alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

                        RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC

                RFMSI SERIES 2007-S3 TRUST (THE "ISSUING ENTITY")

The undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of Residential Funding Company, LLC,
as servicer  (the  "Servicer")  pursuant to the Series  Supplement,  dated as of
March 1, 2007, and the Standard Terms of Pooling and Servicing Agreement,  dated
as of November 1, 2006 (as amended from time to time,  the  "Agreement"),  among
Residential Funding Mortgage Securities I, Inc., as company, Residential Funding
Company,  LLC,  as master  servicer,  and U.S.  Bank  National  Association,  as
trustee, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the  Servicer's  activities  during  the  period  covered  by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
Agreement  has been made under my  supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material  respects  throughout
such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th
day of March 2008.


By:   /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
      Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
      Title:  Managing Director
**Exhibit 32** **.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of uKarma Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bill Glaser, Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Interim Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify to the
      best
      of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15
      (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Bill GlaserBill
                GlaserChief
                Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Interim Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
                Officer)April
                15, 2008




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
      disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3644 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3644

 To suspend temporarily the duty on weft pile fabrics of cotton, other 
             than uncut weft pile fabrics or cut corduroy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2006

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on weft pile fabrics of cotton, other 
             than uncut weft pile fabrics or cut corduroy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WEFT PILE FABRICS OF COTTON, OTHER THAN UNCUT WEFT PILE 
              FABRICS OR CUT CORDUROY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.58.01        Weft pile fabrics of    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           cotton, other than                                                31/2009          ''
                           uncut weft pile                                                                     .
                           fabrics or cut
                           corduroy (provided
                           for in subheading
                           5801.23).............

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of VLOV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A
for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Qingqing Wu, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the
dates and for the periods indicated.




/s/ Qingqing WuQingqing
      Wu
                  Chief
      Executive Officer
                  December
      29, 2010





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of D'Angelo Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank D'Angelo,
President/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                    /s/ Frank D'Angelo
                                    By:  Frank D'Angelo
                                    President/Treasurer
                                    August 12, 2002
#### Neptune Steam Nav. Co. *v.*Sullivan Timber Co.

*(District Court, S. D. New York.*

November 26, 1888.)

Admiralty —Jurisdiction — Suits between Non-Residents — Service on Agent op Corporation.

Admiralty courts have a discretion as to entertaining suits between foreigners; and a transaction taking place in Florida, where all the officers of defendant corporation resided, and the libelant, being an English corporation, *held,*that no comity or reasons of justice or of superior convenience, so far as appeared, demanded relief in this district, and service on a limited agent here was set aside.

In Admiralty. Motion to set aside service of process on an alleged agent of a Florida corporation.

*Seward, Da Costa & Guthrie,*for libelant.

*L. Lafiin Kellogg,*for defendant.

Brown, J.

Upon the language of the marshal’s return, stating service only on Bailey, as well as upon the affidavits of Bailey and Carian, I cannot find that the citation was served upon Carian. Mr. Elliott’s affidavit says it has always been understood that Carian was the defendant’s “managing agent. ” The directory does not indícalo Bailey as agent, and the card attached to the affidavit docs not so represent him. 1 cannot, therefore, find service on Bailey sufficient.

Had Carian been served the question would have been more embarrassing. Under the New York Code (section 1780) it would seem that no action would lie in the present case in the state courts, for both parties are non-resident, the cause of action did not arise here, and the defendant has no property here. Courts of admiralty have a discretion as to entertaining suits between foreigners. This whole dealing being in Florida, where all the officers reside, and the'libelant being an English corporation, no comity, or reasons of justice or of superior convenience, are shown to demand relief here, when full relief is easy within the jurisdiction where the transaction was had. Besides that, 1 doubt if an agent whose authority is limited to a distinct branch of business here, represents the corporation as to matters wholly outside of that branch of business, so that, as respects the latter business done elsewhere, he can be held to be in any sense such a “managing agent” as to make the corporation “found” in his person within this state. Admiralty Rules, 2, 3, 25. See *St. Clair*v. *Cox,*106 U. S. 350, 356, 359, 1 Sup. Ct. Rep. 354; *Hat Sweat Co.*v. *Davis,*31 Fed. Rep. 294.

1

 Reported by Edward tt. Benedict, Esq., of the New York bar.
#### Peter E. Bissell et al., Respondents, v Town of Amherst, Appellant-Respondent and Third-Party Plaintiff. McGonigle & Hilger Roofing Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.

Submitted March 16, 2009;

decided June 11, 2009

Motion by the Town of Amherst for leave to appeal denied. Motion by McGonigle *&*Hilger Roofing Company, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against plaintiffs from the November 14, 2008 Appellate Division order, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the November 14, 2008 order as against defendant Town of Amherst, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action as to these parties within the meaning of the Constitution, and, from other orders of the Appellate Division, upon the ground that such orders do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Pigott taking no part.
663 A.2d 1351

#### STERLING MILLER, ET AL. v. DAVID JONES, ET AL.

June 21, 1995.

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on an appeal as of right pursuant to *Rule*2:2-l(a)(l), and the Court having determined that the matter does not present a substantial constitutional question within the meaning of the *Rule*or applicable caselaw;

It is ORDERED that the within appeal is dismissed.
EX-10.1






EXHIBIT 10.1




May 11, 2007



Brad Morrice


President and Chief Executive Officer


New Century Financial Corporation


18400 Von Karman, Suite 1000


Irvine, CA 92612



Re: Agreement for Interim Management and Restructuring Services – First Amendment



Dear Brad:



This letter represents the first amendment (“First Amendment”) to the agreement between AP
Services, LLC, a Michigan limited liability company (“APS”) and New Century Financial Corporation
(the “Company”) dated March 22, 2007 (the “Engagement Letter”). This First Amendment shall be
effective as of May 11, 2007 (the “Effective Date”). The Engagement Letter shall remain effective
with respect to all periods and events prior to the Effective Date and, except as expressly
modified by this First Amendment, the Engagement Letter shall remain in full force and effect after
such date.



1. The following is incremental to the section titled Objective and Tasks.



APS will provide Holly Felder Etlin to serve as the Company’s Chief
Restructuring Officer (“CRO”), reporting to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer
(“CEO”) and Board of Directors. Working collaboratively with the senior management
team, the Board of Directors and other Company professionals, Ms. Etlin will assist
the Company in evaluating and implementing strategic and tactical options through
the restructuring process by performing those tasks outlined in the Engagement
Letter and include, without limitation, the following: (i) strengthening the
Company’s core competencies in the finance organization, particularly cash
management, planning, general accounting and financial reporting information
management and with communicating and reporting to the Company’s stakeholders and
representatives, (ii) developing and implementing cash management strategies,
tactics and processes and (iii) managing the claim and claim reconciliation process
and supervising the preparation of reports required by the Bankruptcy Court,
including, without limitation, bankruptcy schedules and statements of financial
affairs. As CRO, Ms. Etlin shall have such additional duties as set forth by the
Bankruptcy Court or the Company’s Board of Directors or CEO.




	2.	 	Schedule 2 to the Engagement Letter, Disclosures, is hereby replaced in its entirety by the
attached Schedule 2.






	3.	 	Exhibit A, Temporary Staff, is replaced in its entirety with the attached Exhibit A dated
May 11, 2007.





If these terms meet with your approval, please sign and return the enclosed copy of this First
Amendment.



We look forward to our continuing relationship with you.



Sincerely yours,



AP Services, LLC



/s/ Holly Felder Etlin



Holly Felder Etlin

Managing Director



	 	 	 
	Acknowledged and Agreed to:

	 	

	 
	 	 
	NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

	 
	 	 
	By:

Its:

Dated:

	 	/s/ Brad A. Morrice

President and Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2007
#### In the Matter of: N.C.P. MARKETING GROUP, INC., Debtor, N.C.P. Marketing Group, Inc., Appellant, v. BG Star Productions, *Inc.;*Gayle Blank; Billy Blank, Appellees.

No. 05-17384.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 23, 2008 *.

Filed May 23, 2008.

Jennifer A. Smith, Esq., Lionel Sawyer & Collins, Reno, NV, Brian A. Bash, Esq., Thomas D. Warren, Esq., Baker & Hostet-ler LLP, Cleveland, OH, for Appellant.

Jeanne Jorgensen, Esq., Allen Matkins Leek Gamble Mallory *&*Natsis, LLP, Irvine, CA, Michael A.T. Pagni, Esq., McDonald Carano Wilson, LLP, Michael S. Greger, Esq., Reno, NV, for Appellees.

Before: KLEINFELD, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER **

The request for oral argument is denied, and this ease is hereby submitted for decision. We affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons provided by that court.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AM Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 28, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), H.
Charles Wilson, III, Corporate Controller of the Company certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Dated: February 19, 2003                     /s/ H. Charles Wilson, III
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Name:  H. Charles Wilson, III
                                             Title: Corporate Controller
                                                    (Chief Financial Officer)




*This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

HAROLD BURTON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 67 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of July, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 17-773V 

Filed: February 22, 2018 

UNPUBLISHED 

CARLOS ORDUZ,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for 

petitioner. 

Linda Sara Renzi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On June 12, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2

(the “Vaccine 

Act”). Petitioner alleges that that his receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on 

September 20, 2016, caused him to suffer a right-sided shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On February 22, 2018, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

 

1

 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2

 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that the Division of Injury 

Compensation Programs, Department of Health and Human Services (“DICP”) “has 

concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA, as defined on the 

Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that “petitioner’s pain 

occurred within 48 hours of receipt of an intramuscular vaccination, pain was limited to 

the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered, and no other condition or 

abnormality was identified to explain his shoulder pain”. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OCT 2 5 2010 

'Ierk- U-s. District & Bankruptcy 

Cour' for the District of Columbia Gene Nelson Goodman, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, 1 

) 

Civil Action No. 

1 

) 

Chairman, State Board of Pardons ) 

& Paroles et al., 

1 

Defendants. 1 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and application 

to proceed informapauperis. The application will be granted and the case will be dismissed 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. $ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). Under that statute, the Court is required to dismiss 

a case "at any time" it determines that the complaint, among other grounds, fails to state a claim 

upon which relief can be granted or is frivolous. 

Plaintiff is a resident of Waycross, Georgia, who appears also to be a state parolee. He 

sues various Georgia-based officials, including the Chairman of the State Board of Pardons and 

Paroles, the Clerk of the Georgia Supreme Court, the Chief Judge of the Superior Court of Ware 

County, Georgia, the Ware County District Attorney and the Ware County Sheriff under the 

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO) Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq. In 

addition, plaintiff sues Congressman John Lewis for "refusing to conduct a congressional 

[investigation] into the misconduct of [the] defendants." Compl. at 2. Plaintiff seeks injunctive 

relief and $5 million in monetary damages. Id. at 18- 19.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arthur D. Levinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.                                      | 
| | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| |                    |                                                                    | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
October 28, 2004 | 

I, Louis J. Lavigne, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ Louis J. Lavigne, Jr.                                                                       | 
| | ------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                    |                                                                                                 | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | Louis J. Lavigne, Jr.
Executive Vice President and 
   Chief Financial Officer
October 28, 2004 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genentech, Inc. and will be retained by Genentech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---