21820 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 89 / Monday, May 11, 2009 / Notices 

MICHIGAN 

Oakland County, 

McCoy, Kittie C., House, 1455 Benstein Rd., 

Commerce, 08001105, LISTED, 3/25/09 

NEW YORK 

Allegany County, 

Centerville Town Hall, Fairview Rd., 

Centerville, 09000154, LISTED, 3/25/09 

NEW YORK 

Livingston County, 

Engleside, 9086 McNair Rd., Dansville 

vicinity, 09000156, LISTED, 3/23/09 

NEW YORK 

Orange County, 

Echo Lawn Estate, River Rd. at Stone Gate 

Dr., Balmville vicinity, 09000157, LISTED, 

3/23/09 

NEW YORK 

Orange County, 

Milliken-Smith Farm, 279 Bailey Rd., 

Montgomery vicinity, 09000158, LISTED, 

3/25/09 

NORTH CAROLINA 

Cleveland County, 

Double Shoals Cotton Mill, 199 Old Mill Rd., 

Double Shoals vicinity, 08000775, LISTED, 

3/24/09 

OHIO 

Belmont County, 

Friends Boarding School and Ohio Yearly 

Meetinghouse Historic District, 61830 

Sandy Ridge Rd., Barnesville vicinity, 

09000168, LISTED, 3/25/09 

VIRGINIA 

Charlottesville Independent City, 

Oakhurst-Gildersleeve Neighborhood 

Historic District, Oakhurst Circle, 

Gildersleeve Wood, Valley Rd., Valley 

Circle, and part of Maywood Ln., and 

Jefferson Park Ave., Charlottesville, 

09000161, LISTED, 

3/25/09 

VIRGINIA 

Pittsylvania County, 

Yeatts, John and Nancy, House, VA 795, 

Chatham vicinity, 09000173, LISTED, 

3/25/09 

VIRGINIA 

Rockingham County, 

Bogota, 5375 Lynnwood Rd., Port Republic 

vicinity, 09000162, LISTED, 3/24/09 

WISCONSIN 

Vilas County, 

Jabodon, 1460 Everett Rd., Washington, 

09000164, LISTED, 3/25/09 

[FR Doc. E9–10802 Filed 5–8–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–676] 

In the Matter of: Certain Lighting 

Control Devices Including Dimmer 

Switches and Parts Thereof; Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

April 7, 2009, under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Lutron 

Electronics Co., Inc. of Coopersburg, 

Pennsylvania. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain lighting control devices 

including dimmer switches and parts 

thereof that infringe certain claims of 

U.S. Patent Nos. 5,637,930 and 

5,248,919 and U.S. Trademark 

Registration No. 3,061,804. The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin Levi, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–2781. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2009). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

May 4, 2009, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine: 

(a) Whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain lighting control devices 

including dimmer switches or parts 

thereof that infringe one or more of 

claims 36, 38–41, 47, 53, 54, 56, 58, 60, 

65, 67–70, 76, 82, 83, 85, 87, 89, 94, 96– 

99, 105, 111, 112, 114, 116, 118, 178, 

180, 189, and 197 of U.S. Patent No. 

5,637,930 or claims 1, 2, 5–8, 11–13, 15– 

20, 23, 25–32, 35, 36, and 38 of U.S. 

Patent No. 5,248,919, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; and 

(b) Whether there is a violation of 

subsection (a)(1)(C) of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain lighting control devices 

including dimmer switches or parts 

thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. 

Trademark Registration No. 3,061,804, 

and whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; and 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is—Lutron 

Electronics Co., Inc., 7200 Suter Road, 

Coopersburg, PA 18036. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Universal Smart Electric Corp., 17795 

Sky Park Circle, Suite H, Irvine, CA 

92614. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Benjamin Levi, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 89 / Monday, May 11, 2009 / Notices 21821 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative 

Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, shall designate the 

presiding Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: May 5, 2009. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E9–10928 Filed 5–8–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–407 and 731– 

TA–902, 904, 905 (Review) (Remand)] 

Hot-Rolled Steel Products From 

Kazakhstan, Romania, and South 

Africa 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of remand proceedings. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby 

gives notice of the court-ordered remand 

of its five-year review determinations in 

the countervailing duty and 

antidumping Investigation Nos. 701– 

TA–407 and 731–TA–902, 904, 905 

concerning hot-rolled steel products 

from Kazakhstan, Romania, and South 

Africa. For further information 

concerning the conduct of this 

proceeding and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR 

part 207). 

DATES: May 4, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Messer, Office of Investigations, 

telephone 202–205–3193, or Robin L. 

Turner, Office of General Counsel, 

telephone 202–205–3103, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record of the 

underlying reviews (Investigation Nos. 

701–TA–404–408 and 731–TA–898–902 

and 904–908 (Review)) may be viewed 

on the Commission’s electronic docket 

(‘‘EDIS’’) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—In October 2007, the 

Commission determined that revocation 

of the countervailing duty order on hotrolled steel products from South Africa, 

and that revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on hot-rolled steel products 

from Kazakhstan, Romania, and South 

Africa, would not be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. The Commission’s determinations 

were appealed to the Court of 

International Trade (‘‘CIT’’ or ‘‘Court’’). 

On March 9, 2009, the Court issued a 

decision remanding the matter to the 

Commission for further proceedings. 

Nucor Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 

09–16 (Ct. Int’l Trade, March 9, 2009). 

In its opinion, the Court affirmed the 

Commission’s cumulation analysis, but 

found that the Commission’s 

conclusions concerning likely subject 

import volume, likely price effects, and 

likely impact were unsupported by 

substantial evidence. The Court 

instructed the Commission on remand 

to address six issues. In particular, it 

instructed the Commission to: (1) Reevaluate its finding that the 

ArcelorMittal companies and/or Mittal 

USA would limit subject imports from 

the Mittal Companies; (2) reassess and 

further explain the basis for its findings 

that significant imports in any region of 

the country are likely to have a 

disruptive impact on the overall U.S. 

market; (3) reassess and further explain 

the behavior of ArcelorMittal and its 

predecessor, the Ispat organization, with 

respect to their business practices in 

exporting to countries in which they 

maintain production facilities; (4) 

reassess and further explain certain 

evidence the Court perceived contrary 

to the Commission’s conclusion on 

likely subject import volume; (5) 

reassess likely price effects in 

accordance with its revised volume 

determination and; (6) reassess its likely 

impact analysis in accordance with its 

revised volume and price effects 

determinations, and to explain the poor 

performance of the domestic industry in 

the latter portion of the period of 

review. 

Participation in the proceeding.— 

Only those persons who were interested 

parties to the original reviews (i.e., 

persons listed on the Commission 

Secretary’s service list) and were parties 

to the appeal may participate as parties 

in the remand proceeding as of right. 

Such persons need not re-file their 

appearance notices or protective order 

applications to participate in the 

remand proceeding. The Commission 

will consider permitting Mittal USA to 

participate as a party in the remand if 

it files a notice of appearance with the 

Commission by May 11. Business 

proprietary information (‘‘BPI’’) referred 

to during the remand proceeding will be 

governed, as appropriate, by the 

administrative protective order issued 

in the original reviews. 

Written submissions.—The 

Commission is reopening the record to 

obtain additional information pertinent 

to the issues on which the Court has 

directed a remand. The Commission 

seeks additional information regarding 

the operations of ArcelorMittal, its 

affiliates including Mittal USA, and its 

predecessor companies including Ispat 

and Ispat Inland (collectively ‘‘Mittal’’). 

Specifically, the Commission seeks 

information concerning— 

(a) Mittal’s policies and practices with 

respect to, 

(b) Mittal’s evaluation of the 

economic incentives of, and 

(c) The possible market disruption of, 

shipping hot-rolled steel products 

produced by one Mittal company to the 

market in which another Mittal 

company is located, including the 

European Union and the United States. 

The specific questions are posted on the 

ITC’s Internet site at http:// 

www.usitc.gov/trade_remedy/ 

731_ad_701_cvd/investigations/