alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULES
13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Charles A. Dinarello, certify that:





(1) I have reviewed this Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Omni Bio Pharmaceutical, Inc. (the
“Registrant”);





(2) Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;





(3) Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;





(4) The Registrant’s other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e))and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f))for the
Registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;





(b) Designed such
internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; and





(c) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation.


(d) Omitted
#





(5) I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) Omitted #





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.







Date: June
      29, 2009
                /s/ Charles A. Dinarello,
      M.DCharles
      A. Dinarello, M.D.Acting
      Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)







#
Pursuant to Division of Corporate Finance – Compliance and Disclosure
Interpretations – Regulation S-K, Section 215.02.  Items 308
and 308T – Internal Control over Financial Reporting
#### Anthony VIOLA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-6772-cv.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Nov. 2, 2006.

Anthony Viola, pro se, White Deer, PA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Richard K. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney (Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney, on the brief), Brooklyn, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.

PRESENT: Hon. WALKER, Hon. CHESTER J. STRAUB, Circuit Judges, Hon. TIMOTHY C. STANCEU,* Judge.

*

The Honorable Timothy C. Stanceu, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER

Anthony Viola appeals *pro se*from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Sterling Johnson, Jr., *Judge),*denying his motion made pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e)1 for the return of seized property. Viola also appeals the District Court’s order denying his post-judgment motion for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of appellate issues and hold as follows.

The District Court correctly held that a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(e) made after the conclusion of the movant’s criminal proceedings is treated as a new civil action for equitable relief. *See Rufu v. United States,*20 F.3d 63, 65 (2d Cir.1994); *Mora v. United States,*955 F.2d 156, 158 (2d Cir.1992). This Court reviews a district court’s fashioning of equitable relief for abuse of discretion. *See Onwubiko v. United States,*969 F.2d 1392, 1397 (2d Cir.1992), *overruled on other grounds by Polanco v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Admin.,*158 F.3d 647, 651 (2d Cir.1998). *See generally Abrahamson v. Bd. of Educ. of Wappingers Falls Cent. Sch. Dist.,*374 F.3d 66, 76 (2d Cir.2004). The denial of a motion for re*367consideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) is also subject to review for an abuse of discretion. *Devlin v. Transp. Commc’ns Int’l Union,*175 F.3d 121, 132 (2d Cir.1999).

Having considered each of Appellant’s arguments, we find them unavailing, and we affirm for substantially the reasons given in the District Court’s decision and subsequent order denying post-judgment relief. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Appellant’s motion that we “take judicial notice” of certain documents is DENIED, as he did not present these documents to the District Court in support of his claims despite having been given an opportunity to do so at his hearing. We decline to consider these documents for the first time on appeal. *Cf Leibowitz v. Cornell Univ.,*445 F.3d 586, 592 n. 4 (2d Cir.2006).

1

. On December 1, 2002, Rule 41(e) was re-designated Rule 41(g) without substantive change. *Adeleke v. United States,*355 F.3d 144, 147 n. 1 (2d Cir.2004).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                               682525                       0
<SECURITIES>                              0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0                       0
<INVENTORY>                               0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0                       0
<PP&E>                             10224148                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                      6901369                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      4080089                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0                       0
<BONDS>                                   0                       0
<COMMON>                                  0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                       0
<PREFERRED>                               0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        4080089                       0
<SALES>                             1405180                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1409915                       0
<CGS>                                     0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      559667                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  559667                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                       0
<CHANGES>                                 0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                         559667                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                             0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0                       0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Robert Clark, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 668]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After petitioner, a prison inmate, was observed on facility video surveillance attempting to place something in his rectum during a visit, he was placed on a contraband watch. That night, a clear plastic wrapping containing a substance that was later determined to be marihuana was discovered in petitioner’s feces, and a misbehavior report was issued charging petitioner with smuggling and possession of marihuana. The following morning, two more clear plastic wrappings containing what was later determined to be marihuana were discovered in petitioner’s feces, and a second misbehavior report charging petitioner with smuggling and possession of marihuana was issued. The two reports were combined for a joint tier III disciplinary hearing, after which petitioner was found guilty of one charge of smuggling and two charges of possession of marihuana. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal with a reduction in the penalty. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Turning first to petitioner’s contention that the charges of possession of marihuana constituted a violation of double jeopardy principles, we note that, while there was a single act of smuggling, marihuana was discovered to be in petitioner’s possession on two separate occasions, by different correction officers upon different dates and times. Accordingly, we find no error in the issuance of two misbehavior reports, each containing a charge of possession of marihuana *(see Matter of Austin v Venettozzi,*97 AD3d 867, 867-868 [2012]).

Next, we find that the misbehavior reports, positive test *1046results, unusual incident report and testimony of the correction officers who collected and tested the material recovered from petitioner’s feces provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Faraldo v Bezio,*93 AD3d 1007, 1008 [2012]; *Matter of White v Fischer,*85 AD3d 1483, 1483 [2011]). Contrary to petitioner’s claims, the misbehavior reports were adequate in that they provided sufficient information to inform petitioner of the charges and enable him to prepare a defense *(see Matter of Harrison v Fischer,*104 AD3d 1032, 1033 [2013]). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions, including the severity of the modified penalty, and find them to be without merit.

Peters, EJ., Lahtinen, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 10.1



Exhibit 10.1


  

  

September 19, 2006













Ridgestone Resources, Inc. 

1806 London Street

New Westminster, British Columbia  

Canada   V3M 3E3 


  

Ladies and Gentlemen:


RE: Mt. Grant Mineral Claims













I hold in trust for Ridgestone Resources, Inc. an undivided interest in the following claim:



	
Tenure No.
	
Name
	
Recording
	
Expiration

	
541555
	
Mt. Grant
	
September 18, 2006
	
September 18, 2007 





I will deliver full title on demand to Ridgestone Resources, Inc. for as long as the claims are in good standing with the Province of British Columbia.


Yours truly,


PARDEEP SARAI

Pardeep Sarai
Marc A. LeBeau, Ph.D., F-ABFT, is a Senior Forensic Scientist of the 

Scientific Analysis Section of the FBI Laboratory. He has worked as a 

Forensic Chemist and Toxicologist for the FBI since 1994 and has 

testified in federal, state, and county courts throughout the United 

States. 

Dr. LeBeau holds a Bachelor’s degree in Chemistry and Criminal 

Justice from Central Missouri State University (1988) and a Master of 

Science degree in Forensic Science from the University of New Haven

(1990). He was employed in the St. Louis County Medical Examiner’s Office (1990-1994), before 

beginning his career with the FBI. In 2005, he received his Doctorate in Toxicology from the 

University of Maryland – Baltimore. 

As a Fellow of the American Board of Forensic Toxicology, Dr. LeBeau is active in numerous 

scientific organizations. He serves as the current President of The International Association of 

Forensic Toxicologists (TIAFT) and is a Fellow of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences

(AAFS). Additionally, Dr. LeBeau is a member and Past-President of the Society of Forensic 

Toxicologists (SOFT).

Dr. LeBeau has spent much of his career helping to advance the forensic sciences. He has 

served as a Commissioner on the National Commission on Forensic Science, the chairman of the 

Scientific Working Group on the Forensic Analysis of Chemical Terrorism (SWGFACT), and cochair to the Scientific Working Group on the Forensic Analysis on Chemical, Biological, 

Radiological, and Nuclear Terrorism (SWGCBRN). He was also a co-chair of the Scientific 

Working Group for Forensic Toxicology (SWGTOX). He was the first Chair for the Toxicology 

Subcommittee of the Organization of Scientific Area Committees (OSAC). Currently he is the 

Chair of the OSAC’s Chemistry SAC for Seized Drugs and Toxicology. He also is the Chair of the 

AAFS Standards Board’s Toxicology Consensus Body.

In 2004, Dr. LeBeau won the FBI Director’s Award for Outstanding Scientific Advancement, the 

2008 End Violence Against Women (EVAW) International Visionary Award, and the Alexander O. 

Gettler Award from the Toxicology Section of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in 

2015.
#### In the Matter of RSM West Lake Road LLC et al., Respondents, v Town of Canandaigua Zoning Board of Appeals et al., Respondents, and East Shore Association of Canandaigua Lake, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Submitted December 22, 2008;

decided February 24, 2009

Motion to dismiss the appeal herein denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL -9919-94-OEI] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document announces the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) responses to Agency Clearance Requests, in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501*et. seq.*). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Courtney Kerwin (202) 566-1669, or email at                         *kerwin.courtney@epa.gov*                         and please refer to the appropriate EPA Information Collection Request (ICR) Number.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## OMB Responses to Agency Clearance Requests 

### OMB Approvals 

EPA ICR Number 2380.02; Renewable Fuels Standard Program (RFS2-Supplemental) (Renewal); 40 CFR part 80, and 40 CFR 80.1450(b)(1) and 80.1450(b)(2) ; was approved on 10/20/2014; OMB Number 2060-0637; expires on 10/31/2017; Approved with change.

EPA ICR Number 2333.03; Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS2) (Renewal); 40 CFR part 80, subpart M; was approved on 10/20/2014; OMB Number 2060-0640; expires on 10/31/2017; Approved with change.

EPA ICR Number 2060.07; Cooling Water Intake Structures at Existing Facilities (Final Rule); 40 CFR parts 122 and 125; was approved on 10/15/2014; OMB Number 2040-0257; expires on 10/31/2017; Approved with change.

## Comment Filed

EPA ICR Number 1907.08; Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements Regarding the Sulfur Content of Motor Vehicle Gasoline Under the Tier 2 Rule (40 CFR part 80, subpart H) (Proposed Rule for Tier 3)); in 40 CFR part 80, subpart O; and 40 CFR 80.210; 80.270; 80.330; 80.340; 80.370; 80.380; 80.400; and 80.415. OMB filed comment on 10/28/2014.

Courtney Kerwin,

Acting Director, Collections Strategies Division.

[FR Doc. 2015-00242 Filed 1-9-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 2.2
  
 PSA Seller KGS Cowtown Purchasers Section 9.1(a) Section 10.1(b)
 Cowtown Pipeline L.P.By:
    Cowtown Pipeline Management, Inc.,Its General PartnerBy:
    /s/ Philip CookPhilip CookSenior Vice President 
Chief Financial Officer AGREED AND ACCEPTED
THIS 29th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2009Cowtown Pipeline Partners L.P.By:
    Quicksilver Gas Services Operating GP LLC,Its General PartnerBy:
    /s/ Thomas F. DardenThomas F. DardenPresident and
Chief Executive OfficerQuicksilver Gas Services LPBy:
    Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC,Its General PartnerBy:
    /s/ Thomas F. DardenThomas F. DardenPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-12 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services
September 2 6 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DANIEL DROR II, INDI VIDUALLY AND TRUSTEE OF THE DANIEL DROR

II TRUST OF 1998 AND DANIEL DROR , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 12

- 00322

- CV V.

DANIEL MUSHIN , Appellee

________________________________ This court today heard the motion for rehearing filed by Appellants

. We order that the motion be OVERRULED , this court’s former judgment of July 23
, 201 3 , be vacated, set aside, and annulled, and this court’ s Memorandum Opinion of July 23, 2013 be withdrawn. This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, D aniel Mushin, signed January 30 , 2012, was h eard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s , Daniel Dror II, Individually and Trustee of the Daniel Dror II Trust of 1998 and Daniel Dror, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO****SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Frederick J. Erickson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Bull Run Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures asof May 31, 2005 (the “Evaluation Date”) and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date; and  c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.     Date: September 12, 2005       Signed: /s/ FREDERICK J. ERICKSON         Frederick J. Erickson    Vice President – Finance and Chief Financial Officer