alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Dior W., an Infant. Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent; Catherine W., Appellant.

[961 NYS2d 786]

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the paternal grandmother appeals from an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Richmond County (Wolff, J.), dated October 21, 2011, which, after a hearing, found that she neglected the subject child.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Family Court properly found that she was a “[p]erson legally responsible” for the care of the subject child and, as such, was a proper party to the child protective proceeding (Family Ct Act § 1012 [g]; *see Matter of Yolanda D.,*88 NY2d 790 [1996]; *Matter of Alfredo T.,*61 AD3d 690, 691 [2009]; *Matter of Lillian C.,*8 AD3d 270, 271 [2004]; *Matter of Nathaniel TT.,*265 AD2d 611, 612-613 [1999]; *Matter of Mary Alice V.,*222 AD2d 594, 595 [1995]). Furthermore, the petitioner proved by a preponderance of the evidence that the child was neglected by the appellant *{see generally*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]). The evidence established that because of the appellant’s mental condition and her resistance to efforts to help her care for the child, the child was neglected within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012 (f) *{see Matter of Andrew B. [Deborah B.J,*73 AD3d 1036 [2010]; *Matter of Ifeiye O.,*53 AD3d 501 [2008]; *Matter of Marie L.,*276 AD2d 698, 699 [2000]; *Matter of Danielle C.,*253 AD2d 431, 432 [1998]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court or unpreserved for appellate review.

Angiolillo, J.E, Dickerson, Chambers and Lott, JJ., concur.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code I, M. Jerry Patava, the chief financial officer of Fairmont Hotels &
Resorts Inc. (the Corporation), certify that (i) the report on Form 6-K for
the month of July, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. /s/ M. Jerry PatavaM. Jerry PatavaJuly 26, 2004
    Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-30406

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ANDRES ALCANTARA-LUZ, also known as Andres Perez

Hernandez, also known as Jose Gonzales Luna, also known as

Andres Alcantara, also known as Andres Alcantara Uribe,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-50068-1

--------------------

February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Andres Alcantara-Luz’s appointed counsel has filed a

motion for leave to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). 

Alcantara-Luz received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but

has not filed a response. Although counsel did not address the

validity of Alcantara-Luz’s guilty plea, our independent review

of the record and counsel’s brief reveals that the plea was valid

and that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. 
No. 00-30406

-2-

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities in this case,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2567 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act with respect 

to expanding community eligibility, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2023 

Mr. MCGARVEY (for himself, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. EVANS, 

Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. KILMER, Mrs. MCBATH, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. PAYNE, 

Ms. PETTERSEN, Ms. STEVENS, Mr. SWALWELL, Mr. TONKO, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, and Mrs. WATSON COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act with respect to expanding community eligibility, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Meals Expan5 sion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2567 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANDING COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY. 

2 (a) MULTIPLIER.—Clause (vii) of section 11(a)(1)(F) 

3 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 1759a(a)(1)(F)) is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(vii) MULTIPLIER.—For each school 

6 year beginning on or after July 1, 2023, 

7 the Secretary shall use a multiplier of 

8 2.5.’’. 

9 (b) THRESHOLD.—Clause (viii) of section 

10 11(a)(1)(F) of the Richard B. Russell National School 

11 Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1759a(a)(1)(F)) is amended to read 

12 as follows: 

13 ‘‘(viii) THRESHOLD.—For each school 

14 year beginning on or after July 1, 2023, 

15 the threshold shall be not more than 25 

16 percent.’’. 

17 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

18 section shall apply to a local educational agency with re19 spect to a school year beginning on or after July 1, 2023, 

20 for which such local educational agency elects to receive 

21 special assistance payments under subparagraph (F) of 

22 section 11(a)(1) of the Richard B. Russell National School 

23 Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1759a(a)(1)). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-31035

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARCOS GAMBOA, 

also known as Juanito Angulo,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-331 A

- - - - - - - - - -

October 23, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Marcos Gamboa has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the brief and record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
IIB 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4048 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2006 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

DECEMBER 5, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding for the Organisation for 

Economic Co-operation and Development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exit the OECD Act 

5 of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FUNDING FOR THE 

7 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPER8 ATION AND DEVELOPMENT. 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed10 eral funds may be expended to fund activities or projects 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 4048 RFS

1 undertaken by the Organisation for Economic Co-oper2 ation and Development. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer


                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                  July 30, 2004

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346

                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
                      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                         Form 20-F [X]     Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

 Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
     Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                               Yes [ ]     No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
                  connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST



Exhibit  Description
-------  -----------

  99.1   Press Release, dated July 29, 2004 regarding Hollinger Inc. Provides
         Status Update.

  99.2   Press Release, dated July 29, 2004 regarding Hollinger Inc. Files
         Appeal of Delaware Chancery Court Ruling.

<PAGE>



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  July 30, 2004

                                        HOLLINGER INC.

                                        By  /s/ Peter G. White
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Peter G. White
                                            Title: Co-Chief Operating Officer
                                                   and Secretary
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: August 10, 2006
                                        David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6127
RICHARD DEAN MEARS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN HAHN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-1506-AM) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 5, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Dean Mears, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's denial of a motion for a temporary restraining order. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40707 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
PEDRO TORRES

- RODRIGUEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 191

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Torres

Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Torres

- Rodriguez h a s not file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1 6 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40707 Document: 00513080068 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015No. 14

- 40707

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40707 Document: 00513080068 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

l0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138451 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138451 

 COA: 280438 

Washtenaw CC: 05-001797-FH 

COREY MALIK TAYLOR, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 4115

AN ACT

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to increase the

effectiveness of physician assistance for drug treatment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Effective Physician

5 Assistance for Drug Treatment Act’’.
 †

2

S 4115 ES

1 SEC. 2. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT AMENDMENTS.

2 Section 303(g)(2) of the Controlled Substances Act

3 (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)) is amended—

4 (1) in subparagraph (B)(iii), by striking ‘‘ex5 cept that the’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘unless,

6 not sooner than 1 year after the date on which the

7 practitioner submitted the initial notification, the

8 practitioner submits a second notification to the Sec9 retary of the need and intent of the practitioner to

10 treat up to 100 patients. A second notification under

11 this clause shall contain the certifications required

12 by clauses (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph. The’’;

13 and

14 (2) in subparagraph (J)—

15 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘thereafter’’

16 and all that follows through the period and in17 serting ‘‘thereafter.’’;

18 (B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘Drug Addic19 tion Treatment Act of 2000’’ and inserting

20 ‘‘Effective Physician Assistance for Drug Treat21 ment Act’’; and

22 (C) in clause (iii), by striking ‘‘this para23 graph should not remain in effect, this para24 graph ceases to be in effect’’ and inserting

25 ‘‘subparagraph (B)(iii) should be applied by

26 limiting the total number of patients a practi-
†

3

S 4115 ES

1 tioner may treat to 30, then the provisions in

2 such subparagraph (B)(iii) permitting more

3 than 30 patients shall not apply, effective’’.

Passed the Senate December 8, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 4115

AN ACT

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to infor drug treatment. crease the effectiveness of physician assistance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           6,219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,935
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,465
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,058
<PP&E>                                         212,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              326
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (87,381)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,996
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               177,004
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   817
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,179
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,649
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,548]


Mine Safety Appliances, Murrysville-Soft Goods (Harness), a 
Subsidiary of Mine Safety Appliances, Murrysville, PA; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 10, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of workers of Mine Safety Appliances, Murrysville-Soft 
Goods (Harness), a subsidiary of Mine Safety Appliances, Murrysville, 
Pennsylvania.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of April 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10876 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3896 

To provide for the return of the Fresnel Lens to the lantern room atop 

Presque Isle Light Station Lighthouse, Michigan, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. LEVIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To provide for the return of the Fresnel Lens to the lantern 

room atop Presque Isle Light Station Lighthouse, Michigan, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lester Nichols Presque 

5 Isle Light Station Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RETURN OF FRESNEL LENS TO PRESQUE ISLE 

7 LIGHT STATION LIGHTHOUSE, MICHIGAN. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the 

9 Commandant of the Coast Guard shall modify the 2004 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3896 IS

1 Agreement for Outgoing Loans (AOL) with Presque Isle 

2 Township, Michigan, in order to provide for the return of 

3 the Historic Fresnel Lens to the lantern room atop the 

4 Presque Isle Light Station Lighthouse, Michigan. 

5 (b) CONDITIONS.— 

6 (1) COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW.—Any 

7 modification under subsection (a) of the Agreement 

8 for Outgoing Loans described in that subsection 

9 shall comply with applicable provisions of section 

10 5506 of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations 

11 Act, 1997 (Public Law 104–208; 110 Stat. 3009– 

12 518), relating to the conveyance of the Presque Isle 

13 Light Station. 

14 (2) RETENTION OF OWNERSHIP OF LENS.— 

15 Notwithstanding the return of the Historic Fresnel 

16 Lens pursuant to subsection (a), the United States 

17 shall retain ownership of the lens. 

18 (3) CONTINUING OPERATION OF AID TO NAVI19 GATION.—Notwithstanding the return of the His20 toric Fresnel Lens pursuant to subsection (a), the 

21 active aid to navigation, together with associated 

22 electronic and lighthouse equipment, at Presque Isle 

23 Light Station Lighthouse shall continue to be oper24 ated and maintained by the United States within the 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 3896 IS

1 Historic Third Order Fresnel Lens at the Presque 

2 Isle Light Station Lighthouse. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS