alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.63
 8 March 2010
 XINHUA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LIMITED
c/o Suite 2103-4 Vicwood Plaza
199 Des Voeux Road Central
Hong Kong
 Attention: Board of Directors
  Re:
    
    Bridge Loan in the Amount of $1.5 million USD.
 Lender Xinhua Sports &
Entertainment Limited (the Borrower)
 Purpose of Bridge Loan
 Bridge Loan"
 Availability and Repayment
 March 2, 2010




---



##### 



Interest
   Business Day
  Events of Default
 Event of Default"
 1.
    
    If the Borrower fails to pay to the Lender any amount of principal or interest for a period
of seven days after such principal or interest is due.
 2.
    
    If an order is made or an effective resolution is passed for the winding-up, liquidation,
reorganization or dissolution of the Borrower (except for the purposes of a bona fide
corporate reorganization previously approved in writing by the Lender), or if the Borrower
makes a general assignment for the benefit of creditors in any other jurisdiction, or is
declared bankrupt, or if a custodian or a sequestrator or a receiver or a receiver and manager
or any other officer with similar powers is appointed for the Borrower or its property or any
portion of such property which is, in the Lenders opinion, substantial.
  -2-




---



##### 



3.
    
    If any material part of any property of the Borrower is taken by any governmental authority
by the exercise of any power of expropriation or otherwise.
 4.
    
    If the Borrower fails to pay any indebtedness, or any interest or premium, on indebtedness
when due (whether at stated maturity or by required prepayment, acceleration, demand or
otherwise) and such failure continues after the applicable grace period, if any, specified in
the agreement or instrument relating to such indebtedness; or any other default under any
agreement or instrument relating to such indebtedness, or any other event, shall occur and
shall continue after the applicable grace period if any, specified in such agreement or
instrument, if the effect of such default or event is to accelerate, or to permit the
acceleration of, the maturity of such indebtedness; or any such indebtedness is declared to be
due and payable, or required to be prepaid (other than by a regularly scheduled required
prepayment) prior to its stated maturity.
 Miscellaneous
       -3-




---



##### 



(a)
    
    if to the Borrower, to it at:
Suite 2103 Vicwood Plaza
199 Des Voeux Road Central,
Hong Kong
Attention: Board of Directors
Facsimile: 852 2541 8266(b)
    
    if to the Lender, to it at:
Unit PH3, Block 3, Park Avenue
No 6 Chao Yang Gong Yuan Nan Lu
Chao Yang District,
Beijing 100026, China
Attention: Chloe Meng
Telephone: 86 135 8185 6130
Facsimile: 8610 8587 4166
    -4-




---



##### 



Yours truly,CHLOE MENGBy:
    
    /s/ Chloe MengOn behalf of Dragon Arena
  XINHUA SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT LIMITEDBy:
    
    /s/ Aloysius T. Lawn, IV
  -5-
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 27, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00770

- CR

Stephen RICHARDSON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR10629

Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez

- Gardner , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on November 27, 2019

.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of November, 2019

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
#### State v. Downs

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 860

No. 600P06

1. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-28)

2. AG’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Denied 12/14/06

2. Dismissed as Moot 12/14/06
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 25, 2015

No. 04-15-00318-CV

GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY and Berkley Oil and Gas Specialty Services, LLC,

Appellants

v.

DRILLING RISK MANAGEMENT, INC.,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-066

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The District Clerk's Notification of Late Record is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended 

to July 24, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of June, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
1 

### NO. 01- 15 -00759- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST DISTRICT AT HOUSTON, TEXAS

Ada Ukah Brown, Appellant,

v. Bright O. Wokocha, Appellee

DESIGNATION OF LEAD COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given of the designation of Attorney, Ijeoma Opara as lead counsel f or
Apellee

, Brigh t O. Wokocha . P ursuant to Tex . R. Appellate P. 6
, all further notice and copies of

pleadings, papers and other material relevant to this action should be dir ected to and served upon:

Ijeoma Opara

, The Opara Law Firm

, PLLC

, 4420 Cypress Creek Parkway, Suite 103 H o uston,

Texas 77068

. 

### Respectfully Submitted:

By : /s/ Ijeoma Opara Ijeoma Opara Email:Ijeoma@cheerful.com TBN: 24029189

The Opara Law Firm, PLLC 4420 Cypress Creek Parkway, Suite 103 Houston, Texas 77068 Tel: 281-895-8003 Fax: 281- 895 -8079

Attorney for Appellee, Bright Wokocha ACCEPTED 01-15-00759-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/10/2015 4:41:57 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
Exhibit 33.1.3.1

 

**REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of The First American Corporation and the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party (“the Applicable Servicing Criteria”). The transactions covered by this report include all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the residential and commercial tax service provider (“the Platform”).

 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2007, and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.

By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC

|   | General Partner |
|--------|-----------------|

 

 

/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla

Lucy A. Przybyla

Senior Vice President

February 12, 2008
#### Bradley v. Mission St. Joseph’s Health Sys.

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 592

No. 025P07

Def’s (Health System’s) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-100)

Allowed 05/03/07
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

 Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

February 17, 2017

Order 

Clerk

February 17, 2017

155172(59)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 155172

v COA: 327905

Wayne CC: 15-001051-AR

TREMEL ANDERSON,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time 

for filing his answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer 

will be accepted as timely filed if it is submitted on or before March 20, 2017.
#### IN RE E.F.S., JR.

No. 285P06

ORDER

The Attorney General’s petition for writ of certiorari is allowed for the limited purpose of vacating the Court of Appeals’ order denying the Attorney General’s petition for writ of certiorari and remanding to the Court of Appeals for review on the merits in light of this Court’s decision in *State v. Green,*348 N.C. 588, 595, 502 S.E.2d 819, 823 (1998) and the Court of Appeals’ decision in *In re Bunn,*34 N.C. App. 614, 615-16, 239 S.E.2d 483, 484 (1977).

By order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007.

Hudson, J. For the Court
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Gold
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Drury J.
Gallagher, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


 Dated: May 10, 2005


                                                 By: /s/ Drury J. Gallagher
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                         Drury J. Gallagher
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<MULTIPLIER>             1000
       
<S>                                             <C>      
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                            JUL-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                    2,772,857
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             5,199,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                                212,200
<INVENTORY>                                               6,436,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         14,394,072
<PP&E>                                                    7,113,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                            5,930,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           17,621,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     3,056,658
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                               3,329,051
<COMMON>                                                     71,606
<OTHER-SE>                                                6,398,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             17,621,175
<SALES>                                                  17,252,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         17,252,285
<CGS>                                                    11,759,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             4,699,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          256,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             535,505
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 55,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         363,467
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                                363,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.05
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, as C.F.O., certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: February 17, 2009

 
| Signature: | /s/ Larry Badgley     |
|------------|-----------------------|
|       | Larry Badgley, C.F.O. |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, as C.F.O., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: February 23, 2011 |                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         |                     |
| Signature:                   | /s/   Larry G. Badgley   |   |
|                         | Larry G. Badgley, C.F.O. |   |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Darnell Bernie CALLOWAY, a/k/a Dirty, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-7098.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 21, 2009.

Decided: May 26, 2009.

Darnell Bernie Calloway, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. .

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Darnell Bernie Calloway appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. *United States v. Calloway,*No. 7:05-cr-00051-jct-1, 2008 WL 2552861 (W.D.Va. June 25, 2008). *See United States v. Hood,*556 *229F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009). We deny Callo-way’s motion to consolidate and appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no

precedenti al value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of wellsettled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 93-3544

_______________________

KENNETH J. ARENSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

_________________________________________________________________ (May 11, 1995)

On Petition for Rehearing

Before JONES, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Kenneth J. Arenson petitions this Court on

rehearing for a clear ruling on his claim to attorney's fees,

interest on his judgment, and relief based on his Title VII claim.

For purposes of clarification, we confirm that Arenson is entitled

to attorney's fees as a prevailing party at trial and on appeal and

to interest. We remand to the district court for determination of2

a reasonable fee and appropriate interest. However, Appellant's

request for Title VII relief is denied because Arenson waived his

Title VII claim by failing to seek a ruling on that issue from the

Arenson I panel.

Except as specifically granted above, Appellant's

Petition for Rehearing is D ENIED

. This case is R EMANDED to th e

district court for determination of a reasonable attorney's fee and

appropriate interest.

Clarification GRANTED ; case REMANDED

.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arthur D. Levinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.                                   | 
| | ------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                    |                                                                 | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
July 26, 2004 | 

I, Louis J. Lavigne, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ Louis J. Lavigne, Jr.                                                                    | 
| | ------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                    |                                                                                              | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | Louis J. Lavigne, Jr.
Executive Vice President and 
   Chief Financial Officer
July 26, 2004 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genentech, Inc. and will be retained by Genentech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Fiammegta, Appellant.

Submitted June 8, 2009;

decided June 24, 2009

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn WL. Fa-hey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit
10.10


 


Third Amendment to Marketing and Servicing Agreement Dated
July 31,


2001, Between BankWest and Advance America, Cash Advance
Centers of


Georgia, Inc


 


This Third Amendment, dated this 29th day of July, 2004, is
between BankWest, Inc., a bank organized under the laws of South Dakota (the
“Bank”), and Advance America, Cash Advance Centers of Georgia, Inc. (“Advance
America”).


 


WHEREAS, the parties to this Third Amendment entered into a Marketing
and Servicing Agreement (“the Servicing Agreement”), dated July 31, 2001, the
terms and provisions of which set forth the respective duties, obligations and
responsibilities of the parties in connection with the Bank making small,
short-term Loans to residents of Georgia; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Servicing Agreement as set
forth herein;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained in
this Third Amendment, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound,
the Bank and Advance America (individually a “Party” and together the
“Parties”) agree as follows:


 


1.  Section 5(a) of the Marketing and Servicing Agreement is
hereby amended to read as follows:


 


Section 5. Termination


 


(a)                                  The term of this Agreement will be for an
initial period of three (3) years from the date of this Agreement, and shall
thereafter automatically renew on a month-to-month basis unless terminated by
either Party by giving ten (10) days’


 


1
















 


advance written notice to
the other Party as provided in Section 6.


 


2.             To the extent that the remaining subsections of section
5 of the Marketing and Servicing Agreement require notice of termination
exceeding ten (10) days, they are hereby amended to reduce said notice to ten
(10) days; provided, however, that either Party may terminate the Marketing and
Servicing Agreement sooner if such termination is required due to a change in
the Laws or a communication from a regulatory agency as described in subsection
5(f).


 


3.             Unless specifically amended herein, or unless the
context plainly requires otherwise, all of the terms, conditions, and
provisions of the Servicing Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


 


	
  BankWest,
  Inc.

  	
  Advance
  America, Cash Advance

  Centers of Georgia, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ CHARLES H. BURKE, III

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ WILLIAM M. WEBSTER, IV

  	
   

  
	
  Its:

  	
   

  	
  Pres / CEO

  	
   

  	
  Its:

  	
   

  	
  CEO

  	
   

  
	
  Date:

  	
   

  	
  7-29-04

  	
   

  	
  Date:

  	
   

  	
  8/3/04

  	
   

  
										



 


2