alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
US
      Office


    711
      S
      Carson Street Suite 4 Carson City Nevada 89701

    Canadian
      Office 

    26
      Densely
      Ave Toronto Ontario M6M 2R1

    Phone
      416-246-1100 Fax 416-248-2024

    Web
      www.w2energy.com 


     

    EXHIBIT
      10.6

    Employment
      Agreement between Ron Maruszczak and W2 Energy, Inc.

    


    
      January
      3, 2006

     

    


    Mr.
      Myron
      Maruszczak,

    1124
      Regent Street

    Pefferlaw,
      Ontario

    L6Z
      2A1

    


    


    Dear
      Mr.
      Maruszczak:

    


    Pursuant
      to our recent discussions and on behalf of the Board of Directors of W2 Energy
      Inc. (“WWEN”), I wish to take this opportunity to contract your services to act
      as an officer of WWEN (Chief Operating Officer and Secretary). Your specific
      responsibilities and duties are as follows;

    


    · Develop
      and implement business strategies for the Company

    · Provide
      general management services and day-to-day operations of the
      Company

    · Maintenance
      of internal controls

    · Preparation
      of records, quarterly reports, feasibility studies and budgets

    · Custody
      of Company’s funds and shares

    · Planning
      and controlling the Company’s cash position

    · Provide
      management and administrative services when required

    · Prepare
      regulatory reports, satisfy regulatory and listing requirements

    · Maintain
      transfer agent and legal council relations

    · Consulting
      on future investments

    · Organize
      meetings for directors, and

    · Any
      other
      such activities that are required to maintain the efficient and effective
      operations of the Company


    
      
         

      

      
        1

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    


    WWTI
      agrees to pay you a minimum fee of two thousand ($2,000) dollars per month
      regardless of the companies cash position and a maximum of four thousand
      ($4,000) per month providing the companies cash position is greater than fifty
      thousand ($50,000) dollars.

    


    This
      Agreement shall have an effective date of January 01, 2006 and expire December
      31, 2006 with option to be renewed on terms to be agreed upon that time. WWEN
      may terminate this Agreement at its discretion upon ninety (90) days
      notice.

    


    On
      behalf
      of the Board of Directors 

    


    


    


    /s/
      Michael McLaren

    Director

    


    


    Accepted
      and agreed to this 3rd day of January 2006

    


    


    By:/s/Ron
      Maruszczak

     

     2
#### In re Key

Case below: 182 N.C. App. - (17 April 2007)

No. 208P07

1. Respondent’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA06-498)

2. Respondent’s (Mark Key) Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. Respondent’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 04/30/07 Stay Dissolved 06/27/07

2. Denied 06/27/07

3. Denied 06/27/07
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Teddy Moore, Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 688]

Appeals by the defen*873dant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County (J. Doyle, J.), both imposed October 1, 2007, under indictment Nos. 2877B-06 and 1409-07, respectively, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed. No opinion. Spolzino, J.E, Miller, Covello and Chambers, JJ., concur.
#### Clemmons v. Securitas, Inc.

Case below: 183 N.C. App. - (5 June 2007)

No. 324P07

Defs’ Motion for Temporary Stay (COA06-1346)

Denied 07/11/07
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2


Campbell Soup
Company

Fiscal Year 2005 Restricted Stock Award

<name>

<title>

Date of Grant: <grant date>



Congratulations!



You have been awarded a
grant of <amount> restricted shares under
the Fiscal 2005 Restricted Stock Program.



Providing you continue to be actively employed by the Company, these shares
will vest in three installments as follows:






	 	•	 	One third vests <two and one-half years from the grant date>
	 
	 	•	 	One third vests <three and one-half years from the grant date>
	 
	 	•	 	One third vests <four and one-half years from the grant date>




The statement is not intended to fully explain restricted stock
awards. Please consult the 2003 Long-Term Incentive Plan and the
Restricted Stock brochure for a complete understanding of the
Company’s restricted stock program.




President & Chief Executive Officer
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

HUGH D. COX, JR.,

Claimant

- Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee

______________________

2021

- 2288

______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 19

- 3317, Judge Joseph L. Falvey Jr., Judge Joseph L. Toth, Judge Michael P. Allen.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER
, Law Offices of Carpenter Chartered, Topeka, KS, argued for claimant

- appellant.

B ORISLAV K USHNIR
, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Departmen t of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent

- appellee. Also represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON
, C LAUDIA B URKE
, P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY ; J ONATHAN K RISCH
, C HRISTA A. S HRIBER , Office Case: 21-2288 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 02/09/2023of General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Washingt on, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE
, Chief Judge

, C LEVENGER and
D YK
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 9, 2023 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-2288 Document: 34 Page: 2 Filed: 02/09/2023
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Xavier Santos, Appellant.

[961 NYS2d 922]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered May 10, 2011, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders, 52*AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice.

Concur— Andrias, J.E, Moskowitz, Freedman, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.H.1

                             AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE
                               EL PASO CORPORATION
                             2001 STOCK OPTION PLAN
                           FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

      Pursuant to authorization by the El Paso Corporation Board of Directors
(the "Board") and Section 9.2 of the El Paso Corporation 2001 Stock Option Plan
for Non-Employee Directors, effective as of January 29, 2001, as amended (the
"Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective December 4, 2003:

      WHEREAS, the Board, based upon a recommendation from its Compensation
Committee, has determined it is in the best interests of the Company to
terminate the Plan.

      NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby terminated with respect to any Shares
which are not at the effective date of this amendment subject to any outstanding
stock options, effective December 4, 2003. The termination of the Plan does not
impair the right of a Participant to acquire Shares or retain Shares that the
Participant may have acquired as a result of participation in the Plan prior to
the effective date of this amendment.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be duly
executed on this 4th day of December, 2003.

                                                EL PASO CORPORATION

                                                By: /s/ SUSAN B. ORTENSTONE
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Susan B. Ortenstone
                                                    Senior Vice President,
                                                    Human Resources

Attest:

  /s/ DAVID L. SIDDALL
------------------------
  Corporate Secretary
#### In Will of Yelverton

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 267

No. 376P06-2

Motion by Caveator, Mansel Yelverton, for Temporary Stay (COA05-771 & 772)

Denied 09/12/06
[922 NE2d 890, 895 NYS2d 302]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard A. Leopold, Appellant.

Decided January 14, 2010

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc.,*Buffalo *(Vincent F. Gugino*and *David C. Schopp*of counsel), for appellant.

*924
      *Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney,*Buffalo *(.Matthew B. Powers*and *Donna A. Milling*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.

Correction Law § 168-n (3) requires the court fixing a sex offender’s risk level determination to “render an order setting forth . . . the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determinations are based.” Here, neither the Supreme Court nor the Appellate Division order set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law justifying the risk level determination. We therefore remit this case to Supreme Court to specify its findings of fact and conclusions of law *(see People v Smith,*11 NY3d 797, 798 [2008]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (16 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and      |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| DATE: March 30, 2010    | by: /s/ Min Zhao                                                                                            |   |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   | Min Zhao                                                                                                         |   |
|                                   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |   |
|                                   |                                                                                                             |   |
**[IndyMac Logo]****REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance**I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the transactions listed on the attached schedule and I certify: a)A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision. b)To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all material  respects throughout the reporting period. By:  /s/ Robert M. Abramian Robert M. Abramian  First Vice President  Home Loans Servicing  Investor Reporting Indymac Bank By:   /s/ Bart Vincent Bart Vincent SVP, CFO - Home Loan Servicing  HLS Finance Indymac Bank Prepared for: Aurora Loan Services Date: February 29, 2008 Ref: Exhibit A [IndyMac Logo] Exhibit A  L M T  2006-4 7/28/06 140 LMT 2006-5 8-31-06 294 LMT 2006-6 09/29/06 433 LMT 2006-7 10/30/06 443 LMT 2006-8 11/29/2006 449 LMT 2006-9 12/29/06 4108 LMT 2007-1 1/30/2007 4123 LMT 2007-10 (11/30/07) 4202 LMT 2007-2 02/28/07 4129 LMT 2007-3 03/30/07 4139 LMT 2007-4 04/30/07 4157 LMT 2007-5 05-30-07 4166 LMT 2007-7 07/31/07 4178 LXS 2006-10N (6-30-06) 286 LXS 2006-11 7/27/06 139 LXS 2006-12N LB 7/27/06 137 LXS 2006-13 8/31/06 193 LXS 2006-14N (LB) 8/31/06 188 LXS 2006-15 092906 377 LXS 2006-16N 092906 374 LXS 2006-17 10/30/06 441 LXS 2006-18N 11/29/2006 447 LXS 2006-19 11/29/2006 448 LXS 2006-20 12/29/06 4109 LXS 2006-2N 1/31/06 903 LXS 2006-7 04/28/06 238 LXS 2006-8 05/31/06 276 LXS 2007-1 01/31/2007 4119 LXS 2007-11 06-29-07 4176 LXS 2007-12N 06/29/07 4177 LXS 2007-15N 07/310/7 4186 LXS 2007-2N 1/31/2007 4120 LXS 2007-3 02/28/07 4133 LXS 2007-4N 03/30/07 4138 LXS 2007-6 04/30/07 4152 LXS 2007-9 05/31/07 4171 S A R M  2006-4 04/28/06 234 S A R M  2006-8 (LB) 8/31/06 187 S A R M  2007-11 ( 11/30/07) 4203
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: September 14, 2005
                                        David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Lynette Caban, Respondent.

Submitted December 28, 2009;

decided January 12, 2010

Reported below, 51 AD3d 455.

Motion by respondent to file a supplemental brief and appendix granted, two copies of the supplemental brief and appendix to be served and an original and 24 copies to be filed within seven days. Appellant may serve three copies and file an original and 24 copies of a reply brief on or before January 26, 2010.
<PAGE>
================================================================================

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                    FORM 6-K

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of: August 2004                   Commission File Number: 0-27400

                            CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.
                            ------------------------
                              (Name of Registrant)

                                2255 MARKHAM ROAD
                                TORONTO, ONTARIO
                                 CANADA M1B 3W2
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

                   Form 20-F [ ]              Form 40-F [X]


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                       Yes [ ]                   No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A

================================================================================
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                       CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.

Date: August 26, 2004                  By:  /s/ Lewis Ritchie
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Lewis Ritchie
                                            Title: Executive Vice-President
                                                   Finance and Administration,
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   and Secretary
<PAGE>

                                     EXHIBIT

Exhibit     Description of Exhibit
-------     -----------------------

  99.1      Material Change Report dated August 25, 2004

  99.2      Press Release dated August 25, 2004
#### In the Matter of Ernest A. Hunter, Appellant, v Commissioner of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Respondent.

Decided September 22, 2009

Reported below, 2009 NY Slip Op 72456(U).

Appeal, insofar as taken from that part of the Appellate Division order that denied appellant’s motion for reargument, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
### NUMBER 13
- 11
- 00 340
- CR


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

ALEJANDRO GARCIA , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

.

On appeal from the 9 4 th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Alejandro Garcia , attempts to appeal his conviction for murder . The
trial court has certified that this A is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. @ See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 25.2(a)(2).2

On May 31 , 20 11 , this Court notified appellant = s counsel of the trial court = s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a ri ght to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel = s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. Appellant’s counsel did not respond and o n Aug ust 22, 2011, this Court abated the

case and remanded it to the trial court for a hearing to determine why counsel failed to comply with this Court's order. On September 23, 2011, t he trial court held a hearing and found that the appellant did not have the right to appeal. The finding of the trial court
and counsel’s statements at the hearing do not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant o therwise has a right to appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be
dismissed if the trial court = s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37. 1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b). D elivered and filed the 12th day of January, 20 1 2

.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 442 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 442

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the Secretary of Homeland Security to be included in the 
                    line of Presidential succession.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY IN PRESIDENTIAL LINE OF 
              SUCCESSION.

    Section 19(d)(1) of title 3, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``Secretary of Homeland Security,'' after ``Attorney 
General,''.

            Passed the Senate July 26, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 442

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for the Secretary of Homeland Security to be included in the 
                    line of Presidential succession.
```