alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

================================================================================

                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer


                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                October 28, 2004

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346

                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
                  reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
         paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ________

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
         paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ________

    Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
  this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ] No [X]

       If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
           registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

================================================================================
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST


Exhibit      Description
-------      -----------

99.1         Press Release, dated October 27, 2004, regarding certain Hollinger
             Inc. legal matters.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  October 28, 2004


                                         HOLLINGER INC.

                                         By /s/ Peter G. White
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Peter G. White
                                            Title: Co-Chief Operating Officer
                                                   and Secretary
#### State v. Taylor

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 227

No. 458P07

Defs PWC to Review Decision of COA (COA05-1535)

Denied 11/08/07
---





EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Arthur D. Levinson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Genentech, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: | November 3, 2003 |  | By: | /s/ARTHUR D. LEVINSON                                          
|----- | ---------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                  |  |     |                                                                
|      |                  |  |     | Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer



---
#### Linda L. FELDMAN, RN, an individual, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 08-55563.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 8, 2009.

Filed May 14, 2009.

Robert. K. Scott, Esquire, D. Scott Moh-ney, Esquire, Joel S. Poremba, Esquire, *589Law Offices of Robert K. Scott, Irvine, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Royal Forest Oakes, Esquire, Senior Litigating, Vivian liana Orlando, Esquire, Barger & Wolen, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: B. FLETCHER, FISHER and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Linda Feldman appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to her long-term disability insurer, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The parties are familiar with the facts and procedural history of the case, so we need not repeat them here. We hold that MetLife acted reasonably in suspending Feldman’s benefits because there was a “genuine dispute” as to coverage. *See Guebara v. Allstate Ins. Co.,*237 F.3d 987, 992 (9th Cir.2001). MetLife’s handling of the claim, which included numerous attempts to contact Feldman’s doctors, reveals none of the hallmarks of bad faith. Moreover, MetLife terminated benefits based on the statement of Feldman’s own doctor that he could no longer certify her as disabled. Once MetLife obtained medical documentation confirming Feldman’s continued disability, it adequately handled the claim by reinstating coverage and paying retroactive benefits.

Therefore, we AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment to MetLife.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### In the Matter of Roland Cody, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 883]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered April 16, 2013) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Garni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21834]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10889]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,711]

Cadmus Communications, Easton, MD; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 31, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by a state agency representative on behalf of workers of Cadmus 
Communications, Easton, Maryland.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of April 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10889 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
NO. 07-02-0075 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A APRIL 23, 2002

______________________________ AUGUSTINE TORRES, APP ELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 140 TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 93-416890; HON ORABLE JIM B OB DAR NELL, JUD GE

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. Appellant Augustine Torres was convicted of th e offen se of b urglary of a habitation after a plea of guilty and sentenced toten years confinem ent in the Institutional Division of the Departm ent of Crim inal Justice, probated for ten years. On a pplication by the State, his comm unity super vi sion was su bsequently revoked, and his original sentence was imposed. Appellant gave notice of appeal from that ju dgmen t.However, appellant has now filed a m otion to dismiss his appeal, w hich he has

signed. Because th e m otion m eets th e requirem ents of Rule of A ppellate P rocedure 42.2(a), and this court has not de livered its dec ision prio r torec eivin g it, them otio n is hereby granted and the appeal is dism issed. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no m otion for rehearing will be entertained, and our m andate will issue forthwith.
John T. Boyd Chief Justi ce Do not publish.
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors4 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of thePartnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.

In connection with the quarterly report of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, SLI Acquisition Corp., Spectrum Europe B.V. and Spectrum
Chromatography (collectively, the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Brian A. Watts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2002.

/s/ Brian A. Watts
-------------------------------------
Brian A. Watts
Chief Financial Officer
Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0616 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANTHONY THOMAS DISHON ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including April 1 2 , 202 3 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 2 2023

03/02/2023
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GALAXIAS MARITIME, LTD.,

Appellant,

v.

MORAN YACHT & SHIP, INC., & MORAN YACHT MANAGEMENT, INC. 

d/b/a Moran Yacht Management, LLC, d/b/a 

Moran Yacht Management, Ltd., 

Appellees.

No. 4D16-1777

[August 3, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Dale Ross, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-033025 (08).

Albert L. Frevola, Jr. of Conrad & Scherer, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellant.

Gregory G. Olsen of Morgan, Olsen & Olsen, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN, and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<CIK> 0000318819
<NAME> R. D. SIEVERS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,839,020
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    111,454
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         202,989
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       278,548
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  49,747
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,481,758
<COMMON>                                       100,383
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      342,507
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            739,134
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,182,024
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           79,075
<PREFERRED>                                     17,928
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,894,298
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             230,410
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   21,053
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,056,970
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,481,758
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      481,980
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            36,143
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     316,443
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     352,586
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        129,394
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,520
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 131,914
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        75,264
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,650
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,992
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   54,658
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        32,767
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       72,112
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          91,121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.68
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 29, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

REVISED JULY 10, 2006

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-60552

Summary Calendar

_____________________

RICHARD JOHN FLORANCE, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee

---------------------

Appeal from the United States Tax Court 

(11782-03 and 18209-03)

---------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Proceeding pro se, Petitioner-Appellant Richard John Florance,

Jr. appeals adverse rulings of the United States Tax Court. We

note that, in addition to rulings against Florance on all

substantive issues, the Tax Court imposed sanctions grounded

primarily in the frivolousness of his cases and the actions he took

in prosecuting them. Now, in addition to seeking our affirmance of

the Tax Court in all respects, Respondent-Appellee Commissioner of
Internal Revenue asks us to impose sanctions against Florance for

bringing a frivolous appeal.

Based on our review of the record on appeal, including the

rulings and reasoning of the Tax Court and its imposition of

sanctions, the operative facts, the appellate briefs of the

parties, and the technical revision by the Tax Court of its earlier

ruling, we conclude that the Tax Court correctly held in favor of

the Commissioner on all substantive matters as well as on

sanctions, and that Florance’s contentions there, as here, are

wholly without merit. 

Turning to sanctions for a frivolous appeal, the Commissioner

has clearly made a case for their imposition, and Florance has

failed to file a response or opposition thereto. Noting the

sanctions already imposed by the Tax Court, and further noting that

Florance is before us pro se, we decline to assess further monetary

penalties. We do, however, order the Clerk of this Court to refuse

to accept for filing any further pleadings or other instruments

received from Florance or on his behalf without first obtaining the

authorization of a judge of this court. 

AFFIRMED; ORDER ISSUED PROHIBITING FUTURE FILINGS.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Mass Hysteria Entertainment Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Grodnik, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(b)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 15, 2011





/s/ Daniel Grodnik


Daniel Grodnik


President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
CHARWOMAN INTERRUPTED AGAIN

(For Ella Watson, From, American Gothic)

Jason Reynolds

and so when you were posed,

inched into the center ofthe frame

like a heavy sculpture, woman

chiseled from workday,

and when the question came of

whether or not you could turn

the broom upside-down,the detritus

of a good guh’mentjob dancing

on the straw head, and when

the mop was placed behind you looking

on like a jealous white girl,

backdrop blurred, bars of american rag,

stitched-on star-shaped peepholes, light

shining in from some future

where my grandma would beg

forthe same job nottoo farfrom you

so she wouldn’t have to keep going

allthe way to silver spring to put

elbow grease to miss barbara’s baseboards, 

did you think,

who is this little man with this camera

telling me to stand,telling me to smile

or not smile,telling me to act normal

and poised? don’t he know you can’t

raise five kids without poise? that’s my normal.

don’t he know I gotfive kids to raise

and they won’t wantto hear nothing

about no modeling or even care or question

why someone would wantto make art of char?

don’t he know I got a job to do?

and on the off chance you were not posed,

on the off chance he came into the building,

body and lens swinging from his neck

afterthe suits and hard shoes had made their way

back to theirfamilies forroast chicken

and smalltalk about FDR, and spotted you,

alone and perfect atthe top ofthe steps,

tell me, please tell me, he found you

with that broom offthe floor,

beating beating beating dust outthe flag.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
                                ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and to the
use of our report dated February 11, 2005, except for notes 20 and 21 which are
as of May 5, 2005, included in the Registration Statement on Form F-4 and
related Prospectus of Stantec Inc. dated May 9, 2005.


Edmonton, Canada,                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
May 9, 2005.                                               Chartered Accountants
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18 - 0474 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ANDREW LEWIS ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including May 28 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 21 2020

04/21/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0474