alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-86.htm


Exhibit 10.86

 

EXTENSION OF MATURITY DATE OF CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE

 

This Extension of Maturity Date of Convertible Debenture (“Extension”) is by and between the individual or entity named on an executed counterpart of the signature page hereto (each such signatory is referred to as “Holder”) and OmniComm Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”) and is entered into as of the day the last Holder executes a copy of this Extension.

 

WHEREAS, Maker has delivered to each Holder that certain 10% Convertible Debenture Series 08-03 of the Maker (“Convertible Debenture”) dated August 29, 2008 in the aggregate to all Holder in the principal of $150,000. 

 

WHEREAS, the Maturity Date of the Convertible Debentures, as that term is defined in the Convertible Debenture, is of April 01, 2016, and all principal and interest due thereunder remain unpaid as of the date hereof.

 

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the Maturity Date.

 

WHEREAS, each holder has all requisite power, authority, and capacity to enter into this Extension and to extend the Maturity Date of the Convertible Debenture.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, each Holder and the Maker hereby agree as follows:

 

	 	
1.
	
Recitals. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.



 

	 	
2.
	
Extension of Maturity Date. The Maturity Date is hereby extended to April 01, 2017.



 

	 	
3.
	
No Other Changes. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Convertible Debenture remain in full force and effect.



 

	 	
4.
	
Warrants Extension. Maker hereby agrees to extend the expiration date on the Warrants issued in connection with the Convertible Debenture on August 29, 2008, which were originally expected to expire on April 01, 2016. The new expiration date is April 01, 2017.



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension of Maturity Date of Convertible Debenture is executed as of the day and date the last Holder executes a copy of this Extension.

 

	
 
	 	
OmniComm Systems, Inc. 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	By:	
/s/ Thomas E. Vickers
	
 

	
 
	 	
Thomas E. Vickers 
	
 

	
 
	 	
Chief Financial Officer 
	
 



 

[HOLDERS SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 


 

 




 


  

[EXTENSION OF MATURITY DATE OF CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE SIGNATURE PAGE]

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned represents that it has caused this extension of Maturity Date of Convertible Debenture and Warrants to be duly executed on its behalf (if an entity, by one of its officers thereunto duly authorized) as of the date written below.

 

	
 
	
HOLDER: 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Guus van Kesteren 
	
 

	
 
	
Printed Name of Holder 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	By:	
/s/ Guus van Kesteren
	
 

	
 
	
(Signature of Holder or Authorized Person) 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Guu van Kesteren
	
 

	
 
	
Printed Name and Title if Authorized Person 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	 	
 
	
 

	
 
	
June 30, 2015
	
 

	
 
	
Date
[904 NE2d 816, 876 NYS2d 680]

#### In the Matter of Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd., Appellant, v Town of Brookhaven et al., Respondents.

Argued January 14, 2009;

decided February 17, 2009

*736APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.,*Uniondale *(Mark S. Mulholland, Christine Mclnerney*and *Jonathan C. Sullivan*of counsel), for appellant.

*Harvey B. Besunder, P.C.,*Islandia *(Harvey B. Besunder*and *Zachary D. Dubey*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The certified question should not be answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary.

Petitioner contends that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in *Kelo v New London*(545 US 469 [2005]), which dealt with takings for purposes of economic development, requires a preexisting farmland preservation plan to justify the taking of its property as a public use within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment *(see*US Const Amend V [“nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”]). We need not, and do not, reach the issue whether petitioner’s interpretation of *Kelo*is correct, since the challenged taking was constitutionally proper even assuming that a preexisting farmland preservation plan was necessary. Petitioner’s property was taken pursuant to a legislatively-declared public policy in favor of farmland preservation and as part of the Town of Brookhaven’s master plans endorsing farmland preservation. In furtherance of these plans, Town voters passed three bond acts providing $130 million to acquire development rights or fee interests in undeveloped land in the Town; among the areas specifically designated for preservation was the 500-acre tract of farmland in which petitioner’s parcel is located.

In short, the public benefits of the taking in this case were not incidental or pretextual in comparison with benefits to particular, favored private entities; petitioner’s remaining arguments likewise lack merit. Finally, the parties have not argued, and we do not decide, whether the New York Constitution *(see*
      *737NY Const, art I, § 7 [a]) imposes a more stringent standard for takings than does the Fifth Amendment as interpreted by *Kelo.*

Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum; Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.

Judgment affirmed, etc.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerel J. Munn, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 914]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Penny M. Wolfgang, J.), rendered June 21, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that Supreme Court fulfilled its duty of advising defendant that the promised sentence included a mandatory period of postrelease supervision *(see generally People v Catu,*4 NY3d 242, 244-245 [2005]), and we therefore reject defendant’s further contention that his plea was not knowing and voluntary. The record establishes that “the plea represented] a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to defendant” *(People v Ford,*86 NY2d 397, 403 [1995]; *see People v Cornell,*16 NY3d 801, 802 [2011]).

Present—Scudder, PJ., Peradotto, Sconiers, Valentino and Martoche, JJ.
#### Luis Diaz, Appellant, v 5-01-5-17 48th Avenue, LLC, et al., Respondents.

[974 NYS2d 562]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), entered February 21, 2013, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of the action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) is granted.

*662The Supreme Court erred in denying the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Contrary to the court’s determination, no triable issue of fact existed as to the defendants’ ownership or management of the premises where the plaintiffs accident occurred, since the parties entered into a written stipulation during the pendency of the motion, which was “so ordered” by the court, in which the defendants conceded their involvement with the property.

The plaintiff demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability on the Labor Law § 240 cause of action by establishing that he was injured when he fell from an unsecured ladder that collapsed while he was performing roofing work on the subject construction project *(see e.g. Zhu Wei Shi v Jun Lan Zhang,*76 AD3d 558, 559 [2010]; *Lesisz v Salvation Army,*40 AD3d 1050, 1051 [2007]; *Nephew v Klewin Bldg. Co., Inc.,*21 AD3d 1419, 1420 [2005]). The defendants’ contention that summary judgment should have been denied because the plaintiff was the sole witness to his accident is unpersuasive, as the plaintiff identified three other witnesses in his response to the defendants’ combined discovery demands. In any event, even if the plaintiff had been the sole witness to the accident, summary judgment would not be precluded *(see e.g. Klein v City of New York,*89 NY2d 833 [1996]; *Melchor v Singh,*90 AD3d 866, 869 [2011]; *Fox v H&M Hennes & Mauritz, L.P.,*83 AD3d 889, 891 [2011]; *Campbell v 111 Chelsea Commerce, L.P.,*80 AD3d 721, 722 [2011]).

Additionally, contrary to the defendants’ contention, the plaintiff satisfied his burden of establishing that he was hired by a contractor and was suffered or permitted to work on the premises, such that he was entitled to the protections of the Labor Law *(see*Labor Law § 2 [5], [7]; *Sanatass v Consolidated Inv. Co., Inc.,*10 NY3d 333 [2008]; *LoVerde v 8 Prince St. Assoc., LLC,*35 AD3d 1224 [2006]). Inasmuch as the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to the plaintiff’s prima facie showing, the motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action should have been granted. Mastro, J.E, Skelos, Balkin and Roman, JJ., concur.
EX-35.2
(logo) Homecomings Financial
A GMAC Company

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)
Homecomings Financial, LLC
DBALT 2007-RAMP1 (the "Issuing Entity")


The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Homecomings Financial, LLC, as
servicer (the "Servicer"), does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
   Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under
   the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement
   in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
17th day of March 2008.

By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
Name:  Anthony N. Renzi
Title:    Managing Director
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3826 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3826

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 military pay received by a member of a reserve component of the Armed 
       Forces of the United States who is called to active duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2006

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
 military pay received by a member of a reserve component of the Armed 
       Forces of the United States who is called to active duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Citizen Soldier Relief Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME FOR MILITARY PAY RECEIVED BY A 
              MEMBER OF A RESERVE COMPONENT OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE 
              UNITED STATES CALLED TO ACTIVE DUTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 112 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to certain combat zone compensation of members of the Armed 
Services) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(e) Reserve Components Called to Active Duty.--In the case of an 
individual--
            ``(1) who is called or ordered to active duty in the Armed 
        Forces of the United States for a period in excess of 180 days 
        or for an indefinite period, and
            ``(2) at the time so called or ordered is a member of a 
        reserve component of the Armed Forces of the United States,
gross income shall not include military pay (as defined in section 
101(21) of title 37, United States Code) received by such individual on 
account of such active duty service.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) The heading for section 112 of such Code is amended by 
        inserting before the period ``; pay of members of reserve 
        components of such armed forces called to active duty''.
            (2) The item relating to section 112 in the table of 
        sections for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 
        is amended by inserting before the period ``; pay of members of 
        reserve components of such Armed Forces called to active 
        duty''.
            (3) Section 3401(a)(1) of such Code is amended by inserting 
        ``; pay of members of reserve components of such Armed Forces 
        called to active duty'' after ``United States''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.6 DECOMA INTERNATIONAL INC. Certificate Pursuant to National Instrument 54-101
Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer TO:     CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITIES Decoma International Inc. (the Corporation) hereby certifies, pursuant to paragraph 2.20(c) of
National Instrument 54-101 (NI 54-101), that it is relying upon section 2.20 of NI 54-101, the
abridging time provisions, in connection with the proxy-related materials relating to the special
meeting of the Corporations shareholders scheduled for February 28, 2005, and that it has made the
arrangements described in paragraphs 2.20(a) and 2.20(b) of NI 54-101. Dated:   January 28, 2005  DECOMA INTERNATIONAL INC.By:
    signed  "R.D. Benson"Name:
    R. David BensonTitle:
    Excutive Vice-President,Secretary and
General Counsel
EXHIBIT 13.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) for the purposes of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.




I, Andre Bergstein, Chief Financial Officer of Gafisa S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:




·
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




·
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: April 28, 2014




GAFISA S.A.By:
/s/ Andre BergsteinName:
Andre BergsteinTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Endeavor Explorations
  Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2009
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  Report), I, Belkis Jimenez Rivero, Chief Executive Officer of the
  Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.



/s/ Belkis Jimenez Rivero

Belkis Jimenez Rivero
  Chief Executive Officer
  October 29, 2009

---
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of July 2004
    
    Commission File Number:001-15014
 Sun Life Financial Inc.  
 (Translation of registrants name into English)
 150 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 1J9 
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 [Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.] Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 [Indicate be check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.] Yes   o
    
    No   þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- N/A    Exhibit99.1
    
    Managements Discussion & Analysis for the six months ended June 30, 2004.99.2
    
    Interim Consolidated Financial Statements for the six months ended June 30, 2004.99.3
    
    Dividend Press Release.99.4
    
    Certifications pursuant to Multilateral Instrument 52-109
Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim
Filings.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Sun Life Financial Inc.(Registrant)Date:  July 29, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/  Thomas A. BogartThomas A. Bogart,Executive Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,   Shmuel  Shneibalg,   President,   Chief  Executive  Officer,
Secretary,  and Director of Global General  Technologies,  Inc. (the "Company"),
certifies,  under the  standards  set forth and  solely for the  purposes  of 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that, to his  knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2007



/s/ Shmuel Shneibalg
Shmuel Shneibalg
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    

March 23, 2006
 NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION
 
  CANADA

(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    001-07260
(Commission
File Number)
    
    NOT APPLICABLE

(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
  8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA

(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    L6T 5P6
(Zip Code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
 
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition
  Item 8.01. Other Events.
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d)
    
    Exhibits
 99.1
    
    Press Release issued by the registrant on March 23, 2006.
 2




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/  Paul W. KarrPaul W. KarrControllerBy:
    /s/  Anna VentrescaAnna VentrescaAssistant Secretary  3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release issued by the registrant on March 23, 2006.
 4
National Gallery of Art

Department of Image Collections

Tamarind Institute Archive

Artist Inventory List

 (All items black-and-white photographs unless otherwise noted)

 Artist Last Name Number of Items Notes 

Adams, Clinton

Albers, Anni

Albers, Josef

Antreasian, Garo

Alps, Glen

Altman, Harold

Brach, Paul

Brice, William

Budd, David

Cuevas, Jose Luis

Diebenkorn, Richard

Durieux, Caroline

Engel, Jules

Francis, Sam

Friedensohn, Elias

Funk, Joe

Grillo, John

Hollander, Irwin

Horák, Bohuslav

Hultberg, John

Jones, John Paul

Kanemitsu, Matsumi

Kaplan, Jerome

Keeler, Harold

Kohn, Misch

Lebrun, Rico

Leese, Jason

Lipchitz, Jacques

McGarrell, James

McLaughlin, John

Miyasaki, George

Morris, Carl

Morris, Hilda

Muench, John

Neal, Reginald

Nevelson, Louise

Ochikubo, Tetsuo

O’Hara, Frederick

Oliveira, Nathan

Paris, Harold

Pearson, Henry

Pozzatti, Rudy

Rock, John

Rosenthal, Bernard

Rosenwald, Lessing

Schapiro, Miriam

Schrag, Karl

Schwartz, Aubrey

Sorini, Emiliano

Tamayo, Rufino

Taylor, Prentiss

Ting, Walasse

Treiman, Joyce

Turnbull, WIlliam

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

3

1

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

4

1

Tyler, Kenneth

Urban, Reva

Vicente, Esteban

Viesulas, Romas

Wayne, June

1

1

1

2

5
Weber, Hugo

Weddige, Emil

Woelffer, Emerson

Wray, Dick

Yunkers, Adja

Zucker, Joe

313221