alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Wellstone  Filters, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB  for the year ending  December 31, 2006  as  filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Learned Jeremiah Hand, Chief  Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant   to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and that to  the best of  the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects, the financial condition and result of  operations  of  the
Company.

                         /s/ Learned Jeremiah Hand
                         ----------------------------------------------
                         Learned Jeremiah Hand, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 17, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Manakoa  Services  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date: February 1, 2005                         By: /s/ G. Robert Williams
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    G. Robert Williams
                                                    C.E.O.
                                                   (Principle Executive Officer)

Date: February 1, 2005                         By: /s/ James C. Katzaroff
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    James C. Katzaroff
                                                    President & Acting Treasurer
                                                   (Principle Financial Officer)



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required  by Section  906,  has been  provided  to  Manakoa  Services
Corporation and will be retained by Manakoa Services Corporation,  and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Belkis Jimenez Rivero, principal accounting officer of
Endeavor Explorations Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Endeavor Explorations Inc., for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Endeavor Explorations Inc.



/s/ Belkis Jimenez Rivero
____________________________________Belkis Jimenez Rivero Principal
Accounting Officer October 29, 2007

---
EX-35.8
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corporation
270 Park Avenue
10th Floor
New York, NY 10017


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Trustee and/or Paying Agent under
the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing
Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period


March 1, 2008

/s/ Judith Rishel
JUDITH RISHEL
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Pass
  Through Certificates, Series 2007-C1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee and
  Paying Agent, as applicable

2 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Pass
  Through Certificates, Series 2007-LDP10, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

3 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Pass
  Through Certificates, Series 2006-CIBC16, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee
  and Paying Agent, as applicable

4 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Pass
  Through Certificates, Series 2006-LDP6, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee and
  Paying Agent, as applicable

5 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Pass
  Through Certificates, Series 2006-LDP7, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee

6 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Pass
  Through Certificates, Series 2007-CIBC 20, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying
  Agent and Trustee, as applicable

7 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Pass
  Through Certificates, Series 2007-CIBC18, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying
  Agent and Trustee, as applicable

8 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Pass
  Through Certificates, Series 2006-LDP9, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent
Exhibit 31.1


RULE 13a-14(d) Certification





I, In-Young Chase, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer, Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger toLaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee of SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1,has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement, which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.
 
 In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association and its officers and agents.


By: /s/In-Young ChaseName:        In-Young ChaseTitle:          Vice PresidentDate:          March 31, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           STATMON TEHCNOLOGIES CORP.

      I, Geoffrey P. Talbot, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 of Statmon Technologies Corp., Inc.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2004


------------------------------------------
              GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
         Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10952]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time: Tuesday, May 12, 2009, at 10 a.m.
    Wednesday, May 13, 2009, at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: These meetings will be closed to the public.

Items To Be Discussed: 
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, section 438(b), and 
Title 26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *

Person To Contact for Information: Judith Ingram, Press Officer. 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. E9-10952 Filed 5-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
#### Alfred Milton RIVERA, Petitioner—Appellant, v. T. O’BRIEN, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 06-6925.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 4, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 17, 2006.

Alfred Milton Rivera, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Milton Rivera seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge *508and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis-positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rivera has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Rivera’s motion to substitute party, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, as C.E.O., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: February 23, 2011 |                               |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                         |                               |
| Signature:                   | /s/   Calvin A. Wallen, III   |   |
|                         | Calvin A. Wallen, III, C.E.O. |   |

 

----
# C o urt o f A ppe a ls

o f th e S ta te o f G e o rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 5 E0 01 6 . MARI A SEI BERT v . OSBORNE HUGH LANE I I I

.

Up o n co n s id erat i o n o f M a r i a B o i ce’ s em erg en cy m o t i on fo r an ex t en s i o n o f

t i m e i n wh i c h t o f

i l e an ap pl icat i o n fo r d i scret i o nary rev i ew, t h e sam e i s h ereb y

GRANTED. M o v an t s h al l h av e u n t i l Oct o b er 9 , 2 02 4

, t o fi l e h er ap p l i cat i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t ify t ha t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. 

## September 06, 2024

09/06/2024
#### Rosa Maria CASARRUBIAS; Francisco Javier Casarrubias Zamora, Petitioners, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-75338.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 12, 2009.*

Filed May 27, 2009.

Rosa Maria Casarrubias, San Pedro, CA, pro se.

Francisco Javier Casarrubias Zamora, San Pedro, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Stuart Nickum, *634OIL, Russell John Verby, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division/Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Rosa Maria Casarrubias and Francisco Javier Casarrubias Zamora, wife and husband and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo legal and constitutional issues, *Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft,*324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

Petitioners’ contention that the qualifying relative requirement for cancellation of removal violates equal protection is foreclosed by *Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey,*526 F.3d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir.2008) (per cu-riam).

We reject petitioners’ contention that review of their appeal by a single member of the BIA violated due process or their statutory right to an administrative appeal. *See Jiang v. Gonzales,*425 F.3d 649, 654 (9th Cir.2005) (rejecting statutory challenge to single-member affirmance); *Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 851 (9th Cir.2003) (rejecting due process challenge).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ECHO WESTLEY DIXON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-5056

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:13-cv-00843-NBF, Judge Nancy B. Firestone. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

Echo Westley Dixon moves for leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis. Dixon also moves to supplement his 

informal brief. 

Dixon is currently incarcerated. Pursuant to the 

Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), a prisoner is barred 

from proceeding in forma pauperis if three or more prior 

Case: 14-5056 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 04/17/2014
2 DIXON v. US

actions or appeals have been dismissed as frivolous or 

malicious or for failure to state a claim. Section 1915(g) of 

28 U.S.C. states: 

In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or 

appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding 

under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or 

more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal 

in a court of the United States that was dismissed 

on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or 

fails to sate a claim upon which relief may be 

granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent 

danger of serious physical injury. 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The court notes that three or more actions or appeals 

filed by Dixon have been dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim. See Dixon v. Grant, 

No. 08-CV-7364, ECF No. 16, 17 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 17, 2010). 

Moreover, Dixon has not suggested that he is in imminent 

danger of serious physical injury. Thus, Dixon is barred 

by statute from proceeding in forma pauperis in this 

appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

 (1) If Dixon does not pay the $ 505 filing fee within 30 

days of the date of this order, his appeal will be dismissed. 

 (2) Dixon’s motion to supplement his informal brief is 

granted. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

Case: 14-5056 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 04/17/2014
 DIXON v. US 3

s24

Case: 14-5056 Document: 15 Page: 3 Filed: 04/17/2014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1903

BRENDA C. ARMSTEAD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN CORNYN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-182-1)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 3, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brenda C. Armstead, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Brenda C. Armstead seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

her civil complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s amended judgment was entered on the

docket on April 15, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on July

22, 2003. Because Armstead failed to file a timely notice of appeal

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED