alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Report on Assessment of Compliance****with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**1. The undersigned authorized officer of LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. (the "Company") is responsible for assessing the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as defined in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4) (xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the "Regulation AB Servicing Criteria') for residential and commercial mortgage backed securities for which the Company served as third-party property tax payment provider on the underlying collateral (the "Platform"). Except as set forth in the preceding sentence, the servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) are not applicable to the activities the Company performed with respect to the Platform. 2, The Company used the criteria in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d) to assess the compliance with the applicable Regulation AB Servicing Criteria. 3.Under one of the services offered by the Company, some customers may elect to remit tax payments directly to tax agencies without having the Company remit those property tax payments through our tax payment service. We refer to these customers as "non-outsourced servicer customers." With respect to these non-outsourced customers and the services the Company delivered pursuant to the servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4)(xi), the Company's assertion is strictly limited to its processing of tax payments submitted through the Company's tax payment service. 4.With respect to servicing criteria set forth in 17 CFR Part 229 Section 1122(d)(4)(xii), the Company's assertion is strictly limited to its processing of property tax penalty payments. The Company has determined that its servicer customers may also have access to systems that enable those servicers to process penalties through obligor escrow accounts. Management's assessment  of compliance does not relate to the actual or potential activities of other parties with access to obligor escrow accounts. 5.Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company has complied in all material respects with the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria related to the servicing of the Platform taken as a whole. 6.The registered public accounting firm of Grant Thornton, LLP, has issued an attestation report on the Company's assessment of compliance with the Regulation AB Servicing Criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Date: February 6, 2008 LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc. By:  /s/ Robert Ige Name:  Robert Ige Its: Executive Vice President
#### Jane Doe, Respondent, v Richard Karpf, Appellant. Kopff, Nardelli & Dopf, LLR Nonparty Appellant.

[873 NYS2d *670323]

— In an action to recover damages for psychiatric malpractice, the defendant and his attorneys Kopff, Nardelli & Dopf, *LLP,*appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Palmieri, J.), dated November 21, 2007, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to impose sanctions against the defendant and to recover an award of an attorney’s fee from the defendant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1.

Ordered that the appeal by the nonparty Kopff, Nardelli & Dopf, LLR is dismissed, as it is not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from *(see*CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from by the defendant, on the law, with costs to the defendant, and that branch of the motion which was to impose sanctions against the defendant and to recover an award of an attorney’s fee from the defendant pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 is denied.

It is settled that sanctions under 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 are intended to limit frivolous and harassing behavior *(see Glenn v Annunziata,*53 AD3d 565 [2008]; *Breslaw v Breslaw,*209 AD2d 662 [1994]). Conduct is frivolous if “it is undertaken primarily to delay or prolong the resolution of the litigation, or to harass or maliciously injure another” (22 NYCRR130-1.1 [c] [1], [2]; *see Glenn v Annunziata,*53 AD3d 565, 566 [2008]; *Breslaw v Breslaw,*209 AD2d 662 [1994]). In this case, the Supreme Court imposed sanctions upon the defendant for moving for a protective order. However, under the circumstances of this case, the defendant’s motion was a legitimate and appropriate response to the plaintiffs attempt to obtain further discovery after she had filed her note of issue. Dillon, J.P., Ritter, Garni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
#### Steininger & Company *v.*Donalson.

The facts in evidence made a case for determination by the jury, and the court erred in directing a verdict for the claimant.

April 23, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

*Judgment reversed.*

Levy and claim. Before Judge Bower. Decatur superior court. May term, 1893.

