alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Carlos EduardoMoraes Calheiros, certify that:

 

1.       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Gafisa S.A.;

 

2.       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

3.       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

 

4.       [Omitted]

 

5.       [Omitted]

 

Date: August 14, 2018
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mauricio GUZMAN-GUZMAN, also known as Mauricio Garcia-Guzman, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50492

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

George W. Aristotelidis, Law Offices of Jorge Aristotelidis, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mauricio Guzman-Guzman (Guzman) pleaded guilty to count 1 of an indictment charging him with conspiracy to transport illegal aliens. The district court deviated from the guideline range by 12 months in sentencing Guzman to a 69-month term of imprisonment and to a three-year period of supervised release. Guzman gave timely notice of his appeal.

Guzman contends that the district court erred in deviating upward from the guideline imprisonment range. *See United States v. Smith,*440 F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir.2006). “A non-Guideline sentence unreasonably fails to reflect the statutory sentencing factors where it (1) does not account for a factor that should have received significant weight, (2) gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or (3) represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors.” *Id.*at 708.

Guzman complains that the district court failed to express the reasons for its sentence in writing, contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c)(2). This contention is not supported by the record. Written reasons were provided and put under seal.

*631Guzman contends that the 12-month deviation created an unwarranted sentencing disparity between Guzman and defendants with similar records who were found guilty of similar conduct. Guzman complains that one of his codefendants, Leonel Guzman-Guzman (Leonel Guzman), was sentenced within the guidelines range. Because Leonel Guzman was not similarly situated, it was reasonable for the district court to sentence Leonel Guzman within the guideline range but to deviate from the Guidelines in sentencing Guzman. *See United States v. Duhon,*440 F.3d 711, 720-21 (5th Cir.2006), *petition for cert, filed*(May 18, 2006).

Guzman also complains that his codefen-dant, Pascual Zapata-Torres (Zapata), had a significantly more serious criminal history category of VI and that Zapata’s behavior was particularly cruel and abusive, but that the district court departed downward in sentencing Zapata because Zapata rendered substantial assistance to the Government. As Guzman concedes, this court has recognized the provision of substantial assistance to the Government as a legitimate reason for distinguishing between defendants. *See Duhon,*440 F.3d at 720-21.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 15.1

 

August 14, 2002

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Genentech, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements pertaining to the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment Plan, the 1999 Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, and the 1991 Employee Stock Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37072) related to the resale of common shares deliverable upon the exchange of Liquid Yield Option Notes, and in the related prospectuses, as applicable, contained in such Registration Statements of our report dated July 9, 2002 (except for the 7th and 9th paragraphs of Note 2, and Note 11, as to which the date is August 12, 2002), relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Genentech, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.

 

  
Very truly yours,
***Exhibit 31.2*****CERTIFICATION**I, Philip Cook, Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officer of Quicksilver Gas Services GP LLC,the general partner of Quicksilver Gas Services LP, the registrant, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Quicksilver Gas Services LP;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: February 27, 2008                           /s/  Philip Cook   Philip Cook   Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the
purpose of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied upon or used
for any other purposes.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Rosemary Mazanet, Acting Chief Executive Officer certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Signed at the City of  Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 23rd
day of January, 2006.

/s/ Rosemary Mazanet
---------------------
Rosemary Mazanet
Acting Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00103]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Hearings of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules 
of Criminal Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Criminal Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following public hearing on proposed amendments to the 
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure has been canceled: Criminal Rules 
Hearing, January 30, 2015, in Nashville, Tennessee. Announcements for 
this meeting were previously published in 79 FR 48250 and 79 FR 72702.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan C. Rose, Secretary and Chief 
Rules Officer, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of 
the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-
1820.

    Dated: January 5, 2015.
Jonathan C. Rose,
Secretary and Chief Rules Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-00103 Filed 1-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2554 

To identify certain roads in the vicinity of Beale Air Force Base, Travis 

Air Force Base, and Sierra Army Depot, California, as defense access 

roads for purposes of the defense access roads project under title 10, 

United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2023 

Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself and Mr. LAMALFA) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To identify certain roads in the vicinity of Beale Air Force 

Base, Travis Air Force Base, and Sierra Army Depot, 

California, as defense access roads for purposes of the 

defense access roads project under title 10, United States 

Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2554 IH

1 SECTION 1. IDENTIFICATION OF CERTAIN ROADS IN VICIN2 ITY OF BEALE AIR FORCE BASE, TRAVIS AIR 

3 FORCE BASE, AND SIERRA ARMY DEPOT, 

4 CALIFORNIA AS DEFENSE ACCESS ROADS. 

5 (a) CERTIFICATION.—For purposes of the defense ac6 cess roads project under section 210 of title 23, United 

7 States Code, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

8 Secretary of Transportation a certification stating that the 

9 roads specified in subsection (b) are important to the na10 tional defense pursuant to such section. 

11 (b) ROADS SPECIFIED.—Such certification shall 

12 apply to the following roads in the vicinity of Beale Air 

13 Force Base, California, Travis Air Force Base, California, 

14 or Sierra Army Depot, California: 

15 (1) With respect to Beale Air Force Base, Cali16 fornia: 

17 (A) Chuck Yeager Road. 

18 (B) North Beale Road. 

19 (C) Spenceville Road, also known as Camp 

20 Beale Highway. 

21 (D) South Beale Road. 

22 (2) With respect to Travis Air Force Base, 

23 California: 

24 (A) Air Base Parkway. 

25 (B) Canon Road. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2554 IH

1 (C) Gate Road, including North Gate 

2 Road. 

3 (D) Petersen Road. 

4 (E) Vanden Road. 

5 (F) Creed Road. 

6 (3) With respect to Sierra Army Depot, Cali7 fornia: 

8 (A) Lassen County Route A25. 

9 (B) Lassen County Route A26. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30644

Conference Calendar

 

CLIFTON RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NEW ORLEANS SEWERAGE AND WATER

BOARD; D.L. HEMLEY, 

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-3033

- - - - - - - - - -

February 20, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clifton Richardson appeals the dismissal of his civil rights

action for failure to state a claim. Richardson contends that

the district court erred: (1) in finding that his complaint

failed to state a federal cause of action, (2) in failing to

accept tape recordings into evidence, and (3) in refusing to

permit him to amend his complaint. We have carefully reviewed

the brief and the record and find that the appeal is frivolous. 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Howard v.

King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 
No. 96-30644

-2-

We caution Richardson that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid

sanctions, Richardson is further cautioned to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous. 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 10.5

                             NEW CENTURY ENERGY CORP.
                           5851 SAN FELIPE, SUITE 775
                              HOUSTON, TEXAS 77057
                     OFFICE 713-266-4344 --  FAX 713-266-4358



                                 October 6, 2006


Mr. Sheridan Westgarde
Aquatic Cellulose International Corporation
Suite #5. 2504 43rd St.
Vernon, British Columbia VlT 6Ll


Dear Mr. Westgarde:

        This letter constitutes a release and relinquishment by the undersigned
to any right to receive any shares of stock in Aquatic Cellulose International
Corporation ("Aquatic"). This includes, but is not limited to a release and
relinquishment of the rights to receive shares of stock in Aquatic granted by
the First Amendment of Purchase and Sale & Exploration Agreement made and
entered into effective January 1, 2005 between Aquatic and New Century Energy
Corp. and Century Resources, Inc.

        This release and relinquishment is for the good and valuable
consideration associated with the assignment by Aquatic to New Century of
Aquatic's interest in the Prado Field, effective October 1, 2006.

                                          NEW CENTURY ENERGY CORP

                                          /s/ Edward R. DeStefano

                                          Title: President




 Acknowledged agreed to and accepted this 6th day of October, 2006.

 Aquatic Cellulose International Corporation


 BY: /s/ Sheridan B. Westgarde
          Sheridan Westgarde
          President
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

October 8, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00245

- CR

Julio Alejandro ZUNIGA, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR0936 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On April 8, 2015, the trial court appointed Richard B. Dulany Jr., as Inter i m Chief Public Defender, to represent Appellant on appeal. On October 2, 2015, Richard B. Dulany Jr. filed a motion to withdraw as appellate counsel and delivered a copy to Appellant by certified mail. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.5

. In the motion, inter alia

, counsel mov es to withdraw

. On October 5, 2015, Michael D. Robbins, Assistant Public Defender in th e Bexar County
Public Defender’s Office

, entered his appearance as lead counsel

. Richard B. Dulany Jr.’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED

.
We DIRECT the clerk of this court to (1) update this court’s records to show Michael D.
Robbins as Appellant’s new attorney of record in this appeal and (2) send a copy of the motion to withdraw and the notice of appearance to Appellant by first class mail. See id. R. 6.1(c), 6.5(b).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of October, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Exhibit 15.1


November 14, 1996


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Genentech, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements pertaining to the 1991 Employee Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock 
Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock 
Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1984 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the 
1984 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the shares issuable to certain 
warrant holders, the shares issuable to certain convertible subordinated 
debenture holders, the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment Plan and in 
the related prospectuses, as applicable, contained in such Registration 
Statements of our report dated October 9, 1996 relating to the unaudited 
condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Genentech, Inc. 
which are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter and nine months ended 
September 30, 1996.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a 
part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants 
within the meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.


                                             Very truly yours,




                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP
#### HON WING POON; et al., Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-72498.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 18, 2006.

Aris Artounians, Law Office of Aris Ar-tounians, Glendale, CA, for Petitioners.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Carol Federi-ghi, Esq., M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Janet A. Bradley, Attorney, DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Hon Wing Poon, a native and citizen of China, and his wife, Yin Loi Ho, a native of Hong Kong and citizen of China, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s denial of their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 481, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d *14738 (1992), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision that petitioners failed to show a well-founded fear of future persecution. Because there is no evidence that petitioners would suffer a threat of future harm in Hong Kong, and the 2002 State Department Report on China and Hong Kong does not show that petitioners would be susceptible to any harm in Hong Kong, petitioners’ asylum claim fails. *See Na-goulko v. INS,*333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir .2003).

Because petitioners failed to establish eligibility for asylum, they necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Fisher v. INS,*79 F.3d 955, 960-61 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s conclusion that petitioners failed to show that it was more likely than not that they will be tortured if returned to China. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 13.1
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) for the purposes of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
  I, Alceu Duilio Calciolari,Chief Executive Officer of Gafisa S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:
  ·
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  ·
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
  Date: July 5, 2012
 
 By:
/s/ Alceu Duilio CalciolariName:
Alceu Duilio CalciolariTitle:
Chief Executive Officer