alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of Chief
Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report
of Team Nation Holdings Corporation, ( the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis R. Duffy, Chief Executive Officer
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 4, 2009

/s/ Dennis R. Duffy
Dennis R. Duffy
President & CEO

---
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Gil
Boosidan, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of Suspect
Detection Systems Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth
and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in that Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and  results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
April 14,
2010
 /s/ Gil
Boosidan
 Name:  Gil
Boosidan
 Title:    Chief
Executive Officer
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avro Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike P. Kurtanjek,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
15th day of April, 2011.


/s/ Mike P. Kurtanjek
-------------------------------------
Mike P. Kurtanjek
Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rosalio OVIEDO-VASQUEZ, also known as Rosalio Vasquez-Cordero, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41720.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’S Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rosalio Oviedo-Vasquez (Oviedo) appeals his guilty-plea conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by being found in the United States without permission after deportation. He argues, in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that the 41-month term of imprisonment imposed in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury.

Oviedo’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although he contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Oviedo properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K Current Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report(Date of
earliest event reported)
March 29, 2005 Vitran Corporation Inc.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ONTARIO, CANADA
    
    000-26256
    
    Not applicable(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.185 The West Mall,
Suite 701, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    
    M9C 5L5(Address of
principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code) 416-596-7664(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)




---



##### 



Item 8.01   Other Events On March 24, 2005, the
Registrant issued their 2004 Annual Report Exhibit 99.1, and such annual report is
incorporated in its entirety by reference herein. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  VITRAN CORPORATION INC.By:
        
        /s/ Sean P. WashchukName:
        
        Sean P. WashchukTitle:
        
        Vice President Finance and
Chief Financial Officer Date: March 29, 2005 EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    2004 Annual Report
Exhibit 31.1
**Certifications**
I, J. Collier Sparks, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of American BuildingControl, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Dated: August 16, 2004      By /s/ J. Collier Sparks      J. Collier Sparks   Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32














ENSERVCO CORPORATION





Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 of the


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of Enservco Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, each of the undersigned Michael Herman, the Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company, and Rick D. Kasch, the Chief Financial Officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:






1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




May 6, 2011
/s/ Michael HermanMichael Herman, Chief Executive OfficerMay 6, 2011
/s/ Rick D. KaschRick D. Kasch, Chief Financial Officer
#### Timmy McDONALD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, a/k/a United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, a/k/a United States Department of Justice; S.L. Hamling, Sr. Off. Specialist; Deborah Livingston, Discip. Hrg Officer; K.M. White, Reg. Director; Harrell Watts, Admin. Nat’l; Unknown Employees of Federal Correctional Institution Gilmer, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 08-8280.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 15, 2009.

Decided: May 13, 2009.

Timmy McDonald, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Timmy McDonald appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915A (2006) his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) and *Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *McDonald v. United States,*No. 2:07-cv-00082-REM-JSK, 2008 WL 4615017 (N.D. W.Va. Oct 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
##### 



FORM 6-K
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer
 Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For
the month of September, 2005
 Commission
File Number: 00-30082
 Envoy Communications Group Inc.
  172 John Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 1X5
   þ o
 o
 o
  o þ
 o




---



##### 



Signatures
  Envoy Communications Group Inc.(Registrant)By: /s/ Geoffrey B. GenoveseName: Geoffrey B. GenoveseTitle: President, Chairman andChief Executive OfficerDated: December 23, 2005




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Envoy Communications Group Inc. Year End Annual Report, September 30, 200599.2
    
    Form 52-109F1  Certification of Annual Filings by Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer99.3
    
    Form 52-109F1  Certification of Annual Filings by Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 13, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 13, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0124. RHONDA MCCLENDON v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

19SUR777
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








The undersigned, Juhani Taskinen, Chief Executive Officer, and Trupti Mehta, Principal Financial Officer of Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period December 31, 2010, of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated:  April 13, 2011                         By:  /s/ Juhani Taskinen


Juhani Taskinen


Chief Executive Officer





April 13, 2011                          By:  /s/Trupti Mehta


Principal Financial Officer





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**THETRUSTEE***

**OF THE SAN JUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joshua R. Peterson, Senior Vice President and Trust Officer of BBVA USA, on behalf of BBVA USA, the Trustee of the San Juan Basin Royalty Trust(the “Trust”),* not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee of the Trust, hereby certify that: 

 
 1.
The Report fully complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (as explained in Note 1 to the Trust’s financial statements contained in the Report, in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 12:E, FinancialStatements of Royalty Trusts, the Trust prepares its financial statements in a manner that differs from generally accepted accounting principles; such presentation is customary to other royalty trusts); and 

 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Trust. 

 

BBVA USA, AS TRUSTEE OF THE

SANJUAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
By: /s/ Joshua R. PetersonName: Joshua R. PetersonTitle: Senior Vice President and Trust OfficerDate: November 12, 2019
 
*
The Trust has no executive officers. 
**
#### Waterfall Victoria Mortgage Trust 2011-1 REO, LLC, et al., Respondents, v Jenny J. Mercado, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[961 NYS2d 789]

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Jenny J. Mercado appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated September 7, 2010, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to execute a judgment of foreclosure and sale and to amend the caption, and (2) a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court entered October 29, 2010.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiffs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiffs’ motion to execute a judgment of foreclosure and sale and to amend the caption. Although the plaintiffs failed to timely settle a judgment in accordance with 22 NYCRR 202.48 (a), granting their motion brought the finality to court proceedings that this rule was designed to effectuate, and preserved judicial resources *(see Matter of Loeffler v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation,*37 AD3d 470, 471 [2007]; *Delahanty v DeGuire,*280 AD2d 638, 639 [2001]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court.

Rivera, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golf Rounds.com, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Report’’), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: January 11, 2008


/s/ Robert H. DonehewRobert H. Donehew
President (Principal Executive Officer)
and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)


---
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Cesar M. Garcia, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IRIS International,Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such valuation. 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November11, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4082 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4082

  To make a conforming amendment to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act 
      with respect to examinations of certain insured depository 
                 institutions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2006

   Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To make a conforming amendment to the Federal Deposit Insurance Act 
      with respect to examinations of certain insured depository 
                 institutions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT.

    Paragraph (10) of section 10(d) of the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Act (12 U.S.C. 1820(d)(10)) is amended by striking ``$250,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$500,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```