alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For January 31, 2005 EXTENDICARE INC. (Translation of registrants name into English)
 3000 Steeles Avenue East
Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9W2(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F
    
    Form 40-F
ü
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this
Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes
    No
ü
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection
with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  EXHIBIT INDEXSIGNATURESEX-99.1    Table of Contents  EXHIBIT INDEX ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    News Release dated January 31, 2005  Extendicare Closes Acquisition of Assisted Living
Concepts




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. EXTENDICARE INC.Date:  January 31, 2005
    By:
    /s/ RICHARD L. BERTRANDRichard L. BertrandSenior Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





EXHIBIT
      32.1





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Mountains West Exploration, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report").





I,
      William M. Lynes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
      belief.





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
                November
                19, 2007/s/William M. LynesWilliam
                M. Lynes, Chief Executive
                Officer
II 

Calendar No. 646 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3630 

[Report No. 109–352] 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize a program 

relating to the Lake Pontchartrain Basin, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2006 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 

Reported by Mr. INHOFE, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize a program relating to the Lake Pontchartrain 

Basin, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN BASIN RESTORATION 

4 REAUTHORIZATION. 

5 The first section 121 of the Federal Water Pollution 

6 Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1273) (relating to Lake PontVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:16 Sep 28, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3630.RS S3630

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 3630 RS

1 chartrain Basin) is amended in subsection (f) by striking 

2 ‘‘2005’’ and inserting ‘‘2011’’. 

3 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL CORRECTION. 

4 The second section 121 of the Federal Water Pollu5 tion Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1274) (relating to wet weath6 er watershed pilot projects) is redesignated as section 122. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Calendar No. 646 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3630 

[Report No. 109

–352] 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

Pontchartrain Basin, and for other purposes. to reauthorize a program relating to the Lake 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2006 

Reported without amendment 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Exhibit 32

                          ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

                   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

         To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended March 31, 2005, containing financial statements for the quarter then
ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Aspen Exploration Corporation for the periods presented.



May 10, 2005



/s/ Robert A. Cohan
-----------------------------------------
Robert A. Cohan, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer
#### State v. Shannon

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 350

No. 177A07

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA06-418)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s NOA Based Upon Dissent

4. AG’s PDR as to Additional Issues

5. Def’s PDR

1. Allowed 04/17/07

2. Allowed 06/27/07

3. _

4. Allowed 06/27/07

5. Denied 06/27/07
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Douglas Payton, Appellant.

Submitted January 20, 2009;

decided February 11, 2009

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6815

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JUSTIN O ’ NEAL BARNES , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 4:17

- cr - 00060

- D

- 1 ; 4:22

- cv - 00110

- D )

Submitted : December 19, 2023 Decided: December 27, 2023

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Justin O ’ Neal Barne s, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6815 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Justin Barnes seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party in a civil case, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court exten ds the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court entered its order on April 21, 2023. Barnes filed the notice of appeal on July 5 , 2023. * Because Barnes failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the envelope is the earliest date Barnes could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). USCA4 Appeal: 23-6815 Doc: 7 Filed: 12/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Petra Kandus, Appellant, v. Ricardo Forlenza, Respondent. (Proceeding Nos. 1 and 2.); In the Matter of Ricardo Forlenza, Respondent, v. Petra Kandus, Appellant. (Proceeding Nos. 3 and 4.)

[972 NYS2d 909]

In related child custody and visitation proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals (1), as limited by her brief, from so much an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Greenwald, J.), dated June 26, 2012, as directed the parties to share equally the responsibility of paying the fees *886of the attorney for the children, subject to reallocation at trial, (2) from an order of the same court dated June 27, 2012, (3) from an order of the same court dated August 15, 2012, and (4), as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated December 14, 2012, as, after a hearing, in effect, denied her petition to modify the visitation provisions set forth in a separation agreement dated May 17, 2005, which was incorporated but not merged into the parties’ judgment of divorce dated January 2, 2007.

Ordered that, on the Court’s own motion, the notice of appeal from the order dated June 26, 2012, is deemed an application for leave to appeal from that order, and leave to appeal is granted *(see*Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the orders dated June 27, 2012, and August 15, 2012, are dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the orders dated June 26, 2012, and December 14, 2012, are affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

The record does not support a finding that it was inappropriate or inequitable to require the parties to share equally the responsibility of paying the fees of the attorney for the children. Moreover, at the hearing on the parties’ petitions, the mother failed to request either a reallocation of the parties’ responsibility for fees for the attorney for the children or a hearing on the matter *(cf. Adinolfi v*Adinolfi, 168 AD2d 401, 402 [1990]).

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly, in effect, denied the mother’s petition to modify the visitation provisions set forth in the parties’ separation agreement, and it is unnecessary to remit the matter to the Family Court for further proceedings thereon. Balkin, J.P., Leventhal, Austin and Roman, JJ, concur.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the Annual Report of Knowledge  Transfer  Systems,
Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Steve
K.  Burke,  President  and CEO of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Steve K. Burke
Steve K. Burke
President and CEO
(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)


April 12, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Walden v. Morgan

Case below: 179 N.C. App.-(17 October 2006)

No. 596P06

Pits’ Consent Motion to Withdraw NOA and Alternative PDR (COA05-1560)

Allowed 01/25/07

Hudson, J., Recused
Opinion issued December 20, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-01038-CR

———————————

BOBBY EWING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1277716

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Bobby Ewing, has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The 

motion complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a). See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a). We have not issued a decision in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(b). 
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). 

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, theundersigned Chief Executive Officer of FullNet Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifythat, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the yearended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.     Date: April 15, 2005 /s/ Timothy J. Kilkenny,       Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief
financial officer of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 27, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 27, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    DANIEL T. CARTERDaniel T. Carter Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)




Date: March 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Exhibit 21.1

                                             SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                                                              STATE OF INCORPORATION OR
PARENT                                 SUBSIDIARY                 PERCENTAGE OF OWNERSHIP           ORGANIZATION
------                                 ----------                 -----------------------           ------------

<S>                            <C>                                         <C>                      <C>
FASTNET Corporation             FASTNET Acquisition, Inc.                  100%                       Delaware
FASTNET Corporation              DASLIC Holding Company                    100%                       Delaware
FASTNET Corporation               FASTNET Merger Corp.                     100%                     Pennsylvania
FASTNET Corporation             FASTNET Acquisition Corp.                  100%                     Pennsylvania
FASTNET Corporation                  SuperNet, Inc.                        100%                      New Jersey
FASTNET Corporation                   Netaxs Corp.                         100%                     Pennsylvania
FASTNET Corporation                  NetReach, Inc.                        100%                     Pennsylvania

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2550 

To extend funding for Special Diabetes Programs for Type I diabetes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2023 

Ms. DEGETTE (for herself and Mr. BILIRAKIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend funding for Special Diabetes Programs for Type 

I diabetes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Diabetes Pro5 gram Reauthorization Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAMS FOR 

7 TYPE I DIABETES. 

8 Section 330B(b)(2)(D) of the Public Health Service 

9 Act (42 U.S.C. 254c–2(b)(2)(D)) is amended by striking 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2550 IH

1 ‘‘2018 through 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘2018 through 

2 2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERT K. HUDNALL AND SHARON E.

HUDNALL

,

Appellant s

,

v.

SMITH AND RAMIREZ RESTORATION,

LLC

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 4

- 0 087

- C V

Appeal from the

448th Judicial District Court

o f El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2015DCV1113 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whet her it should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (b)

.

Appellant s filed a notice of appeal on April 1 6 , 202 4 . T he c lerk’s record was filed on

June 4

, 2024, and Appellants ’ second amended docketing statement indicate d that no reporter’s

record was taken or requested for this cause. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6

,

Appellants ’ brief was due July 5, 2024, 30 days after the clerk’s record was filed. Tex. R. App. P.

38.6 (a)(1)

. 1

1 Thirty days from June 4 was July 4, a legal holiday. Therefore, Appellants’ deadline was automatically extended to

July 5, the next day that was “not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday.” Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a)

.2 On July 16, 2024, the Clerk of this Court sent a notice to Appellants notifying them that

their brief was overdue, and their appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if no

brief and motion for extension to file the same was received within 20 days. Tex. R. App. P.

38.8 (a) (1) (allowing an appellate court to dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution if the

appellant fails to file a brief).

As of t his date, Appellant s h ave not filed a brief or a motion for an extension of time to file

their brief. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) ;

42.3( b )

.

LISA J. SOTO

, J ustice

August 9, 2024

Before Alley , C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      10,764,152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,989,333
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,366,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          246,688
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,215,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,366,754
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,027,366
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               662,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              75,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                289,764
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            289,764
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   289,764
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofOdyssey Re Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Andrew A. Barnard, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and  2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company./s/ Andrew A. Barnard Andrew A. BarnardPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2005A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.and will be retained by Odyssey Re Holdings Corp. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO andCFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Real Estate Associates Limited III (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), StevenD. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership,and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification isfurnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.