alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Yolima Niebles, Appellant, v MTA Bus Company et al., Respondents.

[974 NYS2d 253]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), entered June 21, 2011, which, upon a jury verdict in favor of the defendants and against her, and upon the denial of her oral application pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence and for a new trial, is in favor of the defendants and against her dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On May 14, 2008, the plaintiff allegedly was injured when she fell while exiting a bus owned and operated by the defendants. After trial, the jury found that the defendants were negligent, but that their negligence was not a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s fall. Thereafter, the Supreme Court denied the plaintiff’s oral application pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence and for a new trial.

A jury verdict should only be set aside as against the weight of the evidence when the verdict could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Lolik v Big V Supermarkets,*86 NY2d 744, 745-746 [1995]; *Dellamonica v Carvel Corp.,*1 AD3d 311 [2003]; *Bendersky v M & O Enters. Corp.,*299 AD2d 434, 435 [2002]; *Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129, 134 [1985]). “It is for the jury to make determinations as to the credibility of the witnesses, and great deference in this regard is accorded to the jury, which had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses” *(Exarhouleas v Green 317*Madison, *LLC,*46 AD3d 854, 855 [2007]; *see Doran v McNulty,*107 AD3d 843, 844 [2013]). “A jury’s finding that a party was at fault but that such fault was not a proximate cause of the accident is inconsistent and against the weight of the evidence only when the issues are so inextricably interwoven as to make it logically impossible to find negligence without also finding proximate cause” *(Garrett v Manaser,*8 AD3d 616, 617 [2004]; *see Spero v Awasthi Ltd. Partners,*106 AD3d 988, 989 [2013]). Here, contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the jury’s verdict that the defendants were negligent but that their negligence was not a proximate cause of the accident was not contrary to the weight of the evidence *(see Spero v Awasthi Ltd. Partners,*106 AD3d at 989; *Rubin v Pecoraro,*141 AD2d 525 [1988]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs oral application *1048pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) to set aside the verdict as contrary to the weight of the evidence and for a new trial.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT





Each of the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of Global Gold Corporation (the "Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 23, 2010
/s/ Van Z. Krikorian

Van Z. Krikorian

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





Date: August 23, 2010
/s/ Jan E. Dulman

Jan E. Dulman

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
  Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.
   Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    6719
Commission File Number
    
    52-2301683
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification
Number)
 
 Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.
300 First Stamford Place, Stamford, Connecticut 06902
(203) 977-8000
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13c-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
 Credit Agreement




---



##### 



Item 2.03.   Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangement of a Registrant.
 Credit Agreement




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
   ODYSSEY RE HOLDINGS CORP.By:
    /s/   Donald L. SmithName:
    Donald L. SmithTitle:
    Senior Vice President,
General Counsel, and
Corporate Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of AMERICAN EXPLORATION  CORPORATION.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the period ended  December 31, 2008,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Steve Harding, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: April 14, 2009


                                                   /s/ STEVE HARDING
                                                       _________________________
                                                       Steve Harding
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
665 A.2d 386

#### IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD B. WEIL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 19, 1995.

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Court seeking the immediate temporary suspension of RICHARD B. WEIL of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, for failure to cooperate in an ethics investigation as required by *Rule*1:20 — 3(g)(3), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*1:20 — 3(g)(4), RICHARD B. WEIL is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that RICHARD B. WEIL be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that RICHARD B. WEIL comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 30, 2015. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 00457

- CV
JAIMIE DANIELS , Appellant V. BROOKFIELD APTS. , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 15

- 01593

- E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justice s Brown, and Stoddart Opinion by Justice Brown By letter dated April 9, 2015, the Court directed ap pellant to pay the filing fee for the appeal within ten days. On May 29, 2015, we notified appellant that the Dallas County Clerk had informed us no payment had been made for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to file, within ten days, written veri fication that she had either paid or made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record or she was entitled to proceed without payment for the record. We warned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Appellant has not responded to ei ther letter, the filing fee has not been paid, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.– 2

– Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b),
42.3(a).

150457F.P05 /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

JAIMIE DANIELS, Appellant

No. 05

- 15

- 00457

- CV V.
BROOKFIELD APTS., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 15

- 01593

- E. Opinion de livered by Justice Brown, Chief Justice Wright and Justice Stoddart participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of prosecution. We ORDER that appellee Brookfield Apts. recover its costs of this a ppeal from appellant Jaimie Daniels.

Judgment entered this 30th day of July, 2015.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3759 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3759

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To name the Armed Forces Readiness Center in Great Falls, Montana, in 
 honor of Captain William Wylie Galt, a recipient of the Congressional 
                            Medal of Honor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAMING OF ARMED FORCES READINESS CENTER IN GREAT FALLS, 
              MONTANA, IN HONOR OF CAPTAIN WILLIAM WYLIE GALT, A 
              RECIPIENT OF THE CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR.

    The Armed Forces Readiness Center in Great Falls, Montana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain William Wylie Galt Great Falls 
Armed Forces Readiness Center''. Any reference in a law, map, 
regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to 
such facility shall be deemed to be a reference to the Captain William 
Wylie Galt Great Falls Armed Forces Readiness Center.

            Passed the Senate November 16, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3759

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To name the Armed Forces Readiness Center in Great Falls, Montana, in 
 honor of Captain William Wylie Galt, a recipient of the Congressional 
                            Medal of Honor.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jamie Alexander JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-7074.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 4, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 18, 2006.

Jamie Alexander Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William Frederick Gould, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlottes-ville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Alexander Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as untimely. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of ap-pealability will not issue absent “a substan*444tial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Danny Colon, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Ortiz, Appellant.

Submitted September 14, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 55 AD3d 444.

Motion by National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
EX-35.4
(logo) Prudential Financial

Prudential Asset Resources
2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel 214-777-4500  Fax 214-777-4556



Annual Compliance Statement

To: (see attached Distribution List)

Re: Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-PWR15


I, Catherine J. Rodewald, President and Chief Executive Officer of Prudential
Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard to the
Company's role as Loan Specific Special Servicer under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of March 1, 2007 pertaining to
the above-referenced certificates, that:

(i)  a review of the activities of the Company as a Master Servicer under the
     Agreement during the period from March 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007 and
     its performance has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has
     fulfilled all of its obligations, as a Loan Specific Special Servicer,
     under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

Effective Date of Certification: March 20, 2008



/s/ Catherine J. Rodewald
Catherine J. Rodewald, President &
CEO


(page)


March 10, 2008

Re: Series 2007-PWR15 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

DISTRIBUTION LIST


LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
135 South LaSalle, Suite 1625
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Pearlie.bolton@bankofamerica.com

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045
Karen.a.merson@wellsfargo.com

BEAR STEARNS COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
383 Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10179
Attention: J. Christopher Hoeffel and Joseph Jurkowski, Esq.

FITCH, INC.
One State Street Plaza
New York, NY 10004
Attention: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance

STANDARD & POOR'S RATINGS SERVICES
a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
55 Water Street
New York, New York 10041
Attention: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance

Centerline Servicing Inc.
5221 N. O'Connor Blvd.
Suite 600
Irving, TX 75039
Iduggins@centerline.com
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6592

GEORGE CLEVELAND, III , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. DIRECTOR JERRY B. ADGER, of the South Carolina Department of Probation Parole & Pardon Services (SCPPPS); THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:17

- cv
- 02112

- RBH )

Submitted : October 23, 2018 Decided: October 26, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
George Cleveland, III , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George Clevelan d, III, appeals the district court’s order denying as moot his motion to reconsider a prior order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition , and denying his motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible err or. Accordingly, we affirm. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny as unnecessary a certificate of appealability. See Harbison v.
Bell , 556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contenti ons are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) MARCH 17, 2005 NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION 
   CANADA
    
    001-07260
    
    NOT APPLICABLE(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code 905-863-0000  
 
 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation
of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):  o
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)  o
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)  o
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))  o
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 8.01     Other Events On March 17, 2005, the registrant issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, and
such press release is incorporated by reference herein (other than information included on or
linked from the registrants website, referenced in such release, which is not incorporated by
reference into this report). Item 9.01     Financial Statements and Exhibits (c)
    
    Exhibits99.1
    
    
    Press Release issued by the registrant on March 17, 2005.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.  NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/   Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant General Counsel  Securitiesand Corporate SecretaryBy:
    /s/   Tracy S.J. Connelly McGilleyTracy S.J. Connelly McGilleyAssistant Secretary Dated:   March 18, 2005




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release issued by the registrant on March 17, 2005.
Image Collections

library.nga.gov│ image-collections@nga.gov

Hours

The library is open weekdays, except Federal holidays, from 11 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 

Appointments are suggested for the initial appointment in order to help us prepare 

material ahead of your visit.

Make an appointment at https://www.nga.gov/research/library/imagecollections/makean-appointment.html. You will receive a confirmation email with details about your visit. 

Contacts

Office: (202) 842-6026

Web: https://www.nga.gov/research/library/imagecollections.html

Email: image-collections@nga.gov

Procedures

Leave briefcases, bags, computer cases, large purses, coats, hats, umbrellas, and 

books at the checkroom. Upon arriving at the Study Center, sign in with the guard. 

Sign the image collections register at the circulation desk at the start of each visit. Use 

only pencils and exercise care in handling photographic material. Folders and the 

photographs within them are in order. Please assist us in maintaining that order.

Inquire at the circulation desk for information on microforms, rare photographs, albums, 

and reproductive prints.

As a courtesy, please silence all cell phones and other electronic devices before 

entering the library.

Photography

Photography of non-rare material is permitted for personal use only. An image specialist 

can answer questions regarding photographic services, rights, and the reproduction of 

library materials. A photocopy machine is in the northeast corner of the reading room.
##### 








---



##### 



-2-
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21825-21826]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10865]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,794]


Leggett and Platt, Inc., Whittier, CA; Notice of Termination of 
Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on April 14, 2009, in response to a 
petition filed on behalf of workers of Leggett and Platt, Whittier, 
California.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.


[[Page 21826]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 16th day of April 2009.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10865 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric D. Carr, Appellant.

Submitted June 15, 2009;

decided June 24, 2009

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and David C. Schopp, Esq., Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, 237 Main Street, Suite 1602, Buffalo, New York 14203 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.