alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM
      OF

    SECOND
      ALLONGE TO 

    PROMISORY
      NOTE DATED _______ __, 2007

    


    This
      Second Allonge is hereby attached to and made a part of the Promissory Note
      dated _________ __, 2007 (the “Note”),
      executed by WaferGen, Inc. (“Payor”),
      in
      the original maximum principal amount of $_________, in favor of Alnoor Shivji
      (“Holder”).
      The
      first sentence of Paragraph 1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in
      its
      entirety to read as follows

     

    This
      Note
      will automatically mature and be due and payable on June 30, 2007 (the “Maturity
      Date”).

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, Payor and Holder have caused this Allonge to be duly executed
      and delivered as of May 14, 2007.

     

    


    
      	
              PAYOR:
                

               

              WAFERGEN,
                INC.

               

               

              By:
                ______________________________

              Name:
                

              Title:

            	
              HOLDER:

               

               

               

               

              __________________________________

              Name:
                Alnoor Shivji
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60701 Conference Calendar

EDDIE WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAFER N. GHERAIBEH, Dr., Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 96-CV-182

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eddie White requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal so that he may appeal from the district court’s denial of his request to proceed IFP. White’s motion for leave to file brief in present form is GRANTED. To proceed IFP on appeal, White must demonstrate financial eligibility and a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Carson v. Polley , 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). An order denying IFPNo. 97-60701 -2- is an appealable final decision. Flowers v. Turbine Support Div. , 507 F.2d 1242, 1244 (5th Cir. 1975). White’s complaint was subject to dismissal because there is no subject-matter jurisdiction. White relies upon the “Privacy Act of 1974". The Privacy Act of 1974, codified at 5 U.S.C. § 552a, requires agencies to keep accurate “systems of records” on individuals. §§ 552a(a)(5), 552a(e). The Act does not apply to White’s private physician. White has not presented a nonfrivolous issue for appeal. His motion for leave to proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is
DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution White that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, White is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that the appeals do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3922 

To clarify the status of the Young Women’s Christian Association Retirement 

Fund as a defined contribution plan for certain purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2006 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Ms. STABENOW, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To clarify the status of the Young Women’s Christian Association Retirement Fund as a defined contribution plan 

for certain purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘YWCA Retirement 

5 Plan Preservation Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF AGE DISCRIMINATION RULES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—A pension plan described in sub8 section (b) shall be treated as a defined contribution plan 

9 for purposes of sections 204(b)(1)(H) and 204(b)(2) of 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 3922 IS

1 the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 

2 (29 U.S.C. 1054(b)(1)(H) and 1054(b)(2)) and section 

3 4(i)(1) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 

4 1967 (29 U.S.C. 623(i)(1)). 

5 (b) PENSION PLAN DESCRIBED.—A pension plan de6 scribed in this subsection is the plan subject to title IV 

7 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 

8 maintained by the Young Women’s Christian Association 

9 Retirement Fund, a corporation created by an Act of the 

10 State of New York which became law on April 12, 1924. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall apply in 

12 the case of any civil action brought on or after September 

13 21, 2006, alleging a violation occurring before June 29, 

14 2005, of section 204(b)(1)(H) of the Employee Retirement 

15 Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1054(b)(1)(H)), 

16 section 4(i)(1) of the Age Discrimination in Employment 

17 Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 623(i)(1)), or both, with respect 

18 to the plan described in subsection (b). 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Huston Belvett, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 204]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered February 2, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree (three counts), burglary in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the second degree (three counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts) and unlawful possession of marijuana, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 16 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court should have permitted cross-examination of two witnesses regarding whether they thought they could lose their New York City Housing Authority apartment based on drug-selling activity. Under the circumstances of the case, this line of inquiry was relevant to the witnesses’ alleged motives to give false testimony. However, the error was harmless, given the overwhelming evidence of guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]) including testimony from multiple witnesses to the crime, as well as evidence of actions and statements by defendant that undermined his claim of innocence. There is no reasonable possibility that the restriction on cross-examination affected the verdict. Furthermore, defendant received a full opportunity to impeach these witnesses with regard to other matters relating to credibility.

Defendant’s argument that the court committed reversible error by delivering an improper *Allen*charge *(see Allen v United States,*164 US 492, 501 [1896]) is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we would find the court’s instruction to the jurors that they return the next day to “attempt to resolve all the issues in this case [and] attempt to reach a unanimous verdict” was not “unbalanced and coercive so as to deprive defendant of a fair trial” *(People v Aponte,*2 NY3d 304, 305 [2004]).

Defendant did not preserve his argument that the verdict sheet contained annotations that violated CPL 310.20, because defendant did not specifically object to the improper annotations *(see People v Goode,*87 NY2d 1045 [1996]). Although defense counsel objected “on principle to any annotations” when the court disclosed its proposed annotations, he declined to provide input on the issue of annotations to distinguish between counts. We decline to review this claim in the interest of justice.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

*539Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them ih the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal.

Concur—Tom, J.E, Sweeny, Moshpwitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2347 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2347

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the Millennium 
              Challenge Corporation for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the Millennium 
              Challenge Corporation for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE MILLENNIUM 
              CHALLENGE CORPORATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for the Millennium Challenge 
Corporation for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
      32.3**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, Elise Nissen, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.
















