alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Andre Shipley et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[963 NYS2d 692]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for violation of the common-law right of sepulcher, the defendants appeal (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Fusco, J), entered December 16, 2011, which, upon the granting of the plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, and upon a jury verdict on the issue of damages finding that the plaintiff Andre Shipley sustained damages in the sum of $500,000 for past pain and suffering, and that the plaintiff Korisha Shipley sustained damages in the sum of $500,000 for past pain and suffering, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them in the principal sum of $1,000,000, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated March 14, 2012, as denied that branch of their motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a) which was to set aside the jury verdict on the issue of damages as excessive.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Richmond County, for a new trial on the issue of damages for past pain and suffering only, unless within 30 days after service upon the plaintiffs of a copy of this decision and order, the plaintiffs shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of damages for past pain and suffering from the principal sum of $1,000,000 to the principal sum of $600,000 ($300,000 for the plaintiff Andre Shipley and $300,000 for the plaintiff Korisha Shipley), and to the entry of an appropriate amended judgment; in the event *937that the plaintiffs so stipulate, then the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, as academic, without costs or disbursements, in light of our determination on the appeal from the judgment.

“The amount of damages to be awarded to a plaintiff for personal injuries is a question for the jury, and its determination will not be disturbed unless the award deviates materially from what would be reasonable compensation” *(Graves u New York City Tr. Auth.,*81 AD3d 589, 589 [2011]; *see*CPLR 5501 [c]; *Chery v Souffrant,*71 AD3d 715, 716 [2010]; *Keaney v City of New York,*63 AD3d 794, 795 [2009]). Under the circumstances of this case, the jury’s award of damages for past pain and suffering deviated materially from what would be reasonable compensation, to the extent indicated herein *(see*CPLR 5501 [c]; *see also Emeagwali v Brooklyn Hosp. Ctr,*60 AD3d 891, 892 [2009]; *Duffy v City of New York,*178 AD2d 370, 371 [1991]).

Rivera, J.P, Dickerson, Leventhal and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
#### Jennifer Krajewski et al., Respondents, v Linda Andriaccio et al., Respondents, and Trutemp Heating, Inc., Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 883]

— Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered February 21, 2013. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant Trutemp Heating, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the second amended complaint and all cross claims against it, and to strike plaintiffs’ note of issue and certificate of readiness and compel disclosure of the mental health records of plaintiff Jennifer Krajewski.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Centra, J.E, Fahey, Garni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramiro RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41128

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramiro Rivera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Rivera filed a response. Our independent review of the brief, Rivera’s response, and the record discloses no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cm. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6812

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TONY DARNELL KINTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-98-304, CA-01-636-1)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 29, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Darnell Kinton, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Darnell Kinton appeals the district court’s judgment

denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) petition. Kinton’s

case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief

be denied and advised Kinton that failure to file timely objections

to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district

court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning,

Kinton failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Kinton has waived appellate review by

failing to file objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
   FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date: April 22, 2005 GOLDCORP INC. 
  Suite 1560, 200 Burrard St.
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 3L6
CANADA
(Registrants Address) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of
Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes   o
    
    No   þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b):




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  GOLDCORP INC.By:
    /s/   R. Gregory LaingName:
    R. Gregory LaingTitle:
    Vice President, Legal Date:   April 22, 2005




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Letter to Shareholders99.2
    
    Notice of Meeting and Management
Information Circular99.3
    
    Form of Proxy
Amendment to Employment Agreement - Barry P. Hoffman.



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is
made as of May 24, 2007 by and between Valassis Communications, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and Barry P. Hoffman (the “Executive”). 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective as of March 18, 1992, as amended on December 19, 1995, December 12,
1997, December 9, 1998, December 16, 1999, June 5, 2000 and March 14, 2001, December 20, 2001, June 26, 2002, January 8, 2004 and December 21, 2004 (the “Employment
Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect an increase in
the Executive’s Annual Base Salary. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, the parties hereto agree as set
forth below. 
 1. The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 
 “The Executive’s Annual Base Salary (“Annual Base Salary”), payable on a biweekly basis, shall be at the annual rate
of not less than $390,000 effective January 1, 2005 until June 30, 2007 which shall be adjusted to $403,650, effective July 1, 2007.” 
 2. All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 3. This instrument,
together with the Employment Agreement, contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alan F. Schultz
	Name:	 	Alan F. Schultz
	Title:	 	 Chief Executive Officer

	
	/s/ Barry P. Hoffman
	Barry P. Hoffman
----

|                                             |   |           |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|
| Subsidiary                                       |   | Jurisdiction   |
| Container Applications International (U.K.) Ltd. |   | United Kingdom |
| Sky Container Trading, Ltd.                      |   | United Kingdom |
| Sky Domestic Container Leasing, Ltd.             |   | United Kingdom |
| Sky Container Trading, Inc.                      |   | California     |
| Container Applications (Malaysia) SDN BHD        |   | Malaysia       |
| Container Applications Limited                   |   | Barbados       |
| Container Applications International Ltd.        |   | Japan          |
| CAIJ Ltd.                                        |   | Japan          |
| CAI Consent Sweden AB                            |   | Sweden         |
| CAI International GmbH                           |   | Germany        |

----
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 12 (Tuesday, January 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00718]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Arts Advisory Panel Meetings

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the 
Arts and Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that two 
meetings of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts 
will be held by teleconference (unless otherwise specified) from the 
National Endowment for the Arts, Constitution Center, 400 7th St. SW., 
Washington, DC 20506 as follows (all meetings are Eastern time and 
ending times are approximate):
    Folk & Traditional Arts (review of nominations): These meeting will 
be closed.

DATES: February 3, 2015 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. and February 6, 2015 
12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information with reference to 
these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of 
Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#66160a09110f121c0d260714121548010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8a8b4b7afb1aca2b398b9aaacabf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 202/682-5691.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The closed portions of meetings are for the 
purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on 
financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the 
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in 
confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the 
Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the 
public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title 5, United 
States Code.

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2015-00718 Filed 1-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Wayne A. Doss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Texas Sweet Crude Oil Corp for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Texas Sweet Crude Oil Corp.




Date:  June 28, 2010/s/ Wayne A DossWayne A DossPresident, C.E.O. and Director(Principal Executive Officer)












40
EXHIBIT 10



                     AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


        This is an Amendment to the Consulting Agreement dated May 7, 1998
by and between Anthony P. Terracciano, an individual whose mailing address
is 1123 3rd Avenue, Spring Lake, New Jersey  07762 ("Consultant") and
American Water Works Company, Inc. (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation.

                                BACKGROUND

        Consultant and Company entered into a consulting agreement dated
May 7, 1998.  Consultant has provided the consulting and advisory services
requested to date by the Company.  Consultant and Company anticipate that
the prospective services which may be requested by the Company from the
Consultant will be more limited than those services previously rendered by
the Consultant.

        NOW, THEREFORE, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties
agree to amend Section 4 of the Agreement in its entirety as follows:

        4.  Compensation.  Effective as of January 1, 1999, as compensation
and consideration for such services and responsibilities under this
Agreement, the Company agrees to pay Consultant and Consultant agrees to
accept compensation of $150,000 annually.  Such compensation shall be
payable in equal, or as nearly equal as practicable, monthly installments
during each month, beginning January 1, 1999 in which the Consultant
provides services hereunder.  The Company shall not be required to provide
Consultant with any other payments or benefits for his services hereunder,
provided that the services to be performed hereunder, and the compensation
to be paid therefor, shall be in addition to Consultant's services and
compensation as a member of the Board.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment.

                                     AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.


                    By:           Marilyn Ware
                                  Chairman of the Board of Directors         


                                     CONSULTANT:


                                     Anthony P. Terracciano


Dated:  December 22, 1998
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Avery Pettigrew, Appellant.

Submitted April 20, 2009;

decided June 11, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal granted. Motion for poor person relief granted.
#### State v. Bingham

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 347

No. 205P07

1. Def’s NOA Based Upon a Constitutional Question (COA06-639)

2. AG’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal

3. Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. _

2. Allowed 10/11/07

3. Denied 10/11/07
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: January 8, 2015.

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-00419 Filed 1-9-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### Colin Fraser et al., Appellants, v 301-52 Townhouse Corp. et al., Respondents.

Decided May 12, 2009

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
##### 



(SUN LIFE RELEASE) Sun Life Financial announces Preferred Share issue Toronto  February 8, 2005 The Board of Directors of Sun Life Financial Inc. (NYSE, TSX:
SLF) today announced a domestic public offering of $300 million of Class A Non-Cumulative Preferred
Shares, Series 1 (the Preferred Shares), with an option to issue up to an additional $100 million
of Preferred Shares. The Preferred Shares will be priced at $25 per share and will pay
non-cumulative quarterly dividends of $0.297 per share, yielding 4.75% annually. Subject to
regulatory approval, on or after March 31, 2010, Sun Life Financial Inc. may redeem the Preferred
Shares in whole or in part at a declining premium. The Preferred Shares will provide Sun Life Financial with attractive, low-cost capital. The net
proceeds of the offering will be used for general business purposes. The offering will be
underwritten by a syndicate led by RBC Capital Markets and is expected to close on February 25,
2005. The Preferred Shares have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered, sold or delivered within the United States of
America and its territories and possessions or to, or for the account or benefit of, United States
persons except in certain transactions exempt from the registration requirements of such Act. This
release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy such securities in the United
States. Sun Life Financial is a leading international financial services organization providing a diverse
range of wealth accumulation and protection products and services to individuals and corporate
customers. Tracing its roots back to 1865, Sun Life Financial and its partners today have
operations in key markets worldwide, including Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Hong
Kong, the Philippines, Japan, Indonesia, India, China and Bermuda. As of December 31, 2004, the Sun
Life Financial group of companies had total assets under management of CDN$360 billion. Sun Life Financial Inc. trades on the Toronto (TSX), New York (NYSE) and Philippine (PSE) stock
exchanges under ticker symbol SLF. Note to Editors: All figures in Canadian dollars. - 30 - Media Relations Contact:
Susan Jantzi
Manager, Media Relations
Tel: 519-888-3160
susan.jantzi@sunlife.com
    
    Investor Relations Contact:
Tom Reid
Vice-President, Investor Relations
Tel: 416-204-8163
investor.relations@sunlife.com
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hub International
Limited (the Company) dated May 7, 2004 containing the financial statements
of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dennis J.
Pauls, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. By:
    /s/ Dennis J. PaulsDennis J. PaulsChief Financial Officer May 7, 2004