alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. 449

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To facilitate shareholder consideration of proposals to make Settlement Common

Stock under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act available to missed enrollees, eligible elders, and eligible persons born after December 18, 1971, and for

other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT TO ALASKA NATIVE CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT ACT.

Section 36(d)(3) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act

(43 U.S.C. 1629b) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘(d)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘(3)’’;

(2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking

‘‘of this section’’ and inserting ‘‘or an amendment to articles

of incorporation under section 7(g)(1)(B)’’;

(3) in subparagraph (A)—

(A) by striking ‘‘, or’’ and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

(B) by striking ‘‘such resolution’’ and inserting ‘‘the

resolution or amendment to articles of incorporation’’; and

(4) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘such resolution’’ and

inserting ‘‘the resolution or amendment to articles of incorporation’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4004 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain structures, parts, and components 

for use in an isotopic separation facility in southern Ohio. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2006 

Mr. DEWINE (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain structures, parts, 

and components for use in an isotopic separation facility 

in southern Ohio. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN STRUCTURES, PARTS, AND COMPO4 NENTS FOR USE IN AN ISOTOPIC SEPARA5 TION FACILITY IN SOUTHERN OHIO. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

S 4004 IS 

‘‘ 9902.13.75 Certain structures, parts, and components for use in an isotopic separation 

facility (isotopic separation equipment) 

consisting of cold boxes, feed ovens, and 

feed purification systems, including their 

associated cooling systems, control systems, weighing systems, and cylinder 

handling systems, for the construction of 

an isotopic separation facility in southern 

Ohio known as the ‘‘American Centrifuge 

Plant’’ (provided for in subheading 

8401.20.00) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
955 A.2d 754

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Jeffrey Thomas WHITE, Respondent.

Misc. AG No. 22,

Sept. Term, 2008.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Sept. 3, 2008.

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on a Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and the Respondent, Jeffrey T. White.

The Court having considered the Join Petition, it is the 3rd day of September, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland that the Respondent, Jeffrey T. White, be and he is hereby disbarred by consent from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Jeffrey T. White from the register of attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-773(d).
----

----

| (1) |   | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m(a) or 78o(d); and |
|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: March 30, 2011 |   |   |   /s/Robert T. Strong            |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |   | Robert T. Strong                      |   |
|                       |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

|  Date: March 30, 2011 |   |   |   /s/John J. Augustine |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|                       |   |   | John J. Augustine           |   |
|                       |   |   | Chief Financial Officer     |   |

| Note: | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24

- 6144

JOEY D. SCOTT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HUDGINS, Sgt.; MATTHEW PENNELL; KEITH WHITENER; BOYD BENNETT , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 5:08

- cv - 00137

- GCM )

Submitted : Ju ly 25 , 2024 Decided: July 30, 2024

Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Joey D

. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6144 Doc: 12 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Joey D

. Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate the district court’s 2008 order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. ∗ We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court ’s order

. Scott v. Hudgins , No. 5:08

- cv - 00137

- GCM (W.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

∗ We affirmed the district court’s order denying relief on Scott’s § 1983 complaint. Scott v. Hudgins , 334 F. App’x 554 (4th Cir. 2009) (No. 09

- 6051). USCA4 Appeal: 24-6144 Doc: 12 Filed: 07/30/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
##### 



Imperial Oil Limited
237  4th Avenue S.W.
Calgary, AB T2P 0H6
    
    News Release
 Mackenzie Gas Project proponents ready to proceed to public hearings
 Calgary, November 23, 2005 
##### 



FORM 6-K
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer
 Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES CORPORATION
  BCE Place
181 Bay Street
Suite 330
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5J 2T3
(416) 369-2300
  Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 
 
  Yes   o
    
    No   þ




---



##### 



DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS FORM 6-K
  SIGNATURES
   Brookfield Properties CorporationBy:
    /s/    Craig J. LaurieName:
    Craig J. LaurieTitle:
    Senior Vice President &Chief
Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT LIST
 Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Brookfield Properties Corporation Press Release dated November 28,
2005
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4073 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.4073

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

To designate the outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
 located in Farmington, Missouri, as the ``Robert Silvey Department of 
                  Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROBERT SILVEY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT 
              CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located in Farmington, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Robert Silvey Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert 
Silvey Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carl Johnson, Appellant.

Submitted February 9, 2009;

decided April 7, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### In the Matter of Frederick Franklin, Appellant, v Ann Schwartz, as Records Access Officer of the New York County District Attorney’s Office, Respondent.

Submitted April 27, 2009;

decided June 11, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]).

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elijah Lucas, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 805]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered February 24, 2011, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

*764The defendant contends that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence in light of certain alleged inconsistencies in the testimony of the People’s witnesses. In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]; *People v Kinard,*96 AD3d 976 [2012]; *People v Parris,*70 AD3d 725, 727 [2010]).

The trial court improvidently exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of an uncharged crime *(see People v Ross,*104 AD3d 878, 880 [2013]; *People v Tucker,*102 AD2d 535, 537-538 [1984]). Nonetheless, the error was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt and no significant probability that the error contributed to his conviction *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]; *People v Kirksey,*107 AD3d 825 [2013]; *People v Ross,*104 AD3d 878, 880 [2013]). Skelos, J.P, Dickerson, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          50,545
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,545
<PP&E>                                           6,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,794
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       137,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (83,735)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,059
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,435
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24,578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (24,578)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24,578)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EX-35.2
GREENPOINT MORTGAGE FUNDING, INC.

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

GSAA 2007-2

I, Michael Gathright, an authorized officer of GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
(the "Servicer"), certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 (or applicable portion
thereof) and of the Servicer's performance under the applicable servicing
agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.


Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Agreement.

Date: February 29, 2008
/s/ Michael Gathright
Michael Gathright
Senior Vice President, Loan Administration
---

---

**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Diatect International Corporation (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      David Andrus, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











December
                14, 2007
            /s/
                David S. AndrusDavid
                S. AndrusPrincipal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Financial Officer





















































---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0871

_____________________________

TERRY RAY POPE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

W. Joel Boles, Judge.

September 24, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laurel Cornell Niles, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Pamela B. Lee, Respondent, v Kenneth Lee, Appellant.

Submitted May 4, 2009;

decided June 25, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
[919 NE2d 179, 891 NYS2d 8]

#### In the Matter of Anthony Ettari, Respondent, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Appellants.

Decided November 23, 2009

*851APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General,*Albany *(Kathleen M. Arnold, Barbara D. Underwood*and *Denise A. Hartman*of counsel), for appellants.

*Anthony Ettari,*respondent pro se.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed *(see People ex rel. Gill v Greene,*12 NY3d 1 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11

                    AURORA ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      (In thousands, except per share data)
                                   (Unaudited)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three months ended                       Nine months ended
                                                      ------------------                       -----------------
                                               June 29, 1997       June 30, 1996       June 29, 1997       June 30, 1996
                                               -------------       -------------       -------------       -------------
<S>                                            <C>                 <C>                 <C>                 <C>           

Net loss available to common stockholders      $      (4,808)      $      (4,153)      $     (11,868)      $     (11,211)
                                               =============       =============       =============       =============

ADJUSTED NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES

Weighted average shares outstanding                    6,072               5,702               5,926               7,552

Incremental shares for exercise of stock
options and warrants and common stock
issuable                                                 718                 595                 718                 595
                                               -------------       -------------       -------------       -------------

Adjusted number of common shares                       6,690               6,297               6,644               8,147
                                               =============       =============       =============       =============

Net loss per common share                      $       (0.61)      $       (1.14)      $       (1.79)      $       (0.87)
                                               =============       =============       =============       =============
</TABLE>


                                       12
Exhibit 31.3
------------

CERTIFICATION
-------------

I, Elise Nissen, Chief Financial Officer of AFP Imaging Corporation, certify
that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging
     Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to enable that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls over financial reporting.




Date: May 14, 2004                                       /s/ Elise Nissen
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Elise Nissen
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                       17