alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Damien P.C., Respondent, v Jennifer H.S., Appellant.

Decided May 7, 2009

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly report of Venture Catalyst
Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin McIntosh, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

                  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.


                                     By:           /s/ KEVIN MCINTOSH
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                                     Kevin McIntosh
                                         Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                                   Officer, Secretary
                                                      and Treasurer
Dated:    November 13, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Team, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ted W. Owen, Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|/S/    TED W.
OWEN                                           
|Ted W. Owen Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

April 8, 2010
exv4w1



 




















 








LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.




     The following abbreviations,
 when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	    TEN COM

	— 	as tenants in common
	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– 
	 	 	 	 Custodian 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	    TEN ENT

	— 	as tenants by the entireties
	 	 	 	(Cust)
	 	(Minor)	 
	    JT TEN 	— 	as joint tenants with right of
 survivorship and not as
 tenants in common
	 	 	
under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	(State)







Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.




	 	 	 	 	 
	    For value received,

	 	 	 	hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
	 

	 	 	 	 






	 	 	 
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

	 	 
	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	 	 
	 
 

	 	 






 




(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE
NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)



 





 





	 	 	 
	 
	 

	 	Shares
	 
	 	 





of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint




	 	 	 
	 

	 	Attorney
	 
	 	 





to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power
of substitution in the premises.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 





 





	NOTICE:  		
	 	THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF
THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER.
	 
	 
	 
	SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:  	 	 
	 	THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS,
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN
APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. 






KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN,
MUTILATED OR DESTROYED, THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF
INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT
CERTIFICATE.
FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/23/2015 10:48:36 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
#### In the Matter of Jimmy Aponte, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[869 NYS2d 923]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul an administrative determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit possessing a weapon and providing false statements or information. The Attorney General advises this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Rivera v Brown,*54 AD3d 1089 [2008]; *Matter of Decker v Selsky,*53 AD3d 996 [2008]).

Mercure, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                               2,383,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00212-CR

Aracely Garza Cantu

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 02-CRF-0900-2

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 28, 2021
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3613

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 2951 New York Highway 43 in Averill Park,

New York, as the ‘‘Major George Quamo Post Office

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 3613 ES

1 SECTION 1. MAJOR GEORGE QUAMO POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING.

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States

4 Postal Service located at 2951 New York Highway 43 in

5 Averill Park, New York, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘Major George Quamo Post Office Building’’.

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major George Quamo

11 Post Office Building’’.

Passed the Senate August 2, 2006.

Attest:

Secretary.
109TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3613

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostQuamo Post Office Building’’. in Averill Park, New York, as the ‘‘Major George al Service located at 2951 New York Highway 43
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUL-30-2000
<CASH>                                           0
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                 2383607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Cruz, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 289]

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cyrulnik, J.), imposed March 21, 2011, on the grounds that the sentence is both illegal and excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not illegally sentence him as a second felony offender *(see People v McEachern,*275 AD2d 330 [2000]). Furthermore, the defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]). Eng, EJ., Mastro, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 12.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Johan Albrecht, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of MATERIALISE NV (the company);
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 28, 2019



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Johan Albrecht     
|    |  | Johan Albrecht         
|    |  | Alfinco BVBA           
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2573 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2573

To express the Sense of Congress with respect to Federal preemption of 
  State restrictions on dispensing medication abortion, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2023

  Mr. Ryan (for himself, Mrs. Fletcher, Ms. Kuster, Mr. Deluzio, Ms. 
     Perez, Mr. Torres of New York, Ms. Titus, Mrs. McClellan, Mr. 
 Garamendi, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Payne, Ms. Scholten, Ms. Kamlager-Dove, 
 Ms. Velazquez, Mrs. Trahan, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Ms. Meng, Ms. Clarke 
 of New York, Mr. Boyle of Pennsylvania, Mrs. Sykes, Mr. Cleaver, Ms. 
Leger Fernandez, Mr. Magaziner, Ms. Wexton, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Norcross, 
  Ms. Norton, Ms. Manning, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Nickel, Ms. 
   Slotkin, Mr. Landsman, Mr. Goldman of New York, Ms. Caraveo, Ms. 
Porter, Mr. Casten, Ms. Wild, Ms. Jacobs, Ms. Craig, and Mr. Courtney) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To express the Sense of Congress with respect to Federal preemption of 
  State restrictions on dispensing medication abortion, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF STATE 
              RESTRICTIONS ON DISPENSING MEDICATION ABORTION.

    It is the Sense of Congress that medication abortion was 
appropriately approved, and is appropriately regulated, under the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.), and that 
such approval under such Act preempts any State law establishing, 
implementing, or enforcing--
            (1) any requirement that medication abortion be dispensed 
        by a health care practitioner in person; or
            (2) any prohibition or restriction on prescribing or 
        dispensing medication abortion by means of telehealth.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00310]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Prevention; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the 
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA) 
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) Drug Testing Advisory 
Board (DTAB) will meet on February 5, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 
p.m., and February 6, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. E.S.T. The DTAB 
will convene in closed sessions on these two days.
    On February 5, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and February 6, 
2015, from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., the Board will meet in closed 
session to discuss confidential hair testing best practices and data, 
as well as proposed revisions to the Mandatory Guidelines for Federal 
Workplace Drug Testing Programs. Therefore, this meeting is closed to 
the public as determined by the Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance 
with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, 
Section 10(d).
    Meeting information and a roster of DTAB members may be obtained by 
accessing the SAMHSA Advisory Committees Web site, http://www.samhsa.gov/about-us/advisory-councils/drug-testing-advisory-board-dtab, or by contacting Dr. Cook.
    Committee Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration's, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Drug Testing 
Advisory Board.
    Dates/Time/Type: February 5, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 
E.S.T.: CLOSED, February 6, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. E.S.T.: 
CLOSED.
    Place: Sugarloaf Conference Room, SAMHSA Building, 1 Choke Cherry 
Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
    Contact: Janine Denis Cook, Ph.D., Designated Federal Official, 
CSAP Drug Testing Advisory Board, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 7-1043, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone: 240-276-2600, Fax: 240-276-2610, 
Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b616a6562656e25686464604b786a6663786a25636378256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="402a212e292e256e232f2f2b0033212d2833216e2828336e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>.

Janine Denis Cook,
Designated Federal Official, DTAB, Division of Workplace Programs, 
Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and Mental 
Health Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-00310 Filed 1-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Timothy J. Gay, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 898]

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (Craig J. Doran, J.), rendered June 27, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him following a jury trial of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 165.40), defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. We reject that contention. Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crime as charged to the jury *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we conclude that, although a different verdict would not have been unreasonable, the jury did not fail to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded *(see generally*
      *1428
      *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Defendant’s accomplice testified that defendant stole an ATM from a bar, and that testimony was corroborated by other witnesses. Defendant contends that the People’s witnesses lacked credibility, but we give great deference to the factfinder’s “ ‘opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony and observe demeanor’ ” *(People v Harris,*15 AD3d 966, 967 [2005], *lv denied 4*NY3d 831 [2005], citing *Bleakley,*69 NY2d at 495; *see People v Sorrentino,*12 AD3d 1197, 1197-1198 [2004], *lv denied 4*NY3d 748 [2004]). Indeed, a jury is able to “assess [the] credibility and reliability [of the witnesses] in a manner that is far superior to that of reviewing judges[,] who must rely on the printed record” *(People v Lane,*7 NY3d 888, 890 [2006]), and we perceive no reason to disturb the jury’s credibility determinations.

Present—Scudder, PJ., Smith, Centra, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.