FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J UNE 28, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE U

NITED STATE S COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 10 56 0 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 8 :0 9- cv -0 04 58 -AEP ERIC BEEDERS, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Pl ai nt iff - App el la nt , vers us GULF COAST COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt- App el le e, ROY DILLARD, ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll Defen da nt
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt forth e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (J un e 2 8, 2 01 1) Befo re BARKETT, MARTIN an d ANDERSON, Ci rcu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM:Eric Beed ers ap pe al s fr om anadve rs e fi na l ju dg m en t, en te redaft er a b en ch tri al , on hi s co m

pl ai ntag ai ns t Gu lf C oa stCo ll ect io n B ur eau , Inc . (“ Gul f Co as t” ), al le gi ng vi ol at io ns of t he Fai r Deb t Co ll ect io n P ract ic es Act, (FDC PA), Tit le 15 U.S.C. § 1 69 2, an d t he Flo rid a Co ns um er Co ll ect io n P ract ic es Act (F CCPA) , Fl or id a St atut es Ch ap te r 55 9. Th e al le ge d v io la ti on s re la te d t o s ep arat e te le ph on e cal ls th atGul f Co as t m ad e to Beed ers in anatt em ptto co ll ecta de bt . Each o f th e te le ph on e cal ls ut il iz edth e id en ti cal or n earl y id en ti cal vo ic e m ai l m es sa ge , th e
co nt en t o f whi ch is no t a m at te r of factua l d is pu te . The tran sc rib edm es sa ge st at ed
as fol lo ws: Thi s m es sa ge is in te nd edforEric H. Be ed ers . If y ouare n otEric H. Bee de rs pl eas e h an g up o r di sc on ne ct . If y ouare Eri c H. Beed ers pl eas e co nt inue to li st ento th is m es sa ge . By co nt in ui ng to li st ento th is m es sa ge y ouackno wled ge th aty ouare Eri c H. Beed ers . Plea se return t hi s ca ll to Ro y

Dil la rdfro m

Gul f Co as t Co ll ect io n B ur eau . Pl eas e cal l 8 77 -8 27 -4 82 0 a ndaskfor fil e num be r G31 85 2. On ap pe al , Beed ers arg ue s t ha t thi s m es sa ge fai le d t o c om pl y with t he ap pl ic ab le
co ns um er p ro te ct io n re gu la ti on s b ecau se itdi d n otad equa te ly sati sf y th e di sc lo su re re qu ire m en t i n t ha t i t d idno t i de nt ify the na tu re o f th e cal li ng
co m pa ny’ s b us in es s, the factth atth e cal le r was a de btco ll ect or , andth e fac t tha t th e cal l was be in g m ad e wit h re sp ectto co ll ect io n o f a d eb t. W e fi ndno cle ar erro r in th e d is tri ctco urt’s d et erm in at io n t ha t, t ak in g t hi s

2m es sa ge as awho le , eve n a n u ns op hi st ic at edco ns um er wo ul d n otbe mis le d a s t o

th e p ur po se of t hi s ca ll , as t he m es sa ge id en ti fie d t he nam e o f th e cal le r, whi ch in cl ud es th e te rm

“ Co ll ect io n B ur eau ,” an d s pe ci fic al ly referen ceda pe rs on al fil e
nu m be r. Acco rd in gl y , we fin d n o re ve rs ib le erro r in th e d is tri ctco urt’s co nc lu si on th atGul f Co as t s at is fie d t he di sc lo su re requi rem en ts of t he FDCPA. 1 AFFIRMED.

Be causewe f

ind no error

in the district court’s de termination that Gulf Coast satisfied 1 the disclosure r equire ments of the F DCPA, we nee d not addre ss Be eder s’ ar gument that the failure to comply

with these re quirements constitutes a per seviolation of the FCCPA. Acc ording ly , we a lso affirm the district c ourt’s grant of summar y judgme nt to Gulf Coast on Be eder s’ claims for

violation of the FCCPA. 3