alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       71,588
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      5,952
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          12,389
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         3,027
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   2,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,850
<COMMON>                                         5,312
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       15,978
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              5,770
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  27,060
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,406
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            30,903
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               7,095
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      900
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  21,486
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   95,850
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       16,105
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               360
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       5,257
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       6,574
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          2,514
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 782
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   3,296
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,779
<NET-INCOME>                                       564
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        346
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      218
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,166
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           (128)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2558 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2558

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to include a public airport in 
          use by an air reserve station as a primary airport.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2023

Mr. Johnson of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Joyce of Ohio) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to include a public airport in 
          use by an air reserve station as a primary airport.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIMARY AIRPORT DESIGNATION.

    Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
                    ``(K) Public airports with military use.--
                Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a public 
                airport in use by an air reserve station shall be 
                considered a primary airport for purposes of this 
                chapter.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,451,606
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  264,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      53,045,794
<DEPRECIATION>                            (31,974,197)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,673,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     39,340,615
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,673,874
<SALES>                                     11,057,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,155,607
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,716,118
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,856,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            582,518
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   582,518
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed April 19, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-11-01672-CV

WILLIAM BALDWIN, Appellant

V.

THE COLONY ASSETS DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-00877

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, O’Neill, and Lewis 

Opinion by Justice O’Neill

By postcard notice dated January 17, 2013, the Court informed appellant that his brief 

was past due. We instructed appellant to file a brief along with an extension motion within ten 

days and cautioned him that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. As of 

today’s date, appellant has not filed a brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(c).

111672F.P05

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O’NEILL

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM BALDWIN, Appellant

No. 05-11-01672-CV V.

THE COLONY ASSETS DEVELOPMENT, 

L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-00877.

Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. 

Justices Moseley and Lewis participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, THE COLONY ASSETS DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., 

recover its costs of this appeal from appellant, WILLIAM BALDWIN.

Judgment entered this 19th day of April, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O’NEILL

JUSTICE
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. James LABOR, Jr.

No. 98 CR 50-1.

United States District Court, D. Vermont.

Dec. 4, 1998.

Ernest Marvin Allen, III, Stetler, Allen & Kampmann, Burlington, VT, for Defendant.

Tristram J. Coffin, Office of the U.S. Atty., District of Vermont, Burlington, VT, for U.S.

OPINION AND ORDER

SESSIONS, District Judge.

The matter before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant stands charged with one count of possession of a firearm in and affecting interstate commerce by a person who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He moves to dismiss *367on the ground that as of the date of the alleged possession of a firearm, he had no such conviction. He argues that he had received a deferred sentence for the underlying offense for which he was still on probation and that this does not constitute a “conviction” under the statute.

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) provides in relevant part that

> [1]t shall be unlawful for any person who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year to ... possess in or affecting commerce ... any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.

What constitutes a “conviction” for the purposes of this statute is determined in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction in which the underlying proceedings were held. 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20)(B) (Para.2).

Under Vermont law, conviction ordinarily refers to the ascertainment of a defendant’s guilt. *Bugbee v. Boyce,*68 Vt. 311, 313, 35 A. 330, 331 (1896). Specifically, in *Bugbee*the Vermont Supreme Court examined the meaning of “conviction” under No. 127, Acts 1884, a statute which provided that a person, after conviction for intoxication, could be committed for refusal to disclose the origin of the alcohol. The court found that conviction requires only that a plea or verdict of guilty be accepted and entered of record. *Id.*68 Vt. at 314, 35 A. at 331. Further, the general sentencing statutes found at Vt.Stat. Ann. tit. 13 § 7001 and § 7002 clearly equate conviction with a plea or verdict of guilty and separate it from judgment or sentencing by predicating the latter upon the former.

The record shows that the Defendant pled guilty to one felony violation of Vt.Stat. Ann. tit. 18 § 4230(a) and one felony violation of Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 13 § 1404, each of which carried a maximum term of imprisonment of more than one year. Therefore, having pled guilty, he has been convicted within the meaning of the statute.

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED (Paper # 10).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XD658

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of correction of a public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's Pacific                               ( print page 78064)                            Northwest Crab Industry Advisory Committee (PNCIAC) will meet in Seattle, WA. The meeting is open to the public.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on January 12, 2015, from 9 a.m. until 12 noon.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Fishermen's Terminal, Norby conference room, 3919 18th Avenue W., Seattle, WA 98199.

*Council address:*                         North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 4th Avenue, Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Diana Stram, Council Staff; telephone: (907) 271-2809 or Lance Farr, (206) 669-7163.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The original notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 12, 2014 (79 FR 73884). This notice serves a correction to that notice and is being re-published in its entirety due to a date change and an addition to the agenda.                

The Committee will discuss issues to recommend for the 10-year review of the Crab Rationalization Program and discuss extending the Western Baridi fishing season.

## Special Accommodations

This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 working days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: December 22, 2014.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2014-30304 Filed 12-24-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06-13-00134-CV

Tammy Crocker

v.

Thomas Babcock, IV, M.D., Longview Emergency Medicine Associates, Inc. and 

Good Shepherd Medical Center

(No. 2011-2463-B IN 124TH DISTRICT COURT OF GREGG COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

FILING

REPORTER'S RECORD

SUPPLEMENTAL CLERK'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51 FEE

FILING

INDIGENT

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

FILING

$15.00

$10.00

$10.00

($195.00)

$247.95

$42.00

$645.00

$50.00

$195.00

$25.00

$20.00

$100.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

REFUND

UNKNOWN

PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

DARCY STARCHER

DARCY STARCHER

STACEY SPLAWN

N/A

THE LIEBBE FIRM

RUSSEL G THORNTON

THE LIEBBE FIRM

STACEY SPLAWN

N/A (DUPLICATE PAYMENT OF FILING FEE)

STACEY SPLAWN

STACEY SPLAWN

STACEY SPLAWN

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE 

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct 

copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF 

TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, 

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, 

witness my hand and the Seal of 

the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Sixth District of Texas, this 

August 21, 2015.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___________________________

Deputy
#### Patricia Curto, Appellant, v Zittel’s Dairy Farm et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No.2.)

[972 NYS2d 140]

— Motion for re-argument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Centra, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.
UNITEDSTATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington,D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission File Number 0-10304

 

 

ANGELES PARTNERS X

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      PURSUANT TO SECTION 13A-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date therein  specified (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Anthony L. Havens
---------------------
Anthony L. Havens
Chief Executive Officer
Date: September 14, 2004
```
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 24, 2009

p0217 

# Order

February 24, 2009

137626

NORWOOD TWP CITIZENS FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137626 COA: 284494 Charlevoix CC: 06-043821-CZ WAYNE WYNKOOP, MICHELINE WYNKOOP, d/b/a NORWOOD LIMESTONE QUARRY, LLC, Defendants-Appellants,

and

NORWOOD TWP, NORWOOD TWP SUPERVISOR, NORWOOD TWP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, NORWOOD TWP ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS and NORWOOD TWP ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### In the Matter of Keith Murray, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

[871 NYS2d 478]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with making threats. A tier III disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty as charged. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report, related documentation and hearing testimony from the correction officer who authored the report and the inmate who petitioner threatened *(see Matter of Williams v Selsky,*50 AD3d 1426, 1426-1427 [2008], *lv denied*11 NY3d 703 [2008]). As for petitioner’s denial of the allegations against him, a credibility *976issue was created for resolution by the Hearing Officer *(see Matter of Jordan v Fischer,*53 AD3d 1013 [2008]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claims that he was improperly confined to the special housing unit, that he was denied adequate employee assistance and that the Hearing Officer was biased, have been examined and, to the extent preserved, are unavailing.

Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Rose, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1


906 CERTIFICATION OF CERTIFYING OFFICER





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-K of Exclusive Apparel, Inc. for the Year Ended December 31, 2009, I, Georgette Mathers, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Exclusive Apparel, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.   Such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Exclusive Apparel, Inc.





Dated:  March 26, 2010





EXCLUSIVE APPAREL, INC.








By:/s/ Georgette Mathers


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer and


Chief Accounting Officer





This certification accompanies this report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Marvin’s Place, Inc. and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2342 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral Economic 

Assistance, Democracy Fund for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral Economic Assistance, Democracy Fund for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 BILATERAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE, DEMOC5 RACY FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:10 Apr 20, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2342.IH H2342

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2342 IH

1 able for Bilaterial Economic Assistance, Democracy Fund 

2 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $157,700,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB