T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e x c e p t a s p r o v id e db y9 th C ir . R . 3 6 - 3 . H a ile ’s r e q u e s t f o rp ub lic a tio n is d e n ie d . T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T TS EGAI HA I LE , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. SANTA ROSA M EM ORI AL HO SP I TAL, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee , a nd ST . J OSEP H H EALT H SYSTE M S ON OMA C OU NT Y, D e f

e n d a n t. N o. 10- 15904 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 8 - c v - 0 4 1 4 9 - MMC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a xi ne M . C he s ne y , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d Jul y12, 2011 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , A L A R C Ó N , an dL E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED JU L 25 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 15904 2 T s e ga i H a i l e appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntf ol l ow i ng a be nc h a nd j urytr i a l i n hi s e m pl oy m e nta c t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o ad is tr ic t c o u rt’s g r an t o f s u m m aryju d g m e n t. O l s e n v . I daho State B d. of

Me d. , 36 3 F . 3d 91 6, 92 2 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). W e r evi ew f o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n ad is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n f

o ran e w tr ia l. Mol skiv. M. J. Cab le, Inc. , 4 8 1 F. 3 d7 2 4 , 7 2 8 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 7 ) ( Fe d . R. Ci v . P. 5 9 ( a ) ) ; L at

shaw v. T

rai ner W ortha m & Co. , Inc. , 45 2 F . 3d 10 97 , 11 00 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 6 ) ( Fe d . R. Ci v . P. 6 0 ( b ) ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d istrict co u rt p ro p er ly g ra n tedsu m m ary ju d g m en t o n H aile’s C o n so l i d at edO m n i b u s B u d g etR eco n ci l i at i o n A ct(“ C O B R A ”) cl ai m b ecau se H ai l e fai l edt o rai se a g en u i n e d i sp u t e o f m at eri al factas t o w h eth er S an t a R o sa M e m or i a l H os pi t a l c om pl i e d w i th C O B R A ’ s not i f i c a t i on pr ovi s i on. See 2 9 U . S. C. § § 1 1 6 3 ( d e f

in in g “q u a lif

y in g e v e n t” ) , 1 1 6 6 ( a ) ( s e ttin g f o rth n o tic e r e q u ir e m e n ts ) . W e c anno tre vi ew H ai l e’ s c on t ent i on s thatre qu i re exam i nat i on of oral pr oc e e di ngs i n the di s tr i c tc ourtbe c aus e H a i l e f a i l e d t o i nc l ude the r e l e vant tr a n s c r ip ts in th e r e c o r do n ap p e a l a s r e q u ir e db yF e d . R . A p p . P . 1 0 ( b ) . See Sy nc om Capi tal

C or p. v . W ade , 9 2 4 F. 2 d1 6 7 , 1 6 9 - 7 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 1 ) ( p e rc u r i a m) (pro se appel l antfa i l ed t o p rovi de re l evanttranscr i pt s) .10- 15904 3 T o th e e x ten t th at co n sid er atio n o f th e d istrict co u rt’s d en ial o f H aile’s m o tio n f o ran e w tr ia l d o e s n o t r e q u ir e r e v ie w o f atr an s c r ip t, th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id no tabuse i t s di sc re t i on because H ai l e f ai l ed t o sho w grou nd s w arrant i ng such re l i ef . See M ol ski , 48 1 F . 3d at72 9 (se tt i ng forth g roun ds for anew tri alun der R u le 5 9 ( a ) ) ; L at

s haw , 452 F . 3d a t1101- 02 ( pl a i nt i f f w a s note nt i t l e d t o r e l i e f f r om j ud gm entun der Rul e 60(b) on the basi s of heratt orney’ s a l l eged m i sc on du ct). H ai l e’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. H aile’s “M o ti o n to A u g m en t O p en in g B rief an dR eb u tt al to J. C h es n ey ’s A rgum ent ” i s grant ed t o the ext entthati tse eks t o sup pl em entthe op eni ng bri ef a n dis o th e rw is e d e n ie d . H a ile ’s r e m a in in g p e n d in g m o tio n s , in c lu d in g h is r e que s t s f

ors a nc t i ons , a r e de ni e d. AF F I RME D.