alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of July 2004
    
    Commission File Number: 001-15014
 Sun Life Financial Inc. (Translation of registrants name into English)
 150 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 1J9  (Address of principal executive offices)
 [Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.] Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 [Indicate be check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.] Yes   o
    
    No   þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-N/A    Exhibit99.1
    
    Press Release dated July 29, 2004 and Managements Discussion & Analysis
for the six months ended June 30, 2004.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Sun Life Financial Inc.(Registrant)Date:  July 29, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/  Thomas A. BogartThomas A. Bogart,Executive Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer
##### 



MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION FILES AMENDED CIRCULAR; MAILS SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS TO SHAREHOLDERS Toronto, Ontario, February 10, 2005  Masonite International Corporation (TSX and NYSE: MHM)
announced today that it has filed with Canadian and United States securities regulators an amended
management information circular relating to its special meeting of shareholders to be held on
February 18, 2005. Certain sections of Masonites circular dated January 18, 2005 have been
revised in response to comments received from staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC). The circular seeks Masonite shareholder approval for a plan of arrangement pursuant
to which all outstanding common shares of Masonite would be exchanged with Stile Acquisition Corp.,
an affiliate of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., for consideration of C$40.20 per common share. The amended circular does not contain any changes to the terms of the transaction. A copy of the
amended circular which incorporates all changes made as a result of comments received from staff of
the SEC can be found at www.sec.gov and www.sedar.com. Masonite will also be mailing to
shareholders of record on January 17, 2005 a supplement to the circular which will contain a copy
of the sections of the circular describing the background to, reasons for and particulars
concerning the proposed transaction marked to show changes made as a result of SEC comments. The special meeting of shareholders will be held on February 18, 2005 and the record date for
voting will remain January 17, 2005, as previously announced. Any Masonite shareholder who has
already deposited a valid proxy or provided voting instructions to his or her broker or other
intermediary for use at the special meeting and who does not wish to change his or her proxy need
not take any further action. Masonite is a unique, integrated, global building products company with its corporate headquarters
in Mississauga, Ontario and its international administrative offices in Tampa, Florida. It
operates over 75 facilities in 16 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia and
Africa and has approximately 14,000 employees. The company sells its products to customers in over
50 countries. For more information, visit www.masonite.com. - 30 - FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT: Alan Miller
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
Telephone: (212) 750-5831
#### State v. Sarea

Case below: 182 N.C. App.-(17 April 2007)

No. 237P07

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA06-934)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. _

2. Allowed 08/23/07

3. Denied 08/23/07
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          66,982                 238,465
<SECURITIES>                                     1,968<F1>               3,732
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,491,076                  46,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,823                  18,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,578,849                 307,890
<PP&E>                                       1,656,201               1,459,017
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,028,939)             (1,007,792)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,589,519               1,110,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (1,714,770)               (421,235)
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                   (5,721,558)             (5,632,158)
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,127,865)<F2>           5,127,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,589,519               1,110,940
<SALES>                                      (346,282)               (163,437)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (358,170)                 174,786
<CGS>                                           33,169                  24,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  358,582                 443,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               325,413                 418,911
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (412)               (268,751)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (412)               (268,751)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (412)               (268,751)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                   (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
<FN>
<F1>Prepaids
<F2>Retained Earnings
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3587 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3587

   To reduce temporarily the duty on certain footwear with coated or 
                       laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reduce temporarily the duty on certain footwear with coated or 
                       laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR WITH COATED OR LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.03      Footwear, other     20%          No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         than men's or                                                      31/2009
                         women's, except
                         vulcanized
                         footwear and
                         footwear with
                         waterproof molded
                         bottoms,
                         including bottoms
                         comprising an
                         outer sole and
                         all or part of
                         the upper, valued
                         over $20/pair,
                         not covering the
                         ankle, designed
                         to be worn in
                         lieu of, but not
                         over, other
                         footwear as a
                         protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (provided
                         in subheading
                         6404.19.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF EL PASO COUNTY, GREETINGS: 

Before our Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, on December 14, 2020, the cause 

upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

STEVE JUEN AND CSDT AMERICA, INC., Appellants,

No. 08-18-00181-CV and

NOE RODRIGUEZ, Appellee,

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the final summary judgment of the court below and remand the 

cause for further proceedings, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We further order that 

Appellants recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This 

decision shall be certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of 

Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, 

obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

El Paso, this March 11, 2021.

Elizabeth G. Flores, Clerk

Trial Court No. 2016DCV2973

FILE COPY
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7262

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLAYTON SAMUEL PAUL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:13-cr-00342-NCT-1; 

1:21-cv-00560-NCT-LPA)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 25, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clayton Samuel Paul, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7262 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Clayton Samuel Paul seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and construing his “Motion Requesting Review 

of Conviction” as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissing it as successive and 

unauthorized. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, 

the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and 

that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. 

Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Paul has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7262 Doc: 8 Filed: 01/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mountains West Exploration, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").
I, Denis Iler,  CEO & CFO of the  company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




                                         /s/ Denis Iler
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Denis Iler, CEO& CFO

Dated: May 19, 2005
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification
set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015
(the “Report”) for the purposes of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



I, Sandro Rogério
da Silva Gamba, Chief Executive Officer of Gafisa S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | · | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 27, 2016



|GAFISA S.A. |                                  
|----------- | ---------------------------------
|            |                                  
|By:         | /s/ Sandro Rogério da Silva Gamba
|            | Name:                            
|            | Title:
Memorandum Opinion filed April 7, 2016, Withdrawn, and Order filed May 

26, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00944-CV

____________

DAVID SOLIZ AND SOLIZ AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Appellant

V.

DARWIN HANEY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-55761

ORDER

On April 7, 2016, this court issued an opinion dismissing this appeal. On 

April 22, 2016, appellant filed a motion for rehearing, which the court granted on 

May 12, 2016. 

This court’s opinion filed April 7, 2016, is WITHDRAWN, and our judgment 

of that date is VACATED.
664 A.2d 936

#### IN THE MATTER OF GLENN D. DE SANTIS, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 4, 1995.

ORDER

GLENN D. DE SANTIS of WESTMONT, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1986, having entered a plea of guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to one count of mail fraud, in violation of 18 *U.S.CA*1341, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that pursuant to *Rule*l:20-13(b)(l), GLENN D. DE SANTIS, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law pending the final resolution of ethics proceedings against him, effective immediately and until the further order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that GLENN D. DE SANTIS, be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension; and it is further

ORDERED that GLENN D. DE SANTIS, comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER

                    PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                            For the month of May 2004

                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                               (Registrant's Name)

                          1155, University, Suite 1405,
                                Montreal, Quebec
                                 Canada H3B 3A7
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

                      Form 20-F [X]       Form 40-F [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                           Yes [  ]       No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-


<PAGE>


Filed with this Form 6-K is the following which are incorporated herein by
reference:

99.1 Press Release - May 12, 2004: Campbell Resources Announces its First
     Quarter Results 2004

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                      CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.



                                      /s/  Lucy Brun
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Lucy Brun
                                           Executive Vice-President and
                                           Chief Administrative Officer


DATE: May 12, 2004



<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


99.1 Press Release - May 12, 2004: Campbell Resources Announces its First
     Quarter Results 2004
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Tongji Healthcare Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending
December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yunhui
Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
 The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.








/s/
Yunhui Yu
 Date:
May 5, 2017


Yunhui Yu


Chief Executive Officer
J. 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

0124, 

Cherry 

J. 

shall file a habeas corpus petition as a new action separate and distinct 

from any original proceeding in which a conviction has been had); Daniels 

v. State, 100 Nev. 579, 580, 688 P.2d 315, 316 (1984) (recognizing that a 

post-conviction proceeding is separate from the direct appeal), overruled 

on other grounds by Varwig v. State, 104 Nev. 40, 752 P.2d 760 (1988); 

Groesbeck v. Warden, 100 Nev. 259, 260, 679 P.2d 1268, 1268-69 (1984) 

(recognizing that a post-conviction habeas corpus petition is a petition 

seeking collateral review).' Further, the direct appeal had been resolved 

and the remittitur had issued, returning jurisdiction to the district court, 

when appellant filed her petition on August 20, 2013. See Dennis v. State, 

Docket No. 61800 (Order of Affirmance, April 9, 2013) (remittitur issued 

May 8, 2013). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND 

REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with 

this order. 

tx124.; 

1-We note that the district court could take the matter off calendar 

pending resolution of the direct appeal. This solution would preserve the 

timeliness of the petition. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A • 

2 
cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge 

Antwanette Denise Dennis 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
667 A.2d 692

#### IN THE MATTER OF JOHN V. McDERMOTT, JR., AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

December 6, 1995.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having on July 6, 1995, filed with the Court its decision concluding that JOHN V. McDERMOTT, JR., of VERNON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be reprimanded for violating *RPC*3.4(g) (threatening to present criminal charges to obtain an improper advantage in a civil matter) and *RPC*8.4(d) (impeding the orderly administration of justice), and respondent having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN V. McDERMOTT, JR., is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

════════════════ N O

. 13-0760

════════════════



### I N 

### R E 

### G REGORY 

### L EE 

### W EST 

### , R ELATOR

════════════════════════════════════════════════════ O N P ETITION FOR W RIT OF H ABEAS C ORPUS

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

ORDER

1. The petition for writ of habeas co rpus, filed on Sept ember 24, 2013, is ABATED

. 2. This case is abated until further order of this Court a nd is removed from the Court’s active docket. It is the partie s’ responsibility to immediately no tify this Court on ce the court of appeals’ decision is final.

Done at the City of Austin, this 30 th day of September, 2013.

B LAKE A. H AWTHORNE , C LERK S UPREME C OURT OF T EXAS

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk