alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
National Property Investors 4 1998 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000318508
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           3,134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          26,419
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,678   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,580   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         19,300     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,393)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,580    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,971    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,999    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,117    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       855     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    14.10<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin McIntosh, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |  |  |    
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---
|                  
|Date: May 13, 2003 |  |  |  | By:
|                   |  |  |  |    



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Venture Catalyst Incorporated and will be retained by Venture Catalyst Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Avery *V.*Baker Jr., Appellant.

Submitted June 8, 2009;

decided June 24, 2009

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Mitchell S. Kessler, Esq., 63 Pike Creek Drive, Cohoes, New York 12047 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Order entered August 23, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00402-CR

GEORGIA LEE JONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-0971128-M

ORDER

We GRANT court reporter Debi Harris’s August 19, 2013 request for an extension of 

time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the 

date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                   Exhibit 32


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Public  Storage,  Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Ronald L.
Havner,  Jr., as Chief  Executive  Officer and President of the Company and John
Reyes,  as Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  each  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
-------------------------
Name:    Ronald L. Havner, Jr.
Title:   Chief Executive Officer & President
Date:    May 9, 2007

/s/ John Reyes
---------------
Name:    John Reyes
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Date:    May 9, 2007
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Arthur D. Levinson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Genentech, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





|Date: | October 28, 2004 |  | By: | /s/ARTHUR D. LEVINSON                            
|----- | ---------------- |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------
|      |                  |  |     |                                                  
|      |                  |  |     | Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer

---
#### In the Matter of Mark Barrett, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[870 NYS2d 808]

*1032Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating frisk procedures, refusing a direct order, interfering with an employee, assaulting a staff member and engaging in violent conduct. Petitioner was thereafter charged in a second misbehavior report with possessing a document depicting diagrams of portions of the facility. Following a combined tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. Upon administrative appeal, that determination was modified by dismissing only the facility document charge set forth in the second misbehavior report. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment of the determination.

We confirm. The first misbehavior report, together with testimony adduced at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Triplett v Fischer,*54 AD3d 1075, 1076 [2008]). Petitioner’s denial of the allegations and offering of a retaliation defense created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer *(see Matter of Sloane v McKinney,*48 AD3d 850, 850 [2008]). Regarding petitioner’s assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased, it is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination flowed from any purported bias *(see Matter of Sweat v Fischer,*52 AD3d 1142, 1143 [2008]). The remaining claims advanced by petitioner have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Spain, J.P, Rose, Lahtinen, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### Poindexter, Inc. v. Boardwalk, LLC

Case below: 178 N.C. App. 562

No. 443P06

Pit’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-1029)

Allowed as to “Second Issue” only 01/25/07
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7070

In Re: RODNEY H. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Simon Andrew Conrad, a/k/a Siothan Andrew Connor, a/k/a Rod Williams, a/k/a Kenneth Gary Williams, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (CR-01-231) Submitted: September 27, 2005 Decided: October 4, 2005 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney H. Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rodney H. Williams petitions for writ of mandamus. He seeks an order requiring the district court judge presiding over his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) proceeding to be recused. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Williams has failed to allege the extrajudicial bias necessary to warrant recusal of the district judge. In re Beard , 811 F.2d at 827. Thus, his claim fails. Id. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and his petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### In the Matter of Carl Wells, Appellant, v Gregory Carro, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted April 20, 2009;

decided June 9, 2009

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
#### In the Matter of the Adoption of John Doe, an Infant. LMB, Respondent; ERJ, Appellant.

Submitted June 1, 2009;

decided June 4, 2009

Motion by James Ching, Esq. for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2336 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2336

  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral 
   Economic Assistance, Development Assistance for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral 
   Economic Assistance, Development Assistance for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR BILATERAL ECONOMIC 
              ASSISTANCE, DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Bilaterial Economic 
Assistance, Development Assistance for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$3,000,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc.
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  Series 2007-1

  I, Robert Caruso, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, National
  Association (the "Servicer"), certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Banc of America Mortgage 2007-1 Trust (the "Exchange
    Act Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer
    and based upon my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in
    preparing the servicer compliance statements required in this report
    under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the
    Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its
    obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement, dated February
    27, 2007, among Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., as depositor,
     Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee, and the Servicer, in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with the servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
    except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
    of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
    report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

    Dated:   March 25, 2008


    /s/ Robert Caruso
    Signature

    Senior Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the servicer)
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-33,426-18
EX P ARTE LES TER DAVIS, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 18-11716-W7 IN THE 12TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM MA DISON COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Tex as C o d e o f Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S. W
. 2 d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of sexual assault of a c hild and sentenc ed to forty year s’ imprisonment. In his prese nt application, Applicant raises one ground. This application, howeve r, prese nts
a more serious question. This Court’s rec ords ref lect that Applicant has filed six prior applications perta ining to this conviction. It is obvious f rom the rec ord that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous appli ca t i o ns or t hat s hould have been presented2

in previous ap p l ications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be li ghtly or easily abused. Sanders
v. U.S. , 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr , 511 S.W .2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Be cause of his repe titive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barr ed from revie w under Article 11.07, § 4, and ar e wa ived and a

bandoned by

his abuse of the writ. This application is dismiss ed. T h er ef o re , we inst ruct the Clerk of the C ourt of C riminal Appea ls not to acc ept or file the instant application for a writ of habea s corpus, or any future application perta ining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims prese nt ed have not been raised previously and that they could not have been prese nted in a previous application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Bilton , 602 S.W .2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980). Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: Jul y

25, 2018 Do not publish
Exhibit 15.1

October 15, 1998


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Genentech, Inc.


We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
pertaining to the 1991 Employee Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option/Stock 
Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock Option/Stock 
Incentive Plan, the 1984 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 1984 Non-
Qualified Stock Option Plan, the shares issuable to certain convertible 
subordinated debenture holders, the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment 
Plan and in the related prospectuses, as applicable, contained in such 
Registration Statements of our report dated October 9, 1998 relating to the 
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Genentech, 
Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine-months 
ended September 30, 1998.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a 
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants 
within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.


                                             Very truly yours,




                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0399

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLARD DEAN McCAULOU,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Appellant Willard Dean McCaulou , by counsel, has filed a motion for extension of time to file his reply brief. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given to July 7, 2022, within which to file his reply brief. No further extension s will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 7 2022

06/07/2022
Case Number: DA 20-0399
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
PARTNERSHIP'S STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      10,448,785
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,448,785
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,951,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,889
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,770,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,951,768
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               229,297
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               346,457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (154,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (154,190)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (154,190)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>