alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00260]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration 
Board (Board).

DATES: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of 
the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on January 8, 2015, 
from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090. Submit attendance requests via email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ce98a7bda7baa1bc9cabbfbbabbdba8e888d8fe0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="24724d574d504b5676415551415750646267650a434b52">[email protected]</span></a>. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for further 
information about attendance requests.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. Please send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2c7a455f4558435e7e495d59495f586c6a6f6d024b435a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9af908a908d968bab9c888c9c8a8db9bfbab8d79e968f">[email protected]</span></a> at least 
24 hours before the meeting. In your email include: Name, postal 
address, entity you are representing (if applicable), and telephone 
number. You will receive an email confirmation from us. Please be 
prepared to show a photo identification when you arrive. If you need 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or if you have any questions, 
contact Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration 
Board, at (703) 883-4009. The matters to be considered at the meeting 
are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

<bullet> December 11, 2014

B. Reports

<bullet> Equal Employment Opportunity and Inclusion Update
<bullet> Auditor's Report on FCA FY 2014/2013 Financial Statements

Closed Session*
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    *Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 552b(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

<bullet> Executive Meeting with Auditors

    Dated: January 7, 2015.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-00260 Filed 1-7-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**


**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
        Arthur D. Levinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
        Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
        fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
        of
        Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
        financial condition and results of operations of Genentech,
        Inc.





By:
            /s/ ARTHUR
                  D. LEVINSONName:
              Title:
              Date:
            Arthur
                D. Levinson, Ph.D.
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              August
                2, 2007










I,
        David A. Ebersman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
        Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007
        fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
        of
        Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
        financial condition and results of operations of Genentech,
        Inc.





By:
            /s/ DAVID
                  A. EBERSMANName:
              Title:
              
              Date:
            David
                A. Ebersman
              Executive
                Vice President and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              August
                2, 2007
Exhibit 4.1


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


August 20, 2015


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Sustainable Impact Investing
Trust, Series 3


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Sustainable Impact Investing Trust, Series 3 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on August 19, 2015, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in
the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank
of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-205520)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing
of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO________________


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
#### Chaudhry Ali, Respondent, v Daily Pita Bakeries, Inc., et al., Defendants, Janna Kotsioubenko, Appellant, and Ar Car & Limo Corp. et al., Respondents.

[825 NYS2d 533]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Janna Kotsioubenko appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated October 7, 2005, as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against her.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against her is granted.

On February 28, 2001, the plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle owned by his employer, the defendant Ar Car & Limo Corp., and driven by the defendant Javed Iqbal. The vehicle was proceeding on 86th Street in Brooklyn behind a vehicle driven by the appellant, Janna Kotsioubenko. 86th Street is a two-way street with one parking lane and two driving lanes in each direction separated by double yellow lines.

According to the plaintiff’s testimony at his examination before trial, the appellant attempted to make a U-turn, forcing Iqbal to stop. The plaintiff testified that the vehicle occupied by *331him “never hit” the appellant’s vehicle. After Iqbal came to a complete stop, a vehicle owned by the defendant Daily Pita Bakeries, Inc., and driven by the defendant Ivan Gonzalez collided with the rear of the vehicle occupied by the plaintiff, propelling it into a car parked by the side of the road.

The Supreme Court denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment, finding that “issues of fact exist.” We reverse.

The plaintiffs testimony raises an issue of fact as to whether the appellant was negligent. However, since the plaintiff testified that the vehicle occupied by him successfully stopped and “never hit” the appellant’s vehicle, the appellant’s negligence, if any, was not a proximate cause of the accident *(see Good v Atkins,*17 AD3d 315 [2005]; *Lejkowski v Siedlarz, 2*AD3d 791 [2003]; *Lehmann v Sheaves,*231 AD2d 687 [1996]). Accordingly, the appellant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against her. Miller, J.E, Goldstein, Skelos and Fisher, JJ., concur.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Michelle Gill, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of STARM Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-1 (the "Exchange Act
    periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. as Servicer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
    Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 28, 2008


    /s/ Michelle Gill

    Michelle Gill
    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
EXHIBIT 99
                                                                      ----------

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                              As Adoped Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxly Act Of 2002


 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cadema Corporation (the Company) on

Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the Date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger D. Bensen,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15
          (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company



                                      /s/ Roger D. Bensen
                                     --------------------------------------
                                     Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
                                     Officer and Acting CFO







November 8, 2002
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of China Green Creative, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.     Dated:  April 13, 2010 By: /s/ Ye Xing Zhang Ye Xing Zhang Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Martha StewartLiving Omnimedia, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that:The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Form 10-K”) of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     *Dated: March 7, 2006* */s/ Susan Lyne*     *Susan Lyne*    *President & Chief Executive Officer*       *Dated: March 7, 2006* */s/ James Follo* *James Follo*    *Chief Financial and Administrative Officer*  
1
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------



               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Annual Report of Wellstone  Filters,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Learned J. Hand, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
              operations of the Company



/s/ Learned J.Hand
By: Learned J. Hand
Chief Executive Officer
April 15, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, Michael E. Healy, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ShoreTel, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ShoreTel, Inc.



|                          |  |        |  |                                             
|------------------------- |  | ------ |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 12, 2008 |  | By:    |  | /s/    MICHAEL E. HEALY                     
|                          |  | Name:  |  | Michael E. Healy                            
|                          |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                          |  |        |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.1 Praesumo Fourth Extension Agreement


