alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the
Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.





                                   BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
                                   PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST

Date:  November 12, 2002           By: /s/  Ron E. Hooper
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Ron E. Hooper,
                                       Senior Vice President, Royalty Management
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Hudson Ferreira MARTINS, Defendant, Appellant.

No. 07-2745.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

April 30, 2009.

*8Robert S. Sinsheimer with whom Lauren M. Thomas and Denner Pellegrino, LLP was on brief for appellant.

Jeremy M. Sternberg with whom Michael J. Sullivan was on brief for appellee.

Before BOUDIN, FARRIS * and HOWARD Circuit Judges.

*

 Of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

FARRIS, Circuit Judge.

Hudson Ferreira Martins alleges that the government failed to introduce sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to convict him of aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(l) (2000). We review a sufficiency of the evidence challenge de novo in the light most favorable to the government. *United States v. Marin,*523 F.3d 24, 27 (1st Cir.2008). The government was required to show that the Martins knew he was in possession of a false form of identification that belonged to another actual person. *See United States v. Godin,*534 F.3d 51, 53-54 (1st Cir.2008). The government introduced evidence that Martins had the social security card of Lionix Malave, and that Martins knew many specific details of Malave’s life. There was sufficient evidence. Defendant also contends that the aggravated penalties imposed by the Act do not apply to crimes involving the misuse of the statute whereby Congress explicitly provided that violations of “section 208 ... of the Social Security Act” fall within the aggravated identity theft statute. 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(c)(ll) (2000).

Martins next alleges that the District Court failed to instruct the jury that it had to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Martins knew that Malave was a person. We review for plain error. *United States v. Gonzalez-Velez,*466 F.3d 27, 34 (1st Cir.2006). To show plain error, Martins must show “that an error occurred which was clear or obvious and which not only affected the defendant’s substantial rights, but also seriously impaired the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” *United States v. Duarte,*246 F.3d 56, 60 (1st Cir.2001). There was substantial unchallenged evidence that Martins knew that Malave existed. There was no plain error.

Martins alleges that the District Court’s decision to sentence him for both aggravated identity theft, 18 U.S.C. § 1028A (2000), and use of a fraudulent social security number, 42 U.S.C. § 408(a)(7)(B) (2000), constitutes double jeopardy. We review de novo. *United States v. DeCologero,*530 F.3d 36, 71 (1st Cir.2008). The plain wording of the aggravated identity theft statute reveals that Congress “specifically authorize[d] cumulative punishment under two statutes.” *Missouri v. Hunter,*459 U.S. 359, 368, 103 S.Ct. 673, 74 L.Ed.2d 535 (1983).

AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00128-CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF Martin L. ROBERTSON, an Incapacitated Person

From the County Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. G18-22

Honorable Robert Lee Kelly, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 16, 2022

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of 

service to appellee, who has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RAMOND GOMEZ A/K/A

RAMON GOMEZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00044

- CR

Appeal from

355th District Court

of Hood County, Texas

(TC # CR12001)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore modify the judgment for Counts 1, 2, and 3 to reflect that punishment

was assessed by the trial court and not the jury. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial

court as so modified . This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15TH DAY OF J ANUARY, 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
------------
CERTIFICATION
-------------

I, David Vozick, Co-Principal Executive Officer of AFP Imaging Corporation,
certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging
     Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
             disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
             supervision, to enable that material information relating to the
             registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
             to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
             period in which this report is being prepared;

         b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
             and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
             the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
             the end of the period covered by this report based on such
             evaluation; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
    the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
             or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
             reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
             record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
             other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
             internal controls over financial reporting.




Date: February 13, 2004                           /s/__David Vozick_____________
                                                            David Vozick
                                                        Chairman of the Board
                                                  Co-Principal Executive Officer




                                       18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that an orientation and planning meeting of the Wyoming State Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 11:00 a.m. (MDT) on Saturday, February 7, 2015, in the Sage Room, Laramie County Library, 2200 Pioneer Avenue, Cheyenne, WY 82001. The purpose of the orientation meeting is to inform the newly appointed Committee members about the rules of operation of federal advisory committees and to select additional officers, as determined by the Committee. The purpose of the planning meeting is to discuss potential topics that the Committee may wish to study.

                    Persons who desire additional information may contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1961 Stout Street, Suite 13-201, Denver, CO 80294, phone 303-866-1040 and fax 303-866-1050, or email to Evelyn Bohor at                     *ebohor@usccr.gov.*

Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the above phone number, email or street address.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provision of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated: January 12, 2015.

David Mussatt,

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 2015-00582 Filed 1-15-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 486 

To require the Secretary of the Navy to procure helicopters under the VH–

3D presidential helicopter fleet replacement program that are wholly 

manufactured in the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2005 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Navy to procure helicopters 

under the VH–3D presidential helicopter fleet replacement program that are wholly manufactured in the 

United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VH–3D PRESIDENTIAL HELICOPTER FLEET RE4 PLACEMENT PROGRAM PROCUREMENT RE5 QUIREMENT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Navy may 

7 not enter into a contract for the procurement of a heli8 copter under the VH–3D presidential helicopter fleet re-
2

•S 486 IS

1 placement program unless the contract requires the heli2 copter to be wholly manufactured in the United States 

3 from parts wholly manufactured in the United States. 

4 (b) EXISTING CONTRACTS.—If a contract entered 

5 into after December 31, 2004, and before the date of the 

6 enactment of this section does not meet the requirements 

7 described in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Navy shall 

8 terminate such contract.

Æ
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3824 

To provide for uniform penalties for violating regulations within the National 

Park System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2006 

Mr. TALENT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for uniform penalties for violating regulations 

within the National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Park System 

5 Uniform Penalty Amendment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UNIFORM PENALTIES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first section of the Act of 

8 March 2, 1933 (47 Stat. 1420, chapter 180), is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘imprisonment.’’ and inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘imprisonment, unless the violation occurs at a park, site, 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3824 IS

1 monument, or memorial that is part of the National Park 

2 System, in which case the violation shall be subject to the 

3 appropriate penalty under section 3 of the National Park 

4 Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 3) and subchapter C of 

5 chapter 227 of part II of title 18, United States Code.’’. 

6 (b) ADMINISTRATION BY SECRETARY OF INTE7 RIOR.—Section 2(k) of the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 

8 U.S.C. 462(k)), is amended by striking ‘‘proceedings.’’ 

9 and inserting the following: ‘‘proceedings, unless the viola10 tion occurs at an area that is part of the National Park 

11 System, in which case the violation shall be subject to the 

12 appropriate penalty under section 3 of the National Park 

13 Service Organic Act (16 U.S.C. 3) and subchapter C of 

14 chapter 227 of part II of title 18, United States Code.’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,495]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 5, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Gerber Technology and Gerber Services, New York, New York.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of April 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10872 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Opinion issued February 25, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00133-CV

NO. 01-20-00134-CV

NO. 01-20-00135-CV

———————————

IN RE 829 YALE, LLC, TERRY FISHER, KAVAC HOLDINGS, KAVAC 

HOLDINGS, LLC, ALAN J. FISHER, ASSURANCE HOME WARRANTY, 

LLC, JETALL COMPANIES, INC., STEPHANIE ALVAREZ, SHAHNAZW 

CHOUDHRI, ALI CHOUDHRI AND BRAD PARKER, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, 829 Yale, LLC, Terry Fisher, Kavac Holdings, Kavac Holdings, 

LLC, Alan J. Fisher, Assurance Home Warranty, LLC, Jetall Companies, Inc., 

Stephanie Alvarez, Shahnazw Choudhri, Ali Choudhri and Brad Parker, have filed 
2

a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking to have this Court order the trial court to 

vacate an order granting a motion to recuse and to disqualify.

1

We deny relators petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly and Goodman.

1 The underlying case is Steadfast Funding, LLC, et al. v. 2017 Yale Development, 

LLC, et al., cause numbers 2019-23950, 2019-51432 & 2019-59191, pending in

the 125th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Kyle Carter

presiding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of American Metals  Service,  Inc. for the nine months ended May 31,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000319016
<NAME>                                         AMERICAN METALS SERVICE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,102
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,102
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             11
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          20
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,102
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  77
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  44
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   33
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               33
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                      33
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02
        


</TABLE>
#### State v. Lockhart

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 316

No. 033P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-174)

Denied 03/08/07
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 374 

To provide compensation to the Lower Brule and Crow Creek Sioux Tribes 

of South Dakota for damage to tribal land caused by Pick-Sloan projects 

along the Missouri River. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2005 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL

To provide compensation to the Lower Brule and Crow Creek 

Sioux Tribes of South Dakota for damage to tribal land 

caused by Pick-Sloan projects along the Missouri River.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Parity Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

6 Congress finds that— 

7 (1) the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Pro8 gram (authorized by section 9 of the Act of Decem9 ber 22, 1944 (commonly known as the ‘‘Flood Con-
2

•S 374 IS

1 trol Act of 1944’’) (58 Stat. 891)), was approved to 

2 promote the general economic development of the 

3 United States; 

4 (2) the Fort Randall and Big Bend dam and 

5 reservoir projects in South Dakota— 

6 (A) are major components of the Pick7 Sloan Missouri River Basin Program; and 

8 (B) contribute to the national economy; 

9 (3) the Fort Randall and Big Bend projects in10 undated the fertile bottom land of the Lower Brule 

11 and Crow Creek Sioux Tribes, which greatly dam12 aged the economy and cultural resources of the 

13 Tribes; 

14 (4) Congress has provided compensation to sev15 eral Indian tribes, including the Lower Brule and 

16 Crow Creek Sioux Tribes, that border the Missouri 

17 River and suffered injury as a result of 1 or more 

18 Pick-Sloan Projects; 

19 (5) the compensation provided to those Indian 

20 tribes has not been consistent; 

21 (6) Missouri River Indian tribes that suffered 

22 injury as a result of 1 or more Pick-Sloan Projects 

23 should be adequately compensated for those injuries, 

24 and that compensation should be consistent among 

25 the Tribes; and 
3

•S 374 IS

1 (7) the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe and the Crow 

2 Creek Sioux Tribe, based on methodology deter3 mined appropriate by the General Accounting Office, 

4 are entitled to receive additional compensation for 

5 injuries described in paragraph (6), so as to provide 

6 parity among compensation received by all Missouri 

7 River Indian tribes. 

8 SEC. 3. LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE. 

9 Section 4(b) of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Infra10 structure Development Trust Fund Act (Public Law 105–

11 132; 111 Stat. 2565) is amended by striking 

12 ‘‘$39,300,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$186,822,140’’. 

13 SEC. 4. CROW CREEK SIOUX TRIBE. 

14 Section 4(b) of the Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Infra15 structure Development Trust Fund Act of 1996 (Public 

16 Law 104–223; 110 Stat. 3027) is amended by striking 

17 ‘‘$27,500,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$105,917,853’’.

Æ