alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
 
 Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Coyote Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Earl Abbott, President, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coyote Resources, Inc., and will be retained by Coyote Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/ Guy MartinGuy Martin

President, Secretary, Treasurer and a Director

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

April 16 , 2013
#### Eighth Avenue Garage Corp., Appellant, v H.K.L. Realty Corp. et al., Defendants, and Lila Scheiner, Respondent.

Submitted April 27, 2009;

decided June 11, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                    FORM 6-K

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of: May, 2006                      Commission File Number: 0-27400

                            CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.
                              (Name of Registrant)

                                2255 MARKHAM ROAD
                              SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO
                                 CANADA M1B 2W3
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

                       Form 20-F         Form 40-F   X
                                 -----             -----

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                              Yes         No   X
                                  -----      -----

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                        CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.


Date: May 5, 2006                       By: /s/ Lewis Ritchie
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Lewis Ritchie
                                        Title: Executive Vice-President
                                               Finance and Administration,
                                               Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Secretary

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit   Description of Exhibit
-------   -----------------------
<S>       <C>
  99.1    Press Release - Cinram Reports First Quarter 2006 Results
</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.4 (CIBC MELLON LOGO) May 18, 2005


REVISED
 Nova Scotia Securities Commission
    
    Securities Commission of Newfoundland and LabradorAlberta Securities Commission
    
    Saskatchewan Financial Services
Commission, Securities DivisionThe Manitoba Securities Commission
    
    Office of the Administrator of the Securities
Act, New BrunswickOntario Securities Commission
    
    British Columbia Securities CommissionRegistrar of Securities, Prince
Edward Island
    
    Autorité des marchés financiers
 Dear Sirs:RE:       CALL-NET ENTERPRISES INC. Pursuant to a request from our Principal, we wish to advise you of the following dates in
connection with their Special Meeting of Shareholders: DATE OF MEETING:
    
    
    June 29 , 2005RECORD DATE FOR NOTICE:
    
    
    May 17, 2005RECORD DATE FOR VOTING:
    
    
    May 17, 2005BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP DETERMINATION DATE:
    
    
    May 17, 2005SECURITIES ENTITLED TO NOTICE:
    
    
    N/ASECURITIES ENTITLED TO VOTE:
    
    
    New Class B Non-VotingNew Common
 Yours very truly,CIBC MELLON TRUST COMPANY Vijaya Murugaanandan
Administrator, Client Services
Direct Dial: (416) 643-5567 cc:       CDS & Co. (Via Fax) pk\NM_CallNet
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22929-22930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11403]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Appointments to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission

AGENCY: Government Accountability Office (GAO).

ACTION: Notice of appointments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established the Medicare 
Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and gave the Comptroller General 
responsibility for appointing its members. This notice announces the 
appointment of two new members and the reappointments of five existing 
members.

[[Page 22930]]


DATES: Appointments are effective May 1, 2009.

ADDRESSES: 
GAO: 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20548.
MedPAC: 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Suite 9000, Washington, DC 20001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
GAO: Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800.
MedPAC: Mark E. Mifier, PhD, (202) 220-3700.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: To fill this year's vacancies I am 
announcing the following:
    Newly appointed members are Robert A. Berenson, M.D., F.A.C.P., 
senior fellow at the Urban Institute, and Herb B. Kuhn, an independent 
health care consultant specializing in Medicare and Medicaid issues.
    Reappointed members are Mitra Behroozi, J.D., executive director of 
1199 SEIU Benefit and Pension Funds; Karen R. Borman, M.D., professor 
of surgery at the University of Central Florida College of Medicine; 
Ronald D. Castellanos, M.D., urologist at Southwest Florida Urologic 
Associates; Glenn M. Hackbarth, J.D., (chair); and Bruce Stuart, PhD, a 
professor and executive director of the Peter Lamy Center on Drug 
Therapy and Aging at the University of Maryland Baltimore.

