alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Gold Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Garrison, President and Chief Operationg Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)        The Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
                 amended; and

      (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company.





August 19, 2002         By: /s/  Robert Garrison
                                 -----------------------------------------------
Date                             Robert Garrison
                                 President, Chief Operating Officer
#### State v. Conner

Case below: Gates County Superior Court

No. 219A91-6

1. Def’s PWC to Review the Order of Gates County Superior Court

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss PWC

1. Denied 06/27/07

2. Dismissed as Moot 06/27/07
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,548]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 10, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of workers of Mine Safety Appliances, Murrysville-Soft Goods (Harness), a subsidiary of Mine Safety Appliances, Murrysville, Pennsylvania.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of April 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10876 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### State v. Ragland

Case below: 177 N.C. App. 150

No. 246P06

1. Defs NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA05-121)

2. Defs PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Dismissed *Ex Mero Motu*01/25/07

2. Denied 01/25/07
** **

UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM10-Q**

 

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thequarterly period ended September 30, 2009

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

For thetransition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number0-10256

 

**SHELTER PROPERTIESII**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  

[X] Yes  [ ]No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry Rupnarine, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 254]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), rendered November 6, 2009, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court’s conduct, including its alleged excessive interference in the course of the trial, did not deprive the defendant of his right to a fair trial *(see People v Vale,*198 AD2d 246 [1993]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10920]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,715]

Ram Rod Industries, Prentice, WI; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 31, 2009 in response to a worker 
petition filed on behalf of the workers of Ram Rod Industries, 
Prentice, Wisconsin.
    The petitioners requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 20th day of April 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10920 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6897

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FORREST STEPHEN BLACK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilly, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-90-277-WS, CA-97-615-6)

Submitted: December 30, 1998 Decided: January 19, 1999

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Forrest Stephen Black, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Forrest Stephen Black seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Black, Nos. CR-90-277-

WS; CA-97-615-6 (M.D.N.C. May 29, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The
Board of Directors
Boise Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-150563) on Form S-8 and the registration statement
(No. 333-155595) on Form S-3 of Boise Inc. of our report dated February 23, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of
Boise Inc. as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of loss, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2008, annual report on Form 10-K of
Boise Inc.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Boise,
Idaho
February 23, 2009

---
Trust Receipt #5-9-07-2



 Exhibit 10.6 
 TRUST RECEIPT #5-9-07-2 
 The undersigned (hereinafter called the “TRUSTEE”) hereby acknowledges receipt from AUTO
FINANCE CENTER OF AMERICA, INC. in Madison Heights, Michigan (hereinafter called “ENTRUSTER”) or from a third party on behalf of or at the direction of the ENTRUSTER of the goods designated below or for and in consideration of the present
advance of new value as evidence by the Promissory Note of the TRUSTEE made to the ENTRUSTER in the amount of such advance of even date, herewith payable on demand, does acknowledge and agree that a security interest in said goods has been and is
granted and exists and will continue to exist and retain in favor of the ENTRUSTER. 
  

											
	 Year/ Make
	  	Model	  	Stock #	  	Vin #	  	Actual Cost	  	Floor Plan
	 93 Buick
	  	Park Ave	  	73R	  	1G4CW53LXP1632096	  	2000.00	  	2000.00
	 92 Mercury
	  	Sable	  	196R	  	1MELM5049PA635111	  	1500.00	  	1500.00
	 93 Mercury
	  	Sable	  	196R	  	1MELM50UXNG656060	  	1500.00	  	1500.00
	 94 Ford
	  	F250	  	300	  	2FTHF26H5RCA44186	  	6400.00	  	6400.00
	 95 Pontiac
	  	Grand
Prix	  	533R	  	1G2WJ52M9SF274743	  	2425.00	  	2425.00
	 94 GMC
	  	Jimmy	  	761R	  	1GKDT13W2R0513458	  	700.00	  	700.00
	 96 Ford
	  	Econoline	  	0340723	  	1FTEE14Y0THA00213	  	2101.00	  	2101.00
	 90 Ford
	  	F350	  	0340798	  	1FDKF37H8LNA72832	  	6700.00	  	6700.00
	 98 Eagle
	  	Talon	  	0360305T	  	4E3AK44Y4WE027888	  	800.00	  	800.00
	 01 Ford
	  	Focus	  	0361003	  	3FAFP31361R170791	  	3775.00	  	3775.00
		  		  		  		  		  	27901.00

 The TRUSTEE agrees to hold said goods, together with all accessories, attachments and equipment, as a component
part thereof, in trust for the ENTRUSTER for the purpose solely of selling or exchanging them, or of procuring there their sale or exchange in the ordinary course of the TRUSTEE’S trade. 
 The Trust Receipt has been executed and delivered pursuant to and in furtherance of a certain Security Agreement Trust Receipt hereto for executed and delivered by the
undersigned (therein referred to as the DEBTOR) to and in favor of AUTO FINANCE CENTER OF AMERICA INC (therein referred to as the SECURED PARTY), and all the terms and conditions of said Agreement are incorporated herein by reference, made a part of
the Trust Receipt and shall apply to the property above described and the proceeds thereof and to the duties and obligations of the Debtor in connection therewith. 
  

									
	Dated: May 11, 2007.	 		 	
			
	Witnesses:	 		 	Keith Bullard’s Auto Liquidation Center, Inc.
				
	/s/ Mark R. Horvath	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Keith Bullard
		 		 		 	Its:	 	Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                             135
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,075
<INVENTORY>                                      4,411
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,274
<PP&E>                                           9,036
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,709
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           42,100
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           315
<OTHER-SE>                                      (7,381)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,796
<SALES>                                         17,248
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,248
<CGS>                                           13,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (22)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 901
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (8)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,316)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,316)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.48)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Helen Gelish, Appellant, v Dix Hills Water District et al., Respondents.

[872 NYS2d 486]

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J.), dated February 7, 2008, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the petition is granted, and the notice of claim is deemed served.

In determining whether to grant an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the key factors which the court must consider are whether the movant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for the failure to serve a timely notice of claim, whether the municipality acquired actual notice of the essential facts of the claim within 90 days after the claim arose or a rea*842sonable time thereafter, and whether the delay would substantially prejudice the municipality in its defense *(see*General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; *Matter of Blair v Pleasantville Union Free School Dist.,*52 AD3d 827 [2008]; *Matter of Brownstein v Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead,*52 AD3d 507, 508 [2008]; *Jordan v City of New York,*41 AD3d 658, 659 [2007]). The presence or absence of any one factor is not necessarily determinative *(see Matter of Leeds v Port Washington Union Free School Dist.,*55 AD3d 734 [2008]; *Jordan v City of New York,*41 AD3d at 659). However, whether the municipality timely acquired actual notice of the essential facts constituting the claim is a factor which is accorded great weight *(see Brownstein v Incorporated Vil. of Hempstead,*52 AD3d at 508; *Matter of Dell’Italia v Long Is. R.R. Corp.,*31 AD3d 758, 759 [2006]).

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim. Even if the letter sent by the petitioner’s counsel to the respondent Dix Hills Water District within 90 days after the accident was insufficient to provide actual notice of the essential facts constituting the claim, the petitioner served her notice of claim less than one month after the expiration of the 90-day period. Thus, the respondents received actual notice of the essential facts constituting the claim within a reasonable time after the expiration of the 90-day period *(see Bussey v City of New York,*50 AD3d 938, 939 [2008]; *Matter of Urgiles v New York City School Constr. Auth.,*283 AD2d 434 [2001]; *Matter of Harrison v New York City Hous. Auth.,*188 AD2d 367 [1992]). Given the minimal delay in serving the notice of claim and the lack of substantial prejudice to the respondents, the Supreme Court should have granted the petition notwithstanding the lack of reasonable excuse *(see Matter of Molloy v City of New York,*30 AD3d 603, 604 [2006]; *Matter of Morales v New York City Tr. Auth.,*15 AD3d 580 [2005]; *Matter of Urgiles v New York City School Constr. Auth.,*283 AD2d 434 [2001]; *Matter of Irizarry v City of Yonkers,*193 AD2d 746 [1993]). Mastro, J.E, Fisher, Florio, Garni and Eng, JJ., concur. [See 19 Misc 3d 270.]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sandra M. Peay, Contact Representative, or Renee Hallman, Contact Representative, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room H-303, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E9-11249 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0554
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. THOMAS JOSEPH SCHIFFERNS ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant and Appellant in this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender’s Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Defendant and Appellant at his last known address.
Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 3 2020

08/03/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0554
#### In re S.M., C.E., E.E.

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 149

No. 065P07

Respondent’s (Mother) Motion to Withdraw PDR/Writ of Certiorari (COA06-842)

Allowed 05/03/07
**Exhibit 31.1**




**Certification**




I,
      Terry
      L. McCoy, in my capacity as Executive Vice President of First Horizon Asset
      Securities Inc (the Depositor) do hereby certify that:





1.    I
      have
      reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
      be
      filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of First
      Horizon Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-2 (the “Exchange Act periodic
      reports”);





2.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
      contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
      fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which
      such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
      by
      this report;





3.    Based
      on
      my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required
      to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
      in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  Based
      upon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report
      under Item 1123 of Regulation AB and except as disclosed in the Exchange
      Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under
      the
      servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5.    All
      of
      the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
      with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
      in
      this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange
      Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
      report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
      of
      noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
      on
      Form 10-K.





In
      giving
      the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided
      to me
      by The Bank of New York.







**First
                Horizon Asset Securities Inc., as Depositor**By:
            /s/
                Terry L. McCoyTerry
                L. McCoy,Executive
                Vice President
              (Senior
                Officer of the Depositor in charge of
              Securitization)




Date:
      March 28, 2008