alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        47,024,952
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,905,839
<MORTGAGE>                                   8,269,966
<REAL-ESTATE>                                7,726,486
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              73,936,628
<CASH>                                       7,513,158
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       4,221,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,664,091
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             74,476,015
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 713,201
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,908,739
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             10,958,028
<COMMON>                                     9,214,831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,485,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               123,664,091
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,472,623
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,773,427
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              36,027
<OTHER-INCOME>                               4,137,414
<BENEFITS>                                   1,537,330
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    314,828
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                509,974
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,294
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            392,680
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   392,680
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### David Bruce McMahan, Respondent, v Elena McMahan, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 259]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colangelo, J.), entered August 21, 2012, as denied her motion for leave to renew her prior motion to modify the parties’ stipulation of settlement, which had been denied in an order of the same court dated May 22, 2012.

Ordered that the order entered August 21, 2012, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The new facts adduced on the motion for leave to renew would not have changed the prior determination, which denied the defendant’s motion to modify a stipulation of settlement entered into by the parties in November 2011 *(see*CFLR 2221 [e] [2]). As such, the motion for leave to renew was properly denied *(see Semenov v Semenov,*98 AD3d 962 [2012]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.
CL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0616

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ANTHONY THOMAS DISHON, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including April 12, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 2 2023

03/02/2023
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00685]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Decision to Evaluate a Petition To Designate a Class of Employees 
From the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, 
California, To Be Included in the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and 
Human Services.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NIOSH gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a 
decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees from 
the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, California, to 
be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees 
Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial 
proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision 
as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

    Facility: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
    Location: Livermore, California.
    Job Titles and/or Job Duties: All employees of the Department of 
Energy, its predecessor agencies, and its contractors and 
subcontractors who worked in any area.
    Period of Employment: January 1, 1974 through December 31, 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, 
Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, 
Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests 
can also be submitted by email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eeaaadafbdaeadaaadc0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d696e6c7e6d6e696e036a627b">[email protected]</span></a>.

John Howard,
 Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2015-00685 Filed 1-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-19-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/       Elise      Nissen |                                     |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                             | Elise      Nissen                        |   |
|                             | Chief      Financial Officer             |   |
|                             | Executive      Vice President of Finance |   |
|                             |                                     |   |
| May      15, 2008                |                                     |
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to May 29, 2018)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-17-692 State v. Hallauer

A-17-718 State v. Meister

A-17-764

through

A-17-768 State v. Harris

A-17-788 Fischer v Fischer

A-17-861,

A-17-862 In re Interest of Haileigh M. & Kendricks G.

A-17-1149 State v. Marol

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2593

_____________________________
L AVONTREY P HONTEZ C ARTER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit C ourt for Santa Rosa County

. John F. Simon , Judge

. February 5, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRM ED

. W ETHERELL , R OWE , and J AY , JJ., con c ur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant ; Lavontrey Phontez Carter, pro se, Appellant

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Ap pellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

Part A, Office of the Secretary, Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority for the Department of Health and Human Services, is being amended at Chapter AK, Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA), as last amended at 70 FR 36386-36387, dated June 23, 2005, and most recently at 76 FR 19995 (Apr. 11, 2011) as follows:

I. Under Section AK.10, Organization, delete the bullets and sub-bullets after the phrase, “OMHA consists of the following components,” and replace with the following:
    - Medicare Hearings and Appeals Chief Judge's Office (CJO) (Headquarters Office)

— Office of Operations

— Office of Programs
    - Medicare Hearings and Appeals Field Offices

II. Under Section AK.20, Functions, Paragraph B, replace “Medicare Hearings and Appeals Field Offices (AKB1-4)” with “Medicare Hearings and Appeals Field Offices.”

III. Under Section AK.20, Functions, Paragraph B, “Medicare Hearings and Appeals Field Offices,” replace all references to the “Managing Administrative Law Judge (MALJ)” with “Associate Chief Administrative Law Judge (ACALJ).”

Dated: January 13, 2015.

E.J. Holland, Jr.,

Assistant Secretary for Administration (ASA).

[FR Doc. 2015-00743 Filed 1-16-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sincere Chappelle, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 470]

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), imposed March 3, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the People’s contention, the record does not support the conclusion that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see *People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]), and, thus, review of his excessive sentence claim is not precluded. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, EJ., Mastro, Dickerson, Lott and Miller, JJ, concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 110-343) the Idaho Panhandle National Forest's Idaho Panhandle Resource Advisory Committee will meet Friday, May 15, 2009, at 9 a.m. in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho for a business meeting. The business meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

May 7, 2009.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting location is the Idaho Panhandle National Forests' Supervisor's Office, located at 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ranotta K. McNair, Forest Supervisor and Designated Federal Official, at (208) 765-7369.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting agenda will focus on reviewing proposals for forest projects and recommending funding during the business meeting.

The public forum begins at 1 p.m.

Dated: May 7, 2009.

Ranotta K. McNair,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. E9-11157 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
**Exhibit
      32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”), I,
      Donald Rabinovitch, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.














