alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of CAI International, Inc.; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such                statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: April 29, 2020 |     |                                       |
|----------------------|-----|---------------------------------------|
|                      |     |                                       |
|                      | By: | /s/ VICTOR M. GARCIA                  |
|                      |     | Victor M. Garcia                      |
|                      |     | President and Chief Executive Officer |

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Public  Storage,  Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly  period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald
L. Havner, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and John
Reyes,  as Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  each  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
         Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
--------------------------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer & President
Date:    November 9, 2005

/s/ John Reyes
--------------------------------------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    November 9, 2005


                                   Exhibit 32
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

R.J.W., : SEALED CASE

Petitioner :

:

v. :

:

Department of Human Services, :

Respondent : No. 836 C.D. 2015

O R D E R

NOW, July 5, 2016, upon consideration of petitioner’s application for 

reargument en banc, the application is denied.

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
From: The District Court of the 8th Judicial District. County of Cascade.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JOSEPH HENDERSON, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. CDC-08-225 DECISION

On November 25, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to five (5) years in the Montana State Prison, for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, for the offense of Failure of Violent Offender to *31Provide Notice of Address Change, a felony. The Court recommended that he be re-evaluated for chemical dependency, and if indicated, that he be phased into Coxmections-Corrections at some point.

On May 7, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 7th day of May, 2009.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from National
Property Investors 4 1997 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000318508
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,495)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         19,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,625
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,229
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    500
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.25<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Ivey Walton et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Submitted September 14, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 57 AD3d 1180.

Motion by the Sentencing Project et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
#### Daniel M. ANDREOLA, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James E. DOYLE, Matthew J. Frank, Secretary, Cindy O’Donnell, Security Chief, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-3904.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 23, 2008.*

Decided Jan. 24, 2008.

Daniel M. Andreola, Sr., Oregon, WI, pro se.

David E. Hoel, Office of the Attorney General, Wisconsin Department of Justice, Madison, WI, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge, Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

*

 This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f).

Order

In 2006 we held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Daniel Andreola interlocutory relief on his claim that state prison officials failed to provide him with a diet that met his specifications of Kosher preparation. No. 05-1931 (7th Cir. Feb. 22, 2006) (unpublished order). We also held that further proceedings were required to resolve plaintiffs claim under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1.

The district court then conducted a jury trial. The first question in the special-verdict form was whether Andreola holds a sincere religious belief in Judaism. The jury’s negative answer ended the case. On appeal, Andreola insists that the evidence on this issue favors him, but, unless no reasonable person could have taken the jury’s view, the verdict must stand. The district court observed that Andreola conceded that, before his imprisonment, “he had regularly eaten at fast food restaurants and other nonkosher establishments”. Moreover, “Andreola did not testify and personally affirm his religious faith”. Although Andreola asserts that the jury instruction on this point was deficient, he does not identify any error (and at all events did not object before the instruction was given).

Although Andreola contends that the district judge was biased against him, his only basis is the judge’s remark—after the jury had returned its verdict—that the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act “isn’t intended as a get rich scheme for prisoners who feel them rights are being violated”. That statement is a correct proposition of law and does not demonstrate any form of prejudgment. See *Liteky v. United States,*510 U.S. 540, 114 S.Ct. 1147, 127 L.Ed.2d 474 (1994).

*936Andreola’s other arguments are beside the point, given the jury’s verdict, and need not be discussed.

Affirmed.
---



EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arthur D. Levinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.                                                    | 
| | ------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                    |                                                                                  | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 3, 2003 | 

I, Louis J. Lavigne, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ Louis J. Lavigne, Jr.                                                                       | 
| | ------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                    |                                                                                                 | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | Louis J. Lavigne, Jr.
Executive Vice President and 
   Chief Financial Officer
November 3, 2003 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Genentech, Inc. and will be retained by Genentech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Scott Steuber, Appellant, v Home Properties, Inc., et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[965 NYS2d 636]

Mercure, J.P

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 4, 2012, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related injury to his thoracic spine and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant applied for workers’ compensation benefits after falling at work in March 2010, and his claim was established for injuries to his back, left knee and left hip. While claimant had degenerative changes throughout his spine, he further injured his lumbar spine as a result of the initial accident. Claimant thereafter underwent thoracic spine surgery in 2011, and the employer and its workers’ compensation carrier objected to paying for the surgery upon the ground that it was not causally connected to his claim. The Workers’ Compensation Board ultimately agreed, and claimant now appeals.

We affirm. There is no dispute that claimant had a degenerative condition in his thoracic spine that did not become symptomatic as a result of the initial accident. While claimant’s orthopedic surgeon testified that the condition became symptomatic as a result of later falls that were consequential to claimant’s initial accident, an independent medical examiner who evaluated claimant disagreed. Specifically, the examiner not only found claimant’s thoracic condition to be unrelated to the compensable accident, but opined that his subsequent falls were not caused by the injuries sustained in that accident. Moreover, claimant’s orthopedist admitted that his thoracic condition might have become symptomatic even in the absence of any physical trauma. Thus, the Board credited the examiner’s opinion and, deferring to that assessment of credibility, we find substantial evidence in the record to support the determination *(see Matter of Franco v Peckham Indus., Inc.,*91 AD3d 997, 997-998 [2012], *lv denied*18 NY3d 810 [2012]; *Matter of Kot v Beth Ameth Home Attendant Serv.,*70 AD3d 1114, 1115 [2010]; *Mat*
      *1309
      *ter of Banner v Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc.,*59 AD3d 759, 760 [2009]).

Claimant’s remaining contentions have been examined and found to lack merit.

Spain, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Ordered that the

decision is affirmed, without costs.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-22-00120-CV

IN RE MARCIE LYNN DUTSCHMANN SCHRECK

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-3814-5

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In her petition for writ of mandamus filed on April 26, 2022, relator, Marcie Lynn 

Dutschmann Schreck, seeks to compel certain actions by the Honorable Vicki L. Menard, 

Judge of the 414th District Court, and McLennan County District Clerk Jon R. Gimble. 

After review, we deny relator’s April 26, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus as to Judge 

Menard.1

1

In light of our disposition of this proceeding, the Court withdraws its request for a response. 

Furthermore, all pending motions are dismissed as moot.
In re Schreck Page 2

With regard to the district clerk, we dismiss relator’s April 26, 2022 petition for 

writ of mandamus. See In re Smith, 263 S.W.3d 93, 95 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 

2006, orig. proceeding) (noting that appellate courts do not have jurisdiction to issue a 

writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless such is necessary to enforce the 

jurisdiction of the appellate court); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)-(b).

STEVE SMITH

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson,

and Justice Smith

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed May 11, 2022

[OT06]
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Javo Beverage Company, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Cody C.
      Ashwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
      to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
      knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Cody C. AshwellCody
                C. Ashwell
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              March
                16, 2007





[A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Javo Beverage Company, Inc. and will be retained by Javo Beverage Company,
      Inc.
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.]
Certification


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350




Pursuant
to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Si Mei Te Food Limited (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.




Date:
      July 15, 2009
                        By:
                        /s/
      Wang YouliWang
      YouliChief
      Executive Officer and Chairman
                          (Principal
      Executive
Officer)





Date:
      July 15, 2009
                      By:
                      /s/
      Hu YeHu
      YeChief
      Financial Officer
                        (Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002), I, the undersigned President and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of FullNet Communications, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 29, 2004
    
    /s/ Roger P. Baresel,President and Chief Financial andAccounting Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Freshwater Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Max Weissengruber, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 14, 2011








/s/ Max Weissengruber


Max Weissengruber


President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          13,428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,974
<INVENTORY>                                      1,353
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,157
<PP&E>                                           2,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                     942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,075
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           117
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,235)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,961
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,589
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,381
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,488)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>