alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2600 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure the equitable 

treatment of political subdivisions contributing to State expenditures 

under the Medicaid program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2023 

Mr. LANGWORTHY (for himself, Ms. TENNEY, and Mr. WILLIAMS of New 

York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure 

the equitable treatment of political subdivisions contributing to State expenditures under the Medicaid program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Local Tax5 payers Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2600 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENSURING THE EQUITABLE TREATMENT OF POLIT2 ICAL SUBDIVISIONS CONTRIBUTING TO 

3 STATE EXPENDITURES UNDER THE MED4 ICAID PROGRAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(cc) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(cc)) is amended— 

7 (1) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘if it re8 quires’’ and all that follows through the period and 

9 inserting ‘‘unless, with respect to amounts received 

10 by the State attributable to such increases, the State 

11 agrees to distribute to each such subdivision an 

12 amount that bears the same ratio to such amounts 

13 received as such contribution of such subdivision 

14 bears to such non-Federal share of expenditures.’’; 

15 and 

16 (2) in the third sentence, by striking ‘‘, except 

17 that’’ and all that follows through the period and in18 serting a period. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to increases in the 

21 Federal medical assistance percentage of a State for med22 ical assistance furnished in calendar quarters beginning 

23 on or after January 1, 2024. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Christopher Caraballo et al., Respondents, v City of Yonkers, Appellant.

Submitted July 20, 2009;

decided September 22, 2009

Reported below, 54 AD3d 796.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3700 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National Korean War Veterans 

Armistice Day to the list of days on which the flag should especially 

be displayed. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2006 

Mrs. CLINTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add National 

Korean War Veterans Armistice Day to the list of days 

on which the flag should especially be displayed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Korean War Veterans 

5 Recognition Act of 2006’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3700 IS 

1 SEC. 2. DISPLAY OF FLAG ON NATIONAL KOREAN WAR VET2 ERANS ARMISTICE DAY. 

3 Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amend4 ed by inserting ‘‘National Korean War Veterans Armistice 

5 Day, July 27;’’ after ‘‘July 4;’’. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          175502
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3206569
<ALLOWANCES>                                     50876
<INVENTORY>                                    1352833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5156655
<PP&E>                                         1094062
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9439902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3022018
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        128344
<OTHER-SE>                                     1251997
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9439902
<SALES>                                        2049984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2049984
<CGS>                                          1157413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1521495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                643992
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              100616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 590677
<INCOME-TAX>                                     15000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             575677
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    575677
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .045
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .045
        

</TABLE>
From: The District Court of the 13th Judicial District. County of Yellowstone.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES M. STILES, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-96-923 DECISION

On November 30, 2006, the defendant was sentenced to five (5) years in the Montana State Prison for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the offense of Forgery, a felony, to run consecutively with the sentence received in criminal Cause No. DC-06-252.

On May 8, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was represented by Margaret Gallagher, who appeared via videoconference.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 8th day of May, 2009.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.
EXHIBIT 32.1. Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)   I, Adam Anthony, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period December 31, 2008 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  April 14, 2009 By:  /s/ Adam Anthony  Adam Anthony  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Aftermarket Enterprises, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EDDIE'S PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

A CUT ABOVE LANDSCAPE AND MAINTENANCE, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2369

[May 19, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; James Nutt, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-CA-007270-

XXXX-MB.

Scott J. Edwards of Scott J. Edwards, P.A., Boca Raton, and Cory S. 

Carano of Cory S. Carano, P.A., Delray Beach, for appellant.

Erik W. Scharf of The Scharf Appellate Group, Miami, and Brian D. 

Buckstein of Gonzalez, Shenkman & Buckstein, P.L., Wellington, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>11724 and <greek-i>11725]


Georgia Disaster Number GA-00023

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Georgia 
(FEMA-1833-DR), dated 04/23/2009.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes and Straight-line 
Winds.
    Incident Period: 03/26/2009 and continuing.

DATES: Effective Date: 05/01/2009.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/22/2009.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 01/23/2010.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Georgia, dated 04/23/2009, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties:
    Brooks, Calhoun, Cook, Crisp, Decatur, Dodge, Dougherty, Irwin, 
Jeff Davis, Lanier, Miller, Monroe, Pulaski, Tattnall, Telfair, Tift, 
Thomas, Turner, Upson, Wayne, Wheeler, Wilcox, Worth.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-11032 Filed 5-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Parks *v.*The State.

In selling or exchanging a cow as a milch cow, to knowingly, falsely and with fraudulent intent represent her to be a “ three gallon cow,” that is a cow having the milk-yielding capacity of three gallons per day, when in fact her capacity was less than one gallon, whereby the purchaser was cheated and defrauded, is an offence under ¿4595 of the code. And in this case the evidence warranted the verdict. *Judgment affirmed.*

June 25, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

Accusation of cheating and swindling. Before Judgé "Westmoreland. Criminal court of Atlanta. December term, 1893.

The evidence showed, that defendant went to Mrs. Garner’s house with a cow and calf, and offered to sell her the cow for $30. She declined to buy, but offered to swap her cow for his. Her cow gave one and a half gallons of milk a day, and was worth $25. He said his was a three-gallon cow, that she gave three gallons of milk a day; and asked $7 boot. He further said his cow was gentle and only six years old, that he had owned her a year, that the calf was eight weeks old, and that he lived in Payette county. He thereupon drew a small quantity of milk from his cow, stating that the reason she did not give more was that he had milked her that morning and the calf had sucked her. He and Mrs. Garner swapped cows, he carrying the calf away. The cow he swapped would not let Mrs. Garner milk her, and though treated kindly and well fed, would not give as much as a quart at a milking, and could not be made gentle. She proved to he dry. She was kept for nine days, and then sold for $12. In trading for her, Mrs. Garner relied solely on defendant’s statements. Upon inquiry it was found that he did not live in Payette county but in Atlanta; and that his other statements about the matter *were*untrue. He refused, on request, to come and get the cow he swapped.

*602F. L. Haralson and Clinton Gowdt, for plaintiff in error. Lewis *W.*Thomas, solicitor, *contra.*
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

The State of Texas, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CV2301025

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 0 87

- C V * August 24 , 202 3

$20,800.00 in U.S. Currency

, * Memorand um Opinion by Williams, J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J.

, and Williams, J.)

This court has considered the State’s motion to dismiss this appeal and

concludes that the motion should be granted

. Therefore, in accordance with this

court ’ s opi nion, the appeal is dismissed

. The costs incurred by reason of this

appeal are taxed against t he State of Texas.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2578 

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to increase the exemption 

from registration threshold for certain investment advisers of private 

funds to reflect the change in inflation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2023 

Mr. BARR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to increase 

the exemption from registration threshold for certain investment advisers of private funds to reflect the change 

in inflation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Inves5 tor Capital Access Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2578 IH

1 SEC. 2. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR THE EXEMPTION 

2 THRESHOLD FOR CERTAIN INVESTMENT AD3 VISERS OF PRIVATE FUNDS. 

4 Section 203(m) of the Investment Advisers Act of 

5 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–3(m)) is amended by adding at the 

6 end the following: 

7 ‘‘(4) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—The Commis8 sion shall adjust the dollar amount described under 

9 paragraph (1)— 

10 ‘‘(A) upon enactment of this paragraph, to 

11 reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index 

12 for All Urban Consumers published by the Bu13 reau of Labor Statistics of the Department of 

14 Labor between the date of enactment of the 

15 Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration 

16 Act of 2010 and the date of enactment of this 

17 paragraph; and 

18 ‘‘(B) annually thereafter, to reflect the 

19 change in the Consumer Price Index for All 

20 Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of 

21 Labor Statistics of the Department of Labor.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00277

- CR

Alberto Jose Meza

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 271st District Court

o f Wise County (CR17201 )

Octob er 1, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DI STRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
II 

Calendar No. 620 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3617 

[Report No. 109–340] 

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2006 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. CHAFEE, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. VITTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North American Wet5 lands Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2006’’. 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3617 RS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 Section 7(c)(5) of the North American Wetlands Con3 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 4406(c)(5)) is amended by strik4 ing ‘‘fiscal year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 

5 2007 through 2012’’. 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Calendar No. 620 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3617 

[Report No. 109

–340] 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands 

Conservation Act. 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Randy J. Wright, Respondent. Central Transport, Inc., Appellant; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Submitted March 16, 2009;

decided May 7, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
 Pooling
and Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2007 (the "Pooling
 and Servicing
Agreement), among Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corp.,
as
 Depositor,
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LaSalle
Bank
 National Association,
as Trustee and LNR Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer
 GCCFC
2007-GG9
 I, Susan
K. Chapman, a Vice President of LNR Partners, Inc. as Special Servicer under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement, on behalf of the Special Servicer and not in my
individual capacity, hereby certify that:
 1.
                I
      have reviewed the activities performed by the Special Servicer under the
      Pooling and
      Servicing Agreement during the period ending the end of the fiscal year
      2007 (the
      "Reporting;
      Period") and the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling
      and
      Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;
      and
 
 2.
                To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has
      fulfilled
      its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material
      respects
      throughout the Reporting
Period.
 
 LNR
PARTNERS, INC.
  By: /s/ Susan K.
Chapman
 Susan K.
Chapman
 Vice
President
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3630 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize a program 

relating to the Lake Pontchartrain Basin, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2006 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize a program relating to the Lake Pontchartrain 

Basin, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN BASIN RESTORATION 

4 REAUTHORIZATION. 

5 The first section 121 of the Federal Water Pollution 

6 Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273) (relating to Lake Pont7 chartrain Basin) is amended in subsection (f) by striking 

8 ‘‘2005’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3630 IS

1 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

2 The second section 121 of the Federal Water Pollu3 tion Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1274) (relating to wet weath4 er watershed pilot projects) is redesignated as section 122. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NEHEEM WILLIAMSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 40 EAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2006 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, CEO,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: November 13, 2006                     Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Calvin A. Wallen, III, CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANA HOLDING CORPORATION,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SMUCK),

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 729 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in applying the [ Protz II ] standard to the case on appeal at the time of this Court’s decision retroactive to the date of the IRE instead of as of the date of the Supreme Court changed in the law?

2. Whether the Commonwealth Court’s failure to grant the employer credit for the three year period between the date of the IRE evaluation and

the date of this Court’s decision in [ Protz II ] unlawfully violates Employer’s constitutional right pursuant to the “Due Course of Law” provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution Article I, Section 11? M.D. Appeal Dkt. 44 MAP 2019