Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 12, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 22093 

Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) AE 3007A–A– 

72–367, Revision 1, dated April 7, 2009, or 

use paragraphs 2.A through 2.M.(8) of RRC 

Service Bulletin (SB) AE 3007A–72–368, 

Revision 1, dated April 6, 2009, to perform 

the inspections. 

TABLE 1—COMPLIANCE TIMES FOR ECI OR SWUT INSPECTION OF THE HPT STAGE 2 WHEELS BY CYCLES-SINCE-NEW

(CSN) 

For HPT stage 2 wheels with CSN on the effective date of 

this AD: Remove or inspect: 

17,500 or more ............................................................................. Before the next flight. 

15,560 to 17,499 .......................................................................... Within 75 cycles-in-service (CIS). 

15,000 to 15,559 .......................................................................... Within 150 CIS. 

14,700 to 14,999 .......................................................................... Within 200 CIS. 

14,000 to 14,699 .......................................................................... Within 250 CIS. 

13,580 to 13,999 .......................................................................... Within 450 CIS. 

12,460 to 13,579 .......................................................................... Within 600 CIS. 

Installation Prohibition 

(g) After the effective date of this AD, don’t 

return to service, any HPT stage 2 wheel that 

was installed in any RRC AE 3007A series 

turbofan engine removed from service as a 

result of paragraph (f) of this AD unless the 

HPT stage 2 wheel has passed an inspection 

specified in RRC ASB AE 3007A–A–72–367, 

Revision 1, dated April 7, 2009 or RRC SB 

AE 3007A–72–368, Revision 1, dated April 6, 

2009. 

Removal From Service 

(h) After the effective date of this AD, 

remove from service any HPT stage 2 wheel 

covered by this AD that has accumulated 

22,500 CSN. 

(i) After the effective date of this AD, don’t 

install any HPT stage 2 wheel that has 22,500 

or more CSN. 

Credit for Previous Inspections 

(j) HPT stage 2 wheels already inspected 

and passed using RRC ASB AE 3007A–A–72– 

367, Revision 1, dated April 7, 2009, or 

earlier issue; or RRC SB AE 3007A–72–368, 

Revision 1, dated April 6, 2009, or earlier 

issue, meet the requirements for the initial 

inspections specified in paragraph (f) of this 

AD. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(k) The Manager, Chicago Aircraft 

Certification Office, has the authority to 

approve alternative methods of compliance 

for this AD if requested using the procedures 

found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Special Flight Permits 

(l) Under 14 CFR part 39.23, we are 

limiting the special flight permits for this AD 

by restricting the flight to essential flight 

crew only. 

Related Information 

(m) Contact Kyri Zaroyiannis, Aerospace 

Engineer, Chicago Aircraft Certification 

Office, Small Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

2300 E. Devon Ave., Des Plaines, IL 60018; 

e-mail: kyri.zaroyiannis@faa.gov; telephone 

(847) 294–7836; fax (847) 294–7834, for more 

information about this AD. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(n) You must use the service information 

specified in Table 2 of this AD to perform the 

inspections required by this AD. The Director 

of the Federal Register approved the 

incorporation by reference of the documents 

listed in Table 2 of this AD in accordance 

with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You 

can get a copy from Rolls-Royce Corporation, 

P.O. Box 420, Indianapolis, IN 46206; 

telephone (317) 230–3774; fax (317) 230– 

8084; e-mail: indy.pubs.services@rollsroyce.com. You may review copies at the 

FAA, New England Region, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http:// 

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

TABLE 2—INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

Rolls-Royce Corporation service information No. Page Revision Date 

Alert Service Bulletin AE 3007A–A–72–367 ...................................................................... ALL ........ 1 April 7, 2009. 

Total pages: 6 

Service Bulletin AE 3007A–72–368 ................................................................................... ALL ........ 1 April 6, 2009. 

Total pages: 22 

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

May 4, 2009. 

Peter A. White, 

Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–11126 Filed 5–11–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0120; Airspace 

Docket No. 09–ACE–2] 

Establishment of Class E Airspace; 

Rushville, NE 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class 

E airspace at Rushville, NE. Controlled 

airspace is necessary to accommodate 

Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard 

Instrument Approach Procedures 

(SIAPs) at Modisett Airport, Rushville, 

NE. The FAA is taking this action to 

enhance the safety and management of 

Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations 

at Modisett Airport. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, August 

27, 2009. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under 1 CFR Part 51, 

subject to the annual revision of FAA 

Order 7400.9 and publication of 

conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Enander, Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd, Fort 


erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES
22094 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 12, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

Worth, TX 76137; telephone (817) 321– 

7716. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On March 2, 2009, the FAA published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

proposed rulemaking to establish Class 

E airspace at Rushville, NE, adding 

controlled airspace at Modisett Airport, 

Rushville, NE. (74 FR 9053, Docket No. 

FAA–2009–0120). Interested parties 

were invited to participate in this 

rulemaking effort by submitting written 

comments on the proposal to the FAA. 

No comments were received. Class E 

airspace designations are published in 

paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9S 

signed October 3, 2008, and effective 

October 31, 2008, which is incorporated 

by reference in 14 CFR Part 71.1. The 

Class E airspace designations listed in 

this document will be published 

subsequently in the Order. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by 

establishing Class E airspace at 

Rushville, NE, adding controlled 

airspace at Modisett Airport, Rushville, 

NE, for the safety and management of 

IFR aircraft operations. 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the agency’s 

authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it adds 

controlled airspace at Modisett Airport, 

Rushville, NE. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

Part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E. O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR Part 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

signed October 3, 2008, and effective 

October 31, 2008, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface 

* * * * * 

ACE NE E5 Rushville, NE [New] 

Rushville, Modisett Airport, NE 

(Lat. 42°44′12′′ N., long. 102°26′40′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 7.3-mile 

radius of Modisett Airport. 

* * * * * 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on April 24, 

2009. 

Roger M. Trevino, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. E9–10989 Filed 5–11–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

19 CFR Part 361 

[Docket Number: 090416682–9683–01] 

Mexican Cement Import Licensing 

System 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule; removal of 

regulations. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

is removing its Mexican Cement Import 

Licensing (‘‘MCILS’’) regulations 

currently published at 19 CFR Part 361. 

This action is being taken pursuant to 

provisions of the Agreement Between 

the Office of the United States Trade 

Representative and the Department of 

Commerce of the United States of 

America and the Ministry of Economy 

of the United Mexican States (Secretaria 

de Economia) on Trade in Cement 

(‘‘Cement Agreement’’), signed March 6, 

2006. The Cement Agreement was 

terminated at 11:59 p.m. on March 31, 

2009. Accordingly, the MCILS will no 

longer be necessary. 

DATE: Effective Date: May 12, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sally C. Gannon, (202) 482–0162 or 

Judith Wey Rudman, (202) 482–0192. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 

6, 2006, the Office of the United States 

Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) and the 

United States Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Commerce’’) entered into an 

agreement with the Secretaria de 

Economia of Mexico pertaining to 

imports of gray portland cement and 

clinker from Mexico (‘‘Mexican 

Cement’’). The Cement Agreement 

provided for the settlement or 

suspension of ongoing litigation before 

North American Free Trade Agreement 

and World Trade Organization panels 

challenging various antidumping duty 

determinations involving Mexican 

Cement. Pursuant to the terms of the 

Cement Agreement, on February 28, 

2007, Import Administration (‘‘IA’’) 

issued a rule to add new regulations 

implementing the MCILS. This rule 

required all importers of cement from 

Mexico covered by the scope of the 

Cement Agreement to obtain an import 

license from the Department prior to 

completing their U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection entry summary 

documentation. IA used the information 

recorded via the MCILS to monitor 

compliance with the Cement 

Agreement. The Cement Agreement also 

provided that if all interested parties 

had abided by its terms, Commerce 

would terminate the Cement Agreement 

on March 31, 2009, and would revoke 

the underlying antidumping duty order. 

All obligations of the Cement 

Agreement were fulfilled; therefore, 

Commerce has terminated the Cement 

Agreement, and revoked the underlying 

antidumping duty order through a 

notice entitled Gray Portland Cement 

and Clinker from Mexico: Final Results 

of Changed-Circumstances Review, 


erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES