4032 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 13 / Thursday, January 22, 2009 / Notices 

944TH—MEETING—Continued 

Item No. Docket No. Company 

CP06–366–002 ............................................ NorthernStar Energy LLC. 

CP06–376–002.

CP06–377–002.

C–3 ........ CP05–130–005 ............................................ Dominion Cove Point, LNG, LP. 

CP05–132–004.

CP05–395–004.

CP05–131–004 ............................................ Dominion Transmission, Inc. 

C–4 ........ CP08–431–000 ............................................ Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation. 

C–5 ........ CP09–34–000 .............................................. ConocoPhillips Alaska Natural Gas Corporation and Marathon Oil Company. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

A free Web cast of this event is 

available through http://www.ferc.gov. 

Anyone with Internet access who 

desires to view this event can do so by 

navigating to http://www.ferc.gov’s 

Calendar of Events and locating this 

event in the Calendar. The event will 

contain a link to its Web cast. The 

Capitol Connection provides technical 

support for the free Web casts. It also 

offers access to this event via television 

in the DC area and via phone bridge for 

a fee. If you have any questions, visit 

http://www.CapitolConnection.org or 

contact Danelle Springer or David 

Reininger at 703–993–3100. 

Immediately following the conclusion 

of the Commission Meeting, a press 

briefing will be held in the Commission 

Meeting Room. Members of the public 

may view this briefing in the designated 

overflow room. This statement is 

intended to notify the public that the 

press briefings that follow Commission 

meetings may now be viewed remotely 

at Commission headquarters, but will 

not be telecast through the Capitol 

Connection service. 

[FR Doc. E9–1089 Filed 1–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. ER09–498–000] 

Vickers Power, LLC; Supplemental 

Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate 

Filing Includes Request for Blanket 

Section 204 Authorization 

January 13, 2009. 

This is a supplemental notice in the 

above-referenced proceeding of Vickers 

Power, LLC’s application for marketbased rate authority, with an 

accompanying rate tariff, noting that 

such application includes a request for 

blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 

Part 34, of future issuances of securities 

and assumptions of liability. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to 

protest should file with the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, 

in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 

of the Commission’s Rules of Practice 

and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 

385.214). Anyone filing a motion to 

intervene or protest must serve a copy 

of that document on the Applicant. 

Notice is hereby given that the 

deadline for filing protests with regard 

to the applicant’s request for blanket 

authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of 

future issuances of securities and 

assumptions of liability, is February 2, 

2009. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper, using the 

FERC Online links at http:// 

www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic 

service, persons with Internet access 

who will eFile a document and/or be 

listed as a contact for an intervenor 

must create and validate an 

eRegistration account using the 

eRegistration link. Select the eFiling 

link to log on and submit the 

intervention or protests. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the intervention or protest to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

The filings in the above-referenced 

proceeding are accessible in the 

Commission’s eLibrary system by 

clicking on the appropriate link in the 

above list. They are also available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an eSubscription link on the 

Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive e-mail notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

dockets(s). For assistance with any 

FERC Online service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–1134 Filed 1–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0323; FRL–8763–8] 

Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Budgets in Submitted San 

Joaquin Valley 8-Hour Ozone 

Reasonable Further Progress and 

Attainment Plan for Transportation 

Conformity Purposes; California 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of adequacy and 

inadequacy. 

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is 

notifying the public that the Agency has 

found that the motor vehicle emissions 

budgets for the years 2011, 2014 and 

2017 from the San Joaquin Valley 2007 

Ozone Plan are adequate for 

transportation conformity purposes. In 

this notice, EPA is also notifying the 

public that the Agency has found that 

the motor vehicle emissions budgets for 

the years 2008, 2020 and 2023 from the 

San Joaquin Valley 2007 Ozone Plan are 

inadequate for transportation 

conformity purposes. The San Joaquin 

Valley 2007 Ozone Plan was submitted 

to EPA on November 16, 2007 by the 

California Air Resources Board (CARB) 

as a revision to the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), and includes 

reasonable further progress and 

attainment demonstrations for the 8- 

hour ozone standard. On February 1, 

2008, CARB submitted supplemental 

technical information related to 

reasonable further progress for the 8- 

hour ozone standard in San Joaquin 

Valley. As a result of our adequacy 

findings, the San Joaquin Valley 

Metropolitan Planning Organizations 


rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 13 / Thursday, January 22, 2009 / Notices 4033 

and the U.S. Department of 

Transportation must use the adequate 

budgets, and cannot use the inadequate 

budgets, for future conformity 

determinations. 

DATES: This finding is effective February 

6, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karina O’Connor, U.S. EPA, Region IX, 

Air Division AIR–2, 75 Hawthorne 

Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901; 

(775) 833–1276 or 

oconnor.karina@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. 

