alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of FullNet Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 28, 2003                   /s/ Roger P. Baresel,
                                       --------------------
                                       Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10802 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SHELLYE LYNNE BURLISON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-170-ALL-G

- - - - - - - - - - May 7, 1999 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Shellye Burlison (federal prisoner #30712-077) has filed a motion requesting leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) the district court’s order denying her motion brought under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). This court may authorize Burlison to proceed IFP on appeal only if she is economically eligible and her appeal is not frivolous. Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). After reviewing the record, we find no issue of arguable merit. Accordingly, weNo. 98-10802 -2- deny IFP and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. See United States
v. Hatten , 167 F.3d 884, 885-87 (5th Cir. 1999); Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 89 (Monday, May 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 21818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMTL-060-01-1020-PG]


Notice of Public Meeting; Central Montana Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Central Montana Resource 
Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held May 27 & 28, 2009.
    The meetings will be in the Bureau of Land Management--Lewistown 
Field Office conference room (920 NE. Main St.) Lewistown, Montana.
    The May 27 meeting will begin at 10 a.m. with a 30-minute public 
comment period and will adjourn at 5 p.m.
    The May 28 meeting will begin at 8 a.m. with a 30-minute public 
comment period and will adjourn at 3 p.m.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 15-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior on a variety of management issues associated with 
public land management in Montana. During these meetings the council 
will participate in/discuss/act upon:
    Oil & gas issues in central Montana;
    A report from the BLM Montana State Director;
    A discussion of BLM's Bison Conservation Initiative;
    Field manager updates;
    A stewardship agreement between BLM and the Rocky Mountain Elk 
Foundation;
    An educational partnership;
    National Public Lands Day;
    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in central Montana;
    A monument newsletter;
    Fee proposals from the U.S. Forest Service;
    A hunter/angler stakeholder presentation;
    A visionary conversation among RAC members; and
    Administrative details (next meeting agenda, location, etc.).

All RAC meetings are open to the public. The public may present written 
comments to the RAC. Each formal RAC meeting will also have time 
allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary L. ``Stan'' Benes, Lewistown 
Field Manager, Lewistown Field Office, P.O. Box 1160, Lewistown, 
Montana 59457, 406/538-1900.

    Dated: May 5, 2009.
Gary L. ``Stan'' Benes,
Lewistown Field Manager.
[FR Doc. E9-10940 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2244

TYRO R. BEATTY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SCOTT M. THOMAS, Official Capacity as OIC;

MICHAEL A. JONES, individually as Director;

NAVSEA INACTIVE SHIP’S MANAGEMENT OFFICE;

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS

COMMAND HQ,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CA-05-71-2-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted: June 28, 2006 Decided: July 14, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyro R. Beatty, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Richard Leonard,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tyro R. Beatty appeals the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment to Defendants and dismissing his

employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Beatty v. Thomas, No. CA-05-71-

2-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. June 15 and Oct. 25, 2005). We deny Beatty’s

motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION
                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)

I, Calvin A. Wallen, III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cubic Energy, Inc.

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision,  to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including its
     consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within  those
     entities,  particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
     being prepared;
     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and,
     (c)  disclosed  in this  quarterly  report any  change in the  registrant's
     internal  control  over  financial   reporting  that  occurred  during  the
     registrant's  first fiscal  quarter  that has  materially  affected,  or is
     reasonably likely to materially affect,  the registrant's  internal control
     over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the Audit  Committee  of the  registrant's  Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
     (a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,
     summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control
     over financial reporting.


Date: November 13, 2007

Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
           ---------------------------------
           Calvin A. Wallen, III, C.E.O.
Exhibit 10















Exhibit 10.45




Agreement




Party “A”:

(Today’s Teachers Technology & Culture Ltd.)

Party “B”:

[Author]




Both Party “A” and Party “B”, on the matter relating to a joint venture development of [Name of Publication], has reached the following agreement:




1.

Party “A” commissioned Party “B” in the organizing and writing of the [Name of Publication].  Party “B” will also be the chief editor of the said set of Teaching Materials.  Details of the written contents and formats will be subject to the standard discussed and approved by the Writing Committee after the Committee has been established.




2.

Party “B” will be responsible for all the organizing, writing and designing of the written and graphic text.  Actual manpower will be assigned by Party “B”.  The quality of the text has to meet with the Education Board’s most up-to-date standard announced for ____________________________.  Also guaranteed to meet the specialty usage for the Province of ____________________.  Besides, the quality has to commensurate with the top standard of the same kind of product in the country.  Scrip fee includes: Written part at $_____ per 1,000 words; hand drawings at $____ per drawing.  Payment will be made within one month after the scrip has been handed in.




3.

Any content of the text, if found fraud or breach of copy right in relation to other people’s publications or breach of national copy rights, Party “B” will be held fully liable, and will be responsible to repay Party “A” for any financial loss arising out of such situations.




4.

After the establishment of the Writing Committee, and the writing standard being set up by the Committee, Party “B” will has to submit to Party “A” the completed, clearly written and final proofed copy of the text be the [Relevant Date] and [Relevant Date] for the first semester and the second semester.




5.

Upon the signing of the agreement by both parties, Party “A” will pay to Party “B” for the sum of Renminbi ____________ for the first advance payment on development fee.  Upon receipt of the first semester text, Party “A” will pay to Party “B” the sum of Renminbi __________ for development fee.  Upon receipt of the second semester text, Party “A” will pay to Party “B” the sum of Renminbi _________ for development fee.




6.

The copy right, editing right for other provinces, and the publication right on the [Name of Publication] belongs to Party ”A” for a period of 10 years.




7.

Party “A” will select an Editor in _______________ Province who will work and coordinate with Party “B” on the writing progress on professional basis.  The wages will be borne by Party “A”.




8.

Party “A” will pay Party “B” the scrip fee in accordance with the country’s policy in which Party “A” will withhold the Personal Income Tax and be responsible for making payment to the government.




This agreement has a set of two copies and will be effective on the date of signing.  Any special situation arise which is not specified in this agreement will be discussed and resolved by both parties.
Exhibit 4.21  


MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION  


 OF  


 COORS INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO, ULC  


	1.
	The
name of the Company in all its language forms is: 


COORS INTERNATIONAL HOLDCO, ULC  


	2.
	The
Company shall have all the powers, capacity, rights and privileges of a natural person including the following which are expressly conferred upon the Company:



	(a)
	to
sell or dispose of its undertaking, or a substantial part thereof;



	(b)
	subject
to the provisions of the Companies Act with respect to reduction of capital, to distribute any of its property in specie among
its members; and



	(c)
	to
amalgamate with any company or other body of persons.






	3.
	The
liability of the members is unlimited. 



        We,
the undersigned, whose names and addresses are subscribed, are desirous of being formed into a company in pursuance of this Memorandum of Association, and we respectively agree to
take the number and kind of shares in the capital stock of the Company written opposite our respective names. 







Name, Address And Number Of Shares Taken By Subscriber  


COORS BREWING COMPANY  



	Per:	 	/s/  MICHAEL J. GANNON      
	 	 
	 	 	Name: Michael J. Gannon	 	 
	 	 	Position: Treasurer, Chief Corporate Financial Officer	 	 
	1225 - 17th Street, Suite 3200-MCCC

Denver CO 80202-5534
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Total Number of Shares taken:        1,000 common shares with no par value
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Witness to the above signature:
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/  MICHAEL ABBASS      
	 	 
	Name: Michael Abbass	 	 
	Address: 1225 17th St., Suite 3200

               Denver, CO 80202 USA	 	 





DATED the 22nd day of March, 2007.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32(a)


                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc., (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended June 25, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and that the information contained in this Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 15, 2005


/s/ Roy T. Eddleman
---------------------------
Roy T. Eddleman
Chief Executive Officer
Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Juwanna Wrotten, Respondent.

Submitted October 19, 2009;

decided October 22, 2009

Reported below, 60 AD3d 165.

Motion by New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### Mathis *v.*Weaver, executor.

, while an interlocutory order for the appointment of a receiver is reviewable by the Supreme Court, a subsequent order made pending a writ of error in such case, supplying a vacancy in the office of receiver resulting from non-acceptance of the one first appointed, is not reviewable upon a fast writ of error.

April 9, 1894.

Argued at the last term.

J. H. Lumpkin and Little, Wimbish & Worrill, for plaintiff in error. Blandeord & Grimes and Thornton *&*McMichael, *contra.*

*Writ of error dismissed.*
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Robert A. Lento, certify that:





|   |                                                                                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Limelight Networks, Inc.; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date: February 21, 2018 /s/ Robert A. Lento


Robert A. Lento, Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Zoraida Lopez, Respondent, v Mumtaz K. Master, M.D., et al., Defendants, and Ronald H. McLean, M.D., et al., Appellants.

[870 NYS2d 306]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered April 9, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants Ronald H. McLean, M.D.’s and St. Barnabas Hospital’s motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the complaint dismissed as against McLean and the hospital. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

As the court correctly found, McLean established prima facie his entitlement to summary judgment by submitting a medical expert’s affidavit opining that his treatment of plaintiff comported with good and accepted medical practice and that any delay in surgery was not the proximate cause of plaintiffs postoperative complications. The evidence plaintiff submitted in opposition was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact. Her expert physician failed to controvert McLean’s expert’s assertions that the physical findings during surgery suggested that McLean had timely intervened; that conservative management, rather than surgery, was appropriate for a patient with plaintiffs symptoms (and initially appeared to be working) and was indicated as a way to spare plaintiff unnecessary surgery, which could be risky, given her recent medical history; and that that recent history contributed to plaintiff’s postoperative complications. With respect to the proximate cause of the postoperative complications, plaintiffs expert offered only conclu-sory assertions *(see Rodriguez v Montefiore Med. Ctr.,*28 AD3d 357 [2006]).

As there is no liability for plaintiffs injuries against McLean and the other physician defendants previously dismissed from this action, there can be no vicarious liability for plaintiffs injuries against the hospital *(see Magriz v St. Barnabas Hosp.,*43 AD3d 331 [2007], *lv denied*10 NY3d 790 [2008]; *Bertini v Columbia Presbyt. Med. Ctr.,*279 AD2d 492 [2001]). In any event, nowhere in his affirmation does plaintiffs expert identify the manner in which the hospital staff deviated from good and accepted medical practice. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Nardelli, Buckley, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Social Service Employees Union, Local 371, on Behalf of Its Member Matthew Opuoru, Appellant, v City of New York Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

Submitted April 13, 2009;

decided June 4, 2009

*868Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-64,852]

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 12, 2009 in response to a worker petition filed by officials of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union on behalf of workers at MGP Ingredients, Inc., Pekin, Illinois.

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of April 2009.

Richard Church,

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. E9-10899 Filed 5-8-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hiralal Kissoon, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 789]

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hirsh, J.), imposed September 26, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

As the People correctly concede, the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, PJ., Skelos, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.