alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of China Green Creative, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.  Dated:  April 15, 2011 By: /s/ Deng Lin Deng Lin Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Secured Digital Storage Corporation
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”).





I,
      Patrick J. Gainer, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting
      officer of the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my knowledge and belief.





(1)      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                May 13, 2008
            /s/
                Patrick J. GainerPatrick
                J. Gainer, Chief Financial Officer(principal
                financial and accounting officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1.


Certification of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, Juhani Taskinen, Chief Executive Officer, and Trupti Mehta, Principal Accounting Officer, of Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the period September 30, 2009, of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Dated:  May 14,  2010


By:  /s/ Juhani Taskinen


Juhani Taskinen


Chief Executive Officer





By:  /s/  Trupti Mehta


Trupti Mehta, Principal Accounting Officer





* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Princeton Security Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Summary of Changes



 Exhibit 10.8 
 Summary of Changes to Lead Independent Director Compensation 
 On February 14, 2007, the Board of Directors of The Gap, Inc. (the
“Board”) approved the payment of a $10,000 annual retainer to the Board’s Lead Independent Director (in addition to the compensation otherwise paid to that director in connection with his or her service), effective as of the beginning
of the company’s 2007 fiscal year. All other components of director compensation remain unchanged.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate5** 

# <!Courtof**~peaI5** 

# fortbejf 

# eberaI<!Circuit

TERRY L. FARMER,

Claimant-Appellant, 

### v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee. 2012-7119 Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in case no. 10-2483, Judge Mary J. Schoelen. 

### ON MOTION ORDER Terry L. Farmer moves without opposition for a 60- day extension oftime to file his reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: Case: 12-7119 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 11/07/2012TERRY FARMER V. SHINSEKI 2 The motion is granted. Farmer's reply briefis due on or before January 2,2013. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s27 Case: 12-7119 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 11/07/2012
[915 NE2d 1165, 886 NYS2d 867]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Raheem Mayo, Appellant.

Decided September 15, 2009

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Center for Appellate Litigation,*New York City *(Robert S. Dean*of counsel), for appellant.

*768
      *Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney,*New York City *{Justin K. Wechsler*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The evidence presented to the grand jury was legally sufficient to establish that defendant constructively possessed 96 glassine bags containing crack/cocaine recovered from underneath clothing on an apartment’s bedroom floor. Specifically, there was evidence that when the police unexpectedly arrived at the apartment, defendant was getting dressed in the apartment’s small 8 foot by 10 foot bedroom; that his 18-month-old child was present in the apartment; that a plastic bag containing 47 small glassine bags containing crack/cocaine was in plain view on the bedroom dresser; that the additional 96 glassine bags containing crack/ cocaine recovered from the bedroom floor were packaged similarly to the drugs recovered from the dresser; and that defendant was in close proximity to the drugs on both the dresser and the floor. Further, the grand jury could have reasonably inferred that the drugs did not belong to the apartment’s lessee by virtue of the fact that she volunteered the location of the additional drugs in a manner that prevented the defendant and his accomplice from overhearing. This evidence, considered together, made out a prima facie case that defendant exercised dominion and control over the contraband *{People v Manini,*79 NY2d 561, 573-575 [1992]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
     Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2007-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
     reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
     fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
     material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
     have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: ABN
    AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. as Servicer, CitiMortgage, Inc. as Servicer,
    GMAC Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Morgan
    Stanley Credit Corporation as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
    Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Virginia Albizu, Respondent, v Jose Duval, Appellant.

Submitted May 26, 2009;

decided September 1, 2009

Reported below, 57 AD3d 384.

*753Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2431 

To authorize Department of Veterans Affairs health care providers to provide 

recommendations and opinions to veterans regarding participation in 

State marijuana programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2023 

Mr. MAST (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. JOYCE of Ohio, Ms. LEE of 

California, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CORREA, Ms. CROCKETT, Mr. CROW, Ms. 

ESCOBAR, Mr. GAETZ, Ms. MACE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. MOSKOWITZ, Ms. 

NORTON, Mr. PETERS, Ms. SCANLON, and Ms. TITUS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize Department of Veterans Affairs health care 

providers to provide recommendations and opinions to 

veterans regarding participation in State marijuana programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Equal Access 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2431 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROVISION BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF2 FAIRS HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS OF REC3 OMMENDATIONS AND OPINIONS REGARDING 

4 VETERAN PARTICIPATION IN STATE MARI5 JUANA PROGRAMS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi7 sion of law, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall author8 ize physicians and other health care providers employed 

9 by the Department of Veterans Affairs to— 

10 (1) provide recommendations and opinions to 

11 veterans who are residents of States with State 

12 marijuana programs regarding the participation of 

13 veterans in such State marijuana programs; and 

14 (2) complete forms reflecting such recommenda15 tions and opinions. 

