alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,625]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 18, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers of Delphi Thermal Systems, Auburn Hills, Michigan.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Therefore, the investigation under this petition has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of April 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10883 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
From: The District Court of the 18th Judicial District. County of Gallatin.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. VICTORIA PEHRINGER, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-07-44A DECISION

On February 11, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of Theft of Property lay Embezzlement, Common Scheme, a felony. The Court recommends that the Defendant be required to complete the Passages Treatment Program and the Re-Entry Program as a condition of parole.

On October 9, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Kris Copenhaver. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division recently obtained a copy of Judge John Brown’s Reasons for Sentencing. A copy of the reasons was given to counsel, Kris Copenhaver at the time of the hearing. Ms. Copenhaver requested that the hearing be continued until the next set of hearings in order to have time to discuss and review the reasons and the case with the defendant.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the application for review of sentence shall be continued ■until the next set of hearings in April 2010.

Done in open Court this 9th day of October, 2009.

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.
From: The District Court of the 13th Judicial District. County of Yellowstone.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. STEVEN WHITE CLOUD, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-08-142 DECISION

On September 2, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, with two (2) years suspended, for the offense of Robbery, a felony.

On February 12,2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 12th day of February, 2009.

DATED this 27th day of February, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3752

___________

Yoram Raz, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Robert M. Mueller, Director, United * Western District of Arkansas.

States Department of Justice; United *

States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

----------------------------------------

Yoram Raz, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

United States of America, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 7, 2007

Filed: February 9, 2007

___________

Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1

The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas.

-2-

Yoram Raz challenges the adverse judgment entered by the district court1

 after

a bench trial on Raz’s claims based on the FBI’s alleged campaign of surveillance and

harassment of him. For reversal, Raz argues the district court abused its discretion in

limiting essential discovery, in limiting evidence, and in refusing to sanction the

opposing parties. Following careful review, we find no abuse of the district court’s

discretion with regard to these matters, and we affirm for the reasons cited in the

district court’s thorough memorandum opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Sculpture Garden Rules

Alcoholic beverages may not be brought in to the

Sculpture Garden but may be purchased at the cafe.

Do not touch the works of art unless it is

indicated that you may do so.

Do not ride bicycles or use in-line skates 

and skateboards in the Sculpture Garden.

No pets other than service animals are allowed.

Music Department

National Gallery of Art

Sixth Street and Constitution Avenue nw

Washington, DC

www.nga.gov

Concerts are made possible in part through the generosity

of donors to the National Gallery of Art through The Circle.

Reserved seating is available in recognition of their support.

Please contact the development office at (202) 842-6450

or circle@nga.gov for more information.

COVER! Raoul Dufy, Music and the Pink Violin, 1952, oil on canvas,

National Gallery of Art, Washington, Collection of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Mellon

National Gallery of Art

Sculpture Garden Sunday Concerts

12:00 and 1:00 pm

September 7

The United States Air Force Strings

(French and American program)

September 14

Ricardo Marlow and Ensemble (flamenco)

September 21

The Seldom Scene (bluegrass)

September 28

National Gallery of Art Wind Ensemble

(Bach and Beethoven)
Program

The United States Air Force Band

Colonel Larry H. Lang, Commander and Conductor

The United States Air Force Strings

Captain David Alpar, conductor

with MUC Emily Dickson, harpist

Presented in honor of Degas/Cassatt

Gabriel Faure (1845-1924)

Overture to Masques et Bergamasques (1909-1910)

Claude Debussy (1862-1918)

Danse sacree et Danse profane (1904)

George Whitefield Chadwick (1854-1931)

Serenade for Strings in F Major (1890)

September Concerts in the Sculpture Garden are made

possible by support from Barbara A. Spangenberg

The Degas/Cassatt exhibition is made possible 

by a generous grant from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.

in celebration of its 100th Anniversary.

Program Notes

One of six musical ensembles that comprise the United States Air

Force Band, the Air Force Strings consists of twenty active-duty

Airmen musicians performing a wide range of musical styles. The

ensemble often entertains audiences at high-level military and

government events and appears regularly at civilian ceremonial

functions, education outreach events, and public concerts in the

metropolitan Washington area.

The Air Force Strings collaborates in today's performance of

Debussy's Danse sacree et Danse profane with harpist Emily Dickson,

a member of The United States Navy Band. She has also performed

with the Dallas Wind Symphony, National Gallery Orchestra, Naval

Academy Band, and United States Air Force Band. Active in promoting music education for young people, Dickson teaches early

childhood music classes and serves as vice president of her local

parent-teacher association.

Noting the affinity and cross-influence between the Frenchman

Edgar Degas and the American artist Mary Cassatt, Captain Alpar

and the Air Force Strings have selected music by French and American composers who were influential when those artists flourished.

Located in Galleries 72-76 in the West Building, Degas/Cassatt

remains on view until October 5, 2014.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                                 HOLLINGER INC.

                           APPOINTMENT OF NEW AUDITOR

     Toronto, Canada, March 5, 2004 -- Hollinger Inc. ("Hollinger") (TSX: HLG.C;
HLG.PR.B; HLG.PR.C) announced today that its board of directors has appointed
Zeifman & Company, LLP, Chartered Accountants, as its auditors effective March
5, 2004. Zeifman & Company, LLP will be auditing and reporting on the annual
financial statements of Hollinger for the year ended December 31, 2003. Zeifman
& Company, LLP is the twelfth largest public accounting firm in Canada and an
affiliate of SC International, a network of independent public accounting firms
in principal cities throughout the world.

     Hollinger's principal asset is its approximately 72.4% voting and 30.0%
equity interest in Hollinger International Inc. Hollinger International is a
global newspaper publisher with English-language newspapers in the United
States, Great Britain, and Israel. Its assets include The Daily Telegraph, The
Sunday Telegraph and The Spectator and Apollo magazines in Great Britain, the
Chicago Sun-Times and a large number of community newspapers in the Chicago
area, The Jerusalem Post and The International Jerusalem Post in Israel, a
portfolio of new media investments and a variety of other assets.

<TABLE>
<S>                                        <C>
Media contact:                             For more information, please contact:
Jim Badenhausen                            Fred A. Creasey
646-805-2006                               416-363-8721
</TABLE>

                              www.hollingerinc.com
#### Ninotchka J. Manus, Appellant, v Leonard N. Flamm, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 39]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2012, which, upon reargument, *526granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the first, second, and third causes of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The complaint alleges that defendant committed legal malpractice while representing plaintiff in a replevin action brought against her in October 1998 by nonparty Family M. Foundation, Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation formed by the late Allen Manus, plaintiffs former husband.

The first cause of action, which alleges that defendant was negligent in failing to assert certain defenses or move to dismiss the complaint in the replevin action, is belied by the seventh and eighth affirmative defenses, which assert that the loan agreement imposed no personal liability on plaintiff.

The second cause of action alleges that plaintiff “felt compelled” to sign the stipulation of settlement in the replevin action, which converted a $1,000,000 obligation from the corporation to her into a $400,000 obligation from her to the corporation. However, plaintiffs obligation arose in the context of the loan agreement she executed, not the stipulation of settlement. The stipulation did not impose personal liability on plaintiff for the debt created under the loan agreement; it merely directed that her shares in her cooperative apartment be substituted for her jewelry as collateral for the loan.

The third cause of action alleges that, but for defendant’s insistence that the corporation’s president and sole director, Elizabeth (Libby) Manus, had to execute the corporation’s release of plaintiffs obligations to it and that Allen Manus’s execution of the release would not be sufficient, Allen Manus would have signed the release and plaintiff would have been free of her obligations under the stipulation. However, this Court has found that the action by the corporation to enforce the stipulation upon plaintiffs default was properly maintained under Libby Manus’s authority *(see Family M. Found. Ltd. v Manus,*71 AD3d 598 [1st Dept 2010], *lv dismissed*15 NY3d 819 [2010]). Even assuming that Allen Manus, who held a power of attorney for the corporation, was authorized to release plaintiffs obligations to the corporation, Libby Manus’s refusal to sign the release would have revoked his authority *(see Zaubler v Picone,*100 AD2d 620, 621 [2d Dept 1984]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SECOND
QUARTER 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            2345
<SECURITIES>                                      5050
<RECEIVABLES>                                    22304
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4655
<INVENTORY>                                       8274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 38175
<PP&E>                                           17756
<DEPRECIATION>                                   12086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   45148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             6096
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       (15185)
<OTHER-SE>                                       54171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     45148
<SALES>                                          35263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 35263
<CGS>                                             8970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     8970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 18160
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1099
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8666
<INCOME-TAX>                                      3337
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               5329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>
664 A.2d 495

#### IN THE MATTER OF FRANK FORD, III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 27, 1995.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on June 6,1995, recommending that FRANK FORD, III, of BROWNS MILLS, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, and who was thereafter suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years effective January 6, 1992, and who remains suspended at this time, be disbarred for his conduct in a number of matters, including violation of the recordkeeping provisions of *Rule*1:21-6, *RPC*1.1(a) (gross neglect), *RPC*1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), *RPC*1.3 (failure to act with reasonable diligence), *RPC*1.4(a) (failure to communicate with a client), *RPC*1.15(b) (failure to deliver promptly to client or third person funds the client or third person is entitled to receive), *RPC*1.16(b) and *RPC*8.4(d) (failure to comply with a fee arbitration award) and *RPC*8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities),

And respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause in this matter;

*468And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and FRANK FORD, III, is hereby disbarred, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that FRANK FORD, III, be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by FRANK FORD, III, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6, be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that FRANK FORD, III, comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that FRANK FORD, III, reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Neurological Sciences Training Initial Review Group; NST-1 Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         May 11-12, 2009.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Tuscan Inn, 495 Jefferson Street, San Francisco, CA 94109.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Raul A. Saavedra, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC; 6001 Executive Blvd., Ste. 3208, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-9223,                         *saavedrr@ninds.nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: May 4, 2009.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. E9-10803 Filed 5-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
****

Exhibit 35.1

 

[U.S. Bank National AssociationLetterhead]

 

**Annual Statement of Compliance**

SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1

 

VIA: EMAIL

 

MS Structured Asset Corp.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

Reference is made to theTrust Agreement (the “Agreement”), between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle BankNational Association, as Trustee, for SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1, dated March 1, 2007, together with Schedules I, II and III attachedthereto, and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements, between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle BankNational Association, as Trustee dated April 13*,* 2006. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meaningsdefined in the Trust Agreement and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements.

 

I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice Presidentof U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger toLaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Trustee underthe Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Trustee has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.

 

 

Capitalized terms used but not defined hereinhave the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

 

 

Date: March 8, 2018

 

U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interestto Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee

 

 

 

By: /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs 

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President