alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Gallery of Art Archives: World War II Research Resources

World War II-Related Exhibitions at the National Gallery of Art

During the war years, the National Gallery of Art presented a series of exhibitions explicitly 

related to the war or presenting works of art for which the museum held custody during the 

hostilities.

Descriptions of each of the exhibitions is available online on the past exhibition web pages. 

Catalogs, brochures, press releases, news reports, and photographs also may be available for 

examination in the archives for some of the exhibitions.

The Great Fire of London, 1940

18 December 1941-28 January 1942

American Artists’ Record of War and Defense

7 February-8 March 1942

French Government Loan

2 March 1942-1945, periodically

Soldiers of Production

17 March-15 April 1942

Three Triptychs by Contemporary Artists

8-15 April 1942

Paintings, Posters, Watercolors, and Prints, Showing the Activities of the American Red Cross

2-30 May 1942

Art Exhibition by Men of the Armed Forces

5 July-2 August 1942

War Posters

17 January-18 February 1943

Belgian Government Loan

7 February 1943-January 1946

Updated October 2023 National Gallery of Art Archives 1 of 3
War Art

20 June-1 August 1943

Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Drawings and Watercolors from French Museums and Private 

Collections

8 August-5 September 1943 (second showing)

Art for Bonds

12 September-10 October 1943

Marine Watercolors and Drawings

12 September-10 October 1943

Paintings of Naval Aviation by American Artists

21 November-12 December 1943

The Army at War

20 February-19 March 1944

British War Paintings

23 April-20 May 1944

American Battle Painting 1776-1918

4 July-4 September 1944

Paintings of Naval Medicine

10 September-8 October 1944

Paintings and Drawings of the United States Coast Guard

17 September-8 October 1944

Wartime Paintings of the Army Air Forces

15 October-12 November 1944

French Drawings

19 November 1944-8 May 1945

The War Against Japan

27 May-19 June 1945

Soldier Art

4 July-4 September 1945

Updated October 2023 National Gallery of Art Archives 2 of 3
Marine Corps Battle Art

10 November-16 December 1945

Paintings and Drawings on Loan from the French Government

23 December 1945-5 February 1946 (last showing)

Fine Arts under Fire

14 May-2 June 1946

Paintings Looted from Holland, Returned through the Efforts of the United States Armed Forces

7 December 1946-1 January 1947

Men of Action of the Naval Services, World War II

23 November-14 December 1947

Paintings from the Berlin Museums

17 March-25 April 1948

Michelangelo’s David, from the Bargello Museum, Florence

24 January-28 June 1949

Art Treasures from the Vienna Collections

20 November 1949-22 January 1950

Updated October 2023 National Gallery of Art Archives 3 of 3
#### In re Mi.T., Kys.T., Ma.T., & Kye.T.

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 759

No. 148P07

Respondent’s (Mother) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-1214)

Denied 08/23/07
September 22, 2004



XL Capital Ltd
XL House
One Bermudiana Road
Hamilton HM 11
Bermuda

Re:      Primus Guaranty, Ltd. - New York Stock Exchange Listing
         -------------------------------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Primus Guaranty, Ltd. is filing with the New York Stock Exchange an application
for the initial listing of its common shares upon the completion of its initial
public offering. As part of that listing application, the Exchange has requested
XL Capital Ltd, as the largest beneficial owner of Primus's common shares, to
deliver to it a letter confirming, among other things, XL's compliance with the
Exchange's continued listing standards and the extent of its anticipated
ownership of Primus's common shares after the completion of Primus's initial
public offering.

Primus hereby agrees to indemnify and hold harmless XL, its directors, officers
and employees (in their capacities as such), and each person, if any, who
controls XL within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and each affiliate
of XL within the meaning of Rule 405 under such Act, from and against any loss,
claim, damage or liability, joint or several, or any action in respect thereof
(including from and against any legal and any other expenses reasonably incurred
in connection with investigating or defending such loss, claim, damage,
liability or action), to which XL, or any such director, officer, employee or
controlling person may become subject, insofar as such loss, claim, damage,
liability or action arises out of, or is based upon, Primus's application for
listing of its common shares on the Exchange including, without limitation, the
aforesaid letter which XL has agreed to deliver to the Exchange; provided,
however, that the foregoing indemnity does not cover any loss, claim, damage,
liability or action (i) which is governed by Section 10 of the form of
Underwriting Agreement to be executed by Primus, certain shareholders of Primus
(including XL) and the Underwriters for which Lehman Brothers Inc., Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, UBS Securities LLC,
William Blair & Company, L.L.C. and Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc. are acting as
Representatives; or (ii) which arises out of, or is based upon, any information
or representations about XL which XL provides to the Exchange in the
aforementioned letter.






If the foregoing sets forth our agreement on the matters set forth herein,
please indicate by signing in the space provided below.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            PRIMUS GUARANTY, LTD.


                                            By: /s/ Zachary Snow
                                                ------------------------------
                                                  Name:  Zachary Snow
                                                  Title: General Counsel



ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


XL CAPITAL LTD

/s/ Paul S. Giordano
--------------------------
Name:  Paul S. Giordano
Title: Executive Vice President and
       General Counsel
On Little Spider by Alexander Calder

Terri Ellen Cross Davis

Whisper said Movement to the Spider.

Casting off light, propelling into color’s true power. 

Heaving, thinking: Spider grows: awaiting

Itself: its pointed intuition: its gnawing hunger

fuels fruition.

Heaven is heavier

in cognition.

Belief: a tri-prong stand.

A web— a glistening intention.

A web— a glistening intention.

Belief: a tri-prong stand.

In cognition

heaven is heavier,

fueling fruition—

itself-— its pointed intuition. A gnawing hunger

heaves into thinking: Spider grows: waiting

casting off light, propelling into color’s true power. 

Whisper says Movement to the Spider.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Robert A. Doak, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Mountains  West
Exploration, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: July 7, 2004


/s/ Robert A. Doak
- -----------------------
 Robert A. Doak President
VI 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3796 

For the relief of Salah Naji Sujaa. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2006 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Salah Naji Sujaa. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SALAH 

4 NAJI SUJAA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151) and section 240 of such Act (8 

8 U.S.C. 1229a), Salah Naji Sujaa shall be eligible for 

9 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

10 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi11 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immiVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:12 Aug 07, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3796.IS S3796

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3796 IS

1 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

2 of status to lawful permanent resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Salah Naji Sujaa 

4 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci5 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en6 tered and remained lawfully and, if otherwise eligible, shall 

7 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

8 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as 

9 of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

14 not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of 

15 this Act. 

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

17 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res18 idence to Salah Naji Sujaa, the Secretary of State shall 

19 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur20 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im21 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

22 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the 

23 Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, 

24 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•S 3796 IS

1 made available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth 

2 under section 202(e) of such Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2536 

To prohibit importation of commercially produced fresh citrus fruit originating 

from the People’s Republic of China. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2023 

Mr. STEUBE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit importation of commercially produced fresh 

citrus fruit originating from the People’s Republic of China. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S. Citrus Protection 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2536 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF COMMER2 CIALLY PRODUCED FRESH CITRUS FRUIT 

3 ORIGINATING FROM THE PEOPLE’S REPUB4 LIC OF CHINA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, articles of commercially produced fresh citrus 

7 fruit originating from the People’s Republic of China may 

8 not be imported into the United States. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on 

10 the date that is 90 days after the date of the enactment 

11 of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
June 27, 2011





Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC


Four Executive Boulevard – Suite 200


Suffern, NY  10901


Attention: Josh Goldstein





Re:  4th Amendment to Promissory Note





Dear Josh:





In accordance with our discussions, Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC hereby agree to further amend the Promissory Note dated February 23, 2011 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time) between Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) such that, notwithstanding anything contained in the Promissory Note to the contrary:





1.
Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. (“Obligor’) hereby promises to pay to the order of Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC (“Payee’) the principal sum of Four Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($425,000); and





2.
The Maturity Date is hereby extended to August 24, 2011.





Please acknowledge your acceptance of the above change by executing this amendment below.





Q Lotus Holdings, Inc.





By:
/S/ GARY ROSENBERGGary RosenbergIts:
CEO





Understood and Agreed to this 17th day of June, 2011.





Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC





By:
/S/ JOSH GOLDSTEINJosh GoldsteinIts:
General Partner




Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elijah Torres, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 738]

Stein, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (R. Sise, J.), rendered November 5, 2010 in Schenectady County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of burglary in the second degree and petit larceny.

Defendant pleaded guilty to both counts of an indictment charging him with burglary in the second degree and petit larceny and waived his right to appeal. At sentencing, defendant’s request for youthful offender status was denied and he was thereafter sentenced to concurrent terms of four years plus five years of postrelease supervision on the burglary conviction and one year on the petit larceny conviction. Defendant appeals.

We affirm. Contrary to defendant’s contention, his waiver of the right to appeal was valid. Supreme Court distinguished the right to appeal from the rights forfeited by defendant’s guilty plea, and defendant acknowledged that he understood the appeal waiver. Further, defendant signed a written waiver in open court, which acknowledged that he had discussed the waiver with counsel and that he was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waiving his right to appeal his conviction and sentence *(see People v Foote,*102 AD3d 1056, 1057 [2013], *lv denied*20 NY3d 1098 [2013]; *People v Shaver,*92 AD3d 978, 979 [2012], *lv denied*18 NY3d 998 [2012]). Defendant’s valid waiver of the right to appeal precludes both his claim that Supreme Court improperly denied him youthful offender treatment *(see People v Brabham,*83 AD3d 1225, 1225 [2011]; *People v Cullen,*62 AD3d 1155, 1157 [2009], *lv denied*13 NY3d 795 [2009]) and his request that we exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to grant him youthful offender status *(see People v Rahim,*78 AD3d 1240, 1241 [2010]). Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Peters, P.J., McCarthy and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               5
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6
<PP&E>                                              33
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               22
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                         266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       413
<SALES>                                              1
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4
<CGS>                                                1
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       14
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (13)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (13)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (13)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Kenneth J. Lewis et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Civil Service et al., Respondents. Margaret Godfrey et al., Appellants, v Andrew J. Spano et al., Respondents. New York State Comptroller, Intervenor-Respondent.

Submitted September 14, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 60 AD3d 216; 57 AD3d 941.

Motion by Tobias Barrington Wolff et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeals herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Exhibit 10.11


Air Resource


Specialists,
Inc.


 


	
  

  
	
   

  	
  1901 Sharp Point Drive

  
	
   

  	
  Suite E

  
	
   

  	
  Fort Collins, Colorado 80525

  
	
   

  	
  970-484-7941

  
	
   

  	
  FAX: 970-484-3423

  



 


WORK CANCELLATION FORM


	
  Client:

  	
   

  	
  Akron Riverview Corn Processors, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  c/o Mr. Steve Roe

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  4808 F Avenue

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Marcus, Iowa 51035

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Description:

  	
   

  	
  Construction storm water application for a dry-mill
  ethanol plant located near Akron, IA.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Budget:

  	
   

  	
  $7,124

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Terms of

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Cancellation:

  	
   

  	
  Akron and ARS mutually agree to cancellation of the
  construction storm water permit application work tasks originally authorized
  by the Work Authorization Form signed on December 6th, 2006. ARS understands this
  work has been eliminated from the scope-of-work and agrees to not bill the
  client for any costs associated with these tasks.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Approved by:

  	
   

  	
  AKRON RIVERVIEW CORN PROCESSORS, LLC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Signature: 

  	
  /s/ Stephen G. Roe

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: 

  	
  General Manager

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date: 

  	
  April 25, 2007

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  AIR RESOURCE SPECIALIST, INC

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Signature: 

  	
  /s/ D. Howard
  Gebhart

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title: 

  	
  ECS Manager

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Date: 

  	
  April 25, 2007
Exhibit 33.4

[logo]                                                     Wells Fargo Bank, NA
                                                           Document Custody
                                                           1015-10th Avenue SE
                                                           Minneapolis, MN 55014


          ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as
follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding
any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.



                                         WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                                         By: /s/ Shari Gillund

                                         Its: Senior Vice President

                                         Dated: February 28, 2008