(Sec. 4022, Pub. L. 105-33, 111 Stat. 251, 350)

Gene L. Dodardo,
Acting Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. E9-11403 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
Exhibit 10.15

January 4, 2008

Paul J. Mooney







| | Re: | 2008 Employment Agreement Terms & Conditions
| | --- | --------------------------------------------

Dear Paul:

Listed below are the terms of an employment agreement between Paul J. Mooney (Executive) and Esmark Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the
Company). Such terms have been approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Esmark Incorporated and will need to be executed in a definitive agreement. The terms set forth below include:

1) Executive agrees to remain employed through June 30, 2008.

2) Base Salary set at $340,000; subject to annual review and upward adjustment.

3) Signing Bonus of $200,000 to be paid within five (5) days of signing of a definitive agreement.

4) All restricted stock unit awards granted as of the date of the agreement shall continue to vest as scheduled, and to the extent not
vested as of June 30, 2007 then those restricted stock units shall then vest; provided that Executive is employed as of the date of vesting. One third of any restricted stock units granted in 2008 shall vest on June 30, 2008.

5) Retention Bonus of $86,667 per month, payable at the end of each month through June, 2008 provided that such bonus would not be
payable in any month and thereafter in the event that Executive is terminated for cause due to a conviction of (or plea of guilty or no contest to) a felony; or Executive voluntarily terminates his employment. In the event Executive is terminated by
the Company other than as described above, then the Company shall pay the remaining monthly bonuses and vest the restricted stock units described in Item No. 4 on the date of termination.

6) In the event that the Company takes an action that reduces or eliminates the amount of any benefit to which Executive would be
entitled under the SERP or the management pension plan prior to June 30, 2008, then the Company shall pay Executive a cash payment equal to the amount of such reduction.



---

7) Executive remains entitled to participate in long-term incentives and bonus plans of
the Company, including restricted stock unit awards at comparable levels as similarly situated employees.

8) The
definitive agreement shall contain similar terms and conditions as provided to other similarly situated executives of the Company, including change of control provisions.

9) Executive understands and agrees that the payment of the Signing Bonus and monthly Retention Bonuses are in lieu of any payments that
would be given as a result of the Executives termination.





Acknowledged and agreed, intending to be legally bound hereby:



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | 
|/s/ Paul J. Mooney |  |  |  | /s/ J. Gregory Pilewicz
|Paul J. Mooney     |  |  |  | J. Gregory Pilewicz    
|January 4 , 2008   |  |  |  | January 4 , 2008       







1134 MARKET STREET, WHEELING, WV 26003
#### In the Matter of Janet Arnold et al., Respondents, v Erie County Medical Center Corporation et al., Respondents, and County of Erie, Appellant.

Submitted March 23, 2009;

decided May 7, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### In the Matter of Davontae D. and Others, Infants. Monroe County Department of Human Services, Appellant; Celia D., Respondent.

Submitted June 8, 2009;

decided June 30, 2009

*907Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 446 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 446

 To direct the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 
designate New Jersey Task Force 1 as part of the National Urban Search 
                      and Rescue Response System.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2005

 Mr. Corzine (for himself and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to 
designate New Jersey Task Force 1 as part of the National Urban Search 
                      and Rescue Response System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF TASK FORCE TO NATIONAL URBAN SEARCH AND RESCUE 
              RESPONSE SYSTEM.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
            (1) the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, 
        demonstrated the importance of enhancing national domestic 
        terrorism preparedness;
            (2) 26 of the 28 urban search and rescue task forces 
        included in the National Urban Search and Rescue Response 
        System of the Federal Emergency Management Agency were called 
        into action in the wake of the events of September 11;
            (3) highly qualified, urban search and rescue teams not 
        included in the National Urban Search and Rescue Response 
        System were the first teams in New York City on September 11;
            (4) the continuing threat of a possible domestic terrorist 
        attack remains an important mission for which the United States 
        must prepare to respond; and
            (5) part of that response should be to increase the number 
        of urban search and rescue task forces included in the National 
        Urban Search and Rescue Response System.
    (b) Addition of New Jersey Task Force 1.--The Director of the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency shall designate New Jersey Task 
Force 1 as part of the National Urban Search and Rescue Response 
System.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11300]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[PUBLIC NOTICE 6614]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Scripture for the Eyes: Bible Illustration in 
Netherlandish Prints of the Sixteenth Century''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in 
the exhibition: ``Scripture for the Eyes: Bible Illustration in 
Netherlandish Prints of the Sixteenth Century,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of Biblical Art, New 
York, NY, from on or about June 4, 2009, until on or about September 
27, 2009; Michael C. Carlos Museum, Atlanta, GA, from on or about 
October 17, 2009, until on or about January 24, 2010, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to 
be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th 
Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: May 8, 2009.
C. Miller Crouch,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational, and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-11300 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 549 

To extend a certain high priority corridor in the States of Colorado, Nebraska, 

South Dakota, and Wyoming. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2005 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. 

SALAZAR, and Mr. THUNE) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL

To extend a certain high priority corridor in the States 

of Colorado, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDOR 

4 IN COLORADO, NEBRASKA, SOUTH DAKOTA, 

5 AND WYOMING. 

6 Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transpor7 tation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2031; 112 Stat. 

8 191; 115 Stat. 871) is amended by striking paragraph 

9 (14) and inserting the following: 
2

•S 549 IS

1 ‘‘(14) Heartland Expressway from Denver, Col2 orado, through Scottsbluff, Nebraska, to Rapid City, 

3 South Dakota as follows: 

4 ‘‘(A) In the State of Colorado, the Heart5 land Expressway Corridor shall generally fol6 low— 

7 ‘‘(i) Interstate 76 from Denver to 

8 Brush; and 

9 ‘‘(ii) Colorado Highway 71 from 

10 Limon to the border between the States of 

11 Colorado and Nebraska. 

12 ‘‘(B) In the State of Nebraska, the Heart13 land Expressway Corridor shall generally fol14 low— 

15 ‘‘(i) Nebraska Highway 71 from the 

16 border between the States of Colorado and 

17 Nebraska to Scottsbluff; 

18 ‘‘(ii) United States Route 26 from 

19 Scottsbluff to the intersection with State 

20 Highway L62A; 

21 ‘‘(iii) State Highway L62A from the 

22 intersection with United States Route 26 

23 to United States Route 385 north of 

24 Bridgeport; 
3

•S 549 IS

1 ‘‘(iv) United States Route 385 to the 

2 border between the States of Nebraska and 

3 South Dakota; and 

4 ‘‘(v) United States Highway 26 from 

5 Scottsbluff to the border of the States of 

6 Nebraska and Wyoming. 

7 ‘‘(C) In the State of Wyoming, the Heart8 land Expressway Corridor shall generally follow 

9 United States Highway 26 from the border of 

10 the States of Nebraska and Wyoming to the 

11 termination at Interstate 25 at Interchange 

12 number 94. 

13 ‘‘(D) In the State of South Dakota, the 

14 Heartland Expressway Corridor shall generally 

15 follow— 

16 ‘‘(i) United States Route 385 from 

17 the border between the States of Nebraska 

18 and South Dakota to the intersection with 

19 State Highway 79; and 

20 ‘‘(ii) State Highway 79 from the 

21 intersection with United States Route 385 

22 to Rapid City.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-7265

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRIAN PETER ZATER, a/k/a Angel L,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00626-CMC-2; 

3:02-cv-00958-HMH)

Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Peter Zater, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brian Peter Zater seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Zater has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Thomas J. GROSS, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Norman Y. MINETA, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 06-1395.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 27, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 17, 2006.

Thomas J. Gross, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Thomas J. Gross appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action with prejudice for failure to comply with a court order that he file a complaint that complied with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. *Gross v. Mineta,*No. 1:05-cv-01480-LMB (E.D.Va. Jan. 20, 2006). We deny the motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*