded fear of persecution on account of a protected ground”—despite the fact that Cabrera’s motion did not allege, and was not based on, changed country conditions. [AR 2]

The Ninth Circuit has “long held that the BIA abuses its discretion when it fails to provide a reasoned explanation for its actions.” *Movsisian v. Ashcroft,*395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir.2005). Because the BIA failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its actions or to indicate with specificity that it heard and considered Cabrera’s claims, we conclude that it abused its discretion. Therefore we reverse the BIA’s decision and remand for a full consideration of the merits of Cabrera’s motion to reopen.

GRANTED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

50 

KA 08-02408 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CLEMON JONES, ALSO KNOWN AS CLEMENT/CLEMONT JONES,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.)

 

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (MATTHEW DUNHAM OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Teresa D.

Johnson, A.J.), rendered October 29, 2008. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged

instrument in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same Memorandum as in People v Jones (___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 14,

2014]).

Entered: February 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 35.3

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QO3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the period from and including
March 29, 2007 through and including  September  24, 2007 and of the  Servicer's
performance  under the  applicable  servicing  agreement  has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects  throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:  Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2476 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2476

 To keep schools safe using unobligated Federal funds available to the 
         Secretary of Education to respond to the coronavirus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2023

Mr. Weber of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To keep schools safe using unobligated Federal funds available to the 
         Secretary of Education to respond to the coronavirus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Our Children's Schools 
Act''.

SEC. 2. KEEPING SCHOOLS SAFE.

    The unobligated balance of each amount appropriated or otherwise 
made available to the Secretary of Education to prevent, prepare for, 
or respond to the coronavirus shall be made available to local 
educational agencies to keep the elementary schools and secondary 
schools served by such agencies safe.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 5, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-00602-CR
JEREMY GRAY HECKFORD, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TE XAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR2100639

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia Before the Court is appellant’s June 29, 2022 motion to dismiss the appeal.
The motion complies with rule 42.2(a). T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.2(a). We grant the motion
and dismiss this appeal.

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b) 220602F.U05 /Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

JEREMY GRAY HECKFORD, Appellant

No. 05-22-00602-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR2100639. Opinion delivered by Justice Garcia. Justices Molberg and Reichek participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered July 5, 2022
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6306** 

TONY L. MOORE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. ANTHONY J. PADULA; MS. BELL; KEITH MCBRIDE; L. GREER , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg
. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 5:11

- cv - 01033

- TMC )

Submitted : June 12, 2014 Decided: June 25, 2014

Before KING and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tony L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt, MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC, Greenwood, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions ar e not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tony L. Moore appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny Moore’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Padula , No. 5:11

- cv - 01033

- TMC (D.S.C. Jan. 2, 2014) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
##### 



FORM 6-K
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer
 Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the month of May 2006
 Commission File Number 1-14916
 BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES CORPORATION
  BCE Place
181 Bay Street
Suite 330
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5J 2T3
(416) 369-2300
  o þ
    o þ




---



##### 



DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS FORM 6-K
  SIGNATURES
  Date: May 15, 2006.Brookfield Properties CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ Craig J. LaurieName:
    
    Craig J. LaurieTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President & ChiefFinancial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT LIST
 Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Brookfield Properties Corporation 2006 Q1 Interim Report99.2
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer99.3
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Secured Promissory Note




 Exhibit 10.22 
  
 SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	 $100,000.00
	 	Palo Alto, California

  
 August 2, 2002

  
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, John F. Shanley (the “Borrower”)
promises to pay to Conor Medsystems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), or order, the principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000), together with interest on the unpaid principal thereof from the date hereof at the
rate of four and seventy-four-hundredths percent (4.74%), compounded annually. 
  
 The outstanding principal amount and all accrued interest shall be due and payable to the Company upon demand five (5) years from the date hereof. 
  
 The Borrower may at any time prepay all or any portion of the principal and interest owing hereunder. 
  
 This Note is secured pursuant to the terms of a Security Agreement of even
date herewith by a pledge of 400,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock owned by Borrower as of the date of hereof, and is subject to all the provisions of such Security Agreement, and the sole recourse against Borrower in the event of
default shall be to proceed against the collateral securing this Note. 
  
 This Note shall not be transferable, assignable or assumable by either the Company or Borrower. 
  
 Demands hereunder shall be deemed to have been received by the Borrower if delivered or faxed to the address below on the date thereof, or three (3) days
after having been mailed postpaid in the United States mails, so addressed. The Borrower may change the address for notices by written notice to the holder of this note. 
  
 If any provision of this Note is held invalid or unenforceable, it shall not affect the validity and enforceability of the
other provisions of this Note. 
  
 This Note is executed and
delivered in, and shall in all respects be governed by and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California, including all matters of construction, validity and performance. 
  

	
	
	 /s/ John F. Shanley

	 John F. Shanley



  

 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS OF SAN
JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME AND CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS FOR THE
NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,210,715
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,210,715
<PP&E>                                     133,275,528
<DEPRECIATION>                              81,032,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,453,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,210,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,242,601
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,453,316
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,676,423
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               663,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             24,012,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         24,012,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                24,012,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Max Nutrition, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, JinJun Qi, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: February 13, 2008 /s/ JinJun Qi  Name: Nicholas Stone  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   F-1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2008 (the
Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Marc L. Baker, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Marc L. Baker             
|Marc L. Baker                 
|Acting Chief Financial Officer

Dated: January 13, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 590 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

750 4th Street in Sparks, Nevada, as the ‘‘Mayor Tony Armstrong 

Memorial Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 10, 2005 

Mr. ENSIGN (for himself and Mr. REID) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 750 4th Street in Sparks, Nevada, as the 

‘‘Mayor Tony Armstrong Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAYOR TONY ARMSTRONG MEMORIAL POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 750 4th Street in Sparks, Ne7 vada, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Mayor Tony 

8 Armstrong Memorial Post Office’’. 
2 

•S 590 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mayor Tony Arm5 strong Memorial Post Office’’. 

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 12 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF INCOME TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGESSEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited) NineMonthsEnded
    
    
    For the Fiscal Year Ended10/2/04(millions, except ratios)
    
    (unaudited)
    
    2003
    
    2002
    
    2001
    
    2000Fixed ChargesInterest and amortization of debt discount
and expense on all indebtedness
    
    
    $210
    
    
    
    $1,816
    
    
    
    $1,143
    
    
    
    $1,415
    
    
    
    $1,248Add interest element implicit in rentals
    
    
    134
    
    
    
    167
    
    
    
    157
    
    
    
    161
    
    
    
    136344
    
    
    
    1,983
    
    
    
    1,300
    
    
    
    1,576
    
    
    
    1,384Interest capitalized
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    11
    
    
    
    4Total fixed charges
    
    
    $344
    
    
    
    $1,984
    
    
    
    $1,303
    
    
    
    $1,587
    
    
    
    $1,388Income(Loss) / Income before income taxes, minority interest
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
    
    
    ($15
    )
    
    
    $5,449
    
    
    
    $2,453
    
    
    
    $1,223
    
    
    
    $2,223Deduct undistributed net income
of unconsolidated companies
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    8
    
    
    
    20
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    17(21
    )
    
    
    5,441
    
    
    
    2,433
    
    
    
    1,211
    
    
    
    2,206AddFixed charges (excluding interest capitalized)
    
    
    344
    
    
    
    1,983
    
    
    
    1,300
    
    
    
    1,576
    
    
    
    1,384Income before fixed charges and
income taxes
    
    
    $323
    
    
    
    $7,424
    
    
    
    $3,733
    
    
    
    $2,787
    
    
    
    $3,590Ratio of income to fixed charges
    
    
    (A
    )
    
    
    3.74
    
    
    
    2.86
    
    
    
    1.76
    
    
    
    2.59
  (A)
    
    As a result of the loss for the nine months ended October 2, 2004, earnings
did not cover fixed charges by $21 million. Total fixed charges
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $344Income before fixed charges and
income taxes
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $323deficit
    
    
    $21