78784 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 38924 (June 

28, 2013) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’); see also Aluminum 

Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 

2012/2013, 79 FR 36003 (June 25, 2014) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

2See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36006. 

3See ‘‘Second Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an 

Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Case Briefs 

and Rebuttal Case Briefs,’’ dated July 7, 2014 and 

‘‘Second Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an 

Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Rebuttal 

Briefs,’’ dated August 12, 2014. 

4The individual members of the Committee are 

Aerolite Extrusion Company; Alexandria Extrusion 

Company; Benada Aluminum of Florida, Inc.; 

William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.; Frontier 

Aluminum Corporation; Futural Industries 

Corporation; Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.; 

Kaiser Aluminum Corporation; Profile Extrusion 

Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; and Western 

Extrusions Corporation. 

Affected Public: Applicants for 

temporary jobs in office and field 

positions. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory 

to apply for temporary positions. 

Legal Authority: Title 13, United 

States Code, Section 23 a and c. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov 

.Follow the instructions to view 

Department of Commerce collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. 

Dated: December 24, 2014. 

Glenna Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30627 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[S–132–2014] 

Approval of Subzone Status, 5.11, Inc., 

Modesto and Lathrop, California 

On November 6, 2014, the Executive 

Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones 

(FTZ) Board docketed an application 

submitted by the Port of Stockton, 

California, grantee of FTZ 231, 

requesting subzone status subject to the 

existing activation limit of FTZ 231, on 

behalf of 5.11, Inc., in Modesto and 

Lathrop, California. 

The application was processed in 

accordance with the FTZ Act and 

Regulations, including notice in the 

Federal Register inviting public 

comment (79 FR 67413, 11/13/2014). 

The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the 

application and determined that it 

meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant 

to the authority delegated to the FTZ 

Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 

400.36(f)), the application to establish 

Subzone 231B is approved, subject to 

the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including Section 400.13, and further 

subject to FTZ 231’s 2,000-acre 

activation limit. 

Dated: December 23, 2014. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30719 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–967] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on aluminum 

extrusions from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2012, through April 

30, 2013. These final results cover 52 

companies for which an administrative 

review was initiated, and for which this 

administrative review was not rescinded 

in the Preliminary Results.1 For these 

final results, the Department examined 

two mandatory respondents and one 

voluntary respondent for which this 

review was initiated. The first 

mandatory respondent is Guangzhou 

Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering 

Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong 

Kong Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Jangho’’); the 

second mandatory respondent is a 

single entity that the Department 

continues to find is comprised of Guang 

Ya Aluminum Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Guang Ya’’), Foshan Guangcheng 

Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guangcheng’’), 

Kong Ah International Co., Ltd. (‘‘Kong 

Ah’’), and Guang Ya Aluminum 

Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd. (‘‘Guang Ya 

HK’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang Ya Group’’), 

Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Zhongya’’), Zhongya Shaped 

Aluminum (HK) Holding Ltd. (‘‘Shaped 

Aluminum’’), and Karlton Aluminum 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Karlton’’) (collectively 

‘‘Zhongya’’), and Foshan Nanhai Xinya 

Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinya’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang 

Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya’’). 

The Department finds for these final 

results that Jangho and the Guang Ya 

Group/Zhongya/Xinya entity failed to 

demonstrate that they were eligible for 

separate rates and thus are part of the 

PRC-wide entity. For Kromet 

International, Inc. (‘‘Kromet’’), a 

voluntary respondent in this review, the 

Department finds that Kromet did not 

make sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value during the POR. 

Furthermore, the Department finds 

that 19 of the companies under review 

(including Kromet) have established 

their eligibility for a separate rate. 

Additionally, we determine that four 

companies, Hong Kong Gree Electric 

Appliances Sales Limited (‘‘Gree’’), 

Jiuyuan Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiuyuan’’), Shenzhen 

Hudson Technology Development Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen Hudson’’), and Skyline 

Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Skyline’’) had no shipments. The 

Department finds that the remaining 

companies under review either failed to 

establish their eligibility for a separate 

rate or were not responsive, and, 

therefore, these companies are part of 

the PRC-wide entity. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 31, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James Terpstra or Paul Stolz, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3965 or (202) 482– 

4474, respectively. 

Background 

On June 25, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review. At that time, 

we invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results.2

We granted parties an extension of time 

to submit case and rebuttal briefs.3

On August 8, 2014 we received case 

briefs from the Aluminum Extrusions 

Fair Trade Committee (‘‘Petitioner’’); 4

Zhongya; Skyline; Jangho; tenKsolar 

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘tenKsolar’’); 

Permasteelisa South China Factory and 

Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd. 

(collectively, ‘‘Permasteelisa’’); Taishan 

City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co. 

Ltd., and Kam Kiu Aluminium Products 

Sdn. Bhd. (collectively ‘‘Kam Kiu’’). On 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices 78785 

5See ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated September 5, 2014. 

6See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 

30650 (May 26, 2011) (‘‘Order’’). 

7See Memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from 

Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

titled ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review: Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ which is dated concurrently 

with and hereby adopted by this notice (‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum’’) for a complete description 

of the scope of the Order. 

8On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the reference to the Regulations 

can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014). 

9See Attachment to the accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

10 Id.; see also Comment 3 of the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

11See Comment 7 of the accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

12See Comment 8 of the accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

13See Memorandum to the File titled ‘‘Second 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Analysis of the Final Results 

Margin Calculation for Kromet International,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

14See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36006. 

August 20, 2014, we received rebuttal 

briefs from the Petitioner, Kromet, and 

Jangho. 

On September 5, 2014, the 

Department extended the deadline for 

the final results until December 22, 

2014.5

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order 6 is aluminum extrusions which 

are shapes and forms, produced by an 

extrusion process, made from aluminum 

alloys having metallic elements 

corresponding to the alloy series 

designations published by The 

Aluminum Association commencing 

with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or 

proprietary equivalents or other 

certifying body equivalents).7

Imports of the subject merchandise 

are provided for under the following 

categories of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTS’’): 

7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 

7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 

7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 

7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 

7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 

8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 

7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 

7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 

7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 

7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 

7609.00.00.00, 8302.10.30.00, 

8302.10.60.30, 8302.10.60.60, 

8302.10.60.90, 8302.20.00.00, 

8302.30.30.10, 8302.30.30.60, 

8302.41.30.00, 8302.41.60.15, 

8302.41.60.45, 8302.41.60.50, 

8302.41.60.80, 8302.42.30.10, 

8302.42.30.15, 8302.42.30.65, 

8302.49.60.35, 8302.49.60.45, 

8302.49.60.55, 8302.49.60.85, 

8302.50.00.00, 8302.60.90.00, 

8305.10.00.50, 8306.30.00.00, 

8414.59.60.90, 8415.90.80.45, 

8418.99.80.05, 8418.99.80.50, 

8418.99.80.60, 8419.90.10.00, 

8422.90.06.40, 8473.30.20.00, 

8473.30.51.00, 8479.90.85.00, 

8486.90.00.00, 8487.90.00.80, 

8503.00.95.20, 8508.70.00.00, 

8516.90.50.00, 8516.90.80.50, 

8517.70.00.00, 8529.90.73.00, 

8529.90.97.60, 8538.10.00.00, 

8543.90.88.80, 8708.29.50.60, 

8708.80.65.90, 8803.30.00.60, 

9013.90.50.00, 9013.90.90.00, 

9401.90.50.81, 9403.90.10.40, 

9403.90.10.50, 9403.90.10.85, 

9403.90.25.40, 9403.90.25.80, 

9403.90.40.05, 9403.90.40.10, 

9403.90.40.60, 9403.90.50.05, 

9403.90.50.10, 9403.90.50.80, 

9403.90.60.05, 9403.90.60.10, 

9403.90.60.80, 9403.90.70.05, 

9403.90.70.10, 9403.90.70.80, 

9403.90.80.10, 9403.90.80.15, 

9403.90.80.20, 9403.90.80.41, 

9403.90.80.51, 9403.90.80.61, 

9506.11.40.80, 9506.51.40.00, 

9506.51.60.00, 9506.59.40.40, 

9506.70.20.90, 9506.91.00.10, 

9506.91.00.20, 9506.91.00.30, 

9506.99.05.10, 9506.99.05.20, 

9506.99.05.30, 9506.99.15.00, 

9506.99.20.00, 9506.99.25.80, 

9506.99.28.00, 9506.99.55.00, 

9506.99.60.80, 9507.30.20.00, 

9507.30.40.00, 9507.30.60.00, 

9507.90.60.00, and 9603.90.80.50. 

The subject merchandise entered as 

parts of other aluminum products may 

be classifiable under the following 

additional Chapter 76 subheadings: 

7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 

7616.99 as well as under other HTS 

chapters. In addition, fin evaporator 

coils may be classifiable under HTS 

numbers: 8418.99.80.50 and 

8418.99.80.60. While HTS subheadings 

are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes, the written 

description of the scope of this Order is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by parties in this 

review are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, which is 

incorporated herein by reference. A list 

of the issues which parties raised, and 

to which we respond in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, follows as an 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(‘‘ACCESS’’).8 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov, and it is available to 

all parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the internet at http://

www.trade.gov/enforcement/frn/

index.html. The signed Issues and 

Decision Memorandum and the 

electronic version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum are identical in 

content. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on an analysis of the comments 

received from interested parties and a 

review of the record, the Department 

made the following changes for these 

final results of review: 

• We corrected a calculation error for 

the final adjusted margin to be applied 

to the separate rate companies.9

• We adjusted the PRC-wide entity 

margin for both export subsidies and 

domestic subsidy pass-through.10

• We determined that Skyline did not 

have shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR.11

• We made a correction to the 

spelling of Kam Kiu’s name.12

• For Kromet’s preliminary margin 

calculation, we neglected to convert the 

variables ‘‘Magnesium Ingots’’ and 

‘‘Aluminum Titanium Boron Wire’’ 

using Thai exchange rates. We corrected 

this error, and it did not change 

Kromet’s margin.13

Companies Eligible for a Separate Rate 

In our Preliminary Results, we 

determined that 18 companies, plus 

Kromet, are eligible for a separate rate.14

We received no information since the 

issuance of the Preliminary Results that 

provides a basis for reconsideration of 

this determination. Therefore, the 

Department continues to find that these 

19 companies are eligible for a separate 

rate. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

Which Are Eligible for a Separate Rate 

The Department assigned to nonexamined, separate rate companies the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

78786 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices 

15See Comment 4 of the accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum for further discussion. 

16See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36005–36006 

and the Attachment to the accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

17See Comments 2, 5, and 6 of the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum for further 

discussion. See also Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 

36003–36005 and accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum at 14–15. 

18These companies are: (1) Alnan Aluminium 

Co., Ltd.; (2) Chiping One Stop Industrial & Trade 

Co., Ltd.; (3) Cixi Handsome Pool Appliance Co., 

Ltd.; (4) DongChuan Swimming Pool Equipments 

Co., Ltd.; (5) Dongguan Golden Tiger Hardware 

Industrial Co., Ltd.; (6) Foshan Shunde Aoneng 

Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.; (7) Guang Dong Xin 

Wei Aluminum Products Co., Ltd.; (8) Guangdong 

Whirlpool Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd.; (9) 

Guangzhou Mingcan Die-Casting Hardware 

Products, Co. Ltd.; (10) Hanyung Alcobis Co., Ltd.; 

(11) Henan New Kelong Electrical Appliances Cp., 

Ltd.; (12) Idex Dinglee Technology (Tianjin Co., 

Ltd.); (13) Nidec Sankyo (Zhejiang) Corporation; 

(14) Ningbo Splash Pool Appliance Co., Ltd.; (15) 

Samuel, Son & Co., Ltd.; (16) Shenyang Yuanda 

Aluminum Industry Engineering Co., Ltd.; (17) 

Taizhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation; (18) 

Tiazhou Lifeng Manufacturing Corporation; (19) 

Wenzhou Shengbo Decoration & Hardware; and (20) 

Whirlpool (Guangdong). 

19See Comment 3 of the accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum for further discussion. 

weighted-average dumping margin 

assigned to non-examined, separate rate 

companies in the final determination of 

the antidumping investigation and for 

the final results of the first 

administrative review of the Order. 

Neither the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’) nor the 

Department’s regulations address the 

establishment of the rate applied to 

individual companies not selected for 

examination where the Department 

limited its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. The 

Department’s practice in cases involving 

limited selection based on exporters 

accounting for the largest volumes of 

trade has been to look to section 

735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation. 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act instructs 

the Department to avoid calculating an 

all-others rate using any rates that are 

zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts available in investigations. Section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act provides that, 

where all rates are zero, de minimis, or 

based entirely on facts available, the 

Department may use ‘‘any reasonable 

method’’ for assigning an all-others rate. 

We determine that the application of 

the rate from the investigation to the 

non-examined separate rate respondents 

is consistent with precedent and an 

appropriate method to determine the 

separate rate in the instant review. 

Pursuant to this method, we are 

assigning the rate of 32.79 percent, the 

most recent rate (from the less than fair 

value investigation) calculated for the 

non-examined separate rate 

respondents, to the non-examined 

separate rate respondents in the instant 

review.15

Adjustment Under Section 777A(f) of 

the Act 

Pursuant to section 777A(f) of the Act, 

the Department has made an adjustment 

for countervailable domestic subsidies 

which have been found to have 

impacted the U.S. prices. We made no 

changes (since the Preliminary Results) 

to the adjustments made for these final 

results to Kromet’s adjustment or the 

separate rate companies’ adjustment 

(though we corrected a calculation error 

for the final adjusted margin to include 

only the passed-through portion of the 

domestic subsidy for the separate rate 

companies).16 Pursuant to section 

777A(f) of the Act, for these final 

results, we also made an adjustment to 

the PRC-wide entity’s rate to account for 

countervailable domestic subsidies. 

PRC-Wide Entity 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department determined that the 

mandatory respondents Jangho and 

Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya were 

not eligible for a separate rate, and, 

accordingly, were found to be part of the 

PRC-wide entity. The Department 

received no information since the 

issuance of the Preliminary Results that 

provides a basis for reconsideration of 

this determination. Therefore, the 

Department continues to find that 

Jangho and Guang Ya Group/Zhongya/

Xinya 17 are not eligible for a separate 

rate and are part of the PRC-wide entity. 

In the Preliminary Results, the 

Department also found 21 companies to 

be part of the PRC-wide entity. For one 

of those companies, Skyline, the 

Department received information since 

the Preliminary Results sufficient to 

change its determination. For the 

remaining 20 companies, the 

Department received no information 

since the issuance of the Preliminary 

Results that provides a basis for 

reconsideration of its determination. 

Therefore, the Department continues to 

find that these 20 companies are not 

eligible for a separate rate and are part 

of the PRC-wide entity.18

Adverse Facts Available Rate for the 

PRC-Wide Entity 

For the PRC-wide entity, the 

Department in the Preliminary Results 

preliminarily determined that the PRCwide entity had not acted to the best of 

its ability in providing necessary 

information to the Department, and 

assigned the rate of 33.28 percent, the 

only rate ever determined for the PRCwide entity in this proceeding, as 

adverse facts available pursuant to 

sections 776(a) and 776(b) of the Act. 

The rate of 33.28 percent has probative 

value because it was in the range of the 

individual dumping margins which we 

calculated for Kromet. Accordingly, we 

find that the rate of 33.28 percent is 

corroborated within the meaning of 

section 776(c) of the Act, and that it is 

appropriate to continue to apply this 

rate of 33.28 percent to the PRC-wide 

entity.19

Final Results of Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine that the following weightedaverage dumping margins exist for the 

period May 1, 2012, through April 30, 

2013: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage dumping 

margin 20

Margin adjusted 

for liquidation 

and cash deposit 

purposes 

(%) 

Kromet International, Inc ............................................................................................................................. .............................. 0.00 

Allied Maker Limited .................................................................................................................................... 32.79 22.28 

Changzhou Changzheng Evaporator Co., Ltd ............................................................................................ 32.79 32.69 

Classic & Contemporary Inc ........................................................................................................................ 32.79 22.28 

Dynabright Int’l Group (HK) Limited ............................................................................................................ 32.79 22.28 

Hanyung Metal (Suzhou) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................... 32.79 22.28 

Global Point Technology (Far East) Limited 21 ........................................................................................... 32.79 22.28 

Jiangsu Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................... 32.79 27.22 

Jiaxing Jackson Travel Products Co., Ltd ................................................................................................... 32.79 27.22 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices 78787 

20As explained in the Preliminary Results, for the 

Separate Rate Companies (i.e., all companies other 

than Kromet), the Department intends to adjust the 

weighted-average dumping margin, for both cash 

deposit and liquidation purposes. See Attachment 

to the accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for calculations showing the export 

subsidy, domestic subsidy, pass-through rate, and 

net adjustments. 

21Hoff Associates Mfg Reps Inc. (dba Global Point 

Technology, Inc.) is the U.S. importer. 

22Taishan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusions 

Co., Ltd. is the producer. 

23Permasteelisa South China Factory 

(Permasteelisa China) is the producer. 

24See Antidumping Proceeding: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8103 

(February 14, 2012) (‘‘NME Antidumping 

Proceedings’’). 

25For the PRC-wide entity, which received an 

AFA rate, as an extension of the adverse inference 

found necessary pursuant to section 776(b) of the 

Act, the Department has adjusted the PRC-wide 

entity’s AD assessment rate by the lowest export 

subsidy rate and the lowest estimated domestic 

subsidy pass-through determined for any party in 

the companion CVD proceeding. 

26For the PRC-wide entity, which received an 

AFA rate, as an extension of the adverse inference 

found necessary pursuant to section 776(b) of the 

Act, the Department has adjusted the PRC-wide 

entity’s AD cash deposit rate by the lowest export 

subsidy rate and the lowest estimated domestic 

subsidy pass-through determined for any party in 

the companion CVD proceeding. See Attachment to 

accompanying Issues and Decision memorandum. 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage dumping 

margin 20

Margin adjusted 

for liquidation 

and cash deposit 

purposes 

(%) 

Justhere Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... 32.79 27.22 

Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn. Bhd 22 .................................................................................................. 32.79 22.28 

Metaltek Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................. 32.79 27.22 

Midea International Trading Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................... 32.79 27.22 

Permasteelisa Hong Kong Limited 23 .......................................................................................................... 32.79 22.28 

Shanghai Tongtai Precise Aluminum Alloy ................................................................................................. 32.79 27.22 

Sincere Profit Limited .................................................................................................................................. 32.79 27.22 

tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................... 32.79 22.28 

Tianjin Jinmao Import & Export Corp., Ltd .................................................................................................. 32.79 27.22 

Union Industry (Asia) Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................... 32.79 27.22 

PRC-wide Entity ........................................................................................................................................... 33.28 33.18 

Disclosure 

We will disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.212(b).24 The Department intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 

days after the date of publication of 

these final results of review. 

For Kromet, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate all appropriate entries without 

regard to antidumping duties because 

Kromet’s weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero percent. For the 18 nonexamined, separate rate companies, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate all 

appropriate entries at a rate based on 

32.79 percent and adjusted for both 

export and domestic subsidies as 

described above. For the PRC-wide 

entity, we will instruct CBP to liquidate 

all appropriate entries at a rate equal to 

33.18 percent, which is adjusted for 

export and domestic subsidies, as 

appropriate.25

The Department recently announced a 

refinement to its assessment practice in 

non-market economy (‘‘NME’’) cases. 

Pursuant to this refinement in practice, 

for entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales databases submitted by 

companies individually examined 

during this review, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the NME-wide rate. In addition, if the 

Department determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of 

subject merchandise, any suspended 

entries that entered under that 

exporter’s case number (i.e., at that 

exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at the 

NME-wide rate. For a full discussion of 

this practice, see NME Antidumping 

Proceedings, supra. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

For the exporters listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

identified in ‘‘Final Results of the 

Review,’’ and adjusted for applicable 

export and domestic subsidies; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters that are not 

under review in this segment of the 

proceeding but that received a separate 

rate in a previous segment, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) for all PRC exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

been found to be entitled to a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

PRC-wide rate of 33.18 percent, which 

is adjusted for export and domestic 

subsidies, as appropriate; 26 and (4) for 

all non-PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not received 

their own rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be the rate applicable to the PRC 

exporter(s) that supplied that non-PRC 

exporter. The cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

and/or countervailing duties occurred 

and the subsequent assessment of 

double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305(a)(3), this notice serves as a 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under the APO. Timely 

written notification of the return or 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

78788 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices 

1The Alnan Companies are Alnan Aluminum 

Co., Ltd. (Alnan Aluminum), Alnan Aluminum Foil 

Co., Ltd. (Alnan Foil), Alnan (Shanglin) Industry 

Co., Ltd. (Shanglin Industry), and Shanglin Alnan 

Aluminum Comprehensive Utilization Power Co., 

Ltd. (Shanglin Power). Kromet International Inc., 

one of the selected mandatory respondents in this 

administrative review, reported that it is a Canadabased company that sold subject merchandise 

produced by the Alnan Companies to the United 

States during the review period. 

2See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2012, 

79 FR 36009 (June 25, 2014) (Preliminary Results). 

3See Department Memorandum regarding 

‘‘Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic 

of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review’’ 

(August 26, 2014). 

4For additional case history for this 

administrative review, see accompanying Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review: 

Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic 

of China, dated concurrently with this notice 

(Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

5See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 76 

FR 30653 (May 26, 2011) (Order). 

6For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

These final results of review and 

notice are published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: December 22, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix—Issues and Decision 

Memorandum 

Summary 

Background 

Scope of the Order 

Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1A: Selection of the Primary 

Surrogate Country 

Comment 1B: Selection of Financial 

Statements To Derive Financial Ratios 

Comment 1C: Selection of Surrogate Value 

for Primary Aluminum Input 

Comment 1D: Selection of Surrogate Value 

for Labor 

Comment 2: Whether To Continue To 

Collapse Zhongya, Guang Ya, and Xinya 

Comment 3: Whether To Recalculate the 

PRC-Wide Rate 

Comment 4: Whether To Recalculate the 

Separate-Rate for Non-Examined 

Exporters 

Comment 5: Whether the Department Has 

the Authority To Assess Antidumping 

Duties on Imports of Merchandise Prior 

to the Initiation of a Scope Inquiry 

Comment 6: Whether the Department 

Should Make a Scope Ruling on Jangho’s 

Curtain Wall Units and Window Wall 

Units in This Review 

Comment 7: Status of Skyline’s Separate 

Rate 

Comment 8: Whether To Correct the 

Spelling of Company Names in the Final 

Results and CBP Instructions 

Recommendation 

Attachment 

[FR Doc. 2014–30662 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–968] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) completed its 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

aluminum extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC) for the January 

1, 2012, through December 31, 2012, 

period of review (POR). We determine 

that the Alnan Companies 1 and Jiangsu 

Changfa Refrigeration Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu 

Changfa) received countervailable 

subsidies during the POR. The final net 

subsidy rates are listed below in ‘‘Final 

Results of the Review.’’ 

DATES: Effective Date: December 31, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristen Johnson and Joy Zhang, AD/

CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–4793 and (202) 

482–1168, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 25, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review.2 On August 

26, 2014, the Department extended the 

final results of this administrative 

review until December 22, 2014.3

The Department invited interested 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Results, received case and rebuttal briefs 

from several parties, and held a public 

hearing on October 17, 2014.4

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order 5 is aluminum extrusions which 

are shapes and forms, produced by an 

extrusion process, made from aluminum 

alloys having metallic elements 

corresponding to the alloy series 

designations published by The 

Aluminum Association commencing 

with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or 

proprietary equivalents or other 

certifying body equivalents).6

Imports of the subject merchandise 

are provided for under the following 

categories of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS): 

7610.10.00, 7610.90.00, 7615.10.30, 

7615.10.71, 7615.10.91, 7615.19.10, 

7615.19.30, 7615.19.50, 7615.19.70, 

7615.19.90, 7615.20.00, 7616.99.10, 

7616.99.50, 8479.89.98, 8479.90.94, 

8513.90.20, 9403.10.00, 9403.20.00, 

7604.21.00.00, 7604.29.10.00, 

7604.29.30.10, 7604.29.30.50, 

7604.29.50.30, 7604.29.50.60, 

7608.20.00.30, 7608.20.00.90, 

8302.10.30.00, 8302.10.60.30, 

8302.10.60.60, 8302.10.60.90, 

8302.20.00.00, 8302.30.30.10, 

8302.30.30.60, 8302.41.30.00, 

8302.41.60.15, 8302.41.60.45, 

8302.41.60.50, 8302.41.60.80, 

8302.42.30.10, 8302.42.30.15, 

8302.42.30.65, 8302.49.60.35, 

8302.49.60.45, 8302.49.60.55, 

8302.49.60.85, 8302.50.00.00, 

8302.60.90.00, 8305.10.00.50, 

8306.30.00.00, 8414.59.60.90, 

8415.90.80.45, 8418.99.80.05, 

8418.99.80.50, 8418.99.80.60, 

8419.90.10.00, 8422.90.06.40, 

8473.30.20.00, 8473.30.51.00, 

8479.90.85.00, 8486.90.00.00, 

8487.90.00.80, 8503.00.95.20, 

8508.70.00.00, 8516.90.50.00, 

8516.90.80.50, 8517.70.00.00, 

8529.90.73.00, 8529.90.97.60, 

8538.10.00.00, 8543.90.88.80, 

8708.29.50.60, 8708.80.65.90, 

8803.30.00.60, 9013.90.50.00, 

9013.90.90.00, 9401.90.50.81, 

9403.90.10.40, 9403.90.10.50, 

9403.90.10.85, 9403.90.25.40, 

9403.90.25.80, 9403.90.40.05, 

9403.90.40.10, 9403.90.40.60, 

9403.90.50.05, 9403.90.50.10, 

9403.90.50.80, 9403.90.60.05, 

9403.90.60.10, 9403.90.60.80, 

9403.90.70.05, 9403.90.70.10, 

9403.90.70.80, 9403.90.80.10, 

9403.90.80.15, 9403.90.80.20, 

9403.90.80.41, 9403.90.80.51, 

9403.90.80.61, 9506.11.40.80, 

9506.51.40.00, 9506.51.60.00, 

9506.59.40.40, 9506.70.20.90, 

9506.91.00.10, 9506.91.00.20, 

9506.91.00.30, 9506.99.05.10, 

9506.99.05.20, 9506.99.05.30, 

9506.99.15.00, 9506.99.20.00, 

9506.99.25.80, 9506.99.28.00, 

9506.99.55.00, 9506.99.60.80, 

9507.30.20.00, 9507.30.40.00, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES