alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,312]

In accordance with Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on February 19, 2009 in response to a petition filed by a United Food and Commercial Workers Local 655 union representative on behalf of workers of Brown Shoe Company, Inc., Fredericktown, Missouri.

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed in Washington, DC, this 26th day of March 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of  Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10904 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3809 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3809

                 For the relief of Jacqueline W. Coats.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2006

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Jacqueline W. Coats.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR JACQUELINE W. COATS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Jacqueline 
W. Coats shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Jacqueline W. Coats enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
Jacqueline W. Coats shall be considered to have entered and remained 
lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the 
date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Jacqueline W. Coats, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
birth of Jacqueline W. Coats under section 203(a) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Jacqueline W. Coats under section 202(e) of that Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3760 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3760

To prohibit the suspension of royalties under certain circumstances and 
to clarify the authority to impose price thresholds for certain leases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 27 (legislative day, July 26), 2006

  Mr. Kyl (for himself and Mr. DeWine) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the suspension of royalties under certain circumstances and 
to clarify the authority to impose price thresholds for certain leases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Royalty Relief Suspension Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. ROYALTY RELIEF FOR PRODUCTION OF OIL AND GAS.

    (a) Price Thresholds.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
the Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this Act as the 
``Secretary'') shall place limitations based on market price on the 
royalty relief granted under any lease for the production of oil or 
natural gas on Federal land (including submerged land) entered into by 
the Secretary on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Clarification of Authority to Impose Price Thresholds for 
Certain Lease Sales.--Congress reaffirms the authority of the Secretary 
under section 8(a)(1)(H) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 
U.S.C. 1337(a)(1)(H)) to vary, based on the price of production from a 
lease, the suspension of royalties under any lease subject to section 
304 of the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act 
(Public Law 104-58; 43 U.S.C. 1337 note).
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00420-CR

Ruben RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR0747

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 22, 2018

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, appellant pleaded nolo contendere to aggravated 

assault with a deadly weapon and was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment, in accordance with 

the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On July 26, 2018, the trial court signed an amended

certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the 

defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant filed a notice 

of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See 
04-18-00420-CR

- 2 -

id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has 

been filed. See id. 25.2(d). 

“In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to 

appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the 

punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor 

and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed 

and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave its permission to appeal. 

See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a pleabargain case and that appellant does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a 

certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” 

Id. 25.2(d). 

We, therefore, warned Rodriguez that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification showing that he 

had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; 

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). No such amended trial 

court certification has been filed. Rather, Rodriguez’s appointed counsel has filed a response 

acknowledging Rodriguez does not have a right to appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Summary of Standard Director Compensation Arrangements



 EXHIBIT 10.24 
 MAGMA DESIGN AUTOMATION, INC. 
 Summary of Standard Director Compensation Arrangements for
Non-Employee 
 Directors 
 Description of Director Compensation (effective as of April 25, 2006) 
 Directors who are employees of Magma do not
receive separate compensation for service on the Board of Directors. Directors who are not employees of Magma receive a cash retainer of $25,000 per year and $2,500 per Board or committee meeting attended ($500 for teleconference meetings) for
services as a member of the Board of the Directors. In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee and the Chairman of the Compensation Committee each receive a fee of $10,000 per year; the other members of the Audit Committee receive a fee of
$5,000 per year, and the other members of the Compensation Committee receive a fee of $2,500 per year. Magma reimburses its non-employee Directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the board or its Committees. 

Pursuant to the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by Magma’s stockholders, each non-employee director receives an initial stock
option grant to purchase 50,000 shares of Magma common stock upon appointment or election. The initial option vests as to 25% of the shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant with the remaining shares vesting monthly over the following
three years. Following the conclusion of each regular annual meeting of stockholders, each continuing non-employee director receives an additional option to purchase 20,000 shares at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the common
stock on the date of grant. When a non-employee director is appointed to the Board of Directors at a time other than at an annual meeting, such director receives a pro rata portion of the 20,000 share grant. The annual grants and the interim grants
vest in full on the day immediately prior to the annual meeting of stockholders in the year immediately following the year of the grant if the director continues as a member of the Board on that date. All options will vest fully upon a change in
control of Magma, as set forth under the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert OWENS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-13785

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

April 20, 2009.

Robert Owens, Miami, FL, pro se.

Sally M. Richardson, Anne R. Schultz, Kathleen Sayler, AUSA, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before BLACK, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Owens appeals *pro se*the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(e)(2). Owens moved to reduce his sentence based on Amendments 433 and 599 to the Guidelines. We affirm.

We review a denial of a motion to reduce a sentence under section 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion. *United States v.*
      *766
      *Brown,*332 F.3d 1341, 1343 (11th Cir.2003).

A district court may modify a sentence under section 3582(c)(2) for a defendant who was sentenced to a term of imprisonment based upon a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission. Amendment 433 became effective November 1, 1991. U.S.S.GApp. C, amend. 433. Amendment 599 became effective November 1, 2000. U.S.S.G.App. C, amend. 599. Owens was sentenced in 2004.

The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Owens’s motion to reduce his sentence because Amendments 433 and 599 were in effect when he was originally sentenced. Owens’s term of imprisonment was not based on a sentencing range that was later lowered by the Sentencing Commission. *See*U.S.S.G.App. C, amend. 433, 599; 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We affirm the denial of Owens’s motion to reduce his sentence.

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of Steven Lashway, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

[973 NYS2d 496]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was on mental health watch when he began punching a wall and spitting on the floor. After a correction officer ordered him to desist, petitioner exposed himself and urinated on the floor, berating the officer and using a racial epithet. As a result, petitioner was charged with lewd conduct, committing an unhygienic act and refusing a direct order and, following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of all charges. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the determination.

We confirm. To the extent that petitioner challenges the evidence upon which the determination was founded, the misbehavior report, along with the testimony of its author, provide the requisite substantial evidence *(see Matter of Harrison v Fischer,*104 AD3d 1032, 1032 [2013]; *Matter of Alston v Fischer,*104 AD3d 974, 974 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 857 [2013]). Petitioner’s contention that the charges were in retaliation for reports he had filed against certain correction officers raised a credibility issue to be resolved by the Hearing Officer *(see Matter of Blackwell v Fischer,*106 AD3d 1346, 1346 [2013]; *Matter of Fowler v Fischer,*106 AD3d 1344, 1345 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 865 [2013]). The record further demonstrates that, consistent with the regulations, the Hearing Officer conducted an in camera interview with a representative from the Office of Mental Health and properly considered petitioner’s mental state, as reflected in the written disposition of the charges *(see*7 NYCRR 254.6 [c] [3]; [f]; *Matter of Scott v Fischer,*82 AD3d 1431, 1432 [2011]). Finally, the record belies petitioner’s assertion that he was improperly denied an employee assistant, inasmuch as two different correction officers testified that they served him with an assistance form and he refused to select one and petitioner admitted that, when given the second op*1421portunity, he tore the assistant form in half and dropped it in the toilet *(see Matter of White v Fischer,*87 AD3d 1249, 1250 [2011]; *Matter of Warren v Fischer,*63 AD3d 1466, 1467 [2009]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Peters, P.J., Rose, Stein and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Taylor, Appellant.

Submitted March 9, 2009;

decided March 26, 2009

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 8995]

Pursuant to section 7012 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2014 (Div. K, P.L. 113-76) (the Act), E. O. 12163, as amended by E. O. 13346, and Delegation of Authority 245-1, I hereby determine assistance to Somalia is in the national interest of the United States and thereby waive, with respect to Somalia, the application of section 7012 of the Act.

                    This Determination shall be reported to Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: May 5, 2014.

Heather Higginbottom,

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.

*Editorial Note:*                     This document was received for publication by the Office of                     **Federal Register**                     on December 31, 2014.                

[FR Doc. 2014-30958 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
#### State v. Cuthrell

Case below: 175 N.C. App. 593

No. 043P07

Def’s PWC to Review Decision of COA (COA05-314)

Denied 06/27/07
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-61-2014]

On August 21, 2014, the City of Mobile, Alabama, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 82, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on behalf of Airbus Americas, Inc., within Site 1, in Mobile.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (79 FR 52630, 09/04/2014). The FTZ Board has determined that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification is authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.14.                

Dated: December 26, 2014.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-00111 Filed 1-7-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------


                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWMBS, INC.
                     CHL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH TRUST 2007-3
                MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-3


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2008
---------------------------------
Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
<PAGE>
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the use of our report dated April 27, 2004, with respect to the
balance sheets of Voyageur Panel Limited as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and
the statements of earnings (loss), shareholders' equity and cash flows for each
of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2003, included herein and
to the reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the Form F-4
Registration Statement.



/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Winnipeg, Canada
February 18, 2005
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): June 30, 2005 IMPERIAL OIL LIMITED    Canada
    
    0-12014
    
    98-0017682(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 111 St. Clair Avenue West, Toronto, Ontario,
    
    M5W 1K3(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code: 1-800-567-3776    Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below): o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b)) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02

Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Principal Officers.J. Michael Yeager, resigned as a director of Imperial Oil Limited, effective
July 1, 2005. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. Date: June 30, 2005
    IMPERIAL OIL LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ Brian LivingstonName:
    Brian LivingstonTitle:
    Vice-President, General Counsel
and Corporate Secretary By:
    /s/ Marilyn HendersonName:
    Marilyn HendersonTitle:
    Assistant Secretary