Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules 1615 

Elements of this summary report shall 

include: A description of each process 

adjustment performed on the SNCR 

system, a discussion of whether the 

adjustment affected NOX emission rate 

(including CEMS data that may have 

been recorded while the adjustment was 

in progress), a description of the range 

(if applicable) over which the 

adjustment was examined, and a 

discussion of how the adjustment will 

be reflected or accounted for in kiln 

operating practices. In addition, to the 

extent that the owner/operator evaluates 

the impact of varying reagent injection 

rate on NOX emissions, the owner/

operator shall include the following 

information: The range of reagent 

injection rates evaluated (expressed as a 

molar ratio of reagent to average NOX

concentration), reagent injection rate, 

average NOX concentration, lime 

production rate, kiln flue gas 

temperature, and the presence of any 

detached plumes from the kiln exhaust. 

(iii) The owner/operator shall submit 

a report that lists the daily rolling 30- 

kiln operating day emission rates for 

NOX and SO2, calculated in accordance 

with paragraphs (i)(6)(iii) and (iv) of this 

section. 

(iv) The owner/operator shall submit 

a report that lists the monthly rolling 

12-month emission rates for NOX and 

SO2, calculated in accordance with 

paragraphs (i)(6)(v) and (vi) of this 

section. 

(v) The owner/operator shall submit 

excess emissions reports for NOX and 

SO2 limits. Excess emissions means 

emissions that exceed any of the 

emissions limits specified in paragraph 

(i)(3) of this section. The reports shall 

include the magnitude, date(s), and 

duration of each period of 

excessemissions; specific identification 

of each period of excess emissions that 

occurs during startups, shutdowns, and 

malfunctions of the kiln; the nature and 

cause of any malfunction (if known); 

and the corrective action taken or 

preventative measures adopted. 

(vi) The owner/operator shall submit 

a summary of CEMS operation, to 

include dates and duration of each 

period during which the CEMS was 

inoperative (except for zero and span 

adjustments and calibration checks), 

reason(s) why the CEMS was 

inoperative and steps taken to prevent 

recurrence, and any CEMS repairs or 

adjustments. 

(vii) The owner/operator shall submit 

results of all CEMS performance tests 

required by 40 CFR part 60, Appendix 

F, Procedure 1 (Relative Accuracy Test 

Audits, Relative Accuracy Audits, and 

Cylinder Gas Audits). 

(viiii) When no excess emissions have 

occurred or the CEMS has not been 

inoperative, repaired, or adjusted during 

the reporting period, the owner/operator 

shall state such information in the 

semiannual report. 

(9) Notifications. All notifications 

required under this section shall be 

submitted by the owner/operator to the 

Director, Enforcement Division (Mail 

Code ENF–2–1), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. 

(i) The owner/operator shall submit 

notification of commencement of 

construction of any equipment which is 

being constructed to comply with the 

NOX emission limits in paragraph (i)(3) 

of this section. 

(ii) The owner/operator shall submit 

semiannual progress reports on 

construction of any such equipment. 

(iii) The owner/operator shall submit 

notification of initial startup of any such 

equipment. 

(10) Equipment operations. (i) At all 

times, including periods of startup, 

shutdown, and malfunction, the owner/ 

operator shall, to the extent practicable, 

maintain and operate the kilns, 

including associated air pollution 

control equipment, in a manner 

consistent with good air pollution 

control practices for minimizing 

emissions. Pollution control equipment 

shall be designed and capable of 

operating properly to minimize 

emissions during all expected operating 

conditions. Determination of whether 

acceptable operating and maintenance 

procedures are being used will be based 

on information available to the Regional 

Administrator, which may include, but 

is not limited to, monitoring results, 

review of operating and maintenance 

procedures, and inspection of the kilns. 

(ii) After completion of installation of 

ammonia injection on a kiln, the owner/ 

operator shall inject sufficient ammonia 

to achieve compliance with the NOX

emission limits from paragraph (i)(3) of 

this section for that kiln while 

preventing excessive ammonia 

emissions. 

(11) Enforcement. Notwithstanding 

any other provision in this 

implementation plan, any credible 

evidence or information relevant as to 

whether the kiln would have been in 

compliance with applicable 

requirements if the appropriate 

performance or compliance test had 

been performed can be used to establish 

whether or not the owner/operator has 

violated or is in violation of any 

standard or applicable emission limit in 

the plan. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00328 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 14–257; RM–11743; DA 14– 

1868] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Wright 

City, Oklahoma 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This document requests 

comments on a Petition for Rule Making 

filed by Charles Crawford, proposing to 

amend the FM Table of Allotments, 

Section 73.202(b) of the Commission’s 

Rules, by allotting Channel 295A at 

Wright City, Oklahoma, as the 

community’s first local service. A staff 

engineering analysis indicates that 

Channel 295A can be allotted to Wright 

City consistent with the minimum 

distance separation requirements of the 

Commission’s Rules with a site 

restriction located 14 kilometers (8.6 

miles) east of the community. The 

reference coordinates are 34–04–44 NL 

and 94–51–15 WL. 

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before February 9, 2015, and reply 

comments on or before February 24, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. In 

addition to filing comments with the 

FCC, interested parties should serve the 

petitioner as follows: Charles Crawford, 

2215 Cedar Springs Rd., #1605, Dallas, 

Texas 75201. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 

14–257, adopted December 18, 2014, 

and released December 19, 2014. The 

full text of this Commission decision is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

FCC’s Reference Information Center at 

Portals II, CY–A257, 445 12th Street 

SW., Washington, DC 20554. This 

document may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractors, Best Copy and Printing, 

Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY– 

B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1616 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

1–800–378–3160 or via email 

www.BCPIWEB.com. This document 

does not contain proposed information 

collection requirements subject to the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

proposed information collection burden 

‘‘for small business concerns with fewer 

than 25 employees,’’ pursuant to the 

Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 

2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). 

Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. 

Members of the public should note 

that from the time a Notice of Proposed 

Rule Making is issued until the matter 

is no longer subject to Commission 

consideration or court review, all ex 

parte contacts are prohibited in 

Commission proceedings, such as this 

one, which involve channel allotments. 

See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules 

governing permissible ex parte contacts. 

For information regarding proper 

filing procedures for comments, see 47 

CFR 1.415 and 1.420. 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Nazifa Sawez, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Federal Communications 

Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR 

part 73 as follows: 

PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST 

SERVICES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 73 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336 

and 339. 

§ 73.202 [Amended] 

■ 2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM 

Allotments under Oklahoma, is 

amended by adding Wright City, 

Channel 295A. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00341 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 223 

[Docket No. 0911231415–4999–04] 

RIN 0648–XT12 

Advanced Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking and Request for 

Information for the Issuance of 

Protective Regulations Under Section 

4(d) of the Endangered Species Act for 

the Conservation of Threatened Corals 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Advanced notice of proposed 

rulemaking; request for information. 

SUMMARY: We, the National Marine 

Fisheries Service (NMFS), are 

considering proposing protective 

regulations to provide for the 

conservation of the 20 coral species 

recently listed as threatened under the 

Endangered Species Act (ESA). Fifteen 

of the listed species occur in the IndoPacific and five occur in the Caribbean. 

This advanced notice of proposed 

rulemaking (ANPR) is intended to alert 

other agencies and the public of our 

planning efforts and request public 

input that will assist in identifying 

actions and activities that may impact 

the status of these corals, as well as 

information on the existence and 

efficacy of on-going conservation 

activities. This information will help 

inform our evaluation of what, if any, 

protective regulations are necessary and 

advisable for the conservation of these 

species. 

DATES: Responses to this request for 

information must be received by March 

16, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

information, or data on this document, 

identified by NOAA–NMFS–2014–0158, 

by any of the following methods: 

• Electronic Submissions: Submit all 

electronic public comments via the 

Federal e-Rulemaking Portal 

www.regulations.gov. Go to 

www.regulations.gov/

#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2014- 

0158. Click the ‘‘Comment Now’’ icon, 

complete the required fields, and enter 

or attach your comments. 

• Mail: 

Æ To submit written comments 

regarding the species listed in Table 1 

below, contact the Pacific Islands 

Region: Lance Smith, Protected 

Resources Division, National Marine 

Fisheries Service, Pacific Islands 

Regional Office, NOAA Inouye Regional 

Center, 1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176, 

Honolulu, HI 96818. 

Æ To submit written comments 

regarding the species listed in Table 2 

below, contact the Southeast Region: 

Stephania Bolden, Protected Resources 

Division, National Marine Fisheries 

Service, Southeast Regional Office, 263 

13th Avenue South, Saint Petersburg, 

FL 33701. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lance Smith, NMFS, Pacific Islands 

Regional Office, 808–725–5131; 

Kimberly Maison, NMFS, Pacific Islands 

Regional Office, 808–725–5143; 

Stephania Bolden, NMFS, Southeast 

Regional Office, 727–824–5312; or 

Marta Nammack, NMFS Office of 

Protected Resources, 301–427–8469. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 10, 2014, we published 

a final rule listing 20 species of coral as 

threatened under the ESA (79 FR 

53851). The 15 Indo-Pacific species 

include Acropora globiceps, Acropora 

jacquelineae, Acropora lokani, 

Acropora pharaonis, Acropora retusa, 

Acropora rudis, Acropora speciosa, 

Acropora tenella, Anacropora spinosa, 

Isopora crateriformis, Euphyllia 

paradivisa, Montipora australiensis, 

Porites napopora, Pavona diffluens, and 

Seriatopora aculeata. The five 

Caribbean species include Dendrogyra 

cylindrus, Orbicella annularis, Orbicella 

faveolata, Orbicella franksi, and 

Mycetophyllia ferox. The final listing 

rule describes the background of the 

listing actions for these 20 corals and 

provides a summary of our conclusions 

regarding the statuses of the listed 

corals. For additional background and a 

summary of natural history and threats 

to the species, the reader is referred to 

the Status Review Report, Supplemental 

Information Report, and Final Listing 

Rule (all three are available at http://

www.fpir.noaa.gov/PRD/prd_

coral.html). At the time of listing we did 

not propose any protective regulations 

pursuant to section 4(d) of the ESA. 

ESA section 9(a)(1) prohibitions are 

automatically applied to species listed 

as endangered but not to species listed 

as threatened. Section 4(d) of the ESA 

provides that, whenever a species is 

listed as threatened, the Secretary of 

Commerce (Secretary) shall issue such 

regulations as she deems necessary and 

advisable to provide for the 

conservation of the species. Such 

regulations may include any or all of the 

prohibitions in ESA section 9(a)(1) that 

apply automatically to species listed as 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS