alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State v. Angram

Case below: 185 N.C. App.-(4 September 2007)

No. 500P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA07-143)

Denied 11/08/07
#### John Alan MILLER, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. YORK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 09-6237.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 23, 2009.

Decided: May 5, 2009.

*160John Alan Miller, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Alan Miller appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Miller v. York Cnty. Public Defenders Ofc.,*No. 2:08-cv-03834-JFA (D.S.C. Dec. 31, 2008; filed Jan. 21, 2009 & entered Jan. 22, 2009). We deny Miller’s motions for punitive damages, to impose sanctions, to compel all information regarding *Brady v. Maryland,*373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), for transcript at government expense, for intervention, and motion for judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of REGENT  TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the
"Company") on  Form 10-Q for the  period  ended  June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on  the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of
the undersigned  does  hereby  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:   July 23, 2009

/s/ David A. Nelson
--------------------------------------------------------
David A. Nelson
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
   FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934   Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 28, 2005 Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.  Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    6719
Commission File Number
    
    52-2301683
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
   Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.
300 First Stamford Place, Stamford, Connecticut 06902
(203) 977-8000
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number, including area code)   Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction
A.2.below): o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13c-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02.   Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On July 28, 2005, Odyssey Re Holdings Corp. issued the press release attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1 announcing its results for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, which press release
is incorporated by reference herein and furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 of Form 8-K. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the information set forth in
Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release of Odyssey Re Holdings Corp. dated July 28, 2005.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. Date: July 28, 2005 ODYSSEY RE HOLDINGS CORP.By:
    /s/ Donald L. SmithName:
    Donald L. SmithTitle:
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000695

19-FEB-2019

08:21 AM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

148 

CA 15-01938 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

JOSHUA P. BOULTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RACHELLE R. BOULTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH deV. MOELLER OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

JANE G. LAROCK, WATERTOWN, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

KIMBERLY A. WOOD, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WATERTOWN. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County

(James P. McClusky, J.), dated March 13, 2015. The judgment, among

other things, adjudged that plaintiff shall have custody of the

subject child. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: Defendant mother appeals from a judgment which,

inter alia, granted plaintiff father custody of the parties’ child.

The mother failed to preserve for our review her contention that North

Carolina was a more convenient forum for the action by failing to

raise that contention before Supreme Court (see Ciesinski v Town of

Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985). We reject the mother’s contention that

the record does not support the court’s determination to award custody

of the child to the father. Indeed, the court properly considered the

totality of the circumstances in determining that the best interests

of the child are served by awarding custody to the father (see

Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 174), including the stability of the

existing custody arrangement and the relative fitness of the parents,

the ability of each parent to provide for the emotional and

intellectual development of the child, and the financial status and

ability of each parent to provide for the child (see Fox v Fox, 177

AD2d 209, 210). 

Entered: February 10, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              OF SWISS MEDICA, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned
officer of Swiss Medica, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

      (c)   The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
            30, 2006 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
            section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
            (d) Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2006

/s/ Bruce Fairbairn
-------------------
Bruce Fairbairn,
Chief Financial Officer
#### State v. West

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 664

No. 031P07

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA06-205)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. _

2. Allowed 03/08/07

3. Denied 03/08/07
Trust Receipt #5-9-07-1



 Exhibit 10.5 
 TRUST RECEIPT #5-9-07-1 
 The undersigned (hereinafter called the “TRUSTEE”) hereby acknowledges receipt from AUTO
FINANCE CENTER OF AMERICA, INC. in Madison Heights, Michigan (hereinafter called “ENTRUSTER”) or from a third party on behalf of or at the direction of the ENTRUSTER of the goods designated below or for and in consideration of the present
advance of new value as evidence by the Promissory Note of the TRUSTEE made to the ENTRUSTER in the amount of such advance of even date, herewith payable on demand, does acknowledge and agree that a security interest in said goods has been and is
granted and exists and will continue to exist and retain in favor of the ENTRUSTER. 
  

											
	 Year/ Make
	  	Model	  	Stock #	  	Vin #	  	Actual Cost	  	Floor Plan
	 95 Chevy
	  	Lumina	  	0361118	  	2G1WN52M7S1124582	  	995.00	  	995.00
	 98 Pontiac
	  	Sunfire	  	0370219	  	1G2JB5246W7507596	  	2140.00	  	2140.00
	 02 Chrysler
	  	Sebring	  	0370325	  	1C3EL46XX2N216005	  	5530.00	  	5530.00
	 95 Chrysler
	  	Cirrus	  	0370337	  	1C3EJ56H1SN559242	  	2000.00	  	2000.00
	 02 Ford
	  	Mustang	  	0370339	  	1FAFP40432F174330	  	6730.00	  	6730.00
	 00 Chrysler
	  	Sebring	  	0370340	  	3C3EL55H8YT239680	  	4420.00	  	4420.00
	 01 Dodge
	  	Stratus	  	0370405	  	1B3EJ46X41N568434	  	3925.00	  	3925.00
	 99 Dodge
	  	Durango	  	0370407	  	1B4HS28Z8XF550756	  	4425.00	  	4425.00
	 01 Mercury
	  	Sable	  	0370409	  	1MEFM50UX1A616300	  	2910.00	  	2910.00
	 98 Chrysler
	  	Cirrus	  	0370410	  	1C3EJ56H8WN289819	  	2560.00	  	2560.00
		  		  		  		  		  	35635.00

 The TRUSTEE agrees to hold said goods, together with all accessories, attachments and equipment, as a component
part thereof, in trust for the ENTRUSTER for the purpose solely of selling or exchanging them, or of procuring there their sale or exchange in the ordinary course of the TRUSTEE’S trade. 
 The Trust Receipt has been executed and delivered pursuant to and in furtherance of a certain Security Agreement Trust Receipt hereto for executed and delivered by the
undersigned (therein referred to as the DEBTOR) to and in favor of AUTO FINANCE CENTER OF AMERICA, INC. (therein referred to as the SECURED PARTY), and all the terms and conditions of said Agreement are incorporated herein by reference, made a part
of the Trust Receipt and shall apply to the property above described and the proceeds thereof and to the duties and obligations of the Debtor in connection therewith. 
 Dated: May 11, 2007. 
  

									
	Witnesses:	 		 	Keith Bullard’s Auto Liquidation Center, Inc.
				
	/s/ Mark R. Horvath	 		 	By:	 	/s/ Keith Bullard
		 		 		 	Its:	 	Vice President
----

| EXHIBIT      32                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |
| CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO                      |
| 18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       |
| AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       |
| SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |

----

----

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| 2.     | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at and for the year ended December 31,2008. |

|                |   |                                                     |
|---------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| March      30, 2009 |   | /s/      Dana C. Gavenda                                 |
| Date                |   | Dana      C. Gavenda                                     |
|                |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer               |
|                |   |                                                     |
| March      30, 2009 |   | /s/      Kevin D. Maroney                                |
| Date                |   | Kevin      D. Maroney                                    |
|                |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, (the "Report"), I David
Vozick, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.









/s/ David Vozick
------------------------------
David Vozick,
Chairman of the Board
Co-Principal Executive Officer
February 11, 2005



                                       20
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2531 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 

to extend the authority relating to cooperation between the United States 

and Israel on anti-tunnel defense capabilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2023 

Mr. SCHNEIDER (for himself, Ms. MANNING, Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. 

PFLUGER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2016 to extend the authority relating to cooperation 

between the United States and Israel on anti-tunnel defense capabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States-Israel 

5 Anti-Tunnel Cooperation Extension Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2531 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF UNITED STATES-ISRAEL ANTI-TUN2 NEL COOPERATION. 

3 Section 1279(f) of the National Defense Authoriza4 tion Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (22 U.S.C. 8606 note) is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘December 31, 2024’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘December 31, 2026’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 400 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 400

      To prevent the illegal importation of controlled substances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2005

  Mr. Coleman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To prevent the illegal importation of controlled substances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prevention of Illegally Imported 
Controlled Substances Act of 2005'' or ``Todd Rode Act''.

SEC. 2. DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPORTED SHIPMENTS.

    Part D of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 841 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

              ``destruction of certain imported shipments

    ``Sec. 424. (a) In General.--A shipment of controlled substances 
that is imported or offered for import into the United States in 
violation of section 401 and whose value is less than $10,000 shall be 
seized and summarily forfeited to the United States.
    ``(b) Destruction.--Controlled substances seized under subsection 
(a) shall be destroyed, subject to subsection (d). Section 801(b) of 
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 381(b)) does not 
authorize the delivery of the substances pursuant to the execution of a 
bond, and the substances may not be exported.
    ``(c) Notice.--
            ``(1) Procedures.--The seizure and destruction of 
        controlled substances under subsections (a) and (b) may be 
        carried out without notice to the importer, owner, or consignee 
        of the controlled substances involved. Appraisement of such 
        substances is required only to the extent sufficient to 
        document that the substances are subject to subsection (a).
            ``(2) Goals.--Procedures promulgated under paragraph (1) 
        shall be designed toward the goal of ensuring that, with 
        respect to efficiently utilizing Federal resources available 
        for carrying out this subsection, a substantial majority of 
        shipments of controlled substances subject to subsection (a) 
        are identified and seized under such paragraph and destroyed 
        under subsection (b).
    ``(d) Presentation of Evidence.--Controlled substances may not be 
destroyed under subsection (b) to the extent that the Attorney General 
of the United States determines that the controlled substances should 
be preserved as evidence or potential evidence with respect to an 
offense against the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Edwin Johnny Locke, Respondent, v Sikamdar Ali Buksh et al., Appellants.

Submitted March 9, 2009;

decided April 30, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4015 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4015

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount of 
         gain excluded from the sale of a principal residence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2006

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the amount of 
         gain excluded from the sale of a principal residence.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Home Ownership Protection Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED EXCLUSION OF GAIN FROM SALE OF PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 121(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``$250,000'' and 
        inserting ``$350,000''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(A), by striking so much of such 
        paragraph as precedes clause (i) and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) $700,000 limitation for certain joint 
                returns.--Paragraph (1) shall be applied by 
                substituting `$700,000' for `350,000' if--''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to sales and exchanges after December 31, 2006, in taxable years 
ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
----

**EXHIBIT 10.3**

**LETTER        AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT**

**IDEC        **
**PHARMACEUTICALS        CORPORATION**
**GENENTECH,        INC., **

**IN        **
**WITNESS        **
**WHEREOF**

|   | **IDEC                  PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION** |                                                                                     | **GENENTECH,                  INC.** |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                                  |                                                                                     |                                 |   |   |
|   | By:                                                   |  /s/ WILLIAM                  H. RASTETTER                                     |                                 | By: |  /s/ ARTHUR                  D. LEVINSON |
|   |                                                  | William                  H. RastetterTitle:  Chairman                  and CEO |                                 |   | Arthur                  D. LevinsonTitle:  Chairman                  and CEO |

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brookfield Homes Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), each of Ian G. Cockwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and Paul G. Kerrigan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18.U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
their knowledge:  1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: May 10, 2005 By:
    /s/ IAN G. COCKWELLIan G. CockwellPresident and Chief Executive Officer By:
    /s/ PAUL G. KERRIGANPaul G. KerriganExecutive Vice President, Chief
Financial
Officer and Treasurer