alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.5

             Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Gallatin Steel Company

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Gallatin Steel Company as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Gallatin Steel Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

                                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Louisville, Kentucky
January 17, 2005
AMENDMENT


EXHIBIT 4.2

 

AMENDMENT

TO THE

PROMISSORY NOTE DATED MARCH 8, 2005

TO HARMEL S. RAYAT







AMENDMENT dated January 18, 2006 (the “Note Amendment”) to that certain Promissory Note dated March 8, 2005 (the “Note”), issued by Hepalife Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), to Harmel S. Rayat, in the original principal amount of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000), the original executed copy of which is attached hereto.




1.

Amendment to Note.  In accordance with the terms and provisions of Section 4(a) of the Note, the Note is hereby amended as follows:




(a)  By deleting section 1 thereof and substituting the following in lieu thereof:




1.  Payment.  (a)  The Outstanding Principal balance of the Note, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon shall be paid by the Company to the Holder, at the address as provided to the Company by the Holder in writing, in lawful money of the United States of America upon the earlier to occur of:




(1)  The occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in Section 2 of the Note), which occurrence shall be deemed written demand by the holder for payment of the note; or




(2)  The Company’s receipt of written demand for payment from the Holder.




(b)  Interest shall accrue with respect to the unpaid principal amount of the loan from the date of this Note until such principal is paid at a rate of eight and one-half percent (8.50%) per annum (computed on the basis of a 365-day year).




(c)  Company shall have the right at any time and without penalty to prepay, in whole or in part, the principal outstanding and/or the interest accrued hereunder.”







2.

Balance of provisions of Note to Remain Unchanged and in Force and Effect.  Except as amended by Section 1 of this Note Amendment, all of the other terms and provisions of the Note remain unchanged and in full force and effect.




3.

Binding Effect; Assigns.  This Note Amendment and all of the provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Holder, his successors and assigns.




4.

Governing Law.  This Note Amendment and the validity, interpretation and performance of the terms and provisions hereof shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Florida, without regard to the principles of conflicts of laws.











5.

Headings.  The headings used in this Note Amendment are for convenience of  reference only and shall not be construed to affect the meaning or construction of any of the provisions hereof.




6.

Entire Amendment.  This Note Amendment constitutes the entire amendment of the Note, and supersedes all prior agreements and undertakings, both written and oral, between the Company and the Holder with respect to such specific subject matter.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Note Amendment to be executed this 18th day of January, 2006.







Hepalife Technologies, Inc.




By

/s/ Arian Soheili

Name:

Arian Soheili

Title:

Secretary and Treasurer
`
 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-KSB of Exclusive Apparel, Inc. for the Year Ended December 31, 2007, I, Sharon M. Lynch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Exclusive Apparel, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

     1.   Such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

     2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exclusive Apparel, Inc.

 

Dated:  September 23, 2008

 

EXCLUSIVE APPAREL, INC.

 

 

By: */s/ Sharon M. Lynch*

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 
`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000319697
<NAME> BULL RUN CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         166,854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,957,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,288,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,479,223
<PP&E>                                       3,589,638
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,259,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,841,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,811,856
<BONDS>                                     32,156,795
<COMMON>                                       223,097
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,550,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,841,482
<SALES>                                     17,842,461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,685,108
<CGS>                                       12,812,383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,812,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,186,226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,397
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,512,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,365,552
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,215,890
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,821,948
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (295,322)
<CHANGES>                                    (274,248)
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,252,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000319697
<NAME> BULL RUN CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         312,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,803,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,464,815
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,829,160
<PP&E>                                       3,486,004
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,119,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,639,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,336,353
<BONDS>                                     25,212,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          223,094
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,684,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,639,942
<SALES>                                     11,854,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,224,165
<CGS>                                        8,421,391
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,421,391
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               836,999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (3,676)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             988,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,503)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   315,553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            341,753                  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (274,248)
<NET-INCOME>                                    67,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       45,080,944
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   4,779,216
<MORTGAGE>                                   9,281,050
<REAL-ESTATE>                                7,986,419
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              75,805,064
<CASH>                                         982,887
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       4,614,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             129,432,015
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             76,126,538
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 782,079
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,867,880
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             11,585,378
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,826,294
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,490,941
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               129,432,015
<PREMIUMS>                                   3,014,874
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          3,712,179
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              98,099
<OTHER-INCOME>                               9,094,299
<BENEFITS>                                   3,387,429
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    593,054
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                840,258
<INCOME-TAX>                                   194,331
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            645,927
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   645,927
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Donald Edward LEGGETT, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 09-6080.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 23, 2009.

Decided: May 5, 2009.

Donald Edward Leggett, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appel-lee.

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Edward Leggett appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See United States v. Leggett,*No. 7:01-cr-00037-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 6, 2009) (noting that Leggett’s designation as a career offender precluded relief). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
##### 



FORM 6-K  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer
 Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the month of November 2005
 Commission File Number: 00-30082
 Envoy Communications Group Inc.
 172 John Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 1X5
  þ o
    o þ
    Signatures
  Envoy Communications Group Inc.
(Registrant)By:
    /s/ Geoffrey B. GenoveseName:
    Geoffrey B. GenoveseTitle:
    President, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Press release on restructuring.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tara Gravino, Appellant.

Submitted August 17, 2009;

decided August 27, 2009

Reported below, 62 AD3d 1259.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Kathleen P Reardon, Esq., 40 Humboldt Street, Rochester, New York 14609 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### In the Matter of Liarah H., a Child Alleged to be Neglected. Dora S., Appellant; Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 389]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Douglas E. Hoffman, J.), entered on or about December 24, 2012, which, upon a fact-finding determination of neglect, placed the child with petitioner until the completion of the next permanency hearing, unanimously affirmed, insofar as it brings up for review *515the fact-finding determination, and the appeal therefrom otherwise dismissed as moot, all without costs. Appeal from fact-finding order, same court (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about August 29, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the order of disposition.

The finding of neglect against respondent mother is supported by a preponderance of the evidence. Although referred for substance abuse and mental services, the mother failed to attend, citing a lack of a substance abuse problem, although she admitting to smoking marijuana, but “not all the time” in her daughter’s presence, and drinking to the point of black out on a recent occasion. Further, on that occasion, the mother became so intoxicated that she was psychiatrically hospitalized for an “alcohol induced mental disorder.” A single incident in which a parent’s “judgment was strongly impaired and the child exposed to a risk of substantial harm” can sustain a finding of neglect (see *Matter of Isaiah M. [Antoya M.],*96 AD3d 516, 517 [1st Dept 2012]).

We reject the mother’s contention that she did not neglect the child on the occasions when she used drugs or alcohol, because she provided proper supervision by leaving her daughter with others, including her maternal grandmother. However, the record indicates that the child was present on some occasions. Further, the maternal grandmother had a history of yearly psychiatric hospitalizations resulting from failure to take her medications *(see Matter of Messiah T. [Karen S.],*94 AD3d 566 [1st Dept 2012]).

The agency also showed, by a preponderance of the evidence, that if the “child were released to the mother there would be a substantial probability of neglect” that would place the child at risk, since the then 18-year-old mother testified that she herself had been diagnosed with bipolar disorder at age 12 or 13 years old, and had ceased taking any medication to treat it. Further, the record establishes that the mother had been hospitalized twice for suicide attempts *(see Matter of Kazmir*K., 63 AD3d 522 [1st Dept 2009]; *Matter of Messiah T.,*94 AD3d at 566). Since the consequences of the proceedings are temporary rather than permanent, “the absence of a diagnosed condition does not preclude a finding of neglect,” and expert testimony was not required *(see Matter of Danielle M.,*151 AD2d 240, 243 [1st Dept 1989]; *Matter of Jonathan S. [Ismelda S.],*79 AD3d 539 [1st Dept 2010]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Gische, JJ.
#### Wendy Goldin et al., Appellants, v Engineers Country Club et al., Respondents.

Submitted June 22, 2009;

decided September 8, 2009

Reported below, 54 AD3d 658.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal against defendant Engineers Country Club, dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,723]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 1, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Eagle Compressor, Hickman, Kentucky.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of April 2009.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10921 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3802 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3802

To amend the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 to 
expand the county organized health insuring organizations authorized to 
                     enroll Medicaid beneficiaries.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 to 
expand the county organized health insuring organizations authorized to 
                     enroll Medicaid beneficiaries.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF AUTHORIZED COUNTY MEDICAID ORGANIZED HEALTH 
              INSURING ORGANIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 9517(c)(3) of the Consolidated Omnibus 
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (42 U.S.C. 1396b note), as added by 
section 4734 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 and as 
amended by section 704 of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits 
Improvement and Protection Act of 2000, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``, in the case of 
        any health insuring organization described in such subparagraph 
        that is operated by a public entity established by Ventura 
        county, and in the case of any health insuring organization 
        described in such subparagraph that is operated by a public 
        entity established by Merced county'' after ``described in 
        subparagraph (B)''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``14 percent'' and 
        inserting ``16 percent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00367]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE & TIME:  Thursday, January 15, 2015 At 10:00 a.m.

PLACE:  999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS:  This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
Correction and Approval of Minutes for December 11, 2014
Correction and Approval of Minutes for December 17, 2014
Welcome and Opening Remarks by Chair Ann M. Ravel
2015 Meeting Dates (July-December)
Draft Advisory Opinion 2014-19: ActBlue
Draft Advisory Opinion 2014-20: Make Your Laws PAC, Inc.
Management and Administrative Matters

    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-
1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shelley E. Garr,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-00367 Filed 1-8-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### In the Matter of Pamela I.S., Respondent, v Edmund O.E., Appellant.

Submitted March 30, 2009;

decided May 5, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.