An execution against J. B. Donalson, from a judgment of July 8, 1889, was levied on lot of land 232 and the west half of lot 210 in Decatur county. A claim was interposed by an unmarried daughter of J. B. Donalson, to two acres of the southwest corner of lot 210. The court directed a verdict in her favor. She and her father were living on the property levied on, at the date of the levy. She introduced three deeds: (1) from J. B. Donalson to J. E. Donalson, dated March 25, 1889, consideration $661.53, conveying the land levied on; (2) from J. E. Donalson to Fain (a son-in-law of J. B. Donalson), dated December 2, 1889, consideration $346.33, conveying iot 232; (3) from J. E. Donalson to claimant, dated December 3, 1889, consideration $157.67, conveying the west half of lot 210. It appeared that at the time of his conveyance to J. E. Donalson, J. B. Donalson was insolvent. He owed J. E. Donalson $661, owed a bank $541 secured by a mort*515gage on the land, owed Fain some amount secured by mortgage, and owed Loeb over $800, and several other debts. Fain furnished $1,550 with which J. E. Donalson paid off the mortgages and the debt to himself, paid JT. B. Donalson one or two hundred dollars, and made the deed to claimant, which was a deed of gift. The moving-consideration to J. E. Donalson in taking the deed was to collect his debt. What he did with the balance of the money after paying the debts mentioned was done of his own motion, and not at the instance or direction of Fain nor of J. B. Donalson. There was no arrangement or understanding that J. B. Donalson was to have any benefit reserved to him. There was no intention to hinder or delay creditors, etc. It appeared that plaintiffs’ suit was filed jorior to the deed to J. E. Donalson ; and that in the fall of 1889 J. B. Donalson built a dwelling-house on the land claimed, and paid for the material used therein; and there was testimony somewhat conflicting, as to the character and purpose of the transactions mentioned, some of it tending to support the plaintiffs’ theory

G. F. Westmoreland and D. A. Russell, for plaintiffs.

Donalson & Hawes, for claimant.
Q Lotus Holdings, Inc.




500 N Dearborn St.  Suite 605, Chicago, IL  60654





April 25, 2011




Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC


Four Executive Boulevard – Suite 200


Suffern, NY  10901


Attention: Josh Goldstein





Re:  Amendment to Promissory Note - Maturity Date





Dear Josh:





In accordance with my discussion with Shelly, Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC hereby agree to amend the Promissory Note dated February 23, 2011 between Q Lotus Holdings, Inc. and Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC in the amount of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) such that, notwithstanding anything contained in the Promissory Note to the contrary, the Maturity Date is hereby extended to May 9, 2011.





Please acknowledge your acceptance of the above change by executing this amendment below.





Q Lotus Holdings, Inc.





By:
/S/ GARY ROSENBERGGary RosenbergIts:
CEO





Understood and Agreed to this 25th day of April, 2011.





Southshore Real Estate Development, LLC




By:
/S/ JOSH GOLDSTEINJosh GoldsteinIts:
----

----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                               |                                   |                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Date:                March                29, 2007 | By:                                    | /s/ Brian                L. Klemsz |
|                                               | Brian                L. Klemsz         |
|                                               | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                               | Chief                Financial Officer |

----

----
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended August
31, 2008 of Caddystats, Inc., a Deleware corporation (the "Company"), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"), I, Gordon Dawson, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date: October 14, 2008

/s/ Gordon Dawson
__________________
Gordon Dawson
President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Director
#### State v. Deal

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 347

No. 185P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA06-889)

Denied 06/27/07
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form
10-Q (the "FORM 10-Q") for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of Mission Resources
Corporation (the "ISSUER").

I, Richard W. Piacenti, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that:

         (i)      the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Issuer.

         Dated: August 12, 2003                         /s/ Richard W. Piacenti
                                                        -----------------------

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 12th day of August 2003

/s/ Carmen M. Garcia
--------------------

Notary Public in and for the
State of Texas

My commission expires: May 15, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Mission Resources Corporation and will be retained by Mission
Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
exv4w1



 





Exhibit 4.1





	NUMBER
INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
[LOGO]
Celebrate Express, Inc.
SHARES
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
CUSIP 15100A 10 4
THIS CERTIFIES THAT
is the owner of
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001 PER
SHARE, OF Celebrate Express, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation
by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of
this Certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until
countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile signatures of the duly authorized officers of the
Corporation.
Dated:
/s/
VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE AND SECRETARY
/s/
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR,
BY
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE






 









 



Celebrate Express, Inc.

     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of
this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:






	 	 	 	 	 
	TEN COM

	 	—
	 	as tenants in common
	TEN ENT

	 	—
	 	as tenants by the entireties
	JT TEN

	 	—
	 	as joint tenants with right of
survivorship and not as tenants
in common











	 	 	 	 	 
	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT —	 	Custodian

	 	 	
 
	

	 	(Cust)
	 	(Minor)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors	 	 
	

	 	Act	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	
 
	 	 	(State)













Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.




	 	 	 	 	 
	For value received,

	 	 	 	hereby sell, assign and transfer unto










PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE














      


      


      













(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)



 








 








 








shares
of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint








Attorney
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Company with full
power of substitution in the premises.


Dated                                                          







      









		
	NOTICE: 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN
UPON THE FACE OF THE
CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY
CHANGE WHATEVER.











Signature(s) Guaranteed:



 






	 
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN
ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS,
STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION
PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
EXHIBIT
4.17





Capital
GP L.L.C.


3
Iassonos Street, Piraeus, 185 37 Greece





Capital
Product Partners L.P.


3
Iassonos Street


Piraeus,
185 37


Greece





January
30, 2009





Dear
Sirs,





We refer to the meeting of the board of
directors (the “Board”) of Capital
Product Partners L.P. (the “Partnership”) held in
January 2009 (the “Meeting”).  Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the
First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership
Agreement”) of the Partnership.





As the Partnership is aware, the Board
resolved in its Meeting to make a dividend distribution for the fourth quarter
of 2008 (the “Dividend”) which
under the provisions of the Partnership Agreement results in a distribution with
respect to Incentive Distribution Rights (the “IDR
Payment”).  The IDR Payment is payable to Capital GP L.L.C.,
the General Partner, as the sole holder of the Incentive Distribution
Rights.





The General Partner has agreed to defer
payment of a portion of the IDR Payment in order to facilitate the Board’s
decision to make the Dividend and to address certain issues raised by the
independent directors in connection with the IDR Payment and the
Dividend.





Accordingly, the General Partner and
the Partnership hereby agree that the IDR Payment shall be made in four equal
installments on February 13, 2009 and on the respective payment dates for
distributions with respect to the first, second and third quarters of 2009,
provided, however,that such installment
payments shall only be made on each of the respective payment dates for the
first, second and third quarters of 2009 if the Partnership’s regular quarterly
distribution on such payment date equals or exceeds the Minimum Quarterly
Distribution plus any outstanding arrearages of the Minimum Quarterly
Distribution on such payment date.





This letter agreement shall be
construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of The Republic of the
Marshall Islands, without regard to the principles of conflicts of
law.





Yours
faithfully,


Capital
GP L.L.C.


By:
/s/     Ioannis E. Lazaridis


Name:     
Ioannis E. Lazaridis


Title:        Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Capital GP L.L.C.





Agreed
and accepted by:





Capital
Product Partners L.P.


By
Capital GP L.L.C., its General Partner


By:­­­­
/s/    Ioannis E. Lazaridis


Name:     Ioannis
E. Lazaridis


Title:       Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Capital GP
L.L.C.
663 A.2d 108

#### IN THE MATTER OF LAWRENCE V. KELLY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 1, 1995.

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court recommending that LAWRENCE V. KELLY of HASBROUCK HEIGHTS be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that LAWRENCE V. KELLY is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by LAWRENCE V. KELLY, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that LAWRENCE Y. KELLY show cause before this Court on September 26, 1995, at 2:00 p.m., Supreme Court courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, New Jersey, why his temporary suspension and the restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any ethics proceedings pending against him and further why the funds restrained from disbursement should not be transmitted by the financial institutions who are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent may file an original and eight copies of a brief with the Clerk of the Court and serve two copies of the brief on the Office of Attorney Ethics on or before Septem*422ber 11,1995, and the Office of Attorney Ethics shall serve and file a responding brief, if any, on or before September 18,1995; and it is further

ORDERED that LAWRENCE Y. KELLY be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
        OF NT MEDIA CORP. OF CALIFORNIA, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of  NT  Media  Corp.  of  California,   Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

         (1)      the 10-QSB  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the   information   contained  in  the  10-QSB  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.


Dated:  November 15, 2006                   NT MEDIA CORP. OF
                                            CALIFORNIA, INC.

                                            /s/ Ali Moussavi
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Ali Moussavi
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Acting Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier BELTRAN-MADRID, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10239.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 17, 2006.

Claire Kiehl Lefkowitz, Esq., USTU-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, appellee’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is granted.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 30, 2013

p0722

Order 

Clerk

July 30, 2013

146835

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146835

COA: 310501

Dickinson CC: 10-004492-FC

BRIAN ANDREW LEGAULT,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of 

People v Earl (Docket No. 145677) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case.