alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ellington, administrator, *v.*Hall.

This case is ruled in principle by *Western & Atlantic Railroad Co.*v. *Johnson,*59 *Ga.*626; *Pease*v. *Pease,*66 *Ga.*277; *Usry*v. *Phillips,*68 *Ga.*815; *McCord*v. *Harden,*69 *Ga.*747; *Arnold,*v. *Hall,*70 *Ga.*445; *Rich*v. *The State,*74 *Ga.*811. *Judgment affirmed.*

July 23, 1894.

Motion for a new trial. Before Judge Boney. Taliaferro superior court. August term, 1893.

John W. Hixon, for plaintiff in error.

Horace M. Holden, *contra.*

The case was tried at the February term, 1893. On March 1, upon motion for a new trial, the court ordered that the plaintiff show cause on the 24th of August, 1893, why the motion should not be granted. On March 2, the court passed an order, reciting the making of the motion and the approval of the grounds thereof, and proceeding thus: “ and it appearing that it is impossible to make and complete a brief of the testimony in said case upon adjournment of the court, it is therefore ordered and adjudged by the court that said motion stand continued until the day of , 1893, and that it be heard at chambers, and that plaintiff have until 15 inst. to make out and file a brief of testimony, without prejudice.” On August 24, 1893, the court dismissed the motion, on the ground that no brief of testimony had been prepared, filed or approved.
Order entered January 28, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00745-CR

RABYL RIYAZ NATHOO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-82434-2017

ORDER

The reporter’s record was filed October 23, 2018. Included in the record were seven mp4 

files labeled “SX 66-1” through “SX 66-7” and over two hundred mp4 files labeled “part 27” 

through “part 231.” Because the files marked “part 27” through “part 231” were not properly

identified or described with respect to an exhibit offered and admitted at trial, we contacted the 

court reporter and instructed her to refile those exhibits with proper descriptions. On January 16, 

2019, a supplemental reporter’s record was filed containing State’s Exhibit 66, parts 8 through 

231. 

In light of this, we STRIKE the mp4 files labeled “part 27” through “part 231” filed 

October 23, 2018.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Xinhua Finance Media Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fredy
Bush, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 19, 2008

By:      /s/ Fredy Bush
         --------------
Name:    Fredy Bush
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4048 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 4048

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 14, 2006

  Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

                            December 5, 2006

             Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To prohibit Federal funding for the Organisation for Economic Co-
                       operation and Development.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Exit the OECD Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FUNDING FOR THE ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-
              OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be 
expended to fund activities or projects undertaken by the Organisation 
for Economic Co-operation and Development.
                                 <all>
```
#### Elaine WRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-12327

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Dec. 6, 2006.

Christopher D. Vaughn, Melville Johnson, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Elizabeth Johnson Bondurant, Tiffany D. Downs, Carter & Ansley, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellee.

*332Before ANDERSON and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and GOLDBERG,* Judge.

*

 Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation,

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed for the reasons discussed at oral argument.

AFFIRMED.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 419 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the treatment 

of qualified restaurant property as 15-year property for purposes of 

the depreciation deduction. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 17, 2005 

Mr. KYL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the treatment of qualified restaurant property as 15- 

year property for purposes of the depreciation deduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF QUALIFIED 

4 RESTAURANT PROPERTY AS 15-YEAR PROP5 ERTY FOR PURPOSES OF DEPRECIATION DE6 DUCTION. 

7 (a) TREATMENT MADE PERMANENT.—Clause (v) of 

8 section 168(e)(3)(E) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
2 

•S 419 IS

1 1986 (defining 15-year property) is amended by striking 

2 ‘‘placed in service before January 1, 2006’’. 

3 (b) TREATMENT TO INCLUDE NEW CONSTRUC4 TION.—Paragraph (7) of section 168(e) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to classification of prop6 erty) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(7) QUALIFIED RESTAURANT PROPERTY.—The 

8 term ‘qualified restaurant property’ means any sec9 tion 1250 property which is a building or an im10 provement to a building if more than 50 percent of 

11 the building’s square footage is devoted to prepara12 tion of, and seating for on-premises consumption of, 

13 prepared meals.’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to any property placed in service 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2226

___________ Vera Eileen Jackson, also known * as Vera Eileen Sullivan, also known * as Vera Eileen Jackson-Sullivan, *
* Appellant, *
*
v. * State of Missouri; State of Kansas; * Donald Mason; Debroah Neal; * Marsha Walsh; Michael Adams; * Charles Defeo; James Reed; Leonard * Hughes, III; Lee Wells; Peggy * Appeal from the United States Stevens-McGraw; John Jack; William * District Court for the A. Cleaver; Charles Atwell, parties * Western District of Missouri immediately above are judges; Tonya * Lawyer; Vanessa Wise; George Ranft; * [UNPUBLISHED] Gary Wallace; Kathy Verecke; Kelli * Fitzpatrick; Betty, Supervisor of * MADD; Sherri Harmon; Patricia * Grover; Kara Kantola; Sherri * Cassidy; Frank Doe, “Frank” unknown * last name; Michael J. Maloney; * Jonathan Bortnick; Bonita Williams; * Richard Rose; Russell Purvis; Randy * Kitchens; Deborah Porter-Gill; * Steven Treaster; Aldridge & Hall Law * Firm; Menorah Medical Center; * Robert J. Gauer, Dr.; KU Medical * Center, University of Kansas Medical * Center; St. Lukes Hospital, of Kansas * City; North Kansas City Hospital; * Truman Medical Ctr., also known as * Truman Medical Hospital; St. Marys *TheHono rable Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., United States District Judge for th e 1 Western District of Missouri.
-2- Hospital; Western Missouri Mental * Health Center; Richard Rice; Allen * Russell; Erlene Krigel; James Speck; * Dennis Muller, John Picerno; David * Barlow; Thomas Bellman; Fred * Slough; Robb & Robb; Redfearn & * Brown; Shamberg & Johnson; * Connie J. Boysen; Timothy Bosler; * Lazer Tow; Jacqueline Murray-Irving; * A-1 Insurance Agency; Peters * Automotive; Dominick & s A-1 * Alignment; Hunt Electric; National * Auto Brokers; A Bargain Insurance * Agency; Michael Devoe Sullivan; * American Family Insurance Company, * Incorporated; Tracy Hopkins; Hanks * Auto Repair; Rainbow Phillips 66; * Devry Institute of Technology, *
* Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 19, 1998 Filed: July 9, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Vera Eileen Jackson appeals from the final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri dismissing her complaint without

1 prejudice. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that Jackson failed to-3-

allegeany basis for subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
David H. Kaye is Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Pennsylvania State 

University (School of Law, University Park), and Regents’ Professor 

Emeritus, Arizona State University (Schools of Law and Life Sciences). He 

has held teaching or research positions at Cornell University, Duke 

University, the University of Chicago, the University of Virginia, and 

universities in England and China. Professor Kaye was an Assistant 

Watergate Special Prosecutor, an associate in a private law firm, and a 

law clerk for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He holds 

degrees in physics (MIT), astronomy (Harvard University), and law (Yale University).

Professor Kaye's research focuses on the law of evidence, criminal procedure, forensic science 

and statistics, and forensic genetics. His publications include textbooks on scientific evidence 

and on empirical methods in law; three legal treatises on evidence and scientific evidence; and 

over 180 articles and letters in journals of law, philosophy, psychology, medicine, genetics, 

forensic science, and statistics. He is the author or coauthor of The Double Helix and the Law of 

Evidence (Harvard University Press); of chapters of the National Academy of Sciences' and 

Federal Judicial Center's Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (three editions); of a 

forthcoming Handbook on Forensic Statistics; and of chapters on the interpretation of evidence 

in two encyclopedias of forensic science.

Professor Kaye was the founding director of the ASU Center for the Study of Law, Science, and 

Technology, the editor of the ABA publication, Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and 

Technology, and a member of committees of the American Statistical Association, the National 

Academy of Sciences (including the Committee on Forensic DNA Evidence: An Update), the 

National Commission on Forensic Science, the National Commission on the Future of DNA 

Evidence, the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 

and the International Conferences on Forensic Inference and Statistics. He is a recipient of the 

Association of American Law Schools’ John Henry Wigmore Award for Lifetime Achievement for 

contributions to the law of evidence.

He was appointed to the FSSB in 2019 and serves as the FSSB vice chair and liaison to the FSSB 

Legal Task Group.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For November 15, 2004 EXTENDICARE INC. (Translation of registrants name into English)
 3000 Steeles Avenue EastMarkham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9W2 (Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F [  ]
    
    Form 40-F [X]
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Yes [  ]
    
    No [X]
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Material Change Report dated
November 12, 200499.2
    
    Plan of Merger and Acquisition Agreement by and among Extendicare Health
Services, Inc., Alpha Acquisition, Inc. and Assisted Living Concepts, Inc.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. EXTENDICARE INC.Date: November 15, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ RICHARD L. BERTRANDRichard L. BertrandSenior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, as C.F.O., certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 17, 2010

 
| Signature: | /s/  Larry G. Badgley    |   |
|------------|--------------------------|--------|
|       | Larry G. Badgley, C.F.O. |   |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,
Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,

J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

April 3, 2018

s0326 

# Order

Clerk April 3, 2018

155821

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 15 5821 COA: 335761 Macomb CC: 2012-000570-FC RENYATTA ANNETTE HAMILTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applic ation for leave to appeal the March 29, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, becaus e the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EXHIBIT
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 333-144077, No. 333-145401, and No. 333-149483) pertaining to
the 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, and 2002
Stock Plan of Data Domain, Inc. of our reports dated March 12, 2009,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Data
Domain, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
of Data Domain, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2008.









/s/
      ERNST & YOUNG LLP




San
Jose, California


March
12, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11115]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RC09-3-001]


North American Electric Reliability Corporation; Northeast Power 
Coordinating Council, Inc.; Notice of Filing

May 6, 2009.
    Take notice that on April 21, 2009, the North American Electric 
Reliability Corporation and the Northeast Power Coordinating Council, 
Inc. (NPCC) submitted a supplemental compliance filing regarding the 
comprehensive list of Bulk Electric System facilities with the United 
States portion of the NPCC Region and responses to the set of questions 
and data requests, pursuant to the Commission's December 18 Order, 
North American Electric Reliability Corporation and Northeast Power 
Coordinating Council, Inc., 125 FERC ] 61,295 (2008).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. It is 
not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons 
other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0868592838faeaca9aea593b5b0b0afb2b480a6a5b2a3eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94d2d1c6d7dbfaf8fdfaf1c7e1e4e4fbe6e0d4f2f1e6f7baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on May 27, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11115 Filed 5-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 20 29

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Haro l R. Be is el ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt v. W el ls Farg o B an k, N.A. ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Weste rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s - F ay et te vi ll e

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 5, 2 01 2 Fi le d: Octo be r 11 , 20 12

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, MELLOY, andSHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM. Haro l Bei se l ap pe al s th e di st ric t co urt’s di sm is sa l of hi s ci vi l co m pl ai nt . Upo n 1 ou r care fu l de no vo rev ie w, se e McAd am s v. McC or d, 58 4 F.3 d 11 11 , 11 13 (8 th Ci r. The Hon o r ab l e Er in Set se r, Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, to who m th e cas e was refe rred fo r fin al di sp os it io n by co ns en t of th e p art ie s p ur su an t t o 2 8 U.S.C. § 63 6( c).20 09 ) (s ta nd ardof r ev ie w), we fin d n o b as is fo r rev ers al . Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm .

See 8 thCir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2 -
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation;d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in




---



##### 



the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  Date:  August 4, 2010
    By:
    /s/ RON E. HOOPERRon E. Hooper,Senior Vice President and Trust Administrator
Bank of America, N.A.