alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

933 CA 12-01749 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

CLAUDIA S. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LARRY C. JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

BOUVIER PARTNERSHIP, LLP, EAST AURORA (ROGER T. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
HOGAN WILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (ASHLEA L. PALLADINO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered December 7, 2011. The order, among other things, found defendant to be in contempt of court for his willful failure to pay his child support obligation.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Johnson v Johnson ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Sept. 27, 2013]).

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For August 12, 2004 EXTENDICARE INC. (Translation of registrants name into English)
 3000 Steeles Avenue East
Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9W2(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F [ ]
    
    Form 40-F [X]
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Yes [ ]
    
    No [X]
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Shareholders Quarterly Report for the Six Months Ended June 30, 200499.2
    
    Certificates pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200299.3
    
    Certificate pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. EXTENDICARE INC.Date: August 12, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Mark W.
DurishanMark W. DurishanVice-President, Finance andChief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21780-21781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11062]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, 3 p.m.-4 p.m. (Prague Time); 9 
a.m.-10 a.m. ET.

PLACE: Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Editorial Room (4-34), Prague, 
Czech Republic.

CLOSED MEETING: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6))

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Persons interested in obtaining more

[[Page 21781]]

information should contact Timi Nickerson Kenealy at (202) 203-4545.

Timi Nickerson Kenealy,
Acting Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. E9-11062 Filed 5-7-09; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4043 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4043

 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
   to designate a portion of Interstate Route 14 as a high priority 
                   corridor, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2006

 Mrs. Hutchison (for herself and Mr. Cornyn) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 
   to designate a portion of Interstate Route 14 as a high priority 
                   corridor, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HIGH PRIORITY CORRIDOR.

    (a) In General.--Section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface 
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-240; 105 Stat. 
2032) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(46) The Interstate Route 14 corridor from Wilmington, 
        North Carolina, westward to El Paso, Texas, as follows:
                    ``(A) In the State of South Carolina, through 
                Myrtle Beach and Orangeburg.
                    ``(B) In the State of Georgia, through Augusta, 
                Warner Robins, and Columbus.
                    ``(C) In the State of Alabama, through Tuskegee, 
                Montgomery, and Camden.
                    ``(D) In the State of Mississippi, through 
                Waynesboro, Laurel, Brookhaven, and Natchez.
                    ``(E) In the State of Louisiana, through Vidalia, 
                Ferriday, Jonesville, Pineville, Alexandria, and 
                Leesville.
                    ``(F) In the State of Texas, through Jasper, 
                Woodville, Corrigan, Lufkin, Trinity, Livingston, 
                Huntsville, Madisonville, Bryan/College Station, 
                Cameron, Hearne, Brady, Temple, Killeen, Lampasas, 
                Menard, and Sonora.''.
    (b) Limitation on Use of Certain Funds.--Funds allocated under 
section 1927 of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient 
Transportation Equity Act (Public Law 109-59; 119 Stat. 1483) to the 
State of Georgia to conduct a study for a portion of Interstate Route 
14 (including the corridor designated under paragraph (46)(B) of 
section 1105(c) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act 
of 1991 (as amended by subsection (a))) shall be used only to conduct 
that study.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, J. Lance Franke, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-7 (the“Exchange Act periodic reports”);          2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;          4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this reportunder Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, theservicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement andadministration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and          5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as indenture trustee.Date: March 26, 2008   /s/ J. LANCE FRANKE J. Lance Franke  Vice President  (Senior Securitization Officer)  SLM Funding LLC
#### State v. Edwards

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 150

No. 076P07

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA06-12)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1.-

2. Allowed 03/08/07

3. Denied 03/08/07
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,374,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  707,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,749,591
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,904,732
<PP&E>                                       1,216,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                 826,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,420,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          497,742
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,236,274
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,420,424
<SALES>                                      1,132,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,132,108
<CGS>                                          664,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,362,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (230,438)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (230,438)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION





Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Robert A. Doak,  President,  CEO,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of
Mountains West Exploration, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10QSB of the  Company  for the  period  ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         Dated:  August 5, 2004           Officer:   Robert A. Doak

                                        Name:       /s/ Robert A. Doak
                                                    ----------------------------
                                        Position:  President, CEO
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,625]


Delphi Thermal Systems, Auburn Hills, MI; Notice of Termination 
of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 18, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Delphi Thermal 
Systems, Auburn Hills, Michigan.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of April 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10883 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### In the Matter of Lestariyah A., an Infant. Monroe County Department of Human Services, Respondent; Demetrius L., Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 913]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (John B. Gallagher, Jr., J.), entered April 17, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order denied respondent’s request for posttermination contact with the subject child.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is *1455unanimously affirmed without costs *(see Matter of Elsa R. [Gloria R.],*101 AD3d 1688, 1688-1689 [2012]).

Present—Scudder, EJ., Centra, Carni, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shelter Properties II (the "Partnership"), forthe quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as theequivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B.Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership,each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

 

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification is furnished with thisReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall notbe deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### In the Matter of Victor Woodard, Appellant, v Albert Prack, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Submitted August 31, 2009;

decided October 22, 2009

Reported below, 64 AD3d 842.

Motion for leave to appeal granted. Motion for poor person relief granted.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
  HUB INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
  Canada
 1-31310
    
    36-4412416(Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
 
 55 East Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604
(877) 402-6601
 n/a
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13c-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.04. Triggering Events That Accelerate or Increase a Direct Financial Obligation or an
Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
   HUB INTERNATIONAL LIMITEDBy:
    /s/   Marianne D. PaineName:
    Marianne D. PaineTitle:
    Chief Legal Officer
[918 NE2d 945, 890 NYS2d 432]

#### Arts4All, Ltd., et al., Respondents, v Judith L. Hancock, Appellant, and Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellant. Daniel Y.C. Ng et al., Additional Counterclaim Defendants, and Peter Osgood, Additional Counterclaim Defendant-Respondent.

Decided October 20, 2009

*813APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Trachtenberg Rodes & Friedberg LLP,*New York City *{David G. Trachtenberg*of counsel), for appellant.

*Law Offices of Zachary R. Greenhill, P.C.,*New York City *{Zachary R. Greenhill*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered as unnecessary. The courts below did not abuse their discretion in dismissing defendant’s counterclaims pursuant to CPLR 3126 (3) *{see Arts4All, Ltd. v Hancock,*12 NY3d 846 [2009]). Defendant’s remaining argument is without merit.

Concur: Judges Ciparick, Grapfeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Hugo GARCIA-RIZO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-50180.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 17, 2006.

Kyle W. Hoffman, USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Stephen D. Demik, Esq., FDSD-Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, for Defendant — Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Appellee’s unopposed motion for summary vacation of the district court judgment revoking supervised release and imposing sentence after revocation is granted. We vacate the judgment and remand to enable the district court to conform the written judgment to the oral pronouncement. *See United States v. Hicks,*997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir.1993) (remanding to permit district court to conform written judgment to oral pronouncement).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 STATE/JURISDICTION OFINCORPORATION/
    
    NAME UNDER WHICHNAME OF SUBSIDIARY
    
    ORGANIZATION
    
    BUSINESS IS CONDUCTEDQuicksilver Gas Services Operating LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Quicksilver Gas Services Operating LLCQuicksilver Gas Services Operating GP LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Quicksilver Gas Services Operating GP LLCCowtown Gas Processing
Partners L.P.
    
    Texas
    
    Cowtown Gas Processing
Partners L.P.Cowtown Pipeline Partners L.P.
    
    Texas
    
    Cowtown Pipeline Partners L.P.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 12-2029

___________________________

Harol R. Beisel

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville

____________

 Submitted: October 5, 2012

Filed: October 11, 2012

____________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Harol Beisel appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil complaint. Upon

1

our careful de novo review, see McAdams v. McCord, 584 F.3d 1111, 1113 (8th Cir.

The Honorable Erin Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western 1

District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
2009) (standard of review), we find no basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. 

See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit 10.4


Exhibit 10.4







Shaun D. Langford

2678 Point Grey Rd.

Vancouver, BC, Canada V6K 1A5

(604) 732-9583










January 15, 2007




Elray Resource, Inc. 

2678 Point Grey Rd. 

Vancouver, BC, Canada V6K 1A5




To Whom It May Concern:




I hereby agree to advance and loan up to $70,000 USD to Elray Resources, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on an as needed and as requested basis, to finance the business operations and expenses of the Company during the period ending June 30, 2008. 







/s/ Shaun D. Langford




SHAUN D. LANGFORD
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oldalys Ortega, Appellant.

Submitted November 2, 2009;

decided November 19, 2009

Reported below, 64 AD3d 422.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, as amended, (Pub. L. 110-343), the Boise and Payette National Forests' Southwest Idaho Resource Advisory Committee will conduct a business meeting. The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

Wednesday, May 20, 2009 beginning at 10:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Council Ranger District, 2092 Highway 95, Council, Idaho 83612.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics will include review and approval of project proposals, and is an open public forum.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kimberly Brandel, Designated Federal Official, at (208) 347-0301 or e-mail                         *kbrandel@fs.fed.us.*

Dated: April 22, 2009.

Suzanne C. Rainville,

Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest.

[FR Doc. E9-11125 Filed 5-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M