alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Marie Sander, Appellant, v Arnold S. Kronick, Respondent. Marie Sander, Appellant, v Greenspan & Greenspan et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 13, 2009;

decided December 1, 2009

Reported below, 2009 NY Slip Op 77297(U).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the actions within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,713
<INVENTORY>                                      6,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,772
<PP&E>                                          40,288
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,984
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,380
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           26,894
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,262
<OTHER-SE>                                    (74,977)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,704
<SALES>                                         40,885
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,885
<CGS>                                           38,129
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,873)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        54
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,927)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,927)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.20)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of China Vitup Health Care Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report), I, Chunxiang Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  April 15, 2011 /s/ Chunxiang Li Chief Financial Officer
S. 45

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to lift the patient limitation on prescribing

drug addiction treatments by medical practitioners in group practices, and for

other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OR DETOXIFICATION TREATMENT WITH

CERTAIN NARCOTIC DRUGS; ELIMINATION OF 30-

PATIENT LIMIT FOR GROUP PRACTICES.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 303(g)(2)(B) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(B)) is amended by striking clause

(iv).

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 303(g)(2)(B) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(B)) is amended in clause

(iii) by striking ‘‘In any case’’ and all that follows through ‘‘the

total’’ and inserting ‘‘The total’’.

(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect on the date

of enactment of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eugene Francis, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 258]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Neary, J.), rendered May 2, 2012, as amended May 15, 2012, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]) in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the motion of Charles O. Lederman for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant’s new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Andrew W. Sayegh, Esq., 984 Broadway, Suite 300, Yonkers, N.Y., 10701, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is directed to furnish a *copy*of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant’s new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf *1098of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 11, 2012, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

The brief submitted by the appellant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]) is deficient because it fails to adequately recite the underlying facts in the case and analyze potential appellate issues or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal *(see People v Sanders,*91 AD 3d 798, 799 [2012]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252, 256 [2011]; *People v Barger,*72 AD3d 696, 697 [2010]). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel acted “as an active advocate on behalf of his . . . client” *(Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d at 256 [internal quotation marks omitted]), we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant *(see People v Sanders,*91 AD3d at 799; *People v Foster,*90 AD3d 1070 [2011]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d at 258). Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
----

|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d);      and      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| DATE:  May      6, 2009 | by:    | /s/    | Min      Zhao                                    |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                              |   |   | Min      Zhao                                    |   |
|                              |   |   | Chief      Executive Officer and Chief Financial |
|                              |   |   | Officer      (Principal Executive Officer and    |
|                              |   |   | Principal      Financial Officer                 |   |
* P ursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________
No. 98-30174

_____________________
WILLIAM DESHAZER and LOUISE DESHAZER

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

ARCO OIL & GAS CO., A Division of Atlantic Richfield Company

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

(93-CV-1460)

_________________________________________________________________ December 21, 1998

Before GARWOOD, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam: *

Appellant s appeal the summary judgment against their claims

(malicious prosecution, defamation, intentional infliction of

emotional distress and loss of consortium), all arising out of

d isputes and resulting litigation between Appellee and Appellant

William Deshazer, a former senior engineer for Appellee, concerning

his post-employment assistance to a party engaged in litigation

with Appellee over an explosion on one of Appellee’s platforms.

No authority need be cited for th e fact that we review a

summary judgment de novo , applying the same test as does the- 2 -

district court. Such judgment is proper if the summary judgment

record shows that there is no material fact issue a nd that the

movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. F E D

. R

. C IV

.

P .56.

Pursuant to our requisite de novo review, and having

considered the briefs and oral argument presented on appeal, we

conclude that summary judgment is proper, essentially for the

reasons stated by the district court in its comprehensive opinion.

Deshazer v. Arco Oil & Gas Co ., No. 93-CV-1460 (W.D. La. Jan. 26,

1998).

AFFIRMED
##### 






CALL-NET ENTERPRISES INC.


(IMPORTANT REMINDER)

Dear Call-Net Enterprises Inc. shareholder:

A special meeting of Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
(Call-Net) shareholders has been called to consider
a special resolution with respect to the arrangement (the
Arrangement) involving the acquisition by Rogers
Communications Inc. (RCI) of all of the outstanding
Common and Class B shares of Call-Net. The special meeting
will be held at the Hilton Toronto (Toronto III Room),
145 Richmond Street West, Toronto, Ontario on Wednesday,
June 29, 2005 at 11:00 a.m. (Toronto Time).

Under the Arrangement, you will receive one
(1) Class B Non-Voting Share of RCI for every 4.25
Call-Net shares you hold.

The Board of Directors has determined that the Arrangement is
fair to Call-Nets shareholders and unanimously recommends
that shareholders vote in favour of the Arrangement.

If you have not already returned your Voting Form, a duplicate
one is enclosed for your use. Remember that you can vote by
calling the toll-free telephone number indicated on your Voting
Form or through the internet at www.proxyvote.com.

For assistance in voting your shares or if you require
additional copies of the notice of meeting and information
circular, please do not hesitate to contact Georgeson
Shareholder at the number below. Copies of these materials may
also be obtained on SEDAR at www.sedar.com or the SEC at
www.sec.gov.

(GEORGESO LOGO)

Toll Free Number:

1-888-253-0937
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Printing Components Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Vinod Gandhi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |     |                                                                                                                                                      
| |     | Dated this 10th day of April, 2009.                                                                                                                  

VINOD GANDHIVinod GandhiChief Financial Officer

















---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          56,025
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,931
<OTHER-SE>                                     (57,956)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,253
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,253)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,253)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,253)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Electric Car Company, Inc.; (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary Spaniak, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 15, 2010



/s/ Gary Spaniak

Gary Spaniak, Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3580 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3580

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear not covering 
          the ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce temporarily the duty on certain women's footwear not covering 
          the ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN'S FOOTWEAR NOT COVERING THE ANKLE WITH COATED 
              OR LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.12      Women's footwear,   20%          No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         except vulcanized                                                  31/2009
                         footwear and
                         footwear with
                         waterproof molded
                         bottoms,
                         including bottoms
                         comprising an
                         outer sole and
                         all or part of
                         the upper, valued
                         over $20/pair,
                         not covering the
                         ankle, designed
                         to be worn in
                         lieu of, but not
                         over, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (provided
                         in subheading
                         6404.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, based
on our knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                            |  |                                                                           
|----------------- |  | -------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2007 |  | MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|                  |  |                           
|                  |  | By:                        |  | /s/ Richard D. Balanson                                                   
|                  |  |                            |  | Richard D. Balanson                                                       
|                  |  |                            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                                     
|                  |  |                           
|Date: May 7, 2007 |  | By:                        |  | /s/ Tim T. Hart                                                           
|                  |  |                            |  | Tim T. Hart                                                               
|                  |  |                            |  | Vice President  Finance, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 465 

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out a project for the 

mitigation of shore damage attributable to the project for navigation, 

Saco River, Maine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2005 

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to carry out a 

project for the mitigation of shore damage attributable 

to the project for navigation, Saco River, Maine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION PROJECT, SACO 

4 RIVER, MAINE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Army may 

6 carry out, under section 111 of the River and Harbor Act 

7 of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i), a project for the mitigation of 

8 shore damage attributable to the project for navigation, 
2 

•S 465 IS

1 Saco River, Maine, without regard to subsection (c) of 

2 that section. 

3 (b) PLAN.—In carrying out the project under sub4 section (a), the Secretary may implement the plan for the 

5 project preferred by non-Federal interests. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 35.1

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC

                RALI SERIES 2007-QH3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
March 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing Agreement,  dated
as of December 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),  among
Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company,  Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as master servicer,  and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,  as trustee, does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material  respects  throughout
such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:  Managing Director