EXHIBIT 10.1


FOURTH EXTENSION AGREEMENT 
This Fourth Extension Agreement (“Extension Agreement”) is entered into on August 5, 2015 by and between Diamond Resorts Centralized Services Company (the "Company") and Praesumo Partners, LLC ("Independent Contractor"). 
The parties had executed and delivered a Terms of Engagement Agreement for Individual Independent Contractor dated as of June 1, 2009, an Extension Agreement thereto, effective as of June 1, 2010, an Amendment to Extension Agreement dated January 1, 2011, a Second Extension Agreement dated September 12, 2012, which was automatically renewed for a term through August 31, 2014, and a Third Extension Agreement dated August 20, 2014 (collectively, the “Prior Agreement”). The parties now wish to formalize their agreement that the Prior Agreement be extended for an additional one-year period (the “Term”). Any additional extensions of the Term shall require agreement of the parties. Capitalized terms not defined in this Fourth Extension Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Prior Agreement. 
Therefore, the undersigned hereby agree that: 
		
	a)
	The Prior Agreement is hereby extended for an additional one-year term, which shall commence as of September 1, 2015, and shall expire on August 31, 2016. 


		
	b)
	The parties hereby agree that, except as expressly modified pursuant to this Extension Agreement, Prior Agreement remains in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension Agreement has been executed as of the date first written above.


Praesumo Partners, LLC


By: _/s/ Lowell Kraff____________
Name: Lowell Kraff
Title: 




Diamond Resorts Centralized Services Company 


By: /s/ Jared T. Finkelstein_________
Name: Jared T. Finkelstein
Title: SVP, General Counsel and Secretary
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2481 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to include retailers of manufactured 

or modular homes in the definition of mortgage originator, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2023 

Ms. BONAMICI (for herself, Mr. GARCI ́A of Illinois, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. 

HUFFMAN, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. TLAIB, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. CASAR, and Ms. SALINAS) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to include retailers 

of manufactured or modular homes in the definition of 

mortgage originator, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Manufactured 

5 Housing Lending Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2481 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF RETAILERS OF MANUFACTURED OR 

2 MODULAR HOMES IN THE DEFINITION OF 

3 MORTGAGE ORIGINATOR. 

4 Section 103(dd)(2)(C) of the Truth in Lending Act 

5 (15 U.S.C. 1602(dd)(2)(C)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘any person’’ and all that fol7 lows through ‘‘not otherwise’’ and inserting ‘‘any 

8 person who is not otherwise’’; 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and inserting a semicolon; 

10 and 

11 (3) by striking clause (ii). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### State v. Lowe

Case below: 183 N.C. App. - (1 May 2007)

No. 258P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-927)

Denied 08/23/07
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Windwood Presbyterian Church, Inc. v. The Presbyterian Church

(U.S.A.) and Prebytery of New Covenant, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 0

- 00 861

- CV

Tri al court case number: 2008

- 53684

Trial court: 281 st D istrict Court of Harris County

While a motion for rehearing was pending in this case, the Texas Supreme Court issued

an opinion in Masterson v. The Diocese of Northwest Texas , No., 11

- 0332, (Tex. Aug. 30, 2013).

The issues in Masterson are also raised in the present case. Thus, this Court request s

supplemental briefing on rehearing in light of the Masterson opinion. Appellant’s supplemental

brief is due 30 days from the dat e of this order. Appellees supplemental brief is due 30 days

after appellant’s brief is due.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 30, 2013
(October 24, 2013)

#### Robert Banushi, Appellant, v Law Office of Scott W. Epstein et al., Respondents.

[973 NYS2d 198]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered January 18, 2012, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for an order enjoining plaintiff from commencing any further actions or making any motions against them without prior court approval, unless he is represented by counsel, and denied plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Notwithstanding the public policy requiring free access to the courts, the motion court’s order barring plaintiff from initiating further litigation or motion practice against defendants without prior court approval unless he is represented by counsel was justified by plaintiff’s continuous and vexatious litigation against defendants *(Matter of Robert v O’Meara,*28 AD3d 567 [2d Dept 2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 716 [2006]; *Capogrosso v Kansas,*60 AD3d 522 [1st Dept 2009], *cert denied*568 US —, *559133 S Ct 278 [2012]; *see also Melnitzky v Apple Bank for Sav.,*19 AD3d 252, 253 [1st Dept 2005]). Among other things, in addition to the instant action, plaintiff filed a lawsuit in state court and a lawsuit in federal court and a counterclaim in a third suit, as well as a disciplinary complaint, all alleging legal malpractice based on the same sparse allegations, and all unavailing.

Contrary to plaintiff’s contentions, the orde? is not overly broad; it granted the part of defendants’ motion that sought injunctive relief only as to litigation against them.

While defendants, in their appellate brief, request a modification to require court approval even if plaintiff is represented by counsel, and indeed requested such relief from the Supreme Court, we are precluded from granting affirmative relief to a nonappealing party *(see Cox v NAP Constr. Co., Inc.,*40 AD3d 459, 462 [2007], citing *Hecht v City of New York,*60 NY2d 57 [1983]; *Sharp v Stavisky,*221 AD2d 216, 217 [1995]).

The motion court properly denied plaintiffs cross motion to amend the complaint to include additional allegations that defendants produced a forged retainer agreement in connection with their representation of him in the underlying assault case. Plaintiff acknowledged that an attorney-client relationship existed and failed to state how the forged retainer differed from the purportedly valid signed retainer. He further failed to allege the elements of fraud *(see J.A.O. Acquisition Corp. v Stavitsky,*18 AD3d 389 [1st Dept 2005]). Moreover, the motion court correctly held that plaintiffs breach of contract and legal malpractice claims were barred by the applicable statutes of limitations, res judicata, and collateral estoppel, and plaintiffs additional allegations would not alter that determination. Concur — Sweeny, J.P., DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.