[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 11 (Friday, January 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2460-2462]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74040; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2015-003]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change 
Regarding the Extranet Access Fee

January 13, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on January 5, 2015, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in 
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASDAQ. 
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ proposes to add new NASDAQ Options Market (``NOM'') \3\ 
Chapter XV, Section 12 to the Exchange's Options Pricing Schedule 
(``Pricing Schedule''), which includes description about the 
applicability of the Extranet Access Fee. This will conform the 
Exchange's Pricing Schedule to that of other markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ NOM is a facility of NASDAQ.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
Web site at http://www.nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal 
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposal is to add new NOM Chapter XV, Section 
12 entitled ``Extranet Access Fee'' to the Pricing Schedule, which 
includes description about the applicability of the Extranet Access 
Fee. This will conform the Exchange's Pricing Schedule to that of other 
markets.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx''), and NASDAQ OMX 
BX, Inc. (``BX'') are self-regulatory organizations (``SROs'') that 
are wholly owned subsidiaries of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. 
(``NASDAQ OMX''). The Exchange, NOM (a facility of the Exchange), 
BX, BX Options (a facility of BX), Phlx, and PSX (a facility of 
Phlx) (together with the Exchange known as the ``NASDAQ Markets''), 
are independently filing proposals to conform their respective 
Extranet Access Fee rules to NASDAQ Rule 7025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Exchange proposes to establish the Extranet 
Access Fee in proposed new NOM Chapter XV, Section 12 to indicate that 
certain non-Exchange Customer Premises Equipment (``CPE'') Products 
shall be assessed a monthly access fee of $1,000 per CPE. The Exchange 
also proposes to conform the Extranet Access Fee to that of another 
market, specifically NASDAQ Rule 7025, by also indicating that if an 
extranet provider uses multiple CPE Configurations \5\ to provide 
market data feeds to any recipient the monthly fee shall apply to each 
such CPE Configuration; and that no Extranet Access Fee will be charged 
for connectivity to market data feeds containing only consolidated 
data. This proposal conforms the Extranet Access Fee in NOM Chapter XV, 
Section 12 to the equivalent fee in NASDAQ Rule 7025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ As defined in proposed NOM Chapter XV, Section 12, a 
``Customer Premises Equipment Configuration'' means any line, 
circuit, router package, or other technical configuration used by an 
extranet provider to provide a direct access connection to Nasdaq 
market data feeds to a recipient's site.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Extranet Access Fee was introduced a decade ago on NASDAQ Rule 
7025 as an equity fee.\6\ The Extranet Access Fee was introduced about 
five years ago in on BX and about year ago on PSX.\7\ By this proposal, 
the Exchange normalizes the cost and structure of its Extranet Access 
Fee on NOM to that of the equivalent decade-old NASDAQ fee.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 50483 (October 1, 
2004), 69 FR 60448 (October 8, 2004) (SR-NASD-2004-118) 
(establishing the Extranet Access Fee on NASDAQ); and 71199 
(December 30, 2013), 79 FR 686 (January 6, 2014) (SR-NASD [sic]-
2013-159) (notice of filing and immediate effectiveness increasing 
the Extranet Access Fee to $1,000).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59615 (March 20, 
2009), 74 FR 14604 (March 31, 2009) (SR-BX-2009-005) (establishing 
the Extranet Access Fee on BX); and 71841 (April 1, 2014), 79 FR 
19129 (April 7, 2014) (SR-BX-2014-015) (notice of filing and 
immediate effectiveness describing that the Extranet Access Fee is 
$750). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71236 (January 
6, 2014), 79 FR 1906 (January 10, 2014) (SR-Phlx-2014-01) (notice of 
filing and immediate effectiveness establishing the Extranet Access 
Fee on PSX, and describing that no fee is charged at the time of the 
filing).
    \8\ As noted, the NASDAQ Markets are independently filing 
proposals to conform their respective Extranet Access Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed NOM Chapter XV, Section 12 indicates the same fee as 
NASDAQ Rule 7025, namely $1,000 per CPE Configuration, and adds 
verbatim language from NASDAQ Rule 7025 that explains the application 
of the fee.\9\ As proposed, NOM Chapter XV, Section 12 will read as 
follows: ``Extranet providers that establish a connection with Nasdaq 
to offer direct access connectivity to market data feeds shall be 
assessed a monthly access fee of $1,000 per

[[Page 2461]]

recipient Customer Premises Equipment (``CPE'') Configuration. If an 
extranet provider uses multiple CPE Configurations to provide market 
data feeds to any recipient, the monthly fee shall apply to each such 
CPE Configuration. For purposes of this Section 12, the term ``Customer 
Premises Equipment Configuration'' shall mean any line, circuit, router 
package, or other technical configuration used by an extranet provider 
to provide a direct access connection to Nasdaq market data feeds to a 
recipient's site. No extranet access fee will be charged for 
connectivity to market data feeds containing only consolidated data. 
Extranet providers that establish a connection with Nasdaq pursuant to 
this Section 12 as well as a connection with Nasdaq pursuant to Nasdaq 
Rule 7025 shall be assessed a total monthly access fee of $1,000 per 
recipient CPE Configuration.'' The proposal conforms NOM Chapter XV, 
Section 12 to NASDAQ Rule 7025, and makes them substantively 
identical.\10\ The proposal also makes it clear that if an extranet 
provider establishes an extranet connection on PSX [sic] as well as on 
Phlx [sic], the extranet provider will not need to pay a double $1,000 
monthly access fee per CPE, but rather only one total monthly access 
fee of $1,000 per CPE. In addition, as discussed, there is an equity 
market and an options market under the NASDAQ SRO license. This 
proposal brings the Extranet Access Fee per NASDAQ Rule 7025 on the 
equity side to the options side per NOM Chapter XV, Section 12 in 
conformity with NASDAQ Rule 7025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ However, the proposed Section 12 language does not, because 
it deals with options, indicate that consolidated data includes data 
disseminated by the UTP SIP (as noted in NASDAQ Rule 7025).
    \10\ The Exchange notes that while NOM Chapter XV, Section 12 
and NASDAQ Rule 7025 each contain some language particular to the 
relevant exchange, with this proposal the language of the two rules 
is substantively identical. The Exchange notes that the statement 
that extranet providers shall be assessed a total monthly access fee 
of $1,000 per recipient CPE Configuration is not in NASDAQ Rule 
7025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed Extranet Access Fee will, as on NASDAQ, be used to 
help recoup the Exchange's costs associated with maintaining multiple 
extranet connections with multiple providers. These costs include those 
associated with overhead and technology infrastructure, administrative, 
maintenance and operational costs. Since the inception of Extranet 
Access there have been numerous network infrastructure improvements and 
administrative controls enacted. Additionally, the Exchange has 
implemented automated retransmission facilities for most of its data 
clients that benefit extranet clients by reducing operational costs 
associated with retransmissions.
    As the number of extranets has increased, the management of the 
downstream customers has expanded and the Exchange has had to ensure 
appropriate reporting and review processes, which has resulted in a 
greater cost burden on the Exchange over time. The proposed fee will 
also help to ensure that the Exchange is better able to closely review 
reports and uncover reporting errors via audits thus minimizing 
reporting issues.\11\ The network infrastructure has increased in order 
to keep pace with the increased number of products, which, in turn, has 
caused an increased administrative burden and higher operational costs 
associated with delivery via extranets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange will inform extranet providers of their 
reporting responsibilities via its public Web site. This will 
include, as an example, reporting CPE usage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thus, subsequent to the proposal extranet providers that establish 
a connection with the Exchange to offer direct access connectivity to 
market data feeds shall be assessed a monthly access fee of $1,000 per 
CPE Configuration. If, as discussed below, an extranet provider uses 
multiple CPE Configurations to provide market data feeds to any 
recipient, the monthly fee shall apply to each such CPE Configuration.
    The Exchange proposes two new descriptions to conform the language 
of NOM Chapter XV, Section 12 to that of NASDAQ Rule 7025. 
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to indicate that if an extranet 
provider uses multiple CPE Configurations to provide market data feeds 
to any recipient, the monthly fee shall apply to each such CPE 
Configuration; and that no extranet access fee will be charged for 
connectivity to market data feeds containing only consolidated data. 
These proposed descriptions should serve to reduce any confusion as to 
the applicability of the Extranet Access Fee. Moreover, the 
descriptions would make the Exchange's Extranet Access Fee in NOM 
Chapter XV, Section 12 work the same as the equivalent fee in NASDAQ 
Rule 7025, and complete the effort to conform the two rules.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and with Section 6(b)(4) 
of the Act,\13\ in particular, in that it provides for the equitable 
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and 
issuers and other persons using any facility or system which the 
Exchange operates or controls.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that its proposal to add the Extranet Access 
Fee in NOM Chapter XV, Section 12, and to describe the applicability of 
the Extranet Access Fee and thereby conform the fee with the equivalent 
fee on NASDAQ, is consistent with the Act.
    All similarly situated extranet providers, including the Exchange 
operating its own extranet, that establish an extranet connection with 
the Exchange to access market data feeds from the Exchange are subject 
to the same fee structure.\14\ The fee will help the Exchange to offset 
some of the rising overhead and technology infrastructure, 
administrative, maintenance and operational costs it incurs in support 
of the service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ For example, NASDAQ Technology Services, a subsidiary of 
the Exchange, pays the applicable fee(s) to the Exchange for 
services covered under the Extranet Access Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If such costs are covered, the service may provide the Exchange 
with a profit. As such, the Exchange believes that the proposed fee is 
reasonable and notes that this proposal conforms similarly-situated 
Extranet Access Fee rules on NOM options and NASDAQ equities. The 
extranet costs are separate and different from the colocation facility 
that is able to recoup these fees by charging for servers within the 
associated data centers. Additionally, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed change is equitable and not unreasonably discriminatory. The 
monthly fee is assessed uniformly to all extranet providers that 
establish a connection with the Exchange to offer direct access 
connectivity to market data feeds, and is the same for all at $1,000 
per recipient CPE Configuration. Thus, any burden arising from the fees 
is necessary in the interest of promoting the equitable allocation of a 
reasonable fee. Moreover, firms make decisions on how much and what 
types of data to consume on the basis of the total cost of interacting 
with the Exchange or other markets and, of course, the Extranet Access 
Fee is but one factor in a total platform analysis.
    Additionally, proposed NOM Chapter XV, Section 12 contains 
description stating that if an extranet provider uses multiple CPE 
Configurations to provide market data feeds to any recipient, the 
monthly fee shall apply to each such CPE Configuration; and that no 
Extranet Access Fee will be charged for connectivity to market data 
feeds containing only consolidated data. This description should serve 
to reduce any

[[Page 2462]]

confusion as to the applicability of this fee.
    The proposal provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable 
dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other 
persons using any facility or system which the Exchange operates or 
controls, and is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or 
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.
    The proposed fees are applied uniformly among extranet providers, 
which are not compelled to establish a connection with the Exchange to 
offer access connectivity to market data feeds. For these reasons, any 
burden arising from the fees is necessary in the interest of promoting 
the equitable allocation of a reasonable fee. Additionally, firms make 
decisions on how much and what types of data to consume on the basis of 
the total cost of interacting with the Exchange or other exchanges and, 
of course, the Extranet Access Fee is but one factor in a total 
platform analysis.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\15\ the Exchange 
has designated this proposal as establishing or changing a due, fee, or 
other charge imposed by the self-regulatory organization on any person, 
whether or not the person is a member of the self-regulatory 
organization, which renders the proposed rule change effective upon 
filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to 
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#097b7c656c246a6664646c677d7a497a6c6a276e667f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f98b8c959cd49a9694949c978d8ab98a9c9ad79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include 
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-003 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-003. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. 
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission 
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You 
should submit only information that you wish to make available 
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2015-
003, and should be submitted on or before February 6, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00625 Filed 1-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>