alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of November 2004 Commission File Number 1-14916 BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES CORPORATION  BCE Place
181 Bay Street
Suite 330
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5J 2T3
(416) 359-8600
(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F o Form 40-F x Indicate by check mark if
the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ______ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ______ Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No x If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________




---



##### 



DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS FORM 6-K See the Exhibit Index to this Form 6-K. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date: November 12, 2004Brookfield Properties CorporationBy:
    
    /s/ Craig LaurieName:
    
    Craig LaurieTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President & ChiefFinancial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Brookfield Properties Interim Report. Q3 200499.2
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Canadian Law99.3
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Canadian Law
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ABDUL MURRAY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 563 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of June, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
|                    |   |                         |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                    |   |                         |   |   |
|  May 15,      2009 |   | /s/      J. Collier Sparks   |   |   |
|                    |   |                         |   |   |
|                    |   | J.      Collier Sparks       |   |   |
|                    |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |   |
|                    |   |                         |   |   |
#### William Carroll, Appellant, v Mahir Radoniqi et al., Respondents.

[963 NYS2d 97]

*494Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered October 25, 2011, which granted defendant Charles House Condominium’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the breach of duty of loyalty claim brought on behalf of the condominium, and denied plaintiffs motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered March 19, 2012, which, upon reargument of the condominium’s motion, adhered to the original determination, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic. Order, same court and Justice, entered September 12, 2012, which granted defendant Mahir Radoniqi’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the private nuisance cause of action against him, and denied plaintiffs motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The condominium made a prima facie showing that its board of directors’ decisions and actions related to the allegations of misconduct on the part of its employee, Radoniqi, were within the scope of its authority and were made in good faith, and therefore are entitled to deference under the business judgment rule *(see Matter of Levandusky v One Fifth Ave. Apt. Corp.,*75 NY2d 530, 538 [1990]). Plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact, as he failed to submit any evidence to substantiate his allegations of bad faith *(compare Jones v Surrey Coop. Apts.,*263 AD2d 33, 36-37 [1st Dept 1999], *with Louis & Anne Abrons Found. v 29 E. 64th St. Corp.,*297 AD2d 258 [1st Dept 2002]).

Radoniqi made a prima facie showing that his renovation work at the premises abutting plaintiffs unit did not amount to a private nuisance, and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Plaintiff had no personal knowledge of the specific types of work Radoniqi performed, and his remaining allegations were simply too speculative and conclusory to have merit *(see Cedar & Wash. Assoc., LLC v Bovis Lend Lease LMB, Inc.,*95 AD3d 448, 449 [1st Dept 2012]). Moreover, plaintiff never presented evidence or “pleaded facts sufficient to demonstrate diminution of value or use of the property, which is necessary for a measurement of damages” on a claim for nuisance *(see Board of Mgrs. of Waterford Assn., Inc. v Samii,*73 AD3d 617, 618 [1st Dept 2010]).

The court properly decided the motions for summary judgment, despite plaintiff’s claimed need for further discovery, since plaintiff offered only an unsubstantiated hope of discovering information relevant to his claims *(see*CPLR 3212 [f]; *Leonard v Gateway II, LLC,*68 AD3d 408, 410 [1st Dept 2009]).

*495We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Friedman, AbdusSalaam, Román and Clark, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RONALD SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2672

[May 6, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Ernest A. Kollra, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 07-23026CF10A.

Ronald Smith, Okeechobee, pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, GERBER, and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification by Robert E. Drury Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) by eMerge Interactive, Inc.
(Registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ ROBERT E. DRURYRobert E. DruryExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)June 7, 2005
#### Kinsley *v.*Buffalo, N. Y. & P. R. Co.

*(Circuit Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.*

November 20, 1888.)

1. Carriers—Of Freight—Discrimination.

The doctrine of *Ilaysv. Pennsylvania Co.,*12 Fed. Rep. 309, that discriminations by railroad companies in freight rates, based solely on the amount of freight shipped, are unwarrantable, approved.

2. Same.

The larger proportionate expense attending the handling and transportation of a smaller shipment of freight does not, of itself, warrant a railroad company, or a receiver operating .the railroad, in charging a higher rate thereon than was charged for a larger shipment.

3. Same.

Such increased proportionate expense does not differentiate the service performed for the several shippers, nor the conditions or circumstances under which it was performed.

In Equity.

In the matter of the petition of A. L. Couper, alleging that G. Clinton Gardner, receiver of the Buffalo, New York & Philadelphia Railroad Company, (appointed by the court,) had made undue and unreasonable discrimination between himself and other persons in freight charges for the transportation of oil, etc.

*182*B. F. Glenn,*for petitioner.

*James D.*Hancock, for the receiver.

Before McKennan and Acheson, JJ.

Per Curiam.

The petitioner seeks to obtain reimbursement from the receiver of the sum of $478.44, with interest from April 3, 1887, which he alleges was unlawfully exacted from him as and for freights for the transportation of oil upon the railroad in the custody of the receiver. The exaction of this sum is admitted, as is also the tact that a less rate was charged to another shipper of oil upon the railroad. This charge is justified by the master upon the ground that the quantity of oil shipped by another shipper was much larger than that shipped by the petitioner, and hence that the larger proportionate expense attending the handling and transportation of the smaller shipment warranted a higher rate than was charged for the larger shipment. In this conclusion we do not agree with the learned master. It does not differentiate the service performed for the several shippers, nor the conditions or circumstances under which it was performed. The only difference is that in one case the quantity shipped was larger,.and in the other case it was smaller. This has been repeatedly held to be an insufficient and unwarrantable reason for discriminating rates of charge. See *Hays*v. *Pennsylvania Co.,*12 Fed. Rep. 309. In the statement of the law by Judge Baxter Ave concur, and for this reason we cannot approve the master’s finding that the petition ought to be dismissed. We agree with the master that the petitioner’s claim for hire of cars ought to be disallowed. We therefore direct that a decree be entered in favor of the petitioner for the sum of $478.44, with interest from April 3, 1887, and costs against the Buffalo, New York *&*Philadelphia Railroad Company.
##### 



/s/ Pascal Debon
    
    /s/ John GiamatteoPascal Debon
    
    John Giamatteo/s/ Malcolm Collins
    
    /s/ Steven PuseyMalcolm Collins
    
    Steven Pusey/s/ Brian McFadden
    
    /s/ Chahram BolouriBrian McFadden
    
    Chahram Bolouri/s/ Susan L. Spradley
    
    /s/ Robert MaoSusan L. Spradley
    
    Robert Mao/s/ Nicholas DeRoma
    
    /s/ Greg MumfordNicholas DeRoma
    
    Greg Mumford/s/ William Donovan
    
    /s/ Dion JoannouWilliam Donovan
    
    Dion Joannou
Exhibit
15.3


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form F-3 (No. 333-159803) of Gafisa S.A. of our report dated June 5,
2009 (except with respect to our opinion on the consolidated financial
statements insofar as it relates to the retrospective application of ASC 810-10,
as to which the date is November 13, 2009, and except as to the retrospective
adjustment on the share amounts and earnings per share forthe stock split
approved on February 22, 2010, as to which the
date is March 10, 2010) relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
appears in this Form 20-F.
 
  /s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes
 São Paulo,
Brazil
 March 10,
2010
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350BY
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, Dr. Amnon Gonenne, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of MabCure, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | The Annual Report on Form  10-K/A-1
         of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2009 (the
        Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.
        78m); and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                        

|By:    | /s/
      Dr. Amnon Gonenne                     | 
|------ | ----------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Dr. Amnon Gonenne                               | 
|Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director | 
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                   | 
|Date:  | March
      14, 2011                            | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
    
    September 12, 2005Signed:
    
    /s/ ROBERT S. PRATHER, JR.Robert S. Prather, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified
(the "Report"), I, Anthony W. Adler, as Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Anthony W. AdlerAnthony
      W. AdlerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerDate:
      March 22, 2010
#### State v. Coffin

Case below: 171 N.C. App. 515

No. 405P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA04425)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 359 N.C. 854

Stay dissolved 12/19/06

2. Denied 12/19/06

3. See Special Order Page 152
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Frederick J. Erickson, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bull Run Corporation;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this quarterly report;  3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;  4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as
of February 28, 2005 (the Evaluation Date) and presented in this quarterly report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; andc)
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants first fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting. Date:
    
    April 11, 2005Signed:
    
    /s/ FREDERICK J. ERICKSONFrederick J. EricksonVice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
SCWC-16-0000046

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, 

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

JOSHUA RESUN, 

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-16-0000046; CR. NO. 15-1-0268K)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee Joshua Resun’s application 

for writ of certiorari filed on August 17, 2019, is hereby 

rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, October 2, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-16-0000046

02-OCT-2019

12:43 PM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         323,252                 335,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,542                 108,913
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,823<F1>              18,823
<INVENTORY>                                      6,107<F2>               9,770
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               488,724                 473,109
<PP&E>                                       2,898,506               2,487,969
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,654,317)             (1,416,542)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,972,008               1,783,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          482,757                 439,735
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      (4,465,974)<F3>         (4,686,665)
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     5,995,558               5,977,558
<OTHER-SE>                                    (40,333)<F4>            (28,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,972,008               1,783,631
<SALES>                                        840,343                 920,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               964,654               1,023,486
<CGS>                                           75,534                  63,061
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  743,963                 589,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,468                  25,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   220,691                 434,377
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .04                     .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04                     .08
<FN>
<F1>Precious Metals
<F2>PrePaid Expense
<F3>Accumulated Deficit
<F4>Deferred Compensation
</FN>





</TABLE>