alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2949]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; SEP II: Multi-site Clinical Trials.
    Date: January 22, 2015.
    Time: 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Susan O. McGuire, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 4245, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-435-1426, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0bdb3b7a5b9a2b5a3bf90bdb1b9bcfebeb9b8feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9df0fefae8f4eff8eef2ddf0fcf4f1b3f3f4f5b3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos.: 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-00817 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Theodore M. BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; Harnett Correctional Center, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 06-1495.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 19, 2006.

Theodore M. Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Clifford Wilks, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Theodore M. Banks seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting partial summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order that Banks seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10804 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROBERTO JIMENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:89-CR-97-R

- - - - - - - - - - September 19, 1997 Before WISDOM, WIENER, AND DENNIS, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: * Appellant Roberto Jimenez filed his notice of appeal one day late. Upon remand, the district court held that the untimeliness did not result from excusable neglect. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). Jimenez has not contested the district court’s ruling, and the record reveals no reason for this court to conclude that the ruling constitutes an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, Jimenez’s appeal is DISMISSED for failure to file a timely notice of appeal. See United States v. Clark , 51 F.3d 42 (5th Cir. 1995).No. -2- APPEAL DISMISSED.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K/A Amendment No. 1 to CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    
    AUGUST 19, 2004
   NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)  CANADA
    
    001-07260
    
    NOT APPLICABLE(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
      Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K/A filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation
of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17
CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.05
    
    Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities On September 30, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation (the Company) issued a
press release (the Press Release) which, among other things, updated and
provided additional information under the heading Restructuring Plan in the
Press Release (the Updated Restructuring Information) with respect to certain
matters concerning the work plan previously announced in the press release
attached as Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
and filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19, 2004. The Press Release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and the
Updated Restructuring Information is incorporated by reference herein.  Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits  (c)
    
    Exhibits  99.1
    
    Press Release issued by the Company on September 30, 2004.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ WILLIAM R. KERRWilliam R. KerrChief Financial OfficerBy:
    /s/ BLAIR F. MORRISONBlair F. MorrisonAssistant Secretary Dated: September 30, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release issued by the Company on September 30, 2004.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ACHOT MIRZOIAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-70943

Agency No. A070-936-412

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 17, 2012** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Achot Mirzoian, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

FILED

JUL 24 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-70943

abuse of discretion, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and

we deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Mirzoian’s motion to reopen

as untimely where the motion was filed over six years after the BIA’s final order,

see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Mirzoian failed to demonstrate that there has been

a material change in Armenia with respect to the government’s treatment of

opposition party supporters to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit

for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d

at 991; He v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1128, 1132 (9th Cir. 2007) (a change in personal

circumstances does not establish changed country conditions).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00471]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8999]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``J.M.W. Turner: Painting Set Free''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``J.M.W. Turner: Painting Set Free,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the J. Paul Getty 
Museum, Los Angeles, California, from on or about February 24, 2015, 
until on or about May 24, 2015, the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, 
San Francisco, California, from on or about June 20, 2015, until on or 
about September 20, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 7, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-00471 Filed 1-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
EX-35.1
(logo) OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE

One gets it done.

www.optiononemortgage.com



March 15, 2008


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045-1951
Attn: Pamela D. Pendarvis
INV #576

Re: Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-HL1, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series
    2007-HL1

Enclosed is the required Annual Compliance Certification.


If you have any questions, please contact Elizabeth Nguyen at (949) 727-8226 or
email: Elizabeth.Nguyen@oomc.com



Option One Mortgage Corporation
6501 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618



6501 Irvine Center Drive *Irvine *California *92618 *(800) 704-0800 *

(logo) EQUAL HOUSING
LENDER


(page)


(logo) OPTION ONE
MORTGAGE

One gets it done.

www.optiononemortgage.com



Annual Compliance Certificate


I, Fabiola Camperi, the undersigned, the duly authorized President of Option
One Mortgage Corporation (as "Servicer"), does hereby certify the following for
the calendar year ending on December 31, 2007:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period
   and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement (as defined in the
   cover letter) for such period has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all
   material respects throughout the reporting period.



Certified By:

/s/ Fabiola Camperi
Name: Fabiola Camperi
Title: President
Date: March 14, 2008



6501 Irvine Center Drive *Irvine *California *92618 *(800) 704-0800 *

(logo) Equal Housing
Lender
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2024

- 0146

_____________________________
R USSELL N AKIA M ASON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Coleman Lee Robinson , Judge

. June 21, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OBERTS , and R AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Russell Nakia Mason, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### In the Matter of East Fishkill Home & Land Company, LLC, et al., Appellants, v Town of East Fishkill et al., Respondents.

Submitted March 16, 2009;

decided April 7, 2009

Motion by Dutchess County for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed.
#### In the Matter of Darren F., Respondent, v Marie-Amina T., Appellant.

Submitted April 20, 2009;

decided June 11, 2009

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order of affirmance, denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### In the Matter of Allstate Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Melissa Koblin, Appellant, v Washingtonville Central School District, Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 330]

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Bartlett, J.), dated June 5, 2012, which denied the petition.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the petition is granted.

In determining whether to grant an application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the court must consider all relevant circumstances, including whether (1) the public corporation or its attorney or insurance carrier acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days after the claim arose or a reasonable time thereafter, (2) the claimant demonstrated a reasonable excuse for the failure to serve a timely notice of claim, (3) the claimant failed to serve a timely notice of claim by reason of its justifiable reliance upon settlement representations made by an authorized representative of the public corporation or its insurance carrier, and (4) the delay would substantially prejudice the public corporation in its defense on the merits *(see*Education Law § 3813 [2-a]; General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; *Matter of McLeod v City of New York,*105 AD3d 744 [2013]; *Matter of Khalid v City of New York,*91 AD3d 779, 780 [2012]; *Matter of Billman v Town of Deerpark, 73*AD3d 1039 [2010]).

Here, the respondent acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within 90 days of the accident from the petitioner’s letters dated April 14, 2011, and June 15, 2011, respectively, and supporting documentation. Moreover, the petitioner met its initial burden of demonstrating a lack of substantial prejudice to the respondent should service of the late notice of claim be allowed *(see Kim L. v Port Jervis City School Dist., 77*AD3d 627, 629-630 [2010]; *Matter of Leeds v Port Washington Union Free School Dist.,*55 AD3d 734, 735-736 [2008]; *Matter of Felice v Eastport/South Manor Cent. School Dist.,*50 AD3d 138, 152 [2008]). In response, the respondent’s contentions were insufficient to overcome the petitioner’s showing of a lack of substantial prejudice *(see Matter of Lavender v Garden City Union Free School Dist.,*93 AD3d at 671). The absence of a reasonable excuse for the delay does not bar the *718granting of leave to serve a late notice of claim where, as here, there is actual knowledge and an absence of substantial prejudice *(see id.; Matter of Leeds v Port Washington Union Free School Dist.,*55 AD3d at 736).

Accordingly, the petition should have been granted. Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2037 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

Corporation for National and Community Service, Salaries and Expenses 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, Corporation for National and Community 

Service, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, CORPORATION FOR NA5 TIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE, SALA6 RIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Related Agencies, Corporation for National and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2037 IH

1 Community Service, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $83,737,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          32,149                  27,830
<SECURITIES>                                   150,000                 150,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  300,000                 300,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000                 150,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,149                 177,830
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,505,205              11,002,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,935,864              10,514,841
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        23,231                  23,231
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,710,942                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,505,205              11,002,518
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               219,340                 301,308
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,090                   7,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       352                     528
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (227,262)               (308,926)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.055)                  (.071)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-06-00164- CV

In re Burkhart Enterprises

ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M TRAVIS CO UNTY

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
Re la tor B ur kh a rt En ter

pr ise s se e ks a

wr it o f m a nd a mus c omp e lli ng the Ho no ra ble Her b Evans, J ustice of the Peace , Travis County , Precinc t Five, to vac ate a n order transfe rring venue from Tra vis Cou n t y t o Dallas County on the g round that the justice- of-the- peac e cour t lacked jurisdiction to is sue the orde r. This Court’s power to issue writs o f m an d amus is gove rned by Section 22.221 of the Te x as Gove rnment Code. Te x . Go v ’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004). Be cause relat o r d o es not contend that the r espondent ha s interfe red w ith this Court’s jurisdiction, the question is whether

this Court m ay

issue a wr it of mandamus t o a j ustice of the pe ace under section 22.221(b)
. See id. We h old that w e c a nn ot. Se c tio n 2 2. 22 1( b) lim its thi s Co ur t’ s juri sd ic tio n to iss ue wr its o f m a n d a mus “ a g a ins t
a . . . ju dg e of

a dis tr ic t or

c ou nty c ou rt ” or “ jud g e of

a dis tr ic t c ou rt

wh o is a c tin g a s a

ma g istrate at a c o u r t o f in q u ir

y ” u n d e r Ch a

p te r 5 2 o f th e Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c e d u r e . T h e s tatu te d o es not authorize this Court to issue writs of mandamus ag ainst a justice of the peac e. Easton v. Franks , 842 S.W. 2d 77 2, 77 3 (T e x. Ap p. –H ou sto n [1st Di st. ] 1 99 2, or ig . p ro c e e din g ); Simpson v. Morgan , 7792

S.W. 2d 50 9, 51 0 ( Te x. Ap p. –B e a umo nt 1 98 9, or ig . p roce e din g ). Al tho ug h Re la tor c la ims that it
so ug ht ma nd a mus re lie f in the c ou nty c ou rt -at- la w an d tha t court de nie d re lie f, the re is n oth ingin the re c or d b e fo re us to s up po rt Re la tor ’s a lle g a tio ns . Acc ording ly , we dismiss this original proc eeding for wa nt of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________ J an P. Patterson, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Patter son and Pemberton Filed: June 12, 2006