alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Earnest Jesse RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. Francisco PORRAS, Officer; Lora Hanks, Officer; City of Minneapolis, Appellees.

No. 07-3484.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: April 3, 2009.

Filed: April 7, 2009.

Earnest Jesse Richardson, Sandstone, MN, pro se.

Charles J. Brown, Jr., Sara Jeanne La-throp, City Attorney’s Office, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellees.

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Jesse Richardson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil rights action, in which he claimed that he had been the victim of racial profiling when police officers pursued and arrested him. Upon de novo review, *see Ramlet v. E.F. Johnson Co.,*507 F.3d 1149, 1152 (8th Cir.2007), we hold that summary judgment was appropriate because Richardson did not offer evidence from which a jury could find that the officers acted with a discriminatory purpose, *see Johnson v. Crooks,*326 F.3d 995, 999-1000 (8th Cir.2003) (Equal Protection Clause is constitutional basis for objecting to intentionally discriminatory application of laws; district court erred in not dismissing equal protection claim where plaintiffs failed to offer evidence that officer did not stop non-African Americans under similar circumstances, or offer direct evidence of racial animus other than personal opinion); *see also Brockinton v. City of Sherwood, Ark.,*503 F.3d 667, 674 (8th Cir.2007) (for municipal liability to attach, individual liability must first be found on underlying substantive claim); *Johnson v. Outboard Marine Corp.,*172 F.3d 531, 535 (8th Cir.1999) (this court may affirm on any basis supported by record).

*463Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3831 

To reduce temporarily the duty on benzoyl chloride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2006 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on benzoyl chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZOYL CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.29.15 Benzoyl chloride (CAS No. 98–88–4) 

(provided for in subheading 2916.32.20) 2.0% No 

change 

No 

change 

On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•S 3831 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 15, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 15, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0013. JOYCELYN VANTERPOOL v. DAVID PATTON.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: DR152051J5
[DO N OT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 2- 12 41 6 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 4 :0 4- cr-0 03 22 -RDP-TM P-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A,
Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us JEREM Y LAMAR HARRIS, Defen dant -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di stric t Co urt forth e North ernDis tri ctof Al ab am a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Au gu st30 , 20 12 ) Befo re BARKETT, MARCUS andJORDAN, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Je remy Lam ar Harr is , pro ceed in g pr o s e , app eal s the di stric t co urt’s d en ia l Case: 12-12416 Date Filed: 08/30/2012 Page: 1 of 3of

hi s m ot io n und er 1 8 U.S.C. § 35 82 (c)( 2) to reduc e h is sen te nc e. Harri s p le d gu il ty to co ns pi rin g t o d is tri bu te an d p os se ss with i nt en t t o d is tri bu te 50 gra m s o r m or e o f co cai ne ba se , invi ol at io n o f 21 U.S.C. §§ 84 1( a)(1 ) an d 8 46 , di strib ut in g an d p os se ss in g wi thin te ntto di strib ut e 5 gra m s o r m or e o f co cai ne ba se , in vi ol at io n o f § 8 41 (a)( 1) , con sp iri ng to co m m itm on ey

laund eri ng , invi ol at io n o f 18 U.S.C. § 1 95 6( h) , and9 co un ts of m on ey lau nd eri ng , invi ol at io n o f § 1 95 6( a)(1 )(B) (i) . His dru g o ffen se s i nv ol ve d a t l eas t 1 .5 k il og ram s o f co cai ne ba se . The di stric t co urt ca lc ul at eda gu id el in es ran ge of l ife im pr is on m en t b ecau se Harri s was subjec t t o ast atut or il y -m an da te d s ente nc e o f li fe i m pr is on m en t b as ed up onhi s p rio r co nv ic ti on s fo r two fel on y dru g o ffen se s. Aft er g ran ti ng a do wnwar d d ep artur e fo r Harri s’s s ub st an ti al ass is tanc e, th e d is tri ctco urt cal cu la te d agu id el in es ran ge of 2 35 to 29 3 m on th s’ im pr is on m en t, an d s en te nc ed Harri s t o ato ta l s ente nc e o f 24 0 m on th s’ im pr is on m en t. Harri s s ub se qu entl y fil ed a § 35 82 (c)( 2) m ot io n t o re du ce h is sen te nc e b as edup onAm en dm en t 7 50 to th e Sen te nc in g Gu id el in es an d the Fai r Sen te nc in g Actof 2 01 0 (“ FSA”). Bec au se Harri s’s g ui de li ne s rang e o f li fe i m pr is on m en t was ba se d upo n the st atut or il y -m an da te d s ente nc e o f li fe i m pr is on m en t t o wh ic h h e was subjec t, Am en dm en t 7 50 di d n otaffe cthi s ap pl ic ab le gu id el in es ran ge . Mor eo ve r, ev en 2 Case: 12-12416 Date Filed: 08/30/2012 Page: 2 of 3as su m in g tha t the FSA ap pl ie s t o d efen dant s wh o, l ik e Harri s, were sen te nc ed

be fo re i ts en actm ent, Harr is rem ai ns subjec t t o ast atut or il y -m an da te d s en te nc e o f li fe i m pr is on m en t an d an i de nt ic al gu id el in es ran ge . Harris was, the refo re, in el ig ib le fora se nt en ce re du ct io n. AFFIRMED.

3 Case: 12-12416 Date Filed: 08/30/2012 Page: 3 of 3
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





I,
Matthew Krieg, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Generation Zero Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December
31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in
such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Generation Zero Group, Inc.





By:/s/ Matthew
Krieg


Matthew
Krieg


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)





April 13,
2010
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Gold Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jan E. Dulman, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


            Dated: November 14, 2007          /s/ Jan E. Dulman
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Jan E. Dulman
                                              Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00671]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Amended; 
Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Neurological Sciences and Disorders C, February 26, 2015, 08:00 a.m. to 
February 27, 2015, 06:00 p.m., Embassy Suites Alexandria, Alexandria, 
VA which was published in the Federal Register on January 6, 2015, 80 
FR 513.
    The meeting date has been changed from February 26-27, 2015 to 
March 30-31, 2015. The location remains the same. The meeting is closed 
to the public.

    Dated: January 13, 2015.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-00671 Filed 1-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K/A Amendment No. 1 to CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    
    JUNE 29, 2004
 NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION    CANADA
    
    001-07260
    
    NOT APPLICABLE(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
    Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K/A filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation
of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):  [   ]
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17
CFR 230.425)  [   ]
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)[   ]
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))[   ]
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01     Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On October 14, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation (the Company) issued a press
release (the Press Release) which, among other things, updated information
concerning the timing of implementation of certain matters under the existing
agreement between the Company and Flextronics with respect to the Companys
divestiture of certain manufacturing operations and related activities to
Flextronics, previously announced in the press release attached as Exhibit 99.1
to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2004. The Press Release
is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated by reference herein. Item 9.01     Financial Statements and Exhibits (c)     Exhibits 99.1        Press Release issued by the Company on October 14, 2004.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ William R. KerrWilliam R. KerrChief Financial Officer  By:
    /s/ Blair F. MorrisonBlair F. MorrisonAssistant Secretary Dated: October 18, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.     Description 99.1        Press Release issued by the Company on October 14, 2004.
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Security National Financial Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Stephen M. Sill, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      November 14, 2008
            s/s
      Stephen M. SillStephen
      M. SillVice
      President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer








41
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: September 14, 2005
                                        David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a planning meeting and briefing meeting of the Rhode Island Advisory Committee will convene at 11 a.m. on Wednesday, May 27, 2009, at the University of Rhode Island, Feinstein Campus, 80 Washington Street, Providence, Rhode Island. The purpose of the planning meeting is for the Committee to discuss its June briefing. The purpose of the briefing meeting is to meet with the Rhode Island Roundtable to discuss the recently released “Strategic Plan” issued by the Rhode Island Police Chiefs.

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The address is U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Eastern Regional Office, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, present their comments at the meeting, or who desire additional information should contact Alfreda Greene, Secretary, at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to:                     *ero@usccr.gov.*

Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                     *http://www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above e-mail or street address.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC, May 6, 2009.

Christopher Byrnes,

Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. E9-10946 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
(October 17, 2013)

#### In the Matter of Rudranu Toolasprashad, Appellant, v Raymond W. Kelly et al., Respondents.

[975 NYS2d 1]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Saliann Scarpulla, J.), entered on or about April 5, 2012, insofar as appealed from, as limited by the briefs, denying the petition to compel respondents to vest petitioner police officer’s pension and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the judgment vacated, and the petition granted to the extent of directing respondents to vest petitioner’s pension.

Administrative Code of the City of New York § 13-256 provides that a police officer’s pension automatically vests 30 days after he or she “duly execute[s] [an] application for a deferred retirement allowance,” provided, among other things, that the discontinuance of the officer’s employment is not “by . . . dismissal” (§ 13-256 [a] [1], [4]; [b]). On or about March 7, 2006, petitioner submitted a retirement application. On April 3, 2006, before the date of vesting, respondent Commissioner dismissed petitioner from the police force following a hearing held in his absence. However, in a prior CPLR article 78 proceeding, the Supreme Court vacated the order of dismissal, finding that respondents’ attempts to serve petitioner with notice of the charges, which were not “reasonably calculated to give him actual notice and an opportunity to be heard” *(Toolasprashad v Kelly,*2007 NY Slip Op 32075[U], *7 [Sup Ct, NY County 2007], *affd*80 AD3d 530 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*16 NY3d 714 [2011]), violated due process, rendering “the final determination . . . arbitrary and capricious and without sound basis in reason” *(id.*at *7-8). The court granted the petition to the extent of remanding the matter to respondent NYPD for a full hearing on proper notice *(id.*at *8). This Court affirmed the *510Supreme Court’s decision (80 AD3d 530), and the Court of Appeals denied respondents’ application for leave to appeal (16 NY3d 714).

The Supreme Court’s ruling rendered the order of dismissal a nullity, thus, the 30-day vesting period set forth in section 13-256 remained in effect upon remand and began running anew following the Court of Appeals’ denial of leave to appeal.

Although Supreme Court’s remand order was stayed during the pendency of respondents’ appeals (CPLR 5519 [a]), the stay terminated five days after service of the Court of Appeals’ order denying leave to appeal with notice of its entry (CPLR 5519 [e] [ii]). Because respondents failed to hold a hearing and issue a new order of dismissal within 30 days of that date, petitioner’s pension vested automatically and the court should have granted the petition seeking an order compelling them to process the pension *(see Matter of Paniss v Kerik,*15 AD3d 286 [1st Dept 2005]; *Matter of Tolan v Murphy,*39 AD2d 197, 198 [1st Dept 1972]). Concur — Friedman, J.P., Freedman, Richter, Feinman and Gische, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 30747CU).]
Exhibit 10.1


                       THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE


         As of the 10th day of November,  2006,  each of Cubic  Energy,  Inc., a
Texas corporation, and Tauren Exploration,  Inc., a Texas corporation,  agree to
this third amendment of a promissory note.

         WHEREAS,  on February 6, 2006,  Cubic  Energy,  Inc.  ("Cubic")  made a
promissory note in favor of Tauren Exploration, Inc. ("Tauren") in the amount of
US$1,300,000.00 (the "NOTE");

         WHEREAS,  the NOTE was  amended on or about March 30,  2006;  and on or
about June 27, 2006;

         WHEREAS,  Cubic and  Tauren  each  agree to amend the NOTE as  provided
herein; and

         WHEREAS, other than as amended herein, the NOTE, as previously amended,
shall remain in full force and effect.


         NOW THEREFORE,  FOR ALL GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,  including but
not limited to all  consideration  recited  herein,  the sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, Cubic and Tauren agree as follows:

1.           Pursuant to Section  1.1.  of the Note,  the  maturity  date of all
principal  and  interest due under the Note is amended to now read "on or before
October 5, 2007", in the stead of "on or before July 15, 2007".

2.          The first  clause of the first  sentence of the third  paragraph  in
Section 2.2.1.  of the Note is now amended to read "At any time after October 5,
2007", in the stead of "At any time after July 15, 2007"

3.          Other than as amended  herein,  the Note,  and all of its provisions
and covenants, and as previously amended, shall remain in full force and effect.

         EXECUTED AS OF THE DATE WRITTEN ABOVE.


Cubic Energy, Inc.                                      Tauren Exploration, Inc.



________________________                                ________________________
By:                                                     By:
Its:                                                    Its: