alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-34.5
(logo) Deloitte

Deloitte & Touche LLP
111 S. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606-4301
USA

Tel:    +1 312 486 1000
Fax:    +1 312 486 1486
www.deloitte.com

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation
Vernon Hills, Illinois

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that
Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation (the "Company") complied with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB for the Residential Mortgage Loans Platform (the "Platform") as
of and for the year ended November 30, 2007, excluding criteria 1122
(d)(1)(ii), (d)(1)(iii), (d)(2)(iv), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(3)(i)(C), (d)(4)(x),
(d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii), (d)(4)(xiii), and (d)(4)(xv), which management has
determined are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform. Appendix A to the accompanying management's assertion
identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as
constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample
basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether
the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were
limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the
period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have
included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction included
in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect
noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period
specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria for the Residential Mortgage Loans
Platform as of and for the year ended November 30, 2007 is fairly stated, in
all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

March 14, 2008

Member of
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
[904 NE2d 812, 876 NYS2d 676]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Maye, Appellant.

Decided February 12, 2009

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Matthew C. Hug,*North Greenbush, for appellant.

Respondent precluded.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified by granting defendant’s motion to suppress the cocaine recovered and remitting to County Court for farther proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.

Defendant seeks suppression of evidence including cocaine found in a “baggie” during a manual body cavity search performed at a police station, without a warrant. The officer who carried out the search testified that he saw the “baggie” protruding from defendant’s rectum, and removed it. Since no exigent circumstances prevented the police from seeking prior *732judicial authorization for the search, defendant’s motion to suppress should be granted to the extent of suppressing the cocaine recovered (see *People v Hall,*10 NY3d 303, 311 [2008]).

Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order modified, etc.
Form of Specimen Common Stock certificate of Rex Energy Corporation




 

 
  
 NUMBER 0 SHARES

 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 Rex Energy Corporation 
 TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE 2,000 SHARES 
 1,000 SHARES WITHOUT PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK 
 1,000 SHARES WITHOUT PAR VALUE PREFERRED STOCK 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 This is to Certify that is the owner of

 Rex Energy Corporation 
 transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate Properly endorsed. Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its
duly authorized officers. 
 Dated 
 PRESIDENT SECRETARY 
 © 1999 CORPEX BANKNOTE CO., BAY SHORE N.V.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 6610]

*Summary:*                     Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects in the exhibition: “Lords of the Samurai: Legacy of a Daimyo Family,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or                           ( print page 22200)                        display of the exhibit objects at the Asian Art Museum, San Francisco, CA, from on or about June 12, 2009, until on or about September 20, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*For Further Information Contact:*                     For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (                    *telephone:*                     202-453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.                

Dated: May 6, 2009.

C. Miller Crouch,

Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E9-11090 Filed 5-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41377

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

MARC D. YOCOM ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 334

Filed: February 6, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Kootenai County. Hon. John T. Mitchell , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for felony driving under the influence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Spencer J. Hahn , Deputy Appellate Public Defender , Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Marc D. Yocom entered an Alford 1 plea to felony driving under the influence . I.C. §§

18

- 8004, 18

- 8005

. In exchange for his guilty plea, an additional charge that he was a persistent

violator was dismissed. The district court sentenced Yocom to a unified term of ten years, with a

minimum period of confinement of three years . The district court suspended the sentence and

placed Yocom on probation. However, Yocom refused to accept the terms of probation, so the

district court ordered execution of the original sentence. Yocom appeals.

1 See North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 (1970).2 Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeat ed here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Yocom ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3910 

To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to accept the donation of 

a bust depicting Sojourner Truth and to display the bust in a suitable 

location in the Capitol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2006 

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself and Mr. SPECTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To direct the Joint Committee on the Library to accept 

the donation of a bust depicting Sojourner Truth and 

to display the bust in a suitable location in the Capitol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds as follows: 

5 (1) Sojourner Truth was a towering figure 

6 among the founders of the movement for women’s 

7 suffrage in the United States, and no monument 

8 that does not include her can accurately represent 

9 this important development in our Nation’s history. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3910 IS

1 (2) The statue known as the Portrait Monu2 ment, originally presented to Congress in 1920 in 

3 honor of the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment 

4 guaranteeing women the right to vote and presently 

5 exhibited in the rotunda of the Capitol, portrays sev6 eral early suffragists who were Sojourner Truth’s 

7 contemporaries but not Sojourner Truth herself, the 

8 only African American among the group. 

9 SEC. 2. ACCEPTANCE AND DISPLAY OF BUST OF SO10 JOURNER TRUTH IN CAPITOL. 

11 (a) ACCEPTANCE OF DONATION OF BUST.—Not later 

12 than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 

13 the Joint Committee on the Library shall accept the dona14 tion of a bust depicting Sojourner Truth, subject to such 

15 terms and conditions as the Joint Committee considers ap16 propriate. 

17 (b) DISPLAY.—The Joint Committee shall place the 

18 bust accepted under subsection (a) in a suitable perma19 nent location in the Capitol. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
##### 



Certification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act
 Securities Exchange Act
   /s/ Paul. A SmithPaul A. SmithController and Senior Vice-President,Finance and Administration(chief financial officer)
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 14, 2010 |  /s/ George R.      Quist                               |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |  George R.      Quist                                   |
|                     |  Chairman of the      Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|                     | (Principal      Executive Officer)                           |

----
Annual
Statement as to Compliance
 For the
Year Ended December 31, 2007
 
 
 Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.
 Series
2007-CD4
 DB
Americold under JPMC 2007-CIBC18
 
 
 Pursuant
to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced
transaction, I hereby attest that:
 
 i.    A
review of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. as Master Servicer during the
period, and of its performance under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement, has
been made under my supervision.
 
 
 ii.   To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capmark Finance Inc. as Master
Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Pooling and
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period.
 
 
 Capmark
Finance Inc.
 
 
 /s/ Mark
E. McCool
 
 By:
              Mark
      E. McCoolTitle:
              Managing
      DirectorDate:
              February
      20, 2008
 
 
 
 
 .inv
598   lib A
 
 
 
 
 Capmark
      Finance Inc.116
      Welsh RoadReal
      Estate Finance, Investment, Services
              Horsham,
      Pa 19044
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Anthony CLARKE, also known as Jerrell Jovan Carter, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-20531

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender (FPD) appointed to represent Mark Anthony Clarke on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Clarke has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the FPD’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from farther responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         761,375                 238,465
<SECURITIES>                                     1,631<F1>               3,732
<RECEIVABLES>                                  261,467                  46,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,823                  18,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,043,296                 307,890
<PP&E>                                       1,555,568               1,459,017
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,018,365)             (1,007,792)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,941,851               1,110,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (1,239,610)               (421,235)
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                   (5,632,158)             (5,632,158)
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,151,317<F2>           5,127,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,941,851               1,110,940
<SALES>                                      (101,360)                (76,057)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (107,130)                (80,297)
<CGS>                                            5,857                   9,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  130,994                 217,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               125,137                 208,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,864)               (137,369)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,864)               (137,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,864)               (137,369)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
<FN>
<F1>Prepaid Expense
<F2>Retained Earnings
</FN>
        




</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**** 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

            In connection with the Report of Acquired Sales Corp. a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) I, Gerard M. Jacobs, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

 

a.                   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

b.                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

Dated December 30, 2009

 

----
#### In re R.D.R.

Case below: 175 N.C. App. 397

No. 061P06

Appellant’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-651)

Denied 01/25/07
EXHIBIT
32.1





STATEMENT
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE








Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Fred
O’Connor, Chief Executive Officer of Biofuels Power Corporation (the “Company”),
hereby certifies that:





The
Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.








/s/ Fred
O’Connor


Fred
O’Connor, Chief Executive Officer


Dated:
May 4, 2009
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 Form 6-K
 Report
of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the month of:   September, 2005
    
    Commission File Number:   001-32562
 STANTEC INC.
  10160  112 Street
Edmonton, Alberta
Canada T5K 2L6
  Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 
 
  Yes   o
    
    No   þ




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  STANTEC INC.Date:   September 7, 2005
    By:
    /s/   Jeffrey S. LloydName:
    Jeffrey S. LloydTitle:
    Vice President, Secretary andGeneral Counsel




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Material Change Report dated September 7, 200599.2
    
    Press Release dated September 1, 2005
CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of  NT  Media  Corp.  of  California,   Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the  Company on Form  10-QSB for the  quarter  ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

         (1) the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 18, 2004                     NT MEDIA CORP. OF
                                         CALIFORNIA, INC.


                                         /s/ Chris Briggs
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Chris Briggs
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer
                                         and Chief Financial Officer



























                                   EXHIBIT 32