alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7KH +RQRUDEOH %HUQLFH %RXLH 'RQDOG 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LVWULFW-XGJH IRU WKH :HVWHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 7HQQHVVHH VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,213XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH (/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU)LOH 1DPH DS	

			



1,7('7$7(6 2)0(5,&$	

(//,$//(<	

 !"#$%&'(!
)*'!+	'"'!,*'%*-'.%'$%'(!"'!%),*'%*-'$!)'.-/0"'1!2*)3')")+'(!	.'(!%),*'%*-'$(*"'*)-*))"'*44567"%#	%!'!%(*!$,*'%*-'8.+3!	.")8,#'',*'%*-'8.+3!.9&*''!+:8.#0;;,!-*+!+")+*#!+:8.)!4;<!$%!:	
1")+=
1*%-.*'8.+3!6,1,,*'%*-'8.+3! 
  !))!'(  "0#% 		
	 

,	>1!2*)3')!)'.-/0$% !##!!;
? 

  ,!$!)+")' !##* "##!0 " !"# (!%!)'!)-!$%&'@! "%"'!+*'%*-'-.%'. )(!% #!"$3.*#'0'-("%3!$-) *%*)3''!"#$*%!"%&$%&$!+!%"##0#*-!)!+$*%!"%&+!"#!%*)A*#"'*)$5
	BC")+'(! .9'")'*A!-("%3!$'(!$'$ $*%!"%& $%&"#*-!)!+$*%!"%&+!"#!%*)A*#"'*)$5 
	B4;;D.E*)'(!"'!%) ,*'%*-'$ !)'.-/06 ")+'(! -("%3!$ %!-!* '$'#!)$*%!"%&(* !+*)*)'!%'"'!-&&!%-!*)A*#"'*)$5
	BB4;;DFE")+4;D"ED;E*)'(!	.'(!%),*'%*-'$(*	(!@"!)'!)-!+'"'!%&$'(*%'0!A!)&)'(*)'(!"'!%),*'%*-'$!)'.-/0(!-.%'!)(")-!+(!%9"!$$!)!#!A!#.)+!%
		=B;;D"EDE)'(!!%%)!.-)-#.*)'("')!$'(!$*%!"%&'"/!)*)'(!9.%3#"%0@"") *##!3"# !&*".'&"'*- %*)- "".#' @!" )  $'!%9!*)3!)'!)-!+*)!)'.-/0(!@"'(!%!"$'!%!)'!)-!+*)'(!	.'(!%),*'%*-'$(*''(*%'0&)'(-)-.%%!)'@*'('(! %!A*.!)'!)-!$%&'(!"'!%),*'%*-'$!)'.-/0<!-".!$!2-."9#!!%%%&"+!*)'(!!)(")-!&!)'$'(!!)'!)-! @! A"-"'! (!% !)'!)-! $%& 9'( -.%' ")+%!&")+ '(! -"! ' '(! %! !-'*A! +*'%*-' -.%' $%%!!)'!)-*)3"##!0@"*)A#A!+*)"-) *%"-0@*'('(!%''!"#$*%!"%& $%& 3.) +!"#!% ")+ '%") %' '(! $*%!"%& *)*)'!%'"'!-&&!%-!''(!'*&!$'(!!)'!)-*)3*)9'(+*'%*-'-.%''(!-.%'("+9!!)*)$%&!+90'(! %9"'*)$$*-!")+'(! %!-.'*)'("')!$'(!@!" )'"/!)*)"9.%3#"%0*)!)'.-/0@"")*##!3"#!&*".'&"'*-%*)-"".#'@!" ) %(*9*'!+.)+!%5
	B4;D"EDEDE("' @!" ) @" '(! 9"* $% "##!0 !)'!)-*)3!)(")-!&!)'"'(!+*'%*-'-.%'$.)+'("''(!'(!$'")+!*)$.-(")*##!3"#$*%!"%&@"$%!!!"9#!90'(!&!&9!%$'(!-) *%"-0)" !"#'(!"''%)!0)9'(*+!-)'*).!+'9!#*!A!'("''(!$*%!"%&*)G.!'*)@"*##!3"#  (. '(! *.! 9!-"&! @(!'(!% '(! '(!$' $ '("'$*%!"%&$%&"#*-!)!++!"#!%@"$%!!!"9#!'"##!0
$*'@"$%!!!"9#!'(!)'(!!)(")-!&!)'" #*!+6*$)''(!!)(")-!&!)'+*+)'" #0(!
)*'!+	'"'!(")@-)-!+!+'("'*'@"*)!%%%*)'(* -"! ")+ '(! +!$!)! "--! ' '("' -)-!*)  ##*)-#.+*)3'(!+*'%*-'-.%'")+'(*-.%'%*3*)"##0"-'!+.)+!%'(!&*" %!(!)*)'("''(!$*%!"%&*)G.!'*)@"*##!3"#
)'!"+'(! "%'*!)@-)-!+!'("''(!@!" )*)G.!'*)*"%*)-"#"()*/"A"@!" )@(*-(*)'*##!3"# !% ! 9.' * #!3"# ' 9.0  #)3 " *' @"&").$"-'.%!+ % *& %'!+ 9!$%! '(! 9") "3"*)' .-(@!" )5
	B4;;DAED;E6	
 ; + ;C; D;CCED'( *% 44CE D3%")+$"'(!%%A**) !%&*' !*) $ !&*".'&"'*- @!" )#"@$.##0 !!+)+"'!$!)"-'&!)'$%*&!)'%#-'E(.")0%!$!%!)-!*).% %*% *)*)+!-#"%*)3'("'*' * .)#"@$.# $% " !%) ' '%")$!% % ! " !&*".'&"'*- "".#' @!" ) * A"-"'!+ ' '(! !2'!)' *' **)-)*'!)'@*'('(* *)*)(!%!$%! '(! !)'!)-! *) 9'( -"! "%! A"-"'!+ ")+'(!!-"!"%!%!&")+!+''(!%! !-'*A!+*'%*-'-.%'$%%!!)'!)-*)3-)*'!)'@*'('(* *)*)
#### Assiongbon Jonas FOLIVI; Alum Folivi-Anthony; Daniele Ayele Folivi; Marthe Williams A. Folivi, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-1531.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 14, 2007.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2007.

Peter Nyoh, Peter Nyoh & Associates, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioners. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Susan K. Houser, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jason Xavier Hamilton, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Assiongbon Jonas Folivi, a native and citizen of Togo, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review.

We review the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2007); *INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); *Nibagwire v. Gonzales,*450 F.3d 153, 156 (4th Cir.2006). A denial of a motion to reopen must be reviewed with extreme deference, since immigration statutes do not contemplate reopening and the applicable regulations disfavor motions to reopen. *M.A. v. INS,*899 F.2d 304, 308 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc). In explaining the degree of deference given to the agency’s discretionary review, this court has observed that the decision to deny a motion to reopen “need only be reasoned, not convincing.” *Id.*at 310 (quotation marks and citation omitted). We will reverse a denial of a motion to reopen only if the denial is “arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to law.” *Barry v. Gonzales,*445 F.3d 741, 745 (4th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1147, 166 L.Ed.2d 997 (2007).

We find the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*

*

 We note Folivi has not challenged the Board’s decision not to allow him to file a successive asylum application. "It is a well settled rule that contentions not raised in the argument section of the opening brief are abandoned.” *United States v. Al-Hamdi,*356 F.3d 564, 571 n. 8 (4th Cir.2004).
ex10_1.htm


     

     


    EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    AMENDMENT
      TO ANADIGICS, INC.

    AMENDED
      AND RESTATED

    2005
      LONG
      TERM INCENTIVE AND SHARE AWARD PLAN

    


    


    Section
      4(a) of the Anadigics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Long Term Incentive and
      Share Award Plan is amended, effective May 17, 2007, to replace the first
      sentence thereof in its entirety with the following:

     

    "Subject
      to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) hereof, (i) the total number of Shares
      reserved for issuance in connection with Awards under the Plan shall be
      6,450,000, and (ii) the total number of Shares reserved for issuance in
      connection with Awards other than Options (i.e., SARs, Restricted Share,
      Restricted Unit, Performance Share, Performance Unit, Dividend Equivalents
      and
      Other Share-Based Awards) shall be 6,150,000."
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Board of Directors and Stockholders 

E-centives, Inc. 

Bethesda, MD 

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-69276 and 333-58244) of E-centives, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2005, except for Note 16(c) which is asof March 29, 2005, relating to the financial statements which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. 

 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Bethesda, MD 

March 29, 2005
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of MASS Petroleum Inc., (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vitaly Melnikov,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By: /s/ Vitaly
Melnikov


Vitaly
Melnikov


Chief Financial
Officer, Principal Accounting Officer


March 17,
2009
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

The State, Respondent,

v.

Daniel Demond Griffin, Petitioner.

Appellate Case No. 2015-001839

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal From Greenwood County Thomas L. Hughston, Jr ., Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 27635 Submitted April 19, 2016 – Filed May 11, 2016

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, and Assistant Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiora ri to review the Court of Appeals' decision in State v. Griffin , 413 S.C. 258, 776 S.E.2d 87 (Ct. App. 2015).We grant the petition, dispense with furt her briefing, and a ffirm the Court of Appeals' decision as modified.

After the start of trial, Petitioner moved to dismiss the case on the grounds that the deputies involved in hi s arrest and detainment were not duly qualified pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. §§ 23-13-10 and -20 (2007), because: (1) they were not properly bonded; (2) their oaths of office were not properly evidenced by a certificate signed by the sheriff until after Petitioner's arrest; and (3) the certificates acknowledging their appointment s and oaths were not properly authenticated in the public record. The motion was denied.

The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial co urt's ruling, finding the deputies could be considered "de facto deputies despite thei r failure to comply with all of the requirements of sections 23-13-10 and 23- 13-20," because they: (1) were employed with the sheriff's office for a significant am ount of time; (2) stated at trial they
were bonded and had taken an oath to ever y sheriff for whom they had worked; (3) performed duties consistent with their appointments as deputies; and (4) were identifiable to Petitioner as deputy sher iffs who had the authority to act.

However, we find such an an alysis unnecessary, as it is well established that "the illegality of an initial arrest [does] not bar the accused person's subsequent prosecution and conviction of the offense charged." State v. Biehl , 271 S.C. 201, 246 S.E.2d 859 (1978); see also Frisbie v. Collins , 342 U.S. 519 (1952); State v. Holliday , 255 S.C. 142, 177 S.E.2d 541 (1970); 5 Am. Jur. 2d Arrest § 129 (2016) ("The illegality of an arrest does not preclude trial of the accused for the offense.").
Petitioner asked for his case to be dismi ssed with prejudice, a remedy that runs contrary to the established law of South Car olina. Therefore, the trial court did not err in denying Petitioner's motion to dismiss, regardless of whether the underlying arrest was unlawful or committed lawfully by de facto sheriff's deputies.

Accordingly, we vacate the Court of App eals' analysis, but affirm on the grounds
set forth above.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is hereby

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTRED GE, HEARN and FEW, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Deer Consumer Products,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ying
He, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d));
and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
              /s/ Ying HeDate:
      March 2, 2010
              
              Ying
      He
                Chief
      Executive Officer





This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard B. Shortell, Appellant.

