alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of MASS Petroleum Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vitaly Melnikov, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| 1    

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

2

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Vitaly Melnikov

Vitaly Melnikov

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer

March 16, 2010

 

 

 

                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### In the Matter of John Novak, Respondent, v Betsy Novak, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 885]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Schauer, J.), entered November 28, 2012, which vacated a temporary order of support entered October 18, 2012, directing the father to pay child support in the sum of $183 per week.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The order appealed from vacated a temporary order of support entered October 18, 2012, directing the father to pay child support in the sum of $183 per week. Since the order appealed from is not an order of disposition, it is not appealable as of right *(see*Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; *Matter of Gertzulin v Gertzulin,*27 AD3d 562, 562 [2006]; *Matter of Ciotti v Butera,*24 AD2d 983 [1965]), and we decline to grant leave to appeal. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned, Shubo Yu, Chief Executive officer of China Jianye Fuel, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
the annual report on Form 10-K of China Jianye Fuel, Inc for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Jianye Fuel, Inc.




Dated: October 13, 2010




/s/ Shubo YuName:  Shubo YuTitle:  Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to China Jianye Fuel, Inc. and will be retained by China Jianye Fuel, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



SCHEDULE 14A Information Required in Proxy Statement SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:o      Preliminary Proxy Statemento      Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))o      Definitive Proxy Statementþ      Definitive Additional Materialso      Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12 NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):þ     No fee required.o     Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.  1.

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:2.

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:3.

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined):4.

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:5.

Total fee paid:  o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by
registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date
of its filing.  1)

Amount Previously Paid:2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:3)

Filing Party:4)

Date Filed:




---



##### 



NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100
Brampton ON L6T 5P6 Canada May 26, 2005 Dear Nortel Shareholder: We have previously sent to you proxy material for the combined 2004 and 2005 annual meeting of
shareholders of Nortel Networks Corporation to be held on June 29, 2005. In the proxy circular and
proxy statement dated April 29, 2005 and the form of proxy, your Board of Directors has unanimously
recommended that shareholders vote For Resolutions 1  4, and Against Resolutions 5  15. Your vote is important, no matter how many or how few shares you may own. To ensure that your
shares are represented at the meeting, please vote TODAY by fax,viathe Internet, or by signing,
dating and returning the enclosed form of proxy in the envelope provided. Yours truly, /s/ L.R. Wilson
L. R. Wilson
Chairman of the Board  Your vote must be received by Computershare Trust Company of Canada
no later than 10:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Savings Time on June 28, 2005. IMPORTANT REMINDER:You can vote easily by fax orviathe Internet.
Please follow the simple instructions on the enclosed form of proxy. If you have any questions, or need assistance in voting
your shares, please call our proxy solicitor,INNISFREE M&A INCORPORATED
For English, call toll-free, at 1-877-825-8772
For French, call toll-free, at 1-877-825-8777
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Real Estate Associates Limited III (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   |      /s/Steven D. Cordes  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                             |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |
|   |                                               |
|   |      /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                            |
|   | Date: August 13, 2009                              |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21822]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11043]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-09-014]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

Time and Date: May 14, 2009 at 1:30 p.m.

Place: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Agenda for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-462 and 731-TA-1156-1158 (Preliminary) 
(Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Indonesia, Taiwan, and 
Vietnam)--briefing and vote. (The Commission is currently scheduled to 
transmit its determinations to the Secretary of Commerce on or before 
May 15, 2009; Commissioners' opinions are currently scheduled to be 
transmitted to the Secretary of Commerce on or before May 22, 2009.)
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: May 7, 2009.
William R. Bishop,
Hearings and Meetings Coordinator.
[FR Doc. E9-11043 Filed 5-7-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11222]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD-2009-0225; FRL-8904-4]


Board of Scientific Counselors (BOSC), 2009 Clean Air 
Subcommittee Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of a meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and 
Development (ORD), announces the cancellation of a meeting of the Board 
of Scientific Counselors (BOSC) Clean Air Subcommittee. This meeting, a 
teleconference on April 30, 2009, was announced in a Federal Register 
Notice published on April 8, 2009 (74 FR 15967). The purpose of this 
meeting was to provide an overview of ORD and the Clean Air program, 
and to prepare for the June 8-10, 2009 face-to-face meeting of the 
subcommittee. The proposed agenda topics will be covered during the May 
21, 2009 meeting (telecon).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Designated Federal Officer via 
mail at: Heather Drumm, Mail Code 8104-R, Office of Science Policy, 
Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, 
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460; via phone/voice 
mail at: (202) 564-8239; via fax at: (202) 565-2911; or via e-mail at: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bfdbcdcad2d291d7dadecbd7dacdffdacfde91d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="107462657d7d3e78757164787562507560713e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: May 5, 2009.
Fred Hauchman,
Director, Office of Science Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-11222 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Anderson, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-3 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Custodian, GMAC Mortgage, LLC
    f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ John Anderson
    Signature

    Managing Director
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 31.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Cesar M. Garcia, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of IRIS International,Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such valuation. 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 11, 2004
#### Yodit Amde ZELLEKE, Petitioner, v. U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

No. 06-13022

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Oct. 17, 2006.

*276Kerry Elizabeth McGrath, Decatur, GA, for Petitioner.

Jamil N. Jaffer, David V. Bernal, US-DOJ, Office of Immigration Litigation, Papú Sandhu, Andrew C. MacLachlan, David M. McConnell, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before TJOFLAT, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The sole issue before us on this petition to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) December 17, 2004 decision affirming the May 6, 2003 decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) is whether substantial evidence supports the BIA’s and the IJ’s determination that Petitioner faded to establish eligibility for protection under the U.N. Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We conclude that such determination is supported by substantial evidence and therefore deny the petition.

Petitioner is an Ethiopian citizen born and raised in Eritrea. Her mother is of Eritrean ethnicity; her father, now deceased, was Ethiopian. In 1998, a border war broke out between Eritrea and Ethiopia. During the war, great numbers of Eritreans and Ethiopians of Eritrean ethnicity were deported from Ethiopia to Eritrea. The hostilities formally ended in 2000, when the two countries signed a peace accord. Thereafter, such deportations generally ceased.

Petitioner failed to present any evidence that she would be tortured if removed to Ethiopia. Moreover, she presented no evidence that earlier, while in Ethiopia, she, her mother or her brothers had been tortured. In short, nothing in the record supports her position that currently similarly situated Eritreans or Ethiopians of Eritrean ethnicity are being tortured on account of their ethnicity.

Because Petitioner failed to establish that it is more likely than not that she will be detained arbitrarily by the Ethiopian government and tortured if returned to Ethiopia, the IJ and BIA properly denied her CAT relief.

PETITION DENIED.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3937 

To require the Federal Aviation Administration to finalize the proposed rule 

relating to the reduction of fuel tank flammability exposure, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Aviation Administration to finalize 

the proposed rule relating to the reduction of fuel tank 

flammability exposure, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flight 800 Improve5 ment Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF FAA RULE RELATING TO 

7 FUEL TANK FLAMMABILITY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, not later than January 1, 2007, the Federal 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3937 IS

1 Aviation Administration shall finalize and implement, in 

2 accordance with paragraph (2), the rule proposed by the 

3 Federal Aviation Administration relating to the reduction 

4 of fuel tank flammability in transport category airplanes 

5 (70 Fed. Reg. 70922, dated November 23, 2005) and op6 erators and manufacturers of airplanes shall take appro7 priate action to comply with the rule. 

8 (b) MATCHING FUNDS.—For each of the fiscal years 

9 2007 through 2016, the Administrator of the Federal 

10 Aviation Administration may provide financial assistance 

11 to operators and manufacturers of airplanes in an amount 

12 that does not exceed $1 for every $1 incurred by such op13 erators and manufacturers for complying with the rule de14 scribed in subsection (a). 

15 (c) STUDY AND REPORT.—Not later than 180 days 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Adminis17 trator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall con18 duct a study and report to Congress regarding ways to 

19 improve the safety and reduce the flammability of fuel 

20 tanks that are located on the wings of airplanes. 

21 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

22 are authorized to be appropriated $40,000,000 for each 

23 of the fiscal years 2007 through 2016, to carry out the 

24 provisions of subsection (b). 

Æ 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Feliciano, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 694]

Appeal by the defendant from a second resentence of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Neary, J.), imposed November 13, 2008, as amended December 5, 2008, upon his convictions of manslaughter in the second degree, assault in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the second degree, leaving the scene of an incident without reporting, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, reckless driving, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the second degree, driving at an unsafe and imprudent speed, failing to stop at a steady red light, and operating a motor vehicle with a fictitious certificate of inspection, after a nonjury trial, the second resentence being a period of postrelease supervision of five years upon the conviction of assault in the second degree in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed by the same court (West, J.) upon his first resentence on February 14, 2001, and the other sentences remaining unchanged.

Ordered that the second resentence is affirmed.

Inasmuch as the defendant received the minimum period of postrelease supervision permitted by law that could have been imposed upon his conviction of assault in the second degree, this Court has no authority to reduce the term of postrelease supervision as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *958
      *(see*CPL 470.20 [6]; Penal Law § 70.45 [2]; *People v Fiorello,*97 AD3d 763 [2012]). Skelos, J.P, Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.