16 (b) STATE DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

17 ‘‘State’’ means each of the several States, the District of 

18 Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, any terri19 tory or possession of the United States, and each federally 

20 recognized Indian Tribe. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Sunrise Nursing Home, Inc., Respondent, v Marion Ferris, Also Known as Marion Wallis, Respondent, and Stanley Ferris, Individually and as Power of Attorney for Marion Ferris, Also Known as Marion Wallis, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[974 NYS2d 877]

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (James W. McCarthy, J.), entered July 18, 2012. The order denied in part the motion of defendant Stanley Ferris, individually and as power of attorney for Marion Ferris, also known as Marion Wallis, to dismiss certain causes of action against him.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order with respect to the first and second causes of action is unanimously dismissed and the order is modified on the law by vacating the third, seventh, and eighth ordering paragraphs and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Sunrise Nursing Home, Inc. v Ferris*(111 AD3d 1441 [2013]). Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Ben Song, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[962 NYS2d 830]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 17, 2011, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant, a full-time registry and distribution clerk in the employer’s postal office, was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits due to misconduct after four cash on delivery (hereinafter COD) items were not properly processed. A claimant’s disregard of an employer’s established procedures and policies, particularly where it is potentially detrimental to the employer’s best interest and continues despite prior warnings, may constitute disqualifying misconduct *(see Matter of Davila [Commissioner of Labor],*13 AD3d 1043 [2004]; *Matter of Parody [Commissioner of Labor],*7 AD3d 868, 869 [2004]; *Matter of Vinci [Commissioner of Labor],*253 AD2d 994 [1998]). Here, the record establishes that it was claimant’s responsibility as the primary registry clerk to, among other things, check the cabinet daily for COD items and process them in a timely fashion. Furthermore, claimant was the only one who possessed the key to the COD cabinet on the days he worked. Testimony also revealed that claimant had been counseled at a meeting in 2008, with a union representative present, that his job duties included the proper handling of COD items. Claimant’s testimony to the contrary presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Corchado [Commissioner of Labor],*77 AD3d 1009, 1010 [2010]; *Matter of Marshall [Commissioner of Labor],*284 AD2d 775, 776 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 602 [2001]).

*1242Claimant’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.E, Spain, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3847 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

110 Cooper Street in Babylon, New York, as the ‘‘Jacob Samuel Fletcher 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2006 

Mrs. CLINTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 110 Cooper Street in Babylon, New York, 

as the ‘‘Jacob Samuel Fletcher Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JACOB SAMUEL FLETCHER POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 110 Cooper Street in Babylon, 

7 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Jacob 

8 Samuel Fletcher Post Office Building’’. 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3847 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jacob Samuel Fletch5 er Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jevon Lee MILES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10230.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 17, 2006.

Christina Brown, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Las Vegas, NV, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Rene L. Valladares, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*130MEMORANDUM **

The parties’ joint motion for summary reversal and remand is granted. Defendant’s sentence is vacated. *See Taylor v. United States,*495 U.S. 575, 588-89, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990). This appeal is remanded to the district court for the purpose of re-sentencing defendant.

VACATED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by

assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003). 

NO. 07-02-0452-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

SEPTEMBER 5, 2003

______________________________

LINDA WERLEY, APPELLANT

V.

JIMMY DEAN WERLEY, JR., APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 46TH DISTRICT COURT OF FOARD COUNTY;

NO. 4304; HONORABLE TOM NEELY, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., REAVIS, J., and BOYD, S.J.1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal arises from a suit filed by appellee Jimmy Dean Werley, Jr. against

appellant Linda Werley. The suit arises from an alleged farming partnership operation
2

between Jimmy Dean Werley, now deceased, and appellee. In his suit against appellant,

appellee sought a declaratory judgment that the farming partnership he alleged existed

during the crop year 2000, an accounting of the profit or loss of the partnership, an order

directing appellant to turn over to appellee or a court-appointed receiver the assets of the

partnership, and the imposition of a constructive trust upon the assets of the alleged

partnership.

On October 21, 2002, after a jury trial on the issue, an interlocutory judgment was

entered finding that a partnership for the crop year 2000 as alleged by appellee existed.

The judgment contained the express provision that a trial of the remaining matters in the

cause was postponed pending further action by the court. It was from that judgment that

appellant attempted to perfect this appeal.

Although the jurisdiction of this court to hear this appeal has not been challenged

by the parties, we are obligated to determine sua sponte our jurisdiction to hear the appeal

for jurisdiction is fundamental and cannot be ignored. Welch v. McDougal, 876 S.W.2d

218, 220 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 1994, no pet.) (citing New York Underwriters Ins. Co. v.

Sanchez, 799 S.W.2d 677, 678 (Tex. 1990)). In the absence of a special statute making

an interlocutory order appealable, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in the

case to be appealable. New York Underwriters Ins. Co., 799 S.W.2d at 678.

On June 24, 2003, the parties were advised that this court had no jurisdiction to

consider an interlocutory appeal and it appeared we would have no recourse but to
3

dismiss the appeal. Neither party has presented any reason why this attempted appeal

should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Accordingly, this appeal must be, and is hereby, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

John T. Boyd

Senior Justice
|Exhibit 32
|----------



|ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATIONCertification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 of theChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of Aspen Exploration Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, each of the undersigned R.V. Bailey, the Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of the Company, and Kevan B. Hensman, the Chief Financial Officer and the principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:

1.      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                  |  |                                          
|----------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|November 16, 2009 |  | /s/ R.V. Bailey                          
|                  |  | R.V. Bailey, Chief Executive Officer     
|                 
|                 
|November 16, 2009 |  | /s/ Kevan B. Hensman                     
|                  |  | Kevan B. Hensman, Chief Financial Officer



---
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3845 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3845

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the ``Mickey Mantle 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MICKEY MANTLE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Mickey Mantle Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mickey 
Mantle Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate September 30 (legislative day, September 
      29), 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3845

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the ``Mickey Mantle 
                        Post Office Building''.
```