alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-33.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Document Custody
1015 - 10th Avenue SE
Minneapolis, MN 55014


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as
follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: /s/ Shari Gillund
Its: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 29, 2008
S. 384

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the fourth day of January, two thousand and five

An Act

To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial Government

Records Interagency Working Group for 2 years.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF WORKING GROUP.

Section 802(b)(1) of the Japanese Imperial Government Disclosure Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–567; 114 Stat. 2865) is amended

by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and inserting ‘‘6 years’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of HarborView Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-2 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. as Servicer, Central Mortgage
    Company as Servicer and Residential Funding Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Diane Courtney
    Signature

    Vice President
    (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Wells Fargo Bank,
     N.A., in its capacity as Master Servicer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oman Gutierrez, Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 687]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Cocker Snyder, J.), rendered on or about February 10, 2000, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Nardelli, Sweeny and DeGrasse, JJ.
Order issued M ay 27, 201 5 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

________________________________________

No. 05

- 1 4

- 0 0 554

- CR

No. 05

- 14

- 00555

- CR

________________________________________

JARMAL DEON SPEED , Appellant



### V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee



### O R D E R

Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT the December 12, 201 4 mo tion of

Nanette Hendrickson for leave to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal. We DIRECT the

Clerk of the Court to remove Nanette Hendrickson as counsel of record for appellant. We

DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order and all fut ure correspondence to

Jarmal Deon Speed , TDCJ No. 1926279

, Daniel Unit, 938 South FM 1673, Snyder, Texas,

79549.

/ Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4085 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rate of the 

excise tax on certain wooden arrows. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 6, 2006 

Mr. SMITH (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the rate of the excise tax on certain wooden arrows. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RATE OF EXCISE TAX FOR 

4 CERTAIN WOODEN ARROWS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.— 

6 (1) MODIFICATION OF RATE.—Paragraph (2) of 

7 section 4061(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

8 1986 (relating to arrows) is amended by redesig9 nating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C) and 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 4085 IS

1 by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following 

2 new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(B) CERTAIN WOODEN ARROWS.—There 

4 is hereby imposed on the first sale by the man5 ufacturer, producer, or importer of any wooden 

6 shaft (whether sold separately or incorporated 

7 as part of a finished or unfinished product) of 

8 a type used in the manufacture of any arrow 

9 which after its assembly— 

‘‘(i) measures 5 10 ⁄16 of an inch or less in 

11 diameter, 

12 ‘‘(ii) measures 18 inches or more 

overall but less than 281 13 ⁄2 inches overall in 

14 length, and 

15 ‘‘(iii) is not suitable for use with a 

16 bow described in paragraph (1)(A), 

17 a tax equal to 5 cents per shaft.’’. 

18 (2) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Subparagraph 

19 (A) of section 4161(b)(2) of such Code is amended 

20 by inserting ‘‘(other than an arrow described in sub21 paragraph (B))’’ after ‘‘the manufacture of any 

22 arrow’’. 

23 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.— 

24 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (C) of section 

25 4161(b)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•S 4085 IS

1 redesignated by subsection (a)(1), is amended by re2 designating clause (ii) as clause (iii) and by inserting 

3 after clause (i) the following new clause: 

4 ‘‘(ii) CERTAIN WOODEN ARROWS.—In 

5 the case of any calendar year beginning 

6 after 2007, the 5-cent amount specified in 

7 subparagraph (B) shall be increased by an 

8 amount equal to the product of— 

9 ‘‘(I) such amount, multiplied by 

10 ‘‘(II) the cost-of-living adjust11 ment determined under section 1(f)(3) 

12 for such calendar year, determined by 

13 substituting ‘2006’ for ‘1992’ in sub14 paragraph (B) thereof.’’. 

15 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Clause (iii) of 

16 section 4161(b)(2)(C) of such Code, as redesignated 

17 by paragraph (1), is amended by striking ‘‘clause 

18 (i)’’ and inserting ‘‘clause (i) or (ii)’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to shafts first sold after the date 

21 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 12

BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(dollars in thousands, except ratios)



|                                                           |  |                        |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                           |  | Year Ended December 31 |        
|                                                           |  | 2010                   |         |   | 2009 |   |         | 2008 | 
|Available earnings:                                        |  |                        |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Income (loss) before income taxes                          |  | $                      | 63,577  |   |      | $ | 168,170 |      |  | $ | (47,709 | )
|Fixed charges                                              |  |                        | 69,915  |   |      |   | 80,877  |      |  |   | 88,485  |  
|                                                           |  |                        |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Total earnings (losses) before fixed charges               |  | $                      | 133,492 |   |      | $ | 249,047 |      |  | $ | 40,776  |  
|                                                           |  |                        |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|                                                           |  |                        |        
|Fixed charges:                                             |  |                        |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Interest expense                                           |  | $                      | 64,782  |   |      | $ | 74,263  |      |  | $ | 82,945  |  
|Capitalized interest                                       |  |                        | 5       |   |      |   |        |      |  |   | 71      |  
|Interest factor related to noncapitalized leases           |  |                        | 5,128   |   |      |   | 6,614   |      |  |   | 5,469   |  
|                                                           |  |                        |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Total fixed charges                                        |  | $                      | 69,915  |   |      | $ | 80,877  |      |  | $ | 88,485  |  
|                                                           |  |                        |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|                                                           |  |                        |        
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                         |  |                        | 1.91    | x |      |   | 3.08    | x    |  |   | 0.46    | x
|Excess of fixed charges over earnings before fixed charges |  | $                      |        |   |      | $ |        |      |  | $ | 47,709  |
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22 - 51064 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Luis Ferney Campuzano -**  **Henao,** Defendant
— Appellant **, consolidated with** 

**_____________** No. 22 - 51066

**_____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Luis Ferney Campuzano Henao ,**  Defendant
— Appellant **.** United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 26, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-51064 Document: 00516765867 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/26/20232 No. 22 - 51064 c/w No. 22 - 51066 Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC Nos. 4:22 - CR - 609 - 1, 4:22 - CR - 616 - 1

**______________________________** Before **King, Higginson,** and **Willett,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Luis Ferney Campuzano - Henao appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after removal from the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b). He also appeals the revocation of his supervised release and the sentence imposed upon revocation; however, because he does not address either the validity of the revocation or the revocation sentence, he has abandoned any challenge to those issues on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224 - 25 (5th Cir. 1993). With respect to his illegal reentry conviction and sentence, Campuzano - Henao argues that the application of § 1326(b)’s enhanced penalty provision is unconstitutional because it permits a defendant to be sentenced above the statutory maximum of § 1326(a) b ased on the fact of a prior conviction that was not alleged in the indictment or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He has filed an unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief conceding that the issue is foreclosed by Almendarez - To rres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), see United States v. Pervis , 937 F.3d 546, 553 - 54 (5th Cir. 2019), and explaining that he raises the issue to preserve it for Supreme Court review.

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. Case: 22-51064 Document: 00516765867 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/26/202322 - 51064 c/w No. 22 - 51066

3 Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp ., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the motion is **GRANTED** , and the district court’s judgments are **AFFIRMED** . Case: 22-51064 Document: 00516765867 Page: 3 Date Filed: 05/26/2023
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 441 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 

classification of a motorsports entertainment complex. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2005 

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself, Mr. NELSON of Florida, Mr. KYL, Mr. ALLEN, 

Mr. BUNNING, Mrs. DOLE, and Mr. CHAMBLISS) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the classification of a motorsports entertainment complex. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motorsports Fairness 

5 and Permanency Act of 2005’’. 
2 

•S 441 IS

1 SEC. 2. 7-YEAR CLASS LIFE FOR MOTORSPORTS ENTER2 TAINMENT COMPLEX FACILITIES MADE PER3 MANENT. 

4 Paragraph (15) of section 168(i) of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 (relating to motorsports entertainment 

6 complex) is amended by striking subparagraph (D). 

Æ
#### Grady Edward LLOYD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie L. EAGLETON, Warden; Joette D. Scarborough, Assistant Director of Institutional Classification; Arthur Houston, State Classification, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-6996.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 20, 2006.

*467Grady Edward Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, Willcox, Buyck & Williams, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part, vacated in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Grady Edward Lloyd appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Lloyd v. Eagleton,*No. 9:05-cv-02314-DCN, 2006 WL 1341223 (D.S.C. May 16, 2006). However, because Lloyd’s action was dismissed upon a grant of summary judgment to the Defendants, we vacate the district court’s order to the extent it assessed a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART.*
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 July 28, 2005
  BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION
  Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
    
    001-31524
(Commission File Number)
    
    37-1446709
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)12865 Pointe Del Mar
Suite 200
Del Mar, California
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    
    
    92014
(Zip Code)
 (858) 481-8500
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02.
    
    Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
  Item 9.01.
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (c)
    
    Exhibits:
 99.1
    
    
    Press Release issued by Brookfield Homes Corporation on July 28, 2005.
 1




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
   BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ PAUL G. KERRIGANPaul G. KerriganExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 2




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit Number
    
    Exhibit99.1
    
    
    Press Release issued by Brookfield Homes Corporation on July 28, 2005.
AMENDMENT


EXHIBIT 4.6 







AMENDMENT

TO THE

PROMISSORY NOTE DATED DECEMBER 5, 2005

TO HARMEL S. RAYAT







AMENDMENT dated January 18, 2006 (the “Note Amendment”) to that certain Promissory Note dated December 5, 2005 (the “Note”), issued by Hepalife Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), to Harmel S. Rayat, in the original principal amount of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000), the original executed copy of which is attached hereto.




1.

Amendment to Note.  In accordance with the terms and provisions of Section 4(a) of the Note, the Note is hereby amended as follows:




(a)  By deleting section 1 thereof and substituting the following in lieu thereof:




1.  Payment.  (a)  The Outstanding Principal balance of the Note, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon shall be paid by the Company to the Holder, at the address as provided to the Company by the Holder in writing, in lawful money of the United States of America upon the earlier to occur of:




(1)  The occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in Section 2 of the Note), which occurrence shall be deemed written demand by the holder for payment of the note; or




(2)  The Company’s receipt of written demand for payment from the Holder.




(b)  Interest shall accrue with respect to the unpaid principal amount of the loan from the date of this Note until such principal is paid at a rate of eight and one-half percent (8.50%) per annum (computed on the basis of a 365-day year).




(c)  Company shall have the right at any time and without penalty to prepay, in whole or in part, the principal outstanding and/or the interest accrued hereunder.”




2.

Balance of provisions of Note to Remain Unchanged and in Force and Effect.  Except as amended by Section 1 of this Note Amendment, all of the other terms and provisions of the Note remain unchanged and in full force and effect.




3.

Binding Effect; Assigns.  This Note Amendment and all of the provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Holder, his successors and assigns.




4.

Governing Law.  This Note Amendment and the validity, interpretation and performance of the terms and provisions hereof shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Florida, without regard to the principles of conflicts of laws.











5.

Headings.  The headings used in this Note Amendment are for convenience of  reference only and shall not be construed to affect the meaning or construction of any of the provisions hereof.




6.

Entire Amendment.  This Note Amendment constitutes the entire amendment of the Note, and supersedes all prior agreements and undertakings, both written and oral, between the Company and the Holder with respect to such specific subject matter.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Note Amendment to be executed this 18th day of January, 2006.







Hepalife Technologies, Inc.




By

/s/ Arian Soheili

Name:

Arian Soheili

Title:

Secretary and Treasurer
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Residential Funding Company, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QS4 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the Series Supplement, dated as of March 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), among Residential Accredit Loans, Inc., as company, Residential Funding Company, LLC, as master servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report
on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director