alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: November 14, 2006
                                        David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
2



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	3



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	4



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	5



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	6



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	7



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	8
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-1089V 

Filed: October 25, 2016 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

HEATHER STURTZE, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

v. * Tetanus-Diphtheria-Acellular Pertussis 

 * (“Tdap”) Vaccination; Shoulder Injury 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Related to Vaccine Administration 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit 

 * (“SPU”) 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop, Attorney at Law, Beverly Hills, CA, for petitioner. 

Kathryn Ann Robinette, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On August 31, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of her September 16, 2015 tetanus-diphtheriaacellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the 

Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On October 21, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “believes that petitioner’s alleged injury is 

consistent with SIRVA and that it was caused-in-fact by the Tdap vaccine she received 

on September 16, 2015.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that no other causes 

have been identified for petitioner’s SIRVA, and that “petitioner met the statutory 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

requirements by suffering the condition for more than six months.” Id. Respondent 

additionally indicates that “based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied 

all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id.

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
"Report"), I, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Anthony L.
Havens


Anthony
L. Havens


Chief
Executive Officer


Date:
September 21, 2009
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maria De Jesus SAMUDIO-DE ALONSO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40173.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael L. Herman, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Maria de Jesus Samudio-de Alonso appeals her jury convictions for importing into the United States, and possessing with intent to distribute, cocaine. She argues pursuant to *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), that (1) a defendant’s knowledge of drug type and drug quantity are *643material elements of the offense of conviction which must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury and, therefore, the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions and (2) 21 U.S.C. § 841 is facially unconstitutional.

She correctly concedes that these issues are foreclosed by *United States v. Gamez-Gonzalez,*319 F.3d 695, 700 (5th Cir.2003), and *United States v. Slaughter,*238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000), respectively, and she raises them only to preserve their further review by the Supreme Court. We are bound by our precedent absent an intervening Supreme Court decision or a subsequent en banc decision. *See United States v. Short,*181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir.1999).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Hodges, Appellant.n

[869 NYS2d 912]

Appeals by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered April 24, 2006, convicting him of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) a judgment of the same court rendered June 14, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal from the judgment rendered April 24, 2006, brings up for review the denial (Lewis, J.), after a hearing (O’Dwyer, J.H.O.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain incriminating statements the defendant made to detectives during an interview. The credibility determinations of the hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and its conclusions will not be set aside unless manifestly erroneous or unsupported by the record *(see People v Rivera,*27 AD3d 489, 490 [2006]). The record supports the hearing court’s determination to credit the detectives’ testimony, which established that the defendant’s right to counsel had not attached when the defendant made the statements to the detectives *(see People v Jenneman,*37 AD3d 736, 737 [2007]). Furthermore, the defendant’s contention that his due process rights were violated by the detectives’ failure to videotape the interview is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, is without merit *(see People v Nelson,*52 AD3d 534, 535 [2008]; *People v Rosas,*30 AD3d 545 [2006], *affd*8 NY3d 493 [2007]).

The defendant’s remaining contention has been rendered academic in light of our determination. Spolzino, J.E, Covello, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.
Order entered March 5, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00050-CV

MATTHEW MCKERLEY, D.O., Appellant

V.

DANISHA JACKSON, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-10884

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s March 3, 2021 unopposed motion for an 

extension of time to file his brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and 

extend the time to April 5, 2021.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Bull Run Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as
of November 30, 2004 (the Evaluation Date) and presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; andc)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date:
    
    September 12, 2005Signed:
    
    /s/ ROBERT S. PRATHER, JR.Robert S. Prather, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

JONATHON HAMLETTE, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 317 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130923 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130923 COA: 257334 Wayne CC: 04-004965-01 OTEAGO WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2006

Clerk
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For March 28, 2005 EXTENDICARE INC. (Translation of registrants name into English)
 3000 Steeles Avenue East
Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9W2(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F o                                                  Form 40-F þ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this
Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o                                                  No þ If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection
with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX  ExhibitNumber

Description of Exhibit99.1

News Release dated March 16, 2005  Extendicare Inc. Declares Preferred Share Dividend
Payment  TSX: EXE.PR.E99.2

News Release dated March 28, 2005  Extendicare to Present at Lehman Brothers Global
Healthcare Conference




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. EXTENDICARE INC.Date: March 28, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Richard L. BertrandRichard L. BertrandSenior Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### State v. Cornett

Case below: 177 N.C. App. 452

No. 304P06

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon A Constitutional Question (COA05-722)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. _

2. Allowed 12/14/06

3. Denied
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, (the "Report"), I David
Vozick, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.









/s/ David Vozick
----------------
David Vozick,
Chairman of the Board
Co-Principal Executive Officer
May 14, 2004

                                       18
Side Letter



 Exhibit 10.8 
 AGREEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 
 In connection with and as further consideration for Stock Redemption and
Debt Restructuring Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated May 11, 2007, between Keith Bullard’s Auto Liquidation Center, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”), Horvath Holdings, LLC, a Michigan limited liability
company (“Seller”), Keith Bullard, an individual, and Mark R. Horvath, an individual, the undersigned acknowledge and agree as follows: 
 1. On May 14, 2007, Seller will deliver to the Company a check in the amount of $7,845.91, which sum represents the aggregate amount of checks drawn on the Company’s bank account but not yet cashed as of the date of the Agreement;

 2. Upon Seller’s receipt of a satisfactory accounting of all outstanding sales tax owed by the Company for vehicle sales up to and
including the date of Closing (which accounting shall include, but not be limited to, copies of all checks to be drawn on the Company’s bank account and sent to the applicable taxing authority pursuant hereto), with an agreed upon maximum
amount of $6,404.40 (the “Sales Tax Amount”), Seller shall deliver the Sales Tax Amount to the Company via wire transfer in immediately available funds; 
 3. Before or immediately upon receipt of the Sales Tax Amount, Keith Bullard and the Company agree to deliver payment of the Sales Tax Amount to the applicable taxing authority; 
 4. Keith Bullard and the Company agree to immediately deposit all cash and check receipts in their possession in the Company’s bank account arising
out of the Company’s business operations up to and including the date of Closing; and 
 5. The parties agree that Sections 7 through 14
of the Agreement shall apply to the agreements and acknowledgements of the parties set forth herein. 
 Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement or the Assignment, as applicable. 
 Executed and
delivered this 11th day of May, 2007. 
  

			
	“COMPANY”	 	
	
	/s/ Keith Bullard
	 Keith Bullard’s Auto Liquidation Center, Inc.
 a Pennsylvania corporation

	
	By: Keith Bullard
	Its: Vice President


  

			
	“SELLER”
	
	/s/ Mark R. Horvath
	 Horvath Holdings, LLC,
 a Michigan limited
liability company

	
	By: Mark R. Horvath
	Its: Manager










	
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED UPON BY:
	
	/s/ Keith Bullard
	Keith Bullard, Individually
Exhibit 4.19  


MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION  


 OF  


 MOLSON COORS INTERNATIONAL GENERAL, ULC  


	1.
	The
name of the Company in all its language forms is: 


MOLSON COORS INTERNATIONAL GENERAL, ULC  


	2.
	The
Company shall have all the powers, capacity, rights and privileges of a natural person including the following which are expressly conferred upon the Company:



	(a)
	to
sell or dispose of its undertaking, or a substantial part thereof;



	(b)
	subject
to the provisions of the Companies Act with respect to reduction of capital, to distribute any of its property in specie among
its members; and



	(c)
	to
amalgamate with any company or other body of persons.






	3.
	The
liability of the members is unlimited. 



        We,
the undersigned, whose names and addresses are subscribed, are desirous of being formed into a company in pursuance of this Memorandum of Association, and we respectively agree to
take the number and kind of shares in the capital stock of the Company written opposite our respective names. 







Name, Address And Number Of Shares Taken By Subscriber  


Molson Coors Brewing Company  



	Per:	 	/s/  MICHAEL J. GANNON      
	 	 
	 	 	Name: Michael J. Gannon	 	 
	 	 	Position: VP, Global Treasurer	 	 
	1225 - 17th Street, Suite 3200-MCCC

Denver CO 80202-5534
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Total Number of Shares taken:        1,000 common shares with no par value
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Witness to the above signature:
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/  MICHAEL ABBASS      
	 	 
	Name: Michael Abbass	 	 
	Address: 1225 17th St., Suite 3200

               Denver, CO 80202 USA	 	 





DATED the 22nd day of March, 2007.