alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 15.1


May 10, 2000


The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Genentech, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment Plan, the 1999
Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option
Plan, the 1990 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, and the 1991 Employee Stock
Plan and in the related prospectuses, as applicable, contained in such
Registration Statements of our report dated April 10, 2000 relating to the
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Genentech,
Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2000.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants
within the meaning of section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.


Very truly yours,




/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
--------------------------
   Ernst & Young LLP
EX-4.4



 EXHIBIT 4.4 

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT 
 OF 

COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC. 

THESE ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Columbia Banking System, Inc., a Washington corporation,
are executed and delivered for filing in accordance with the provisions of Section 23B.10.060 of the Washington Business Corporation Act: 
  

	 	1.	The name of the Corporation is Columbia Banking System, Inc. 

  

	 	2.	Section 4.1 of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the corporation is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


Section 4.1        The aggregate number of shares that the corporation shall have
authority to issue is 115,000,000 common shares with no par value (hereinafter referred to as “the common stock”) and 2,000,000 preferred shares with no par value (hereinafter referred to as “the preferred stock”). The preferred
stock is senior to the common stock, and the common stock is subject to the rights and preferences of the preferred stock as provided in the following section. 
  

	 	3.	The above amendment was adopted by the Board of Directors of the corporation on February 25, 2015. 

  

	 	4.	Shareholder approval of the above amendment was required, and the above amendment was duly approved by the shareholders of the corporation on April 22, 2015, in accordance with Section 23B.10.030 and
Section 23B.10.040 of the Washington Business Corporation Act. 

 DATED and effective this
22nd day of April, 2015. 
  

			
	COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.
		
	By	 	/s/ MELANIE J. DRESSEL
		 	 Melanie J. Dressel
 President and Chief
Executive Officer
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0474

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANDREW LEWIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including May 28, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file the 

State’s response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 21 2020

04/21/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0474
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Mike HP Kwon, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Axesstel, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 3, 2005
#### In the Matter of Ivey Walton et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

Submitted September 14, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 57 AD3d 1180.

Motion by the Legal Aid Society for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted only to the extent that the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                        CURRENT SUBSIDIARIES OF TRIZETTO

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

               ENTITY NAME                                      JURISDICTION
-------------------------------------------------             -----------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Creative Business Solutions, Inc.                                    Texas

Erisco, Inc.                                                       New York

Finserv Health Care Systems, Inc.                                  New York

Healthcare Media Enterprises, Inc.                                 Delaware

      Healthcare Media Private Limited                               India

HealthWeb, Inc.                                                    Delaware

Margolis Health Enterprises, Inc.                                 California

Novalis Corporation                                                Delaware

      Digital Insurance Systems Corporation                          Ohio

      Health Networks of America, Inc.                             Maryland

      Novalis Development Corporation                              Delaware

      Novalis Development & Licensing Corporation                   Indiana

      Novalis Services Corporation                                 Delaware

Resource Information Management Systems, Inc.                      Illinois

      Option Services Group, Inc.                                  Illinois


      Winthrop Financial Group, Inc.                               Illinois

TriZetto Application Services, Inc.                                Colorado
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        47,024,952
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       49,025,464
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   4,861,816
<MORTGAGE>                                   9,151,866
<REAL-ESTATE>                                7,580,197
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              76,222,978
<CASH>                                         984,448
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       4,474,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             128,179,369
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             75,470,630
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 756,503
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,861,183
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             11,684,809
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,706,670
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,283,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               128,179,369
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,558,065
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,844,154
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              36,046
<OTHER-INCOME>                               4,369,160
<BENEFITS>                                   1,564,227
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    296,527
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                614,165
<INCOME-TAX>                                   135,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            478,910
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   478,910
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

**Certification   Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18  U.S.C. 1350) the undersigned General Partners of TASA Products  Limited, a Washington limited partnership (the "Company"), do  hereby certify, to the best of such General Partner's knowledge and belief, that:

 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ MICHEL E. MAES Michel E. MaesCo-General Partner                       Date: 8-5-10 | /s/JAMES R. STEFFEYJames R. SteffeyCo-General PartnerDate: 8-5-10 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin McIntosh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date: November 14, 2002 | By: | /s/ KEVIN MCINTOSH                                                                                                                 
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |     |                                                                                                                                    
|                        |     | Kevin McIntosh Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 10.81


 





AMENDMENT NO. 1 


TO TWINLAB CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS INC.
WARRANT NO. 2015-16


 


This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”)
to Twinlab Consolidated Holdings, Inc. Warrant No. 2015-16 (the “Warrant”) is made and entered as of this 14th day
of August, 2015 (the “Effective Date”) by and among TWINLAB CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS, INC., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) and the DAVID L. VAN ANDEL TRUST, UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 30, 1993 (the “Holder”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company issued the Warrant
to the Holder on June 2, 2015; and


 


WHEREAS, Company and Holder wish
to amend the terms of the Warrant as set forth herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable
consideration the sufficiency of which are hereby expressly acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.       Section 3.3.3 of the Warrant is hereby
deleted in its entirety.


 


2.       Section 5.3 of the Warrant is hereby
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“Amendments and Waivers. Any provision
of this Warrant may be amended or waived, but only pursuant to a written agreement signed by the Company and the Holder.”


 


3.       Schedule 3.3.3 of the Warrant is hereby
deleted in its entirety.


 


4.       Except as expressly modified by this
Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect.


 


5.       This Amendment may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed to be one and the same instrument.
A signed, including electronically signed, copy of this Amendment delivered by facsimile, email (for example in a .pdf, .tif or
..jpeg format), or other means or electronic transmission shall be deemed to be legally binding upon the party so delivering such
signature and of the same legal force and effect as delivery of an original signature upon this Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned
has executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date written above.


 


 





	DAVID L. VAN
    ANDEL TRUST, UNDER	TWINLAB CONSOLIDATED
	TRUST AGREEMENT
    DATED 11/30/93	HOLDINGS, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/
    David L. Van Andel	 	/s/
    Thomas Tolworthy	 
	By: 	David L. Van Andel	 	By:	Thomas Tolworthy	 
	Title:	Trustee	 	Title:	CEO
#### Robert C. KONOP, Appellant, and Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, Creditor, v. HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC., Reorganized Debtor—Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 03-00817, Appellee, and Joshua Gotbaum and Office of the U.S. Trustee, Trustees.

No. 08-16128.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*261Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Oct. 27, 2010.

Robert C. Konop, Playa Del Rey, CA, pro se.

Chuck C. Choi, Esquire, Wagner, Choi *&*Evers, Honolulu, HI, Brett H. Miller, Esquire, Otterbourg Steindler Houston & Rosen, James H. Millar, Esquire, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Lisa G. Beckerman, Esquire, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer *&*Feld, LLP, New York, NY, Sydney P. Levinson, Esquire, Joshua M. Mester, Hennigan Bennett *&*Dorman, LLP, David P. Simonds, Esquire, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Ronald W. Goldberg, Esquire, Orrick Herrington *&*Sutcliffe, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Tom E. Roesser, Esquire, Carlsmith Ball LLP, Nicholas C. Dreher, Esquire, Cades, Schutte, Fleming *&*Wright, Charles H. Hurd, Esquire, Hurd & Luria, Curtis B. Ching, Office of the United States Trustee, Honolulu, HI, Jonathan B. Hill, Esquire, Dow Lohnes PLLC, Washington, DC, Garry Cedric Pritchard, Esquire, Emil Ford *&*Co., Sydney P. Levinson, Esquire, Charles J. Moll, Esquire, Morrison *&*Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA, Tom E. Roesser, Esquire, for Appellee and Trustees.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Konop’s motion to have oral argument held in Pasadena, California, is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Robert C. Konop appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying Konop’s motion to amend or clarify his proof of claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review decisions of the bankruptcy court independently without deference to the district court’s determinations. *Leichty v. Neary (In re Strand),*375 F.3d 854, 857 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not clearly err by finding that Konop’s proof of claim did not include a request for equitable relief because the claim summary focused on monetary damages and included only a single, past-tense reference to equitable relief. *See Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Justus (In re Kaypro),*218 F.3d 1070, 1073 (9th Cir.2000) (bankruptcy court’s findings of fact are reviewed for clear error). Further, the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by denying Konop’s motion to amend the proof of claim as untimely. *See Roberts Farms Inc. v. Bultman (In re Roberts Farms),*980 F.2d 1248, 1251 (9th Cir.1992).

Konop’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Konop’s request for judicial notice is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2547 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to extend funding 

for special diabetes programs for Indians. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2023 

Mr. COLE (for himself and Mr. RUIZ) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to 

extend funding for special diabetes programs for Indians. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Diabetes Pro5 gram for Indians Reauthorization Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENDING FUNDING FOR SPECIAL DIABETES PRO7 GRAMS FOR INDIANS. 

8 Section 330C(c)(2) of the Public Health Service Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 254c–3(c)(2)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2547 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

4 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(E) $150,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

8 2024 through 2028, to remain available until 

9 expended.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 STATE/JURISDICTION OFINCORPORATION/
    
    NAME UNDER WHICHNAME OF SUBSIDIARY
    
    ORGANIZATION
    
    BUSINESS IS CONDUCTEDQuicksilver Gas Services Operating LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Quicksilver Gas Services Operating LLCQuicksilver Gas Services Operating GP LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Quicksilver Gas Services Operating GP LLCCowtown Gas Processing Partners L.P.
    
    Texas
    
    Cowtown Gas Processing Partners L.P.Cowtown Pipeline Partners L.P.
    
    Texas
    
    Cowtown Pipeline Partners L.P.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 

 

May 29, 2018 

d0521 

Order 

 

Clerk 

May 29, 2018 

156125 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 156125 

 COA: 337839 

Wayne CC: 09-006214-FC 

BURRELL CLARK, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 16, 2017 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.