alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-7366, No. 333-106654, and No. 33-25333 ofNortel Networks Corporation on Form S-8 of our report datedJune 22, 2006, relating to theFinancial Statements and Supplemental Schedule of the Nortel NetworksLong-Term Investment Plan (which report expressed an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a suspension in March 2006 of contributions into the Nortel Networks Corporation Stock Fund), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Nortel Networks Long-TermInvestment Plan for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPDallas, Texas
Framework Agreement among Comerica Bank, Remington Capital, LLC and the Registra



 Exhibit 10.98 
  
 FRAMEWORK AGREEMENT 
  
 This Framework Agreement is entered into on September 23, 2004 among Comerica Bank (“Comerica”), Remington Capital, LLC (“Remington”)
and Synbiotics Corporation (“Synbiotics”). 
  
 1. At a
Closing to occur immediately upon the signing of this Agreement: 
  
 (a) Comerica and Synbiotics shall enter into a Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement and Loan Documents and Waiver of Defaults (the “Fourth Amendment”) calling for the original Amended Promissory Note to be amended so as to be
split into two promissory notes (“New Promissory Note A” and “New Promissory Note B”), each (separately) differing from the provisions of the original Amended Promissory Note in the manner specified in the Fourth Amendment, and
amending certain other Loan Documents as specified therein. 
  
 (b) Synbiotics shall deliver to Comerica, in pledge, the $425,000 promissory note from Agen Biomedical Limited dated June 25, 2004 and shall pledge to Comerica 308,750 shares of Synbiotics Europe SAS. 
  
 (c) Comerica and Remington shall enter into a Loan Purchase Agreement.

  
 (d) Comerica shall assign and deliver New Promissory Note B to
Remington against delivery of the cash consideration specified in the Loan Purchase Agreement. 
  
 (e) Comerica and Remington shall enter into a Subordination Agreement. 
  
 (f) Synbiotics shall issue to each Comerica and Remington a separate warrant for the purchase of 250,000 shares of Synbiotics common stock. The exercise
price of such warrant shall be the closing sale price of Synbiotics common stock on the business day before the Closing. 
  
 (g) Synbiotics shall issue and sell at least 200 shares of its Series C Preferred Stock for $1,000 cash per share to accredited investors. 
  
 (h) The other actions called for by the Fourth Amendment, the Loan Purchase
Agreement and the Subordination Agreement to occur at the Closing shall occur. 







 2. The effectuation of each of the matters specified in Section 1 above is expressly conditioned upon the
simultaneous effectuation of each and every one of the other matters specified in Section 2 above. 
  
 3. Each of Comerica and Remington separately represents that it is acquiring its Synbiotics warrant, and would acquire the underlying common stock, for
its own account for investment and not with a view to distribution. These securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933. 
  
 4. The Framework Agreement and the other written agreements specified herein constitute the entire agreement among the parties, and between each
respective pair of parties, with regard to the subject matter hereof and thereof, and supersede all prior and contemporaneous agreements, commitments and discussions with regard to such subject matter. This Agreement can be amended only in writing.

  

			
	 COMERICA BANK

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Thomas G. Kinzel


	
	 REMINGTON CAPITAL, LLC

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/Jerry L. Ruyan


	
	 SYNBIOTICS CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Paul R. Hays




  

 2
##### 



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of January 2005 Commission File Number: 0-29350 VASOGEN INC.  2505 Meadowdale Boulevard, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 5S2  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of
Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F

                                         Form 40-F X Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1). Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted
solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted
to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must furnish and
make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant is incorporated, domiciled
or legally organized (the registrants home country), or under the rules of the home country
exchange on which the registrants securities are traded, as long as the report or other document
is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been distributed to the registrants
security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K
submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes  No X If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-.




---



##### 



On January 18, 2005, Vasogen Inc. publicly released comparative audited consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto at November 30, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the years ended
November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002. These statements are attached as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated
herein by reference. On January 18, 2005, Vasogen publicly released its Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year ended November 30, 2004,
which is attached as Exhibit 99.2 to this report and is incorporated herein by reference.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. VASOGEN INC.By:Christopher J. WaddickExecutive
Vice President &
     Chief
Financial Officer Date: January 19, 2005




---



##### 



Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Consolidated Financial Statements99.2
    
    Managements Discussion and
Analysis for the period endedNovember
30, 2004
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. KAREN ELAINE EVERETT

No. 350A06

(Filed 26 January 2007)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 178 N.C. App. 44, 630 S.E.2d 703 (2006), reversing and remanding a judgment entered 12 August 2004 by Judge Leon Stanback in Superior Court, Wake County, and ordering a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court 8 January 2007.

*Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Thomas G. Meacham, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant.*

*Amos Granger Tyndall for defendant-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

Justice HUDSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. *See State v. Harrison,*360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); *Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co.,*356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); *Robinson v. Byrd,*356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert S. Prather, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bull Run Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as
of May 31, 2005 (the Evaluation Date) and presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; andc)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date:
    
    July 14, 2005Signed:
    
    /s/ ROBERT S. PRATHER, JR.Robert S. Prather, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
exv10w3



 






Exhibit 10.3




September 17, 2004



Mr. J. Timothy Howard

Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

Fannie Mae

3900 Wisconsin Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20016



Dear Tim:


The Fannie Mae Board of Directors proposes that the following amendments be
made to your Employment Agreement, executed by Fannie Mae in April 2004 and
previously amended on June 30, 2004:




•  Amend Section 4.1(b) to read as follows:


(b) For Cause: Notwithstanding any other provision
hereunder, the Corporation may terminate Employee’s
employment for “Cause,” which shall mean that
Employee has (A) materially harmed the Corporation
by, in connection with his service under this
Agreement, engaging in dishonest or fraudulent
actions or willful misconduct, or performing his
duties in a grossly negligent manner, or (B) been
convicted of, or pleaded nolo contendere with respect
to, a felony. The Corporation by written notice may
terminate Employee’s employment for Cause at any time
following the occurrence of an event described in
(B). Employee shall not be deemed to have been
terminated for Cause following the occurrence of an
event described in (A) unless the Corporation shall
have provided (i) reasonable notice to Employee
setting forth the Corporation’s intention to
terminate for Cause, (ii) where remedial action is
feasible, a reasonable opportunity for such action,
(iii) an opportunity for Employee, together with his
counsel, to be heard before the Board and (iv)
Employee with a notice of termination stating that
Employee was guilty of the conduct set forth in this
Section 4.1(b)(A) and specifying the particulars
thereof in detail. No act or failure to act will be
considered “willful” unless it is done, or omitted to
be done, by Employee in bad faith or without
reasonable belief that his



 









 





J. Timothy Howard

September 17, 2004

Page 2 of 2




action or omission was in the best interests of the
Corporation.



•  Amend Section 5.2 to read as follows:


Section 5.2. Termination for Cause. In the event of
a Termination of Employment for Cause, Employee shall
not be entitled to any payments or benefits except as
follows: Employee shall be entitled to all of
Employee’s Base Salary which has accrued to the date
of termination and any benefits or awards (whether of
options, stock or other property) which have vested
prior to such date. The Corporation shall have no
further obligations to Employee.


If you agree to the foregoing, please so indicate by signing the enclosed copy
of this letter in the space indicated below and returning a fully executed copy
of the letter to my attention, whereupon your Employment Agreement will be
amended.




	 
	Sincerely,

	 

	/s/ Anne Mulcahy

	 

	Anne Mulcahy

	Chairman, Compensation Committee








AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:




	 	 	 	 
	/s/ J. Timothy Howard

	 	September 20, 2004	 
	
 

	 	
 	 
	J. Timothy Howard

	 	Date
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4015 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount of 

gain excluded from the sale of a principal residence. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the amount of gain excluded from the sale of a principal 

residence. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Ownership Pro5 tection Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASED EXCLUSION OF GAIN FROM SALE OF 

7 PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 121(b) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusion of gain from 

10 sale of principal residence) is amended— 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 4015 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘$250,000’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘$350,000’’; and 

3 (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking so much of 

4 such paragraph as precedes clause (i) and inserting 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(A) $700,000 LIMITATION FOR CERTAIN

7 JOINT RETURNS.—Paragraph (1) shall be ap8 plied by substituting ‘$700,000’ for ‘350,000’ 

9 if—’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 subsection (a) shall apply to sales and exchanges after De12 cember 31, 2006, in taxable years ending after such date. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.3
------------
CERTIFICATION
-------------

I, Elise Nissen, Chief Financial Officer of AFP Imaging Corporation, certify
that:

1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging
    Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
    a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
    statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
    the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
    registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
             disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
             supervision, to enable that material information relating to the
             registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
             to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
             period in which this report is being prepared;

         b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
             and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
             the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
             the end of the period covered by this report based on such
             evaluation; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
             or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
             reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
             record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
             other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
             internal controls over financial reporting.





Date: February 13, 2004                            /s/__Elise Nissen____________
                                                           Elise Nissen
                                                     Chief Financial Officer



                                       20
950 A.2d 100

#### William K. SHAFFER v. STATE of Maryland.

No. 29,

Sept. Term, 2008.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

June 12, 2008.

William K. Shaffer, Jessup, for petitioner.

*106Kathleen A. Ellis, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen.), Baltimore, for respondent.

Submitted before BELL, C.J., HARRELL, BATTAGLIA, GREENE and MURPHY, JJ.

PER CURIAM

ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case, it is this 12th day of June, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated and the case is remanded to that Court with directions to remand the case to the Circuit Court for Washington County for further proceedings. Costs to abide the result.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1994
<CASH>                                             692
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,645
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,026
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,991
<PP&E>                                          10,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,032)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,562
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,234
<PREFERRED>                                        417
<COMMON>                                           290
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,531)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,972
<SALES>                                          1,989
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,632
<CGS>                                              944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 588
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (221)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,453)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reynaldo Concepcion, Appellant.

Submitted June 14, 2010;

decided June 24, 2010

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn W.L. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
| (1)   | the      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of World Series of Golf, Inc. for the year      ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year      ended December 31, 2007,  fairly presents in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of World      Series of Golf, Inc.. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/R. Terry Leiweke                                                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                            |
| Name:  | R.      Terry Leiweke                                                           |
|   |                                                                            |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                            |
| Date:  | March      17, 2008                                                             |