alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Form Amendment Number One to the Deferred Compensation Agreement


 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE 
 DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT 
 WHEREAS, Carmike Cinemas, Inc. (“Employer”) and
                     (“Employee”) entered into a Deferred Compensation Agreement dated
                     (“Deferred Compensation Agreement”) pursuant to which Employer agreed to provide certain retirement, death and
disability benefits to Employee; 
 WHEREAS, Employer and Employee desire to amend the Deferred Compensation Agreement at this time to
amend the contribution formula under the Deferred Compensation Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2007; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for
consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Deferred Compensation Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. The
second sentence of paragraph (a) of Article I of the Deferred Compensation Agreement is amended to read as follows: 
 In addition,
for the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 1998, and within forty-five (45) days following the end of each succeeding calendar quarter, but subject to termination as described in paragraph (b) of this Article I or Article IV, Employer
shall make payments equal to ten percent (10%) of Employee’s Compensation (as such term is defined in paragraph (3) below) for such calendar quarter, in the following manner: 
 2. A new subparagraph (3) is added at the end of paragraph (a) of Article I as follows: 
 (3) For calendar quarters beginning with the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 1998 and ending with the calendar quarter ending on December 31,
2006, Compensation shall mean Employee’s taxable compensation for such calendar quarter (as same shall be reflected by Employer for the calendar year on Employee’s Form W-2 or Form 1099). For calendar quarters beginning on or after
January 1, 2007, Compensation shall mean Employee’s base salary and cash bonus received in such calendar quarter. For all calendar quarters beginning on or after January 1, 2007, no equity or equity-based compensation shall be taken
into account in determining Employee’s Compensation. 
 3. Paragraph (b) of Article I of the Deferred Compensation Agreement is amended to read
as follows: 
 (b) Termination of Contributions. Notwithstanding that Employee may continue to be employed by Employer or any other
provision of this Agreement to the contrary, payments by Employer, as required by paragraph (a) of Article I of this Agreement, shall cease as of the end of the calendar quarter immediately prior to the first date that benefits become
distributable from the Trust. 






 4. Except as amended by this Amendment Number One, the Deferred Compensation Agreement shall remain in effect as
written. 
 (Signatures on next page) 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer and Employee have executed this Amendment Number One this _____ day
of ________, 2007, to be effective as of January 1, 2007. 
  

			
		 	 CARMIKE CINEMAS, INC.:

		
		 	  

		 	 Its:

		
		 	 EMPLOYEE:
EXHIBIT 10.11

                        VECTOR SAFETY TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD.
   6F, No. 14, Kong Yeh 1st Road, Ping-Cheng City, Taoyuan County, Taiwan, ROC
        Tel. 886-3-4693530, Fax 886-3-4694743 Email neolite@ms7.hinet.net

MANDATE

                                                                 Date: 1999/3/25

ROC TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
MR. PATRICK ROCILLO


We hereby mandate Mr. Patrick Rocillo of M/S Roc Technologies Group, Address:
1088 Burgas Terrace Union City, CA 94587. Tel. 888-918-2972, Fax (510) 786-2673,
for our products (anti-infrared printed cloth, fire resistant fabrics, activated
carbon cloth) into North American Market, date from March 23, 1999 to March 25,
2001. If it is necessary that we will extend the date of mandate to next period.

VECTOR SAFETY TECHNOLOGY CO. LTD.
DIRECTOR:  Wen-Kai Hsu
           /s/ Wen Kai Hsu
           ----------------------------





                                                                              49
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2138 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

Postal Regulatory Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, Postal Regulatory Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, POSTAL REGU5 LATORY COMMISSION, SALARIES AND EX6 PENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Independent Agencies, Postal Regulatory ComVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:09 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2138.IH H2138

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2138 IH

1 mission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may 

2 not exceed $15,200,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  By:
    
    /s/ William G. Manias
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Robert G. PhillipsWilliams G. Manias
    
    
    
    
    
    Robert G. PhillipsSenior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    
    
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3673 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s footwear covering the 

ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2006 

Mr. CARPER (for himself and Mr. GREGG) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s footwear covering the ankle with coated or laminated textile 

fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR COVERING THE 

4 ANKLE WITH COATED OR LAMINATED TEX5 TILE FABRICS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3673 IS 

‘‘ 9902.64.11 Women’s footwear, except 

vulcanized footwear and 

footwear with waterproof 

molded bottoms, including 

bottoms comprising an outer 

sole and all or part of the 

upper, valued over $20/pair, 

covering the ankle, whose 

height from the bottom of 

the outer sole to the top of 

the upper does not exceed 8 

inches, designed to be worn 

in lieu of, but not over, other 

footwear as a protection 

against water, oil, grease or 

chemicals or cold or inclement weather where such protection includes protection 

against water that is imparted by the use of a coated or laminated textile fabric 

(provided in subheading 

6404.19.20) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wendell David WENEE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-30531.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*787Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 23, 2006.

Michelle R. Mallard Fax, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Pocatello, ID, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Steven V. Riehert, Esq., Federal Defenders Eastern Washington and Idaho, Pocatello, ID, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellant’s request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Wendell David Wenee appeals from the 42-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction for being in unlawful possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Wenee contends the sentence imposed was unreasonable because the district court failed to analyze adequately the factors enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 8553(a). However, a review of the record reveals that the sentence imposed for the offense was not unreasonable in light of Wenee’s criminal and personal history. *See United States v. Plouffe,*445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2314, 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006).

Wenee also contends the district court unreasonably imposed a sentence that ran partially consecutive to his state sentence. However, the district court’s imposition of a partially consecutive sentence is consistent with the Sentencing Guidelines’ policy that sentences be imposed consecutively to those imposed for revocation of state parole, and was therefore not unreasonable. *See*U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3, cmt. n. 3(C).

AFFIRMED.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### State v. Trujillo

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 609

No. 125P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-2)

Denied 05/03/07
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2720-2721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c) (4) and 552b(c) (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel NIAID Resource Related Research 
Projects (R24).
    Date: February 9, 2015.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Room 3F100, 5601 Fisher 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Raymond R. Schleef, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review, Program Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 5601 Fisher Lane, 
MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 240-669-5019, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#106373787c7575766262507e797179743e7e79783e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f1c0c07030a0a091d1d2f01060e060b4101060741080019">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology,

[[Page 2721]]

and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious 
Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 13, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-00660 Filed 1-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50622

Summary Calendar

 

JOHN A. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

(SA-94-CV-833)

 

March 13, 1996

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM and STEWART, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

John A. Thompson appeals the district court’s judgment

affirming the denial of social security disability benefits.

Thompson contends that the administrative law judge disregarded Dr.

Henke’s report and failed to give proper weight to evidence of his

alcoholism and psychological disorder and asked the vocational
2

expert a hypothetical question that did not incorporate all of his

disabilities.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and

we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment

for essentially the reasons given by the magistrate judge and the

district court.

AFFIRMED
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Total System Services, Inc. 

Board of Directors Compensation for Non-Employee Directors 

(Effective May 2015) 
  

					
	 Cash Compensation
	  			
		
	 Annual Board Retainer
	  	$	75,000	  
		
	 Annual Committee Member Retainers
	  			
		
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Technology Committee
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	  	$	7,500	  
		
	 Annual Committee Chair Retainers*
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	15,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Technology Committee
	  	$	10,000	  
	 Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	  	$	7,500	  
		
	 Annual Lead Director Retainer
	  	$	20,000	  

  

	*	Note: The committee chair receives both an annual committee member retainer and an annual committee chair retainer. 


Equity Compensation 
 Annual equity award with a
fixed value of $130,000, with 50% awarded in the form of fully vested stock options and 50% in the form of fully vested shares.
Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement - J. David Aronson



 EXHIBIT 10.6 
 EXECUTION VERSION 
 AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 Dated as of January 25, 2007 
 Reference
is made to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Original Agreement”), dated as of the Effective Date as defined therein, by and between Tube City IMS Corporation (the “Company”), a Delaware
corporation, and J. David Aronson (the “Executive”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Original Agreement. 
 For good and valuable consideration (including the promises set forth herein), the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, each of the
Company and Executive intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Amendment. 

  

	 	a.	The second sentence of Section 1. of the Original Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: “The number of shares of Restricted Stock
shall be equal to 14.70% of the total number of shares reserved for issuance under the Restricted Stock Plan on the Effective Date, which shall be equal to ten percent (10%) of the total number of shares of common stock of Buyer outstanding
upon the Closing, and such Restricted Stock shall be granted pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in the Restricted Stock Plan and a Restricted Stock Agreement (as defined in the Restricted Stock Plan).” 

  

	 	2.	Miscellaneous. Except as modified hereby, the provisions of the Original Agreement shall remain unmodified, and, subject to the amendments contained herein, the Original
Agreement is hereby confirmed as having been validly executed and delivered by each of the undersigned and as being in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts which together shall constitute one
instrument, shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of New York, without reference to or giving effect to any choice or conflict of laws provision or rule that would cause the application of the
domestic substantive laws of any other jurisdiction. 

 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment
Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the date first above written. 
  

					
	TUBE CITY IMS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Thomas E. Lippard
		 	Name:	 	Thomas E. Lippard
		 	Title:	 	Vice President
		
		 	/s/ J. David Aronson
		 	J. David Aronson


 [Signature Page to 
 Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement]
#### Joseph Batista, Respondent, v Francisco Rafae Porro et al., Appellants.

[973 NYS2d 213]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered October 14, 2011, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on plaintiffs failure to establish a serious injury pursuant to Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint against all defendants.

Defendants made a prima facie showing that the 53-year-old plaintiff did not suffer a serious injury to his right knee as a result of an incident in which he was struck by a motor vehicle. Defendants submitted the affirmed report of an orthopedist who opined that plaintiff had no deficits in range of motion in his right knee, and that the findings made following arthroscopic surgery were consistent with plaintiffs age and preexisting condition of the knee. Defendants also submitted the affirmed report of a radiologist who opined that x-rays of plaintiffs right knee showed conditions that were degenerative and due to a preexisting condition *(Vasquez v Almanzar,*107 AD3d 538 [1st Dept 2013]; *Kamara v Ajlan,*107 AD3d 575 [1st Dept 2013]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. He submitted, inter alia, affirmed medical reports from his treating orthopedic surgeon, which included findings of degenerative conditions in various compartments of plaintiffs right knee, yet his physicians failed to address those findings, thus supporting the conclusion that plaintiff had a preexisting degenerative condition *(Rosa v Mejia,*95 AD3d 402, 404-405 [1st Dept 2012]; *Malupa v Oppong,*106 AD3d 538 [1st Dept 2013]; *Kamara,*107 AD3d at 575; *Vasquez,*107 AD3d at 539).

Defendants established entitlement to dismissal of plaintiffs 90/180-day injury claim by submitting plaintiff’s bill of particulars wherein he alleged that he was “incapacitated” for approximately 34 days as a result of the subject accident *(see Vasquez,*107 AD3d at 540-541, citing *Mitrotti v Elia,*91 AD3d 449, 450 [1st Dept 2012]). Plaintiffs assertion that his ability to *610do everyday activities had been significantly limited was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact without objective medical evidence to substantiate his claims *(id.).*Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
Order entered February 4, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00058

- CV

FRISCO MEDICAL CENTER, L.L.P., ET AL., Appellant s

V.

PAULA CHESTNUT , ET AL. , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 07283

O RDER

Before the Court is appellants’ February 2, 2022 motion requesting an

extension of time to file their brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and

extend the time to March 14 , 2022

.

/s/ BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the quarterly report of MDI, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lori Jones, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: November 16, 2009

| |  |                                       
| |  | --------------------------------------
| |  |                                       
| |  | /s/ LORI JONES                        
| |  | Lori Jones
Principal Financial Officer

A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.