alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions.

The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports.

Peace, Appellant, v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellee. [Cite as Peace v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. (1993), Ohio St.3d .] Insurance -- Underinsured motorist coverage -- Wrongful death claim -- Each person entitled to recover under R.C.2125.02 has separate claim subject to any per accident limit -- Each person who is covered by an uninsured/underinsured policy has a separate claim subject to a per person policy

limit. (No. 93-1716 -- Submitted November 9, 1993 -- Decided December 29, 1993.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Erie County, No.

E-92-60.

Ronald G. Kaufman, for appellant. Flynn, Py & Kruse, L.P.A., James W. Hart and R.E. Digges III, for appellee.

The motion to certify the record is granted and the cause is reversed and remanded on authority of Savoie v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 500, N.E.2d . A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ.,

concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents. Resnick, J., not participating. Moyer, C.J., concurring separately. I concur separately in the judgment entry in the above-styled case. As my dissent in Savoie v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 500, N.E.2d , stated, I do not agree with the law announced in the majority decision. Nevertheless, it is the law on the issue in the above-styled case. As I believe all parties should receive equal application of the law announced by this court, and only for that reason, I concur in the judgment entry. Wright, J., dissenting. I must dissent in continuing protest to the majority's sundry holdings in Savoie v. GrangeMut. Ins. Co. (1993), 67 Ohio St.3d 500, 620 N.E.2d 809. As stated in the dissent in Savoie, that holding lacks sound reasoning, reverses ten years of established case law and flaunts the will of the General Assembly. Thus, I feel compelled to remain in this posture until the General Assembly has had the opportunity to undo the damage caused to the public by this unfortunate, result-oriented decision.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan
    Trust 2007-WF1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Clayton Fixed Income Services, Inc., as Credit Risk Manager, Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A., as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities
    Administrator and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    E. Todd Whittemore

    Executive Vice President
    (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan
    Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)

   Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Acquired Sales Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerard M. Jacobs, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: December 16, 2010
/s/ Gerard M. JacobsGerard M. Jacobs

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Collins BRUMFIELD, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-3890.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted May 20, 2009.

Decided May 27, 2009.

Rita M. Rumbelow, Office of the United States Attorney; Madison, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Collins Brumfield, Terre Haute, IN, pro se.

Before RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge, ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge and ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Collins Brumfield pleaded guilty to distributing crack cocaine, *see*21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to the top of the guidelines range, 235 months’ imprisonment. Because his appeal was pending when the Supreme Court decided *Kimbrough v. United States,*552 U.S. 85, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), we remanded Brumfield’s sentence to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting the sentencing judge to advise this court whether he was inclined to resen-tence Brumfield in light of *Kimbrough.*However, we instructed the sentencing judge to hold off telling the court whether he was inclined to resentence the defendant under *Kimbrough*until he decided whether to act favorably on a motion to reduce the defendant’s sentence under the new guidelines range, U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(A).

Chief Judge Crabb, who is currently the only judge in the Western District of Wisconsin due to Judge' Shabaz’s medical leave, appropriately responded in place of Judge Shabaz. *See United States v. Howe,*310 Fed.Appx. 43, 45 (7th Cir.2009) (unpublished order). Chief Judge Crabb *461announced that she intends to lower Brumfield’s offense level to comport with the amended crack guidelines—Brum-field’s new guidelines range would be 151 to 188 months—and also that she is inclined to impose a yet lower sentence, pursuant to *Kimbrough,*based on the remaining disparity between the crack and powder cocaine sentencing guidelines. Brumfield requests a remand for resen-tencing; the government has not responded.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Brumfield’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court for resentencing.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hong Zhao, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  April 21, 2011
/s/ Hong ZhaoBy:  Hong ZhaoIts:  Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Volodymyr I. Tkachyshyn, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[971 NYS2d 908]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 26, 2012, which, among other things, charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of emergency unemployment compensation benefits.

Claimant, a substitute teacher, filed initial claims for unemployment insurance benefits, effective June 27, 2011 and July 4, 2011. A review of the record provides substantial evidence to support the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant did not have sufficient remuneration in his base periods or alternate base periods to establish valid original claims *(see*Labor Law § 527; *see also Matter of Stennett [Commissioner of Labor],*54 AD3d *1131478, 478-479 [2008]). Further, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s finding that claimant failed to establish economic hardship militating in favor of a waiver of his obligation to repay federally funded emergency unemployment compensation benefits *(see Matter of Silver [Commissioner of Labor],*84 AD3d 1634, 1635 [2011]).

Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and are either without merit or not properly before this Court.

