alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Annual Report of UPLIFT NUTRITION, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual Report"), I, Gary C. Lewis, the Company's Chairman of the Board, its President, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief or Principal Financial Officer (CFO), and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  UPLIFT NUTRITION, INC.  Date:March 31, 2008By:/s/Gary C. LewisGary C. LewisChairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer (CEO)   Date:March 31, 2008By:/s/ Gary C. LewisGary C. LewisPrincipal Financial Officer (CFO) and Principal Accounting Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**














**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”), I,
      Donald Rabinovitch, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.


























/s/_Donald
      Rabinovitch_____________


Donald
      Rabinovitch,


President


Co-Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      15,
      2007






25
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-64,981]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 22, 2009 in response to a petition filed by the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), Local 888, on behalf of workers of EFTEC North America LLC, Dayton, Ohio.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of April 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10902 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<PAGE>


Exhibit 11.       Computation of Earnings Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                   Three Months Ended March 31,         Three Months Ended March 31,
                                               1999                                 1998
                                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Weighted     Per                     Weighted     Per
                                                  Average    Share                     Average    Share
                                      Income       Shares    Amount        Income       Shares    Amount
                                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                   <C>        <C>        <C>            <C>        <C>        <C>  
Basic Earnings Per Share
     Income available to                                               
     common stockholders              $1,527       2,763    $0.55          $1,440       2,881    $0.50

Effect of Dilutive Securities
   Stock options                                       7                                    4
   Phantom stock units                                10                                    8
                                             ------------                         ------------

Diluted Earnings Per Share
    Income available to
    common stockholders
    and assumed  conversions          $1,527       2,780    $0.55          $1,440       2,893    $0.50
                                 ======================================================================

                                      (20)
<PAGE>
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
================================================================================


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549


                                    FORM 6-K

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the month of: April, 2005                    Commission File Number: 0-27400


                            CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.
                              (Name of Registrant)


                                2255 MARKHAM ROAD
                              SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO
                                 CANADA M1B 2W3
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

                       Form 20-F [ ]         Form 40-F [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _______________

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _______________

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes [ ]         No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):  N/A

================================================================================
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

    Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                    CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.



Date:  April 26, 2005               By: /s/ Lewis Ritchie
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:   Lewis Ritchie
                                        Title:  Executive Vice-President Finance
                                                and Administration, Chief
                                                Financial Officer and Secretary


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


        Exhibit         Description of Exhibit
        -------         ----------------------

         99.1           Press Release
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3751 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3751

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain subassemblies for measuring 
                   equipment for telecommunications.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 27 (legislative day, July 26), 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain subassemblies for measuring 
                   equipment for telecommunications.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SUBASSEMBLIES FOR MEASURING EQUIPMENT FOR 
              TELECOMMUNICATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.90.32        Subassemblies           Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           containing one or                                                 31/2009          ''
                           more printed circuit                                                                .
                           assemblies for
                           instruments and
                           apparatus for
                           measuring or checking
                           electrical
                           quantities, specially
                           designed for
                           telecommunications
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           9030.90.88)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### State v. Shelly

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 196

No. 066P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-1395)

Denied 05/03/07
#### Kevin Glassman, Respondent, v Pro Health Ambulatory Surgery Center, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Submitted November 9, 2009;

decided November 19, 2009

Reported below, 55 AD3d 538.

Motion by New York State Association of Ambulatory Surgery Centers, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### State v. Richardson

Case below: Nash County Superior Court

No. 232A95-3

1. Def’s Motion to Toll Time for Perfecting Appeal

2. Def’s Motion to Reverse Sentence of Death and Convert to Life Sentence

3. Def’s Motion to Order a New Mental Retardation Motion Hearing

4. Def’s Motion to Remand and to Determine if an Accurate Transcript can be Produced

5. AG’s Motion to Deem Response Timely Filed

1. Allowed 06/27/07

2. Denied 06/27/07

3. Denied 06/27/07

4. Denied 06/27/07

5. Denied 06/27/07
APRIL 2009 CALENDAR

From: The District Court of the 1st Judicial District. County of Lewis and Clark.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. AMANDA BELL, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. BDC-2008-172 DECISION

On October 2, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a period of five (5) years, for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence, for the offense of Assault on a Minor, a felony. The Court recommended that the Defendant be placed in the Passages Program for evaluation for consideration of placement of the defendant in a community setting.

On April 3, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Kris Copenhaver. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 3rd day of April, 2009.

DATED this 21st day of April, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.
#### In the Matter of Thomas G. Bergamine et al., Appellants, v Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[608 NYS2d 431]

