alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 01-15-00 226

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

WEYLIN W. ALFORD § APPELLANT

§

V. §

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPELLANT

APPEAL FROM THE 177 TH DISTRICT CRIMINAL COURT

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

TRIAL COURT NO. 1450840

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE

COUNSEL OF RECORD

NOW COMES, WEYLIN ALFORD through counsel, and presents this

Motion to Substitute Counsel of Record. In support of his motion, he would

respectfully show the court the following:

I.

Appellant was charged with aggravated assault. Following a jury trial,

Appellant was sentenced to thirty five ( 35 ) years confinement in the Institutional

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Notice of Appeal was timely

filed.

II. ACCEPTED

01-15-00226-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/19/2015 11:03:09 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2

Mark Kratovil

, T BN 240 76098 was previously the public defender appointed

to represent Appellant on appeal in this cause. However, Daucie Schindler, TBN

24013495, also with the Public Defender’s Office, is now assign ed to this case

.

Appellant respectfully requests this Court to enter an order substituting Daucie

Schindler as part of the Harris County Public Defender’s Office as attorney of record

in this case.

Respect fully submitted,

Alexander Bunin

Chief Public Defender

/s/ Daucie Schindler

Daucie Schindler

State Bar No. 24013495

Public Defender’s Office

Harris County, Texas

Assistant Public Defender

1201 Franklin, 13 th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

Daucie.Schindler@pdo.hctx.net

Tel: 713

- 274

- 6717

Fax: 713

- 368

- 92783 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above motion was electronically

served on the Appellat e Division of the Harris County Distr ict Attorney’s Office, on

August 19 , 201 5

.

.

/s/ Daucie Schindler

Daucie Schindler

Public Defender’s Office

Harris County, Texas

Assistant Public Defender
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Date: February 15, 2007 |   |   |                                   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                         |   |   | /s/ Rafiq                A. Sayed |
|                         |   |   | Rafiq                A. Sayed          |
|                    |   |   | Chief Financial Officer                |

----
CERTIFICATION FOR QUARTERLY REPORTS ON FORM 10-QSB

I, Chris Briggs, certify that:

1. I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of NT Media Corp. of
California, Inc. ("Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  Registrant's   other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

     a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,  including its
     consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made  known to us by  others  within  those
     entities,  particularly  during the  period in which  this  report is being
     prepared;

     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
     effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control
     over financial  reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to
     materially  affect,  the  Registrant's   internal  control  over  financial
     reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) All significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely  affect the  Registrant's  ability to record,  process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls
     over financial reporting.
                                   /s/ Chris Briggs
Date:  November 22, 2004           -------------------------------------------
                                   Chris Briggs, President and Chief Executive
                                   Officer

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 19
- 00169
- CV

__________________ TENIKA ROBERTS , Appellant

V. CERBERUS SFR HOLDINGS, LP , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19
- 31315

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION In May 2019, Ten i k a Roberts filed a notice of appeal. In June 2019, the Clerk
mailed Roberts a bill of costs , payable in thirty days. Subsequently, Roberts failed

to timely pay the amount the Clerk billed her for her costs of court

. T o proceed wi thout paying court costs, Rule 20.1(b)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure required Roberts to advise the Clerk of the Court of Appeals
that the trial court allowed her to proceed without paying costs because she2

established in that court that she is indigent . Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(b)(2). Roberts
could have includ ed that information in her notice of appeal or in a docketing

statement , but she failed to do so. See id. In a letter dated July 11, 2019, which the Clerk sent to Roberts at the address she provided the Court in he r notice of appeal, the Court warned Roberts that if she
failed to pay the costs bill , her appeal would be dismissed without further notice on any date after July 26, 2019. T h at notice was returned undelivered , with no forwarding address

. Nevertheless, Roberts has never filed a statement with this Court alleging she is unable to afford pay ing her court costs or alleging that she is
entitled to proceed without pay ing them

. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. And Roberts
failed to p ay the costs set out in the invoice the C lerk sent to her by mail

. A party’s appeal may be dismissed based on the appellant ’s fail ure to comply with a requirement of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure or if the appellant fails to respond to a notice fr om the Clerk of the Court that requir es a response or other action within a specified time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Roberts has not timely paid her bill of costs, she did not file a motion in this C ourt asking to proceed without paying costs based on a ny claim of indigence , and she has not shown she is entitled to proceed without pay ing costs. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 20.1

.3

Because Roberts both failed to pay he r costs of court and failed to establish she is entitled to proceed without paying them , we dismiss her appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (b) , (c)

. APPEAL DISMISSED.

_________________________ HOLLIS HORTON Justice
Submitted on August 21, 2019 Opinion Delivered August 22, 2019 Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3.2

                          CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                          OF AMENDED AND RESTATED
                        CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


Genentech, Inc. a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

FIRST:  That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of Genentech, Inc.
resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation,
declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the
stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof.  The resolution
setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

RESOLVED, that the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of this
corporation be amended by changing "Section 4.01(a)" of the Article thereof
numbered "4" so that, as amended, said Section of said Article shall be and
read as follows:

          "Section 4.01.  CAPITAL STOCK.   (a)  The Corporation is
      authorized to issue two classes of stock to be designated,
      respectively, preferred stock and common stock.  The total
      number of shares which the Corporation is authorized to issue
      is one billion three hundred million (1,300,000,000) shares.
      One hundred million (100,000,000) shares shall be designated
      preferred stock, par value $0.02 per share ("Preferred Stock").
      One billion two hundred million (1,200,000,000) shares shall
      be designated common stock, par value $0.02 per share ("Common
      Stock").  The Common Stock of the Corporation shall be all of
      one class."

SECOND:  That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,
the regular meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called
and held upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares
as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

THIRD:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

FOURTH:  That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by
reason of said amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Genentech, Inc. has caused this Certificate of
Amendment to be signed by Stephen G. Juelsgaard, an Authorized Officer, this
10th day of May, 2001.

                                        GENENTECH, INC.


                                        By:  /s/ Stephen G. Juelsgaard
                                             --------------------------------
                                        Name:  Stephen G. Juelsgaard
                                        Title: Senior Vice President, General
                                               Counsel and Secretary
#### In the Matter of Richard Lazzari, Appellant, v Town of Eastchester et al., Respondents.

Submitted July 20, 2009;

decided September 15, 2009

Reported below, 62 AD3d 1002.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution and is not an order of the type provided for in CPLR 5602 (a) (2).
#### In the Matter of Wayne C. James, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[871 NYS2d 455]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty following a tier III disciplinary hearing of harassment, refusing a direct order and lewd conduct. That determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and testimony adduced at the hearing support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Rodriguez v Selsky,*50 AD3d 1337, 1337 [2008]). Petitioner’s denial of the allegations and claims of inconsistencies in the evidence presented credibility issues for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of James v Poole,*52 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2008]). To the extent preserved, petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his assertion that he was denied a fair and impartial hearing, have been examined and we discern no basis upon which to disturb the determination.

Mercure, J.P, Peters, Spain, Rose and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### State v. Johnson

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 287

No. 072P07-2

Def’s Motion for “Notice of Appeal” (COA05-1403)

Dismissed *ex mero motu*05/03/07

Hudson, J., Recused
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2553 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorize removal of an action 

or prosecution against a President, Vice President, former President, 

or former Vice President, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2023 

Mr. FRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to authorize removal 

of an action or prosecution against a President, Vice 

President, former President, or former Vice President, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No More Political 

5 Prosecutions Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN ACTIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1442(a) of title 28, 

8 United States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2553 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (3), by striking the semicolon 

2 and inserting a period; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(5) The President or Vice President, or a 

5 former President or Vice President.’’. 

6 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub7 section (a) shall apply to civil actions or criminal prosecu8 tions pending on the date of enactment of this Act or com9 menced on or after such date. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7424
PAUL DAVID GEORGE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE TRENT, Warden, Respondent - Appellee, and WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-328) Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 11, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Paul David George, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Dawn Ellen Warfield, Molly Margaret McGinley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. George v. Trent , No. CA-97-328 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report(date of earliest event reported)August 16, 2004 NORTEL NETWORKS
CORPORATION 
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  CANADA
    
    001-07260
    
    not applicable(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
  8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
    
    L6T 5P6(address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code (905) 863-0000.




---



##### 



Item 5.    Other Events On August 16, 2004, the Registrant issued the press release attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1, and such press release is incorporated in its entirety by
reference herein. Item 7.    Financial Statements,Pro FormaFinancial Information and Exhibits  (c)
    
    Exhibits.  99.1
    
    Press release issued by the Registrant on August 16, 2004.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Deborah J. NobleDeborah J. NobleCorporate Secretary By:
    /s/ Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant Secretary Dated:   August 17, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX  99.1
    
    Press Release issued by the Registrant on August 16, 2004
EXHIBIT 3.3

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              K-9 PROTECTION, INC.

          (PURSUANT TO NRS 78,385 AND 78.390 - AFTER ISSUANCE OF STOCK)



           K-9 PROTECTION, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the Nevada Revised Statutes,

Does hereby certify that:
                  FIRST: THAT at a meeting of the Board of Directors of K-9
Protections Inc. (the "Corporation") resolutions were duly adopted setting forth
proposed amendments of the Articles of Incorporation of said Corporation,
declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of stockholders
of said corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the
proposed amendments are as follows:

                  RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this
                  Corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof
                  numbered "FIRST" so that said Article, as amended, shall be in
                  read in its entirety as follows:

"The name of the Corporation is Miracle Entertainment, Inc."

                  RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of this
                  Corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof
                  numbered "SECOND" so that said Article, as amended, shall be
                  in read in its entirety as follows:

"SECOND: Registered Agent
                  The address of the Corporation's registered agent in the State
of Nevada is National Registered Agents, Inc. of NV, 202 South Minnesota Street,
Carson City, NV 89703, until such time as another is duly authorized and
appointed by the Corporation."

                  SECOND: THAT thereafter, pursuant to the resolution of its
Board of Directors, in a meeting of Stockholders of said Corporation duly called
and held, upon notice, at which meeting the necessary number of shares as
required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.


                                       1
<PAGE>


           THIRD: THAT the foregoing amendments WILL NOT alter or change any
preference or any relative or other right given to any class or series of
outstanding shares of the Corporation.

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, K-9 Protection, Inc. has caused the Certificate
to be signed by Anthony J. Cataldo, its Chief Executive Officer and attested by
Clifford D. Brune, its Assistant Secretary, this _______________ day of June,
2000.


                                 /S/ ANTHONY J. CATALDO
                                 ----------------------
                                  Anthony J. Cataldo


                                  /S/ CLIFFORD D. BRUNE
                                  ---------------------
                                  Clifford D. Brune



                                       2
<PAGE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT QUINCY MAURICE CURRY, JR.,

Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D23-730 December 27, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Stephen Mathew Whyte, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SILBERMAN, BLACK, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON
                             5001 SPRING VALLEY ROAD
                                 SUITE 800 EAST
                               DALLAS, TEXAS 75244

                                 April 20, 2007


Dune Energy, Inc.
3050 Post Oak Blvd
Suite 695
Houston, Texas 77056


Ladies and Gentlemen:

      We hereby consent to the use of the name DeGolyer and MacNaughton and to
the inclusion of our "Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2006 on Certain
Properties owned by Dune Energy Inc." (our Report) in the Annual Report section
on 10-KSB/A of Dune Energy, Inc.". We further consent to the use of information
from our Report in the section "Oil & Gas Reserves" of the Annual Report on
10-KSB/A of Dune Energy, Inc.

                                                    Very truly yours,

                                                    /s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton

                                                    DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1976 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Heart, 

Lung, and Blood Institute for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1976 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NA4 TIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTI5 TUTE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Na9 tional Institutes of Health National Heart, Lung, and 

10 Blood Institute for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $3,488,335,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS