1624 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Notices 

metrics determination. Several 

demographic questions and coverage 

probes are included in this test to 

combine with results from other recent 

testing opportunities to achieve optimal 

coverage for decennial censuses and 

surveys. 

The specific goal for the Non-ID 

Processing research is to continue 

evaluating enhancements to the Census 

Bureau’s process to collect address 

information needed for real-time 

matching and geocoding of Non-ID 

responses. Testing enhancements to 

Non-ID processing will inform planning 

for the 2020 Census design, as well as 

the infrastructure required to support 

large scale, real-time processing of 

electronic Non-ID response data 

submitted via the Internet or a Censusprovided questionnaire application 

designed for mobile devices. 

The goal of the advertising and 

outreach component of the Savannah 

site Test is twofold; first, we are 

supporting the entire OSR test by 

educating respondents and motivating 

self-response in an effort increase 

response rates. Secondarily, this is our 

first opportunity to evaluate the effects 

of new advertising media on response 

rates. Specifically we are interested in 

assessing digital and targeted digital 

advertising, mediums the Census 

Bureau did not employ in the 2010 

Census but that are now available due 

to the evolution of technology. Results 

of this test will inform additional tests 

and will help the Census Bureau begin 

planning for the 2020 Census 

communications campaign. 

The data collected from households 

and individuals during the 2015 Census 

Test will be used to research and 

evaluate new methodologies and 

systems to plan the 2020 Census. The 

Census Bureau will not publish any 

tabulations or population estimates 

using the results from this test. 

However, methodological papers may be 

written that include summary tallies of 

response characteristics or problems 

identified, and responses may be used 

to inform future research studies 

building upon the results of these tests. 

The Census Bureau plans to make the 

evaluation results of this study available 

to the general public. 

In the Maricopa County site, where 

the Census Bureau will conduct NRFU, 

the 2015 Census Test is designed to 

collect information to: 

• Research the cost and quality 

impacts of differing approaches to 

removing workload from the NRFU 

universe through the use of 

administrative records information. 

• Research the cost and quality 

impacts of new NRFU contact strategies 

that make use of adaptive design and a 

re-engineered management structure 

employing an Area Operations Support 

Center housed at the Regional Office, 

automated payroll, automated training, 

and minimal face-to-face contact 

between enumerators and supervisors. 

For these experimental panels 

enumerators also provide work-time 

availability in advance, and the system 

assigns them the optimal number of 

cases to attempt each day, as well as the 

routing they should employ. 

We are continuing our research on 

differing approaches to removing 

workload from the NRFU universe. In 

one approach we will remove all cases 

(both occupied and vacant) from the 

NRFU workload when we have 

administrative records data for the 

address. In a second approach we will 

make one contact attempt (for those 

cases considered occupied based on 

administrative records) before removing 

them from NRFU. The goal is to 

determine how these approaches vary 

regarding costs and quality measures. 

Results from both of these alternative 

strategies will be compared to a control 

panel that will conduct NRFU 

operations similar to how it was done in 

the 2010 Census. The testing will also 

obtain detailed data on when and how 

enumerators use proxy respondents. 

The Census Bureau will conduct an 

additional NRFU data collection activity 

in the Maricopa site with enumeratorowned commercially provided mobile 

devices. The use of employee owned 

equipment/services is commonly 

referred to as ‘‘Bring Your Own Device’’ 

or BYOD. After selecting enumerators 

for this study, a sample of up to 5,000 

households will be contacted at the end 

of the NRFU field operation using this 

methodology. These will be additional 

households not included in the other 

test activities (e.g., the self-response 

phase). The objectives of this 

component of the test are to: 

• Design, develop, deploy, and 

support secure software solutions that 

can be installed on employee’s 

personally owned commercially 

available mobile devices; 

• Conduct interviews of respondents 

using these employee owned mobile 

devices; and 

• Capture lessons learned for future 

operations, including: focus groups with 

a sub-set of the respondents, 

questionnaires for the enumerators, and 

collecting feedback from the local 

census office. 

Focus groups also will be conducted 

in the Maricopa site to ask respondents 

about their experiences with the 2015 

Census Test. Respondents will be 

recruited into groups with regard to 

their treatment and demographic 

characteristics (e.g., age, education). For 

example, respondents will be recruited 

into one of the groups of 8–12 

participants by age and education as 

well as whether they were NRFU 

respondents or non-respondents. 

Participants also will be asked about 

their general concerns with government 

collection and protection of confidential 

data. For the Nonresponse Follow-up 

groups only, we will ask participants 

their reactions to enumerators using 

personal devices when conducting 

Census interviews. At the end of the 

focus groups, we will be asking 

participants for whom we have acquired 

additional data to verify whether this 

information is accurate. 

All focus groups will be tape-recorded 

to facilitate a summary of the results. 

Participants will be asked to sign 

consent forms and give permission to be 

recorded. All participants will be 

informed that their response is 

voluntary and that the information they 

provide is confidential. Respondents 

will receive a $75 stipend after the focus 

group concludes. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Frequency: One time. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13, United 

States Code, Sections 141 and 193. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. 

Follow the instructions to view 

Department of Commerce collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov or fax to (202)395–5806. 

Dated: January 8, 2015. 

Glenna Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00321 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Patent and Trademark Office 

[Docket No.: PTO–P–2014–0064] 

Extension of the Extended Missing 

Parts Pilot Program 

AGENCY: United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO) 

implemented a pilot program (Extended 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Notices 1625 

Missing Parts Pilot Program) in which 

an applicant, under certain conditions, 

can request a 12-month time period to 

pay the search fee, the examination fee, 

any excess claim fees, and the surcharge 

(for the late submission of the search fee 

and the examination fee) in a 

nonprovisional application. The 

Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program 

benefits applicants by permitting 

additional time to determine if patent 

protection should be sought—at a 

relatively low cost—and by permitting 

applicants to focus efforts on 

commercialization during this period. 

The Extended Missing Parts Pilot 

Program benefits the USPTO and the 

public by adding publications to the 

body of prior art, and by removing from 

the USPTO’s workload those 

nonprovisional applications for which 

applicants later decide not to pursue 

examination. The USPTO is extending 

the Extended Missing Parts Pilot 

Program until December 31, 2015, to 

better gauge whether the Extended 

Missing Parts Program offers sufficient 

benefits to the patent community for it 

to be made permanent. The 

requirements of the program have not 

changed. 

DATES: Duration: The Extended Missing 

Parts Pilot Program will run through 

December 31, 2015. Therefore, any 

certification and request to participate 

in the Extended Missing Parts Pilot 

Program must be filed before December 

31, 2015. The USPTO may further 

extend the pilot program (with or 

without modifications) depending on 

the feedback received and the continued 

effectiveness of the pilot program. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eugenia A. Jones, Senior Legal Advisor, 

Office of Patent Legal Administration, 

Office of the Deputy Commissioner for 

Patent Examination Policy, by telephone 

at (571) 272–7727, or by mail addressed 

to: Mail Stop Comments—Patents, 

Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 

1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–1450, 

marked to the attention of Eugenia A. 

Jones. 

Inquiries regarding this notice may be 

directed to the Office of Patent Legal 

Administration, by telephone at (571) 

272–7701, or by electronic mail at 

PatentPractice@uspto.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

December 8, 2010, after considering 

written comments from the public, the 

USPTO changed the missing parts 

examination procedures in certain 

nonprovisional applications by 

implementing a pilot program (i.e., 

Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program). 

See Pilot Program for Extended Time 

Period To Reply to a Notice to File 

Missing Parts of Nonprovisional 

Application, 75 FR 76401 (Dec. 8, 2010), 

1362 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 44 (Jan. 4, 

2011). The USPTO has previously 

extended the Extended Missing Parts 

Pilot Program. See Extension of the 

Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program, 

76 FR 78246 (Dec. 16, 2011), 1374 Off. 

Gaz. Pat. Office 113 (Jan. 10, 2012); 

Extension of the Extended Missing Parts 

Pilot Program, 78 FR 2256 (Jan. 10, 

2013), 1387 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 46 (Feb. 

5, 2013); Extension of Extended Missing 

Parts Pilot Program, 79 FR 642 (Jan. 6, 

2014), 1398 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 197 

(Jan. 28, 2014). 

The USPTO is further extending the 

Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program 

until December 31, 2015. The USPTO 

may further extend the Extended 

Missing Parts Pilot Program, or may 

discontinue the pilot program after 

December 31, 2015, depending on the 

results of the program. The 

requirements of the program, which 

have not been modified, are reiterated 

below. Applicants are strongly 

cautioned to review the pilot program 

requirements before making a request to 

participate in the Extended Missing 

Parts Pilot Program. 

The USPTO cautions all applicants 

that, in order to claim the benefit of a 

prior provisional application, the statute 

requires a nonprovisional application 

filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) to be filed 

within 12 months after the date on 

which the corresponding provisional 

application was filed. See 35 U.S.C. 

119(e). It is essential that applicants 

understand that the Extended Missing 

Parts Pilot Program cannot and does not 

change this statutory requirement. Title 

II of the Patent Law Treaties 

Implementation Act of 2012 (PLTIA) 

amended the provisions of title 35, 

United States Code, including 35 U.S.C. 

119(e), to implement the Patent Law 

Treaty (PLT). See Public Law 112–211, 

§§ 20–203, 126 Stat. 1527, 1533–37 

(2012). In the rulemaking to implement 

the PLT and title II of the PLTIA, the 

Office provided that an applicant may 

file a petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b) to 

restore the benefit of a provisional 

application filed up to fourteen months 

earlier. See Changes To Implement the 

Patent Law Treaty, 78 FR 62367, 62368– 

69 (Oct. 21, 2013) (final rule). Any 

petition to restore the benefit of a 

provisional application must include 

the benefit claim, the petition fee, and 

a statement that the delay in filing the 

subsequent application was 

unintentional. This change was effective 

on December 18, 2013, and applies to 

any application filed before, on, or after 

December 18, 2013. However, if a 

petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b) to restore 

the benefit claim of a prior provisional 

application is required, the application 

is not eligible for participation in the 

Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program. 

I. Requirements 

In order for an applicant to be 

provided a 12-month (non-extendable) 

time period to pay the search and 

examination fees and any required 

excess claims fees in response to a 

Notice to File Missing Parts of 

Nonprovisional Application under the 

Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program, 

the applicant must satisfy the following 

conditions: (1) The applicant must 

submit a certification and request to 

participate in the Extended Missing 

Parts Pilot Program with the 

nonprovisional application on filing, 

preferably by using Form PTO/AIA/421, 

titled ‘‘Certification and Request for 

Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program’’; 

(2) the application must be an original 

(i.e., not a Reissue) nonprovisional 

utility or plant application filed under 

35 U.S.C. 111(a) within the duration of 

the pilot program; (3) the 

nonprovisional application must 

directly claim the benefit under 35 

U.S.C. 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78 of a prior 

provisional application filed within the 

previous 12 months, and the specific 

reference to the provisional application 

must be in an application data sheet 

under 37 CFR 1.76 (see 37 CFR 

1.78(a)(3)); and (4) the applicant must 

not have filed a nonpublication request. 

As required for all nonprovisional 

applications, the applicant will need to 

satisfy filing date requirements and 

publication requirements. In the 

rulemaking to implement the PLT and 

title II of the PLTIA, the Office provided 

that an application (other than an 

application for a design patent) filed on 

or after December 18, 2013, is not 

required to include a claim to be 

entitled to a filing date. See Changes To 

Implement the Patent Law Treaty, 78 FR 

62367, 62638 (Oct. 21, 2013) (final rule). 

This change was effective on December 

18, 2013, and applies to any application 

filed under 35 U.S.C. 111 on or after 

December 18, 2013. However, if an 

application is filed without any claims, 

the Office of Patent Application 

Processing will issue a notice giving the 

applicant a two-month (extendable) 

time period within which to submit at 

least one claim in order to avoid 

abandonment (see 37 CFR 1.53(f)). The 

Extended Missing Parts Pilot Program 

does not change this time period. In 

accordance with 35 U.S.C. 122(b), the 

USPTO will publish the application 

promptly after the expiration of 18 

months from the earliest filing date for 

which benefit is sought. Therefore, the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1626 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Notices 

nonprovisional application should also 

be in condition for publication as 

provided in 37 CFR 1.211(c). The 

following are required in order for the 

nonprovisional application to be in 

condition for publication: (1) The basic 

filing fee; (2) the executed inventor’s 

oath or declaration in compliance with 

37 CFR 1.63 or an application data sheet 

containing the information specified in 

37 CFR 1.63(b); (3) a specification in 

compliance with 37 CFR 1.52; (4) an 

abstract in compliance with 37 CFR 

1.72(b); (5) drawings in compliance with 

37 CFR 1.84 (if applicable); (6) any 

application size fee required under 37 

CFR 1.16(s); (7) any English translation 

required by 37 CFR 1.52(d); and (8) a 

sequence listing in compliance with 37 

CFR 1.821–1.825 (if applicable). The 

USPTO also requires any compact disc 

requirements to be satisfied and an 

English translation of the provisional 

application to be filed in the provisional 

application if the provisional 

application was filed in a non-English 

language and a translation has not yet 

been filed. If the requirements for 

publication are not met, the applicant 

will need to satisfy the publication 

requirements within a two-month 

extendable time period. 

As noted above, applicants should 

request participation in the Extended 

Missing Parts Pilot Program by using 

Form PTO/AIA/421. For utility patent 

applications, the applicant may file the 

application and the certification and 

request electronically using the USPTO 

electronic filing system, EFS-Web, and 

selecting the document description of 

‘‘Certification and Request for Missing 

Parts Pilot’’ for the certification and 

request on the EFS-Web screen. Form 

PTO/AIA/421 is available on the 

USPTO Web site at http://

www.uspto.gov/forms/aia0421.pdf. 

Information regarding EFS-Web is 

available on the USPTO Web site at 

http://www.uspto.gov/patents/ebc/

index.jsp. 

The utility application including the 

certification and request to participate 

in the pilot program may also be handcarried to the USPTO or filed by mail, 

for example, by Priority Mail Express®

in accordance with 37 CFR 1.10. 

However, applicants are advised that, 

effective November 15, 2011, as 

provided in the Leahy-Smith America 

Invents Act, a new additional fee of 

$400.00 for a non-small entity ($200.00 

for a small entity) is due for any 

nonprovisional utility patent 

application that is not filed by EFS-Web. 

See Public Law 112–29, § 10(h), 125 

Stat. 283, 319 (2011). This nonelectronic filing fee is due on filing of 

the utility application or within the twomonth (extendable) time period to reply 

to the Notice to File Missing Parts of 

Nonprovisional Application. Applicants 

will not be given the 12-month time 

period to pay the non-electronic filing 

fee. Therefore, utility applicants are 

strongly encouraged to file their utility 

applications via EFS-Web to avoid this 

additional fee. 

For plant patent applications, the 

applicant must file the application 

including the certification and request 

to participate in the pilot program by 

mail or hand-carried to the USPTO 

since plant patent applications cannot 

be filed electronically using EFS-Web. 

See Legal Framework for Electronic 

Filing System—Web (EFS-Web), 74 FR 

55200 (Oct. 27, 2009), 1348 Off. Gaz. 

Pat. Office 394 (Nov. 24, 2009). 

II. Processing of Requests 

If the applicant satisfies the 

requirements (discussed above) on filing 

of the nonprovisional application and 

the application is in condition for 

publication, the USPTO will send the 

applicant a Notice to File Missing Parts 

of Nonprovisional Application that sets 

a 12-month (non-extendable) time 

period to submit the search fee, the 

examination fee, any excess claims fees 

(under 37 CFR 1.16(h)–(j)), and the 

surcharge under 37 CFR 1.16(f) (for the 

late submission of the search fee and 

examination fee). The 12-month time 

period will run from the mailing date, 

or notification date for e-Office Action 

participants, of the Notice to File 

Missing Parts. For information on the eOffice Action program, see Electronic 

Office Action, 1343 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 

45 (June 2, 2009), and http://www.uspto.

gov/patents/process/status/e-Office_

Action.jsp. After an applicant files a 

timely reply to the Notice to File 

Missing Parts within the 12-month time 

period and the nonprovisional 

application is completed, the 

nonprovisional application will be 

placed in the examination queue based 

on the actual filing date of the 

nonprovisional application. 

For a detailed discussion regarding 

treatment of applications that are not in 

condition for publication, processing of 

improper requests to participate in the 

program, and treatment of 

authorizations to charge fees, see Pilot 

Program for Extended Time Period To 

Reply to a Notice to File Missing Parts 

of Nonprovisional Application, 75 FR 

76401, 76403–04 (Dec. 8, 2010), 1362 

Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 44, 47–49 (Jan. 4, 

2011). 

III. Important Reminders 

Applicants are reminded that the 

disclosure of an invention in a 

provisional application should be as 

complete as possible because the 

claimed subject matter in the later-filed 

nonprovisional application must have 

support in the provisional application 

in order for the applicant to obtain the 

benefit of the filing date of the 

provisional application. 

Furthermore, the nonprovisional 

application as originally filed must have 

a complete disclosure that complies 

with 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and is sufficient 

to support the claims submitted on 

filing and any claims submitted later 

during prosecution. New matter cannot 

be added to an application after the 

filing date of the application. See 35 

U.S.C. 132(a). In the rulemaking to 

implement the PLT and title II of the 

PLTIA, the Office provided that, in 

order to be accorded a filing date, a 

nonprovisional application (other than 

an application for a design patent) must 

include a specification with or without 

claims. See Changes To Implement the 

Patent Law Treaty, 78 FR 62367, 62369 

(Oct. 21, 2013) (final rule). This change 

was effective on December 18, 2013, and 

applies to any application filed under 

35 U.S.C. 111 on or after December 18, 

2013. Although a claim is not required 

in a nonprovisional application (other 

than an application for a design patent) 

for filing date purposes and the 

applicant may file an amendment 

adding additional claims as prescribed 

by 35 U.S.C. 112 and drawings as 

prescribed by 35 U.S.C. 113 later during 

prosecution, the applicant should 

consider the benefits of submitting a 

complete set of claims and any 

necessary drawings on filing of the 

nonprovisional application. This would 

reduce the likelihood that any claims 

and/or drawings added later during 

prosecution might be found to contain 

new matter. Also, if a patent is granted 

and the patentee is successful in 

litigation against an infringer, 

provisional rights to a reasonable 

royalty under 35 U.S.C. 154(d) may be 

available only if the claims that are 

published in the patent application 

publication are substantially identical to 

the patented claims that are infringed, 

assuming timely actual notice is 

provided. Thus, the importance of the 

claims that are included in the patent 

application publication should not be 

overlooked. 

Applicants are also advised that the 

extended missing parts period does not 

affect the 12-month priority period 

provided by the Paris Convention for 

the Protection of Industrial Property 

(Paris Convention). Accordingly, any 

foreign filings must, in most cases, still 

be made within 12 months of the filing 

date of the provisional application if the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Notices 1627 

applicant wishes to rely on the 

provisional application in the foreignfiled application or if protection is 

desired in a country requiring filing 

within 12 months of the earliest 

application for which rights are left 

outstanding in order to be entitled to 

priority. 

