alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-65,602]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on March 16, 2009 in response to a petition filed on behalf of the workers at LeeMAH Electronics, Inc., San Francisco, California.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of April 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10914 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00693-CR

Badesire BAHINDWA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR5024

Honorable Mark Luitjen, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 10, 2019

AFFIRMED

Badesire Bahindwa pled true to violating the conditions of his deferred adjudication 

community supervision. The trial court adjudicated his guilt and sentenced him to four years’ 

imprisonment. 

Bahindwa’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of 

the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel concludes the 

appeal has no merit. Counsel provided Bahindwa with a copy of the brief and informed him of his 

right to review the record and file his own brief. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. 
04-18-00693-CR

- 2 -

App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 1996, no pet.). Bahindwa did not file a pro se brief.

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and 

without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw 

is granted. Nichols, 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. No substitute counsel will 

be appointed. Should Bahindwa wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals, Bahindwa must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary 

review or Bahindwa must file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for 

discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of: (1) the date of this opinion; 

or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the 

requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

DO NOT PUBLISH
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3751 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain subassemblies for measuring 

equipment for telecommunications. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27 (legislative day, JULY 26), 2006 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain subassemblies 

for measuring equipment for telecommunications. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SUBASSEMBLIES FOR MEASURING 

4 EQUIPMENT FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3751 IS 

‘‘ 9902.90.32 Subassemblies containing one or more 

printed circuit assemblies for instruments and apparatus for measuring or 

checking electrical quantities, specially 

designed for telecommunications (provided for in subheading 9030.90.88) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2246 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Economic Research Service for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ECO5 NOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, Economic ReVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:33 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2246.IH H2246

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2246 IH

1 search Service for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $86,757,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
|Conditions of UseThe contents of this site, including all images and text, are for personal, 
        educational, non-commercial use only.
        The contents of this site may not be reproduced in any form without 
        the permission of the National Gallery of Art.
        National Gallery of Art 
          4th and Constitution Avenue NW
          Washington, D.C.
        Mailing Address:
		  National Gallery of Art
		  2000B South Club Drive
	    Landover, MD 20785
		www.nga.gov
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



overview |
    search  |
    guide  | 
    essay |
    glossary |
    credits |
    home |
    NGA home

Copyright ©
Exhibit 32.1
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cubic  Energy,  Inc.  (the
     "Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2007 as filed
     with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
     "Report"), I, the CEO, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
     pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2007                          Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Calvin A. Wallen, III, CEO


                             Exhibit 32.1 - Page 1
##### 



Exhibit 99.7 FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
EARNINGS COVERAGE FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 The earnings coverage ratios set out below have been prepared in
accordance with applicable Canadian disclosure requirements. The annual interest requirements on the long-term debt of Fairmont Hotels
& Resorts Inc. (FHR) using applicable interest rates, after giving effect to
new issues and retirement of long-term debt, amounts to $36.3 million for the
twelve months ended June 30, 2004. FHRs net income before interest expense and
income taxes for twelve months ended June 30, 2004 is $84.3 million which is
2.3 times FHRs interest requirements for the twelve months ended June 30,
2004. The interest coverage ratio has been calculated using the interest
requirements on FHRs long-term debt as calculated under Canadian generally
accepted accounting principals and thus includes the accretion charge on the
long-term debt that is associated with the component of the debt that is
classified in equity. If FHRs outstanding $270 million aggregate principal
amount of 3.75% convertible senior notes due 2023 were accounted for entirely
as debt, then FHRs interest expense would be lower (due to the absence of the
accretion charge) and FHRs interest coverage ratio would be 2.4 times its
interest requirements for the twelve months ended June 30, 2004.
**EXHIBIT 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

** **

Pursuant to U.S.C.Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Arcade Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Kfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:   March 4, 2008 |   |   |   | /s/ Jonathan Furer      |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                  |   |   |   | Jonathan Furer          |
|                                  |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |   |   |   |                    |   |   |   |   |
|                                  |   |   |   | /s/ John Chapman        |
|                                  |   |   |   | John Chapman            |
|                                  |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

----
EX-35.1
(logo) Bank of America

Bank of America
475 CrossPoint Parkway
PO Box 9000
Getzville, NY 14068-9000


Annual Statement as to Compliance

Banc of America Mortgage 2007-1 Trust,
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-1

I, H. Randall Chestnut, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, National
Association (the "Servicer"), hereby certify with respect to the Banc of America
Mortgage 2007-1 Trust formed pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated February 27, 2007 (the "Pooling Agreement"), among Banc of America
Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Bank of America, National Association,
as Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee, that: (a) a review of the
Servicer's activities during calendar year 2007 and of the Servicer's
performance under the Pooling Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling Agreement in all material
respects throughout calendar year 2007.


March 1, 2008

By: /s/ H. Randall Chestnut
Name: H. Randall Chestnut
Title: Senior Vice President
#### Kirk Smith, Appellant, v Garo Enterprises, Inc., et al., Defendants. Carol Radin et al., Nonparty Respondents.

Submitted June 1, 2009;

decided September 1, 2009

Reported below, 60 AD3d 751.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
#### State v. Reed

Case below: 182 N.C. App. - (6 March 2007)

No. 141P07

AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA06-400)

Allowed 03/23/07
Exhibit 31

                             Certifications

I, John Anderson, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
         10-D required to  be filed in respect of the period covered by
         this report on Form 10-K of Soundview Home Loan Trust 2007-NS1
         (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
         a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
         or omit to state a material fact necessary to  make the statements
         made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
         were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
         this report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
         information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
         covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
         periodic reports;

     4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
         in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
         as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
         has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in
         all material respects; and

     5.  All of reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
         for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports
         on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
         securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
         Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
         have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
         disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
         described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
         Form 10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied
on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
 Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.

Date: March 28, 2008


/s/ John Anderson
Name:  John Anderson
Title:  Managing Director
(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the Depositor)
Exhibit 31

DEPOSITOR CERTIFICATION

Re:  J.P. Mortgage Acceptance Corporation I,
     J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp.,
     Asset-Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-CH2

I, Paul White, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of period covered by this report on Form
10-K of J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Trust 2007-CH2 (the "Exchange Act
periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by
this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their
obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to
be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances
of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report
on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company as trustee.


                                  /s/ Paul White
                                  Paul White
                                  President
                                  (Senior Officer in Charge of
                                  Securitization of the Depositor)
                                  March 28, 2008
#### Mahesh Kumar PATHAK, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71803.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 17, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 27, 2006.

*830Mahesh Kumar Pathak, Berkeley, CA, pro se.

Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Norah Aseoli Schwarz, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: KLEINFELD and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and WHALEY,** District Judge.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

The Honorable Robert H. Whaley, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

The facts are known to the parties, and we do not repeat them here. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) determination that Pathak is ineligible for asylum because he provided material support to terrorists. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(2)(A)(v); 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(i)(I); *see Bellout v. Ashcroft,*363 F.3d 975, 977 (9th Cir.2004). Although we do have jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision in the context of Pat-hak’s request for withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) relief, we find that substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Pat-hak is ineligible for both forms of relief because he materially supported terrorists. By Pathak’s own admission, he provided assistance to known terrorists by permitting them to use his family’s workshop to repair their weapons, by repairing their weapons himself, and by joining them on a lengthy cross-country trip to help them recover weapons they claimed to have hidden in his family’s workshop. This conduct clearly constitutes material support of terrorism. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(iv)(VT). The BIA properly held that Pathak’s material support of terrorists in his native India rendered him ineligible for both statutory withholding of removal as well as withholding of removal under CAT. *See Bellout,*363 F.3d at 978-79.

Accordingly, the petition for review is DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press. 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 20-BG-66

IN RE JOSEPH A. FERRIERO

2019 DDN 231

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 414306

BEFORE: Thompson and McLeese, Associate Judges, and Steadman, Senior Judge. 

O R D E R

(FILED –April 30, 2020)

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey 

disbarring respondent; this court’s February 3, 2020, order suspending respondent 

pending resolution of this matter and directing him to show cause why reciprocal 

discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it 

appearing that respondent failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show 

cause or his D.C. Bar R. XI, §14(g) affidavit, it is 

ORDERED that Joseph A. Ferriero is hereby disbarred from the practice of 

law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In re 

Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical 

reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not 

participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of 

respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar

R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Global Gold  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Lester S. Caesar, CPA,
the Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 14, 2005


                                          By:  /s/ Lester S. Caesar
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Lester S. Caesar, CPA
                                          Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Sarah McL., Appellant, v Clarence L., Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 778]

— Order, Family Court, New York County, (Lori S. Sattler, J.), entered on or about December 27, 2011, which, after a fact-finding hearing, dismissed the petition seeking an order of protection against respondent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

While the Family Court may have erred in precluding testimony regarding threats that respondent allegedly made toward petitioner in 2009 and 2010 since the previous petition was concluded by stipulation, on consent of the parties, and the issues were not adjudicated on the merits *(see Brown v Keating,*166 AD2d 220, 220 [1st Dept 1990]), the court carefully evaluated the testimony concerning the most recent claims and found the petitioner to not be credible. Thus, we see no reason to disturb the court’s findings and conclusions. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Friedman, Freedman and Clark, JJ.