alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




AWARD AGREEMENT




          This Award Agreement (“Agreement”) is made as of
                    , 2007 between Centex Corporation,
a Nevada corporation (the “Corporation”), and
                                        

(the “Participant”) under the
stockholder-approved Centex Corporation 2003 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”), and
sets forth the terms, conditions and limitations applicable to an Award to the Participant relative
to fiscal year 2008.




          This Agreement is subject to the Plan (which may be amended from time to time), and the Plan
will govern where there is any inconsistency between the Plan and this Agreement. The provisions
of the Plan are also the provisions of this Agreement, and all terms, provisions and definitions
set forth in the Plan are incorporated into this Agreement and made a part of this Agreement for
all purposes. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Agreement have the meanings
ascribed to such terms in the Plan.




          The maximum cash Award that may be paid to the Participant for fiscal year 2008 is two percent
(2%) of the reported net income of the Corporation and its subsidiaries for such fiscal year.
Attached hereto is a chart that describes the performance goal or goals applicable to this
Agreement and the percentage of the maximum Award to be paid, depending on what level(s) of the
performance goal(s) is or are achieved during fiscal year 2008. The Corporation acknowledges that
the operating results of Centex Corporation and its subsidiaries during fiscal year 2008 are
substantially uncertain, and, accordingly, it is substantially uncertain whether the performance
goal(s) will be satisfied during fiscal year 2008.




          Payment of an Award will be made to the Participant following the conclusion of fiscal year
2008, upon the conditions that the performance goal or goals specified herein have been achieved
and the Compensation and Management Development Committee has reviewed and approved the Award. In
reviewing and approving the Award, the Committee may reduce the Award otherwise computed by
reference to the attached chart taking into account such factors as the Committee shall determine
to be appropriate. No Award will be granted to a Participant who is not employed by the
Corporation on the last day of the fiscal year, unless otherwise specified by the Committee.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	CENTEX CORPORATION	 	PARTICIPANT	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0558 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. QUINCY DEAN PFISTER,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 21 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2024

05/15/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0558
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, royalty-bearing, revocable license to U.S. Patents 7,899,687; 8,510,129; and 8,682,692; issued respectively on March 1, 2011, August 13, 2013 and March 25, 2014, entitled respectively “System and method for handling medical information,” “Medical information handling system and method,” and “Medical information handling method, and foreign patents derived from PCT Application PCT/US03/15071 filed on May 15, 2003, entitled “System and method for handling medical information” to Vista Partners, LLC, with its principal place of business at Hanger 9B2, 7375 South Peoria, Englewood, CO 80112-4157.

# ADDRESSES:

Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, ATTN: Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, MD 21702-5012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For licensing issues, Mr. Barry Datlof, Office of Research & Technology Assessment, (301) 619-0033. For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Anyone wishing to object to grant of this license can file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, within 15 days from the date of this publication. Written objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate (see                     **ADDRESSES**                    ).                

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2014-30457 Filed 12-29-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2586 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to exempt certain noncontiguous 

trade from the coastwise laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2023 

Mr. CASE (for himself and Mr. MOYLAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to exempt certain 

noncontiguous trade from the coastwise laws. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Noncontiguous Ship5 ping Competition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SHIPPING: EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN NONCONTIG7 UOUS TRADE FROM THE COASTWISE LAWS. 

8 Section 55101(b) of title 46, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2586 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or’’ after the 

2 semicolon; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period and 

4 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) carriage on a route in noncontiguous trade 

7 (as that term is defined in section 53501), unless— 

8 ‘‘(A) at least three owners or operators of 

9 coastwise qualified vessels (as that term is de10 fined in section 55108(a)) regularly operate 

11 such a vessel on such route; 

12 ‘‘(B) each of such owners or operators 

13 transports at least 20 percent of the volume of 

14 goods on that route; and 

15 ‘‘(C) none of such owners or operators are 

16 under common ownership.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR PRIMA ENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      26,947,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,279,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,714,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (47,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    548,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,636,000
<PP&E>                                      70,046,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (37,391,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,548,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,123,000
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,408,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,548,000
<SALES>                                      4,243,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,789,000
<CGS>                                        2,458,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,125,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,090,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   575,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,515,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,515,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DELAWARE COUNTY DEMOCRATIC

COMMITTEE AND DAVID LANDAU AND JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE,

Petitioners

v.

DELAWARE COUNTY VOTER

REGISTRATION COMMISSION AND

DELAWARE COUNTY BUREAU OF ELECTIONS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 160 MM 2016

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7 th day of November, 2016

, Petitioners’ Application for Leave to

File Original Process is GRANTED ; Petitioner’s Emergency Application for Relief under

and Pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 726 and Pursuant to the Court’s King’s Bench Powers

to Issue a Writ of Mandamus is DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Team, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip J. Hawk, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/    PHILIP J.
HAWK                              
|Philip J. Hawk
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

October 8, 2010
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Yearly Report of AVVAA World Health Care Products, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
Austin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Charles Austin
----------------------------------
Name:   Charles Austin
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:   September 14, 2004
EXHIBIT
13.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Itzik
Tadmor, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|/s/Itzik Tadmor*            | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Itzik
Tadmor                | 
|Principal
Financial Officer | 
|                            | 
|April
26, 2017              | 



|* | The originally executed copy of this Certification will
be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This
certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 23, 2015. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291: 

                    1.                     *Toby R. Kommer,*                     Fargo, North Dakota; to acquire voting shares of Hatton Bancshares, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The Farmers and Merchants National Bank of Hatton, Hatton, North Dakota.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 5, 2015. 

Michael J. Lewandowski, 

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-00064 Filed 1-7-15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-89053) pertaining to the 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock
Option Plan, the 1996 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, the 1999
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1999 Stock Plan of E-Stamp Corporation,
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-31902) pertaining to the 1999
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1999 Stock Plan of E-Stamp Corporation,
and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-42566) pertaining to the
Infinity Logistics Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan, of our report dated
February 20, 2001, with respect to the financial statements of E-Stamp
Corporation included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 28, 2001
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of Pacer International, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Daniel W.
Avramovich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John J. Hafferty, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Daniel W. Avramovich
|Daniel W. Avramovich    
|Chief Executive Officer 
|February 24, 2011       
|                        
|/s/ John J. Hafferty    
|John J. Hafferty        
|Chief Financial Officer 
|February 24, 2011       

A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacer International, Inc. and will be retained by Pacer International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 5.3

OSLER,          Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
HOSKIN &        Barristers & Solicitors
HARCOURT        Box 50, 1 First Canadian Place, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5X 1B8
                T 416 362 2111 F 416 862 6666 osler.com

                TORONTO   OTTAWA   CALGARY   MONTREAL   NEW YORK



January 27, 2004

TO:             Ontario Securities Commission, as Principal Regulator

AND TO:         British Columbia Securities Commission
                Alberta Securities Commission
                Securities Division, Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission
                The Manitoba Securities Commission
                Commission des valeurs mobilieres du Quebec
                Office of the Administrator, New Brunswick
                Registrar of Securities, Prince Edward Island
                Nova Scotia Securities Commission
                Securities Commission of Newfoundland



Dear Sirs and Mesdames:


RE:      HYDROGENICS CORPORATION

We refer you to the final short form PREP prospectus dated January 27, 2004 (the
"Prospectus") of Hydrogenics Corporation (the "Issuer"). In the Prospectus,
reference is made to this firm on the face page and under the heading "Legal
Matters" and to the opinion of this firm under the heading "Eligibility for
Investment". We hereby consent to being named in the Prospectus and to the use
of our opinion.

We also confirm that we have read the Prospectus and that we have no reason to
believe that there are any misrepresentations as defined in the Securities Act
(Ontario) in the information contained in the Prospectus that is derived from
our opinions referred to above or that is within our knowledge as a result of
the services we performed to render these opinions.



Yours very truly,


"OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP"
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Amie Noelle RUTH, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-10055.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 23, 2006.

Matthew Stegman, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Sacramento, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Daniel J. Broderick, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Amie Noelle Ruth appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following her guilty plea to two counts of theft of mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708. We have jurisdiction pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review for clear error a district court’s factual findings. *See United States v. Kimbrew,*406 F.3d 1149, 1151 (9th Cir. 2005). We review de novo a district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines. *See id.*

Ruth contends that the district court erroneously determined the amount of loss pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1. The record belies this contention. The district court correctly focused its inquiry upon the amount of loss that Ruth intended to inflict upon her victims. *See*U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1. cmt. 3.

Ruth also contends that the district court erred by finding that the total intended loss was over $150,000. This contention lacks merit. The district court’s finding of intended loss was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. *See United States v. Dare,*425 F.3d 634, 642 (9th Cir.2005); *see also United States v. Riley,*143 F.3d 1289, 1292 (9th Cir.1998) (concluding that the district court did not err in calculating the intended loss by using the face amount of false tax refund claims); *see also*U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1. cmt. 3 (providing that the loss need not be determined with precision, but rather a sentencing court need only make a reasonable estimate of the loss, given the available information).

As Ruth never challenged the actual factual allegations within her Presentence Report, the district court properly relied upon them to support its finding. *See United States v. Riley,*335 F.3d 919, 931 (9th Cir.2003). We note that at sentencing, Ruth’s counsel stated that there was no need for an evidentiary hearing concerning loss amounts.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.