alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Q Lotus Holdings, Inc.




500 N Dearborn St.  Suite 605, Chicago, IL  60654





May 20, 2011




Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC


Four Executive Boulevard – Suite 200


Suffern, NY  10901


Attention: Josh Goldstein





Re:  2nd Amendment to Promissory Note





Dear Josh:





In accordance with our discussions, Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC hereby agree to further amend the Promissory Note dated February 23, 2011 between Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) such that, notwithstanding anything contained in the Promissory Note to the contrary:





1.
Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. (“Obligor’) hereby promises to pay to the order of Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC (“Payee’) the principal sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000); and





2.
The Maturity Date is hereby extended to June 30, 2011.





Please acknowledge your acceptance of the above change by executing this amendment below.





Q Lotus Holdings, Inc.





By:
/S/ GARY ROSENBERGGary RosenbergIts:
CEO





Understood and Agreed to this 20th day of May, 2011.





Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC





By:
/S/ JOSH GOLDSTEINJosh GoldsteinIts:
General Partner
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4075 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4075

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply the joint return 
 limitation for capital gains exclusion to certain post-marriage sales 
             of principal residences by surviving spouses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 5, 2006

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to apply the joint return 
 limitation for capital gains exclusion to certain post-marriage sales 
             of principal residences by surviving spouses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF JOINT RETURN LIMITATION FOR CAPITAL GAINS 
              EXCLUSION TO CERTAIN POST-MARRIAGE SALES OF PRINCIPAL 
              RESIDENCES BY SURVIVING SPOUSES.

    (a) Sale Within 2 Years of Spouse's Death.--Section 121(b) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to limitations) is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Special rule for certain sales by surviving 
        spouses.--In the case of a sale or exchange of property by an 
        unmarried individual whose spouse is deceased on the date of 
        such sale, paragraph (1) shall be applied by substituting 
        `$500,000' for `$250,000' if such sale occurs not later than 2 
        years after the date of death of such spouse and the 
        requirements of paragraph (2)(A) were met immediately before 
        such date of death.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to sales or exchanges after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, May 27, 2009, 9 a.m. to May 27, 2009, 2 p.m., Courtyard by Marriott Rockville, 2500 Research Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 24, 2009, Volume 74, Number 78.                

The date of the meeting was changed from May 19, 2009 to May 27, 2009. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: May 6, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-11247 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**Exhibit 32.2**

**** 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

            In connection with the Report of Acquired Sales Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) I, Gerard M. Jacobs, Principal Financial Officer hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

 

a.                   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

b.                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

Dated December 30, 2009

 

----
#### Barklee 94 LLC, Appellant, v Jane O'Keefe, Respondent.

Decided May 5, 2009

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,640
<SECURITIES>                                     1,057
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,832
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          131,970
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,348
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,833
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       150
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (27,993)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (27,993)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.006)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.006)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22765-22766]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11722 and <greek-i>11723]


Georgia Disaster Number GA-00021

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Georgia (FEMA-1833-DR), dated 04/23/
2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straight-line 
Winds.
    Incident Period: 03/26/2009 through 04/13/2009.

DATES: Effective Date: 04/13/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/22/2009.
    EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/23/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Georgia, dated 04/23/2009 is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
03/26/2009 and continuing through 04/13/2009.

[[Page 22766]]

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E9-11285 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10895]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,814]


Sperian Protective Gloves, USA, Buffalo, NY; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on April 17, 2009 in response 
to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of 
Sperian Protective Gloves, USA, Buffalo, New York.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 21st day of April 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10895 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[For
      the Southern Iowa BioEnergy LLC Letterhead]

    


    RESCISSION
      OFFER ELECTION FORM

     

    ____________,
      2007

    



      _______ I
        accept
        this rescission offer. Please refund the purchase price of the membership
        units
        to me plus interest.


     


      _______ I
        decline
        this rescission offer and will continue my investment. I understand that
        my
        right to sue under the securities laws of ___________________, with respect
        to
        the material changes to Southern Iowa BioEnergy LLC’s initial public offering is
        extinguished with this offer of rescission.


