alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.4
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated December 1, 2006 (the "Pooling and
Servicing Agreement") by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
Securities Corp., as Depositor, LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee,
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Paying Agent, Midland Loan Services, Inc., as Master
Servicer No. 1, Capmark Finance Inc., as Master Servicer No. 2, Wachovia Bank,
National Association, as Master Servicer No. 3 and LNR Partners, Inc., as
Special Servicer

JPMCC 2006-LDP9


I, Susan K. Chapman, a Vice President of LNR Partners, Inc. as Special Servicer
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, on behalf of the Special Servicer
and not in my individual capacity, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under the
   Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the period ending the end of the
   fiscal year 2007 (the "Reporting Period") and the Special Servicer's
   performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my
   supervision; and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has
   fulfilled its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all
   material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


LNR PARTNERS, INC.



By: /s/ Susan K. Chapman
Susan K. Chapman
Vice President
#### Joseph ZIADEH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GREGORY POOLE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-6398.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 18, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 27, 2006.

Joseph Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se.

Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. *54459(e) motion to alter or amend the district court’s previous order dismissing his civil complaint as malicious under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Ziadeh v. Gregory Poole Equip. Co.,*No. 3:05-cv-00777-RLW (E.D.Va. Feb. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
THIRD QUARTER 10QSB (SEPT. 31, 1995) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995             SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         539,716                 539,716
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,801,044               1,801,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                   488,302                 488,302
<INVENTORY>                                    598,714                 598,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,673,923               3,673,923
<PP&E>                                       2,515,264               2,515,264
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,765,121               1,765,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,772,704               4,772,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,085,671               1,085,671
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<COMMON>                                        44,415                  44,415
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,947,802               2,947,802
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,772,704               4,772,704
<SALES>                                        878,317               3,131,765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               878,317               3,131,765
<CGS>                                          600,828               2,040,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  600,828               2,040,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               849,785               2,824,049
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                 213,070
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (572,296)             (1,732,847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0               (319,758)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (572,296)             (1,413,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (572,296)             (1,413,089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)                   (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)                   (.34)
        
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1996
<CASH>                                         67,649
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,568,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                   50,000
<INVENTORY>                                    3,523,598
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,328,189
<PP&E>                                         3,439,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                 967,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 54,641,131
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,219,076
<BONDS>                                        26,825,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       222,977
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,444,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   54,641,131
<SALES>                                        6,044,321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,412,027
<CGS>                                          4,269,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,269,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               454,661
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,320
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             475,995
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                78,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                   45,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            48,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      (274,248)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (225,389)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Drury J. Gallagher, the
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: June 8, 2004


                                        By: /s/ Drury J. Gallagher
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Drury J. Gallagher
                                            Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Treasurer
#### N.C. State Bar v. Brewer

Case below: 183 N.C. App.-(15 May 2007)

No. 288P07

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-815)

Denied 10/11/07
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21828]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,580]


Sipco, Incorporated, Meadville, PA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on March 12, 2009 in response to a petition 
filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Sipco, 
Incorporated, Meadville, Pennsylvania.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of April 2009.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10880 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS

The following information is provided to assist donors in making gifts via wire transfer to the

National Gallery of Art.

Wire transfers should be delivered to: 

Truist

ABA # 061000104 

Foundation & Endowments

303 Peachtree Street, 15th Floor

Atlanta, GA 30303

For credit to the National Gallery of Art 

Account # 206708343 

To ensure the donor is properly credited, please complete the attached gift information form, 

including: 

• Name of the donor(s)

• Purpose of the gift and any known restrictions

• Amount transferred

Please return the completed form either by e-mail to the Development Office at giving@nga.gov

or by mail to ensure prompt acknowledgement to the donor. 

Mailing address: National Gallery of Art 

Development Office 

2000 South Club Drive 

Landover, MD 20785 

If you have any questions, please contact the Development Office at (202) 842-6372.
NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART

Name of donor(s):____________________________________________________________ 

Purpose of gift: ______________________________________________________________ 

For wire transfers: 

Amount transferred:____________________________________________________ 

Date of transfer:________________________________________________________ 

For stock transfers:

Name(s) of securities transferred:_________________________________________

Number of shares of the securities transferred:______________________________

Approximate value of the securities transferred:_____________________________ 

If there are questions about this gift, please contact: 

Name: ___________________________________

Phone:___________________________________ 

E-mail:___________________________________

Brokerage (if applicable): ____________________

Please return this form to the National Gallery of Art at: 

E-mail: giving@nga.gov 

Mail: National Gallery of Art 

Development Office 

2000 South Club Drive 

Landover, MD 20785
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andrew Goldstein, Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 687]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered on or about November 2, 2006, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Lippman, PJ., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

RULE13a-14(d) Certification

 

I,In-Young Chase, certify that:

 

1.     	Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. 	     Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     	Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.     	Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, andexcept as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”)as successor in interest to Bank of America, National Association (“BANA”), of SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1, has fulfilledits obligations under the servicing agreement, which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1; and

 

5.      	Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordancewith Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S.Bank as successor-in-interest to BANA and its officers and agents.

 

 

By:	/s/In-YoungChase	

Name:	In-YoungChase
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2610 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2610

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2023

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to specify certain 
   registration statement contents for emerging growth companies, to 
     permit issuers to file draft registration statements with the 
  Securities and Exchange Commission for confidential review, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGISTRATION STATEMENTS.

    Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 
78l(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(K), by striking ``years,'' and 
        inserting ``years (or, in the case of an emerging growth 
        company, not more than the two preceding years),''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
``Any issuer may confidentially submit to the Commission a draft 
registration statement for confidential nonpublic review by the staff 
of the Commission prior to public filing, provided that the initial 
confidential submission and all amendments thereto shall be publicly 
filed with the Commission not later than 10 days before listing on a 
national securities exchange. Notwithstanding any other provision of 
this title, the Commission shall not be compelled to disclose any 
information provided to or obtained by the Commission pursuant to this 
subsection. For purposes of section 552 of title 5, this subsection 
shall be considered a statute described in subsection (b)(3)(B) of such 
section 552. Information described in or obtained pursuant to this 
subsection shall be deemed to constitute confidential information for 
purposes of section 24.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
From: The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. CLIFTON SPAIN, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-90-9211 DECISION

On January 27, 2009, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence as follows: Count I: A commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years for the offense of Accountability for Forgery, a felony; and Count II: A commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years, for the offense of Accountability for Theft, a felony, to run consecutively with Count I.

On May 7, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 7th day of May, 2009.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.
#### In the Matter of The Professional Career Center, Inc., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[964 NYS2d 271]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 7, 2011, which assessed the Professional Career Center, Inc. for additional unemployment insurance contributions.

As the result of an audit, the Commissioner of Labor determined that the Professional Career Center, Inc., which offers licensing and continuing education courses to real estate salespersons, brokers and appraisers, was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions based upon remuneration paid to teachers. That determination was sustained upon administrative review, prompting this appeal.

“A determination identifying professional workers as employees will be upheld if substantial evidence in the record *1220demonstrates that the employer had control over important aspects of the services performed, even if the workers retain control over their work product and the means of crafting it” *(Matter of Viig [Hello World Language Ctr., Inc.—Commissioner of Labor],*66 AD3d 1064, 1065 [2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; *see Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assoc. [Roberts],*60 NY2d 734, 736 [1983]). Here, Career Center concedes that the instructors are integral to its operation. Furthermore, the evidence establishes that Career Center hires the instructors after ascertaining that they have the required state qualifications, pays them, and oversees the quality of the instructors based upon student evaluations. Career Center also recruits the students; collects tuition; sets the class schedules; provides the classrooms, books and some equipment; provides substitute instructors when necessary; and maintains responsibility for ensuring that the curriculum meets state standards. Together, these factors constitute substantial evidence that an employer-employee relationship exists, notwithstanding the existence of a consulting agreement identifying teachers as independent contractors *(see Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assoc. [Roberts],*60 NY2d at 736-737; *Matter of Piano School of N.Y. City [Commissioner of Labor],*71 AD3d 1358, 1359 [2010]; *Matter of Viig [Hello World Language Ctr., Inc.—Commissioner of Labor],*66 AD3d at 1065).

Rose, J.E, Spain, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
EX-10.04C



 





Exhibit 10.04c




MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

RETIREMENT PLAN




Amendment No. 3 to GUST Restatement




     Pursuant to Section 11.1, the Plan is amended, effective March 28, 2005, by deleting current
Section 5.2(b) and substituting in its place the following:




     Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, if a Participant has
terminated employment and the present value of his Accrued Benefit under this Plan
is $5,000 or less, this present value shall be distributed under the terms of this
Section 5.2(b) in lieu of all benefits to which the Participant is otherwise
entitled under this Plan. Effective March 28, 2005, cashouts of benefits having a
present value of more than $1,000 but $5,000 or less shall be permitted only after
such time (but no later than December 31, 2005) as the Company has established
rollover IRAs for mandatory cashouts. At such time as the rollover IRAs are
available, if the present value of a Participant’s nonforfeitable Accrued Benefit
is more than $1,000 but $5,000 or less, and he fails to elect to have his benefit
paid in cash or transferred to an IRA of his own designation, his entire
nonforfeitable Accrued Benefit shall be paid automatically to a rollover IRA of
the Company’s designation. If a Participant terminates participation in the Plan
at a time when the present value of his nonforfeitable Accrued Benefit
attributable to Company contributions is $1,000 or less, the present value of his
entire nonforfeitable Accrued Benefit shall be paid to him automatically in cash.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officer to execute this
amendment on its behalf this 29th day of March, 2005.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Catherine D’Amico
 	 
	 	 	Title: Executive Vice President — Chief Financial Officer