##### Table of Contents





UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549





FORM 10-K

(Mark One)



|þ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commission File Number: 001-33380





PHARMERICA
CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 87-0792558                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|                                                               | 
|1901 Campus Place Louisville, KY                               |  | 40299                               
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                          

(502) 627-7000

(Registrants telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



|                             |  |                                     
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Title of each class          |  | Name of exchange on which registered
|Common stock $0.01 par value |  | New York Stock Exchange             

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

N/A

(Title
of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities Act.    Yes   ̈    No  þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.    Yes   ̈    No  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.    Yes  þ    No   ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).    Yes   ̈    No   ̈

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



|                                                                       |  |                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Large accelerated filer   ̈                                             |  | Accelerated filer  þ        
|Non-accelerated filer   ̈ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |  | Smaller reporting company   ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).    Yes   ̈    No  þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2009 was
$590,930,429.



|                              |  |                                
|----------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Class of Common Stock         |  | Outstanding at January 29, 2010
|Common stock, $0.01 par value |  | 30,621,615 Shares              

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates certain information by reference from registrants definitive proxy statement for the 2010
annual meeting of stockholders, which proxy statement will be filed no later than 120 days after the close of the registrants fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.









---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

FORM 10-K

INDEX



|         |  |                                                                                                               |  |     
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|         |  |                                                                                                               |  | Page
|Part I   |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 1.  |  | Business                                                                                                      |  | 3   
|Item 1A. |  | Risk Factors                                                                                                  |  | 23  
|Item 1B. |  | Unresolved Staff Comments                                                                                     |  | 35  
|Item 2.  |  | Properties                                                                                                    |  | 36  
|Item 3.  |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                             |  | 36  
|Item 4.  |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                           |  | 36  
|         | 
|Part II  |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 5.  |  | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder 
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |  | 37  
|Item 6.  |  | Selected Financial Data                                                                                       |  | 40  
|Item 7.  |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                         |  | 43  
|Item 7A. |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                                    |  | 88  
|Item 8.  |  | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data                                                                   |  | F-1 
|Item 9.  |  | Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure                          |  | 89  
|Item 9A. |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                       |  | 89  
|Item 9B. |  | Other Information                                                                                             |  | 90  
|         | 
|Part III |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 10. |  | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance                                                        |  | 91  
|Item 11. |  | Executive Compensation                                                                                        |  | 91  
|Item 12. |  | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters                |  | 91  
|Item 13. |  | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence                                     |  | 91  
|Item 14. |  | Principal Accountant Fees and Services                                                                        |  | 91  
|         | 
|Part IV  |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 15. |  | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules                                                                       |  | 92  



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

PharMerica Corporation
(the Corporation) was formed on October 23, 2006 by Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (Kindred or Former Parent) and AmerisourceBergen Corporation (AmerisourceBergen) for the purpose of consummating the
transactions contemplated by the Master Transaction Agreement dated October 25, 2006, as amended (the Master Agreement). Pursuant to the Master Agreement, Kindred and AmerisourceBergen, through a series of transactions
(collectively, the Pharmacy Transaction), combined their respective institutional pharmacy businesses, Kindred Pharmacy Services (KPS) and PharMerica Long-Term Care (PharMerica LTC), into a new, stand-alone,
publicly traded company. The Pharmacy Transaction was consummated on July 31, 2007 (the Closing Date).

Under
the terms of the Pharmacy Transaction, on the Closing Date, each of KPS and PharMerica LTC borrowed $125.0 million as mutually agreed upon by Kindred and AmerisourceBergen and used such proceeds to fund a one-time, tax-free cash distribution in that
amount to their respective parent companies. Following the cash distributions, Kindred spun off to its stockholders all of the outstanding stock of KPS and AmerisourceBergen spun off to its stockholders all of the outstanding stock of PharMerica
LTC. Immediately thereafter, separate wholly owned subsidiaries of the Corporation were merged with and into KPS and PharMerica LTC with KPS and PharMerica LTC as the surviving entities of the mergers, and, as a result, KPS and PharMerica LTC became
wholly owned subsidiaries of the Corporation. Immediately following such spin-offs and mergers, the stockholders of Kindred and AmerisourceBergen each owned 50% of the outstanding common stock of the Corporation. The shares of the Corporations
common stock held by Kindred and AmerisourceBergen prior to the Pharmacy Transaction were cancelled, and neither retained any ownership of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Corporation.

Prior to the closing of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation had no assets or liabilities and conducted no business activity. Prior to
the closing of the Pharmacy Transaction, the business was operated as separate businesses within two different public companies, Kindred and AmerisourceBergen.

Reporting Entity

For accounting purposes, the Pharmacy Transaction
was treated as an acquisition by KPS of PharMerica LTC with KPS being considered the accounting acquirer. As a result, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include certain accounts and results of operations representing the
institutional pharmacy business of Kindred on a carve-out basis. Because KPS was determined to be the acquirer for accounting purposes, the historical financial statements of KPS became the historical financial statements of the
Corporation. Accordingly, the financial statements of the Corporation prior to the Pharmacy Transaction reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of KPS, which during the historical periods presented in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements, was a wholly owned subsidiary of Kindred. Following the Pharmacy Transaction, the financial statements reflect the financial position, results of operation and cash flows of the Corporation. The results of
operations of PharMerica LTC are included in the results of operations of the Corporation beginning August 1, 2007. Therefore, the consolidated financial statements included in this report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation, which during the first seven months of 2007, KPS was a wholly owned subsidiary of Kindred.

The Corporation operates two business segments: institutional pharmacies and hospital pharmacy management. Institutional pharmacies
provide pharmacy services to nursing centers and other healthcare providers and the hospital pharmacy management business provides management services primarily to Kindreds hospitals.



3



---

##### Table of Contents

Reclassifications

For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation has reclassified $27.9 million from Integration, merger and acquisition related
costs and other charges to provision for doubtful accounts, a component of Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. The $27.9 million increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts is related to the
acquired receivables of PharMerica LTC as of July 31, 2007, and is unrelated to the accounts receivable and revenue of KPS. These reclassification have no impact on the Corporations total assets, liabilities, stockholders equity,
net income (loss) or cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Institutional Pharmacy Business

The Corporation is the second largest institutional pharmacy services company in the United States based on revenues. We service healthcare
facilities and provide management pharmacy services to hospitals. The Corporation operates 98 institutional pharmacies in 41 states. The Corporations customers are typically institutional healthcare providers, such as skilled nursing
facilities, assisted living facilities, hospitals, and other long-term alternative care settings. The Corporation is generally the primary source of supply of pharmaceuticals to its customers. The Corporation also provides pharmacy management
services to 86 hospitals in the United States.

Our core business provides pharmacy products and services to residents and
patients in skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, hospitals, and other long-term alternative care settings. We purchase, repackage, and dispense prescription and non-prescription pharmaceuticals in accordance with physician orders
and deliver such medication to healthcare facilities for administration to individual patients and residents. Depending on the specific location, we service healthcare facilities typically within a radius of 120 miles or less of our pharmacy
locations at least once each day. Each pharmacy provides 24-hour, seven-day per week on-call pharmacist services for emergency dispensing, delivery, and/or consultation with the facilitys staff or the residents attending physician. We
also provide various supplemental healthcare services that complement our institutional pharmacy services.

We offer
prescription and non-prescription pharmaceuticals to our customers through unit dose or modified unit dose packaging, dispensing, and delivery systems, typically in a 15 to 30-day supply. Unit dosed medications are packaged for dispensing in
individual doses as compared to bulk packaging used by most retail pharmacies. The customers we serve prefer the unit dose delivery system over the bulk delivery system employed by retail pharmacies because it improves control over the storage and
ordering of drugs and reduces errors in drug administration in healthcare facilities. Nursing staff in our customers facilities administer the pharmaceuticals to individual patients and residents.

Our computerized dispensing and delivery systems are designed to improve efficiency and control over distribution of medications to patients
and residents. We provide computerized physician orders and medication administration records for each patient or resident on a monthly basis as requested. Data from these records are formulated into monthly management reports on patient or resident
care and quality assurance. This system improves efficiencies and nursing time, reduces drug waste, and lowers adverse drug reactions.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

Consultant Pharmacist Services

Federal and state regulations mandate that long-term care facilities, in addition to providing a source of pharmaceuticals, retain consultant
pharmacist services to monitor and report on prescription drug therapy in order to maintain and improve the quality of resident care. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA of 1987) implemented in 1990 sought to further
upgrade and standardize care by setting forth more stringent standards relating to planning, monitoring, and reporting on the progress of prescription drug therapy, as well as overall drug usage. In addition, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) issued revised guidelines to surveyors of long-term care facilities which, effective December 18, 2006, expanded the scope and detail in which surveyors are assessing pharmacy services at facilities,
including consultant pharmacy services. In addition, on September 30, 2008, the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General publishedOIG Supplemental Compliance Program Guidance for
Nursing Facilities. With quality of care the first risk area identified, the supplemental guidance is part of a series of recent government efforts focused on improving quality of care at skilled nursing and long-term care facilities. The
guidance contains new compliance recommendations and an expanded discussion of risk areas. The guidance stressed that facilities must provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and should be mindful of potential quality of
care problems when implementing policies and procedures on proper medication management. It further stated that facilities can reduce risk by educating staff on medication management and improper pharmacy kickbacks for consultant pharmacists and
that facilities should review the total compensation paid to consultant pharmacists to ensure it is not structured in a way that reflects the volume or value of particular drugs prescribed or administered to residents.

We provide consultant pharmacist services that help our customers comply with the federal and state regulations applicable to nursing homes.
The services offered by our consultant pharmacists include:



| |  |  | Monthly reviews of each residents drug regimen to assess the appropriateness and efficacy of drug therapies, including the review of medical
records, monitoring drug interactions with other drugs or food, monitoring laboratory test results, and recommending alternative therapies;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Participation on quality assurance and other committees of our customers, as required or requested by such customers;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Monitoring and reporting on facility-wide drug utilization;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Development and maintenance of pharmaceutical policy and procedure manuals; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Assistance with federal and state regulatory compliance pertaining to resident care.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These services, while costly, may be replicated by local providers.

Ancillary Services

The Corporation provides intravenous drug
therapy products and services to its customers. We provide intravenous (IV) (or infusion therapy) products and services for these client facilities as well as hospice and home care patients. Infusion therapy consists of the product (a
nutrient, antibiotic, chemotherapy, or other drugs in solution) and the intravenous administration of the product.

We prepare
the product to be administered using proper equipment in an aseptic environment and then deliver the product to the nursing home for administration by the nursing staff. Proper administration of IV drug therapy requires a highly trained nursing
staff. Upon request, our nurse consultants provide an education and certification program on IV therapy to assure proper staff training and compliance with regulatory requirements in client facilities offering an IV therapy program.



5



---

##### Table of Contents

Hospital Pharmacy Management Services

We also provide hospital pharmacy management services. These services generally entail the overall management of the hospital pharmacy
operations, including the ordering, receipt, storage, and dispensing of pharmaceuticals to the hospitals patients pursuant to the clinical guidelines established by the hospital. We offer the hospitals a wide range of regulatory and financial
management services, including inventory control, budgetary analysis, staffing optimization, and assistance with obtaining and maintaining applicable regulatory licenses, certifications, and accreditations. We work with the hospitals to develop and
implement pharmacy policies and procedures, including drug formulary development and utilization management. We also offer clinical pharmacy programs that encompass a wide range of drug therapy and disease management protocols, including protocols
for anemia treatment, infectious diseases, wound care, nutritional support, renal dosing, and therapeutic substitution. The hospital pharmacy management services segment is comprised of a few customers, of which, our largest service is to
substantially all of Kindreds hospitals.

Additional business segment information is set forth in Part II, Item 8
Financial Statements and Note 12Business Segment Data to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this annual report on Form 10-K.

Our Business Focus

Focusing on Client Retention and Improving
Customer Service. We will focus on consistently providing quality pharmaceutical services to our customers at competitive prices and delivery of prescriptions in a timely and effective manner. Our business seeks to implement innovative and
cost-effective solutions to improve the provision of medication to our customers and the residents and patients that they serve.

Driving Organic Sales.We aim to grow our business through expansion in our existing markets and by servicing new customers. We intend to grow organically. We believe our industry has underlying market growth potential attributable
to both an increase in drug utilization as well as the general aging population of the United States. We believe the Pharmacy Transaction improved our market competitiveness by giving us more operating scale and increased organizational breadth and
depth. We seek to increase our market share, in part, by capturing business currently conducted by our competitors and capitalizing on our improved market position.

Acquiring Competitors. We also intend to expand our market share through selected geographic expansion in markets not currently served by us and through strategic acquisitions in existing and
underserved markets. The Corporation currently operates in 41 states. We believe there are growth opportunities in several other markets. There are numerous businesses in our market, mostly small or regional companies that lack the scale that we
believe will be necessary to ultimately compete in a market that is national in scope. We intend to actively seek opportunities to acquire these companies.

Sales and Marketing

We sell our products and services through a
national sales force. Our sales force is organized along geographic lines to maximize coverage, manage costs, and align more effectively with our operating regions. Our sales representatives specialize in the products and services we offer and the
markets in which we operate. Their knowledge permits us to meet the unique needs of our customers while maintaining profitable relationships.

Customers

Institutional Care Settings. Our customers are typically institutional healthcare
providers, such as, skilled nursing facilities, nursing centers, assisted living facilities, hospitals and other long-term alternative care settings. We are generally the primary source of supply of pharmaceuticals for our customers.

Our customers depend on institutional pharmacies like us to provide the necessary pharmacy products and services and to play an integral
role in monitoring patient medication regimens and safety. We dispense pharmaceuticals in patient specific packaging in accordance with physician instructions.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

At December 31, 2009, we had contracts to provide pharmacy services to 317,885 licensed
beds for patients in healthcare facilities in 41 states. We also have significant customer concentrations with facilities operated by Kindred. For the year ended December 31, 2009, Kindred institutional pharmacy contracts represented
approximately 10.0% of the Corporations total revenues.

Hospital Pharmacy Management Services. At
December 31, 2009, the Corporation had provided hospital management services to Kindred and other customers at 86 locations. For the year ended December 31, 2009, revenues under the Kindred hospital pharmacy management service contracts
represented approximately 3.0% of the Corporations total revenues.

Suppliers/Inventory

At the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation entered into a Prime Vendor Agreement (the Prime Vendor
Agreement), with AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (ABDC), a wholly owned subsidiary of AmerisourceBergen, the Corporations former 50% stockholder. Pursuant to this agreement, the Corporation agreed to purchase at least 95%
of the Corporations prescription pharmaceutical drugs from ABDC and to participate in ABDCs generic formulary purchase program for a period of five years, ending on July 31, 2012. In addition, ABDC supports the distribution of
pharmaceuticals that the Corporation contracts directly with manufacturers and provides inventory management support. Also, under the provisions of the agreement, the Corporation may not undertake any merger, change of ownership, change in control
or other transaction without the consent of ABDC unless certain conditions are met, including the surviving entity is believed in good faith to be obligated to assume all obligations under the agreement.

We also obtain pharmaceutical and other products from contracts negotiated directly with pharmaceutical manufacturers. We are a member of an
industry buying group, which contracts with pharmaceutical manufacturers for discounted prices. While the loss of a supplier could adversely affect our business if alternate sources of supply are unavailable, numerous sources of supply are generally
available to us and we have not experienced any difficulty in obtaining pharmaceuticals or other products and supplies to conduct our business.

We seek to maintain an on-site inventory of pharmaceuticals and supplies to ensure prompt delivery to our customers. ABDC maintains local distribution facilities in most major geographic markets in which
we operate.

Supplier and Manufacturer Rebates

We currently receive rebates from certain manufacturers and distributors of pharmaceutical products for achieving targets of market share or purchase volumes. Rebates are designed to prefer, protect, or
maintain a manufacturers products that are dispensed by the pharmacy under its formulary. Rebates for brand name products are generally based upon achieving a defined market share tier within a therapeutic class. Rebates for generic products
are more likely to be based on achieving volume requirements. Rebates included in our statements of operations were $31.7 million, $50.6 million, and $49.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.

For more information regarding rebates, see Overview of Reimbursement.

Brand versus Generic

The pharmaceutical industry has been experiencing a higher level of brand to generic drug conversions. We expect an increase in the demand for generic drugs as the result of a large number of patent expirations.

The following table summarizes the historical generic drug dispensing rate:



|                         |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|------------------------ |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | -
|                         |  | 2007 |   |  | 2008 |   |  | 2009 |  
|Generic despensing rate: |  | 67.4 | % |  | 70.7 | % |  | 74.2 | %
|                         |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  



7



---

##### Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the material anticipated brand to generic conversions from
2010 to 2015 that were in the top 50 drug spend for the Corporation during the year ended December 31, 2009:



|                                                         |  |               |  |                 |  |               |  |               |  |             
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- |  | --------------- |  | ------------- |  | ------------- |  | ------------
|2010                                                     |  | 2011          |  | 2012            |  | 2013          |  | 2014          |  | 2015        
|Mirapex (1Q)                                             |  | Actos (1Q)    |  | Geodon (1Q)     |  | Xopenex (1Q)  |  | Exelon (1Q)   |  | Abilify (2Q)
|Flomax (1Q)                                              |  | Levaquin (2Q) |  | Seroquel (1Q)   |  | Humalog (2Q)  |  | Nexium (2Q)   |  | Zyvox (2Q)  
|Effexor XR (3Q)                                          |  | Xalatan (3Q)  |  | Plavix (1Q)     |  | Cymbalta (4Q) |  | Celebrex (2Q) |  | Namenda (2Q)
|Aricept (4Q)                                             |  | Advair (3Q)   |  | Singulair (1Q)  |  |               |  | Copaxone (4Q) |  |             
|                                                         |  | Zyprexa (4Q)  |  | Detrol (1Q)     |  |               |  |               |  |             
|                                                         |  | Lipitor (4Q)  |  | Lovenox (1Q)    |  |               |  |               |  |             
|                                                         |  |               |  | Lexapro (3Q)    |  |               |  |               |  |             
|                                                         |  |               |  | Diovan (3Q)     |  |               |  |               |  |             
|                                                         |  |               |  | Diovan HCT (4Q) |  |               |  |               |  |             
|(Number in parentheses
equals the quarter of conversion)

Historically, when a branded drug shifts to a generic, initial pricing of the generic
drug in the market will vary depending on the number of manufacturers launching their generic version of the drug. It is believed that a shift from brand to generic will decrease our revenue but at the same time may improve our gross margin from
sales of these classes of drugs during the initial time period a brand drug has a generic alternative. The amount of improvement in gross margin is also dependent on the particular brand not being granted an exclusivity period and actual contracted
terms with customers. In addition, once a generic has been introduced and multiple manufacturers begin producing alternatives, the Corporation is likely to see margin compression as reimbursement declines. Due to the nature of the brand to generic
conversion, management cannot estimate the financial impact of the brand to generic conversions from 2010 to 2015 on its results of operations.

Information Technology

Computerized medical records and documentation are an integral part of our
distribution system. We primarily utilize a proprietary information technology infrastructure that automates order entry of medications, dispensing of medications, invoicing, and payment processing. These systems provide consulting drug review,
electronic medication management, medical records, and regulatory compliance information to help ensure patient safety. These systems also support verification of eligibility and electronic billing capabilities for the Corporations pharmacies.
They also provide order entry, shipment, billing, reimbursement and collection of service fees for medications, specialty services and other services rendered.

Based upon our electronic records, we are able to provide reports to our customers and management on patient care and quality assurance. These reports help to improve efficiency in patient care, reduce
drug waste, and lower adverse drug reactions. We expect to continue to invest in technologies that help improve data integrity, critical information access, and system availability.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

At the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation entered into an Information
Technology Services Agreement with Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc. (KHOI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Kindred (the IT Services Agreement). Pursuant to the IT Services Agreement, KHOI is the Corporations exclusive
provider of certain information services and support related to information technology infrastructure and financial systems for a period of five years, ending on July 31, 2012. The services provided by KHOI include business services necessary
to operate, manage, and support certain financial applications the Corporation uses, including enabling or supporting technology infrastructure and technology procurement services to support certain business functions. Such services include, among
other matters, functions for financial management and systems and payroll. The Corporation supports internally all other operating systems, including functions for order entry, pharmacy dispensing, clinical consulting, billing and collections,
electronic medication management, sales and marketing, medical records management, human resources, internal and external customer call center support, and general business systems.

Except for certain services that will be provided at cost, KHOI will provide such services to the Corporation at its cost plus 10%, which
will be the actual costs and expenses incurred in providing these services, including certain overhead costs and per hour costs of the KHOI employees providing the services. The initial term of the agreement is five years. The agreement will
automatically renew for successive one-year periods after the expiration of the initial five year term, absent 120 days prior written notice of termination as provided for in the agreement. The IT Services Agreement may be terminated by either party
for cause and, in certain circumstances, by the Corporation in the event that KHOI undergoes a change of control to one of the Corporations competitors. Following termination of the IT Services Agreement, KHOI must provide termination and
expiration assistance for up to 180 days. The Corporation has incurred costs of $7.3 million, $17.3 million and $11.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively, under the IT Services Agreement.

Sources of Pharmacy Revenues

We receive payment for our services from third party payers, including Medicare Part D Plans, government reimbursement programs under Medicare and Medicaid, and non-government sources such as institutional healthcare providers, commercial
insurance companies, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations, and contracted providers. The sources and amounts of our revenues will be determined by a number of factors, including the mix of our customers patients,
brand to generic conversions and the rates of reimbursement among payers. Changes in our customers censuses, the case mix of the patients, brand and generic dispensing rates, and the payer mix among private pay, Medicare Part D and Medicaid,
will affect our profitability.

In December 2003, Congress enacted the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and
Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA) which included a major expansion of the Medicare program through the introduction of a prescription drug benefit (titled Medicare Part D) which is administered by commercial market insurers contracted with
CMS. Under Medicare Part D, Medicare beneficiaries who are also entitled to benefits under a state Medicaid program (so called dual eligibles) now have their outpatient prescription drug costs covered by Medicare Part D, subject to
certain limitations. Since January 1, 2006, most of the nursing center residents we serve whose drug costs were previously covered by state Medicaid programs are dual eligibles who qualify for Medicare Part D. Accordingly, Medicaid is no longer
a primary payer for the pharmacy services provided to these residents. See Overview of Reimbursement.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

A summary of our revenues by payer type for the years ended December 31, are as follows
(dollars in millions):



|                                   |  |        |         |              |       |   |        |      |              |  |       |        |  |              |         |  |       |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ------ | ------- | ------------ | ----- | - | ------ | ---- | ------------ |  | ----- | ------ |  | ------------ | ------- |  | ----- | -
|                                   |  | 2007   |         |              | 2008  |   |        | 2009 |             
|                                   |  | Amount |         | % ofRevenues |       |   | Amount |      | % ofRevenues |  |       | Amount |  | % ofRevenues |        
|Medicare Part D                    |  | $      | 550.2   |              | 45.2  | % |        | $    | 885.8        |  | 45.5  | %      |  | $            | 852.6   |  | 46.3  | %
|Institutional healthcare providers |  |        | 369.3   |              | 30.3  |   |        |      | 577.2        |  | 29.7  |        |  |              | 545.6   |  | 29.6  |  
|Medicaid                           |  |        | 108.8   |              | 8.9   |   |        |      | 181.1        |  | 9.3   |        |  |              | 165.8   |  | 9.0   |  
|Private and other                  |  |        | 77.7    |              | 6.4   |   |        |      | 133.2        |  | 6.8   |        |  |              | 122.4   |  | 6.6   |  
|Insured                            |  |        | 46.8    |              | 3.8   |   |        |      | 101.4        |  | 5.2   |        |  |              | 91.5    |  | 5.0   |  
|Medicare                           |  |        | 10.2    |              | 0.9   |   |        |      | 10.1         |  | 0.5   |        |  |              | 6.8     |  | 0.4   |  
|Hospital management fees           |  |        | 54.8    |              | 4.5   |   |        |      | 58.5         |  | 3.0   |        |  |              | 56.5    |  | 3.1   |  
|                                   |  |        |         |              |       |   |        |      |              |  |       |        |  |              |         |  |       |  
|Total                              |  | $      | 1,217.8 |              | 100.0 | % |        | $    | 1,947.3      |  | 100.0 | %      |  | $            | 1,841.2 |  | 100.0 | %
|                                   |  |        |         |              |       |   |        |      |              |  |       |        |  |              |         |  |       |  

Competition

We face a highly competitive environment in the institutional pharmacy market. In each geographic market, there are national, regional and
local institutional pharmacies that provide services comparable to those offered by our pharmacies which may have greater financial and other resources than we do and may be more established in the markets they serve than we are. In addition, owners
of skilled nursing facilities are also entering the institutional pharmacy market, particularly in areas of their geographic concentration. On a nationwide basis, there is one other large competitor in the institutional pharmacy industry, Omnicare,
Inc.

We believe that the competitive factors most important to our business are pricing, quality and the range of services
offered, clinical expertise, ease of doing business with the provider and the ability to develop and maintain relationships with customers. Because relatively few barriers to entry exist in the local markets we serve, we may encounter substantial
competition from local market entrants.

Patents, Trademarks and Licenses

We use a number of trademarks and service marks. All of the principal trademarks and service marks used in the course of our business have
been registered in the United States or are the subject of pending applications for registration.

We have various proprietary
products, processes, software and other intellectual property that are used either to facilitate the conduct of our business or that are made available as products or services to customers. We generally seek to protect such intellectual property
through a combination of trade secret, patent and copyright laws and through confidentiality and other contractually imposed protections.

Although we believe that our products and processes do not infringe upon the intellectual property rights of any third parties, third parties may assert infringement claims against us from time to time.

Seasonality

Our largest customers in our institutional pharmacy segment are skilled nursing facilities. Both prescription and non-prescription drug sales at skilled nursing facilities are affected by the timing and severity of the cold/flu season and
other seasonality of the long-term care facilities industry.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Working Capital

For information about the Corporations practices relating to working capital items, see Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsLiquidity and Capital Resources.

Corporate Integrity Agreement

On March 29, 2005, PharMerica LTC and the Office of Inspector General within the Department of Health and Human Services
(OIG) entered into the Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) to promote compliance with the requirements of the federal healthcare programs. Under the CIA, PharMerica LTC agreed to continue its comprehensive compliance program,
which includes a corporate compliance officer, a corporate compliance committee, a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, written policies and procedures, educational and training initiatives, review and disciplinary procedures, a confidential
disclosure program, an ineligible persons screening program, and internal audit and review procedures, all designed to promote compliance with applicable laws, including federal healthcare program requirements and the promotion of ethical business
practices. PharMerica LTC is also subject to extensive reporting requirements under the CIA, including annual reports describing PharMerica LTCs compliance activities, notices of any government investigations or legal proceedings, overpayments
received from federal healthcare programs and changes in pharmacy locations and new business units. The term of the CIA is five years and it ends on March 29, 2010. PharMerica LTC is required to comply fully and timely with all of the CIA
requirements. Failure to do so may lead to the imposition of stipulated penalties, including substantial monetary penalties and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. Any such penalties could
have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and liquidity.

The CIA continues to apply to
PharMerica LTC through its original term. Pursuant to an agreement reached with the OIG regarding the Pharmacy Transactions impact on the CIA, the CIAs requirements do not apply to KPS or any of the KPS employees or contractors. However,
among other obligations, the Corporations employees and contractors that are involved with PharMerica LTCs operations will be subject to training requirements in accordance with the CIAs existing terms. In addition, pursuant to the
agreement reached with the OIG, oversight of, and day-to-day responsibility for, the CIA is undertaken by the Corporations compliance officer and the Corporations compliance committee (an ad hoc committee comprised of members of the
Corporations senior management).

Employees

As of December 31, 2009, we have approximately 5,800 employees which includes approximately 1,100 part-time employees. None of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. We employ
approximately 1,600 licensed pharmacists. We believe that our relationships with our employees are good.

Government Regulation

General

Extensive federal, state and local regulations govern institutional pharmacies and the healthcare facilities that they serve. These regulations cover licenses, staffing qualifications, conduct of operations, reimbursement, recordkeeping and
documentation requirements and the confidentiality and security of health-related information. Our institutional pharmacies are also subject to federal and state laws that regulate financial arrangements between healthcare providers, including the
federal anti-kickback statutes and the federal physician self-referral statutes.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Licensure, Certification and Regulation

States generally require that the state board of pharmacy license a pharmacy operating within the state. Many states also regulate
out-of-state pharmacies that deliver prescription products to patients or residents in their states. We have the necessary pharmacy state licenses, or pending applications, for each pharmacy we operate. Our pharmacies are also registered with the
appropriate federal and state authorities pursuant to statutes governing the regulation of controlled substances. In addition, pharmacists, nurses and other healthcare professionals who provide services on our behalf are in most cases required to
obtain and maintain professional licenses and are subject to state regulation regarding professional standards of conduct.

The Drug Enforcement Agency (the DEA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the FDA) and various state regulatory authorities regulate the distribution of pharmaceutical products and controlled substances. These
laws impose a host of requirements on the pharmaceutical supply channel, including providers of institutional pharmacy services. Under the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, as a dispenser of controlled substances, we must
register with the DEA, file reports of inventories and transactions and provide adequate security measures. In addition, we are required to comply with all the relevant requirements of the Prescription Drug Marketing Act for the transfer and
shipment of pharmaceuticals. The FDA, DEA and state regulatory authorities have broad enforcement powers, including the ability to seize or recall products and impose significant criminal, civil and administrative sanctions for violations of these
laws and regulations. We have received all necessary regulatory approvals and believe that our pharmacy operations are in substantial compliance with applicable federal and state good manufacturing practice requirements.

Client long-term care facilities are separately required to be licensed in the states in which they operate and, if serving Medicaid or
Medicare patients, must be certified to be in compliance with applicable program participation requirements. Client facilities are also subject to the nursing home reforms of the OBRA of 1987, as amended, which imposed strict compliance standards
relating to quality of care for nursing home operations, including vastly increased documentation and reporting requirements.

On September 20, 2006, CMS issued revised guidance to surveyors of long term care facilities regarding the survey protocol for review of pharmacy services provided in long-term care facilities
participating in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The new guidelines, which became effective December 18, 2006, expanded the areas and detail in which surveyors are to assess pharmacy services at the facility, including ordering, acquiring,
receiving, storing, labeling, dispensing and disposing of all medications at the facility; the provision of medication-related information to health care professionals and residents; the process of identifying and addressing medication-related
issues through medication regimen reviews and collaboration between the licensed consultant pharmacist, the facility and other healthcare professionals; and the provision, monitoring and use of medication-related devices. The guidelines also
emphasize the important role of consultative services of pharmacists in promoting safe and effective medication use through the coordination of all aspects of pharmacy services provided to all residents within a facility. In addition, on
September 30, 2008, the OIG published OIG Supplemental Compliance Program Guidance for Nursing Facilities. With quality of care the first risk area identified, the supplemental guidance is part of a series of recent government efforts
focused on improving quality of care at skilled nursing and long-term care facilities. The guidance contains new compliance recommendations and an expanded discussion of risk areas. The guidance stressed that facilities must provide pharmaceutical
services to meet the needs of each resident and should be mindful of potential quality of care problems when implementing policies and procedures on proper medication management. It further stated that facilities can reduce risk by educating staff
on medication management and improper pharmacy kickbacks for consultant pharmacists and that facilities should review the total compensation paid to consultant pharmacists to ensure it is not structured in a way that reflects the volume or value of
particular drugs prescribed or administered to residents.



12



---

##### Table of Contents

Laws Affecting Referrals and Business Practices

We are subject to federal and state laws that govern financial and other arrangements between healthcare providers. These laws prohibit
certain direct and indirect payments or fee-splitting arrangements between healthcare providers that are designed to induce or encourage the referral of patients to, or the recommendation of, a particular provider for medical products and services.
These laws include:



| |  |  | the federal anti-kickback statute, which prohibits, among other things, knowingly or willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying
remuneration including any kickback, bribe or rebate directly or indirectly in return for or to induce the referral of an individual to a person for the furnishing or arranging for the furnishing of any item or service for which payment
may be made in whole or in part under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the federal Stark laws which prohibit, with limited exceptions, the referral of patients by physicians for certain designated health
services, to an entity with which the physician has a financial relationship.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These laws impact the
relationships that we may have with potential referral sources. We have a variety of relationships with potential referral sources, including hospitals and skilled nursing facilities with which we have contracted to provide pharmacy services. With
respect to the anti-kickback statute, the OIG has enacted safe harbor regulations that outline practices that are deemed protected from prosecution. While we endeavor to comply with the applicable safe harbors, certain of our current arrangements,
none of which is material to us, may not qualify for safe harbor protection. Failure to meet a safe harbor does not mean that the arrangement necessarily violates the anti-kickback statute, but may subject the arrangement to greater scrutiny. While
we believe our practices comply with the anti-kickback statute, we cannot assure you that our practices that are outside of a safe harbor will not be found to violate the anti-kickback statute.

As one means of providing guidance to healthcare providers, the OIG issues Special Fraud Alerts. These alerts do not have the
force of law, but identify features of arrangements or transactions that may indicate that the arrangements or transactions violate the anti-kickback statute or other federal health care laws. The OIG has identified several arrangements, which, if
accompanied by inappropriate intent, constitute suspect practices, including: (a) the use of free or significantly discounted office space or equipment in facilities, (b) provision of free or significantly discounted billing, nursing or
other staff services, (c) free training in areas such as management techniques and laboratory techniques, (d) purchasing goods or services from potential referral sources at prices in excess of their fair market value, and (e) rental
of space from potential referral sources at other than fair market value terms. The OIG has encouraged persons having information about entities that offer the above types of incentives to report such information to the OIG.

The OIG also issues Special Advisory Bulletins as a means of providing guidance to healthcare providers. These bulletins, along
with the Special Fraud Alerts, have focused on certain arrangements that could be subject to heightened scrutiny by government enforcement authorities, including contractual joint venture arrangements and other joint venture arrangements
between those in a position to refer business and those providing items or services for which Medicare or Medicaid pays.

In
addition to issuing Special Fraud Alerts and Special Advisory Bulletins, the OIG from time to time issues compliance program guidance for certain types of healthcare providers. These guidance documents contain voluntary
actions for providers to consider to promote compliance with Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. Although the OIG has not issued compliance guidance for long-term care pharmacies, the OIG has issued compliance guidance for
hospitals, nursing facilities and suppliers of durable medical equipment, which may be instructive. These guidance documents advise entities to adopt policies and procedures to address the risks arising from, among other things:
(a) arrangements with vendors that result in the facility receiving non-covered items at below market prices or at no charge, provided the facility orders Medicare-reimbursed products, (b) soliciting or receiving items of value in exchange
for providing the supplier access to patients medical records and other information needed to bill Medicare, (c) joint ventures with entities supplying goods or services, and (d) discounts and other financial incentives given to
potential referral sources.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Further, the OIG frequently issues Advisory Opinions to provide specific
guidance on the applicable health care fraud laws and regulations. Interested parties are able to submit detailed information to the OIG describing a particular arrangement and the OIG will explain whether or not it implicates these laws and whether
or not the OIG will elect to enforce in the described situation. Although these opinions are only binding for the party disclosing, they provide helpful guidance on a variety of potential arrangements with physicians.

In addition to federal law, many states have enacted similar statutes which are not necessarily limited to items or services for which
payment is made by federal healthcare programs. Violations of these laws may result in fines, imprisonment, denial of payment for services and exclusion from the Medicare and Medicaid programs and other state-funded programs.

Other provisions in the Social Security Act and in other federal and state laws authorize the imposition of penalties, including criminal
and civil fines and exclusions from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs for false claims, improper billing and other offenses. These laws include the federal False Claims Act, under which private parties have
the right to bring qui tam whistleblower lawsuits against companies that submit false claims for payments to the government. Recent changes to the False Claims Act, expanding liability to certain additional parties and circumstances, may
make these qui tam law lawsuits more prevalent. Some states have adopted similar state whistleblower and false claims laws.

In addition, a number of states have undertaken enforcement actions against pharmaceutical manufacturers involving pharmaceutical marketing programs, including looking at relationships with pharmacies and programs containing incentives for
pharmacists to dispense one particular product rather than another. These enforcement actions arose under various state laws including fraud and abuse laws and consumer protection laws which generally prohibit false advertising, deceptive trade
practices and the like.

In the ordinary course of business, we are subject regularly to inquiries, investigations and audits
by federal and state agencies that oversee applicable healthcare program participation and payment regulations. We believe that the regulatory environment surrounding most segments of the healthcare industry remains intense. Federal and state
governments continue to impose intensive enforcement policies resulting in a significant number of inspections, citations for regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory sanctions including demands for refund of overpayments, terminations from the
Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments and fines. To date, we have not experienced any demands for refund of overpayments, terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, bars on Medicare and Medicaid payments
or fines that are material to us. However, such sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operation and liquidity.

We believe our contract arrangements with other healthcare providers, our pharmaceutical suppliers and our pharmacy practices are in substantial compliance with applicable federal and state laws. These
laws may, however, be interpreted in the future in a manner inconsistent with our interpretation and application.

State Laws Affecting
Access to Services

Some states have enacted freedom of choice or any willing provider
requirements as part of their state Medicaid programs or in separate legislation. These laws may preclude a nursing center from requiring their patients and residents to purchase pharmacy or other ancillary medical services or supplies from
particular providers that have a supplier relationship with the nursing center. Limitations such as these may increase the competition which we face in providing services to nursing center residents.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

HIPAA

The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, commonly known as HIPAA, mandates the adoption of regulations aimed at standardizing transaction formats and billing
codes for documenting medical services, dealing with claims submissions and protecting the privacy and security of individually identifiable health information. HIPAA regulations that standardize transactions and code sets require standard
formatting for healthcare providers, like us, that submit claims electronically.

The HIPAA privacy regulations apply to
protected health information, which is defined generally as individually identifiable health information transmitted or maintained in any form or medium, excluding certain education records and student medical records. The privacy
regulations seek to limit the use and disclosure of most paper and oral communications, as well as those in electronic form, regarding an individuals past, present or future physical or mental health or condition, or relating to the provision
of healthcare to the individual or payment for that healthcare, if the individual can or may be identified by such information. HIPAA provides for the imposition of civil or criminal penalties if protected health information is improperly disclosed.

HIPAAs security regulations require us to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of all electronic
protected health information that we create, receive, maintain or transmit. We must protect against reasonably anticipated threats or hazards to the security of such information and the unauthorized use or disclosure of such information.

In addition to HIPAA, we are subject to state privacy laws and other state privacy or health information requirements not preempted by
HIPAA, including those which may furnish greater privacy protection for individuals than HIPAA.

The scope of our operations
involving health information is broad and the nature of those operations is complex. Although we believe that our contract arrangements with healthcare payers and providers and our business practices are in material compliance with applicable
federal and state electronic transmissions, privacy and security of health information laws, the requirements of these laws, including HIPAA, are complicated and are subject to interpretation. In addition, state regulation of matters also covered by
HIPAA, especially the privacy standards, is increasing, and determining which state laws are preempted by HIPAA is a matter of interpretation. Failure to comply with HIPAA or similar state laws could subject us to loss of customers, denial of the
right to conduct business, civil damages, fines, criminal penalties and other enforcement actions.

Stimulus Package

The American Recovery and Responsibility Act, commonly known as the Stimulus Package, is a $787.0 billion federal bill
intended to stimulate the economy through both tax cuts and increased government spending. Within this package there are a variety of healthcare-related provisions including (i) the $87.0 billion temporary increase in Medicaid Federal Medical
Assistance Percentage (FMAP), and (ii) the $21.0 billion of funding to encourage adoption of certain health information technology (HIT).

Under Medicaid FMAP, the federal government matches certain state expenditures for Medicaid social service programs. As such, the $87.0 billion increase in FMAP goes directly from the federal government
to eligible states. Eligible states will receive a minimum 6.2% FMAP increase retroactive to October 1, 2008 and going forward to December 31, 2010, with additional funds going to states with higher unemployment rates. To ensure
eligibility for the FMAP increase, states must maintain or reinstate previously required Medicaid eligibility standards, comply with prompt pay requirements and meet certain other specific criteria. Although the funds are through the FMAP program,
states receive the money as general funds and, aside from a prohibition against placing the money in a rainy day fund, may expend the funds at the states discretion. HHS continues to release determinations of enhanced payments on a
rolling basis, effective for the quarter-year periods.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

The Stimulus Package also provides $21.0 billion designated for investment in HIT
infrastructure and Medicare and Medicaid incentives to encourage doctors, hospitals, and other providers to adopt HIT. Of this funding, $2.0 billion is set aside for adoption activities while $19.0 billion will go to providers engaged in
the meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR). Meaningful users are providers who use certified EHR technology, exchange EHR information to improve quality and coordination of care, and use EHR to submit quality
measures. For physicians, the structure largely mirrors the e-prescribing framework set out in the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) by incentivizing adoption of HIT through granting up to $44,000 per physician
until 2014, and thereafter penalizing physicians who have not yet adopted. Similarly, hospitals are eligible for bonus payments if determined to be meaningful users of EHR. The impact of these provisions, according to the Congressional Budget
Office, will be that approximately 90% of doctors and 70% of hospitals adopt EHR technology over the next 10 years. The impact of the Stimulus Package is unclear at this time.

Proposed Federal Budget and Health Care Reform

The proposed federal
budget for fiscal year 2010 builds on the health provisions of the Stimulus Package while simultaneously introducing new healthcare-related programs generally aimed at improving quality, efficiency, and accountability, and at encouraging shared
responsibility for health care. The proposed budget does not include many program specifics and will not necessarily parallel the final version as altered and approved by Congress. The most significant aspect of the proposed budget is a new $630.0
billion reserve fund to help finance future healthcare reform. This is proposed to be funded by both tax changes and Medicare and Medicaid reform. The budget specifies increasing Medicaid rebates and broadening utilization of generics as some of the
many parts of the Health Reform Reserve Fund. The exact nature and structure of such reform is being debated by Congress and the Obama administration and cannot be predicted with any certainty. In conjunction, Congress and the Obama administration
are debating significant restructuring of the health care system as a whole, the impact of which is unclear at this time.

Beyond healthcare reform, the budget expands funding for a variety of programs including comparative effectiveness and cancer research. In addition, the proposed budget builds on and implements a variety of provisions of the Stimulus
Package. At this time, however, all these provisions are solely the administrations recommendation. The House and Senate are currently working on separate versions of the budget. Without a final version of the appropriations bills, we are
unable to analyze the potential impact of these fiscal changes on our business.

Federal Trade Commission Red Flag Rules

The recently issued Identity Theft Red Flag and Address Discrepancy Rules, referred to as the Red Flag Rules, which
the FTC will begin to enforce on June 1, 2010, require creditors that maintain certain kinds of covered accounts to develop and implement a written program to detect and respond to identity theft. Because the Corporation does not
require full payment at the time of service of a patient, it will be considered a creditor for purposes of the Red Flag Rules. Therefore, the Corporation will be required to implement a program to detect and respond to identity theft. Failure to
implement a program by the deadline can result in substantial monetary penalties. The deadline for compliance with these rules, as well as the scope of their application, has been subject to various regulatory, legislative, and judicial changes. As
such, we cannot fully analyze the potential impact of these Red Flag Rules on our business.

Overview of Reimbursement

Medicare is a federal program that provides certain hospital and medical insurance benefits to persons age 65 and over and to certain
disabled persons. Medicaid is a medical assistance program administered by each state that provides healthcare benefits to certain indigent patients. Within the Medicare and Medicaid statutory framework, there are substantial areas subject to
administrative rulings, interpretations, and discretion that may affect payments made under Medicare and Medicaid.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

We receive payment for our services from institutional healthcare providers, commercial
Medicare Part D Plans, third party payers, government reimbursement programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, and other non-government sources such as commercial insurance companies, health maintenance organizations, preferred provider organizations,
and contracted providers. With respect to our skilled nursing facilities customers, their residents are covered by Medicare Part A, Part B and Part D Plans, Medicaid, insurance, and other private payers (including managed care).

Medicare

The
Medicare program consists of four parts: (1) Medicare Part A, which covers, among other things, in-patient hospital, skilled nursing facilities, home healthcare, and certain other types of healthcare services; (2) Medicare Part B, which
covers physicians services, outpatient services, and certain items and services provided by medical suppliers such as intravenous therapy; (3) a managed care option for beneficiaries who are entitled to Medicare Part A and enrolled in
Medicare Part B, known as Medicare Part C or Medicare Advantage; and (4) Medicare Part D, which provides coverage for prescription drugs that are not otherwise covered under Medicare Part A or Part B for those beneficiaries that enroll.

Part A

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (the BBA) mandated the Prospective Payment System (PPS) for Medicare-eligible enrolled residents in skilled nursing facilities. Under PPS, Medicare pays skilled nursing facilities a
fixed fee per patient per day for extended care services to patients, covering substantially all items and services furnished during such enrollees stay. Such services and items include pharmacy services and prescription drugs. We bill skilled
nursing facilities based upon a negotiated fee schedule and are paid based on those contractual relationships. We do not receive direct payment from Medicare for patients covered under the Medicare Part A benefit. We classify the revenues recognized
from these payers as Institutional Healthcare Providers.

Federal legislation continues to focus on reducing Medicare and
Medicaid program expenditures. The Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, or DRA, is intended to reduce net Medicare and Medicaid spending by approximately $11.0 billion over five years. Among other things, the DRA reduces certain bad debt payments to
Medicare skilled nursing facilities by 30 percent for those individuals who are not dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. It also strengthens asset transfer restrictions for people seeking to qualify for Medicaid long-term care coverage. This
provision is expected to reduce payments to skilled nursing facilities by approximately $100 million over five years (fiscal years 2006-2010). In addition, CMS has proposed or finalized multiple rules decreasing both skilled nursing facilities PPS
payments and long-term care hospital PPS payments. Such decreases may directly impact the Corporations customers and their Medicare reimbursement. Given the changing nature of these rules, we are unable at this time to fully evaluate the
impact on our business. Any evaluation of budgeting, cost-cutting, and financing of health care must also consider the new federal administration and the impact its proposed health care policies could have on any future cost considerations.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

Part B

The MMA also changed the Medicare payment methodology and conditions for coverage of certain items of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) under Medicare
Part B. The Corporation provides some of these products to its nursing home customers. The changes include, among other things, a new competitive bidding program. Beginning on January 1, 2011, only suppliers that are winning bidders will be
eligible to provide services, at prices established as a result of the competitive bids, to Medicare beneficiaries in the selected areas. Enteral nutrients, equipment and supplies, and oxygen equipment and supplies are among the 10 categories of
DMEPOS included in the first round of the competitive bidding process. The Corporation did not participate in the bidding process, however, it will still be able to sell products not in the categories described above that are otherwise reimbursed
under Medicare Part B. Integrity Medical Supplies, LLC, a recently acquired company, did participate in the bidding process and is awaiting the results of the bids. CMS intends to announce the payment amounts and to begin the contracting process
with the bidders in June 2010 and to publicly announce the contracted suppliers in September 2010. The Corporation will continue to evaluate whether it will participate in Round 2 of the bidding, which is not yet scheduled.

Part D

Medicare
Part D provides coverage for prescription drugs that are not otherwise covered under Medicare Part A or Part B for those beneficiaries that enroll. Under Medicare Part D, beneficiaries may enroll in prescription drug plans offered by private
commercial insurers who contract with CMS (or in a fallback plan offered on behalf of the government through a contractor, to the extent private entities fail to offer a plan in a given area), which provide coverage of outpatient
prescription drugs (collectively, Part D Plans). Part D Plans include both plans providing the drug benefit on a stand alone basis and Medicare Advantage plans providing drug coverage as a supplement to an existing medical benefit under
that Medicare Advantage plan. Medicare beneficiaries generally have to pay a premium to enroll in a Part D Plan, with the premium amount varying from one Part D Plan to another, although CMS provides various federal subsidies to Part D Plans to
reduce the cost to beneficiaries.

Part D Plans are required to make available certain drugs on their formularies.
Dually-eligible residents in nursing centers generally are entitled to have their prescription drug costs covered by a Part D Plan, provided that the prescription drugs which they are taking are either on the Part D Plans formulary or an
exception to the Part D Plans formulary is granted. CMS reviews the formularies of Part D Plans and requires these formularies to include the types of drugs most commonly used by Medicare beneficiaries. CMS also reviews the formulary
exceptions criteria of the Part D Plans that provide for coverage of drugs determined by the Part D Plan to be medically appropriate for the enrollee; however there currently is not a separate formulary for long-term care residents.

We obtain reimbursement for drugs we provide to enrollees of the given Part D Plan in accordance with the terms of agreements negotiated
between us and the Part D Plan. The Medicare Part D final rule prohibits Part D plans from paying for drugs and services not specifically called for by the BBA. Beginning in 2010, CMS will require Part D sponsors to use pass-through pricing, based
on the price actually received by the pharmacy for drugs, in order to determine beneficiary cost sharing and drug reporting. This change, and similar changes by CMS aimed at ensuring administrative costs are absorbed by the Pharmacy Benefit Manager
(PBM) and not the government, may alter the way certain PBMs negotiate prices with pharmacies. Currently, we are unable to fully evaluate the impact of this change in pricing definition on the Corporation.

Medicare Part D does not alter federal reimbursement for residents of nursing centers whose stay at the nursing center is covered under
Medicare Part A. Accordingly, Medicares fixed per diem payments to nursing centers under PPS will continue to include a portion attributable to the expected cost of drugs provided to such residents. We will, therefore, continue to receive
reimbursement for drugs provided to such residents from the nursing center in accordance with the terms of our agreements with each nursing center.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

In June 2009, CMS released a report indicating that approximately $41.0 million in Medicare
Part D payments for prescription drugs, some dispensed by LTC pharmacies, were likely made incorrectly. CMS concluded many of the drugs, which were dispensed during Part A skilled nursing facility stays, should have been included in per diem
payments under Medicare Part A. CMS stated it will focus on ensuring such improper payments do not occur in the future. We are unable to fully evaluate the impact of current and future federal initiatives aimed at eliminating these discrepancies.

In addition, we receive rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers for undertaking certain activities that the manufacturers
believe may increase the likelihood that we will dispense their products. CMS continues to question whether institutional pharmacies should be permitted to receive these access/performance rebates from manufacturers with respect to prescriptions
covered under Medicare Part D, but has not prohibited the receipt of such rebates. CMS defines these as rebates a manufacturer provides to long-term care pharmacies that are designed to prefer, protect, or maintain that
manufacturers product selection by the long-term care pharmacy or to increase the volume of that manufacturers products that are dispensed by the pharmacy under its formulary. CMS, in 2007, required PDPs to have policies and systems in
place as part of their drug utilization management programs to protect beneficiaries and reduce costs when long-term care pharmacies receive incentives to move market share through access/performance rebates. The elimination or reduction of
manufacturer rebates, if not offset by other reimbursement, could have an adverse effect on our business.

Other

On July 15, 2008, MIPPA of 2008 was enacted. MIPPA cancels a reduction in Medicares payment rates for physicians services
that went into effect on July 1, 2008 and extends other expiring provisions governing the Medicare program. It also increases payment rates for physicians services for 2009, expands eligibility for low-income benefits, and reduces
payments to Medicare Advantage Plans. The various provisions that could impact our operations are as follows:

Incentives
for Electronic PrescribingProviders who electronically prescribe (e-Rx) are eligible to receive bonus payments based on a percentage of Medicare allowable charges through 2013. Beginning in 2014, penalty payments will become
effective for providers who fail to use e-Rx.

Low-Income SubsidyThe legislation eliminates the Part D
late-enrollment penalty for low income beneficiaries and specifies that certain income and assets be disregarded in determining eligibility for the low-income subsidy program in Part D. MIPPA also provides additional funds to federal and state
entities to increase outreach efforts to encourage eligible individuals to enroll in those programs.

Prompt
PayBeginning 2010, long-term care (LTC) pharmacies will be required to submit Part D claims to PDPs no less than 30 days but no more than 90 days from the date the drugs are dispensed for reimbursement.

FormulariesThis provision legislatively expands the list of covered Part D drugs. This provision also offers CMS the authority
to designate certain classes of drugs as having a protected status. CMS announced that it will maintain its current six protected classes policyantidepressants, antipsychotics, antiretrovirals, immunosuppresants, anticonvulsants, and
antineoplastics.

These various provisions of MIPPA are currently being implemented through CMS rules and regulations and are
being incorporated into other health care related legislation.



19



---

##### Table of Contents

Medicaid

The reimbursement rate for pharmacy services under Medicaid is determined on a state-by-state basis subject to review by CMS and applicable federal law. Although Medicaid programs vary from state to
state, they generally provide for the payment of certain pharmacy services, up to established limits, at rates determined in accordance with each states regulations. The federal Medicaid statute specifies a variety of requirements that a state
plan must meet, including the requirements related to eligibility, coverage for services, payment, and admissions. For residents that are eligible for Medicaid only, and are not dual eligibles covered under Medicare Part D, we bill the individual
state Medicaid program or in certain circumstances the states designated managed care or other similar organizations. Federal regulations and the regulations of certain states establish upper limits for reimbursement of certain
prescription drugs under Medicaid. In most states, pharmacy services are priced at the lower of usual and customary charges or cost, which generally is defined as a function of average wholesale price and may include a profit percentage
plus a dispensing fee. Most states establish a fixed dispensing fee per prescription that is adjusted to reflect associated cost. Over the last several years, state Medicaid programs have lowered reimbursement through a variety of mechanisms,
principally higher discounts off average wholesale price levels, expansion of the number of medications subject to federal upper limit pricing, and general reductions in contract payment methodology to pharmacies.

In addition, effective October 1, 2007, CMS promulgated new rules under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, or DRA, changing the federal
upper payment limit for Medicaid reimbursement from 150% of the lowest published price for a drug (which is usually the average wholesale price) to 250% of the lowest Average Manufacturer Price, or AMP. Although the use of an AMP benchmark would
have reduced Medicaid reimbursement rates for certain generic pharmaceuticals, it did not take effect due to a December 19, 2007 federal district court injunction against CMS prohibiting the agency from implementing the rule. The outcome of the
AMP litigation is uncertain, and there can be no assurance that changes in reimbursement formula under the DRA or future legislation or regulation will not have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations. MIPPA delayed the possible
use of AMP in setting the Federal Upper Limit (FULs) for multiple source drugs through September 30, 2009, and delayed public posting of AMP data until October 1, 2009. The use of AMP in FULs and public posting of AMP data are
currently on hold due to the injunction. Further, several current legislative proposals make significant changes to the AMP and FUL calculations and data. It is unclear if and when these changes will be implemented and thus we cannot fully evaluate
the potential impact on our business.

Additionally, OIG recently released a report comparing the relative pharmacy
reimbursements amounts for select drugs under Medicare Part D and Medicaid in select states. The OIG found that national reimbursement amounts were roughly equal for single-source drugs, but that the Medicaid pharmacy reimbursement amount for select
multiple-source drugs was 17 percent higher than Medicare Part D reimbursement for those same drugs. In addition, the report states that Medicaid dispensing fees exceeded Medicare Part D dispensing fees for both single-source and multiple-source
drugs by at least 40 percent and 55 percent, respectively. The report repeatedly notes that these disparities would likely be remedied by the DRA provisions related to AMP that are not yet in use due to the aforementioned injunction. We are unable
to fully evaluate the impact of current and future federal initiatives aimed at eliminating these disparities.

Further, the
Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 modified several Medicaid policies, including, among other things, reducing the limit on Medicaid provider taxes from the current six percent to five-and-a-half percent from January 1, 2008 through
September 30, 2010.

Other

Average wholesale price, or AWP, is a pricing benchmark published by First DataBank, Inc. in its Blue Book, that provides drug databases, content integration software, and drug reference products. AWP has
been widely used to calculate a portion of the Medicaid and Medicare Part D drug reimbursements payable to pharmacy providers. In 2005, several pension funds brought an action against First DataBank and another healthcare provider alleging
collusion to set AWPs for branded drugs.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

On March 30, 2009, the Court approved the settlement of the litigation. Pursuant to the
settlement, First DataBank: (i) adjusted its reporting of Blue Book AWP for those prescription drugs (approximately 1,400 National Drug Codes, or NDCs in number) identified in the plaintiffs previously filed complaint by reducing the
mark-up factor utilized in connection with the calculation of the Blue Book AWP data field to 1.20 times the Wholesale Acquisition Cost, or WAC, or direct price for those prescription drugs that are on a mark-up basis; and (ii) established a
centralized data repository to facilitate reasonable access to discoverable material from First DataBank concerning its drug price reporting practices. The price adjustment required under the provisions of the settlement agreement occurred on
September 26, 2009. Although some appeals are pending, the court has rejected most of these appeals.

Independent of the
settlement and on the same schedule as the Blue Book AWP adjustment noted above, First DataBank intends to apply the same 1.20 markup factor to all NDCs whose Blue Book AWP is set based upon a markup to WAC or direct price in excess of 1.20 times
WAC. First DataBank will also independently discontinue publishing the Blue Book AWP data field for all drugs no later than two years following the date that the Blue Book AWP adjustments noted above are implemented.

The Corporation and the vast preponderance of the Corporations PDPs, third party insurance companies and its Medicare Part A
customers have voluntarily agreed to adjust reimbursement so that pricing could not increase or decrease as a result of the changes to AWP; however, the state Medicaid programs have been unwilling to remain price neutral and accordingly the
Corporation is being reimbursed based on the adjusted AWP. As a result, we believe the AWP settlement will adversely impact our revenues approximately $6.0 million on an annual basis. This exposure is primarily related to the states in which the
Corporation operates, who have refused to adjust their Medicaid reimbursement. The National Association of Chain Drug Stores and the National Community Pharmacists Association, the industry trade groups, have filed lawsuits against several state
Medicaid programs to force the state Medicaid programs to agree to price neutrality. These cases are still pending.

As a
result of political, economic, and regulatory influences, the healthcare delivery industry in the United States is under intense scrutiny and subject to fundamental changes. We cannot predict which reform proposals will be adopted, when they may be
adopted, or what impact they may have on us.

The costs associated with complying with federal and state regulations could be
significant and the failure to comply with any such legal requirements could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.

Environmental Matters

In operating our facilities, historically we have
not encountered any material difficulties effecting compliance with applicable pollution control laws. No material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities are expected. While we cannot predict the effect which any future
legislation, regulations or interpretations may have upon our operations, we do not anticipate any changes regarding pollution control laws that would have a material adverse impact on the Corporation.

Available Information

We
make available free of charge on or through our web site, atwww.pharmerica.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably
practicable after such material is electronically filed with the SEC. Additionally, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, D.C., 20549.
Information regarding operation of the Public Reference Room is available by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Information that we file with the SEC is also available at the SECs web site at www.sec.gov.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

Our SEC filings are available to the public through the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE), 20 Broad Street, New York, New York, 10005. Our Common Stock is listed on the NYSE and trades under the symbol PMC.

The certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act have been filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should consider carefully the risks described below, together with all of the other information, in evaluating our company and our
common stock. If any of the risks described below actually occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position and stock price.

Risk Factors Relating to the Pharmacy Transaction

The integration of the remaining
pharmacy locations and systems infrastructure will be time consuming and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We will continue our information systems integration to one operating platform which will continue to be time consuming, may distract our management from our operations, may be disruptive to our customers
and will be expensive, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We may be charged for services
and products from our former parents at amounts greater than those charged prior to the Pharmacy Transaction and those charged by third-parties.

Before the Pharmacy Transaction, our business was part of two separate public companies. Our former parent companies performed many corporate functions at costs that are less than those that are presently
being charged. After the Pharmacy Transaction, AmerisourceBergen continues to be our primary drug distributor under the Prime Vendor Agreement and Kindred provides information technology services under the Information Technology Services Agreement.
These agreements were entered into as part of the Pharmacy Transaction and have multi-year terms. During the terms of these agreements, we are not able to negotiate potentially better pricing and other more favorable terms with other vendors thus
these existing agreements could negatively impact our results of operations, financial position and competitive position.

Risk Factors
Relating to Our Business

Future volatility and disruption to the global capital and credit markets may adversely affect our results
of operations and financial condition, as well as our ability to access credit and the financial soundness of our customers and suppliers.

The global capital and credit markets have been experiencing a period of unprecedented turmoil and upheaval, characterized by the bankruptcy, failure, collapse or sale of various financial institutions
and an unprecedented level of intervention from the United States federal government. These conditions could adversely affect the demand for our products and services and, therefore, reduce purchases by our customers, which would negatively affect
our revenue growth and cause a decrease in our profitability. In addition, interest rate fluctuations, financial market volatility or credit market disruptions may limit our access to capital, and may also negatively affect our customers and
our suppliers ability to obtain credit to finance their businesses on acceptable terms. As a result, our customers needs and ability to purchase our products or services may decrease, and our suppliers may increase their
prices, reduce their output or change their terms of sale. If our customers or suppliers operating and financial performance deteriorates, or if they are unable to make scheduled payments or obtain credit, our customers may not be able
to pay, or may delay payment of, accounts receivable owed to us, and our suppliers may restrict credit or impose different payment terms. Any inability of customers to pay us for our products and services, or any demands by suppliers for
different payment terms, may adversely affect our earnings and cash flow. Additionally, both state and federal government sponsored payers, as a result of budget deficits or reductions, may seek to reduce their health care
expenditures by renegotiating their contracts with us. Any reduction in payments by such government sponsored payers may adversely affect our earnings and cash flow. Declining economic conditions may also increase our costs. Economic
conditions could adversely affect our results of operations or financial condition.



23



---

##### Table of Contents

Intense competition may erode our profit margins.

The distribution of pharmaceuticals to healthcare facilities is highly competitive. In each geographic market, there are national, regional
and local institutional pharmacies and numerous local retail pharmacies, which provide services comparable to those offered by our pharmacies and which may have greater financial and other resources than we do and may be more established in the
markets they serve than we are. We also compete against regional and local pharmacies that specialize in long-term care. Many of our competitors have equal or greater resources and access to capital than the Corporation. In addition, local
pharmacies have strong personal relationships with their customers. Because relatively few barriers to entry exist in the local markets we serve, we may encounter substantial competition from local market entrants. Consolidation within the
institutional pharmacy industry may also lead to increased competition. Competitive pricing pressures may adversely affect our future operating revenue and profitability.

We compete based on innovation and service as well as price. To attract new clients and retain existing clients, we must continually meet service expectations of our clients and customers. We cannot be
sure that we will continue to remain competitive with the service to our clients at our current levels of profitability.

If we lose
relationships with one or more key pharmaceutical manufacturers or if the payments made or discounts provided by pharmaceutical manufacturers decline, our business and financial results could be adversely affected

We maintain contractual relationships with numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers that may provide us with, among other things:



| |  |  | discounts for drugs we purchase to be dispensed from institutional pharmacies;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | rebates based upon distributions of drugs from our institutional pharmacies; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | administrative fees for managing rebate programs.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

If several of these contractual relationships are terminated or materially altered by the pharmaceutical manufacturers, our business and financial results could be materially adversely affected. In
addition, formulary fee programs have been the subject of debate in federal and state legislatures and various other public and governmental forums. Changes in existing laws or regulations or in interpretations of existing laws or regulations
or the adoption of new laws or regulations relating to any of these programs may materially adversely affect our business.

Our
operating revenue and profitability may suffer upon the loss of large multi-facility customers.

We have a number of
customers that own or operate numerous multi-facilities in our institutional pharmacy segment. In addition, our hospital segment revenues are primarily derived from one large multi-facility customer. If we are not able to continue these
relationships or are only able to continue these relationships on less favorable terms than the ones currently in place, our operating revenues and results of operations would be materially impacted. There can be no assurance that these customers
will not terminate all or a portion of their contracts with the Corporation.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

If we fail to comply with complex and rapidly evolving laws and regulations, we could suffer
penalties, or be required to pay substantial damages or make significant changes to our operations.

We are subject to
numerous federal and state regulations. If we fail to comply with existing or future applicable laws and regulations, we could suffer civil or criminal penalties, including the loss of our licenses to operate our institutional pharmacies and our
ability to participate in federal and state healthcare programs. As a consequence of the severe penalties we could face, we must devote significant operational and managerial resources to complying with these laws and regulations. Although we
believe that we are substantially compliant with all existing statutes and regulations applicable to our business, different interpretations and enforcement policies of these laws and regulations could subject our current practices to allegations of
impropriety or illegality, or could require us to make significant changes to our operations. In addition, we cannot predict the impact of future legislation and regulatory changes on our business or assure that we will be able to obtain or maintain
the regulatory approvals required to operate our business.

Pharmaceutical products can develop unexpected safety or efficacy concerns.

Unexpected safety or efficacy concerns can arise with respect to marketed products, whether or not scientifically
justified, leading to product recalls, withdrawals or declining sales. If we fail to or do not promptly withdraw pharmaceutical products upon a recall by a drug manufacturer, our business and results of operations could be negatively impacted.

Legal and regulatory changes reducing reimbursement rates for pharmaceuticals and/or medical treatments or services may reduce our
profitability.

Both our own profit margins and the profit margins of our customers may be adversely affected by laws
and regulations reducing reimbursement rates. The sources and amounts of our revenues are determined by a number of factors, including licensed bed capacity and occupancy rates of our customers, the number of drugs administered to patients, the mix
of pharmaceuticals dispensed, whether the drugs are brand or generic, and the rates of reimbursement among payers. Changes in the number of drugs administered to patients, as well as payer mix among private pay, Medicare and Medicaid, in our
customers facilities will significantly affect our profitability.

Medicare Part D

The Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 or MMA included a major expansion of the Medicare program with the
addition of a prescription drug benefit under the new Medicare Part D program. The continued impact of these regulations depends upon a variety of factors, including our ongoing relationships with the Part D Plans and the patient mix of
our customers. Future modifications to the Medicare Part D program may reduce revenue and impose additional costs to the industry. In addition, we cannot assure you that Medicare Part D and the regulations promulgated under Medicare
Part D will not have a material adverse effect on our institutional pharmacy business.

Risks related to manufacturer rebates

Our pharmacies receive rebates from pharmaceutical manufacturers for undertaking certain activities that the manufacturers
believe may increase the likelihood that their respective products will be dispensed. CMS has questioned whether long-term care pharmacies should be permitted to receive discounts, rebates and other price concessions from pharmaceutical
manufacturers with respect to prescriptions covered under the Medicare Part D benefit. CMS requires Plan Sponsors to report prescription volume and prescription cost for long-term care pharmacies. As such, most Plan Sponsors require disclosure
from us of discounts, rebates or other remuneration received from drug manufacturers. It is possible that these disclosure requirements and others imposed by CMS could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Our business
would be adversely affected if CMS should take any action that has the effect of eliminating or significantly reducing the rebates that we receive from pharmaceutical manufacturers.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

Changes in Medicaid Reimbursement

In addition, effective October 1, 2007, CMS promulgated new rules under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, or DRA changing the federal
upper payment limit for Medicaid reimbursement from 150% of the lowest published price for a drug (which is usually the average wholesale price) to 250% of the lowest average manufacturer price, or AMP. Although the use of an AMP benchmark would
have reduced Medicaid reimbursement rates for certain generic pharmaceuticals, it did not take effect due to a December 19, 2007 federal district court injunction against CMS prohibiting the agency from implementing the rule. The outcome of the
AMP litigation is uncertain. We are unable to fully evaluate the potential impact until a final action is ultimately determined. There can be no assurance that changes in reimbursement formula under the DRA or future legislation or regulation will
not have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

The Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act
of 2008 delayed use of AMP in setting FULs for multiple source drugs through September 30, 2009, and delayed public posting of AMP data until October 1, 2009. As stated above, the use of AMP in FULs and public posting of AMP data are
currently on hold due to an injunction.

The settlement by First DataBank, Inc. on pricing benchmark may reduce reimbursement to us.

Average wholesale price, or AWP, is a pricing benchmark published by First DataBank, Inc. in its Blue Book, that
provides drug databases, content integration software, and drug reference products. AWP has been widely used to calculate a portion of the Medicaid and Medicare Part D drug reimbursements payable to pharmacy providers. In 2005, several pension
funds brought an action against First DataBank and another healthcare provider alleging collusion to set AWPs for branded drugs.

On March 30, 2009, the Court approved the settlement of the litigation. Pursuant to the settlement, First DataBank: (i) adjusted its reporting of Blue Book AWP for those prescription drugs (approximately 1,400 National Drug Codes,
or NDCs in number) identified in the plaintiffs previously filed complaint by reducing the mark-up factor utilized in connection with the calculation of the Blue Book AWP data field to 1.20 times the Wholesale Acquisition Cost, or WAC, or
direct price for those prescription drugs that are on a mark-up basis; and (ii) established a centralized data repository to facilitate reasonable access to discoverable material from First DataBank concerning its drug price reporting
practices. The price adjustment required under the provisions of the settlement agreement occurred on September 26, 2009.

Independent of the settlement and on the same schedule as the Blue Book AWP adjustment noted above, First DataBank intends to apply the same 1.20 markup factor to all NDCs whose Blue Book AWP is set based upon a markup to WAC or direct
price in excess of 1.20 times WAC. First DataBank will also independently discontinue publishing the Blue Book AWP data field for all drugs no later than two years following the date that the Blue Book AWP adjustments noted above are implemented.

The Corporation and the vast preponderance of the Corporations PDPs, third party insurance companies and its
Medicare Part A customers have voluntarily agreed to adjust reimbursement so that pricing could not increase or decrease as a result of the changes to AWP; however, the state Medicaid programs have been unwilling to remain price neutral and
accordingly the Corporation is being reimbursed based on the adjusted AWP. As a result, we believe the AWP settlement will adversely impact our revenues approximately $6.0 million on an annual basis. This exposure is limited to the states who are
refusing to adjust prices at this time. Currently, the National Association of Chain Drug Stores and the National Community Pharmacists Association, the industry trade groups, have filed lawsuits against several state Medicaid programs to force the
state Medicaid programs to agree to price neutrality. These cases are still pending.

As a result of political, economic, and
regulatory influences, the healthcare delivery industry in the United States is under intense scrutiny and subject to fundamental changes. We cannot predict which reform proposals will be adopted, when they may be adopted, or what impact they may
have on us.



26



---

##### Table of Contents

The costs associated with complying with federal and state regulations could be significant
and the failure to comply with any such legal requirements could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.

Adverse results in material litigation matters or governmental inquiries could have a material adverse effect upon the Corporations business.

The Corporation may from time to time become subject in the ordinary course of business to material legal action related to, among other
things, intellectual property disputes, professional liability and employee-related matters, as well as inquiries from governmental agencies and Medicare or Medicaid carriers requesting comment and information on allegations of billing
irregularities and other matters that are brought to their attention through billing audits, third parties or other sources. The health care industry is subject to substantial federal and state government regulation and audit. Legal actions could
result in substantial monetary damages as well as damage to the Corporations reputation with customers, which could have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations and financial position.

If we or our customers fail to comply with Medicare and Medicaid regulations, we may be subjected to penalties or loss of eligibility to participate
in these programs.

The Medicare and Medicaid programs are highly regulated. These programs are also subject to
frequent and substantial changes. If we or our customers facilities fail to comply with applicable reimbursement laws and regulations, whether purposely or inadvertently, our reimbursement under these programs could be curtailed or reduced and
our eligibility to continue to participate in these programs could be adversely affected. Federal or state governments may also impose other penalties on us for failure to comply with the applicable reimbursement regulations. Failure by our
customers to comply with these or future laws and regulations could result in our inability to provide pharmacy services to these customers and their residents. We do not believe that we have taken any actions that could subject us to material
penalties under these rules and regulations.

Among these laws is the federal anti-kickback statute. This statute prohibits
anyone from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying any remuneration with the intent to refer, or to arrange for the referral or order of, services or items payable under a federal healthcare program. Courts have
interpreted this statute broadly. Violations of the anti-kickback statute may be punished by a criminal fine of up to $25,000 for each violation or imprisonment, civil money penalties of up to $50,000 per violation and damages of up to three times
the total amount of the remuneration and/or exclusion from participation in federal health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. This law impacts the relationships that we may have with potential referral sources. We have a variety of
relationships with potential referral sources, including hospitals and skilled nursing facilities with which we have contracted to provide pharmacy services. The Office of Inspector General at HHS, or OIG, among other regulatory agencies, is
responsible for identifying and eliminating fraud, abuse or waste. The OIG carries out this responsibility through a nationwide program of audits, investigations and inspections. The OIG has promulgated safe harbor regulations that outline practices
that are deemed protected from prosecution under the anti-kickback statute. While we endeavor to comply with the applicable safe harbors, certain of our current arrangements may not qualify for safe harbor protection. Failure to meet a safe harbor
does not mean that the arrangement necessarily violates the anti-kickback statute, but may subject the arrangement to greater scrutiny. It cannot be assured that practices outside of a safe harbor will not be found to violate the anti-kickback
statute.



27



---

##### Table of Contents

The anti-kickback statute and similar state laws and regulations are expansive. We do not
always have the benefit of significant regulatory or judicial interpretation of these laws and regulations. In the future, different interpretations or enforcement of these laws and regulations could subject our current or past practices to
allegations of impropriety or illegality, or could require us to make changes in our facilities, equipment, personnel, services, capital expenditure programs and operating expenses. A determination that we have violated these laws, or the public
announcement that we are being investigated for possible violations of these laws, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects and our business reputation could suffer significantly.
If we fail to comply with the anti-kickback statute or other applicable laws and regulations, we could be subjected to liabilities, including criminal penalties, civil penalties (including the loss of our licenses to operate one or more facilities),
and exclusion of one or more facilities from participation in the Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state health care programs. In addition, we are unable to predict whether other legislation or regulations at the federal or state level will
be adopted, what form such legislation or regulations may take or their impact.

Continuing government and private efforts to contain
healthcare costs may reduce our future revenue.

We could be adversely affected by the continuing efforts of government
and private payers to contain healthcare costs. To reduce healthcare costs, payers seek to lower reimbursement rates, limit the scope of covered services and negotiate reduced or capped pricing arrangements. While many of the proposed policy changes
would require congressional approval to implement, we cannot assure you that reimbursement payments under governmental and private third party payer programs will remain at levels comparable to present levels or will be sufficient to cover the costs
allocable to patients eligible for reimbursement under these programs. Any changes that lower reimbursement rates under Medicare, Medicaid or private pay programs could result in a substantial reduction in our net operating revenues. Our operating
margins may continue to be under pressure because of deterioration in reimbursement, changes in payer mix and growth in operating expenses in excess of increases, if any, in payments by third party payers.

Healthcare reform could adversely affect the liquidity of our customers which would have an adverse effect on their ability to make timely payments to
us for our products and services.

Healthcare reform and legislation may have an adverse effect on our business through
decreasing funds available to our customers. Limitations or restrictions on Medicare and Medicaid payments to our customers could adversely impact the liquidity of our customers, resulting in their inability to pay us, or to timely pay us, for our
products and services. This inability could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

The changing U.S. healthcare industry and increasing enforcement environment may negatively impact our business.

Our products and services are part of the structure of the healthcare financing and reimbursement system currently existing in the United States. In recent years, the healthcare industry has undergone significant changes in an effort to
reduce costs and government spending. These changes include an increased reliance on managed care, cuts in Medicare funding affecting our healthcare provider customer base and consolidation of competitors, suppliers and customers.

We expect the healthcare industry to continue to change significantly in the future. Some of these potential changes, such as a reduction in
governmental support of healthcare services or adverse changes in legislation or regulations governing prescription drug pricing, healthcare services or mandated benefits, may cause healthcare providers to reduce the amount of our products and
services they purchase or the price they are willing to pay for our products and services. If we are unable to adjust to changes in the healthcare environment, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
and liquidity.



28



---

##### Table of Contents

Further, both federal and state government agencies have increased their focus on and
coordination of civil and criminal enforcement efforts in the healthcare area. The OIG and the U.S. Department of Justice have, from time to time, established national enforcement initiatives, targeting all providers of a particular type, that focus
on specific billing practices or other suspected areas of abuse. In addition, under the federal False Claims Act, private parties have the right to bring qui tam whistleblower lawsuits against companies that submit false claims for
payments to the government. A number of states have adopted similar state whistleblower and false claims provisions. We do not believe that we have taken any actions that could subject us to material penalties under these provisions.

Further consolidation of managed care organizations and other third-party payers may adversely affect our profits.

Managed care organizations and other third-party payers have continued to consolidate in order to enhance their ability to influence the
delivery of healthcare services. Consequently, the healthcare needs of a large percentage of the U.S. population are increasingly served by a small number of managed care organizations. These organizations generally enter into service agreements
with a limited number of providers for needed services. In addition, private payers, including managed care payers, increasingly are demanding discounted fee structures. To the extent that these organizations terminate us as a preferred provider,
engage our competitors as a preferred or exclusive provider or demand discounted fee structures, our profitability and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Possible changes in or our failure to satisfy our manufacturers rebate programs could adversely affect our results of operations.

We currently earn rebates from certain manufacturers of pharmaceutical products for meeting tiered market share and purchase volumes. There
can be no assurance that pharmaceutical manufacturers will continue to offer these rebates or that we will continue to satisfy the tiered market share and purchase volumes. A decrease in the volume of prescriptions dispensed or an increase in the
generic dispensing rate could affect our ability to satisfy our manufacturers rebate programs. The termination of such programs or our failure to satisfy the tiered market share and volumes may have an adverse affect on our cost of goods sold
and our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

If we or our customers fail to comply with licensure requirements,
laws and regulations in respect of healthcare fraud or other applicable laws and regulations, we could suffer penalties or be required to make significant changes to our operations.

Our pharmacies must be licensed by the state board of pharmacy in the state in which they operate. Many states also regulate out-of-state
pharmacies that are delivering prescription products to patients or residents in their states. The failure to obtain or renew any required regulatory approvals or licenses could adversely impact the operation of our business. In addition, the
healthcare facilities we service are also subject to extensive federal, state and local regulations and are required to be licensed in the states in which they are located. The failure by these healthcare facilities to comply with these or future
regulations or to obtain or renew any required licenses could result in our inability to provide pharmacy services to these facilities and their residents and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and
liquidity.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

While we believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws, many of the
regulations applicable to us, including those relating to marketing incentives offered by pharmaceutical suppliers, and rebates paid by pharmaceutical manufacturers are vague or indefinite and have not been interpreted by the courts. They may be
interpreted or applied by a prosecutorial, regulatory or judicial authority in a manner that could require us to make changes in our operations. These changes may be material and may require the expenditure of material funds to implement. We believe
that the regulatory environment surrounding most segments of the healthcare industry remains intense. Federal and state governments continue to impose intensive enforcement policies resulting in a significant number of inspections, citations of
regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory sanctions including demands for refund of overpayments, terminations from the Medicare and Medicaid programs, bans on Medicare and Medicaid payments and fines. If we or our customers fail to comply with
the extensive applicable laws and regulations, we could become ineligible to receive government program reimbursement, suffer civil or criminal penalties or be required to make significant changes to our operations. In addition, we could be forced
to expend considerable resources responding to an investigation or other enforcement action under these laws or regulations regardless of whether we have actually been involved in any violations or wrong-doing.

Federal and state medical privacy regulations may increase the costs of operations and expose us to civil and criminal sanctions.

We must comply with extensive federal and state requirements regarding the transmission and retention of health information. The Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and its implementing regulations, referred to as HIPAA, was enacted to ensure that employees can retain and at times transfer their health insurance when they change jobs, to enhance the privacy
and security of personal health information and to simplify healthcare administrative processes. HIPAA requires the adoption of standards for the exchange of electronic health information. Failure to comply with HIPAA could result in fines and
penalties that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.

Acquisitions, investments and
strategic alliances that we have made or may make in the future may use significant resources, may be unsuccessful and could expose us to unforeseen liabilities.

We have made and anticipate that we may continue to make acquisitions of, investments in and strategic alliances with complementary businesses to enable us to capitalize on our position in the geographic
markets in which we operate and to expand our businesses in new geographic markets. At any particular time, we may be in various stages of assessment, discussion and negotiation with regard to one or more potential acquisitions, investments or
strategic alliances, not all of which, if any, will be consummated. Our growth plans rely, in part, on the successful completion of future acquisitions. If we are unsuccessful, our business would suffer.

We intend to make public disclosure of pending and completed acquisitions when appropriate or required by applicable securities laws and
regulations. Acquisitions may involve significant cash expenditures, debt incurrence, additional operating losses, amortization of certain intangible assets of acquired companies, and expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operations and liquidity. Acquisitions involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation:



| |  |  | difficulties integrating acquired operations, personnel and information systems, or in realizing projected efficiencies and cost savings;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | diversion of managements time from existing operations;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | potential loss of key employees or customers of acquired companies;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | inaccurate assessment of assets and liabilities and exposure to undisclosed or unforeseen liabilities of acquired companies, including liabilities for
failure to comply with healthcare laws;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | increases in our indebtedness and a limitation on our ability to access additional capital when needed; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | failure to operate acquired facilities profitably or to achieve improvements in their financial performance.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



30



---

##### Table of Contents

If we fail to comply with our Corporate Integrity Agreement, we could be subject to severe sanctions,
including stipulated monetary penalties and exclusion from federal healthcare programs.

We are subject to the terms of
a CIA, entered into between the OIG and PharMerica LTC on March 29, 2005. In June 2004, the OIG commenced an administrative action against PharMerica LTC, including its subsidiary PharMerica Drug Systems, Inc., or PDSI. The OIG alleged that
PDSIs December 1997 acquisition of Hollins Manor I, LLC, or Hollins, from HCMF Corporation, or HCMF, violated the anti-kickback provisions of the Social Security Act. The Hollins acquisition predated the acquisition of PharMerica LTC in
1999 by AmerisourceBergens predecessor. Hollins was an institutional pharmacy that had been established to serve the nursing homes then operated by HCMF. As part of the settlement, in which PharMerica LTC and PDSI expressly denied wrongdoing,
PharMerica LTC paid $5.8 million to the HHS and entered into a five-year CIA. In turn, the OIG provided PharMerica LTC and its subsidiaries with a full release for the conduct covered by the administrative action, including an agreement not to
pursue their exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. Under the CIA, PharMerica LTC agreed to continue its, and the Corporation as of the closing of the Pharmacy Transaction has agreed to maintain a
comprehensive compliance program, which includes a corporate compliance officer, a corporate compliance committee, a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, written policies and procedures, educational and training initiatives, review and disciplinary
procedures, a confidential disclosure program, an ineligible persons screening program and internal audit and review procedures, all designed to promote compliance with applicable laws, including federal healthcare program requirements, and the
promotion of ethical business practices. PharMerica LTC is also subject to extensive reporting requirements under the CIA, including annual reports describing PharMerica LTCs compliance activities, notices of any government investigations or
legal proceedings, overpayments received from federal healthcare programs and changes in pharmacy locations and new business units. The term of the CIA is five years and it ends on March 29, 2010. PharMerica LTC is required to comply fully and
timely with all of the CIA requirements. Failure to do so may lead to the imposition of stipulated penalties, including substantial monetary penalties and exclusion from participation in federal healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid.
Any such penalties could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

Risks generally
associated with our sophisticated information systems may adversely affect our results of operations.

We rely on
sophisticated information systems in our business to obtain, rapidly process, analyze, and manage data to facilitate the dispensing of prescription and non-prescription pharmaceuticals in accordance with physician orders and deliver those
medications to patients and long-term care residents on a timely basis; to manage the accurate billing and collections for thousands of customers; and to process payments to suppliers. Our business and results of operations may be materially
adversely affected if these systems are interrupted or damaged or if they fail for an extended period of time.

We purchase a
significant portion of our pharmaceutical products from one supplierAmerisourceBergen.

We are required to
purchase 95% of our pharmaceutical products from AmerisourceBergen, one of our former parent companies, pursuant to the Prime Vendor Agreement. If the Prime Vendor Agreement is terminated or AmerisourceBergen fails to deliver products in accordance
with the Prime Vendor Agreement, there can be no assurance that our operations would not be disrupted or that we could obtain the products at similar cost or at all. In this event, failure to satisfy our customers requirements would result in
defaults under these customer contracts subjecting us to damages and the potential termination of those contracts. Such events could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity. In addition, under
the terms of the Prime Vendor Agreement, we are unable to negotiate potentially better pricing and other terms with other drug distributors which could negatively impact our competitive position.



31



---

##### Table of Contents

Prescription volumes may decline, and our net revenues and profitability may be negatively impacted,
if products are withdrawn from the market or if increased safety risk profiles of specific drugs result in utilization decreases.

We dispense significant volumes of brand-name and generic drugs from our institutional pharmacies. These volumes are the basis for our net revenues and profitability. When increased safety risk profiles
of specific drugs or classes of drugs result in utilization decreases, physicians may cease writing or reduce the numbers of prescriptions written for these drugs. Additionally, negative press regarding drugs with higher safety risk profiles may
result in reduced consumer demand for such drugs. On occasion, products are withdrawn by their manufacturers. In cases where there are no acceptable prescription drug equivalents or alternatives for these prescription drugs, our volumes, net
revenues, profitability and cash flows may decline.

We could be required to record a material non-cash charge to income if our recorded
intangible assets are impaired, or if we shorten intangible asset useful lives.

We have $90.8 million of recorded
intangible assets, net, on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009. Our intangible assets primarily represent the value of client relationships that were recorded from acquisitions prior to July 31, 2007 and upon our
acquisition of PharMerica LTC along with subsequent acquisitions in 2008 and 2009. Under current accounting rules, intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives. These assets may become impaired with the loss of significant clients. If the
carrying amount of the assets exceeds the undiscounted pre-tax expected future cash flows from the lowest appropriate asset grouping, we would be required to record a non-cash impairment charge to our statement of operations in the amount the
carrying value of these assets exceeds the undiscounted expected future cash flows. In addition, while the intangible assets may not be impaired, the useful lives are subject to continual assessment, taking into account historical and expected
losses of relationships that were in the base at time of acquisition. This assessment may result in a reduction of the remaining weighted average useful life of these assets, resulting in potentially significant increases to non-cash amortization
expense that is charged to our consolidated statement of operations. An intangible asset impairment charge, or a reduction of amortization lives, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2008,
we incurred a pre-tax impairment charge of $14.8 million or $0.30 earnings per diluted share as a result of a review of our lost customer base of pre-Pharmacy Transaction assets.

We primarily obtain our information services from one provider. Failure to provide information services, in a timely manner could cause delays in the delivery of our services, which could damage our
reputation, cause us to lose customers and negatively impact our growth.

We obtain substantially all of our
information services from Kindred, one of our former parent companies, pursuant to the IT Services Agreement. Kindred is not in the business of providing comprehensive information technology outsourcing services to third parties and does not have
any significant prior experience providing comprehensive outsourcing information technology services for any third party. If Kindred or other third parties upon whom we are dependent fail to devote sufficient time and resources to us or if their
performance is substandard, our business may be harmed. Any delays, malfunctions, inefficiencies or interruptions in these products or services could adversely affect the reliability or operation of our business, which could cause us to experience
difficulty retaining current customers and attracting new customers. This could result in our failure to satisfy our customers requirements or comply with certain of our financial or regulatory reporting requirements, which could have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.



32



---

##### Table of Contents

We are highly dependent on our senior management team and our pharmacy professionals.

We are highly dependent upon the members of our senior management and our pharmacists and other pharmacy
professionals. Our business is managed by a small number of senior management personnel. If we were unable to retain these persons, we might be materially adversely affected due to the limited pool of senior management personnel with significant
experience in our industry. Accordingly, we believe we could experience significant difficulty in replacing key management personnel. We expect that any employment contracts we enter into with our key management personnel will be subject to
termination without cause by either party. Moreover, although the majority of the members of our senior management team have significant experience in the industry, they will need time to fully assess and understand our business and operations. We
can offer no assurance how long these members of senior management will choose to remain with us.

In addition, our continued
success depends on our ability to attract and retain pharmacists and other pharmacy professionals. Competition for qualified pharmacists and other pharmacy professionals is intense. The loss of pharmacy personnel or the inability to attract or
retain sufficient numbers of qualified pharmacy professionals could adversely affect our business. Although we generally have been able to meet our staffing requirements for pharmacists and other pharmacy professionals, our inability to do so in the
future could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

Risk Factors Relating to
Ownership of Our Common Stock and Our Senior Secured Credit Facility

The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be
volatile

The market price of our common stock could fluctuate significantly for many reasons, including, without
limitation the following:



| |  |  | as a result of the risk factors listed in this document;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | actual or anticipated fluctuations in our results of operations;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | for reasons unrelated to our specific performance, such as reports by industry analysts, investor perceptions, or negative announcements by our
customers or competitors regarding their own performance;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | regulatory changes that could impact our business or that of our customers; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | general economic and industry conditions.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------

In addition, when the market price of a companys common stock drops significantly, stockholders often institute securities class action lawsuits against the company. A lawsuit against us could cause
us to incur substantial costs and could divert the time and attention of our management and other resources.

Certain provisions of our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws and provisions of Delaware law as well as certain provisions of agreements entered into in connection with the Pharmacy Transaction could delay or prevent a change of control that stockholders favor.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or other change of control
that stockholders may consider favorable or may impede the ability of the holders of our common stock to change our management. The provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, among other things:



| |  |  | prohibit stockholder action except at an annual or special meeting. Specifically, this means our stockholders will be unable to act by written consent;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | regulate how stockholders may present proposals or nominate directors for election at annual meetings of stockholders. Advance notice of such proposals
or nominations will be required;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | regulate how special meetings of stockholders may be called. Our stockholders will not have the right to call special meetings;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



33



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock in one or more series, without stockholder approval. Under this authority, our board of
directors could adopt a rights plan which could ensure continuity of management by rendering it more difficult for a potential acquirer to obtain control of us; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | require an affirmative vote of the holders of three-quarters or more of the combined voting power of our common stock entitled to vote in the election
of our directors in order for the stockholders to amend our bylaws.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition, because we have not chosen
to be exempt from Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL), this provision could also delay or prevent a change of control that may be favorable. Section 203 provides that unless board and/or shareholder
approval is obtained pursuant to the requirements of the statute, persons that acquire, or are affiliated with a person that acquires, more than 15% of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation shall not engage in any business
combination with that corporation, including by merger, consolidation or acquisitions of additional shares, for a three-year period following the date on which that person or its affiliate becomes the holder of more than 15% of the
corporations outstanding voting stock.

