alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-64,773]

      ( print page 21828)    
Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on December 23, 2008 in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at United States Steel, Great Lakes Works, Ecorse, Michigan. The workers at the subject facility produce flat rolled steel.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 15th day of April 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10898 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**Exhibit
      32.3**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, (the “Report”), I, Elise
      Nissen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.























/s/
      Elise Nissen


Elise
      Nissen,


Chief
      Financial Officer


May
      15,
      2006
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting 
in Clovis, California on May 27th. The purpose of the meeting will be 
to discuss monitoring for the projects submitted for funding.

DATES: The meeting will be from 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. in Clovis, CA.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Sierra National Forest 
Supervisor's Office, 1600 Tollhouse Rd., Clovis, CA. Send written 
comments to Robbin Ekman, Fresno County Resource Advisory Committee 
Coordinator, c/o Sierra National Forest, High Sierra Ranger District, 
29688 Auberry Road, Prather, CA 93651 or electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0775626c6a666947617429616263297274"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6715020c0a060927011449010203491214">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robbin Ekman, Fresno County Resource 
Advisory Committee Coordinator, (559) 855-5355 ext. 3341.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring Payments to States Fresno County 
Title II project matters to the attention of the Committee may file 
written statements with the Committee staff before or after the 
meeting. Agenda items to be covered include (1) Monitoring.

    Dated: May 7, 2009.
Ray Porter,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-11160 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Avro Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike P. Kurtanjek,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of April
15, 2011.


/s/ Mike P. Kurtanjek
-----------------------------------
Mike P. Kurtanjek
Chief Executive Officer
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00047

- CR

CARLOS GONZALEZ

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19FC

- 1982F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
May 27, 2021
Slip Op. 00-168

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

__________________________________________

:

RHP BEARINGS LTD., NSK BEARINGS :

EUROPE LTD. and NSK CORPORATION, :

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : Consol. Court No.

: 97-02-00217

UNITED STATES, :

:

Defendant, :

:

THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, :

:

 Defendant-Intervenor. :

__________________________________________:

J U D G M E N T

This Court having received and reviewed the United States Department of Commerce,

International Trade Administration’s (“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to

Court Remand, RHP Bearings Ltd. v. United States, 23 CIT ___, 83 F. Supp. 2d 1322 (1999)

(“Remand Results”), and Commerce having complied with the Court’s remand and no responses to

the Remand Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on February 10, 2000 are affirmed

in their entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed.

_________________________________________

 NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

 SENIOR JUDGE

Dated: December 21, 2000

New York, New York
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Shelter Properties II
first quarter 1999 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000319723
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      343
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,505)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,852
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          8,228
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,852
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,971
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       619
<EPS-BASIC>                                      22.29<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Mulitplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Warren *v.*Blevins.

Where, in an action for the recovery of land, the parties went to trial, not.upon the whole case, but upon the single question of the jurisdiction of the court, the same depending upon whether any part of the premises lay in the county in which the action was brought, and the jury found in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant, without making a motion for a new trial, brought a writ of error upon various rulings of the court made during the progress of the trial, the reversal of none of which would operate to terminate the case but would leave it still pending in the court below, the writ of error was premature, and for that reason is dismissed, with direction that the plaintiff in error be allowed to enter his bill of exceptions on the minutes of the court below as exceptions taken *pendente lite.*

July 30, 1894.

Practice in Supreme Court.

H. P. Lumpkin and R. J. & J. McCamy, for plaintiff in error. McCutchen & Shumate, *contra.*

Lumpkin, Justice.

