alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------

                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES TRUST 2007-BC1
                   ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-BC1


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.17 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                          Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
Exhibit 23.2







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-147334, 333-157041, 333-164469, 333-171981, 333-180461 and 333-185998, on Form S-8, and in Registration Statement No. 333-159917 and 333-180460, on Form S-3, of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.











|                  | /s/ Davidson & Company LLP
|----------------- | --------------------------
|Vancouver, Canada | Chartered Accountants     
|                  |                           
|March 4, 2014     |
#### Wendy Silva-Carpanzano, Respondent, v Scott Schecter et al., Appellants.

[963 NYS2d 389]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered December 5, 2011, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

On a January evening at 6:30 p.m., the plaintiff was leaving the defendants’ home when she allegedly slipped and fell on ice on an exterior step which was part of a walkway connecting the front door to the abutting sidewalk. Snow had fallen two days earlier, and one of the defendants had shoveled and salted the walkway, placing one to two inches of snow on the grass to the side of the walkway steps. The plaintiff worked for the defendants as a child-care provider, and at her deposition she testified that, in the days before her fall, she did not complain to the defendants of any hazardous conditions. At the time of her fall, the walkway appeared to be clear and she did not see any ice, but she felt ice on the ground with her hands after she fell. The defendants both testified at their depositions that they had used the walkway without incident on the day of the plaintiffs fall, and the defendant who had shoveled the walkway had used it within a half hour prior to the plaintiffs fall.

Based upon the foregoing deposition testimony, the defend*1031ants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that they neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of the alleged icy condition *(see Mayo v Cedar Manor Mut. Hous. Corp.,*96 AD3d 913 [2012]; *Gershfeld v Marine Park Funeral Home, Inc.,*62 AD3d 833, 834 [2009]; *Simon v PABR Assoc., LLC,*61 AD3d 663, 664 [2009]; *Kaplan v DePetro,*51 AD3d 730, 731 [2008]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiffs contention that the icy condition formed as a result of the defendants’ negligent snow removal efforts, which created a foreseeable risk of melting and refreezing snow, was based on speculation and unsupported by the record *(see Spinoccia v Fairfield Bellmore Ave., LLC,*95 AD3d 993, 993-994 [2012]; *Gershfeld v Marine Park Funeral Home, Inc.,*62 AD3d at 834; *Simon v PABR Assoc., LLC,*61 AD3d at 664-665; *Kaplan v DePetro,*51 AD3d at 731). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

Skelos, J.P, Angiolillo, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           27202
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 37381
<PP&E>                                         2494003
<DEPRECIATION>                                   25320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2714189
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2445966
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         37019
<OTHER-SE>                                      231204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2714189
<SALES>                                          25216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 72768
<CGS>                                             6010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 88652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  14380
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              14380
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     14380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.001
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10904]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-65,312]


Brown Shoe Company, Inc., Fredericktown, MO; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended, an investigation was initiated on February 19, 2009 in 
response to a petition filed by a United Food and Commercial Workers 
Local 655 union representative on behalf of workers of Brown Shoe 
Company, Inc., Fredericktown, Missouri.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of March 2009.
Richard Church,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E9-10904 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Order entered September 9 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00799

- CV

STRATA BV SWD, LLC ; BVCITI, LP; BVCITI GP, LLC; BV PARTNERS , LP; BV PARTNERS GP, LLC; TH OMAS A LEISER; PRYOR BLACKWELL; AND CHAR LES A. ANDERSON, Appellant s

V.

MARATHON OIL COMPANY , Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 17

- 14153



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellants ’ second unopposed motion to extend briefing deadline

. Appellants ask the deadline be extended to November 4, 2019 to allow the parties an opportunity

to attend mediation on October 14, 2019.

We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants to file, no later than Novemb er 4, 2019,
either their opening brief or a motion to dismiss the appeal

.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
EX-31 Sarbanes-Oxley Certification.


  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed the report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Alternative Note Asset Trust, Series 2007-F1
    (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for ABS and their related attestation reports on assessment of
    compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
    to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
    Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
    included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
    this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
    reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Central Mortgage Company as Servicer, IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer
    and Wachovia Mortgage Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Diane Courtney
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50229

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN DAVID SEGURA-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:08-CR-496-4

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan David Segura-Lopez appeals the sixty-month sentence he received

after pleading guilty to conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute more

than 100 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. For the first

time on appeal, he contends that the district court plainly erred in not awarding

him a U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2 safety-valve reduction and in failing to impose a sentence

below the statutory minimum. As the Government contends, the instant appeal

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 23, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-50229

2

is barred by the waiver-of-appeal provision in Segura-Lopez’s plea agreement,

which was knowing, voluntary, and enforceable. See United States v. Robinson,

187 F.3d 516, 517 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292-93

(5th Cir. 1994); Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1)(N).

Segura-Lopez’s argument that the Government breached the plea

agreement by failing to request a safety valve reduction fails because the

Government was under no affirmative obligation to request such a reduction.

In addition, he had two criminal history points. Thus he was statutorily

ineligible to receive the safety valve reduction. U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(1). SeguraLopez’s claim that the Government engaged in prosecutorial misconduct by

withholding unspecified information regarding his eligibility for safety valve

consideration is wholly conclusional and is not cognizable. See Nichols v. Scott,

69 F.3d 1255, 1286 (5th Cir. 1995) (28 U.S.C. § 2254 case).

AFFIRMED.
950 A.2d 77

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Herbert Aldon CALLIHAN, Jr., Respondent.

Misc. AG No. 80,

Sept. Term, 2007.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

June 11, 2008.

*ORDER*

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Herbert Aldon Callihan, Jr., to disbar the Respondent, by consent, from the practice of law.

The Court, having considered the Petition, it is this *11th*day of *June,*2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Herbert Aldon Callihan, Jr., be and he is hereby disbarred by consent from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, and it is further,

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Herbert Aldon Callihan, Jr. from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 16-773(d).
Order entered September 9, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00799-CV

STRATA BV SWD, LLC; BVCITI, LP; BVCITI GP, LLC; BV PARTNERS, LP; BV 

PARTNERS GP, LLC; THOMAS A LEISER; PRYOR BLACKWELL; AND CHARLES 

A. ANDERSON, Appellants

V.

MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14153

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ second unopposed motion to extend briefing deadline. 

Appellants ask the deadline be extended to November 4, 2019 to allow the parties an opportunity 

to attend mediation on October 14, 2019. 

We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants to file, no later than November 4, 2019, 

either their opening brief or a motion to dismiss the appeal.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
From: The District Court of the 8th Judicial District. County of Cascade.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES SWANK, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. CDC-03-202 NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER TO CORRECT DECISION

The Decision of August 6,2009 of the Sentence Review Division was incorrect in that the Decision was noted as affirmed. At the August 6, 2009 sentence review hearings, the defendant had requested a continuance in this matter and it was granted by the Division.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT the August 6, 2009 Decision shall be amended and the Application for Review of Sentence shall be continued to the next available hearing on November 12, 2009. Notice will be given four weeks prior to the hearing informing the defendant and counsel of the actual date and time of the hearing.

DATED this 28th day of August, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler
#### In the Matter of Robert Clarke, Appellant, v Natasha I. Wilson, Respondent.

[973 NYS2d 574]

In a custody and visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (McGrady, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated May 14, 2012, as, after a hearing, denied his petition, inter alia, for joint custody of the parties’ child and awarded the mother sole custody of the parties’ child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The parties, who were never married to each other, are the parents of a son born on July 4, 1999. In April 2011, the father filed a petition, inter alia, for joint custody. Following a hearing, the Family Court, in an order dated May 14, 2012, among other things, awarded sole custody to the mother. The father appeals.

This case involves an initial custody determination. Contrary to the father’s contention, there is a “sound and substantial” basis in the record for the Family Court’s finding that the best interests of the child would be served by awarding sole custody of the parties’ child to the mother *(see Matter of Wallace v Roberts,*105 AD3d 1053 [2013]; *Matter of Arndt v Arndt,*100 AD3d 879 [2012]; *Kaplan v Kaplan,*21 AD3d 993 [2005]). Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.
#### Maurice Oparaji, Appellant, v The New York Mortgage Company, LLC, Respondent.

Submitted July 13, 2009;

decided September 8, 2009

Reported below, 55 AD3d 429.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see 12*NY3d 881 (2009)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3759 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3759

 To name the Armed Forces Readiness Center in Great Falls, Montana, in 
 honor of Captain William Wylie Galt, a recipient of the Congressional 
                            Medal of Honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 27 (legislative day, July 26), 2006

   Mr. Burns introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To name the Armed Forces Readiness Center in Great Falls, Montana, in 
 honor of Captain William Wylie Galt, a recipient of the Congressional 
                            Medal of Honor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAMING OF ARMED FORCES READINESS CENTER IN GREAT FALLS, 
              MONTANA, IN HONOR OF CAPTAIN WILLIAM WYLIE GALT, A 
              RECIPIENT OF THE CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR.

    The Armed Forces Readiness Center in Great Falls, Montana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain William Wylie Galt Great Falls 
Armed Forces Readiness Center''. Any reference in a law, map, 
regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to 
such facility shall be deemed to be a reference to the Captain William 
Wylie Galt Great Falls Armed Forces Readiness Center.
                                 <all>
```
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Structured Asset Securities Corporation
745 7th Avenue
New York, NY 10019



RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and/or Securities
Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


February 25, 2008

/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
KRISTEN ANN CRONIN
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Trust Agreement for THORNBURG 2006-4, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
  Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

2 Sale and Servicing Agreement for Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-1
  Mortgage-Backed Notes, Series 2007-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
  Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable

3 Sale and Servicing Agreement for Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-2
  Mortgage-Backed Notes, Series 2007-2, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
  Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable
Exhibit 31

                         FORM OF CERTIFICATION TO BE
                          PROVIDED WITH FORM 10-K


     Re: Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-NC2, issued
         pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
         February 1, 2007, between Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC,
         as depositor, NC Capital Corporation as responsible party, Barclays
         Capital Real Estate Inc. d/b/a HomEq Servicing, as servicer, and
         Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

I, Paul Menefee, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-NC2 (the
"Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
Report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
reports;

     4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
material respects; and

     5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
 criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as trustee.

Date: 3/28/08


/s/Paul Menefee
Paul Menefee
Vice President and
Chief Accounting Office
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Contact Phone Number


     

    Kelly
      Sundberg

     

      
        

      

    

     

    December
      18, 2006

    To:
      Sunberta Resources Inc. (Nevada)

     

    I
      agree
      to loan up to US$100,000.00 to Sunberta Resources Inc. (Nevada)
      if and
      as
      the need arises, to assist in funding the operations of the
      Company.

     

    The
      terms
      of such loan will be negotiated at the time of lending, but interest charged
      will not exceed
      the
      prevailing prime rate of interest plus 3%.

     

    Sincerely,

     

    /s/
      Kelly Sundberg

    Kelly
      Sundberg