alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Description of Cash Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.97 
  
 CASH BONUS PROGRAM 
  
 The Microsemi Corporation Cash Bonus Program (“Program”) provides cash awards based on the achievement of goals relating to the performance of the Company. The
intention of the Program is to increase the Company’s shareholder value and the success of the Company by motivating executives and employees (1) to perform to the best of their abilities, and (2) to achieve the Company’s objectives.

  
 The Compensation Committee administers the Program and, in its sole
discretion, selects the executives and employees of the Company who shall be participants in the Program for any performance period. Our Chief Executive Officer and the four most-highly-compensated executive officers have been and will generally be
participants in the Program. 
  
 The Compensation Committee, in its sole
discretion, establishes the performance goal or goals for each participant for each performance period and establishes formulae for purposes of determining the actual award (if any) payable to each participant assuming the performance goals for the
performance period are achieved (“Target Award”). 
  
 Actual awards may
be greater than or less than the participant’s Target Award, depending in part upon the extent to which actual performance exceeds or falls below the performance goals. The award formulae are generally based on overall corporate profit
performance, direct profit results controlled by the executive and on performance against individual-specific goals. Notwithstanding the preceding, in no event shall a participant’s actual award for any performance period exceed 150% of the
participant’s annual salary. 
  
 Nevertheless, the Compensation Committee, in
its sole discretion, may (a) eliminate or reduce the award payable to any participant below that which otherwise would be payable under the payout formula, and (b) determine whether or not any award will be paid in the event of a participant’s
termination of service prior to the end of the performance period. 
  
 Payment of
each award shall be made as soon as practicable after the end of the performance period during which the award was earned. Each award normally shall be paid in cash in a single lump sum, subject to payroll taxes and tax withholding. 
  
 Each award that may become payable under the Program shall be paid solely from the general
assets of the Company. Nothing in the Program should be construed to create a trust or to establish or evidence any participant’s claim of any right to payment of an award other than as an unsecured general creditor with respect to any payment
to which a participant may be entitled.
##### 







---

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 8-K

Current Report

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 19, 2004



---



INCO LIMITED

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Canada
    
    1-1143
    
    98-0000676(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)


145 King Street West, Suite 1500, Toronto, Ontario
    
    M5H 4B7(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code)


(416) 361 7511




Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the
following provisions:

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))



---





---



##### 



Item 7.01. Regulation
FD Disclosure. On October 19, 2004, Inco Limited (the Company) issued a press release
announcing its decision to proceed with its Goro project located in
the French overseas
territorial community (collectivité territoriale) of New Caledonia. A copy of the press release is being
furnished as
Exhibit 99.1 to this Report on Form 8-K and is hereby incorporated by reference. 2




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. INCO LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ Stuart F. FeinerStuart F. FeinerDate:
October 19, 2004

    Executive Vice-President,
General Counsel and Secretary 3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Inco Limited press release dated October 19, 2004
 4
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BRUCE EZELL

,

Appellant,

v.

SCOTT R. CRAWLEY

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 20

- 00238

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2

of Travis County, Texas 1

(TC# C

- 1

- CV

- 20

- 003262)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s agreed motion for voluntary dismiss al

of the appeal, and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed.

We therefore dismis s the appeal. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, each will bear their own

costs. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.1(d). This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF MARCH , 2021.

JEFF ALLEY, Justice

Before Rodriguez, Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 41.3.
#### Esther Salgado, Respondent, v Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Defendant, and American Airlines, Appellant.

[962 NYS2d 129]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jeffrey K. Oing, J.), entered September 7, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant American Airlines for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

American failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff alleges that she slipped and fell on a wet floor. American did not affirmatively demonstrate that its agent was not responsible for creating the defective condition that caused plaintiffs fall. Rather, American attempted to establish the absence of negligence by merely pointing to gaps in plaintiffs account of the accident *(see Dabbagh v Newmark Knight Frank Global Mgt. Servs., LLC,*99 AD3d 448, 450 [1st Dept 2012]). Although American’s facilities manager did testify that the cleaning company usually mopped *418the terminal floor during the night when passenger traffic was lighter, he also noted that the company performed spot cleaning when notified of a need.

We have considered American’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of January 2005 Commission File Number: 0-29350 Vasogen Inc.  2155 Dunwin Drive, Suite 10, Mississauga, Ontario, L5L 4M1
(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of
Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F
    
    
    
    Form 40-F
    
    X
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1). ______ Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted
solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ______ Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted
to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must furnish and
make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant is incorporated, domiciled
or legally organized (the registrants home country), or under the rules of the home country
exchange on which the registrants securities are traded, as long as the report or other document
is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been distributed to the registrants
security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already been the subject of a Form 6-K
submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes
    
    
    
    No
    
    X
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-__________.




---



##### 



On January 18, 2005, Vasogen Inc. issued a press release Vasogen Announces 2004 Year-end
Results. The press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this report and is incorporated herein
by reference. SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. VASOGEN INC.By:
    /s/ Christopher  WaddickName:
    Christopher  WaddickTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer Date: January 18, 2005




---



##### 



EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release of Vasogen Inc. dated January 18, 2005
# STATEOF LOUISIANA COURTOFAPPEAL, FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHAZ LESEAN BROWN In Re: Chaz Lesean Brown, applying 22nd Judicial District Court, No. 605914. NO. 2022 KW 1358 

### FEBRUARY 1, 2023 for supervisory writs, Parish of St. Tammany, BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., WOLFE AND MILLER, JJ. WRIT DENIED.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT JMG EW SMM
#### State v. Pittman

Case below: 174 N.C. App. 745

No. 694P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA04-417)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. G’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA04-417)

4. Motion to Dissolve Temporary Stay and Set Date Certain for Def’s Response

5. AG’s Motion to Deem Response Timely Filed

1. Allowed Pending determination of the State’s PDR 360 N.C. 294

Stay dissolved 12/19/06

2. Denied 12/19/06

3. See Special Order Page 156

4. Dismissed as Moot 12/19/06

5. Allowed 12/19/06
Prepared by R.R. Donnelley Financial -- Amendment to Distribution Agreement, dated August 18, 2004




 Exhibit 10.28 
  
 [CONOR LETTERHEAD] 
  
 August 18, 2004 
  
 Dr. Claus Martini 
 Managing Director 
 Biotronik AG 
 Ackerstr. 6 
 CH-8180 Bülach,
Switzerland 
  
 Dear Dr. Martini: 
  
 Conor Medsystems Ireland, Ltd. (“Conor”) and Biotronik AG
(“Biotronik”) are parties to a Distribution Agreement dated May 25, 2004 (the “Agreement”). By this letter agreement (the “Amendment”), effective as of the date of this letter, Conor and Biotronik hereby agree to amend
the Agreement as follows: 
  
 1. Exhibit B is hereby
amended to define the Territory (as such term is used in the Agreement) as follows: “Worldwide, except for Japan, United States, India, Pakistan, Australia, New Zealand, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Tanzania, and Korea.” The remainder of
Exhibit B, and in particular the list of countries in which Biotronik sells products directly, remains unchanged. 
  
 2. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument. The Agreement and this Amendment represent the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter thereof and supersede all prior understandings and agreements with respect thereto. 
  
 Please sign where indicated below to indicate your acceptance of, and
agreement to, the terms set forth above. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	CONOR MEDSYSTEMS IRELAND, LTD.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jeff Tillack

	 	 	 Jeff Tillack
 Director


  

			
	Accepted and Agreed:
	
	BIOTRONIK AG
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Claus Martini

	 	 	 Dr. Claus Martini
 Managing Director
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10967 Conference Calendar

__________________ REGINALD CHARLES ROBERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus JOHN FRANKLIN, Detention Services Officer; DALLAS COUNTY; JIM BOULES, Dallas County Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:95-CV-1442-T
- - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Reginald Charles Roberson appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s findings and find no error in the district court’s determination that the complaint is frivolous as it is barred by the applicable Texas two-year statute of limitations. See Roberson v. Franklin , No. 3:95-CV1442-T (N.D. Tex. Aug. 15, 1995); Gartrell v. Gaylor , 981 F.2d 254, 256 (5th Cir. 1993).No. 95-10967 -2- Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. Rule 42.2. Roberson’s motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED as moot.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 13, 2018

No. 04-17-00332-CV

AME & FE INVESTMENTS, LTD.,

Appellant

v.

NEC NETWORKS, LLC, dba CaptureRX,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-11952

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Relief from Stay is GRANTED. The stay 

imposed by this court in appeal No. 04-17-00332-CV is lifted.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of February, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31

               CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K

          Re: GSAA Home Equity Trust 2007-S1 (the "Trust") Mortgage Pass-
              Through Certificates, Series 2007-S1, issued pursuant to the
              Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2007
              (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), among GS Mortgage
              Securities Corp., as depositor (the "Depositor"), Ocwen Loan
              Servicing, LLC, as a servicer ("Ocwen"), Avelo Mortgage,
              L.L.C., as a servicer ("Avelo"), Specialized Loan Servicing
              LLC, as a servicer ("SLS" and collectively with Ocwen and
              Avelo, the "Servicers"), Wells Fargo Bank, National
              Association, as master servicer (the "Master Servicer"),
              U.S. Bank National Association, as a custodian and Deutsche
              Bank National Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee")

I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of the Trust;

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
 circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

     4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the Servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material
respects; and

     5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports
on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: the Trustee, the
Servicers and the Master Servicer.






<page>

Dated: March 31, 2008

/s/ Michelle Gill
Michelle Gill
Vice President
(Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 522 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 522

                   For the relief of Obain Attouoman.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 3, 2005

   Mr. Kerry introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Obain Attouoman.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR OBAIN ATTOUOMAN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Obain Attouoman shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Obain Attouoman enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Obain Attouoman, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Obain 
Attouoman shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

s0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

147205

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147205

COA: 308610

Wayne CC: 11

- 010663

- FC

PATRICK OLIVER SMITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### In the Matter of Raymond C. Miller Sr., Appellant, v Patricia A. Miller, Respondent.

Submitted July 13, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 63 AD3d 1323.

*782Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the appellant is not a party aggrieved.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the
Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of
the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR
 PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTDate:  August 4, 2004
    By:
    /s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. Hooper,Senior Vice President, Royalty Management
Bank of America, N.A. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Permian Basin Royalty Trust and will be retained by Permian Basin
Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, as  C.F.O.,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2008

Signature: /s/ Scott D. Guffey
          ----------------------------------
          Scott D. Guffey, C.F.O.