alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Real Estate Associates Limited III (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), JohnMcGrath, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership,and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 37 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 37

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer research for 2 
                                 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF POSTAGE STAMP FOR BREAST CANCER 
              RESEARCH.

    Section 414(h) of title 39, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2005'' and inserting ``2007''.

            Passed the Senate September 27, 2005.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 37

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the special postage stamp for breast cancer research for 2 
                                 years.
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2388 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase civil penalties 

related to child labor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Ms. SCHOLTEN (for herself and Ms. MACE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to increase 

civil penalties related to child labor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Exploited 

5 Children Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CIVIL PENALTIES RELATED TO CHILD LABOR. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 16(e)(1)(A) of the Fair 

8 Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 216(e)(1)(A)) 

9 is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2388 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘not to exceed—’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘as follows:’’; 

3 (2) by moving the margins for clauses (i) and 

4 (ii) 4 ems to the left; 

5 (3) in clause (i)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘$11,000’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘Not less than $5,000 but not more than 

8 $132,270’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and inserting a pe10 riod; and 

11 (4) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘$50,000’’ and in12 serting ‘‘Not less than $25,000 but not more than 

13 $601,150’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments in sub15 section (a) shall be applicable to violations occurring on 

16 or after the date of enactment of this section. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Northern Empire Energy Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”).  I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-K”).





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge ,the Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  December 18, 2013/s/ RANIERO CORSINIRaniero CorsiniTitle: Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Johnathan Gibson, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, et al., Respondents.

[973 NYS2d 867]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with drug use after his urine twice tested positive for cocaine. He was found guilty as charged following a tier III disciplinary hearing, although the imposed penalty was modified upon administrative review. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. Substantial evidence supports the determination in the form of the misbehavior report, the test results and the testimony of the correction officer who authored the report and conducted the tests *(see Matter of Mannino v Fischer,*102 AD3d 1032, 1032 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 855 [2013]; *Matter of Xao He Lu v New York State Dept. of Corrections,*72 AD3d 1379, 1380 [2010]). The officer testified that it was possible for the second test to detect a higher amount of cocaine than the first, *1415and petitioner’s claims to the contrary presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Xao He Lu v New York State Dept. of Corrections,*72 AD3d at 1380). Petitioner’s remaining arguments, to the extent they are properly before us, have been considered and found to be lacking in merit.

Peters, P.J., Rose, Lahtinen and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Cevon W. and Another, Infants. Talisha W., Appellant; Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 38]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Rhoda J. Cohen, J.), entered on or about July 18, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, brings up for review a fact-finding determination that appellant mother neglected her son and derivatively neglected her daughter, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The Family Court’s neglect finding as to appellant’s son, a child with special needs, was supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see Matter of Ameena C. [Wykisha C.],*83 AD3d 606 [1st Dept 2011]; *Matter of J. Children,*216 AD2d 159 [1st Dept 1995]). The court’s neglect finding was also procedurally proper, as there was no need to conform the petition to the evidence, since the petition alleged that the mother failed to exercise a minimum degree of care toward her son, including excessive corporal punishment *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f]; *Matter of Shawn BB.,*239 AD2d 678, 680 [3d Dept 1997]).

The mother’s argument that, since her inappropriate actions at a parent-teacher conference were a one-time incident, the Family Court’s finding of neglect was not based on legally sufficient evidence is unavailing, inasmuch as “[a] single incident ‘where the parent’s judgment was strongly impaired and the child exposed to a risk of substantial harm’ can sustain a finding of neglect” *(Matter of Kayla W.,*47 AD3d 571, 572 [1st Dept 2008]).

The record also supports a finding of derivative neglect with *543respect to the daughter, since the mother’s behavior towards her son demonstrates a sufficiently faulty understanding of her parental duties to warrant an inference of an ongoing danger to her daughter as well *(see Ameena C.,*83 AD3d at 607). Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extendicare Inc. (the Company) on
Form 6-K for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the Report) each of the
undersigned officers of the Company certify solely for purposes of complying
with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.  /s/ Mel Rhinelander  
  /s/ Richard L. Bertrand  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Extendicare Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2186

RICHARD A. PATTERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF COLUMBIA, a municipality of the

State of South Carolina; J. P. SMITH; W. A.

EVANS; DEIDRE PRIESTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-95-1522-3-23)

Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 28, 1998

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard A. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Gordon Cooper,

Columbia, South Carolina; Danny Calvert Crowe, TURNER, PADGET,

GRAHAM & LANEY, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Patterson v. City of Columbia, No. CA-95-1522-3-23 (D.S.C. Aug. 5, 1997). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report(date of earliest event reported)August 10, 2004 NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION 
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  CANADA
    
    001-07260
    
    not applicable(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
  8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
    
    L6T 5P6(address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code (905) 863-0000.




---



##### 



Item 5.    Other Events On August 10, 2004, the Registrant issued the press release attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1, and such press release is incorporated by reference herein (other
than information included on or linked from the Registrants website,
referenced in such release, which is not incorporated by reference into this
report). Item 7.    Financial Statements,Pro FormaFinancial Information and Exhibits (c)            Exhibits. 99.1
    
    Pressh Release issued by the Registrant on August 10, 2004.
 Item 12.   Results of Operations and Financial Condition On August 10, 2004, the Registrant issued a press release providing a status
update on its financial restatement process and other related matters. Such
press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and furnished in accordance
with Item 12 of Form 8-K.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.  NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/   Nicholas J. DeRomaNicholas J. DeRomaChief Legal OfficerBy:
    /s/   Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant Secretary Dated:   August 10, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX 99.1
    
    Press Release issued by the Registrant on August 10, 2004
Exhibit
      32.2







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFP Imaging Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”),
      I, Donald Rabinovitch, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









Donald
      Rabinovitch


Donald
      Rabinovitch,


President


Co-Chief
      Executive Officer


February
      14, 2008




30
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golf Rounds.com,
		Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February28,
		2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
		Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
		indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
		adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.the Report fully
		complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
		Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.the information
		contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
		financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





|Date: April 10, 2007 | /s/ Robert H. Donehew                                                                 
|-------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | Robert H. Donehew                                                                     
|                     | President (Principal Executive Officer)and Treasurer (Principal
				Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of YaFarm Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhiguang Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  April 16, 2010
/s/ Zhiguang ZhangBy:  Zhiguang ZhangIts:  Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by YaFarm Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FILED COURT OF APPEALS DIV I STATE OF WASHINGTON 

### 2018MAR 12 AM 1:58 it.i I • „ t1` •



### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent, V. JAMES EDWIN MULLINS,

Appellant. No.75508-1-1 DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION FILED: MAR 1 2 2018
PER CURIAM. James Mullins appeals his convictionsfor second degree murder and witness tampering,arguing in partthat prosecutorial misconduct and the court's failure to give instructions on intentional murder and manslaughter denied him a fair trial. The State concedes these errors, noting that"[t]he State has conferred with counselfor Mullins[who]concurs in the motion to remand for a new trial," and thatthe remaining issues raised by Mullins on appeal are moot. We acceptthe concession oferror. Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

For the Court:
#### Arrello Barnes, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted July 6, 2009;

decided September 8, 2009

Reported below, 2008 NY Slip Op 85094(U); 2009 NY Slip Op 63023(11).

Motion for reargument denied *[see*11 NY3d 883 (2008)]. Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 853-854]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-109]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 31, 2008.
    The Department of Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the

[[Page 854]]

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or after the date 
of publication of this notice. Copies of the submission(s) may be 
obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer listed. 
Comments regarding this information collection should be addressed to 
the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department Clearance 
Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, and 1750 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 9, 
2009 to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1511.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: REG-209828-96 (TD 8758--Final) Nuclear Decommissioning 
Funds; Revised Schedules of Ruling Amounts.
    Description: The regulations revise the requirements for requesting 
a schedule of ruling amounts based on a formula or method.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 100 hours.

    OMB Number: 1545-0013.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Form: 56.
    Title: Notice Concerning Fiduciary Relationship.
    Description: Form 56 is used to inform the IRS that a person in 
acting for another person in a fiduciary capacity so that the IRS may 
mail tax notices to the fiduciary concerning the person for whom he/she 
is acting. The data is used to ensure that the fiduciary relationship 
is established or terminated and to mail or discontinue mailing 
designated tax notices to the fiduciary.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 292,800 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Glenn P. Kirkland (202) 622-3428, Internal 
Revenue Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC 20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Nicholas A. Fraser (202) 395-5887, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-109 Filed 1-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Norbert Nicholson, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v Ethelyn M. Bader et al., Respondents.

[962 NYS2d 350]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Norbert Nicholson appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated January 31, 2012, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment in his favor on the issue of whether he sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs, and that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment in his favor on the issue of whether he sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) is granted.

As the proponent of the motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff Norbert Nicholson (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) had the burden of making a prima facie showing that he sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) and that the injury was causally related to the accident *(see Elshaarawy v U-Haul Co. of Miss.,*72 AD3d 878, 881 [2010]; *Autiello v Cummins,*66 AD3d 1072, 1073 [2009]). The injured plaintiff satisfied this burden by submitting his own deposition testimony, his New York City Police Department employment records, and the affirmation and affirmed reports of his treating physician, all of which established that the injured plaintiff was out of work for more than 90 days during the 180-day period following the accident, and that the causes of his *720absence were medically determined injuries to the cervical and lumbar regions of his spine that were caused by the accident *(see e.g. Kapeleris v Riordan,*89 AD3d 903 [2011]; *Elshaarawy v U-Haul Co. of Miss.,*72 AD3d at 881).

In opposition, the defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the injured plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the accident *(cf. Elshaarawy v U-Haul Co. of Miss.,*72 AD3d at 881). Therefore, the Supreme Court should have granted that branch of the injured plaintiffs motion.

Angiolillo, J.E, Balkin, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.