Acquisitions, investments and strategic alliances we may make in the future may need to be
financed by borrowings from the senior secured credit facility for which funds may not be made available by certain participants.

We have made and anticipate that we may continue to make acquisitions of, investments in and strategic alliances with complementary businesses to enable us to capitalize on our position in the geographic
markets in which we operate and to expand our business in new geographic markets. Our growth plans rely, in part, on the successful completion of future acquisitions. At any particular time, we may need to finance such acquisitions and strategic
alliances by borrowings from our senior secured credit facility. The financial markets are very volatile and certain participants in our senior secured credit facility may not be able to participate in funding their commitments under the revolving
line of credit. If we are unsuccessful in obtaining the financing, our business would be impacted.

We are exposed to interest rate
changes.

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2009, we had
outstanding debt of $240.0 million, all of which was subject to variable rates of interest. See Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMarket Risk.

We have indebtedness, which restricts our ability to pay dividends and has a negative impact on our financing options and liquidity.

We have $240.0 million in indebtednesses outstanding under our senior secured credit facility.

The credit agreement contains customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations on our ability to incur indebtedness, including a
maximum of debt to EBITDA ratio. The senior secured credit facility contains financial covenants that require us to satisfy certain financial tests and maintain certain financial ratios. The senior secured credit facility limits our ability to
declare and pay dividends or other distributions on our shares of common stock. If our lenders permit us to declare dividends, the dividend amounts, if any, will be determined by our board of directors, which will consider a number of factors,
including our financial condition, capital requirements, funds generated from operations, future business prospects, applicable contractual restrictions and any other factors our board of directors may deem relevant. The amount of this outstanding
indebtedness could limit our ability to pay dividends and to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditure and acquisition purposes. A significant portion of our cash flows will be dedicated to debt service and
will be unavailable for investment, capital expenditures or other operating expenses.



34



---

##### Table of Contents

As a result of these and other factors, we cannot assure you that our business will generate
sufficient cash flows from operations or that future borrowings will be available to us in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we do not generate or are unable to borrow sufficient amounts
of cash on satisfactory terms to meet these needs, we may need to seek to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, sell assets, curtail discretionary capital expenditures or seek additional capital. There can be no
assurance that additional capital will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all, which could adversely impact our business, results of operations, liquidity, capital resources, and financial position.

Our ability to pay dividends is limited by our financial results and we do not anticipate paying any distributions in the foreseeable future.

We anticipate that future earnings will be used principally to support operations and finance the growth of our business.
Thus, we do not intend to pay dividends or other cash distributions on our common stock in the foreseeable future. See Dividend Policy. We entered into a senior secured credit facility providing for both term and revolving credit
borrowings.

Our ability to make payments on our existing and future debt and to fund working capital needs and planned
capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future, which is largely subject to general economic, financial, competitive, regulatory, legislative and other factors that are beyond our control. Cost containment and lower
reimbursement levels relative to increases in cost by third party payers, including federal and state governments, could have a significant negative impact on our business and on our cash flows. Our operating margins continue to be under pressure
because of continuing regulatory scrutiny and growth in our operating expenses, such as product and labor costs.

See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity and Capital Resources.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 2. Properties

We have facilities including offices and key operating facilities (e.g. institutional pharmacies) in various locations throughout the United
States. The Corporations corporate headquarters are located in Louisville, Kentucky. In addition to the institutional pharmacies listed below, the Corporation also has four facilities throughout the nation with several overhead and
administrative functions. As of December 31, 2009, all facilities were leased. We consider all of these facilities to be suitable, adequate, and are utilized at full capacity by the institutional pharmacy business segment.

The following table presents certain information with respect to operating leases of our institutional pharmacies identified by the
Corporation as properties as of December 31, 2009:



|              |  |                 |  |               |  |  |  |                |  |                 |  |              
|------------- |  | --------------- |  | ------------- |  |  |  | -------------- |  | --------------- |  | -------------
|Property      |  | # of Facilities |  | SquareFootage |  |  |  | Property       |  | # of Facilities |  | SquareFootage
|Alabama       |  | 2               |  | 20,330        |  |  |  | Minnesota      |  | 1               |  | 15,264       
|Arizona       |  | 2               |  | 19,288        |  |  |  | Mississippi    |  | 1               |  | 11,600       
|Arkansas      |  | 1               |  | 6,850         |  |  |  | Missouri       |  | 1               |  | 4,090        
|California    |  | 11              |  | 109,218       |  |  |  | Montana        |  | 1               |  | 2,440        
|Colorado      |  | 2               |  | 14,067        |  |  |  | Nebraska       |  | 1               |  | 5,120        
|Connecticut   |  | 1               |  | 15,600        |  |  |  | Nevada         |  | 2               |  | 10,860       
|Delaware      |  | 1               |  | 15,600        |  |  |  | New Hampshire  |  | 1               |  | 7,500        
|Florida       |  | 9               |  | 94,982        |  |  |  | New Mexico     |  | 1               |  | 4,798        
|Georgia       |  | 2               |  | 32,800        |  |  |  | North Carolina |  | 4               |  | 26,950       
|Hawaii        |  | 5               |  | 15,008        |  |  |  | Ohio           |  | 3               |  | 22,051       
|Idaho         |  | 1               |  | 5,750         |  |  |  | Pennsylvania   |  | 9               |  | 59,388       
|Illinois      |  | 1               |  | 15,256        |  |  |  | Rhode Island   |  | 1               |  | 7,800        
|Indiana       |  | 1               |  | 23,724        |  |  |  | South Dakota   |  | 2               |  | 12,050       
|Iowa          |  | 2               |  | 10,342        |  |  |  | Tennessee      |  | 3               |  | 28,862       
|Kansas        |  | 1               |  | 9,977         |  |  |  | Texas          |  | 8               |  | 62,860       
|Kentucky      |  | 2               |  | 43,500        |  |  |  | Utah           |  | 1               |  | 8,002        
|Louisiana     |  | 1               |  | 4,914         |  |  |  | Virginia       |  | 3               |  | 23,647       
|Maine         |  | 1               |  | 10,200        |  |  |  | Washington     |  | 2               |  | 14,792       
|Maryland      |  | 1               |  | 10,744        |  |  |  | West Virginia  |  | 1               |  | 8,000        
|Massachusetts |  | 2               |  | 59,358        |  |  |  | Wisconsin      |  | 1               |  | 10,700       
|Michigan      |  | 2               |  | 13,185        |  |  |  |                |  |                 |  |              

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in legal and regulatory proceedings. While it is not possible to determine the ultimate disposition of the
various ongoing proceedings and whether they will be resolved in our favor, we do not believe that the outcome of these proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II



|Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our only class of common equity is our $0.01 par value common stock, which trades on the NYSE under the symbol PMC. Trading in
our common stock commenced on the NYSE on August 1, 2007. Prior to that time, there was no public trading market for our common stock.

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share during the period, at closing, of our common stock as reported by the NYSE for the fiscal periods indicated.



|               |  |      |       |     |   |       |  |   |      
|-------------- |  | ---- | ----- | --- | - | ----- |  | - | -----
|               |  | High |       | Low |   | Close
|Fiscal 2008    |  |      |       |     |   |       |  |   |      
|First Quarter  |  | $    | 17.17 |     | $ | 13.15 |  | $ | 16.57
|Second Quarter |  | $    | 23.18 |     | $ | 15.58 |  | $ | 22.59
|Third Quarter  |  | $    | 25.05 |     | $ | 21.59 |  | $ | 22.49
|Fourth Quarter |  | $    | 22.19 |     | $ | 13.70 |  | $ | 15.67
|               |  |      |      
|Fiscal 2009    |  |      |       |     |   |       |  |   |      
|First Quarter  |  | $    | 19.38 |     | $ | 14.51 |  | $ | 16.64
|Second Quarter |  | $    | 19.86 |     | $ | 15.99 |  | $ | 19.63
|Third Quarter  |  | $    | 21.47 |     | $ | 18.57 |  | $ | 18.57
|Fourth Quarter |  | $    | 18.49 |     | $ | 14.59 |  | $ | 15.88

As of January 29, 2010, we had approximately 2,740 stockholders of record of the
Corporations common stock.

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total return on a $100 investment in each of the Common Stock of the Corporation, the Standard & Poors 500 Stock Index, the Standard &
Poors 600 Index and the Standard & Poors Healthcare Index for the period from August 1, 2007 to December 31, 2009. This graph assumes an investment in the Corporations common stock and the indices of $100 on
August 1, 2007 and that all dividends were reinvested:

LOGO



37



---

##### Table of Contents

|                   |  |                       |     |         |   |         |  |               |  |                      |     |  |   |    
|------------------ |  | --------------------- | --- | ------- | - | ------- |  | ------------- |  | -------------------- | --- |  | - | ---
|                   |  | PharMericaCorporation |     | S&P 500 |   | S&P 600 |  | S&PHealthcare |  | PMC PeerGroup - 2008
|August 1, 2007     |  | $                     | 100 |         | $ | 100     |  | 100           |  | $                    | 100 |  | $ | 100
|September 30, 2007 |  |                       | 86  |         |   | 104     |  | 104           |  |                      | 104 |  |   | 98 
|December 31, 2007  |  |                       | 80  |         |   | 100     |  | 104           |  |                      | 104 |  |   | 101
|March 31, 2008     |  |                       | 96  |         |   | 90      |  | 89            |  |                      | 92  |  |   | 91 
|June 30, 2008      |  |                       | 131 |         |   | 87      |  | 89            |  |                      | 90  |  |   | 95 
|September 30, 2008 |  |                       | 130 |         |   | 79      |  | 88            |  |                      | 90  |  |   | 106
|December 31, 2008  |  |                       | 91  |         |   | 62      |  | 65            |  |                      | 79  |  |   | 90 
|March 31, 2009     |  |                       | 96  |         |   | 54      |  | 54            |  |                      | 72  |  |   | 70 
|June 30, 2009      |  |                       | 114 |         |   | 63      |  | 65            |  |                      | 78  |  |   | 80 
|September 30, 2009 |  |                       | 108 |         |   | 72      |  | 77            |  |                      | 85  |  |   | 93 
|December 31, 2009  |  |                       | 92  |         |   | 76      |  | 81            |  |                      | 92  |  |   | 103

During 2009, the Corporation changed its peer group comparison to the S&P
Healthcare Index and also included the S&P 600 Index, as management feels the Healthcare Index is a more comprehensive overview of the industry.

The PMC Peer Group - 2008 index includes the following companies: Amedisys Inc., Gentiva Health Services, Inc., Catalyst Health Solutions, Inc., Health South Corporation, Henry Schein, Inc., Invacare
Corporation, Lincare Holdings, Inc., Magellan Health Services Inc., Omnicare Inc., Owens & Minor, PSS World Medical Inc., and Res Care, Inc.

The Corporation has never paid a cash dividend on its common stock and does not expect to pay cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future. Our Senior Secured Credit Facility also limits
our ability to declare and pay dividends or other distributions on our shares of common stock. Management believes the stockholders are better served if all of the Corporations earnings are retained for expansion of the business. The
Corporation did not repurchase any of the shares of its common stock during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Amended and Restated
2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan

On July 12, 2007, the Corporation adopted the PharMerica Corporation 2007 Omnibus
Incentive Plan (as amended and restated, the Omnibus Plan) under which the Corporation is authorized to grant equity-based and other awards to its employees, officers, directors, and consultants. The Corporation has reserved 3,800,000
shares of its common stock for awards to be granted under the Omnibus Plan plus 534,642 shares reserved for substitute equity awards for employees of KPS and PharMerica LTC whose awards were cancelled or forfeited upon the consummation of the
Pharmacy Transaction. The Corporations Compensation Committee administers the Omnibus Plan and has the authority to determine the recipient of the awards, the types of awards, the number of shares covered, and the terms and conditions of the
awards. The Omnibus Plan allows for grants of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, deferred shares, performance awards, including cash bonus awards, and other
stock-based awards. The Compensation Committee establishes long-term and short-term incentive programs under the Omnibus Plan. On July 24, 2008, the Corporations stockholders approved an amendment to the Omnibus Plan to provide the
Compensation Committee with increased flexibility to use non-GAAP measures to measure performance, including the ability to exclude from the performance measures certain items or charges related to an event or occurrence that the Compensation
Committee determines should be excluded in accordance with the performance criteria of performance awards granted pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. In connection with the Corporations 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders of the
Corporation approved and adopted the amended and restated Omnibus Plan to preserve preferential tax treatment as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.



38



---

##### Table of Contents

The stock options granted under the Omnibus Plan to replace options granted by Kindred or
AmerisourceBergen that were cancelled or forfeited upon the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction have the same basic terms, conditions, and vesting schedule of the awards granted to them by Kindred and AmerisourceBergen. In addition, unvested
restricted shares of Kindred and AmerisourceBergen common stock held by our named executive officers who were formerly KPS or PharMerica LTC employees were replaced with restricted shares of the Corporations common stock, which have the same
basic terms, conditions, and vesting schedule as applied to the forfeited Kindred or AmerisourceBergen restricted shares.

Stock options granted to officers and employees under the Omnibus Plan generally vest in four equal annual installments and have a term of seven years. The restricted stock granted to officers and employees under the Omnibus Plan generally
vest in full upon the three-year anniversary of the date of grant. The restricted stock grant to members of the board of directors vest in three equal annual installments. The restricted stock units granted to officers and employees under the
Omnibus Plan generally vest in two equal annual installments. The performance share units granted under the Omnibus Plan generally vest based upon the achievement of a target amount of the Corporations earnings before interest, income taxes,
depreciation and amortization, integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges, impairment of intangible assets, and any changes in accounting principles, which reinforces the importance of achieving the Corporations
profitability objectives. The performance is measured over a three-year period.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Recent Purchases of
Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases

None.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth equity compensation plan information:



|                                                   |  |                                                                                 |  |                                                                 |  |                                                                                                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Plan Category                                      |  | Number of securities to beissued upon exercise
ofoutstanding options and rights |  | Weighted-average exerciseprice of outstanding optionsand rights |  | Number of securitiesremaining available for futureissuance under equitycompensation plans
(excludingsecurities reflected incolumn (a))
|                                                   |  | (a)                                                                             |  | (b)                                                             |  | (c)                                                                                                                                   
|Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders |  | 2,041,500(1)                                                                    |  | $15.60(2)                                                       |  | 1,443,127                                                                                                                             

See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the
material features of the Omnibus Plan.

(1) Includes the following:

1,733,325 shares of common stock to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock options granted under the Omnibus Plan;

208,843 shares of common stock to be issued upon vesting of performance share units under the Omnibus Plan; and

99,332 shares of common stock to be issued upon vesting of restricted stock units under the Omnibus Plan.

(2) The weighted average exercise price in column (b) does not take the 308,175 shares of common stock to be issued under performance share units and restricted stock units into account.



39



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Selected Financial Data

The
following table presents our selected historical consolidated financial and operating data. The selected historical financial and operating data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (in millions, except
where indicated):



|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ------ | - | -------- | - | ------- | ----------- |  | - | ------- | - |  | ---- | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                    |  | Years Ended December 31, |       
|                                                                    |  | 2005 (1)                 |        |   | 2006 (1) |   |         | 2007 (1)(5) |  |   | 2008    |   |  | 2009 |        
|Statement of operations data:                                       |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Revenues                                                            |  | $                        | 522.2  |   |          | $ | 652.6   |             |  | $ | 1,217.8 |   |  | $    | 1,947.3 |   |  | $ | 1,841.2 |  
|Cost of goods sold                                                  |  |                          | 439.1  |   |          |   | 557.9   |             |  |   | 1,044.0 |   |  |      | 1,662.7 |   |  |   | 1,568.9 |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Gross profit                                                        |  |                          | 83.1   |   |          |   | 94.7    |             |  |   | 173.8   |   |  |      | 284.6   |   |  |   | 272.3   |  
|Selling, general and administrative                                 |  |                          | 46.6   |   |          |   | 67.3    |             |  |   | 169.3   |   |  |      | 214.1   |   |  |   | 187.6   |  
|Amortization expense                                                |  |                          | 2.2    |   |          |   | 3.4     |             |  |   | 5.0     |   |  |      | 6.5     |   |  |   | 9.0     |  
|Impairment of intangible assets                                     |  |                          |       |   |          |   |        |             |  |   |        |   |  |      | 14.8    |   |  |   |        |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |                          |       |   |          |   | 2.9     |             |  |   | 29.8    |   |  |      | 26.7    |   |  |   | 5.2     |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Operating income (loss) (2)                                         |  | $                        | 34.3   |   |          | $ | 21.1    |             |  | $ | (30.3   | ) |  | $    | 22.5    |   |  | $ | 70.5    |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net income (loss)                                                   |  | $                        | 21.0   |   |          | $ | 12.8    |             |  | $ | (24.1   | ) |  | $    | 5.0     |   |  | $ | 42.2    |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Earnings (loss) per common share: (3)                               |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic                                                               |  |                          | NM     |   |          |   | NM      |             |  | $ | (1.13   | ) |  | $    | 0.17    |   |  | $ | 1.39    |  
|Diluted                                                             |  |                          | NM     |   |          |   | NM      |             |  | $ | (1.13   | ) |  | $    | 0.17    |   |  | $ | 1.39    |  
|Shares used in computing earnings (loss) per common share:          |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic                                                               |  |                          | NM     |   |          |   | NM      |             |  |   | 21.3    |   |  |      | 30.1    |   |  |   | 30.3    |  
|Diluted                                                             |  |                          | NM     |   |          |   | NM      |             |  |   | 21.3    |   |  |      | 30.2    |   |  |   | 30.4    |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |         
|Balance sheet data:                                                 |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                           |  | $                        | 1.4    |   |          | $ | 3.7     |             |  | $ | 32.0    |   |  | $    | 41.3    |   |  | $ | 51.2    |  
|Working capital                                                     |  | $                        | 72.3   |   |          | $ | 79.2    |             |  | $ | 268.6   |   |  | $    | 272.3   |   |  | $ | 312.8   |  
|Goodwill                                                            |  | $                        | 40.0   |   |          | $ | 45.2    |             |  | $ | 111.3   |   |  | $    | 113.7   |   |  | $ | 140.1   |  
|Intangible assets, net                                              |  | $                        | 34.3   |   |          | $ | 38.0    |             |  | $ | 77.5    |   |  | $    | 73.4    |   |  | $ | 90.8    |  
|Total assets                                                        |  | $                        | 194.6  |   |          | $ | 236.8   |             |  | $ | 680.1   |   |  | $    | 679.2   |   |  | $ | 724.3   |  
|Long-term debt                                                      |  | $                        |       |   |          | $ |        |             |  | $ | 250.0   |   |  | $    | 240.0   |   |  | $ | 240.0   |  
|Total stockholders equity                                          |  | $                        | 170.4  |   |          | $ | 198.3   |             |  | $ | 309.2   |   |  | $    | 319.8   |   |  | $ | 370.9   |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |         
|Supplemental information:                                           |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Adjusted EBITDA (4)                                                 |  | $                        | 40.1   |   |          | $ | 32.8    |             |  | $ | 44.5    |   |  | $    | 92.5    |   |  | $ | 102.7   |  
|Adjusted EBITDA Margin (4)                                          |  |                          | 7.7    | % |          |   | 5.0     | %           |  |   | 3.7     | % |  |      | 4.8     | % |  |   | 5.6     | %
|Adjusted EBITDA per prescription dispensed (4)                      |  | $                        | 3.90   |   |          | $ | 2.59    |             |  | $ | 1.80    |   |  | $    | 2.29    |   |  | $ | 2.63    |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                           |  | $                        | 5.3    |   |          | $ | 10.0    |             |  | $ | 36.3    |   |  | $    | 65.7    |   |  | $ | 85.0    |  
|Net cash used by investing activities                               |  | $                        | (109.5 | ) |          | $ | (25.0   | )           |  | $ | (22.0   | ) |  | $    | (47.4   | ) |  | $ | (76.1   | )
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                 |  | $                        | 103.6  |   |          | $ | 17.3    |             |  | $ | 14.0    |   |  | $    | (9.0    | ) |  | $ | 1.0     |  
|Statistical information (in whole numbers except where indicated)   |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                              |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Volume information:                                                 |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Prescriptions dispensed (in thousands)                              |  |                          | 10,289 |   |          |   | 12,644  |             |  |   | 24,751  |   |  |      | 40,319  |   |  |   | 39,037  |  
|Revenue per prescription dispensed                                  |  | $                        | 46.25  |   |          | $ | 47.63   |             |  | $ | 46.99   |   |  | $    | 46.85   |   |  | $ | 45.72   |  
|Gross profit per prescription dispensed                             |  | $                        | 7.03   |   |          | $ | 6.65    |             |  | $ | 6.57    |   |  | $    | 6.78    |   |  | $ | 6.76    |  
|Institutional pharmacy gross margin                                 |  |                          | 15.2   | % |          |   | 14.0    | %           |  |   | 14.0    | % |  |      | 14.5    | % |  |   | 14.8    | %
|Generic drug dispensing rate                                        |  |                          | NA     |   |          |   | NA      |             |  |   | 67.4    | % |  |      | 70.7    | % |  |   | 74.2    | %
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |         
|Customer licensed beds under contract:                              |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Beginning of period                                                 |  |                          | 66,195 |   |          |   | 93,282  |             |  |   | 102,571 |   |  |      | 337,043 |   |  |   | 322,376 |  
|Additions                                                           |  |                          | 34,174 |   |          |   | 19,567  |             |  |   | 260,376 |   |  |      | 21,398  |   |  |   | 35,921  |  
|Losses and other                                                    |  |                          | (7,087 | ) |          |   | (10,278 | )           |  |   | (25,904 | ) |  |      | (36,065 | ) |  |   | (40,412 | )
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|End of period                                                       |  |                          | 93,282 |   |          |   | 102,571 |             |  |   | 337,043 |   |  |      | 322,376 |   |  |   | 317,885 |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Hospital management contracts serviced                              |  |                          | 73     |   |          |   | 81      |             |  |   | 86      |   |  |      | 84      |   |  |   | 86      |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |        |   |          |   |         |             |  |   |         |   |  |      |         |   |  |   |         |  



|(1) | The historical periods of the Corporation exclude the results of PharMerica LTC for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, PharMerica LTC is included beginning August 1, 2007. See Notes 1 and 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | Includes depreciation expense of $3.6 million, $5.4 million, $15.6 million, $22.0 million and $18.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
and 2009, respectively.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | The Corporation has never declared a cash dividend. Earnings (loss) per share in whole dollars and cents.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(4) | See Use of Non GAAP Measures for Measuring Annual Results for a definition and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income and Adjusted EBITDA Margin.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(5) | For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation has reclassified $27.9 million from Integration, Merger and acquisition related costs and other charges to
bad debt expense, as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



40



---

##### Table of Contents

Use of Non-GAAP Measures For Measuring Annual Results

The Corporation calculates Adjusted EBITDA as provided in the reconciliation below and calculates Adjusted EBITDA Margin by taking Adjusted
EBITDA and dividing it by revenues. The Corporation calculates and uses Adjusted EBITDA as an indicator of its ability to generate cash from reported operating results. The measurement is used in concert with net income and cash flows from
operations, which measure actual cash generated in the period. In addition, the Corporation believes that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin are supplemental measurement tools used by analysts and investors to help evaluate overall operating
performance and the ability to incur and service debt and make capital expenditures. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, is used in conjunction with the Corporations debt leverage and fixed charges ratios and this
calculation sets the applicable margin for the quarterly interest charge. Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, is not the same calculation used in this Adjusted EBITDA table. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent funds available for the
Corporations discretionary use and is not intended to represent or to be used as a substitute for net income or cash flows from operations data as measured under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The items
excluded from Adjusted EBITDA but included in the calculation of the Corporations reported net income are significant components of the accompanying consolidated income statements, and must be considered in performing a comprehensive
assessment of overall financial performance. The Corporations calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be consistent with calculations of EBITDA used by other companies. The following is a reconciliation of the Corporations net income
(loss), net operating cash flows and earnings (loss) per diluted share for the periods presented (in millions):

Reconciliation of Net
Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA



|                                                                    |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ---- | - | ---- | - | ---- | ---- |  | - | ----- | - |  | ---- | ---- | - |  | - | ----- | -
|                                                                    |  | Years Ended December 31, |     
|                                                                    |  | 2005                     |      |   | 2006 |   |      | 2007 |  |   | 2008  |   |  | 2009 |     
|Net income (loss)                                                   |  | $                        | 21.0 |   |      | $ | 12.8 |      |  | $ | (24.1 | ) |  | $    | 5.0  |   |  | $ | 42.2  |  
|Add:                                                                |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Interest expense, net                                               |  |                          |     |   |      |   | (0.1 | )    |  |   | 7.2   |   |  |      | 14.2 |   |  |   | 9.4   |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |                          |     |   |      |   | 2.9  |      |  |   | 29.8  |   |  |      | 26.7 |   |  |   | 5.2   |  
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                |  |                          | 13.3 |   |      |   | 8.4  |      |  |   | (13.4 | ) |  |      | 3.3  |   |  |   | 18.9  |  
|Effect of change in estimate on cost of goods sold                  |  |                          |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   | (3.1  | ) |  |      |     |   |  |   |      |  
|Effect of change in estimate on allowance for doubtful accounts     |  |                          |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   | 27.9  |   |  |      |     |   |  |   |      |  
|Impairment of intangible assets                                     |  |                          |     |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |      |   |  |      | 14.8 |   |  |   |      |  
|Depreciation and amortization expense                               |  |                          | 5.8  |   |      |   | 8.8  |      |  |   | 20.2  |   |  |      | 28.5 |   |  |   | 27.0  |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Adjusted EBITDA                                                     |  | $                        | 40.1 |   |      | $ | 32.8 |      |  | $ | 44.5  |   |  | $    | 92.5 |   |  | $ | 102.7 |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Adjusted EBITDA Margin                                              |  |                          | 7.7  | % |      |   | 5.0  | %    |  |   | 3.7   | % |  |      | 4.8  | % |  |   | 5.6   | %
|                                                                    |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |       |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |       |  



41



---

##### Table of Contents

Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net Operating Cash Flows



|                                                                    |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |   |  |      |       |   |  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ----- | - |  | ---- | ----- | - |  | - | ----- | -
|                                                                    |  | Years Ended December 31, |      
|                                                                    |  | 2005                     |       |   | 2006 |   |       | 2007 |  |   | 2008  |   |  | 2009 |      
|Adjusted EBITDA                                                     |  | $                        | 40.1  |   |      | $ | 32.8  |      |  | $ | 44.5  |   |  | $    | 92.5  |   |  | $ | 102.7 |  
|Interest expense, net                                               |  |                          |      |   |      |   | 0.1   |      |  |   | (7.2  | ) |  |      | (14.2 | ) |  |   | (9.4  | )
|(Provision) benefit for income taxes                                |  |                          | (13.3 | ) |      |   | (8.4  | )    |  |   | 13.4  |   |  |      | (3.3  | ) |  |   | (18.9 | )
|Effect of change in estimate on cost of goods sold                  |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   | 3.1   |   |  |      |      |   |  |   |      |  
|Effect of change in estimate on allowance for doubtful accounts     |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   | (27.9 | ) |  |      |      |   |  |   |      |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |                          |      |   |      |   | (2.9  | )    |  |   | (22.6 | ) |  |      | (22.2 | ) |  |   | (4.8  | )
|Provision for bad debt                                              |  |                          | (1.1  | ) |      |   | 7.3   |      |  |   | 44.1  |   |  |      | 24.7  |   |  |   | 16.6  |  
|Stock-based compensation                                            |  |                          | 0.8   |   |      |   | 0.9   |      |  |   | 1.5   |   |  |      | 4.9   |   |  |   | 4.6   |  
|Amortization of deferred financing fees                             |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   | 0.2   |   |  |      | 0.4   |   |  |   | 0.4   |  
|Loss on disposition of equipment                                    |  |                          |      |   |      |   | 0.5   |      |  |   | 0.1   |   |  |      | 0.2   |   |  |   | 0.3   |  
|Deferred income taxes                                               |  |                          | (2.0  | ) |      |   | (1.6  | )    |  |   | (13.4 | ) |  |      | 2.8   |   |  |   | 19.7  |  
|Other                                                               |  |                          | (1.1  | ) |      |   | (3.5  | )    |  |   | (0.9  | ) |  |      | (0.5  | ) |  |   | (0.3  | )
|Changes in assets and liabilities                                   |  |                          | (18.1 | ) |      |   | (15.2 | )    |  |   | 1.4   |   |  |      | (19.6 | ) |  |   | (25.9 | )
|                                                                    |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |   |  |      |       |   |  |   |       |  
|Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities                            |  | $                        | 5.3   |   |      | $ | 10.0  |      |  | $ | 36.3  |   |  | $    | 65.7  |   |  | $ | 85.0  |  
|                                                                    |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |   |  |      |       |   |  |   |       |  



42



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which reflect the Corporations current estimates, expectations and projections about the Corporations future results, performance, prospects and
opportunities. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, the information concerning the Corporations possible future results of operations including revenue, costs of goods sold, and gross margin, business and growth strategies,
financing plans, the Corporations competitive position and the effects of competition, the projected growth of the industries in which we operate, and the Corporations ability to consummate strategic acquisitions. Forward-looking
statements include statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by forward-looking words such as anticipate, believe, could, estimate, expect, intend,
plan, may, should, will, would, project and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based upon information currently available to the Corporation and are
subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the Corporations actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause the Corporations actual results to differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements the Corporation makes in this report include:



| |  |  | the Corporations access to capital, credit ratings, indebtedness, and ability to raise additional financings and operate under the terms of
the Corporations debt obligations;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our certificate of incorporation and our by laws could delay or deter a change in
control;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | certain restrictions resulting from continuing relationships with the Corporations former parent companies;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the effects of adverse economic trends or intense competition in the markets in which we operate;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the demand for the Corporations products and services;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the effects of retaining existing customers and service contracts and the Corporations ability to attract new customers for growth of the
Corporations business;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the effects of renegotiating contract pricing relating to significant customers, supplier, including the hospital pharmacy segment which is
substantially related to service provided to one customer;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the effects of an increase in credit risk, loss or bankruptcy of or default by any significant customer, supplier, or other entity relevant to the
Corporations operations;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Corporations ability to successfully pursue the Corporations development activities and successfully integrate new operations and
systems, including the realization of anticipated revenues, economies of scale, cost savings, and productivity gains associated with such operations;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the impact of the First Data Bank settlement agreement on the reimbursement the Corporation receives for its products and services;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Corporations ability to control costs, particularly labor and employee benefit costs, rising pharmaceutical costs, and regulatory compliance
costs;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the effects of healthcare reform and government regulations, including proposals being contemplated by the current administration, interpretation of
regulations, and changes in the nature and enforcement of regulations governing the healthcare and institutional pharmacy services industries;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in the reimbursement rates or methods of payment from Medicare and Medicaid and other third party payers, or the implementation of other
measures to reduce the reimbursement for the Corporations products and services or the services of the Corporations customers or the Corporations Medicare business covered by specific contracts;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



43



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | the potential impact of state government budget shortfalls and their ability to pay the Corporation and its customers for services provided;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Corporations ability, and the ability of the Corporations customers, to comply with Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement regulations or
other applicable laws;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the ability to obtain financing for acquisitions from the various lenders in the senior secured credit facility;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the effects of changes in the interest rate on the Corporations outstanding floating rate debt instrument and the increases or decreases in
interest expense;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | further consolidation of managed care organizations and other third party payers;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | political and economic conditions nationally, regionally, and in the markets in which the Corporation operates;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | natural disasters, war, civil unrest, terrorism, fire, floods, tornadoes, earthquakes, hurricanes, epidemic, pandemic, catastrophic event or other
matters beyond the Corporations control;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | increases in energy costs, including state and federal taxes, and the impact on the costs of delivery expenses and utility expenses;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | elimination of, changes in, or the Corporations failure to satisfy pharmaceutical manufacturers rebate programs;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Corporations ability to attract and retain key executives, pharmacists, and other healthcare personnel;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Corporations ability to comply with the terms of its Corporate Integrity Agreement entered into between the Office of Inspector General of
the Department of Health and Human Services and PharMerica LTC on March 29, 2005;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Corporations risk of loss not covered by insurance;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the outcome of litigation to which the Corporation is a party from time to time, including adverse results in material litigation or governmental
inquiries;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in accounting rules and standards, audits, compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and regulatory investigations;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the effects on the Corporations results of operations related to the accounting for the costs of acquisitions as a result of new accounting
rules;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in market conditions that would result in the impairment of goodwill or other assets of the Corporation;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in market conditions in which we operate that would influence the value of the Corporations stock;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in volatility of the Corporations stock price and the risk of litigation following a decline in the price of the Corporations stock
price;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Corporations ability to anticipate a shift in demand for generic drug equivalents and the impact on the financial results including the
negative impact on brand drug rebates;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | prescription volumes may decline, and our net revenues and profitability may be negatively impacted, if the safety risk profiles of drugs increase or
if drugs are withdrawn from the market, including as a result of manufacturing issues, or if prescription drugs transition to over-the-counter products;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the effects on the Corporations results of operations related to interpretations of accounting principles by the external auditors and the SEC
staff that may differ from those of management;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



44



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | changes in tax laws and regulations;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------



| |  |  | the effects of changes to critical accounting estimates; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | other factors, risks and uncertainties referenced in the Corporations filings with the Commission, including the Risk Factors set
forth in this Report on Form 10-K.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

YOU ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE ON ANY FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS, ALL OF WHICH SPEAK ONLY AS OF THE DATE OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT. EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY LAW, WE UNDERTAKE NO OBLIGATION TO PUBLICLY UPDATE OR RELEASE ANY REVISIONS TO THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS TO REFLECT ANY EVENTS OR CIRCUMSTANCES
AFTER THE DATE OF THIS ANNUAL REPORT OR TO REFLECT THE OCCURRENCE OF UNANTICIPATED EVENTS. ALL SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN AND ORAL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO US OR ANY PERSON ACTING ON THE CORPORATIONS BEHALF ARE EXPRESSLY QUALIFIED IN
THEIR ENTIRETY BY THE CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS CONTAINED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS SECTION AND IN OUR RISK FACTORS SET FORTH IN PART I, ITEM 1A OF THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IN OTHER REPORTS FILED WITH THE SEC BY THE CORPORATION.

General

Pharmacy Transaction

The Corporation was formed on October 23, 2006 by Kindred and AmerisourceBergen for the purpose of consummating the
transactions contemplated by the Master Agreement dated October 25, 2006, as amended. Pursuant to the Master Agreement, Kindred and AmerisourceBergen, through the Pharmacy Transaction, combined their respective institutional pharmacy
businesses, KPS and PharMerica LTC, into a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company. The Pharmacy Transaction was consummated on July 31, 2007.

Under the terms of the Pharmacy Transaction, on the Closing Date, each of KPS and PharMerica LTC borrowed $125.0 million as mutually agreed upon by Kindred and AmerisourceBergen and used such proceeds to
fund a one-time, tax-free cash distribution in that amount to their respective parent companies. Following the cash distributions, Kindred spun off to its stockholders all of the outstanding stock of KPS and AmerisourceBergen spun off to its
stockholders all of the outstanding stock of PharMerica LTC. Immediately thereafter, separate wholly owned subsidiaries of the Corporation were merged with and into KPS and PharMerica LTC with KPS and PharMerica LTC as the surviving entities of the
mergers, and, as a result, KPS and PharMerica LTC became wholly owned subsidiaries of the Corporation. The Corporation issued 30 million shares of its common stock in the mergers (see Note 2 to the Corporations consolidated financial
statements). Immediately following such spin-offs and mergers, the stockholders of Kindred and AmerisourceBergen each owned 50% of the outstanding common stock of the Corporation. The shares of the Corporations common stock held by Kindred and
AmerisourceBergen prior to the Pharmacy Transaction were cancelled, and neither retained any ownership of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Corporation.

The Pharmacy Transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, with KPS treated as the accounting acquirer. Under
the purchase method of accounting, the deemed purchase price was allocated to the underlying tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities acquired based upon their respective fair values with any excess deemed purchase price allocated
to goodwill. See Note 2 to the Corporations consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Prior to the
closing of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation had no assets or liabilities and conducted no business activity. Prior to the closing of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporations business was operated as separate businesses of two
different public companies, Kindred and AmerisourceBergen.



45



---

##### Table of Contents

Reporting Entity

The consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 reflect the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation, which during the first seven months of 2007, KPS was a wholly owned subsidiary of Kindred. As discussed above, the Pharmacy Transaction was accounted for as an acquisition by KPS of
PharMerica LTC with KPS being considered the accounting acquirer. As a result, the historical financial statements of KPS have become the historical financial statements of the Corporation. The results of PharMerica LTC are included in the results
of operations of the Corporation beginning August 1, 2007. Accordingly, except as otherwise discussed below, this Managements Discussion and Analysis reflects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Corporation at December 31, 2008, and 2009 and historically of KPS on a stand-alone basis for all periods prior to August 1, 2007.

The Corporations Business and Industry Trends

The Corporation is an institutional pharmacy services
company, which services healthcare facilities and provides management pharmacy services to hospitals. The Corporation is the second largest institutional pharmacy services company in the United States. The Corporation operates 98 institutional
pharmacies in 41 states. The Corporations customers are typically institutional healthcare providers, such as nursing centers, assisted living facilities, hospitals and other long-term alternative care settings. The Corporation is generally
the primary source of supply of pharmaceuticals to its customers. The Corporation also provides pharmacy management services to 86 hospitals in the United States.

The institutional pharmacy services business is highly competitive. Competition is a significant factor that can impact the Corporations financial results. In each geographic market, there are
national, regional and local institutional pharmacies that provide services comparable to those offered by the Corporations pharmacies. These pharmacies may have greater financial and other resources than we do and may be more established in
the markets they serve than we are. The Corporation also competes against regional and local pharmacies that specialize in the highly-fragmented long-term care markets. In the future some of the Corporations customers may seek to in-source the
provision of pharmaceuticals to patients in their facilities by establishing an internal pharmacy.

A variety of factors are
affecting the institutional pharmacy industry. With an aging population and the extension of drug coverage to a greater number of individuals through Medicare Part D, the consumption of pharmaceuticals by residents of long-term care facilities
is likely to increase in the future. In addition, individuals are expected to enter assisted living facilities, independent living facilities and continuing care retirement communities at increasing rates. Under Medicare Part D, eligible
individuals may choose to enroll in various Medicare Part D Plans to receive prescription drug coverage. Each Medicare Part D Plan determines the formulary for the long-term care residents enrolled in its plan. Accordingly, institutional
pharmacies must follow each Part D Plans formulary, reimbursement and administrative processes for the long-term care residents they serve. Institutional pharmacies have expanded their formularies to accommodate various formularies of key
Part D Plans. Institutional pharmacies may experience increased administrative burdens and costs owing to the greater complexity of the requirements for drug reimbursement. Medicare Part D also requires increased choices for patients with
respect to complex drug categories and therapeutic interchange opportunities. Institutional pharmacies may realize increased revenue by providing long-term care residents with specialized services in these areas. Continued industry consolidation may
also impact the dynamics of the institutional pharmacy market.

In addition, our continued success depends on our ability to
attract and retain pharmacists and other pharmacy professionals. Competition for qualified pharmacists and other pharmacy professionals is strong. The loss of pharmacy personnel or the inability to attract, retain or motivate sufficient numbers of
qualified pharmacy professionals could adversely affect our business. Although we generally have been able to meet our staffing requirements for pharmacists and other pharmacy professionals in the past, our inability to do so in the future could
have a material adverse impact on us.



46



---

##### Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires us to make estimates
and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Management considers an accounting estimate to be critical if:



| |  |  | It requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the time the estimate was made; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Changes in the estimate or different estimates could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Corporations management has discussed the development and selection of these critical accounting
estimates with the audit committee of the Board of Directors and with the Corporations independent registered public accounting firm, and they both have reviewed the disclosure presented below relating to critical accounting estimates.

The table of critical accounting estimates is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of the Corporations
accounting policies that require estimates. Management believes that of the significant accounting policies, as discussed in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report, the estimates discussed below
involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity. Management believes the current assumptions and other considerations used to estimate amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements are appropriate. However, if actual experience
differs from the assumptions and other considerations used in estimating amounts reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the resulting changes could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations and financial
condition of the Corporation.

The table that follows presents information about our critical accounting estimates, as well as
the effects of hypothetical changes in the material assumptions used to develop each estimate. Our sensitivity analysis was performed assuming the assumptions listed based upon the actual results of the Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2009, and the actual diluted shares:



47



---

##### Table of Contents

Balance Sheet or Income Statement Caption/ Nature of Critical Estimate Item  Allowance for doubtful accounts and provision
for doubtful accounts Accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts due from Prescription Drug Plans
(PDPs) under Medicaid Part D, long-term care institutions, the respective state Medicaid programs, private payers and third party insurance companies. Our ability to collect outstanding receivables is critical to our results of
operations and cash flow. We establish an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce the carrying value of our receivables to their estimated net realizable value. In addition, certain drugs dispensed are subject to being returned and the responsible
paying party is due back a credit for such returns. Our allowances for doubtful accounts, included in our balance sheet at
December 31, 2008 and 2009, were $46.5 million and $40.2 million, respectively. Our quarterly provision for doubtful
accounts included in our statements of operations was as follows (dollars in millions):  Amount

% ofRevenues2007March 31

$
1.1

0.6
%June 30


3.3

1.9September 30 (1)


34.2

9.1December 31


5.5

1.12008March 31

$
5.2

1.1
%June 30


5.5

1.1September 30


7.2

1.5December 31


6.8

1.42009March 31

$
7.1

1.5
%June 30


3.6

0.8September 30


2.5

0.5December 31


3.4

0.8  (1)
Includes the $27.9 million change in estimate to increase the allowance for doubtful accounts associated with the Pharmacy Transaction.


Assumptions/Approach Used  The largest components of bad debts in our accounts receivable relate to the accounts for which private payers are responsible (which we
refer to as private and other), accounts for which our customers from long-term care institutions are responsible for under Medicare Part A and owe us for the drug component of their patients stay at their respective institution, third party,
Medicare Part D, and Medicaid accounts that have been denied. We attempt to collect the private and other accounts through
various efforts for which the patient is the responsible party. We attempt to collect payments due from long-term care institutions through billing and collecting in accordance with the terms of the contracts. We attempt to collect from third party,
Medicare Part D and Medicaid accounts by obtaining the appropriate documentation and direct discussions with the payors. In all cases, the drugs have been dispensed. In general, we perform the following steps in collecting accounts receivable:  

if possible, perform up front adjudication prior to dispensing the product;  

billing and follow-up with third party payers;  

billing and follow-up with long-term care institutions;  

utilization of collection agencies; and  

other legal processes. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts utilizing a number of analytical tools and benchmarks. No single statistic or measurement alone determines the allowance for doubtful accounts. We monitor and review trends by payer classification along with the composition of our aging accounts receivable. This review is focused
primarily on trends in private and other payer, PDPs, dual eligible co-payments, historic payment patterns of long-term care institutions, and monitoring respective credit risks. In addition, we analyze other factors such as revenue days in accounts receivables, denial trends by payer types, payment patterns by payer
types, subsequent cash collections, and current events that may impact payment patterns of our long-term care institution customers. The following table shows our institutional pharmacy revenue days outstanding reflected in our institutional pharmacy net accounts receivable as of the dates indicated:  2007

2008

2009March 31

41.5

39.7

42.4June 30

44.4

40.7

42.0September 30

45.4

41.1

42.1December 31

40.1

42.0

42.9


Sensitivity Analysis  If our provision as a percent of institutional revenue increases 0.10%, our after tax income would decline by approximately $1.1 million or
$0.03 per diluted share. This is only one example of reasonably possible sensitivity scenarios. The process of determining
the allowance requires us to estimate uncollectible accounts that are highly uncertain and requires a high degree of judgment. Our estimates may be impacted by economic conditions, success in collections at the regional business offices, payer mix
and trends in federal and state regulations.




48



---

##### Table of Contents

Balance Sheet or Income Statement Caption/ Nature of Critical Estimate Item  Allowance for doubtful accounts and provision
for doubtful accounts -(continued) The following table shows our allowance for doubtful accounts as a percent of gross accounts receivable:  Allowance

GrossAccountsReceivable

% ofGrossAccountsReceivable2007March 31


NM


NM

NMJune 30


NM


NM

NMSeptember 30

$
64.6

$
282.1

22.9
%December 31


43.4


256.4

16.92008March 31

$
44.3

$
261.6

16.9
%June 30


45.2


262.0

17.3September 30


45.8


266.6

17.2December 31


46.5


265.8

17.52009March 31

$
49.1

$
267.8

18.3
%June 30


50.4


260.6

19.3September 30


46.3


261.6

17.7December 31


40.2


255.5

15.7 Please refer to Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this report for a detailed rollforward of our allowance for doubtful accounts.


Assumptions/Approach Used  The following table shows our
summarized aging categories by quarter:  0 to 60days


61 to 120days


Over 120Days2007March 31

NM


NM


NMJune 30

NM


NM


NMSeptember 30

60.6
%

16.5
%

22.9
%December 31

64.8


17.4


17.82008March 31

68.7
%

14.2
%

17.1
%June 30

63.2


19.7


17.1September 30

62.0


19.1


18.9December 31

64.1


18.1


17.82009March 31

63.1
%

17.4
%

19.5
%June 30

64.3


17.0


18.7September 30

63.6


17.1


19.3December 31

64.9


17.1


18.0 On a monthly basis, the Corporation performs a comprehensive assessment of its
reserve levels in light of its expectations around the ultimate collection of its accounts receivable balances. The Corporation considers recent industry trends, changes in reimbursement sources and procedures, age of receivables and recent
collection history. In September 2007, as part of the analysis described above, the Corporation recorded in selling, general
and administrative a change in accounting estimate to increase the allowance for doubtful accounts by $27.9 million, resulting in loss per diluted share impact of $0.84. The change in accounting estimate of $27.9 million representing an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts is related to the acquired receivables of PharMerica LTC as of July 31, 2007, and is
unrelated to the accounts receivable and revenue of KPS. This amount was charged to selling, general and administrative expenses, however, the related revenue had never been recorded in the accounts of either the Corporation or its predecessor
entity, KPS.


Sensitivity Analysis




49



---

##### Table of Contents

Balance Sheet or Income Statement Caption/ Nature of Critical Estimate Item  Revenue recognition/Allowance for contractual
discounts We recognize revenues at the time services are provided or products are delivered. Our sources of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 are as follows:  2007


2008


2009Medicare Part D

45.2
%

45.5
%

46.3
%Institutional healthcare providers

30.3


29.7


29.6Medicaid

8.9


9.3


9.0Private and other

6.4


6.8


6.6Insured

3.8


5.2


5.0Medicare

0.9


0.5


0.4Hospital Management fees

4.5


3.0


3.1Total

100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
% Our sources of revenues for the quarters ended March 31, June 30, September 30,
and December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 are as follows:  Three MonthsEndedMarch 31,


Three MonthsEndedJune 30,2007


2008


2009


2007


2008


2009Medicare Part D

43.9
%

46.2
%

45.9
%

41.2
%

44.7
%

45.5
%Institutional healthcare providers

33.9


29.6


30.1


34.0


30.1


30.1Medicaid

7.8


9.6


9.3


7.9


9.2


9.2Private and other

4.8


6.2


6.2


5.2


7.0


6.8Insured

0.7


4.8


5.0


2.5


5.4


4.9Medicare

1.2


0.6


0.3


1.3


0.5


0.4Hospital management fees

7.7


3.0


3.2


7.9


3.1


3.1Total

100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
%Three MonthsEndedSeptember 30,


Three MonthsEndedDecember 31,2007


2008


2009


2007


2008


2009Medicare Part D

45.9
%

45.1
%

45.9
%

46.5
%

45.9
%

48.0
%Institutional healthcare providers

29.1


29.2


29.2


28.7


29.7


29.0Medicaid

9.1


9.5


9.1


9.6


8.9


8.4Private and other

7.1


7.3


7.5


6.9


6.9


6.2Insured

4.5


5.3


5.0


4.9


5.3


5.0Medicare

0.7


0.6


0.3


0.6


0.4


0.4Hospital management fees

3.6


3.0


3.0


2.8


2.9


3.0Total

100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
%

100.0
% Please refer to Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this report for a detailed discussion of our revenue recognition policies.


Assumptions/Approach Used  We recognize revenues at the time
services are provided or products are delivered. A significant portion of our revenues are billed to PDPs under Medicare Part D, the state Medicaid programs, long-term care institutions, third party insurance companies, and private payers. Some
claims are electronically adjudicated through online processing at the point the prescription is dispensed such that our operating system is automatically updated with the actual amount to be reimbursed. As a result, our revenues and the associated
receivables are based upon the actual reimbursement to be received. For claims that are adjudicated on-line and are rejected or otherwise denied upon submission, the Corporation provides contractual allowances based upon historical trends,
contractual reimbursement terms and other factors which may impact ultimate reimbursement. Amounts are adjusted to actual reimbursed amounts based upon cash receipts. Co-payments for our services can be applicable under Medicare Part D, the state Medicaid programs, and certain third party payers and are typically not collected at the time products are delivered or
services are provided. Co-payments under the Medicaid programs and third party plans are generally billed to the responsible party as part of our normal billing procedures which are subject to normal collection procedures. Under Medicare Part D, co-payments related to institutional residents who are both Medicare and Medicaid eligible are due from the
responsible party for up to the first thirty days of a beneficiarys stay in a skilled nursing facility subsequent to which the PDPs are responsible for reimbursement. Under certain circumstances, including state-mandated return policies under various Medicaid programs, we accept returns of medications and
issue credit memorandums to the applicable payer. Product returns are processed in the period returned. We estimate an amount for expected returns based on historical trends. Our hospital pharmacy management revenues represent contractually defined management fees and the reimbursement of costs associated with the
direct operations of hospital pharmacies, and are primarily comprised of personnel costs.


Sensitivity Analysis  If our reimbursement declined or was
negatively impacted 0.25%, the negative impact on net income would be $2.6 million or $0.09 per diluted share.




50



---

##### Table of Contents

Balance Sheet or Income Statement Caption/ Nature of Critical Estimate Item  Inventory and cost of drugs dispensed We have inventory located at each of our institutional pharmacy locations. The inventory consists of prescription drugs, over
the counter products and intravenous solutions. Our inventory relating to controlled substances is maintained on a manually prepared perpetual system to the extent required by the Drug Enforcement Agency. All other inventory is maintained on a
periodic system, through the performance of quarterly physical inventories. At December 31, 2008 and 2009, our inventory
on our consolidated balance sheets was as follows (dollars in millions):  

2008    $73.4  

2009    $79.8 Our annualized inventory turns were as follows:  2007

2008

2009March 31

15.8

16.4

16.7June 30

16.1

16.1

16.8September 30

15.9

16.5

16.7December 31

16.7

16.5

15.8 We receive rebates on purchases from various vendors and suppliers. Rebates included in our statements of operations were as follows (dollars in millions):  2007

2008

2009March 31

$
4.0

$
12.7

$
10.5June 30


3.8


13.9


11.6September 30


11.5


12.1


12.9December 31


12.4


11.9


14.5Total

$
31.7

$
50.6

$
49.5 Please refer to Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this report for a detailed discussion of our inventory.


Assumptions/Approach Used  Our inventory is maintained on a
first-in, first-out lower of cost or market basis. Our controlled prescription drugs are maintained on a perpetual inventory basis to the extent required by the Drug Enforcement Agency. All other inventory is maintained on a periodic basis. We
perform quarterly inventory counts at all locations with the use of our personnel and the use of third party inventory count teams under our supervision. We perform quarterly inventory counts in the third month of each quarter. All inventory counts are reconciled to the balance sheet account and differences are adjusted through cost of goods sold. In addition, we
record an amount of potential returns of prescription drugs based on historical rates of returns. We account for rebates and
other incentives received from vendors and suppliers, relating to the purchase or distribution of inventory, as a reduction to cost of goods sold and inventory. We consider these rebates to represent product discounts, and as a result, the rebates
are capitalized as a reduction of product cost and relieved through cost of goods sold upon the sale of the related inventory.


Sensitivity Analysis  Actual inventory counts may include
estimates based on amounts that may be dispensed from an open container. In addition, items are reviewed for potential obsolescence. A 1.0% error rate in the count of prescription drugs in inventory would negatively impact net income $0.5 million, or $0.02 per diluted share. If our rebates received were to be reduced by 1.0%, the effect on net income for the year ended December 31, 2009 would have been a decrease of $0.3 million, or $0.01 per diluted share.




51



---

##### Table of Contents

Balance Sheet or Income Statement Caption/ Nature of Critical Estimate Item  Goodwill, other intangible assets and
accounting for business combinations Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the
net assets of acquired companies. Our intangible assets are comprised primarily of trade names, customer relationship assets, and non-compete agreements. Our goodwill included in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 was as follows (dollars in millions):  

2008    $113.7  

2009    $140.1 Our net intangible assets, included in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 were as follows (dollars in millions):  2008


2009Customer relationships

$
53.1


$
76.6Tradenames


27.9



28.5Non-competition agreements


2.4



4.783.4



109.8Accumulated Amortization


(10.0
)


(19.0
)$
73.4


$
90.8 Please refer to Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this report for a detailed roll forward of our goodwill and intangible assets. As a part of the August 10, 2009
institutional pharmacy business acquisition, we have a contingent consideration liability of $1.7 million. This amount is not to exceed $10.0 million in the form of a contingent consideration to be paid at the end of a three year period based upon
the cumulative achievement of certain financial performance measures.


Assumptions/Approach Used  We are required to test goodwill for
impairment annually, absent some triggering event that would accelerate an impairment test using a fair value approach. We determine fair value using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow and market multiple analyses.
These types of analyses require us to make assumptions and estimates regarding future cash flows, industry economic factors and the profitability of future business strategies. The purchase price of acquisitions are allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their respective fair values. We
engage independent third-party valuation firms to assist us in determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Such valuations require us to make significant estimates and assumptions, including projections of future events
and operating performance. Fair value estimates are determined by management based upon established market values of
comparable assets, or internal calculations of estimated future net cash flows. Our estimate of future cash flows is based on assumptions and projections we believe to be currently reasonable and supportable. The ultimate decision of allocations are
that of management. We assess for the potential impairment of tangible assets and long-lived assets recorded on the
Corporations balance sheet whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recognized an impairment charge of $14.8 million related to finite lived intangible assets resulting in a loss per dilutive share impact of $0.30. The impairment, which related to the Institutional
Pharmacy segment, was incurred when the reporting unit experienced a higher than expected loss of licensed beds. See Note 4 to our financial statements for further disclosures of the impairment charge.


Sensitivity Analysis  We performed our annual testing for
goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 using the methodology described here, and determined that no goodwill impairment existed. If actual future results are not consistent with our assumptions and estimates, we may be
required to record goodwill impairment charges in the future. Our estimate of fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable based upon current facts and circumstances. As it relates to the contingent consideration liability, if actual future results are not consistent with our assumptions and estimates, we
may be required to record a charge as acquisition costs to the consolidated statement of operations. Our estimate of fair value of the liability is based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable based upon current facts and circumstances. As these
facts and circumstance change, our estimate will be adjusted through the income statement.




52



---

##### Table of Contents

Balance Sheet or Income Statement Caption/ Nature of Critical Estimate Item  Accounting for income taxes The provision for income taxes is based upon the Corporations annual taxable income or loss for each respective
accounting period. The Corporation recognizes an asset or liability for the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax
assets generally represent items that will result in a tax deduction in future years for which we have already recorded the tax benefit in our income statement. The Corporation also recognizes as deferred tax assets the future tax benefits from net
operating and capital loss carryforwards. We assess the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be recovered from future
taxable income. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our deferred tax asset balances in our consolidated balance sheets
as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 were as follows (dollars in millions), including the impact of valuation allowances:  

2008    $ 84.3  

2009    $ 60.8 Our valuation allowances for deferred tax assets in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 were as follows (dollars in millions):  

2008    $ 10.3  

2009    $ 1.7 Significant judgment is required in determining and assessing the impact of uncertain tax positions. For an identified uncertain tax position to qualify for benefit recognition, the position must have at
least a more-likely-than-not chance of being sustained on its technical merits if challenged by relevant taxing authorities and taken by management to the court of last resort. If an uncertain position does not meet this recognition threshold based
on our analysis of applicable tax law, we establish a liability for the realized, but unrecognized tax benefit. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation has a $1.6 million liability recorded for unrecognized tax benefits for U.S. federal and
state tax jurisdictions. The Corporation records accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the consolidated statement of operations. We recognize the benefit for an uncertain tax position we have
taken upon any one of the following conditions: 1) the recognition threshold is met due to changes in facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date; 2) the tax position is effectively settled through examination, negotiation
or litigation; or 3) the statute of limitations for the relevant taxing authority to examine and challenge the tax position has expired. Please refer to Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a detailed discussion of our accounting for income taxes.


Assumptions/Approach Used  The first step in determining the
deferred tax asset valuation allowance is identifying reporting jurisdictions where we have a history of tax and operating losses or are projected to have losses in future periods as a result of changes in operational performance. We then determine
if a valuation allowance should be established against the deferred tax assets for that reporting jurisdiction. The second step is to determine the amount of valuation allowance. We will generally establish a valuation allowance equal to the net
deferred tax asset (deferred tax assets less deferred tax liabilities) related to the jurisdiction identified in step one of the analysis. In certain cases, we may not reduce the valuation allowance by the amount of the deferred tax liabilities
depending on the nature and timing of future taxable income attributable to deferred tax liabilities. Tax benefits from
uncertain tax positions are recognized in the Corporations financial statements if it is more-likely-than-not that the position is sustainable based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether the position has met this
recognition threshold, the Corporation assumes that the appropriate taxing authority has full knowledge of all relevant information. The amount of benefit recognized in the Corporations financial statements for a tax position meeting the
recognition threshold is determined by a measurement of the largest amount of benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Subsequent recognition, derecognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions is based on managements best judgment given the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting
date. With respect to the net operating loss carryforwards, the Corporation considers all available positive and negative
evidence to determine whether a valuation allowance is needed. This includes an analysis of the statutory carryforward available under law, anticipated future income or loss, as well as tax planning strategies. If the cumulative weight of evidence
suggests that it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion of the net operating losses will not be realized, a full or partial valuation allowance will be recognized based upon the qualitative and quantitative evidence examined. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation recorded a tax benefit of $5.7 million ($0.19 per diluted share) for valuation
allowance releases related to the adoption of an internal legal entity restructuring plan. Pursuant to the restructuring plan, the Corporation believes that it is more likely than not that it will be able to realize certain historic state net
operating loss carryforwards for which a valuation allowance had previously been provided.


Sensitivity Analysis  Our deferred tax assets exceeded our
deferred tax liabilities by $60.8 million as of December 31, 2009, including the impact of valuation allowances. Historically, we have produced federal taxable income and we expect to generate taxable income in future years. Therefore, we believe
that the likelihood of our not realizing the federal tax benefit of our deferred tax assets is remote. However, we do have
subsidiaries with a history of tax losses in certain state jurisdictions and, based upon those historical tax losses and current expected results, we assumed that the subsidiaries would not be profitable in the future for those states tax
purposes unless a strong earnings history existed apart from an identifiable operational condition no longer present. If our assertion regarding the future profitability of those subsidiaries was incorrect, then our deferred tax assets would be
understated by the amount of the valuation allowance of $10.3 million and $1.7 million at December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The IRS may propose adjustments for items we have failed to identify as tax contingencies. If the IRS were to propose and sustain assessments we would incur additional tax payments for 2009 plus the applicable penalties and interest.




