alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000318245
<NAME>     Yournet, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>     1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       63,803
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     20456
<OTHER-SE>                                (84,259)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            33,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (33,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (33,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (33,365)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.00)


</TABLE>
##### 



(FAIRMONT HOTELS AND RESORTS LOGO)

|                      |  |                 
|--------------------- |  | ----------------
|For immediate release |  | Exhibit No. 99.1

FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC. TO PRESENT AT
JMP SECURITIES RESEARCH CONFERENCE

TORONTO, March 4, 2004 Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. (FHR)(TSX/NYSE: FHR)
will participate in the JMP Securities Research Conference held in San
Francisco on March 9, 2004. William R. Fatt, FHRs Chief Executive Officer,
will present at approximately 1:50 p.m. Eastern Time.

Interested participants can access a live audio webcast of the presentation and
slide materials through FHRs website at
www.fairmont.com/investor. A replay
of the presentation will be archived through to April 10, 2004. The webcast
will last for approximately 35 minutes.

About Fairmont Hotels &
Resorts Inc.
FHR is one of North Americas leading owner/operators of luxury hotels and
resorts. FHRs managed portfolio consists of 83 luxury and first-class
properties with more than 33,000 guestrooms in the United States, Canada,
Mexico, Bermuda, Barbados and the United Arab Emirates. It holds an 83.5%
controlling interest in Fairmont Hotels Inc., North Americas largest luxury
hotel management company, as measured by rooms under management. Fairmont
manages 44 distinctive city center and resort hotels such as The Fairmont San
Francisco, The Fairmont Banff Springs and The Fairmont Scottsdale Princess.
FHR also owns Delta Hotels, Canadas largest first-class hotel management
company, which manages and franchises 39 city center and resort properties in
Canada. In addition to hotel management, FHR holds real estate interests in 23
properties and an approximate 35% investment interest in Legacy Hotels Real
Estate Investment Trust, which owns 24 properties.

-30-

Contact:
    
    Emma Thompson
Executive Director Investor Relations
Tel: 416.874.2485
Email: investor@fairmont.com
Website: www.fairmont.com
<PAGE>
AUDITORS' CONSENT

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form F-4 of
Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. of our report dated February 21, 2003
relating to the financial statements of Millar Western Forest Products Ltd.,
which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to
us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.

(SIGNED) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Chartered Accountants

Edmonton, Alberta
February 17, 2004
**FORM 52-109FT2**
**CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS**
I, Craig J. Laurie, Chief Financial Officer of Brookfield PropertiesCorporation, certify that:
1. I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined inMultilateral Instrument 52-109 *Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’Annual and Interim Filings*) of Brookfield Properties Corporation, (theissuer) for the interim period ending September 30, 2004; 2. Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required tobe stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in lightof the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the periodcovered by the interim filings; and 3. Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with theother financial information included in the interim filings fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presentedin the interim filings.
Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ Craig J. LaurieCraig J. LaurieChief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
National Property Investors 4 1998 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000318508
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 4
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998   
<CASH>                                           2,035
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          26,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,185   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,843   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         19,300     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,086)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,843    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,618    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,084    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 372    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       162    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.67<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Brown, Appellant.

[871 NYS2d 133]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bruce Allen, J-), rendered August 7, 2007, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant claims that his guilty plea was involuntary because the court allegedly promised to order him enrolled in the comprehensive alcohol and substance abuse treatment (CASAT) program, a promise that went unfulfilled since court-mandated CASAT is only available for persons convicted of drug offenses (Penal Law § 60.04 [6]). However, while defendant moved to withdraw his plea, he did so on different grounds from those he advances on appeal, and while he raised his present claim in a CPL article 440 motion to vacate the judgment, the court denied that motion, and this Court denied leave to appeal. Accordingly, this issue is unpreserved *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. The record does not establish that a guarantee of CASAT was part of the court’s sentence promise. Instead, the record reflects that, as defendant specifically acknowledged, the only promise upon which the plea was actually conditioned was a sentence of 2 to 4 years, that defense counsel additionally asked the court to recommend CASAT, and that defendant’s plea was not induced by the court’s promise to “place” him in CASAT. Furthermore, the fact that, at sentencing, the court purported to direct defendant’s enrollment in CASAT did not render the sentence illegal or entitle defendant to withdraw his plea. The purported direction was essentially a recommendation made by the court to the Department of Correctional Services, which chose, instead, to place defendant in a different therapeutic program.

*541We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.E, Andrias, Nardelli, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
    FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934    Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 28, 2004 Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.  Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation)
    
    6719
Commission File Number
    
    52-2301683
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification
Number)
    Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.
300 First Stamford Place, Stamford, Connecticut 06902
(203) 977-8000
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number, including area code) 140 Broadway, 39th Floor, New York, New York 10005
(Former name or former Address, if changed since last Report)    Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the
following provisions (see General Instruction A.2.below): o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17
CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13c-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition. On October 28, 2004, Odyssey Re Holdings Corp. issued the press release
attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 announcing its results for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, which press release is incorporated by reference herein and
furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 of Form 8-K. The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including the
information set forth in Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed to be filed for
the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section.




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release of Odyssey Re Holdings Corp. dated October 28, 2004.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. Date:    October 28, 2004 ODYSSEY RE HOLDINGS CORP.By:
    /s/ Donald L. SmithName:
    Donald L. SmithTitle:
    Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3581 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain other footwear covering the ankle 

with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2006 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain other footwear 

covering the ankle with coated or laminated textile fabrics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN OTHER FOOTWEAR COVERING THE 

4 ANKLE WITH COATED OR LAMINATED TEX5 TILE FABRICS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3581 IS 

‘‘ 9902.64.13 Footwear, other than men’s 

or women’s, except vulcanized footwear and footwear 

with waterproof molded bottoms, including bottoms 

comprising an outer sole and 

all or part of the upper, valued over $20/pair, covering 

the ankle, whose height from 

the bottom of the outer sole 

to the top of the upper does 

not exceed 7 inches, designed to be worn in lieu of, 

but not over, other footwear 

as a protection against 

water, oil, grease or chemicals or cold or inclement 

weather where such protection includes protection 

against water that is imparted by the use of a coated or laminated textile fabric 

(provided in subheading 

6404.19.20) ......................... 20% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
#### AABLE TANK SERVICES, INC., Appellant, v. Robert PIRIE, Secretary of the Navy, Appellee.

No. 00-1456.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: May 15, 2001.

Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PharMerica Corporation (the
Corporation) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory S. Weishar, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation.

|                                                                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                   
|/S/    GREGORY S.
WEISHAR Gregory S. Weishar
Chief Executive Officer and Director February 24, 2011
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2525 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for, and extend 

authorization of, certain programs for homeless veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2023 

Mr. RUIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility 

for, and extend authorization of, certain programs for 

homeless veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care for Home5 less Veterans Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2525 IH

1 SEC. 2. HEALTH CARE FOR HOMELESS VETERANS PRO2 GRAM: EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY; EXTEN3 SION OF AUTHORIZATION. 

4 (a) EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY.—Section 

5 2002(b)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

6 by inserting ‘‘2031,’’ after ‘‘2013,’’. 

7 (b) EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION.—Section 

8 2031(b) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘2024’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘2029’’. 

10 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAM OF 

11 ADDITIONAL SERVICES FOR HOMELESS VET12 ERANS. 

13 Section 2033(d) of title 38, United States Code, is 

14 amended by striking ‘‘2024’’ and inserting ‘‘2029’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Confirmation Agreement dated May 8, 2007



 Exhibit 10.8 
 CONFIRMATION 
 THIS CONFIRMATION (the “Confirmation”) is executed by and
between HUNGARIAN TELEPHONE AND CABLE CORP., a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Delaware (“HTCC”), and TDC A/S, a company organized under the laws of Denmark (“TDC”) on May 8, 2007.

 WHEREAS, the parties have on March 6, 2007, entered into a secondment agreement (the “Secondment Agreement”)
relating to the secondment by TDC of the services of TORBEN V. HOLM (the “Principal”) to HTCC upon the terms set out in the Secondment Agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties wish to cancel the secondment of the services of the Principal with effect as of April 30, 2007; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto confirm their mutual agreement with respect to cancellation
of the secondment of the services of the Principal as follows: 
 1. Cancellation of Secondment. With reference to Clause 2(i) of the
Secondment Agreement the parties hereto confirm their agreement to cancel the secondment of the Principal with effect from May 1, 2007. 
 2. Reimbursement. HTCC shall remain liable for reimbursement of the fees, costs and expenses set out in Clause 4 of the Secondment Agreement in accordance with the terms set out in the Secondment Agreement to the extent that such
fees, costs and expenses relate to the period until April 30, 2007. HTCC shall not be liable for reimbursement of any fees, costs or expenses relating to the period from May 1, 2007 and onwards. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HTCC and TDC have executed this Confirmation as of the day and year first above written. 
  

					
	HUNGARIAN TELEPHONE AND CABLE CORP.	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ John B. Ryan
	 	
		 	Name: John B. Ryan	 	
		 	Title: Chairman, Audit Committee	 	


  

					
	 TDC A/S
	 	
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Jesper Theill Eriksen
	 	
		 	Name: Jesper Theil Eriksen	 	
		 	Title: President, TDC Mobile International
#### Rufus E. THOMPSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 06-1394.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 25, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 16, 2006.

*502Rufus E. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Rufus E. Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying Thompson’s motion to vacate or set aside judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Thompson v. Potter,*No. 1:03-cv-00593-JAB (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 23, 2006; entered Feb. 24, 2006). We deny Thompson’s motion to place his case in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


                Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



                                             Ten        For the        For the       For the
                                          months           year           year          year
                                           ended          ended          ended         ended
                                        December       December       December      December
                                        31, 1996       31, 1997        31,1998      31, 1999
                                               $              $              $              $
                                      -------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>
Earnings
Loss before income taxes,
      minority interest, equity
      accounted for investment
      and extraordinary item              (3,018)        (5,231)        (4,435)       (14,183)
Fixed charges                                 43          1,519          4,937         21,107
Minority interest                             --            249            204             --
Earnings (loss) from equity
      accounted for investment              (228)          (261)          (677)          (773)
                                      -------------------------------------------------------
                                          (3,203)        (3,724)            29          6,151
                                      -------------------------------------------------------
Fixed charges
Interest component of rent expense            43             82            114            142
Interest on long-term debt                    --          1,055          3,863         20,427
Accrued contingent interest                   --            382            960            538
                                      -------------------------------------------------------
                                              43          1,519          4,937         21,107
                                      -------------------------------------------------------
Deficiency of earnings available
      to cover fixed charges              (3,246)        (5,243)        (4,908)       (14,956)
                                      =======================================================
</TABLE>