alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


(GERDAU AMERISTEEL LOGO)

                  GERDAU AMERISTEEL APPOINTS ANDRE JOHANNPETER
                           AS CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

TORONTO, July 26, 2004 -- Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation (TSX: GNA.TO) today
announced the appointment of Andre Johannpeter as chief operating officer.

In assuming the key COO leadership position, Mr. Johannpeter will be responsible
for all North American consolidated steel manufacturing and commercial
operations, as well as raw materials procurement. The addition of a COO to the
organizational structure is reflective of the company's aggressive growth
strategy and the operational demands of today's competitive steel industry. As
chief operating officer, Mr. Johannpeter will report to Gerdau Ameristeel
president and CEO, Phillip E. Casey.

Commenting on the appointment, president and CEO Phillip Casey said, "Gerdau
Ameristeel is focused on strategic growth and is pursuing an accelerated capital
investment program for performance improvements in all aspects of our rapidly
expanding steel business. Mr. Johannpeter's exceptional knowledge of our steel
business and his operational experience will be instrumental in coordinating the
daily activities of our operations. We are fortunate to have Mr. Johannpeter's
management skills and the added flexibility that he brings to our new
organizational framework."

Mr. Johannpeter has over 20 years of steel industry experience in the
international and North American business activities of the Gerdau Group.
Throughout his career, Mr. Johannpeter has assumed increasingly responsible
roles in the leadership of the company's manufacturing, commercial, and
administrative activities. Mr. Johannpeter has been instrumental to the
aggressive expansion of the North American steel operations and the successful
integration of its diverse business segments. Since joining Gerdau Ameristeel,
Mr. Johannpeter has served as chief operating officer of the Canadian operations
and as vice president of corporate business development. Mr. Johannpeter will
continue as a member of the board of directors of Gerdau Ameristeel.

ABOUT GERDAU AMERISTEEL

Gerdau Ameristeel is the second largest minimill steel producer in North America
with annual manufacturing capacity of over 6.8 million tons of mill finished
steel products. Through its vertically integrated network of 11 minimills
(including one 50%-owned minimill), 13 scrap recycling facilities, and 32
downstream operations, Gerdau Ameristeel primarily serves customers in the
eastern half of North America. The company's products are generally sold to
steel service centers, to fabricators, or directly to original equipment
manufacturers for use in a variety of industries, including construction,
automotive, mining, and equipment manufacturing. Gerdau Ameristeel's common
shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol GNA.TO. For
additional financial and investor information, visit www.gerdauameristeel.com.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Earl Wright, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 660]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Aloise, J.), rendered June 21, 2010, convicting him of rape in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, and sexual abuse in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions of robbery in the first degree and burglary in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish *837the defendant’s guilt of those crimes beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*GPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by certain remarks made by the prosecutor during the opening statement and on summation is unpreserved for appellate review *(see*GPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Wright,*90 AD3d 679 [2011]). In any event, the challenged remarks were fair comment on the evidence, were permissible rhetorical comment, constituted a fair response to defense counsel’s summation, or otherwise do not warrant reversal *(see People v Galloway,*54 NY2d 396, 401 [1981]; *People v Morency,*104 AD3d 877, 878 [2013]; *People v Hernandez,*92 AD3d 802, 803 [2012]; *People v Valerio,*70 AD3d 869, 869-870 [2010]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit, or based on matter dehors the record. Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.2










CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
      certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
      satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      and
      may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
      B. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that (1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.





Signed
      at
      the City of Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 15th day of May,
      2007.








/s/
      Stephen B. Thompson


Stephen
      B. Thompson


Chief
      Financial Officer
EX-34.8
(logo) ERNST & YOUNG
Quality In Everything We Do

Ernst & Young LLP
901 E. Cary Street Suite 1000
Richmond, VA 23219

Phone (804) 344-6000
www.ey.com


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors
SunTrust Bank


We have examined management's assertion included in the accompanying report of
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that
SunTrust Bank (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(4)(i), and 1122(d)(4)(ii) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loan servicing
platform of SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007. Refer to management's assertion for the asset backed transactions
covered by this platform. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions
and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the
Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2007 for the residential mortgage loan servicing platform is fairly stated, in
all material respects.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


March 6, 2008
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 5.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form F-10, as
amended by pre-effective Amendment No. 1 (the "Registration Statement") of our
report dated January 28, 2003, relating to the financial statements of
Greenlight Power Technologies, Inc., which appears in the Registration
Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in
the Registration Statement.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Vancouver, British Columbia

January 27, 2004
#### *In re*Williams.

*(District Court, D. South Carolina.*

January 23, 1889.)

1. Witness—Attendances ax» Fees—In Federal Courts.

A person, under subpoma as a witness for the United States, attended court. The case was continued, and the witnesses were verbally instructed to attend at the next term. In the mean time he removed his residence into another state. Without further summons, he attended court, and was used as a witness by the United States. *JMd,*that he was entitled to mileage from his place of residence.

3. Same.

A witness for the United States, voluntarily coming to and attending court on the verbal instructions of the district attorney, is entitled to *per diem*and mileage, notwithstanding that his residence is out of the district, and more than 100 miles from the place at which the court is held.

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Qn Application for Compensation as Witness.

*B. A. Ifagood*and *R. W. Memminger, Jr.,*for applicant.

*IT. Á. De Saussure,*Asst. TJ. S. Disk Atty.

Simonton, J.

Williams was served with subpoena to attend the July term of this court in *United States*v. *Howard*in behalf of the government. He attended, and was registered by the district attorney. The case was continued to the October term. All the witnesses in behalf of the government were discharged with instructions to return at the next term. In October Williams attended, was again registered, and, the case of Howard having -been continued, he was, with the other witnesses, discharged under instructions to appear at the January term. In November he went, under his father’s instructions, to Jersey City, the residence of his father; he being a minor. .ITe came back to Charleston to attend the January term of this court. Tie reported himself to the district attorney, and was registered as a witness, giving his residence as Jersey City, and was used at the trial of Howard. He never was bound over as a witness. He received no subpoena except to the July term. He claims his mileage from Jersey City.

With serious doubt of the *bona jides*of this case, I have examined into the facts presented in the affidavits, and have come to the conclusion ibat Williams came here in good faith, thinking that he was obliged to come, and for the sole purpose of being a witness. Assuming that the exigency of his subpoena was satisfied by his attendance at the July term, and that he has afterwards attended under the verbal instructions of the district attorney, he would, under the practice of this court, sane*326tioned by the practice of other United States courts, be entitled to his *per diem. U. S.*v. *Williams,*1 Cranch, C. C. 178; *Dennis*v. *Eddy,*12 Blatchf. 196; *Cummings*v. *Cement Co.,*6 Blatchf. 509. See, also, *Dreskill*v. *Parish,*5 McLean, 241. And if Jersey City is *bona fide*his residence, he is entitled to his mileage, notwithstanding the fact that it is out of this state and district, and is more than 100 miles away from the place for the holding of the court. *U. S.*v. *Sanborn,*28 Fed. Rep. 299. Let the order be prepared accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         146,039
<SECURITIES>                                 1,030,120
<RECEIVABLES>                                  196,413<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     92,045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,000,099
<PP&E>                                         857,450
<DEPRECIATION>                                 308,391
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,170,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,490
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,423
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,777,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,170,985
<SALES>                                        443,105
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               738,353
<CGS>                                           77,868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               343,008
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                138,598
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            110,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   110,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE PRESENTED NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS IN 
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET.  THE PROVISION FOR LOSSES ON DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS IS NOT REPORTED AS A SEPARATE LINE IN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME OR STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

# AGENCY:

Government Accountability Office (GAO).

# ACTION:

Notice on letters of nomination.

# SUMMARY:

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 established the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and gave the Comptroller General responsibility for appointing its members. For appointments to MedPAC that will be effective May 1, 2015, I am announcing the following: Letters of nomination and resumes should be submitted by March 13, 2015 to ensure adequate opportunity for review and consideration of nominees prior to the appointment of new members.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Email:                         *MedPACappointments@gao.gov*

Mail: U.S. GAO, Attn: MedPAC Appointments, 441 G Street NW., Washington, DC 20548

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 GAO Office of Public Affairs, (202) 512-4800. 

42 U.S.C. 1395b-6.

Gene L. Dodaro,

Comptroller General of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2015-00759 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-M
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14210 and #14211]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Mississippi (FEMA—4205—DR), dated 01/07/2015. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         12/23/2014. *Effective Date:*
                         01/07/2015. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         03/09/2015. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/07/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 01/07/2015, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Marion. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625For Economic Injury:Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14210B and for economic injury is 14211B. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator, for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2015-00673 Filed 1-16-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Addendum to Employment Agreement between the Company and John Supan



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
 ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN 
 JOHN SUPAN AND PEAK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 
 Whereas, the parties entered into an
employment agreement dated August 1, 2006 (hereinafter the “Agreement”); and 
 Whereas, the parties desire to amend paragraph
2.2 of the Agreement; 
 Now, therefore, the parties agree as follows: 
 Paragraph 2.2 of the Agreement is deleted and the following substituted in lieu thereof: “Effective May 14, 2007 and after Employee’s
signature below, Employee shall be paid an annual salary of US$262,500.00 in twelve equal monthly payments.” 
 In witness whereof, the
parties have executed this addendum on the later to occur of May 14, 2007 (the effective date) or the date last signed below. 
  

					
	PEAK INTERNATIONAL LIMITED	 		 	JOHN SUPAN
			
	/s/ Dean Personne	 		 	/s/ John Supan
	By: Dean Personne, President & CEO	 		 	 
			
	30 May 2007	 		 	30 May 2007
	Date:	 		 	Date:
#### Executive Risk Indemnity Inc., Appellant, v Pepper Hamilton LLP et al., Respondents and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Continental Casualty Company et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

Submitted August 3, 2009;

decided August 27, 2009

Reported below, 56 AD3d 196.

Motion by Philadelphia Bar Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed. Two copies of the brief must be served and 24 copies filed within seven days.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 (EXTENDICARE LOGO) NEWS RELEASEFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
October 15, 2004 Extendicare Inc. Declares Preferred Share Dividend Payment (TSX: EXE.PR.E) MARKHAM, ONTARIO  Extendicare Inc. (TSX: EXE and EXE.A; NYSE: EXE.A)
announced today that a monthly dividend of $0.065 per share, on the Companys
Class II Preferred Shares, Series 1 (EXE.PR.E) has been declared payable on
November 15, 2004 to shareholders of record on October 29, 2004. The floating
rate monthly dividend on the Class II Preferred Shares, Series 1 is based on
the prime interest rate on September 30, 2004. For further information, contact: Extendicare Inc.
Christopher Barnes
Manager, Investor Relations
Telephone: (905) 470-5483
Fax: (905) 470-4003
Visit Extendicares Website @ www.extendicare.com - 30 -