alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aspen Exploration Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 11, 2008                    By  /s/ R.V. Bailey
                                                ---------------
                                                R.V. Bailey, interim Chief
                                                Executive Officer and
                                                Principal Executive Officer
----

|                                           | LaSalle      Bank N.A. |
|------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
| 135      South LaSalle Street                  |
| Suite      1625                                |
| Chicago,      IL 60603                    |
| Global      Securities and TrustServices  |

| Attention: | Merrill      Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed Certificates,      Series 2007-HE2 |
|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Re: | Pooling      and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of March 1, 2007 among      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc., as Depositor, LaSalle Bank      National Association, as Master Servicer, Litton Loan Servicing, LP, as      Servicer, Wilshire Credit Corporation, as Servicer, Option One Mortgage      Corporation, as Servicer, and Citibank, N.A., as Trustee, relating to      Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed      Certificates, Series 2007-HE2 |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1.   | A      review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding      calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the      Agreement has been made under my supervision;  and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has      fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects      throughout such year or a portionthereof. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION    FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of: January, 2005
    
    Commission File No.: 1-11796
 MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION  1600 Britannia Road East
Mississauga, Ontario
L4W 1J2  PREMDOR INC.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form
20-F or Form 40-F: Form 20-F     o
    
    Form 40-F     þ
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): Yes     o
    
    No     þ
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Yes     o
    
    No     þ
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Yes     o
    
    No     þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b): N/A




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONDate: January 18, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Harley UlsterName:
    Harley UlsterTitle:
    Executive Vice-President
and Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Notice of Application and Notice
and Management Proxy Circular, dated January 18, 200599.2
    
    Form of Proxy Card99.3
    
    Form of Voting Instruction Form99.4
    
    Letter of Transmittal with respect
to the Common Shares of Masonite International Corporation, dated
January 18, 2005
TERRY PERRY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3028

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Hulsey, III, Judge.

William J. Sheppard, Elizabeth L. White, Matthew R. Kachergus, and Bryan E. 

DeMaggio of Sheppard, White, Kachergus & DeMaggio, P.A., Jacksonville, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 10.2



 





EXHIBIT 10.2




SUMMARY OF BOARD COMPENSATION




Non-employee directors of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (the “Company”) receive compensation
for their services to the Board of Directors and related committees as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Amount	 	Description
	$	50,000	 	 	Lead director annual retainer, disbursed in five equal payments for each
regularly scheduled Board meeting.

	 	 	 	 	 

	 	30,000	 	 	Annual retainer for all other non-employee directors, disbursed in five equal
payments for each regularly scheduled Board meeting.

	 	 	 	 	 

	 	10,000	 	 	Audit committee chairman annual retainer, disbursed in same manner as Board
member annual retainer (excludes lead director).

	 	 	 	 	 

	 	5,000	 	 	Non-audit committee chairman annual retainer, disbursed in same manner as Board
member annual retainer (excludes lead director).

	 	 	 	 	 

	 	3,000	 	 	Attendance fee for each in-person Board meeting.

	 	 	 	 	 

	 	1,250	 	 	Attendance fee for each telephonic Board meeting or committee meeting of any kind.







All directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board of Directors.
Each non-employee director of the Company currently receives, and will continue to receive, an
annual award grant of 9,000 stock appreciation rights, which have a base price equal to the closing
market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant and are payable in shares of
common stock. Sally Frame Kasaks, who is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is not paid
any fees or additional remuneration for her services as a member of the Board of Directors.
665 A.2d 384

#### IN THE MATTER OF PERRY FEINBERG, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 13, 1995.

ORDER

PERRY FEINBERG of POINT PLEASANT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, having been ordered to show cause on October 11, 1995, why this Court’s Order of temporary suspension should not be continued pending the disposition of ethics proceedings against him, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the suspension of PERRY FEINBERG continue pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he continue to comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics may transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund the attorney account funds held in any financial institution by PERRY FEINBERG, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of September 20, 1995.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report ofSino Charter Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Bradley W. Miller, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 7thday of March, 2008.

BRADLEY W. MILLERBradley W. MillerChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
































---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.7

       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F and in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-109970) of our report dated March 4,
2005 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Gerdau Ameristeel
Corporation, filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 40-F.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Tampa, Florida
March 30, 2005
#### American Guaranty and Liability Insurance Company, Appellant, v Avraham Moskowitz et al., Respondents.

[870 NYS2d 307]

*427Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered July 7, 2008, which, inter alia, declared that defendants are entitled to recover from plaintiff $33,845.03, representing legal fees and expenses incurred in this declaratory judgment action, and order, same court and Justice, entered February 28, 2008, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment declaring that plaintiff had a duty to defend defendant Avraham Moskowitz in an underlying federal action and that defendants are entitled to reimbursement for costs incurred in connection with this declaratory judgment action, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Moskowitz was counsel to a certain individual and companies in which he owned stock. He was named as a defendant in the first amended complaint in a federal action alleging fraud and RICO violations against, inter alia, these clients. A fair reading of the amended complaint, which expressly alleges that Moskowitz “is and was an attorney” and “represented [the individual and the aforementioned companies],” reveals that the claims against him were predicated upon his purported acts or omissions in rendering those legal services. Therefore, they were covered under the subject professional liability insurance policy *(see Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford v Cook,*7 NY3d 131, 137 [2006] [when the allegations of the complaint even “suggest” a “reasonable possibility of coverage,” the insurer will be required to defend]). The allegation that Moskowitz had served as *“de facto*in-house counsel” does not render him an officer, director or employee of a business enterprise whose coverage is negated pursuant to exclusion D of the policy *(see RJC Realty Holding Corp. v Republic Franklin Ins. Co., 2*NY3d 158, 165 [2004]). Nor does the conclusory, unsupported allegation that Moskowitz was a member of a criminal enterprise, which apparently arose out of communications between him and his client or clients in the course of his representation of her or them, place him within exclusion A, which renders the policy inapplicable to any claim arising out of a criminal act by an insured *(see Fitzpatrick v American Honda Motor Co.,*78 NY2d 61, 68 [1991]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find *428them without merit. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Moskowitz and Renwick, JJ.
EX-34.3
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
Suite 500
191 West Nationwide Boulevard
Columbus, OH 43215-2568



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors
Nationwide Life Insurance Company:

We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying
Management Assessment of Compliance, that Nationwide Life Insurance Company
(the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB relating to the servicing
of certain loans it services within the commercial mortgage-backed security
transactions listed in Appendix A (the "Platform") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2007, except for the servicing criteria (d)(1)(iii); d(2)(iii);
(d)(2)(vi); (d)(3)(i)-(iv); (d)(4)(iii); (d)(4)(vi)-(vii); (d)(4)(ix)-(xi);
(d)(4)(xiii) and (d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable
to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform. Appendix A of
management's assessment identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and
securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assessment about the
Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the ended December 31, 2007 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 27, 2008

KPMG LLP a US limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 List of the Registrants Subsidiaries Name
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationOdyssey America Reinsurance Corporation
    
    ConnecticutClearwater Insurance Company (formerly Odyssey Reinsurance Corporation)
    
    DelawareHudson Insurance Company
    
    DelawareHudson Specialty Insurance Company
    
    New YorkClearwater Select Insurance Company (formerly Overseas Partners US Reinsurance Company)
    
    DelawareO.R.E. Holdings Limited
    
    MauritiusOdyssey UK Holdings Corp.
    
    DelawareNewline Holdings UK Limited
    
    United KingdomNewline Underwriting Management Limited
    
    United KingdomNewline Corporate Name Limited
    
    United KingdomNewline Underwriting Limited
    
    United KingdomOdyssey Holdings Latin America, Inc.
    
    DelawareOdyssey Latin America Inc.
    
    Delaware
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-50160

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FRANKLIN ROLLIN JOHNSTON, also known as

Johnny Johnston,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CR-154-2-JN

--------------------

October 19, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Franklin Rollin Johnston appeals from the district court’s

denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment on jurisdictional

grounds pursuant to FED. R. CRIM. P. 12(b)(2) after a timely

notice of appeal from his convictions had been filed. Johnston’s

timely notice of appeal divested the district court of its

jurisdiction to address the motion. United States v. 4,970 Acres

of Land, 130 F.3d 712, 714 (5th Cir. 1997). This appeal is 
No. 99-50160

-2-

without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. It is DISMISSED. 

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Renee Chapman, Contact Representative, or Theresa Kingsberry, Legal Assistant, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room CC-5301, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326-3100.

By direction of the Commission.

Donald Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-00515 Filed 1-14-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
HOWARD C. HICKEY,

Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL D. CREWS, 

Secretary, Florida Department of 

Corrections,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-255

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 18, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Lafayette County.

Darren K. Jackson, Judge.

Howard C. Hickey, pro se, Appellant.

Jennifer Parker, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee; Pamela 

Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg and Jay Kubica, Assistant 

Attorneys General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.

1
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer


                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                               September 28, 2004

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346

                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
                      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                          Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

    Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
   this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
     Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
                                    of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ] No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
                  connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST




Exhibit                  Description
-------                  -----------

99.1              Press Release, dated September 28, 2004 regarding Hollinger
                  Inc. Announces the Appointments of Robert J. Metcalfe and
                  Allan Wakefield as Directors of Hollinger Inc.






<PAGE>



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  September 28, 2004

                                                HOLLINGER INC.

                                                By       /s/ Peter G. White
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                Name:    Peter G. White
                                                Title:   Co-Chief Operating
                                                         Officer and Secretary