alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM A BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      13,194,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               49,068,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                13,431,000
<INVENTORY>                                    362,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,556,000
<PP&E>                                       2,550,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,382,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,520,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,577,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          199,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       317,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,520,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,898,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (3,438,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             290,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,822,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,822,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,822,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-11-0001019

30-OCT-2014

09:10 AM
Exhibit 31(ii)
                                 --------------


                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 --------------

I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
          required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
          on Form 10-K of Alternative Loan Trust 2007-HY4 (the "Exchange Act
          periodic reports");

     2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
          whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
          to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
          light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
          misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
          information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
          covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
          reports;

     4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
          servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
          conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required
          in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
          disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have
          fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all
          material respects; and

     5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
          for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
          assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
          securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
          Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
          have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
          disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
          described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
          10-K.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
     provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York,
     as Trustee.

Date: March 26, 2008

     /s/ Steve Bailey
     ---------------------
     Steve Bailey
     Senior Managing Director, Chief Executive Officer
     Loan Administration
     (Senior officer in charge of the servicing function of
     Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP)
IIB 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2610 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2023 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to specify 

certain registration statement contents for emerging 

growth companies, to permit issuers to file draft registration statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission for confidential review, and for other purposes. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2610 RFS

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REGISTRATION STATEMENTS. 

4 Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

5 (15 U.S.C. 78l(b)) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1)(K), by striking ‘‘years,’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘years (or, in the case of an emerging 

8 growth company, not more than the two preceding 

9 years),’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘Any issuer may confidentially submit to the Commission 

12 a draft registration statement for confidential nonpublic 

13 review by the staff of the Commission prior to public fil14 ing, provided that the initial confidential submission and 

15 all amendments thereto shall be publicly filed with the 

16 Commission not later than 10 days before listing on a na17 tional securities exchange. Notwithstanding any other pro18 vision of this title, the Commission shall not be compelled 

19 to disclose any information provided to or obtained by the 

20 Commission pursuant to this subsection. For purposes of 

21 section 552 of title 5, this subsection shall be considered 

22 a statute described in subsection (b)(3)(B) of such section 

23 552. Information described in or obtained pursuant to this 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2610 RFS

1 subsection shall be deemed to constitute confidential infor2 mation for purposes of section 24.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2023. 

Attest: CHERYL L. JOHNSON, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Gold Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jan E. Dulman, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 14, 2008
                /s/
      Jan E. DulmanJan
      E. Dulman
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7008

ANDREW DAVID OWENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JIM HUNT; FRANKLIN FREEMAN; MARY LOU ROGERS;

MACK JARVIS; DANIEL L. STIENEKE; HATTIE PIMPONG; PAMELA MARTIN; LIEUTENANT ROSS; NURSE

CURRIE; NURSE KINLAW; ROOSEVELT STRICKLAND;

JAMES BROWN; JACK HOLTZMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-40-5-CT-B0)

Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 10, 1998

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew David Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Andrew D. Owens appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint as

frivolous because Owens failed to present his claims in a short and

plain manner as is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 8. He also appeals

the district court’s orders denying two motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and orders and find no reversible error. We note, however,

that the district court did not afford Owens the opportunity to

amend his complaint prior to dismissal. We therefore affirm the

district court’s dismissal, with the modification that it be without prejudice to Owens’ ability to refile his complaint in compliance with Rule 8. See 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1994). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Exhibit 99.1

Certificate of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers

The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1349), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549



Ladies
and Gentlemen:

In
accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1349), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



Dated
as of this 13th day of August 2002.

|/s/ Floyd L. EnglishFloyd L. English
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | /s/ Charles R. NicholasCharles R. Nicholas
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3655 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3655

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals 
 eligible for veterans health benefits to contribute to health savings 
                               accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2006

 Mr. Craig (for himself and Mr. Coburn) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow individuals 
 eligible for veterans health benefits to contribute to health savings 
                               accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALLOWANCE OF INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR VETERANS HEALTH 
              BENEFITS TO CONTRIBUTE TO HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (defining eligible individual) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Special rule for individuals eligible for 
                veterans health benefits.--For purposes of subparagraph 
                (A)(ii), an individual shall not be treated as covered 
                under a health plan described in such subparagraph 
                merely because the individual receives periodic 
                hospital care or medical services under any law 
                administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ruby Scafe, Respondent, v Schindler Elevator Corp., Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 399]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered August 30, 2012, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

“On a motion for summary judgment, the movant bears the burden of adducing affirmative evidence of its entitlement to summary judgment” *(Cole v Homes for the Homeless Inst., Inc.,*93 AD3d 593, 594 [1st Dept 2012]). Defendant, the exclusive elevator maintenance contractor, did not make a prima facie showing that it either lacked actual or constructive notice of any condition or defect in the subject elevator that would have caused the doors to quickly slam shut and trap plaintiff s hand as she exited, or that it did not fail to use reasonable care to correct a dangerous condition that it should have been aware of *(see Rogers v Dorchester Assoc.,*32 NY2d 553, 559 [1973]).

Documents produced by defendant, which contain numerous references to recurring problems, some from which it can be reasonably inferred that the doors may have been involved, did not necessarily explain the cause of the defects previously found, and the deposition testimony of defendant’s employee did not establish the lack of notice of the condition that caused plaintiffs accident *(see Romero v Morrisania Towers Hous. Co. Ltd. Partnership,*91 AD3d 507, 507-508 [1st Dept 2012]). Defendant’s reliance upon that employee’s affidavit to cure his deposition testimony is unavailing. The affidavit improperly alleges, for the first time in reply, that the employee had personal knowledge of conducting an inspection on the date of the accident *(see Matter of Cintron v Calogero,*99 AD3d 456, 458 [1st Dept 2012]) and was improperly tailored to overcome his prior testimony *(see Weinberger v 52 Duane Assoc., LLC,*102 AD3d *557618, 619 [1st Dept 2013]). Moreover, there is no dispute that the elevator had been out of service for three straight days, undergoing 24 hours of labor immediately before plaintiffs incident *(see Ruiz-Hernandez v TPE NWI Gen.,*106 AD3d 627 [1st Dept 2013]).

Given the insufficiency of defendant’s moving papers, we need not address plaintiffs opposition papers *(Romero,*91 AD3d at 508) or consider whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applies. Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-13395

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENRIC LOTT, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 5:22-cr-00004-LGW-BWC-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 22-13395 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 04/06/2023 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-13395

Before WILSON, LUCK, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Phelps, III, appointed counsel for Kenric Lott in this 

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of 

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to 

withdraw is GRANTED, and Lott’s convictions and sentences are 

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 22-13395 Document: 18-1 Date Filed: 04/06/2023 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

Certification Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) the
undersigned General Partners of TASA Products Limited, a Washington limited
partnership (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of such General
Partner's knowledge and belief, that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the
"Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/MICHEL E. MAES                       /s/JAMES R. STEFFEY
Michel E. Maes                          James R. Steffey
Co-General Partner                      Co-General Partner
Date: 8-17-05                           Date: 8-17-05
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ralph N. Williams, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[971 NYS2d 924]

Appeal from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), rendered September 2, 2011. Defendant was resentenced upon his conviction of rape in the first degree, rape in the second degree and endangering the welfare of a child.

It is hereby ordered that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same memorandum as in *People v Williams*(110 AD3d 1458*1461[2013]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Centra, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.1






     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10QSB for the
Quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") by New Century Companies,  Inc., each
of the undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report complies in all material  respects with the requirements of
          section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  as
          amended, and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of  the
          operations of Registrant.


Dated:  August 14, 2002


                                       /s/ David Duquette
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Name: David Duquette
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer



                                       /s/ David Duquette
                                       ------------------------------
                                       Name: David Duquette
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3692 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3692

To extend the date on which the National Security Personnel System will 
              first apply to certain defense laboratories.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2006

Mr. Voinovich (for himself, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. DeWine, Mr. 
   Domenici, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Lott, Mr. Reed, and Mr. 
   Sessions) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the date on which the National Security Personnel System will 
              first apply to certain defense laboratories.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DATE OF APPLICATION OF NATIONAL SECURITY 
              PERSONNEL SYSTEM TO DEFENSE LABORATORIES.

    Section 9902(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``October 1, 2008'' each place such term appears and inserting 
``October 1, 2011'' in each such place.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Michael Yovino, Appellant, v New York City Civil Service Commission, Respondent.

Submitted June 15, 2009;

decided September 3, 2009

Reported below, 2009 NY Slip Op 61617ÍU).

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied *[see*12 NY3d 813 (2009)].
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the
purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used
for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen B. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Signed at the City of  Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 16th
day of August, 2004.


/s/ Stephen B. Thompson
-----------------------
Stephen B. Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.3

Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.

In connection with the quarterly report of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, SLI Acquisition Corp., Spectrum Europe B.V. and Spectrum
Chromatography (collectively, the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), Brian A. Watts, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: November 12, 2002.


/s/ Brian A. Watts
-------------------------------------


Brian A. Watts
Chief Financial Officer
Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.