alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3737 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the WashingtonRochambeau Revolutionary Route National Historic Trail. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 26, 2006 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself, Mr. WARNER, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. REED, Mr. 

MENENDEZ, Mr. DODD, and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the 

Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route National 

Historic Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Washington-Rocham5 beau Revolutionary Route National Historic Trail Des6 ignation Act’’. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3737 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION TO NATIONAL SCENIC AND NATIONAL 

2 HISTORIC TRAILS. 

3 Section 5(a) of the National Trails System Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 1244(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(25) WASHINGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLU7 TIONARY ROUTE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Washington-Ro9 chambeau Revolutionary Route National His10 toric Trail, a corridor of approximately 600 

11 miles following the route taken by the armies of 

12 General George Washington and Count Ro13 chambeau between Newport, Rhode Island, and 

14 Yorktown, Virginia, in 1781 and 1782, as gen15 erally depicted on the map entitled ‘WASH16 INGTON-ROCHAMBEAU REVOLU17 TIONARY ROUTE NATIONAL HISTORIC 

18 TRAIL’, numbered T01/80,000, and dated July 

19 2006 . 

20 ‘‘(B) MAP.—The map referred to in sub21 paragraph (A) shall be on file and available for 

22 public inspection in the appropriate offices of 

23 the National Park Service. 

24 ‘‘(C) ADMINISTRATION.—The trail shall be 

25 administered by the Secretary of the Interior, 

26 in consultation with— 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•S 3737 IS

1 ‘‘(i) other Federal, State, tribal, re2 gional, and local agencies; and 

3 ‘‘(ii) the private sector. 

4 ‘‘(D) LAND ACQUISITION.—The United 

5 States shall not acquire for the trail any land 

6 or interest in land outside the exterior boundary 

7 of any federally-managed area without the con8 sent of the owner of the land or interest in 

9 land.’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
**Exhibit      32.3**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

| /s/              Elise Nissen                                                                     |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Elise              Nissen, Chief                Financial OfficerFebruary                12, 2007 |   |
|                                                                                              |   |
|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 17, 2008   | By:    | /s/                Patrick J. Gainer                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          |   | Patrick                J. GainerChief                Financial Officer(Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #11732 and #11733]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-1831-DR), dated 04/28/2009.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Tornadoes, and Straight-line Winds.                    

*Incident Period:*                         03/26/2009 and continuing.                    

*Effective Date:*                         05/01/2009.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/29/2009.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         01/28/2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of Florida, dated 04/28/2009 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Dixie, Gilchrist.                

*Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Florida: Alachua, Levy.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-11033 Filed 5-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3976 

To provide a mechanism for the determination on the merits of the claims 

of claimants who met the class criteria in a civil action relating to 

racial discrimination by the Department of Agriculture but who were 

denied that determination. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide a mechanism for the determination on the merits 

of the claims of claimants who met the class criteria 

in a civil action relating to racial discrimination by the 

Department of Agriculture but who were denied that 

determination. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pigford Claims Rem5 edy Act of 2006’’. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3976 IS

1 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION ON MERITS OF PIGFORD CLAIMS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any Pigford claimant who has not 

3 previously obtained a determination on the merits of a 

4 Pigford claim may, in a civil action, obtain that determina5 tion. 

6 (b) INTENT OF CONGRESS AS TO REMEDIAL NATURE

7 OF SECTION.—It is the intent of Congress that this sec8 tion be liberally construed so as to effectuate its remedial 

9 purpose of giving a full determination on the merits for 

10 each Pigford claim denied that determination. 

11 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this Act— 

12 (1) the term ‘‘Pigford claimant’’ means an indi13 vidual who previously submitted a late-filing request 

14 under section 5(g) of the consent decree in the case 

15 of Pigford v. Glickman, approved by the United 

16 States District Court for the District of Columbia on 

17 April 14, 1999; and 

18 (2) the term ‘‘Pigford claim’’ means a discrimi19 nation complaint, as defined by section 1(h) of that 

20 consent decree and documented under section 5(b) 

21 of that consent decree. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
<SEQUENCE>13

                                  EXHIBIT 32.a


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Regent Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2000, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Nelson, in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                        /S/ DAVID A. NELSON
                                        -------------------
Date: September 1, 2005                 David A. Nelson,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3883 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3883

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an alternate 
 sulfur dioxide removal measurement for advanced coal-based generation 
  technology units under the qualifying advanced coal project credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2006

  Mr. Coleman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an alternate 
 sulfur dioxide removal measurement for advanced coal-based generation 
  technology units under the qualifying advanced coal project credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALTERNATE SULFUR DIOXIDE REMOVAL MEASUREMENT FOR ADVANCED 
              COAL-BASED GENERATION TECHNOLOGY UNITS UNDER QUALIFYING 
              ADVANCED COAL PROJECT CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 48A(f)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to advanced coal-based generation technology) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``percent'' the first place it appears in 
        the table contained in subparagraph (B),
            (2) by striking ``99 percent'' in such table and inserting 
        ``SO<INF>2</INF> removal design level'', and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new flush sentence:
        ``For purposes of the table contained in subparagraph (B), the 
        term `SO<INF>2 </INF>removal design level' means either 99 
        percent SO<INF>2 </INF>removal or the achievement of an 
        emission limit of 0.04 pound SO<INF>2</INF> per million Btu, on 
        a 30-day average.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the amendment made by section 1307(b) of the 
Energy Policy Act of 2005.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3617 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3617

      To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2006

 Mr. Inhofe (for himself, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Chafee, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. 
Crapo, Mr. Nelson of Nebraska, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Craig, Mr. Cochran, and 
  Mr. Baucus) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North American Wetlands Conservation 
Reauthorization Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 7(c)(5) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 4406(c)(5)) is amended by striking ``fiscal year 2007'' and 
inserting ``each of fiscal years 2007 through 2012''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 for  Hallwood  Energy  Corporation  and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000319019
<NAME>                        Hallwood Energy Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         8,424
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  25,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               34,494
<PP&E>                                         754,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 598,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          23,279
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    20,873
<COMMON>                                       100
<OTHER-SE>                                     57,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,204
<SALES>                                        21,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,528
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,757
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,170
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            8,587
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   8,587
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .75




</TABLE>
#### Alberto Mora et al., Appellants, v Kane is Able, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[963 NYS2d 375]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Alberto Mora appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated September 20, 2011, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Kane is Able, Inc., and Kane Freight Lines, Inc., and the defendant MK, LLC, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them by the plaintiff Alberto Mora, and the plaintiff Nitza Mora also appeals from the same order.

Ordered that the appeal by the plaintiff Nitza Mora is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the plaintiff Alberto Mora; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The appeal by the plaintiff Nitza Mora must be dismissed as abandoned, since the appellate brief was submitted only on behalf of the plaintiff Alberto Mora.

The Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Kane is Able, Inc., and Kane Freight Lines, Inc., and the defendant MK, LLC, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them by the plaintiff Alberto Mora (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; *cf. Cain v Amaro,*287 AD2d 676 [2001]). Those defendants established, prima facie, that their drivers and trucks were not involved in the hit-and-run accident in which the injured plaintiff was injured. In opposition, the injured *1023plaintiff did not raise a triable issue of fact as to the identity of the driver or the owner of the truck which struck him *(see Alvarez v Prospect*Hosp., 68 NY2d at 324; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d at 562).

Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
EX 4.2


    EXHIBIT
      4.2

     

     

     

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        -1-

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

    
       

       

       

      
        
           

        

        
          -2-

          
            

          

        

        
           

        

      

    

     

    
       

       

       

      
        
           

        

        
          -3-

          
            

          

        

        
           

        

      

    

     

    
       

       

      
        
           

        

        
          -4-

          
            

          

        

        
           

        

      

       

      
         

         

         

        
          
             

          

          
            -5-

            
              

            

          

          
             

          

        

      

       

      
         

         

         

        
          
             

          

            -6-
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1 Attention Business Editors: Rogers and Call-Net to Hold Joint Teleconference to Discuss
Rogers Acquisition of Call-Net TORONTO,
May 11 /CNW/  Rogers Communications Inc. (Rogers) and
Call-Net Enterprises Inc. (Call-Net), will jointly host a teleconference
call today, Wednesday, May 11, 2005 at 10:15 a.m. Eastern Time (ET) to discuss
Rogers acquisition of Call-Net as announced earlier this morning. Those wishing to listen to the teleconference call should access the live
webcast on the Investor Relations section of Rogers web site at
www.rogers.com/webcast or Call-Nets web site at
www.callnet.ca/webcast. The
webcast will be available on the Rogers and Call-Net web sites for
re-broadcast following the teleconference call for a period of at least two
weeks. Members of the financial community and media wishing to ask questions
during the call may access the teleconference call by dialing (416) 640-1907
or (800) 814-4862 ten minutes prior to the scheduled start time and requesting
the Rogers and Call-Net teleconference call. A re-broadcast will be available
following the teleconference call by dialing (416) 640-1917, pass code
21124363 followed by the number sign. About the Companies: Rogers Communications Inc. (TSX: RCI; NYSE: RG) is a diversified Canadian
communications and media company engaged in three primary lines of business.
Rogers Wireless Inc. is Canadas largest wireless voice and data
communications services provider and the countrys only carrier operating on
the world standard GSM/GPRS technology platform; Rogers Cable Inc. is Canadas
largest cable television provider offering cable television, high-speed
Internet access and video retailing; and Rogers Media Inc. is Canadas premier
collection of category leading media assets with businesses in radio and
television broadcasting, televised shopping, publishing and sports
entertainment. For further information about the Rogers group of companies,
please visit www.rogers.com. Call-Net Enterprises Inc., (TSX: FON, FON.NV.B) primarily through its
wholly owned subsidiary Sprint Canada Inc., is a leading Canadian integrated




---



##### 



communications solutions provider of home phone, wireless, long distance and
IP services to households, and local, long distance, toll free, enhanced
voice, data and IP services to businesses across Canada. Call-Net,
headquartered in Toronto, owns and operates an extensive national fibre
network, 151 co-locations in five major urban areas including 33
municipalities and maintains network facilities in the United States and the
United Kingdom. For more information, visit www.callnet.ca and
www.sprint.ca. %SEDAR: 00003765EF For further information: Deborah DeRoche, (416) 935-3551,
deborah.deroche@rci.rogers.com;
Archived images on this organization are searchable through CNW Photo Archive
website at http://photos.newswire.ca. Images are free to
accredited members of the media.