alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Thompson, the Chief Financial Officer of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date: May 17, 2004

/s/ Stephen B. Thompson
------------------------
Stephen B. Thompson

Chief Financial Officer
#### HAGEN v. ANDERSON COUNTY.

New Triai,. — Where there is testimony tending to establish all the material issues in favor of prevailing party, it is not error of law to refuse motion for new trial.

Before Aedrich, J., Anderson, October term, 1900.

Affirmed.

Action for damages for personal injuries from' falling through a bridge, by John Hagen, by guardian *ad litem,*against Anderson County. From refusal of motion of defendant to grant a new trial, defendant appeals.

*Mr. J. B. Breazeale,*for appellant,

cites': *In absence of statutory liability, there is none against county:*34 S. C., 145; 27 S. C., 419; 42 S. C., 19. *If plaintiff brought about the injury by his own act or negligently contributed thereto, he cannot recover:*40 S. C., 344; 57 S. C., 294; 58 S. C., 417529 S. C., 140. *There being evidence that plaintiff negligently contributed to the injury, there was no evidence to support the verdict and new trial should have been granted:*54 S. C., 141, 605.

*Messrs. Bonham & Watkins,*contra,

cite: *Appellant can raise no other grounds in exceptions than those raised in motion:*41 S. C., 454. *What exceptions this Court will not consider:*11 S. C., 195, 589; 23 S. C., 231; 53 S. C., 215; 57 S. C., 433. *As to construction of stat. {Rev. Stat., 1169), in regard to plaintiff’s negligence:*55 S. C., 422; 38 S. E. R., 2; 58 S. C., 222.

September 7, 1901.

The opinion of -the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This action was brought under section 1169 of the Revised Statutes, to recover damages for personal injury alleged to 'have been sustained by plaintiff through a defect in a bridge over a ditch on a public high*491way in Anderson County, occasioned by the neglect or mismanagement of said county. The jury having rendered a verdict for $98 in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant moved for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was not supported by the evidence, which motion was refused. The defendant now appeals from the judgment rendered solely on the ground that there was error in refusing the motion for a new trial.

The refusal of a motion for a new trial is final as to all issues of fact involved. It is only when the verdict Is wholly without any evidence to support it, that it is error of law to refuse a motion for new trial based upon the evidence. *Martin*v. *Jennings,*52 S. C., 382. There was no error of law in this case, for an examination of the testimony shows that there was some testimony tending to establish all the material issues in favor of the plaintiff.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3


                           CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
                                     TO THE
                     RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           SEARCH CAPITAL GROUP, INC.


     The undersigned, Search Capital Group, Inc. (the "Corporation"), for the
purpose of correcting its Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as presently
in effect, does hereby make and execute this Certificate of Correction (the
"Correction") and does hereby certify that:

     1.   The name of the Corporation is Search Capital Group, Inc.

     2.   This Correction shall correct the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation, as filed with the Secretary of State of
Delaware on July 29, 1996.

     3.   On Page 2 of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the last two
lines of Article FOURTH, Section 2 of the Certificate of Designations for the
12% Senior Convertible Preferred Stock were missing and the section did not
reflect a complete paragraph. This Correction will incorporate the completed
paragraph.

     4.   Article FOURTH, Section 2 of the Certificate of Designations for the
12% Senior Convertible Preferred Stock should therefore be corrected to read in
its entirety as follows:

     Article FOURTH:

          SECTION 2. Number of Shares. The number of shares of 12% Preferred
     Stock is 400,000 of the par value of $0.01 per share with a liquidation
     preference of $5.00 per share which number of shares the Board of
     Directors may increase or decrease but may not decrease below the number
     of shares of the series then outstanding.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Correction to the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation has been executed by the Corporation by its
President and attested by its Secretary, and each of them does hereby affirm
and acknowledge, under penalties of perjury, that this Certificate of
Correction is the act and deed of the Corporation and that the facts stated
herein are true.

     DATED: August 15, 1996

                                       SEARCH CAPITAL GROUP, INC.


