alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; SEP II: Multi-site Clinical Trials.                    

*Date:*                         January 22, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Susan O. McGuire, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 4245, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-435-1426,                         *mcguireso@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.: 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 14, 2015.

Michelle Trout, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-00817 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION





Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Robert A. Doak,  President,  CEO,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of
Mountains West Exploration, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10QSB of the  Company  for the  period  ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         Dated:  July 7, 2004           Officer:   Robert A. Doak

                                        Name:       /s/ Robert A. Doak
                                                    ----------------------------
                                        Position:  President, CEO
664 A.2d 492

#### IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM B. BUTLER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 25, 1995.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on April 10, 1995, recommending that WILLIAM B. BUTLER of WESTFIELD, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1967, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for failing to inform his clients, the sellers, of the buyer’s contract to sell the property to a third party, executed before the closing of title with respondent’s client, in violation of *RPC*1.4(a) and (b) and *RPC*8.4(c), and for representing both parties in negotiating a contract of sale and in negotiating a modification thereto, in violation of *RPC*1.7(c)(1), and said WILLIAM B. BUTLER having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM B. BUTLER is hereby suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, effective October 16, 1995, and until the further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with *Rule*1:20-20; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2082 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2082

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
    Court of Appeals, District Courts, and Other Judicial Services, 
              Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, 
    Court of Appeals, District Courts, and Other Judicial Services, 
              Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE JUDICIARY, COURT 
              OF APPEALS, DISTRICT COURTS, AND OTHER JUDICIAL SERVICES, 
              SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for The Judiciary, Court of 
Appeals, District Courts, and Other Judicial Services, Salaries and 
Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $5,144,383,000.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10900

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLIFTON ONEIL NEMONS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CR-102-ALL-D

- - - - - - - - - -

July 31, 1998

Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Clifton Oneil Nemons has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744,

(1967), and we have independently reviewed counsel's brief and

the record and have found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
(April 24, 2013)

#### Christine Adami, Appellant, v Warwick Valley Central School District et al., Respondents.

[963 NYS2d 385]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J), dated September 16, 2011, as granted those branches of the defendants’ separate motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them, and (2) so much of an order of the same court dated January 4, 2012, as denied that branch of her motion which was for leave to renew her opposition to the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The defendant Warwick Valley Central School District established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that the plaintiff voluntarily engaged in the sport of track and field, including the discus event, and was aware of the possibility of being hit with a discus while participating in that activity *(see Morales v Beacon City School Dist.,*44 AD3d 724 [2007]). The record shows that the plaintiff understood the rules and procedures of the discus event, including those related to safety, and understood the inherent risks associated with the sport *(see Gerry v Commack Union Free School Dist.,*52 AD3d 467 [2008]; *Ciccone v Bedford Cent. School Dist.,*21 AD3d 437 [2005]). The defendant Jared Komorowski also established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by showing that his conduct was not reckless *(see Lumley v Motts,*1 AD3d 573 [2003]; *Schneider v Levittown Union Free School Dist.,*303 AD2d 394 [2003]).

*983The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to either of the defendants’ motions. The plaintiffs expert’s affidavit was speculative and conclusory and was properly disregarded by the Supreme Court *(see Rui-Jiao Liu v City of White Plains,*95 AD3d 1192 [2012]; *Toes v National Amusements, Inc.,*94 AD3d 742 [2012]; *Harris v Debbie’s Creative Child Care, Inc.,*87 AD3d 615 [2011]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the defendants’ separate motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.

The Supreme Court also properly denied that branch of the plaintiffs subsequent motion which was for leave to renew her opposition to the defendants’ separate motions for summary judgment, as the plaintiff failed to set forth new facts which would change the court’s prior determinations *(see*CPLR 2221 [e]).

Mastro, J.P, Chambers, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
COURT OF CHANCERY

OF THE

S AM G LASS C OCK III

V ICE C HANCELLOR STATE OF DELAWARE C OURT OF C HANCERY C OURTHOUSE

34 T HE C IRCLE

G EORGETOWN

, D ELAWARE 19947

May 7, 2020

Kevin R. Shannon, Esq.

Christopher N. Kelly, Esq.

D aniel M. Rusk, Esq.

POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON

LLP

1313 N. Market Street

Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Rudolf Koch, Esq.

Kevin M. Gallagher, Esq.

Kevin M. Regan, Esq.

RICHARDS, LAYTON & FING ER P.A.

One Rodney Square

920 North King Street

Wilmington, Delaware 19801

RE: RoundPoint Mortgage Servicing Corporation, et al

. v. Freedom

Mortgage Corporation et al. , C.A. No. 2020

- 0161

- SG

Dear Counsel:

I have Plaintiffs’ motion for reargument. The Plaintiffs have moved for

reargument of a scheduling order. A motion fo r reargument is appropriate in two

circumstances: where the court has “ overlooked a decision or principle of law that

would have controlling effect or misapprehended the facts or the law so the outcome

of the decision would be different. ” RE: Kratos Def. & Sec. Sols., Inc., v. Securitas

Elec. Sec., Inc. , 2020 WL 1922000, at *1 (Del. Ch. Apr. 20, 2020) (quoting Pontone

v. Milso Indus. Corp. , 2014 WL 4352341, at *1 (Del. Ch. Sept . 13, 2014)). Neither

of those circumstances is present here. Plaintiffs simply dis agree with a matter

within the c ourt’ s discretion. Coleman v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC , 902 A.2d2 1102, 1107 (Del. 2006) (“It is well settled that t he trial court has discretion to resolve

scheduling issues and to control its own docket.” (int ernal quotations omitted)).

Therefore, to the extent I consider the Plaintiffs’ motion a motion for reargument it

is denied.

I find it appropriate, however, to consider the Plaintiffs’ motion a motion for

reconsideration of scheduling, I have directed my Assistant to contact the parties to

schedule a teleconference promptly regarding moving this matter forward.

To the extent the foregoing requires an order to take effect, it is SO

ORDERED.

Sincerely,

/s/ Sam Glasscock III

Sam Glasscock III
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Alvin Fulton Jr., Appellant, v William Lape, as Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Decided September 8, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 1227.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
# Supreme Court of Florida

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2023
In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 SC2021
- 0929

The Court has considered the comments concerning Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280, which was amended in the opinion issued August 26, 2021. As no further amendments to the rule are warranted at this time, this case is hereby final. MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., dissen ts with an opinion

. LABARGA, J., dissenting. In 2021, despite the robust discovery framework set forth in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the majority concluded that there was a need for additional protections against abusive discovery tactics in the private sector. To that end, the majority unilaterally adopted new Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(h),
which extended the “ a pex d octrine” to the private sector and granted special discovery protections to top

- level corporate decision
makers. See In re Amend. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.280 , 324 So. 3d 459 (Fla. 2021).CASE NO.: SC2021
- 0929 Page Two I dissented to the majority’s unilateral action because the existing Florida Rules of Civil Procedure were adequate to address the majority’s concerns about abusive discovery tactics

— and the
rules remain adequate to do so. Id. at 464

- 65 (Labarga, J., dissenting). As such, I continue to deem the adoption of rule 1.280(h) unwarranted. I respectfully dissent to today’s order because the majority, having considered the comments filed in response to th e adoption of rule 1.280(h), has determined that the rule should remain as originally adopted. A True Copy Test:

SC2021

- 0929 11/2/2023

SC2021

- 0929 11/2/2023

SO Served: JOSHUA E. DOYLE HEATHER S. TELFER JENNIFER MARIE VOSS CHRISTOPHER J. BAUMCASE NO.: SC2021
- 0929 Page Three J UDSON LEE COHEN WILLIAM W. LARGE HON. ASHLEY MOODY FRANK CRUZ

- ALVAREZ ROBERT L. CHRISTIE HENRY C. WHITAKER KANSAS R. GOODEN DANIEL B. ROGERS DANIEL W. BELL CHRISTOPHER G. BURNS JOHN W. HOGAN
#### Dean G. Skelos et al., as Duly Elected Members of the New York State Senate, Respondents, v David Paterson, as Governor of the State of New York, et al., Appellants.

Submitted September 8, 2009;

decided September 15, 2009

Reported below, 65 AD3d 339.

Motion by New York Civil Liberties Union for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
##### 



File No. 33-52214 FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 
 Report of Foreign Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of July, 2004 Norbord Inc.    Suite 500, 1 Toronto StreetToronto, Ontario Canada M5C 2W4   Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F  o
    
    Form 40-F  þ
 Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1). Yes  o
    
    No  þ
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7). Yes  o
    
    No  þ
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Yes  þ
    
    No  o
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-3173 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Norbord Inc.(Registrant)Date: July 8th, 2004/s/  Lynne TaylorLynne Taylor
Assistant Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Form 6K Continued... Exhibits  Exhibit 1:
    
    Material Change ReportExhibit 2:
    
    Articles of ArrangementExhibit 3:
    
    Restated Articles of Incorporation -2-
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------

                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-OA3
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-OA3


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------------------------
Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3597 

To increase public access to the Statue of Liberty. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To increase public access to the Statue of Liberty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE STATUE OF LIBERTY. 

4 Not later than 60 days after the date of the enact5 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall ensure 

6 that all persons who satisfy reasonable and appropriate 

7 security measures shall have full access to the public areas 

8 of the Statue of Liberty, including the crown and the 

9 stairs leading thereto. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|Certification of Principal Financial Officer
|--------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aspen Exploration Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |  |    |  |                                                      
|--------------------- |  | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Dated:   May 13, 2008 |  | By |  | /s/ Kevan B. Hensman                                 
|                      |  |    |  | Kevan B. Hensman, interim Chief Financial Officer and
|                      |  |    |  | Principal Financial Officer                          



---
to: Q TimeSection (Presos del division institucional)

Classification and Records Headquarters

BOT Warehouse Huntsville, Texas S' l^fA^/i^

Q Intake/Classification Office

Marca las cajas apropiadas.

Fecha de Comienzo de Sentencia

Informacion de Compromiso

Estado Tiempo Ahorrado

Tiempo de la Carcel del Contado

Tiempo Sobresueldo

'-- • f>& f'lV

fi/2 /Ye. t&opt $ TJX4s osfa/

<ny

CL-147 (Rev. 05/03)

RESOLUCION DE CREDITO DE TIEMPO DISPUTABLE/^f*^ /^rf<^^ ^e>^ &q£*<~M*ZfogL

FECHA

NOMBREDEL

PRESO/OFENSOR: •^SjUhPS-

(Presos del division do carcel del estadol/ft/Yl^J-fj-ftf 6fififlAZ^. ffc £f/c /!/lf}J,-^l- gg/O

State Jail Facility NUMERO DE TDCJ:

Fecha del Projecto del Descari

Al Frente Fecha del Descargo/Descargo de la Carcel del Estado

MAR 09 2015

Fecha de Libertad Provisional/Condicionai

Otro: •

Yt>
TIME CREDIT DISPUTE RESOLUTION

TO: \Pf Time Section (ID Offenders)

Classification and Records Headquarters

BOT Warehouse Huntsville, Texas

• Intake/Classification Office(SJD Offenders)

State Jail Facility

Mark ^''appropriate bpx(es).

'Sentence'Begin Date'''- ''•--"•

mmitment Information

1/ Time Earning Status

^ ^Coqnty•JailTimeJfc?/&c/T 't+0»v*rj*&t

^i Bonus Time

DATE: 3-S-tS"

OFFENDER WMIfe:/?/hA/ Q&A &//ltfT&J

'?

TDCJ No.:

4

Time-?A*L&foM{Akcr£*c&rc_ m^fcutfa*.

ijected Release Date/Maximum Expiration Date

Upfront Release Date/State Jail Release Date

Parole Date— A'iro/e./jATe

^h Other: f//e*/?/fr /?*?*£/!&/Me..M

> si* t-~.\*/ jh^ >_ l. . .-/ a^ -^ / Jy, jit - . .«_X ,J J.. ~" 1

Explain the problem in youj; own words. i^£fg)'r^A/4Att/£^e^li^^^X^^V^^I^^^^t>

<• <rfu'/7%4Q>»i/>c'r<sr//e- WgO 4V7Xj*r ^7^14^ ^y^/>i^^e-CA4^fi^f dWlJf79?ZlS £/>/°/04&/&P<*l%&-&>} To 7Z)£~ <&fc-0*?£jl-ZjZ~%o/o/M^js3o/Ortff<t/ool>^^ A/%/ A i/fat/lf Q/P^T $f/*e.