alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7640
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARCUS TYRONE WILLIAMSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-00-288, CA-02-81-1) Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marcus Tyrone Williamson, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Marcus Tyrone Williamson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Williamson’s motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and the district court that Williamson has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See United States v. Williamson , Nos. CR-00- 288-1; CA-02-81-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2408-2409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00570]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-22-000]


Nevada Power Company; Notice Setting Due Date for Intervention in 
Section 206 Proceeding

    On December 9, 2014, the Commission issued an order in Docket Nos. 
EL15-22-000, ER10-2475-006, ER10-2474-006, ER10-3246-003, ER13-520-002, 
ER13-521-002, ER13-1441-002, ER13-1442-002, ER12-1626-003, ER13-1266-
003, ER13-1267-002, ER13-1268-002, ER13-1269-002, ER13-1270-002, ER13-
1271-002, ER13-1272-002, ER13-1273-002, and ER10-2605-006, pursuant to 
section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), 
instituting an investigation concerning the justness and reasonableness 
of the Berkshire MBR Sellers' and their affiliates' market-based rates 
in the PacifiCorp-East, PacifiCorp-West, Idaho Power, and NorthWestern 
balancing authority areas. Nevada Power Company, 149 FERC ] 61,219 
(2014). On January 5, 2015, the Commission issued a notice establishing 
a refund effective date.
    Any interested person desiring to become a party in the above-
referenced proceeding must file a notice of intervention or motion to 
intervene, as appropriate, in accordance with Rule 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) by 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on January 20, 2015. The Commission encourages 
electronic submission of interventions in lieu of paper using the 
``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.

[[Page 2409]]

Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original hard 
copy of the intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

    Dated: January 9, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00570 Filed 1-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 35.2


                                  [logo] CHASE

                        SUBSERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


RE: J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH2 Asset Backed Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2007-CH2: This Pooling and Servicing Agreement, is dated as
of February 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), by and among J.P. Morgan Acceptance
Corporation I, a Delaware corporation, as Depositor (the "Depositor"), J.P.
Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, as Seller (the
"Seller") for purposes of Section 2.03 and 2.06, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
as Trustee (the "Trustee") and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Oversight
Manager (the "Trust Oversight Manager")

The undersigned, each a duly authorized officer of Chase Home Finance LLC
("CHF"), do hereby certify that:

      (1) CHF is a Subservicer under the Agreement

      (2) A review of the activities of CHF during the calendar year ending
December 31, 2007 and of the performance of CHF under the Agreement has been
made under our supervision; and

      (3) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, CHF has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
year.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned
in the Agreement.

Date: 02/28/2008


                                Chase Home Finance LLC,
                                as Subservicer

                                By: /s/ Kim Greaves
                                    ---------------
                                Name:  Kim Greaves
                                Title: Senior Vice President
                                       Servicing Manager


                                By: /s/ Jim Miller
                                    --------------
                                Name:  Jim Miller
                                Title: Senior Vice President
                                       Default Servicing Manager
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136898 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136898 

 COA: 271478 

Oakland CC: 2005-204119-FC 

RASHAUN MICHAEL JOHNSON-PEEL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 8, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
#### ESTATE OF MELVIN NELSON, Decedent, by and through his co-executors JANICE BREWER AND LIBBY NELSON v. CARRIE LEE NELSON

No. 508A06

(Filed 4 May 2007)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 179 N.C. App. 166, 633 S.E.2d 124 (2006), reversing and remanding a judgment entered 18 February 2005 by Judge Jacquelyn L. Lee in District Court, Lee County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 April 2007.

*Staton, Doster, Post & Silverman, by Jonathan Silverman, for plaintiff-appellee.*

*Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP, by K. Edward Greene, for defendant-appellant.*

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION




C-Bass
Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-CB2







I,
Elizabeth Folk, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Litton Loan
Servicing LP, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed the report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to
be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of C-BASS
2007-CB2 Trust (the “Exchange Act Periodic Reports”);





2.           Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;





4.           I
am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based
on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,
and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement in all
material respects; and





5.           All
of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
report on Form 10-K.





In giving
the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me
by the following unaffiliated parties:  The Bank of New York
(custodian) and LaSalle National Association (trustee).








