alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                    Form 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                            Report of Foreign Issuer
                      Pursuant of Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


  For the month of March 2004                  Commission File Number: 1-14242



                        ROYAL GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
                              (Name of registrant)


                             1 Royal Gate Boulevard
                               Woodbridge, Ontario
                                     L4L 8Z7
                                 (905) 264 0701


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files of will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

         Form 20-F______   Form 40-F___X___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the SEC
pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

         Yes______         No___X___

If "YES" is marked, indicate the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A




<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT INDEX





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit                    Description of Exhibit                                 Page
-------                    ----------------------                                 ----
<S>                       <C>                                                     <C>
1                          Letter to Shareholders                                  1
2                          Press Release                                           2
</TABLE>




<PAGE>




                                    SIGNATURE




         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




ROYAL GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED




                              By: /s/ Scott Bates
                                  ---------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Scott Bates
                                  Title: General Counsel and Corporate Secretary


Date: March 2, 2004
<PAGE>

                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         For the month of September 2004

                        Commission File Number 333-101591

                          GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION

                              5100 W. Lemon Street
                                   Suite 3100
                                 Tampa, Florida
                                      33609

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
                      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F [ ] Form 40-F [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                 permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [ ]

 Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
     Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                 Yes [ ] No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
                     connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- _________

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit                                    Description
-------                                    -----------
<S>              <C>
99.1             Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of September 9, 2004
                 among North Star Steel Company, North Star Recycling Company,
                 North Star Steel Texas, Inc., North Star Steel Kentucky, Inc.
                 and Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc.

99.2             Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of September 9, 2004
                 between Cargill, Incorporated and Gerdau Ameristeel US Inc.
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: September 17, 2004

                                          GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION

                                          By:  /s/ Tom J. Landa
                                              ---------------------------------
                                          Name:  Tom J. Landa
                                          Title: Vice-President, Finance, Chief
                                                 Financial Officer and Secretary
EX-35.1
(logo) OCWEN



ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB


March 7, 2008


RE: ACE 2007-ASL1


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Reporting Period"), Ocwen
Loan Servicing, LLC ("OLS") furnishes this annual servicer compliance
statement pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, indicating its compliance
with the servicing standards of the Securities & Exchange Commission as set
forth in Regulation AB, 17 CFR Section 229.1100, et seq., ("Regulation AB").
In this regard, I make the following representations, which are true to the
best of my knowledge and belief in all material respects.


1. A review of the servicing activities of OLS during the Reporting Period, and
   of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
   February 1, 2007 (the "Agreement"), has been performed under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on this review, OLS has fulfilled all of
   its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
   Reporting Period.



By: /s/ Ronald M. Faris
Name: Ronald M. Faris
Title: President



Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC
1661 Worthington Road Suite 100
Centrepark West
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATEANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

            I, H. John Berens, an authorized officer of Washington Mutual Bank (the “Servicer”), do hereby certify to WaMu AssetAcceptance Corp. (the “Depositor”), pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2007 (as amended, the “Servicing Agreement”) by and between the Depositor, the Servicer, Citibank, N.A., as Trustee,and  Christiana Bank & Trust Company, as Delaware Trustee the following with respect to WaMu Asset-Backed Certificates WaMu Series 2007-HE2 for the 2007 fiscal year  (the “Relevant Year”):

1.  A review of the activities of the Servicer during the Relevant Year and of performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under mysupervision.

2.  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Relevant Year.

 

Dated as of March 1, 2008.

 
| /s/ H. John BerensName:  H. John Berens Title:    Senior Vice President |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Unassociated Document


    PROMISSORY
      NOTE

    


    $500,000.00
      USD.
      Date: May 17, 2007

    


    


    FOR
      VALUE
      RECEIVED, RAVEN GOLD CORP. (the “Promissor”) hereby promises to pay to COACH
      CAPITAL, LLC, or such other holder for the time being hereof (the “Holder”), the
      principal amount of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) in United States
      currency (the “Principal Amount”), and to pay interest thereon at the rate of
      ten per cent (10%) per annum calculated annually from May 1, 2007, on so much
      of
      the Principal Amount as shall be outstanding from time to time, ON DEMAND.
      This
      Promissory Note is dated as of May 17, 2007, and shall be effective as of
      October 12, 2006.

    


    Time
      shall be of the essence of this Note. Extension of time for payment of all
      or
      any part of the amount owing hereunder at any time or times, or failure of
      the
      Holder to enforce any of the rights or remedies hereunder, shall not release
      the
      Promissor and shall not constitute a waiver of the rights of the Holder to
      enforce such rights and remedies thereafter.

    


    Should
      suit be brought to recover on this Note, the Promissor promises to pay
      reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs in addition to the amount found to be
      due on this Note.

    


    The
      Holder acknowledges and agrees that the Promissor is a public company having
      reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the
      Promissor shall file a Current Report on Form 8-K with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), upon the execution of this Note, setting forth
      the terms of this Note and filing a copy of this Note as an exhibit thereto.
      The
      Holder further acknowledges and agrees that the Promissor shall have the right
      to make any filing with the SEC or disclose the terms of this Note, without
      the
      prior approval of the Holder if such disclosure is required by law, court order
      or the SEC rules or regulations.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF the Promissor has executed this Note on May 17,
      2007.

    


    


    RAVEN
      GOLD CORP.

    


    


    By:
      /s/
      Gary Haukeland

    
      
        

      

    

    Name:
      Gary Haukeland

    Title:
      Chief Executive Officer
**AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
The Board of Directors of Voyageur Panel Limited
We have read the Form F-4 Registration Statement of Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd.(the “Company”) dated June 1, 2004 relating to the offering of US $110,000,000of 6.75% senior notes due March 15, 2014 of the Company. We have complied withCanadian generally accepted standards for an auditors’ involvement withoffering documents.
We consent to the use in the above-mentioned Registration Statement of ourreport to the directors of Voyageur Panel Limited on the balance sheets ofVoyageur Panel Limited as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the statements ofearnings (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years inthe two-year period ended December 31, 2003. Our report is dated April 27,2004.
 
/s/   KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
Winnipeg, Canada
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132629 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132629 

 COA: 270439 
 Wayne CC: 01-011952-03

EFRAIM GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 28, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0416 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 24, 2007 

 Clerk
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AC HO T MI R Z OI AN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 70943 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 936- 412 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y17, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A c hotM i r z oi an, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of A rm e ni a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen r e m ova l pr oc e e di ngs . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED JU L 24 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70943 2 ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n , N

aj m ab ad iv. H

older , 597 F . 3d 983, 986 ( 9th C i r . 2010) , a nd w e d e n yth e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng M i rz oi an’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y w here the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov ersi x years af t erthe B IA ’ s f

i nal order, se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and M i rz oi an fa i l ed t o d em on strat e thatthere has bee n am a t e r i a l c hange i n A rm e ni aw i th r e s pe c tt o the gove rnm e nt ’ s tr e a tm e ntof o p p o s itio n p artys up p o rte r s to q u a lif yf o rth e r e g u la to rye x c e p tio n to th e tim e lim it f o rf ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; N ajm abadi , 597 F . 3d a t 9 9 1 ; H e v . G on zales , 50 1 F . 3d 11 28 , 11 32 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( a c hang e i n p er sonal ci rc um st ance s does notes t abl i sh changed cou ntrycond i t i on s) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Exhibit 33.1.6

 

[Letterhead of Wells Fargo Bank, NA]

 

 

ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA 

Corporate Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows: 

Platform: Publicly-issued *(i.e.,*transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1,2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any publicly issued transactions issued by any government sponsored entity (the "Platform"). 

Applicable Servicing Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(I)(iv), 1122{d)(4)(i) and 

 

I 122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform (the 

"Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Management of the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform. 

Period: As of and for the twelve months ended December 31,2007 (the "Period"). 

With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria: 

1. The Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. 

2. The Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, the Company used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1 122 of Regulation AB. 

3. Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied, in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. 

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Company's assessment of compliance as of and for the Period. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 

|   | By: */s/Shari Gillund*  |
|--------|------------------------------|

lts: Senior Vice President 

Dated: February 29, 2008
Exhibit 23.1




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors


Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc.


El Dorado Hills, California




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-156961) of Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc. of our report dated March 30, 2011, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc.






/s/ Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP


Macias Gini & O’Connell LLP


Sacramento, California




May 27, 2011
#### Joseph T. McLaren et al., Respondents, v Turner Construction Company, Appellant, and Mastercraft Masonry I, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[963 NYS2d 386]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Turner Construction Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated December 6, 2011, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the motion of the defendant Turner *1017Construction Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it is granted.

“Although a construction manager is generally not considered a contractor responsible for the safety of the workers at a construction site ... it may nonetheless become responsible if it has been delegated the authority and duties of a general contractor, or if it functions as an agent of the owner of the premises” *(Rodriguez v JMB Architecture, LLC,*82 AD3d 949, 950 [2011]; *see Domino v Professional Consulting, Inc.,*57 AD3d 713, 714 [2008]). “ *‘A*party is deemed to be an agent of an owner or general contractor under the Labor Law when it has supervisory control and authority over the work being done where a plaintiff is injured’ ” *(Rodriguez v JMB Architecture, LLC,*82 AD3d at 951, quoting *Linkowski v City of New York,*33 AD3d 971, 974-975 [2006]). The defendant Turner Construction Company (hereinafter Turner) made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing, through the admission of construction documents and agreements and the deposition testimony of the parties, that it had not been delegated the authority and duties of a general contractor, and did not have supervisory control and authority over the work being done *(see Rodriguez v JMB Architecture, LLC,*82 AD3d at 950-951). In opposition, neither the plaintiffs nor the defendant Mastercraft Masonry I, Inc., raised a triable issue of fact as to whether Turner was an agent of the property owner or a general contractor on the construction project *(see id.*at 950-951). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted Turner’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

In light of our determination, we need not reach Turner’s remaining contention.

Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
#### Combined Ventures, LLC, Respondent, v Fiske House Apt. Corp. et al., Defendants, and Karen V.M. Smith, Appellant.

Submitted March 9, 2009;

decided May 5, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judge Jones taking no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         597,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  327,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               925,031
<PP&E>                                      19,335,806
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,626,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,634,738
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          641,660
<BONDS>                                      8,917,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,588<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,634,738
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,006,625
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,363,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             341,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                301,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            301,462
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   301,462
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   131.07<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1> THIS ENTITY IS A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP. THE OTHER STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY LINE
     REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERSHIP EQUITY.

<F2> THE EPS-PRIMARY LINE REPRESENTS NET INCOME PER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        





</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3692 

To extend the date on which the National Security Personnel System will 

first apply to certain defense laboratories. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2006 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. CLINTON, Mr. DEWINE, 

Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. LOTT, Mr. REED, 

and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend the date on which the National Security Personnel 

System will first apply to certain defense laboratories. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DATE OF APPLICATION OF NA4 TIONAL SECURITY PERSONNEL SYSTEM TO 

5 DEFENSE LABORATORIES. 

6 Section 9902(c)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘October 1, 2008’’ each place such 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3692 IS

1 term appears and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2011’’ in each 

2 such place. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS