alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, William Augustin IV, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2007-1 (the
    "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: EMC
    Mortgage Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 30, 2008


    /s/ William Augustin IV
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
From: The District Court of the 8th Judicial District. County of Cascade.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. DARIN GUCKEEN, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. CDC-07-106 AMENDED JUDGMENT AND COMMITMENT

On November 25, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to five (5) years in the Montana State Prison for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence for the offense of Assault with a Weapon, a felony. The Court recommended that the Defendant phased into Connections Corrections prior to release.

On February 12,2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

The Defendant having been duly informed ofthe amendedjudgment and commitment, and having waived his right to appear before the undersigned for this pronouncement of sentence, whereupon,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the term of the sentence shall be affirmed. However, the Sentence Review Division recommends the sentence be modified so that the defendant be committed to the Department of Corrections for a period of five (5) years to allow the Department of Corrections to consider medical and safety issues in any type of placement.

DATED this 23rd day of March, 2009.

Hon. Richard Simonton, District Court Judge
T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-13-00029- CV In re Re ginald A. Noble ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Goodwin and F ield Filed: January

18, 2013
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------



               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Annual Report of Wellstone  Filters,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Samueal Veasey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company



/s/ Samuel Veasey
By: Samueal Veasey
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2005
#### In re: Lucienne HUNTER, Debtor. Lucienne Hunter and Kevin Smith, Appellants, v. Paul Mansdorf, Chapter 7 Trustee, and United States Trustee, Oakland, Appellees.

Nos. 09-60009, 09-60010.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 19, 2010.*

Filed Nov. 1, 2010.

*229Lucienne Hunter, Oakland, CA, pro se.

Kevin Smith, Oakland, CA, pro se.

United States Trustee, Oakland, CA, pro se.

Reidun Stromsheim, Stromsheim & Associates, San Francisco, CA, for Appellees.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lucienne Hunter and Kevin Smith appeal pro se from the January 7, 2009 orders of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) dismissing their appeals for failure to prosecute, from the January 9, 2009 BAP order stating that the BAP would not take action on the latest motion for extension of time to file the opening brief because the case had been dismissed, and from the February 13, 2009 BAP order denying the motion for reconsideration of the dismissals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review the orders for abuse of discretion. *Morrissey v. Stuteville (In re Morrissey),*349 F.3d 1187, 1190 (9th Cir.2003); *Nat’l Bank of Long Beach v. Donovan (In re Donovan),*871 F.2d 807, 808 (9th Cir.1989) (per curiam). We affirm.

The trustee contends that we have jurisdiction over only the February 13, 2009 order because the notice of appeal was not timely with regard to the earlier orders. However, because the appellants filed a tolling motion, the notice of appeal was timely as to all the orders. *See*Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8002; *see also*Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9006(a)(1).

Contrary to the appellants’ contentions, the BAP did not abuse its discretion by issuing the January 7, 2009 and January 9, 2009 orders because the BAP gave the appellants several extensions and explicit warnings that failure to file the opening brief might result in dismissal, and the appellants have not provided a non-frivolous excuse for their failure to file the brief by the time the BAP issued the orders. *See Moneymaker v. CoBen (In re Eisen),*31 F.3d 1447, 1451 (9th Cir.1994) (explaining factors courts must consider before dismissing for failure to prosecute); *see also Greco v. Stubenberg,*859 F.2d 1401, 1404 (9th Cir.1988) (explaining that courts ordinarily should consider alternative sanctions as well as the fault of the person failing to prosecute).

The BAP also did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion for reconsideration because the appellants failed to show that their delay was due to excusable neglect. *See Pincay v. Andrews,*389 F.3d *230853, 855 (9th Cir.2004) (en banc) (explaining the factors to consider when determining whether there is “excusable neglect”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
663 A.2d 640

#### IN THE MATTER OF BENJAMIN GEDAL SPRECHER, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 14, 1995.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed its decision with the Court on May 24,1995, recommending that as reciprocal discipline for his disbarment in New York, BENJAMIN GEDAL SPRECHER of FLUSHING, NEW YORK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended from practice by Order of this Court dated May 16, 1994, and who remains suspended at this time, be disbarred;

And the disbarment of respondent in New York having been based on his convictions of conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to commit securities fraud, obstruction of proceedings, perjury, and obstruction of justice;

And respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause in this matter;

*433And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED BENJAMIN GEDAL SPRECHER be disbarred and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this State, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that BENJAMIN GEDAL SPRECHER be and

hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by BENJAMIN GEDAL SPRECHER, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6, be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that BENJAMIN GEDAL SPRECHER comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that BENJAMIN GEDAL SPRECHER reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs.
From: The District Court of the 7th Judicial District. County of Dawson.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, *87vs. BILLY RAY MCLAIN, Defendant,

*86CAUSE NO. DC-08-16 *87DECISION

On July 6, 2009, the defendant was sentenced to a commitment to the Department of Corrections for a period of eight (8) years, with two (3) years suspended, for the offense of Theft, a felony.

On November 12, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Bert Certain. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 12th day of November, 2009.

DATED this 25th day of November, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Alt. Member, Kurt Krueger.
Exhibit 31

                                                           [LOGO] IndymacBank(R)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Blair Abernathy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
      required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
      Form 10-K of IndyMac INDX Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-FLX2 (the "Exchange Act
      periodic reports");

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
      whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
      state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
      information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
      by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
      this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
      the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance-with servicing criteria for
      asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
      assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
      securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
      1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
      included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
      this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
      reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company and Newport Management Corporation.

Date: March 26, 2008



/s/ Blair Abernathy
-----------------------
Blair Abernathy
Executive Vice President
(Senior Officer in Charge of Securitization of the Depositor)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANA HOLDING CORPORATION,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (SMUCK),

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 729 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of May, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all 

remaining issues. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

1. Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in applying the [Protz II] 

standard to the case on appeal at the time of this Court’s decision 

retroactive to the date of the IRE instead of as of the date of the Supreme 

Court changed in the law?

2. Whether the Commonwealth Court’s failure to grant the employer 

credit for the three year period between the date of the IRE evaluation and 

the date of this Court’s decision in [Protz II] unlawfully violates Employer’s 

constitutional right pursuant to the “Due Course of Law” provisions of the 

Pennsylvania Constitution Article I, Section 11? 

M.D. Appeal Dkt.

44 MAP 2019
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of Colorado Wyoming Reserve Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, I, Rafiq A. Sayed,, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 29, 2005

/s/ Rafiq A. Sayed



Rafiq A. Sayed



Chief Financial Officer
|EXHIBIT 31.2
|------------



|Certification:
|--------------

I,  Kevan B. Hensman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Aspen Exploration Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)   [intentionally omitted]

c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)   disclosed in this report any changes in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting.

5.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

|                    |  |    |  |                                          
|------------------- |  | -- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: May 13, 2008 |  | By |  | /s/   Kevan B. Hensman                   
|                    |  |    |  | Kevan B. Hensman, interim Chief Financial
|                    |  |    |  | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer 



---
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
     Form 10-K of ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series
     2007-ASL1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
     have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Ocwen
    Loan Servicing, LLC as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)