alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,902
<SECURITIES>                                   313,798
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               320,200
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 404,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    109,356
<COMMON>                                         4,851
<OTHER-SE>                                   (790,686)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   404,950
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,690
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,154
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 42,445
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,291)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10874 Summary Calendar

MANLEY RICHARD MILLIGAN, Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant,

versus ERATH COUNTY, TX; DAVID BOUCHER, DR., Defendants-Appellees,
DAVID COFFEE; JACK TATE; JOYCE HOLLOWAY; MARGO BRISENDINE; MIKE SHELBY; HOWARD BRITTON; WAYNE BYERS; DONNA SCOTT; JUDY TATE; ALICE KOLB; LEWIS QUASSA; JOE PHILLIPS; DAVID BASS; Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CV-804-A

- - - - - - - - - - July 24, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Manley R. Milligan appeals the grant of summary judgment for the defendants in his civil rights action. He also appeals the denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. Milligan contends that the district court erred by granting summaryNo. 95-10874 - 2 - judgment for the defendants, erred by denying his motion for a continuance to respond to the defendants’ summary-judgment motions, and that the district court erred by denying his motion for appointment of counsel. Milligan has failed to brief whether the district court erred by granting summary judgment for the defendants, other than Dr. David Boucher, on the basis of qualified immunity and whether the district court erred by granting summary judgment on all of his state-law claims and his federal-law claims other than his conspiracy contention. Because he has failed to brief those issues, he has abandoned them. Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 524-25 (5th Cir. 1995). Because Milligan has abandoned his contention that the district court erred by granting summary judgment for the defendants other than Boucher on the basis of qualified immunity, and the district court’s judgment may be affirmed on those grounds, we do not consider whether the district court erred by finding Milligan’s claims against those defendants prescribed. Regarding Milligan’s conspiracy claims against Dr. Boucher, we have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment for essentially the reasons relied on by the district court. See Milligan v. Erath County, Tex. , No. 4:94-CV804-A (N.D. Tex. Oct. 2, 1995). Finally, we find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denials of Milligan’s motions for a continuance to respond to the defendants’ summary-judgment motions and forNo. 95-10874 - 3 - appointment of counsel. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep’t , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986); Fontenot v. Upjohn Co. , 780 F.2d 1190, 1193 (5th Cir. 1986).
AFFIRMED.
exv10w36



 





Exhibit 10.36




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Microsoft Corporation
	 	Tel 425 882 8080
	 

	 	One Microsoft Way
	 	Fax 425 936 7329
	 

	 	Redmond, WA 98052-6399
	 	http://www.microsoft.com/











November 7, 2006




Novell, Inc.

404 Wyman

Waltham, MA USA 02451





			
	Attention:	 	Joseph A. LaSala, Jr.,

Senior Vice President and General Counsel





                    Re: Patent Cooperation Agreement




Dear Joe:




     We wish to confirm that the attached form of Patent Cooperation Agreement (“PCA”), which
incorporates corrections to the form of PCA executed on November 2, 2006, constitutes the Patent
Cooperation Agreement between Microsoft Corporation and Novell, Inc. dated as of November 2, 2006.
The form of PCA executed on November 2 shall be of no force or effect.



     Please sign below to indicate your agreement with the foregoing.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Sincerely,	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	MICROSOFT CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Bradford L. Smith
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Sen. VP & Gen. Counsel	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	MICROSOFT LICENSING, GP	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Joel Freedman	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 





	 	 	 	 	 
	NOVELL, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Joseph A. LaSala, Jr.
 

	 	 
	Title:

	 	SVP, GENERAL COUNSEL & SECRETARY
 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 





          Microsoft Corporation is an equal opportunity employer.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 9 (Wednesday, January 14, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00518]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting; National Science Board

    The National Science Board's ad hoc Committee on Honorary Awards, 
pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science 
Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the 
scheduling of a meeting for the transaction of National Science Board 
business, as follows:

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, January 21, 2015, at 3:00 p.m. EST

SUBJECT MATTER: Consideration of nominations for honorary awards.

STATUS: Closed.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference originating at the 
National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.
    Please refer to the National Science Board Web site (www.nsf.gov/nsb) for information or schedule updates, or contact: Nadine Lymn, 
National Science Foundation, 4201Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. 
Telephone: (703) 292-7000.

Ann Bushmiller,
NSB Senior Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-00518 Filed 1-12-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2021

No. 04-21-00347-CV

Steven SCHAAF,

Appellant

v.

CHRISTUS SANTA ROSA HEALTH CARE CORPORATION a/k/a Christus Santa Rosa 

Health System and Christus Health,

Appellees

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI19278

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 6, 2021, appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, stating he no longer 

wished to prosecute the appeal. We dismissed the appeal pursuant to the motion to dismiss. On 

October 26, 2021, appellant filed a “Motion to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss and Request to 

Reinstate.” Because we have already issued an opinion and judgment in this case, we will treat 

this as a motion for rehearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. The court hereby requests a response to 

the motion from the appellee. See id. R. 49.2. Any response must be filed in this court no later 

than ten days from the date of this order. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey B. Davis, Chief Executive Officer certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Signed at the City of Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 16th day of May, 2011.





/s/ Jeffrey B. Davis


Jeffrey B. Davis


Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1635-1636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[DA 14-1855]


Notice of Debarment

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Enforcement Bureau published a document in the Federal 
Register of January 7, 2015, debarring Mr. Gregory Paul Styles from the 
schools and libraries universal service support mechanism (or ``E-Rate 
Program'') for three years. The document contained incorrect contact 
information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy M. Ragsdale, 202-418-1697.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 7, 2015, in FR Doc. 2015-00035, 
on page 888, in the first column, correct the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section to read:

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy M. Ragsdale, Attorney Advisor, 
Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Investigations 
and Hearings Division, Room 4-C330, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 
20554. Joy Ragsdale may be contacted by telephone at (202) 418-1697 or 
by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#307a5f491e6251574354515c55705653531e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fc5e0f6a1ddeee8fcebeee3eacfe9ececa1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>. If Ms. Ragsdale

[[Page 1636]]

is unavailable, you may contact Mr. Jeffrey J. Gee, Acting Chief, 
Investigations and Hearings Division, by telephone at (202) 418-1420 
and by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eca6898a8a9e8995c2ab8989ac8a8f8fc28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="de94bbb8b8acbba7f099bbbb9eb8bdbdf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>.

Federal Communications Commission.
Jeffrey J. Gee,
Acting Chief, Investigations and Hearings Division, Enforcement Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2015-00355 Filed 1-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99(c)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2003

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Energy Supply,
  LLC (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"),
  I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  hereby certify that:

| | · | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| | · | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: May 13, 2003 | /s/ William
        F. HechtWilliam F. Hecht
        President
        PPL Energy Supply, LLC
|------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of SVC Financial Services Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2004 accompanying this
      certification and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher Haigh, Chief Executive Officer of the
      Company, certify, to the best


of
      my
      knowledge, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
      ss.
      1350, that:




1.
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
       January 12, 2006





/s/
      Christopher Haigh


_________________


Christopher
      Haigh


Chief
      Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a  14(a) OR 15d  14(a)
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Dennis J. Pauls, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Hub
International Limited, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hub International
Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. By:
    /s/  Dennis J. PaulsDennis J. PaulsVice President and Chief Financial Officer DATE: May 7, 2004
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-75,223-05

IN RE REIDIE JACKSON, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 98-J-226 IN THE 130 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM MATAGORDA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 130 District Court of Matagorda County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the th

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of

Matagorda County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on

such habeas corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to

be investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating
2

that Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Matagorda County. Should

the response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for

leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the

appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: April 27, 2016

Do not publish
ADVANCING METROLOGY FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND THE

ENVIRONMENT IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE

(ACRONYM: M4SET- METROLOGY FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND THE ENVIRONMENT)

BENEFICIARY COUNTRIES: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, 

Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, 

Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, 

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela.

PROJECT DURATION (M4SET): November 2016 - November 2020

GOAL: To support the deployment of sustainable energy technologies and foster low carbon economic growth 

in the Americas. 

PURPOSE: To improve the measurement capabilities in the fields of energy efficiency, sustainable and

renewable energy and greenhouse gases. 

DESCRIPTION: The first phase of this project (SID 1306) was an important step to start the dialogue about the 

potential opportunities that the metrology community has to support sustainable energy technologies, as well as 

to identify regional priorities. Nevertheless, more awareness and training is needed in order to prepare 

government officials and metrology communities to actually respond to the technical needs that are arising as 

part of the implementation of the plans that each country has to comply with the commitments adopted.

Developing the Western Hemisphere’s renewable energy sector requires adequate metrology infrastructure, 

accurate traceability, calibration and measurement capabilities, and adherence to internationally recognized 

measurement standards. The proposed project will impart training on these and other topics as a means to bridge 

the gap between the sustainable energy and policy. 

The M4SET project submitted herein will improve the understanding and application of metrology in the fields 

of greenhouse gas measurements, energy efficiency, and sustainable and renewable energy through training and 

awareness of relevant high-ranking government officials and technical stakeholders. Training and technical 

assistance will be delivered through knowledge sharing, best practices, workshops, technical exchanges and 

regional cooperation. These actions will contribute to greater involvement of the metrology community in the 

implementation of measures dealing with energy efficiency, renewable energy, and GHG emissions, —these 

conditions are required to comply with the targets committed to by the OAS Member States.
#### Jesse J. CORLEY, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent.

No. 2007-3324.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 11, 2007.

Jesse J. Corley, pro se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Jesse J. Corley’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his appeal for failure to file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination, the statement now having been filed,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The mandate is recalled, the dismissal order is vacated, and the petition is reinstated.

*269(2) Corley’s informal brief (form enclosed) is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.