UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                    For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-10412


                          NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



         California                                         13-3031722
(State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                         Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)





<PAGE>



                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



                          NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
                                  BALANCE SHEET
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)


                                  June 30, 2003

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Assets
<S>                                                                          <C>
   Cash and cash equivalents                                                 $ 390
   Receivables and deposits                                                      55
   Other assets                                                                 955
   Investment property:
       Land                                                  $ 1,980
       Buildings and related personal property                 27,174
                                                               29,154
       Less accumulated depreciation                          (24,262)        4,892
                                                                            $ 6,292
Liabilities and Partners' Deficit
Liabilities
   Accounts payable                                                           $ 8
   Tenant security deposit liabilities                                          397
   Other liabilities                                                            699
   Mortgage note payable                                                     29,102

Partners' Deficit
   General partner                                            $ (383)
   Limited partners (60,005 units
      issued and outstanding)                                 (23,531)      (23,914)
                                                                            $ 6,292


                   See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                          NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
                            STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
                                   (Unaudited)
                      (in thousands, except per unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                           Three Months               Six Months
                                          Ended June 30,            Ended June 30,
                                        2003         2002         2003         2002
Revenues:
<S>                                   <C>           <C>          <C>         <C>
   Rental income                      $ 1,752       $ 1,836      $ 3,496     $ 3,646
   Other income                            90            74          187         154
       Total revenues                   1,842         1,910        3,683       3,800

Expenses:
   Operating                              606           579        1,280       1,113
   General and administrative              57           107          138         174
   Depreciation                           323           321          641         637
   Interest                               523           536        1,050       1,075
   Property taxes                         148           138          292         276
       Total expenses                   1,657         1,681        3,401       3,275

Net income                             $ 185         $ 229        $ 282       $ 525

Net income allocated to
   general partner (1%)                 $ 2           $ 2          $ 3         $ 5
Net income allocated to
   limited partners (99%)                 183           227          279         520

                                       $ 185         $ 229        $ 282       $ 525
Net income per limited
   partnership unit                    $ 3.05       $ 3.78       $ 4.65       $ 8.66

Distributions per limited
   partnership unit                    $ 3.19       $ 7.48       $ 8.42       $ 7.48

                   See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
                          NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
                    STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' DEFICIT
                                   (Unaudited)
                        (in thousands, except unit data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Limited
                                    Partnership     General       Limited
                                       Units        Partner      Partners       Total

<S>                                    <C>            <C>        <C>           <C>
Original capital contributions         60,005         $ 1        $ 30,003      $ 30,004

Partners' deficit at
   December 31, 2002                   60,005       $ (381)      $(23,305)     $(23,686)

Distributions to partners                  --            (5)         (505)         (510)

Net income for the six months
   ended June 30, 2003                     --             3           279           282

Partners' deficit at
   June 30, 2003                       60,005       $ (383)      $(23,531)     $(23,914)

                   See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                          NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
                            STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Six Months Ended
                                                                        June 30,
                                                                  2003         2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>
  Net income                                                     $ 282        $ 525
  Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
   provided by operating activities:
     Depreciation                                                   641          637
     Amortization of loan costs                                      21           21
     Change in accounts:
      Receivables and deposits                                       20         (239)
      Other assets                                                  118          115
      Accounts payable                                                8          (21)
      Tenant security deposit liabilities                            30          (30)
      Other liabilities                                             165           68
        Net cash provided by operating activities                 1,285        1,076

Cash flows used in investing activities:
  Property improvements and replacements                           (344)        (178)

Cash flows from financing activities:
  Distributions to partners                                        (510)        (454)
  Payments on mortgage note payable                                (323)        (361)
       Net cash used in financing activities                       (833)        (815)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                           108           83
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                    282          375
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                       $ 390        $ 458

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
  Cash paid for interest                                         $ 856       $ 1,054


                   See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                          NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)

Note A - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of National Property Investors 4
(the  "Partnership" or the  "Registrant")  have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting  principles for interim financial  information and
with  the  instructions  to Form  10-QSB  and Item  310(b)  of  Regulation  S-B.
Accordingly,  they do not include all of the information and footnotes  required
by generally accepted accounting  principles for complete financial  statements.
In the opinion of NPI Equity Investments, Inc. (the "Managing General Partner"),
all adjustments  (consisting of normal recurring accruals)  considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included.  Operating results for the three and
six month periods  ended June 30, 2003,  are not  necessarily  indicative of the
results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2003.  For
further  information,  refer to the financial  statements and footnotes  thereto
included in the  Partnership's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended  December  31,  2002.  The Managing  General  Partner is a  subsidiary  of
Apartment  Investment and Management Company  ("AIMCO"),  a publicly traded real
estate investment trust.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The  Partnership  has no employees  and is  dependent  on the  Managing  General
Partner  and  its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of all
partnership  activities.  The  Partnership  Agreement  provides  for payments to
affiliates for services and for  reimbursement of certain  expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing  General  Partner are entitled to receive 5% of gross
receipts  from the  Partnership's  property for  providing  property  management
services.  The Partnership  paid to such affiliates  approximately  $183,000 and
$191,000 for the six month periods  ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,  respectively,
which is included in operating expenses.

Affiliates  of  the  Managing   General  Partner  received   reimbursements   of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $77,000 and
$105,000 for the six month periods  ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,  respectively,
which  are  included  in  general  and  administrative  expense  and  investment
properties.   Included  in  these  amounts  are  fees  related  to  construction
management  services provided by an affiliate of the Managing General Partner of
approximately  $7,000 and $6,000 for the six month  periods  ended June 30, 2003
and 2002, respectively.  The construction management service fees are calculated
based on a  percentage  of current  additions  to the  Partnership's  investment
property.

For services relating to the  administration of the Partnership and operation of
the Partnership's  property, the Managing General Partner is entitled to receive
payment for non-accountable  expenses up to a maximum of $100,000 per year based
upon the number of Partnership units sold, subject to certain  limitations.  The
Managing  General  Partner  received  payment  for  non-accountable  expenses of
approximately  $34,000 and $47,000  during the six month  periods ended June 30,
2003 and 2002,  respectively,  which are included in general and  administrative
expense.

In  addition  to the amounts  discussed  above,  as  compensation  for  services
rendered in managing the  Partnership,  the Managing General Partner is entitled
to receive Partnership management fees in conjunction with distributions of cash
from operations,  subject to certain  limitations.  During the six month periods
ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,  approximately $11,000 and $10,000,  respectively,
was paid in conjunction with the  distributions  from operations and is included
in general and administrative expense.

NPI Equity,  on behalf of the Partnership and certain  affiliated  partnerships,
has established a revolving credit facility (the  "Partnership  Revolver") to be
used to fund deferred  maintenance  and working capital needs of the Partnership
and certain other  affiliated  partnerships in the National  Property  Investors
Partnership  Series.  The maximum draw  available to the  Partnership  under the
Partnership Revolver is $300,000. Loans under the Partnership Revolver will have
a term of 365 days, be unsecured and bear interest at the prime rate plus 2% per
annum. The maturity date of any such borrowing  accelerates in the event of: (i)
the removal of NPI Equity as the managing  general  partner  (whether or not for
cause); (ii) the sale or refinancing of the property by the Partnership (whether
or not a borrowing under the Partnership  Revolver was made with respect to such
property);  or (iii) the liquidation of the  Partnership.  During the six months
ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,  the  Partnership  did not have any  borrowings or
amounts outstanding.

The  Partnership  insures its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insures its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing  General  Partner.  During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,
the  Partnership was charged by AIMCO and its affiliates  approximately  $78,000
and $94,000,  respectively,  for  insurance  coverage and fees  associated  with
policy claims administration.

Note C - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint, which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The Court dismissed without leave to amend certain of the plaintiffs' claims. On
February 11, 2002, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class
comprised  of all  non-affiliated  persons  who own or have  owned  units in the
partnerships. The Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants opposed the
motion.  On April 29, 2002, the Court held a hearing on  plaintiffs'  motion for
class certification and took the matter under submission after further briefing,
as ordered by the court,  was  submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002,  the
Court  entered an order  vacating the trial date of January 13, 2003 (as well as
the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the case in its entirety
through  November  7, 2002 so that the  parties  could  have an  opportunity  to
discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002, the court entered an order  extending
the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first  amended  complaint.  The  Heller  action  was  brought  as a  purported
derivative  action,  and  asserted  claims for,  among other  things,  breach of
fiduciary duty, unfair competition,  conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial
dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a motion to consolidate  the
Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that the Heller action was filed
in order to preserve the derivative  claims that were dismissed without leave to
amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated July 10, 2001. On October 5,
2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants moved to strike the
first amended  complaint in its entirety for violating the Court's July 10, 2001
order  granting in part and denying in part  defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes
action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of the complaint based on
the  statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the action  demurred to the
fourth amended complaint, and, alternatively,  moved to strike the complaint. On
December 11, 2001,  the court heard argument on the motions and took the matters
under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court  served  notice of its order
granting defendants' motion to strike the Heller complaint as a violation of its
July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On March 27,  2002,  the  plaintiffs
filed a notice  appealing the order  striking the complaint.  Before  completing
briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further  proceedings in the appeal in
light of a settlement.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action described below.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
a tender offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the Partnerships
within one year of final  approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide  partners
with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The  proposed
settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs which the
Managing  General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.

Estate of Harry  Schubert v.  National  Property  Investors  4, Civil Action No.
97-09129, Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pennsylvania.  During 1998, the
Plaintiff brought action against the Partnership  alleging that as the result of
carbon monoxide and methane  poisoning due to a malfunctioning  heat unit in the
apartment at the  Partnership's  property leased by decedent's son, the decedent
lost consciousness for several hours,  suffered respiratory arrest, and suffered
other  pains and  injuries.  He died  several  months  after the  exposure.  The
Plaintiff  alleges  breach of contract,  fraud,  violations  of the Unfair Trade
Practices  and  Consumer  Protection  Law and  negligence  resulting in wrongful
death. This matter is in the discovery stages of litigation,  and a mediation is
scheduled  for August 21,  2003 in an attempt to have the matter  resolved.  The
Partnership is vigorously defending this matter.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant operates;  financing risks, including the risk that cash
flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal
and interest;  real estate risks, including variations of real estate values and
the general  economic  climate in local markets and  competition  for tenants in
such markets;  litigation,  including  costs  associated  with  prosecuting  and
defending  claims  and  any  adverse   outcomes,   and  possible   environmental
liabilities.   Readers  should  carefully  review  the  Registrant's   financial
statements and the notes thereto,  as well as the risk factors  described in the
documents  the  Registrant  files  from  time to time  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission.

The Partnership's investment property consists of one apartment complex, Village
of Pennbrook Apartments,  located in Falls Township,  Pennsylvania.  The average
occupancy  was 93% and 97% for the six month  periods  ended  June 30,  2003 and
2002,  respectively.  The decrease in average  occupancy  was due primarily to a
weak economy and layoffs at several companies in the property's market area.

Results of Operations

The Partnership  recognized net income for the six months ended June 30, 2003 of
approximately  $282,000 compared to net income of approximately $525,000 for the
same period in 2002. The  Partnership  recognized net income for the three month
periods  ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 of  approximately  $185,000 and  $229,000,
respectively.  The decrease in net income for the six months ended June 30, 2003
is  attributable  to a  decrease  in total  revenues  and an  increase  in total
expenses. The decrease in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2003 is
attributable to a decrease in total revenues  partially  offset by a decrease in
total expenses.

The decrease in total  revenues for both the three and six month  periods  ended
June 30,  2003 is due to a  decrease  in rental  income  partially  offset by an
increase in other income.  The decrease in rental income is  attributable to the
decrease  in  occupancy  at  the  Partnership's  sole  investment  property,  as
discussed  above  and an  increase  in the cost of  concessions  offered  at the
property in order to maintain the current occupancy rates. The increase in other
income is  primarily  attributable  to an  increase  in late  charges  and lease
cancellation fees collected at the property.

The increase in total  expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2003 is due to
increases in operating and property tax expenses  partially  offset by decreases
in general and administrative and interest expenses. Operating expense increased
primarily  due to an increase in natural gas expense as a result of an unusually
severe  winter and an increase  in  interior  painting  and snow  removal  costs
partially  offset by a decrease  in legal fees at the  Partnership's  investment
property.  Property tax expense  increased due to an increase in the tax rate by
the local taxing authorities at Village of Pennbrook Apartments. The decrease in
general  and  administrative  expense is due to a decrease  in  accountable  and
non-accountable  reimbursements  paid to an affiliate  of the  Managing  General
Partner.  Interest expense  decreased due to the payment of scheduled  principal
payments on the mortgage  encumbering the property which has reduced the average
outstanding  balance over the past twelve months. The decrease in total expenses
for the three  months  ended June 30, 2003 was due to  decreases  in general and
administrative  and  interest  expenses  partially  offset  by  an  increase  in
operating  and property tax expenses as discussed  above.  Depreciation  expense
remained relatively constant for the comparable periods.

Included  in general  and  administrative  expenses  are  reimbursements  to the
Managing General Partner allowed under the Partnership Agreement associated with
its  management  of the  Partnership.  Costs  associated  with the quarterly and
annual  communications  with investors and regulatory  agencies,  and the annual
audit required by the Partnership Agreement are also included.

As part of the ongoing  business plan of the  Partnership,  the Managing General
Partner  monitors the rental market  environment of its  investment  property to
assess the feasibility of increasing rents,  maintaining or increasing occupancy
levels and protecting  the  Partnership  from increases in expenses.  As part of
this plan, the Managing General Partner attempts to protect the Partnership from
the burden of  inflation-related  increases in expenses by increasing  rents and
maintaining a high overall  occupancy  level.  However,  due to changing  market
conditions,  which  can  result  in the use of  rental  concessions  and  rental
reductions to offset softening market conditions, there is no guarantee that the
Managing General Partner will be able to sustain such a plan.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

At June 30, 2003, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$390,000 as compared to  approximately  $458,000 at June 30, 2002. Cash and cash
equivalents  increased  approximately  $108,000  from  December 31,  2002.  This
increase  was due to  approximately  $1,285,000  of cash  provided by  operating
activities partially offset by approximately  $833,000 and $344,000 of cash used
in financing  and  investing  activities,  respectively.  Cash used in financing
activities  consisted of distributions paid to the partners and payments made on
the mortgage encumbering Village of Pennbrook Apartments. Cash used in investing
activities consisted of property improvements and replacements.  The Partnership
invests its working capital reserves in interest bearing accounts.

NPI Equity,  on behalf of the Partnership and certain  affiliated  partnerships,
has established a revolving credit facility (the  "Partnership  Revolver") to be
used to fund deferred  maintenance  and working capital needs of the Partnership
and certain other  affiliated  partnerships in the National  Property  Investors
Partnership  Series.  The maximum draw  available to the  Partnership  under the
Partnership Revolver is $300,000. Loans under the Partnership Revolver will have
a term of 365 days, be unsecured and bear interest at the prime rate plus 2% per
annum. The maturity date of any such borrowing  accelerates in the event of: (i)
the removal of NPI Equity as the managing  general  partner  (whether or not for
cause); (ii) the sale or refinancing of the property by the Partnership (whether
or not a borrowing under the Partnership  Revolver was made with respect to such
property);  or (iii) the liquidation of the  Partnership.  During the six months
ended June 30, 2003 and 2002,  the  Partnership  did not have any  borrowings or
amounts outstanding. Other than cash and cash equivalents, the line of credit is
the Partnership's only unused source of liquidity.

The sufficiency of existing  liquid assets to meet future  liquidity and capital
expenditure   requirements   is  directly   related  to  the  level  of  capital
expenditures required at the property to adequately maintain the physical assets
and other operating  needs of the Partnership and to comply with Federal,  state
and local  legal and  regulatory  requirements.  The  Managing  General  Partner
monitors  developments  in the area of legal and  regulatory  compliance  and is
studying  new  federal  laws,  including  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002.  The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests  additional  compliance measures
with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and other areas. In light of these
changes,  the Partnership  expects that it will incur higher expenses related to
compliance,  including  increased  legal and audit  fees.  Capital  improvements
planned for the Partnership's investment property are detailed below.

During  the  six  months  ended  June  30,  2003,  the   Partnership   completed
approximately   $344,000  of  capital   improvements  at  Village  of  Pennbrook
Apartments,  consisting primarily of a gas submetering project,  floor covering,
appliance and water heater  replacements,  heating and  structural  upgrades and
parking lot  improvements.  These  improvements  were funded from operating cash
flow. The Partnership  evaluates the capital  improvement  needs of the property
during the year and  currently  expects to  complete  an  additional  $64,000 in
capital  improvements  during the  remainder  of 2003.  The  additional  capital
improvements  will consist  primarily of additional floor covering and appliance
replacements,  balcony  improvements and air conditioning  upgrades.  Additional
capital improvements may be considered and will depend on the physical condition
of the property as well as the anticipated cash flow generated by the property.

The  capital  improvements  will be  incurred  only if  cash is  available  from
operations  or from  Partnership  reserves.  To the  extent  that such  budgeted
capital improvements are completed,  the Partnership's  distributable cash flow,
if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.

The  Partnership's  assets are thought to be sufficient for any near-term  needs
(exclusive  of  capital   improvements)   of  the   Partnership.   The  mortgage
indebtedness of  approximately  $29,102,000 is being amortized over 20 years and
will mature in  September  2021 at which time the  mortgage is  scheduled  to be
fully amortized.

Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement,  the term of the Partnership is scheduled
to expire on December 31, 2005. Accordingly,  prior to such date the Partnership
will need to  either  sell its  investment  property  or extend  the term of the
Partnership.

The Partnership  distributed  the following  amounts during the six months ended
June 30, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands, except per unit data):
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                       Six Months       Per Limited       Six Months      Per Limited
                          Ended         Partnership         Ended         Partnership
                      June 30, 2003        Unit         June 30, 2002         Unit

<S>                       <C>             <C>               <C>              <C>
Operations                $ 510           $ 8.42            $ 454            $ 7.48
</TABLE>

The  Partnership's  cash  available  for  distribution  is reviewed on a monthly
basis. Future cash distributions will depend on the levels of net cash generated
from operations,  the availability of cash reserves,  and the timing of the debt
maturity,  refinancing, and/or property sale. There can be no assurance that the
Partnership  will  generate  sufficient  funds from  operations  after  required
capital improvements to permit further  distributions to its partners during the
remainder of 2003 or subsequent periods.

Other

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates  owned 45,310 limited  partnership  units
(the "Units") in the Partnership representing 75.51% of the outstanding Units at
June 30, 2003. A number of these Units were  acquired  pursuant to tender offers
made by AIMCO or its  affiliates.  It is possible  that AIMCO or its  affiliates
will acquire  additional Units in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and
units in the operating  partnership of AIMCO either through private purchases or
tender offers.  Pursuant to the  Partnership  Agreement,  unitholders  holding a
majority of the Units are  entitled to take action with  respect to a variety of
matters that include,  but are not limited to,  voting on certain  amendments to
the Partnership  Agreement and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. As
a result of its  ownership  of 75.51% of the  outstanding  Units,  AIMCO and its
affiliates are in a position to influence all such voting decisions with respect
to the  Partnership.  However,  with respect to 26,466 Units acquired on January
19, 1996, Insignia Properties,  LP, an affiliate of the Managing General Partner
and  of  AIMCO,  agreed  to  vote  such  Units:  (i)  against  any  increase  in
compensation  payable to the Managing General Partner or to its affiliates;  and
(ii) on all other matters  submitted by it or its  affiliates,  in proportion to
the votes cast by third party  unitholders.  Except for the foregoing,  no other
limitations are imposed on AIMCO's or Insignia  Properties,  L.P.'s or any other
affiliates' right to vote each Unit held.  Although the Managing General Partner
owes fiduciary duties to the limited  partners of the Partnership,  the Managing
General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.  As
a result,  the duties of the  Managing  General  Partner,  as  managing  general
partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with
the duties of the Managing General Partner to AIMCO, as its sole stockholder.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The financial  statements are prepared in accordance with accounting  principles
generally  accepted in the United States which require the  Partnership  to make
estimates and  assumptions.  The  Partnership  believes that of its  significant
accounting  policies,  the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and
complexity.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The  Partnership's  investment  property is recorded at cost,  less  accumulated
depreciation,  unless considered impaired.  If events or circumstances  indicate
that the carrying amount of the property may be impaired,  the Partnership  will
make an assessment of its  recoverability by estimating the undiscounted  future
cash flows,  excluding interest charges, of the property. If the carrying amount
exceeds the aggregate  future cash flows,  the  Partnership  would  recognize an
impairment  loss to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the
property.

Real  property  investments  are  subject  to varying  degrees of risk.  Several
factors  may  adversely  affect  the  economic  performance  and  value  of  the
Partnership's   investment  property.  These  factors  include  changes  in  the
national,  regional and local economic  climate;  local  conditions,  such as an
oversupply  of  multifamily   properties;   competition   from  other  available
multifamily  property  owners and changes in market  rental  rates.  Any adverse
changes in these factors could cause an impairment in the Partnership's asset.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally leases apartment units for twelve-month terms or less.
Rental income  attributable to leases is recognized  monthly as it is earned and
the Partnership  fully reserves all balances  outstanding  over thirty days. The
Partnership will offer rental concessions during  particularly slow months or in
response to heavy  competition  from other  similar  complexes in the area.  Any
concessions  given at the inception of the lease are amortized  over the life of
the lease.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.

                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint, which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The Court dismissed without leave to amend certain of the plaintiffs' claims. On
February 11, 2002, plaintiffs filed a motion seeking to certify a putative class
comprised  of all  non-affiliated  persons  who own or have  owned  units in the
partnerships. The Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants opposed the
motion.  On April 29, 2002, the Court held a hearing on  plaintiffs'  motion for
class certification and took the matter under submission after further briefing,
as ordered by the court,  was  submitted by the parties.  On July 10, 2002,  the
Court  entered an order  vacating the trial date of January 13, 2003 (as well as
the pre-trial and discovery  cut-off  dates) and stayed the case in its entirety
through  November  7, 2002 so that the  parties  could  have an  opportunity  to
discuss  settlement.  On October 30, 2002, the court entered an order  extending
the stay in effect through January 10, 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first  amended  complaint.  The  Heller  action  was  brought  as a  purported
derivative  action,  and  asserted  claims for,  among other  things,  breach of
fiduciary duty, unfair competition,  conversion, unjust enrichment, and judicial
dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a motion to consolidate  the
Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that the Heller action was filed
in order to preserve the derivative  claims that were dismissed without leave to
amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated July 10, 2001. On October 5,
2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated defendants moved to strike the
first amended  complaint in its entirety for violating the Court's July 10, 2001
order  granting in part and denying in part  defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes
action, or  alternatively,  to strike certain portions of the complaint based on
the  statute of  limitations.  Other  defendants  in the action  demurred to the
fourth amended complaint, and, alternatively,  moved to strike the complaint. On
December 11, 2001,  the court heard argument on the motions and took the matters
under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the Court  served  notice of its order
granting defendants' motion to strike the Heller complaint as a violation of its
July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes  action.  On March 27,  2002,  the  plaintiffs
filed a notice  appealing the order  striking the complaint.  Before  completing
briefing on the appeal, the parties stayed further  proceedings in the appeal in
light of a settlement.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement of the Nuanes action and the Heller action described below.

In general  terms,  the  proposed  settlement  provides  for  certification  for
settlement  purposes of a settlement class consisting of all limited partners in
this  Partnership and others (the  "Partnerships")  as of December 20, 2002, the
dismissal  with  prejudice  and  release  of claims  in the  Nuanes  and  Heller
litigation,  payment by AIMCO of $9.9  million  (which shall be  distributed  to
settlement  class  members  after  deduction of attorney fees and costs of class
counsel and certain costs of settlement) and up to $1 million toward the cost of
independent  appraisals of the  Partnerships'  properties  by a Court  appointed
appraiser.  An affiliate of the Managing General Partner has also agreed to make
a tender offer to purchase all of the partnership  interests in the Partnerships
within one year of final  approval,  if it is granted,  and to provide  partners
with the  independent  appraisals  at the time of these  tenders.  The  proposed
settlement  also provided for the  limitation  of the allowable  costs which the
Managing  General  Partner or its  affiliates  will charge the  Partnerships  in
connection with this litigation and imposes limits on the class counsel fees and
costs in this litigation.  On April 11, 2003,  notice was distributed to limited
partners providing the details of the proposed settlement.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.

Estate of Harry  Schubert v.  National  Property  Investors  4, Civil Action No.
97-09129, Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County, Pennsylvania.  During 1998, the
Plaintiff brought action against the Partnership  alleging that as the result of
carbon monoxide and methane  poisoning due to a malfunctioning  heat unit in the
apartment at the  Partnership's  property leased by decedent's son, the decedent
lost consciousness for several hours,  suffered respiratory arrest, and suffered
other  pains and  injuries.  He died  several  months  after the  exposure.  The
Plaintiff  alleges  breach of contract,  fraud,  violations  of the Unfair Trade
Practices  and  Consumer  Protection  Law and  negligence  resulting in wrongful
death. This matter is in the discovery stages of litigation,  and a mediation is
scheduled  for August 21,  2003 in an attempt to have the matter  resolved.  The
Partnership is vigorously defending this matter.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  3.4   Agreement  of  Limited   Partnership,   incorporated  by
                        reference  to  Exhibit  A  to  the   Prospectus  of  the
                        Partnership,  dated  September  20, 1983,  as amended on
                        June 13, 1989, and as thereafter supplemented, contained
                        in the Partnership's Registration Statement of Form S-11
                        (Reg. No. 2-63733).

                  31.1  Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer
                        pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-
                        14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  31.2  Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer
                        pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-
                        14(a),  as Adopted  Pursuant to Section 302 of
                        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  32.1  Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
                        Adopted  Pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
                        Act of 2002.

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4


                                    By:   NPI EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC.
                                          Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Thomas C. Novosel
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Chief Accounting Officer


                                    Date: August 13, 2003



<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National  Property
      Investors 4;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003

                                    /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Patrick J. Foye
                                    Executive Vice President of NPI Equity
                                    Investments, Inc., equivalent of the chief
                                    executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of National  Property
      Investors 4;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 13, 2003

                                  /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
                                  Officer of NPI Equity Investments, Inc.,
                                  equivalent of the chief financial officer of
                                  the Partnership



<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of National  Property
Investors 4 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  Patrick J. Foye, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of
the Partnership, and Paul J. McAuliffe, as the equivalent of the chief financial
officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  August 13, 2003


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  August 13, 2003


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.