alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3867 

To designate the Federal courthouse located at 555 Independence Street, 

Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the ‘‘Rush H. Limbaugh, Sr., Federal 

Courthouse’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 6), 2006 

Mr. BOND (for himself and Mr. TALENT) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal courthouse located at 555 Independence Street, Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the ‘‘Rush 

H. Limbaugh, Sr., Federal Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RUSH H. LIMBAUGH, SR., FEDERAL COURT4 HOUSE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal courthouse located 

6 at 555 Independence Street, Cape Girardeau, Missouri, 

7 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Rush H. 

8 Limbaugh, Sr., Federal Courthouse’’. 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3867 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the Federal courthouse referred to in subsection 

4 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Rush H. 

5 Limbaugh, Sr., Federal Courthouse. 

Æ 


pwalker on PRODPC60 with BILLS
______________________AURORA LOAN SERVICES_________________________
Owner: None Depositor:
Structured Asset Securities Corporation

Attention: Mortgage Finance GPMF 2007-AR1

745 7th Ave, 7th Floor

New York, NY 10019
Master Servicer:
Aurora Loan Services

Michele Olds

10350 Park Meadows Drive

Littleton, CO 80124
Trustee:
US Bank, N.A.

Structured Finance / GPMF 2007-AR1

One Federal Street, 3rd Floor

Boston, Massachusetts 02110
Securities Administrator:  Subject:
Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:  2007 Investor Code: H08 Investor Name:
GPMF 2007-AR1
I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year 2007: 1.    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2007 (the reporting period) and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision. 2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout such reporting period.



Certified by:  AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC








By:   /s/ Terry L. Gentry






Name:  Terry L. Gentry
Title:    Managing Director
Exhibit 35.5

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Provident Funding Associates, LP.

RFMSI Series 2007-SA2 (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Provident Funding Associates as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entitys report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly
executed this Certificate this 20th day of February 2008.



|       |  |                   
|------ |  | ------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Michelle Blake
|Name:  |  | Michelle Blake    
|Title: |  | CFO
Exhibit 32

                          ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

                   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

     To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
December 31, 2006, containing financial statements for the quarter then ended,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of
1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Aspen
Exploration Corporation for the periods presented.


February 14, 2007



/s/ Robert A. Cohan
-----------------------------------------------
Robert A. Cohan, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2937]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00759]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE


Medicare Payment Advisory Commission Nominations

AGENCY: Government Accountability Office (GAO).

ACTION: Notice on letters of nomination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established the Medicare 
Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and gave the Comptroller General 
responsibility for appointing its members. For appointments to MedPAC 
that will be effective May 1, 2015, I am announcing the following: 
Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted by March 13, 2015 
to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees 
prior to the appointment of new members.

ADDRESSES: 
    Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eca18988bcadaf8d9c9c83858298818982989fac8b8d83c28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d0028291d0c0e2c3d3d22242339202823393e0d2a2c22632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>
    Mail: U.S. GAO, Attn: MedPAC Appointments, 441 G Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20548

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  GAO Office of Public Affairs, (202) 
512-4800.

42 U.S.C. 1395b-6.

Gene L. Dodaro,
Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2015-00759 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

Calendar No. 6

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 384

To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial 

Government Records Interagency Working Group for 2 years. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2005

Mr. DEWINE (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar 

A BILL

To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial Government Records Interagency Working 

Group for 2 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF WORKING GROUP. 

4 Section 802(b)(1) of the Japanese Imperial Govern5 ment Disclosure Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–567; 114 

6 Stat. 2865) is amended by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘6 years’’. 
Calendar No. 6

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 384

A BILL

To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes 

Interagency Working Group for 2 years. and Japanese Imperial Government Records 

FEBRUARY 15, 2005

Read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar
<PAGE>
================================================================================


                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer


                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                 October 1, 2004

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346


                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                       Form 20-F [X]        Form 40-F [ ]

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ______________

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ______________

     Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes [ ]         No [X]

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-____________


================================================================================

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit       Description
-------       -----------
<C>           <S>
99.1          Press Release, dated September 30, 2004 regarding Hollinger Inc.
              Announces Amendments to, and a Waiver Under, its Senior Note
              Indenture and Closing of a US$15 Million Debt Issue.
</TABLE>



<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date:  October 1, 2004

                                        HOLLINGER INC.


                                        By     /s/ Peter G. White
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:   Peter G. White
                                           Title:  Co-Chief Operating Officer
                                                   and Secretary
2010 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d

S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s

for the Thir d C ir c uit

10-22-2010



# D a niel R a mo s -Oli

v ie r i v . Att y Ge n U S A

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 09-2558

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a

U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2010 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a

U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" D a nie l R a mos -Ol iv ie r i v

. Att y Ge n U SA" (2010). 2010 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 328.

h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2010/328

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

October 22, 2010

No. 09

- 2558

DANIEL O. RAMOS

- OLIVIERI,

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent

( B.I.A. No. A095

- 833

- 985 )

Present: SLOVITER, BARRY and SMITH

, Circuit Judges

1. Respondent’s Motion to Publish the Court’s Opinion dated 09/17/10.

Respectfully,

Clerk/cjg

______________________ ___________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion is GRANTED.

By the Court,

/s/Maryanne Trump Barry

Circuit Judge

Dated: October 22, 2010

CJG/cc: Lauren Anselowitz, Esq.

Anthony P. Nicastro, Esq.

Joanna L. Watson, Esq.
#### David M. KISSI, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Bud MITCHLER; Hugh G. Hardesty, Jr.; Joseph B. Hardesty; Morgan Investments, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 08-8570.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 23, 2009.

Decided: May 4, 2009.

David M. Kissi, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David M. Kissi appeals from the district court’s order requiring him to pay a partial filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(L)(1)(A) (2006). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Kissi seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Kissi’s motion for appointment of counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7694

ANTONIO L. FULLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-717)

Submitted: January 10, 2001 Decided: January 19, 2001

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio L. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Banci Enga Tewolde, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio L. Fuller seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fuller v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,

No. CA-99-717 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Martha L. Long, certifythat:

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors4;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles.

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
#### Minowicz v. Stephens

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 473

No. 616P06

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-1686)

Denied 01/25/07
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0305. MARQUISE ALI ROBBINS v. GREGORY C. DOZIER.

After the trial court granted summary judgment to the respondent, Petitioner

Marquise Robbins filed a motion for reconsideration. The trial court denied the

motion on January 9, 2020, and Robbins filed this application for discretionary

review on February 14, 2020. We lack jurisdiction because the application is

untimely.

Pretermitting whether the trial court’s order is subject to appellate review, an

application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the

order or judgment to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of

OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for

appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734

(380 SE2d 57) (1989). Here, Robbins filed his application 36 days after the trial

court’s order was entered. His application is thus untimely, and it is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

March 06, 2020

03/06/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3893 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3893

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the adjusted 
 gross income limitation for qualified performing artists eligible for 
         an above-the-line deduction for performance expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2006

 Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the adjusted 
 gross income limitation for qualified performing artists eligible for 
         an above-the-line deduction for performance expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASED ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME LIMITATION FOR QUALIFIED 
              PERFORMING ARTISTS ELIGIBLE FOR ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION 
              FOR PERFORMANCE EXPENSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 62(b)(1)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 (defining qualified performing artist) is amended by striking 
``$16,000'' and inserting ``$30,000''.
    (b) Adjustment for Inflation.--Section 62(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(4) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning in a calendar year after 2010, the dollar amount 
        contained in paragraph (1)(C) shall be increased by an amount 
        equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, determined by substituting 
                `calendar year 2009' for `calendar year 1992' in 
                subparagraph (B) thereof.
        Any increase determined under the preceding sentence shall be 
        rounded to the nearest multiple of $50.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT VIC TOR M ANUEL C AB RE R

A R OSAS; M AR IA ESTHER

C AB RER

A, Pe titione rs, v. ERIC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 11-73014 Age n c y Nos. A095-295-030 Age n c y Nos. A095-295-031 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 12, 2014 ** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , WA RDLAW , a

nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Vic tor M anue l C a

bre ra R osa s a nd M aria Esthe r C a

bre ra , native s a

nd c itiz e ns of M e xic o, pe tition for re vie wof the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing the i r a

ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing the ir



# FIL ED JUN 16 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).a

pplic ations for c anc e lla

tion of re m o va l. Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie wde novo c onstitutiona l c la i m s a nd que s tions of la

w. Martine z -Rosas v . Gonzale

s , 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th C ir. 2005). W e dism iss in pa rt a nd de ny in pa rt the pe tition for re v ie w. W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the a ge nc y ’ s disc re t iona ry de te rm ination tha

t pe titione rs fa ile d to show e xc e ptiona l a nd e xtre m e l y

unusua l ha

rdship to the ir qua lify ing re lative s. Se eid. Pe titione rs’ c onte ntion tha t the a g e nc y

viola te d due proc e ss by

disre ga rding the e va luations re ga

rding the i r c hildre n’ s la

n gua g e a bilitie s is not supporte d

by the re c o rd and doe s not a

m ount to a

c olora b le c onstitutiona

l c la im tha t would invoke our jurisdic tion. Se eid. (tra ditiona l a buse of disc re tion c ha lle n ge s re c a st a s a lle g e d due proc e ss viola

tions do not c onstitute

c olora ble c onstitutiona

l c la im s). Pe titione rs’ c onte ntion tha t the B IA viola

te d due proc e ss by

re vie wing de novo theIJ’ s 2004 de c ision is una va iling. Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.1(d)(3)(ii) (gra nting B IA a uthority to re v ie w de novo que stions of la w, disc re t ion, a

nd judgm e nt). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.

1 1 - 7 3 0 1 4 2