[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 400-402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30942]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau

27 CFR Part 9

[Docket No. TTB-2014-0005; T.D. TTB-126; Ref: Notice No. 143]
RIN 1513-AC07


Expansion of the Fair Play Viticultural Area

AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.

ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) is 
expanding the approximately 33-square mile ``Fair Play'' viticultural 
area in El Dorado County, California, by 1,200 acres (approximately 2 
square miles). The established viticultural area and the expansion area 
are both located entirely within the larger El Dorado and Sierra 
Foothills viticultural areas. TTB designates viticultural areas to 
allow vintners to better describe the origin of their wines and to 
allow consumers to better identify wines they may purchase.

DATES: This final rule is effective February 5, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and 
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G 
Street NW., Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 175.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background on Viticultural Areas

TTB Authority

    Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act), 
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe 
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt 
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among 
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading 
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with 
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The 
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act 
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, 
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various 
authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01 (Revised), dated 
December 10, 2013, to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions 
and duties in the administration and enforcement of this law.
    Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes the 
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their 
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine 
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets 
forth the standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for 
the establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) 
and lists the approved AVAs.

Definition

    Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) 
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9 
of the regulations, and a name

[[Page 401]]

and a delineated boundary, as established in part 9 of the regulations. 
These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given 
quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes 
grown in an area to the wine's geographic origin. The establishment of 
AVAs allows vintners to describe more accurately the origin of their 
wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify wines they may 
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is neither an approval nor an 
endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in that area.

Requirements

    Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) 
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any 
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region 
as an AVA. Petitioners may use the same process to request changes 
involving established AVAs. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 
9.12) prescribes standards for petitions for modifying established 
AVAs. Petitions to expand an established AVA must include the 
following:
    <bullet> Evidence that the area within the proposed expansion area 
boundary is nationally or locally known by the name of the established 
AVA;
    <bullet> An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of 
the proposed expansion area;
    <bullet> A narrative description of the features of the proposed 
expansion area that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology, 
soils, physical features, and elevation, that make the proposed 
expansion area similar to the established AVA and distinguish it from 
adjacent areas outside the established AVA boundary;
    <bullet> The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS) 
map(s) showing the location of the proposed expansion area, with the 
boundary of the proposed expansion area clearly drawn thereon; and
    <bullet> A detailed narrative description of the proposed expansion 
area boundary based on USGS map markings.

Petition To Expand the Fair Play AVA

    TTB received a petition from Randy and Tina Rossi, owners of Saluti 
Cellars winery and vineyard, proposing that the established Fair Play 
AVA in El Dorado County, California, be expanded. The Fair Play AVA (27 
CFR 9.168) was established by T.D. ATF-440, which was published in the 
Federal Register on February 26, 2001 (66 FR 11539). The Fair Play AVA 
contains approximately 250 acres of commercially producing vineyards 
and covers approximately 33 square miles in southern El Dorado County, 
California, around the small, unincorporated community of Fair Play. 
The proposed expansion area and the established AVA are both located 
within the El Dorado AVA (27 CFR 9.61), which, in turn, is within the 
larger, multicounty Sierra Foothills AVA (27 CFR 9.120). The Fair Play 
AVA and the proposed expansion area do not overlap any other 
established or proposed AVAs.
    The proposed expansion area is adjacent to the northeast corner of 
the established Fair Play AVA boundary and covers approximately 1,200 
acres (approximately 2 square miles). One commercial vineyard, Saluti 
Cellars, is within the proposed expansion area. The petition included a 
letter from the president of the Fair Play Winery Association in 
support of the proposed expansion.
    According to the petition, the soils, topography, and climate of 
the proposed expansion area are similar to those of the established 
Fair Play AVA. The proposed expansion area and the established AVA are 
both regions of steep hillsides and ridge tops with elevations between 
2,000 and 3,000 feet. The soils of the proposed expansion area and the 
established AVA are deep, well-drained sandy loams and coarse sandy 
loams derived mainly from granite, with the Holland, Musick, and Shaver 
soil series being the most prevalent soil series. Finally, the proposed 
expansion area and the Fair Play AVA both have growing seasons of 
between 230 and 250 days and receive between 35 and 40 inches of rain 
annually.
    Although the proposed expansion area is more similar to the Fair 
Play AVA than the surrounding regions, the proposed expansion area 
still shares some of the features of the surrounding El Dorado and 
Sierra Foothills AVAs. For example, the well-drained sandy loam soils 
that characterize the proposed expansion area are also found in limited 
amounts within the two larger AVAs, although the most common soils 
within the El Dorado and Sierra Foothills AVA are poorly drained 
volcanic soils. The proposed expansion area is a region of rolling 
hills that become progressively steeper, similar to the topography of 
the El Dorado and Sierra Foothills AVAs. However, the range of 
elevations within the smaller proposed expansion area is not as great 
as within the two larger AVAs, which have elevations ranging from 500 
to 3,500 feet. Finally, although the range of annual rainfall amounts 
and the growing season lengths within the proposed expansion area and 
the Fair Play AVA are within the ranges of those of the larger El 
Dorado and Sierra Foothills AVA, the wider range of elevations within 
the two larger AVAs results in a much wider range of precipitation 
amounts and growing season lengths.

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received

    TTB published Notice No. 143 in the Federal Register on June 17, 
2014 (79 FR 34474), proposing to expand the Fair Play AVA. In the 
notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition regarding the 
name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the proposed expansion 
area. For a detailed description of the evidence relating to the name, 
boundary, and distinguishing features of the proposed expansion area, 
and for a comparison of the distinguishing features of the proposed 
expansion area to the surrounding areas and to the established Fair 
Play AVA, see Notice No. 143.
    In Notice No. 143, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the 
name, boundary, climatic, and other required information submitted in 
support of the petition. The comment period closed on August 18, 2014. 
TTB received no comments in response to Notice No. 143.

TTB Determination

    After careful review of the petition, TTB finds that the soil, 
climate, and topography evidence provided by the petitioner 
sufficiently demonstrates that although the proposed expansion area 
shares some of the broader characteristics of the larger El Dorado and 
Sierra Foothills AVAs, it is also similar to the established Fair Play 
AVA and should also be recognized as part of that AVA. Accordingly, 
under the authority of the FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the Homeland 
Security Act of 2002, and part 4 of the TTB regulations, TTB expands 
the 33-square mile ``Fair Play'' AVA to include the approximately 2-
square mile expansion area as described in Notice No. 143, effective 30 
days from the publication date of this document.

Boundary Description

    See the narrative description of the boundary of the AVA expansion 
in the regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.

Maps

    The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed 
below in the regulatory text.

[[Page 402]]

Impact on Current Wine Labels

    Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a 
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true 
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a 
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine 
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that 
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in Sec.  
4.25(e)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). If the wine is 
not eligible for labeling with an AVA name and that name appears in the 
brand name, then the label is not in compliance, and the bottler must 
change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label. Similarly, if 
the AVA name appears in another reference on the label in a misleading 
manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label. 
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing an AVA name 
that was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986. 
See Sec.  4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for 
details.
    The expansion of the Fair Play AVA will not affect any other 
existing AVA, and bottlers using ``Fair Play,'' ``El Dorado,'' or 
``Sierra Foothills'' as an appellation of origin or in a brand name for 
wines made from grapes within the ``Fair Play,'' ``El Dorado,'' or 
``Sierra Foothills'' AVAs will not be affected by this expansion of the 
Fair Play AVA. The expansion of the Fair Play AVA will allow vintners 
to use ``Fair Play,'' ``El Dorado,'' or ``Sierra Foothills'' as 
appellations of origin for wines made primarily from grapes grown 
within the expansion area if the wines meet the eligibility 
requirements for the appellation.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The 
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other 
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA 
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer 
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory 
flexibility analysis is required.

Executive Order 12866

    It has been determined that this rule is not a significant 
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.

Drafting Information

    Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted 
this final rule.

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9

    Wine.

The Regulatory Amendment

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27, 
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:

PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  27 U.S.C. 205.

Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas

0
2. Section 9.168 is amended by revising paragraphs (b), (c)(4) through 
(c)(7), (c)(12), and (c)(13) to read as follows:


Sec.  9.168  Fair Play.

    (a) * * *
    (b) Approved maps. The four United States Geological Survey (USGS) 
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the 
Fair Play viticultural area are titled:
    (1) Aukum, Calif., 1952 (photorevised 1973);
    (2) Camino, CA, 1952 (photorevised 1973);
    (3) Sly Park, CA, 1952 (photorevised 1973); and
    (4) Omo Ranch, Calif., 1952 (photorevised 1973).
    (c) * * *
    (4) The boundary continues east along Grizzly Flat Road to its 
intersection with the 2,200-foot contour line (``Camino Quadrangle'');
    (5) The boundary continues northeasterly and then easterly along 
the 2,200-foot contour line until the contour line intersects with 
Jackass Canyon Creek near the eastern boundary of Section 10, T. 9 N., 
R. 12. E., on the ``Camino Quadrangle'' map;
    (6) The boundary then proceeds southeast along Jackass Canyon 
Creek, crossing over the southwestern corner of the ``Sly Park'' 
Quadrangle map and onto the ``Omo Ranch'' Quadrangle map, to the 
headwaters of the creek, then proceeds in a straight line southeast to 
Grizzly Flat Road in Section 24, T. 9 N., R. 12 E.;
    (7) The boundary continues east along Grizzly Flat Road until the 
road intersects with the range line between R. 12 E. and R. 13 E. 
(``Omo Ranch Quadrangle'');
* * * * *
    (12) The boundary continues west along the South Fork of the 
Cosumnes River to its intersection with the western boundary of Section 
14, T. 8 N., R 11 E. (``Aukum Quadrangle'');
    (13) The boundary then proceeds north along the western boundary 
lines of Sections 14, 11, and 2, T. 8 N., R 11 E., and then the western 
boundary lines of Sections 35 and 26, T. 9 N., R 11 E., to return to 
the beginning point (``Aukum Quadrangle'').

    Signed: October 14, 2014.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
    Approved: November 18, 2014.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2014-30942 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P