alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Deutsche Alt-A Securities Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
    2007-RAMP1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: GMAC
    Mortgage, LLC f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Sub-Servicer for
    Residential Funding Company, LLC, Homecomings Financial, LLC as
    Sub-Servicer for Residential Funding Company, LLC and Residential
    Funding Company, LLC as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 31, 2008


    /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2582 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2582

To prohibit the use of forfeited funds made available to certain State 
  or local law enforcement agencies pursuant to equitable sharing for 
                           certain purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2023

  Mr. Biggs introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of forfeited funds made available to certain State 
  or local law enforcement agencies pursuant to equitable sharing for 
                           certain purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Federal Funds for Political 
Prosecutions Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FORFEITED FUNDS MADE AVAILABLE PURSUANT TO 
              EQUITABLE SHARING.

    (a) In General.--No funds or property received pursuant to section 
511(e) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811(e)), section 981 
of title 18, United States Code, or section 524 of title 28, United 
States Code, by a State or local law enforcement agency with the 
authority to prosecute a criminal case may be used to investigate or 
prosecute the President or Vice President, a former President or Vice 
President, or a candidate for the office of President.
    (b) Certification.--A State or local law enforcement agency 
referred to in subsection (a) shall certify to the Attorney General 
that the law enforcement agency will comply with subsection (a).
    (c) Disqualification.--In the case of a State or local law 
enforcement agency that the Attorney General determines has failed to 
comply with this section, the Attorney General may not transfer, under 
section 511(e) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 811(e)), 
section 981 of title 18, United States Code, or section 524 of title 
28, United States Code, any property seized by the Attorney General and 
forfeited to the United States, or any of the proceeds from the sale of 
such property to such State or local law enforcement agency.
    (d) Definition.--In this section, the term ``candidate'' has the 
meaning given such term in section 301 of the Federal Election Campaign 
Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of E-centives, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | (a) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and



| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated this 30th day of March, 2006



By:

/s/ Kamran AmjadiKamran AmjadiChief Executive Officer and Chairman
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7702

MICHAEL LEON HILL-BEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-415-AM)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Leon Hill-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew P. Dullaghan, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Leon Hill-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Hill-Bey v. Director,

Virginia Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-99-415-AM (E.D. Va. Dec. 1,

1999). We also deny Hill-Bey’s motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The undersigned, Steve Harding, the Chief Executive Officer and Brian Manko, Chief Financial Officer of American Exploration Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Exploration Corporation for fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of American Exploration Corporation.






Dated: April 5, 2011





/s/   "Steve Harding"Steve Harding

President, Chief Executive Officer





/s/   "Brian Manko"Brian Manko

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Exploration Corporation and will be retained by American Exploration Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report
(date of earliest event reported)
July 13, 2004 Nortel Networks Limited (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 CANADA
    
    000-30758
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
    
    L6T 5P6(address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code (905) 863-0000.




---



##### 



Item 5.    Other Events On July 13, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation issued the press release attached
hereto as Exhibit 99.1, and such press release is incorporated by reference
herein (other than information included on or linked from the Registrants
website, referenced in such release, which is not incorporated by reference
into this report). Nortel Networks Corporation owns all of the Registrants common shares and the
Registrant is Nortel Networks Corporations principal direct operating
subsidiary. Item 7.    Financial Statements,Pro FormaFinancial Information and Exhibits (c) Exhibits. 99.1    Press release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on July 13, 2004. Item 12.    Results of Operations and Financial Condition On July 13, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation issued a press release providing
a status update on its financial restatement process and other related matters.
Such press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and furnished in
accordance with Item 12 of Form 8-K.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ William R. KerrWilliam R. KerrChief Financial Officer By:
    /s/ Blair F. MorrisonBlair F. MorrisonAssistant Secretary Dated: July 13, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX 99.1    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on July 13, 2004.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**454 CA 14-01772**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

HELEN F. DRISCOLL AND THOMAS DRISCOLL, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS,

V ORDER

BJ’S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, AND PAUL F. VITALE, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

MACKENZIE HUGHES LLP, SYRACUSE (LORRAINE R. MERTELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.
COSTELLO COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, SYRACUSE (ELIZABETH A. HOFFMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAELS & SMOLAK, P.C., AUBURN (MICHAEL G. BERSANI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

Appeals and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Thomas G. Leone, A.J.), entered December 19, 2013. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of plaintiffs for sanctions against defendant BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., for spoliation of evidence, and denied the motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: May 1, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darryl A. Fowler, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 691]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), rendered June 28, 2011, convicting him attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, burglary in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, aggravated criminal contempt, criminal contempt in the first degree, and criminal contempt in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not improperly delegate the appeal waiver allocution to the prosecutor *(see People v Bethune,*91 AD3d 966, 966-967 [2012]). However, we find that the defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid. The record does not demonstrate that the defendant “grasped the concept of the appeal waiver and the nature of the right he was forgoing” *(People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; *People v Springer,*109 AD3d 557, 557 [2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see People v Grant,*83 AD3d 862, 862-863 [2011]). Therefore, “notwithstanding the written appeal waiver form, it cannot be said that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to appeal” *(People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d at 267; *see People v Elmer,*19 NY3d 501, 510 [2012]; *People v Vasquez,*101 AD3d 1054, 1055 [2012]; *cf. People v Ramos,*7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]). Thus, the defendant is not precluded from challenging his sentence as excessive. Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Angiolillo, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This Schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form 10-QSB of American Metals  Service,  Inc. for the six months ended February
28,  1997 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                             0000319016
<NAME>                                            AMERICAN METALS SERVICE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                            2,104
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2,104
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                17
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             20
<OTHER-SE>                                        2,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2,104
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     51
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        28
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      23
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  23
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                         23
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**     In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofOdyssey Re Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Robert Giammarco, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and  2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company./s/ Robert Giammarco Robert GiammarcoExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2005A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Odyssey Re Holdings Corp.and will be retained by Odyssey Re Holdings Corp. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
#### Khajir KHAJIRYAN, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-73321.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 13, 2009.*

April 27, 2009.

Yeznik O. Kazandjian, Esquire, Porter Ranch, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esquire, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Mark W. Pletcher, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*485Before: GRABER, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Khajir Khajiryan, a native and citizen of Syria, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s finding that Khajiryan did not demonstrate changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse the untimely filing of his asylum application. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(4), (5); *Ramadan v. Gonzales,*479 F.3d 646, 656-58 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). Accordingly, Khajiryan’s asylum claim fails.

The record does not compel reversal of the IJ’s conclusion that the detention and interrogations Khajiryan suffered, and the beating Khajiryan’s son endured, did not constitute past persecution. *See Gu v. Gonzales,*454 F.3d 1014, 1020-21 (9th Cir.2006); *see also Nagoulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1017 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that acts of violence against a petitioner’s family do not compel a finding of past persecution). Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s conclusion that Khajiryan did not establish he faced a clear probability of future persecution if returned to Syria. *See Hakeem,*273 F.3d at 816-17. Therefore, Khajiryan’s withholding claim also fails.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of CAT protection because Khajiryan failed to establish that it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to Syria. *See El Himri v. Ashcroft,*378 F.3d 932, 938 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
EXHIBIT
32








Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NT Media Corp. of California, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ali
Moussavi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of
the Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant.





Dated:  August
      23, 2010
              
              /s/ Ali
      MoussaviAli
      MoussaviPrincipal
      Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
   FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of: November, 2004
    
    Commission File No.: 1-11796
 MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION  1600 Britannia Road East
Mississauga, Ontario
L4W 1J2 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) PREMDOR INC.
(Former Name of Registrant) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F: Form 20-F
    
    o
    
    Form 40-F
    
    x
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): Yes
    
    o
    
    No
    
    x
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Yes
    
    o
    
    No
    
    x
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934: Yes
    
    o
    
    No
    
    x
 If Yes is marked, indicate the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATIONDate: November 11, 2004By::
    
    /s/ Harley UlsterName:
    
    Harley UlsterTitle:
    
    Executive Vice-Presidentand Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Third Quarter Report to Shareholders