alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         149,817
<SECURITIES>                                 1,016,268
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,561<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     93,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,005,605
<PP&E>                                         950,783
<DEPRECIATION>                                 332,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,282,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          248,464
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,447
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,857,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,282,166
<SALES>                                        154,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               257,285
<CGS>                                           27,685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               122,743
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,888
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,289
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,599
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE PRESENTED NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS IN
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET.  THE PROVISION FOR LOSSES ON DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS IS NOT REPORTED AS A SEPARATE LINE IN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME OR STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS. 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00486]



[[Page 2116]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Nursing Research; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Special Emphasis Panel; Training and Career Development.
    Date: February 17, 2015.
    Time: 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Nursing Research, National 
Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, 
Suite 703, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Yujing Liu, Ph.D., MD Chief, Office of Review, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Nursing 
Research, National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 710, Bethesda, MD 20892 (301) 451-5152, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3cac6d9daddd4ecdfdac6f3dddadb9dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c55594645424b734045596c424544024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Nursing Research 
Initial Review Group.
    Date: February 19-20, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Weiqun Li, MD, Scientific Review Officer, Office 
of Review, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, One Democracy 
Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 710, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 594-5966, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#40372c29002d21292c6e2e29286e272f36"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e2958e8ba28f838b8ecc8c8b8acc858d94">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.361, 
Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 9, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-00486 Filed 1-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Marsha Lichtman-Williams et al., Respondents, v Elaine Desmond, Defendant, and Paul A. Zelem et al., Appellants.

[609 NYS2d 296]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Paul A. Zelem and Carol McKelvey appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated June 16, 1992, which, upon the plaintiffs’ motion, *inter alia,*for renewal, granted renewal, and vacated so much of a prior order of the same court, entered March 27, 1992, as granted the appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion for renewal is denied, and so much of the order entered March 27, 1992, as dismissed the respondents’ complaint, is reinstated.

The plaintiff Marsha Lichtman-Williams has failed to establish a prima facie case that she sustained "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The report of the plaintiffs’ physician, Dr. Ralph Parisi, failed to indicate with specificity any limitation in Lichtman-Williams’ range of movement *(see, Licari v Elliott,*57 NY2d 230; *O’Neill v Rogers,*163 AD2d 466). Moreover, Lichtman-Williams returned to work four days after the accident, and so was not prevented from performing substantially all of the material acts that constituted her customary daily activities for 90 out of the 180 days following the accident *(see,*Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; *Licari v Elliott, supra; Grotzer v Levy,*133 AD2d 67). Nor is there any evidence in the record of any causal relationship between the accident and a herniated disc revealed by a magnetic resonance imaging taken four years *647after the accident *(see, Wierzbicki v Kristel,*192 AD2d 906). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.2**Certifications**I, Michael Sweet, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of MDI, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Dated: May 11, 2007         By /s/ Michael Sweet       Michael Sweet      Chief Financial Officer  
16
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00345]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Neuroendocrinology, Neuroimmunology, Rhythms and Sleep Study Section, 
February 05, 2015, 08:00 a.m. to February 06, 2015, 06:00 p.m., JW 
Marriott New Orleans, 614 Canal Street, New Orleans, LA, 70130 which 
was published in the Federal Register on January 02, 2015, 80 FR 42.
    The meeting location has changed to the Renaissance New Orleans 
Pere Marquette Hotel, 817 Common Street, New Orleans, LA, 70112. The 
meeting date and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: January 8, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-00345 Filed 1-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of CAI International, Inc.; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such                statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: April 29, 2020 |     |                         |
|----------------------|-----|-------------------------|
|                      |     |                         |
|                      | By: | /s/ TIMOTHY B. PAGE     |
|                      |     | Timothy B. Page         |
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 32.2
  Certification
of Principal Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Mandalay Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
  The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of the Company
(the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:
August 14, 2009
  /s/
      Russell BurkeRussell
      BurkeChief
      Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal
      Financial Officer)
 
 
 43
NO. 07-01-0055-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MAY 4, 2001

	______________________________

	JOSE O. MARTINEZ, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 286TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY;

	NO. 95-01-4169; HONORABLE ANDREW J. KUPPER, JR., JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	On February 5, 2001, a copy of a Notice of Appeal in cause No. 95-01-4169 in the 286th District Court of Hockley County, Texas (the trial court), was filed with the clerk of this court.  The document filed gives notice that Jose O. Martinez desires to appeal from some action of such court and cause number.  On February 22, 2001, a docketing statement was filed with the clerk of this court which sets out that the appeal is from a judgment or order dated September 16, 1999.  

	On May 3, 2001, the clerk of this court received a notice from the trial court clerk that the clerk’s record has not been paid for, and that the record will not be forwarded to the appellate court for filing.  The appellate clerk’s record reflects no other action by any party to the appeal to prosecute the appeal.  

	Accordingly, this appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the trial court.  Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(2).  Upon remand, the judge of the trial court is directed to immediately cause notice to be given of and to conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is entitled to have the clerk’s record furnished without charge; and (3) what orders, if any, should be entered to assure the filing of appropriate notices and documentation to dismiss appellant’s appeal if appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, or, if appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, to assure that the clerk’s record will be promptly filed and that the appeal will be diligently pursued. 

	The trial court is directed to: (1) conduct any necessary hearings; (2) make and file appropriate findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommendations, and cause them to be included in a clerk’s record of proceedings on remand; (3) cause the hearing proceedings to be transcribed and included in a reporter’s record; and (4) have a record of the proceedings made to the extent any of the proceedings are not included in the clerk’s record on remand or the reporter’s record.  In the absence of a request for extension of time from the trial court, the clerk’s record on remand, reporter’s record of the hearing and proceedings pursuant to this order, and any additional proceeding records, including any orders, findings, conclusions and recommendations, are to be sent so as to be received by the clerk of this court not later than June 15, 2001. 	

									Per Curiam

Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          69,229
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                87,055
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     42,829
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         255,624
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           253,900
<LOANS>                                      1,028,143
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,524,798
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,387,621
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,799
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     102,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,524,798
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 69,123
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               12,659
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,816
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                84,598
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              30,652
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,381
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           53,217
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,045
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 37,908
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,135
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      21,135
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,952
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.41
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,835
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,052
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,555
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,822
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,838
<RECOVERIES>                                       789
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,156
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,869
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          7,287
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Kallo Inc., formerly, Diamond Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, John Cecil, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 18th day of May, 2011.





JOHN CECILJohn CecilChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 99.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code I, William R. Fatt, the chief executive officer of Fairmont Hotels &
Resorts Inc. (the Corporation), certify that (i) the report on Form 6-K for
the month of November 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. /s/ William R. Fatt

William R. Fatt
Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 5, 2004
#### Mercedes McIntosh, Respondent, v Sisters Servants of Mary et al., Appellants.

[965 NYS2d 403]

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered on or about December 30, 2010, which af*673firmed an order of the Civil Court, Bronx County (Mitchell Danziger, J.), entered on or about June 9, 2010, denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint alleging a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants made a prima facie showing that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury as a result of the subject accident by proffering the affirmation of a radiologist who found degenerative disc disease and no posttraumatic abnormality *(see Barhak v Almanzar-Cespedes,*101 AD3d 564, 564-565 [1st Dept 2012]; *Porter v Bajana,*82 AD3d 488 [1st Dept 2011]).

In opposition, plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact. The medical records she submitted not only showed that doctors had diagnosed her with degenerative osteoarthritic changes before the accident and that MRIs taken shortly after the accident noted disc desiccation and diffuse degenerative disc disease, but also that she was asymptomatic during the four years prior to the accident. Plaintiff also submitted the affidavit of her chiropractor who found significant limitations in range of motion of her cervical and lumbar spine immediately after and persisting after the accident. Plaintiffs neurologist made similar range of motion findings in an examination almost six years after the accident. Both doctors opined that plaintiffs injuries resulted from the accident. Moreover, her chiropractor opined that, given her “pre-existing cervical and lumbar condition,” the injuries she sustained from the accident “were superimposed upon her already delicate medical condition.” Thus, plaintiffs submissions and the opinions of her experts suffice to raise an issue of fact as to the significant limitations of her cervical and lumbar spine *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 219 [2011]).

Plaintiff adequately explained a gap in treatment by submitting the affidavit of her chiropractor, wherein he opined that after a year of treating plaintiff she had reached the maximum therapeutic benefit and that further treatment would not benefit her recovery *(see Pommells v Perez,*4 NY3d 566, 577 [2005]; *Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345, 355 [2002]).

As to her 90/180-day claim, plaintiff raised an issue of fact with the submission of her chiropractor’s affidavit in which he averred that shortly after the accident he recommended that she refrain from working until further notice, and he concluded a year later that “she was still unable to perform her usual daily activities” *(see Pannell-Thomas v Bath,*99 AD3d 485 [1st Dept 2012]). In her affidavit, plaintiff reported that her injuries prevented her from performing her usual daily activities for at least nine months following the accident.

Concur—Tom, J.P, *674Mazzarelli, Saxe, Moskowitz and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.