alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors  U.S. Bank National Association We have examined management's  assertion, included in the accompanying  Report on Assessment of Compliance with  Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC's Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities  platform (the Platform)  as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007,  except for  servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), and 1122(d)(4)(iv)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing  platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  Our examination  included  testing of less than all of  the individual asset backed  transactions  and securities that comprise the  Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform,   and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.  Furthermore, our  procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.  Our procedures  were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts  calculated or  reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the  aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota February 12, 2008
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 For the month of April 2005
    
    Commission File Number: 001-15014
 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC. 
 (Translation of registrants name into English)
 150 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 1J9 
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 [Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.] Form 20-F     o
    
    Form 40-F     þ
 [Indicate be check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.] Yes     o
    
    No     þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-N/A




---



##### 



Exhibit99.1
    
    Earnings Press Release for the three month period ended March 31, 200599.2
    
    Shareholders Report for the three
month period ended March 31, 2005
 SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Sun Life Financial Inc. 
          (Registrant)Date:  April 28, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Thomas A. BogartThomas A. Bogart,Executive Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1.





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, Juhani
Taskinen, Chief Executive Officer, and Trupti Mehta, Principal Accounting
Officer, of Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based
upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period December 30, 2008
of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"):





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Dated:  April
14,
2009                                                                           By:  /s/ Juhani
Taskinen


Juhani Taskinen


Chief Executive Officer





By:  /s/  Trupti
Mehta


Trupti
Mehta, Principal Accounting Officer





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by
Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11340]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ER08-1588-000; EL09-6-000]


Notice of Motion to Brief the Commission

May 8, 2009.

Kentucky Utilities Company...  Docket No. ER08-1588-000.
Frankfort Electric and Water   Docket No. EL09-6-000.
 Plant Board.
    City of Barbourville,
     Kentucky
    City of Bardstown,
     Kentucky
    City of Bardwell,
     Kentucky
    City of Benham, Kentucky
    City of Berea, Kentucky
    City of Corbin, Kentucky
    City of Falmouth,
     Kentucky
    City of Madisonville,
     Kentucky
    City of Nicholasville,
     Kentucky
    City of Paris, Kentucky
    City of Providence,
     Kentucky
        Complainants.........
            v.
Kentucky Utilities Company
        Respondent...........
 

    On May 6, 2009, Kentucky Utilities Company and the Kentucky 
Municipals \1\ submitted a joint Motion to Brief the Commission on an 
Outstanding Issue in the above-captioned proceeding. The Commission 
provides notice that it will allow the parties to file briefs with the 
Commission. Initial briefs are due to the Commission by June 1, 2009; 
reply briefs are due to the Commission by July 1, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Kentucky Municipals are the Frankfort Electric and Water 
Plant Board, and the Cities of Barbourville, Bardstown, Bardwell, 
Benham, Berea, Corbin, Falmouth, Madisonville, Nicholasville, Paris, 
and Providence, Kentucky.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11340 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,570]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 12, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Pentair Water Pool and Spa, Auburn, California.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of April 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10878 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3903 

To redesignate the Special Textile Negotiator of the United States Trade 

Representative as the Chief Textiles Negotiator and confer the rank 

of Ambassador upon that position, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2006 

Mrs. DOLE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Special Textile Negotiator of the United 

States Trade Representative as the Chief Textiles Negotiator and confer the rank of Ambassador upon that 

position, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Textile Negotiator Pro5 motion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CHIEF TEXTILES NEGOTIATOR. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 141 of the Trade Act of 

8 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2171) is amended— 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•S 3903 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b)(2)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘and one Chief Agricul3 tural Negotiator’’ and inserting ‘‘, one Chief 

4 Agricultural Negotiator, and one Chief Textiles 

5 Negotiator’’; 

6 (B) by striking ‘‘or the Chief Agricultural 

7 Negotiator’’ and inserting ‘‘, the Chief Agricul8 tural Negotiator, or the Chief Textiles Nego9 tiator’’; and 

10 (C) by striking ‘‘and the Chief Agricultural 

11 Negotiator’’ and inserting ‘‘, the Chief Agricul12 tural Negotiator, and the Chief Textiles Nego13 tiator’’; and 

14 (2) in subsection (c), by adding at the end the 

15 following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(6) The principal function of the Chief Tex17 tiles Negotiator shall be to conduct trade negotia18 tions and to enforce trade agreements relating to 

19 United States textile and apparel products and serv20 ices. The Chief Textiles Negotiator shall be a vig21 orous advocate on behalf of United States textile 

22 and apparel interests. The Chief Textiles Negotiator 

23 shall perform such other functions as the United 

24 States Trade Representative may direct.’’. 

25 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE; CONTINUATION IN OFFICE.— 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•S 3903 IS

1 (1) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

2 by this section shall take effect on the date of the 

3 enactment of this Act. 

4 (2) CONTINUATION IN OFFICE.—The individual 

5 serving as Special Textile Negotiator of the United 

6 States Trade Representative on the day before the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act may serve in the 

8 Chief Textiles Negotiator position established pursu9 ant to subsection (a) as Acting Chief Textiles Nego10 tiator until the date that an individual nominated to 

11 such position by the President is confirmed by the 

12 United States Senate. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANGEL RIVERA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 98 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### Kevin Glassman, Respondent, v Pro Health Ambulatory Surgery Center, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Submitted February 23, 2009;

decided May 5, 2009

Motion by New York State Association of Ambulatory Surgery Centers, Inc. for leave to file a memorandum of law amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the memorandum of law is accepted as filed.
Exhibit 32.3



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2003, (the "Report"), I Elise
Nissen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.







/s/__Elise Nissen____________
Elise Nissen
Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2004
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Jackson, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 277]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered October 27, 2011, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 4.3

                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST
                                       OF
                            WINTRUST CAPITAL TRUST VI


         This certificate of trust of Wintrust Capital Trust VI (the "Trust"),
is being duly executed and filed by Wilmington Trust Company, a Delaware banking
corporation, and David L. Stoehr, an individual, as trustees, to form a Delaware
statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801
et seq.) (the "Act").

1.       The name of the Delaware statutory trust formed hereby is Wintrust
         Capital Trust VI.

2.       The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State
         of Delaware is Wilmington Trust Company, Rodney Square North, 1100
         North Market Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19890-0001, Attention:
         Corporate Trust Administration.

3.       This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon the filing of this
         Certificate.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a)(1) of the Act.


                                       Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee




                                       By:  /s/ Kristin Long
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name: Kristin Long
                                            Title: Financial Services Officer


                                       /s/David L. Stoehr
                                       -----------------------------, as trustee
                                       Name:  David L. Stoehr
#### Warren S. Dank, Appellant, v Sears Holding Management Corporation et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 16, 2009;

decided May 7, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, as C.F.O., certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 16, 2009 |                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         |                     |   |
| Signature:                   | /s/  Larry G. Badgley    |   |
|                         | Larry G. Badgley, C.F.O. |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
GLOBAL GOLD CORPORATION DATED 3/31/97
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  300,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,850
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,648,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,987,561
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,981
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,686,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,648,049
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               105,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       176
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (111,115)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.027)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Loan Forgiveness Letter to for John F. Shanley




 Exhibit 10.24 
  
 September 14, 2004 
  
 John F. Shanley 
  

	Re:	Debt Forgiveness 

  
 Dear Mr. Shanley, 
  
 On August 2, 2002, you
executed a Secured Promissory Note in favor of Conor Medsystems, Inc. (the “Company”), in the principal amount of $100,000.00 (the “Note”). The outstanding balance on the Note as of the date hereof is
$111,073.63 (the “Balance”). This letter serves to notify you that the Company is hereby canceling the Balance, and $111,073.63 will be reported on Form W-2 as cancellation of indebtedness income. 
  
 Enclosed herewith is the cancelled Note. We have retained a copy for our records. Please sign
and date this letter to acknowledge your receipt of the same, and return it to me at your earliest convenience. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  

			
	CONOR MEDSYSTEMS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ FRANK LITVACK

	 	 	 FRANK LITVACK, M.D.
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


  
 Acknowledged: 
  

									
				
	 /s/    John F. Shanley

	 	 	 	 	 	 September 15, 2004


	 Signature
	 	 	 	 	 	 Date
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00118-CV

IN THE MATTER OF M.P., A JUVENILE

From the County Court at Law

Hill County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1734

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal of the denial of a writ of habeas corpus filed by a juvenile 

pursuant to section 54.01(q)(1) of the Texas Family Code. TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 

54.01(q) (Vernon 2009). This Court has received a letter from the State indicating that 

the parties have agreed to a resolution of the case.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. 

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 12, 2010

[CV06]