alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


SECTION 906 SARBANES OXLEY CERTIFICATION


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of New Century  Companies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
Duquette,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




August 14, 2006                        /s/ David Duquette
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Name:  David Duquette
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required  by Section  906 has been  provided  to Company and will be retained by
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before STEPHENS, DEERWESTER, and STARITA Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Daniel Q. MARTINEZ Corporal (E

- 4 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 2020000264
Decided: 31 March 2021 Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge : Nicholas S. Henry
Senten ce adjudged 28 August 2020 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune , North Carolin a, consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 6 months , and a bad

- conduct discharge. For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Michael D. Berry , USMCR For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.United States v. Martinez , NMCCA No. 202000264 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have dete rmined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 17, 2008   | By:    | /s/                William M. Lynes                                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          |   | William                M. LynesChief                Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board(Principal                Executive Officer) |

----
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, DC 20549

Form 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE
ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of March 2004

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc.(Translation of Registrants Name Into English)

Canadian Pacific Tower, Ste 1600, 100 Wellington Street W., Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, Canada
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)

|           |  |           
|---------- |  | ----------
|Form 20-Fo |  | Form 40-Fþ

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.)

|     |  |    
|---- |  | ---
|Yeso |  | Noþ

(If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-.)

This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant: Form S-8 No. 333-13960.



Page 1 of 2 Pages
Exhibits Index appears on Page 3





---



##### 



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|      |  |               |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                              
|----- |  | ------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |               |  |     |  | FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
                         (Registrant)                                                                         
|     
|     
|Date: |  | March 4, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Terence P. BadourName:  Terence P. Badour
Title:    Executive Vice President, Law and Administration
             and Corporate Secretary





---



##### 



Exhibits Index

The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form 6-K.

|            |  |                                                                                
|----------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description of Exhibits                                                        
|            |  |                                                                                
|99.1        |  | Fairmont Hotels
& Resorts Inc. To Present At JMP Securities Research Conference
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mountains West Exploration, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").
I, Denis Iler, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                         /s/ Denis Iler
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Denis Iler, President
Dated: October 14, 2005
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Rafael HERNANDEZ-URIBE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41849.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public *663Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Rafael Hernandez-Uribe appeals his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). In his sole issue on appeal, Hernandez-Uribe argues that § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury is unconstitutional in light of *Ap-prendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348,147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Hernandez-Uribe’s constitutional challenge to § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Hernandez-Uribe contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Hernandez-Uribe properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
----

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | By:              | /s/ ARTHUR                D. LEVINSON                                                                    |   |
|--------|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:Title:Date: | Arthur                D. Levinson, Ph.D.Chief                Executive OfficerOctober                30, 2006 |   |

|   | By:                    | /s/ DAVID                A. EBERSMAN                                                                                                                           |   |
|--------|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:Title: Date: | David                A. EbersmanExecutive                Vice President and    Chief                Financial OfficerOctober                30, 2006 |   |

----
ex_4-5.htm


    


      
        

        

      

       

      EXHIBIT
        4.5

      


       

      ULURU
        Inc.

       

      FIRST
        AMENDMENT

      TO
        THE

      2006
        EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

       

       

      WHEREAS,
        2,000,000 shares of Common
        Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of ULURU Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
        “Company”), are currently reserved under the Company’s 2006 Equity
        Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and

      


      WHEREAS,
        the stockholders of the
        Company voted on May 8, 2007 during the Company’s annual stockholders meeting to
        approve and authorize this First Amendment to the Plan, pursuant to which
        the
        number of shares reserved under the Plan shall be increased as set forth
        herein.

      


      NOW
        THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby
        amended as follows:

      


      
        	
                 

              	
                In
                  Section 1.3 of the Plan, the number “2,000,000” is hereby deleted and
                  replaced with the number
“6,000,000.”

              


      

      


      Except
        as
        expressly set forth above, all of the terms and provisions of the Plan shall
        remain in full force and effect and all references to the Plan shall hereinafter
        be deemed to be references to the Plan as amended by this First
        Amendment.

       

      


       

      
        	 	
                /s/
                  Terrance K. Wallberg

              	 
	 	
                Terrance
                  K. Wallberg

              
	 	
                Vice
                  President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary &
                  Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50212

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EDGAR IVAN GALVAN, also known as El Negro,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-3172-2

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Edgar Ivan Galvan has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Galvan has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant 

parts of the record reflected therein, as well as Galvan’s response. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 8, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50212 Document: 00513868418 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/08/2017
No. 16-50212

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50212 Document: 00513868418 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/08/2017
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2550 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2550

  To extend funding for Special Diabetes Programs for Type I diabetes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2023

 Ms. DeGette (for herself and Mr. Bilirakis) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend funding for Special Diabetes Programs for Type I diabetes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Special Diabetes Program 
Reauthorization Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAMS FOR TYPE I DIABETES.

    Section 330B(b)(2)(D) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254c-2(b)(2)(D)) is amended by striking ``2018 through 2023'' and 
inserting ``2018 through 2028''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In re: PARAGON TRADE BRANDS, INC., Debtor. Weyerhaeuser Company, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randall Lambert, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-14729.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 27, 2008.

Emmet J. Bondurant, Bondurant, Mix-son & Elmore, Atlanta, GA, Joel N. Bo-dansky, Louis D. Peterson, Michael R. Scott, Timothy D. Benedict, Hillis Clark Martin & Peterson, P.S., Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Richard H. Caldwell, John A. Lee, Andrews & Kurth, LLP, Houston, TX, Charles E. Campbell, Mckenna, Long *&*Aldridge, Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and BUCKLEW,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable Susan C. Bucklew, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

After reviewing the record and briefs in this case, and having the benefit of oral argument, we affirm the judgment of the district court based on its comprehensive and well-reasoned order and opinion of September 26, 2007, 2007 WL 2826957.

AFFIRMED.
#### Jane Doe et al., Respondents, v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester et al., Appellants.

Submitted May 4, 2009;

decided June 11, 2009

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see 12*NY3d 764 (2009)].
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 11

                              BULL RUN CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
           (Dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts)


                                                          THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                MARCH 31
                                                            1997       1996

PRIMARY:
     Income before cumulative effect of
       accounting change                                  $  20    $    49
     Cumulative effect of accounting change                           (274)
                                                          -----       ----
     Net income (loss)                                    $  20     $ (225)
                                                             ==       ====

Primary shares:
     Weighted average number of shares
       outstanding                                       21,363     22,123
     Assuming exercise of options                           896        990
                                                        -------    -------
     Weighted average number of shares
       outstanding, as adjusted                          22,259     23,113
                                                         ======     ======

Primary earnings per share:
     Income before cumulative effect of
       accounting change                                 $  .00     $  .00
     Cumulative effect of accounting change                           (.01)
                                                         ------       ----
     Net income (loss)                                   $  .00     $ (.01)
                                                           ====       ====



ASSUMING FULL DILUTION:
     Income before cumulative effect of
       accounting change and extraordinary item           $  20    $    49
     Cumulative effect of accounting change                           (274)
                                                          -----       ----
     Net income (loss)                                    $  20     $ (225)
                                                             ==       ====

Fully diluted shares:
     Weighted average number of shares
       outstanding                                       21,363     22,123
     Assuming exercise of options                           896        990
                                                        -------    -------
     Weighted average number of shares
       outstanding, as adjusted                          22,259     23,113
                                                         ======     ======

Fully diluted earnings per share:
     Income before cumulative effect of
       accounting change                                 $  .00     $  .00
     Cumulative effect of accounting change                           (.01)
                                                         ------       ----
     Net income (loss)                                   $  .00     $ (.01)
                                                           ====       ====
From: The District Court of the 3rd Judicial District. County of Powell.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JAMES A. WHITTINGTON, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-08-32 DECISION

On December 16, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a term of six (6) years, with four (4) years suspended. The Court recommends the Defendant be placed in the Connections Corrections Program and then in the Pre-Release Program.

On May 7, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was represented by Lewis Smith.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 7th day of May, 2009.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.
Exhibit 21.1
 LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OFNAME OF SUBSIDIARY
    
    INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATIONHeartWare Pty. Limited (formerly HeartWare Limited) (1)
    
    AustraliaHeartWare, Inc. (2)
    
    DelawareHeartWare GmbH (3)
    
    GermanyHeartWare (UK) Limited (4)
    
    United Kingdom
 
 (1)
    
    100% owned by HeartWare International, Inc.(2)
    
    100% owned by HeartWare Pty. Limited(3)
    
    100% owned by HeartWare, Inc.(4)
    
    100% owned by HeartWare, Inc.
<PAGE>
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED BUSINESS VALUATOR

We consent to the reference to our company under the caption "Experts" and to
the use of our valuation recommendation report dated November 3, 2004 with
respect to the valuation analysis of the fair market value of certain net
assets of OccuLogix, Inc.

                                                 /s/ Peter Ott & Associates Inc.

Toronto, Canada
December, 2004