alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

Exhibit 99.2

                               LEARN2 CORPORATION

                               111 High Ridge Road
                               Stamford, CT 06905

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                 March 27, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Learn2 Corporation
has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen")
stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their quality control
system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable
assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional
standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working
on the audit and availability of national office consultation. Availability of
personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to this audit.

                           Very truly yours,

                           Learn2 Corporation



                           Marc E. Landy
                           Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of Colorado Wyoming Reserve Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, I, Rafiq A. Sayed,, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November 14, 2005

/s/ Rafiq A. Sayed



Rafiq A. Sayed



Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles Park
Communities, Ltd 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317969
<NAME> ANGELES PARK COMMUNITIES, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             415
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,598)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,068)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,209
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,556
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.57<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | By:              | /s/ ARTHUR                D. LEVINSON                                                               |   |
|--------|------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:Title:Date: | Arthur                D. Levinson, Ph.D.Chief                Executive OfficerMay                1, 2006 |   |

|   | By:                    | /s/ DAVID                A. EBERSMAN                                                                                                                      |   |
|--------|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:Title: Date: | David                A. EbersmanExecutive                Vice President and    Chief                Financial OfficerMay                1, 2006 |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6649

DION WYVIS COLEMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-96-458-2)

Submitted: May 12, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dion Wyvis Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Coleman v. Angelone, No. CA-96-458-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT  10(III)(O)(2)


                                   KEVIN GREGORY
                  SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT & CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   2007 PAY PLAN

Salary                    $310,000 (1)
------

Term                      New three (3) year contract
----

Signing Bonus             11,500 restricted shares (subject to four year
-------------             vesting)
                          11,500 shares granted upon 1st anniversary (subject to
                          four year vesting)
                          11,500 shares granted upon 2nd anniversary (subject to
                          four year vesting)

                          45,000 cash upon execution of agreement (if employee
                          leaves for any reason or is terminated for cause
                          within initial 3 year term, then the
                          prorated / unvested portion must be reimbursed to the
                          Company)

Auto Allowance            $900 per month
--------------

Communications Allowance  $250 per month
------------------------

Disability                one year's base salary
----------

Life Insurance            750,000 years one, two and three
--------------

QUARTERLY BONUS BASED ON COMPANY NPBT

>XXX% NPBT =     $15,000
>XXX% NPBT =     $20,000
>XXX% NPBT =     $25,000

QUARTERLY BONUS BASED ON COMPANY DSO'S

<XXX days =     $15,000
<XXX days =     $20,000
<XXX days =     $25,000


<PAGE>
YEAR END TOTAL COMPANY BONUS

> XXX million in sales =     $25,000 + 12,500 options (3)
> XXX million in sales =     $37,500 + 17,500 options (3)
> XXX million in sales =     $50,000 + 22,500 options (3)

Minimum of XXX% NPBT required
-----------------------------

@ XXX cents EPS =     $25,000 + 12,500 options (3)
@ XXX cents EPS =     $37,500 + 17,500 options (3)
@ XXX cents EPS =     $50,000 + 22,500 options (3)


All  other T&C's and standard language to apply as did in the past (i.e. Vesting
schedules,  deferred,  changes in business model, etc ). Attach as an exhibit to
existing  employment  agreement.

     (1)  If second benchmark of year end Company bonus is achieved then base
          salary shall be increased to $325,000.

     (2)  If employee is terminated without cause then employee is entitled to
          12 months severance (at then current base salary) and all deferred
          compensation, option and restricted share grants are immediately
          vested. Plus, employee is eligible for any bonuses deemed earned in
          the existing year.

     (3)  Options are subject to a three year vesting schedule. 50% of cash
          consideration will vest over a three year period. Company reserves the
          right to substitute restricted shares or other forms of compensation
          in lieu of stock options.
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Frank T. Smith, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Dune Energy, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31,
2006 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 20, 2007

                                               /s/ Frank T. Smith, Jr.
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Frank T. Smith, Jr.
                                               Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
804 

OF=lCE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable Arthur 8. Kniokuboaksr 

mm rd&tent Oonual 

&d$Atent Qonor6l’r Dopartunt 

Awti.n, T8xrr 

row lrttor of AQ 

of thl8 Iope$tmnt en the qor 

low t 

. 

'*lA 0&8X that thi 

the Attorney Qe 

bo em~loyo4 by 

beSag ontitled 

oos~lote& in tho firoal 

an glvon, or oaa they 

0 tho tollw1ng ii8081 

08ttlOSI 8#it idO rr8OhnIB Of 0110 

month? ;Lt not, When 18 6#l eMjkOye0 06 te a 0t.u tywmwk8 vaoation? 

'5. Oan T8OitiOll8 bo eOeOJJUlht8d fl?Mh 008 TO8r 

to the next? Yor l uqploj Ton dapl taoat%On t4tkUA h8t YOU; WI& fOWtOM b&y8 

tefcen thi8 year. 

'6. Xi thi8 D8Q8&WUIt h88 08rt8ill oiIQ1OyOO8 

uhe hare been rlth it for 8~# tJs0, and 
Honor8blo Arthur Be Knlokerbookor - Pago 2 

h8ta rondorod iritbiti 8ON14S, Will thO80 

o@OrS8S, goOn -8iylillU frOr Skt. SUViOO, 

.- b0 Ultitbt t0 t8e8tiOlA8? 

The Qsnenl itidrr 8ppeaQod to Ben&e Bill Ho. 332, 

Aoba of the 48th tylelatura, ste@m Bo88ion, 19.9u, (the 

Current Blonaial ApgrOprtitlOsi AOt) prOvi&8t 

“. . . . 

. . . l .î 

hVi8U et tQI iOngO* pCOti8i.n Of the WQ8rtPmtd &pgto&Wi8tiQa Bm, it 18 OR? Option thrt beton l II 

WplOJOO Of JUW &O@UtdE@nt i8 1.w oZltiu8& t0 l +8OetiOn, 

he or 8h4 au8t &to bow an 8a &yoo of t&ho dopartnioat tar 

not lo48 t&a riz oalsadar ma & a preaoding the r8oatlon 

QUlOd. 

In 8nffU SO 8QUr 888Oad qU,8tiOS, JOP 8N 8bVi806, 

tht it i8 OW OpbiOll thO8 ToO4tiOll8 Say bO&li St 8iiJ tiM 

aftor th8 h68 born an urployoo or the aspwtmont for 

Xi06 1888 thW 8 08lMdu loath, JW808dbI4J th8 1808tiOn 

period. 

805 ’ ’ 

r 

& r ep ly t8 p UX th b ir 8 U888iOn ~00 l Iy 86Vb Ob 

-‘t&et V8OddOn8 4IU8t b0 WiUfiOkd & tho fj80.1 ysrr ior rhioh 

they uo girea end ea8 not be l wrled over into t&a following 

fl8081 J48f. 
Eonoreblo Arthur B, Knlekerbocltar - Pago 3 

lin8WOr w YOU? fOur tb QUO8tiOli, JO1 3 l O rdV18Od th8t 

a lroatioa i8 no00 8plit into fmotiQn8 of Oil0 dy par aonth, 

but 88 harotoron 8t8tOd, whoa 8n unployoo ha8 been o4lployed 

by th4 dopartaont ror aot 1088 then rir oalend8r aoath prooo(Liry tho leartiM wriO6, 8uOh rap~oyer I8 M%itlod to 8 iUli 

two week8 raortiea 8uOh raootioa period to bo autw~ r&mod 

upea by the head 0) tho dopartaoat and th8 U~~OFOO. 

YO,w iiita QW8t%fMl 18 rO8pOtftlllJ M8WOrd iE th0 

n8gatiro* P8oatlonr een not be l eeumul8tod Sron aa0 tear to 

the Ilox*. 

& U8W.P t@ YOU= 8iLth md WYWth qbte8tiOIi8, YOU 

ero 86vi8& the% 8fkr Oh0 eWplOpeE& Of the 0 lOye 18 

8##h UL~bJU i8 OOt BntiuOa t0 d V808%iOI14. 

, the 8beere quetad prorlrioa of the Dopart 

06 Bii.i W&d U4m t0 8OUt44L&4t# th8t On8 

rust bo a dopwtmatal oaplem4 

in or&or to neoivr peg for the 

Of thi8 8kt8JMnt, w0 dfre8t yew 8t$MtiO#I bo O&U 

HO. o-zulb, a aopy or mhioh 18 8aolO8ed ror your wnvoaf*noo. 

AHal willl8E8 

A8Oi8tant 

__~ --;- 

L ._. 2? + I) 

- 

@- 

T- f 

::L”: .,‘i : 

* ...h ,_ ,._ 

.
664 A.2d 941

#### IN THE MATTER OF STEVEN E. HEATH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 8, 1995.

ORDER

STEVEN E. HEATH formerly of BRADLEY BEACH, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1973, having tendered his consent to disbarment as an attorney at law of the State of New Jersey, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that STEVEN E. HEATH is disbarred by consent, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk May 28 , 2020

1 6 1273

- 4 (20)(23)(24)(25)(28)(29)(3 0)(34)(39)(40)

In re MONTANO

____________________________________

MARIO ALLEN MONTANO

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 161273

- 4

COA: 353392; 353410

OAKLAND CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE,

Defendant

- Appellee

.

____________________________________ /

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for immediate consideration of the motion

to waive fees , the motion to amend the application, and the motions to add issues are

GRANT ED

. On further order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is DENIED

. The plaintiff

- appellant shall pay the fees for the interlocutory application , the motion to

amend the application filed on May 4, 2020, and the motions to add issues filed on May 6,

2020, and May 12, 2020, within 28 days of the date of this order or the ap plication will be

administratively dismissed. The motions to expedite, for stay, and for immediate

consideration filed on May 4, 2020, are ordered withdrawn in accordance with the request

of the plaintiff

- appellant.
#### State v. McGirt

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 348

No. 390P06-3

Def’s Motion for “Notice of Appeal” (COA06-609)

Dismissed *ex mero mo tu*06/27/07
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________ NO. 09
- 1 2
- 00 244
- CV



### _________________
IN RE COMMITMENT OF WILLIAM CYRUS SCOTT

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 435th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11
- 10
- 10849
- CV

________________________________________________________________________ ORDER
Volumes 1 and 2 of t he reporter’s record, due September 10 , 20 12 , ha v e not been
filed. Heather Deiss is responsible for preparing, certifying, and timely filing the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(b). On September 24 , 2012, we informed the court reporter that the record must be filed within thirty days or the matter would be referred for an enforcement order. The court reporter failed to file the record by the due
date. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal be ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court for a hearing to determine why the reporter’s record has2

not been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(1). The trial court shall determine why the court reporter did not timely file the record, and may make such orders as shall be necessary to ensure the reporter’s record is promptly filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c) (“The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed.”). A reporter’s record shall be made of the hearing and, together with a supplemental clerk’s record containing any fi ndings or orders of the trial court, shall be filed with the Court of Appea ls by November 26 , 2012

. ORDER ENTERED Octo ber 2 5 , 2012

. PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
1... See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-04-249-CR

TONY DEMOND WRIGHT APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 158TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REMAND1

------------

Appellant Tony Demond Wright was charged with the second degree

felony offense of possession of a controlled substance. Before trial, he filed a

motion to suppress, challenging the police’s no-knock entry. After a hearing,

the trial court denied his motion. Appellant pled guilty pursuant to a plea

bargain, and the trial court placed him on deferred adjudication community
2... Wright v. State, No. 02-04-00249-CR, 2006 WL 563617, at *2–3

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 9, 2006) (not designated for publication).

3... Id. at *2–3 (Dauphinot, J.),*5 (McCoy, J., concurring).

4... Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586, 126 S. Ct. 2159 (2006); Wright

v. State, 253 S.W.3d 287, 288 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). 

5... Hudson, 547 U.S. at 594, 599, 126 S. Ct. at 2165, 2168. 

2

supervision for four years.

In his original appeal to this court, Appellant challenged the trial court’s

denial of his motion to suppress.2 A majority of this court, admittedly for

different reasons, reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded the case for

a new trial without the illegally seized evidence.3

On the State’s petition for discretionary review, the Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals reversed this court’s decision and remanded the case to this

court for reconsideration in light of Hudson v. Michigan, which the United

States Supreme Court handed down after this court handed down its original

opinion.4 The Hudson court held that under the Fourth Amendment to the

United States Constitution, a violation of the knock-and-announce rule does not

require the suppression of evidence discovered during a search.5

Although Appellant referred to the Texas Constitution and statutes in his

motion to suppress, on appeal he relied solely on the Fourth Amendment to the
6... See Wright, 253 S.W.3d at 288. 

7... See Monreal v. State, 947 S.W.2d 559, 563 n.5 (Tex. Crim. App.

1997); Rochelle v. State, 791 S.W.2d 121, 124–25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990);

Eldridge v. State, 940 S.W.2d 646, 650 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); McCambridge

v. State, 712 S.W.2d 499, 501–02 n.9 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986).

8... See Hudson, 547 U.S. at 594, 599, 126 S. Ct. at 2165, 2168. 

3

United States Constitution.6 On remand, he suggests that he is entitled to relief

under the Texas Constitution. 

Because on appeal Appellant challenged the trial court’s denial of his

motion to suppress solely under the Fourth Amendment, we hold that he has

forfeited his state law claims.7 Relying on Hudson, we hold that the trial court

did not reversibly err by denying Appellant’s motion to suppress.8 We therefore

overrule his points and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

LEE ANN DAUPHINOT

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: November 26, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3613 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3613

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2951 New York Highway 43 in Averill Park, New York, as the ``Major 
                  George Quamo Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAJOR GEORGE QUAMO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2951 New York Highway 43 in Averill Park, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Major George Quamo Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
George Quamo Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate August 2, 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3613

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 2951 New York Highway 43 in Averill Park, New York, as the ``Major 
                  George Quamo Post Office Building''.
```