alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Ashley M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 748]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Spodek, J.), entered June 1, 2005, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court (O’Donoghue, J.) entered April 15, 2005 finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult would have constituted the crimes of assault in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 120.05 (3), assault in the third degree pursuant to Penal Law § 120.00 (1), obstruction of governmental administration in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 195.05, resisting arrest pursuant to Penal Law § 205.30, and theft of services pursuant to Penal Law § 165.15 (3), adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent, and conditionally discharged her for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated April 15, 2005.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the appellant’s contentions, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(cf. People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]; *Matter of Jamal C.,*186 AD2d 562 [1992]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, the “physical injury” element of the crimes of assault in the second degree and assault in the third *613degree *(see*Penal Law § 120.05 [3]; § 120.00 [1]). “[P]hysical injury” is defined as “impairment of physical condition” or “substantial pain” *(see*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]). The complainant’s testimony established that he was punched in the face, which caused him to bite down and sustain a half-inch laceration to his tongue resulting in swelling and “stinging pain” which the emergency room record denominated as pain level “5.” In addition, he incurred a contusion of the left thumb which remained painful and swollen with a restricted range of motion for several days. This evidence was sufficient to support the determination that the complainant sustained a “physical injury” within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9) *(see People v Ellis,*8 AD3d 826, 828-829 [2004]; *People v Berry,*273 AD2d 120, 121 [2000]; *Matter of Tyrone T.,*233 AD2d 451 [1996]; *People v Pacheco,*204 AD2d 577, 578 [1994]; *Matter of Jason J.,*187 AD2d 652, 653 [1992]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P, Adams, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement, J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

May 4, 2018

t0419 

# Order

Clerk May 4, 2018

153828 (80)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153 828 COA: 324018 Wayne CC: 14-000152-FC THEODORE PAUL WAFER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 9, 2018 order is considered, and it appearing to this Court that t he case of People v Davis (Docket No. 156406) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present motion for reco nsideration, we ORDER that the motion for reconsidera tion be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that

case.
From: The District Court of the 2nd Judicial District. County of Silver Bow.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. MARTIN ROBINSON, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-07-142 DECISION

On August 8, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to twenty (20) years in the Montana State Prison, with five (5) years suspended, for the offense of Aggravated Assault, a felony.

On February 12,2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Walter Hennessey. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review *12Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 12th day of February, 2009.

DATED this 27th day of February, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.
Sally Bruce, Quality System Task Force Chair

Claire Saundry, President, SIM

APROBACIÓN DEL SISTEMA DE 

GESTIÓN DE LA CALIDAD

APPROVAL OF 

QUALITY MANAGEMENT 

SYSTEM 

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) - USA

Mass and Related Quantities: Hardness

The Quality Management System supporting measurement 

services, as defined in a motion of the Quality System Task 

Force (QSTF), has been reviewed and found to be in 

conformance with the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025:2017 

and ISO 17034 under the mandate of the Inter-American 

Metrology System in support of the expectations of the CIPM

Mutual Recognition Arrangement.

El Sistema de Gestión de Calidad en que se apoyan los servicios 

de medición, según se define en una moción del Grupo de 

Trabajo del Sistema de Calidad (QSTF), ha sido revisado y se 

ha determinado que cumple con los requisitos de ISO/IEC 

17025:2017 y ISO 17034 bajo mandato del Sistema 

Interamericano de Metrología en apoyo de las expectativas del 

Acuerdo de Reconocimiento Mutuo del CIPM.

Approval date: 21 April 2022

Expiration date: 21 April 2027

Sally Bruce, Quality System Task Force Chair
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION
No
. 04 -0 8- 00 81 9- CR L awr ence GA LLARDO , Appellant
v. The STA TE of

Te xas , Appellee F ro m th e Cou nty

Court a t L a w N o. 2, B e xar

County , T e xas Trial Court No. 266939 Honora ble Fr ed Shannon , J udg e Presiding PER CU RI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini , J ustice

Sandee B ry an Mar ion , J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin , J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Dec ember 23, 2008 DI SMI SSED Th e Court

ha s b e fo re it L a wr e nc e Ga lla rd o’ s mot ion to wi thd

ra w his a pp e a l. T he mot ion

is sig ne d b y bo th G a lla

rd o a nd his a tto rn e y

of re c or d. Th e mo ti on is g ra nte d a nd thi s a pp e a l is dismiss ed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.2(a)
. PER CU RI AM DO NOT PUBL I SH
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2506 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2506

 To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to exempt off-exchange secondary 
  trading from State regulation where such trading is with respect to 
 securities of an issuer that makes publicly available certain current 
                  information, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2023

  Mr. Meuser introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Securities Act of 1933 to exempt off-exchange secondary 
  trading from State regulation where such trading is with respect to 
 securities of an issuer that makes publicly available certain current 
                  information, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring the Secondary Trading 
Market Act''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM STATE REGULATION.

    Section 18(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77r(b)(4)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) shall directly or indirectly prohibit, limit, or 
        impose any conditions upon the off-exchange secondary trading 
        in securities of an issuer that makes current information 
        publicly available, including--
                    ``(A) the information required in the periodic and 
                current reports described under paragraph (b) of 
                section 230.257 of title 17, Code of Federal 
                Regulations; or
                    ``(B) the documents and information specified in 
                paragraph (b) of section 15c2-11 of title 17, Code of 
                Federal Regulations.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

p1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143602

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 14 3602 COA: 296055 Antrim CC: 09-004275-FC JOHN JASON HAMMOND, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

cases of People v Pullen (Docket No. 142751) and People v Watkins (Docket No. 142031) are pending on appeal before this C ourt and that the decisions in those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for le ave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
664 A.2d 938

#### IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD C. CURCIO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

October 5, 1995.

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court on May 31, 1995, recommending the disbarment of EDWARD C. CURCIO of BERLIN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1978, and who was thereafter temporarily suspended *477from practice by Order of this Court dated May 27,1992, and who remains suspended at this time;

And the recommendation of disbarment being based on respondent’s conviction of one count of racketeering (18 *U.S.C.A*1962(c)); one count of conspiracy (18 *U.S.C.A*1962(d)); and four counts of mail fraud (18 *U.S.C.A*134.1);

And the Court having heard the arguments of counsel;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and EDWARD C. CUR-CIO is hereby disbarred, effective as of the filing date of this Order; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that EDWARD C. CURCIO be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by EDWARD C. CURCIO, pursuant to *Rule*1:21-6, which were restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court by Order dated May 27, 1992, for good cause shown, shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that EDWARD C. CURCIO comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that EDWARD C. CURCIO reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs.
petition for a writ of habeas corpus and releasing Bueno from the

conditions of lifetime supervision.' Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.

Pickering J.


### cc/LA Parraguirre

Saitta cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Turco & Draskovich Eighth District Court Clerk
'We note that the district court did not provide findings of fact or conclusions of law in its order. To the extent that the district court granted relief to Bueno under NRS 176.0931(3), the district court did not have the authority to do this, as Bueno did not meet the statutory requirements for release from his lifetime supervision sentence.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2256 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Buildings 

and Facilities for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health 

Inspection Service Buildings and Facilities for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2256 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ANIMAL 

3 AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE 

4 BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant 

9 Health Inspection Service Buildings and Facilities for fis10 cal year 2024 may not exceed $3,175,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### State v. Montgomery

Case below: 183 N.C. App. - (1 May 2007)

No. 245P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. : (COA06-956) 7A-31

Denied 06/27/07
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For November 25, 2004 EXTENDICARE INC. (Translation of registrants name into English)
 3000 Steeles Avenue East
Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9W2 (Address of principal executive offices)
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F     o
    
    Form 40-F     þ
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934. Yes     o
    
    No     þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    News Release dated November 25, 2004  Extendicare Inc. Announces Normal Course Issuer Bid




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. EXTENDICARE INC.Date: November 25, 2004
    By:
    /s/ RICHARD L. BERTRANDRichard L. BertrandSenior Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer
|   | (1) | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  November 12, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Thomas J. Meaney                                                                    |   |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   |                                                                                         |   |
|                         |   | Thomas J. MeaneyPresident (Principal ExecutiveOfficer and Principal  Financial Officer) |   |
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KONSTANTIN GEORGIYEVICH 

BULDAKOV,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72921

Agency No. A098-762-951

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted June 4, 2014

Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and ROTHSTEIN, Senior 

District Judge.**

 

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except 

as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The Honorable Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, Senior District Judge for the U.S. 

District Court for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation.

FILED

JULY 1 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Konstantin Buldakov, a native and citizen of Russia, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen 

removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for 

abuse of discretion the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen. Bhasin v. Gonzales, 423 

F.3d 977, 983 (9th Cir. 2005). Buldakov’s petition is denied on the ground that 

Buldakov has failed to establish changed circumstances that would exempt his 

motion from the applicable time limitation.

The parties are familiar with the facts, as set forth in the BIA’s decision, so we 

need not review them here. Section 240(c)(7)(C)(i) of the Immigration and 

Nationality Act (“Act”), 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), requires that motions to 

reopen be filed within 90 days of the final administrative order of removal. 

Buldakov filed his motion to reopen outside the 90-day window. 

Along with his motion to reopen, Buldakov filed an asylum application 

seeking an exemption from the 90-day limitation. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii) 

specifies that there is no time limit for asylum-seekers moving to reopen if the 

asylum-seeker can show “changed country conditions” through material evidence 

that was unavailable at the previous proceeding. 

We conclude that based on the evidence before it the BIA did not abuse its 

discretion when it concluded that Buldakov failed to establish changed conditions in 
Russia. Because Buldakov could not take advantage of the exemption to the 90-day 

limit, the BIA denied his motion to reopen as untimely. We agree and affirm.

PETITION DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 99.5
Certificate Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) I, M. Jerry Patava, Chief Financial Officer of Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 6-K of Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc.
(the registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




---



##### 



(a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting. Date: November 4, 2004. /s/ M. J. PatavaName:
    M. Jerry PatavaTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer