alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3826 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

military pay received by a member of a reserve component of the Armed 

Forces of the United States who is called to active duty. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2006 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income military pay received by a member 

of a reserve component of the Armed Forces of the 

United States who is called to active duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Citizen Soldier Relief 

5 Act of 2006’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3826 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR MILITARY 

2 PAY RECEIVED BY A MEMBER OF A RESERVE 

3 COMPONENT OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE 

4 UNITED STATES CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 112 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 (relating to certain combat zone com7 pensation of members of the Armed Services) is amended 

8 by adding at the end the following new subsection: 

9 ‘‘(e) RESERVE COMPONENTS CALLED TO ACTIVE

10 DUTY.—In the case of an individual— 

11 ‘‘(1) who is called or ordered to active duty in 

12 the Armed Forces of the United States for a period 

13 in excess of 180 days or for an indefinite period, and 

14 ‘‘(2) at the time so called or ordered is a mem15 ber of a reserve component of the Armed Forces of 

16 the United States, 

17 gross income shall not include military pay (as defined in 

18 section 101(21) of title 37, United States Code) received 

19 by such individual on account of such active duty service.’’. 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

21 (1) The heading for section 112 of such Code 

22 is amended by inserting before the period ‘‘; PAY OF

23 MEMBERS OF RESERVE COMPONENTS OF SUCH

24 ARMED FORCES CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY’’. 

25 (2) The item relating to section 112 in the table 

26 of sections for part III of subchapter B of chapter 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•S 3826 IS

1 1 of such Code is amended by inserting before the 

2 period ‘‘; pay of members of reserve components of 

3 such Armed Forces called to active duty’’. 

4 (3) Section 3401(a)(1) of such Code is amended 

5 by inserting ‘‘; pay of members of reserve compo6 nents of such Armed Forces called to active duty’’ 

7 after ‘‘United States’’. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

10 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00186]



[[Page 1406]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-742-000]


Chief Energy Power LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Chief Energy Power LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is January 22, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4f2f1e6f7fbdad8dddad1e7c1c4c4dbc6c0f4d2d1c6d79ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="763033243539181a1f181325030606190402361013041558111900">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 2, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00186 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avro Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike P. Kurtanjek,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of April
15, 2010.


/s/ Mike P. Kurtanjek
---------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3643 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain woven fabrics of cotton, containing less than 85 percent by weight of cotton, mixed mainly or 

solely with man-made fibers, weighing not more than 200 g/m2. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain woven fabrics 

of cotton, containing less than 85 percent by weight 

of cotton, mixed mainly or solely with man-made fibers, 

weighing not more than 200 g/m2. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3643 IS 

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CON2 TAINING LESS THAN 85 PERCENT BY WEIGHT 

3 OF COTTON, MIXED MAINLY OR SOLELY WITH 

4 MAN-MADE FIBERS, WEIGHING NOT MORE 

THAN 200 G/M2 5 . 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.52.12 Woven fabrics of cotton, containing less 

than 85 percent by weight of cotton, 

mixed mainly or solely with man-made fibers, weighing not more than 200 g/m2, 

the foregoing printed and other than 

plain weave or 3-thread or 4-thread twill 

(including cross twill) (provided for in 

subheading 5210.59) ............................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

12 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.8
                               CONSULTANT AGREEMENT


Consultant Agreement, between Aquatic Cellulose (the "Company") and Les
Westgarde (the " Consultant ").

1. For good consideration, the Company employs the consultant on the following
terms and conditions.

2. TERM OF EMPLOYMENT. Subject to the provisions for termination set forth below
this agreement will begin on Oct 1, 2006.

3. SALARY. The Company shall pay a salary of $5000 per month, for the services
of the Consultant, payable by monthly for three months commencing October 1,
2006 to Dec 31, 2006. After which, at the Company's option to renew this
contract may have option to pay the Consultant 80% in cash and 20% in stock for
services rendered.

4. VACATION. The Consultant shall be entitled to a yearly vacation of 3 weeks at
full pay.

5. DUTIES AND POSITION. The Company hires the Consultant in the capacity of
office administration and the Consultants duties may be reasonably modified at
the Company's discretion from time to time.

6. CONFIDENTIALITY OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION. Consultant agrees, during the
term of this employment, not to reveal confidential information, or trade
secrets to any person, firm, corporation, or entity. Should Consultant reveal or
threaten to reveal this information, the Company shall be entitled to an
injunction restraining the Consultant from disclosing same, or from rendering
any services to any entity to whom said information has been or is threatened to
be disclosed, the right to secure an injunction is not exclusive, and the
Company may pursue any other remedies it has against the Consultant for a breach
or threatened breach of this condition, including the recovery of damages from
the Consultant.

7. REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES. The Consultant may incur reasonable expenses for
furthering the Company's business, including expenses for entertainment, travel,
and similar items. The Company shall reimburse Consultant for all business
expenses after the Consultant presents an itemized account of expenditures,
pursuant to Company policy.

8. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT. Without cause, if the Company terminates this
agreement at any time, the Company will pay the Consultant on the date of the
termination a severance allowance of 3 months Salary

9. SETTLEMENT BY ARBITRATION. Any claim or controversy that arises out of or
relates to this agreement, or the breach of it, shall be settled by arbitration
in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. Judgment
upon the award rendered may be entered in any court with jurisdiction.

10. ASSUMPTION OF AGREEMENT BY COMPANY'S SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNEES. The Company's
rights and obligations under this agreement will inure to the benefit and be
binding upon the Company's successors and assignees.


SIGNED THIS 01 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2006


/S/ SHERIDAN B. WESTGARDE                   /S/ LES W. WESTGARDE
-------------------------                   --------------------
President                                   Consultant
Order filed August 5, 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14 - 21 - 00365 - CV

____________ JAROD DOUET AND JASALYN MOSBEY - DOUET , Appellant V. PAPILLON ROMERO, AND BOBBY SULLIVAN , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018 - 38090

ORDER This appeal is related to two appeals previously filed in this court: No. 14

- 20

- 00 6 3 2

- CV , Jared Douet and Jasalyn Mosbey

- Douet v. Papillon Romero, Dustin Fergosn d/b/a AACE Inspection s, and URE Ho ust on, LLC ; and No. 14

- 21

- 00103

- CV , Jared Douet and Jasalyn Mosbey

- Douet v. Papillon Romero, Bobby Sullivan, a nd United Realty Advisors
. Appel lant has filed a motion requesting the record from the previous appeal s be transferred into this appe al. The motion is granted. The clerk of this court is directed to file a copy of the appellate record in appeal number 14

- 20

- 00 6 3 2

- CV and 14

- 21

- 00 103

- CV into this appeal. PE R CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Hassan and Pois sant.
| $_______ | February __, 2011 |
|----------|------------------------|
|     |                   |
|     |                   |

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | ACQUIRED SALES CORP. |
|--------|----------------------|
|   |
|   |
|   |
|   | By:                  |   |   |
|   | Name:                | Gerard M. Jacobs |   |
|   | Title:               | CEO |   |

----
#### Victor J. Runner, Respondent, v New York Stock Exchange, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Submitted October 19, 2009;

decided October 22, 2009

Motion by Defense Association of New York, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on consideration of the certified questions herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 Certification:

I, Kevan B. Hensman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Aspen Exploration
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b) [intentionally omitted]

     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     d) disclosed in this report any changes in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Dated: February 11, 2008                 By  /s/ Kevan B. Hensman
                                             --------------------
                                             Kevan B. Hensman, interim Chief
                                             Financial Officer and
                                             Principal Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1301

KENNETH G. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, United States Postal 

Service; DR. FRANCIS COLLINS, Director, National Institute 

of Health; ARNE DUNCAN, Secretary of Education, U.S. 

Department of Education,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-1494

KENNETH G. SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, United States Postal 

Service; DR. FRANCIS COLLINS, Director, National Institute 

of Health; ARNE DUNCAN, Secretary of Education, U.S. 

Department of Education,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:12-cv-00790-JCC-TRJ)
2

Submitted: September 30, 2013 Decided: October 11, 2013

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

No. 13-1301 affirmed; No. 13-1494 dismissed by unpublished per 

curiam opinion.

Kenneth G. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Reynolds Wilson, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In Case No. 13-1301, Kenneth G. Smith appeals the 

district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss 

for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter 

jurisdiction and for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(b)(1), (6) & 56(a). We have carefully reviewed the record 

and Smith’s informal briefs and find no legal or factual basis 

to reverse the district court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm.

In Case No. 13-1494, Smith appeals the district 

court’s orders denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment 

and denying as moot his motion to strike. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 

59(e). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because 

the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

When the United States or its officer or agency is a 

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty 

days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or 

reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he 

timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 

214 (2007).

The district court’s orders were entered on the docket 

on January 23, 2013, and January 31, 2013, respectively. The 
4

notice of appeal was filed on April 10, 2013. Because Smith

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an 

extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the 

appeal. Smith’s motions for settlement and to strike this 

court’s prior order are denied. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

No. 13-1301 AFFIRMED

No. 13-1494 DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Robert A. Lento, certify that:





1.I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Limelight Networks, Inc.; and





2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: February 21, 2017 /s/ Robert A. Lento


Robert A. Lento,  Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4057

To protect the second amendment rights of individuals to carry firearms 
                 in units of the National Park System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 16, 2006

   Mr. Allen introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To protect the second amendment rights of individuals to carry firearms 
                 in units of the National Park System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Park Second Amendment 
Restoration and Personal Protection Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) the second amendment to the Constitution provides that 
        ``the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be 
        infringed'';
            (2) section 2.4(a)(1) of title 36, Code of Federal 
        Regulations, provides that ``except as otherwise provided in 
        this section and parts 7 (special regulations) and 13 (Alaska 
        regulations), the following are prohibited: (i) Possessing a 
        weapon, trap or net (ii) Carrying a weapon, trap or net (iii) 
        Using a weapon, trap or net'';
            (3) the regulations described in paragraph (2) prevent 
        individuals complying with Federal and State laws from 
        exercising the second amendment rights of the individuals while 
        at units of the National Park System;
            (4) the existence of different laws relating to the 
        transportation and possession of firearms at different units of 
        the National Park System entraps law-abiding gun owners while 
        at units of the National Park System; and
            (5) the Federal laws should make it clear that the second 
        amendment rights of an individual at a unit of the National 
        Park System should not be infringed.

SEC. 3. USE OF FIREARMS IN UNITS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including regulations), 
the possession or carrying of a firearm at a unit of the National Park 
System in compliance with Federal law and the law of the State in which 
the unit of the National Park System is located shall not be 
prohibited.
                                 <all>
```
WWW.EXFILE.COM -- 15216 --MATRITECH, INC. -- EXHIBIT 4.2 TO FORM 8-K


    EXHIBIT
      4.2

     

    
      
        


        ELECTION
          REGARDING PAYMENTS DUE JUNE 13, 2007 ON SERIES B

        15%
          SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES

        


        


        The
          undersigned Holder hereby elects to have Matritech, Inc. defer all payments
          due
          June 13, 2007 for interest on the Series B 15% Secured Convertible Promissory
          Notes dated January 22, 2007 held by the Holder to July 13, 2007.

        


        


        


        
          	 	
                  Holder:
                    ______________________

                  


                  


                  By:__________________________

                  Name:________________________

                  Title:_________________________

                  Date:_________________________