alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: September 13, 2005
                                        David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                      16,263,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,978,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,443,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,000
<INVENTORY>                                 16,607,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,847,000
<PP&E>                                     146,929,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             104,698,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              87,361,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,943,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   124,245,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (87,672,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                87,361,000
<SALES>                                     79,228,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            79,228,000
<CGS>                                       66,892,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               66,892,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,765,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,444,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,576,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (19,576,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,576,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20277

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WILLIAM LEROY FERGUSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-604-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent William Leroy

Ferguson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ferguson has filed a response.

The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of

Ferguson’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally

“cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before

the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-20277 Document: 00511382451 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
No. 10-20277

of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir.

2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review

of the record, counsel’s brief, and Ferguson’s response discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-20277 Document: 00511382451 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4062 

To freeze non-defense discretionary spending at fiscal year 2007 levels 

effective in fiscal year 2008. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2006 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To freeze non-defense discretionary spending at fiscal year 

2007 levels effective in fiscal year 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fiscal Responsibility 

5 Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL ENFORCEMENT. 

7 (a) ENFORCEMENT.—Section 312 of the Congres8 sional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 643) is amended by 

9 adding at the end the following: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 4062 IS

1 ‘‘(g) EXCESS NON-DEFENSE DISCRETIONARY FED2 ERAL SPENDING REDUCTION POINT OF ORDER.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—It shall not be in order in 

4 the House of Representatives or the Senate to con5 sider any bill or resolution (or amendment, motion, 

6 or conference report on that bill or resolution) that 

7 would cause spending for non-defense, non-trust8 fund, discretionary spending for the budget year to 

9 exceed the amount of spending for such activities in 

10 fiscal year 2007. 

11 ‘‘(2) ALLOCATIONS.—The allocations under sec12 tion 302(a) shall include allocations for the amount 

13 described in paragraph (1). 

14 ‘‘(3) SUPER MAJORITY WAIVER OR APPEAL.— 

15 This subsection may be waived or suspended in the 

16 Senate only by an affirmative vote of two-thirds of 

17 the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative 

18 vote of two-thirds of the Members of the Senate, 

19 duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Sen20 ate to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair 

21 on a point of order raised under this subsection.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall apply be23 ginning with fiscal year 2008. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, Martin G. Paravato, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: August 12, 2005 
|                       
|/s/ MARTIN G. PARAVATO 
|Martin G. Paravato     
|Chief Financial Officer



This certification shall not be deemed
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Ace. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Collins *v.*The State.

The evidence not absolutely requiring the verdict, the accused is entitled to a new trial for error in the charge of the court, to the effect that the jury in weighing the evidence might consider the *395character of the witnesses if known to them personally. *Chattanooga, Some & Columbus S. Co.*v. *Owen,*90 *Ga.*266.

March 5, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

Indictment for riot. Before Judge Milner. Catoosa superior court. February term, 1893.

R. J. & J. McCamy, for plaintiff’ in error.

A. W. Fite, solicitor-general, by A. S. Johnson, *contra.*

*Judgment reversed.*
#### Boston *v.*The State.

1. The State having proved that the accused killed his wife by shooting her, disappeared for a few minutes and then returned, made manifestations of grief and said that he shot her by accident and would not have done so for the world, it was competent for him to prove that he acted consistently with this theory by going in search of an officer, overtaking him and surrendering himself, saying at the time of the surrender, and as explanatory thereof, that he had killed his wife by accident, the interval between the killing and the surrender not exceeding twenty or thirty minutes according to the indications of the evidence, though the precise time did not definitely appear. His mere declaration, made subsequent to his arrest, to the effect that the killing was accidental and that he desired to return to see the body of his wife, was inadmissible; nor was the statement of the officer to other officers on turning over the prisoner to them admissible evidence, such statement consisting of a repetition of what the accused had said on surrendering himself.

2. It is not matter of right for the accused to make a second statement to the court and jury because the State has introduced additional evidence which strengthens the case against him.

3. There was no error in the charge of the court complained of; nor was the mere failure to charge, without request so to do, any cause for a new trial.

June 4, 1894.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Bartlett. Bibb superior court. November term, 1893.

John L. Hardeman, for plaintiff in error.

J. M. Terrell, attorney-general, and *W.*H. Belton, Jr., solicitor-general, *contra.*

*Judgment reversed.*
|   | Right to Purchase ____________ shares of Common Stock of Acquired Sales Corp. (subject to adjustment as provided herein) |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

|   Where    | X=    | the number of shares of Common Stock to be issued to the holder |
|--------------------------------|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Y= | the number of shares of Common Stock purchasable under the Warrant or, if only a portion of the Warrant is being exercised, the portion of the Warrant being exercised (at the date of such calculation) |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | A= | the average of the closing sale prices of the Common Stock for the ten (10) Trading Days immediately prior to (but not including) the Exercise Date, or Fair Market Value, whichever is less |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | B= | Purchase Price (as adjusted to the date of such calculation) |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

|   | ACQUIRED SALES CORP.   By:    __________________________________________    Gerard M. Jacobs    Title: CEO     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gamzio Mobile, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







Date: April 15, 2014                                                              /s/ Monika Sagar


Monika Sagar


Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, J. Lance Franke, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-5 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”);          2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;          4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this reportunder Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, theservicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement andadministration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and          5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as indenture trustee.Date: March 26, 2008   /s/ J. LANCE FRANKE J. Lance Franke  Vice President  (Senior Securitization Officer)  SLM Funding LLC
Exhibit 32.2
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cubic  Energy,  Inc.  (the
     "Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2007 as filed
     with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
     "Report"), I, the CFO, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
     pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2007                                 Signature: /s/ James L. Busby
                                                             -------------------
                                                             James L. Busby, CFO

                             Exhibit 32.2 - Page 1
EX-34.2
(logo) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
214 N. Tryon Street
Ste 3600
Charlotte NC 28202
Telephone (704) 344 7500
Facsimile (704) 344 4100


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Bank of America, National Association:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Assessment
Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Compliance
Statement"), that Bank of America, National Association (the "Company") complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions
involving commercial mortgage loan transactions that involved an offer or sale
of asset-backed securities that were required to be registered on or after
January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2007 and for the
year then ended, excluding the criteria which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the
Platform as indicated in Appendix A of the Compliance Statement. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset- backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Bank of America, National
Association complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for the Platform is fairly stated, in
all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers L.L.P

February 28, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3928 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3928

To provide for the Office of Domestic Preparedness of the Department of 
  Homeland Security to provide grants to local governments for public 
  awareness education relating to preparedness for natural disasters, 
               terrorist attacks, and influenza pandemic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2006

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the Office of Domestic Preparedness of the Department of 
  Homeland Security to provide grants to local governments for public 
  awareness education relating to preparedness for natural disasters, 
               terrorist attacks, and influenza pandemic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PUBLIC AWARENESS PREPAREDNESS GRANTS.

    Section 430 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 238) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Public Awareness Preparedness Grants.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Office of Domestic Preparedness may 
        provide grants to local governments for the promotion of public 
        awareness, through media campaigns and educational materials, 
        relating to preparedness for natural disasters, terrorist 
        attacks, and influenza pandemic.
            ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There are 
        authorized to be appropriated such sums as necessary to carry 
        out this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered October 1 7 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00327

- CV

ERIKA JACOBS , Appellant

V.

GREYHOUND BUS LINES CORPORATE OFFICE , Appellee

On Appeal fr om the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 20

- 03277

O RDER Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Garcia

Before the C o urt is appellant ’ s September 7, 2022 “ Motion ” in which she

complains of this Court ’ s August 2, 2022 memorandum opinion. We construe this

motion as a motion for rehearing and DENY the motion.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE