alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from National
Property Investors IV 2000 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000318508
<NAME>                                National Property Investors IV
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    1,255
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   27,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                           20,281
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            9,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                  19,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                              (10,301)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              9,790
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          1,733
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                346
<EPS-BASIC>                                                5.72 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 18

- 00013

- CR

Matthew Patrick Agnew

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County , Texas

Trial Cause No. S

- 17

- 3321CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 10, 2019
exv10w35



 





EXHIBIT 10.35




AMENDMENT 2006-1

TO THE

NON-QUALIFIED SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

COVERING OFFICER-EMPLOYEES

OF

CSS INDUSTRIES, INC.





	1.	 	Paragraph 2 of the SERP is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
	 
	 	 	“2.     (a)     Commencing with the calendar year 1994, the Company will, for each year in
which the Company makes a profit sharing contribution to the 401(k) Profit Sharing
Plan of Cleo Inc or such other profit sharing plan then maintained for the benefit
of the employees of the Company (“Plan”), incur and accrue on its books as a
liability to each such officer of the Company for whom it makes a contribution to
the Plan, an amount equal to the product of (x) the percentage then used in deriving
the dollar amount approved by the Company’s Board of Directors as the Company’s
contribution to the Plan for such calendar year, and (y) the difference between (i)
the lesser of each such Company officer’s total cash compensation for such calendar
year or the dollar amount of the contribution limitation (subject to applicable
COLA) imposed by Section 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, prior to the applicable provisions of the Revenue Reconciliation Act of
1993 (“Act”) and (ii) the dollar amount of the contribution limitation (subject to
applicable COLA) imposed by the Act. For purposes of this paragraph “compensation”
shall have the same meaning as the term “Compensation” as defined under the Plan;
	 
	 	 	(b)     Commencing March 31, 2005, irrespective of whether a liability is incurred and
accrued for a calendar year pursuant to subparagraph (a) above, the Company may,
with the approval of the Human Resources Committee of the Company’s Board of
Directors, incur and accrue on its books as a liability to each such officer of the
Company a discretionary amount which will be based on a percentage of such officer’s
compensation that exceeds the contribution limitation (subject to applicable COLA)
imposed by Section 401 (a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. A
liability incurred and accrued pursuant to this subparagraph (b) is purely
discretionary and is in the sole discretion of the Human Resources Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors;”






	2.	 	This Amendment 2006-1 is effective as of March 31, 2005.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 5, 2017

No. 04-17-00516-CV

IN RE Robert B. CAIRNS

 

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

The Court has considered the Motion for Rehearing filed by relator, and the motion is 

DENIED. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of December, 2017.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012-CI-11471, styled In the Interest of A.N.C. and H.C.C., pending in the 

288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Solomon Casseb III presiding.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3598 

To clarify the effective date of the modification of treatment for retirement 

annuity purposes of part-time service before April 7, 1986, of certain 

Department of Veterans Affairs health-care professionals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2006 

Mr. ROCKEFELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify the effective date of the modification of treatment 

for retirement annuity purposes of part-time service before April 7, 1986, of certain Department of Veterans 

Affairs health-care professionals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3598 IS

1 SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE OF MODIFICATION OF TREAT2 MENT FOR RETIREMENT ANNUITY PURPOSES 

3 OF CERTAIN PART-TIME SERVICE OF CER4 TAIN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

5 HEALTH-CARE PROFESSIONALS. 

6 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The effective date of the 

7 amendment made by section 132 of the Department of 

8 Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs Enhancement Act 

9 of 2001 (Public Law 107–135; 115 Stat. 2454) shall be 

10 January 23, 2002, in the case of health care professionals 

11 referred to in subsection (c) of section 7426 of title 38, 

12 United States Code (as so amended), who retire on or 

13 after that date and in the case of health care professionals 

14 referred to in such subsection (c) who retired before such 

15 date, but after April 7, 1986. 

16 (b) RECOMPUTATION OF ANNUITY.—The Office of 

17 Personnel Management shall recompute the annuity of 

18 each health-care professional described in the first sen19 tence of subsection (c) of section 7426 of title 38, United 

20 States Code (as so amended), who retired before January 

21 23, 2002, but after April 7, 1986, in order to take into 

22 account the amendment made by section 132 of the De23 partment of Veterans Affairs Health Care Programs En24 hancement Act of 2001. Such recomputation shall be efVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:48 Jul 04, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3598.IS S3598

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 3598 IS

1 fective with respect to annuities paid for months after 

2 January 23, 2002. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kevin McMayo, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 359]

Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered on or about February 18, 2003, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may *291thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Buckley, EJ., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Sullivan and Sweeny, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification by David C. Warren Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) by eMerge Interactive, Inc.
(Registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ DAVID C. WARRENDavid C. WarrenPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)June 7, 2005
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3675 

To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)–6- 

(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)–1,3,5-tri zin-2-yl]-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]- 

3-methylbenzoate and application adjuvants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl 2-[[[[[4- 

(dimethylamino)–6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)–1,3,5-tri zin-2- 

yl]-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate and 

application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 3675 IS 

1 SECTION 1. METHYL 2-[[[[[4-(DIMETHYLAMINO)–6-(2,2,2- 

2 TRIFLUOROETHOXY)–1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2-YL]- 

3 AMINO]CARBONYL]AMINO]SULFONYL]-3- 

4 METHYLBENZOATE AND APPLICATION ADJU5 VANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.01 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)–6-(2,2,2- 

9 trifluoroethoxy)–1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]- 

10 amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate and ap11 plication adjuvants) is amended by striking the date in 

12 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2010’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

15 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Jamie S., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 260]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about June 1, 2012, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the second degree, menacing in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility and identification, including its evaluation of any inconsistencies in testimony.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it denied appellant’s request for an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, and instead adjudicated him a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation, which was the least restrictive *449dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]). The 12-month period of supervision was warranted by the seriousness of appellant’s violent attack on the victim, as well as appellant’s truancy, poor academic performance, and school disciplinary record. These factors outweighed the mitigating factors cited by appellant. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,733]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on April 2, 2009, in response to a worker petition filed by the State Workforce Office on behalf of workers at Wausau Paper Specialty Products, LLC, a subsidiary of Wausau Paper Corporation, Jay, Maine.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of April 2009.

Linda G. Poole,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10892 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 35.1

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC

                RASC SERIES 2007-KS3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement,
dated as of March 1, 2007 (as amended from time to time, the "Agreement"), among
Residential  Asset Securities  Corporation,  as depositor,  Residential  Funding
Company,  LLC,  as master  servicer,  and U.S.  Bank  National  Association,  as
trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material  respects  throughout
such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
      Title: Managing Director
EX-35.1
(logo) OPTION ONE
       MORTGAGE

One gets it done.

www.optiononemortgage.com



March 15, 2008


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045-1951
Attn: Pamela D. Pendarvis
INV #569

Re: Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-CP1, Asset-Backed Certificates,
Series 2007-CP1


Enclosed is the required Annual Compliance Certification.


If you have any questions, please contact Elizabeth Nguyen at (949)
727-8226 or email: Elizabeth.Nguyen@oomc.com


Option One Mortgage Corporation
6501 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618


(page)


Annual Compliance Certificate


I, Fabiola Camperi, the undersigned, the duly authorized President of
Option One Mortgage Corporation (as "Servicer"), does hereby certify the
following for the calendar year ending on December 31, 2007:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period
   and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement (as defined in the
   cover letter) for such period has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
   material respects throughout the reporting period.



Certified By:

/s/ Fabiola Camperi
Name: Fabiola Camperi
Title: President
Date: March 14, 2008



6501 Irvine Center Drive *Irvine *California *92618 *(800) 704-0800 *

(logo) Equal Housing
Lender
#### Amy L. Roberts et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Respondents, v Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants.

Submitted August 3, 2009;

decided August 27, 2009

Reported below, 62 AD3d 71.

*738Motion by New York State Tenants and Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al. for leave to appear amici curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
From: The District Court of the 21st Judicial District. County of Ravalli.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. KIMBERLY HARPER, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-01-79 DECISION

On June 24,2009, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years, for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, for the offense of Criminal Endangerment, a felony.

On October 9, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Kris Copenhaver. The state was represented by T. Geoffrey Mahar who appeared via videoconference.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that she understood this and stated that she wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

*66The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 9th day of October, 2009.

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                   EXHIBIT 27


<ARTICLE>  5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S 10-QSB FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING
FOOTNOTES.
</LEGEND>


<CAPTION>

<S>                           <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                            362,684
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     509,433
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  876,868
<PP&E>                            989,097
<DEPRECIATION>                    334,958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,556,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             879,355
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                          105,481
<OTHER-SE>                        300,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,556,274
<SALES>                           403,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  515,017
<CGS>                             187,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     187,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  205,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 36,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   122,575
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               122,575
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      122,575
<EPS-BASIC>                        0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.01











</TABLE>