alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          For the month of October 2004

                        Commission File Number 333-101591

                          GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION

                              5100 W. Lemon Street
                                   Suite 3100
                                 Tampa, Florida
                                      33609

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                          Form 20-F         Form 40-F   X
                                    -----             -----

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): _________________

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): _________________

     Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                Yes         No   X
                                    -----      -----

     If  "Yes"  is  marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- _______________


<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

     Exhibit        Description
     -------        ------------------------------------
       <S>          <C>
       99.1         Press Release dated October 15, 2004

</TABLE>



<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  October 15, 2004

                                   GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION


                                   By:         /s/ Tom J. Landa
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Tom J. Landa
                                        Title: Vice-President, Finance, Chief
                                               Financial Officer and Secretary
#### In re: John A. KING, Debtor. John A. King, Plaintiff-Appellant. v. Renee Blackman, H. Sloan Blackman, Misty D. Shephard, DefendantsAppellees.

No. 10-11232

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2010.

Leila Hirayama Watson, Cory Watson Crowder & Degaris, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

John A. King, Birmingham, AL, pro se.

Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John King appeals *pro se*a judgment in favor of Renee Blackman, Sloan Blackman, and Misty Shephard in their adversary proceeding against King in his bankruptcy proceeding. The bankruptcy court ruled that King’s debts were nondischargeable because he made false oaths about the existence of financial records and about his examination and approval of a statement of financial affairs and schedules accompanying his petition for bankruptcy. 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4). We affirm.

King argues there was insufficient evidence to prove he made false oaths, but we disagree. King’s statement of financial affairs and schedules omitted assets and interests in entities and trusts that were relevant to determining his financial condition. *See Swicegood v. Ginn,*924 F.2d 230, 232 (11th Cir.1991); *Chalik v. Moorefield,*748 F.2d 616, 618-20 (11th Cir.1984). The bankruptcy court was entitled to find that King’s omissions were intentional and to discredit his evasive and inconsistent testimony. *See Chalik,*748 F.2d at 619. The bankruptcy court did not clearly err by denying King a discharge.

King makes two other complaints about the adversary proceeding, but both complaints are meritless. First, King argues that the bankruptcy court omitted findings of fact from its written order, but the bankruptcy court made extensive oral findings of fact during the adversarial hearing. King cites no authority that requires a bankruptcy court to make its findings in a written order. Second, King complains that the bankruptcy judge was biased, but King failed to raise that objection in the bankruptcy court. The bankruptcy judge had the discretion to question King, comment on the evidence and his knowledge of other proceedings that related to King’s petition for bankruptcy, and admonish King to respond to questions. *See*Fed. R.Evid. 614(b); *Hanson v. Waller,*888 F.2d 806, 812-13 (11th Cir.1989) (discussing *Moore v. United States,*598 F.2d 439, 442 (5th Cir.1979)). The record does not support King’s argument that the bankruptcy judge abused that discretion.

The judgment in favor of the Blackmans and Shephard is AFFIRMED.
----

----

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: November 12, 2010 |  /s/ Stephen M. Sill                                      |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |  Stephen M. Sill                                          |
|                     |  Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer    |
|                     | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |

----
EXHIBIT 10.10

Mr. Samuel Veasey
COO/CFO Wellstone Tobacco
250 Crown Blvd.
Timberlake, NC 27583

                                                                        5/2/2005

Dear Sam,

Effective 4/01/05 Wellstone Tobacco expanded its use of the existing leased area
to include an additional  four (4) offices.  The  approximate  square footage of
this area is 750sf.  Based on your current  rent of $18.00 per square foot,  the
additional  monthly  rental  charge will be $1,125  bringing  the total  monthly
rental  charge to $3,375.  If this is  agreeable  to you,  please  sign and date
below.

/s/Tim Jackson                                                5/2/05
--------------                                                -------
Tim Jackson - Director of Operations
U.S. Flue Cured Tobacco Growers Inc.

/s/Samuel Veasey                                              5/2/05
----------------                                              -------
Samuel Veasey - COO/CFO
Wellstone Tobacco
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1119

SHERIF A. PHILIPS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA STATE; NORTH CAROLINA COURT SYSTEM; NORTH 

CAROLINA AGENCY; VIDANT MEDICAL CENTER, f/k/a Pitt County 

Memorial Hospital; M.D. PAUL BOLIN; RALPH WHATLEY; DAVID 

CREECH, Pitt County Memorial Hospital lawyer; JAY SALSMAN, 

Pitt County Memorial Hospital lawyer; DEBBIE MEYER, Law 

Firm, Cary, NC; KAREN ZANER, Law Firm, Dallas, TX; JAMES 

CROUSE, Law Firm, Raleigh, NC; NARDINE GUIRGUIS, Law Firm, 

Raleigh, NC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:15-cv-00095-F)

Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 1, 2016

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherif Philips, Appellant Pro Se. Kathryn Hicks Shields, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Walter 

Gregory Merritt, HARRIS, CREECH, WARD & BLACKERBY, New Bern, 

North Carolina; Joseph Lawrence Nelson, DICKIE, MCCAMEY & 
2

CHILCOTE, Charlotte, North Carolina; John Thomas Crook, David 

Stebbins Coats, BAILEY & DIXON, Raleigh, North Carolina; Felix 

Hill Allen, IV, THARRINGTON SMITH LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Sherif Philips appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Philips v. N.C. State, No 

5:15-cv-0095-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 28, 2015). We deny Philips’

motions to appoint counsel and for consideration of recusal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

|  1. | I am an officer of      Principal Global Investors, LLC;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  2. | I have reviewed the      activities and performance of Principal Global Investors,      LLC in its capacity as Primary Servicer during the calendar year ending      December 31, 2007; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|  3. | To the      best of my knowledge, Principal Global Investors, LLC, as Primary Servicer      has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the      Primary      Servicing Agreement for said Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through      Certificates, (see Attachment A) throughout the above-referenced calendar      year. |

| /s/      Steven Johnson                                                    |  Date: | 2-19-08 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------|---------|
| Steven      Johnson, Managing DirectorPrincipal      Global Investors, LLC |        |    |

----

----

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Axesstel, Inc. (the Company), that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.

Dated: March 31, 2007



/S/    MARVIN
TSEUMarvin Tseu, Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: March 31, 2007



/S/    PATRICK
GRAYPatrick Gray, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
#### In the Matter of Eddie Sanchez, Appellant, v Andrea W. Evans, Chairwoman, New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 832]

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered January 24, 2012 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of his application for release to parole supervision in January 2011. The Attorney General has advised this Court that, subsequent to that denial, petitioner reappeared before the Board of Parole on January 28, 2013 and was denied release again. Consequently, this appeal must be dismissed as moot (see *Matter of Dobranski v Alexander,*69 AD3d 1091, 1091 [2010]). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, this matter does not fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see *Matter of Malangone v Dennison,*46 AD3d 1155, 1155 [2007]; see *generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Present — Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Garni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7354

SHANE O’BRIAN WHITFIELD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

BOBBY SOLES, Unit #2,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge.

(CA-99-541-AM)

Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shane O’Brian Whitfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

July 26, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on July 28, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Shane O’Brian Whitfield seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Whitfield v. Soles, No.

CA-99-541-AM (E.D. Va. July 28, 1999).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Consent of George Nicholson P.Geo.


    

      George
        Nicholson

      #302
        675 W. Hasting St.

      Tel:
        604-682-1845


     

     

    


    To:   
United
      States Securities and Exchange Commission

    


    I,
      George
      Nicholson, P.Eng. do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory
      authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled “Geology Report on
      the Willowvale Project” dated August, 2006 (the “Technical Report”) and to the
      written disclosure of the Technical Report and of extracts from or a summary
      of
      the Technical Report in the written disclosure in any Offering Memorandum,
      other
      offering documents, or an Annual Information Form of Sustut Exploration
      Inc.

    


    I
      hereby
      certify that I have read Sustut’s Form SB-2 and I do not have any reason to
      believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from
      the Technical Report in the written disclosure in the Offering Memorandum,
      other
      offering documents, or an Annual Information Form of Sustut Exploration
      Inc.

    


    I
      hereby
      consent to the use of my name as a consultant to the Company.

    


    Dated
      April 24, 2007

    


    


    /s/George
      Nicholson

    GEORGE
      NICHOLSON
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the
Company) for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Shay, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ GREG SHAYGreg ShayChief Executive Officer, President andChief Operating Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: November 8, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted form National
Property Investors IV 1999 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in it entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000318508
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS IV
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,736
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          26,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         19,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,495
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,403
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       594
<EPS-BASIC>                                       9.80<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        24,670,200
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                       24,670,200
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                         24,670,200
<EQUITIES>                                   5,170,218
<MORTGAGE>                                  15,357,344
<REAL-ESTATE>                                7,890,150
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             108,040,664
<CASH>                                       8,032,183
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      10,211,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             200,380,639
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,696,973
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          1,732,318
<POLICY-OTHER>                              43,936,840
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                       89,896,539
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              9,977,497
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,324,002
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,092,595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               200,380,639
<PREMIUMS>                                  10,008,484
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          7,663,760
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             228,622
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 827,413
<BENEFITS>                                   6,393,198
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,111,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                   368,844
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   579,790
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>