alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                           1,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                       146
<INVENTORY>                                      1,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,185
<PP&E>                                           9,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,455
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,159
<BONDS>                                          1,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            53
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,455
<SALES>                                          6,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,712
<CGS>                                            3,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    20
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    638
<INCOME-TAX>                                       255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                383
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       383
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Peer Review Meeting.                    

*Date:*                         January 27-28, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Room 3E61, 5601 Fisher Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Raymond R. Schleef, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5109,                         *schleefrr@niaid.nih.gov.*

Late notification due to delayed response from panel members.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 2118)    
Dated: January 9, 2015.

Melanie J. Gray,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-00489 Filed 1-14-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**[Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Logo]****Wells Fargo Home Mortgage********One Home Campus********Des Moines, IA 50328-0001************Wells Fargo Bank N.A.****Servicer Compliance Statement**1.  I, John B. Brown, Senior Vice President of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo") hereby state that a review of the activities of Wells Fargo during the calendar year 2007 and of Wells Fargo's performance under the servicing agreement(s) listed on the attached Exhibit A (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision. 2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout 2007. /s/ John B Brown John B. Brown Senior Vice President Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. February 29, 2008 **EXHIBIT A****CLIENT****INV#****INV****MASTER****SERVICER/TRUSTEE****DEAL NAME**708 C20 JP MORGAN US BANK JPALT 2007-Al 708 340 WACHOVIA  US BANK WMLT 2006-A 591 340 WACHOVIA  US BANK WMLT 2006-A 708 C44 WACHOVIA  US BANK WMLT 2007-A 708 H17 CHASE US BANK JPMMT 2007-A5
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 22 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                         Calendar No. 4
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 22

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 23 (legislative day, January 3), 2023

                                Received

             January 24 (legislative day, January 3), 2023

                          Read the first time

                            January 25, 2023

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from sending petroleum products 
 from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting America's Strategic 
Petroleum Reserve from China Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SALES OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS FROM THE STRATEGIC 
              PETROLEUM RESERVE TO CHINA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Energy 
shall not draw down and sell petroleum products from the Strategic 
Petroleum Reserve--
            (1) to any entity that is under the ownership, control, or 
        influence of the Chinese Communist Party; or
            (2) except on the condition that such petroleum products 
        will not be exported to the People's Republic of China.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 12, 2023.

            Attest:

                                             CHERYL L. JOHNSON,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                         Calendar No. 4

118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 22

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from sending petroleum products 
 from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 25, 2023

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
#### State v. Williams

Case below: 184 N.C. App.-(19 June 2007)

No. 350P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-850)

Denied 10/11/07
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6996

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

EDWIN FLORES, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior 

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00292-JCC-5; 1:07-cv-01054-JCC) 

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 2, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Edwin Flores, Appellant Pro Se. Jenny C. Ellickson, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Edwin Flores seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Flores has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>      0000318245
<NAME>     ASSOCIATED MEDIAL DEVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   44031
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00424]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the 
Dallas Floodway Project, in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, TX

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The comment period for the Availability of Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement for the Dallas Floodway Project, in the City of 
Dallas, Dallas County, TX published in the Federal Register on Friday, 
December 19, 2014 (79 FR 75794), required comments be postmarked on or 
before January 18, 2015. The comment period has been extended to 
February 2, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia Hackett at (817) 886-1373 or 
via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2845495a4b4149065a0640494b434d5c5c685d5b494b4d06495a455106454144"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c3aea2b1a0aaa2edb1edaba2a0a8a6b7b783b6b0a2a0a6eda2b1aebaedaeaaaf">[email protected]</span></a>.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-00424 Filed 1-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGECOMMISSION

Washington,D.C. 20549

 

**Form10-Q**

** **

(Mark One)

[X]   QUARTERLYREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE 

 ACT OF 1934

 

For thequarterly period ended****March 31, 2011

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

 

For thetransition period from __________ to __________

 

Commission file number0-10673

 

**REALESTATE ASSOCIATES LIMITED III**

(Exactname of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Addressof principal executive offices)

 

(864)239-1000

(Registrant’s telephonenumber, including area code)

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days.  [X] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporateWeb site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted andposted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) duringthe preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant wasrequired to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitionsof “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reportingcompany” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
#### In the Matter of Earl Muldrow, Petitioner, v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 38]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Wilma Guzman, J.), entered on or about October 2, 2012, which denied the petition to set aside respondent’s determination, dated December 29, 2011, affirming the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), which, after a hearing, revoked petitioner’s parole, unanimously vacated, the petition treated as one transferred to this Court for de novo review, and upon such review, respondent’s determination confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, dismissed, without costs.

The subject petition raised an issue of substantial evidence, and thus, the proceeding should have been transferred to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g). Accordingly, we treat the substantial evidence issue de novo and decide all issues as if the proceeding had been properly transferred *(see Matter of Coleman v Rhea,*104 AD3d 535 [1st Dept 2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 857 [2013]).

*426The determination to revoke petitioner’s parole is supported by substantial evidence, including petitioner’s handwritten admission that he engaged in a physical altercation with his girlfriend and her daughter during which he hit his girlfriend *(see Matter of Swinson v Warden, Rikers Is. Correctional Facility,*75 AD3d 433 [2010]). This admission was consistent with the photographic evidence and the testimony of the police officer who responded to the emergency call made by the daughter of petitioner’s girlfriend. Moreover, there exists no basis to disturb the ALJ’s credibility determinations *(see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70*NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]).

Petitioner’s due process rights to a fair hearing or cross-examination were not violated by the admission of hearsay statements at the administrative hearing *(see Matter of Rispoli v Waterfront Commn. of N.Y. Harbor,*104 AD3d 461 [1st Dept 2013]). In light of the evidence that the complainants were unavailable to testify, there is no due process violation in the admission of the police officer’s testimony as to what the complainants had said *(Matter of LaPorta v New York State Bd. of Parole,*251 AD2d 119 [1st Dept 1998]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, Saxe and Clark, JJ.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 22-1223

RALPH TREY JOHNSON; et al.

v.

NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, et al.

 National Collegiate Athletic Association;

 Cornell University; Fordham University;

 Lafayette College; Sacred Heart University;

 Villanova University, 

 Appellants

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The precedential opinion issued on July 11, 2024 is further amended. Amicus Appellee 

Professor Michael H. LeRoy’s surname was incorrectly listed as Leroy. The opinion is 

amended to correctly reflect the correct surname LeRoy.

For the Court, 

PATRICIA S. DODSZUWEIT, 

Clerk

Date: July 25, 2024

cc: All Counsel of Record
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000318245
<NAME>     Yournet, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              5770
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        50482
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     20456
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  5770
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             14274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,274)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.00)


</TABLE>
Report
on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Item 1123








Pursuant
to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, a review of the Regulus' activities during the
year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period") and of its
performance under the servicing agreement between Regulus and Home Loan Services(the
"Servicing Agreement") has been
made under the undersigned officer's supervision. To the best of such officer's
knowledge, based on such review, Regulus has fulfilled its obligations under the
Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.








/s/
Kimberlee Clark


Kimberlee
Clark


Chief Financial
Officer






February 15,
2008


























860 Latour
Court  |   Napa,
CA   |   94558   |    Tel:
707.254.4000   |   regulusgroup.com