alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,228,504
<SECURITIES>                                 2,635,902
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,142,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                    87,759
<INVENTORY>                                  4,097,910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,259,315
<PP&E>                                       4,214,741
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,826,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,411,335
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,368,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,778
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,762,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,411,335
<SALES>                                      7,407,309
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,727,551
<CGS>                                        4,263,425
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,738,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                688,319
<INCOME-TAX>                                   130,291
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   558,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of REGENT  TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on  Form 10-Q for the  period ended June 30, 2008  as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on  the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of
the undersigned  does  hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   August 13, 2008

/s/ David A. Nelson
--------------------------------------------------------
David A. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3842 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic quartz or fused silica photomask 

blank substrates. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on synthetic quartz or 

fused silica photomask blank substrates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SYNTHETIC QUARTZ OR FUSED SILICA 

4 PHOTOMASK SUBSTRATES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 3842 IS 

‘‘ 9902.70.60 Synthetic fused silica (100 percent 

SIO2) photomask blank substrates in 

squares having a surface area of 150 

cm2 or more but not over 522 cm2 and a 

thickness of 2.2 mm or more but not 

over 6.45 mm (provided for in subheading 7006.00.40) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
##### 



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 21, 2006
 INCO LIMITED
  CANADA
    
    1-1143
    
    98-0000676(Province or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification
Number (if applicable))
 145 King Street West, Suite 1500,
Toronto, Ontario M5H 4B7
(416) 361-7511
 Form 8-K
 þ
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01
    
    Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
   Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits
 2.1
    
    Third Amending Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2006, between Inco Limited and Falconbridge
Limited.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  INCO LIMITEDBy:
    
    Stuart F. FeinerName: Stuart F. FeinerTitle:   Executive Vice PresidentDate: March 24, 2006




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibit2.1
    
    Third Amending Agreement, dated as of March 21, 2006, between Inco Limited and Falconbridge
Limited
[911 NE2d 846, 883 NYS2d 784]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jesus Cano, Appellant.

Decided June 11, 2009

*877APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Larkin, Axelrod, Ingrassia & Tetenbaum, LLP,*Newburgh *(Kathleen V. Wells*of counsel), for appellant.

*Francis D. Phillips, II, District Attorney,*Middletown *(Andrew R. Kass*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The defendant came “dangerously near” the commission of crimes when he arrived at the location of what he thought would be a sexual rendevous with an underage boy. The proof of defendant’s intent and extensive preparation followed by his travel to the intended crime scene showed that he was close to achieving his illegal goal and justified his convictions for attempt (P*eople v Naradzay,*11 NY3d 460 [2008]).

The appellant’s other contentions lack merit.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed in a memorandum.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 466 

To deauthorize a certain portion of the project for navigation, Rockland 

Harbor, Maine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 18, 2005 

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To deauthorize a certain portion of the project for navigation, 

Rockland Harbor, Maine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ROCKLAND HARBOR, MAINE. 

4 As of the date of enactment of this Act, the portion 

5 of the project for navigation, Rockland Harbor, Maine, au6 thorized by the Act of June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 202, chapter 

7 314), consisting of a 14-foot channel located in Lermond 

8 Cove and beginning at a point with coordinates N. 

9 99977.37, E. 340290.02, thence running easterly about 

10 200.00 feet to a point with coordinates N. 99978.49, E. 
2 

•S 466 IS 

1 340490.02, thence running northerly about 138.00 feet to 

2 a point with coordinates N. 100116.49, E. 340289.25, 

3 thence running westerly about 200.00 feet to a point with 

4 coordinates N. 100115.37, E. 340289.25, thence running 

5 southerly about 138.00 feet to the point of origin, is not 

6 authorized. 

Æ
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For March 31, 2005 EXTENDICARE INC. (Translation of registrants name into English)
 3000 Steeles Avenue East
Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9W2(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F o
    
    Form 40-F þ
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this
Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o
    
    No þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection
with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Extendicare Inc. Security holders documents  Articles of Continuance and Amendments99.2
    
    Extendicare Inc. Security holders documents  By-law Number 1




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. EXTENDICARE INC.Date: March 30, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Richard L. BertrandRichard L. BertrandSenior Vice-President andChief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00294-CR

TREVOR WARD APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CR-2016-08486-A

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss,” which 

complies with rule 42.2(a). Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). Because this court has not 

yet issued a decision in this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.2 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw is denied as moot.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 28, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10914]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,602]


LeeMAH Electronics, San Francisco, CA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 16, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed on behalf of the workers at LeeMAH Electronics, Inc., San 
Francisco, California.
    The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of April 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10914 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### The Western Union Telegraph Company *v.*Ryals.

.A. telegraphic company does not incur liability for the statutory penalty because of delay in transmitting or delivering a message, unless the delay occurs after actual payment or tender of the charges. Where, by mutual agreement of the sender and the company’s agent or operator, the charges are held open as a debt to be subsequently paid by the sender, or by him and a third person jointly, this is neither actual payment nor any substitute therefor, with reference to the penal element of the statute; and it makes no difference that the message is forwarded over the wire nominally as a prepaid message.

August 20, 1894.

*337Action for penalty. Before Judge Smith. Telfair ■superior court. October term, 1893.

Gustin, Guerry & Hall, for plaintiff in error.

D. C. McLennan, *contra.*

Lumpkin, Justice.

This case is controlled by the ruling announced in the head-note. A telegraph company is not liable for the penalty imposed by the act of 1887, except in cases ■where there has been a “ payment or tender of the usual charge, according to the regulations of such company.” This statute, being penal in its nature, should be strictly ■ construed ; and accordingly, after careful consideration, it is our judgment that where, by mutual agreement of the sender of a message and the company’s agent or operator, the amount due for sending the message is •charged to the account of the sender, or of himself and a third person jointly — thus holding it open as a demand to be subsequently paid — this is not, within the meaning of the statute and with reference to its penal element, either actual payment or a tender of the same.

While marking a message “Paid” would, in the absence of proof to the contrary, raise the presumption against the company that it was a prepaid message (as we held in *Conyers*v. *Postal Telegraph Cable Co.,*92 *Ga.*619, 19 S. E. Rep. 253), yet, where it affirmatively appears that the charge for the message was not paid in .advance, forwarding it nominally as a prepaid message would not make it such in fact.

If a customer of the telegraph company chooses to • do business with it on credit, he cannot hold the company liable to him for the penalty because of delay in -transmitting or delivering a message. If he wishes the company to transact his business at its peril with reference to the penalty, he must either pay in cash, or make -the tender required by the statute. Of course if any *338negligent delay occurs either after actual payment or tender of the chai’ges, the rule would be different.

*Judgment reversed.*
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 449 Reported in Senate (RS)]







                                                       Calendar No. 182
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 449

                          [Report No. 109-112]

To facilitate shareholder consideration of proposals to make Settlement 
Common Stock under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act available to 
  missed enrollees, eligible elders, and eligible persons born after 
               December 18, 1971, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 17, 2005

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

                             July 28, 2005

               Reported by Mr. McCain, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To facilitate shareholder consideration of proposals to make Settlement 
Common Stock under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act available to 
  missed enrollees, eligible elders, and eligible persons born after 
               December 18, 1971, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO ALASKA NATIVE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT ACT.

    Section 36(d)(3) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 
U.S.C. 1629b) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(d)(3)'' and inserting ``(3)'';
            (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``of this section'' and inserting ``or an amendment to articles 
        of incorporation under section 7(g)(1)(B)'';
            (3) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking ``, or'' and inserting ``; or''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``such resolution'' and inserting 
                ``the resolution or amendment to articles of 
                incorporation''; and
            (4) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``such resolution'' 
        and inserting ``the resolution or amendment to articles of 
        incorporation''.
                                                       Calendar No. 182

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 449

                          [Report No. 109-112]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To facilitate shareholder consideration of proposals to make Settlement 
Common Stock under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act available to 
  missed enrollees, eligible elders, and eligible persons born after 
               December 18, 1971, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 28, 2005

                       Reported without amendment`
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3795 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3795

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a two-
 year moratorium on certain Medicare physician payment reductions for 
                           imaging services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2006

 Mr. Smith (for himself, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Isakson, Mr. DeWine, Mr. 
  Burr, Mr. Bingaman, Ms. Stabenow, and Mr. Menendez) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a two-
 year moratorium on certain Medicare physician payment reductions for 
                           imaging services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Access to Medicare Imaging Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. TWO-YEAR MORATORIUM ON CERTAIN MEDICARE PHYSICIAN PAYMENT 
              REDUCTIONS FOR IMAGING SERVICES.

    (a) Moratorium.--Subsections (b)(4)(A) and (c)(2)(B)(v)(II) of 
section 1848 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4), as added 
by section 5102(b) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, are each 
amended by striking ``2007'' and inserting ``2009''.
    (b) GAO Study and Report on Imaging Services Furnished Under the 
Medicare Program.--
            (1) Study.--The Comptroller General of the United States 
        shall conduct a comprehensive study on imaging services 
        furnished under the Medicare program.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to 
        Congress and the Secretary of Health and Human Services a 
        report on the findings and conclusions of the study conducted 
        under paragraph (1) together with recommendations for such 
        legislation and administrative actions as the Comptroller 
        General considers appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Perry J. Grace, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly on Form 10-Q of ZiLOG, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |                          
|----------------------- | -------------------------
|Date: February 12, 2008 | By:    /s/ Perry J. Grace

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| |                                                     
| | Perry J. Grace                                      
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---