Exhibit 34.1

[LOGO] ERNST & YOUNG      Ernst & Young LLP               Phone: (1)214-969-8000
                          2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 1500    www.ey.com
                          Dallas, TX 75201 USA


             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Managers
Nationstar Mortgage LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that
Nationstar Mortgage LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB
for the first and second lien residential mortgage loans for which the Company
acted as Servicer other than (a) transactions registered prior to compliance
with Regulation AB and (b) Fannie Mae residential mortgage loan securitizations
(the Platform), except for the instances of material noncompliance described
therein, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, and except for the
criteria set forth in Sections 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), and
1122(d)(4)(xi)-(xii), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by
this report. See Exhibit B of Management's certification for the asset backed
transactions covered by this platform. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with
the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions
and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the
Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria and as permitted by the
Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of
Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations ("Interpretation 17.06").
Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have
occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the
balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period
covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions.
Although the Company is responsible for assessing compliance with Section
1122(d)(4)(iii) of Regulation AB, there were no servicing activities performed
by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2007 that required this
servicing criterion to be complied with. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.


<PAGE>


As described in management's assertion, for servicing criterion 1122(d)(2)(i),
the Company has engaged a vendor to perform the activities required by this
servicing criterion. The Company has determined that this vendor is not
considered a "servicer" as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the
Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by
Interpretation 17.06. As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has
asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide
reasonable assurance that the vendors' activities comply in all material
respects with servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is
solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply
Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described in its
assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company's
eligibility to apply Interpretation 17.06.

Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with servicing
criteria 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(vii)(B), 1122(d)(2)(vii)(D), 1122(d)(4)(iv)
and 1122(d)(4)(xiv) applicable to the Company during the year ended December 31,
2007. 1122(d)(2)(i) - Payments on pool assets were not deposited into the
custodial bank accounts within two business days of receipt, or such other
number of days specified in the transaction agreements. 1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) -
Reconciliations were not prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank
statement cutoff date, or such other number of days specified in the transaction
agreements. 1122(d)(2)(vii)(D) - Reconciliations did not contain explanations
for reconciling items, and reconciling items were not resolved within 90
calendar days of their original identification, or such other number of days
specified in the transaction agreements. 1122(d)(4)(iv) - Loan payoffs were not
posted to the applicable servicer's obligor records within two business days
after receipt, or such other number of days specified in the transaction
agreements, and were not allocated to principal and interest in accordance with
the related pool asset documents. 1122(d)(4)(xiv) - Loan charge-offs were not
recognized and recorded in accordance with the transaction agreements.

The information in the Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable
Servicing Criteria in Items 2 and 3 of Exhibit C (i.e., vendor non-compliance
and vendor monitoring) is presented by the Company for information purposes.
Such information has not been subjected to the procedures applied in our
examination of management's assertion as described above, and accordingly, we
express no opinion on it.

In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the fourth
paragraph, the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria,
including servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(i) for which compliance is determined
based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007.


                                                               /s/ Ernst & Young


March 15,2008