An action of ejectment was brought by Blevins against Warren in the superior court of Dade county. The defendant filed a plea alleging that the court had no jurisdiction over the subject-matter of the suit, for the reason "that the land sued for lay in Walker county, and that the superior court of that county alone had jurisdiction of the case. The parties went to trial upon the single question of the jurisdiction of the court, and upon this-issue the jury found for the plaintiff; but there was no recovery by him of the premises in dispute, and for this reason the main case is still pending in the court below. Without moving for a new trial, the defendant sued out :a bill of exceptions alleging error upon various rulings made by the court during the progress of the trial. After *&*careful examination of these rulings, we find that the reversal of none of them would operate to make a final termination of the case. Por this reason, the writ of *216error, under section 4250 of the code, was prematurely' brought, and must be dismissed.

For the purpose, however, of allowing the defendant-to take advantage of the exceptions he has made, in the event it should in the end become necessary for him to-do so, we have directed that he be allowed to enter his-bill of exceptions on the minutes of the court below as exceptions taken *pendente lite.*We do not mean to-say that these exceptions are meritorious, or that they are not. We give the direction indicated, simply for the purpose of preserving the rights of the defendant until the final hearing, this being, in our judgment, under the circumstances, a proper disposition to make of this case. *Writ of error dismissed, with direction.*
Summary of Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.20 
 Summary of Director Compensation 
 Directors of ABIOMED who are not our employees receive an annual
retainer of $15,000 or an equivalent value of our Common Stock, at the individual’s option, and $1,200 for attendance at in-person meetings of our Board of Directors, $1,000 for attendance at meetings of Committees of our Board of Directors and
$600 for attendance at all telephonic meetings. The Chair of our Audit Committee receives $1,500 for attendance at meetings of our Audit Committee. In addition, our Lead Director, receives additional compensation of $20,000. 
 These directors are also eligible to receive stock options and other awards under our stock incentive plans. It is currently our policy to grant
each non-employee director who continues to be a director following our annual meeting of stockholders, a stock option to purchase 8,000 shares of our common stock, with an exercise price of the fair market value of our common stock on the date of
grant, and vesting in full one year after the date of grant. It is also currently our policy to grant a stock option to purchase 25,000 shares of our common stock upon the appointment of new non-employee directors, with an exercise price of the fair
market value of our common stock on the date of grant, and vesting annually over five years. 
 Our directors are also eligible for
additional compensation in the event that they perform additional services for ABIOMED in excess of the normal time commitments we expect of our directors.
~FF~~EOF~EA'LTORNEY'G~NERALOF~~A~ 

AUSTIN 

Pear Stir .., 

sion next menti~mib r&a, that it 

end oolleotad level p~dame, oontraoteQ 
Eonorable 0. P. Lo&hart, Page P 

no al& &se’sements~ ‘haW: sm?ip been needed~ 

or pada .,and that. the, probabflitle6. sre~ t&&t 

no eaaesamenta vi.l.l. ever be'necided. 

“Xq 1941. the Dompauy : snanded its aliarter anix, br-lay 80’ as to ‘prvvlde .that 

thenosf&th It oodld opera?% 88’8. legal 

reserve iriutual. oomgmy; But it la stated 

in the ‘Mm.ndod’eharter and.by-laws that the 

amailments ‘were eff beted ,by the. Oompahy 

without $bandoning.Its~right to operate 

utqdei the other proe~,ai6ne .oi GsJiforni~ 

law uuder pihiah pr+vZouslg it had ‘been: ,tiy 

ear orsted, 

tha e 

lioansed and operatiingg ana 

further operations should be nithout &wgirrg or affecting In shy wag the, 

old out stEinding poLieiee . 

*It Is etated, that slnoe the amendment a&l polloisa ,pow ‘fesuad, an& to be 

issued in the rutu.26, are to be without 

aaseeambnt poyera and upon the level pramium, legal reserve ba,sis,’ providi.ng fok 

unalterable sma oertalu In benefits. 
‘We enoloa~+ hazewith &a-oer$iiied oopy of 

9hq66~ aa amandatl and Bp4aw8 as amenbaa, 

whi,ah we iek you ts PebUn 6e w with polir 

epiaien a8 to whe6har wdaP this plan OS 

OQaqa6irm 6hfS ~qmkpany can 1awfuU.y .bS adJtQe& to Texas as a mutwl ooapanp ‘opbrit 

Fos on the old line ox? Legal rsrerve .ba~im* 

under ow ,br+la 475717.” 

A%W.sle’ 6757, VQPIIM~~ Annotated Tetis 

GtrtZ Statubw ;, reada sis foli6wal 

“No maoh. ftirei@~ life forrur&ee aimpanes, or ~3.We and aoaident, bealth~aixd ao1 

oidan6, or ~life; health ana aaoident 

inmarana~~ oompqny, shall traneaot any 

bW&ien~ of inmrauae ia thl8 State, uulers 

swh aompaqp ia poeserasd oi at leaat me 

hundred thousand dollara of aotual~paid~ up 

sash 5oney oapftal invested ia uuah tae’aurlbiaa ae~provlded under the laws of the 

Btrafe, tiamitory Or oomtry Of its oree6ion. 

JYa. mutW1 life ~inouranae OP auoidant izmmanae OaplPWi or llia.and aeoident, health 

and aooidant,, o$ l.ir?, health and aooldent 

iuaurataoe ‘ocm~paxty operatfng on the old’lina 

-of legal meerre basis, ahall traneaet any 

b+aineas or ineu~~oa in thtrr State, unleae 

euoh aampesy Is posaeesed of at leant one 

hundred t+oueand dollare of net eurplw 

aaeet~s Invested in seaurities provided ror 

udar the Lawa of the State, terri6org or 

oow6ry of its oreation.* 

‘After a ,aareiul examination of the 

oharter and by-laws rubnltted UB by you with 

~eforanoa to the above named oompa~y it ie ‘hour 

520’ 
521 

opinian that sw,h ampany aan be Iawreallq admIttea 

WTamaa aa a mutual wmgany 0 

Una as .lagaZ reoono baris i 

6Pabing an the old 

un ar Artfola~ 4757, 

Vu, A* @I. 8:,) 10 it posroroas wla not etlrplu8 r* 

@xed.by.~Arttele 4737, and ir not othemiaa 

air~mL&fied. 

We are retuning herewith the instPoment8 

you sent w with raiesanea to.ttil8 matbar. 

Wm. a. Paoning; 

Aeaistent 

ATTORl?EY GENERAL 03 !J!ms
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

I, Calli R. Bucci, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. 

 

 

 

 

 

*/s/ Calli R. Bucci* 

Calli R. Bucci 

Chief Financial Officer 

 

September 7, 2018 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. and will be retained by Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2272 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2272

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Development, Salaries 
                   and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Development, Salaries 
                   and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, RURAL 
              DEVELOPMENT, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Development, Salaries 
and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $236,835,000.
                                 <all>
```
954 A.2d 456

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Peter Daniel FARRIS, Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG, No. 13

Sept.Term, 2008.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Aug. 13, 2008.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for Indefinite Suspension filed herein, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 18th day of August, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Peter Daniel Farris, be, and he is hereby, indefinitely suspended by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Peter Daniel Farris from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.
#### Nolan v. Town of Weddington

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 486

No. 221P07

Petitioner’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-704)

Denied 10/11/07

Martin, J., Recused
#### DeLoach *v.*Richards.

The plaintiff in error not having paid the costs in this court, and the affidavit sent up with the record not conforming in terms to the act of September 27th, 1881 (Code, £4263), and counsel not having appeared in person when the case was called for argument, and not having sent up money with which to pay the costs, the writ of error is dismissed. *Harris*v. *Harrold, Johnson & Co.,*74 *Ga.*410.

April 9, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

A rule absolute was granted against a constable for failing to make the money upon levy of a distress warrant. He excepted, and instead of making the usual affidavit *in forma pauperis,*he swore “ that because of his poverty he is unable to pay the cost in the above stated case.” The head-note states the other facts.

J. J. Bull, by brief, for plaintiff' in error.

*Writ of error dismissed.*