alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w6



 




Exhibit 10.6

The Security Interests (Guernsey) Law




Certificate of discharge



We, Ingalls & Snyder LLC, a company formed under the laws of New York having its office at 61
Broadway, New York, USA as security agent acting for and on behalf of the Secured Parties (as
defined in the Security Interest Agreement, as defined below), certify that the security interest
created or provided by CanArgo Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Guernsey having
its registered office at Borough House, Rue due Pre, St Peter Port, Guernsey under a security
interest agreement dated 9 February 2007 (the “Security Interest Agreement”) is discharged in part
such that 6 million of the ordinary shares of $0.10 each in the capital of Tethys Petroleum Limited
(being formerly 30 million ordinary shares of £0.01, the shares in Tethys Petroleum Limited having
been consolidated on a five for one basis in or around May 2007) held by CanArgo Limited is hereby
released and no longer forms part of the Collateral (as defined in the Security Interest Agreement)
(the “Released Collateral”).



We covenant to deliver to CanArgo Limited the certificates of title to the Released Collateral and
(if any) the Derivative Assets (as defined in the Security Interest Agreement) in respect of the
Released Collateral.



We confirm we give this certificate on behalf of and with the authority of each of the Secured
Parties (as defined under the Security Interest Agreement).




Dated: 5 June 2007




	 	 	 
	  

Signed
for and on behalf of

Ingalls & Snyder LLC

	 	 




We accept and agree to the above




	 	 	 
	  

Signed
for and on behalf of

CanArgo Limited

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	  

Signed
for and on behalf of

Tethys Petroleum Limited

	 	 





1
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT  Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 27, 2005
 Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.
  Delaware
    
    6719
    
    52-2301683(State or Other Jurisdiction
    
    Commission File Number
    
    (I.R.S. Employerof Incorporation)
    
    
    
    Identification Number)
 
 Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.
300 First Stamford Place, Stamford, Connecticut 06902
(203) 977-8000
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    
    Press release of Odyssey Re Holdings Corp. dated October 27, 2005.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
   ODYSSEY RE HOLDINGS CORP.By:
    /s/ Donald L. SmithName:
    Donald L. SmithTitle:
    Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-01-00440-CR
Rober t James Cuzz e, Appel lant v. The State of Texas , Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR-00-519, HONO RABLE CHARLE S R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING PER CURIAM

T his i s a n a ppe al f rom a j udg men t of con vi cti on f or a gg ra v ate d a ss aul

t. Sentence was im posedon Ap ril 10, 200 1. The re was a t imely mot ion fo r ne w t rial. T he de adline fo r p er fect ing appeal was theref

ore July 9, 2001. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(2). Notice of appeal was f il ed on Jul y 19, 200 1. No ex

tens i on of tim e f or fi l i ng n otice of a ppea l wasreque sted. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. The re is no indica t ion t hat not ice o f app eal wa s pr op er ly m ailed t o t he dist rict clerk wit hin the t ime pres cri

be d by rul e 26.2 (a). See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). Under the c i rcum stan ces , we l ack j urisd i cti on to di sp ose

of t he pu rp or t ed a ppe al in any man ne r oth er th an by di sm i ss i ng i t f or wa nt of jurisd ictio n. See Slato n v. State , 981 S.W .2d 208 (Tex . Cri m . App.1998 ); Olivo v. Sta te , 918 S.W.2d 519, 52 2-23 (Tex. C

ri m . App. 1996 ).2 The appeal

is dis mi ssed. Be f ore C hi ef Ju sti ceA bou ss i e, J us ti ce s Y ea

ke l an d Pa tters on Di sm i ss ed f or W an t of Ju ri sd i cti on File d: August 30, 2001 Do No t Publis

h
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of REGENT  TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on  Form 10-Q  for the  period  ended  March 31, 2010  as  filed with
the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the  date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned  does hereby  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   March 14, 2010

/s/ David A. Nelson
--------------------------------------------------------
David A. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2013

p1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2013

147455

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147455

COA: 309767

Genesee CC: 10-026871-FC

CAMERON JOSEPH TIETZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EX-34.5
(logo) Crowe
Crowe Chizek and Company LLC
Member Horwath International


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Audit Committee
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
West Palm Beach, Florida


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report
"Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria", that
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB for the Residential Mortgage Loans Platform (the "Platform") as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007, excluding criteria 1122(1)(iii) and
1122(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. The Platform
consists of the asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management
in Appendix B of Management's Report. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards established by
the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in
all material respects, based on the aforementioned applicable servicing
criteria.


/s/ Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Crowe Chizek and Company LLC

Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 6, 2008
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 4093

AN ACT

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act

of 2002 to extend a suspension of limitation on the

period for which certain borrowers are eligible for guaranteed assistance.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 4093 ES

1 SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF LIMITATION ON PERIOD FOR

2 WHICH BORROWERS ARE ELIGIBLE FOR

3 GUARANTEED ASSISTANCE.

4 Section 5102 of the Farm Security and Rural Invest5 ment Act of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 1949 note; Public Law 107–

6 171) is amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2006’’ and

7 inserting ‘‘September 30, 2007’’.

Passed the Senate December 6, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 4093

AN ACT

To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment

gible for guaranteed assistance.on the period for which certain borrowers are eliAct of 2002 to extend a suspension of limitation
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6749

FRANCIS AKINRO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA MAHER, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; GEORGE W.

BUSH, President of United States of America,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.

(1:02-cv-00555-CCB)

Submitted: July 31, 2008 Decided: August 11, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francis Akinro, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Francis Akinro appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reopen his case based on newly discovered evidence.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Akinro v. Maher, No. 1:02-cv-00555-CCB (D. Md. Apr. 25,

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 491 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 491

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    expand the definition of firefighter to include apprentices and 
            trainees, regardless of age or duty limitations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2005

 Mr. Specter (for himself, Mr. Santorum, and Mr. Leahy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    expand the definition of firefighter to include apprentices and 
            trainees, regardless of age or duty limitations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Christopher Kangas Fallen 
Firefighter Apprentice Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF DEFINITION OF FIREFIGHTER TO INCLUDE APPRENTICES 
              AND TRAINEES.

    Section 1204(4) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(4)) is amended by inserting ``, regardless of 
age, status as an apprentice or trainee, or duty restrictions imposed 
because of age or status as an apprentice or trainee,'' after ``fire 
department''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall apply with respect to deaths 
and injuries which occur on or after May 4, 2002.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: TEMPORARY MODIFICATION OF THE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE ARISING UNDER THE PENNSYLVANIA ELECTION CODE : : : : No. 571 Judicial Administration Docket

ORDER

PER CURIAM
AND NOW , this 5 th day of April , 2022, in order to expedite the appellate process regarding appeals from challenges to nomination petitions for any and all candidates running for office in the May 17, 2022 General Primary Election, Pa.R.A.P. 903(c)(1)(ii), providing for a ten

- day appeal period from an order in any matter arising under the Pennsylvania Election Code , is TEMPORARILY M ODIFIED to provide for a five

- day appeal period

. Add itionally, Pa.R.A.P. 107 is TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED to the ex tent it specifies that weekends and holidays are to be excluded from calculating the five

- day appeal period.
I n appeals arising under the Election Code that fall within this order , appellants
sh all file briefs within twenty

- four hours after filing their notice of appeal and jurisdictional
statement

. Appellees’ briefs are due within twenty

- four hours of the filing of appellants ’
briefs. Further, Pa.R.A.P. 2113 (regarding reply briefs) is TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED
in these matters ; n o reply briefs will be permitted.
Notices of appeal, jurisdictional statements, and briefs shall be filed electronically when counsel or the litigants have a PACFile account . Otherwise, counsel or the litigants
shall contact the relevant filing office during normal business hours to make alternative arrangements to ensure that the filing office actually receives the submissions by the applicable deadline

.Pa.R.A.P. 1931(a) and (c) (regarding the deadline for transmittal of the record

when complete) are TEMPORARILY SUSPENDED in these matters , and the record shall
be transferred as soon as practicable . The lower court may transmit partially completed records in the interest of facilitating prompt resolution of any appeal in these matters

. Applications for reconsideration or reargument will not be entertained by this Court on election matters falling under this order.
A ny court deciding a matter that arises under the Pennsylvania Election Code in relation to the May 17, 2022 General Primary Election shall append a copy of this order
to its decision

.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

James Robert Smith

, * From the 132nd District Court

of Scurry County,

Trial Court No. 9972

.

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00251

- CR * January 20 , 2017

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opinion, the judgment of the trial c ourt is in all things affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Benson Point Realty Corporation, Appellant, v Town of East Hampton, Respondent.

Submitted July 27, 2009;

decided September 22, 2009

Reported below, 62 AD3d 989.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not an order of the type provided for in CPLR 5602 (a) (2).
#### In the Matter of New York State Office of Children and Family Services et al., Respondents, v Lauren Lanterman et al., Appellants.

Submitted January 4, 2010;

decided January 12, 2010

Reported below, 62 AD3d 1109.

Motion by Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
June 17, 2011





Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC


Four Executive Boulevard – Suite 200


Suffern, NY  10901


Attention: Josh Goldstein





Re:  3rd Amendment to Promissory Note





Dear Josh:





In accordance with our discussions, Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC hereby agree to further amend the Promissory Note dated February 23, 2011 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time) between Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) such that, notwithstanding anything contained in the Promissory Note to the contrary:





1.
Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. (“Obligor’) hereby promises to pay to the order of Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC (“Payee’) the principal sum of Three Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars ($340,000); and





2.
The Maturity Date is hereby extended to August 17, 2011.





Please acknowledge your acceptance of the above change by executing this amendment below.





Q Lotus Holdings, Inc.





By:
/S/ GARY ROSENBERGGary RosenbergIts:
CEO





Understood and Agreed to this 17th day of June, 2011.





Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC





By:
/S/ JOSH GOLDSTEINJosh GoldsteinIts:
General Partner




Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.25

                          TERMINATION OF SPLIT DOLLAR
                            LIFE INSURANCE AGREEMENT

     This Termination of Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreement (the
"Termination"), is effective September 17, 2004, between AUTOCAM CORPORATION, a
Michigan corporation, of 4070 East Paris Ave., Kentwood, Michigan 49512
("Company"), and Warren A. Veltman ("Owner").

                                   BACKGROUND

     A.   On one or more dates prior to the date here of Company and Owner have
executed one or more Split Dollar Life Insurance Agreements (the "Plans").

     B.   The Plans were intended to qualify as a life insurance employee
benefit plan as described in Rev. Rule 64-328.

     C.   Company and Owner now desire to terminate all of the Plans.

                                   AGREEMENT

     The parties agree as follows:

     1.   Distribution of Amounts Due.  Pursuant to the employment agreement
all of the Plans are terminated and company has release and distributed to
Owner all amounts due to Company under the Plans ($215,279.39).

     2.   Notice of Termination.  This Termination serves as written notice of
termination of all of the Plans.

     3.   Acknowledgement of Termination.  Owner and Executive acknowledge
release of the amounts due under the Plans and this Termination.

     4.   Future Premiums.  Company shall continue to pay the premiums on each
of the policies and the premiums paid will be compensation to the Owner as
agreed upon pursuant to an employment agreement between Owner and Company.

     5.   Effective Date.  This Termination is effective as of the date set
forth above.



AUTOCAM CORPORATION, a
Michigan Corporation


   /s/ John C. Kennedy                       /s/ Warren A. Veltman
By ______________________________________    _________________________________
       John C. Kennedy, President                Warren A. Veltman
#### State v. Wissink

Case below: 172 N.C. App. 829

No. 484P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA04-1081)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed Pending Determination of PDR 360 N.C. 77

2. Allowed 12/19/06

3. Allowed 12/19/06
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      November 13, 2009 |  /s/ Stephen M.      Sill                                       |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |  Stephen M.      Sill                                           |
|                          |  Vice President,      Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer     |
|                          | (Principal      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting  Officer) |

----
<PAGE>   1
                             THE CERPLEX GROUP, INC.


                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Item           Description of Exhibits

Exhibit 11     Computation of Per Share Earnings

Exhibit 27     Financial Data Schedule -- Article 5 of Regulation S-X


                                       18
<PAGE>   2
                             THE CERPLEX GROUP, INC.


                          COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE LOSS
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three months ended                          Six months ended
                                                   ----------------------------------       -----------------------------------
                                                   March 28, 1998      March 30, 1997       March 28, 1998       March 30, 1997
                                                   ----------------------------------       -----------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>                  <C>                  <C>                  <C>      
Net loss available to common stockholders            $ (9,753)            $ (4,045)            $(15,566)            $ (7,060)
                                                     ========             ========             ========             ========

ADJUSTED NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES

Weighted average shares outstanding                     6,848                5,963                6,848                5,853

Incremental shares for exercise of stock
options and warrants and common stock
issuable                                                                       718                                       718
                                                     --------             --------             --------             --------

Adjusted number of common shares                        6,848                6,681                6,848                6,571
                                                     ========             ========             ========             ========

Basic and diluted loss per common share              $  (1.42)            $  (0.61)            $  (2.27)            $  (1.07)
                                                     --------             --------             --------             --------
</TABLE>

                                       19