Peters, EJ., McCarthy, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
#### In the Matter of Robert F. Rubscha, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[962 NYS2d 814]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 20, 2010, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance *1218benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant had worked as a mechanical design engineer for 29 years when his employer instituted a voluntary reduction in force program in an effort to avoid eventual layoffs. He had no information that his job would be eliminated, but nevertheless accepted the severance package out of concern that he or his coworkers would be laid off. Inasmuch as leaving a job in order to take advantage of a severance or early retirement package when continuing work is available does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause *(see Matter of Keane [Commissioner of Labor],*93 AD3d 1002, 1003 [2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 854 [2013]; *Matter of Powell [Commissioner of Labor],*79 AD3d 1507, 1507 [2010], *lv denied*17 NY3d 701 [2011]). Substantial evidence further supports the Board’s finding that claimant received retirement incentives identical to those that he would have been provided had he been laid off and that, as a result, he lacked “a compelling financial incentive to leave his job” *(Matter of Biedka [Hudacs],*196 AD2d 944, 944 [1993]; *see Matter of Fisher [Levine],*36 NY2d 146, 153 [1975]).

Mercure, J.E, Lahtinen, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10968]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5309-N-01]


Notice of Availability: Program Requirements for Community 
Development Block Grant Program Funding Under the American Recovery and 
Reinvestment Act of 2009

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the program requirements, submission deadlines, 
and waivers and alternative requirements for funding available under 
the Community Development Block Grant Recovery (CDBG-R) program 
authorized by Title XII of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 
of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5, approved February 17, 2009). The focus of CDBG-
R funding is on infrastructure improvements that meet the overall goals 
of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which are to stimulate 
the economy through measures that modernize the nation's 
infrastructure, improve energy efficiency, and expand educational 
opportunities and access to health care. Approximately $1 billion is 
available for CDBG-R to states and local governments. The notice 
establishing the program requirements, including waivers and 
alternative requirements, is available on the HUD Web site at:  http://www.hud.gov/recovery/cdblock.cfm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Gimont, Director, Office of 
Block Grant Assistance, Office of Community Planning and Development, 
Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW., Room 
7286, Washington, DC 20410; telephone 202-708-3587 (this is not a toll-
free number). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access 
this number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information 
Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

    Dated: April 14, 2009.
Nelson R. Breg[oacute]n,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development.
[FR Doc. E9-10968 Filed 5-6-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
EXHIBIT 35.2

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                               GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

                RASC SERIES 2007-KS3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of GMAC Mortgage,  LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer")  pursuant to the applicable  servicing  agreement,  does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects  throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.

By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Executive Vice President
<PAGE>
================================================================================


                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                            For the month of May 2005

                        Commission File Number 333-101591


                          GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION

                       4221 W. Boy Scout Blvd., Suite 600
                              Tampa, Florida 33607

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                         Form 20-F [ ]    Form 40-F [X]

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ______________

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ______________

     Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                               Yes [ ]    No [X]

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-_______________


================================================================================
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Exhibit     Description
     -------     -----------
     <C>         <S>
      99.1       Press Release dated May 26, 2005
</TABLE>



<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  May 26, 2005


                                  GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION



                                  By:      /s/  Robert E. Lewis
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                  Name:    Robert E. Lewis
                                  Title:   Vice-President, General Counsel and
                                           Corporate Secretary
#### Brown v. Ginn

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 563

No. 107P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-511)

Denied 05/03/07
EXHIBIT 32.2





STATEMENT OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., chief accounting officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Sam H. Lindsey, Jr.,


Sam H. Lindsey, Jr., Chief Accounting Officer


Dated: April 15, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11162]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5311-N-01]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Capital Fund Recovery 
Competition Grants

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian 
Housing, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Through this notice, HUD announces the availability on its Web 
site of the application information, eligibility requirements, review 
and selection procedures, and other program requirements governing the 
availability of $995 million in Capital Fund Recovery Competition 
Grants under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The 
assistance is intended to preserve and create jobs, promote economic 
recovery, assist those impacted by the recession, and invest in 
transportation, environment, and infrastructure that will provide long-
term economic benefits. The notice establishing the program 
requirements is available on the HUD Web site at: http://www.hud.gov/recovery.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have a question or need a 
clarification, you may contact the Office of Capital Improvements by 
sending an email message to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c2c3534333f353c140918521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="09594041464a4049617c6d276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>. Please see http://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/programs/ph/capfund/ocir.cfm, which can be 
accessed from http://www.hud.gov/recovery/, for additional information.

    Dated: May 5, 2009.
Paula O. Blunt,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing.
[FR Doc. E9-11162 Filed 5-8-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>