alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dated:  3/27/2008                                                                       By: /s/      E. Todd Whittemore                                                              Title:Executive Vice President, Master ServicingAurora Loan Services LLC,   as Master ServicerI, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-BC2 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.E. Todd Whittemore**Exhibit 31 : Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications**(Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)Name:In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:Homeq Servicing Corporation, as ServicerLaSalle Bank National Association, as CustodianNewport Management Corporation, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCOffice Tiger Global Real Estate Services, Inc., as Credit Risk ManagerU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Paying Agent and CustodianWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CustodianWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as ServicerWestlake Settlement Services, LLC, as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLCZC Real Estate Tax Solutions Limited, as Sub-Contractor for HomEq ServicingZC Sterling Insurance Agency, Inc., as Sub-Contractor for HomEq Servicing
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I n th e M a tt e ro f: D O CTO RS M A R K E T I N G G R O U P , I N C ., D ebt or, J EFF H O LM ES, A p p e lla n t, v. FRO N TLI N E M ED I CA L A SSO CI A TES, I N C . , aC a l i f

orni ac orpor a t i on, A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 55499 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 7 7 2 7 - GW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G e or ge H . W u, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 26, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , H A W K IN S , an d G O U L D , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED JU L 11 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2 10- 55499

J e f f H ol m e s appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s or de rr e ve r s i ng the bank rupt cycourt ’ s dec i si on and v ac at i ng the j ud gm entas vo i d for l ac k o f s ubj ec t m a tt e rj ur i s di c t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 158( d) . W e r e vi e w de n o v o , Se a H

a w k Se a fo o d , I n c . v . A la s ka (

I n r e V a ldezFis h e r ie s D e v . A s s o c .) , 439 F. 3 d 5 4 5 , 5 4 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 6 ) , a n d w e a f f i rm. C ontr a ry t o H ol m e s ’ s c ont e nt i on, the ba nkrupt c y c our tdi d notha ve j ur i s di c t i on ove rthi s pr oc e e di ng be c a us e the out c om e w oul d ha ve no e f f e c ton the e s ta te b e in g a d m in is te r e d in b a n k ru p tc y . See F i et z v. G rea t

W . Sa v. (In re Fei t

z) , 852 F . 2d 455, 457 ( 9th C i r . 1988) ( ba nkrupt c y c our t s ha ve “ r e l a t e d t o” j ur i s di c t i on o v era c iv il p ro ce ed in g o n ly w h en “‘ th e o u tc o m e o f th e p r o c e e d in gc o u ld concei vabl

y have any ef

f ec t on the es tat e bei ngadm i nister ed i n b an kr up tcy ’” ( c ita tio n o m itte d ) ) ; s e e al s o A r baugh v . Y

& H C or p. , 546 U . S . 500, 514 ( 2006) (“ [S ] ubj ec tm att erj uri sdi ct i on , because i ti nv ol ves acourt ’ s pow ert o h ea r aca se , ca n n everbe forf

ei t ed or w ai ved. ” ( ci t at i on om i tt ed)) . AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of FLM Minerals Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Xin Chen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 28th day of February, 2010.




XIN CHENXin ChenChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Belton HARRIS, Jr., a/k/a Lett, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; John J. Lamanna, Warden at FCI - Edgefield, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 06-7369.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 24, 2006.

Belton Harris, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Belton Harris, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s judgment and order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Harris v. United States,*No. 9:05-ev-02602-MJP (D.S.C. June 23, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 To the extent Harris may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a *482second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, we deny authorization.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 9 -00067 -CV In re ScottAnderson ORIG IN A L PR OC E E D IN GFR OM T R A V IS C OU N T Y M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Filed: F ebrua

ry 19, 2009
#### Bridge Capital Corp. et al., Respondents, v Todd E. Ernst et al., Defendants, and Sigurd A. Sorenson, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. 257/117 Realty LLC, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Submitted May 26, 2009;

decided June 30, 2009

Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.
#### State v. Covington

Case below: 184 N.C. App.-(19 June 2007)

No. 376P07

Def’s Motion for “Notice of Appeal Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(1)” (COA06-903)

Denied 10/11/07
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Mobile Data Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Cozine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Steven Cozine


Steven Cozine






Chief Executive Officer






October 29, 2010









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In connection with the Annual Report of Mobile Data Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Belkis Jimenez Rivero, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Belkis Jimenez Rivero


Belkis Jimenez Rivero




Chief Financial Officer






October 29, 2010
Exhibit 33.5



|                                                       |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|[Letterhead of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association] |  |  |  | Wells Fargo Bank, NA 
|                                                       |  |  |  | Document Custody     
|                                                       |  |  |  | 1015  10thAvenue SE 
|                                                       |  |  |  | Minneapolis, MN 55014

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended)
residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government
sponsored entity (the Platform).

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth
in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the
Period).

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the
Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the Securities
and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has
complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Companys assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.



WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:

/s/ Shari GillundName:

Shari GillundIts:

Senior Vice PresidentDated:

February 29, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3941 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3941

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to fully allow students to 
live in units eligible for the low-income housing credit, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2006

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to fully allow students to 
live in units eligible for the low-income housing credit, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF STUDENT HOUSING ELIGIBLE FOR LOW-INCOME 
              HOUSING CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 42(i)(3)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 (relating to certain students not to disqualify unit) is 
amended by striking all after clause (i) and inserting the following:
                            ``(ii) entirely by full-time students if 
                        such students are--
                                    ``(I) single parents and their 
                                children,
                                    ``(II) married and file a joint 
                                return, or
                                    ``(III) adult students fulfilling 
                                the requirements for a secondary school 
                                education or secondary education 
                                equivalency diploma.
                For purposes of determining whether a unit is occupied 
                by a full-time student, an individual under the age of 
                19 years who attends kindergarten through grade 12 
                shall not be taken into account.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
PROMISSORY NOTE

SHOUGUANG CITY HAOYUAN CHEMICAL COMPANY LIMITED

PROMISSORY NOTE

                NO.  1                     $  889,005            June 8th, 2007
                    ---                     ---------            --------------

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Shouguang City Haoyuan Chemical Company
Limited, a company of limited liabilities incorporated and validly existing
under the laws of China (the "Maker"), hereby promises to pay to the order of
Dong Hua Yang (the "Payee"), the principal amount of $889,005, all in accordance
with the provisions of this Promissory Note.

1. Payment of Principal. The full amount of the principal shall be due and
payable on or before July 8th , 2007 (the "Maturity Date").

2. No Interest. Under no circumstances shall interest accrue or be charged on
the unpaid principal balance of this Promissory Note.

3. Method of Payment. Payments hereunder shall be in lawful money of the United
States and shall be made to Payee at the following address or at such other
place as Payee may designate to Maker in writing: c/o __ Wo Pu Town, Qing He Oil
Extraction Plant 2nd Living District, Shouguang City, Shandong Province, China.

4. Unconditional Payment Obligation. No provision of this Promissory Note shall
alter or impair the obligation of the Maker, which is absolute and
unconditional, to pay the principal of this security deposit at the time and
place and in the currency herein prescribed.

5. Governing Law. This promissory note shall be construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of New York, without regard to its conflicts of laws rules.

6. Notices. All notices, requests, demands and other communications with respect
to this security deposit shall be given in person or forwarded by mail, postage
prepaid, registered or certified mail, with return receipt requested, addressed
to the party's address. Any notice, request, demand or communication shall be
deemed validly given and received upon delivery if given in person, and on the
5th business day after deposit in the mail if given by mail as provided for in
the preceding sentence.

<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker has executed and delivered this Promissory Note
effective as of         , 2007.

                                 SHOUGUANG CITY HAOYUAN CHEMICAL COMPANY LIMITED


                                 By: ___________________________
                                 Ming Yang
                                 Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

 

 

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “Administrative Agent”), dohereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 (the“Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Servicer, and theAdministrative Agent the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WAMU Series 2007-HY2 Trust for the 2007 fiscal year  (the “RelevantYear”): 

1.                  A review of the activities of the AdministrativeAgent during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,the Administrative Agent has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of March 1, 2008.

 

| /s/ Barbara Campbell Name:  Barbara Campbell Title:    First Vice President |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victorino GODINEZ, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victorino Godinez, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 04-30306, 04-30312.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 23, 2006.

*803Jane M. Kirk, Esq., USYA — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Yakima, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Anne Walstrom, Esq., FDWAID — Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). We deny the Government's motion to submit the case on the briefs without oral argument as moot.

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated appeals, Victorino Godinez appeals from the 135-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and failure to appear for sentencing in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292, and we dismiss in part and affirm in part.

Godinez contends that he was entitled to a two-level reduction in sentence under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 for his minor role in the conspiracy offense. We disagree. It is uncontested that Godinez admitted to being a courier who transported 831.3 grams of methamphetamine. *See United States v. Murillo,*255 F.3d 1169, 1179 (9th Cir. 2001) (‘Where drugs are present in significant quantities, that in itself is sufficient to deny a sentencing reduction.”). In addition, the Government presented evidence that, among other things, Godinez had previously purchased precursor ingredients for methamphetamine and that, during a search of Godinez’s property, a federal agent claimed to have smelled an odor that he thought was associated with the manufacture of methamphetamine. We therefore affirm the district court.

Godinez’s remaining contentions are barred in light of his valid appeal waiver of all other issues. *See United States v. Nguyen,*235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

We also note that Godinez makes no contentions addressing his conviction and sentence concerning his failure to appear.

We also decline to address the *pro se*letter received on July 11, 2006, because it raises issues that are not properly addressed on direct appeal.

*804AFFIRMED in part and DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.