alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Frederick J. Erickson, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bull Run Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as
of November 30, 2004 (the Evaluation Date) and presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; andc)
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date:
    
    January 11, 2005Signed:
    
    /s/ FREDERICK J. ERICKSONFrederick J. EricksonVice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
        32.1
  **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of Colorado
        Wyoming Reserve Company (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended September
        30, 2006, I, Waseem A. Sayed, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        hereby
        certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
        the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date
                  November 13, 2006/s/ Waseem
                A. SayedWaseem
                A. SayedChief
                  Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Robert A. Doak, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Mountains  West
Exploration, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 22, 2004


/s/ Robert A. Doak
- -----------------------
 Robert A. Doak President
#### Palladian Health, LLC, et al., Respondents, v Summer Street Capital II, L.P., et al., Appellants.

[963 NYS2d 811]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered July 2, 2012. The order granted *1442the motion of plaintiffs for leave to renew their motion to stay arbitration, and upon renewal, stayed the subject arbitration.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion upon renewal and vacating the stay of arbitration, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Contrary to defendants’ contention, we conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in granting plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew their motion for a stay of arbitration *(see generally Smith v Cassidy,*93 AD3d 1306, 1307 [2012]). We agree with defendants, however, that upon renewal the court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for a stay of arbitration, and we therefore modify the order accordingly. Plaintiffs sought a stay of arbitration pursuant to CPLR 2201, 3103 and 6301. Inasmuch as a “court’s participation in the [arbitration] process is limited to the provisions contained in CPLR article 75” *(Susquehanna Val. Cent. School Dist. at Conklin v Susquehanna Val. Teachers’ Assn.,*101 AD2d 933, 933 [1984], *appeal dismissed*63 NY2d 610 [1984]; *see also Matter of Horowitz v Pitterman,*178 AD2d 939, 939 [1991]), plaintiffs’ reliance on CPLR 2201, 3103 and 6301 in support of their motion is misplaced. Rather, an application to stay arbitration is governed by CPLR 7503 (b), which precludes a party that has participated in arbitration from thereafter applying to stay arbitration. Here, plaintiffs participated in the arbitration at issue *(see N.J.R. Assoc. v Tausend,*19 NY3d 597, 602 [2012]; *see generally Greenwald v Greenwald,*304 AD2d 790, 790-791 [2003]), and we thus conclude that the court erred in staying that arbitration. In view of our determination, we do not address defendants’ remaining contentions.

Present—Smith, J.P, Fahey, Peradotto, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00677]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE CORPORATION


Regular Board Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board; Regular 
Meeting.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit System Insurance Corporation Board (Board).

DATES: Date and Time: The meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
January 22, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 
883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation, 1501 Farm Credit 
Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102. Submit attendance requests via email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7127180218051e0323140004140205313732305f161e07"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="72241b011b061d0020170307170106323431335c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for further 
information about attendance requests.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). Please send an email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f79465c465b405d7d4a5e5a4a5c5b6f696c6e01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="db8db2a8b2afb4a989beaaaebea8af9b9d989af5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a> at least 24 hours before the meeting. In your 
email include: Name, postal address, entity you are representing (if 
applicable), and telephone number. You will receive an email 
confirmation from us. Please be prepared to show a photo identification 
when you arrive. If you need assistance for accessibility reasons, or 
if you have any questions, contact Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the 
Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board, at (703) 883-4009. The 
matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

<bullet> December 11, 2014

B. New Business

<bullet> Review of Insurance Premium Rates
<bullet> Policy Statement Concerning Investments

    Dated: January 13, 2015.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-00677 Filed 1-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6710-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned, as principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to the undersigned's knowledge:



|/s/CHRISTOPH WESTPHALChristoph Westphal President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: March 24, 2008                                                                                        |  | 
|/s/GAREN BOHLINGaren Bohlin Chief Operating Officer
(principal financial officer)                           |  | 
|Date: March 24, 2008                                                                                        |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### Frank James, Respondent, v Ella Blackmon, Appellant, and Oscars Electronics and Music, Inc., Respondent.

[872 NYS2d 179]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Ella Blackmon appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated September 19, 2007, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On July 27, 2004, the plaintiff tripped and fell over what she alleged was a dangerous condition in a public sidewalk in front of a commercial building owned by the defendant Ella Blackmon (hereinafter the defendant). The plaintiff subsequently commenced the instant action to recover damages for injuries he allegedly sustained as a result of the accident.

Generally, liability for injuries sustained as a result of a dangerous condition on a public sidewalk is placed on the municipality, and not on the owner of the abutting land *(see Hausser v Giunta,*88 NY2d 449, 452-453 [1996]). However, liability may be imposed on the abutting landowner where the landowner either affirmatively created the dangerous condition, voluntarily but negligently made repairs to the sidewalk, created the dangerous condition through a special use of the sidewalk, or violated a statute or ordinance expressly imposing liability on the abutting landowner for a failure to maintain the sidewalk *(see Ellman v Village of Rhinebeck,*41 AD3d 635, 637 [2007]; *Sverdlin v Gruber,*289 AD2d 475, 476 [2001]).

Here, the plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that the accident occurred as a result of the defendant’s violation of a particular *809ordinance requiring a commercial landowner to maintain the sidewalk abutting the land and expressly imposing liability on the landowner for injuries caused as a result of a failure to maintain the sidewalk *(see*Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-210 [a], [b]; § 19-152 [a] [2], [6] [i]; *see also Vucetovic v Epsom Downs, Inc.,*10 NY3d 517, 520-521 [2008]; *Cook v Consolidated Edison Co. of NY, Inc.,*51 AD3d 447, 448 [2008]). On her motion for summary judgment, the defendant failed to provide any evidence showing that she properly maintained the sidewalk as the Administrative Code of the City of New York requires, or that any failure to properly maintain the sidewalk was not a proximate cause of the plaintiffs injuries. Although the defendant argued that she was an out-of-possession landlord, under these circumstances, this did not constitute a defense *(cf. Cook v Consolidated Edison Co. of NY, Inc.,*51 AD3d at 448). Thus, the defendant failed to demonstrate her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied her motion for summary judgment *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Santucci and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors4 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of thePartnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
 For the month of July 2005
    
    Commission File Number: 001-15014
 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC.
  
 (Translation of registrants name into English)
 150 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 1J9
 
 (Address of principal executive offices)
  þ
 Rule 12g3-2(b)
 þ
 Rule 12g3-2(b)
 N/A
   Exhibit99.1
    
    Earnings Press Release dated
July 28, 2005.99.2
    
    Shareholders Report for the period
ended June 30, 2005.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Sun Life Financial Inc. 
(Registrant)Date:  July 28, 2005
    By
    /s/ Thomas A. BogartThomas A. Bogart,Executive Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50088 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANTONIO CASARES-MELENDEZ, also known as Tony Casares, also known as Antonio Melendez Casares, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-02-CR-459

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Antonio Casares-Melendez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Casares-Melendez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should haveNo. 03-50088 -2- been alleged in his indictment. Casares-Melendez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Casares-Melendez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of American Metals  Service,  Inc. for the six months ended February
28,  1998 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                             0000319016
<NAME>                                            AMERICAN METALS SERVICE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                    SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                            2,145
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2,145
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,145
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 5
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             20
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,145
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     53
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        32
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      21
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  21
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                         21
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .01
        


</TABLE>