alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 22, 2018

s0821

Order 

Clerk

August 22, 2018

155405

SC: 155405

In re J. J. GUIDO-SEGER, Minor. COA: 333529

Livingston CC Family Division:

2015-014958-NA

_______________________________________/

By order of June 9, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in In re 

Hill, Minors (Docket No. 155152). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been 

denied in In re Hill, Minors on April 6, 2018, 501 Mich 1047 (2018), the application is 

again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of In re Ferranti, Minor

(Docket No. 157907-8) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in 

that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we 

ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBancTec, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for thequarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Brian R. Stone, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to my knowledge:

 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/                                                | Brian R. Stone |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------|--------|
|                                               |
| Brian R. Stone                                     |
| Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|                                               |
| May 14, 2003                                       |

 

1

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ABDUL MURRAY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 563 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 35
                                   ----------

                       COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                              OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                     ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                   CWALT, INC.
                         ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2007-3T1
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-3T1


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to Section
3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the Agreement
has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                       Dated: March 14, 2008
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**(18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of BancTec, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Brian R. Stone, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that tomy knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Brian R. Stone                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |
| Brian R. Stone                                     |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

August 14,2004

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by 18 USC Section 1350has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RENNIE TRULY COWAN, an individual,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

WILLIAM MORRIS AGENCY, INC.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-55149

D.C. No. 5:08-cv-00917-VAPRNB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 25, 2014** 

Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Rennie Truly Cowan appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

her motion to seal the entire record in her employment discrimination and

retaliation action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an

abuse of discretion, Oliner v. Kontrabecki, 745 F.3d 1024, 1025 (9th Cir. 2014),

FILED

JUL 2 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Cowan’s motion to

seal the entire record in her case because Cowan failed to establish compelling

reasons to do so. See id. at 1026 (applying the “compelling reasons” standard to

request to seal the entire record of the district court proceedings, including the

court’s opinion); Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir.

2010) (discussing the “compelling reasons” standard and explaining that a court

may not rely on hypothesis or conjecture in ruling on a motion to seal); Kamakana

v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006) (“The mere fact

that the production of records may lead to a litigant’s embarrassment,

incrimination, or exposure to further litigation will not, without more, compel the

court to seal its records.”).

We do not consider Cowan’s challenge to the district court’s entry of a

vexatious litigant order against her because Cowan failed to file a timely notice of

appeal from the entry of judgment and the vexatious litigant order. See Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A) (establishing the time for filing a notice of appeal).

AFFIRMED.

2 12-55149
#### In the Matter of Bruce Maddox, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[962 NYS2d 821]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After food was discovered hidden among cardboard that petitioner had removed from the commissary, he was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting smuggling, theft of state property, and the possession of both contraband and stolen property. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty as charged. Petitioner’s administrative appeal was unsuccessful, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.*

Petitioner first argues that the Hearing Officer was unable to properly assess the credibility of a confidential informant, but the Hearing Officer personally interviewed the informant and was fully capable of doing so *(see Matter of Bonnemere v Fischer,*100 AD3d 1174, 1175 [2012]). Next, legitimate considerations of institutional safety further justified the denial of his request to review various confidential evidence *(see Matter of Torres v Goord,*261 AD2d 759, 759-760 [1999]). Petitioner’s remaining contention is unpreserved for our review and, in any event, is without merit.

Rose, J.P., Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

*

 To the extent that petitioner raised a substantial evidence question in his petition, he has abandoned that issue by failing to address it in his brief *(see Matter of Land v Fischer,*100 AD3d 1170, 1170 [2012]).
## NO. 12

- 16

- 00141

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

PAUL D. WILLIAMS,

APPELLANT

V.

SARAH PORTER,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

App ellant has filed a motion to dismiss this pro se appeal. Appellant’s motion to dismiss

is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2 (a).

Opinion delivered June 8, 2016.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JUNE 8 , 2016

NO. 12

- 16

- 00141

- CV

PAUL D. WILLIAMS,

Appellant

V.

SARAH PORTER,

Appellee

Appeal from the County Court a t Law

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 48,143)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss

the appeal herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and

DECREED by this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and

that the decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                  June 28, 2004

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346


                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    (Address of principal executive offices)



     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
                  reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

   Indicate by check mark if the  registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
               as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

  Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
              as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

    Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
  this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ] No [X]

       If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
           registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit       Description
-------       ------------
<S>           <C>
99.1          Press Release, dated June 25, 2004 regarding Hollinger Inc.
              Provides Update on Annual Shareholders' Meeting.
</TABLE>



<PAGE>

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date: June 28, 2004


                                        HOLLINGER INC.

                                        By /s/ Peter G. White
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Peter G. White
                                           Title: Co-Chief Operating Officer
                                                  and Secretary
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Culotta, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and result of operations of the Corporation.



/s/    MICHAEL J.
CULOTTAMichael J. Culotta Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer February 19,
2008
#### State v. Johnson

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 63

No. 139P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA06-523)

Denied 06/27/07
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the
purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used
for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Stephen B. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Signed at the City of  Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 15th
day of November, 2004.


/s/ Stephen B. Thompson
-----------------------
Stephen B. Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David YEPEZ, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Audenago Acosta-Montes, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 09-50271, 09-50409.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 1, 2012.

Timothy C. Perry, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Edmund Burke, Esquire, San Diego, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

D.C. Nos. 3:08-cr-03499-LAB-l, 3:08-cr-02350-L-l.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge CHRISTEN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.
Exhibit 10.24


    Exhibit
      10.24

    FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO

    INPLAY
      TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    2005
      STOCK AWARD PLAN

     

    THIS
      FIRST
      AMENDMENT to the InPlay Technologies, Inc. 2005 Stock Award Plan (this
      "Amendment")
      is
      entered into as of May 31, 2007, by InPlay Technologies, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company").

     

    RECITALS

     

    A. The
      Company adopted the InPlay Technologies, Inc. 2005 Stock Award Plan effective
      as
      of May 20, 2005 (the "Plan").

     

    B. Section
      10(e) of the Plan provides that the Company’s Board of Directors may amend,
      alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan.

     

    C. As
      of the
      date hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to
      the
      Plan, subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders, increasing the
      maximum number of shares of the Company's common stock reserved and available
      for delivery in connection with Awards under the Plan from 500,000 shares to
      1,000,000 shares.

     

    D. Pursuant
      to the authority contained in Section 10(e) of the Plan, the Company now desires
      to amend the Plan as set forth herein.

     

    AGREEMENT

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants set forth
      in
      the Plan, the Company agrees as follows:

     

    1. Section
      4(a) of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted
      in
      lieu thereof:

     

    (a) Limitation
      on Overall Number of Shares Subject to Awards.
      Subject
      to adjustment as provided in Section 10(c) hereof, the total number of Shares
      reserved and available for delivery in connection with Awa rds under the Plan
      shall be 1,000,000 Shares. Any Shares delivered under the Plan may consist,
      in
      whole or in part, of authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.


     

    IN
      WITNESS
      WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the date first above
      written.

     

    
      	 	 	INPLAY
              TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/
              Robert J. Brilon 
	 	 	Robert
              J. Brilon,
	 	 	Chief
              Executive Officer
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-10412

 

 

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
Motion Denied as Premature and Order filed June 14, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00270-CV

___________

DON WADE, Appellant

V.

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP. III, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Caldwell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 540281101

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter 

for the County Court at Law No. 1 informed this court that appellant has not 

requested a reporter’s record be prepared or made arrangements for payment for 

the reporter’s record. On May 17, 2018, the clerk of this court notified appellant 

that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter’s 

record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this court with proof of 

payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). In response, appellant filed a 

motion for extension of time to file an appellant’s brief. 
Subsequent to the filing of the requested extension, the official court reporter 

for the County Court at Law No. 1 again informed this court that appellant has not 

requested a reporter’s record be prepared. Accordingly, we order appellant to file a 

brief in this appeal on or before July 16, 2018. Appellant’s motion for extension of 

time is denied as premature.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, Wise, and Jewell.