alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                             -------------------------

                                    FORM 6-K

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the month of: February 2005                    Commission File No.: 1-11796

                       MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
                              (Name of registrant)

                            1600 Britannia Road East
                              Mississauga, Ontario
                                     L4W 1J2

                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                                  PREMDOR INC.
                           (Former Name of Registrant)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

    Form 20-F [ ]                                        Form 40-F  [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):

    Yes       [ ]                                          No        [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):

    Yes       [ ]                                          No        [X]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

    Yes       [ ]                                          No        [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                              MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Date: February 22, 2005

                                                 By: /s/ Harley Ulster
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                 Name:  Harley Ulster
                                                 Title: Executive Vice-President
                                                        and Secretary


<PAGE>




                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


EXHIBIT           DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT
-------           ----------------------
99.1              Material Change Report dated February 22, 2005

99.2              Second Amended and Restated Combination Agreement dated
                  February 17, 2005
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6283

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus LINWOOD LEE RUFFIN, a/k/a Lenny, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (1:99-cr-00024-TSE) Submitted: April 20, 2006 Decided: April 26, 2006 Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Linwood Lee Ruffin, Appellant Pro Se. Sonya LaGene Sacks, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Linwood Lee Ruffin seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, which the district court properly construed as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Ruffin has not made the requisite showing. Additionally, we construe Ruffin’s notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or successive § 2255 motion. See United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). To obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously- 3 - unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence sufficient to establish that no reasonable fact finder would have found the movant guilty. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(C), 2255 (2000). Ruffin’s claim does not satisfy either of these conditions. For these reasons, we deny a certificate of appealability, decline to authorize Ruffin to file a successive § 2255 motion, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERIC YALE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 523 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of February, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED . The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) Whether the Superior Court misapplied controlling case law and misapprehended controlling facts in concluding that the trial court did not err as a matter of law or abuse its discretion in precluding the defense from presenting evidence that Larry Thompson, an

individual found at the scene, ha d been previously arrested for similar offenses and possessed knowledge of how to manufacture methamphetamine, to demonstrate that he was the perpetrator of the present charges? M.D. Appeal Dkt. 9 MAP 2020
EX-35.4
(logo) J.E. ROBERT
COMPANIES

15455 Dallas Parkway, 6th Floor
Addison, TX 75001

tel 972.764.5248
fax 972.764.5101


CERTIFICATION

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-LDP10
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2007-LDP10 (the "Trust")
Annual Compliance Statement per PSA Section 11.09

I, Michael F. Cocanougher, on behalf of J.E. Robert Company, Inc., as special
servicer (the "Certifying Servicer"), certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial
Mortgage Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with
the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

1.   I have reviewed the Certifying Servicer's activities during the preceding
     calendar year or portion thereof and the Certifying Servicer's performance
     under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

2.   To the best of my knowledge, based on my review, the Certifying Servicer
     has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing
     Agreement in all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof.

Date: March 4, 2008

J.E. ROBERT COMPANY, INC.

By: /s/ Michael F. Cocanougher
Michael F. Cocanougher
Director
Order entered July 1, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01432-CR

AYOUAL AKOUT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-12-60792-N

ORDER

Because the voluntariness of appellant’s custodial confession was challenged at trial, the 

trial judge was required, pursuant to section 6 of article 38.22 of the Texas Code of Criminal 

Procedure, to make written fact findings and conclusions of law as to whether the challenged 

statement was made voluntarily. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN., art.§ 6 (West 2014). The 

record before us does not contain the required findings and conclusions, and nothing indicates 

the trial judge issued any findings and conclusions. Accordingly, we ORDER the Honorable 

Fred Tinsley, Presiding Judge of the 195th Judicial District Court, to issue, no later than July 

10, 2015, the required written findings of fact and conclusions of law. See Urias v. State, 155 

S.W.3d 141, 142 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). If necessary, the trial judge may review the reporter’s 
record of the testimony upon which the original ruling was made to refresh his recollection of the 

reasons behind such ruling. See Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987).

We ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing the trial court’s findings and conclusions no later than July 13, 2015.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply with this order. 

It shall be reinstated July 14, 2015 or when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed, whichever 

occurs earlier.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Judge Tinsley, Ms. 

Pitre, and counsel for the parties. 

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,271

EX PARTE DAVID DUANE DUNIGAN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 32765CR/A IN THE 40 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM ELLIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of evading arrest

and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal despite telling Applicant that he would file the appeal on his behalf. 

The trial court has determined that trial counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We

find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the
2

judgment of conviction in Cause No. 32765CR/A from the 40th Judicial District Court of Ellis

County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be

calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues.

We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file

a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: January 13, 2010

Do Not Publish
#### Jose OJEDA-VAZQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72862.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2009.*

Filed May 26, 2009.

Mario Acosta, Jr., Esquire, Elsa Ines Martinez, Esquire, Martinez Goldsby & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esquire, Assistant Director, Susan Houser, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Ronald E. LeFevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Ojeda-Vazquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immi*624gration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

Contrary to Ojeda-Vazquez’s contention, the IJ concluded that Ojeda-Vazquez lacks good moral character as a matter of discretion. We lack jurisdiction to consider his challenge to that determination. *See 8*U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); *see also Moran v. Ashcroft,*395 F.3d 1089, 1091 (9th Cir.2005).

We also lack jurisdiction to consider Ojeda-Vazquez’s contention that the IJ made an improper credibility determination because he did not raise it before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (generally requiring exhaustion of claims before the BIA).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
|  | 1. | A                base salary of $200,000 annually. |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | You                will receive 5% of the total outstanding fully diluted shares in                stock                options of Mountains West Exploration, Inc. The options will vest                over a                three year period, 40% upon signing and 20% at the end of each successive                year end period. The options will be issued at $.51, which is the                trading                value as of today, September 19,                2007. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 3. | Employee                health and dental insurance coverage is provided at the same level                as the                rest of the company, once insurance coverage is                initiated. |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 4. | You                will be eligible to participate in the company sponsored 401K plan                when it                is implemented. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Larry Malone | 9/19/2007 |   | /s/                Donald Hauschild | 9/19/2007 |
|---------------------------------|-----------|--------|-------------------------------------|-----------|
| Larry                  Malone   | Date      |   | Donald                Hauschild     | Date      |
| President                       |      |   |                                |      |

----
SHIV INVESTMENTS OF

JACKSONVILLE, LLC

,

Petitioner,

v.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, and

THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINA L UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2252

Opinion filed September 19, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

.

Paul M. Harden, Jacksonville , for Petitioner.

Craig D. Feiser and Jason R. T eal, Assistant General Counsel, Jacksonville , for

Respondent s

.

P ER CURIAM.

DENIED.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, as  C.E.O.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2008

Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
          ----------------------------------
          Calvin A. Wallen, III, C.E.O.
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                November 2, 2004

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346

                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ] No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit   Description
-------   -----------
<S>       <C>
99.1      Press Release, dated November 1, 2004 regarding Hollinger Inc.
          Provides Status Update.

99.2      Press Release, dated November 2, 2004 regarding Hollinger Inc.
          Retirement of Conrad (Lord) Black.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 2, 2004

                                        HOLLINGER INC.

                                        By /s/ Peter G. White
                                           ---------------------------------
                                           Name:  Peter G. White
                                           Title: Co-Chief Operating Officer
                                                  and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATION FOR THE THREE MONTH AND NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,207,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,428,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                   346,742
<INVENTORY>                                  4,418,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,170,480
<PP&E>                                       5,161,794
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,896,832
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,759,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,900,265
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,040
<COMMON>                                        97,944
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,304,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,759,958
<SALES>                                     20,831,319
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,372,394
<CGS>                                       10,062,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,062,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,512,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             727,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,223,218
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,192,591
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,030,627
<DISCONTINUED>                               (485,544)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,545,083
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
##### 



FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of June 2005 Commission File Number 1-14916 BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES CORPORATION  BCE Place
181 Bay Street
Suite 330
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5J 2T3
(416) 369-2300
(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form
20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F o                      Form 40-F þ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o                     No þ If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-




---



##### 



DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS FORM 6-K See the Exhibit Index to this Form 6-K. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date: June 7, 2005. Brookfield Properties CorporationBy:
    /s/ "Craig J. Laurie"Name:
    Craig J. LaurieTitle:
    Senior Vice President & Chief
Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Brookfield Properties Corporation Report on Voting Results from Annual and Special Shareholders Meeting held on April 27, 2005