[962 NYS2d 785]

Lahtinen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lawliss, J.), rendered June 13, 2011 in Clinton County, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of criminal contempt in the second degree.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of the misdemeanor of criminal contempt in the second degree for his alleged intentional violation, in February 2011, of a two-year order of protection that had been issued under CPL 530.13 in October 2010. His CPL 330.30 motion to set aside the verdict was denied, and he was sentenced to one year in jail. Defendant appeals arguing that the provision of the October 2010 order of protection he was alleged to have violated directed him to stay away from a place—not a person—and, thus, was not a lawful mandate.

We affirm. Orders of protection for victims and certain witnesses may include a condition that a defendant “stay away from the home, school, business or place of employment” of such individuals (CPL 530.13 [1] [a]). Coming within the proscribed distance of such a place that is included in the order of protection can constitute a violation of the order even if the victim or witness for whom the order was issued is not present there at that time *(see People v Clisby,*82 AD3d 1288, 1288 [2011]; *see also People v Nuffer,*70 AD3d 1299, 1300 [2010]; *People v Dewall,*15 AD3d 498, 501 [2005], *lv denied 5*NY3d 787*1079[2005]). Here, the record, while somewhat sparse, reflects that the October 2010 order was issued with the consent of defendant as part of a plea bargain. Among other things, the order directed defendant to stay 1,000 feet away from three individuals and an apartment complex. Although the order did not specifically recite that the individuals resided at that apartment complex, the record establishes that they resided there and defendant was aware of such fact. Under the circumstances, we find defendant’s argument unavailing.

Peters, EJ., McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ, concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
No. 07-14-00423-CR

Terry Fielder

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

Appellee §

§

§

§ From the 361st District Court

of Brazos County

October 13, 2015

Opinion by Justice Pirtle

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated October 13, 2015

, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, Dr. Amnon Gonenne, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of MabCure, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
      annual period ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                    



|By:    | /s/ Dr. Amnon Gonenne                                 | 
|------ | ----------------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Dr. Amnon Gonenne                                     | 
|Title: | President, Chief Executive
      Officer and Director | 
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                         | 
|Date:  | April 15, 2011                                        | 



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 4.3

March 15, 2004

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re: Brookfield Homes Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Brookfield Homes
Corporation (the Registrant) has not filed herewith any instrument with
respect to long-term debt not being registered where the total number of
securities authorized thereunder does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total
assets of the Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The
Registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such agreement to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

Sincerely,

BROOKFIELD HOMES CORPORATION



/s/ IAN G. COCKWELL
Ian G. Cockwell
President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



---

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, DC 20549

Form 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE
ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of January 2004

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc.(Translation of Registrants Name Into English)

Canadian Pacific Tower, Ste 1600, 100 Wellington Street W., Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, Canada
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)

|           |  |           
|---------- |  | ----------
|Form 20-Fo |  | Form 40-Fþ

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.)

|     |  |    
|---- |  | ---
|Yeso |  | Noþ

(If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-.

This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant: Form S-8 No. 333-13960.



---

---

Page 1 of 2 Pages
Exhibits Index appears on Page 3





---



##### 



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|      |  |                  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                              
|----- |  | ---------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                  |  |     |  | FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
                         (Registrant)                                                                         
|     
|     
|Date: |  | January 28, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Terence P. BadourName:  Terence P. Badour
Title:    Executive Vice President, Law and Administration
             and Corporate Secretary





---



##### 



Exhibits Index

The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form 6-K.

|            |  |                                                                                
|----------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description of Exhibits                                                        
|            |  |                                                                                
|99.1        |  | Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter And
Year-End 2003 Results
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>        5


<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                        12,228
<SECURITIES>                               1,509,928
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              14,128
<PP&E>                                         2,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                   332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,525,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         25,776
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                1,309,928
<COMMON>                                      26,850
<OTHER-SE>                                   166,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,525,938
<SALES>                                        4,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,168
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 16,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (11,157)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (11,157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (11,157)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.004)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
      "Report"), I, Anthony W. Adler, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Anthony W. Adler


Anthony
      W. Adler


Principal
      Financial Officer


Date:
      September 22, 2008