alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State v. Shue

Case below: 175 N.C. App. 796163 N.C. App. 58

No. 048P07

Def’s PWC to review the Decisions of the COA (COA05-244) and (COA03-133)

Denied 06/27/07

Hudson, J., Recused
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         958,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               520,281
<PP&E>                                      26,586,566
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,727,965
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,337,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          938,841
<BONDS>                                     14,585,696
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,187,092)<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,337,445
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,152,070
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,878,218
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             865,152
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                408,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            408,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   408,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   177.53<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>This entity is a limited partnership. The Other Stockholders Equity line
represents total Partnership equity
<F2>The EPS - Primary line represents net income per limited partnership unit.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3749 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3749

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and accessories for 
                   measuring or checking instruments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 27 (legislative day, July 26), 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and accessories for 
                   measuring or checking instruments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PARTS AND ACCESSORIES FOR MEASURING OR CHECKING 
              INSTRUMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.90.31        Parts and accessories   Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           of instruments and                                                31/2009          ''
                           apparatus for                                                                       .
                           measuring or checking
                           electrical
                           quantities, specially
                           designed for
                           telecommunications
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           9030.90.88), not
                           including
                           subassemblies
                           containing one or
                           more printed circuit
                           assemblies, specially
                           designed for
                           telecommunications
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           9030.90.88)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
================================================================================

                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER

                    PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16 OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                            For the month of May 2004

                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                             -----------------------
                               (Registrant's Name)

                          1155, University, Suite 1405,
                                Montreal, Quebec
                                 Canada H3B 3A7
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

                   Form 20-F [X]              Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                      Yes [ ]                     No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-

================================================================================

<PAGE>

Filed with this Form 6-K is the following which are incorporated herein by
reference:

99.1     Press Release - May 6, 2004 : Surface Drilling Results on Meston
         Property and Underground Drilling at the Joe Mann Mine.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                       CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.



                                       /s/ Lucy Brun
                                       ----------------------------
                                       Lucy Brun
                                       Executive Vice-President and
                                       Chief Administrative Officer



DATE: May 6, 2004

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

99.1     Press Release - May 6, 2004 : Surface Drilling Results on Meston
         Property and Underground Drilling at the Joe Mann Mine.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 2, 2004


### Before Hon . W ILLIAM J. B AUER , Circuit Judge 

### Hon . F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK , Circuit Judge 

### Hon . K ENNETH F. R IPPLE , Circuit Judge



### No . 02-2450 In the matter of:
J AMES E. H OVIS and J AMES E. H OVIS T RUST N O . 90, Debtors-Appellants . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division. No. 01 C 50475 Philip G. Reinhard, Judge .

Order The opinion of this court issued on February 2, 2004, is amended as follows: Page 3, line 8, change “treat” to “treats”; Page 4, line 6, change “it” to “he”; Page 5, line 18, change “liquidated” to “sold.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      11,563,458
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,788,639
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,148,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          118,888
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,119,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,148,971
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,300,040
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               992,954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             113,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,193,836
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,193,836
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,193,836
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

KIMBERLY WHITE, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 

VINCENT OCHOA, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents. 

No. 85312 

tuu r 

SEP .3. 20i2 

...NH 

.7..LER)5.1; )1,,F.V• ;• • : 

12Y 

*." 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

This original, pro se, emergency petition for a writ of mandamus 

challenges multiple interim district court orders in a custody action. 

The petition does not comply with several statutory and court 

rule requirements, such that it appears not all of the parties were provided 

proper notice and this court is unable to fully understand the matters set 

forth in the petition. NRAP 21 governs writ petitions filed in this court and 

requires petitioners to (a) name in the petition's caption and serve the 

respondent judge and all real parties in interest, and also to serve any other 

parties to the district court action, NRAP 21(a)(1) & (2); (b) comply with the 

content requirements of NRAP 21(a)(3); (c) include with the petition 

necessary documentation supporting the request for relief, NRAP 21(a)(4) 

(petitioner must provide all documents essential to understanding the 

matters set forth in the petition); (d) verify the petition by affidavit or 

declaration of the petitioner, NRAP 21(a)(5); see NRS 34.170; (e) include a 

certificate of compliance with NRAP 21(d)'s page/word count limit, NRAP 

21(e); and (f) for emergency petitions, comply with NRAP 27(e)'s certificate 

requirements. NRAP 21(a)(6). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

III! 147,1 30c1S 
Parraguirre 

Here, petitioner, the paternal grandmother of the children 

subject to the custody proceeding, failed to name the children's parents, who 

are parties below, as real parties in interest and to serve them with the 

petition. Additionally, although the petition discusses and challenges 

several orders and rulings issued by the district court in the underlying 

custody matter, no copies of those orders were submitted in any appendix 

to the petition, nor was any transcript, copy of court minutes, or other 

documentation provided.' Finally, petitioner failed to sign the petition and 

to include an affidavit or declaration verifying the petition, an NRAP 27(e) 

certificate, and a certificate of compliance. In light of these defects, we are 

unable to consider this petition, and without prejudice to petitioner's ability 

to file a petition that complies with court rules and relevant statutes in the 

future, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

.444c..x 

Hardesty Stiglich 

cc: Hon. Vincent Ochoa, District Judge 

Kimberly White 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'Petitioner did provide four photos of the children as exhibits. It is 

unclear whether those photos are part of the record below. In light of this 

order, we direct the clerk of this court to return, unfiled, the photos 

provisionally received on September 12, 2022. 

2
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 271

EX PA R TE D A V I D D U A N E D U N I G A N , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 3 2 7 6 5 CR/ A I N T HE 4 0 J UDI CI AL DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM ELLI S CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 4 18 S.W. 2d

82 4, 82 6 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 67 ). Ap pli c ant w a s c on vic te d o f e va din g arr e st and sente nced to twenty

y ear s’ imprisonment. Ap pli c ant c on te nd s th a t his c ouns e l r e nd e re d in e ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e becau se he fa ile d to timely file a notice of appe al despite telling Applicant that he w ould file the appe al on his behalf. T h e tr ia l c o u rt h a s d e te r

mi n e d th a t tr ia l c o u n s e l f

a il e d to ti me ly f il e a n o ti c e o f a p p e a l. We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to t h e o pportunity to file an out-of

-time appe al of the2

jud g me nt o f c on vic tio n in Ca us e No
. 32 76 5CR /Afr om t he 40 thJudic ia l D istri c t Co ur t of El lis County
. Applicant is order ed re turned to that time at which he may g ive a wr itten notice of a ppeal so that he may

then, with the aid of c ounsel, obtain a mea ningf u l appea l. All tim e limits shall be
c a lc ulate d a s if

the se nte nc e ha d b e e n imp os e d on the date on

wh ic h th e mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s. We h old tha t, s ho uld Ap pli c ant d e sir e to p ro se c ute an a pp e a l, he mus t take a ff

ir mativ e ste ps to f

ile
a wr itt e n n oti c e of

a pp e a l in the tr ia l c ourt

wi thi n 3 0 d ay s a ft e r t

he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: J anuar

y 13, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         189,952
<SECURITIES>                                 1,198,324 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  180,086<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    116,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,272,117
<PP&E>                                       1,102,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                 409,351
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,606,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          267,241
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,517
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,156,502
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,606,695
<SALES>                                        340,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               532,712
<CGS>                                           70,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   70,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               191,151
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                113,043
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,652
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             81,391
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    81,391
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE PRESENTED NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS IN
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET.  THE PROVISION FOR LOSSES ON DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS IS NOT REPORTED AS A SEPARATE LINE IN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME OR STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS. 
<F2>REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3937 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3937

To require the Federal Aviation Administration to finalize the proposed 
rule relating to the reduction of fuel tank flammability exposure, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2006

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Federal Aviation Administration to finalize the proposed 
rule relating to the reduction of fuel tank flammability exposure, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flight 800 Improvement Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF FAA RULE RELATING TO FUEL TANK FLAMMABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not 
later than January 1, 2007, the Federal Aviation Administration shall 
finalize and implement, in accordance with paragraph (2), the rule 
proposed by the Federal Aviation Administration relating to the 
reduction of fuel tank flammability in transport category airplanes (70 
Fed. Reg. 70922, dated November 23, 2005) and operators and 
manufacturers of airplanes shall take appropriate action to comply with 
the rule.
    (b) Matching Funds.--For each of the fiscal years 2007 through 
2016, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration may 
provide financial assistance to operators and manufacturers of 
airplanes in an amount that does not exceed $1 for every $1 incurred by 
such operators and manufacturers for complying with the rule described 
in subsection (a).
    (c) Study and Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall conduct a study and report to Congress regarding 
ways to improve the safety and reduce the flammability of fuel tanks 
that are located on the wings of airplanes.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $40,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2007 through 
2016, to carry out the provisions of subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
#### Kenneth J. Lewis et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Civil Service et al., Respondents. Margaret Godfrey et al., Appellants, v Andrew J. Spano et al., Respondents. New York State Comptroller, Intervenor-Respondent.

Submitted September 14, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 60 AD3d 216; 57 AD3d 941.

Motion by New York State United Teachers for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeals herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

July 28, 2006.

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 3741) entitled ‘‘An Act to provide funding authority to facilitate the 

evacuation of persons from Lebanon, and for other purposes’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

Strike subsection (a) of section 1, and insert the following new subsection (a):

1 (a) INCREASE IN AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR EMERGENCY

2 EVACUATIONS.—Notwithstanding the transfer restrictions 

3 under section 402 of the Science, State, Justice, Commerce, 

4 and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public 

5 Law 109–108), the second proviso under the headings ‘‘DE6 PARTMENT OF STATE AND RELATED AGENCY – 

7 DEPARTMENT OF STATE – ADMINISTRATION OF FOR8 EIGN AFFAIRS – DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR PROGRAMS’’ 
2

•S 3741 EAH 

1 is amended by striking ‘‘$4,000,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$19,000,000’’.

Attest:

Clerk. 
109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3741

AMENDMENT