alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 33.8

[logo]                                                     Wells Fargo Bank, NA
                                                           Document Custody
                                                           1015-10th Avenue SE
                                                           Minneapolis, MN 55014


          ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as
follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding
any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the
"Platform").

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities
performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 (the "Period").

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation
AB.

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.



                                         WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION

                                         By: /s/ Shari Gillund

                                         Its: Senior Vice President

                                         Dated: February 28, 2008
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132629 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132629 COA: 270439 Wayne CC: 01-011952-03 EFRAIM GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 28, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d0416 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 24, 2007

Clerk
##### 



ENVOY COMMUNICATIONS GROUP INC.
RENEWS NORMAL COURSE ISSUER BID
 TORONTO, ON  August 19, 2005 
    About Envoy
 www.envoy.to
 Cautionary Statement




---



##### 



info@envoy.to
EXHIBIT 32.2










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification set forth below is hereby
made solely for the purposes of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied
upon or used for any other purposes.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Abeona Therapeutics Inc. and will be retained by Abeona Therapeutics Inc. and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon its request.



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company
Accounting Reform and Investor Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), Stephen B. Thompson,
Vice President Finance of the Company hereby certifies that to his knowledge the report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2015 of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period specified.



Signed at the City of Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 14th day
of August, 2015.



|/s/ Stephen B. Thompson                    | 
|------------------------------------------ | 
|Stephen B. Thompson                        | 
|Vice President Finance                     | 
|Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1613]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the Foreign-Trade Zones Board Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) has considered the application (filed 07/23/2008) submitted by the North Carolina Department of Commerce (NCDOC), grantee of FTZ 57, Charlotte, North Carolina, requesting reissuance of the grant of authority for said zone to the Charlotte Regional Partnership, Inc. (CRP), a non-profit organization, which has accepted such reissuance subject to approval by the FTZ Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest.

                        Therefore, the Board approves the application and recognizes the Charlotte                               ( print page 21623)                            Regional Partnership, Inc. (CRP) as the new grantee of Foreign Trade Zone 57, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                     

Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of April 2009.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

[FR Doc. E9-10800 Filed 5-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Robert Bauman et al., Appellants, v Debra Maynard et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[974 NYS2d 818]

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered August 20, 2012. The judgment, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs’ complaint following a nonjury trial.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court. Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Garni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Allen KOKOSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-7471.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 24, 2006.

Michael Allen Kokoski, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, Office of the United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael Allen Kokoski seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his Rule 60(b) motion and denying his motion to quash, as well as other related motions. Kokoski sought to reopen the proceedings brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Kokoski has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Kokoski’s motion for oral argument. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

*DISMISSED.*

*

 To the extent Kokoski may be seeking authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, we deny authorization.
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




LETTER OF AGREEMENT




by and between




The INTERNATIONAL UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS

LOCAL 302




and




NW BIOTHERAPEUTICS (Tenant)



This Letter of Agreement between IUOE Local 302 (Landlord) and NW Biotherapeutics (Tenant) is
for an extension of the Lease Agreement due to expire on June 30, 2007.



IUOE Local 302 agrees to extend the current lease with no changes for a period of six (6) months
beginning July 1, 2007, and ending December 31, 2007. All prior provisions of the lease shall
remain in effect.



Agreed to this day of May 31, 2007




	 	 	 
	NW BIOTHERAPEUTICS

	 	INTERNATIONAL UNION

OF OPERATING ENGINEERS,

LOCAL 302
#### Richard Joseph CRANE, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. M. GONZALES, Correctional Officer; et al., Defendant—Appellees.

No. 05-15279.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2009.*

Filed May 26, 2009.

Richard Joseph Crane, Soledad, CA, pro se.

Monica Noella Anderson, Esq., AGCA— Office of the California Attorney General (SAC), Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Richard Joseph Crane, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s application of substantive law de novo and its factual determinations for clear error, *Wyatt v. Terhune,*315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Crane’s action because he did not complete the prison grievance process prior to filing suit, and failed to demonstrate that he was obstructed from doing so. *See Woodford v. Ngo,*548 U.S. 81, 93-95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (holding that “proper exhaustion” under § 1997e(a) is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules); *see also McKinney v. Carey,*311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (requiring inmates to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit in federal court).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
2010 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-22-2010

Daniel Ramos-Olivieri v. Atty Gen USA

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 09-2558

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2010 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Daniel Ramos-Olivieri v. Atty Gen USA" (2010). 2010 Decisions. Paper 328.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2010/328
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

October 22, 2010

No. 09-2558

DANIEL O. RAMOS-OLIVIERI,

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent

(B.I.A. No. A095-833-985 )

Present: SLOVITER, BARRY and SMITH, Circuit Judges

1. Respondent’s Motion to Publish the Court’s Opinion dated 09/17/10.

Respectfully,

Clerk/cjg

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion is GRANTED. 

By the Court,

/s/Maryanne Trump Barry 

Circuit Judge

Dated: October 22, 2010

CJG/cc: Lauren Anselowitz, Esq.

 Anthony P. Nicastro, Esq.

 Joanna L. Watson, Esq.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from SHELTER
PROPERTIES  II 2000 First  Quarter  10-QSB and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000319723
<NAME>                                SHELTER PROPERTIES II
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    1,425
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               183
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   26,887
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (18,207)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           11,164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                   8,037
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                2,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             11,164
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          1,564
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,263
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                301
<EPS-BASIC>                                               10.84 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 33.3

**Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**

Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (the "**Asserting Party**") is responsible for assessing compliance as of June 30, 2007 and for the period from February 27, 2007 (date of issuance of the Medallion Trust Series 2007-1G) through June 30, 2007 (the "**Reporting Period**") with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the "**CFR**"), except for criteria 229.1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv) in the CFR, which theAsserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing of the Medallion Trust Series 2007-1G asset-backed securitization transaction backed by housing loan receivables and serviced by the Asserting Party (the "**Applicable Servicing Criteria**"). The sole asset-backed securitization transaction covered by this report is the Medallion Trust Series 2007-1G.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Medallion Trust Series 2007-1G asset-backed securitization transaction backed by housing loan receivables serviced by the Asserting Party.

KPMG, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the Asserting Party’s assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 Date:  3 September 2007

 

By:  Perpetual Trustee Company Limited

 

/s/ Chris Green               Name:    Chris Green, General Manager, Debt Markets,               Perpetual Trustee Company Limited
#### Arrowhead Capital Finance, Ltd., Respondent, v Seven Arts Pictures PLC et al., Appellants.

[972 NYS2d 899]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J), entered June 22, 2012, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment and granted in part plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly determined that plaintiff junior lender’s action is not barred by the limitation on law suit provisions contained in its agreement with non-party senior lender. The first of those provisions allows suit where the senior lender has been paid in full. Defendants debtors entered into an agreement, which although denominated as an “assignment” of the loan, provided that the senior lender would be “deemed” paid in full in exchange for payment of nearly all that was owed. Accordingly, it would torture the subordination agreement to construe it as continuing to bar plaintiff from bringing suit on the junior note *(see Perry v Bankers’ Life Ins. Co.,*47 App Div 567, 570 [1900], *affd*167 NY 607 [1901]; *see also In re Innovative Communication Corp.,*2010 WL 1728536, *9-10, 2010 Bankr LEXIS 1141, *29-30 [D VI, Apr. 27, 2010, No. 07-30012 (JKF)] [where a party pays creditor for “assignment” of own debt, it is an accord and satisfaction of the debt]). Once the senior lender was paid off, the junior lender was not required to obtain its consent to sue. The purpose of the consent was to protect the senior creditor’s seniority in all assets of the defendants. Following repayment of the debt, there was no remaining purpose for this condition *(see*Restatement [Second] of Contracts § 261). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman and *515Clark, JJ. [Prior Case History: 36 Misc 3d 1205(A), 2012 NY Slip Op 51195(U).]
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inter-Atlantic Financial, Inc. (the
Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge:(1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
  /s/  Andrew LernerAndrew LernerChief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
The Seventy-third Season of

The William Nelson Cromwell and F. Lammot Belin

Concerts

National Gallery ofArt 

3,050th concert

United States Army Band “Pershing’s Own

Music by John Philip Sousa and other composers

May 3, 2015

Sunday, 3:30 pm

West Building, Mall Entrance