    

      
        	 
	 	 

	
                (Investor’s
                  name and signature)

              	 	
                (Date)

              


      

    

     

    In
      order
      to register your election, you must return this completed Rescission Offer
      Election Form to us at the following address:

    


    SOUTHERN
      IOWA BIOENERGY LLC

    Attn:
      William T. Higdon

    115
      S.
      Linden Street


      Lamoni,
        Iowa 50140



     

    IF
      YOU WISH TO CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, YOU MUST CHECK THE BOX AS INDICATED
      ABOVE
      AND RETURN THIS FORM TO US. YOU MAY CHANGE YOUR ELECTION AT ANYTIME PRIOR TO
      EXPIRATION OF THE RESCISSION OFFER. THE RESCISSION OFFER EXPIRES ON
      ______________, 2007. ONCE YOU RETURN THE COMPLETED FORM AND THE RESCISSION
      OFFER EXPIRES, YOUR ELECTION TO CONFIRM IS IRREVOCABLE, AND YOUR INVESTMENT
      WILL
      NOT BE RETURNED, UNLESS WE REJECT YOUR SUBSCRIPTION. IF THIS FORM IS NOT
      COMPLETED AND RECEIVED BY US WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF RECEIPT, YOUR RESCISSION
      RIGHTS ARE WAIVED, AND YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO WITHDRAW YOUR
      INVESTMENT.
##### 



FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of June, 2004 Commission File Number: 00-30082 Envoy Communications Group Inc.(Translation of registrants name into English)172 John Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 1X5(Address of principal executive offices)
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F  þ
    
    Form 40-F  o
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Yes  o
    
    No  þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- Signatures Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Envoy Communications Group Inc.(Registrant)By:
    /s/  Geoffrey B. GenoveseName:
    Geoffrey B. GenoveseTitle:
    President, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Dated:  August 20, 2004




---



##### 



Exhibit Index Exhibit
    
    
    Description99.1
    
    Consolidated Financial Statements for the six months ended June 30, 200499.2
    
    Certification of Interim Filings
Exhibit
32





Certification
Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





(18
U.S.C. 1350)





Persuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) the
undersigned General Partners of TASA Products Limited, a Washington limited
partnership (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of such General
Partner's knowledge and belief, that:





1. The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Sept. 31, 2008 (the "Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/MICHEL
      E. MAES
              /s/JAMES
      R. STEFFEYMichel
      E. Maes
              James
      R. SteffeyCo-General
      Partner
              Co-General
      PartnerDate:
      10-14-08
              Date:
      10-14-08
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3990 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3990

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 216 Oak Street in Farmington, Minnesota, as the ``Hamilton H. Judson 
                             Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2006

Mr. Coleman (for himself and Mr. Dayton) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 216 Oak Street in Farmington, Minnesota, as the ``Hamilton H. Judson 
                             Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAMILTON H. JUDSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 216 Oak Street in Farmington, Minnesota, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Hamilton H. Judson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Hamilton 
H. Judson Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,918]


Lehman Brothers, Incorporated, New Haven, CT; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 16, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by the Rapid Response Coordinator for the State of 
Connecticut on behalf of workers of Lehman Brothers, Incorporated, New 
Haven, Connecticut.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10900 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
### The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 15, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00703

- CR

Charlotte A. LEAL

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR5724 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant is attempting to appeal the trial court’ s denial of h er motion to suppress signed on October 8, 2014 . It appears, however, from the doc uments before the Court that the case has not yet proceeded to trial and judgment.

As a general rule, an appellate court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant only after a final judgment of conviction. Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 1998, no pet.);
McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). An intermediate appellate court has no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders absent express authority. Ex parte

A

polinar, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Wright, 969 S.W.2d at 589. An order denying a motion to suppress is not an interlocutory order that an intermediate appellate court has express authority to consider. See Wright , 969 S.W.2d at 589 (noti ng types o f appealable interlocutory orders); Brandon v. State, No. 05

– 10

– 01040

– CR, 2010 WL 3529528, *1 (Tex. App.

— D a llas Sept. 13, 2010, no pet.) (m em. op., not designated for publication).

Therefore , Appellant is ORDERED to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction within twenty days from the date of this order

.

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the jurisdictional

issue.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court

on this 15th day of October, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32

                          ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

                   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350


     To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
December 31, 2003, containing financial statements for the quarter then ended,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of
1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aspen
Exploration Corporation for the periods presented.



February 11, 2004



/s/ Robert A. Cohan
-------------------
Robert A. Cohan, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diatect International Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay W. Downs, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 15, 2004

By:

/s/ Jay W. Downs________

Name:

Jay W. Downs,

Title:

Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer