alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Rinaldo DelGallo, III, Appellant, v Yulea DelGallo, Respondent.

Submitted April 13, 2009;

decided June 9, 2009

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against the Law Guardian, dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Yulea DelGallo, denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### In the Matter of Daniel Goldstein et al., Appellants, v New York State Urban Development Corporation, Doing Business as Empire State Development Corporation, Respondent.

Submitted September 8, 2009;

decided September 15, 2009

Reported below, 64 AD3d 168.

*771Motion by Willets Point United, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3752 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of frozen fish fillets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27 (legislative day, JULY 26), 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of frozen fish 

fillets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION. 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF FROZEN FISH FILLETS. 

5 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF ENTRIES.— 

6 Notwithstanding sections 514, 520, and 751 of the Tariff 

7 Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514, 1520, and 1675) or any 

8 other provision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border 

9 Protection shall, not later than 90 days after the date of 

10 enactment of this Act— 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3752 IS 

1 (1) liquidate or reliquidate the entries listed in 

2 subsection (b) at the rate of duty, value, quantity, 

3 and amount of duties deposited at the time of entry 

4 by the importer of record; and 

5 (2) refund any antidumping duties and interest 

6 paid on such entries in excess of the duties deposited 

7 at the time of entry. 

8 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

9 subsection (a) are the following: 

Entry number Date of entry Port 

T81–4311966–7 ............................... 03/29/03 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

T81–4312347–9 ............................... 04/12/03 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

T81–4312801–5 ............................... 04/28/03 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

ACN–1012880–7 .............................. 08/24/03 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

ACN–1013702–2 .............................. 10/04/03 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

ACN–1014535–5 .............................. 11/15/03 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

T81–4317619–6 ............................... 12/14/03 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

T81–4319209–4 ............................... 01/23/04 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

T81–4319701–0 ............................... 02/21/04 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

T81–4320893–2 ............................... 04/23/04 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

T81–4321087–0 ............................... 05/06/04 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

T81–4321930–1 ............................... 06/11/04 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

T81–4322426–9 ............................... 07/10/04 ............................. Los Angeles/Long Beach

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE:

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

RELATOR. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00106

- CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Pedro Gomez, Jr. , Judge of the 112th District Court

, Pecos County , Texas, and

concludes that Relater’s petition for writ of mandamus should be dismissed a s moot. We therefore

d ismiss as moot the petition for writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF JUNE , 2021.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Be fore Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhiguang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  April
      14, 2008
            /s/
      Zhiguang ZhangBy:  Zhiguang
      ZhangIts:  Chief
      Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|  | 1. | A                base salary of $240,000 annually. |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | You                will receive 7% of the total outstanding fully diluted shares in                stock                options of Mountains West Exploration, Inc. The options will vest                over a                three year period, 40% upon signing and 20% at the end of each successive                year end period. The options will be issued at $.51, which is the                trading                value as of today, September 19,                2007. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 3. | Employee                health and dental insurance coverage is provided at the same level                as the                rest of the company, once insurance coverage is                initiated. |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 4. | You                will be eligible to participate in the company sponsored 401K plan                when it                is implemented. |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Lee Wiskowski | 9/19/2007 |   | /s/                Larry Malone | 9/19/2007 |
|----------------------------------|-----------|--------|---------------------------------|-----------|
| Lee                Wiskowski     | Date      |   | Larry                Malone     | Date      |
| President                        |      |   |                            |      |

----
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00240]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee; Meeting 
Notice

    The Sensors and Instrumentation Technical Advisory Committee 
(SITAC) will meet on January 27, 2015, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 6087B, 14th Street between Constitution and 
Pennsylvania Avenues NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration on 
technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable 
to sensors and instrumentation equipment and technology.

Agenda

    Public Session:
    1. Welcome and Introductions.
    2. Remarks from the Bureau of Industry and Security Management.
    3. Industry Presentations.
    4. New Business.
    The open session will be accessible via teleconference to 20 
participants on a first come, first serve basis. To join the 
conference, submit inquiries to Ms. Yvette Springer at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#471e3122333322691437352e2920223507252e346923282469202831"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9a08f9c8d8d9cd7aa898b90979e9c8bb99b908ad79d969ad79e968f">[email protected]</span></a> no later than January 21, 2015.
    A limited number of seats will be available during the public 
session of the meeting.
    Reservations are not accepted. To the extent that time permits, 
members of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. The 
public may submit written statements at any time before or after the 
meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation 
materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests that the 
materials be forwarded before the meeting to Ms. Springer.
    For more information contact Yvette Springer on (202) 482-2813.

    Dated: January 6, 2015.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-00240 Filed 1-9-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
- img20230616_14314147.pdf
- img20230616_14333923.pdf
- img20230616_14352600.pdf
EX-35.2
(logo) OCWEN


ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

March 7, 2008

RE: CMLTI 2007-AMC2

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen Loan
Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance statement
pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance with the
servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set forth in
Regulation AB, 17 CFR section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB"). In this
regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the best of my
knowledge and belief in all material respects.

1. A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period, and
of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
March 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.

By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name: Ronald M. Faris
Title: President


Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
****

Exhibit 35.1

 

[U.S. Bank National Association Letterhead]

 

**Annual Statement of Compliance**

SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1

 

VIA: EMAIL

 

MS Structured Asset Corp.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

Reference is made to theTrust Agreement (the “Agreement”), between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle BankNational Association, as Trustee, for SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1, dated March 1, 2007, together with Schedules I, II and III attachedthereto, and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements, between MS Structured Asset Corp., as Depositor and U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee, as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, as successor by merger to LaSalle BankNational Association, as Trustee dated April 13*,* 2006. Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meaningsdefined in the Trust Agreement and the Standard Terms for Trust Agreements.

 

I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice Presidentof U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interest to Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger toLaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee hereby certify that:

 

1.      A review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Trustee underthe Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Trustee has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year.

 

 

Capitalized terms used but not defined hereinhave the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

 

 

Date: 3/7/2017

 

U.S. Bank National Association as successor-in-interestto Bank of America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee

 

 

 

By: /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs 

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lucky Strike Explorations
Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael
Noble, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: March 25, 2008                By: /s/ Michael Noble
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Noble
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-34.11
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG

Ernst & Young LLP
220 South Sixth Street, Ste 1400
Minneapolis, MN 55402-4509

Phone (612) 343-1000
www.ey.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
U.S. Bank National Association

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the
Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
SEC's Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform
(the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2007, except for
servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(i)-(vii),
1122(d)(3)(i)-(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(iv)-(xv), which the Company has determined
are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the
servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with
the servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions
and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the
Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007, for the Corporate Trust Asset Backed Securities platform is fairly stated,
in all material respects.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

February 12, 2008

A member firm of Ernst & Young Global Limited
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Springs, Appellant.

[871 NYS2d 136]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Micki A. Scherer, J., at suppression motion; Charles H. Solomon, J., at nonjury trial and sentence), rendered June 12, 2007, convicting defendant of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 21/2 to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There was ample evidence, including, among other things, a surveillance videotape and defendant’s own statements to the police, to establish that he knowingly entered a basement unlawfully, and did so with the intent to steal property.

*542The trial court properly declined to consider criminal trespass in the second and third degrees as lesser included offenses, as there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, to support those charges (see *e.g. People v Jones,*33 AD3d 461 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 926 [2006]). There was no evidence to support a reasonable view that defendant, by reason of alleged intoxication or otherwise, entered the premises without the intent to steal.

The motion court properly denied that portion of defendant’s suppression motion that sought a *Dunaway*hearing. The allegations in defendant’s moving papers, when considered in the context of the detailed information provided to defendant, were insufficient to create a factual dispute requiring such a hearing *(compare People v Long,*36 AD3d 132 [2006], *affd*8 NY3d 1014 [2007], *with People v Bryant,*8 NY3d 530, 533-534 [2007]). Defendant merely claimed, in a conclusory manner, that he had lawfully entered the building and that , he was not engaged in “any illegal or illicit behavior at the time of his arrest or at [any time] prior to his arrest.” However, he did not address the specific allegations set forth in the felony complaint and voluntary disclosure form.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.E, Andrias, Nardelli, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.
Exhibit
31.01




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE
13a-14




I, George G. Chachas, certify
that:




1.           I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Anoteros, Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:





(a)         Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;





(b)         Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)         Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and




5.           I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




(a)         All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b)         Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.








Date:
March 27, 2008
  Signature
  By:
George G. Chachas
 Its:
Chief Executive Officer