alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edward Ryan et al., Respondents, v Philip Pascale et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[871 NYS2d 722]

In an action to *712recover damages for fraudulent inducement, the defendants Philip Pascale and Debra Pascale appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Woodard, J.), entered January 25, 2008, which denied that branch of their motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs to the appellants, and that branch of the appellants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) is granted.

The Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the appellants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The causes of action asserted in the complaint were barred by the specific disclaimer provisions contained in the contract of sale *(see Danann Realty Corp. v Harris,*5 NY2d 317, 320 [1959]; *Rigney v McCabe,*43 AD3d 896 [2007]; *Roland v McGraime, 22*AD3d 824, 825 [2005]; *Fabozzi v Coppa, 5*AD3d 722, 723-724 [2004]). Furthermore, the alleged misrepresentations upon which the plaintiffs purportedly relied did not concern matters within the peculiar knowledge of the appellants *(see Danann Realty Corp. v Harris,*5 NY2d at 322; *Rigney v McCabe,*43 AD3d at 896-897).

We do not reach the appellants’ contention concerning that branch of their motion which was for an award of costs pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, as that branch of the motion was not addressed by the Supreme Court. Thus, it remains pending and undecided *(see Magriples v Tekelch,*53 AD3d 532 [2008]; *Katz v Katz,*68 AD2d 536, 543 [1979]). Spolzino, J.E, Fisher, Miller and Garni, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2558 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to include a public airport in use 

by an air reserve station as a primary airport. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2023 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio (for himself and Mr. JOYCE of Ohio) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to include a public 

airport in use by an air reserve station as a primary airport. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRIMARY AIRPORT DESIGNATION. 

4 Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(K) PUBLIC AIRPORTS WITH MILITARY

7 USE.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

8 law, a public airport in use by an air reserve 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2558 IH

1 station shall be considered a primary airport for 

2 purposes of this chapter.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3927 

To require the placement of blast-resistant cargo containers on all commercial 

passenger aircraft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2006 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the placement of blast-resistant cargo containers 

on all commercial passenger aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BLAST-RESISTANT CONTAINERS. 

4 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Section 41704 of title 49, 

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following: ‘‘Each aircraft used to provide air transpor7 tation for individuals and their baggage or other cargo 

8 shall be equipped with not less than 1 hardened, blast9 resistant cargo container.’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 3927 IS

1 (b) DISTRIBUTION TO AIR CARRIERS.—Not later 

2 than 90 days after the completion of the Hardened Con3 tainer Pilot Program, the Secretary of Homeland Security 

4 shall distribute sufficient blast-resistant cargo containers 

5 to air carriers to meet the requirement under section 

6 41704 of title 49, United States Code, as amended by sub7 section (a). 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Defense Acquisition University, DoD.

# ACTION:

Board of Visitors meeting; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On May 8, 2009, 74 FR 21664, the Department of Defense published a notice announcing a meeting of the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) Board of Visitors (BoV) on May 20, 2009. This notice is published to inform participants of the new meeting location. All other information remains unchanged.

# ADDRESSES:

Defense Acquisition University, 9820 Belvoir Road, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Christen Goulding at 703-805-5134.

Dated: May 12, 2009.

Morgan E. Frazier,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. E9-11346 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### In the Matter of Amirah Nicole A. and Others, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Tamika R., Appellant; Sabre A., Respondent, et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 1, 2010;

decided July 1, 2010

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1078

MONSANTO COMPANY

and MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

LOREN DAVID,

Defendant-Appellant.

Gregory H. Lantier , Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Washington, DC,

argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were Paul R.Q. Wolfson

, Seth P.

Waxman , and Shirley Cassin Woodward . Of counsel was Joseph C. Orlet , Husch

Blackwell Sanders LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri.

Bruce E. Johnson , Cutler Law Firm, P.C., of We st Des Moines, Iowa, argued for

defendant-appellant.

Appealed from: United States District Cour t for the Eastern District of Missouri

Judge Henry E. AutreyNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1078

MONSANTO COMPANY

and MONSANTO TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

LOREN DAVID,

Defendant-Appellant.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United St ates District Court for the

Eastern District of Missouri

in CASE NO(S). 4:04-CV-425

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURI E, LINN and MOORE, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R.36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED October 14, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3733 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3733

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plasma flat panel displays.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2006

   Mr. Pryor introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plasma flat panel displays.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PLASMA FLAT PANEL DISPLAYS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.85.01      Plasma flat panel   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         displays                                                           31/2009
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         8529.90.53)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

================================================================================

                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer


                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                  July 15, 2005

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346

                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
                  reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
           paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
           paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

    Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
  this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ] No [X]

       If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
           registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

================================================================================

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST




Exhibit          Description
-------          -----------

99.1             Press Release, dated July 14, 2005, regarding Hollinger Inc.
                 Status Update.

<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  July 15, 2005


                                      HOLLINGER INC.

                                      By  /s/ Robert J. Metcalfe
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Robert J. Metcalfe
                                          Title: Executive Vice President,
                                                 Chief Operating Officer
## Court of Appeals of the State of Geo rgia

ATLA NTA,

_________________ _ The Court of

Appeals hereby passes

the followi

ng order: A14A2106 . LYNN ARTHUR BROWN, SR. v. CAROLYN BROWN. Lynn Arth ur Brown , Sr. appealed to this Court from the trial court’ s order findinghim in contem

pt of cer tain provisi ons of the parties’ divorce decree. Under the Georgia

Constitution

of 1983, A

rt. VI, Se c. VI, Par. I II (6), the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdic tion over “ [a]ll divorce a ndalim ony ca ses.” “ [A]n a ppeal fro m the judgmen t in a contempt action seeking to enforce any portion of [a] divorce decree other than child cust ody is ancilla ry to d ivorce an d alim ony and falls within [the Supreme] Court’s jurisdiction over ‘divorce and al imony cas es.’ [Ci ts.]” Rogers v. McGahee , 278 Ga. 2 87, 288 (1) (602 S E2d 582) (2004) ; see also Morris v. Morris , 284 Ga. 748, 750 (2) (670 SE2d 84) (2008). Therefore, this appea l is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court of Ge orgia.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Offi

ce, Atlant a,_______________

___ I certify t hat the abo ve is a true

extrac t from the minutes of the Court

of Appeals

of Georgia. Witness my signature a nd t he s eal of sai

d court hereto aff

ixed the day and year last above writt

en. , Clerk. 07/23/2014 July 23, 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SALVADOR ZARATE,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 14-72434

Agency No. A070-814-780

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 26, 2016**

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Salvador Zarate, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 3 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 14-72434 

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. §1252. We review for

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 

1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition 

for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Zarate’s ineffective assistance of counsel 

claim because he did not exhaust it before the BIA. See Ontiveros-Lopez v. INS, 

213 F.3d 1121, 1124 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring an alien who argues ineffective 

assistance of counsel to exhaust his administrative remedies by first presenting the 

issue to the BIA).

The IJ denied Zarate’s claims for relief based on an adverse credibility 

determination and independently denied his claims on the merits. The BIA 

affirmed the IJ’s denial only on the merits. Although Zarate challenges the IJ’s 

adverse credibility determination and the BIA’s failure to address the IJ’s adverse 

credibility findings, he does not raise any challenge to the BIA’s dispositive denial 

on the merits. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 

1996) (issues not argued in opening brief deemed waived). Thus, we deny the 

petition as to Zarate’s asylum, withholding of removal and CAT claims. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
Annual
Statement as to Compliance
 For the
Year Ended December 31, 2007
 
 
 Citigroup
Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.
 Series
2007-CD4
 
 
 Pursuant
to Section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced
transaction, I hereby attest that:
 
 i.    A
review of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. as Master Servicer during the
period, and of its performance under this Pooling and Servicing Agreement, has
been made under my supervision.
 
 
 ii.   To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capmark Finance Inc. as Master
Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Pooling and Servicing
Agreement in all material respects throughout the period.
 
 
 Capmark
Finance Inc.
 
 
 /s/ Mark
E. McCool
 
 By:
              Mark
      E. McCoolTitle:
              Managing
      DirectorDate:
              February
      20, 2008
 
 
 
 
 .inv
598   lib A
 
 
 
 
 Capmark
      Finance Inc.116
      Welsh RoadReal
      Estate Finance, Investment, Services
              Horsham,
      Pa 19044
#### Bernadette Gotay, Respondent, v David Breitbart et al., Defendants, and Michael Handwerker et al., Appellants.

Submitted March 30, 2009;

decided May 5, 2009

Motions to vacate this Court’s March 11, 2009 dismissal order granted *[see*12 NY3d 780 (2009)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
#### In the Matter of Anonymous, an Applicant for Admission to the Bar, Appellant.

Submitted March 30, 2009;

decided May 5, 2009

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Rango  Energy,  Inc.  (formerly  Avro
Energy,  Inc.) (the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31,
2011 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  I, Donny  Fitzgerald,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this  certification as of the
10th day of May 2012.


/s/ Donny Fitzgerald
------------------------------------
Donny Fitzgerald
Chief Financial Officer
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  Re:  MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2007-3

  I, John Lingenfelter, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
     Form 10-K of MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust 2007-3 (the
    "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
     respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for ABS and their related attestation reports on assessment of
     compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
     to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
     Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
     included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
     this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
     reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Chevy
    Chase Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer, Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
    as Servicer and IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ John Lingenfelter
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| /s/              David Vozick                                                                                                                |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| David              Vozick, Chairman                of the BoardCo-Principal                Executive OfficerFebruary                12, 2007 |   |