Date:     March
3, 2008







/s/ Elizabeth
Folk__________________
 Elizabeth
Folk
 Senior
Vice President and
 Chief
Financial Officer
 Litton
Loan Servicing LP
 (Senior
Officer in charge of servicing
 function
of the servicer)








LLS
10K – Certification (Inv 392)
Exhibit 35.2

                                  [logo] CHASE

                        SUBSERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT


RE: J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CHl Asset Backed Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2007-CHl: This Pooling and Servicing Agreement, is dated as
of February 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), by and among J.P. Morgan Acceptance
Corporation I, a Delaware corporation, as Depositor (the "Depositor"), J.P.
Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp. a Delaware corporation, as Seller (the
"Seller") for purposes of Section 2.03 and 2.06, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as Servicer (the "Servicer"), Deutsche Bank National Trust Company,
as Trustee (the "Trustee") and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Oversight
Manager (the "Trust Oversight Manager")

The undersigned, each a duly authorized officer of Chase Home Finance LLC
("CHF"), do hereby certify that:

      (1) CHF is a Subservicer under the Agreement

      (2) A review of the activities of CHF during the calendar year ending
December 31,2007 and of the performance of CHF under the Agreement has been made
under our supervision; and

      (3) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, CHF has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
year.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned
in the Agreement.

Date: 02/28/2008


                              Chase Home Finance LLC,
                              as Subservicer

                              By: /s/ Kim Greaves
                                  ---------------
                              Name:  Kim Greaves
                              Title: Senior Vice President
                                     Servicing Manager

                              By: /s/ Jim Miller
                                  --------------
                              Namer  Jim Miller
                              Title: Senior Vice President
                                     Default Servicing Manager
#### In the Matter of Mayank V. Munsiff, a Suspended Attorney, Appellant. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Respondent.

Decided June 30, 2009

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 11194 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

SALVADOR VALADEZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:12

- CR

- 65

- 4

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Salvador Valadez has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Valadez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief a nd the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 29, 2015
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 12-11194 Document: 00513097086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/29/2015No. 12

- 11194

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from furt her responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 12-11194 Document: 00513097086 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/29/2015
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification
set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
(the “Report”) for the purposes of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



I, Saulo Nunes, Principal
Executive Officer of Gafisa S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | · | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 11, 2019



|GAFISA S.A. |                
|----------- | ---------------
|            |                
|            |                
|By:         | /s/ Saulo Nunes
|            | Name:          
|            | Title:
I 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4050 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2006 

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 103 East Thompson Street in Thomaston, 

Georgia, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Robert Lee 

‘Bobby’ Hollar, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

S 4050 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS ROBERT LEE ‘‘BOBBY’’ 

2 HOLLAR, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 103 East Thompson Street in 

5 Thomaston, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sergeant First Class Robert Lee ‘Bobby’ Hollar, Jr. Post 

7 Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant First Class 

12 Robert Lee ‘Bobby’ Hollar, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate December 6, 2006. 

Attest: EMILY J. REYNOLDS, 

Secretary. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 10, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 10, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0189. TRACY TOWNS v. HAVENBROOK HOMES, LLC et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15C06216
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |                                                               |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  May 23, 2011 |   | /s/ Ali Moussavi                                              |   |
|                           |   | Ali Moussavi                                                       |   |
|                           |   | Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer |   |

----
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.

AMMED HASSAN , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 2 1

- 0 094 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR20 11

- 154825

- 001 The Honorable Shellie F. Smith , Judge Pro Tempore
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Krista Wood Counsel for Respondent
Ammed Hassan, Florence Petitioner FILED 11-15-2022STATE v. HASSAN Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz , Judge Angela K. Paton , and Judge Peter B. Swann delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Ammed Hassan seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief

. This is petitioner’s second successive petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the supe rior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matte r, the superior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0871

_____________________________
T ERRY R AY P OPE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for E scambia County

. W. Joel Boles , Judge

. September 24, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laurel Cornell Niles, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 0**  **9 -**  **81 1**  **8**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,
v. FRANCISCO DURAN AVILA, a/k/a J. Trinidad Cervantez

- R , Defendant

– Appell ant .

Appeal from the United Stat es District Court for the Middle District of N o r th Carolina , at Greensboro
. James A. Beaty, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 1 : 0 6

- c r - 00270

- JAB

- 1; 1:08

- 00715

- JA B

- DPD )

Submitted : June 1 , 2010 Decided: June 7, 2010

Before GREGORY , S HEDD , and KEENAN, Circ uit Judges.

Dismiss e d by un published per curiam opinion
.
Francisco Duran Avila , Appellant Pro Se . An gela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Francisco Duran Avila seeks to appeal the district court’s order s accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion , and denying his motion for reconsidera tion . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional rig ht.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is deba table, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Avila has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certific ate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2379
BELDEV ENAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus M. ABRAHAM AHMAD, Defendant - Appellee, and AHMAD & HIMALFARB, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge; Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-3471-K) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Beldev Enand, Appellant Pro Se.* To the extent Appellant appeals the district court's marginal order denying his motion to reconsider, we also deny relief. 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. * Enand v. Ahmad , No. CA-96-3471-K (D. Md. Aug. 7, 1997). We also deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED