alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3836

AN ACT

To reauthorize the United States Advisory Commission on

Public Diplomacy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Advisory

5 Commission on Public Diplomacy Reauthorization Act of

6 2006’’.
 †

2

S 3836 ES

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF UNITED STATES ADVISORY

2 COMMISSION ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY.

3 Section 1334 of the Foreign Affairs Reform and Re4 structuring Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 6553), as amended

5 by section 410 of the Department of State and Related

6 Agency Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109–108;

7 119 Stat. 2327), is amended by striking ‘‘October 1,

8 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2009’’.

Passed the Senate August 3, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3836

AN ACT

To reauthorize the United States Advisory

Commission on Public Diplomacy.
EX-35.1
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 7, 2008


RE: RMAC 2007-1


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen
Loan Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance
statement pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance
with the servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set
forth in Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB").
In this regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the
best of my knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1. A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period,
   and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement dated as of March 29,
   2007 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
   its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
   Reporting Period.


By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name: Ronald M. Faris
Title: President



Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Continental Airlines, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Dated: October 20, 2008

 

/s/ Lawrence W. Kellner	

Lawrence W. Kellner

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

/s/ Zane C. Rowe	

Zane C. Rowe 

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the month of June 2004 Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. (Translation of Registrants Name Into English)
 Canadian Pacific Tower,
Ste 1600,100 Wellington Street W., Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7,
Canada (Address of Principal Executive Offices)
 (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.) Form 20-F     o
    
    Form 40-F     þ
 (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.) Yes     o
    
    No     þ
 (If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-. This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant: Form S-8 No.333-13960.    Page 1 of 2 Pages
Exhibits Index appears on Page 3




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
                
        (Registrant)Date: June 3, 2004
    By:
    /s/ Sari L. DiamondName:
    Sari L. DiamondTitle:
    Assistant Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibits Index The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form
6-K. Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibits99.1
    
    Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. Declares Dividend
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-1996       JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1995       DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         453,963                 0
<SECURITIES>                                     8,654<F1>             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,478                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (37,000)                 0
<INVENTORY>                                    471,059                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               962,154                 0
<PP&E>                                       1,525,411                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                               (894,725)                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,796,481                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          517,428                 0
<BONDS>                                              0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                 0
<COMMON>                                     5,661,812                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,796,481                 0
<SALES>                                         95,928                 441,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,105                 492,311
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,739                 375,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (98,634)                 116,808
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (98,634)                 116,808
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (98,634)                 116,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)                     .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)                     .03
<FN>
<F1>Prepaid Expense
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3916 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3916

To expand the boundaries of the Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2006

 Mr. Sessions introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To expand the boundaries of the Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cahaba River National Wildlife 
Refuge Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Refuge.--The term ``Refuge'' means the Cahaba River 
        National Wildlife Refuge and the lands and waters in such 
        refuge in Bibb County, Alabama, as established by the Cahaba 
        River National Wildlife Refuge Establishment Act (Public Law 
        106-331).
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF BOUNDARIES.

    (a) Expansion.--The boundaries of the Refuge are expanded to 
include land and water in Bibb County, Alabama, depicted as ``Proposed 
National Wildlife Refuge Expansion Boundary'' on the map entitled 
``Cahaba River NWR Expansion'' and dated March 14, 2006.
    (b) Availability of Map.--The Secretary shall make the map referred 
to in subsection (a) available for inspection in appropriate offices of 
the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

SEC. 4. ACQUISITION OF LAND AND WATER IN EXPANDED BOUNDARIES.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the Secretary may 
acquire by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or 
exchange the land and water, and interests in land and water (including 
conservation easements), within the boundaries of the Refuge as 
expanded by this Act.
    (b) Manner of Acquisition.--All acquisitions of land or waters 
under this section shall be made in a voluntary manner and shall not be 
the result of forced takings.
    (c) Inclusion in Refuge; Administration.--Any land, water, or 
interest acquired by the Secretary under this section--
            (1) shall be part of the Refuge; and
            (2) shall be administered by the Secretary in accordance 
        with--
                    (A) the National Wildlife Refuge System 
                Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd et seq.);
                    (B) the Cahaba River National Wildlife Refuge 
                Establishment Act; and
                    (C) this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Broome County Department of Social Services on Behalf of Tequilla XX, Respondent, v Meaghan XX., Appellant.

[976 NYS2d 272]

Garry, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Connerton, J.), entered March 9, 2012, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 4, denied respondent’s objections to an order of support.

Respondent is the mother of Tequilla XX, who was born in 2011 and placed in foster care shortly after her birth. Thereaf*1175ter, petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking child support on Toquilla’s behalf. Respondent is developmental^ disabled; she receives Supplemental Security Income benefits (hereinafter SSI) and public assistance payments in a total sum of $961 per month, and earns some wages from part-time employment at a sheltered workshop. Her SSI payments are currently made directly to petitioner, as her representative payee. After a hearing, the Support Magistrate directed respondent to pay $25 per month in support retroactive to the date that Tequilla became eligible for public assistance, and capped respondent’s arrears at $500. Respondent filed objections to the order, which Family Court denied. Respondent appeals, and we reverse.

The Support Magistrate’s determination that respondent’s average weekly income is “between $15[ ] to $20 [ ] per week gross each and every week” is unsupported by the record, and apparently in error. Respondent’s financial disclosure affidavit was the only evidence presented at the support hearing regarding her income, and it lists her biweekly gross income at $25. Thus, after subtracting respondent’s public assistance and SSI benefits (see Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [b] [5] [vii] [E], [F]; [c]), the child support award represents roughly one half of respondent’s earnings. We find this award “unjust and inappropriate” (Family Ct Act § 413 [1] [f]) and, accordingly, exercise our authority upon review to grant respondent’s objections and set her support obligation at $0 (see *Matter of Rose v Moody,*83 NY2d 65, 71 [1993], *cert denied*511 US 1084 [1994]; *Creighton v Creighton,*222 AD2d 740, 741 [1995]).

Rose, J.E, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, respondent’s objections are sustained, and her child support obligation is determined to be $0.
Exhibit32.2




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





I, James D. Tilton, Jr., in connection with the Annual Report of World Series of Golf, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, certify that:





·the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





·the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ James D. Tilton, Jr.Name: James D. Tilton, Jr.Title: Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)Dated: April 12, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           445,021
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,296,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                     125,000
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,057,538
<PP&E>                                           422,731
<DEPRECIATION>                                   204,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,962,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,242,413
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                         320,002
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,160,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,962,078
<SALES>                                        2,321,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,321,939
<CGS>                                          1,525,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,525,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 778,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   20,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                      13,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                6,035
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                       6,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .000

        


</TABLE>
#### Boyd *v.*Janesville Hay Tool Co.1

*(Circuit Court, W. D. Wisconsin.*

November 9, 1888.)

1. Patents eok Inventions—Anticipation—Hay Et/evatob.

Letters patent to John M. Boyd, No. 300,687, dated June 17, 1884, are void for want of novelty, being anticipated by prior patents.

S. Same—Patentability.

Mere differences of form and mechanics, which do not involve invention, are not patentable.

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

In Equity.

This was a bill for infringement of letters patent of the United States No. 300,687, to John M. Boyd, for hay elevators. The defendant man*888ufactured hay carriers under letters patent of the United States No. 279-869, to Prank B. Strickler. The defenses were want of novelty and non-infringement.

*Erwin &*Benedict, for complainant.

*Offield &; Towle,*for defendant.

1

 Publication delayed by failure to obtain copy of opinion at timo ol delivery.

Bunn, J.

The best judgment I have been able to form in this case from the evidence and from an inspection of the various patents and machines introduced on the hearing is this That the complainant’s device is anticipated by the various patents introduced by the defendant; especially by the Walters patent, the Brower patent, the Church patent;, the Jordon patent, the Kirch patent, the Hennyton patent, the Hustis patent, the Drake patent, and the Van Sickle patent. That in view of the several patents and machines, all prior to that of complainant, and apparently accomplishing substantially the same results by substantially the same means, there was very little left upon that line for inventors to work upon, and that the difference between the complainant’s device and those preceding it is a difference of form and mechanics, and not one of art and invention. Complainant’s bill dismissed, with costs.
#### Adonay MELENDEZ, Petitioner—Appellant, v. James WALKER, Warden; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 07-55986.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 14, 2009.

Filed May 4, 2009.

David H. Goodwin, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Douglas L. Wilson, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

*563Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, and MILLS,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM**

The California state court decision was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1). The admission of Rodriguez’s redacted statement did not violate *Bruton v. United States,*391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), because the statement only incriminated Melendez when “linked with other evidence introduced at trial.” *United States v. Hoac,*990 F.2d 1099, 1105 (9th Cir.1993).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rafael Angel ASCENCIO-CONTRER-AS, also known as Rafael Acen-cio, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40829

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rafael Angel Ascencio-Contreras appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in *628light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Ascencio-Contreras’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Ascencio-Contreras contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Ascencio-Contreras properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### In re Key

Case below: 182 N.C. App. - (17 April 2007)

No. 208P07

Respondent’s (Mark Key) Motion for Temporary Stay (COA06-498)

Allowed 04/30/07