alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 15.1


November 13, 2000


The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Genentech, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment Plan, the 1999
Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option
Plan, the 1990 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, and the 1991 Employee Stock
Plan and in the related prospectuses, as applicable, contained in such
Registration Statements of our report dated October 9, 2000 (except for Note
8, as to which the date is October 24, 2000) relating to the unaudited
condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Genentech, Inc. which
are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2000.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants
within the meaning of section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.


Very truly yours,




/s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP
--------------------------
   Ernst & Young LLP
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report
(date of earliest event reported)
June 29, 2004 Nortel Networks Limited (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 CANADA
    
    000-30758
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
    
    L6T 5P6(address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code (905) 863-0000.




---



##### 



Item 5.
    
    Other Events
 On June 29, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation issued the press release attached
hereto as Exhibit 99.1, and such press release is incorporated by reference
herein (other than information included on or linked from the Registrants
website, referenced in such release, which is not incorporated by reference
into this report). Nortel Networks Corporation owns all of the Registrants common shares and the
Registrant is Nortel Networks Corporations principal direct operating
subsidiary.  Item 7.
    
    Financial Statements,Pro FormaFinancial Information and Exhibits(c)
    
    Exhibits.99.1
    
    Press release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on June 29, 2004.
 Item 12.    Results
of Operations and Financial Condition On June 29, 2004, Nortel Network Corporation issued a press release providing a status update on its
financial restatement process and other related matters. Such press
release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and furnished in
accordance with Item 12 of Form 8-K.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:
    
    /s/ Nicholas J. DeRomaNicholas J. DeRomaChief Legal OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Blair F. MorrisonBlair F. MorrisonAssistant Secretary
 Dated: June 29, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX 99.1
    
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on June 29, 2004.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

RICHARD EMANUEL, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D17-2467

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed March 6, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County,

Mark S. Blechman, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and 

Allison A. Havens, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. See Vennisee v. State, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D2170, D2172-73 (Fla. 3d 

DCA Oct. 11, 2017); Rogers v. State, 223 So. 3d 281, 282 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017); Currie v. 

State, 219 So. 3d 960, 960-61 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). 

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Gilbert, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 874]

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), rendered March 16, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree, aggravated criminal contempt and endangering the welfare of a child (three counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]) and aggravated criminal contempt (§ 215.52 [1]), defendant contends that he involuntarily entered his plea and that his negotiated sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Because defendant did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, his challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved for our review (see *People v Weakfall,*108 AD3d 1115, 1116 [2013]; *People v Spears,*106 AD3d 1534, 1535 [2013]), and the narrow exception to the preservation rule does not apply here (see *People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]; *People v Wissert,*85 AD3d 1633, 1634 [2011], *lv denied*17 NY3d 956 [2011]). In any event, defendant’s contention lacks merit. Although defendant stated during the plea colloquy that he was “under a lot of pressure,” that statement alone did not render his plea involuntary.

Finally, given that defendant did not dispute that he slashed his wife’s throat in front of their children and came dangerously *1438close to killing her, we conclude that defendant’s negotiated sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Present — Smith, J.E, Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40130

Conference Calendar

 

MICHAEL LYNN BRADDEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES TURNER, Lieutenant; MARTIN MCDANIEL,

Lieutenant; FRED ARLINE, Captain;

ROBERT MORIN, Major,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:94-CV-650

- - - - - - - - - -

August 21, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Bradden, # 289786, a Texas prison inmate, has

appealed the grant of summary judgment to the defendants in his

civil rights action. There was no Eighth Amendment violation

because the defendants' temporary inaction did not result in

substantial harm to Bradden. See Mendoza v. Lynaugh, 989 F.2d

191, 195 (5th Cir. 1993).
No.

- 2 -

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC
383 Madison Avenue
New York, NY 10719


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance for Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I
Trust 2007-AC2, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2007-AC2

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Trustee during the Reporting Period
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;
and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as otherwise
provided on Schedule A hereto, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.


March 1, 2008
/s/ William Augustin
WILLIAM AUGUSTIN
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

List of Exceptions for Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-AC2,
Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2007-AC2

Reporting Error Relating to Delinquency Reporting:

This deal experienced a non-systemic administrative issue that caused a single
instance in which some delinquent loans were not stratified accurately. The
instance was subsequently corrected and remittance reports were revised to
reflect the correct stratification. No payments to certificate holders were
impacted by the reporting errors.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

RODNEY MURPHY, : 

 

 Plaintiff, :

 

vs. : CA 15-0206-CB-C 

 

SECRETARY, UNITED STATES : 

DEPARTMENT OF HUD, 

 : 

 Defendant. 

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having 

been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made 

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated May 1, 2015 is ADOPTED as the opinion 

of this Court. 

DONE this 3rd day of June , 2015. 

s/Charles R. Butler, Jr. 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00206-CB-C Document 6 Filed 06/03/15 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Form 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Report of Foreign Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of:   January 2005
    
    Commission File Number 1-14992
 CORUS ENTERTAINMENT INC.  181 Bay Street
Suite 1630
Toronto, Ontario
M5J 2T3
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of
Form 20-F or Form 20-F: Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the SEC pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Yes   o
    
    No   þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b):   N/A




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  CORUS ENTERTAINMENT INC.By:
    /s/ Thomas C. PeddieName:
    Thomas C. PeddieTitle:
    Senior Vice President & CFO Date:   January 13, 2005




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit1.
    
    Shareholders Report
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-16-00422-CV

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. APPELLANT

V.

JAIME PEREZ APPELLEE

------------ FROM COUNTY COUR T AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2015-006081-2

------------ 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------ We have considered “Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 PER CURIAM PANEL: KERR, J.; LIVING STON, C.J.; PITTMAN, J. DELIVERED: March 30, 2017
#### In the Matter of Martin Dekom, Appellant, v New York Department of Financial Services et al., Respondents.

[973 NYS2d 163]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Donna M. Mills, J), entered September 12, 2012, denying the petition to annul respondents’ determination, dated March 2, 2012, which changed petitioner’s Mortgage Loan Originator (MLO) license status to “approved-inactive,” and dismissing the proceeding brought pursuant to CFLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Banking Law § 599-i (1) (a) provides that respondent superintendent may renew an MLO’s license only if the MLO “continue [s] to meet the minimum standards for license issuance set forth in section [599-e].” Section 599-e provides that the superintendent shall not issue an MLO license unless the applicant “has demonstrated financial responsibility, character, and general fitness such as to command the confidence of the community” (§ 599-e [1] [c]). Further, an application for the issuance of an MLO license must include an “independent credit report” and “[s]uch other pertinent information as the superintendent may require” (§ 599-d [9] [b] [i]; [d]).

Although petitioner ultimately made his credit report available to respondents in connection with his MLO license renewal application, he nevertheless refused to provide an explanation as to why his mortgage payments were 120 days past due, as indicated in his credit report. Accordingly, respondents’ determination to change petitioner’s MLO license status to “approved-inactive” had a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and capricious *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 231 [1974]).

*528The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act, and only where there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought *(see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman,*53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). Petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Further, respondents’ determination to inactivate petitioner’s MLO license was discretionary *(see Matter of Town of Riverhead v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation,*50 AD3d 811, 813 [2d Dept 2008], citing *Klostermann v Cuomo,*61 NY2d 525, 539 [1984]).

We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Acosta, J.P., Saxe, Renwick, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 32310(11).]
| 1. | Peng      Xiang Peng Fei Investments Limited (“PXPF”) is a British Virgin Islands      company and is wholly-owned by theCompany. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Dong      Rong Capital Investment Limited (“HK Dong Rong”) is a Hong Kong company      formerly known as Korea Jinduren (International) Dress Limited, and is      wholly-owned by PXPF.  |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 3. | Dong      Rong (China) Company Limited is a People’s Republic of China company and      is wholly-owned by HK Dong Rong.                                                                             |
Exhibit 10.2


 


First Amendment
to


Employment
AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment
to Employment Agreement (the “First Amendment”), effective as of August 10, 2015, is between Eastside Distilling,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Steven Earles (the “Executive”).


 


A.                Effective February
6, 2015, the Company and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which
the Executive agreed to provide certain services to the Company. The Agreement is incorporated into this First Amendment by this
reference and all defined terms in the Agreement shall have the same meaning in this First Amendment.


 


B.                The parties now
wish to modify and amend the Agreement in accordance with this First Amendment.


 


The parties, each intending
to be legally bound, agree as follows:


 


1.                 
Section 1 of the Agreement shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


“(a)             In consideration
for Executive’s performance of Executive’s duties and responsibilities with the Company, the Company shall pay to Executive,
a base salary of $245,000 per annum (the “Base Salary”). Executive will be paid in bi-weekly installments pursuant
to the Company’s normal payroll policies.”


 


2.                 
This First Amendment shall be deemed a modification of the Agreement in accordance with Section 11(h) of the Agreement.
Except as specifically modified hereby, the Agreement shall be deemed controlling and effective, and the parties hereby remake
and confirm each of the representations and warranties of the Agreement and agree to be bound by each of its terms and conditions.


 


3.                 
This First Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of
which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


 


 


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 






     


     

    

 


 


The Company and the
Executive have duly executed this First Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


 


EASTSIDE
DISTILLING, INC.


 


 





By: /s/
Martin Kunkel                          


Name: Martin
Kunkel


Title: Secretary


 


 


STEVEN
EARLES


 


 





/s/ Steven
Earles                                    


Name: Steven
Earles


 


 


 


 


[Signature Page to First Amendment to
Employment Agreement]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his
capacity as an officer of MicroIslet, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
presented in the financial statements included in such report.

Dated: March 30, 2004

/s/ John F. Steel IV
--------------------------------------------
John F. Steel IV
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: March 30, 2004

/s/ William G. Kachioff
-------------------------------------------
William G. Kachioff
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                               5
<PERIOD TYPE>                        9-MONTHS
<FISCAL YEAR END>                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD END>                         SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             19,331
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT ASSETS>                                   19,331
<PP&E>                                              3,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL ASSETS>                                     26,326
<CURRENT LIABILITIES>                              30,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           37,751
<OTHER SE>                                        (41,425)
<TOTAL LIABILITY AND EQUITY>                       26,326
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER EXPENSES>                                   89,474
<LOSS PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME PRETAX>                                   (89,474)
<INCOME TAX>                                            0
<INCOME CONTINUING>                               (89,474)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET INCOME>                                      (89,474)
<EPS PRIMARY>                                       (0.04)
<EPS DILUTED>                                        0.00

</TABLE>
#### East Mkt. St. Square, Inc. v. Tycorp Pizza IV, Inc.

Case below: 175 N.C. App. 628

No. 123P06

Defendant’s (Gilbert T. Bland) PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA05-212)

Denied 12/14/06
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Labor Relations Board

# TIME AND DATES: 

All meetings are held at 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, January 7; Tuesday, January 13; Wednesday, January 14; Thursday, January 15; Tuesday, January 20; Wednesday, January 21; Thursday, January 22; Tuesday, January 27; Wednesday, January 28; Thursday, January 29.

# PLACE: 

Board Agenda Room, No. 11820, 1099 14th St. NW., Washington, DC 20570.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Pursuant to § 102.139(a) of the Board's Rules and Regulations, the Board or a panel thereof will consider “the issuance of a subpoena, the Board's participation in a civil action or proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or disposition . . . of particular representation or unfair labor practice proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of the [National Labor Relations] Act, or any court proceedings collateral or ancillary thereto.” See also 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Henry Breiteneicher, Associate Executive Secretary, (202) 273-2917.

Dated: January 6, 2015.

William B. Cowen,

Solicitor.

[FR Doc. 2015-00131 Filed 1-6-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARK A. REESE, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 15-00316-CB-N

SAM COCHRAN, et al, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to 

the issue raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and 

Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is 

ADOPTED as the opinion of this court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby 

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to obey the Court's order.

DONE this 14th day of April, 2016.

s/Charles R.Butler, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:15-cv-00316-CB-N Document 16 Filed 04/14/16 Page 1 of 1