alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Charles Michael J. and Others, Children Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Zaida M., Appellant; The Children’s Aid Society, Respondents.

[870 NYS2d 310]

Orders, Family Court, Bronx County (Clark V Richardson, J.), entered on or about April 18, 2007, which, upon findings of permanent neglect, terminated respondent’s parental rights, respectively, to Destiny Jess M., Eduardo M., Romeo Cesar J., and Smooth Love J., and committed custody and guardianship of the children to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same *402court and Judge, entered on or about April 18, 2007, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent’s parental rights to Charles Michael J., and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children’s Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the termination of parental rights, the matter remanded for a further dispositional hearing, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The findings of permanent neglect were supported by clear and convincing evidence (Social Services Law § 384-b [7]). Despite the diligent efforts of the agency to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship, which included arranging for frequent visitation with the children, scheduling service plan reviews, medical and educational appointments and meetings, respondent failed to comply with the court’s directives that she visit with the children consistently, attend individual therapy, undergo a psychiatric evaluation, and plan for the return of the children *(see Matter of Tashona Sharmaine*A., 24 AD3d 135 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 715 [2006]).

The finding that termination of respondent’s parental rights is in the best interests of Destiny Jess M., Eduardo M., Romeo Cesar J., and Smooth Love J. is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, which shows that they have been in foster care since 2001 and are either in or have the opportunity to be placed in kinship foster homes where they will be with siblings and maternal aunts *(see e.g. Matter of Ericka Stacey B.,*27 AD3d 245, 246-247 [2006], *lv denied*6 NY3d 715 [2006]). For the eldest child, Charles Michael J., who is not in a kinship foster or preadoptive home, termination would serve no useful purpose, since he is over the age of 14 and must consent to adoption, to which he has repeatedly expressed opposition. A further hearing is necessary to determine whether respondent’s recent progress has continued and whether she is presently able to meet her eldest son’s needs *(see Matter of Miguel Angel Andrew R.,*263 AD2d 354 [1999]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP214
      N. Tryon StreetSte
      3600Charlotte
      NC 28202Telephone
      (704) 344 7500Facsimile
      (704) 344 4100








Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To Board
of Directors and Shareholders


of Bank
of America, National Association:





We have
examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Assessment
Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Compliance
Statement"), that Bank of America, National Association (the "Company") complied
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions
involving commercial mortgage loan transactions that involved an offer or sale
of asset-backed securities that were required to be registered on or after
January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2007 and for the
year then ended, excluding the criteria which the Company has determined are not
applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the
Platform as indicated in Appendix A of the Compliance Statement. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our
examination.





Our
examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not
designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred
prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or
amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this
report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria.




In our
opinion, management's assertion that Bank of America, National Association
complied with the  aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007 for the Platform is fairly stated, in
all material respects.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2381 

To nullify the termination of the Fulbright exchange program with regard 

to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington (for himself, Mr. BEYER, and Ms. CHU) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

A BILL 

To nullify the termination of the Fulbright exchange program 

with regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to 

future exchanges for participants traveling both from 

and to China or Hong Kong, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Fulbright 

5 Exchanges with China and Hong Kong Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2381 IH

1 SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION. 

2 Section 3(i) of Executive Order 13936 (relating to 

3 the termination of the Fulbright exchange program with 

4 regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future 

5 exchanges for participants traveling both from and to 

6 China or Hong Kong) is nullified and shall have no force 

7 or effect, and Fulbright exchanges with China and Hong 

8 Kong shall carry on as if such section had not been in9 cluded in such Executive Order. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

Homecomings Financial, LLC

RAMP Series 2007-RS1 Trust (the Issuing Entity)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Homecomings Financial, LLC, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period from and including March 9, 2007 through and including September 24, 2007 and of the
Servicers performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout such period.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 24th day of March 2008.



|       |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
|Name:  |  | Anthony N. Renzi    
|Title: |  | Managing Director
---



EXHIBIT 15.1



October 31, 2003

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Genentech, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements pertaining to the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment Plan, the 1999 Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, and the 1991 Employee Stock Plan, and the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37072) related to the resale of common shares deliverable upon the exchange of Liquid Yield Option Notes, and in the related Prospectuses, as applicable, contained in such Registration Statements of our report dated October 7, 2003, relating to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Genentech, Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within the meaning of section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.





| |  | Very truly yours,   
| |  | --------------------
| |  | /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      47,168,476
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,989,462
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,200,946
<INVENTORY>                                 35,035,228
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           121,333,877
<PP&E>                                       9,013,290
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,000,119
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             183,742,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,368,444
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    976,755
<COMMON>                                       140,836
<OTHER-SE>                                 160,255,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               161,373,551
<SALES>                                     40,572,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,572,193
<CGS>                                       27,511,144
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,511,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,172,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (783,096)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,161,910
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,127,477
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,034,433
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,034,433
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
#### Eric Stanley, Respondent, v Caddie Service Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

[971 NYS2d 886]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated January 25, 2013, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants met their prima facie burden of showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident *(see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys.,*98 NY2d 345 [2002]; *Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]). The defendants submitted competent medical evidence establishing, prima facie, that the alleged injuries to the plaintiffs left shoulder and to the cervical and lumbar regions of his spine, did not constitute serious injuries under either the permanent consequential limitation of use or significant limitation of use categories of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) *(see Staff v Yshua,*59 AD3d 614 [2009]).

In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether he sustained a serious injury to his left shoulder *(see Perl v Meher,*18 NY3d 208, 218-219 [2011]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Lott and Austin, JJ., concur.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION   Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report
(date of earliest event reported)
August 19, 2004 NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED 
  CANADA
    
    000-30758
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
    
    L6T 5P6(address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code (905) 863-0000.




---



##### 



Item 7.     Financial Statements,Pro FormaFinancial Information and Exhibits (c) Exhibits. 99.1 Press release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on August 19, 2004. Item 12.     Results of Operations and Financial Condition On August 19, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation issued a press release
providing a status update on its financial restatement process and other
related matters. Such press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and
furnished in accordance with Item 12 of Form 8-K. Nortel Networks Corporation owns all of the Registrants common shares and the
Registrant is Nortel Networks Corporations principal direct operating
subsidiary.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:
    /s/ William R. KerrWilliam R. KerrChief Financial OfficerBy:
    /s/ Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant Secretary Dated: August 19, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX 99.1     Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on August 19, 2004.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the month of April 2004 Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc.   Canadian Pacific Tower, Ste
1600, 100 Wellington Street W., Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, Canada   (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.) Form 20-F   o      Form 40-F   x (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.) Yes   o      No   x (If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
82-. This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant:
Form S-8 No.333-13960. Page 1 of 2 Pages
Exhibits Index appears on Page 3




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
                    (Registrant)Date:
    
    April 8, 2004
    
    By
Name:
Title:
    
    /s/ Terence P. Badour
Terence P. Badour
Executive Vice President, Law and Administration
and Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibits Index The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form
6-K. Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibits99.1
    
    Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. Announces Effectiveness Of U.S.
Registration Statement In Connection With Previously Issued Convertible
Senior Notes And Underlying Common Shares
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3592 

To appropriate $160,500,000 for the Department of Veterans Affairs to 

improve security for personal data of veterans and other persons held 

by the Department of Veterans Affairs and to provide remedial assistance 

to veterans and other persons who have had personal data stolen from 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2006 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. OBAMA, and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To appropriate $160,500,000 for the Department of Veterans Affairs to improve security for personal data of 

veterans and other persons held by the Department of 

Veterans Affairs and to provide remedial assistance to 

veterans and other persons who have had personal data 

stolen from the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following sum is appropriated, out of any money 

4 in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the DeVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:41 Jun 29, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3592.IS S3592

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3592 IS 

1 partment of Veterans Affairs for the fiscal year ending 

2 September 30, 2006, namely: 

3 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

4 DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION

5 GENERAL OPERATING EXPENSES

6 For an additional amount for ‘‘General Operating 

7 Expenses’’ for necessary expenses to improve security for 

8 personal data of veterans and other persons held by the 

9 Department of Veterans Affairs and to provide remedial 

10 assistance to veterans and other persons who have had 

11 personal data stolen from the Department of Veterans Af12 fairs, $160,500,000: Provided, That the amount under 

13 this heading shall remain available until expended: Pro14 vided further, That the amount provided under this head15 ing is designated as an emergency requirement pursuant 

16 to section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th Congress), the 

17 concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                            Report of Foreign Issuer

                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                    For the financial year ended May 31, 2003

                             Lorus Therapeutics Inc.
                             -----------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                    2 Meridian Road, Toronto, Ontario M9W 4Z7
                    -----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


             [Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or
          will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.]


                     Form 20-F            Form 40-F    X
                               --------             --------

                [Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by
            furnishing the information contained in this Form is also
          thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
          to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                           Yes            No    X
                               --------      --------

               [If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number
     assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
                                                                      --------

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                          Lorus Therapeutics Inc.


Date: January 29, 2004                    By: "Shane Ellis"
      ----------------                         ----------------
                                               Shane Ellis
                                               Vice President, Legal Affairs
                                               Corporate Secretary
#### In the Matter of Akhtar Ali Sheikh, Appellant, v New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 781]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alexander W Hunter, Jr., J.), entered June 18, 2012, denying the petition to annul the determination of respondent, dated December 29, 2011, which affirmed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge finding petitioner guilty of violating 35 RCNY 54-20 (a) (1) (refusal to take passenger to destination) and 35 RCNY 54-15 (1) (failure to be courteous to passenger) and assessed fines in the amount of $550 and two points against petitioner, and granting respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner did not petition respondent’s Chairperson within 30 days after his administrative appeal was denied *(see*35 RCNY *47168-16 [a] [1]). Accordingly, petitioner failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies, requiring the denial of the petition *(see Matter of Uddin v New York City Taxi & Limousine Commn.,*106 AD3d 557 [1st Dept 2013]). Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Friedman, Sweeny, Moskowitz and Clark, JJ.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00260-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.H., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 360th District Court

of Tarrant County (360-687549-20)

January 27, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker