alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION





Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Robert A. Doak,  President,  CEO,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of
Mountains West Exploration, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10QSB of the Company  for the period  ended
June 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         Dated:  July 7, 2004           Officer:   Robert A. Doak

                                        Name:       /s/ Robert A. Doak
                                                    ----------------------------
                                        Position:  President, CEO
#### Ceferina Gayo HESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LANDER UNIVERSITY; Daniel W. Ball, President; Robin R. Agnew, The Board of Trustees; Ann B. Bowen, The Board of Trustees; Bobby M. Bowers, The Board of Trustees; C. Tyrone Gilmore, The Board of Trustees; Finis E. Horne, The Board of Trustees; Maurice Holloway, The Board of Trustees; Raymond D. Hunt, The Board of Trustees; J. Thomas Kinard, The Board of Trustees; Glenn J. Lawhon, Jr., The Board of Trustees; Mammie W. Nicholson, The Board of Trustees; Anthony Noury, The Board of Trustees; Sally E. Self, The Board of Trustees; George R. Starnes, The Board of Trustees; Fred Thrailkill, The Board of Trustees; S. Anne Walker, The Board of Trustees; Ricci Land, The Board of Trustees; M. Craig White, The Board of Trustees; Susan C. Going; Larry A. Jackson; William T. Martin; Timothy L. Snyder; Aron G. Tannenbaum; Frieder-ike Wiedemann, Defendants-Appel-lees.

No. 06-1341.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 19, 2006.

*457Ceferina Gayo Hess, Appellant Pro Se. Vance J. Bettis, Gignilliat, Savitz & Bettis, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

Ceferina Gayo Hess appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Hess’ civil action concerning her discharge from Lander University. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Hess v. Lander Univ.,*No. 8:04-cv-01474-GRA, 2006 WL 406688 (D.S.C. Feb. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Sellers v. Ochs

Case below: 180 N.C. App. 332

No. 630P06

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-235)

Denied 01/25/07
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3641 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain woven fabrics of cotton, 

containing less than 85 percent by weight of cotton. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2006 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mrs. CLINTON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain woven fabrics 

of cotton, containing less than 85 percent by weight 

of cotton. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOVEN FABRICS OF COTTON, CON4 TAINING LESS THAN 85 PERCENT BY WEIGHT 

5 OF COTTON. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•S 3641 IS 

‘‘ 9902.52.10 Woven fabrics of cotton, containing less 

than 85 percent by weight of cotton, 

mixed mainly or solely with man-made fibers, weighing not more than 200 g/m2, 

the foregoing bleached and other than 

plain weave fabrics or 3-thread or 4- 

thread twill (including cross twill) fabrics 

(provided for in subheading 5210.29) ..... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
663 A.2d 1348

#### MYSTIC ISLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ET AL. v. PERSKIE AND NEHMAD, ET AL. AND WEYMOUTH TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, ET AL.

January 11, 1995.

ORDER

Leave to appeal is granted.
From: The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES RYAN, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-07-450 AMENDED JUDGMENT AND COMMITMENT

On February 24, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with ten (10) years suspended, for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence for the offense of Count I: Criminal Possession of Dangerous Drugs With Intent to Distribute, a felony.

*92On November 12, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

The Defendant having been duly informed of the amended judgment and commitment, and having waived his right to appear before the undersigned for this pronouncement of sentence, whereupon,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the sentence shall be modified to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a term of twenty (20) years, with fifteen (15) years suspended. The terms and conditions shall remain as imposed in the Judgment of February 24, 2009.

DATED this 17th day of December, 2009.

Hon. Laurie McKinnon, District Court Judge
#### Robert E. Judge, Appellant, v New York College of Professional Health, Respondent.

Submitted June 15, 2009;

decided September 8, 2009

Reported below, 2008 NY Slip Op 68025(U); 2008 NY Slip Op 82157(U); 2008 NY Slip Op 88405(0).

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5601). Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie *(see*CPLR 5602). Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### Robert STROUD, Petitioner, v. J. A. MAYDEN and R. S. Nicholas, Respondents.

Civ. A. No. 13564-4.

United States District Court W. D. Missouri, W. D.

July 6, 1964.

Stanley A. Furman, Beverly Hills, Cal., English & MacDowell, by Richard M. English, Lynwood, Cal., Charles D. Martin, Springfield, Mo., for petitioner.

F. Russell Millin, U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., Eugene N. Barkin, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondents.

BECKER, District Judge.

In this petition for habeas corpus, the petitioner, a federal prisoner, sought relief from interference with his alleged right to publish and sell his literary writings. The petition was heard on the issues raised by an order to show cause, and response thereto. Among the compositions of the petitioner was a six-volume history of the prison system of the United States. On order of Court a photocopy of this history was made and impounded under seal in the office of the Clerk of this Court.

Before the final judgment in this cause, the petitioner died. Thereupon the claim of illegal personal restraint and other personal complaints became moot.

As previously stated from the Bench,, it was ruled that:

> “In cases of this character, the petition for habeas corpus will be considered as giving jurisdiction to the Court to give relief other than release from detention, or, if counsel desires so to designate, it will be considered as a petition for an injunction, as well as a petition for habeas corpus.” (Tr. 4.)

See also Harris v. Settle (C.A. 8) 322: F.2d 908.

Now petitioner’s counsel Stanley A. Furman moves for an order substituting1 himself for the prisoner in his capacity as Executor of the Last Will and Testament of the prisoner, having been appointed by the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. The counsel and executor cites for authority Rule 25(a) (1) F.R.Civ.P.; Barnes Coal Corp. v. Retail Coal Merchants Ass’n (C.A. 4), 128 F.2d 645, 648; Schreiber v. Sharpless, 110 U.S. 76, 3 S.Ct. 423, 28 L.Ed. 65; and Kirk v. Commissioner (C.A. 1), 179 F.2d 619, 15 A.L.R.2d 1031.

*379These authorities do not support the motion. This petition for habeas corpus was entertained as an action to restrain allegedly illegal personal restraints and mistreatment of petitioner. With the death of petitioner this action becomes moot and abates.

Furthermore the movant has not qualified under the applicable Missouri statutes to claim the property of the deceased petitioner.

The photocopy of the composition will be held by the Clerk until an appropriate proceeding is commenced by a qualified party. In the meantime, it is hereby

Ordered that the composition of the prisoner be retained by the Clerk until further order of Court. It is further

Ordered that this cause be, and it is hereby, dismissed as moot without prejudice to rights of property in the impounded composition or the original.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3704 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require staff working 

with developmentally disabled individuals to call emergency services in 

the event of a life-threatening situation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 20, 2006 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to require 

staff working with developmentally disabled individuals 

to call emergency services in the event of a life-threatening situation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Danielle’s Act’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 3704 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF STAFF WORKING WITH DEVEL2 OPMENTALLY DISABLED INDIVIDUALS TO 

3 CALL EMERGENCY SERVICES IN THE EVENT 

4 OF A LIFE-THREATENING SITUATION. 

5 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Section 1902(a) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (69), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

8 end; 

9 (2) in paragraph (70), by striking the period at 

10 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (3) by inserting after paragraph (70) the fol12 lowing new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(71) provide, in accordance with regulations of 

14 the Secretary, that direct care staff providing 

15 health-related services to a individual with a develop16 mental disability or traumatic brain injury are re17 quired to call the 911 emergency telephone service 

18 or equivalent emergency management service for as19 sistance in the event of a life-threatening emergency 

20 to such individual and to report such call to the ap21 propriate State agency or department.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 subsection (a) take effect on January 1, 2007. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Diane Word, Appellant, v Superintendent of Bedford Hills Correctional Facility et al., Respondents.

Decided May 12, 2009

Appeal transferred, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, to the Appellate Division, Second Department, upon the ground that a direct appeal does not lie when questions other than the constitutional validity of a statutory provision are involved (NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [2]; § 5 [b]; CPLR 5601 [b] [2]).
EX-35.5
(logo) Wilshire



March 7, 2008


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
Attn: Servicer Compliance Team

Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.
250 Vesey Street
4 World Financial Center, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10080
Attn: Ketan Parekh


Wilshire Credit Corporation

Payments
P.O. Box 105344; Atlanta, GA 30348-5344
or P.O. Box 7195; Pasadena, CA 91109-7195

Correspondence
P.O. Box 8517; Portland, OR 97207-8517

Phone
(503) 952-7947
(888) 502-0100

Fax
(503) 952-7476

Web Site
www.wcc.ml.com


Re: Annual Officer's Certificate
    (Wilshire Pool 1603) The Reconstituted Servicing Agreement dated as of
    March 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc.,
    (the "Depositor") and Wilshire Credit Corporation, (the "Servicer") under
    the Merrill Lynch Alternative Note Asset Trust Series 2007-F1, Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A., (the "Master Servicer")

I, Ken Frye, Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing, Wilshire Credit
Corporation, (the "Servicer"), hereby certify that:

(1) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the preceding calendar
    year and of the performance of the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing
    Agreement (the "Servicing Agreement") has been made under my supervision;
    and

(2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
    fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
    respects throughout such year or a portion thereof.


WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, SERVICER


Certified By: /s/ Ken Frye
Name: Ken Frye
Title: Senior Vice President, Loan Servicing
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC REPORT
  Each of
the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of Global Gold Corporation (the
"Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that:
  (1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending September 30,
2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
  (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Date:
      November 19,
      2009
                /s/
      Van Z. Krikorian
                  Van
      Z. Krikorian
                  Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
   Date:
      November 19, 2009
                /s/ Jan E. Dulman
                  Jan
      E. Dulman
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
  
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Eugenia Brennan Heslin, as Administrator of the Estate of Egypt A. Phillips, Deceased, Appellant, v County of Greene et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Submitted July 13, 2009;

decided September 17, 2009

Reported below, 53 AD3d 996.

Motion, insofar as it seeks to strike the brief and appendix of the County of Greene Department of Social Services and County of Greene Child Protective Services, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks to expand the record to include the responsive documentation submitted by appellant, granted; motion, insofar as it seeks an enlargement of time to submit a reply brief, denied.
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      May 15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ George R.      Quist                   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | George      R. Quist                                                                                                                 |
|                     |   | Chairman      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer                                                                               |

----
PETER CHARLES

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2452

__________ ___________________/

Opinion filed January 3, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James O. Shelfer , Judge

.

Peter Charles, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Attorney

General, Tall ahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., WOLF and B.L. THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000319697
<NAME>                        BULL RUN
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           286,520
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,698,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                      98,000
<INVENTORY>                                    5,079,133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10,244,227
<PP&E>                                         5,064,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,197,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                86,711,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,070,363
<BONDS>                                       50,704,699
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         225,917
<OTHER-SE>                                    26,254,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  86,711,450
<SALES>                                        6,613,545
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,615,675
<CGS>                                          4,969,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,969,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 554,535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  27,315
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,032,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,234,053)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (421,172)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,083,012)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,083,012)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.05)
        

</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17 -773V Filed: February 22, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

CARLOS ORDUZ

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for
petitioner. Linda Sara Renzi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On June 12, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that his receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on September 20, 2016, caused him to suffer a right-sided shoulder injury related to

v accine administration (“SIRVA”) . Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 22, 2018

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

eas e of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that the Division of Injury Compensation Programs, Department of Health a nd Human Services (“DICP”) “ has concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA, as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table. ” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that “petitioner’s pain occurred within 48 hours of receipt of an intramuscular vaccination, pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered, and no other condition or abnormality was identified to explain his shoulder pain ”

. Id.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3716 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3716

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New York, as the ``Captain George A. 
                      Wood Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2006

 Mrs. Clinton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New York, as the ``Captain George A. 
                      Wood Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN GEORGE A. WOOD POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 100 Pitcher Street in Utica, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Captain George A. Wood Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Captain 
George A. Wood Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```