alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3699 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3699

                       To provide private relief.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 2006

  Mr. Specter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                       To provide private relief.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE RELIEF.

    The survivors of Christopher Kangas of Brookhaven, Pennsylvania, 
shall be eligible for an award of $250,000 to be issued by the Bureau 
of Justice Assistance of the Department of Justice due to his death as 
a result of his acting in the capacity of a public safety officer.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL FALLEN FIREFIGHTERS MEMORIAL.

    The United States Fire Administration shall include the name of 
Christopher Kangas on the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial in 
Emmitsburg, Maryland.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of Veracity Management Global, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Michael Rideman, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael Rideman

Michael RidemanCEODated: September 26, 2007

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Veracity Management Global, Inc.and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
#### Leeward Isles Resorts, Limited, Respondent, v Charles C. Hickox, Appellant.

Submitted March 9, 2009;

decided April 7, 2009

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*11 NY3d 914 (2009)]. Movant was not precluded by CPLR 5511 from seeking leave to appeal from the final April 2008 Supreme Court judgment to bring up for review the prior nonfinal Appellate Division order by which he is aggrieved. That Supreme Court’s final judgment was entered without opposition did not here constitute a waiver of the right to move for leave to appeal from that paper under CPLR 5602 (a) (1) (ii) *(see*
      *804
      *Paramount Communications v Gibraltar Cas. Co.,*90 NY2d 507, 513 [1997]).

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-J1
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-J1


         The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                  Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.6

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the use of our report dated January 17, 2005, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Gallatin Steel Company included in this
Annual Report on Form 40-F of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

                                                        /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
March 25, 2005
12029.

#### Denson *v.*The State.

Luke, J.

The conviction in this case depended wholly upon proof of the recent possession of the defendant of the property alleged to have been stolen; and, this possession having been fully explained, the evidence *428did not authorize the verdict, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. *Brooks*v. *State,*21 *Ga. App.*661 (94 S. E. 810), and cases cited.

Decided March 8, 1921.

Accusation of larceny; from city court of Macon — Judge Johnson presiding. November 13, 1920.

The accusation charged the larceny of certain lumber consisting of painted molding for billboards and of framing lumber, the property of F. H. Powers. Powers testified, that it was reported to him by one of his workers that certain pieces of molding and some other lumber had been blown from a billboard of his during a storm, and that some molding was under the defendant’s house, next door to the vacant lot on which was the billboard; he went to the defendant’s house, and under it saw red and green molding and other lumber which he recognized as his; the lumber was not concealed from view; “ defendant told him that he purchased part of the lumber from show people who were showing on vacant lot where billboard was, and that same people gave him some of it for services he rendered to them. ” The witness further testified that the show to which the defendant referred left that place before the storm occurred, that the storm blew down the billboard, and that the disappearance of the molding was reported to him a month .after the storm. Other witnesses testified that before the storm they saw lumber, some of which was colored green and red, plainly exposed to public view, under the defendant’s house, and he told them that he bought a part' of it from 'show people and that they gave a part of it to him for favors he had done.. A witness testified that one morning before the storm he saw the defendant and one of the showmen standing in front of a pile of lumber, some of which was colored green and some red, and saw the defendant give some money to the man. In his statement at the trial the defendant repeated his explanation as to the purchase of the lumber from a showman. He said that the show was on the vacant lot next to his house, and before the storm occurred the showman came to him and offered to sell him a pile of the lumber and gave him another pile.

*Clements & Clements,*for plaintiff in error.

*Roy W. Moore, solicitor,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Broyles, G. J., a/nd Bloodworth, J., concur.*
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED S COTT HARTMAN , A ppellant ,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 574 LT Case No. 2021

- CA

- 905 HERNANDO COUNTY S HERIFF'S O FFICE, SHAUN K LUCZNIK, A. B ATCHELDER, K. DEKANY , R

. MCPHEE , S. SOLLAZZO , AND C. ANDREWS ,

Appellee s. ________________________________/ Decision filed January 31, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando C ounty , Pamela S tinnette V ergara , Judge. Scott Hartman, Brooksville, pro s e. Clifford A. Taylor, of The Hogan Law Firm, Bro oksville, for Appellee , Hernando County S heriff's Office

. No Appearance for Remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS , JJ. , conc ur.
#### In the Matter of Mary E. Carriero et al., Appellants, v Town Board of the Town of Stillwater et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 23, 2009;

decided May 7, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal, insofar as made by Mary E. Carnero and Olympia D’Amico, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5602, 5611). As to them, the February 13, 2009 judgment of Supreme Court did not dispose of any issues beyond those resolved by the June 14, 2007 Appellate Division order, which was final as to them and from which they previously sought leave to appeal in a motion the Court of Appeals denied on November 20, 2007 (9 NY3d 980 [2007]). Mo*839tion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining movants are not parties aggrieved (see CPLR 5511).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1997
<CASH>                                           2,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                       692
<INVENTORY>                                      2,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,362
<PP&E>                                           6,837
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,268
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           52,033
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           348
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,579
<SALES>                                          8,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,324
<CGS>                                            7,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (94)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,002)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,002)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,002)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.85)
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of George Infante, as Administrator of the Estate of Rosemary A. Infante, Deceased, Respondent, v Caroline R. Dignan, M.D., as Medical Examiner of Monroe County, et al., Appellants.

Submitted March 2, 2009;

decided March 26, 2009

Motion by Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.

Judge Graffeo taking no part.
Exhibit 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I Donald
Rabinovitch, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.








/s/ Donald Rabinovitch
----------------------
Donald Rabinovitch,
President
(Co-Principal Executive Officer)
May 14, 2004

                                       19
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF MISSION RESOURCES CORPORATION

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-Q
(the "FORM 10-Q") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 of Mission Resources
Corporation (the "ISSUER").

I, Richard W. Piacenti, the Chief Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that:

      (i)   the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
            or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
            78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

      Dated: November 10, 2004                   /s/ Richard W. Piacenti
                                                 -----------------------

Subscribed and sworn to before me
this 10th day of November 2004

/s/ Carmen M. Garcia
--------------------

Notary Public in and for the
State of Texas

My commission expires: May 15, 2006

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to Mission Resources Corporation and will be retained by
      Mission Resources Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
     Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 78908)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 3, 2014, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) Consortium (“V2I Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Chrysler Group LLC, Auburn Hills, MI; Ford Motor Company—Research and Innovation Center, Dearborn, MI; General Motors Company—Research and Development Center, Warren, MI; Honda R&D Americas, Inc., Southfield, MI; Hyundai-Kia America Technical Center, Inc., Superior Township, MI; Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Irvine, CA; Mercedes-Benz Research & Development North America, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; Nissan Technical Center North America Inc., Farmington Hills, MI; Fuji Heavy Industries USA, Inc., Subaru, Cherry Hill, NJ; Volkswagen/Audi of America, Auburn Hills, MI; and Volvo Group North America, Costa Mesa, CA.

The general area of V2I Consortium's planned activity is to engage in a collaborative effort in order to gain further knowledge and understanding of connected vehicle interactions and/or applications for vehicles that are intended to transform surface transportation safety, mobility, and environmental performance through a connected vehicle environment.

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2014-30673 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of BCSB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



By:

/s/ Joseph J. BouffardName:

Joseph J. BouffardTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




By:

/s/ Anthony R. ColeName:

Anthony R. ColeTitle:

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Date: December 23, 2010
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Carlton Christopher SULLIVAN, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-8194.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 27, 2009.

Carlton Christopher Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah A. Johnston, Chan Park, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlton Christopher Sullivan appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Sullivan,*No. 8:03-cr-00194-DKC-4 (D. Md. Sept. 23, 2008; Aug. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7634

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM ERNEST LEWIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge.

(CR-99-8)

Submitted: January 17, 2002 Decided: January 29, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Lewis appeals from the district court’s order denying

his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000) motion. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Lewis, No. CR-99-8 (E.D. Va. July 23,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.1 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors of BoiseInc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (Nos. 333-158737 and 333-150563) on Form S-8 of Boise Inc.,the registration statement (Nos. 333-166390, 333-157881 and 333-155595) on Form S-3 of Boise Inc., and the registration statement (Nos. 333-166926 and 333-166936) on Form S-4 of BZ Intermediate Holdings LLC, of our report dated March 2, 2011,with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Boise Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year periodended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Boise Inc. and BZ Intermediate HoldingsLLC. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Boise, Idaho

March 2, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Fields, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 557]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (A. Kirke Bartley, Jr., J.), entered on or about June 2, 2010, which adjudicated defendant a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed defendant 15 points for drug or alcohol abuse. Regardless of whether these points should have been assessed, defendant’s point score would still be far above the threshold for a level three adjudication.

Defendant’s argument for a downward departure is not only unpreserved, but is based on facts outside the record, relating *560to events that postdated the order being appealed. In any event, defendant has not established that his psychiatric placement is a factor that should affect his risk level. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-3430

_____________________________

WILLIE J. EDWARDS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

September 29, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, C.J., and B.L. THOMAS and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Richard M. Bracey, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Sharon Traxler, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.