—Judgment, Supreme Court New York County (Bruce McM. Wright, J.) entered May 14, 1993, which dismissed the petition, brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, requesting that petitioners be granted police officer’s variable supplements fund benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Former police officers, superior officers and police detectives *202who had retired for ordinary disability, accident disability or with vested rights to a deferred retirement allowance, but before the completion of 20 years of service without disability, brought this proceeding claiming that the respective respondent Benevolent Associations breached their duties of fair representation to them in failing to take steps to procure variable supplements fund ("VSF”) payments on their behalf. These VSF benefits were established pursuant to a 1968 collective bargaining agreement and subsequent implementing legislation (L 1970, ch 876). The importance of the VSF benefits is that they serve as supplemental monies paid in addition to pension benefits and do not constitute a pension or retirement allowance (Administrative Code of City of NY § 13-269 [b]; § 13-279 [b]; *see, Poggi v City of New York,*109 AD2d 265, *affd*67 NY2d 794; *see also, Matter of Duffy v Dinkins,*190 AD2d 619). The constitutionality of the statutory scheme which permits VSF payments to only those retirees who retired after 20 years of service without disability, while denying payments to those officers who retire under other circumstances (Administrative Code § 13-268 [5]; §§ 13-269, 13-278 [5]; § 13-279), has been upheld *(Castellano v Board of Trustees,*752 F Supp 98, *affd*937 F2d 752, *cert denied*— US — 112 S Ct 378). The collective bargaining agreement was conspicuously silent with respect to the eligibility of members for VSF benefits and it was the legislation which implemented the collective bargaining agreement that set restrictions on the payment of such benefits. Thus, assuming, arguendo, the accuracy of petitioners’ allegations and contentions, it is nevertheless clear that they have not stated a claim for breach of the respondents’ duty of fair representation. Since the record demonstrates petitioners were not entitled to VSF benefits and petitioners failed to set forth any facts to show either arbitrariness, discrimination or bad faith conduct on the part of respondents in discharging their duties *(see, Matter of Farkas v Public Empl. Relations Bd.,*97 AD2d 569, *lv denied*61 NY2d 601), the IAS Court properly dismissed the petition. Concur — Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
#### Burnette v. City of Goldsboro

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 741

No. 471P06

Petitioners’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-1277)

Denied 01/25/07
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22727-22728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11161]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collection to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this

[[Page 22728]]

notification. Comments should be sent via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dc9fb4bdb8839df28390bdb0b0b9b1bdb2b89cb3b1bef2b9b3acf2bbb3aa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d291bab3b68d93fc8d9eb3bebeb7bfb3bcb692bdbfb0fcb7bda2fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to 202-395-7285. Copies of submission may 
be obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Number: OMB 0412-0011.
    Form Number: AID 1010-2.
    Title: Application for Assistance--American Schools and Hospitals 
Abroad.
    Type of Submission: Renewal of Information Collection.
    Purpose: USAID finances grant assistance to U.S. founders or 
sponsors who apply for grant assistance from the Office of American 
Schools and Hospitals Abroad (ASHA) on behalf of their institutions 
overseas. ASHA is a competitive grants program. The Office of ASHA is 
charged with judging which applicants may be eligible for consideration 
and receive what amounts of funding for what purposes.
    To aid in such determination, the Office of ASHA has established 
guidelines as the basis for deciding upon the eligibility of the 
applicants and the resolution on annual grant awards. These guidelines 
are published in the Federal Register, 79-36221.
    Annual Reporting Burden:
    Respondents: 85.
    Total annual responses: 85.
    Total annual hours requested: 900 hours.

    Dated: May 7, 2009.
Sylvia Lankford,
Acting Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of 
Administrative Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. E9-11161 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Sublease extension, dated June 16, 2004


 Exhibit 10.22 
  
 June 16, 2004 
  
 Pacific Financial Printing (“Sublessor”) 
 4020 Campbell Avenue

 Menlo Park, CA 94025 
 Attention: Charlene Johnston 

 
 Mr. Albert Gounod (“Lessor”) 
 373 Alicia Way 
 Los Altos, CA 94022 
  
 Exercise one-year lease extension from 10/01/04-09/30/05 at 4020 Campbell Avenue, Menlo Park,
CA 94025. Approximately 10,000 Sq ft. (the “Premises”) 
  
 The undersigned, Memry Corporation (“Sublessee”) is subtenant of the Premises under that certain Standard Sublease dated February 3, 2000 (the “Sublease”). Your rights as tenant of the Premises (and other premises at the
same address) are governed by that certain Standard Industrial/Commercial Single-Tenant Lease dated February 14, 2000 and as extended to April 15, 2006 by Second Addendum to Lease dated December 31, 2000 (as so extended and renewed, the
“Lease”). 
  
 Memry Corporation (“Sublessee”)
is exercising the third of four 1-year extensions as contained in paragraph ( c ) of Sublease Extension dated April 12, 2001. As requested by Pacific Financial Printing, Sublessee will make monthly payments of $11,220, for a total of $134,640 (12
months X’s $11,220 per month), directly to the owner of 4020 Campbell Avenue Mr. Albert Gounod. 
  
 The terms and conditions of this extension will be applied if the 1 remaining extension is exercised. 
  

									
	 Agreed and Acknowledged:
	 	 	 	 Agreed and Acknowledged:

			
	 Memry Corporation (Sublessee)
	 	 	 	 Pacific Financial Printing (Sublessor)

					
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert P. Belcher
	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Charlene Johnston

	 Robert P. Belcher
	 	 	 	 Charlene Johnston

	 Memry Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	 	 Owner of Pacific Financial Printing

	 Date: 6/15/04
	 	 	 	 Date: 6/25/04


  

			
	 Agreed and Acknowledged:
 (Lessor)

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Albert M. Gounod

	 Mr. Albert Gounod

	 4020 Campbell Ave. Owner

	 Date:                                   
 


  
 Memry Corporation

  

			
	Headquarters and Eastern Operations 3 Berkshire Boulevard	 	Western Operations 4065 Campbell Avenue
	Bethel, CT 06801	 	Menlo Park, CA 94025
	Executive Offices 203-739-1100 Fax 203-798-6511	 	650-463-3400 Fax 650-463-3456

  
 Customer Service 866-Go
Memry / Fax 203-798-6606
From: The District Court of the 20th Judicial District. County of Lake.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. *10DANIEL MILES, Defendant,

*9NO. DC-01-172 DECISION

*10On June 9, 2005, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of two (2) years, for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence, for the offense of Violation of Protective Order, a felony.

On February 12,2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 12th day of February, 2009.

DATED this 27th day of February, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.