alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert S. Prather, Jr., certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bull Run
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:  a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures as of May 31, 2004 (the Evaluation Date) and presented
in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date; andc)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors:  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting. Date:
    
    July 15, 2004Signed:
    
    /s/ ROBERT S. PRATHER, JR.

Robert S. Prather, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
Dismissed and Opinion Filed August 22, 2023

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05

- 23

- 00337

- CV
ONA MARIE HENDRIX , Appellant

V. AAC FUNDING III, LLC DBC THIRTY 377 , Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 23

- 00821

- A
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida

- Kipness, Reichek, and Miskel

Opinion by Justice Miskel On June 9, 2023, we sent a letter to the part ies questioning our jurisdiction and requested jurisdictional briefing by June 30, 2023. In our letter, we warned appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice should appellant fail to file the requested letter brief. To date, appellant ha s not filed the requested letter brief. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(b)(c). 230337f.p05 /Emily Miskel/ EMILY MISKEL JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
ONA MARIE HENDRIX, Appellant

No. 05

- 23

- 00337

- CV V.
AAC FUNDING III, LLC DBC THIRTY 377, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 23

- 00821

- A. Opinion delivered by Justice Miskel. Justices Partida

- Kipness and Reichek participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.
Judgment entered this 22 nd day of August , 2023

.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Franklin SCHOONOVER, Jr., also known as Robert Aaron Cord, also known as Robert Cord, also known as Robert Nabors, also known as Robert Aaron Nabors, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-20586

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Robert Franklin Schoonover, Jr., on appeal from the revocation of his supervised release has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as is required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. *613738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Schoonover has not responded to counsel’s motion.

Our independent review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<PAGE>

================================================================================

                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer


                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                 April 25, 2005

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346

                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
                      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

 Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
     Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ] No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
                  connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

================================================================================

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST

Exhibit      Description
-------      -----------

99.1         Press Release, dated April 22, 2005, regarding Hollinger Inc.
             Receiver Appointed to The Ravelston Corporation Limited and
             Ravelston Management Inc.

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  April 25, 2005

                                         HOLLINGER INC.

                                         By /s/ Peter G. White
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Peter G. White
                                            Title: Vice President, Operations
                                                   and Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Robert Jones, Appellant, v Daniel F. Martuscello, as Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 698]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Platkin, J.), entered September 26, 2012 in Greene County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

Petitioner was convicted in 1983 of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and was sentenced to a prison term of 2 to 4 years. He was next convicted of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree in 1987, and was sentenced to *21h*to 5 years in prison. Petitioner was then convicted of robbery in the first degree and sodomy in the first degree in 1990, adjudicated a persistent violent felony offender, and sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 14 years to life *(People v Jones,*188 AD2d 364 [1992], *lv denied*81 NY2d 972 [1993]). Believing that various defects existed with regard to the imposition and calculation of the various sentences, as well as that he had been the victim of harassment by prison officials, petitioner commenced the present CPLR article 70 proceeding. *1185Supreme Court denied the petition without a hearing, prompting this appeal.

We affirm. Supreme Court properly rejected petitioner’s challenge to his persistent violent felony offender status, as he has unsuccessfully attacked that status upon both his direct appeal from the judgment of conviction and in a subsequent CPL article 440 motion *(see People ex rel. Tislon v Rock,*84 AD3d 1606, 1607 [2011], *lv denied 17*NY3d 712 [2011]; *Matter of Caroselli v Goord,*269 AD2d 706, 706 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 754 [2000]). Petitioner faces the possibility of life imprisonment as a result of that status and, accordingly, habeas corpus relief is unavailable on his remaining claims because he is not entitled to immediate release *(see People ex rel. Hall v Rock, 71*AD3d 1303, 1304 [2010], *appeal dismissed*14 NY3d 882 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 703 [2010]; *Matter of Caroselli v Goord,*269 AD2d at 706).

Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3802 

To amend the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 

to expand the county organized health insuring organizations authorized 

to enroll Medicaid beneficiaries. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation 

Act of 1985 to expand the county organized health insuring organizations authorized to enroll Medicaid beneficiaries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF AUTHORIZED COUNTY MED4 ICAID ORGANIZED HEALTH INSURING ORGA5 NIZATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9517(c)(3) of the Consoli7 dated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (42 

8 U.S.C. 1396b note), as added by section 4734 of the OmVerDate Aug 31 2005 05:13 Aug 05, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3802.IS S3802

hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•S 3802 IS

1 nibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 and as amended 

2 by section 704 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP 

3 Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘, in the 

6 case of any health insuring organization described in 

7 such subparagraph that is operated by a public enti8 ty established by Ventura county, and in the case of 

9 any health insuring organization described in such 

10 subparagraph that is operated by a public entity es11 tablished by Merced county’’ after ‘‘described in sub12 paragraph (B)’’; and 

13 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘14 per14 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘16 percent’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact17 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIE T. PEYTON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

OPTION ONE MORTGAGE

CORPORATION, a California

corporation, its successors and assigns,

now known as Sand Canyon

Corporation; DEUTSCHE BANK

NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,

asTrustee for HSI Asset Securitization

Corporation trust 2006-OPT3,

Mortgage Pass-Though Certificates,

Series 2006-OPT3; DOES, 1-30, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11-17775

D.C. No. 

1:10-cv-00186-SOM-KSC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Susan Oki Mollway, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 24, 2017** 

Honolulu, Hawaii

FILED

MAR 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
page 2

Before: KOZINSKI, HAWKINS and BEA, Circuit Judges.

1. A borrower has a right to rescind a home mortgage transaction “until

midnight of the third business day following the consummation of the transaction.”

15 U.S.C. § 1635(a). But, if the lender fails to disclose this rescission right, the

right can instead be exercised for three years. See 12 C.F.R. § 226.23(a)(3). The

Peytons signed a document stating that they “RECEIVED TWO (2) COMPLETED

COPIES OF THE NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CANCEL IN THE FORM

PRESCRIBED BY LAW.” This evidence creates a presumption that the Peytons

received the appropriate disclosures and are not entitled to the three-year extension. 

See 15 U.S.C. § 1635(c). The Peytons presented no admissible evidence to rebut

the presumption and extend the rescission period. Their rescission claims were

thus time-barred, and the district court properly granted summary judgment to the

defendants.

2. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the Peytons’

motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(e) and 60(b). See McDowell v.

Calderon, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th Cir. 1999); Briones v. Riviera Hotel & Casino,

116 F.3d 379, 380–82 (9th Cir. 1997). 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                  July 15, 2004

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346

                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
                      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                         Form 20-F [X]   Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

 Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
     Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                Yes [ ]   No [X]

       If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
           registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>

<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT          DESCRIPTION
-------          -----------
<S>              <C>
99.1             Press Release, dated July 14, 2004 regarding Hollinger Inc.
                 Provides Status Update.

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  July 15, 2004

<TABLE>
<S>                                    <C>
                                       HOLLINGER INC.

                                       By   /s/ Peter G. White
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Name:    Peter G. White
                                            Title:   Co-Chief Operating Officer
                                                     and Secretary
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  I, CEO and CFO,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Date: May 16, 2005                          Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Calvin A. Wallen, III, CEO

Date: May 16, 2005                          Signature: /s/ Jon Stuart Ross
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Jon Stuart Ross, CFO
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WEN HUEI CHENG a.k.a. En Hui Zheng,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74593

Agency No. A095-687-729

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Wen Huei Cheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

FILED

FEB 28 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-74593

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse

credibility determinations created by the Real ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590

F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on, among other findings, the inconsistency between Cheng’s testimony and

the two different birth certificates she presented regarding her birthplace. See Pal

v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir. 2000). Cheng’s explanation that she is illiterate

does not compel a contrary conclusion. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th

Cir. 2000). In the absence of credible testimony, Cheng’s asylum and withholding

of removal claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.

2003).

Because Cheng’s CAT claim is based on the testimony the agency found not

credible, and she points to no other evidence showing it is more likely than not she

will be tortured if returned to China, her CAT claim also fails. See id. at 1156-57. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4078 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

152 North 5th Street in Laramie, Wyoming, as the ‘‘Gale W. McGee 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 5, 2006 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. THOMAS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 152 North 5th Street in Laramie, Wyoming, 

as the ‘‘Gale W. McGee Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GALE W. MCGEE POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 152 North 5th Street in Lar6 amie, Wyoming, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Gale W. McGee Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 4078 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Gale W. McGee Post 

3 Office’’. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS