alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dederick *v.*Farquhar.

*(Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.*

June 28, 1889.)

Pleading—Amendment—Laches.

Plaintiff had filed an amendment to his bill, after the expiration of the patent sued on, introducing new causes of action, and moved to extend the time for taking testimony. He had allowed three years to elapse in total inactivity on account of the alleged unsettled state of the law. *Held,*the delay not being sufficiently excused, the amendment will be stricken off and the motion dismissed.

In Equity. Motion to strike off amendment, and to extend time for taking testimony.

*Church & Church,*for complainant.

*W. G. King,*for defendant.

Butler, J.

The amendment was filed without hearing, subject to a motion to strike off. The patent had expired. New causes of action are embodied in the amendment. If suit were brought upon them it could not be sustained. The expiration of the patent terminated the right to sue here. Whether we could obtain jurisdiction by their introduction into the pending suit is open to doubt. The question, however, need not be decided. An examination of the record has satisfied me that if the court may allow such introduction it would be an unwise exercise of its discretion to do so. The suit was commenced in the summer of 1886, and nothing whatever has been done to prepare it for trial. The complainant’s recent affidavit does not show a sufficient excuse for this delay. The supposed unsettled state of the law did not constitute a reason for total inaction during all this time. If complainant did not believe he had a cause of suit which could be sustained, he should not have sued. If he did so believe, he should at least have prepared for trial. The suit is virtually dead, and might be stricken off for want of prosecution. We should not, therefore, breathe new life into it by extending the time to take testimony, and allowing the amendment, thus depriving the respondent of the opportunity to try before a jury, which now seeems to be his right as respects the new causes of action, and virtually as respects the old. The amendment must be stricken off, and the motion to extend be disallowed.
663 A.2d 1350

#### EDWARD J. FLYNN v. JOHN R. CONNOR.

June 15, 1995.

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on a claim of an appeal as of right based on *Rule*2:2-l(a)(l), and the Court having reviewed the submissions of the parties, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for failure to state a substantial constitutional question. See *Tidewater Oil Co. v. Mayor and Council of Carteret,*44 *N.J.*338, 341-342, 209 A.2d 105 (1965); *Piscataway Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Piscataway,*73 *N.J.*546, 549, 376 A.2d 527 (1977).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bradley W. Kinnish, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | the Annual Report of Marin Software Incorporated on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Marin Software Incorporated for the periods presented therein. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: March 5, 2018

 

|   | By:    |   | /s/ Bradley W. Kinnish                                         |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   | Bradley W. Kinnish                                             |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                                        |
|   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
#### Frank Adamo, as Executor of Norma Rose, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, as Successor in Interest to The American Tobacco Company, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Submitted February 9, 2009;

decided March 26, 2009

Motion for reargument denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*11 NY3d 545 (2008)].

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMPANY'S
DECEMBER 31, 1996 10-Q/A FILED JUNE 9, 1997 WITH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      15,697,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               60,899,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                11,207,000
<INVENTORY>                                    591,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            65,980,000
<PP&E>                                       3,069,075
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,545,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,788,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       47,955,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,078,000
<PREFERRED>                                    201,000
<COMMON>                                       252,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,788,000
<SALES>                                      6,861,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,861,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           (4,611,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,255,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,740,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,740,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,740,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.09)
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2346 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the Peace Corps 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the 

Peace Corps for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 THE PEACE CORPS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

6 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail7 able for the Peace Corps for fiscal year 2024 may not ex8 ceed $410,500,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### In the Matter of Azmara N.G., Appellant, v Jessica Stephanie S. et al., Respondents, and Administration for Children’s Services, Respondent.

[973 NYS2d 215]

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Fernando H. Silva, J.), entered on or about November 9, 2012, which denied petitioner’s motion to vacate an order, same court and Judge, entered on or about September 19, 2012, on default, dismissing her petition for custody of the subject children, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order entered on or about September *61819, 2012, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable paper.

Petitioner presented a reasonable excuse for her failure to appear at the September 19, 2012 hearing; she explained that she had attempted to contact her attorney to inform him that she could not appear in court to testify because she had had oral surgery the day before, but she could not reach him. Indeed, the record shows that petitioner’s counsel apprised the court on the morning of the court date of his own inability to appear due to a family emergency. Petitioner stated further that she went to the courthouse later, intending to show the court a letter from her dentist’s office, but she arrived too late *(see Matter of Calvin S.,*47 AD3d 491 [1st Dept 2008]). Petitioner did not, however, establish a meritorious claim; she failed to show that granting her custody would be in the children’s best interests *(see Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]). The evidence shows that the children need special medical care and that the pre-adoptive foster family, with whom they have been living for most of their lives, has been providing that care and meeting all their needs *(see Matter of Julianna Victoria S. [Benny William W.],*89 AD3d 490 [1st Dept 2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 805 [2012]). In contrast, petitioner has not shown that she has a real plan for providing for the children’s medical and other needs if granted custody. Moreover, she is living with the father of the children’s half-siblings, whose parental rights to those children have been terminated and who has mental health and anger management problems *(see Matter of Azmara N.G. v Jesse Stephanie S.,*93 AD3d 404 [1st Dept 2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 803 [2012]).

No appeal lies from an order entered on default *(see Matter of Lisa Marie Ann L. [Melissa L.],*91 AD3d 524 [1st Dept 2012]). Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sycamore
Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel E. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|                                                   
|/s/    DANIEL E. SMITH                             
|Daniel E. Smith                                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer June 21, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Arts Advisory Panel Meetings

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting--date change.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting 
of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts 
previously announced for January 16, 2015, has been changed. The 
meeting will be held by teleconference from the National Endowment for 
the Arts, Constitution Center, 400 7th St. SW., Washington, DC, 20506 
as follows (all meetings are Eastern time and ending times are 
approximate):
    Partnerships/Folk & Traditional Arts (application review): This 
meeting will be closed.

DATES: January 26, 2014. 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information with reference to 
these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of 
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC, 20506; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9c9d5d6ced0cdc3d2f9d8cbcdca97ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c1c00031b051816072c0d1e181f420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 202/682-5691.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closed portions of meetings are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United 
States Code.

    Dated: January 6, 2015.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2015-00140 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

GMAC Mortgage, LLC

RALI Series 2007-QA2 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period covered by the Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicers performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly
executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                         
|------ |  | ------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi    
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi        
|Title: |  | Executive Vice President
Employment Offer Letter - Robert M. Wolfarth



 Exhibit 10.8 
 AMEDICA CORPORATION 
 November 11, 2004 
 Mr. Robert M. Wolfarth 
 Dear
Robert: 
 Amedica is pleased to offer you the position of Director, Regulatory Affairs and Quality Assurance reporting to Ashok Khandkar, CEO at a salary of
$3,625.00 per average semi monthly pay period which equates to $87,000.00 per year. This position is exempt. We anticipate your employment to begin on January 17, 2005 which will be your hire date. 
 This offer includes a comprehensive relocation package for your move to Utah, limited to $10,000.00. Amedica will directly reimburse you for all reasonable and customary
deductible relocation expenses pursuant to IRS Publication 521 for an accountable Plan, including shipment of household goods, transporting, temporary storage if needed and temporary lodging for you and your family for up to 45 days and
transportation of family or a mileage allowance of $.375/mile and an actual hotel and meal expenses. To the extent that reimbursement of these expenses exceeds IRS guidelines, portions thereof will be considered non-deductible and taxable.

 Upon your hire date, you will be nominated to receive an incentive stock option award for 35,000 shares of Amedica’s common stock, subject to a
4-year vesting schedule, 10-year option life and approval by Amedica’s Board of Directors. We feel that these stock options are a valuable part of your total compensation package. 
 As part of this offer, you will be eligible for Amedica’s complete benefits program, including medical, dental, life and long term disability insurances and our 401(k) retirement plan. Also included are
Amedica’s 10 paid holidays, 5 days of persona/sick leave and 10 days of vacation per year. An Employee Handbook will be mailed to you in January that will provide more detailed information regarding our complete policies and benefits programs.

 Your employment at Amedica assumes an obligation to maintain confidentiality of Amedica’s business information and that of its clients, partners and
suppliers. By safeguarding such confidential information, Amedica earns the respect and further trust of our clients, suppliers and partners. Thus, as a condition of your employment, you will be required to sign a standard confidentiality agreement.








 Robert M. Wolfart 
 11/11/04 
 Page 2 
 Amedica is committed to maintain its leading technology position in the orthopedic implant field and to the commercialization of
revolutionary orthopedic implant products for treatment of joint diseases. Our success depends upon bright, dedicated staff such as yourself. If you are in agreement with the terms of this letter, please sign below and return one original to our
offices. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Eugene B. Jones

	Eugene B. Jones
	Vice President Finance & CFO


  

	
	Agreed to and Accepted by:
	
	 /s/ Robert M. Wolfarth

	Robert M. Wolfarth
	Date: 12/03/2004
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

FAYE S. GRAY a/k/a FAYE STANLEY ) GRAY and JAMES GRAY, Jr., ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-1513 ) YOUDALI INTERNATIONAL ) INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Florida Limited ) Liability Company; FORD MOTOR CREDIT ) COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware Limited ) Liability Company f/k/a FORD MOTOR ) CREDIT COMPANY, a corporation; ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, ) INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; ) COPPER RIDGE POINT HOMEOWNERS ) ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida Not-for- ) Profit Corporation; JAMES GRAY, III; and ) JASON GRAY, ) ) Appellees. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed January 30, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Andrea Teves Smith, Judge. Faye Elaine Stanley Gray and James Gray, Jr., Lakeland, pro se. Melissa A. Giasi of Sivyer, Barlow & Watson, P.A., Tampa; and Kristopher Fernandez of Kristopher Fernandez, P.A.,- 2 -

Tampa, for Appellee Youdali International Investments, LLC. No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and SLEET,, JJ., Concur.
CERTIFICATIONS













I, Tammy
Spriggs, certify that:






1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GreenPoint
Mortgage Funding Trust 2007-HE1 (the “Exchange Act periodic
reports”);






2. Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;






3. Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;






4. I am
responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicers and based on
my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,
and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements; and






5. All of
the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance
with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in
this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as
otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
10-K.






In giving
the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me
by the following unaffiliated parties: GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc., as
servicer; LandAmerica Tax and Flood Services, Inc., as vendor; and American
Security Insurance Company, TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (formerly, “Safeco
Financial Institution Solutions, Inc”) and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company
(all affiliates of Assurant Inc.), each as vendor.






Date:
March 28, 2008






LaSalle
Bank National Association, as Master Servicer








/s/
Tammy
Spriggs


Tammy
Spriggs


First
Vice President
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2353 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, 

Peacekeeping Operations for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, Peacekeeping Operations for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PEACEKEEPING OP5 ERATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:12 Apr 20, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2353.IH H2353

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2353 IH

1 able for Department of State, Peacekeeping Operations 

2 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $163,457,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
## NO. 12-08-00240-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTRICT

TYLER, TEX AS
J.D. TODD

, JR., § APPEAL F ROM THE 294TH APPELLANT V . § JUDICIAL DISTRI CT COURT OF TH E ST ATE OF TEX AS, APP ELL EE § V AN ZAN DT CO UN TY, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM Appellant wa s convicted of the offe nse of indec ency

with a child. We have r ece ived the trial court' s cer tification showingthat this is a plea barg ain case and Appe llant has no rig ht to appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). The c ertifica tion is si g ned by

Appellant and his counsel. Acc ording ly , the a pp e a l is dism issed for want of ju risdiction
. Opinion delivere d J une 11, 2008. P an elconsi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBL I SH)