Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Notices 1391 

18See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion 

of this practice. 

1See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 79 FR 

5374 (January 31, 2014) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

2See Memorandum from Gary Taverman, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance‘‘Decision 

Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review, 2012– 

2013: Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ dated December 31, 

2014 (‘‘Preliminary Decision Memorandum’’) for a 

full description of the Scope of the Order. 

antidumping duty cases.18 Pursuant to 

this refinement in practice, for 

merchandise that was not reported in 

the U.S. sales databases submitted by an 

exporter individually examined during 

this review, but that entered under the 

case number of that exporter (i.e., at the 

individually-examined exporter’s cash 

deposit rate), the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, 

pursuant to this refinement, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number will be 

liquidated at the PRC-wide rate. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for shipments of 

the subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

companies listed above the cash deposit 

rate will be their respective rate 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), then 

no cash deposit will be required; (2) for 

previously investigated PRC and nonPRC exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be that for the 

PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporter that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213. 

Dated: December 31, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

1. Background 

2. Period of Review 

3. Extension of Preliminary Results 

4. Scope of the Order 

5. Selection of Respondents 

6. Non-Market Economy Country 

7. Separate Rate 

8. Rate for Non-Examined, Separate Rate 

Respondents 

9. The PRC-wide Entity 

10. Surrogate Country and Surrogate Value 

Data 

11. Date of Sale 

12. Fair Value Comparisons 

13. Affiliation and Single Entity Status 

14. U.S. Price 

15. Value Added Tax 

16. Factor Valuations 

17. Adjustment Under Section 777(A)(f) of 

the Act 

18. Currency Conversion 

[FR Doc. 2015–00197 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China; 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty New Shipper Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new 

shipper review of the antidumping duty 

order on multilayered wood flooring 

(‘‘MLWF’’) from the People’s Republic 

of China (‘‘PRC’’). The review covers 

one exporter of subject merchandise, 

Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd., 

(‘‘Anying’’). We preliminarily find that 

Anying has not made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value. 

The period of review (‘‘POR’’) for 

Anying is December 1, 2012, through 

November 30, 2013.1

DATES: Effective Date: January 9, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maisha Cryor or Robert Bolling, AD/

CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5831 or (202) 482– 

3434, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

includes MLWF, subject to certain 

exceptions.2 The subject merchandise is 

currently classifiable under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings: 4412.31.0520; 

4412.31.0540; 4412.31.0560; 

4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; 

4412.31.4040; 4412.31.4050; 

4412.31.4060; 4412.31.4070; 

4412.31.4075; 4412.31.4080; 

4412.31.5125; 4412.31.5135; 

4412.31.5155; 4412.31.5165; 

4412.31.6000; 4412.31.9100; 

4412.32.0520; 4412.32.0540; 

4412.32.0560; 4412.32.0565; 

4412.32.0570; 4412.32.2510; 

4412.32.2520; 4412.32.2525; 

4412.32.2530; 4412.32.3125; 

4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; 

4412.32.3165; 4412.32.3175; 

4412.32.3185; 4412.32.5600; 

4412.39.1000; 4412.39.3000; 

4412.39.4011; 4412.39.4012; 

4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; 

4412.39.4032; 4412.39.4039; 

4412.39.4051; 4412.39.4052; 

4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; 

4412.39.4062; 4412.39.4069; 

4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; 

4412.39.5050; 4412.94.1030; 

4412.94.1050; 4412.94.3105; 

4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 

4412.94.3131; 4412.94.3141; 

4412.94.3160; 4412.94.3171; 

4412.94.4100; 4412.94.5100; 

4412.94.6000; 4412.94.7000; 

4412.94.8000; 4412.94.9000; 

4412.94.9500; 4412.99.0600; 

4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1392 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Notices 

3See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, regarding 

‘‘Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review’’ (June 27, 2014). 

4See Memorandum to the File, regarding 

‘‘Alignment of the New Shipper Review of 

Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s 

Republic of China with the Second Administrative 

Review of Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ dated November 12, 

2014. 

5See Memorandum to the File, regarding 

‘‘Extension of Deadline for the Preliminary Results 

of the New Shipper Review of Multilayered Wood 

Flooring from the People’s Republic of China,’’ 

dated November 20, 2014. 

6On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(c); see also 19 CFR 351.303 

(for general filing requirements). 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

9See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

10See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

11 In these preliminary results, the Department 

applied the assessment rate calculation method 

adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation 

of the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 

4412.99.1040; 4412.99.3110; 

4412.99.3120; 4412.99.3130; 

4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; 

4412.99.3160; 4412.99.3170; 

4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5100; 

4412.99.5105; 4412.99.5115; 

4412.99.5710; 4412.99.6000; 

4412.99.7000; 4412.99.8000; 

4412.99.9000; 4412.99.9500; 

4418.71.2000; 4418.71.9000; 

4418.72.2000; 4418.72.9500; and 

9801.00.2500. 

The HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes 

only; the written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

Extension of Deadlines for Preliminary 

Results 

On June 27, 2014, the Department 

extended the time period for issuing the 

preliminary results of this review by 120 

days, until November 20, 2014.3 On 

November 12, 2014, the Department 

aligned this new shipper review with 

the second administrative review of 

MLWF from the PRC.4 On November 20, 

2014, the Department extended the 

preliminary results until December 31, 

2014, to align with the second 

administrative review of this 

proceeding.5

Methodology 

The Department is conducting this 

review in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(B) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the 

Act’’) and 19 CFR 351.214. The 

Department calculated export prices in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Because the PRC is a nonmarket 

economy country (‘‘NME’’) within the 

meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, 

the Department calculated normal value 

in accordance with section 773(c) of the 

Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum, dated 

concurrently with these results and 

hereby adopted by this notice. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).6

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn. The signed 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum and 

the electronic versions of the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum are 

identical in content. 

Preliminary Results of New Shipper 

Review 

The Department preliminarily 

determines that the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists for the 

POR from December 1, 2012 through 

November 30, 2013: 

Exporter Producer Weighted-average dumping 

margin (percent) 

Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd ........................................... Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd .......................................... 0.00 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department intends to disclose 

calculations performed for these 

preliminary results to the parties within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 30 days 

after the date of publication of these 

preliminary results of review.7 Rebuttals 

to case briefs may be filed no later than 

five days after the time limit for filing 

case briefs.8 A table of contents, list of 

authorities used, and an executive 

summary of issues should accompany 

any briefs submitted to the Department. 

This summary should be limited to five 

pages total, including footnotes. 

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice.9 Hearing requests should 

contain the following information: (1) 

The party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of the issues 

to be discussed. Oral presentations will 

be limited to issues raised in the briefs. 

If a request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the time and date for 

the hearing to be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230.10

The Department intends to issue the 

final results of this new shipper review, 

which will include the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in any such 

comments, within 90 days of 

publication of these preliminary results, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of 

the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results of this 

new shipper review, the Department 

shall determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. The Department intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP 15 days 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this new shipper review. If the 

individually examined respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

above de minimis, we will calculate 

importer-specific ad valorem duty 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for the importer’s examined sales to the 

total entered value of those same sales 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).11


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 6 / Friday, January 9, 2015 / Notices 1393 

12For a full discussion of this practice, see NonMarket Economy Antidumping Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011). 

1See Antidumping Duty Order: Electrolytic 

Manganese Dioxide from Australia, 73 FR 58538 

(October 7, 2008) (‘‘Australia Order’’); see also 

Antidumping Duty Order: Electrolytic Manganese 

Dioxide from the People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 

58537 (October 7, 2008). 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this new shipper 

review when the importer-specific 

assessment rate calculated in the final 

results of this review is above de 

minimis. Where either the respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis, or an importerspecific assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

The Department announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement 

in practice, for entries that were not 

reported in the U.S. sales databases 

submitted by Anying for this new 

shipper review, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the PRC-wide rate. In addition, if the 

Department determines that the exporter 

under review had no shipments of the 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

PRC-wide rate.12

The final results of this new shipper 

review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

new shipper review for shipments of the 

subject merchandise from the PRC 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the 

companies listed above that have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that rate established in the final 

results of this new shipper review 

(except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, 

then a zero cash deposit will be 

required); (2) for previously investigated 

or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters 

not listed above that received a separate 

rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing producer/

exporter-specific combination rate; (3) 

for all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the PRCwide entity, or 58.84 percent; and (4) for 

all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

producer/exporter combination that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214. 

Dated: December 30, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I–List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

1. Summary 

2. Background 

3. Scope of the Order 

4. Discussion of the Methodology 

5. Bona Fide Sale Analysis 

6. Non-Market Economy Country Status 

7. Separate Rates 

8. Absence of De Jure Control 

9. Absence of De Facto Control 

10. Surrogate Country 

11. Economic Comparability 

12. Significant Producer of Comparable 

Merchandise 

13. Data Availability 

14. Date of Sale 

15. Fair Value Comparisons 

16. Differential Pricing Analysis 

17. Results of the Differential Pricing 

Analysis 

18. U.S. Price 

19. Value Added Tax 

20. Normal Value 

21. Factor Valuations 

22. Currency Conversion 

23. Section 777A(f) of the Act 

[FR Doc. 2015–00194 Filed 1–8–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–919, A–602–806] 

Electrolytic Manganese Dioxide From 

the People’s Republic of China and 

Australia: Continuation of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on the 

People’s Republic of China, 

Revocation of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Australia 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (the ‘‘Department’’) and the 

International Trade Commission (the 

‘‘ITC’’) in their five year (sunset) 

reviews that revocation of the 

antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on 

electrolytic manganese dioxide (‘‘EMD’’) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and material injury to an industry in the 

United States, the Department is 

publishing a notice of continuation of 

the AD order on EMD from the PRC. In 

addition, as a result of the ITC’s 

determination that revocation of the AD 

order on EMD from Australia is not 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time, the Department is revoking the AD 

order on EMD from Australia. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 9, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Howard Smith, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202– 

482–5193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background 

On October 7, 2008, the Department 

published the AD orders on EMD from 

the PRC and Australia.1 On September 

3, 2013, the Department published the 

notice of initiation of the first sunset 

review of the AD orders on EMD from 

the PRC and Australia, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES