alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000318380
<NAME>                                        Public Storage, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                     1
<CURRENCY>                                                      US
       
<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           Mar-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                  1
<CASH>                                                 102,575,000
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       102,575,000
<PP&E>                                               3,681,500,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (437,655,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,110,491,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   88,872,000
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                          1,098,900,000
<COMMON>                                                13,532,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           2,571,401,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,110,491,000
<SALES>                                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       148,270,000
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           50,886,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        30,985,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       1,204,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         61,842,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            61,842,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.34
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 88 (Friday, May 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10829]



[[Page 21688]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health


Final Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition 
to the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HHS gives notice concerning the final effect of the HHS 
decision to designate a class of employees at Westinghouse Atomic Power 
Development Plant in East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as an addition to 
the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees 
Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. On March 31, 
2009, as provided for under 42 U.S.C. 7384q(b), the Secretary of HHS 
designated the following class of employees as an addition to the SEC:

    All Atomic Weapons Employer employees who worked at Westinghouse 
Atomic Power Development Plant in East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 
from August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1944, for a number of work 
days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely 
under this employment or in combination with work days within the 
parameters established for one or more other classes of employees in 
the SEC.

    This designation became effective on April 30, 2009, as provided 
for under 42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)(C). Hence, beginning on April 30, 2009, 
members of this class of employees, defined as reported in this notice, 
became members of the Special Exposure Cohort.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry Elliott, Director, Office of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, 
OH 45226, Telephone 513-533-6800 (this is not a toll-free number). 
Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d79894968497949394f9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b14181a081b181f18751c140d">[email protected]</span></a>.

Christine M. Branche,
Acting Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. E9-10829 Filed 5-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
665 A.2d 1105

#### IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES FOR AN OPEN COMMISSION UNDER RULE 4:11-5(b) TO EXAMINE UNDER OATH ROBERT G. BERKSON, A RESIDENT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF NEW JERSEY BUREAU OF SECURITIES FOR AN OPEN COMMISSION UNDER RULE 4:11-5(b) TO EXAMINE UNDER OATH PETER F. HIBBARD, A RESIDENT OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND.

August 9, 1995.

Certification is granted and summarily remanded to the Chancery Division for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion of the Court in *Silverman v. Berkson,*141 *N.J.*412, 661 A.2d 1266 (1995).
#### State v. Caudle

Case below: 172 N.C. App. 261

No. 433P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA03-1576)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

4. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

5. Defs Motion to Vacate Temporary Stay

1. Allowed 359 N.C. 854

Stay dissolved 12/19/06

2. Denied 12/19/06

3. See Special Order Page 151

4. Denied 10/06/05

5. Dismissed as Moot 12/19/06

Timmons-Goodson, J., Recused
|   | (1)      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the date and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 30, 2011                                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                          |
| /s/ Dean R. Marks                                                  |
| Dean R. MarksChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |

----
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(d) Certification

 

I, In-Young Chase, certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period coveredby this report on Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.        Based on my knowledge,the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, allof the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.        Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) assuccessor in interest to Bank of America, National Association (“BANA”), ofSATURNS Trust No. 2007-1, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement,which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1; and

 

5.        All of the reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as anexhibit to this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this reporton Form 10–K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bankas successor-in-interest to BANA and its officers and agents.

 

 

By:/s/In-Young Chase	

Name:	In-YoungChase

Title:	VicePresident

Date:	March 30, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 22, 2011





/s/ Anthony L. HavensAnthony L. HavensChief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.8

Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.

In connection with the quarterly report of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, SLI Acquisition Corp., Spectrum Europe B.V. and Spectrum
Chromatography (collectively, the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Roy T. Eddleman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: May 6, 2003.


/s/ Roy T. Eddleman
-------------------------------------


Roy T. Eddleman
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 88 (Friday, May 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21622-21623]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10800]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1613]


Designation of New Grantee Foreign-Trade Zone 57, Charlotte, 
North Carolina Area Resolution and Order

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 
18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the Foreign-Trade Zones 
Board Regulations (15 CFR Part 400), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the 
Board) adopts the following Order:

    The Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board (the Board) has considered 
the application (filed 07/23/2008) submitted by the North Carolina 
Department of Commerce (NCDOC), grantee of FTZ 57, Charlotte, North 
Carolina, requesting reissuance of the grant of authority for said 
zone to the Charlotte Regional Partnership, Inc. (CRP), a non-profit 
organization, which has accepted such reissuance subject to approval 
by the FTZ Board. Upon review, the Board finds that the requirements 
of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that 
the proposal is in the public interest.
    Therefore, the Board approves the application and recognizes the 
Charlotte

[[Page 21623]]

Regional Partnership, Inc. (CRP) as the new grantee of Foreign Trade 
Zone 57, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of April 2009.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. E9-10800 Filed 5-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Shelter Properties II;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 8, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters







Vice President of Shelter Realty II Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
#### In the Matter of James McNulty et al., Petitioners, v Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

[974 NYS2d 301]

— Lahtinen, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this Court pursuant to Tax Law § 2016) to review a determination of respondent Tax Appeals Tribunal which denied petitioners’ requests for additional interest on certain refunds of personal income tax imposed under Tax Law article 22.

We confirm the determination of respondent Tax Appeals Tribunal for the reasons set forth in *Matter of Michael A. Goldstein No. 1 Trust v Tax Appeals Trib. of the State of N.Y.*(101 AD3d 1496 [2012], *lv denied*21 NY3d 860 [2013]) and *Matter of Goldstein v Tax Appeals Trib. of the State of N.Y.*(111 AD3d 986 [2013] [decided herewith]).

Peters, PJ, Rose and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|Certification of Principal Executive Officer
|--------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aspen Exploration Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |    |  |                                                 
|-------------------- |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  May 13, 2008 |  | By |  | /s/ R.V. Bailey                                 
|                     |  |    |  | R.V. Bailey, interim Chief Executive Officer and
|                     |  |    |  | Principal Executive Officer                     



---
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |                         | Across      America Financial Services, Inc.  |
|---------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      March 30, 2009 | By:                          | /s/ Brian      L. Klemsz                      |
|                      | Brian      L. Klemsz         |
|                      | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                      | Chief      Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             19 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     /s/ GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
-------------------------------------------
         GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
       CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
         SEPTEMBER 24, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been  provided to Statmon  Technologies  Corp.  and
will be retained by Statmon  Technologies  Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Rebecca Chusid, Respondent, v Daniel Silvera, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 877]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Janowitz, J), dated January 3, 2013, as denied his motion for recusal.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“Absent a legal disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, a court is the sole arbiter of the need for recusal, and its decision is a matter of discretion and personal conscience” *(Matter of O’Donnell v Goldenberg,*68 AD3d 1000, 1000 [2009]; *see People v Moreno,*70 NY2d 403, 405-406 [1987]; *Vigo v 501 Second St. Holding Corp.,*100 AD3d 870 [2012]; *Matter of Imre v Johnson,*54 AD3d 427 [2008]). Here, the appellant failed to set forth any proof of bias or prejudice in support of his motion for recusal *(see Vigo v 501 Second St. Holding Corp.,*100 AD3d at 870; *Gihon, LLC v 501 Second St., LLC,*77 AD3d 709 [2010]; *Daulat v Helms Bros., Inc.,*57 AD3d 938 [2008]; *Matter of Alizia McK.,*25 AD3d 429 [2006]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for recusal. Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Cohen, JJ., concur.
663 A.2d 637

#### IN THE MATTER OF WAYNE POWELL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 12, 1995.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed its decision with the Court on June 27, 1995, recommending that WAYNE POWELL of CHERRY HILL, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, be reprimanded for violating *RPC*1.8(e) (advancing personal funds to clients) and *RPC*1.15(d) (failure to comply with record-keeping provisions of *Rule*1:21-6), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WAYNE POWELL is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

*427ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.