23110 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 94 / Monday, May 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2008–0731; Directorate 

Identifier 2008–NM–058–AD; Amendment 

39–15812; AD 2009–04–06] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing 

Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B 

SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 

747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747– 

400F, 747SR, and 747SP Series 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting 

typographical errors in an existing 

airworthiness directive (AD) that was 

published previously in the Federal 

Register. The error resulted in two 

incorrect paragraph references. This AD 

applies to certain Boeing Model 747– 

100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747– 

200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 

747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, 

and 747SP series airplanes. This AD 

requires repetitive detailed inspections 

of the aft pressure bulkhead for 

indications of ‘‘oil cans’’ and previous 

oil can repairs at reduced compliance 

times, and corrective actions if 

necessary. 

DATES: Effective April 2, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) 

is the Document Management Facility, 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, M–30, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan 

Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe 

Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind 

Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 

98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6437; 

fax (425) 917–6590. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 29, 2009, the FAA issued AD 

2009–04–06, amendment 39–15812 (74 

FR 8719, February 26, 2009), for certain 

Boeing Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747– 

100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747– 

200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 

747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP series 

airplanes. This AD requires repetitive 

detailed inspections of the aft pressure 

bulkhead for indications of ‘‘oil cans’’ 

and previous oil can repairs at reduced 

compliance times, and corrective 

actions if necessary. 

As published, there are two locations 

in the AD that reference an incorrect 

paragraph identifier. 

No other part of the regulatory 

information has been changed; 

therefore, the final rule is not 

republished in the Federal Register. 

The effective date of this AD remains 

April 2, 2009. 

§ 39.13 [Corrected] 

In the Federal Register of February 

26, 2009, on page 8721, in the first 

column, paragraph (i) of AD 2009–04– 

06 is corrected to read as follows: 

* * * * * 

(i) If no crack is found during the eddy 

current inspection required by paragraph (h) 

of this AD, do the actions specified in 

paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD, as 

applicable. 

* * * * * 

In the Federal Register of February 

26, 2009, on page 8721, in the second 

column, paragraph (j)(1) of AD 2009– 

04–06 is corrected to read as follows: 

* * * * * 

(1) If no crack and no oil can are found, 

repeat the detailed inspection in accordance 

with paragraph (g) of this AD. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 6, 

2009. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–11280 Filed 5–15–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Bureau of Customs and Border 

Protection 

19 CFR Part 101 

[USCBP–2005–0035; CBP Dec. 09–16] 

Extension of Port Limits of St. Louis, 

MO 

AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, 

DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This document amends the 

Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS) regulations pertaining to Customs 

and Border Protection’s (CBP’s) field 

organization by extending the 

geographical limits of the port of St. 

Louis, Missouri to include the entire 

expanded Lambert-St. Louis 

International Airport. The change is part 

of CBP’s continuing program to more 

efficiently utilize its personnel, 

facilities, and resources, and to provide 

better service to carriers, importers, and 

the general public. 

DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Wendy M. Cooper, Office of Field 

Operations, 202–344–2057. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

(NPRM) published in the Federal 

Register (71 FR 47156) on August 16, 

2006, CBP proposed to amend the list of 

CBP ports of entry at 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) 

to extend the geographical limits of the 

St. Louis, Missouri port of entry. 

The current port limits of the St. 

Louis, Missouri, port of entry are 

described in Treasury Decision (T.D.) 

69–224, effective September 27, 1969. In 

the NPRM, CBP explained that the 

Lambert-St. Louis International Airport 

was located within the boundaries of 

these port limits. However, at the time 

the NPRM was published, the airport 

had initiated an expansion project, 

which, when completed, would place 

part of the airport outside of the port’s 

current boundaries. Accordingly, so that 

the entire airport would be within the 

port’s boundaries and to make the 

boundaries more easily identifiable to 

the public, CBP proposed to extend the 

port limits of the port of St. Louis, 

Missouri in such a way that would align 

the port boundaries with the Federal 

Interstate Highways that encircle the St. 

Louis metropolitan area. CBP 

determined that this proposed change in 

the boundaries of the port of St. Louis, 

Missouri, would not result in a change 

in the service that is provided to the 

public by the port, nor would it require 

a change in the staffing or workload at 

the port. 

II. Analysis of Comments and 

Conclusion 

CBP did not receive any comments in 

response to the NPRM. With the 

expansion of the airport being 

completed as scheduled, CBP is 

extending the geographical limits of the 

port of St. Louis, Missouri, as proposed 

in the NPRM. CBP believes that the 

inclusion of the entire airport within the 

port limits and alignment of the port 

boundaries with the Federal Interstate 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES