alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) FEBRUARY 28, 2005 NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED  CANADA
    
    000-30758
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code 905-863-0000  
 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):  o
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition On February 28, 2005, Nortel Networks Corporation issued a press release providing a status update
on its and Nortel Networks Limiteds financial restatement process and other related matters. Such
press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and furnished in accordance with Item 2.02 of Form
8-K. Nortel Networks Corporation owns all of the registrants common shares and the registrant is Nortel
Networks Corporations principal direct operating subsidiary. Item 8.01 Other Events On February 28, 2005, Nortel Networks Corporation issued the press release attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1, and such press release is incorporated by reference herein (other than information
included on or linked from the registrants website, referenced in such release, which is not
incorporated by reference into this report). Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits  (c)
    Exhibits  99.1
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on February 28, 2005.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ Peter W. CurriePeter W. CurrieChief Financial OfficerBy:
    /s/ Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant General Counsel 
Securitiesand Corporate Secretary Dated: March 1, 2005




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on February 28, 2005.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6726

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES H. HUTCHINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-92-162, CA-97-302-3) Submitted: July 14, 1998 Decided: July 30, 1998 Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James H. Hutchins, Appellant Pro Se. John E. Sullivan, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order transferring his successive motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Appellant cannot now seek review of claims raised in his first § 2255 motion, the dismissal of which he chose not to appeal. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hutchins , No. CR-92- 162; CA-97-302-3 (E.D. Va. Apr. 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

RASHAAN LONDALE GREER,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 47 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether a [c]ourt on appeal should rule on the merits of an 

existing appeal of a PCRA [court order] before remanding a 

case where a [PCRA petitioner] raised new/additional layered 

claims of PCRA counsel’s ineffectiveness pursuant to 

Commonwealth v. Bradley, [261 A.3d 381 (Pa. 2021)] for the 

first time before the appellate court, where there were issues 

of merit that could have been disposed of prior to remand for 

new issues.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-4882

JAMES DEWAYNE DYE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston.

John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-94-177)

Submitted: August 12, 1997

Decided: September 8, 1997

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Gregory M. Courtright, COLLINS & COURTRIGHT, Charleston,

West Virginia, for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael L. Keller, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston,

West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

James Dewayne Dye appeals his conviction for escape from federal

custody, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a) (1994). He contends he

was not in the custody of the Attorney General and her authorized

representatives at the time of the escape, rendering his indictment and

subsequent conviction improper. We affirm his conviction and sentence.

Dye pled guilty to aiding and abetting the interstate transportation

of a stolen vehicle. As a part of his plea agreement, Dye agreed to

enter a guilty plea in a pending state charge of battery prior to being

sentenced on the federal offense. Although a federal prisoner, Dye

was confined at South Central Regional Jail, a state facility. On

November 9, 1994, in response to a state writ of habeas corpus ad

prosequendum, Dye was released to a deputy of the Roane County

Sheriff's Department to enter his plea on the battery charge. Dye

appeared before the magistrate, entered his guilty plea, and received

his sentence. Upon leaving the courthouse, Dye escaped from custody

as he was entering a vehicle that was to be used to transport him back

to the South Central Regional Jail. Dye remained at large until he was

recaptured at his home on November 29, 1994, by local and federal

law enforcement officials.

Dye asserts that because he was in the custody of state officials at

the time of his escape, the indictment charging him with escape from

federal custody was defective and should have been dismissed. We

rejected a similar challenge in United States v. Hall, 451 F.2d 347,

348 (4th Cir. 1971). Further, escape from federal custody, as defined

in § 751(a), is a continuing offense; therefore, an escapee can be held

liable for his initial departure as well as his failure to return to custody. See United States v. Bailey, 444 U.S. 394, 413 (1980).

Accordingly, Dye's conviction under § 751(a) was appropriate and

we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or

Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                |  |                                                                                   
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  | BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., TRUSTEE FOR PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUST
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 4, 2013 |  |  |  | By:                                                            |  | /s/ RON E. HOOPER                                                                 
|                       |  |  |  |                                                                |  | Ron E. Hooper, Senior Vice President and
Trust Administrator Bank of America, N.A.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Permian Basin Royalty Trust and
will be retained by Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Continuing Abatement Order filed January 23, 2020. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00088-CR

____________

KIMBEL VERSHON CARTER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1492023

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant is pro se. On January 23, 2019, appellant timely filed a notice of 

appeal from his judgment of conviction. Since February 2019, we have issued 

three orders to the trial court. In our last order of December 17, 2019, this court 

ordered the trial court to determine:

1. Whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal; and, if so,
2. Whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel on 

appeal. 

Our order provided that if the trial court found that appellant desired to prosecute 

his appeal and is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel on appeal, then the trial 

court was to forward to the clerk of this court a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing those findings and an order, if any, appointing appellate counsel. We 

ordered the trial court to complete this process and forward the requested items

within ten (10) days.

As of this date, no response from the trial court has been received.

The appeal remains abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this 

court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket 

when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. This

court also will consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either 

party. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
Exhibit 35.2

May 22, 2007

American Honda Finance Corporation20800 Madrona Ave.Torrance, California 90503

Attention: Michael J. Greene

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Title Administration Agreement dated as of February 5, 2002 between triVIN, Inc. (triV1N) for services provided by its wholly owned subsidiary, FDI Computer Consulting, Inc., dba FDI Collateral Management (the Company), and American Honda Finance Corporation (AFHC).

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | a)  | A review of the Company’s activities and performance under the Title Administration Agreement dated as of February 5, 2002 between triVIN and AFHC during the period commencing April 1, 2006 through and including March 31, 2007 has been conducted under my supervision, and; |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | b)  | To the best of my knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligations under the Title Administration Agreement dated as of February 5, 2002 between triVIN and AFHC in all material respects throughout the period commencing April 1, 2006 through and including March 31, 2007. |

Signed as of May 22, 2007.

FDI COMPUTER CONSULTING INC.,DBA FDI COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT

|           |                                                              |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:  | /s/ Jeff CookeName: Jeff CookeTitle: Chief Executive Officer |

cc: Paul C. Honda, Assistant Vice President, American Honda Finance Corporation

----
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10867]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,089]


Brunswick Corporation, Crestliner Division, Little Falls, MN; 
Notice of Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on February 3, 2009 in response to a 
petition filed by a Minnesota state agency representative on behalf of 
workers at Brunswick Corporation, Crestliner Division, Little Falls, 
Minnesota. The workers at the subject facility produce aluminum boats.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 15th day of April 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10867 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Antonio Charles BLOW, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Warden STANSBERRY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 08-8358.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 14, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

Antonio Charles Blow, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Charles Blow, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Blow v. Stansberry,*No. 2:08-cv-00426-RGD-TEM (E.D.Va. Oct. 6, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be*225fore the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549


                                    FORM 6-K

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the month of: October, 2005                  Commission File Number: 0-27400

                            CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.
                              (Name of Registrant)

                                2255 MARKHAM ROAD
                              SCARBOROUGH, ONTARIO
                                 CANADA M1B 2W3
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

                      Form 20-F [ ]      Form 40-F [X]



Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                            Yes [ ]      No [X]



If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                     CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.



Date: October 7, 2005                By: /s/ Lewis Ritchie
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Name:  Lewis Ritchie
                                         Title: Executive Vice-President Finance
                                                and Administration, Chief
                                                Financial Officer and Secretary



<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


<Table>
<Caption>

Exhibit        Description of Exhibit
-------        ----------------------
<S>          <C>
99.1           Press Release dated October 7, 2005

</Table>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,460                   3,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,527                  45,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,408                   1,408
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,230                  79,230
<PP&E>                                         245,551                 245,551
<DEPRECIATION>                                 137,427                 137,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 308,240                 308,240
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,609                  86,609
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           330                     330
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,056)                (22,056)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   308,240                 308,240
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,087                 204,970
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,184                 168,470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,929                (21,562)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   524                   (112)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,600                  20,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    374                  37,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                       145                  14,389
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                229                  23,435
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       229                  23,435
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01                    0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01                    0.74
        

</TABLE>
#### Sam Pilato and Son, Inc., et al., Respondents, v Leo D. Starowitz, Sr., et al., Defendants, and Frank Starowitz, Appellant.

Submitted March 23, 2009;

decided May 7, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or**

**Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Permian Basin Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to its knowledge: 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust. 

 
  SIMMONS BANK, TRUSTEE FOR PERMIAN BASIN ROYALTY TRUSTDate: November 2, 2018  By: /s/ RON E. HOOPER   Ron E. Hooper,   SVP Royalty Trust Management   Simmons Bank
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Permian Basin Royalty Trust andwill be retained by Permian Basin Royalty Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 
**