For additional reminders, see Pilot 

Program for Extended Time Period To 

Reply to a Notice to File Missing Parts 

of Nonprovisional Application, 75 FR 

76401, 76405 (Dec. 8, 2010), 1362 Off. 

Gaz. Pat. Office 44, 50 (Jan. 4, 2011). 

Dated: January 7, 2015. 

Michelle K. Lee, 

Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for 

Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of 

the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00372 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–16–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID: DoD–2014–OS–0084] 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense 

has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act. 

DATES: Consideration will be given to all 

comments received by February 12, 

2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Licari, 571–372–0493. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title, Associated Form and OMB 

Number: Joint Services Support (JSS) 

System; OMB Control Number 0704– 

XXXX. 

Type of Request: New Collection. 

Number of Respondents: 12,000. 

Responses per Respondent: 1. 

Annual Responses: 12,000. 

Average Burden per Response: 10 

minutes. 

Annual Burden Hours: 2,000. 

Needs and Uses: The information 

collection requirement is necessary for 

the National Guard Bureau and its 

participating programs (Yellow Ribbon 

Reintegration Program (Guard and 

Reserve Component-wide), Family 

Program, Employer Support Program, 

financial Management Awareness 

Program, Sexual Assault Prevention and 

Response Program, Psychological Health 

Program, and Warrior Support Program) 

to ensure key activities may be 

associated with system-registrants for 

program management, accountability, 

reporting and support purposes. 

Examples of use of such information 

include: Validating event registration 

and attendance, enabling users to login 

to system to facilitate outreach and 

communication activities, enabling 

leadership across the participating 

programs, with oversight and reporting. 

In addition, JSS plans on collecting 

Civilian Employer Information (CE) 

from Service members. Defense 

Manpower Data Center (DMDC) will be 

ceasing its CEI Web site as of October 1, 

2012. The service components as a 

result have been tasked to take over the 

collection of CEI prior to this date. 

JSS in particular helps the Yellow 

Ribbon Reintegration Program and (in 

the future) also help Employer Support 

for the Guard and Reserve, reporting 

program activities, as required by a 

congressional mandate. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

Households; Federal Government; State, 

Locale or Tribal Government. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet 

Seehra. 

Written comments and 

recommendations on the proposed 

information collection should be sent to 

Ms. Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of 

Management and Budget, Desk Officer 

for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

You may also submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by the following method: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name, docket 

number and title for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 

for comments and other submissions 

from members of the public is to make 

these submissions available for public 

viewing on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

DOD Clearance Officer: Mr. Frederick 

Licari. 

Written requests for copies of the 

information collection proposal should 

be sent to Mr. Licari at WHS/ESD 

Directives Division, 4800 Mark Center 

Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, 

Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. 

Dated: January 8, 2015. 

Aaron Siegel, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00308 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID: DoD–2014–HA–0162] 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

Correction 

In notice document 2014–30753 

appearing on pages 34–35 in the issue 

of January 2, 2015, make the following 

correction: 

On page 34, in the second column, 

under the DATES heading, in the second 

line, ‘‘March 3, 2014’’ should read 

‘‘March 3, 2015’’. 

[FR Doc. C1–2014–30753 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Defense Acquisition University Board 

of Visitors; Notice of Federal Advisory 

Committee Meeting 

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition 

University, DoD. 

ACTION: Meeting notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing this notice to announce a 

Federal Advisory Committee meeting of 

the Defense Acquisition University 

Board of Visitors. This meeting will be 

open to the public. 

DATES: Wednesday, January 28, 2015, 

from 9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: DAU Headquarters, 9820 

Belvoir Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Caren Hergenroeder, Protocol Director, 

DAU. Phone: 703–805–5134. Fax: 703– 

805–5940. Email: caren.hergenroeder@

dau.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

meeting is being held under the 

provisions of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., 

Appendix, as amended), the 

Government in the Sunshine Act of 

1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 

41 CFR 102–3.150. 

Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose 

of this meeting is to report back to the 

Board of Visitors on continuing items of 

interest. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES