alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) MARCH 17, 2005 NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED 
   CANADA
    
    000-30758
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code 905-863-0000  
   Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation
of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):  o
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)  o
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)  o
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))  o
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 8.01     Other Events On March 17, 2005, Nortel Networks Corporation issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit
99.1, and such press release is incorporated by reference herein (other than information included
on or linked from the registrants website, referenced in such release, which is not incorporated
by reference into this report). Nortel Networks Corporation owns all of the registrants common shares and the registrant is Nortel
Networks Corporations principal direct operating subsidiary. Item 9.01     Financial Statements and Exhibits (c)
    
    Exhibits99.1
    
    
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on March 17, 2005.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.  NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:
    /s/   Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant General Counsel  Securitiesand Corporate SecretaryBy:
    /s/   Tracy S.J. Connelly McGilleyTracy S.J. Connelly McGilleyAssistant Secretary Dated:   March 18, 2005




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on March 17, 2005.
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed August 22 , 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00868

- CV

JOAN L. GILLHAM , Appellant
V.
CLAUDIA JACKSON AND JAMES JACKSON , Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 14

- 01318

- E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Fillmore, Evans, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis
Before the Court is appellant’s motion to dismi ss the appeal. Appellant has informed the

Court that the parties have settled their differences. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion

and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

140868F.P05 /David Lewis/
DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JOAN L. GILLHAM, Appellant

No. 05

- 14

- 00868

- CV V.

CLAUDIA JACKSON AND JAMES JACKSON, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas.
Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 14

- 01318

- E. Opinion delivered by Justice Lewis. Justices Fillmore and Evans, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
Subject to any agreement between the parties, it is ORDERED that appellees Claudia Jackson and James Jackson recover their costs of this appeal from appellant Joan L. Gillham.

Judgment entered this 22nd day of August, 2014.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Annual Report of Endeavor Explorations Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter Stunder,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.













/s/
Walter Stunder


Walter
Stunder




Chief
Executive Officer






October
29, 2008









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of Endeavor Explorations Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Belkis Jimenez
Rivero, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and






(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.













/s/
Belkis Jimenez Rivero


Belkis
Jimenez Rivero




Chief
Financial Officer






October
29, 2008
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 13395 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus KENRIC LOTT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 5:22

- cr
- 00004

- LGW

- BWC

- 1

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-13395 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 04/06/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 13395

Before W ILSON , L UCK , and M ARCUS , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Joseph Phelps, III , appointed counsel for Kenric Lott in thisdirect criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our indep endent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit ofthe appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Lot t’s conviction s and sentence s are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 22-13395 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 04/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jordan Lake, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 80]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Rene A. White, J.), rendered on or about March 29, 2010, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549



                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER

                    PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         For the month of November 2004

                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                               (Registrant's Name)

                          1155, University, Suite 1405,
                                Montreal, Quebec
                                 Canada H3B 3A7
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

                          Form 20-F [X]     Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                Yes [ ]     No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-



<PAGE>

Filed with this Form 6-K is the following which are incorporated herein by
reference:

99.1      Press Release - November 11, 2004: Campbell Resources Announces its
          Third Quarter Results for 2004


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                       CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.



                                       /s/  Lucy Brun
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Lucy Brun
                                       Executive Vice-President and
                                       Chief Administrative Officer


DATE: November 12, 2004


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

99.1      Press Release - November 11, 2004: Campbell Resources Announces its
          Third Quarter Results for 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1473

JAMES T. BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT M. DORAN; K. KEELEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-02-1019-1) Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004 Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James T. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Samuel Cohen, Paula Keyser Speck, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James T. Brown appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint for lack of jurisdiction and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Doran , No. CA-02-1019-1 (M.D.N.C. Dec. 3, 2003 & Feb. 13, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 13.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) for the purposes of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




I, Alceu Duilio Calciolari, Chief Executive Officer of Gafisa S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:




·
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




·
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 12, 2013




Company NameBy:
/s/ Alceu Duilio CalciolariName:
Alceu Duilio CalciolariTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 12, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 22201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


The Cancelation of the Fourth Plenary Meeting, NextGen Mid-Term 
Implementation Task Force

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of the Cancelation of a NextGen Mid-Term Implementation 
Task Force meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
cancelation of a meeting of the NextGen Mid-Term Implementation Task 
Force.

DATES: The meeting scheduled for June 9, 2009 starting at 1 a.m. to 4 
p.m. is canceled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 850, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for the cancelation of a NextGen Mid-Term 
Implementation Task Force meeting.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 4, 2009.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. E9-10984 Filed 5-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
#### State v. Gillespie

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 514

No. 002P07

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA05-1182)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 01/08/07 Stay Dissolved 361 N.C. 223

2. Allowed 05/03/07

3. Allowed 05/03/07
#### In the Matter of New York Urban Development Corporation, Respondent, v P.G. Singh Enterprises, LLC, et al., Appellants.

[975 NYS2d 339]

— Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia Kern, J.), entered February 28, 2013, which granted condemnees EG. Singh Enterprises, LLC’s and Ear-minder Kaur and Amanji Kaur’s motions for an extension of time to file appraisal reports, on condition that the interest on their claims cease to accrue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court did not abuse its discretion when it suspended the accrual of interest on the condemnees’ claims during the extension of time they sought for the completion of their appraisal reports *(see e.g. Abele v State of New York,*39 Misc 3d 1240[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 52550[U] [Ct Cl 2011]; see *also*EDPL 514 [b]). Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3748 

To require the Secretary of the Army to publish a supplement to the major 

rehabilitation report for the Herbert Hoover Dike system, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27 (legislative day, JULY 26), 2006 

Mr. NELSON of Florida (for himself and Mr. MARTINEZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Army to publish a supplement to the major rehabilitation report for the Herbert 

Hoover Dike system, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HERBERT HOOVER DIKE SUPPLEMENTAL 

4 MAJOR REHABILITATION REPORT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than May 31, 2007, the 

6 Secretary of the Army shall publish a supplement to the 

7 major rehabilitation report for the Herbert Hoover Dike 

8 system, approved by the Chief of Engineers in November 

9 2000. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3748 IS

1 (b) INCLUSIONS.—The supplemental report under 

2 subsection (a) shall include— 

3 (1) an evaluation of existing conditions at the 

4 Herbert Hoover Dike system; 

5 (2) an identification of additional risks associ6 ated with flood events at the system that are equal 

7 to or greater than the standard projected flood risks; 

8 (3) an evaluation of the potential to integrate 

9 projects of the Corps of Engineers into an enhanced 

10 flood protection system for Lake Okeechobee, includ11 ing— 

12 (A) the potential for additional water stor13 age north of Lake Okeechobee; and 

14 (B) an analysis of other project features 

15 included in the Comprehensive Everglades Res16 toration Plan; and 

17 (4) a review of the report prepared for the 

18 south Florida water management district dated April 

19 2006. 

20 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

21 authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

22 $1,500,000. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties II Limited Partnership 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000319723
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,664
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       20
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          24,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,734
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          8,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,251
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,898
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       258
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       258
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.27<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Marvin Fitzgerald WALKER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 08-8503.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 2009.

Decided: May 11, 2009.

Marvin Fitzgerald Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marvin Fitzgerald Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dis-positive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and *199dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhiguang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  April 15, 2010
/s/ Zhiguang ZhangBy:  Zhiguang ZhangIts:  Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2004 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, CEO and
CFO, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: November 8, 2004                      Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Calvin A. Wallen, III
                                                      As CEO and CFO
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dennis D. Holcomb, Also Known as Dennis Dale Holcomb, Also Known as Dennis Holcomb, Appellant.

[964 NYS2d 55]

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered September 27, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Present—Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.