1678 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Notices 

2. If, after reviewing the record, an 

individual believes that it is incorrect or 

incomplete in any respect and wishes to 

change, correct, or update the alleged 

deficiency, or to explain any matter in 

the record, the individual may initiate 

challenge procedures. These procedures 

include either direct application by the 

individual challenging the record to the 

agency (i.e., law enforcement agency) 

that contributed the questioned 

information, or direct challenge as to the 

accuracy or completeness of any entry 

on the criminal history record to the 

Assistant Director, Federal Bureau of 

Investigation Identification Division, 

Washington, DC 20537–9700 (as set 

forth in 28 CFR 16.30 through 16.34). In 

the latter case, the FBI forwards the 

challenge to the agency that submitted 

the data and requests that agency to 

verify or correct the challenged entry. 

Upon receipt of an official 

communication directly from the agency 

that contributed the original 

information, the FBI Identification 

Division makes any changes necessary 

in accordance with the information 

supplied by that agency. The licensee 

must provide at least 10 days for an 

individual to initiate an action 

challenging the results of a FBI CHRC 

after the record is made available for 

his/her review. The licensee may make 

a final access determination based on 

the criminal history record only upon 

receipt of the FBI’s ultimate 

confirmation or correction of the record. 

Upon a final adverse determination on 

access to an ISFSI, the licensee shall 

provide the individual its documented 

basis for denial. Access to an ISFSI shall 

not be granted to an individual during 

the review process. 

G. Protection of Information 

1. The licensee shall develop, 

implement, and maintain a system for 

personnel information management 

with appropriate procedures for the 

protection of personal, confidential 

information. This system shall be 

designed to prohibit unauthorized 

access to sensitive information and to 

prohibit modification of the information 

without authorization. 

2. Each licensee who obtains a 

criminal history record on an individual 

pursuant to this Order shall establish 

and maintain a system of files and 

procedures, for protecting the record 

and the personal information from 

unauthorized disclosure. 

3. The licensee may not disclose the 

record or personal information collected 

and maintained to persons other than 

the subject individual, his/her 

representative, or to those who have a 

need to access the information in 

performing assigned duties in the 

process of determining suitability for 

unescorted access to the protected area 

of an ISFSI. No individual authorized to 

have access to the information may redisseminate the information to any 

other individual who does not have the 

appropriate need to know. 

4. The personal information obtained 

on an individual from a CHRC may be 

transferred to another licensee if the 

gaining licensee receives the 

individual’s written request to redisseminate the information contained 

in his/her file, and the gaining licensee 

verifies information such as the 

individual’s name, date of birth, social 

security number, sex, and other 

applicable physical characteristics for 

identification purposes. 

5. The licensee shall make criminal 

history records, obtained under this 

section, available for examination by an 

authorized representative of the NRC to 

determine compliance with the 

regulations and laws. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00379 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. STN 50–456, STN 50–457, STN 

50–454 and STN 50–455; NRC–2012–0203] 

Issuance; Exelon Generation 

Company, LLC 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Director’s decision under 10 

CFR 2.206; issuance. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) has issued a 

director’s decision with regard to a 

petition dated April 29, 2012, filed by 

Mr. Barry Quigley (the petitioner), 

requesting that the NRC take action with 

regard to Braidwood Station, Units 1 

and 2, and Byron Station, Units 1 and 

2. The petitioner’s requests and the 

director’s decision are included in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 

this document. 

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID 

NRC–2012–0203 when contacting the 

NRC about the availability of 

information regarding this document. 

You may obtain publicly-available 

information related to this document 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2012–0203. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Carol 

Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422; 

email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly 

available documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then 

select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS 

Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, 

please contact the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by 

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 

ADAMS accession number for each 

document referenced in this document 

(if that document is available in 

ADAMS) is provided the first time that 

a document is referenced. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the Director, Office of 

Nuclear Reactor Regulation, has issued 

a director’s decision (ADAMS Accession 

No. ML14239A313), on a petition filed 

by the petitioner on April 20, 2012 

(ADAMS Accession No. ML12130A318). 

The petitioner requested that the NRC 

immediately shutdown Braidwood 

Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron 

Station, Units 1 and 2, until all turbine 

building (TB) high-energy line break 

(HELB) concerns were identified and 

those important to safety were 

corrected. 

As the basis of the request, the 

petitioner asserted: 

• An adequate supply of combustion air 

for the emergency diesel generators (EDGs) is 

threatened because the combustion air can be 

diluted with steam. Although the combustion 

air is drawn from an air shaft (not the TB), 

it is also the same air shaft that supplies 

ventilation for the EDG room. Under certain 

conditions, the ventilation damper alignment 

is such that steam that enters the EDG room 

from the ventilation exhaust can back flow 

into the inlet air shaft. From there it can be 

drawn into the engine, potentially starving 

the engine of air. 

• The effects of high temperature in the 

engineered safeguards features (ESF) 

switchgear (SWGR) rooms on the protective 

relaying setpoints have not been evaluated. 

The concern is that high temperatures could 

alter the setpoints such that protective 

actions occur under normal loading 

conditions. 

• The current method of analysis for TB 

HELB uses a ‘‘lumped volume’’ approach 

wherein the mass and energy (M&E) of the 

ruptured line mixes instantly with the entire 

volume before flowing into the areas of 

concern. Because this substantially reduces 

the energy flow, it does not always give 

conservative results. For example, the 

petitioner’s preliminary assessment using the 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 8 / Tuesday, January 13, 2015 / Notices 1679 

subdivided volume feature in GOTHIC 

showed that the structural limits on the block 

wall between the ESF SWGR rooms would be 

substantially exceeded. 

• There has been no structured and 

detailed review of the licensing requirements 

for HELB. 

On May 14, 2012, the petitioner and 

the licensee met with the NRC’s Petition 

Review Board. The meeting provided 

the petitioner and the licensee an 

opportunity to provide additional 

information and to clarify issues cited in 

the petition. On November 15, 2012, the 

petitioner and the licensee again met 

with the NRC’s Petition Review Board at 

the request of the Petition Review 

Board. The transcripts of these meetings 

were treated as supplements to the 

petition and are available in the 

ADAMS (Accession Nos. ML 

12145A633 and ML 12347A354, 

respectively). 

The NRC sent a copy of the proposed 

director’s decision to the petitioner and 

the licensee for comment on June 18, 

2014. The petitioner and the licensee 

were asked to provide comments within 

30 days on any part of the proposed 

director’s decision that was considered 

to be erroneous or any issues in the 

petition that were not addressed. The 

staff did not receive any comments on 

the proposed director’s decision. 

The Director of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation has determined that the 

request, to require immediate shutdown 

of Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, 

and Byron Station, Units 1 and 2, until 

all turbine building (TB) high-energy 

line break (HELB) concerns were 

identified and those important to safety 

were corrected be denied. The Director 

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation has 

determined to partially grant the 

petition in that the licensing basis 

requirements for high energy line break 

were reviewed during the review of the 

application for the Braidwood/Byron 

measurement uncertainty recapture 

uprate, which was completed in the 

February 7, 2014 (ADAMS accession 

No. ML13281A000). The reasons for this 

decision are explained in the director’s 

decision NRC–2012–0203 pursuant to 

Section 2.206 of Title 10 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (10 CFR) of the 

Commission’s regulations. 

The NRC will file a copy of the 

director’s decision with the Secretary of 

the Commission for the Commission’s 

review in accordance with 10 CFR 

2.206. As provided by this regulation, 

the director’s decision will constitute 

the final action of the Commission 25 

days after the date of the decision unless 

the Commission, on its own motion, 

institutes a review of the director’s 

decision in that time. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 22nd 

day of December, 2014. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

William Dean, 

Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00369 Filed 1–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL SERVICE 

Temporary Emergency Committee of 

the Board of Governors: Sunshine Act 

Meeting 

DATES AND TIMES: On January 6, 2015, 

members of the Temporary Emergency 

Committee of the Board of Governors of 

the United States Postal Service met in 

Washington, DC, via teleconference, and 

voted unanimously to move their 

previously announced January 7, 2015, 

meeting to January 6, 2015. In addition, 

the members voted to close the meeting 

to public observation and to revise the 

items to be considered. The Committee 

determined that no earlier public notice 

was possible. 

MATTERS CONSIDERED: 

1. Strategic Issues. 

2. Pricing. 

3. Financial Matters. 

4. Governors’ Executive Session. 

GENERAL COUNSEL CERTIFICATION: The 

General Counsel of the United States 

Postal Service certified that the meeting 

might be closed under the Government 

in the Sunshine Act. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Requests for information about the 

meeting should be addressed to the 

Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, 

at 202–268–4800. 

Julie S. Moore, 

Secretary, Board of Governors. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00506 Filed 1–9–15; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE P 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirement of section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

which provides opportunity for public 

comment on new or revised data 

collections, the Railroad Retirement 

Board (RRB) will publish periodic 

summaries of proposed data collections. 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed information collection is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information has practical 

utility; (b) the accuracy of the RRB’s 

estimate of the burden of the collection 

of the information; (c) ways to enhance 

the quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (d) 

ways to minimize the burden related to 

the collection of information on 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Title and purpose of information 

collection: Evidence for Application of 

Overall Minimum: OMB 3220–0083. 

Under section 3(f)(3) of the Railroad 

Retirement Act (RRA), the total monthly 

benefits payable to a railroad employee 

and his/her family are guaranteed to be 

no less than the amount which would 

be payable if the employee’s railroad 

service had been covered by the Social 

Security Act. This is referred to as the 

Social Security Overall Minimum 

Guarantee, which is prescribed in 20 

CFR 229. To administer this provision, 

the Railroad Retirement Board (RRB) 

requires information about a retired 

employee’s spouse and child(ren) who 

would not be eligible for benefits under 

the RRA but would be eligible for 

benefits under the Social Security Act if 

the employee’s railroad service had 

been covered by that Act. The RRB 

obtains the required information by the 

use of Forms G–319, Statement 

Regarding Family and Earnings for 

Special Guaranty Computation, and G– 

320, Student Questionnaire for Special 

Guaranty Computation. One response is 

required of each respondent. 

Completion is required to obtain or 

retain benefits. The RRB proposes nonburden impacting editorial changes to 

Forms G–319 and G–320. 

ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN

Form number Annual 

responses 

Time 

(minutes) 

Burden 

(hours) 

G–319 (completed by the employee) 

With assistance .................................................................................................................... 5 26 2 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES