alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           35507
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 42931
<PP&E>                                         2776026
<DEPRECIATION>                                   24319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3002763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2754418
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         37035
<OTHER-SE>                                      211310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3002763
<SALES>                                          10895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 24550
<CGS>                                             4205
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 27709
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6274)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6274)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2470 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2470

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize additional grant 
             activities for Hispanic-serving institutions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2023

   Mr. Ruiz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize additional grant 
             activities for Hispanic-serving institutions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accessing Higher Education 
Opportunities Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED GRANT ACTIVITIES.

    Subsection (b) of section 503 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1101b(b)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (7) through (16) as 
        paragraphs (9) through (18), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
            ``(7) Student support programs (which may include 
        counseling, mentoring, and other support services) designed to 
        facilitate the successful advancement of students from four-
        year institutions to postbaccalaureate doctoral degree granting 
        programs that prepare students for health care occupations as 
        such occupations are described in the most recent edition of 
        the Occupational Outlook Handbook published by the Bureau of 
        Labor Statistics.
            ``(8) Developing or expanding access to dual or concurrent 
        enrollment programs and early college high school programs.''.

SEC. 3. FUNDING.

    (a) Authorizations of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out part A of title V of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), as amended by this Act, $107,795,000 
for the first fiscal year starting after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (b) Additional Extensions Not Permitted.--Section 422 of the 
General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. 1226a) shall not apply to 
further extend the duration of the authority under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

 

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, Barbara Campbell, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp. (the “Administrative Agent”), dohereby certify to WaMu Asset Acceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”) and Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Administrative Agent Agreement dated as of February 1, 2005 (the“Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Servicer, and theAdministrative Agent the following with respect to WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WAMU Series 2007-HY3 Trust for the 2007 fiscal year  (the “RelevantYear”): 

1.                  A review of the activities of the AdministrativeAgent during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

2.                  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,the Administrative Agent has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of March 1, 2008.

 

| /s/ Barbara Campbell Name:  Barbara Campbell Title:    First Vice President |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2392-2393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Mexico Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that an orientation and 
planning meeting of the New Mexico Advisory Committee to the Commission 
will convene at 1:00 p.m. (MDT) on Tuesday, February 10, 2015, in the 
Wells Fargo Board Room, Albuquerque Hispano Chamber of commerce, 1309 
Fourth Street NW., Albuquerque, NM 87102. The purpose of the 
orientation meeting is to inform the newly appointed Committee members 
about the rules of operation of federal advisory committees and to 
select additional officers, as determined by the Committee. The purpose 
of the planning meeting is to discuss potential topics that the 
Committee may wish to study.

[[Page 2393]]

    Persons who desire additional information may contact the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 1961 Stout 
Street, Suite 13-201, Denver, CO 80294, phone 303-866-1040 and fax 303-
866-1050, or email to Evelyn Bohor at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1376717c7b7c615366607070613d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="462324292e293406333525253468212930">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the word of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the 
above phone number, email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provision of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated January 12, 2015.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2015-00581 Filed 1-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Ferdinand REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Defendant, and Theodore White, Warden; Ivalee Henry; Stanley Wang, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-17110.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Oct. 19, 2006.

Filed Nov. 2, 2006.

Alexis Coil-Very, Esq., Simpson Thacher *&*Bartlett, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Gregory T. Fayard, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Department of Justice, Sacramento, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: GRABER, W. FLETCHER,. and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

We construe Appellant Reynolds’s pro per July 20, 2005 letter, seeking relief from the judgment entered on June 17, 2004, as a Rule 60(b)(4) motion under the *877Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The order “disregarding” Reynolds’s filing constitutes a denial of that motion. Reynolds has timely appealed from that denial.

Because Reynolds did not receive notice of the district court proceedings, or an opportunity to be heard in those proceedings, we conclude that the district court erred in denying Reynolds’s motion under Rule 60(b)(4). The orders sent to Reynolds’s trial attorney Falcone did not constitute adequate notice because Falcone was not acting as Reynolds’s attorney. Among other things, Falcone’s interests were adverse to those of Reynolds, Reynolds had filed pro per motions after the trial, and both initial notices to Falcone were returned to the court marked as undeliverable. No documents were submitted by Reynolds, or on behalf of Reynolds, in the district court proceedings.

Accordingly, we reverse the denial of Reynolds’s Rule 60(b)(4) motion and vacate the judgment below. We remand for an evidentiary hearing, as ordered by this court in 2004, on the issue of whether Reynolds conditioned his waiver of a jury trial on a bench trial before the magistrate judge.

JUDGMENT VACATED; REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(D)/15D-14(D)
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  report  on Form  10-K and all  reports  on Form  10-D
   required to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report on Form
   10-K of RFMSI Series 2007-S3 Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a whole,
   do not contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
   material  fact  necessary  to make  the  statements  made,  in  light  of the
   circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not  misleading  with
   respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  all  of  the  distribution,  servicing  and  other
   information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
   this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities  performed by the servicers and
   based on my knowledge and the compliance  reviews  conducted in preparing the
   servicer  compliance  statements  required in this report  under Item 1123 of
   Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,
   the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements
   in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for
   asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on assessment
   of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
   be included in this report in accordance  with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
   Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
   report,  except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
   of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
   on Form 10-K.

In giving the  certifications  above,  I have  reasonably  relied on information
provided  to me by  the  following  unaffiliated  parties:  U.S.  Bank  National
Association.

Date:  March 24, 2008


By:     /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
Title:  Managing Director
(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT
M ARIE T . PE Y T O N,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt,
v. O PT IO N O NE M O RT G AG E CO R PO RAT IO N, a Califor nia c or por ation, its suc c e ssor s and assigns, now k now n as Sand Cany on Cor por ation; DE UT SCH E B ANK NAT IO NAL T RUST CO M PANY, asT r uste e forH SI Asse t Se c ur itiz ation Cor por ation tr ust 2006-O PT 3, M or tgage Pass-T hough Ce r tific ate s, Se r ie s 2006-O P T 3; DO E S, 1-30,

De fe nda nts-Appe lle e s. No. 11-17775 D.C . No. 1:10-c v-00186-SOM -KSC
M E M O RANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ha

wa ii Susa n Oki M ollwa

y , Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2017 * * Honolulu, Ha

wa ii 

# F IL ED
MAR 22 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).pa ge 2

B e fore : K O Z INSKI , H A W KINS and B E A , C i rc u it Judge s.
1. A borrowe r ha s a

right to re sc i nd a

hom e m ortga ge tra

nsa c tion “until
m idnight of the

third busine ss da

y following the

c onsum m ation of the transa c tion.” 15 U.S.C . § 1635(a). B ut, if thele nde r fa ils to disc l ose this re sc ission right, the right c an inste a d be e xe rc ise d for thre e y e ars. Se e 12 C .F.R . § 226.23(a)(3). The Pe ytons signe d a

doc um e nt sta

ting tha t the y “ REC E IVED TW O (2) C OM PLETED C OPIES OF THE NOTIC E OF RIGHT TO C ANC EL IN THE FOR M PR E SC R IB ED B Y LAW .” This e vide nc e c re ate s a pre sum p tion tha t the Pe ytons
re c e ive d the a

ppropria t e disc l osure s a

nd a re not e ntitle d to thethre e -y e ar e xte nsion. Se e 15 U.S.C . § 1635(c ). The Pe ytons pre se nte d no a dm issiblee vide nc e to re but the p re sum

ption a n d e xte n d the re sc ission pe riod. The i r re sc i ssion c la im s we re thus tim e -barre d, a

nd the distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt to the de fe nda n ts.
2. The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re t ion by de ny ing the Pe yt ons’
m otion under Fe d e ra l R

u le s of C ivil Proc e dure 59(e ) and 60(b). Se e M c Dowe ll v. C a lde ron, 197 F.3d 1253, 1255 (9th C i r. 1999); B rione s v. Rivie ra Hote l & C a sino, 116 F.3d 379, 380–82 (9th C i r. 1997).
AFFIRM E D.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2554 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2554

  To identify certain roads in the vicinity of Beale Air Force Base, 
 Travis Air Force Base, and Sierra Army Depot, California, as defense 
  access roads for purposes of the defense access roads project under 
                     title 10, United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2023

 Mr. Garamendi (for himself and Mr. LaMalfa) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To identify certain roads in the vicinity of Beale Air Force Base, 
 Travis Air Force Base, and Sierra Army Depot, California, as defense 
  access roads for purposes of the defense access roads project under 
                     title 10, United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IDENTIFICATION OF CERTAIN ROADS IN VICINITY OF BEALE AIR 
              FORCE BASE, TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE, AND SIERRA ARMY DEPOT, 
              CALIFORNIA AS DEFENSE ACCESS ROADS.

    (a) Certification.--For purposes of the defense access roads 
project under section 210 of title 23, United States Code, the 
Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Secretary of Transportation a 
certification stating that the roads specified in subsection (b) are 
important to the national defense pursuant to such section.
    (b) Roads Specified.--Such certification shall apply to the 
following roads in the vicinity of Beale Air Force Base, California, 
Travis Air Force Base, California, or Sierra Army Depot, California:
            (1) With respect to Beale Air Force Base, California:
                    (A) Chuck Yeager Road.
                    (B) North Beale Road.
                    (C) Spenceville Road, also known as Camp Beale 
                Highway.
                    (D) South Beale Road.
            (2) With respect to Travis Air Force Base, California:
                    (A) Air Base Parkway.
                    (B) Canon Road.
                    (C) Gate Road, including North Gate Road.
                    (D) Petersen Road.
                    (E) Vanden Road.
                    (F) Creed Road.
            (3) With respect to Sierra Army Depot, California:
                    (A) Lassen County Route A25.
                    (B) Lassen County Route A26.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 16, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 22 - 00577 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF I.P., A CHILD On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 19 - 00991

O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s November 15, 2022 unopposed second motion for extension of time to file his brief, which is currently due November 22, 2022. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief f iled no later than December 22, 2022.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Leon R. Koziol, Appellant, v Kelly Hawse Koziol, Respondent.

Decided September 8, 2009

Reported below, 60 AD3d 1433 (Appeal No. 1).

*764Appeal from order of the Appellate Division dismissing the appeal from an order of Supreme Court, among other things, denying appellant’s motion for custody and suspension of his support obligations pending determination of the action, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
EXHIBIT 15.1








November
3, 2008








The
Board of Directors and Stockholders of Genentech, Inc.





We
are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment Plan, the 2004 Equity
Incentive Plan, the 1999 Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan,
the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1991
Employee Stock Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37072)
related to the resale of common shares deliverable upon the exchange of Liquid
Yield Option Notes, and in the related Prospectuses, as applicable, contained in
such Registration Statements of our report dated October 27, 2008, relating to
the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Genentech,
Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2008.





Very
      truly yours,/s/ Ernst
      & Young LLP





Palo
Alto, California
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the “Form 10-K/A”) for the year ended December 31, 2018 of Tautachrome Inc. (the “Issuer”). The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.





|                     |        |                                     | 
|-------------------- | ------ | ----------------------------------- | 
|Date: April 18, 2019 | By:    | */s/ Jon N. Leonard*                | 
|                     | Name:  | Jon N. Leonard                      | 
|                     | Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer, | 
|                     |        | Chief Financial Officer, and        | 
|                     |        | Principal Accounting Officer        | 



This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00584]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-15-005]

Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: January 21, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Agendas for future meetings: None.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-511 and 731-TA-1246-1247 (Final) 
(Certain Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Products from China and 
Taiwan). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its 
determinations and views of the Commission on February 5, 2015.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: None.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 12, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-00584 Filed 1-13-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```