_
      _/s/_Donald Rabinovitch


Donald
      Rabinovitch,


President


(Co-Principal
      Executive Officer)


November
      14, 2006




24
Exhibit
10.50


June 11, 2004


Activision, Inc.

Michael Hand

3100 Ocean Park Blvd.

Santa Monica, CA 90405


	
  Re:

  	
  Modification of Territory for PlayStation® 2
  CD-ROM/DVD-ROM Licensed Publisher Agreement

  	
   

  



 


Dear Mr. Hand:


Section 4.4 of your
PlayStation® 2 CD-ROM/DVD-ROM Licensed Publisher Agreement (“PS2 LPA”)
provides, in pertinent part, that SCEA may modify your territory through
written notification to you.  SCEA is
pleased to advise you that, effective immediately, your Licensed Territory in
section 1.18 of the PS2 LPA shall be expanded to include Mexico, provided that,
in accordance with Section 4.4 of the PS2 LPA, SCEA reserves the right upon
further written notice to require publisher to withdraw from a particular
country if necessary for protection of SCEA’s intellectual property.  Please keep in mind that all Licensed
Products – whether sold in the U.S., Canada or, now Mexico – must comply with
all applicable laws and regulations (see,
PS2 LPA, section 9.2 (x)).


SCEA will review
and approve all printed materials for Mexico pursuant to our normal procedures,
however the Licensed Publisher is responsible for the accuracy of any text
translation.  In the event that SCEA
makes any changes to our standard packaging guidelines to reflect local
language issues, it will be communicated through an amendment to the Source
Book in due course.


Please contact
your designated Account Manager if you have any questions regarding this issue.


	
  

  	
  Very best regards,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Andrew House

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Andrew House

  
	
   

  	
  Executive Vice-President

  
	
  cc:

  	
  Account Manager

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Mary Tierney

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Karen Borowick
Exhibit 31.1

RULE 13a-14(d) Certification

 

I, In-Young Chase, certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10–K and all reports on Form 10–D required to be filed in respect of the period coveredby this report on Form 10–K of SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.        Based on my knowledge,the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.       Based on my knowledge, allof the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10–D for the period covered by thisreport is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.        Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) assuccessor in interest to Bank of America, National Association (“BANA”), ofSATURNS Trust No. 2007-1, has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement,which is the Trust Agreement relating to SATURNS Trust No. 2007-1; and

 

5.        All of the reports on assessmentof compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliancewith servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of RegulationAB and Exchange Act Rules 13a–18 and 15d–18 have been included as an exhibit to this report. Any material instancesof noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10–K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bankas successor-in-interest to BANA and its officers and agents.

 

 

By:/s/In-Young Chase	

Name:	In-YoungChase

Title:	VicePresident

Date:	March 27, 2018
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Vargas, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 572]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme *1017Court, Queens County (Camacho, J.), rendered October 6, 2011, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, a class B felony, in exchange for the Supreme Court’s promise that, if he successfully completed a substance abuse treatment program, he would be permitted to plead guilty to a reduced charge of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, a class A misdemeanor. However, the court explained to the defendant that, if he violated the terms of the plea agreement, he would be sentenced to a prison term of up to six years. The defendant left the treatment program without permission.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion or violate the defendant’s due process rights in determining that the defendant violated the terms of the plea agreement and in sentencing him accordingly *(see People v Gary,*106 AD3d 932, 932 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1042 [2013]; *People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80, 86 [1982]; *see also People v Emma,*101 AD3d 1146, 1147 [2012]). Rivera, J.P., Sgroi, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
[ex1042securitiespurchasea1.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea2.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea3.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea4.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea5.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea6.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea7.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea8.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea9.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea10.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea11.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea12.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea13.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea14.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea15.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea16.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea17.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea19.gif]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea20.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea21.jpg]  [ex1042securitiespurchasea23.gif]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00347

- CV

Steven SCHAAF, Appellant

v.

CHRISTUS SANTA ROSA HEALTH CARE CORPORATION a/k/a Christus Santa Rosa Health System and Christus Health,

Appellees

From the 408th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI19278

Honorable Laura Salinas , Jud ge Presiding



### O R D E R

On October 6, 2021, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, stating he no longer wished to prosecute the appeal. We dismissed the appeal pursuant to the motion to dismiss. On October 26, 2021, appellant filed a “Motion to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss and Request to Reinstate.” Because we have already issued an opi nion and judgment in this case, we will treat this as a motion for rehearing

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1. The court hereby requests a response to the motion from the appellee. See id. R. 49.2. Any response must be filed in this court no later than ten days from the date of this order.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a ffixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of November, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Order entered August 29, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-10-01133-CV

ELIZABETH W. CELMER, Appellant

V.

CHARLES MCGARRY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-3023-E

ORDER

Appellee’s August 27, 2013 unopposed motion for extension of time to file 

motion for rehearing is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the time for filing 

appellee’s motion for rehearing is extended from August 23, 2013 to August 30, 

2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Appellant, v John Robert Langan, as Administrator of the Estate of Neil Conrad Spicehandler, Deceased, Respondent.

Decided June 11, 2009

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.