alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Deer Consumer Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ying He, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 10, 2011
By:
/s/ Ying HeYing He

Chief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Agyeman Boateng, Respondent, v Pompeyo G. Calle, Appellant, and Nora Ofosu Dankyi, Also Known as Nora Ofosu Allen, Respondent. (And Another Action.)

[964 NYS2d 95]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ben R. Barbato, J.), entered May 22, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant Pompeyo G. Calle’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon the failure to establish a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and, upon a search of the record, defendant Allen’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Defendant Calle established his entitlement to judgment as a *542matter of law. Calle submitted the affirmed reports of a radiologist, who examined plaintiff and reviewed his medical records, and found that the injuries to the right shoulder and thoracic spine were degenerative in nature. Calle also submitted the affirmed report of an orthopedist, who examined plaintiff and found normal ranges of motion in his right shoulder and cervical and lumbar spines *(see Spencer v Golden Eagle, Inc.,*82 AD3d 589 [1st Dept 2011]; *Johnson v Singh,*82 AD3d 565, 565 [1st Dept 2011]).

In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Plaintiff failed to submit objective evidence of significant limitations of any of the subject body parts *(see Vega v MTA Bus Co.,*96 AD3d 506, 507 [1st Dept 2012]).

Dismissal of the 90/180-day claim is warranted in light of plaintiffs testimony that he only missed two days of work following the accident and that he was placed on a reduced work schedule thereafter *(see Arenas v Guarnan,*98 AD3d 461 [1st Dept 2012]; *Borja v Delarosa,*90 AD3d 407, 408-409 [1st Dept 2011]).

Defendant Allen did not appeal from the denial of her motion for summary judgment. Nonetheless, she is entitled to dismissal of the complaint as against her because “if [a] plaintiff cannot meet the threshold for serious injury against one defendant, [he or] she cannot meet it against the other” *{Lopez v Simpson,*39 AD3d 420, 421 [1st Dept 2007]).

Concur—Sweeny, J.P, Moskowitz, Abdus-Salaam, Román and Feinman, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2581 

To prohibit Federal funds from being awarded or otherwise made available 

to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mrs. MILLER of Illinois, Mr. CRANE, Mr. NORMAN, 

Mr. GOSAR, and Mr. GOOD of Virginia) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funds from being awarded or otherwise 

made available to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accountability for 

5 Lawless Violence In our Neighborhoods Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘ALVIN Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING WITH RE8 SPECT TO MANHATTAN DISTRICT ATTORNEY. 

9 (a) PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING.—Notwith10 standing any other provision of law, no Federal funds may 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2581 IH

1 be awarded or otherwise made available to the Manhattan 

2 District Attorney’s Office. 

3 (b) RECISION AND REPAYMENT OF FEDERAL FUND4 ING.—The unobligated balances of all amounts allocated 

5 for or otherwise made available to the Manhattan District 

6 Attorney’s Office is hereby rescinded, and the Attorney 

7 General shall take such steps as may be necessary and 

8 practicable to require the Manhattan District Attorney’s 

9 Office to reimburse the Federal Government for all 

10 amounts expended for such Office after the date of Janu11 ary 1, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3625 

To provide for the reliquidation of cerain entries of certain small diameter 

carbon and alloy seamless standard, line and pressure pipe from Romania. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2006 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for the reliquidation of cerain entries of certain 

small diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line 

and pressure pipe from Romania. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION. 1. RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ENTRIES OF 

4 CERTAIN SMALL DIAMETER CARBON AND 

5 ALLOY SEAMLESS STANDARD, LINE AND 

6 PRESSURE PIPE FROM ROMANIA. 

7 (a) RELIQUIDATION OF ENTRIES.—Notwithstanding 

8 sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

9 1514 and 1520) or any other provision of law, the Bureau 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3625 IS 

1 of Customs and Border Protection shall, not later than 

2 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act— 

3 (1) reliquidate the entries of certain small di4 ameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line and 

5 pressure pipe from Romania produced by S.C. 

6 Silcotub S.A. (Silcotub), imported by Duferco Steel, 

7 Inc., listed in subsection (b) in accordance with the 

8 final results of the antidumping duty administrative 

9 review of the Department of Commerce (68 Fed. 

10 Reg. 12672 (March 17, 2003)) and Message No. 

11 3087205, dated March 28, 2003, issued by the Bu12 reau of Customs and Border Protection; and 

13 (2) refund any antidumping duties with interest 

14 which were previously paid on such entries not later 

15 than 90 days after the date of reliquidation. 

16 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

17 subsection (a) are the following: 

Entry number Date of entry Port 

558–1171537–8 ............. 01/20/01 ................ Houston 

558–2014403–2 ............. 07/24/00 ................ Mobile 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Tomahawk Industries, Inc.
File No. 0-9483


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Tomahawk  Industries,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Glenn A. Little,  Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 10, 2004                    By: /s/ Glenn A. Little
      -----------------                       ----------------------------------
                                                                 Glenn A. Little
                                           Chief Executive and Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Tomahawk  Industries,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Tomahawk
Industries,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Thomas Sarcona, Appellant, v J & J Air Container Station, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[976 NYS2d 156]

*915In an action to recover on a promissory note, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated October 18, 2012, which granted the defendants’ motion to vacate a judgment of the same court dated April 23, 2012, which, upon an order dated August 29, 2011, granting the plaintiffs unopposed motion for summary judgment on the complaint, and upon an order dated February 15, 2012, granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was to modify the prior order dated August 29, 2011, was in favor of him and against the defendants in the total sum of $505,285.59.

Ordered that the order dated October 18, 2012, is affirmed, with costs.

To vacate the judgment entered upon their failure to oppose the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, the defendants were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default and a potentially meritorious opposition to the motion *(see*CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; *Herrera v MTA Bus Co.,*100 AD3d 962, 963 [2012]; *Tsikotis v Pioneer Bldg. Corp.,*96 AD3d 936 [2012]; *Walker v Mohammed,*90 AD3d 1034 [2011]). The Supreme Court may, in its discretion, accept law office failure as a reasonable excuse *(see*CPLR 2005) where that claim is supported by a detailed and credible explanation of the default at issue *(see Swensen v MV Transp., Inc.,*89 AD3d 924, 925 [2011]; *Remote Meter Tech. of NY, Inc. v Aris Realty Corp.,*83 AD3d 1030, 1032 [2011]; *Henry v Kuveke,*9 AD3d 476, 479 [2004]). Under the circumstances of this case, and based on the evidence in the record, the defendants demonstrated that their failure to oppose the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the complaint was due to their former attorney’s law office failure *(see Muir v Coleman,*98 AD3d 569, 570 [2012]; *L&L Auto Distribs. & Suppliers Inc. v Auto Collection, Inc.,*85 AD3d 734, 735 [2011]; *Gironda v Katzen,*19 AD3d 644, 645 [2005]; *Belesi v Gifford,*269 AD2d 552 [2000]). Furthermore, while the defendants’ former attorney failed to appear at a court conference that resulted in the issuance of an order dated February 15, 2012, upon which the subject default judgment was subsequently entered, there is no evidence that the defendants were placed on notice that their former attorney was not going to appear or that he was no longer representing them *(see*CPLR 321 [b] [2]). Moreover, the defendants moved to vacate the subject default judgment shortly after it was entered and they obtained new counsel, and they demonstrated a potentially meritorious opposition to the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the *916complaint *(see Gruder v Gruder,*38 AD2d 587 [1971]; *cf. Sacco v Sutera,*266 AD2d 446, 447 [1999]; *Phillips v Cioffi,*204 AD2d 94, 95 [1994]; *Inter Bus. Mktg. v Kronengold,*135 AD2d 474 [1987]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendants’ motion to vacate the subject default judgment. Dillon, J.E, Leventhal, Chambers and Miller, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Denis Iler, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB of  Mountains  West
Exploration, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of September 30, 2004; and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 11, 2004


/s/ Denis Iler
- -----------------------
 Denis Iler, President
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of China Green Creative, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s knowledge:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


Dated:
March 8, 2012By:
/s/ Ye Xing ZhangYe Xing ZhangChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3625 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3625

  To provide for the reliquidation of cerain entries of certain small 
  diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line and pressure pipe 
                             from Romania.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2006

Mr. Menendez (for himself and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the reliquidation of cerain entries of certain small 
  diameter carbon and alloy seamless standard, line and pressure pipe 
                             from Romania.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN ENTRIES OF CERTAIN SMALL DIAMETER 
              CARBON AND ALLOY SEAMLESS STANDARD, LINE AND PRESSURE 
              PIPE FROM ROMANIA.

    (a) Reliquidation of Entries.--Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 
of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520) or any other 
provision of law, the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection shall, 
not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) reliquidate the entries of certain small diameter 
        carbon and alloy seamless standard, line and pressure pipe from 
        Romania produced by S.C. Silcotub S.A. (Silcotub), imported by 
        Duferco Steel, Inc., listed in subsection (b) in accordance 
        with the final results of the antidumping duty administrative 
        review of the Department of Commerce (68 Fed. Reg. 12672 (March 
        17, 2003)) and Message No. 3087205, dated March 28, 2003, 
        issued by the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection; and
            (2) refund any antidumping duties with interest which were 
        previously paid on such entries not later than 90 days after 
        the date of reliquidation.
    (b) Affected Entries.--The entries referred to in subsection (a) 
are the following:

 
                 Entry number                             Date of entry                         Port
 
  558-1171537-8..............................  01/20/01...........................  Houston
  558-2014403-2..............................  07/24/00...........................  Mobile
 

                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
                          TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  officer  of  NT  Media  Corp.  of  California,   Inc.,  a  Delaware
corporation (the  "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the  Company on Form  10-QSB for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that:

         (1) the  10-QSB  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information  contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 20, 2004            NT MEDIA CORP. OF
                                   CALIFORNIA, INC.


                                   /s/ Chris Briggs
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Chris Briggs
                                   President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                   Financial Officer


























                                  EXHIBIT 32-1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2431 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2431

 To authorize Department of Veterans Affairs health care providers to 
      provide recommendations and opinions to veterans regarding 
               participation in State marijuana programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2023

 Mr. Mast (for himself, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Joyce of Ohio, Ms. Lee of 
California, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Correa, Ms. Crockett, Mr. Crow, Ms. Escobar, 
   Mr. Gaetz, Ms. Mace, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Moskowitz, Ms. Norton, Mr. 
  Peters, Ms. Scanlon, and Ms. Titus) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize Department of Veterans Affairs health care providers to 
      provide recommendations and opinions to veterans regarding 
               participation in State marijuana programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Equal Access Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HEALTH CARE 
              PROVIDERS OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND OPINIONS REGARDING 
              VETERAN PARTICIPATION IN STATE MARIJUANA PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall authorize physicians and other 
health care providers employed by the Department of Veterans Affairs 
to--
            (1) provide recommendations and opinions to veterans who 
        are residents of States with State marijuana programs regarding 
        the participation of veterans in such State marijuana programs; 
        and
            (2) complete forms reflecting such recommendations and 
        opinions.
    (b) State Defined.--In this section, the term ``State'' means each 
of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of 
Puerto Rico, any territory or possession of the United States, and each 
federally recognized Indian Tribe.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sally Dinerman, Appellant, v NYS Lottery, Respondent.

[870 NYS2d 792]—

In an action to recover damages for negligence, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated January 31, 2008, which granted the defendant’s pre-answer motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction over actions for money damages against State agencies, departments, and employees acting in their official capacity in the exercise of governmental functions *(see Morell v Balasubramanian,*70 NY2d 297, 300 [1987]; *Schaffer v Evans,*57 NY2d 992, 994 [1982]; *Sinhogar v Parry,*53 NY2d 424, 431 [1981]). Consequently, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (2) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as the claims in this case arise from acts performed, and determinations made, by State employees in the course of their official duties. Rivera, J.P., Santucci, Garni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.