alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION 

I, Patrick Gray, Senior Vice President Finance of Axesstel, Inc.(“Registrant”), certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A ofAxesstel, Inc.; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.    The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5.    The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: July 17, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,590,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,590,938
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,390,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,493
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,382,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,390,395
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,721
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               495,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (384,610)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (384,610)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (384,610)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.  AMOUNTS IN
THOUSANDS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         306,989
<SECURITIES>                                 1,604,775
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,034<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    254,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,245,876
<PP&E>                                       1,277,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                 540,905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,454,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          238,972
<BONDS>                                        149,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,208
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,416,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,454,638
<SALES>                                        283,178
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               385,692
<CGS>                                          106,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               111,406
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,630)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,725)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,905)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,905)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE PRESENTED NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS IN
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET.  THE PROVISION FOR LOSSES ON DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS IS NOT REPORTED AS A SEPARATE LINE IN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME OR STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS.
</FN>



</TABLE>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### NOV 30 2000 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 99-4240 JULIE ANN DOBBS, (D.C. No. 99-CR-284-W) (D. Utah) Defendant-Appellant.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , McKAY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

This appeal from a conviction and sentence for poss ession of stolen mail raises only sentencing issues. The Defendant firstappeals the trial court’s inclusion of all relevant conduct at sentencing. A t trial, two checks were introduced into evidence which had been stolen fromthe mail, together with evidence that Defendant presented them to a busines s for services and that she filled in the name of the business and the amount t endered in her own handwriting. At sentencing, the trial court includ ed as relevant conduct fourteen-2-

additional checks from the stolen series of blanks. There was no evidence that Defendant negotiated those checks, but there was ev idence before the court at sentencing that the handwriting on the additional c hecks was similar to that on the checks Defendant passed. (Appellee’s App. at 6 2). There was additional testimony that Defendant was with a Ms. Spinuzzi (w ho testified that she gave some of the checks to Defendant) when Ms. Spinuzzi passed some of the checks. The handwriting and other evidence were sufficient to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant was in volved in the passing of at least seventeen checks, whose value exceeded the $2 ,000 that the court used in sentencing. The second issue on appeal concerns the court’s two -level offense increase for more than minimal planning. The number of chec ks, the elaborate ruses Defendant used to explain her right to the checks s he passed, and the apparent coordination between Defendant and Ms. Spinuzzi mor e than satisfied the necessary support for this conclusion. We have hel d that more than minimal planning exists where “there are repeated acts overa period of time, unless it is clear that each instance is purely opportune.” United States v. Copus , 110 F.3d 1529, 1537 (10th Cir. 1997). AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court-3- Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultrak, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Niklaus F. Zenger, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)  This Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Niklaus F. Zenger
---------------------------
Niklaus F. Zenger
Chief Executive Officer
November 22, 2002
<PAGE>

[GERDAU AMERISTEEL LOGO]

GERDAU AMERISTEEL ANNOUNCES US$100 MILLION PRIVATE EQUITY PLACEMENT

TORONTO, April 1, 2004 -- Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation (TSX: GNA.TO) announced
that it intends to sell 26,800,000 common shares to its majority shareholder,
Gerdau S.A. The price has been set at C$4.90 per share, the closing price of the
Company's common shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange on March 31, 2004. The
Company intends to use the total net proceeds of approximately US$100 million
for general corporate purposes, which may include funding capital equipment or
working capital and repayment of debt.

The transaction is subject to approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange and closing
is expected to take place no later than April 16, 2004. As of March 31, 2004
Gerdau Ameristeel has 198,196,559 shares outstanding. Gerdau S.A. indirectly
holds 68.60%, or 135,954,900 of those shares. Upon completion of the transaction
Gerdau Ameristeel will have 224,996,559 common shares outstanding of which
72.34%, or 162,754,900 shares, will be held indirectly by Gerdau S.A.

ABOUT GERDAU AMERISTEEL

Gerdau Ameristeel is the second largest minimill steel producer in North America
with annual manufacturing capacity of over 6.8 million tons of mill finished
steel products. Through its vertically integrated network of 11 minimills
(including one 50%-owned minimill), 13 scrap recycling facilities and 32
downstream operations, Gerdau Ameristeel primarily serves customers in the
eastern half of North America. The company's products are generally sold to
steel service centers, fabricators, or directly to original equipment
manufacturers for use in a variety of industries, including construction,
automotive, mining and equipment manufacturing. Gerdau Ameristeel's common
shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol GNA.TO

For more information please contact:

Phillip E. Casey                    Tom J. Landa
President & CEO                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Gerdau Ameristeel                   Gerdau Ameristeel
(813) 207-2225                      (813) 207-2300
pcasey@gerdauameristeel.com         tlanda@gerdauameristeel.com
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

lionorable J. B. Bank8 

county Judge 

Pavker County 

Weatherford, Teum 

mar sir1 

Your requert ta an 8 

ln part; 

dqartment reada 

r OS the State OS Teru have 

County Attorney or Criminal 

Ill out 81’. Borden’s unexColatulonero Oourt le now in 

niting tU8 letter at the request of the Cowt La the abrenoe of a Oeunty Attorney through vhom ve oan meet tlrFa quution. 

I right state hers that Parker County bar alvap 

dealgnated its Attorney a8 the County Attorney, 

but he hea alvsga handled the duties of’ a Matriot 

Attorney, ae we are not In any Distriot Attomey’r 

Dl8triot. n 
Hcixwrrble J. B. Banka, pa@ 2 

‘lie held in our Cplnlm Pp. O-3636, a copy of vhloh 

la enoloaed herevlth, thet a ohcnge ln th43 title oi county attorney to that of cr*imlml dlatriot attorney under Senate Bill 

312, Acts of the 47th Legislature, does not ahAng the ~Overa, 

duties &rid fumtlona of the offloer. 

Senate Bill 3l2, 47th Legislature of texaa, provides 

that the oounty attorney of any oounty Fn thla State not ,embraoed ln or oom#tltutSng either a or-1 dlatriot attorney's 

dlatrlot or a district attorne 

of representing the State in a L 

(8 dlatrlot and u&e&eln the duty 

Oriml.n01 uattera arising ln 

such oouuty devolves upon the oountr attorney of such oounty, 

EQht pet1tiOn the cOlwi*alone&a * court to deal(pute the oifloe 

of oounty attorney 8L the offloe of orlmlnel dlatrlet l tto&ney 

o f l ueh oounty. It apeoUloO11y provides that”0 ayltg g,e 

PO 0r th0 0fri00 8haii not ogard20 80 u t0 

affeot either the rights, dutiesI Or emoluvmnta’o~ ;wh ofiioe 

or the lncllmbeIlt thereor. . . . * 

Seotlon 2 of the Aot reada: 

‘INTENT OF ACT. It ie not the intention of 

this Act to oreate any efiiicpe gr.zai8trlcti Attorney 

or any ottup Conatltutlonel offloej. but It is the 

lntent10n of thl.8 Act mere4 to LuthoPUe 8 ohange 

lnthenameofanda 

r 

uatbm of th0 0iri00 0f 

County Attorney and e inouabent thereof in tiertaln @ountiea, without otheruLae ~ha@.ng or atfooting the rights, dutlea 0# emolummta either of 

l uoh OfilOe Or the inoumbent ~thO&ctOf .” 

Artlole 2355, Vernon*a Anuotated Civil Statutes, reedas 

“Tha Court shall have paver to fill vaoanoiea 

In the ofiloe of8 County Judge, County Clerk, Shwlff, Couuty Attorpep, County Treasurer, County Su&- 

veyor, CouutJr Bid0 Iuapeotor, Aa8eaaw of faxes, 

Colleotor of Taxes, Juatloea oi the Peace, Constables, and County Superlnteudent of Pub110 Inl trriction. su0h vaoaaoiea ahall b0 illlad by a 

majority vote of the wmbera of aaid Court p&esent and voting, and the person uhoaen ah011 hold 

offloe until th0 next; general eleotion.” 
I 

B j 

Aaalatant 

Bonor8bls d. ~B. Banke, pege 3 

It la Our oplnlim that the vmuioy IJI the oiflea OS 

ariestnal dlat&lct attorney should be tilled by l o tla n of the 

commlaalonerat aourt, acting pursuant to Artlale 2355, sup&a. 

Very truly yours 

ATTOAIIEY WIBRAL OP TEL83 

En0108 ure
##### 



---

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

FORM 6-K

Report of Foreign Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For October 15, 2003

EXTENDICARE INC.

---

3000 Steeles Avenue East
Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9W2(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F o
    
    Form 40-F x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.

Yes o
    
    No x


If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-



---

---





---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX

ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    News Release dated October 15, 2003






---



##### 



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

EXTENDICARE INC.Date:   October 15, 2003
    
    By:
    
    /s/   MARK W. DURISHANMark W. DurishanVice-President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
#### Petition of INGERSOLL-RAND CO. to Perpetuate Testimony and Inspect Documents and Tangible Things.

United States District Court D. New York.

May 26, 1964.

Hopgood & Calimafde, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, for respondent.

WYATT, District Judge.

Ingersoll-Rand Company filed a petitions under Fed.R.Civ.P. 27 to perpetuate testimony and gave notice to Thor Power-Tool Company as “an expected adverse-party” of an application for the order described in the petition.

The petition and application for an order were denied, with a memorandum, opinion, by order filed April 20, 1964, D. C., 35 F.R.D. 122.

A primary reason for denial of the petition was that Ingersoll-Rand did not. “tell us that it intends to make or sell the patented article”.

- Ingersoll-Rand now moves for reargument and renews its petition and application. An affidavit is submitted of the-Executive Vice-president of IngersollRand who states that “Ingersoll-Rand' knows it will commercially produce its. impulse tool within the next two years”.

Unless I am to disregard this sworn-statement, the purpose of Ingersoll-Rand “to make or sell the patented article”' seems now established.

It is also clear that Ingersoll-Rand and Thor are engaged in actual controversy. A denial of the petition might mean prejudice to one or both of the parties, because evidence might be lost or be otherwise unavailable. To grant the petition “may prevent a failure or delay of justice” (Fed.R.Civ.P. 27(a) (3)) and in any event can cause little, if any, harm to Thor.

Giving Rule 27 a “liberal construction”, -to which it has been declared to be entitled (Petition of Ernst, D.C., 2 F.R.D. .447, 450; S.D.Calif.1942), I am inclined *to*grant the petition and application^ See Martin v. Reynolds Metals Corp., 297 F.2d 49 (9th Cir. 1961); Mosseler v. United States, 158 F.2d 380 (2d Cir. 1946).

The motion for reargument is granted and on reargument the petition and application are granted. :

Settle order on notice. '
##### 



FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (RUSSEL METALS LOGO) For the month of April, 2004 Commission File Number: 0-22774 RUSSEL METALS INC. (Translation of registrants name into English)
 1900 Minnesota Court, Suite 210 Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 3C9(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F
 Form 40-F  X Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a
Form 6-K if submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security
holders. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a
Form 6-K if submitted to furnish a report or other document that the registrant
foreign private issuer must furnish and make public under the laws of the
jurisdiction in which the registrant is incorporated, domiciled or legally
organized (the registrants home country), or under the rules of the home
country exchange on which the registrants securities are traded, as long as
the report or other document is not a press release, is not required to be and
has not been distributed to the
registrants security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already
been the subject of a




---



##### 



Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR. Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Yes  No  X If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- Signatures Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Russel Metals Inc.(Registrant)Date: April 5, 2004
    
    By: /s/ BRIAN R. HEDGESBrian R. HedgesExecutive Vice President & CFO
 Documents Included as Part of this Report: No.
    
    Document1.
    
    2003 Annual Report2.
    
    Notice of Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders3.
    
    2004 Management Proxy Circular4.
    
    Form of Proxy5.
    
    Confirmation of Mailing