[CORPORATE SEAL]
                                       By:            /s/ George C. Evans
                                                ------------------------------
                                       Name:    George C. Evans
                                       Title:   Chairman, President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer

ATTEST:

   /s/ Ellis A. Regenbogen
-----------------------------
Ellis A. Regenbogen
Secretary
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of New Century Companies, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                 |  |  |  |                                                                                  
|---------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | 
|November 7, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ David Duquette                                                               
|                 |  |  |  | Name: David Duquette Title:   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to New Century Companies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Derrick Hill, Appellant.

[962 NYS2d 140]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P. Conviser, J.), rendered April 13, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of driving while intoxicated and driving while ability impaired, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 60 days and five years’ probation, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in determining that defendant’s cross-examination opened the door *(see generally People v Massie,*2 NY3d 179, 183-185 [2004]) to limited testimony that defendant declined to make a statement to the arresting officer. Defendant pursued a line of questioning that created misleading impressions about his post-arrest interactions with the police *(see United States v Fairchild,*505 F2d 1378, 1383 [5th Cir 1975]; *see also People v Davis,*61 NY2d 202, 205-207 [1984]). Furthermore, any potential prejudice was prevented by the court’s thorough instruction, which defense counsel drafted, and which the jury is presumed to have followed *(see People v Davis,*58 NY2d 1102, 1104 [1983]). In any event, any error in receiving the challenged testimony was harmless *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Acosta, Renwick, Richter and Gische, JJ.
**AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
The Board of Directors of Voyageur Panel Limited
We have read the Form F-4 Registration Statement of Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd.(the “Company”) dated June 1, 2004 relating to the offering of US $210,000,000of 6.75% senior notes due March 15, 2014 of the Company. We have complied withCanadian generally accepted standards for an auditors’ involvement withoffering documents.
We consent to the use in the above-mentioned Registration Statement of ourreport to the directors of Voyageur Panel Limited on the balance sheets ofVoyageur Panel Limited as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the statements ofearnings (loss), shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years inthe two-year period ended December 31, 2003. Our report is dated April 27,2004.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants
Winnipeg, Canada
Exhibit 11


                        Computation of Per Share Earnings





         The following is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominators of
the basic and diluted EPS computations at June 30, 2001 and July 1, 2000.

                                           June 30,          July 1,
                                             2001             2000
                                         ------------    -------------

Net Income                               $    269,000    $     200,000
                                         ============    =============

Basic Shares                               43,365,488       33,383,963
Convertible Preferred Stock                 2,644,000        3,444,000
Diluted Options and Warrants                5,060,224       17,192,683
                                          -----------     ------------
Diluted Shares                             51,069,712       54,020,646
                                          ===========     ============
Net Income Per Common Share
     Basic                                       0.01             0.01
     Diluted                                     0.01              Nil
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1671 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1671

 To allow additional individuals to enroll in standalone dental plans 
                   offered through Federal Exchanges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 21, 2023

  Mr. Curtis (for himself and Mrs. Dingell) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow additional individuals to enroll in standalone dental plans 
                   offered through Federal Exchanges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Increasing Access to Dental 
Insurance Act''.

SEC. 2. STANDALONE DENTAL PLANS.

    Section 1321 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 
U.S.C. 18041) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Availability of Standalone Dental Plans.--The Secretary may 
not restrict any qualified individual from enrolling in a plan 
described in section 1311(d)(2)(B)(ii) offered through an Exchange 
established pursuant to subsection (c) on the basis of such qualified 
individual not being also enrolled in a qualified health plan offered 
through the Exchange.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2318 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Programs, 

The Asia Foundation for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for 

Related Programs, The Asia Foundation for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED PROGRAMS, THE ASIA FOUNDA5 TION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Related Programs, The Asia Foundation for fiscal 

9 year 2024 may not exceed $17,000,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 15.1


May 11, 1998


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Genentech, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements pertaining to the 1991 Employee Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock 
Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock 
Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1984 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 
1984 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the shares issuable to certain 
convertible subordinated debenture holders, the Genentech, Inc. Tax 
Reduction Investment Plan and in the related prospectuses, as applicable, 
contained in such Registration Statements of our report dated April 9, 1998 
relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial 
statements of Genentech, Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for the 
quarter ended March 31, 1998.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a 
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants 
within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.


                                             Very truly yours,




                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2317 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2317

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Agency for 
 Global Media, Broadcasting Capital Improvements for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Agency for 
 Global Media, Broadcasting Capital Improvements for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US AGENCY FOR GLOBAL 
              MEDIA, BROADCASTING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Agency for Global 
Media, Broadcasting Capital Improvements for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $9,700,000.
                                 <all>
```
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

OP 24-0105 

JEROMY ARCHER, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

ORDER 

MONTANA EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL 

DISTRICT COURT, GALLATIN COUNTY, 

HON. JOHN C. BROWN, Presiding, 

Respondent. 

FILED 

FEB 2 3 2024 

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana 

Petitioner Jeromy Archer seeks a writ of supervisory control over the Montana 

Eighteenth Judicial District Court in Cause No. DR-22-468C to vacate that court's 

December 14, 2023 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order, and Interim Parenting 

Plan. Archer maintains the District Court erred in failing to comply with § 3-5-126, MCA, in 

issuing its findings and conclusions, and it closed this case without issuing a Final Parenting 

Plan. 

Having reviewed the Petition and the challenged Order, this Court deems it appropriate 

to obtain a summary response. Therefore, in accordance with M. R. App. P. 14(7), 

IT IS ORDERED that the Eighteenth Judicial District Court and the named parties in 

Cause No. DR-22-468C are granted to and including March 25, 2024, to prepare, file, and 

serve responses to the petition for writ of supervisory control. 

The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for 

Petitioner, all counsel of record in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court Cause No. DR-22-

468C, and to the Honorable John C. Brown, presiding District Judge. 

DATED this day of February, 2024. 

For the Court, 

By C4 .00,: " ..

Justice 

02/23/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0105
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FELICIA BOONE, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 05-0444-CB-D 

 )

PAULINE PADGETT, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, an Alabama prison inmate proceeding pro se filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. §

1983. This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

72.2, and is now before the Court for plaintiff's failure to prosecute.

The court’s order dated August 26, 2005, granting plaintiff’s motion to proceed without

prepayment of fees (Doc. 7) was returned to the Court with the notation “return to sender” “no longer

here.” Thereupon, the Court contacted the Alabama Department of Corrections and discovered that

plaintiff was released on September 4, 2005 and there was no forwarding address.

Due to plaintiff’s failure to advise the Court of her new address, the Court concludes that

plaintiff has abandoned the prosecution of this action. Upon consideration of the alternatives available

to the Court, it is recommended that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as no other lesser sanction will suffice. Link v. Wabash R. R.,

370 U.S. 626, 630, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962) (interpreting Rule 41(b) not to restrict the

court's inherent authority to dismiss sua sponte an action for lack of prosecution); World Thrust Films,

Inc. v. International Family Entertainment, Inc., 41 F.3d 1454, 1456-57 (11th Cir. 1995); Ballard v.

Case 2:05-cv-00444-CB-D Document 8 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 2
2

Carlson, 882 F.2d 93 (4th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, Ballard v. Volunteers of America, 493 U.S. 1084,

110 S.Ct. 1145, 107 L.Ed.2d 1049 (1990); Mingo v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101,

102 (11th Cir. 1989); Goforth v. Owens, 766 F.2d 1533, 1535 (11th Cir. 1983); Jones v. Graham,

709 F.2d 1457, 1458 (11th Cir. 1983). Accord Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 111 S.Ct.

2123, 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991) (ruling that federal courts' inherent power to manage their own

proceedings authorized the imposition of attorney's fees and related expenses as a sanction; Malautea

v. Suzuki Motor Co., 987 F.2d 1536, 1545-46 (11th Cir. 1993)(finding that the court’s inherent

power to manage actions before it permitted the imposition of fines), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 863, 114

S.Ct. 181, 126 L.Ed.2d 140 (1993).

The attached sheet contains important information regarding objections to the Report and

Recommendation.

DONE and ORDERED this 9

th day of November, 2005.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00444-CB-D Document 8 Filed 11/10/05 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit (32.2) Certification of Periodic Financial Report
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, the undersigned, Paul A. Smith, the chief
financial officer of Imperial Oil Limited (the Company), hereby certifies
that, to his knowledge: (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: August 4, 2004 /s/  Paul A. SmithPaul A. SmithController and Senior Vice-President,
Finance and Administration
(chief financial officer)