alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2610 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2610

    To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to specify certain 
   registration statement contents for emerging growth companies, to 
     permit issuers to file draft registration statements with the 
  Securities and Exchange Commission for confidential review, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2023

 Mr. McHenry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to specify certain 
   registration statement contents for emerging growth companies, to 
     permit issuers to file draft registration statements with the 
  Securities and Exchange Commission for confidential review, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGISTRATION STATEMENTS.

    Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 
78l(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(K), by striking ``years,'' and 
        inserting ``years (or, in the case of an emerging growth 
        company, not more than the two preceding years),''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
``Any issuer may confidentially submit to the Commission a draft 
registration statement for confidential nonpublic review by the staff 
of the Commission prior to public filing, provided that the initial 
confidential submission and all amendments thereto shall be publicly 
filed with the Commission not later than 10 days before the issuer's 
requested date of effectiveness of the registration statement. 
Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the Commission shall 
not be compelled to disclose any information provided to or obtained by 
the Commission pursuant to this subsection. For purposes of section 552 
of title 5, this subsection shall be considered a statute described in 
subsection (b)(3)(B) of such section 552. Information described in or 
obtained pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed to constitute 
confidential information for purposes of section 24.''.
                                 <all>
```
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 2415 LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 001593

- B

_____________________________ M ATTHEW A NTHONY S PLUNGE , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ 3.850 appeal from t he Circuit Court for Lake County. Heidi Davis, Judge. Matthew Anthony Splunge, Live Oak, p ro s e. No Appearance for Appellee. October 17, 2023
P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C.J., and M AKAR and M AC I VER , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Alston, De cker and Senior Judge Coleman

THE PITTSTON COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2384-13-3 PER CURIAM MAY 27, 2014 FRANKLIN CALO

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Ramesh Murthy; Penn, Stuart, & Eskridge, on brief), for appellant. (Paul L. Phipps; Mingkwan Emme Collins; Lee and Phipps, P.C., on brief), for appellee.

The Pittston Company appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that Franklin Calo was entitled to wage loss benefits when he di d not sustain any wage loss on March 18, 2013, due to his post-injury earni ngs that were greater than his pre-injury earnings. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for th e reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Calo v. The Pittston Co., VWC File No. 2059223 (Nov. 20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid th e decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.UNPUBLISHED
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Paul G. Kerrigan, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Brookfield HomesCorporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operation and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a — 15(e) and 15d — 15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
       Date: March 15, 2004          By: /s/ PAUL G. KERRIGAN
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Team, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip J. Hawk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/S/    PHILIP J.
HAWK               
|Philip J. Hawk                      
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

January 8, 2009
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JUNE 28, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-10560 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-00458-AEP

ERIC BEEDERS, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

GULF COAST COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee,

ROY DILLARD,

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(June 28, 2011)

Before BARKETT, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Eric Beeders appeals from an adverse final judgment, entered after a bench

trial, on his complaint against Gulf Coast Collection Bureau, Inc. (“Gulf Coast”),

alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, (FDCPA), Title 15

U.S.C. § 1692, and the Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA),

Florida Statutes Chapter 559. The alleged violations related to separate telephone

calls that Gulf Coast made to Beeders in an attempt to collect a debt. Each of the

telephone calls utilized the identical or nearly identical voice mail message, the

content of which is not a matter of factual dispute. The transcribed message stated

as follows:

This message is intended for Eric H. Beeders. If you are not Eric H.

Beeders please hang up or disconnect. If you are Eric H. Beeders

please continue to listen to this message. By continuing to listen to

this message you acknowledge that you are Eric H. Beeders. Please

return this call to Roy Dillard from Gulf Coast Collection Bureau. 

Please call 877-827-4820 and ask for file number G31852. 

On appeal, Beeders argues that this message failed to comply with the applicable

consumer protection regulations because it did not adequately satisfy the

disclosure requirement in that it did not identify the nature of the calling

company’s business, the fact that the caller was a debt collector, and the fact that

the call was being made with respect to collection of a debt. 

We find no clear error in the district court’s determination that, taking this

2
message as a whole, even an unsophisticated consumer would not be misled as to

the purpose of this call, as the message identified the name of the caller, which

includes the term “Collection Bureau,” and specifically referenced a personal file

number. Accordingly, we find no reversible error in the district court’s conclusion

that Gulf Coast satisfied the disclosure requirements of the FDCPA.1

AFFIRMED.

 Because we find no error in the district court’s determination that Gulf Coast satisfied 1

the disclosure requirements of the FDCPA, we need not address Beeders’ argument that the

failure to comply with these requirements constitutes a per se violation of the FCCPA. 

Accordingly, we also affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Gulf Coast on

Beeders’ claims for violation of the FCCPA. 

3
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32(b)


                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that the accompanying Form 10-QSB of Spectrum Laboratories, Inc., (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended June 25, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and that the information contained in this Form 10-QSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 15, 2005


/s/ Brian A. Watts
---------------------------
Brian A. Watts
Chief Financial Officer
Spectrum Laboratories, Inc.
No. 01-15-00226-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE 

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

HOUSTON, TEXAS 

WEYLIN W. ALFORD § APPELLANT 

 § 

V. § 

 § 

THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPELLANT 

APPEAL FROM THE 177TH DISTRICT CRIMINAL COURT 

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

TRIAL COURT NO. 1450840 

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE 

COUNSEL OF RECORD 

NOW COMES, WEYLIN ALFORD through counsel, and presents this 

Motion to Substitute Counsel of Record. In support of his motion, he would 

respectfully show the court the following: 

I.

 Appellant was charged with aggravated assault. Following a jury trial, 

Appellant was sentenced to thirty five (35) years confinement in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Notice of Appeal was timely 

filed. 

II.

ACCEPTED

01-15-00226-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/19/2015 11:03:09 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/19/2015 11:03:09 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

Mark Kratovil, TBN 24076098 was previously the public defender appointed 

to represent Appellant on appeal in this cause. However, Daucie Schindler, TBN 

24013495, also with the Public Defender’s Office, is now assigned to this case.

Appellant respectfully requests this Court to enter an order substituting Daucie 

Schindler as part of the Harris County Public Defender’s Office as attorney of record 

in this case. 

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Bunin

Chief Public Defender

/s/ Daucie Schindler

Daucie Schindler

State Bar No. 24013495

Public Defender’s Office

Harris County, Texas

Assistant Public Defender

1201 Franklin, 13th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

Daucie.Schindler@pdo.hctx.net

Tel: 713-274-6717

Fax: 713-368-9278
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above motion was electronically 

served on the Appellate Division of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, on 

August 19, 2015.

.

/s/ Daucie Schindler

Daucie Schindler

Public Defender’s Office

Harris County, Texas

Assistant Public Defender
##### 



NEWSfrom  H. L. LANZET, INC.



| | 12 Hull Street
Oceanside, NY 11572
(212) 888-4570  (516) 763-1668
Fax: (212) 888-4569  (516) 763-1626
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONTACT:
    
    Greg Walling
    
    Ron Eilath
    
    DeeDee LanzetPresident & CEO
    
    CFO
    
    H.L. LanzetCabletel Communications
    
    Cabletel Communications
    
    (212) 888-4570(905) 475-1030
    
    (905) 475-1030




CABLETEL COMMUNICATIONS BOARD CHAIRMAN RESIGNS

Cites Time Demands Created By Appointment As
President & CEO Of MI Developments, Inc.

MARKHAM, Ontario, November 24, 2003  Cabletel Communications Corp.
(AMEX: TTV; TSX: TTV), a leading distributor of broadband equipment to the
Canadian television and telecommunications industries, today announced the
resignation of William J. Biggar as Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr.
Biggar, appointed in September as President and CEO of MI Developments, Inc.,
cited significant time demands necessitating a reduction in his outside
commitments. I have enjoyed my association with Cabletel over the last two
and one half years and wish the Board and management all the best in their
future endeavors with the Company, said Mr. Biggar.

On behalf of Cabletel and all of its shareholders, I would like to thank
Mr. Biggar for his exceptional leadership and active participation. Our
Company will definitely miss his input, stated Greg Walling, Cabletel
President and CEO. However, as we finish 2003 and our realignment efforts,
we eagerly look forward to 2004 and plan to shortly announce the addition of
new Board members.

Cabletel Communications Corp. is a full-service distributor and manufacturer of
broadband equipment to the television and telecommunications industries
offering a wide variety of products required to construct, build, maintain and
upgrade broadcasting and telecommunications systems. Stirling Connectors,
Cabletels manufacturing division, supplies national and international clients
with proprietary products for deployment in cable, DBS and other wireless
distribution systems. More information about Cabletel can be found at
www.cabletelgroup.com.

This press release contains forward-looking statements as defined in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Readers are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results may
differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a
result of risks and uncertainties impacting the Companys business including
increased competition; the ability of the Company to expand its operations
through either acquisitions or internal growth, to attract and retain qualified
professionals, and to expand commercial relationships; technological
obsolescence; general economic conditions; and other risks detailed time to
time in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC).
(October 9, 2013)

#### Rayon Al-Shahrani, Appellant, v Hudson Auto Traders, Inc., Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 902]

In an action, inter alia, in effect, to rescind a contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), dated July 18, 2012, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

“ ‘It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal’ ” *(Waterside Estates at Cresthaven Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ciafone,*108 AD3d 620, 620 [2013], quoting *Gaffney v Gaffney,*29 AD3d 857, 857 [2006]; *see Fernald v Vinci,*13 AD3d 333, 334 [2004]). “An appellant’s record on appeal must contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court” *(Waterside Estates at Cresthaven Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ciafone,*108 AD3d at 620; *see*CPLR 5526; *Matison v County of Nassau,*290 AD2d 494, 495 [2002]). “ ‘Appeals that are not based upon complete and proper records must be dismissed’ ” *(Waterside Estates at Cresthaven Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ciafone,*108 AD3d at 620, quoting *Garnerville Holding Co. v IMC Mgt.,*299 AD2d 450, 450 [2002]).

Here, the plaintiff failed to include in the record on appeal the papers submitted by the defendant in support of its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, which are necessary for this Court to render an informed decision on the merits *(see Waterside Estates at Cresthaven Homeowners Assn., Inc. v Ciafone,*108 AD3d at 620-621; *Gurwitz v French,*90 AD3d 840, 840-841 [2011]; *Block 6222 Constr. Corp. v Sobhani,*84 AD3d 1292, 1292 [2011]). Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed. Mastro, J.P., Dickerson, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.
Summary of Compensation to Independent Directors


 Exhibit 10.1 
 Summary of Compensation to Independent Directors 
 On May 29, 2007, the Board of Directors (the
“Board”) of Cheniere Energy Partners GP, LLC (the “Company”), the general partner of Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (the “Partnership”), approved an annual payment of $50,000 to each independent director of the Company
for services as a director. An additional annual payment of $30,000 was approved for the chairman of the Audit Committee as well as an annual payment of $15,000 for the members of the Audit Committee other than the chairman. An additional annual
payment of $5,000 was approved for the chairman of the Conflicts Committee. In addition, on May 29, 2007 (the “Grant Date”), the Board granted each of the independent directors 12,000 phantom units pursuant to the terms of the
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. Long-Term Incentive Plan. In addition, annually on the anniversary of the Grant Date, the independent directors will receive an additional 3,000 phantom units. Vesting will occur for one-fourth of the phantom units on
each anniversary of the Grant Date beginning on the first anniversary of the Grant Date. Upon vesting, the phantom units will be payable in cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of a Partnership unit.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3675 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3675

 To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-
              (2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-tri zin-2-yl]-
    amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate and application 
                               adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the suspension of duty on Methyl 2-[[[[[4-(dimethylamino)-6-
              (2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-tri zin-2-yl]-
    amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate and application 
                               adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL 2-[[[[[4-(DIMETHYLAMINO)-6-(2,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHOXY)-
              1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2-YL]-AMINO]CARBONYL]AMINO]SULFONYL]-3-
              METHYLBENZOATE AND APPLICATION ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Methyl 2-[[[[[4-
(dimethylamino)-6-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]-
amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-3-methylbenzoate and application 
adjuvants) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2010''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```