alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER09-873-000]

Take notice that on May 6, 2009, ISO New England, Inc. filed a correction to its March 29, 2009, Internal Market Monitoring Unit filing.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 13, 2009.                

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-11332 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22741-22742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8904-8]


Notice To Terminate the National Environmental Performance Track 
Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 22742]]

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has decided to terminate 
the National Environmental Performance Track Program.

DATES: The Performance Track Program is terminated effective May 14, 
2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chuck Kent, Office of Policy, 
Economics and Innovation, 202-566-2805 or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#440f212a306a072c31272f042134256a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="155e707b613b567d60767e557065743b727a63">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 26, 2000, EPA announced the launch 
of the National Environmental Performance Track, ``Performance Track'', 
which was initially designed to have two levels, the ``Achievement 
Track,'' and the ``Stewardship Track.'' On July 6, 2000, EPA published 
in the Federal Register (65 FR 41655) the design of the Achievement 
Track level of the Performance Track program. The Achievement Track was 
subsequently renamed the National Environmental Performance Track 
Program and the development of the Stewardship Track led instead to the 
creation of the Performance Track Corporate Leader designation.
    On March 16, 2009, EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson issued a 
memorandum halting the Performance Track Program. The Administrator's 
memorandum was followed by a memorandum from Chuck Kent, Director, 
Office of Policy Economics, and Innovation, dated March 25, 2009, which 
provided more details about the termination, including that the low 
priority for routine inspections incentive is no longer in effect. This 
notice announces that EPA's decision to terminate the Performance Track 
Program is effective as of the date of this publication, and provides 
public notice that the low priority for routine inspections incentive 
for Performance Track facilities is hereby terminated.

    Dated: May 11, 2009.
Marcia E. Mulkey,
Acting Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Economics and 
Innovation.
 [FR Doc. E9-11272 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Toombs *v.*West & Obear.

Where the payee of a promissory note procured the same to be executed by stipulating with the maker that he, the payee, would procure employment for a third person (for whose benefit the note was given and who received the entire consideration therefor) by which the latter would earn enough money to pay off the note, a total breach of this stipulation is a defence to an action brought-upon the note by the payee.

August *14,*1894.

Complaint on note. Before Judge Griggs. Randolph superior court. November term, 1893.

W. C. Worrill, for plaintiff in error.

Lumpkin, Justice.

This was an action by West & Obear against Toombsupon a promissory note payable to them. The defendant’s plea alleged, in substance, as follows: The plaintiffs, being agents of the Manhattan Life Insurance Company, desired to issue a policy on the life of one Tumlin and to obtain the defendant’s note for the premium thereon. In order to induce him to give the note, they promised to procure Tumlin an appointment as agent of' the company, and represented that he could soon realize enough from his commissions to pay off’ the note, it-being expressly agreed between the parties to the note and Tumlin, that Toombs should be .interested in. the commissions earned by Tumlin to the extent of the amount of the note; and had this contract been carried out, Tumlin could, with reasonable certainty, have earned money enough to pay the note. In consideration of' the promise and representation made by the plaintiffs, Toombs signed the note, but after it was made and delivered, the plaintiffs failed and refused to procure the agency for Tumlin.

Properly construed, the undertakings of the plaintiffs,, in consideration of which the note was given, amounted *281to a stipulation on their part to procure employment for Tumlin by which he would earn enough money to pay off the note, and there was a total breach of this stipulation. We think the plea set up a good defence to the-action on the note. Whether, if Tumlin had been appointed agent, he would have been successful and would have made money enough to satisfy the note cannot be known; but the plaintiffs will not be heard to say he would have failed,because,by the breach of their contract,, they denied him the opportunity even to make the effort and besides, the plea alleges, in effect, he would have succeeded, and on demurrer this allegation must be taken as true. The court erred in striking the plea.

*Judgment reversed.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, César M. García, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2006
|                        
|/s/ CESAR M. GARCIA     
|César M. García         
|Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James M. Richardson, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 695]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (De Rosa, J.), rendered November 17, 2010, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the motion of John R. Lewis for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant is granted, and he is directed to turn over all papers in his possession to the appellant’s new counsel assigned herein; and it is further,

Ordered that Richard L. Herzfeld, 104 West 40th Street, 20th Floor, New York, N.Y. 10018, is assigned as counsel to prosecute the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is directed to furnish a copy of the certified transcript of the proceedings to the appellant’s new assigned counsel; and it is further,

Ordered that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 30, 2012, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties, who were directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other.

The brief submitted by the appellant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]) is deficient because it does not contain an adequate statement of facts and fails to adequately analyze potential appellate issues or highlight facts in the record that might arguably support the appeal *(see People v Singleton,*101 AD3d 909, 910 [2012]; *People v Gonzalez,*100 AD3d 921, 922 [2012]; *People v Ovalle,*99 AD3d 1023, 1024 [2012]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252, 256 [2011]). Since the brief does not demonstrate that assigned counsel fulfilled his obligations under *Anders v California,*we *963must assign new counsel to represent the appellant *(see People v*Singleton, 101 AD3d at 910; *People v Ovalle,*99 AD3d at 1024; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d at 258). Mastro, J.E, Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131458 & (16) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 131458 

 COA: 265879 
 Wayne CC: 74-000772

GEARY GILMORE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 4, 2006 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to 

remand is DENIED. 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
### RAUL 

### DAVID JACKSON #1367898 William R Boyd Jr Unit 

### 200 Spur 113 Teague, Tx. 75860

Court of Criminal Appeals Able Acosta, Clerk P.O. Box 12308 Austin, Tx. 78711

RE: EX PARTE RAUL DAVID JACKSON May 

### 16, 2015

WRIT NO. WR-73,697-06, WR-73,697-07, WR-73,697-08, WR-73,697-09 TRIAL NO. W06-00445-K,**W06-00448~K,** 

### W06-00450-K, W06-00453-K

. ....)

Dear Mr Acosta,
Enclosed please find a true copy of·my correspondence that I have sent this date by certified mail RRR to Felicia Pitre, District Clerk, Dallas County, Texas. Please file this correspondence for record in the above-cause so that the Court is aware that I am not able to file objections to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court because the trial court clerk has failed or refused to forward them to me in accordance with Rules of Appellate Procedure**Ru~§~.** 7 3 . 4 Cb)(2 ) . Thank you
. ;';: · ·.·.·,

c. File

# ~~tiCi&ij\f.(E[D)**~N ~RT** **CYFCAIMIN~l A~t.S** 

## ~EC~~V·**~bfCRtMI** 

### MAY 

## MAY.2·0

## 1015**Arc»~ ~00~,** **Cf®~**

### RAUL DAVID JACKSON #1367898 William R Boyd Jr Unit 

### 200 Spur 113 

### Teague,**Tx~** 

### 75860

Felicia Pitre Dist.Clerk, Dallas Co. 133 N. Riverfront Blvd. LB 12 Dallas, Tx. 75207-4300

RE: EX PARTE RAUL-DAVID JACKSON May 16, 2015

WRIT NO.**WR~73,697-06, WR-73,697~07,**  WR-73,697-08, WR-73,697-09 TRIAL NO. W06-00445-K, W06-00448-K,**W06~00450-K,** W06-00453-K

Dear Ms Pitre, On 5/13/15, I received 4 white-card-notices from.the Court of Criminal Appeals indicating that they have**rec~ived** and filed my habeas applications forwarded from your office. Please be advised that I am proceeding pro se and I have not receiveda copy of the findings of fact and conclusions of law as required.by Rules of Appellate**Procedur~** Rule 73.4 (b)(2). In accordancewithmandamus requirements, I am hereby demanding that you perform a mandatory duty and mail to me forthwith a true and correct copy of the findings of fact and conclusions of law that were forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appeals in this cause. I am further**requ~sting** a true copy of the Clerk's Summary Sheet that was forwarded with said applications. Please file-mark and return to me the enclosed copy of this correspondence. Thank you.

c. Able Acosta File

A TRUE 

### COPY.
#### State v. Alegria-Sanchez

Case below: 165 N.C. App. 544

No. 637P06

Def’s PWC to Review the Decision of the COA (COA03-1545)

Denied 01/25/07

Hudson, J., Recused
#### In the Matter of Sareta A., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 652]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Jeanette Ruiz, J.), entered on or about June 1, 2012, which adjudicated *540appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that she committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute attempted assault in the third degree, and placed her on probation for 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it denied appellant’s request for an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal. A term of probation was the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The 12-month period of supervision was warranted by the seriousness of appellant’s violent attack on the victim, which outweighed the mitigating factors cited by appellant. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Renwick, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22920-22921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11337]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL05-55-004; Docket No. EL05-63-006]


City of Holland, MI v. Midwest Independent Transmission System 
Operator, Inc.; DTE Energy Trading, Inc. v. Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Notice of Filing

May 7, 2009.
    Take notice that on April 30, 2009, The Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. submit a refund report, effective 
April 15, 2009, in compliance with the Commission's May 20, 2008 Order, 
City of Holland, Michigan v. Midwest Independent Transmission System 
Operator, Inc. and DTE Energy Trading, Inc. v. Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc., 123 FERC 61,187 (2008) (May 20, 
Order).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cb8d8e998884a5a7a2a5ae98bebbbba4b9bf8badaeb9a8e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bff9faedfcf0d1d3d6d1daeccacfcfd0cdcbffd9dacddc91d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

[[Page 22921]]

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 21, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11337 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
BOISE INC.

We are providing this Certificate pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C., Section 1350. It
accompanies Boise Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report).



I,
Alexander Toeldte, Boise Inc.'s chief executive officer, certify that:



/s/ Alexander ToeldteAlexander Toeldte
Chief Executive Officer


I,
Robert M. McNutt, Boise Inc.'s chief financial officer, certify that:



/s/ Robert M. McNutt Robert M. McNutt
Chief Financial Officer


Date:
February 24, 2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 will be retained by Boise Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### In the Matter of Danielle Joy K., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Administration for Children’s Services et al., Respondents; Stacy K., Appellant.

Submitted April 27, 2009;

decided June 4, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       20
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    20
<PP&E>                                              11
<DEPRECIATION>                                       7
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      91
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               30
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (3)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        91
<SALES>                                              4
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                1
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    11
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (7)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (7)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (7)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)


</TABLE>
#### Amazon.com LLC et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Taxation and Finance et al., Respondents.

Decided May 5, 2009

Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, First Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,
Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,

J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

March 28, 2018

s0321 

# Order

Clerk March 28, 2018

156602

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 15 6602 COA: 332653 Branch CC: 14-101331-FH VICKI RENEE DICKINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 15, 2017 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIE D, because we are not persuaded that the questions pre sented should be reviewed by th is Court.