Today’s notice is simply an 

announcement of a finding that we have 

already made. EPA Region IX sent a 

letter to CARB on January 8, 2009 

stating that the motor vehicle emissions 

budgets in the submitted San Joaquin 

Valley 2007 Ozone Plan, as 

supplemented by CARB on February 1, 

2008, for the reasonable further progress 

(RFP) milestone years of 2011, 2014, 

2017 are adequate. The finding is 

available at EPA’s conformity Web site: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/state

resources/transconf/adequacy.htm. The 

adequate motor vehicle emissions 

budgets are provided in the following 

table: 

MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION BUDGETS

[Summer planning tons per day] 

Year 2011 2014 2017 

County VOC1 NOX VOC1 NOX VOC1 NOX

Fresno .............................................................................. 15.5 47.9 12.9 37.2 11.1 29.1 

Kern (SJV) ....................................................................... 15.7 79.4 13.5 64.1 11.6 49.5 

Kings ................................................................................ 3.4 15.9 2.8 12.3 2.3 9.4 

Madera ............................................................................. 3.7 12.2 3.1 9.7 2.6 7.7 

Merced ............................................................................. 6.2 28.8 5.1 22.3 4.2 17.1 

San Joaquin ..................................................................... 12.1 34.7 10.1 27.8 8.6 21.3 

Stanislaus ......................................................................... 9.0 22.3 7.5 17.2 6.5 13.4 

Tulare ............................................................................... 9.2 20.9 7.7 16.6 6.7 13.1 

1The plan uses a comparable State term, reactive organic gases (ROG). 

Our letter dated January 8, 2009 also 

states that budgets for 2008, 2020, and 

2023 are inadequate for transportation 

conformity purposes. The San Joaquin 

Valley 8-hour ozone plan does not show 

reasonable further progress for the year 

2008. As a result, one of the 

transportation conformity rule’s 

adequacy criteria is not met (40 CFR 

93.118(e)(4)(iv)), and thus, the 2008 

budget is inadequate. The State has 

included additional on-road mobile 

source emissions reductions in the 

budgets for 2020 and 2023 from the 

2007 State Strategy for the California 

SIP. The adequate budgets include no 

such reductions but rather reflect 

emissions reductions from CARB rules 

that have already been adopted. EPA 

has determined that the 2020 and 2023 

budgets are inadequate because they 

include new emission reductions that 

do not result from specific or 

enforceable control measures. As a 

result, three of the transportation 

conformity rule’s adequacy criteria are 

not met (40 CFR 93.118(e)(4)(iii), (iv), 

and (v)) for these budgets. The 

inadequate motor vehicle emissions 

budgets are provided in the following 

table: 

INADEQUATE MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSION BUDGETS

[Summer planning tons per day] 

Year 2008 2020 2023 

County VOC1 NOX VOC1 NOX VOC1 NOX

Fresno .............................................................................. 18.6 58.5 8.0 16.9 7.8 15.7 

Kern (SJV) ....................................................................... 18.1 93.9 8.5 28.4 8.1 24.8 

Kings ................................................................................ 3.9 18.3 1.7 5.3 1.6 4.7 

Madera ............................................................................. 4.4 14.6 1.9 4.8 1.9 4.5 

Merced ............................................................................. 7.4 35.5 2.9 9.9 2.8 9.0 

San Joaquin ..................................................................... 13.9 40.0 6.3 12.7 6.3 11.9 

Stanislaus ......................................................................... 10.5 26.7 4.9 8.0 4.6 7.1 

Tulare ............................................................................... 10.5 23.4 5.2 8.4 4.8 7.4 

1The plan uses a comparable State term, reactive organic gases (ROG). 

Receipt of the motor vehicle 

emissions budgets in the San Joaquin 

Valley 2007 Ozone Plan was announced 

on EPA’s transportation conformity Web 

site on April 18, 2008. We received 

comments in response to the adequacy 

review posting. The finding and the 

response to comments are available at 

EPA’s transportation conformity Web 

site: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/state

resources/transconf/adequacy.htm. 

Transportation conformity is required 

by Clean Air Act section 176(c). EPA’s 

conformity rule requires that 

transportation plans, transportation 

improvement programs, and projects 

conform to SIPs and establishes the 

criteria and procedures for determining 

whether or not they do conform. 

Conformity to a SIP means that 

transportation activities will not 

produce new air quality violations, 

worsen existing violations, or delay 

timely attainment of the national 

ambient air quality standards. 

The criteria by which we determine 

whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission 


rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
4034 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 13 / Thursday, January 22, 2009 / Notices 

budgets are adequate for conformity 

purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 

93.118(e)(4) which was promulgated in 

our August 15, 1997 final rule (62 FR 

43780, 43781–43783). We have further 

described our process for determining 

the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets 

in our July 1, 2004 final rule (69 FR 

40004, 40038), and we used the 

information in these resources in 

making our adequacy determination. 

Please note that an adequacy review is 

separate from EPA’s completeness 

review, and should not be used to 

prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval action 

for the SIP. Even if we find a budget 

adequate, the SIP could later be 

disapproved. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: January 9, 2009. 

Laura Yoshii, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. E9–1110 Filed 1–21–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OECA–2008–0371; FRL–8763–9] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to OMB for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; NESHAP for Flexible 

Polyurethane Foam Fabrication, 

Renewal, EPA ICR Number 2027.04, 

OMB Control Number 2060–0516 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.), this document announces 

that an Information Collection Request 

(ICR) has been forwarded to the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval. This is a request 

to renew an existing approved 

collection. The ICR which is abstracted 

below describes the nature of the 

collection and the estimated burden and 

cost. 

DATES: Additional comments may be 

submitted on or before February 23, 

2009. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing docket ID number EPAOECA–2008–0371, to (1) EPA online 

using www.regulations.gov (our 

preferred method), or by e-mail to 

docket.oeca@epa.gov, or by mail to: EPA 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket and Information 

Center, mail code 2201T , 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB at: 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer 

for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20503. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sounjay Gairola, Office of Enforcement 

and Compliance Assurance, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone 

number: (202) 564–4003; e-mail 

address: gairola.sounjay@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has 

submitted the following ICR to OMB for 

review and approval according to the 

procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. 

On May 30, 2008 (73 FR 31088), EPA 

sought comments on this ICR pursuant 

to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no 

comments. Any additional comments on 

this ICR should be submitted to EPA 

and OMB within 30 days of this notice. 

EPA has established a public docket 

for this ICR under docket ID number 

EPA-HQ-OECA–2008–0371, which is 

available for public viewing online at 

http://www.regulations.gov, in person 

viewing at the Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket 

Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the 

Enforcement and Compliance Docket is 

(202) 566–1927. 

Use EPA’s electronic docket and 

comment system at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, to submit or view 

public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the docket, and 

to access those documents in the docket 

that are available electronically. Once in 

the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then 

key in the docket ID number identified 

above. Please note that EPA’s policy is 

that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, 

as EPA receives them and without 

change, unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, Confidential 

Business Information (CBI), or other 

information whose public disclosure is 

restricted by statute. For further 

information about the electronic docket, 

go to www.regulations.gov. 

Title: NESHAP for Flexible 

Polyurethane Foam Fabrication 

(Renewal) 

ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 

2027.04, OMB Control Number 2060– 

0516. 

ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to 

expire on March 31, 2009. Under OMB 

regulations, the Agency may continue to 

conduct or sponsor the collection of 

information while this submission is 

pending at OMB. An Agency may not 

conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 

required to respond to, a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid OMB control number. 

The OMB control numbers for EPA’s 

regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after 

appearing in the Federal Register when 

approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, 

and displayed either by publication in 

the Federal Register or by other 

appropriate means, such as on the 

related collection instrument or form, if 

applicable. The display of OMB control 

numbers in certain EPA regulations is 

consolidated in 40 CFR part 9. 

Abstract: The National Emission 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

(NESHAP) for Flexible Polyurethane 

Foam Fabrication (40 CFR part 63, 

subpart MMMMM) were proposed on 

August 8, 2001 (66 FR 41729) and 

promulgated on April 14, 2003 (68 FR 

18062). 

The affected entities are subject to the 

General Provisions of the NESHAP at 40 

CFR part 63, subpart A, and any 

changes, or additions to the General 

Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, 

subpart MMMMM. 

Owners or operators of the affected 

facilities must submit a one-time-only 

report of any physical or operational 

changes, initial performance tests, and 

periodic reports and results. Owners or 

operators are also required to maintain 

records of the occurrence and duration 

of any startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction in the operation of an 

affected facility, or any period during 

which the monitoring system is 

inoperative. Reports, at a minimum, are 

required semiannually. 

Burden Statement: The annual public 

reporting and recordkeeping burden for 

this collection of information is 

estimated to average 90 hours per 

response. Burden means the total time, 

effort, or financial resources expended 

by persons to generate, maintain, retain, 

or disclose or provide information to or 

for a Federal agency. This includes the 

time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize 

technology and systems for the purposes 

of collecting, validating, and verifying 

information, processing and 

maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the 

existing ways to comply with any 

previously applicable instructions and 


rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES