alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                --------------


                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
            10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
            report on Form 10-K of CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2007-HY1
            (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

         2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
            a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
            omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
            this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and
            other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the
            period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act
            periodic reports;

         4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
            conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s)
            required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
            except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the
            servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
            agreement(s) in all material respects; and

         5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
            criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
            reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
            asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
            accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
            13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
            except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
            instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
            disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

         In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
         information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
         Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 25, 2008

         /s/ Steve Bailey
         -------------------------------
         Steve Bailey
         Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
         (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
         Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP)
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**Consent of IndependentCertified Public Accountants**

 

 

Board of Directors 

eMerge Interactive, Inc.: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.333-39896 and No. 333-60382) on Form S-8 of eMerge Interactive, Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of eMerge Interactive, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 Form 10-K of eMerge Interactive, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill andother intangible assets and the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets in 2002, and derivative instruments and hedging activities in 2001. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

 

Orlando, Florida 

March 26, 2003
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kezine Murray, Appellant.

Submitted June 29, 2009;

decided August 27, 2009

Reported below, 57 AD3d 921.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Mark Diamond, Esq., Box 287356, Yorkville Station, New York, NY 10128 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
NO. 07-04-0322-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JUNE 23, 2004

______________________________

TOMMY HEATH, JR, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 45,316-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Following the trial court’s order of revocation of community supervision and

reformation of sentence, on October 14, 2003, appellant Tommy Heath, Jr. was sentenced

to nine years confinement for robbery. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial.
1Appellant may have recourse by filing a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus

returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. Tex.

Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2004).

2

However, his notice of appeal was not filed until May 24, 2004. We dismiss for want of

jurisdiction. 

When a timely motion for new trial is filed, a notice of appeal is due to be filed with

the trial court clerk within 90 days after the day sentence is imposed. Tex. R. App. P.

26.2(a)(2). The Rules of Appellate Procedure provide for a 15-day extension in which to

file the notice if it is accompanied by a motion for extension of time. See Tex. R. App. P.

26.3. This Court is without jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal and can take no

action other than to dismiss an appeal without a timely filed notice of appeal. See Slaton

v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Cr.App. 1998).

Appellant’s sentence was imposed on October 14, 2003, and following his timely

motion for new trial, the deadline in which to file his notice of appeal was extended to

January 12, 2004. The notice filed on May 24, 2004, is beyond the deadline, including the

15-day extension period, and thus, does not invoke our jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the purported appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.1

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

Do not publish.
#### In the Matter of Anthony M. Spicer, Appellant, v Myrcine Fotiathis, Respondent.

[870 NYS2d 021]

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), dated November 8, 2007, which, after a hearing, in effect, denied his petition and granted the mother’s cross petition for custody of the parties’ minor child, and awarded him visitation supervised by his sister.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A custody finding after a hearing is entitled to deference and will not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record *(see Matter of Zeis v Slater,*57 AD3d 793 [2008]; *Matter of Brian S. v Stephanie P.,*34 AD3d 685, 686 [2006]).

Contrary to the father’s contentions, there is a sound and substantial basis in the record for the Family Court’s determination that the child’s best interests would be served by awarding custody to the mother and awarding him visitation supervised by his sister in accordance with the order *(see Matter of Panetta v Ruddy,*18 AD3d 662 [2005]; *Matter of Custer v Slater,*2 AD3d 1227, 1228 [2003]; *Matter of Bryant v Nazario,*306 *862AD2d 529 [2003]). Fisher, J.E, Miller, Garni and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diatect International Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay W. Downs, Principal Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 14, 2003

By:

/s/ Jay W. Downs________

Name:

Jay W. Downs,

Title:

Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

          - 26 CFR Part 1 
          - [REG-150670-07] 
          - RIN 1545-BH49 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Correction to notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to a notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations (REG-150670-07) that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Monday, December 15, 2008 (73 FR 75979) giving guidance regarding the distribution of stock of a controlled corporation acquired in a transaction described in section 355(a)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. This action is necessary in light of amendments to section 355(b). The text of those regulations also serves as the text of these proposed regulations. These regulations will affect corporations and their shareholders.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Russell P. Subin, (202) 622-7790 (not a toll-free number). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background 

The correction notice that is the subject of this document is under section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

## Need for Correction 

As published, the notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations (REG-150670-07) contains an error that may prove to be misleading and is in need of clarification. 

## Correction of Publication 

Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations (REG-150670-07), which was the subject of FR Doc. E8-29545, is corrected as follows: 

On page 75980, column 2, under the CFR part heading “PART 1—INCOME TAXES”, line 2 of the authority citation, the language “Section 1.355-2(g) also issued under 26” is corrected to read “Section 1.355-2(g) and (i) also issued under 26”. 

LaNita Van Dyke, 

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).

 [FR Doc. E9-1104 Filed 1-16-09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Gold Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Van Z. Krikorian, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and                    
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|
|

Date: May 15, 2008
     
     /s/ Van Z. KrikorianVan. Z. KrikorianChairman and Chief Executive Officer




---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

148 CA 15-01938 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

JOSHUA P. BOULTER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RACHELLE R. BOULTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH deV. MOELLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JANE G. LAROCK, WATERTOWN, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

KIMBERLY A. WOOD, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WATERTOWN.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County (James P. McClusky, J.), dated March 13, 2015. The judgment, among other things, adjudged that plaintiff shall have custody of the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant mother appeals from a judgment which, inter alia, granted plaintiff father custody of the parties’ child. The mother failed to preserve for our review her contention that North Carolina was a more convenient forum for the action by failing to raise that contention before Supreme Court ( see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora , 202 AD2d 984, 985). We reject the mother’s contention that the record does not support the court’s determination to award custody of the child to the father. Indeed, the court properly considered the totality of the circumstances in determining that the best interests of the child are served by awarding custody to the father ( see Eschbach v Eschbach , 56 NY2d 167, 174), including the stability of the existing custody arrangement and the relative fitness of the parents, the ability of each parent to provide for the emotional and intellectual development of the child, and the financial status and ability of each parent to provide for the child ( see Fox v Fox , 177 AD2d 209, 210).

Entered: February 10, 2017 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 -------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

     1.   I have  reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
          required  to be filed in respect of the period  covered by this report
          on Form 10-K of CWHEQ Home  Equity  Loan Trust,  Series  2007-S1  (the
          "Exchange Act periodic reports");

     2.   Based on my knowledge,  the Exchange Act periodic reports,  taken as a
          whole, do not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit
          to state a material  fact  necessary to make the  statements  made, in
          light of the circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge,  all of the  distribution,  servicing and other
          information  required  to be  provided  under Form 10-D for the period
          covered  by this  report is  included  in the  Exchange  Act  periodic
          reports;

     4.   I am  responsible  for  reviewing  the  activities  performed  by  the
          servicer(s)  and based on my knowledge  and the  compliance  review(s)
          conducted in preparing the servicer compliance  statement(s)  required
          in this  report  under  Item  1123 of  Regulation  AB,  and  except as
          disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic  reports,  the servicer(s) have
          fulfilled their  obligations  under the servicing  agreement(s) in all
          material respects; and

     5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
          for asset-backed  securities and their related  attestation reports on
          assessment  of compliance  with  servicing  criteria for  asset-backed
          securities  required to be included in this report in accordance  with
          Item 1122 of  Regulation  AB and  Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
          have been  included as an exhibit to this report,  except as otherwise
          disclosed in this  report.  Any  material  instances of  noncompliance
          described in such  reports have been  disclosed in this report on Form
          10-K.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
      information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The
      Bank of New York, as Trustee.

Date: March 27, 2008

      /s/ Steve Bailey
      -----------------------
      Steve Bailey
      Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer Loan Administration
      (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of Countrywide
      Home Loans Servicing LP)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 13, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 13, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0124. RHONDA MCCLENDON v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 19SUR777
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

Washington,D.C. 20549

 

**Form10-Q**

** **

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE 

 ACT OF 1934

 

For thequarterly period ended****September 30, 2009

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

 

For thetransition period from __________ to __________

 

Commission file number0-10673

 

 

**REALESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED III**

(Exactname of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  [X] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB/A  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, CEO,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: December 12, 2005                     Signature: /s/ Calvin A. Wallen, III
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Calvin A. Wallen, III, CEO







<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cubic Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB/A  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, CFO,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: December 12, 2005                            Signature: /s/ James L. Busby
                                                             -------------------
                                                             James L. Busby