alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATION FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
IT'S ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,013,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,385,375
<ALLOWANCES>                                   271,544
<INVENTORY>                                  4,293,747
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,601,892
<PP&E>                                       7,163,811
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,394,149
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,787,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,878,089
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         30
<COMMON>                                        64,328
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,675,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,787,645
<SALES>                                      6,557,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,622,238
<CGS>                                        3,340,307
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,340,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,598,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             282,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,611,863)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (292,794)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,319,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,319,069)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

933 

CA 12-01749 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

CLAUDIA S. JOHNSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LARRY C. JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.)

 

BOUVIER PARTNERSHIP, LLP, EAST AURORA (ROGER T. DAVISON OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

HOGAN WILLIG, PLLC, AMHERST (ASHLEA L. PALLADINO OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F.

O’Donnell, J.), entered December 7, 2011. The order, among other

things, found defendant to be in contempt of court for his willful

failure to pay his child support obligation. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Johnson v Johnson ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d

___ [Sept. 27, 2013]).

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Wesolowski, Appellant.

[964 NYS2d 56]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied.

Present—Scudder, EJ., Peradotto, Carni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):   August 12, 2004 IMPERIAL OIL LIMITED 
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  Canada
    
    0-12014
    
    98-0017682(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    
    
    Identification No.)
 111 St. Clair Avenue WestToronto, Ont., Canada
    
    M5W 1K3(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code: (800) 567-3776  
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




---



##### 



ITEM 10.   Amendments to the Registrants Code of Ethics or Waiver of a Provision of the Code of Ethics. The registrant has replaced, effective August 10, 2004, its code of ethics
and conflict of interest guidelines with a code of ethics and business conduct
that applies to all employees. The revision consists of concise statements of
the registrants code of ethics consisting of its ethics policy, conflicts of
interest policy, corporate assets policy, directorships policy and procedures
and open door communication. The procedures and open door communication was added to describe how
employees may report suspected violations of the law, company policies or
internal controls, as well as how employees may make confidential complaints
without identifying themselves. The revisions deleted previous commentary and guidelines relating to the
aforementioned policies and also deleted the discussion relating to Canadian
competition law. While there have been no substantive changes to the companys
policies set out in the code, the revised code is a more succinct statement of
the companys policies directly related to ethics and business conduct.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.  IMPERIAL OIL LIMITEDDate:   August 12, 2004
    By:
    /s/   Brian W. LivingstonName:
    Brian W. LivingstonTitle:
    Vice-President, General Counsel and
Corporate SecretaryDate:   August 12, 2004
    By:
    /s/   Marilyn HendersonName:
    Marilyn HendersonTitle:
    Assistant Secretary
#### Empire Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Jose R. Rivera, Respondent, v Irwin J. Lackowitz et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[872 NYS2d 186]

In an action to recover damages for injury to property, the defendants Irwin J. Lackowitz and Jillian Lackowitz appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated June 3, 2008, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability insofar as asserted against the appellants is denied.

A rear-end collision with a stopped or stopping vehicle creates a prima facie case of negligence with respect to the operator of the moving vehicle and imposes a duty on that operator to provide a nonnegligent explanation for the collision *(see Arias v Rosario,*52 AD3d 551, 552 [2008]; *Ahmad v Grimaldi,*40 AD3d 786, 787 [2007]). Evidence that a vehicle was struck in the rear and propelled into the vehicle in front of it may provide a suf*798ficient nonnegligent explanation *(see Katz v Masada II Car & Limo Serv., Inc.,*43 AD3d 876, 877 [2007]; *Harris v Ryder,*292 AD2d 499, 500 [2002]). Here, the plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability insofar as asserted against the appellants by submitting evidence that the vehicle driven by its subrogee, Jose R. Rivera (hereinafter the Rivera vehicle), was struck in the rear by a vehicle operated by the defendant Jillian Lackowitz and owned by the defendant Irwin J. Lackowitz (hereinafter the Lackowitz vehicle). In opposition to the plaintiff’s showing, however, the appellants raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the Lackowitz vehicle was itself struck in the rear end by a third vehicle and propelled forward into the Rivera vehicle, which would provide a sufficient nonnegligent explanation, thus precluding an award of summary judgment in the plaintiffs favor on the issue of the appellants’ liability. Spolzino, J.E, Santucci, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ, concur.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3979 

To amend the National Trails System Act to clarify Federal authority relating 

to land acquisition from willing sellers for the North Country National 

Scenic Trail. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to clarify Federal 

authority relating to land acquisition from willing sellers 

for the North Country National Scenic Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

4 (a) ACQUISITION OF LAND.—Section 5(a)(8) of the 

5 National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(8)) is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘No lands 

7 or interests therein outside the exterior boundaries of any 

8 Federally administered area may be acquired by the FedVerDate Aug 31 2005 07:30 Sep 30, 2006 Jkt 049196 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3979.IS S3979

jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3979 IS

1 eral government for the trail except with the consent of 

2 the owner thereof.’’. 

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 10(c)(1) of 

4 the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1249(c)(1)) 

5 is amended by striking ‘‘the North Country National Sce6 nic Trail,’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
[914 NE2d 142, 885 NYS2d 450]

#### In the Matter of John Gebbie, Respondent, v David Mammina et al., Appellants.

Decided August 27, 2009

*729APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Richard S. Finkel, Town Attorney,*Manhasset *(Christopher G. Senior*and *Simone Marie Freeman*of counsel), for appellants.

*William A. DiConza,*Oyster Bay, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the judgment of Supreme Court reinstated.

In view of the broad discretion afforded zoning boards considering applications for area variances *(see Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead,*2 NY3d 608, 612-613 [2004]), the denial of petitioner’s application for area variances to subdivide his lot to create two nonconforming lots had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious. The Board of Zoning Appeals rationally balanced and weighed the requisite statutory factors, and the Appellate Division erroneously substituted its judgment for that of the agency *(see*Town Law § 267-b [3] [b]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
First Amendment to Officer Incentive Compensation Plan



 Exhibit 10(x) 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 KULICKE & SOFFA INDUSTRIES, INC. 
 OFFICER INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
  
 WHEREAS, Kulicke & Soffa Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) maintains the Kulicke & Soffa Industries, Inc. Officer Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, it is desired to amend the Plan to permit the Compensation Committee the discretion to adjust the percentages assigned to a participant
with respect to corporate goals and individual goals; 
  
 NOW,
THEREFORE, Section F.4 of the Plan is hereby amended, effective October 1, 2003, by adding a sentence at the end thereof to read as follows: 
  
 The Incentive Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, adjust the allocation of the Incentive Target by adjusting the percentages set forth above
with respect to Corporate Goals and Individual Goals with respect to any Participant, provided that the sum of such adjusted percentages equals 100%.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 551 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 551

  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national 
 cemetery for veterans in the Colorado Springs, Colorado, metropolitan 
                                 area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 8, 2005

  Mr. Allard introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to establish a national 
 cemetery for veterans in the Colorado Springs, Colorado, metropolitan 
                                 area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL CEMETERY IN COLORADO SPRINGS, 
              COLORADO, METROPOLITAN AREA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish, 
in accordance with chapter 24 of title 38, United States Code, a 
national cemetery in the Colorado Springs, Colorado, metropolitan area 
to serve the needs of veterans and their families.
    (b) Consultation in Selection of Site.--Before selecting the site 
for the national cemetery to be established under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall consult with--
            (1) appropriate officials of the State of Colorado and 
        local officials of the Colorado Springs metropolitan area; and
            (2) appropriate officials of the United States, including 
        the Administrator of General Services, with respect to land 
        belonging to the United States in that area that would be 
        suitable to establish the national cemetery under subsection 
        (a).
    (c) Authority to Accept Donation of Parcel of Land.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may accept on behalf of the 
        United States the gift of an appropriate parcel of real 
        property. The Secretary shall have administrative jurisdiction 
        over such parcel of real property, and shall use such parcel to 
        establish the national cemetery under subsection (a).
            (2) Income tax treatment of gift.--For purposes of Federal 
        income, estate, and gift taxes, the real property accepted 
        under paragraph (1) shall be considered as a gift to the United 
        States.
    (d) Report.--As soon as practicable after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the 
establishment of the national cemetery under subsection (a). The report 
shall set forth a schedule for the establishment of the national 
cemetery and an estimate of the costs associated with the establishment 
of the national cemetery.
                                 <all>
```
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMOFILLNePR06-0422JAN122021INTHEMATTEROFTHEPETITIONOFKRISTOFERS.BAUGHMANBowenGreenwoodClerkofSupremeCoun:SteteofNilontanaORDERKristoferS.BaughmanhaspetitionedtheCourttowaivethethree-yeartestrequirementfortheMultistateProfessionalResponsibilityExamination(MPRE)forpurposesofapplyingforadmissionbymotiontotheStateBarofMontana.Byrule,applicantsforadrnissionbymotionrnustprovideevidenceoftherequisitescoreonanMPREtaken"withinthreeyearsprecedingthedateoftheapplicationforadmission."RuleIV.A.3,RulesofAdmission.BaughmanpassedtheMPREin2013whenseekingadmissiontothepracticeoflawintheStateofCalifornia,andwasadmitted.Baughmanhassincepracticedlawcontinuously"withoutanyethicalordisciplinaryactionorissues."Goodcauseappearing,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatthepetitionofKristoferS.Baughmantowaivethethree-yeartestrequirementfortheMPREforpurposesofacurrentapplicationforadrnissionbymotiontotheStateBarofMontanaisGRANTED.TheClerkshallmailacopyofthisordertoPetitionerandtotheAdministratoroftheBoardofBarExaminersattheStateBarofMontana."0,DATEDthis1Z.-dayofJanuaiy,2021.ChiefJusticeta01/12/2021Case Number: PR 06-0422Justices
EX-35.3
(logo) Wilshire
EXHIBIT P

Wilshire Credit Corporation

Payments
P.O. Box 105344; Atlanta, GA 30348-5344
or P.O. Box 7195; Pasadena, CA 91109-7195

Correspondence
P.O. Box 8517; Portland, OR 97207-8517

Phone
(503) 952-7947
(888) 502-0100

Fax
(503) 952-7476

Web Site
www.wcc.ml.com


March 7, 2008


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
Attn: Servicer Compliance Team

Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.
250 Vesey Street
4 World Financial Center, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10080
Attn: Ketan Parekh


Re: Annual Officer's Certificate
    (Wilshire Pool 1602) Merrill Lynch Alternative Note Asset Trust Series
    2007-0AR1, Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2007,
    among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator, Wilshire
    Credit Corporation, as Servicer, Central Mortgage Company, as Servicer, and
    HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as Trustee


I, Ken Frye, Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing, Wilshire Credit
Corporation, (the "Servicer"), hereby certify that:

(1) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
    year and of the performance of the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
    Agreement (the "Servicing Agreement") has been made under my supervision;
    and

(2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
    fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
    respects throughout such year or a portion thereof.


WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, SERVICER


Certified By: /s/ Ken Frye
Name: Ken Frye
Title: Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing
Order entered October 27 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00413

- CR
VINCENT PASCO, Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12

- 59001

- Y



### O RDER
The reporter’s record is overdue in this appeal. We also note that we have not received the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a), (d);

Cortez v. State , 420 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel,
indigence, or for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute t he appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, thetrial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall deter mine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the rep orter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date
of this order. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record contain a certification of appellant’s right to appeal that accurately reflects the trial court proceedings. The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,
whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
S. 4044

One Hundred Ninth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and six

An Act

To clarify the treatment of certain charitable contributions under title 11, United

States Code.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Religious Liberty and Charitable

Donation Clarification Act of 2006’’.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CONTRIBUTIONS IN BANKRUPTCY.

Section 1325(b)(3) of title 11, United States Code, is amended

by inserting ‘‘, other than subparagraph (A)(ii) of paragraph (2),’’

after ‘‘paragraph (2)’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that, based
on our knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                            |  |                   |  |                                                                                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 5, 2007 |  |  |  | MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | By:                        |  | /s/ David Schramm
|                       |  |  |  |                            |  |                   |  | David Schramm President and Chief Executive Officer                                          
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 5, 2007 |  |  |  | By:                        |  | /s/ Tim T. Hart  
|                       |  |  |  |                            |  |                   |  | Tim T. Hart Senior Vice President  Finance,
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary