alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM REGENT
TECHNOLOGIES INC. ART 5 SX 3RD QTR 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          36,566
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,668
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,281
<PP&E>                                          43,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        88,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   344,938
<SALES>                                        359,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               366,508
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,271)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,271)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.002)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of David R. Roggenbaum, for Reinstatement to the Practice of Law in the State of New York.

[974 NYS2d 883]

—Order entered terminating suspension and reinstating petitioner to the practice of law. Present — Centra, J.E, Peradotto, Lindley and Whalen, JJ. (Filed Oct. 23, 2013.)
Presidential Documents

21765 

Federal Register 

Vol. 74, No. 88 

Friday, May 8, 2009 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of May 7, 2009 

Continuation of the National Emergency with Respect to the 

Actions of the Government of Syria 

On May 11, 2004, pursuant to his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701–1706, and the Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003, Public Law 108– 

175, the President issued Executive Order 13338, in which he declared 

a national emergency with respect to the actions of the Government of 

Syria. To deal with this national emergency, Executive Order 13338 authorized the blocking of property of certain persons and prohibited the exportation or re-exportation of certain goods to Syria. On April 25, 2006, and 

February 13, 2008, the President issued Executive Order 13399 and Executive 

Order 13460, respectively, to take additional steps with respect to this national emergency. 

The President took these actions to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 

threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 

States constituted by the actions of the Government of Syria in supporting 

terrorism, maintaining its then-existing occupation of Lebanon, pursuing 

weapons of mass destruction and missile programs, and undermining U.S. 

and international efforts with respect to the stabilization and reconstruction 

of Iraq. 

Because the actions and policies of the Government of Syria continue to 

pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 

policy, and economy of the United States, the national emergency declared 

on May 11, 2004, and the measures adopted on that date, on April 25, 

2006, in Executive Order 13399, and on February 13, 2008, in Executive 

Order 13460, to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond 

May 11, 2009. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National 

Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared with respect to certain actions of the Government of 

Syria. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROCS
21766 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 88 / Friday, May 8, 2009 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

May 7, 2009. [FR Doc. E9–11047 

Filed 5–7–09; 1:00 pm] 

Billing code 3195–W9–P 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with PROCSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
April 11, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ASHTON PIERRE COYT

- SOWELLS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00986

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript o f the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
** **

UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM10-Q**

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thequarterly period ended March 31, 2009

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number0-10256

 

**SHELTER PROPERTIESII**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**431 KA 09-00732** 
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRYSON DAVIS-JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

CHARLES T. NOCE, CONFLICT DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KIMBERLY J. CZAPRANSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (AMANDA L. DREHER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered March 20, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of manslaughter in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15 [1]) after his first trial ended in a hung jury. Contrary to defendant’s contention, the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence ( see generally People v Delamota
, 18 NY3d 107, 113; People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349). Although defendant’s further challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence at the first trial is properly before us because “[t]he Double Jeopardy Clause precludes a second trial if the evidence from the first trial is determined by the reviewing court to be legally insufficient” ( People v Scerbo
, 74 AD3d 1730, 1731, lv denied 15 NY3d 757; see People v Scott
, 107 AD3d 1635, 1636-1637, lv denied 21 NY3d 1077), we reject that challenge. The evidence at both trials, which included the testimony of four eyewitnesses, was substantially similar, and demonstrated that defendant was “aware of and consciously disregard[ed] a substantial and unjustifiable risk” of death when defendant and at least one other individual gained entry to a known drug house operated by the victim, and the victim was fatally shot through his apartment door when he returned (§ 15.05 [3]; see §§ 20.00, 125.15 [1]; see also People v Flayhart , 72 NY2d 737, 742; People v Davis
, 278 AD2d 886, 886-887, lv denied 96 NY2d 757). Even if defendant’s “assistance was not initially planned, the totality of the evidence permits only the conclusion that he knowingly participated and continued to participate even after his companion’s intentions became clear” ( People v Allah , 71 NY2d 830, 832; see People**-2- 431 KA 09-00732** 

v Scott , 107 AD3d 1592, 1593, lv denied 22 NY3d 958).

“Defendant was convicted ‘upon legally sufficient trial evidence,’ and thus his contention with respect to the competency of the evidence before the grand jury ‘is not reviewable upon an appeal from the ensuing judgment of conviction’ ” ( People v Haberer , 24 AD3d 1283, 1284, lv denied 7 NY3d 756, reconsideration denied 7 NY3d 848, quoting CPL 210.30 [6]). Defendant’s sentence is not unduly harsh or severe, and his remaining contention does not require modification or reversal of the judgment.

Entered: May 9, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. OP 23-0681

DANIEL R. WOOD,

Petitioner, 

v. 

BRIAN GOOTKIN, 

Respondent.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Respondent’s motion for an extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted an extension of time 

to and including January 29, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and serve its 

response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 21 2023

12/21/2023

Case Number: OP 23-0681
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QS4 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under
the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi    
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi        
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robin Forshaw, Chief Executive Officer of Endeavor
Explorations Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Endeavor Explorations Inc., for the fiscal year ended
July 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Endeavor Explorations Inc.



/s/ Robin
Forshaw______________________________________ Robin Forshaw
Chief Executive Officer October 29, 2007

---
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-005-113    245-3-054-CV

THE CADLE COMPANY ANDVeErRnNoOnN WhHiIpPpPlLeE 	APPELLANTS

DANIEL C. CADLEVernon Whipple

	V.

DAVID B. LOBINGIER AND THER2 EeEnNtTeErRpPrRiIsSeEsS, IiInNcC. aAnNdD TtTeEdD RrReEeEvVeEsS 	APPELLEES

InN tThHeE InNtTeErReEsStT oOfF M.S.M., J.E.C., L.M.C., M.R.C. 

L.M.C., M.R.C. AND C.S.C., CHILDREN

aAnNdD C.S.C., ChHiIlLdDrReEnN

STATE OF TEXAS

	----------

	FROM THE 16TH16TH DISTRICT  48TH 158TH       158TH DISTRICT COURT OF  DENTON           DENTON TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “aapAppellant’s Joint Motion tTo Dismiss for Mootness aAppealPppPEAL .”  Appeal Due To Settlement.”  It is the court'’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(21), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appelllanant, the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL DMDdD:	mHOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 2430, 2005December 31, 2003  jANUARYJanuary 26, 2006
<PAGE>
================================================================================



                                    FORM 6-K


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER


                    PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


                         For the month of February 2005


                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                               (Registrant's Name)


                          1155, University, Suite 1405,
                                Montreal, Quebec
                                 Canada H3B 3A7
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

                           Form 20-F [x]    Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ]    No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-_____________



================================================================================
<PAGE>


Filed with this Form 6-K is the following which are incorporated herein by
reference:

99.1     Press Release -- February 24, 2005 : Campbell Resources Announces its
         Fourth Quarter and Annual Results for 2004


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                         CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.


                                         /s/  Lucy Brun
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Lucy Brun
                                         Executive Vice-President and
                                         Chief Administrative Officer


DATE: February 24, 2005


<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

99.1     Press Release -- February 24, 2005:  Campbell Resources Announces its
         Fourth Quarter and Annual Results for 2004.
#### In the Matter of Faith Ann Peaslee and Others. George M. Reiber, Appellant, v GMAC, LLC, et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 1, 2009;

decided June 4, 2009

Motion by Ingrid M. Hillinger et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on consideration of the certified question herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 27, 2021

a0419

Order 

Clerk

April 27, 2021

161978

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161978

COA: 353530

Benzie CC: 18-002596-FH;

MICHAEL RUSSELL BANCROFT, 2018-002598-FH; 18-002599-FH

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2020 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         292,696
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (41,831)
<INVENTORY>                                     51,589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               714,907
<PP&E>                                         408,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,820,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,887,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    635,600
<COMMON>                                        66,806
<OTHER-SE>                                   (986,190)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,820,043
<SALES>                                        430,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               430,792
<CGS>                                          680,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  680,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,476,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,752,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,752,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,752,701)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $(.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(.26)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Sajid Malhotra, certify that:





|   |                                                                                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Limelight Networks, Inc.; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date: February 21, 2018 /s/ Sajid Malhotra


Sajid Malhotra, Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3736 

To suspend temporarily the duty on vulcanized rubber lug bottom boots 

for use in fishing waders. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2006 

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on vulcanized rubber lug 

bottom boots for use in fishing waders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LUG BOTTOM BOOTS FOR USE IN FISHING WAD4 ERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.64.01 Vulcanized rubber lug bottom boots for 

actual use in fishing waders (provided for 

in subheading 6401.92.90) ...................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 3736 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS