alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION  Washington, D.C. 20549
 ______________________ FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of: November, 2004 Commission File Number: 000-31815 HYDROGENICS CORPORATION
 CORPORATION HYDROGENIQUE  5985 MCLAUGHLIN ROAD, MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L5R 1B8, CANADA  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F o          Form 40-F x Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Yes o          No x If Yes is marked, indicate below the File Number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):.




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY NOTE On November 19, 2004, Hydrogenics Corporation filed with the System for
Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval in Canada the following:
(i) Material Change Report dated November 18, 2004,
(ii) Lock-Up Agreement dated November 10, 2004 by and among Hydrogenics
Corporation and each of Dr. Hugo Vandenborre, Samuel C. Johnson 1996
Trust, Samuel C. Johnson 1988 Trust I, Newstar Technology Limited,
Mercator Verzekeringen N.V., Robert S. Torokvei, Douglas S. Alexander,
Barrie Cook, Kelly T. Grindle, Peter C. Johnson, Jon Slangerup, Andrew
T.B. Stuart, Robert W. Campbell, George P. Kempff, R. Randall MacEwen,
Bart Van Ouytsel and Peter Wressell and (iii) Support
Agreement dated November 10, 2004 between Hydrogenics Corporation
and Stuart Energy Systems Corporation. Copies of these documents are attached to this report as Exhibit 1,
2 and 3, respectively. -2-




---



##### 



SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. HYDROGENICS CORPORATION -CORPORATION HYDROGENIQUEDate: November 23, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jonathan LundyName: Jonathan LundyTitle: Vice President, General Counseland Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description1.
    
    Material Change Report dated November 18, 20042.
    
    Lock-Up Agreement dated November 10, 2004 by and among Hydrogenics
Corporation and each of Dr. Hugo Vandenborre, Samuel C. Johnson 1996
Trust, Samuel C. Johnson 1988 Trust I, Newstar Technology Limited,
Mercator Verzekeringen N.V., Robert S. Torokvei, Douglas S. Alexander,
Barrie Cook, Kelly T. Grindle, Peter C. Johnson, Jon Slangerup, Andrew
T.B. Stuart, Robert W. Campbell, George P. Kempff, R. Randall MacEwen,
Bart Van Ouytsel and Peter Wressell3.
    
    Support Agreement dated November 10, 2004 between Hydrogenics Corporation
and Stuart Energy Systems Corporation
 -4-
#### Ricardo LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Scott KERNAN, Warden; et al., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 05-16279.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 23, 2006.

*788Ricardo Lopez, lone, CA, pro se.

Margaret J. Littlefield, Esq., Law Office of Michael Satris, Bolinas, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Lisa A. Tillman, Esq., Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Ricardo Lopez appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court’s decision to deny a § 2254 petition, *see McQuillion v. Duncan,*306 F.3d 895, 899 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

The State contends that this Court lacks jurisdiction because there is no federally protected interest in parole release in California, and thus, Lopez has failed to state a federal claim. This contention is foreclosed. *See Sass v. Cal. Bd. of Prison Terms,*461 F.3d 1123, 1127-28 (9th Cir. 2006).

Lopez contends that the California Board of Prison Terms’ (the “Board”) decision to deny him parole violated his due process rights because the confidential evidence before the Board was unreliable. We conclude that some evidence supported the Board’s finding that Lopez was involved with a prison gang and has not removed himself from gang membership for a sufficiently long period. The statements regarding Lopez’s prison gang membership by confidential informants were sufficiently reliable because each informant independently supplied the same information about Lopez. *See Zimmerlee v. Keeney,*831 F.2d 183, 186-87 (9th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (reliability of confidential information may be established by, among other things, corroborating testimony). Accordingly, the denial of parole did not result in an unreasonable application of federal law, and Lopez is not entitled to federal habeas relief. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).

We conclude that Lopez is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2)(A).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### Bradley Steenbuck, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 348]

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Ferreira, J.), dated May 18, 2012, which, upon a decision of the same court dated March 30, 2012, made after a nonjury trial on the issue of liability, is in favor of the defendant and against him dismissing the claim.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“On an appeal from a judgment after a nonjury trial, this Court’s power to review the evidence is as broad as that of the trial court, and this Court may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, giving due regard to the trial court, which had the advantage of assessing the credibility of witnesses” *(Rock v*Rock, 100 AD3d 614, 615-616 [2012]; *see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford,*60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]; *Perriello v State of New York,*106 AD3d 797, 797 [2013]).

“The State of New York is not an insurer of the safety of its roads and no liability will attach unless the State’s alleged negligence in maintaining its roads in a reasonable condition is a proximate cause of the accident” *(Sinski v State of New York,*2 AD3d 517, 517 [2003]; *see Carlo v State of New York,*51 AD3d 618 [2008]; *Vega v State of New York,*37 AD3d 825 [2007]). Here, the determination of the Court of Claims that the claimant failed to establish that a dangerous condition existed at the subject intersection on the date of the subject accident is warranted by the facts *(see Marshall v State of New York,*252 AD2d 852, 853-854 [1998]; *Whiter v State of New York,*148 AD2d 825, 826-827 [1989]). In addition, based on the trial evidence, it was just as likely that the subject accident might have occurred from causes other than the State’s alleged negligence *(see Ingersoll v Liberty Bank of Buffalo,*278 NY 1, 7 [1938]; *Johnson v State of New York,*27 AD3d 1061, 1062 [2006]). Accordingly, the Court of Claims’ determination that the claimant failed to show that any negligence ascribable to the State proximately caused the subject accident is also warranted by the facts *(see Ingersoll v Liberty Bank of Buffalo,*278 NY at 7; *Johnson v State of New York,*27 AD3d at 1062), and we discern no basis upon which to disturb the court’s judgment. Mastro, J.E, Leventhal, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.5 NEWS RELEASE Call-Net realigns organizational structure TORONTO, September 29, 2004  Call-Net Enterprises Inc. today announced a
realignment of its organizational structure designed to improve organizational
effectiveness. Duncan McEwan, the current chief operating officer will take on a new
assignment as executive vice president and chief strategy officer. In this new
role, he will continue to provider leadership to the company. All new product
development, strategic marketing and planning activities will be consolidated
under his leadership. The business solution and wholesale carrier services business units will be
consolidated and Eric Dobson will become senior vice president of Business and
Carrier Services. Dobson was formerly president of Carrier Services. Phil
Hartling will become senior vice president of Consumer and Small Office Home
Office. Phil was previously vice president, customer service operations and
strategy. Call-Net is consolidating its corporate, operations, marketing and provisioning
functions, and eliminating the positions of chief operating officer, chief
legal counsel and business unit presidents. Concurrent with this realignment George Malysheff, senior vice president and
chief legal counsel and Greg McCamus, president Sprint Canada Business
Solutions will be assisting with the transition and will be departing the
organization by the end of year. The changes take effect October 1, 2004. About Call-Net Enterprises Inc.
Call-Net Enterprises Inc., (TSX: FON, FON.B) primarily through its wholly owned
subsidiary Sprint Canada Inc., is a leading Canadian integrated communications
solutions provider of home phone, wireless, long distance and IP services to
households, and local, long distance, toll free, enhanced voice, data and IP
services to businesses across Canada. Call-Net, headquartered in Toronto, owns
and operates an extensive national fibre network, has over 148 co-locations in
five major urban areas including 31 municipalities and maintains network
facilities in the United States and the United Kingdom. For more information,
visit www.callnet.ca and www.sprint.ca. Media contact:
Karen OLeary
(416) 718-6445
karen.oleary.sprint-canada.com
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Thompson, the Chief Financial Officer of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ Stephen B. Thompson
-----------------------
Stephen B. Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Initial Review Group; Neurological Sciences and Disorders 
B.
    Date: February 19-20, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hotel Monaco Alexandria, 480 King Street, Alexandria, VA 
22314.
    Contact Person: Birgit Neuhuber, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, 
NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 
3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-496-3562, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d13180815081f180f3d131413190e53131415531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="563833233e2334332416383f38322578383f3e78313920">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 30, 2014.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-30875 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                   Exhibit 32


In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Public  Storage,  Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald L.
Havner,  Jr., as Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  Harvey  Lenkin,  as
President of the Company,  and John Reyes,  as Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  each  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of  operations  of the
      Company.


/s/ Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
--------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Date:    May 10, 2005

/s/ Harvey Lenkin
--------------------------
Name:    Harvey Lenkin
Title:   President
Date:    May 10, 2005

/s/ John Reyes
---------------------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    May 10, 2005


                                  Exhibit 32
#### Jeffrey E. Phillips, Appellant, v James P. Lavelle et al., Respondents.

[975 NYS2d 766]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated November 29, 2012, as granted the motion of the defendants James E Lavelle and Kelly A. Lavelle for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident and granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Ruth A. Messina which was for the same relief as to her.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and the motion of the defendants James E Lavelle and Kelly A. Lavelle for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them and that branch of *911the cross motion of the defendant Ruth A. Messina which was for the same relief as to her are denied, with one bill of costs payable by the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The defendants James E Lavelle and Kelly A. Lavelle, and the defendant Ruth A. Messing, moving separately but relying on the same evidence and arguments, met their prima facie burden of establishing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to the plaintiff’s right shoulder and to the cervical and lumbar regions of the plaintiffs spine did not constitute serious injuries under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact as to whether he sustained serious injuries to his right shoulder and to the cervical and lumbar regions of his spine *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 215-218 [2011]). Therefore, the Supreme Court should have denied the motion and that branch of the cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> OPUR1
<CIK> 0000318819
<NAME> R. D. SIEVERS
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    3,607,277
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    107,317
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         182,795
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       277,753
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  41,045
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,216,187
<COMMON>                                        99,325
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      318,804
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            707,380
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,125,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           80,027
<PREFERRED>                                     17,929
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,800,892
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             154,092
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   37,132
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,000,606
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                4,216,187
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      717,284
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            57,916
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     460,899
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     518,815
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        198,469
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               3,393
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 201,862
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       108,701
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,161
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,988
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   90,173
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        44,976
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      103,113
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         182,138
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
to: 

### Q TimeSection (Presos del division institucional) Classification and Records Headquarters 

# BOTWarehouse Huntsville, Texas S' l^fA^/i^ Q Intake/Classification Office

Marca las cajas apropiadas. Fecha de Comienzo de Sentencia Informacion de Compromiso Estado Tiempo Ahorrado Tiempo de la Carcel del Contado Tiempo Sobresueldo

'-- • f>& f'lV 

# fi/2 /Ye. t&opt $ TJX4s os fa/ <ny CL-147 (Rev. 05/03) 

# RESOLUCION DE CREDITO DE TIEMPO DISPUTABLE/^f*^/^rf<^^ ^e>^ &q£*<~M*ZfogL FECHA NOMBREDEL PRESO/OFENSOR: 

# •^SjUhPS- (Presosdeldivisiondocarceldel estadol/ft/Yl^J-fj-ftf6fififlAZ^. ffc £f/c /!/lf}J,-^l- gg/O State Jail Facility NUMERO DE TDCJ: Fecha del Projecto del Descari Al Frente Fecha del Descargo/Descargo de la Carcel del Estado 

## MAR 09 2015 Fecha de Libertad Provisional/Condicionai Otro: • Yt>TIME CREDIT DISPUTE RESOLUTION 

### TO: \Pf Time Section (ID Offenders) Classification and Records Headquarters BOT Warehouse Huntsville, Texas


### • Intake/Classification Office(SJD Offenders) State Jail Facility 

### Mark ^''appropriate bpx(es). 'Sentence'Begin Date'''- ''•--"• mmitment Information 

### 1/ Time Earning Status 

# ^ ^Coqnty•JailTimeJfc?/&c/T 't+0»v*rj*&t ^i Bonus Time DATE: 

# 3-S-tS" OFFENDER WMIfe:/?/hA/ Q&A &//ltfT&J '?

TDCJ No.: 

# 4 Time-?A*L&foM{Akcr£*c&rc_m^fcutfa*. ijected Release Date/Maximum Expiration Date 

### Upfront Release Date/State Jail Release Date 

## Parole Date— A'iro/e./jATe 

# ^h Other: f//e*/?/fr/?*?*£/!&/Me..M

> si* t-~.\*/ jh^ >_ l. . .-/ a^ -^ / Jy, jit - . .«_X ,J J.. ~" 1 

# Explain the problem inyouj; own words. i^£fg)'r^A/4Att/£^e^li^^^X^^V^^I^^^^t>

<• <rfu'/7%4Q>»i/>c'r<sr//e- WgO 4V7Xj*r ^7^14^ ^y^/>i^^e-CA4^fi^fdWlJf79?ZlS £/>/°/04&/&P<*l%&-&>}

To 7Z)£~ <&fc-0*?£jl-ZjZ~%o/o/M^js3o/Ortff<t/ool>^^ A/%/ A i/fat/lf Q/P^T $f/*e.