/s/
      Elise
      Nissen


Elise
      Nissen,


Chief Financial
      Officer


November
      14, 2007






28
II 

Calendar No. 514 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3637 

To require the submittal to Congress of any Presidential Daily Briefing 

relating to Iraq during the period beginning on January 20, 1997, 

and ending on March 19, 2003. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2006 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read the first time 

JULY 12, 2006 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To require the submittal to Congress of any Presidential 

Daily Briefing relating to Iraq during the period beginning on January 20, 1997, and ending on March 19, 

2003. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS OF CERTAIN PRESI4 DENTIAL DAILY BRIEFINGS ON IRAQ. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of National Intel6 ligence shall submit to the congressional intelligence comVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:14 Jul 13, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3637.PCS S3637

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3637 PCS 

1 mittees any Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB), or any 

2 portion of a Presidential Daily Briefing, of the Director 

3 of Central Intelligence during the period beginning on 

4 January 20, 1997, and ending on March 19, 2003, that 

5 refers to Iraq or otherwise addresses Iraq in any fashion. 

6 (b) CONGRESSIONAL INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEES

7 DEFINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘congressional intel8 ligence committees’’ means— 

9 (1) the Select Committee on Intelligence of the 

10 Senate; and 

11 (2) the Permanent Select Committee on Intel12 ligence of the House of Representatives. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Calendar No. 514 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3637 

A BILL 

To require the submittal to Congress of any Presiing on March 19, 2003. period beginning on January 20, 1997, and end- dential Daily Briefing relating to Iraq during the 

JULY 12, 2006 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Brian A. Vecchio, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 906]

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Saratoga County (Scarano, J.), rendered August 3, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminally negligent homicide.

While operating a motor vehicle at an excessive speed, defendant was involved in an accident that killed his passenger. As a result, he was charged in an 11-count indictment with numerous crimes. In full satisfaction thereof, defendant pleaded guilty to criminally negligent homicide, waived his right to appeal and, in accordance with the plea agreement, was sentenced to lVs to 4 years in prison. He now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant upon the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel’s brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979, 980 *1122[1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Stein, J.R, Spain, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 384

AN ACT

To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial Government Records Interagency Working

Group for 2 years.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 384 ES

1 SECTION 1. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF WORKING GROUP.

2 Section 802(b)(1) of the Japanese Imperial Govern3 ment Disclosure Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–567; 114

4 Stat. 2865) is amended by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘6 years’’.

Passed the Senate February 16, 2005.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 384

AN ACT

To extend the existence of the Nazi War Crimes

Interagency Working Group for 2 years.and Japanese Imperial Government Records
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,569,653
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,569,653
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,424,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,357
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,422,753
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,424,110
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               270,638
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               615,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (344,759)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (344,759)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (344,759)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marquis Herbert, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 901]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered February 19, 2009, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. Rather, viewing the circumstances of the case in their totality, the record does not support the conclusion that the defendant was deprived of meaningful representation *(see People v Caban,*5 NY3d 143, 152 [2005]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).

*832The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v West,*56 NY2d 662, 663 [1982]; *People v Cox,*54 AD3d 684 [2008]; *People v Carter,*44 AD3d 677 [2007]), and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.
exv4w1



 








	STOCK CERTIFICATE CUSIP 20564W 10 5












 














	COMSCORE, INC. THE CORPORATION IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE MORE THAN ONE CLASS OR SERIES OF STOCK. THE
CORPORATION WILL FURNISH UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER THE POWERS,
DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL AND OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH
CLASS OF STOCK AND SERIES WITHIN A CLASS OF STOCK OF THE CORPORATION, AS WELL AS THE
QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS RELATING TO THOSE PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. A
STOCKHOLDER MAY MAKE THE REQUEST TO THE CORPORATION OR TO THE TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR. The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN
COM — as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- . . . . . . . . . .Custodian . . . . . . . . . . . .
        . . . (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT — as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act . .
        . . . . . . . . . . . (State) JT TEN — as joint tenants with right of survivorship            UNIF TRF
MIN ACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Custodian (until age. . . ). . . . . . . . . . . and not as
tenants in common (Cust)
(Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act. . . . . . .
        . . . (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. PLEASE
INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE For value received,
___hereby sell, assign and transfer unto ___
(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
___Shares of
the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint ___Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the
within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated:
___20___Signature(s) Guaranteed: Medallion Guarantee Stamp THE
SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers,
Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. Signature: ___Signature:
___Notice: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as
written upon the face of the certificate, in every particular, without alteration or enlargement,
or any change whatever. SECURI TY I NSTRUCTI ONS THI S IS WATERMARKED PAPER, DO NOT ACCEP T WI
THOUT NOTI NG WATERMARK. HOLD TO LI GHT TO VERI FY WATERMARK.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2501 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2501

                      To repeal Public Law 107-40.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2023

Ms. Lee of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                      To repeal Public Law 107-40.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sunset for the 2001 Authorization 
for Use of Military Force Act''.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDING.

    Congress finds that the Authorization for Use of Military Force 
(Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note), signed into law on September 
18, 2001, has been used to justify a broad and open-ended authorization 
for the use of military force and such an interpretation is 
inconsistent with the authority of Congress to declare war and make all 
laws for executing powers vested by the Constitution in the Government 
of the United States.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF PUBLIC LAW 107-40.

    Effective 240 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107-40; 50 U.S.C. 
1541 note) is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
April 8, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF A .R.M., A CHILD

NO. 14

- 13

- 01039

- CV

This cause, an appeal from a judgment terminating parental rights si gned November 21, 2013 , was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court
below AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We furthe r order the mandate be issued immediately.