alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2509 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2509

    To direct the Secretary of Transportation to submit a report on 
 helicopter and rotorcraft noise in the District of Columbia, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2023

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of Transportation to submit a report on 
 helicopter and rotorcraft noise in the District of Columbia, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RECOMMENDATIONS ON REDUCING HELICOPTER NOISE IN THE DISTRICT 
              OF COLUMBIA.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation, in consultation 
with all relevant operators and entities, shall submit to the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 
and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 
Senate a report containing recommendations to reduce helicopter and 
rotorcraft noise in the District of Columbia.
    (b) Contents.--The report required under subsection (a) shall 
include recommendations on, at least--
            (1) altitude;
            (2) the number of flights;
            (3) flight paths;
            (4) time of day of flights;
            (5) types of aircraft;
            (6) operating procedures; and
            (7) pilot training.
    (c) Relevant Operators and Entities Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``relevant operators and entities'' means--
            (1) the head of any agency or department of the Federal 
        Government that flies a helicopter or rotorcraft over the 
        District of Columbia;
            (2) the Chief of Police of the Metropolitan Police 
        Department of the District of Columbia;
            (3) any medical helicopter or rotorcraft operator that 
        routinely flies a helicopter or rotorcraft over the District of 
        Columbia; and
            (4) any other operator that routinely flies a helicopter or 
        rotorcraft over the District of Columbia.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GARY OWEN KENDALL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-35433 

D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00140-BLW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges. 

Gary Owen Kendall appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action concerning his veterans’ benefits. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Bishop Paiute Tribe v. Inyo County, 

863 F.3d 1144, 1151 (9th Cir. 2017) (dismissal for lack of subject matter 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 28 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-35433 

jurisdiction); Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Kendall’s action for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction because the United States Courts of Appeals for Veterans 

Claims and the Federal Circuit have exclusive jurisdiction over questions that 

relate to benefits administered by the Veterans Administration. See 38 U.S.C. 

§ 511(a); Veterans for Common Sense v. Shinseki, 678 F.3d 1013, 1022-25 (9th 

Cir. 2012) (en banc) (the Veterans’ Judicial Review Act generally precludes 

district court jurisdiction over claims relating to or affecting veterans’ benefits 

decisions, “even if the veteran dresses his claim as a constitutional challenge, and 

even where the veteran has challenged some other wrongful conduct that, although 

unrelated to the [Department of Veterans Affair’s] ultimate decision on his claim, 

affected his or her benefits proceeding” (citations omitted)). However, a dismissal 

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction should be without prejudice. Kelly v. 

Fleetwood Enters., Inc., 377 F.3d 1034, 1036 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm the 

dismissal, and instruct the district court to amend the judgment to reflect that the 

dismissal of this action is without prejudice.

We reject Kendall’s contention that the denial of his petition for ex parte 

injunction was unconstitutional as unpersuasive.

We do not consider allegations raised for the first time on appeal. See 
3 20-35433 

Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions to amend the judgment.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40865

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARCIDES CRUZ-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:14-CR-1829

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Arcides Cruz-Hernandez has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Cruz-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40865 Document: 00513461617 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/12/2016
No. 15-40865

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40865 Document: 00513461617 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/12/2016
#### Dana Juhasz, Appellant, v Stephen Juhasz, Respondent.

Submitted March 30, 2009;

decided May 12, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John W.
Combs, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

The Annual
Report on Form 10-K of ShoreTel, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
ShoreTel, Inc.

|                           |        |                                      
|-------------------------- | ------ | -------------------------------------
|Dated:
 September 10, 2010 | By:    | /s/ JOHN W.
 COMBS                   
|                           |        |                                      
|                           | Name:  | John W. Combs                        
|                           | Title: | President and Chief Executive        
|                           |        | Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|                           |        |                                      
|                          

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review: Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Sensorimotor Integration Study Section, February 06, 2015, 08:00 a.m. 
to February 06, 2015, 06:00 p.m., JW Marriott New Orleans, 614 Canal 
Street, New Orleans, LA, 70130 which was published in the Federal 
Register on January 08, 2015, 80 FR 1031.
    The meeting will be held at the Renaissance New Orleans Pere 
Marquette Hotel, 817 Common Street New Orleans, LA, 70112. The meeting 
date and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: January 8, 2015.
Carolyn A. Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-00496 Filed 1-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony Marlin TUNNELL, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-6431.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Sept. 29, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 18, 2006.

Anthony Marlin Tunnell, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Marlin Tunnell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d*676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tunnell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.
SECTION 30.2 SARBANES OXLEY CERTIFICATION

I, David Duquette, certify that:

1. I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of New  Century
Companies, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Omitted;

c)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures  and presented in this report my  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit
committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

August 22, 2005                        /s/ David Duquette
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  David Duquette
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1971-1972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00351]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Arts


Proposed Collection; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), as part of its 
continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, conducts a 
preclearance consultation program to provide the general public and 
federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing collections of information in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995. This program helps to ensure that requested data 
is provided in the desired format; reporting burden (time and financial 
resources) is minimized; collection instruments are clearly understood; 
and the impact of collection requirements on respondents is properly 
assessed. Currently, the NEA is soliciting comments concerning the 
proposed information collection of an NEA applicant survey. A copy of 
the current information collection request can be obtained by 
contacting the office listed below in the address section of this 
notice.

DATES: Written comments must be submitted to the office listed in the 
address section below within 60 days from the date of this publication 
in the Federal Register. The NEA is particularly interested in comments 
that:
    <bullet> Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is 
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, 
including whether the information will have practical utility;

[[Page 1972]]

    <bullet> Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the 
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
    <bullet> Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    <bullet> Could help minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on those who are to respond.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Jillian Miller, Director, Office of 
Guidelines and Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, at: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7c1b09151819101512190f3c1d0e080f521b130a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b1c0e121f1e1712151e083b1a090f08551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kathy Daum,
Director, Administrative Services, National Endowment for the Arts.
[FR Doc. 2015-00351 Filed 1-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            2957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      899
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 15880
<PP&E>                                           14470
<DEPRECIATION>                                   11173
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4589866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4216859
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         38020
<OTHER-SE>                                      334987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4589866
<SALES>                                          99932
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 99932
<CGS>                                             2182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 75986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22081
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              22081
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     22081
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Debra H., Appellant, v Janice R., Respondent.

Submitted August 17, 2009;

decided September 1, 2009

Reported below, 61 AD3d 460.

*754Motion by Richard Allen et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the motion for leave to appeal herein granted and the brief is accepted as filed, and for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted, three copies of the brief to be served and an original and 24 copies filed within 30 days.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2513 

To require that in a notice of proposed rulemaking for a new rule, the 

notice shall identify three rules which the agency intends to repeal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2023 

Mr. POSEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require that in a notice of proposed rulemaking for a 

new rule, the notice shall identify three rules which the 

agency intends to repeal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cutting Unnecessary 

5 Red Tape and Bureaucracy Act’’ or the ‘‘CURB Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO REPEAL THREE RULES BEFORE 

7 MAKING A NEW RULE. 

8 Section 553(b) of title 5, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2513 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting after paragraph (3) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(4) in the case of a notice of proposed rule 

8 making for a new rule, except in the case of a new 

9 rule which is required by statute, an identification of 

10 three rules that the agency intends to repeal, includ11 ing the date on which the agency began the rule 

12 making process in order to repeal such rules.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LAUD Resources Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary Chayko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
|2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| 



|By: /s/ Gary Chayko
Gary Chayko
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 14, 2008
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---