alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

[CINRAM LOGO]

2255 MARKHAM ROAD, SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO, M1B 2W3

NEWS RELEASE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

      CINRAM UPDATES STATUS OF ITS EVALUATION OF POSSIBLE CONVERSION TO AN
                           INCOME TRUST TYPE STRUCTURE

TORONTO (OCTOBER 7, 2005) -- The Board of Directors of Cinram International Inc.
(TSX: CRW) met on October 6, 2005, to receive an update from management on its
ongoing evaluation of the viability of converting the corporation to an income
trust type structure.

After receiving the update, the Board concluded that management should continue
with its evaluation on the basis of recapitalization as an income deposit
security structure. In that connection management will continue to investigate
certain relevant issues, including an equity raise, the degree of foreign
ownership and the issuance of securities commonly referred to as "bachelor
bonds" and "spinster equity."

The Board has not made a final determination as to whether or not to proceed
with this recapitalization.

ABOUT CINRAM
Cinram International Inc. is the world's largest independent provider of
pre-recorded multimedia products and related logistics services. With facilities
in North America and Europe, Cinram manufactures and distributes pre-recorded
DVDs, VHS video cassettes, audio CDs, audio cassettes and CD-ROMs for motion
picture studios, music labels, publishers and computer software companies around
the world. The Company's shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (CRW)
and are included in the S&P/ TSX Composite Index. For more information, visit
our Web site at www.cinram.com.

Certain statements included in this release constitute "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance
or achievements of the Company, or results of the multimedia
duplication/replication industry, to be materially different from any future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward
looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the following: general
economic and business conditions, which will, among other things, impact the
demand for the Company's products and services; multimedia
duplication/replication industry conditions and capacity; the ability of the
Company to implement its business strategy; the Company's ability to retain
major customers; the Company's ability to invest successfully in new
technologies and other factors which are described in the Company's filings with
the securities commissions.

                                      -30-

FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Lyne Beauregard
Cinram International Inc.
Tel: (416) 321-7930
lynebeauregard@cinram.com


                                      - 1 -
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of China Vitup Health Care Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Feng Gu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  April 15, 2009 /s/Feng Gu     Chief Executive Officer
#### Citibank, N.A., Respondent, v Angst, Inc., et al., Defendants, and John M. McNamara, Appellant.

Submitted June 1, 2009;

decided September 1, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 484.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution *(see*Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 4:11, at 83-85 [3d ed rev]).
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, CEO,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2005                     Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Calvin A. Wallen, III, CEO













<PAGE>


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, CFO,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2005                            Signature: /s/ James L. Busby
                                                             -------------------
                                                             James L. Busby
| Name                               |   | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |   | Percentage Owned by Company |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Deer International Group Ltd.      |   | British Virgin Islands                  |   | 100                                        | %      |
| Winder Electric Group Ltd.         |   | People’s Republic of China        |   | *                                          | (1)    |
| Delta International Limited        |   | People’s Republic of China        |   |  *                                    | (2)    |
| Deer Technology (AnHui) Co., Ltd.  |   | People’s Republic of China        |   | *                                          | (1)    |
| Anlin Technology (AnHui) Co., Ltd. |   | People’s Republic of China        |   | *                                          | (1)    |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00214-CV

Hal Sauls

v.

Munir Bata, LLC, William J. Baldwin, 

American National Development, LP, 

Chicago Title Company, and The 

Colony Assets Development, LLC

§

§

§

§

From the 431st District Court

of Denton County (2008-20011-158)

June 11, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

It is further ordered that appellant Hal Sauls shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
#### East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co. *v.*Smith.

1. Where one receives a personal injury which causes at first temporary unconsciousness, and a physician is called, and during his attendance, extending continuously through some weeks, the patient complains of pain, and indicates the region thereof in her system, these facts are competent evidence in her favor on the trial of an action for the tort causing the injury, when testified to by the physician in connection with a description of the symptoms which he observes in the course of his attendance and treatment.

2. According to the principle laid down by this court in *Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line By. Co.*v. *Gravitt,*93 *Ga.*369, the railway company was not, relatively to the plaintiff who was injured by a passing train about 125 yards from a public crossing, under any duty to comply with the statutory requirements as to blowing the whistle and checking the speed of the train, and consequently *581the failure to observe these requirements was not, as *to*her, negligent, and she was not entitled to recover. Bueckley, C. J., dissenting.

June 25, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

Action for damages. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. Marcli term, 1898.

McCutchen & Shumate and Hoskinson & Harris, for plaintiff in error.

"Wrights & Harper and Bean & Smith, *contra.*

*Judgment reversed,.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    An application has been submitted for the Board's approval of the organization of a corporation to do business under section 25A of the Federal Reserve Act (“Edge Corporation”) 12 U.S.C. Sec. 611*et seq.*                     The factors that are to be considered in acting on the application are set forth in the Board's Regulation K (12 CFR 211.5).                

                    The application listed below is available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for                           ( print page 22550)                        inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Any comment on an application that requests a hearing must include a statement of why a written presentation would not suffice in lieu of a hearing, identify specifically any questions of fact that are in dispute, ans summarize the evidence that would be presented at a hearing.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding this application must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than May 28, 2009.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York**                     (Ivan Hurwitz, Bank Applications Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:                

*1. The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland*, Dublin, Ireland; to establish a                     *de novo*                     Edge Corporation, Bank of Ireland Foreign Exchange Corporation, Orlando, Florida, pursuant to Section 25A of the Federal Reserve Act and Section 211.5(b) of Regulation K.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, May 8, 2009.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. E9-11136 Filed 5-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Diatect International Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), We,
Patrick Carr, Principal Executive Officer and Robert Rudman, Principal
Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 August
      19, 2009
                    /s/ Patrick CarrPatrick
      CarrPrincipal
      Executive OfficerAugust
      19, 2009
                    /s/ Robert RudmanRobert
      RudmanPrincipal
      Accounting OfficerPrincipal
      Accounting
Officer
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
 For the month of November 2005
    
    Commission File Number:   001-15014
 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC.
  (Translation of registrants name into English)
 150 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 1J9
 
 (Address of principal executive offices)
  Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 Rule 12g3-2(b)
 Yes   o
    
    No   þ
 Rule 12g3-2(b) N/A




---



##### 



Exhibit99.1
    
    Press Release




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  Sun Life Financial Inc. 
           (Registrant)Date:   November 16, 2005
    By
    /s/   Thomas A. BogartThomas A. Bogart,Executive Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer
#### Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp., Formerly Known as Financial Security Assurance Inc., Respondent, v DB Structured Products, Inc., et al., Defendants. DB Structured Products, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 455]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner *479Kornreich, J.), entered July 16, 2012, which granted plaintiff Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.’s motion for a protective order preventing the discovery of documents and information concerning its pre-complaint repurchase review, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

In this action arising from the securitization of home equity lines of credit originated by third-party defendant GreenPoint, and sold to defendants DB Structured Products, Inc. and ACE Securities Corp., plaintiff insurer issued a policy guaranteeing payment of certain classes of the securities issued and when the loans began to default at what it considered to be a high rate, it retained a law firm that hired consultants to conduct a forensic re-underwriting review of the loans. Based on the consultant’s findings, plaintiff commenced the instant action alleging, inter alia, fraudulent inducement and breach of representations and warranties. Thereafter, defendants served demands seeking any and all records surrounding the loan review conducted by the consultants and plaintiff provided the consultants’ conclusions and the raw data used in their analysis but asserted the attorney work product and trial preparation privileges in objecting to the remainder of the demands, including the demand for correspondence between the consultants and plaintiffs counsel and documents concerning the methodology employed by the consultants. Plaintiff moved for a protective order preventing the discovery of these documents and defendants and Green-Point objected on the ground that plaintiff had placed the consultants’ findings “at issue.”

The motion for a protective order was properly granted. Plaintiff did not waive any privilege by referencing the prelitigation repurchase review conducted by its consultants in the complaint *(Ambac Assur. Corp. v DLJ Mtge. Capital, Inc.,*92 AD3d 451, 452 [1st Dept 2012]; *MBIA Ins. Corp. v Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.,*93 AD3d 574, 574-575 [1st Dept 2012]). Those references were not made as elements of the claims, but as a good-faith basis for the allegations that are based on defects discovered during the repurchase review of the loans *(see Ambac,*92 AD3d at 452). Further, plaintiff does not need the documents relating to the pre-litigation investigation to sustain its causes of action or prove them at trial, and upholding the privilege with respect to the pre-litigation review materials will not deprive defendants of information vital to their defense since plaintiff disavows any intention to use such materials to help establish its claim *(see IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.,*107 AD3d 451 [1st Dept 2013]; *Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP,*62 AD3d 581, 582 *480[1st Dept 2009]). Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of BNC Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Chase
    Home Finance LLC, as Subservicer for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Clayton
    Fixed Income Services, Inc., as Credit Risk Manager, Deutsche Bank
    National Trust Company, as Custodian, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
    Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    E. Todd Whittemore

    Executive Vice President
    (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan
    Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)

   Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 4046

AN ACT

To extend oversight and accountability related to United

States reconstruction funds and efforts in Iraq by extending the termination date of the Office of the Special

Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Iraq Reconstruction

5 Accountability Act of 2006’’.
 †

2

S 4046 ES

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE TERMINATION DATE FOR

2 THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR

3 GENERAL FOR IRAQ RECONSTRUCTION.

4 Section 3001(o) of the Emergency Supplemental Ap5 propriations Act for Defense and for the Reconstruction

6 of Iraq and Afghanistan, 2004 (Public Law 108–106; 117

7 Stat. 1238; 5 U.S.C. App., note to section 8G of Public

8 Law 95–452), as amended by section 1054(b) of the John

9 Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal

10 Year 2007 (Public Law 109–364), is amended to read as

11 follows:

12 ‘‘(o) TERMINATION.—(1)(A) The Office of the In13 spector General shall terminate 10 months after 80 per14 cent of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available

15 to the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund have been ex16 pended.

17 ‘‘(B) For purposes of calculating the termination of

18 the Office of the Inspector General under this subsection,

19 any United States funds appropriated or otherwise made

20 available for fiscal year 2006 for the reconstruction of

21 Iraq, irrespective of the designation of such funds, shal

22 be deemed to be amounts appropriated or otherwise made

23 available to the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund.

24 ‘‘(2) The Special Inspector General for Iraq Recon25 struction shall, prior to the termination of the Office o

26 the Special Inspector General under paragraph (1), pre-
†

3

S 4046 ES

1 pare a final forensic audit report on all funds deemed to

2 be amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to

3 the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund.’’.

Passed the Senate December 6, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 4046

AN ACT

To extend oversight and accountability related to

construction.fice of the Special Inspector General for Iraq ReIraq by extending the termination date of the OfUnited States reconstruction funds and efforts in
EXHIBIT 35.3

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                           HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC

                RFMSI SERIES 2007-S3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized  officer of Homecomings  Financial,  LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable  servicing agreement,  does
hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during the period from and including
March 29, 2007 through and including  September  24, 2007 and of the  Servicer's
performance  under the  applicable  servicing  agreement  has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable  servicing agreement in all material
respects  throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:    Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:   Managing Director
#### State v. Hoover

Case below: 174 N.C. App. 596

No. 370P04-4

Defs Motion for “Petition for a Writ on Newly Discovery Exculpatory Evidence for Appropriate Relief and Subpoena” (COA05-64)

Dismissed 01/25/07

Hudson, J., Recused