alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. RAYMOND J. REYNOLDS, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-07-322 DECISION

On July 13, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to fifteen (15) years and five hundred ninety-three (593) days in the Montana State Prison, with fifteen (15) years suspended, for the offense of Count II: Sexual Assault, a felony.

*90On November 12, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was represented by Kirsten Pabst LaCroix who appeared via videoconference.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 12th day of November, 2009.

DATED this 25th day of November, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.
CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of Javo Beverage Company, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Cody C.
Ashwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Cody
C. Ashwell


Cody C.
Ashwell


Chief
Executive Officer


March 16,
2010







[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Javo Beverage Company, Inc. and will be retained by Javo Beverage Company, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
NO. 07-02-0075-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

APRIL 23, 2002

______________________________

AUGUSTINE TORRES, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 93-416890; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

Appellant Augustine Torres was convicted of the offense of burglary of a habitation

after a plea of guilty and sentenced to ten years confinement in the Institutional Division

of the Department of Criminal Justice, probated for ten years. On application by the State,

his community supervision was subsequently revoked, and his original sentence was

imposed. Appellant gave notice of appeal from that judgment.
However, appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal, which he has

signed. Because the motion meets the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure

42.2(a), and this court has not delivered its decision prior to receiving it, the motion is

hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

John T. Boyd

 Chief Justice

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 23
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
     We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of our report dated June 24, 2005 on our audit of the financial statements and financial statement schedule of the Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. 401(k) Plan for the Plan year ended December 31, 2004.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Principal Global
      Investors





MANAGEMENT'S
ASSERTION ON


COMPLIANCE
WITH REGULATION AB CRITERIA


For
Capmark Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer


Principal
Global Investors. LLC, in its capacity as Primary Servicer (the "Asserting
Party") is responsible for assessing compliance for the transactions listed on
Attachment A for the period January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007, except as
noted on Attachment A (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set
forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the
"CFR"), except for the criteria set forth in Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(ii)-(iii),
229.1122(d)(3)(i) - (iv), 229.1122(d)(4)(ix), and 229.1122(d)(4)(xv), in the
CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing
of the transactions listed on Attachment A, backed by commercial mortgage loans
and primarily serviced by the Asserting Party (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria").


The
Asserting Party has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria
for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for
the transactions listed on Attachment A backed by commercial mortgages primarily
serviced by the Asserting Party.


Ernst
&Young LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report
on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the
Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.


Principal
Global Investors, LLC, as Primary Servicer


By:     
/s/
Steven Johnson


Steven
Johnson
 Managing
Director


Date: 2-19-08
   801 Grand
Avenue, Des moines, IA USA 50392-0490 /
www.principallobal.com


A
member of the Principal Financial Group©





Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
 Capmark
Finance, Inc., as Master Servicer





Series
2002 IQ-3 dated 12/1/2002
 Series
2002 WL-1 dated 6/1/2002
 Series
2007 HQ-11 dated 2/28/2007
 Series
2007 IQ-14 dated 5/30/2007
 Series
2007 IQ-15 dated 8/23/2007
 Series
2007 IQ-16 dated 11/27/2007
----

----

----

----

|   |  By:                            |  /s/ Stephen B.      Thompson |
|--------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|   |  Name:                          |  Stephen B.      Thompson     |
|   |  Title:     |  Secretary,                   |
|   |                                 |  Vice      President,         |
|   |                                 |  Chief      Financial Officer |

----
<PAGE>

                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                SEEKING AN ORDER APPROVING NEW BOARD APPOINTMENTS

         Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August 22 2005 -- Hollinger Inc.
("Hollinger") (TSX: HLG.C; HLG.PR.B) is pleased to announce that Hollinger will
bring a motion before the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the "Court") on
August 25, 2005 seeking an Order approving the appointment of David Drinkwater
and David Rattee to the Hollinger Board of Directors. Messrs. Rattee and
Drinkwater will join the recently appointed board comprised of Randy Benson (the
Chief Restructuring Officer), Stanley Beck, Newton Glassman and Joseph Wright.

On the same day, Hollinger will also bring a motion before the Court seeking an
Order extending the time for calling the Annual General Meeting of Hollinger
shareholders to December 30, 2005.

         In a previous news release, sent today, Mr. David Rattee's surname was
incorrectly spelled. Please consider this news release as the amended version.

Company Background

         Hollinger's principal asset is its approximately 66.8% voting and 17.4%
equity interest in Hollinger International, which is a newspaper publisher, the
assets of which include the Chicago Sun-Times, a large number of community
newspapers in the Chicago area and a portfolio of news media investments.
Hollinger also owns a portfolio of revenue-producing and other commercial real
estate in Canada, including its head office building located at 10 Toronto
Street, Toronto, Ontario.

Media contact:
Larry Parnell
Hill & Knowlton
416-413-4623
larry.parnell@hillandknowlton.ca

                              www.hollingerinc.com
Exhibit 99.1


                         ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

                   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350


         To my knowledge: the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended December 31, 2002, containing financial statements for the quarter then
ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Aspen Exploration Corporation for the periods presented.



February 12, 2003



                                            /s/  R. V. Bailey
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 R.V. Bailey,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer,
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>
    
    <ARTICLE>                         5
           
    <S>                               <C>
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
    <PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
    <PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998 
    <CASH>                                            0
    <SECURITIES>                                      0
    <RECEIVABLES>                                     0
    <ALLOWANCES>                                      0
    <INVENTORY>                                       0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
    <PP&E>                                            0
    <DEPRECIATION>                                    0
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    0
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
    <BONDS>                                           0
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
    <PREFERRED>                                       0
    <COMMON>                                          0
    <OTHER-SE>                                  2384819     
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      0
    <SALES>                                           0
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
    <CGS>                                             0
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
    <INCOME-TAX>                                      0
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
    <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
    <CHANGES>                                         0
    <NET-INCOME>                                      0
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                     0

    
</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Allen, Appellant.

Submitted April 13, 2009;

decided April 30, 2009

*810Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Robert A. Doak, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Mountains  West
Exploration, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:July 7, 2004


/s/ Robert A. Doak
- -----------------------
 Robert A. Doak President
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Everton D. Simms, Respondent.

Submitted April 6, 2009;

decided April 30, 2009

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Lynn W.L. Fahey, Esq., Appellate Advocates, 2 Rector Street, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the respondent on the appeal herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       5,583,169
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,583,169
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,571,382
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,305
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,565,077
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,571,382
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,577
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               169,062
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,515
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            103,515
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   103,515
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31







CERTIFICATIONS



I, Jay W. Downs, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Diatect International Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function); a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control.



6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether of not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: May 14, 2004                               /S/Jay W. Downs

Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of David C. Kobrin (Admitted as David Culman Kobrin), a Disbarred Attorney, Respondent.

[869 NYS2d 918]

Motion by the respondent David C. Kobrin, admitted as David Culman Kobrin, for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 3, 1994, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law based on substantial admissions under oath that he committed acts of professional misconduct, the Griev*630anee Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against him, and the issues raised were referred to Honorable Jerome M. Becker, as Special Referee to hear and report. By opinion and order of this Court dated January 13, 1997, the respondent was disbarred, effective immediately, based on the Special Referee’s report sustaining all 31 charges of professional misconduct. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 14, 2008, the respondent’s application for reinstatement to the Bar was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on the respondent’s current fitness to be an attorney, “including, but not limited to, the missing income tax returns for the years 1994, 1995, and 1996, and his source of income during the time he was suspended.” The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division for the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on December 16, 1970, under the name David Culman Kobrin. Upon the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness dated September 10, 2008, and the exhibits annexed thereto, it is Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further, Ordered that, effective immediately, the respondent David C. Kobrin, admitted as David Culman Kobrin, is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of David Culman Kobrin to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Fisher, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3759 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3759

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 To name the Armed Forces Readiness Center in Great Falls, Montana, in 
 honor of Captain William Wylie Galt, a recipient of the Congressional 
                             Medal of Honor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAMING OF ARMED FORCES READINESS CENTER IN GREAT FALLS, 
              MONTANA, IN HONOR OF CAPTAIN WILLIAM WYLIE GALT, A 
              RECIPIENT OF THE CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR.

    The Armed Forces Readiness Center in Great Falls, Montana, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Captain William Wylie Galt Great Falls 
Armed Forces Readiness Center''. Any reference in a law, map, 
regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to 
such facility shall be deemed to be a reference to the Captain William 
Wylie Galt Great Falls Armed Forces Readiness Center.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```