alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Richard DeGarmo, Acting Chief Executive Officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies that:





The Company’s Form 10-K/A Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2012  (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and   Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Richard DeGarmo


Richard DeGarmo, Director and


Acting Chief Executive Officer


Dated: December 30, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Michael Ceccon, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Kitcher Resources Inc. hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kitcher Resources Inc. for fiscal year ended January 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Kitcher Resources Inc.





Date: March 12, 2012





/s/   "Michael Ceccon"Michael CecconPresident, Chief Executive Officer







/s/   "Michael Ceccon"Michael CecconChief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kitcher Resources Inc. and will be retained by Kitcher Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                 HOLLINGER INC.

                    OSC DECISION ON GOING PRIVATE TRANSACTION

         Toronto, Ontario, Canada, March 28, 2005 - Hollinger Inc. ("Hollinger")
(TSX: HLG.C; HLG.PR.B) announced that the Ontario Securities Commission released
its decision today that the Commission was unable to form the opinion that it
would not be prejudicial to the public interest to grant the relief sought by
Hollinger and others in connection with the proposed share consolidation going
private transaction (the "Going Private Transaction") involving Hollinger. As a
result, the Commission denied granting the requested relief of varying the
Hollinger and Hollinger International Inc. management cease trade orders.

         Hollinger's Board of Directors is currently reviewing the decision to
determine whether or not the special meeting of Hollinger's shareholders to
consider the Going Private Transaction scheduled for Thursday, March 31, 2005
will proceed in the circumstances.

Company Background

         Hollinger's principal asset is its interest in Hollinger International
Inc. which is a newspaper publisher, the assets of which include the Chicago
Sun-Times, a large number of community newspapers in the Chicago area and a
portfolio of news media investments. Hollinger also owns a portfolio of
revenue-producing and other commercial real estate in Canada, including its head
office building located at 10 Toronto Street, Toronto, Ontario.

Media contact:
Larry Parnell
Hill & Knowlton
416-413-4623
larry.parnell@hillandknowlton.ca

                              www.hollingerinc.com
**Exhibit 24.1**

**Form of**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that I,                     , a member of the board of Directors of WABCO Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, (the “Company”) hereby constituteand appoint the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, the Treasurer, the Controller, the Secretary, the Assistant Secretary and the Chief Human Resources Officer, and each of them, my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, withfull power of substitution and resubstitution for me and in my name, place and stead, to sign the Form 10-K Annual Report for the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and all amendments thereto, and to file the same with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and the appropriate securities exchange, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, or their substitutes, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite ornecessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, or their substitutes, may lawfullydo or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This Power of Attorney shall be effective until such time as I deliver a written revocation thereof to the above-named attorneys-in-fact and agents.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOHAMMAD RAHMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 72622

Agency No. A094

- 922

- 849

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 14, 2016 **

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Mohammad Rahman, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for protection under the

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. §

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 20 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 72622

1252. We review for substantial evid ence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v.

Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006) , and w e deny the petition for

review.

In his opening brief, Rahman accepts the agency’s determin ation that he was

not credible, but challenges the denial of C AT protection. S ubstantial evidence

supports the agency’s denial of Rahman’s CAT claim , because it is based on the

same testimony the agency found not credible, and Rahman does not point to any

other evidence in the record that compels the conclusion that it is more likely than

not he would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official

in Bangladesh. See Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1049 (9th Cir. 2010). We

reject Rahman’s contention that the agency ignored evidence or err ed in its

analysis

.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
##### 



EXHIBIT 15

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Sears, Roebuck and Co.

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial information of Sears, Roebuck and Co. for the 13-week
and 39-week periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001, as
indicated in our report dated November 12, 2002; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 13-week period ended September 28, 2002,
is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 2-64879, 2-80037,
33-18081, 33-23793, 33-41485, 33-43459, 33-45479, 33-55825, 33-58851, 33-64345,
333-08141, and 333-52056 of Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Registration Statement No.
333-92082 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears, Roebuck Acceptance Corp.;
Registration Statement Nos. 33-64775, 333-18591, and 333-43309 of Sears,
Roebuck and Co. and Sears Roebuck and Co. Deferred Compensation Plan;
Registration Statement No. 333-56272 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the Sears
401(K) Savings Plan (formerly, The Savings and Profit Sharing Fund of Sears
Employees and the Sears 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan); Registration Statement No.
33-44671 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Sears DC Corp.; Registration Statement
No. 333-72514 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and the 2001 Broad-Based Stock Option
Plan; and Registration Statement No. 333-87942 of Sears, Roebuck and Co. and
the 2002 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
November 12, 2002
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11250]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: First Net Insurance 
Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 14 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2008 Revision, published July 1, 2008, at 73 FR 37644.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company: First Net Insurance Company (NAIC 10972). 
Business Address: 102 Julale Center, Hagatna, GU 96910. Phone: (671) 
477-8613. Underwriting Limitation b/: $634,000. Surety Licenses c/: GU, 
MP. Incorporated IN: GU.
    Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference 
copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2008 Revision, to 
reflect this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR 
part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of 
July 1st in the Circular, which outlines details as to the underwriting 
limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety 
business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c57O.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: April 28, 2009.
Rose M. Miller,
Acting Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. E9-11250 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
```
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

STEPHENS, DEERWESTER, and STARITA

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Daniel Q. MARTINEZ

Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 2020000264

Decided: 31 March 2021

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Nicholas S. Henry

Sentence adjudged 28 August 2020 by a special court-martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 6 months, and a bad-conduct 

discharge.

For Appellant: 

Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Berry, USMCR

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Martinez, NMCCA No. 202000264

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. 

§§ 859, 866.

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
#### Mitchel D. Ramos, Respondent, v Alicia Court Enterprises, Inc., et al., Defendants. County of Westchester, Nonparty Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 163]

*710In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, nonparty County of Westchester appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), entered September 11, 2007, as granted those branches of the plaintiffs motion which were to vacate its “assertion of a lien” on certain settlement proceeds, and its suspension of the plaintiffs benefits.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly vacated the nonparty County of Westchester’s “assertion of a lien” on the proceeds of a settlement of this personal injury action between the plaintiff and the defendants. Contrary to the County’s contention, its exclusive remedy to recover moneys paid to the plaintiff pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c was a direct action against the tortfeasor, and not a lien on the plaintiffs recovery *(see City of Buffalo v Maggio,*21 NY2d 1017 [1968]; *Musgrove v American Protection Ins. Co.,*32 AD3d 916 [2006]; *Foy v Florczuk,*51 AD2d 534 [1976]). The Supreme Court also properly vacated the County’s suspension of the plaintiffs benefits without affording him a hearing because the right of a disabled officer to receive disability payments pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c constitutes “a property interest giving rise to procedural due process protection, under the Fourteenth Amendment, before those payments are terminated” *(Matter of Park v Kapica,*8 NY3d 302, 310 [2007]).

Motion by the respondent on an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 11, 2007, inter alia, to strike the record on appeal and the nonparty appellant’s brief. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated June 16, 2008 [2008 NY Slip Op 74996(U)], that branch of the motion which is to strike the record on appeal and the nonparty appellant’s brief was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for a determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the branch of the motion which is to strike the *711record on appeal and the nonparty appellant’s brief is denied. Skelos, J.E, Santucci, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
949 A.2d 619

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner, v. Jonathan Ames STEINBERG, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 79,

Sept. Term, 2007.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

June 3, 2008.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 3rd day of June, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Jonathan A. Steinberg, be, and he is hereby, disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Jonathan A. Steinberg from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,039,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  840,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,604,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,545,861
<PP&E>                                       1,237,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                 879,997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,020,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          494,645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,239,249
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,020,110
<SALES>                                      2,379,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,379,525
<CGS>                                        1,388,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,010,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (630,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (630,630)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                HUTCHISON GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LIMITED
       (FORMERLY KNOWN AS VANDA SYSTEMS & COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS LIMITED)
                (incorporated in Bermuda with limited liability)
                        HK$3,200,000,000 CONVERTIBLE NOTE

                                FORM OF TRANSFER

FOR VALUE RECEIVED (receipt of which is hereby acknowledged) the undersigned
hereby transfers to

HUTCHISON TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL (CAYMAN) HOLDINGS LIMITED

Century Yard, Cricket Square, Hutchins Drive

P.O. Box 2681GT, George Town, Grand Cayman

British West Indies

Cayman Islands


HK$3,200,000,000 principal amount of the Hutchison Global Communications
Holdings Limited (formerly known as Vanda Systems & Communications Holdings
Limited) HK$3,200,000,000 Convertible Notes and all rights in respect thereof.


Dated: 20 September 2004

For and on behalf of
Mangere International Limited

/s/ Edith Shih


-----------------------------
Director
November 13, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DEBBIE MALLARD, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00974-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record 

indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

November 13, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00652

- CR

A ntonine D. HENDERSON, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR5195W Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Antonine D. Henderson entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which he pleaded nolo contendere to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating this “ is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. ” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). Henderson timely filed a notice of appeal. The
clerk ’ s record, which includes the trial court ’ s r ule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain ag reement, has been filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal

“ if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the
record. ” Id

.

Henderson is hereby given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to r ule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing he has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by December 4, 2015

. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 25.2(d) ; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04

- 03

- 00176

- CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref ’ d) (not designated for publication).

We order all appellate deadlines suspended until further order of the court. We further
order the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record

._________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 13th day of November, 2 015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 10.54




Modification of January 22, 2007 Distribution Agreement (the “Agreement”) Between Lightning Poker, Inc. (“LP”) And Shuffle Master, Inc. (“SMI”).




[Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked "[******]", has been omitted and filed separately with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.]




As of April 2010, the Agreement was modified in the following respects:




1)           Shuffle Master GmbH & Co KG (“SM Europe”) was added as a party.




2)           SM Europe became the exclusive distributor of LP’s proprietary electronic poker table (the “EPT”) in Europe and Africa. All other exclusivity provisions relating to distribution of the EPTs were terminated.




3)           SM Europe is entitled to retain [******], as defined in paragraph 6 of the Agreement, as the distribution fee. The balance of [******] is to be remitted by SM Europe to LP.




4)           SM Europe took over any and all existing service contracts for EPTs in Europe and Africa, and is entitled to all service revenues from the service contracts.




5)           SM Europe’s purchase of spare parts from LP will be priced at [******].




6)           SM Europe shall build up a spare parts stock of its own in order to supply its customers accordingly. Existing EPTs still owned by LP for spare parts shall not be used for such purpose.




7)           Spare parts taken from incomplete EPTs shall be provided by LP as warranty replacement free of charge. SM Europe shall return to LP defective parts replaced by such spare parts.




8)           SM Europe has the right to assign, sublicense or transfer its rights, duties and obligations assumed under the Agreement to any of SM Europe’s current or future agents, affiliates or subsidiaries.




9)           The modified terms shall continue in effect for five years, but shall be deemed terminated on the same date the Agreement is terminated by a party.