alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS Initial Review Group; Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B Subcommittee.                     

*Date:*                         February 11-12, 2009.                     

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                     

*Place:*                         Bethesda North Marriott, 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.                     

*Contact Person:*                        Gary S. Madonna, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-3528,                         *gm12w@nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 13, 2009. 

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-1148 Filed 1-21-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00241

- CV
RICARDO MARTINEZ, M. D. AND ALBERTO PENA, M.D. v. MARIA GONZALES, ET A L.
On Appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 2797

- 12

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF AP PEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this decisio n certified below for observance. September 17, 2015
Opinion issued March 8, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 16
- 00073
- CR NO. 01
- 16
- 00074
- CR

——————————— IN RE THE CITY OF ME ADOWS PLACE, TEXAS , AND GARY STEWART, CHIEF OF POLICE , Re lators

O riginal Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Writ of Prohibition



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relators , The City of Meadows Place , Texas, and Gary Stewart, Chief of Police , filed a petition for a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition challenging an “Order to Register Defendant as Sex Offender in T he City of Meadows Place,2

Texas” and oral rulings regarding the city’s Ordinance 2006

- 21

. 1 After relators filed their petition, the trial court signed an order vacating the order to register and any findings regarding the ordinance. Relator s ha ve filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss the petition as moot

. Accordingly, w e grant the motion and dismiss the petition for a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition as moot

. All pending motions als o are dismissed
as moot. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bland, Brown, and Lloyd. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).

1 The underlying proceeding is The State of Texas v. Shane West , cause no. 1 374217 , in the 1 74 th District Court of Harris County, Texas , the Honorable Ruben Guerrero presiding

.
J-S77018-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

OTIS DESANUEL MITCHELL,

Appellee No. 73 EDA 2014

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered December 12, 2013, 

in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, 

Criminal Division, at No(s): CP-46-CR-0009576-2012

BEFORE: STABILE, JENKINS, and STRASSBURGER*, JJ.

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED FEBRUARY 02, 2015

I agree with the Majority that Appellant’s substantive arguments do 

not warrant relief. However, I write separately because I am troubled by the 

Majority’s draconian application of Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b). The Majority’s overly 

strict interpretation of the Rule in this instance elevates form over 

substance. The record reflects that Appellant filed (albeit prematurely) a 

one-page concise statement with the Montgomery County Clerk of Courts. 

Neither the fact that his statement was included in an envelope with another 

petition, nor the inclusion of a single certificate of service, changes the fact 

that Appellant substantially complied with the mandates of the Rule.1,2 

 

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

1

I disagree with the Majority’s attempt to discredit the validity of Appellant’s 

certificate of service based on the address listed therein considering the 
J-S77018-14

-2 -

Given these circumstances, Appellant should not be forced to re-comply with 

the Rule to avoid waiver, nor should his previous compliance be negated. 

Accordingly, I respectfully concur.

 

Montgomery County Courts website lists P.O. Box 311, Norristown, PA 

19404 as the mailing address for the Clerk of Courts, all of the county’s 

judges, and the Office of the District Attorney. See Montgomery County, 

Pennsylvania Official Website, 

http://www.montcopa.org/index.aspx?NID=1396 and 

http://www.montcopa.org/Directory.aspx?did=55 (accessed January 7, 

2015). 

2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 564

To improve traffic safety by discouraging the use of traffic signal preemption 

transmitters. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 8, 2005

Mr. DEWINE (for himself and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

To improve traffic safety by discouraging the use of traffic 

signal preemption transmitters.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Intersections Act 

5 of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAFE INTERSECTIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 2 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 
2

•S 564 IS 

1 ‘‘§ 39. Traffic signal preemption transmitters 

2 ‘‘(a) OFFENSES.—

3 ‘‘(1) SALE.—A person who knowingly sells a 

4 traffic signal preemption transmitter in or affecting 

5 interstate or foreign commerce to a person who is 

6 not acting on behalf of a public agency or private 

7 corporation authorized by law to provide fire protec8 tion, law enforcement, emergency medical services, 

9 transit services, maintenance, or other services for a 

10 Federal, State, or local government entity, shall, 

11 notwithstanding section 3571(b) of title 18, United 

12 States Code, be fined not more than $10,000, im13 prisoned not more than 1 year, or both. 

14 ‘‘(2) USE.—A person who makes unauthorized 

15 use of a traffic signal preemption transmitter in or 

16 affecting interstate or foreign commerce shall be 

17 fined not more than $10,000, imprisoned not more 

18 than 6 months, or both. 

19 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following 

20 definitions apply: 

21 ‘‘(1) TRAFFIC SIGNAL PREEMPTION TRANS22 MITTER.—The term ‘traffic signal preemption trans23 mitter’ means any mechanism that can change or 

24 alter a traffic signal’s phase time or sequence. 

25 ‘‘(2) UNAUTHORIZED USE.—The term ‘unau26 thorized use’ means use of a traffic signal preemp-
3

•S 564 IS 

1 tion transmitter by a person who is not acting on be2 half of a public agency or private corporation au3 thorized by law to provide fire protection, law en4 forcement, emergency medical services, transit serv5 ices, maintenance, or other services for a Federal, 

6 State, or local government entity. The term ‘unau7 thorized use’ does not apply to use of a traffic signal 

8 preemption transmitter for classroom or instruc9 tional purposes.’’. 

10 (b) CHAPTER ANALYSIS.—The chapter analysis for 

11 chapter 2 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 

12 adding at the end the following:

‘‘39. Traffic signal preemption transmitters.’’.

Æ