alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.8.3


    
      

    


    Exhibit
      4.8.3

    AMENDMENT
      NO. 2

    TO
      THE

    GULFMARK
      OFFSHORE, INC.

    1997
      INCENTIVE EQUITY PLAN

    


    


    Pursuant
      to the terms and provisions of Article 6 of the GulfMark Offshore, Inc. 1997
      Incentive Equity Plan (the "Plan"), GulfMark Offshore, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the "Company"), hereby adopts the following Amendment No. 2 to
      the
      Plan (the "Amendment No. 2").

    


    1.

    


    Subsection
      (a)(i) of Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety by
      substituting the following therefor:

    


    
      	 	
              (a)

            	
              (i)

            	
              Subject
                to the following provisions of this Section 4.2, the maximum number
                of
                shares of Stock that may be delivered to Participants and their
                beneficiaries under the Plan shall be 600,000 shares of
                Stock.

            


    

    


    2.

    


    Subsection
      (b)(i) of Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety by
      substituting the following therefor:

    


    
      	 	
              (b)

            	
              (i)

            	
              The
                maximum number of shares of Stock that may be issued upon exercise
                of
                Options intended to be Incentive Stock Options shall be the maximum
                number
                of shares of Stock that may be delivered under the Plan, from time
                to
                time.

            


    

    


    3.

    


    Each
      amendment made by this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan has been effected in
      conformity with the provisions of the Plan. This Amendment No. 2 was adopted
      by
      the Board of Directors of the Company on February 27, 2002 and approved by
      the
      stockholders of the Company on May 2, 2002.

    


    


    4.

    


    At
      the
      time of the adoption of this Amendment No. 2 to the Plan, 9,924,137 shares
      of
      the Company's common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding and
      entitled to vote, 9,321,465 shares were represented in person or by proxy,
      of
      which 9,091,615 shares were voted for this Amendment No.2, 81,834 shares were
      voted against this Amendment No. 2, and 148,016 shares abstained from
      voting.

    


    5.

    


    Capitalized
      terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to such terms
      in
      the Plan.

    


    


    Dated:
      May 24, 2002

    


    
      	 	
              GulfMark
                Offshore, Inc.

            
	 	 	 
	 	
              By:

            	
              /s/
                Edward A. Guthrie

            
	 	 	
              Executive
                Vice President, Finance

            


    

    



    
      
         

      

      
        1
EXHIBIT 31.2

                           STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Geoffrey P. Talbot, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 of Statmon Technologies Corp., Inc.

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 14, 2005

       /s/ Geoffrey P. Talbot
    ----------------------------
         GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
      Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Building Control, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Chris
Sharng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

This Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Chris Sharng

Chris Sharng
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
Trust Agreement


    

      SUSTUT
        EXPLORATION, INC.

       

      1420
        5TH
        AVENUE #220 

       

      SEATTLE,
        WASHINGTON 98101 

       

       

       

      TRUST
        AGREEMENT

       

       

      May
        6,
        2006

       

       

      In
        accordance with the instructions of the Board of Directors of the Corporation
        I,
        Terry Hughes, President will hold the Willow Claim as described in Appendix
        A
        attached to this TRUST AGREEMENT IN Trust for the CORPORATION as President
        of
        the CORPORATION. If I resign from position of President than I will immediately
        transfer the Willow Claim to the new President of the CORPORATION.

       

       

      Terry
        Hughes, President

       

      Free
        Miner License Number: ___________________

       

       

       

       

       

       

      



      
        
           

        

        
           

          
            

          

        

        
           

        

      


      


       

       

       

       

       

       

      APPENDIX
        “A”

       

       

      WILLOW
        Claim Description

      Omineca
        Mining Division

       

      UTM
        Zone
        9

       

      Map
        Sheet
        94D/10E

       

      Centered
        Approximately

      Latitude
        56° 33’ N

      Longitude
        126° 35’ W 

       

       

      


      


      The
        following claim comprise the Willow mineral claim group as described in the
        Trust Agreement dated May 6, 2006:

       

      
        	
                Claim
                  Name

              	
                Claim
                  Size (Ha)

              	
                Record
                  #

              	
                Expiry
                  Date

              	
                Map
                  Sheet

              
	
                Willow

              	
                445.70

              	
                530309

              	
                December
                  13, 1997

              	
                94D/10E
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 5 8 9 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN,

Defendant and Appellant .

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 16, 2022 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 7 2022

02/07/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0589
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Piedmont Community Bank Group, Inc. (the Company) for the year
ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the FDIC on the date hereof (the Report), Robert D. Hulsey, Jr. , President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Julie Simmons, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Robert D. Hulsey, Jr.Robert D. Hulsey, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2007/s/ Julie SimmonsJulie SimmonsChief Financial/Accounting OfficerMarch 30, 2007


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



45
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Anthony W. Adler, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  September 19, 2012





/s/ Anthony W. AdlerAnthony W. AdlerPrincipal Financial Officer
#### Richard ARIZPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary E. PETERS, Secretary, United States Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration; Cari M. Dominguez, Chairwoman, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-50819

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 2007.

Richard Arizpe, San Antonio, TX, pro se.

Robert Keith Shaw-Meadow, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Richard Arizpe sued under title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. As the magistrate judge stated,

> [Plaintiff] is obviously upset with the circumstances surrounding his employment with defendant, as evidenced by the lawsuits he filed in 1998 and 2002 against the Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration [footnote omitted]. Plaintiffs conclusory allegations and legal conclusions masquerading as factual conclusions, however, cannot suffice to prevent defendant’s motion to dismiss in this case.

After reviewing the briefs and pertinent parts of the x-ecord and the applicable law, we affirm, essentially for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge in her comprehensive Report and Recommendation signed on January 12, 2007. We also conclude that Arizpe’s argument that the district court’s ruling is legally invalid because it listed Maria Ciño as Acting Secretary of Transpoi’tation, rather than Mary Peters as Secretary of Transpoi’tation, is frivolous. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(d) (“[A]ny misnomer not affecting the parties’ substantial rights must be disregarded.”). Arizpe’s other arguments are equally unavailing.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Michael John BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-7402.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2007.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2007.

Michael John Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael John Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition without prejudice because he failed to comply with the court’s order to pay the required filing fee. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report
(date of earliest event reported)
June 29, 2004 Nortel Networks Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 CANADA
    
    001-07260
    
    not applicable(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
    
    L6T 5P6(Address
of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code (905) 863-0000.




---



##### 



Item 5.    Other Events On June 29, 2004, the Registrant issued the press release attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1, and such press release is incorporated by reference herein (other
than information included on or linked from the Registrants website,
referenced in such release, which is not incorporated by reference into this
report). Item 7.     Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits (c) Exhibits. 99.1 Press Release issued by the Registrant on June 29, 2004. Item 12.    Results
of Operations and Financial Condition On June 29, 2004, the
Registrant issued a press release providing a status update on its
financial restatement process and other related matters. Such press
release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and furnished in
accordance with Item 12 of Form 8-K.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Nicholas J. DeRomaNicholas J. DeRomaChief Legal OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Blair F. MorrisonBlair F. MorrisonAssistant Secretary
 Dated: June 29, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX 99.1    Press Release issued by the Registrant on June 29, 2004
#### In re: CAO HUU TRAN, Debtor Cao Huu Tran, Appellant, v. Harrah’s Operating Company, Inc.; Harvey’s Tahoe Management Company; Lawrence Loheit; and The Golden 1 Credit Union, Appellees.

No. 06-16696.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 15, 2008.

Filed May 23, 2008.

Anthony J. Palik, Esq., Placerville, CA, for Appellant.

Robert G. Aisenstein, Esq., Henderson, NV, Roxanne T. Daneri, Esq., Sacramento, CA, for Appellees.

Lawrence J. Loheit, Sacramento, CA, pro se.

Before: B. FLETCHER and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and DUFFY *, District Judge.

*

 The Honorable Kevin Thomas Duffy, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Cao Huu Tran appeals the ruling of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit affirming the ruling of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California sustaining objections by the Chapter 18 Trustee and certain creditors to confirmation of Appellant’s third amended Chapter 13 plan and dismissing Appellant’s Chapter 13 case.

Appellant incurred large gambling debts over the several months prior to filing his Chapter 13 petition, and admitted to gambling at least once after filing his petition. He also borrowed large sums of money from family members to repay other gambling debts. At the time he filed his Chapter 13 petition, Appellant owed just under $150,000 to casinos and family members, all gambling-related debt. The bankruptcy court identified Appellant’s admitted gambling problem as the major obstacle to confirmation of the plan.

The bankruptcy court denied confirmation of Tran’s third amended Chapter 13 plan and ultimately dismissed Tran’s case because, though Tran was given several opportunities to prove that his gambling problem would not render his plan infeasible, and though he was given additional time in which to do so, Tran failed to submit a confirmable plan. Under these circumstances, the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying confir*568mation and dismissing the case. *See*11 U.S.C. § 1307(c).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00187]



[[Page 1404]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-748-000]


Garrison Energy Center LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Garrison Energy Center LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is January 22, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#793f3c2b3a36171510171c2a0c0909160b0d391f1c0b1a571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1f7f4e3f2fedfddd8dfd4e2c4c1c1dec3c5f1d7d4c3d29fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 2, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00187 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>