alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32(f)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
2009





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Electric Utilities
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered
Report"), I, the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  May
      1, 2009
            /s/  J.
      Matt Simmons, Jr.J.
      Matt Simmons, Jr.
              Vice
      President and Controller
              PPL
      Electric Utilities Corporation





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Delano Brown, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

Submitted July 13, 2009;

decided September 15, 2009

Reported below, 2009 NY Slip Op 74919(11).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report(Date of earliest event reported)
August 23, 2004 Vitran Corporation Inc. 
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 CANADA
    
    000-26256
    
    Not applicable(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)incorporation)
  185 The West Mall, Suite 701, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    
    M9C 5L5(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code)
  416-596-7664 
 (Registrants telephone number,
 including area code)
 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the
following provisions: o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02.     Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Appointment of Principal Officers. The Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, Kevin
Glass resigned on August 19, 2004. On August 23, 2004 the Registrant appointed Sean Washchuk, age 32, to the
position of Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Sean Washchuk
was employed as the Registrants Corporate Controller for the past five years. On August 23, 2004 the Registrant issued the press release attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1, and such press release is incorporated in its entirety by
reference herein.   SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  VITRAN CORPORATION INC.Date: August 23, 2004
    By:
    /s/   Kevin GlassName:
    Kevin GlassTitle:
    Vice President Finance
andChief Financial Officer   EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Vitran Promotes Sean Washchuk to Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Tongji Healthcare Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending
December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric
Zhang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.








/s/
Eric
Zhang
 Date:
May 5, 2017


Eric Zhang


Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Scott P. Woodhouse, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 299]

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered July 22, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while ability impaired by drugs.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of driving while ability impaired by drugs, as a felony. Consistent with the plea agreement, he was sentenced to six months in jail, five years of probation and a $1,000 fine.* Defendant now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record, counsel’s brief and defendant’s pro se submission, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Rose, J.E, Lahtinen, Stein and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

*

 Notably, defendant’s probation was subsequently revoked and he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ignacio HERNANDEZ-BELTRAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41847

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendantr-Appel-lant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ignacio Hernandez-Beltran appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being unlawfully present in the United States after deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and contends that his challenge is not barred by the appeal-waiver provision in his plea agreement. The Government seeks enforcement of the waiver provision.

We assume, *arguendo*only, that the waiver does not bar the instant appeal. Although Hernandez-Beltran contends that *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Hernandez-Beltran properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in *595light of *Alrmndarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
The use of cameras or recording equipment during the 

performance is not allowed. Please be sure that cell phones,

pagers, and other electronic devices are turned off.

Music Department

National Gallery ofArt

Sixth Street and Constitution Avenue nw

Washington, DC

www.nga.gov

Concerts are made possible in part through the generosity of donors

to the National Gallery ofArt through The Circle. Reserved seating is

available in recognition oftheir support. Please contact the development 

office at (202) 842-6450 or circk@nga.gov for more information.

The Seventy-first Season of

The William Nelson Cromwell and F. Lammot Belin

Concerts

National Gallery ofArt

2,953rd Concert

Gjermund Larsen Trio

Gjermund Larsen, violin

Sondre Meisfjord, double bass

Andreas Utnem, organ and piano

Presenting original music by Gjermund Larsen

In honor of Edward Munch: A ljoth Anniversary Tribute

June 5, 2013

Wednesday, 12:10 pm

West Building, West Garden Court

Admissionfree
The Musicians

GJERMUND LARSEN TRIO

Recently featured in the Kennedy Center’s “Nordic Cool” festival, the three

members ofthe Gjermund Larsen Trio represent a wide range ofmusical

genres, from classical and contemporary to jazz and pop as well as traditional folk music. The result is a highly refined and rich soundscape.

One ofthe most respected and active performers and composers on the

contemporary Norwegian folk music scene, Gjermund Larsen was educated

at the Norwegian State Academy. In 2002 he became the youngest fiddler

ever to win the Norwegian Championship in traditional folk-fiddling, and

in 2011 he was nominated for a Grammy Award together with the Trondheim

Soloists. The 2006 premiere of “Brytningstid,” commissioned by the Telemark 

Festival, marked his official debut as a composer. Devoted to new, contemporary, and original folk music, Larsen draws inspiration from the local dance

music traditions ofthe Verdal area in the Trondelag region.

Double bassist Sondre Meisfjord and keyboardist Andreas Utnem joined

Larsen for the premiere of “Brytningstid,” and the musicians have continued

to work as a trio ever since. In 2008, the ensemble received the Norwegian

Grammy for its debut album, “Ankomst,” followed two years later by “Aurum,”

which was nominated in two categories. The group’s third album, “Reise,”

was released in March 2013.

The program will he announcedfrom the stage

Sponsored by the Royal Norwegian Embassy

Upcoming Concerts at the National Gallery ofArt

Duo Hoerr/Sigfridsson

Music for cello and piano by Beethoven, Duport, and Mozart

June 9, 2013

Sunday, 6:30 pm

West Building, West Garden Court

Michael Arnowitt, pianist

Music by Debussy, Rachmaninoff, Satie, and other composers

Presented in honor of

Diaghilev and the Ballets Russes, 1909 - 1929:

When Art Danced with Music

Sponsored in part by the Billy Rose Foundation

June 16, 2013

Sunday, 6:30 pm

West Building, West Garden Court

Carpe Diem String Quartet

Music by Leshnoff and other composers

June 23, 2013

Sunday, 6:30 pm

West Building, West Garden Court
#### State v. Godwyn

Case below: 183 N.C. App.-(1 May 2005)

No. 270P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA06-670)

Denied 06/27/07
From: The District Court of the 8th Judicial District. County of Cascade.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. CHRISTOPHER LIESTMAN, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. ADC-00-438 DECISION

On October 31, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to the balance of three (3) years to the Department of Corrections for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the following offenses: Count I: Accountability (Burglary), a felony; and Count II: Theft, a felony.

On May 7, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review *37Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 7th day of May, 2009.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Targa
Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rene R. Joyce, as Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2008



|       |  |                                                 
|------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    RENE R.
JOYCE                            
|Name:  |  | Rene R. Joyce                                   
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer of Targa Resources, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[960 NYS2d 902]

#### In the Matter of Patrick H. Diamond (Admitted as Patrick Henry Diamond), a Suspended Attorney, Movant.

First Department,

March 26, 2013

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jorge Dopico, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee,*New York City.

*Maria Matos, Executive Secretary, Committee on Character and Fitness,*New York City.

*Patrick Henry Diamond,*movant pro se.

*122OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The movant was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by this Court on December 12, 1966. Based on a 1985 federal conviction on two counts of filing a false income tax return *(see United States v Diamond,*788 F2d 1025 [4th Cir 1986]), we immediately suspended him from the practice of law and directed that a sanction hearing be held *(Matter of Diamond,*117 AD2d 114 [1st Dept 1986]). The movant failed to appear at the hearing, and we subsequently suspended him from the practice of law for one year commencing May 13, 1986 (the date of the initial suspension) or until the completion of his probation, whichever was later, and until further order of this Court *(Matter of Diamond,*150 AD2d 115 [1989]). In 2007, this Court denied an application for reinstatement by the movant. Accordingly, the movant’s suspension from the practice of law remains in effect.

In the application now before us, the movant recounts the foregoing history and asks that he be permitted to resign from the bar “in the interest of justice.” He states that he is 69 years of age and has no further desire to practice law. The Departmental Disciplinary Committee, which advises that there is no disciplinary proceeding or investigation currently pending with respect to the movant, does not oppose our granting the movant’s request. The Committee on Character and Fitness takes no position on the matter.

This Court’s rules do not provide for a voluntary resignation from the bar by an attorney in the movant’s situation, namely, an attorney suspended pursuant to a closed disciplinary proceeding and who is not subject to any pending investigation or proceeding *(cf.*22 NYCRR 603.11 [a] [providing for a resignation by an attorney “who is the subject of an investigation into allegations of misconduct or who is the subject of a disciplinary proceeding pending in the court”]). Nonetheless, given that the movant no longer wishes to practice law, we deem it appropriate, under these particular circumstances, to grant the movant’s application to resign from the bar in the interest of justice.

Accordingly, the motion should be granted, in the interest of justice, and the movant’s resignation from the practice of law in the State of New York is accepted, effective immediately.

*123Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Mazzarelli, Andrias and. Friedman, JJ., concur.

Movant’s resignation accepted, and his name removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective the date hereof.
665 A.2d 1104

#### TORMEE CONSTRUCTION, INC., ETC., ET AL. v. MERCER COUNTY IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY, ETC.

September 21, 1995.

ORDER

This matter having been duly presented to the Court, and the Court having determined that the specification requiring a Project Labor Agreement for Phase II of the Mercer County Improvement Authority library improvement project is invalid;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the motion for a stay of the opening and award of bids on Phase II is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that all bids shall be returned to the bidders and the project rebid, if desired, without the Project Labor Agreement specification.

The reasons underlying the Court’s Order will be set forth in an opinion that will follow, in due course, in connection with the disposition of the related pending appeal in the within matter.

Justices POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN, and COLEMAN join in this Order.

Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justice HANDLER dissent from the Order.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1649

DALE EDWIN SANDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEPHEN R. FARINA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-01214-TSE-IDD)

Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen R. Farina, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph O’Donnell, Jr., 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen R. Farina appeals from the district court’s orders

awarding costs and attorney fees to Dale Sanders pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012), based on Farina’s second improper removal 

of a lawsuit from state court to district court, and denying 

Farina’s motions for reconsideration and for appointment of 

counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Sanders v. Farina, No. 1:14-cv-01214-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va.

Apr. 21, 2016 & filed May 20, 2016; entered May 23, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. BRIAN PARINI, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-06-484 DECISION

On December 23, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of five (5) years, for violations of the conditions of a suspended sentence, for the offense of Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs, a felony. The Court recommended that the Defendant have mental health screening at MASC followed by the Intensive Supervision Program. The sentence shall run concurrent with the sentences imposed on Counts I and II of Cause No. DC-93-10752.

On August 6, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Ethan Lerman. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

*58The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 6th day of August, 2009.

DATED this 20th day of August, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.