alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The use of cameras or recording equipment during the 

performance is not allowed. Please be sure that cell phones, 

pagers, and other electronic devices are turned off.

Music Department

National Gallery of Art

Sixth Street and Constitution Avenue nw

Washington, DC

www.nga.gov

Concerts are made possible in part through the generosity ofdonors

to the National Gallery ofArt through The Circle. Reserved seating is

available in recognition oftheir support. Please contact the development 

office at (202) 842-6450 or circle@nga.gov for more information.

The Seventy-second Season of

The William Nelson Cromwell and F. Lammot Belin

Concerts

National Gallery ofArt

3,010th Concert

Bahamas National Youth Choir

Cleophas R. E. Adderly, founder and director

July 14, 2014

Monday, 3:30 pm

West Building, West Garden Court

Admissionfree
Program

The choir will perform selections from its 2014 tour repertoire, which

includes music by Cleophas R. E. Adderly, Duke Ellington, Moses Hogan,

and other composers.

The Musicians

BAHAMAS NATIONAL YOUTH CHOIR

Founded in 1983 to mark the tenth anniversary of Bahamian independence,

the Bahamas National Youth Choir sings in twenty-four languages, has produced nine commercial recordings, performed in twenty-two countries on

four continents, and researched and documented much ofthe folk music

ofthe Bahamas. Among the prestigious venues in which the ensemble has

sung are the Barbican and Oxford University Playhouse in England, Beijing 

Symphony Hall, the Kennedy Center, the Moscow Conservatory, Notre

Dame Cathedral in Paris, the Royal Swazi Theater and Convention Center

in Swaziland, Saint Peter’s Basilica in Rome, and Weill Recital Hall in New

York City. Frequently featured on television in the Bahamas, the Choir has

appeared in special broadcasts on the national networks of Canada, China,

Cuba, Mexico, Russia, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

CLEOPHAS R. E. ADDERLY

Founder and director ofthe Bahamas National Youth Choir Cleophas R. E.

Adderly is an attorney and executive director of national musical heritage and

research at the Bahamanian Ministry ofYouth, Sports, and Culture. A composer as well as a conductor, Adderly has written Our Boys, the first opera to 

have originated in the English-speaking Caribbean, and the first Bahamian

concert mass, Missa Caribe. Among his numerous other compositions are

works for choir, piano, pipe organ, and voice as well as incidental music for the

theater. A founding board member ofthe National Art Gallery ofthe Bahamas

in Nassau, Adderly also serves on that country’s Antiquities, Monuments, and

Museums Board; National Cultural Heritage Commission; Charitable Arts 

Foundation; and Harry C. Moore Memorial Scholarship in the Arts Committee.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harold H., Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 292]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pickett, J.), rendered December 19, 2011, convicting him of robbery in *652the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant’s assigned counsel pursuant to *Anders v California*(386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.],*89 AD3d 252 [2011]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Angiolillo, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ, concur.
EX-33.3
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January
1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 ("the Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code
of Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party ("the Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report include all loans
for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting
Party served as the commercial tax service provider (the "Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party
has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the
Platform taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.


FIRST AMERICAN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.


/s/ Scott R. Friberg
Scott R. Friberg
Chief Operations Officer
February 22, 2008
Exhibit
32.3











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Elise Nissen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.













/s/
      Elise NissenElise
      NissenChief
      Financial OfficerExecutive
      Vice President of Finance





Date:
November 19, 2008






30
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
(the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Donald Rabinovitch,
Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Donald
      RabinovitchDonald
      RabinovitchPresidentCo-Chief
      Executive Officer





Date: May
14, 2009








34
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Skyview Development Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  March 28, 2008              By:   /s/ Donald R. McKelvey
        --------------                    ----------------------
                                          Donald R. McKelvey, President
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated:  March 28, 2008              By:   /s/ Donald R. McKelvey
        --------------                    ----------------------
                                          Donald R. McKelvey
                                          Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of New Century Companies, Inc. (the Company), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2005 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


November  14, 2005                 /s/ David Duquette
                                   ----------------------------------------
                                   Name:  David Duquette
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to New Century
Companies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or
its Staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      15,803,741
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               41,071,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,984,319
<INVENTORY>                                 53,183,749
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           123,559,588
<PP&E>                                      13,470,832
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,731,107
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             194,875,948
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,953,148
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    976,755
<COMMON>                                       145,029
<OTHER-SE>                                 133,530,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               134,652,122
<SALES>                                     47,748,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,748,359
<CGS>                                       32,972,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,972,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,879,039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (19,367)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                967,229
<INCOME-TAX>                                   386,892
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            580,337
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   580,337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
The Sixty-eighth Season of

The William Nelson Cromwell and F. Lammot Belin

Concerts

National Gallery ofArt

2,769th Concert

National Gallery of Art Brass Quintet

Presented in honor ofAfrican American History Month

February 17, 2010

Wednesday, 12:10pm

East Building Auditorium

Admissionfi'ee
Program

Music by Duke Ellington, Scott Joplin, and other composers.

The musicians will announce their selections from the stage.

Next Week at the National Gallery ofArt

Miceal O’Rourke, pianist

Stephen Ackert, narrator

Music by Debussy

February 21, 2010

Sunday, 6:30 pm

East Building Auditorium

_* _

Harold Jones, flutist

Peter Vinograde, pianist

Music by Chaminade, Perkinson, McDaniel, and other composers

February 24, 2010

Wednesday, 12:10 pm

West Building Lecture Hall
National Gallery ofArt

NGA Brass Quintet

February 17, 2010
2. Bouree Rondo, arr. Robert King 1:34

3. Bach: Fugue in G Minor 2:53

4. Stefano Danaudy: Aria 1 2:50

5. Samuel Schytte: Syntony no. 5, first movement 3:58

6. Elam Ray Sprenkle: from CrossingBrooklyn Ferry, ’’Interlude” 2:05

7. Scott Joplin: The Entertainer 1:56

8. Duke Ellington:

Satin Doll

Mood Indigo

Take the A Train 8:15

9. George Gershwin: Summertime 2:32

10. Lew Pollack: That’s a Plenty 1:50

11. Frank Loesser: “IfI were a Bell” from Guys and Dolls 2:28
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Cecil Adams and Maxine Adams v. Harris County, Texas

, Relator s
Appellate case number: 01

- 1 6

- 0 0 760

- C V

Trial court case number: 20 1 4

- 35653

Trial court: 157 th District Court of H a rri s County

On December 29, 2016, this Court’s Order had directed appellants to pay for the reporter’s record within 30 days of that order or else this Court would set the briefing schedule without it. On February 6 , 201 7
, appellants

, Cecil and Maxine Adams, proceeding pro se, filed a “Motion to Stay Appeal Pending Ruling on Mandamus Relief in Cause No. 01

- 16

- 00405

- CV.” Appellants state that they filed an “Amended Request for Emergency En Banc Motion for Reconsideration and Emergency Notice of Intent to File Writ of Mandamus to the Supreme Court of Texas

, ” also on February 6, 2017, in 01

- 16

- 00405

- CV . Appellants claim that a stay is needed because if this Court grants their amended motion and petition, that would render this appeal moot. This Court has not ye t determined whether to permit the amended motion or to request a response from the real parties in interest in 01

- 16

- 00405

- CV. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.2, 49.6

. However, appellants ’ motion for a stay does not identify the need to stay this appeal pending this Court’s resolution of the ir amended motion

. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the appellants ’ motion to stay

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10 (a), (b). Because the appellants filed this motion partly in response to this Court’s December 29, 2016 Order, appella nts are ORDERED to pay for the reporter’s record and file evidence of payment with this Court within 1 0 days of the date of this order . If appellants fail to comply with this Order, this Court will proceed without the reporter’s record and set the briefing schedule. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c)(1), (2), 42.3(b), (c). It is so ORDERED. Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn Keyes X Acting ind ividually  Acting for the Court Date: February 14, 2017
**Exhibit 10.18**

**AMENDMENT**

**TO**

**WABCO HOLDINGS INC. SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN**

**WHEREAS**, WABCO Holdings Inc. (the“Company”) adopted the WABCO Holdings Inc. Supplemental Savings Plan (the “Plan”); 

**WHEREAS**, the Board ofDirectors of the Company reserves the right to amend the Plan; and 

**WHEREAS**, the Board of Directors of the Company has determinedthat it is in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to amend the Plan on the terms set forth herein. 

**NOW, THEREFORE,**the Plan shallbe amended as follows, effective as of December 31, 2008: 

1. The Plan shall be amended to add a definition of “Specified Employee” asfollows: 

“For purposes of this Plan, ‘Specified Employee’ shall have the meaning set forth in Treas. Reg.Section 1.409A-1(i), except that ‘compensation’ shall be defined using the rule provided in Treas. Reg. Section 1.415(c)-2(g)(5)(ii).” 

2. All other terms of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

**IN WITNESS THEREOF**, the Company has caused its nameto be signed by its duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.
______________________AURORA LOAN SERVICES_________________________
Owner:
None
Depositor:
Structured Asset Securities Corporation

Attention: Mortgage Finance SASCO 2007-BC2

745 7th Ave, 7th Floor

New York, NY 10019
Master Servicer:   Aurora Loan Services
Michele Olds

10350 Park Meadows Drive

Littleton, CO 80124
Trustee:
US Bank, N.A.

Structured Finance / SASCO 2007-BC2

One Federal Street, 3rd Floor

Boston, Massachusetts 02110
Securities Administrator:

Subject:
Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:
2007
Investor Code:
H03
Investor Name:
SASCO 2007-BC2
I, Terry Gentry, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year 2007: 1.    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on the cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2007 (the reporting period) and of its performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision. 2.     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout such reporting period.



Certified by:  AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC









By:   /s/ Terry L. Gentry






Name:  Terry L. Gentry






Title:    Managing Director
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-51322 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DUNOIS DEE T. BEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-98-CR-2-2

- - - - - - - - - - October 26, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Dunois “Dee” T. Beman appeals from his sentence following resentencing for conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine and aiding and abetting the manufacture of methamphetamine. He argues that his sentence is invalid pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because it was based upon the district court’s determination of drug quantity and such quantity was neither submitted to a jury nor found beyond a reasonable doubt.No. 00-51322 -2- This court has declined to apply Apprendi when a sentence is enhanced within the statutory range based upon a drug-quantity finding. United States v. Keith , 230 F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1163 (2001) ; United States v. Doggett , 230 F.3d 160, 166 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1152 (2001); United States v. Meshack , 225 F.3d 556, 575-77 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied sub nom. , Parker v. United States , 531 U.S. 1100 (2001), amended on reh’g , 244 F.3d 367 (5th Cir. 2001). Beman concedes that his sole argument on appeal is foreclosed by this court’s precedent, but he urges this court to reconsider the issue. The above-cited cases are binding on this court. See United States v. Ruff , 984 F.2d 635, 640 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
exv10w7



 





Exhibit 10.7




DESCRIPTION OF

ZIX CORPORATION 2007 MANAGEMENT VARIABLE COMPENSATION PLAN




     The Company’s 2007 Management Variable Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) provides for variable
compensation to be paid to certain Company employees, based upon the achievement by December 31,
2007 relative to the metrics listed below. A total of $554,000 is available for payment under the
Plan. A total of nine employees are eligible to participate in the Plan, as of May 3, 2007.



Achievement of Plan based on performance in these full-year business areas:



Secure Messaging — New First Year Orders



Core Product Revenue Growth



Number of New Healthcare Payors for the Company’s e-prescribing Service



New Physicians Sponsored by Healthcare Payors



Cumulative Active Physician Precribers



Script Volume Per Quarter (by Q4)



Non-restricted Cash Balance as of December 31, 2007
#### L’Hommedieu *et al. v.*The Mischief.1

*(District Court, E. D. New York.*

July 12, 1889.)

Collision—Vessel at Anchor—Lights.

The steam-tug Q. had taken a tow up Hunter’s Point creek, and, having landed it in a proper place on the shore, was lying along-side the tow, stern down the creek, without lights, and with over 100 feet of clear water outside of her. In the early morning the tug M. came up the creek and ran into the Q., doing the damage sued for. The M. claimed that the absence of lights on the Q. was the cause of the collision. *Held,*that under the circumstances the Q. was not required to have a light, and the M. was responsible for the collision.

In Admiralty. Action by Samuel L’Hommedieu and others for damages by collision.

*Wing, Shoudy & Putnam,*for libelants.

*Alexander & Ash,*for claimants.

1

Reported by Edward G. Benedict, Esq., of the New York bar.

Benedict, J.

This is an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by the steam-tug Quickstep in a collision with the steam-tug Mischief, which occurred in Newtown creek, above the first bridge, on the morning of the 8th of December, 1887. The evidence shows that early in the morning, and before light, the Quickstep had taken a tow up the creek. She landed her tow on the Hunter’s Point side of the creek, above the first bridge, at a proper place, and at the time of the collision was lying still along-side of the boats, with her stern down the river. She had no lights. While so lying, the Mischief, having got under way below the bridge, passed up the creek near the Hunter’s Point side, and struck the Quickstep in her stem, doing the damage sued for. The collision occurred early in the morning. The testimony leaves it somewhat in doubt as to whether, at the time of the collision, there was not light enough to enable the Mischief to see the Quickstep in time to avoid her. Some evidence is to the effect that it was light enough to see a man on the other side of the creek, which was there some 282 feet wide. The only fault on the part of the Quickstep charged by the answer which deserves consideration is that she had no light. I am not aware of any statute which required her to have a light, under the circumstances,—not being in motion, but moored along-side other vessels attached to the shore of Newtown creek, and with over 100 feet of clear water outside of her. Nor can I find that an absence of light on the Quickstep caused the collision. The pilot of the Mischief himself testifies that he saw the Quickstep, but *511thought she was far enough out in the river for him to go inside of her, and so he changed his course to pass between her and the Hunter’s Point side. He immediately discovered his mistake, but it was too late to enable him to swing the other way before reaching the Quickstep. His fault consisted in changing his course, instead of stopping his boat as soon as the Quickstep was discerned, and this fault caused the collision. Let a decree be entered for the libelant, with an order of reference.