alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of IRIS International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Report), I, César M. García, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                        
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 7, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ César M. García    
|                  |  |  |  | César M. García        
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be
deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EX-34.15
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Suite 3300
1100 Walnut Street
Kansas City, MO 64106-2129
USA

Tel:+1 816 474 6180
www.deloitte.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, Inc., (the "Company"), an indirect wholly
owned subsidiary of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., complied with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission's Regulation AB for its role in servicing Commercial Mortgage Backed
Securities Transactions (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended December
31, 2007, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)((B), (C) and
(D)), 1122(d)3(ii) through 3(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform. Management's assertion identifies the transactions
defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to
selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered
by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each specific asset-backed transaction included in the
Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance
arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above
that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the
Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing
criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31,2007, for its role in servicing Commercial Mortgage Backed
Securities Transactions is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Kansas City, MO
February 18, 2008



Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Samuel William COCKE, Appellant.

No. 08-3461.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 11, 2009.

Filed: May 18, 2009.

Jeffrey S. Paulsen, Nancy Ellen Brasel, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.

Manvir Kaur Atwal, Assistant, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, Samuel William Cocke, Chicago, IL, for Appellant.

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BYE, Circuit Judge, and MILLER, District Judge.1

1

. The Honorable Brian Stacy Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Samuel William Cocke appeals the eighteen-month sentence he received for violating a condition of his supervised release. Despite the fact his sentence is three months below the low end of the range recommended under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) (21-27 months based on the Grade B violation Cocke admitted to and his Criminal History Category of VI), Cocke argues the district court2 imposed an unreasonable sentence.

*466We review the sentence imposed for an abuse of discretion. *United States v. Charles,*531 F.3d 637, 640 (8th Cir.2008). The record indicates the district court was aware of, and considered, the relevant sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for determining an appropriate sentence for a violation of supervised release. The record also indicates the district court considered Cocke’s arguments for imposing a lower sentence. We see nothing in the record to indicate the district court abused its discretion in imposing a sentence that was already below the recommended Guidelines, and therefore affirm.

2

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
EXHIBIT 10.1.12


                                                                    [ORMAT LOGO]


                            ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
                980 GREG STREET, SPARKS, NEVADA 89431-6039, USA


                             AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO

                                  CAPITAL NOTE


Sections 2 and 5 of the Capital Note dated December 22nd, 2003 are hereby
replaced in their entirety by the following:

2.  For Value Received and upon demand at any time after November 30th, 2007,
    Ormat Technologies Inc. hereby primises to repay the Loan to Ormat
    Industries Ltd. without any interest.

5.  In any and all events, the Loan shall be repaid not later than
    December 30th, 2009.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment to the Capital Note has been duly signed on
behalf of Ormat Technologies Inc. this 20 day of September, 2004 value of June
30, 2004.

Ormat Technologies Inc.

By: Connie Stechman
    ------------------------


Connie Stechman
---------------------------
Name

Vice President
---------------------------
Title

ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

980 Greg Street o Sparks, NV 89431-6039 o
Telephone:(775) 356-9029 o Facsimile: (775) 356-9039
exv10w20



 





Exhibit 10.20



AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


     
This Amendment dated this 8th day of March, 2004,
covers the Employment Agreement dated October 24, 1994
between Edelbrock Corporation, a Delaware corporation
(“Edelbrock”) and Jeffrey L. Thompson
(“Employee”).



 


		
	Section 3.	
    Term and Termination




			
	 	3.1 	
    Employee’s term of employment shall be amended to cover the
    period July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2009.




     
All other provisions of the October 24, 1994 Agreement
shall remain unchanged and be in full force and effect.



		
	
    EMPLOYEE	 
	 
	
    /s/ Jeffrey L. Thompson	 
	
    
	 
	
    Jeffrey L. Thompson	 
	 
	
    EDELBROCK CORPORATION	 





			
	By: 	
    /s/ O. Victor Edelbrock Jr.	 



		
	
    
	 





			
	Its: 	
    President & C.E.O.
#### In the Matter of Kole HH. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected. Broome County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Thomas HH., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

Submitted May 11, 2009;

decided June 25, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### Mark Lindkvist, Respondent, v Travelers Insurance, Defendant, and Maxons Restorations, Inc., et al., Appellants. Maxons Restorations, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v JLC Environmental Consultants, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant/Second Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. New Concept Environmental Cleaning Corp., Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 421]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J), entered February 15, 2013, which denied JLC Environmental Consultants, Inc.’s motion and Maxons Restorations, Inc.’s and New Concept Environmental Cleaning Corp.’s cross motions in limine for the preclusion of plaintiff’s experts’ testimony, unanimously modified, on the law, to preclude plaintiffs experts from testifying as to a causal connection between plaintiffs alleged mold exposure and his injuries, and, upon such preclusion, plaintiffs personal injury claim dismissed, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

In this action, plaintiff seeks, inter alia, recovery for personal injuries and property damage sustained as a result of mold remediation work performed by Maxons Restorations, Inc., New Concept Environmental Cleaning Corp. and JLC Environmental Consultants, Inc. to address a condition that existed in his apartment after it was flooded.

The proposed expert testimony purporting to establish that a mold condition existing in plaintiff’s apartment caused his injuries is inadmissible as it fails to set forth “plaintiff’s exposure to a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)” *(Parker v Mobil Oil Corp.,*7 NY3d 434, 448 [2006]). Plaintiffs experts do not identify the specific mold alleged to be the cause of plaintiffs injuries, set forth that the specific mold is capable of causing the claimed injuries, or quantify the level of exposure needed to cause the illness at issue, a worsening of plaintiffs respiratory and dermatologic conditions *(see id.; Cleghorne v City of New York,*99 AD3d 443, 446 [1st Dept 2012]; *Fraser v 301-52 Townhouse Corp.,*57 AD3d 416, 419-420 [1st Dept 2008], *appeal dismissed*12 NY3d 847 [2009]). Indeed, plaintiff’s mold expert conceded that he was not qualified to render an opinion as to “any significance of elevated mold spore exposure” and failed to address the other possible sources of mold in the apartment. Plaintiff’s medical experts, inter alia, take plaintiffs claim that his symptoms worsened due to mold *453exposure at face value, without reference to plaintiffs extensive preexisting medical conditions, and assume the existence of a mold condition capable of causing the claimed injuries *(see Rivera v Crotona Park E. Bristow Elsmere,*107 AD3d 550 [1st Dept 2013]; *cf. Cornell v 360 W. 51st St. Realty, LLC,*95 AD3d 50, 58 [1st Dept 2012]).

In the absence of the precluded expert testimony, plaintiff cannot establish a claim for personal injuries. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
#### State v. Phelps

Case below: 166 N.C. App. 518

No. 566P06

Def’s PWC (COA04-298)

Dismissed 05/03/07
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Public Storage, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald L.
Havner, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Harvey Lenkin, as
President of the Company, and John Reyes, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
-------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:    August 6, 2004

/s/ Harvey Lenkin
-----------------
Name:    Harvey Lenkin
Title:   President
Date:    August 6, 2004

/s/ John Reyes
--------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    August 6, 2004

                                   Exhibit 32
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4048 

To prohibit Federal funding for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation 

and Development. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 14, 2006 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding for the Organisation for 

Economic Co-operation and Development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Exit the OECD Act 

5 of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FUNDING FOR THE 

7 ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPER8 ATION AND DEVELOPMENT. 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Fed10 eral funds may be expended to fund activities or projects 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 4048 IS

1 undertaken by the Organisation for Economic Co-oper2 ation and Development. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust,
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2007-C30 (the "Trust Fund")

  I, Charles L. Culbreth, a Managing Director of Wachovia Commercial
  Mortgage Securities, Inc., the depositor into the above-referenced Trust
  Fund, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
    Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of periods included in the
    year covered by this annual report, of the Trust Fund;

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided on Form 10-D for the period covered
    by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement;
    in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    CWCapital Asset Management LLC as Special Servicer, First American
    Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., Global Realty Outsourcing, Inc.,
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
    Custodian.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ Charles L. Culbreth
    Signature

    Managing Director
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 10.2 Pacific Software, Inc. 6.12.07


    ASSIGNMENT
      OF CONTRACT

    


    


    For
      value
      received by way of a promissory note dated October 30, 2006, Rinus
      Jellema
      hereby
      assigns all interest and benefit in the attached contract to Pacific
      Software, Inc.

    


    The
      assigned contract transfers all assets and rights as detailed in the agreement
      to Pacific Software, Inc.

    


    Given
      on
October
      30, 2006

    (date)

    


    


    Signed,
      sealed,
      and                   
)

    delivered
      in the presence         
)

    of:                                                
      )

                                                         
      )

    /s/
      David
      Tannar                       
)

    /s/
      Rinus Jellema  )  /s/
      Rinus Jellema  

    for
      the
      Assignor                 
The
      Assignor
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5056

_____________________________
D EVIN N. J ONES and L ISA A. J ONES , Appellant s ,

v.

A UTO

- O WNERS I NSURANCE C OMPANY , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County

. Jeffrey E. Lewis , Judge

. November 28, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , R AY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Dixie D. Powell of Powell Injury Law, P.A., Crestview
, for Appellant s

. Bobby L. Whitney, Jr., of Seymour & Whitney, Fort Walton Beach
, for Appellee.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For October 11, 2005
 Commission File No. 1-11284
 FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED
 (Translation of registrants name into English)
 BCE Place, 181 Bay Street, Suite 200,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2T3  (Address of principal executive offices)
  o þ
  o þ
  o þ
  o þ




---



##### 



th




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  FALCONBRIDGE LIMITED(Registrant)October 11, 2005
    By:

/s/ Stephen K. YoungStephen K. Young -- Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Support Agreement made the 10th day of October,
2005 between Inco Limited and Falconbridge Limited
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER Appellate case name: Dustin Wayne Glenn v. The State of Texas Appellate case number: 01 - 1 3 - 00 640 - CR , 01 - 13 - 00641 - CR Trial court case number: 12CR2237 , 12CR2238 Trial court: 405th Dis trict Court of Galveston County, Texas Appellant , Dustin Wayne Glenn, has filed a motion to consolidate the above - referenced appeals and cause numbers 01 - 14 - 00042 - CR and 01 - 14 - 00195 - CR , contending that “it appears that all grounds for appeal are similar .” In cause numbers 01 - 13 - 00640 - CR and 01 - 13 - 00641 - CR , Glenn appeals from judgments of convictions for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. In cause numbers 01 - 14 - 00042 - CR and 01 - 14 - 00195 - CR, Glenn appeals from the trial court’s denial of his applicati ons for writs of habeas corpus. We deny the motion to consolidate . It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Date: June 10, 2014
|   | 1. | Such      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending June 30,      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for      the period ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      China Advanced Construction Materials Group,  Inc. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      January 14, 2009                                    |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                           |   |
| /s/Chin Hsiao                                                  |   |
| Chin      HsiaoPrincipal      Financial and Accounting Officer |   |

----
#### Mynor Orellana, Respondent, v Dutcher Avenue Builders Inc., Respondent, and Ellen Meagher et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Submitted March 2, 2009;

decided April 7, 2009

*805Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made by Christopher Meagher, dismissed upon the ground that he is not a party aggrieved as the complaint has been dismissed against him; motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made by Ellen Meagher, dismissed upon the ground that as to her the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10901]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-64,930]


Kaiser Aluminum, Greenwood, SC; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 22, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Kaiser Aluminum, Greenwood, 
South Carolina.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10901 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P