alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Paco ESCAMILLA, Petitioner v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 08-60466

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 22, 2009.

Jonathan H. Lamb, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

*391Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Luis Enrique Perez, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Sharon A. Hudson, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Houston, TX, for Respondent.

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Paco Escamilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks a petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his applications for cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b and a waiver of inadmissibility pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a). We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

We generally review only the BIA’s decision except to the extent that the immigration judge’s (IJ) decision influences the BIA. *Zhu v. Gonzales,*493 F.3d 588, 593 (5th Cir.2007). We lack jurisdiction to review the denial of Escamilla’s requests for relief because he is removable for having committed criminal offenses involving moral turpitude. *See*8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I), 1252(a)(2)(C); *Danso v. Gonzales,*489 F.3d 709, 712 (5th Cir.2007). Moreover, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)®, we are statutorily barred from reviewing the BIA’s purely discretionary denial of cancellation of removal. *Sung v. Keisler,*505 F.3d 372, 377 (5th Cir.2007); *Rueda v. Ashcroft,*380 F.3d 831, 831 (5th Cir.2004). To the extent that Escamilla challenges the disere-tionary denial of his requests for relief, we dismiss his petition for want of jurisdiction.

In addition, because Escamilla conceded to his removability under § 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(I) and (a)(6)(E)®, we need not consider his argument that the Government did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that he was also removable pursuant to § 1182(a)(6)(C)®. *See Flores-Garza v. INS,*328 F.3d 797, 802-03 (5th Cir.2003). Escamilla’s attempt to confer jurisdiction in this court by claiming that the IJ committed legal error and violated his due process rights by “failing to appropriately exercise discretion and follow the controlling case law” is unavailing. Our review of the record reveals that both the IJ and the BIA undertook a comprehensive and reasoned analysis of Escamilla’s case and also appropriately weighed both the positive and negative equities before exercising the discretion to deny relief. We reject Escamilla’s attempt to recast what amounts to a disagreement with the weighing and consideration of the relevant factors by the IJ and the BIA as either a constitutional or legal issue. *See Hadwani v. Gonzales,*445 F.3d 798, 801 (5th Cir.2006); *Assaad v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 471, 475-76 (5th Cir.2004).

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Danny Colon, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Ortiz, Appellant.

Submitted September 14, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 55 AD3d 444.

Motion by Center on the Administration of Criminal Law for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.

*783Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Sarah Kerrigan, Ph.D. is the Chair of the Department of 

Forensic Science and Director of the Institute for Forensic Research 

Training and Innovation at Sam Houston State University. Dr. 

Kerrigan has experience as an academician, researcher, 

practitioner, and director of ABFT and ISO/IEC 17025 accredited 

laboratories. She is a former President of the Society of Forensic 

Toxicologists and California Association of Toxicologists, and 

currently serves on the Board of Directors of the American 

Academy of Forensic Sciences. Dr. Kerrigan is a former Associate 

Editor of the Journal of Forensic Sciences and has served on the Texas Forensic Science 

Commission for over a decade. Since 2014 Dr. Kerrigan has held multiple positions with the 

NIST OSAC, including Executive Secretary of the Forensic Science Standards Board. She was 

reappointed to the FSSB in 2021 where she currently serves as the Society of Forensic 

Toxicologists representative.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSE P. FONT,

Appellant,

v.

THE HOMES AT SHERIDAN OCEAN CLUB 

HOMEOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC., a

Florida Not for Profit Corporation,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3389

[May 2, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barbara McCarthy, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE19-

013410.

Jose P. Font of Font & Nelson, PLLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Jeremy Dicker of Sachs Sax Caplan, Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of March, 2004 Commission File Number: 00-30082 Envoy Communications Group Inc.(Translation of registrants name into English) 172 John Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5T 1X5
(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F þ           Form 40-F o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Yes o           No þ If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- Signatures Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Envoy Communications Group Inc.
(Registrant)By:
    /s/ Geoffrey B. GenoveseName:
    Geoffrey B. GenoveseTitle:
    President, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer Dated: May 20, 2004




---



##### 



Exhibit Index Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release on second quarter results.
#### Superior Ice Rink, Inc., Respondent, v Nescon Contracting Corp., Doing Business as A1 Discount Painting, et al., Defendants, and Merchants Mutual Marine Insurance Company, Appellant.

Submitted January 26, 2009;

decided March 26, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Petitions to Rehear

#### Bio-Medical Applications of N.C., Inc. v. N.C. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs.

Case below: 361 N.C. 229

No. 549A06-2

Pit’s Petition for Rehearing (COA05-294)

Denied 05/02/07
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Public  Storage,  Inc.
(the  "Company") for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Ronald L.
Havner,  Jr., as Chief  Executive  Officer and President of the Company and John
Reyes,  as Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  each  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
-------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer & President
Date:    August 9, 2005

/s/ John Reyes
--------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    August 9, 2005


                                   Exhibit 32
EXHIBIT
32.1




STATMON
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


19
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geoffrey Talbot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Geoffrey P. Talbot/s/Geoffrey
      P. Talbot
                  Chief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      18, 2010


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 34.1.4.1

[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Members

Regulus Group LLC:

 

We have examined management’s assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Regulus Group LLC complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122 (d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for remittance processing services to those issuers of asset backed securities and servicers of loan and/or receivable portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Regulus Group LLC has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for theCompany’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may haveoccurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/_KPMG LLP

 

February 12, 2008
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3677 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the in the 

home restriction for Medicare coverage of mobility devices for individuals 

with expected long-term needs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2006 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. SANTORUM, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. 

JEFFORDS, Mr. KERRY, Mr. HARKIN, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the in the home restriction for Medicare coverage of 

mobility devices for individuals with expected long-term 

needs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Independent 

5 Living Act of 2006’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3677 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF IN THE HOME RESTRICTION FOR 

2 MEDICARE COVERAGE OF MOBILITY DEVICES 

3 FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH EXPECTED LONG4 TERM NEEDS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(n) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(n) is amended by inserting 

7 ‘‘or, in the case of a mobility device required by an indi8 vidual with expected long-term need, used in customary 

9 settings for the purpose of normal domestic, vocational, 

10 or community activities’’ after ‘‘1819(a)(1))’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply to items furnished on or after 

13 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3617 

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2006 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. CHAFEE, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. 

CRAPO, Mr. NELSON of Nebraska, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North American Wet5 lands Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2006’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 Section 7(c)(5) of the North American Wetlands Con8 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 4406(c)(5)) is amended by strikVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:51 Jul 04, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3617.IS S3617

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3617 IS

1 ing ‘‘fiscal year 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fiscal years 

2 2007 through 2012’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Abu I., Appellant, v Zaratu I., Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 249]

Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (David B. Cohen, J.), entered on or about November 30, 2012, which, after a fact-finding hearing, respectively, dismissed with prejudice the petition alleging family offenses against respondent, and ordered a full order of protection against petitioner, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A fair preponderance of the evidence supports the court’s finding that petitioner committed acts that would constitute assault in the third degree, menacing in the second and third degrees, and criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation *(see*Family Ct Act §§ 812, 832). The court’s credibility determinations are supported by the record and therefore entitled to deference *(see Matter of Creighton v Whitmore,*71 AD3d 1141 [2d Dept 2010]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Richter and Feinman, JJ.
#### Milton Clifton WILLIAMS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 09-6299.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 28, 2009.

Decided: May 8, 2009.

Milton Clifton Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Mozley Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Milton Clifton Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of ap-pealability. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *288and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-CIBC18
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
  Series 2007-CIBC18 (the "Trust")

  I, Brian Baker, the President and Chief Executive Officer of J.P. Morgan
  Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., the depositor into the
  above-referenced Trust, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
    Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of period covered by this
    annual report on Form 10-K, of the Trust (the "Exchange Act Periodic
    Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements
    were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
    report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the master servicer and
    the special servicer have fulfilled their obligations under the pooling
    and servicing agreement in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with
    servicing criteria required to be included in this report in accordance
    with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and
    15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
    otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
    noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Capmark Finance Inc. as Master Servicer, Centerline Servicing Inc. as
    Special Servicer, LNR Partners, Inc. as Special Servicer, LNR Partners,
    Inc. as Special Servicer for the 131 South Dearborn loan, Midland Loan
    Services, Inc. as Master Servicer for the 131 South Dearborn loan,
    Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying
    Agent and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent and Trustee for the
    131 South Dearborn loan.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ Brian Baker
    Signature

    President and Chief Executive Officer
    J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 27, 2019

No. 04-19-00770-CR

Stephen RICHARDSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR10629

Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT 

OF JURISDICTION. 

It is so ORDERED on November 27, 2019.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of November, 2019.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT
32.2





STATMON
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


19
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Geoffrey P. TalbotGeoffrey
      P. TalbotChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      23, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.