53



---

##### Table of Contents

Balance Sheet or Income Statement Caption/ Nature of Critical Estimate Item  Accounting for stock-based compensation On July 12, 2007, the Corporation adopted the PharMerica Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Omnibus
Plan) under which the Corporation is authorized to grant equity-based and other awards to its employees, officers, directors and consultants. The Corporation has reserved 3,800,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be granted under the
Omnibus Plan plus 534,642 shares issued for substitute equity awards for employees of KPS and PharMerica LTC whose awards were cancelled or forfeited upon the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction. The Compensation Committee has granted stock based compensation awards with respect to 3,293,019 common shares under the Omnibus Plan. After
consideration of forfeitures, 1,443,127 shares remain available for grant at December 31, 2009. The Corporations
Compensation Committee administers the Omnibus Plan and has the authority to determine the recipient of the awards, the types of awards, the number of shares covered and the terms and conditions of the awards. The Omnibus Plan allows for grants of
incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred shares, performance awards, including cash bonus awards, and other stock-based awards. On July 24, 2008, the Corporations
stockholders approved an amendment to the Omnibus Plan to provide the Compensation Committee with increased flexibility to use non-GAAP measures to measure performance, including the ability to exclude from the performance measures certain items or
charges related to an event or occurrence which the Compensation Committee determines should be excluded, in accordance with the performance criteria of performance awards granted pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. The Compensation Committee establishes
long-term and short-term incentive programs under the Omnibus Plan. In connection with the Corporations 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders of the Corporation approved and adopted the amended and restated Omnibus Plan to
preserve preferential tax treatment as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code. Unvested stock option and restricted shares of Kindred and AmerisourceBergen common stock held by our employees who were formerly PharMerica LTC or KPS employees were replaced with stock based awards of the Corporations common stock,
which will have the same terms and conditions as applied to the forfeited Kindred or AmerisourceBergen stock based awards. Our stock-based compensation for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 included in our results of operations was as follows (dollars in millions):  

2007: $1.5  

2008: $4.9  

2009: $4.6 Please refer to Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report for a detailed discussion of our accounting for stock-based compensation.


Assumptions/Approach Used  In connection with the granting of
shares under the Omnibus plan, each option generally vests in four equal annual installments and to have a term of seven years. The restricted stock will generally vest, in full, upon the three-year anniversary of the date of grant, thus stressing
the retentive aspect of these awards. The restricted stock units generally vest in two equal annual installments. The full vesting of performance share units is based upon a target amount of the Corporations earnings before interest, income
taxes, depreciation and amortization, or Adjusted EBITDA performance, which will reinforce the importance of achieving the Corporations profitability objectives. The performance period for the performance share units is generally a three-year
period. We estimated the fair value of stock options granted during 2007, 2008, and 2009 using the Black  Scholes
 Merton option valuation model (BSM). We are amortizing the fair value on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards, which are the vesting periods of three to four years. The stock options that were
granted under the Omnibus Plan vest 25% on each grant anniversary date over four years of continued employment. Restricted stock awards vest 100% at the third anniversary. The weighted average fair value per share of stock options granted by us during 2007, 2008, and 2009 were $5.82, $4.67, and $4.40,
respectively. The following table shows the weighted average assumptions we used to develop the fair value estimates under our stock options valuation model for 2007, 2008, and 2009 and the paragraphs below this table summarizes each assumption:  2007

2008

2009Expected volatility (range)

33.3 - 45.0%

33.3 - 41.7%

36.36 - 41.07%Risk free interest rate (range)

4.55 - 4.98%

1.53 - 2.45%

0.75 - 2.09%Expected dividends





Average expected term (years)

0.3 - 5.0

2.0 - 5.0

2.0 - 5.0Fair value per share of stock options granted based on the Black-Sholes-Merton model (dollars)

$5.82

$4.67

$4.40Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year (in millions)

$6.2

$1.5

$2.5 The Corporation aggregates individual awards into relatively homogeneous groups with
respect to exercise and post-vesting employment behaviors for the purpose of refining the expected term assumption, regardless of the valuation technique used to estimate the fair value. We have stratified our employee population into two groups:
(i) insiders, who are the Section 16 filers under SEC rules; and (ii) non-insiders, who are the rest of the employee population. Volatility is a measure of the tendency of investment returns to vary around a long-term average rate. As the Corporation has no history prior to July 31, 2007, we have used historical peer-group
volatility. We also consider how future experience may differ from the past. This may require using other factors to adjust historical volatility, such as implied volatility, peer-group volatility and the range and mean-reversion of volatility
estimates over various historical periods. The peer-group utilized consisted of fourteen companies in the same or similar industries as the Corporation.


Sensitivity Analysis  The fair value calculations of our
stock option grants are affected by assumptions that are believed to be reasonable based upon the facts and circumstances at the time of grant. Changes in our volatility estimates can materially affect the fair values of our stock option grants. If
our stock based compensation expense during 2009 was 10% higher, our 2009 after-tax income would decrease by approximately $0.2 million, or $0.01 per diluted share.




54



---

##### Table of Contents

Balance Sheet or Income Statement Caption/ Nature of Critical Estimate Item


Assumptions/Approach Used  In addition, management uses the
mean in the range of reasonable estimates for volatility. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the option. We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and
do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, we use an expected dividend yield of zero. Pre-vesting forfeitures do not affect the fair value calculation, but they affect the expense calculation. The Corporation estimates pre-vesting forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those
estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We have estimated pre-vesting option forfeitures and recorded share-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. Post-vesting cancellations include vested options that are cancelled, exercised or expire unexercised. The Corporation calculated an expected term using managements estimate of option exercises. The majority of the Corporations
stock options are on a graded-vesting schedule. The Corporation estimates the value of awards with graded vesting by treating each vesting tranche as a separate award. Management has determined to value each tranche of the awards separately
utilizing a multiple fair value method.


Sensitivity Analysis




55



---

##### Table of Contents

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Management reviewed the most recent issued accounting pronouncements as of December 31, 2009 and determined that none were applicable to
the Corporation.

Key Financial Statement Components

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Our revenues are comprised primarily
of product revenues and are derived from the sale of prescription drugs through our institutional pharmacies. The majority of our product revenues are derived on a fee-for-service basis. Our revenues are recorded net of certain discounts and
estimates for returns. Hospital pharmacy revenues represent management fees and pass through costs associated with managing the clients hospital pharmacy.

Cost of goods sold is comprised primarily of the cost of product and is principally attributable to the dispensing of prescription drugs. Our cost of product relating to drugs dispensed by our
institutional pharmacies consists primarily of the cost of inventory dispensed and our costs incurred to process and dispense the prescriptions. Cost of goods also includes direct labor, delivery costs, rent, utilities, depreciation, travel costs,
professional fees and other costs attributable to the dispensing of medications. In addition, cost of product includes a credit for rebates earned from brand-name pharmaceutical manufacturers whose drugs are included in our formularies. These
rebates generally take the form of formulary rebates, which are earned based on the volume of a specific drug dispensed, or market share rebates, which are earned based on the achievement of contractually specified market share levels. The
Corporation also receives rebates on generic drugs dispensed and administrative rebates.

Selling, general and administrative
expenses reflect the costs of operations dedicated to executive management, the generation of new sales, maintenance of existing client relationships, management of clinical programs, enhancement of technology capabilities, direction of pharmacy
operations, human resources and performance of reimbursement activities, in addition to finance, legal and other staff activities.

Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges represents the costs associated with the spin-offs of Kindred Pharmacy Services and PharMerica LTC from Kindred Healthcare and AmerisourceBergen and their respective
mergers. Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges also includes costs of acquisitions subsequent to the Pharmacy Transaction. Effective January 1, 2009, the accounting standards for the accounting of business
combinations changed, prior to the adoption of this accounting change, substantially all costs incurred as a result of an acquisition were capitalized as a part of the purchase price of the business combination. The new rules require such costs to
be expensed and recorded as a component of the statement of operations.

Interest expense (income), net, primarily includes
interest expense relating to our senior secured credit facility and the swap agreement that expired on July 31, 2009, partially offset by interest income generated by cash and cash equivalents.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

Our assets include cash and cash equivalent investments, accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets, deferred tax assets, goodwill and intangibles.

Cash reflects the accumulation of positive cash flows from our operations and financing activities, and primarily includes deposits with banks or other financial institutions. Our cash balances are at the
highest on Thursday nights and at the lowest on Friday nights. Friday is usually our largest cash disbursement day as a result of payments for our drug costs and our payrolls.



56



---

##### Table of Contents

Accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts due from Prescription Drug Plans under
Medicare Part D, the respective state Medicaid programs, long-term care institutions, third party insurance companies, and private payers, net of allowances for doubtful accounts, as well as contractual allowances.

Inventory reflects the cost of prescription products held for dispensing by our institutional pharmacies, net of capitalized rebates, and
are recorded on a first-in, first-out basis. We perform quarterly inventory counts and record our inventory and cost of goods sold based on such quarterly inventories. We also include an estimate for returns on inventory.

Deferred tax assets primarily represent temporary differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of certain accrued
expenses, tax deductible goodwill, ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards, and stock-based compensation. Fixed assets include investments in our institutional pharmacies and information technology, including capitalized software
development. Goodwill and intangible assets are comprised primarily of goodwill and intangibles related to our previous acquisitions.

Our primary liabilities include accounts payable, accrued salaries and wages, other current liabilities, debt, and deferred tax liabilities. Accounts payable primarily consist of amounts payable for prescription inventory purchases under
our Prime Vendor Agreement and other purchases made in the normal course of business. The balances in accounts payable and accrued salaries and wages are at the highest on Thursday nights and at the lowest on Friday nights, as a result of payments
for drug costs and payroll being made on Friday. Accrued expenses and other current liabilities primarily consist of employee and facility-related cost accruals incurred in the normal course of business, as well as income taxes payable. Our debt is
primarily comprised of a loan under our senior secured credit facility. We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, other than purchase commitments and lease obligations.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

An important element of our
operating cash flows is the timing of billing cycles, subsequent cash collections and payments for drug costs and labor. Due to the nature of the Corporations cash cycle, cash flows from operations can fluctuate significantly depending on the
day of the week of the respective close process. We pay for our prescription drug inventory in accordance with payment terms offered under our Prime Vendor Agreement. The Corporation receives rebates from its prime vendor and suppliers each period.
Rebates earned are recorded as a reduction to inventory and cost of goods sold in the period earned. Outgoing cash flows include inventory purchases, employee payroll and benefits, facility operating expenses, capital expenditures including
technology investments, interest and principal payments on our outstanding debt, and income taxes. The cost of acquisitions will also result in cash outflows.

Definitions

Listed below are definitions of terms used by the Corporation
in managing the business. The definitions are necessary to the understanding of the Managements Discussion and Analysis section of this document.

Assisted Living Facilities (ALF): Represents assisted living facility. Its units or beds will represent the number of apartment type units within the facility.

Bps: Represents basis points. Basis points are based on percentages. For example, 100 bps represents a change of 1.0%.

DNA: Represents data not available.

NA: Represents not applicable.

NM: Represents not meaningful.



57



---

##### Table of Contents

Prescriptions Dispensed: Represents a prescription filled for an individual patient.
A prescription will usually be for a 15 or 30 day period and will include only one drug type.

Revenues per prescription
dispensed: Represents the revenues from the institutional pharmacy segment divided by the total prescriptions dispensed.

Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF): Represents skilled nursing facilities. Its licensed beds will represent the customer licensed beds and this may not be indicative of its census.

Results of Operations

The
following table presents selected consolidated comparative results of operations and statistical information (dollars in millions, except per prescription and per patient amounts, and prescriptions in thousands):



|                                                                 |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------- | ------------------ |  | ----- | ---- |  | - | ------------------ | - |  | ------ | -- |  | ------------ | ------- | - |  | ----- | - |  | - | ------- | ------ |  | ----- | ------------ |  | - | ------- | - |  | ----- | -
|                                                                 |        | Years Ended December 31, |        
|                                                                 | 2007   |                          |         | Increase(Decrease) |  |       | 2008 |  |   | Increase(Decrease) |   |  | 2009   |   
|                                                                 | Amount |                          |         | % ofRevenues       |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  | Amount |    |  | % ofRevenues |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         | Amount |  |       | % ofRevenues | 
|Net revenues:                                                    |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                           |        | $                        | 1,163.0 |                    |  | 95.5  | %    |  | $ | 725.8              |   |  | 62.4   | %  |  | $            | 1,888.8 |   |  | 97.0  | % |  | $ | (104.1  | )      |  | (5.5  | )%           |  | $ | 1,784.7 |   |  | 96.9  | %
|Hospital Management                                              |        |                          | 54.8    |                    |  | 4.5   |      |  |   | 3.7                |   |  | 6.8    |    |  |              | 58.5    |   |  | 3.0   |   |  |   | (2.0    | )      |  | (3.4  | )            |  |   | 56.5    |   |  | 3.1   |  
|                                                                 |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Total net revenues                                               |        |                          | 1,217.8 |                    |  | 100.0 |      |  |   | 729.5              |   |  | 59.9   |    |  |              | 1,947.3 |   |  | 100.0 |   |  |   | (106.1  | )      |  | (5.4  | )            |  |   | 1,841.2 |   |  | 100.0 |  
|                                                                 |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Cost of goods sold:                                              |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                           |        |                          | 1,000.3 |                    |  | 82.1  |      |  |   | 615.0              |   |  | 61.5   |    |  |              | 1,615.3 |   |  | 83.0  |   |  |   | (94.4   | )      |  | (5.8  | )            |  |   | 1,520.9 |   |  | 82.6  |  
|Hospital Management                                              |        |                          | 43.7    |                    |  | 3.6   |      |  |   | 3.7                |   |  | 8.5    |    |  |              | 47.4    |   |  | 2.4   |   |  |   | 0.6     |        |  | 1.3   |              |  |   | 48.0    |   |  | 2.6   |  
|                                                                 |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Total cost of goods sold                                         |        |                          | 1,044.0 |                    |  | 85.7  |      |  |   | 618.7              |   |  | 59.3   |    |  |              | 1,662.7 |   |  | 85.4  |   |  |   | (93.8   | )      |  | (5.6  | )            |  |   | 1,568.9 |   |  | 85.2  |  
|                                                                 |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Gross profit:                                                    |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                           |        |                          | 162.7   |                    |  | 13.4  |      |  |   | 110.8              |   |  | 68.1   |    |  |              | 273.5   |   |  | 14.0  |   |  |   | (9.7    | )      |  | (3.5  | )            |  |   | 263.8   |   |  | 14.3  |  
|Hospital Management                                              |        |                          | 11.1    |                    |  | 0.9   |      |  |   |                   |   |  | 0.0    |    |  |              | 11.1    |   |  | 0.6   |   |  |   | (2.6    | )      |  | (23.4 | )            |  |   | 8.5     |   |  | 0.5   |  
|                                                                 |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Total gross profit                                               |        | $                        | 173.8   |                    |  | 14.3  | %    |  | $ | 110.8              |   |  | 63.8   | %  |  | $            | 284.6   |   |  | 14.6  | % |  | $ | (12.3   | )      |  | (4.3  | )%           |  | $ | 272.3   |   |  | 14.8  | %
|                                                                 |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy (in whole numbers except where indicated) |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Volume information                                               |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Prescriptions dispensed (in thousands)                           |        |                          | 24,751  |                    |  |       |      |  |   | 15,568             |   |  | 62.9   | %  |  |              | 40,319  |   |  |       |   |  |   | (1,282  | )      |  | (3.2  | )%           |  |   | 39,037  |   |  |       |  
|Revenue per prescription dispensed                               |        | $                        | 46.99   |                    |  |       |      |  | $ | (0.14              | ) |  | (0.3   | )% |  | $            | 46.85   |   |  |       |   |  | $ | (1.13   | )      |  | (2.4  | )%           |  | $ | 45.72   |   |  |       |  
|Gross profit per prescription dispensed                          |        | $                        | 6.57    |                    |  |       |      |  | $ | 0.21               |   |  | 3.2    | %  |  | $            | 6.78    |   |  |       |   |  | $ | (0.02   | )      |  | (0.3  | )%           |  | $ | 6.76    |   |  |       |  
|Institutional pharmacy gross margin                              |        |                          | 14.0    | %                  |  |       |      |  |   | 0.5                |   |  | 3.5    | %  |  |              | 14.5    | % |  |       |   |  |   | 0.3     |        |  | 2.1   | %            |  |   | 14.8    | % |  |       |  
|Generic dispensing rate                                          |        |                          | 67.4    | %                  |  |       |      |  |   | 3.3                |   |  | 4.9    | %  |  |              | 70.7    | % |  |       |   |  |   | 3.5     |        |  | 5.0   | %            |  |   | 74.2    | % |  |       |  
|Customer licensed beds under contract                            |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Beginning of period                                              |        |                          | 102,571 |                    |  |       |      |  |   | 234,472            |   |  | 228.6  | %  |  |              | 337,043 |   |  |       |   |  |   | (14,667 | )      |  | (4.4  | )%           |  |   | 322,376 |   |  |       |  
|Additions                                                        |        |                          | 260,376 |                    |  |       |      |  |   | (238,978           | ) |  | (91.8  | )  |  |              | 21,398  |   |  |       |   |  |   | 14,523  |        |  | 67.9  |              |  |   | 35,921  |   |  |       |  
|Losses and other                                                 |        |                          | (25,904 | )                  |  |       |      |  |   | (10,161            | ) |  | 39.2   |    |  |              | (36,065 | ) |  |       |   |  |   | (4,347  | )      |  | 12.1  |              |  |   | (40,412 | ) |  |       |  
|                                                                 |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|End of period                                                    |        |                          | 337,043 |                    |  |       |      |  |   | (14,667            | ) |  | (4.4   | )% |  |              | 322,376 |   |  |       |   |  |   | (4,491  | )      |  | (1.4  | )%           |  |   | 317,885 |   |  |       |  
|                                                                 |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Hospital Management (in whole numbers except where indicated)    |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Volume information                                               |        |                          |         |                    |  |       |      |  |   |                    |   |  |        |    |  |              |         |   |  |       |   |  |   |         |        |  |       |              |  |   |         |   |  |       |  
|Hospital management contracts serviced                           |        |                          | 86      |                    |  |       |      |  |   | (2                 | ) |  | -2.3   | %  |  |              | 84      |   |  |       |   |  |   | 2       |        |  | 2.4   | %            |  |   | 86      |   |  |       |  



58



---

##### Table of Contents

Revenues

The decrease in institutional pharmacy revenues of $104.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, was the result of an unfavorable rate
variance of approximately $44.0 million or a $1.13 decline per prescription dispensed and an unfavorable volume variance of approximately $60.1 million or 1,282,000 fewer prescriptions dispensed. The rate variance was comprised of approximately
$85.6 million increase due to inflation on brand and generic drugs, offset by a decline in revenues of approximately $129.6 million due to the increase in the generic drug dispensing rate from 70.7% to 74.2% during the period, the AWP impact of $1.4
million and other concessions. The volume variance of approximately $60.1 million was due to the decline in net customer licensed beds under contract and one less calendar day. The year ended December 31, 2009, had one less business and
calendar day of activity compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, resulting in less revenue for the current period of approximately $4.9 million or 107,000 fewer prescriptions dispensed.

The decrease in hospital management revenues for the year ended December 31, 2009, of $2.0 million was due primarily to concessions
with certain hospital management contracts serviced in the period.

The increase in institutional pharmacy revenues of $725.8
million for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007 was primarily the result of the acquisition of PharMerica LTC on July 31, 2007. This resulted in a significant increase in patients serviced.
The acquisition of an institutional pharmacy business in the fourth quarter of 2008 accounted for $4.5 million of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The $3.7 million increase in hospital management revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended December 31, 2007 resulted from an increase in direct reimbursable
costs as well as certain contractually provided management fee increases, partially offset by a decline in the number of hospitals served.

Cost of Goods Sold

Institutional pharmacy cost of goods sold decreased $94.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008, due primarily to a reduction in drug purchases as a result of less prescriptions being dispensed. Drug spend as a percentage of revenues increased 31 bps but was
partially offset by an improvement in rebates of 9 bps during the comparable periods. Other costs included within cost of goods sold as a percent of revenues improved a combined 52 bps, predominately as a result of operational efficiencies. The year
ended December 31, 2008, also included a reduction related to the reimbursement of overcharges on self-insured employee health benefits of $1.5 million, of which approximately $0.9 million related to 2007.

Hospital management cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2009, increased $0.6 million, compared to the respective prior
periods, due to the increase in the number of hospital contracts serviced between periods.

Institutional pharmacy cost of
goods sold increased $615.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due primarily to the acquisition of PharMerica LTC on July 31, 2007.

The $3.7 million increase in hospital management cost of goods sold for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to the year ended
December 31, 2007 was the result of an increase in the direct costs of the hospital pharmacies which was a pass-through to our customers. These increases were primarily related to labor and related expenses.



59



---

##### Table of Contents

Gross Profit and Operating Expenses

Gross profit and other operating expenses for the periods presented were as follows (dollars in millions):



|                                                    |  |                          |       |   |                    |      |    |      |   |       |                    |  |        |        |  |              |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   |        |        |              |  |   |       |  |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----- | - | ------------------ | ---- | -- | ---- | - | ----- | ------------------ |  | ------ | ------ |  | ------------ | ----- |  | ---- | - |  | - | ----- | - | ------ | ------ | ------------ |  | - | ----- |  | ---- | -
|                                                    |  | Years Ended December 31, |      
|                                                    |  | 2007                     |       |   | Increase(Decrease) |      |    | 2008 |   |       | Increase(Decrease) |  |        | 2009   | 
|                                                    |  | Amount                   |       |   | % ofRevenues       |      |    |      |   |       |                    |  |        | Amount |  | % ofRevenues |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   | Amount |        | % ofRevenues | 
|Gross profit and operating expenses:                |  |                          |       |   |                    |      |    |      |   |       |                    |  |        |        |  |              |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   |        |        |              |  |   |       |  |      |  
|Total gross profit                                  |  | $                        | 173.8 |   |                    | 14.3 | %  |      | $ | 110.8 |                    |  | 63.8   | %      |  | $            | 284.6 |  | 14.6 | % |  | $ | (12.3 | ) |        | (4.3   | )%           |  | $ | 272.3 |  | 14.8 | %
|Selling, general and administrative expenses        |  |                          | 169.3 |   |                    | 13.9 |    |      |   | 44.8  |                    |  | 26.5   |        |  |              | 214.1 |  | 11.0 |   |  |   | (26.5 | ) |        | (12.4  | )            |  |   | 187.6 |  | 10.2 |  
|Amortization expense                                |  |                          | 5.0   |   |                    | 0.4  |    |      |   | 1.5   |                    |  | 30.0   |        |  |              | 6.5   |  | 0.3  |   |  |   | 2.5   |   |        | 38.5   |              |  |   | 9.0   |  | 0.5  |  
|Impairment of intangible assets                     |  |                          |      |   |                    |     |    |      |   | 14.8  |                    |  | 100.0  |        |  |              | 14.8  |  | 0.8  |   |  |   | (14.8 | ) |        | (100.0 | )            |  |   |      |  |     |  
|Integration, merger related costs and other charges |  |                          | 29.8  |   |                    | 2.5  |    |      |   | (3.1  | )                  |  | (10.4  | )      |  |              | 26.7  |  | 1.4  |   |  |   | (21.5 | ) |        | (80.5  | )            |  |   | 5.2   |  | 0.3  |  
|Interest expense, net                               |  |                          | 7.2   |   |                    | 0.6  |    |      |   | 7.0   |                    |  | 97.2   |        |  |              | 14.2  |  | 0.7  |   |  |   | (4.8  | ) |        | (33.8  | )            |  |   | 9.4   |  | 0.5  |  
|                                                    |  |                          |       |   |                    |      |    |      |   |       |                    |  |        |        |  |              |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   |        |        |              |  |   |       |  |      |  
|Income (loss) before provision for income taxes     |  |                          | (37.5 | ) |                    | (3.1 | )  |      |   | 45.8  |                    |  | (122.1 | )      |  |              | 8.3   |  | 0.4  |   |  |   | 52.8  |   |        | 636.1  |              |  |   | 61.1  |  | 3.3  |  
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                |  |                          | (13.4 | ) |                    | (1.1 | )  |      |   | 16.7  |                    |  | (124.6 | )      |  |              | 3.3   |  | 0.1  |   |  |   | 15.6  |   |        | 472.7  |              |  |   | 18.9  |  | 1.0  |  
|                                                    |  |                          |       |   |                    |      |    |      |   |       |                    |  |        |        |  |              |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   |        |        |              |  |   |       |  |      |  
|Net income (loss)                                   |  | $                        | (24.1 | ) |                    | (2.0 | )% |      | $ | 29.1  |                    |  | (120.7 | )%     |  | $            | 5.0   |  | 0.3  | % |  | $ | 37.2  |   |        | 744.0  | %            |  | $ | 42.2  |  | 2.3  | %
|                                                    |  |                          |       |   |                    |      |    |      |   |       |                    |  |        |        |  |              |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   |        |        |              |  |   |       |  |      |  

Institutional pharmacy gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2009, was
$263.8 million, or $6.76 per prescription dispensed, compared to $273.5 million, or $6.78 per prescription dispensed for the year ended December 31, 2008. The year ended December 31, 2008, included the reimbursement of overcharges on
self-insured employee health benefits of $1.5 million of which approximately $0.9 million related to 2007 ($0.02 per script). Excluding the favorable impact of the reimbursement of the self-insurance, the gross profit per prescription dispensed
would be consistent from 2008 to 2009. The institutional pharmacy gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2009, was 14.8% compared to 14.5% for the year ended December 31, 2008. After considering the impact of the reimbursement
of overcharges on self-insurance, the gross profit margin increased 40 bps from 14.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008, to 14.8% for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in institutional pharmacy gross profit margin as a
percent of institutional pharmacy revenues is due primarily to synergies from the consolidation of pharmacy locations, partially offset by margin compression as reimbursement declined on generic drugs as more alternatives become available.

The decrease in hospital management gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2009, of $2.6 million, was due
primarily to concessions with certain hospital management contracts serviced during the periods.

Institutional pharmacy gross
profit for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $273.5 million or $6.78 per prescription dispensed. Institutional gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 14.5% of institutional revenue. This compares to an
institutional gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2007 of $162.7 million or $6.57 per prescription dispensed. Institutional gross profit margin for the year ended December 31, 2007 was 14.0% of institutional revenue. The
institutional gross profit for 2008 compared to 2007 was favorably impacted by a reduction in expenses as a result of the consolidation of pharmacy locations during the period as institutional cost of goods as a percent of institutional revenue
declined 50 bps.



60



---

##### Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses represent the following costs for the periods, excluding integration, merger and acquisition
related costs and other charges (dollars in millions):



|                                                   |  |                          |       |              |                    |   |  |      |       |   |                    |        |        |      |              |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   |        |       |              |  |   |       |  |      |  
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----- | ------------ | ------------------ | - |  | ---- | ----- | - | ------------------ | ------ | ------ | ---- | ------------ | ----- |  | ---- | - |  | - | ----- | - | ------ | ----- | ------------ |  | - | ----- |  | ---- | -
|                                                   |  | Years Ended December 31, |      
|                                                   |  | 2007                     |       |              | Increase(Decrease) |   |  | 2008 |       |   | Increase(Decrease) |        |        | 2009 |             
|                                                   |  | Amount                   |       | % ofRevenues |                    |   |  |      |       |   |                    |        | Amount |      | % ofRevenues |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   | Amount |       | % ofRevenues | 
|Selling, general and administrative expenses       |  |                          |       |              |                    |   |  |      |       |   |                    |        |        |      |              |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   |        |       |              |  |   |       |  |      |  
|Total wages, benefits and contract labor           |  | $                        | 68.9  |              | 5.7                | % |  | $    | 38.6  |   |                    | 56.0   | %      |      | $            | 107.5 |  | 5.5  | % |  | $ | (5.8  | ) |        | (5.4  | )%           |  | $ | 101.7 |  | 5.5  | %
|Contracted services                                |  |                          | 9.6   |              | 0.8                |   |  |      | 7.6   |   |                    | 79.2   |        |      |              | 17.2  |  | 0.9  |   |  |   | (4.0  | ) |        | (23.3 | )            |  |   | 13.2  |  | 0.7  |  
|Provision for doubtful accounts                    |  |                          | 44.1  |              | 3.6                |   |  |      | (19.4 | ) |                    | (44.0  | )      |      |              | 24.7  |  | 1.3  |   |  |   | (8.1  | ) |        | (32.8 | )            |  |   | 16.6  |  | 0.9  |  
|Supplies                                           |  |                          | 3.7   |              | 0.3                |   |  |      | 3.8   |   |                    | 102.7  |        |      |              | 7.5   |  | 0.4  |   |  |   |      |   |        |      |              |  |   | 7.5   |  | 0.4  |  
|Travel expenses                                    |  |                          | 4.7   |              | 0.4                |   |  |      | 1.2   |   |                    | 25.5   |        |      |              | 5.9   |  | 0.3  |   |  |   | (1.4  | ) |        | (23.7 | )            |  |   | 4.5   |  | 0.2  |  
|Professional fees                                  |  |                          | 5.6   |              | 0.5                |   |  |      | 4.0   |   |                    | 71.4   |        |      |              | 9.6   |  | 0.5  |   |  |   | (0.3  | ) |        | (3.1  | )            |  |   | 9.3   |  | 0.5  |  
|Stock-based compensation                           |  |                          | 1.5   |              | 0.1                |   |  |      | 3.4   |   |                    | 226.7  |        |      |              | 4.9   |  | 0.3  |   |  |   | (0.3  | ) |        | (6.1  | )            |  |   | 4.6   |  | 0.3  |  
|Management fee                                     |  |                          | 8.4   |              | 0.7                |   |  |      | (8.4  | ) |                    | (100.0 | )      |      |              |      |  |     |   |  |   |      |   |        |      |              |  |   |      |  |     |  
|Depreciation                                       |  |                          | 6.4   |              | 0.5                |   |  |      | 4.3   |   |                    | 67.2   |        |      |              | 10.7  |  | 0.5  |   |  |   | (2.1  | ) |        | (19.6 | )            |  |   | 8.6   |  | 0.5  |  
|Rent                                               |  |                          | 5.3   |              | 0.4                |   |  |      | 3.6   |   |                    | 67.9   |        |      |              | 8.9   |  | 0.4  |   |  |   | (4.8  | ) |        | (53.9 | )            |  |   | 4.1   |  | 0.2  |  
|Maintenance                                        |  |                          | 2.0   |              | 0.2                |   |  |      | 1.1   |   |                    | 55.0   |        |      |              | 3.1   |  | 0.2  |   |  |   | (0.5  | ) |        | (16.1 | )            |  |   | 2.6   |  | 0.2  |  
|Other costs                                        |  |                          | 9.1   |              | 0.7                |   |  |      | 5.0   |   |                    | 54.9   |        |      |              | 14.1  |  | 0.7  |   |  |   | 0.8   |   |        | 5.7   |              |  |   | 14.9  |  | 0.8  |  
|                                                   |  |                          |       |              |                    |   |  |      |       |   |                    |        |        |      |              |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   |        |       |              |  |   |       |  |      |  
|Total selling, general and administrative expenses |  | $                        | 169.3 |              | 13.9               | % |  | $    | 44.8  |   |                    | 26.5   | %      |      | $            | 214.1 |  | 11.0 | % |  | $ | (26.5 | ) |        | (12.4 | )%           |  | $ | 187.6 |  | 10.2 | %
|                                                   |  |                          |       |              |                    |   |  |      |       |   |                    |        |        |      |              |       |  |      |   |  |   |       |   |        |       |              |  |   |       |  |      |  

Total labor costs decreased $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
over the comparable period in the prior year as a result of managements effort to eliminate duplicate overhead positions within the pharmacy locations and reduce certain corporate overhead functions. Total labor costs in 2008 were reduced by
$0.3 million related to the health insurance reimbursement which related to 2007, without which the total labor decrease would have been $6.1 million. Costs associated with contracted services decreased $4.0 million predominantly due to lower costs
associated with the IT Services Agreement. The provision for doubtful accounts decreased $8.1 million primarily as a result of improved collections from certain payer types. Total rent decreased $4.8 million primarily as a result of the pharmacy
consolidations in the prior period. Other costs within selling, general and administrative expenses declined during the year ended December 31, 2009, a combined $3.8 million due primarily to synergies resulting from the pharmacy consolidations.

The increase of $44.8 million in selling, general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to December 31, 2007, was primarily attributable to a full year of operating results from the acquisition of PharMerica LTC, provision for doubtful accounts described below, the legal and accounting fees associated with becoming
compliant under the Sarbanes Oxley Act and the additional costs associated with being a public company. Stock based compensation increased $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007, due to the
Corporation incurring a full year of compensation expense. Prior year stock based compensation primarily represented only stock based compensation for the period from the date of the Pharmacy Transaction, July 31, 2007 to December 31,
2007.



61



---

##### Table of Contents

For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation has reclassified $27.9 million
from Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges to provision for doubtful accounts, a component of Selling, general and administrative expenses. The change in accounting estimate of $27.9 million representing an increase in
the allowance for doubtful accounts is related to the acquired receivables of PharMerica LTC as of July 31, 2007, and is unrelated to the accounts receivable and revenue of KPS. This amount was previous charged to Integration, merger and
acquisition related costs and other charges as the related revenue had never been recorded in the accounts of either the Corporation or its predecessor entity, KPS. These reclassifications have no impact on the Corporations total assets,
liabilities, stockholders equity, net income (loss) or cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Depreciation and
Amortization

Depreciation expense for the periods presented was as follows (dollars in millions):



|                                                                                     |  |                          |      |              |      |   |        |      |              |  |     |        |  |              |      |  |     |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------ | ---- | ------------ | ---- | - | ------ | ---- | ------------ |  | --- | ------ |  | ------------ | ---- |  | --- | -
|                                                                                     |  | Years Ended December 31, |     
|                                                                                     |  | 2007                     |      |              | 2008 |   |        | 2009 |             
|                                                                                     |  | Amount                   |      | % ofRevenues |      |   | Amount |      | % ofRevenues |  |     | Amount |  | % ofRevenues |     
|Leasehold improvements                                                               |  | $                        | 2.7  |              | 0.2  | % |        | $    | 2.3          |  | 0.1 | %      |  | $            | 1.5  |  | 0.1 | %
|Equipment and software                                                               |  |                          | 12.7 |              | 1.1  |   |        |      | 19.3         |  | 1.0 |        |  |              | 15.9 |  | 0.9 |  
|Leased equipment                                                                     |  |                          | 0.2  |              | NM   |   |        |      | 0.4          |  | NM  |        |  |              | 0.6  |  | NM  |  
|                                                                                     |  |                          |      |              |      |   |        |      |              |  |     |        |  |              |      |  |     |  
|Total depreciation expense                                                           |  | $                        | 15.6 |              | 1.3  | % |        | $    | 22.0         |  | 1.1 | %      |  | $            | 18.0 |  | 1.0 | %
|                                                                                     |  |                          |      |              |      |   |        |      |              |  |     |        |  |              |      |  |     |  
|Depreciation expense recorded in cost of goods sold                                  |  | $                        | 8.8  |              | 0.7  | % |        | $    | 11.3         |  | 0.6 | %      |  | $            | 9.4  |  | 0.5 | %
|Depreciation expense recorded in selling, general & administrative expenses          |  |                          | 6.4  |              | 0.5  |   |        |      | 10.7         |  | 0.5 |        |  |              | 8.6  |  | 0.5 |  
|Depreciation expense recorded in integration, merger related costs and other charges |  |                          | 0.4  |              | NM   |   |        |      |             |  |    |        |  |              |     |  |    |  
|                                                                                     |  |                          |      |              |      |   |        |      |              |  |     |        |  |              |      |  |     |  
|Total depreciation expense                                                           |  | $                        | 15.6 |              | 1.3  | % |        | $    | 22.0         |  | 1.1 | %      |  | $            | 18.0 |  | 1.0 | %
|                                                                                     |  |                          |      |              |      |   |        |      |              |  |     |        |  |              |      |  |     |  
|Total capital expenditures                                                           |  | $                        | 16.7 |              | 1.4  | % |        | $    | 22.1         |  | 1.1 | %      |  | $            | 21.6 |  | 1.2 | %
|                                                                                     |  |                          |      |              |      |   |        |      |              |  |     |        |  |              |      |  |     |  

Depreciation expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to
the year ended December 31, 2008, due primarily to assets acquired as a result of the Pharmacy Transaction nearing the end of their weighted average useful life and the consolidation of pharmacy locations. Capital expenditures have declined in
2009 compared to the same period in 2008 primarily as a result of the completion of substantially all consolidations in 2008.

The increase of $6.4 million in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 2008 over the prior year amount of $15.6 million is primarily related to a full year of operating results from the PharMerica LTC acquisition as well
as assets acquired for the Corporation to establish its own systems infrastructure.



62



---

##### Table of Contents

Amortization expense related to certain identifiable intangibles for the periods presented
were as follows (dollars in millions):



|                                      |        |                          |              |      |     |        |      |              |     |  |        |   |              |   |     |  |     |  
|------------------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------ | ------------ | ---- | --- | ------ | ---- | ------------ | --- |  | ------ | - | ------------ | - | --- |  | --- | -
|                                      |        | Years Ended December 31, |             
|                                      | 2007   |                          |              | 2008 |     |        | 2009 |             
|                                      | Amount |                          | % ofRevenues |      |     | Amount |      | % ofRevenues |     |  | Amount |   | % ofRevenues |  
|Amortization of intangibles:          |        |                          |              |      |     |        |      |              |     |  |        |   |              |   |     |  |     |  
|Trade names                           |        | $                        | 0.6          |      |    | %      |      | $            | 1.3 |  | 0.1    | % |              | $ | 1.4 |  | 0.1 | %
|Non-compete agreements                |        |                          | 0.4          |      |    |        |      |              | 0.4 |  | NM     |   |              |   | 1.1 |  | NM  |  
|Noncontractual customer relationships |        |                          | 4.0          |      | 0.4 |        |      |              | 4.8 |  | 0.2    |   |              |   | 6.5 |  | 0.4 |  
|                                      |        |                          |              |      |     |        |      |              |     |  |        |   |              |   |     |  |     |  
|Total amortization expense            |        | $                        | 5.0          |      | 0.4 | %      |      | $            | 6.5 |  | 0.3    | % |              | $ | 9.0 |  | 0.5 | %
|                                      |        |                          |              |      |     |        |      |              |     |  |        |   |              |   |     |  |     |  

Amortization expense for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year
ended December 31, 2008, increased due primarily to additional amortization associated with intangibles capitalized as a result of acquisitions in the period.

The increase in amortization expense in 2008 of $1.5 million was the result of amortization of the intangibles acquired in connection with the PharMerica LTC acquisition.

Impairment of intangible assets

During the fourth quarter 2008, the Corporation recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $14.8 million, related to finite lived customer relationships. The impairment, which related to the Institutional Pharmacy segment, was incurred
when the reporting unit experienced a higher than expected loss of licensed beds. The impairment was related to assets acquired in acquisitions by KPS during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006. Using a discounted cash flow analysis, the
Corporation determined that a pre-tax impairment charge of $14.8 million was required to write the carrying value down to the fair value, resulting in a loss per diluted share impact of $0.30.



63



---

##### Table of Contents

Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges

Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges incurred by the Corporation for the periods presented were as follows
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts):



|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ----- | -
|                                                                          |  | Years Ended December 31, |      
|                                                                          |  | 2007                     |       |   | 2008 |   |       | 2009 | 
|Integration costs and other charges:                                      |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                                            |  | $                        | 1.1   |   |      | $ | 1.7   |      |  | $ | 0.2   |  
|General and administrative                                                |  |                          | 0.6   |   |      |   | 3.2   |      |  |   | 0.8   |  
|Employee costs                                                            |  |                          | 0.6   |   |      |   | 7.2   |      |  |   | 1.5   |  
|Severance costs                                                           |  |                          | 1.1   |   |      |   | 5.3   |      |  |   | 0.9   |  
|Facility costs                                                            |  |                          | 2.6   |   |      |   | 9.3   |      |  |   | 0.8   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                          |  |                          | 6.0   |   |      |   | 26.7  |      |  |   | 4.2   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Merger related costs:                                                     |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                                            |  |                          | 8.0   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|General and administrative                                                |  |                          | 5.4   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Employee costs                                                            |  |                          | 7.6   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Severance costs                                                           |  |                          | 2.0   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Facility costs                                                            |  |                          | 0.7   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Other costs                                                               |  |                          | 0.1   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                          |  |                          | 23.8  |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Acquistion related costs:                                                 |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                                            |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   | 1.0   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   | 1.0   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Total integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  | $                        | 29.8  |   |      | $ | 26.7  |      |  | $ | 5.2   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Negative effect on earnings per diluted share                             |  | $                        | (0.90 | ) |      | $ | (0.53 | )    |  | $ | (0.10 | )
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  

Integration, merger, and acquisition related costs and other charges decreased for
the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was due to the completion of the majority of the planned pharmacy consolidations during 2008. The costs incurred for the year ended
December 31, 2009, were primarily related to the planned integration of our pharmacy operating systems. Acquisition costs increased $1.0 million as a result of the acquisitions during the third and fourth quarter of 2009. Effective
January 1, 2009, the accounting standards for the accounting of business combinations changed. Prior to the adoption of this accounting change, substantially all costs incurred as a result of an acquisition were capitalized as part of the
purchase price of the business combination. The new rules require such costs to be expensed and recorded as a component of the statement of operations. Acquisition related costs will increase as the Corporation consummates future acquisitions.

Integration costs and other charges of $26.7 million increased approximately $20.7 million compared to the prior year amount
of $6.0 million due to the increased number of pharmacy consolidations during the year ended December 31, 2008 and costs incurred to integrate the Corporations operating systems. The merger related costs of $23.8 million incurred for the
year ended December 31, 2007, were costs incurred to merge the legacy KPS and Pharmerica LTC operations.



64



---

##### Table of Contents

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the periods presented was as follows (dollars in millions):



|                                                                |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ---- | - | ---- | - | ---- | ---- |  | - | ---- | -
|                                                                |  | Years Ended December 31, |     
|                                                                |  | 2007                     |      |   | 2008 |   |      | 2009 | 
|Interest expense:                                               |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Term Debt                                                       |  | $                        | 7.4  |   |      | $ | 14.5 |      |  | $ | 9.1  |  
|Revolving Credit Facility                                       |  |                          | 0.2  |   |      |   |     |      |  |   |     |  
|                                                                |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Subtotal (including commitment fees and letters of credit fees) |  |                          | 7.6  |   |      |   | 14.5 |      |  |   | 9.1  |  
|Other:                                                          |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Interest income                                                 |  |                          | (0.6 | ) |      |   | (0.7 | )    |  |   | (0.2 | )
|Amortization of deferred financing fees                         |  |                          | 0.2  |   |      |   | 0.4  |      |  |   | 0.5  |  
|                                                                |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Total interest expense                                          |  | $                        | 7.2  |   |      | $ | 14.2 |      |  | $ | 9.4  |  
|                                                                |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Interest rate (excluding applicable margin):                    |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Average interest rate on variable term debt                     |  |                          | 6.32 | % |      |   | 3.05 | %    |  |   | 0.65 | %
|LIBOR1 month, at beginning of period                           |  |                          | 5.32 | % |      |   | 4.60 | %    |  |   | 0.44 | %
|LIBOR1 month, at end of period                                 |  |                          | 4.60 | % |      |   | 0.44 | %    |  |   | 0.23 | %
|LIBOR3 months, at beginning of period                          |  |                          | 5.36 | % |      |   | 4.70 | %    |  |   | 1.43 | %
|LIBOR3 months, at end of period                                |  |                          | 4.70 | % |      |   | 1.43 | %    |  |   | 0.25 | %

The decrease in interest expense was due to lower LIBOR and the expiration of the
interest rate swap on July 31, 2009. The margin over LIBOR was between 0.75% and 1.00% during the year ended December 31, 2009. Total long-term debt outstanding, including capital lease obligations, as of December 31, 2008 and 2009,
was $240.0 million and $241.5 million, respectively. Due to the expiration of the interest rate swap on July 31, 2009, the Corporations $240.0 million term debt is now subject to variable interest rates. The current margin over LIBOR is
1.0% at December 31, 2009.

Interest expense increased $7.0 for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the
prior year period as a result of a full year of incurring interest on the Corporations debt instruments in 2008. During 2007 and 2008, the Corporation paid down $25.0 and $10.0 million, respectively, in borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

Tax Provision (Benefit)

The tax provision (benefit) for the periods presented was as follows (dollars in millions):



|                                                      |  |                          |       |    |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----- | -- | ---- | - | ---- | ---- |  | - | ---- | -
|                                                      |  | Years Ended December 31, |      
|                                                      |  | 2007                     |       |    | 2008 |   |      | 2009 | 
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                  |  | $                        | (13.4 | )  |      | $ | 3.3  |      |  | $ | 18.9 |  
|                                                      |  |                          |       |    |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Provision (benefit) as a percentage of pre-tax income |  |                          | (35.7 | )% |      |   | 39.7 | %    |  |   | 30.9 | %
|                                                      |  |                          |       |    |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  

Our effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2009, was 30.9% comprised
of the 35.0% federal rate and 4.5% for the state rate. The net impact of the valuation allowance releases, permanent rate differences, and other discrete items was a benefit of 8.6%.

The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2008, was 39.7% comprised of the 35.0% federal rate and 4.7% for the state and
permanent rate differences.

The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2007 was a benefit of 35.7% comprised
of the 35.0% federal rate and net benefit rate of 0.7% for state rate and permanent rate differences.



65



---

##### Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The primary source of liquidity for the Corporation is cash flows from operations and the available borrowing capacity under the Credit
Agreement. Based upon our existing cash levels, expected operating cash flows, capital spending, potential future acquisitions and the availability of borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility, we believe that we have the necessary
financial resources to satisfy our expected short-term and long-term liquidity needs.

The Corporation continues to achieve
certain cost savings resulting from operating efficiencies, synergies and other restructuring activities that resulted from the Pharmacy Transaction. Notwithstanding other anticipated savings, we will experience some increased costs associated with
the continuation of information systems integration and enhancements.

Cash Flows. The following table presents
selected data from our consolidated statements of cash flows (dollars in millions):



|                                                    |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ----- | -
|                                                    |  | Years Ended December 31, |      
|                                                    |  | 2007                     |       |   | 2008 |   |       | 2009 | 
|Net cash provided by operating activities           |  | $                        | 36.3  |   |      | $ | 65.7  |      |  | $ | 85.0  |  
|Net cash used in investing activities               |  |                          | (22.0 | ) |      |   | (47.4 | )    |  |   | (76.1 | )
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |  |                          | 14.0  |   |      |   | (9.0  | )    |  |   | 1.0   |  
|                                                    |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Net increase in cash and cash equivalents           |  |                          | 28.3  |   |      |   | 9.3   |      |  |   | 9.9   |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period    |  |                          | 3.7   |   |      |   | 32.0  |      |  |   | 41.3  |  
|                                                    |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period          |  | $                        | 32.0  |   |      | $ | 41.3  |      |  | $ | 51.2  |  
|                                                    |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  

Operating ActivitiesCash provided by
operations aggregated $85.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $65.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Operating cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2009, were positively impacted by an
improvement in the results of operations following the fiscal 2008 pharmacy consolidations.

Investing
ActivitiesCash used in investing activities aggregated $76.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to $47.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The year ended December 31, 2009, had a higher
amount of cash used in investing activities than normal due to the acquisitions in 2009 of $54.7 million.

Financing ActivitiesCash provided by financing activities aggregated $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, due to cash proceeds received from the exercise of stock options in the period. Cash flows used
in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008, were due to the Corporations decision to make a $10.0 million early payment on long-term debt. Management did not make an early payment on long-term debt during the year ended
December 31, 2009.

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $51.2 million at December 31, 2009 compared to $41.3 million
at December 31, 2008.



66



---

##### Table of Contents

Credit Agreement

On the Closing Date, the Corporation entered into a Credit Agreement among the Corporation, the Lenders named therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMorgan), as Administrative Agent. The
Credit Agreement consists of a $275.0 million term loan facility and a $150.0 million revolving credit facility. The Corporation borrowed $275.0 million under the term loan portion of the Credit Agreement and an additional $20.0 million under the
revolving credit portion of the Credit Agreement on the Closing Date to refinance the loans made to KPS and PharMerica LTC to finance their respective cash distributions, to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Pharmacy Transaction
and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement matures on July 31, 2012. There is no scheduled amortization under the term loan facility but the term loan is subject to certain prepayment
obligations relating to certain asset sales, certain casualty losses and the incurrence by the Corporation of certain indebtedness.

Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate equal to, at our option, a base rate plus a margin between 0.0% and 0.75% per annum, or an adjusted LIBO rate plus a margin between 0.625% and 1.75% per annum,
in each case depending on the leverage ratio of the Corporation. The base rate is the higher of the prime lending rate announced by JPMorgan in New York from time to time and the federal funds rate published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
plus 0.50%. The Credit Agreement also provides for letter of credit participation fees between 0.625%, and 1.75%, letter of credit fronting fees of 0.125%, and a commitment fee payable on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, which
shall accrue at a rate per annum ranging from 0.125% to 0.250%, in each case depending on the leverage ratio of the Corporation. As of December 31, 2009, borrowings under the Credit Agreement bore interest at a rate of 1.24%, including the
applicable margin of 1.0%, per annum based upon the one month LIBO Rate and the Corporation had approximately $147.7 million available under the revolving credit facility.

The obligations of the Corporation under and related to the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of its assets. Those
obligations are guaranteed by many of the Corporations wholly owned subsidiaries and the obligations of the guarantors are secured by substantially all of their assets. The foregoing includes a pledge of all of the equity interests of
substantially all of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries and a portion of the equity interests of any future foreign subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement also contains financial and non-financial affirmative and negative covenants,
representations, warranties, affirmative covenants and events of default that are customary to facilities of this nature.

The
Corporation had a total of $240.0 million outstanding of term debt under the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2009. The Corporation had no borrowings under the revolving portion of the Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2009. The
Credit Agreement provides for the issuance of letters of credit which, when issued, constitute usage and reduce availability on the revolving portion of the Credit Agreement. The aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding as of
December 31, 2009, was $2.3 million. After giving effect to the letters of credit, total availability under the revolving credit facility was $147.7 million as of December 31, 2009. The total availability of the revolving credit facility
is limited by the ability of the lenders in the Credit Agreement to fund any future requested borrowings.



67



---

##### Table of Contents

Covenants

The Credit Agreement requires the Corporation to satisfy a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum total leverage coverage ratio. The minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, which is tested
quarterly on a trailing four quarter basis, can be no less than 2.25:1.00 during the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009; and 2.50:1.00 thereafter. The maximum total leverage coverage ratio, which also is tested quarterly,
cannot exceed 3.50:1.00 during the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009; and 3.00:1.00 thereafter (the leverage ratio is not tested when at any time it is less than 2.00:1.00 or both S&P and Moodys shall have in
effect corporate credit ratings for the Corporation that are investment grade). The Credit Agreement provides for the Corporation to use an adjusted EBITDA number in conjunction with the calculation of the leverage ratio. This adjusted EBITDA used
in connection with the leverage ratio calculation pursuant to the Credit Agreement is not the same calculation the Corporation uses to determine the Adjusted EBITDA for its financial analysis and other purposes. In addition, capital expenditures
(other than those funded with proceeds of asset sales or insurance) are restricted in any fiscal year to 3.0% of revenues.

The financial covenant ratio and requirements are as follows:



|                  |  |                                   |  |                                     |  |                     |  
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | -
|                  |  | Minimum FixedChargeCoverage Ratio |  | Maximum TotalLeverageCoverage Ratio |  | CapitalExpenditures |  
|Requirement       |  | >=2.00 to 1.00                    |  | <=4.75 to 1.00                      |  | <=3.00              | %
|December 31, 2007 |  | 2.57                              |  | 2.99                                |  | 1.40                | %
|Requirement       |  | >=2.00 to 1.00                    |  | <=4.50 to 1.00                      |  | <=3.00              | %
|December 31, 2008 |  | 3.67                              |  | 1.99                                |  | 1.13                | %
|Requirement       |  | >=2.25 to 1.00                    |  | < = 3.50 to 1.00                    |  | <=3.00              | %
|December 31, 2009 |  | 5.09                              |  | 1.88                                |  | 1.17                | %

In addition, the Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative
covenants, which among other things, limit the Corporations ability to incur additional debt, create liens, pay dividends, effect transactions with the Corporations affiliates, sell assets, pay subordinated debt, merge, consolidate,
enter into acquisitions, and effect sale leaseback transactions.

Prime Vendor Agreement

At the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation entered into a Prime Vendor Agreement (the Prime Vendor
Agreement), with AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (ABDC), a wholly owned subsidiary of AmerisourceBergen, the Corporations former 50% stockholder. Pursuant to this agreement, the Corporation agreed to purchase at least 95%
of the Corporations prescription pharmaceutical drugs from ABDC and to participate in its generic formulary purchase program for a period of five years. Also under the provisions of the agreement, the Corporation may not undertake any merger,
change of ownership, change in control or other transaction without the consent of ABDC unless certain conditions are met.

If
the Corporation fails to reach this minimum purchase volume, ABDC may adjust the price of goods the Corporation purchases from it to reflect the lower than expected purchase volume. In addition, ABDC will support the distribution of pharmaceuticals
that the Corporation purchases directly from manufacturers and provide inventory management support and packaging services. Unless either party provides certain notice of termination, the agreement will continue on a month-to-month basis upon
expiration of the initial five year term. The agreement may be terminated by either party for cause during the initial five year term, and by either party with or without cause thereafter upon 90 days notice. As of December 31, 2009, the
Corporation was in compliance with the terms of the Prime Vendor Agreement.



68



---

##### Table of Contents

Information Technology Services Agreement

At the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation entered into an Information Technology Services Agreement with Kindred
Healthcare Operating, Inc. (KHOI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Kindred, the Corporations former 50% stockholder (the IT Services Agreement). Pursuant to this IT Services Agreement, KHOI is the Corporations
exclusive provider of certain information services and support related to information technology infrastructure and financial systems for a period of five years. The services provided by KHOI includes business services necessary to operate, manage
and support certain financial applications the Corporation uses, including enabling and/or supporting technology infrastructure and technology procurement services to support certain business functions. Such services include, among other matters,
functions for financial management and systems and payroll. The Corporation internally supports all other operating systems, including functions for order entry, pharmacy dispensing, clinical consulting, billing and collections, electronic
medication management, sales and marketing, medical records management, human resources, internal and external customer call center support and general business systems.

Except for certain services that will be provided at cost, KHOI will provide such services to the Corporation at its cost plus 10%, which will be the actual costs and expenses incurred in providing these
services, including certain overhead costs and per hour costs of the KHOI employees providing the services. The IT Services Agreement shall automatically renew for successive one-year periods after the expiration of the initial five year term,
absent 120 days prior notice of termination as provided for in the agreement. The initial term expires on July 31, 2012. The IT Services Agreement may be terminated by either party for cause and, in certain circumstances, by the Corporation in
the event that KHOI undergoes a change of control to one of the Corporations competitors. Following termination, KHOI must provide termination and expiration assistance for up to 180 days. The Corporation incurred approximately $7.3 million,
$17.3 million, and $11.5 million to Kindred under the terms of the IT Services Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements, other than purchase commitments and lease obligations. See Contractual Obligations below.

Contractual
Obligations

The Corporation is obligated to make future payments under various contracts such as long-term purchase
obligations, debt agreements, and lease agreements, and has certain commitments such as guarantees. The Corporation has grouped these contractual obligations and off-balance sheet arrangements into operating activities, financing activities, and
investing activities in the same manner as they are classified in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in order to provide a better understanding of the nature of the obligations and arrangements and to provide a basis for comparison to
historical information.



69



---

##### Table of Contents

The table below provides a summary of contractual obligations and off-balance sheet
arrangements as of December 31, 2009 (dollars in millions):



|                                  |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |      |       |      |   |            |  |   |     |  |   |    
|--------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- | ---- | - | ---- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ---------- |  | - | --- |  | - | ---
|                                  |  | 2010 |      | 2011 |   | 2012 |  | 2013 |       | 2014 |   | Thereafter
|Operating activities:             |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |      |       |      |   |            |  |   |     |  |   |    
|Prime Vendor Agreement (1)        |  | $    |     |      | $ |     |  | $    |      |      | $ |           |  | $ |    |  | $ |   
|Non-cancelable operating leases   |  |      | 13.2 |      |   | 8.7  |  |      | 6.4   |      |   | 5.1        |  |   | 4.4 |  |   | 5.7
|Technology services agreement     |  |      | 14.4 |      |   | 14.4 |  |      | 8.4   |      |   |           |  |   |    |  |   |   
|Investing activities:             |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |      |       |      |   |            |  |   |     |  |   |    
|Contingent Consideration          |  |      |     |      |   |     |  |      | 1.7   |      |   |           |  |   |    |  |   |   
|Financing activities:             |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |      |       |      |   |            |  |   |     |  |   |    
|Total debt and estimated interest |  |      | 3.0  |      |   | 3.0  |  |      | 241.8 |      |   |           |  |   |    |  |   |   
|                                  |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |      |       |      |   |            |  |   |     |  |   |    
|Totals                            |  | $    | 30.6 |      | $ | 26.1 |  | $    | 258.3 |      | $ | 5.1        |  |   | 4.4 |  | $ | 5.7
|                                  |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |      |       |      |   |            |  |   |     |  |   |    



|(1) | Under the Prime Vendor Agreement the Corporation is required to purchase 95% of its drug purchases through AmerisourceBergen through July 31, 2012.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



70



---

##### Table of Contents

Supplemental Quarterly Information

The following tables represent the results of the Corporations quarterly operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009
(in millions, except where indicated)



|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------- | - | ------------- | - | ------- | ----- |  | - | ------- | - |  | ----- | ------- | - | ------ | - | ------- | ----- |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                    |  | 2008 Quarters |         |   | 2009 Quarters |  
|                                                                    |  | First         |         |   | Second        |   |         | Third |  |   | Fourth  |   |  | First |         |   | Second |   |         | Third |  |   | Fourth  |  
|Net revenues:                                                       |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Institutional pharmacy revenues                                     |  | $             | 480.2   |   |               | $ | 471.3   |       |  | $ | 471.6   |   |  | $     | 465.7   |   |        | $ | 453.4   |       |  | $ | 446.5   |   |  | $ | 447.1   |   |  | $ | 437.7   |  
|Hospital management revenues                                        |  |               | 14.9    |   |               |   | 15.0    |       |  |   | 14.6    |   |  |       | 14.0    |   |        |   | 14.8    |       |  |   | 14.1    |   |  |   | 13.9    |   |  |   | 13.7    |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Total revenues                                                      |  |               | 495.1   |   |               |   | 486.3   |       |  |   | 486.2   |   |  |       | 479.7   |   |        |   | 468.2   |       |  |   | 460.6   |   |  |   | 461.0   |   |  |   | 451.4   |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Cost of goods sold:                                                 |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Institutional pharmacy                                              |  |               | 410.5   |   |               |   | 403.4   |       |  |   | 404.1   |   |  |       | 397.3   |   |        |   | 384.8   |       |  |   | 379.9   |   |  |   | 382.6   |   |  |   | 373.6   |  
|Hospital management                                                 |  |               | 12.1    |   |               |   | 12.1    |       |  |   | 11.8    |   |  |       | 11.4    |   |        |   | 12.0    |       |  |   | 11.9    |   |  |   | 12.2    |   |  |   | 11.9    |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Total cost of goods sold                                            |  |               | 422.6   |   |               |   | 415.5   |       |  |   | 415.9   |   |  |       | 408.7   |   |        |   | 396.8   |       |  |   | 391.8   |   |  |   | 394.8   |   |  |   | 385.5   |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Gross profit:                                                       |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Institutional pharmacy                                              |  |               | 69.7    |   |               |   | 67.9    |       |  |   | 67.5    |   |  |       | 68.4    |   |        |   | 68.6    |       |  |   | 66.6    |   |  |   | 64.5    |   |  |   | 64.1    |  
|Hospital management                                                 |  |               | 2.8     |   |               |   | 2.9     |       |  |   | 2.8     |   |  |       | 2.6     |   |        |   | 2.8     |       |  |   | 2.2     |   |  |   | 1.7     |   |  |   | 1.8     |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Total gross profit                                                  |  |               | 72.5    |   |               |   | 70.8    |       |  |   | 70.3    |   |  |       | 71.0    |   |        |   | 71.4    |       |  |   | 68.8    |   |  |   | 66.2    |   |  |   | 65.9    |  
|Selling, general and administrative                                 |  |               | 57.3    |   |               |   | 54.0    |       |  |   | 50.5    |   |  |       | 52.3    |   |        |   | 50.9    |       |  |   | 47.2    |   |  |   | 44.1    |   |  |   | 45.4    |  
|Amortization expense                                                |  |               | 1.6     |   |               |   | 1.6     |       |  |   | 1.6     |   |  |       | 1.7     |   |        |   | 1.8     |       |  |   | 1.9     |   |  |   | 2.5     |   |  |   | 2.8     |  
|Impairment of intangible assets                                     |  |               |        |   |               |   |        |       |  |   |        |   |  |       | 14.8    |   |        |   |        |       |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |   |  |   |        |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |               | 4.1     |   |               |   | 6.6     |       |  |   | 7.1     |   |  |       | 8.9     |   |        |   | 2.0     |       |  |   | 0.6     |   |  |   | 0.9     |   |  |   | 1.7     |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Operating income (loss)                                             |  |               | 9.5     |   |               |   | 8.6     |       |  |   | 11.1    |   |  |       | (6.7    | ) |        |   | 16.7    |       |  |   | 19.1    |   |  |   | 18.7    |   |  |   | 16.0    |  
|Interest expense, net                                               |  |               | 3.7     |   |               |   | 3.5     |       |  |   | 3.4     |   |  |       | 3.6     |   |        |   | 3.2     |       |  |   | 3.3     |   |  |   | 1.9     |   |  |   | 1.0     |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Income (loss) before income taxes                                   |  |               | 5.8     |   |               |   | 5.1     |       |  |   | 7.7     |   |  |       | (10.3   | ) |        |   | 13.5    |       |  |   | 15.8    |   |  |   | 16.8    |   |  |   | 15.0    |  
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                |  |               | 2.5     |   |               |   | 2.2     |       |  |   | 3.4     |   |  |       | (4.8    | ) |        |   | 5.3     |       |  |   | 6.6     |   |  |   | 2.2     |   |  |   | 4.8     |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Net income (loss)                                                   |  | $             | 3.3     |   |               | $ | 2.9     |       |  | $ | 4.3     |   |  | $     | (5.5    | ) |        | $ | 8.2     |       |  | $ | 9.2     |   |  | $ | 14.6    |   |  | $ | 10.2    |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Earnings (loss) per common share (1):                               |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic                                                               |  | $             | 0.11    |   |               | $ | 0.10    |       |  | $ | 0.14    |   |  | $     | (0.18   | ) |        | $ | 0.27    |       |  | $ | 0.30    |   |  | $ | 0.48    |   |  | $ | 0.34    |  
|Diluted                                                             |  | $             | 0.11    |   |               | $ | 0.10    |       |  | $ | 0.14    |   |  | $     | (0.18   | ) |        | $ | 0.27    |       |  | $ | 0.30    |   |  | $ | 0.48    |   |  | $ | 0.33    |  
|Shares used in computing earnings (loss) per common share:          |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Basic                                                               |  |               | 30.1    |   |               |   | 30.1    |       |  |   | 30.1    |   |  |       | 30.1    |   |        |   | 30.2    |       |  |   | 30.2    |   |  |   | 30.3    |   |  |   | 30.3    |  
|Diluted                                                             |  |               | 30.1    |   |               |   | 30.2    |       |  |   | 30.4    |   |  |       | 30.1    |   |        |   | 30.3    |       |  |   | 30.4    |   |  |   | 30.5    |   |  |   | 30.5    |  
|Balance sheet data:                                                 |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                           |  | $             | 25.2    |   |               | $ | 34.9    |       |  | $ | 42.6    |   |  | $     | 41.3    |   |        | $ | 52.1    |       |  | $ | 77.7    |   |  | $ | 73.8    |   |  | $ | 51.2    |  
|Working capital                                                     |  | $             | 263.5   |   |               | $ | 277.1   |       |  | $ | 281.1   |   |  | $     | 272.3   |   |        | $ | 307.4   |       |  | $ | 324.2   |   |  | $ | 323.7   |   |  | $ | 312.8   |  
|Goodwill                                                            |  | $             | 109.9   |   |               | $ | 109.9   |       |  | $ | 110.7   |   |  | $     | 113.7   |   |        | $ | 113.7   |       |  | $ | 115.6   |   |  | $ | 128.5   |   |  | $ | 140.1   |  
|Intangible assets, net                                              |  | $             | 75.9    |   |               | $ | 74.3    |       |  | $ | 72.7    |   |  | $     | 73.4    |   |        | $ | 71.6    |       |  | $ | 69.9    |   |  | $ | 72.3    |   |  | $ | 90.8    |  
|Total assets                                                        |  | $             | 675.4   |   |               | $ | 673.2   |       |  | $ | 684.1   |   |  | $     | 679.2   |   |        | $ | 677.6   |       |  | $ | 684.2   |   |  | $ | 705.9   |   |  | $ | 724.3   |  
|Long-term debt                                                      |  | $             | 240.0   |   |               | $ | 240.0   |       |  | $ | 240.0   |   |  | $     | 240.0   |   |        | $ | 240.0   |       |  | $ | 240.0   |   |  | $ | 240.0   |   |  | $ | 240.0   |  
|Total stockholders equity                                          |  | $             | 311.2   |   |               | $ | 317.4   |       |  | $ | 324.3   |   |  | $     | 319.8   |   |        | $ | 330.0   |       |  | $ | 341.9   |   |  | $ | 359.2   |   |  | $ | 370.9   |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |      
|Supplemental information:                                           |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Adjusted EBITDA(2)                                                  |  | $             | 21.1    |   |               | $ | 22.4    |       |  | $ | 25.1    |   |  | $     | 23.9    |   |        | $ | 25.2    |       |  | $ | 25.8    |   |  | $ | 26.6    |   |  | $ | 25.1    |  
|Adjusted EBITDA Margin (2)                                          |  |               | 4.3     | % |               |   | 4.6     | %     |  |   | 5.2     | % |  |       | 5.0     | % |        |   | 5.4     | %     |  |   | 5.6     | % |  |   | 5.6     | % |  |   | 5.6     | %
|Adjusted EBITDA per presecription dispensed (2)                     |  | $             | 2.07    |   |               | $ | 2.23    |       |  | $ | 2.50    |   |  | $     | 2.39    |   |        | $ | 2.54    |       |  | $ | 2.63    |   |  | $ | 2.74    |   |  | $ | 2.62    |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities                 |  | $             | 11.2    |   |               | $ | 13.0    |       |  | $ | 17.5    |   |  | $     | 24.0    |   |        | $ | 13.9    |       |  | $ | 28.8    |   |  | $ | 16.9    |   |  | $ | 25.4    |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                               |  | $             | (8.1    | ) |               | $ | (3.5    | )     |  | $ | (10.3   | ) |  | $     | (25.5   | ) |        | $ | (3.2    | )     |  | $ | (3.2    | ) |  | $ | (21.7   | ) |  | $ | (48.0   | )
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                 |  | $             | (9.9    | ) |               | $ | 0.2     |       |  | $ | 0.5     |   |  | $     | 0.2     |   |        | $ | 0.1     |       |  | $ |        |   |  | $ | 0.9     |   |  | $ |        |  
|Statistical information (in whole numbers except where indicated)   |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                              |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Volume information:                                                 |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Prescriptions dispensed (in thousands)                              |  |               | 10,212  |   |               |   | 10,067  |       |  |   | 10,044  |   |  |       | 9,996   |   |        |   | 9,919   |       |  |   | 9,815   |   |  |   | 9,713   |   |  |   | 9,590   |  
|Revenue per prescription dispensed                                  |  | $             | 47.02   |   |               | $ | 46.82   |       |  | $ | 46.95   |   |  | $     | 46.59   |   |        | $ | 45.71   |       |  | $ | 45.49   |   |  | $ | 46.03   |   |  | $ | 45.64   |  
|Gross profit per prescription dispensed                             |  | $             | 6.83    |   |               | $ | 6.74    |       |  | $ | 6.72    |   |  | $     | 6.84    |   |        | $ | 6.92    |       |  | $ | 6.79    |   |  | $ | 6.64    |   |  | $ | 6.68    |  
|Institutional gross margin                                          |  |               | 14.5    | % |               |   | 14.4    | %     |  |   | 14.3    | % |  |       | 14.7    | % |        |   | 15.1    | %     |  |   | 14.9    | % |  |   | 14.4    | % |  |   | 14.6    | %
|Generic drug dispensing rate                                        |  |               | 69.0    | % |               |   | 69.9    | %     |  |   | 71.3    | % |  |       | 72.5    | % |        |   | 73.5    | %     |  |   | 74.2    | % |  |   | 74.5    | % |  |   | 74.7    | %
|Customer licensed beds under contract:                              |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Beginning of period                                                 |  |               | 337,043 |   |               |   | 334,226 |       |  |   | 331,299 |   |  |       | 325,613 |   |        |   | 322,376 |       |  |   | 320,745 |   |  |   | 317,358 |   |  |   | 317,660 |  
|Additions                                                           |  |               | 5,157   |   |               |   | 6,335   |       |  |   | 4,901   |   |  |       | 5,005   |   |        |   | 6,762   |       |  |   | 6,473   |   |  |   | 10,549  |   |  |   | 12,137  |  
|Losses and other                                                    |  |               | (7,974  | ) |               |   | (9,262  | )     |  |   | (10,587 | ) |  |       | (8,242  | ) |        |   | (8,393  | )     |  |   | (9,860  | ) |  |   | (10,247 | ) |  |   | (11,912 | )
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|End of period                                                       |  |               | 334,226 |   |               |   | 331,299 |       |  |   | 325,613 |   |  |       | 322,376 |   |        |   | 320,745 |       |  |   | 317,358 |   |  |   | 317,660 |   |  |   | 317,885 |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  
|Hospital management contracts serviced                              |  |               | 88      |   |               |   | 86      |       |  |   | 85      |   |  |       | 84      |   |        |   | 84      |       |  |   | 85      |   |  |   | 85      |   |  |   | 86      |  
|                                                                    |  |               |         |   |               |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |       |         |   |        |   |         |       |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |   |  |   |         |  



|(1) | The Corporation has never declared a cash dividend. Earnings (loss) per common share in actual cents.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | See Use of Non GAAP Measures For Measuring Quarterly Results for a definition and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss).
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



71



---

##### Table of Contents

Use of Non-GAAP Measures For Measuring Quarterly Results

The Corporation calculates Adjusted EBITDA as provided in the reconciliation below and calculates Adjusted EBITDA Margin by taking Adjusted
EBITDA and dividing it by revenues. The Corporation calculates and uses Adjusted EBITDA as an indicator of its ability to generate cash from reported operating results. The measurement is used in concert with net income and cash flows from
operations, which measure actual cash generated in the period. In addition, the Corporation believes that Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA Margin is a supplemental measurement tool used by analysts and investors to help evaluate overall operating
performance and the ability to incur and service debt and make capital expenditures. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, is used in conjunction with the Corporations debt leverage ratio and this calculation sets
the applicable margin for the quarterly interest charge. Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement, is not the same calculation as this Adjusted EBITDA table. Adjusted EBITDA does not represent funds available for the Corporations
discretionary use and is not intended to represent or to be used as a substitute for net income or cash flows from operations data as measured under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The items excluded from Adjusted
EBITDA but included in the calculation of the Corporations reported net income are significant components of the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, and must be considered in performing a comprehensive assessment of overall
financial performance. The Corporations calculation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be consistent with calculations of EBITDA used by other companies. The following is a reconciliation of the Corporations net income, net operating cash flows
and earnings (loss) per diluted share for the periods presented.

Unaudited Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to Adjusted EBITDA

(dollars in millions)



|                                                                    |  |               |      |   |               |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |       |      |   |        |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ---- | - | ------------- | - | ---- | ----- |  | - | ------ | - |  | ----- | ---- | - | ------ | - | ---- | ----- |  | - | ------ | - |  | - | ---- | - |  | - | ---- | -
|                                                                    |  | 2008 Quarters |      |   | 2009 Quarters |  
|                                                                    |  | First         |      |   | Second        |   |      | Third |  |   | Fourth |   |  | First |      |   | Second |   |      | Third |  |   | Fourth |  
|Net income (loss)                                                   |  | $             | 3.3  |   |               | $ | 2.9  |       |  | $ | 4.3    |   |  | $     | (5.5 | ) |        | $ | 8.2  |       |  | $ | 9.2    |   |  | $ | 14.6 |   |  | $ | 10.2 |  
|Add:                                                                |  |               |      |   |               |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |       |      |   |        |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |  
|Interest expense, net                                               |  |               | 3.7  |   |               |   | 3.5  |       |  |   | 3.4    |   |  |       | 3.6  |   |        |   | 3.2  |       |  |   | 3.3    |   |  |   | 1.9  |   |  |   | 1.0  |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |               | 4.1  |   |               |   | 6.6  |       |  |   | 7.1    |   |  |       | 8.9  |   |        |   | 2.0  |       |  |   | 0.6    |   |  |   | 0.9  |   |  |   | 1.7  |  
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                |  |               | 2.5  |   |               |   | 2.2  |       |  |   | 3.4    |   |  |       | (4.8 | ) |        |   | 5.3  |       |  |   | 6.6    |   |  |   | 2.2  |   |  |   | 4.8  |  
|Impairment of intangible assets                                     |  |               |     |   |               |   |     |       |  |   |       |   |  |       | 14.8 |   |        |   |     |       |  |   |       |   |  |   |     |   |  |   |     |  
|Depreciation and amortization expense                               |  |               | 7.5  |   |               |   | 7.2  |       |  |   | 6.9    |   |  |       | 6.9  |   |        |   | 6.5  |       |  |   | 6.1    |   |  |   | 7.0  |   |  |   | 7.4  |  
|                                                                    |  |               |      |   |               |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |       |      |   |        |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |  
|Adjusted EBITDA                                                     |  | $             | 21.1 |   |               | $ | 22.4 |       |  | $ | 25.1   |   |  | $     | 23.9 |   |        | $ | 25.2 |       |  | $ | 25.8   |   |  | $ | 26.6 |   |  | $ | 25.1 |  
|                                                                    |  |               |      |   |               |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |       |      |   |        |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |  
|Adjusted EBITDA Margin                                              |  |               | 4.3  | % |               |   | 4.6  | %     |  |   | 5.2    | % |  |       | 5.0  | % |        |   | 5.4  | %     |  |   | 5.6    | % |  |   | 5.6  | % |  |   | 5.6  | %
|                                                                    |  |               |      |   |               |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |       |      |   |        |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |  



72



---

##### Table of Contents

Use of Non-GAAP Measures For Measuring Quarterly Results (Continued)

Unaudited Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net Operating Cash Flows

(dollars in millions)



|                                                                    |  |               |      |   |               |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |       |      |   |        |   |       |       |  |   |        |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |      |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ---- | - | ------------- | - | ---- | ----- |  | - | ------ | - |  | ----- | ---- | - | ------ | - | ----- | ----- |  | - | ------ | - |  | - | ----- | - |  | - | ---- | -
|                                                                    |  | 2008 Quarters |      |   | 2009 Quarters |  
|                                                                    |  | First         |      |   | Second        |   |      | Third |  |   | Fourth |   |  | First |      |   | Second |   |       | Third |  |   | Fourth |  
|Adjusted EBITDA                                                     |  | $             | 21.1 |   |               | $ | 22.4 |       |  | $ | 25.1   |   |  | $     | 23.9 |   |        | $ | 25.2  |       |  | $ | 25.8   |   |  | $ | 26.6  |   |  | $ | 25.1 |  
|Interest expense, net                                               |  |               | (3.7 | ) |               |   | (3.5 | )     |  |   | (3.4   | ) |  |       | (3.6 | ) |        |   | (3.2  | )     |  |   | (3.3   | ) |  |   | (1.9  | ) |  |   | (1.0 | )
|(Provision) benefit for income taxes                                |  |               | (2.5 | ) |               |   | (2.2 | )     |  |   | (3.4   | ) |  |       | 4.8  |   |        |   | (5.3  | )     |  |   | (6.6   | ) |  |   | (2.2  | ) |  |   | (4.8 | )
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |               | (3.6 | ) |               |   | (6.2 | )     |  |   | (6.5   | ) |  |       | (5.9 | ) |        |   | (1.8  | )     |  |   | (0.6   | ) |  |   | (0.9  | ) |  |   | (1.5 | )
|Provision for bad debt                                              |  |               | 5.2  |   |               |   | 5.5  |       |  |   | 7.2    |   |  |       | 6.8  |   |        |   | 7.1   |       |  |   | 3.6    |   |  |   | 2.5   |   |  |   | 3.4  |  
|Stock-based compensation                                            |  |               | 1.0  |   |               |   | 1.1  |       |  |   | 1.4    |   |  |       | 1.4  |   |        |   | 0.6   |       |  |   | 1.3    |   |  |   | 1.3   |   |  |   | 1.4  |  
|Amortization of deferred financing fees                             |  |               | 0.1  |   |               |   | 0.1  |       |  |   | 0.1    |   |  |       | 0.1  |   |        |   | 0.1   |       |  |   | 0.1    |   |  |   | 0.1   |   |  |   | 0.1  |  
|Deferred income taxes                                               |  |               | 2.5  |   |               |   | 1.6  |       |  |   | 2.8    |   |  |       | (4.1 | ) |        |   | 4.8   |       |  |   | 6.8    |   |  |   | 2.7   |   |  |   | 5.4  |  
|(Gain) loss on disposition of equipment                             |  |               |     |   |               |   | 0.6  |       |  |   | 0.2    |   |  |       | (0.6 | ) |        |   | 0.1   |       |  |   |       |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 0.2  |  
|Other                                                               |  |               | (0.3 | ) |               |   | 0.3  |       |  |   | (0.3   | ) |  |       | (0.2 | ) |        |   | (0.1  | )     |  |   |       |   |  |   | (0.1  | ) |  |   | (0.1 | )
|Changes in assets and liabilities                                   |  |               | (8.6 | ) |               |   | (6.7 | )     |  |   | (5.7   | ) |  |       | 1.4  |   |        |   | (13.6 | )     |  |   | 1.7    |   |  |   | (11.2 | ) |  |   | (2.8 | )
|                                                                    |  |               |      |   |               |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |       |      |   |        |   |       |       |  |   |        |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |      |  
|Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities                            |  | $             | 11.2 |   |               | $ | 13.0 |       |  | $ | 17.5   |   |  | $     | 24.0 |   |        | $ | 13.9  |       |  | $ | 28.8   |   |  | $ | 16.9  |   |  | $ | 25.4 |  
|                                                                    |  |               |      |   |               |   |      |       |  |   |        |   |  |       |      |   |        |   |       |       |  |   |        |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |      |  

The Corporation calculates and uses earnings per diluted share, exclusive of the
impact of impairment of intangible assets, integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges, impairment on intangible assets and favorable impact on tax ruling as an indicator of its core operating results. The measurement is
used in concert with net income and earnings per diluted share, which measure actual earnings per share generated in the period. The Corporation believes the exclusion of these charges in expressing earnings per share provides management with a
useful measure to assess period to period comparability and is useful to investors in evaluating the Corporations operating results from period to period. Earnings per diluted share, exclusive of the impact of impairment of intangible
assets, integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges, impairment on intangible assets and favorable impact on tax ruling does not represent the amount that effectively accrues directly to stockholders (i.e., such costs are a
reduction in earnings and stockholders equity) and is not intended to represent or to be used as a substitute for earnings per diluted share as measured under GAAP. The impact of impairment of intangible assets, integration, merger and
acquisition related costs and other charges, impairment on intangible assets and favorable impact of tax rate matters excluded from the earnings per diluted share are significant components of the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations, and must be considered in performing a comprehensive assessment of overall financial performance.

Unaudited Reconciliation of
Earnings (Loss) Per Diluted Share to Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share



|                                                                    |  |              |      |               |   |              |  |               |      |  |      |       |              |  |               |      |              |   |      |               |   |      |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ---- | ------------- | - | ------------ |  | ------------- | ---- |  | ---- | ----- | ------------ |  | ------------- | ---- | ------------ | - | ---- | ------------- | - | ---- | ---- | - | ----- | - |  | - | ----- | - |  | - | ----- | -
|                                                                    |  | 2008         |      | 2009          |  
|                                                                    |  | FirstQuarter |      | SecondQuarter |   | ThirdQuarter |  | FourthQuarter |      |  | Year |       | FirstQuarter |  | SecondQuarter |      | ThirdQuarter |   |      | FourthQuarter |   |      | Year |  
|Earnings (loss) per diluted share                                   |  | $            | 0.11 |               | $ | 0.10         |  | $             | 0.14 |  | $    | (0.18 | )            |  | $             | 0.17 |              | $ | 0.27 |               | $ | 0.30 |      | $ | 0.48  |   |  | $ | 0.33  |   |  | $ | 1.39  |  
|Add:                                                                |  |              |      |               |   |              |  |               |      |  |      |       |              |  |               |      |              |   |      |               |   |      |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|Diluted earnings per share impact of:                               |  |              |      |               |   |              |  |               |      |  |      |       |              |  |               |      |              |   |      |               |   |      |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|Impairment of intangible assets                                     |  |              |     |               |   |             |  |               |     |  |      | 0.30  |              |  |               | 0.30 |              |   |     |               |   |     |      |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |              | 0.08 |               |   | 0.12         |  |               | 0.13 |  |      | 0.20  |              |  |               | 0.53 |              |   | 0.04 |               |   | 0.01 |      |   | 0.02  |   |  |   | 0.03  |   |  |   | 0.10  |  
|Impact of tax rate matters                                          |  |              |     |               |   |             |  |               |     |  |      | (0.06 | )            |  |               |     |              |   |     |               |   |     |      |   | (0.15 | ) |  |   | (0.04 | ) |  |   | (0.19 | )
|                                                                    |  |              |      |               |   |              |  |               |      |  |      |       |              |  |               |      |              |   |      |               |   |      |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|Adjusted earnings per diluted share after impact of above items     |  | $            | 0.19 |               | $ | 0.22         |  | $             | 0.27 |  | $    | 0.26  |              |  | $             | 1.00 |              | $ | 0.31 |               | $ | 0.31 |      | $ | 0.35  |   |  | $ | 0.32  |   |  | $ | 1.30  |  
|                                                                    |  |              |      |               |   |              |  |               |      |  |      |       |              |  |               |      |              |   |      |               |   |      |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |  



73



---

##### Table of Contents

Following Represents the Fourth Quarter 2009 Results compared to the Fourth Quarter 2008

Results of Operations

The following table presents selected consolidated comparative results of operations and statistical information (dollars in millions):



|                                                                 |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ------- | - | ------------------ | ----- | - | ---------------- | - | ------ | - |  | ----- | ------ |  | - | ------------ | - |  | ----- | -
|                                                                 |  | Quarter Ended    |        
|                                                                 |  | December 31,2008 |         |   | Increase(Decrease) |       |   | December 31,2009 |  
|                                                                 |  | Amount           |         |   | % ofRevenues       |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       | Amount |  |   | % ofRevenues |  
|Net revenues:                                                    |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                           |  | $                | 465.7   |   |                    | 97.1  | % |                  | $ | (28.0  | ) |  | (6.0  | )%     |  | $ | 437.7        |   |  | 97.0  | %
|Hospital Management                                              |  |                  | 14.0    |   |                    | 2.9   |   |                  |   | (0.3   | ) |  | (2.1  | )      |  |   | 13.7         |   |  | 3.0   |  
|                                                                 |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Total net revenues                                               |  |                  | 479.7   |   |                    | 100.0 |   |                  |   | (28.3  | ) |  | (5.9  | )      |  |   | 451.4        |   |  | 100.0 |  
|                                                                 |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Cost of goods sold:                                              |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                           |  |                  | 397.3   |   |                    | 82.8  |   |                  |   | (23.7  | ) |  | (6.0  | )      |  |   | 373.6        |   |  | 82.8  |  
|Hospital Management                                              |  |                  | 11.4    |   |                    | 2.4   |   |                  |   | 0.5    |   |  | 4.4   |        |  |   | 11.9         |   |  | 2.6   |  
|                                                                 |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Total cost of goods sold                                         |  |                  | 408.7   |   |                    | 85.2  |   |                  |   | (23.2  | ) |  | (5.7  | )      |  |   | 385.5        |   |  | 85.4  |  
|                                                                 |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Gross profit:                                                    |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                           |  |                  | 68.4    |   |                    | 14.3  |   |                  |   | (4.3   | ) |  | (6.3  | )      |  |   | 64.1         |   |  | 14.2  |  
|Hospital Management                                              |  |                  | 2.6     |   |                    | 0.5   |   |                  |   | (0.8   | ) |  | (30.8 | )      |  |   | 1.8          |   |  | 0.4   |  
|                                                                 |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Total gross profit                                               |  | $                | 71.0    |   |                    | 14.8  | % |                  | $ | (5.1   | ) |  | (7.2  | )%     |  | $ | 65.9         |   |  | 14.6  | %
|                                                                 |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy (in whole numbers except where indicated) |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Volume information                                               |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Prescriptions dispensed (in thousands)                           |  |                  | 9,996   |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | (406   | ) |  | (4.1  | )%     |  |   | 9,590        |   |  |       |  
|Revenue per prescription dispensed                               |  | $                | 46.59   |   |                    |       |   |                  | $ | (0.95  | ) |  | (2.0  | )%     |  | $ | 45.64        |   |  |       |  
|Gross profit per prescription dispensed                          |  | $                | 6.84    |   |                    |       |   |                  | $ | (0.16  | ) |  | (2.3  | )%     |  | $ | 6.68         |   |  |       |  
|Institutional pharmacy gross margin                              |  |                  | 14.7    | % |                    |       |   |                  |   | (0.1   | ) |  | (0.7  | )%     |  |   | 14.6         | % |  |       |  
|Generic dispensing rate                                          |  |                  | 72.5    | % |                    |       |   |                  |   | 2.2    |   |  | 3.0   | %      |  |   | 74.7         | % |  |       |  
|Customer licensed beds under contract                            |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Beginning of period                                              |  |                  | 325,613 |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | (7,953 | ) |  | (2.4  | )%     |  |   | 317,660      |   |  |       |  
|Additions                                                        |  |                  | 5,005   |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | 7,132  |   |  | 142.5 |        |  |   | 12,137       |   |  |       |  
|Losses and other                                                 |  |                  | (8,242  | ) |                    |       |   |                  |   | (3,670 | ) |  | 44.5  |        |  |   | (11,912      | ) |  |       |  
|                                                                 |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|End of period                                                    |  |                  | 322,376 |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | (4,491 | ) |  | (1.4  | )%     |  |   | 317,885      |   |  |       |  
|                                                                 |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Hospital Management (in whole numbers except where indicated)    |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Volume information                                               |  |                  |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |       |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Hospital management contracts serviced                           |  |                  | 84      |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | 2.0    |   |  | 2.4   | %      |  |   | 86           |   |  |       |  



74



---

##### Table of Contents

Revenues

The decrease in institutional pharmacy revenues of $28.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2008, was the result of a rate
variance of approximately $9.1 million or a $0.95 decline per prescription dispensed and an unfavorable volume variance of approximately $18.9 million or 406,000 fewer prescriptions dispensed. The rate variance was comprised of approximately $11.6
million due to inflation on brand and generic drugs, offset by a decline in revenues of approximately $20.7 million due to the increase in the generic drug dispensing rate during the period, the AWP impact of $1.4 million and other concessions. The
volume variance of approximately $18.9 million was due to the decline in net customer licensed beds under contract.

The
decrease in hospital management revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2009, of $0.3 million was due primarily to concessions with certain hospital management contracts serviced in the period, despite an increase in the number of
hospital contracts serviced between periods.

Cost of Goods Sold

Institutional pharmacy cost of goods sold decreased $23.7 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the three
months ended December 31, 2008, due primarily to a reduction in drug purchases as a result of less prescriptions being dispensed. Drug spend as a percentage of revenues increased 171 bps but was partially offset by an improvement in
rebates of 74 bps during the comparable periods. Other costs included within cost of goods sold as a percent of revenues improved a combined 87 bps, predominately as a result of operational efficiencies.

Hospital management cost of goods sold increased $0.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the respective
prior periods due to an increase in the number of hospital contracts serviced between periods.

Gross Profit and Operating Expenses

Gross profit and other operating expenses were the following for the periods presented (dollars in millions):



|                                                    |  |                  |       |   |                    |      |    |                  |   |       |   |  |        |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- | - | ------------------ | ---- | -- | ---------------- | - | ----- | - |  | ------ | ------ |  | ----------- | ---- |  | ---- | -
|                                                    |  | Quarter Ended    |      
|                                                    |  | December 31,2008 |       |   | Increase(Decrease) |      |    | December 31,2009 |  
|                                                    |  | Amount           |       |   | % ofRevenue        |      |    |                  |   |       |   |  |        | Amount |  | % ofRevenue |     
|Gross profit and operating expenses:                |  |                  |       |   |                    |      |    |                  |   |       |   |  |        |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Total gross profit                                  |  | $                | 71.0  |   |                    | 14.8 | %  |                  | $ | (5.1  | ) |  | (7.2   | )%     |  | $           | 65.9 |  | 14.6 | %
|Selling, general and administrative expenses        |  |                  | 52.3  |   |                    | 10.9 |    |                  |   | (6.9  | ) |  | (13.2  | )      |  |             | 45.4 |  | 10.1 |  
|Amortization expense                                |  |                  | 1.7   |   |                    | 0.4  |    |                  |   | 1.1   |   |  | 64.7   |        |  |             | 2.8  |  | 0.6  |  
|Impairment of intangible assets                     |  |                  | 14.8  |   |                    | 3.0  |    |                  |   | (14.8 | ) |  | (100.0 | )      |  |             |     |  |     |  
|Integration, merger related costs and other charges |  |                  | 8.9   |   |                    | 1.9  |    |                  |   | (7.2  | ) |  | (80.9  | )      |  |             | 1.7  |  | 0.4  |  
|Interest expense, net                               |  |                  | 3.6   |   |                    | 0.7  |    |                  |   | (2.6  | ) |  | (72.2  | )      |  |             | 1.0  |  | 0.2  |  
|                                                    |  |                  |       |   |                    |      |    |                  |   |       |   |  |        |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Income (loss) before provision for income taxes     |  |                  | (10.3 | ) |                    | (2.1 | )  |                  |   | 25.3  |   |  | (245.6 | )      |  |             | 15.0 |  | 3.3  |  
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                |  |                  | (4.8  | ) |                    | (1.0 | )  |                  |   | 9.6   |   |  | (200.0 | )      |  |             | 4.8  |  | 1.0  |  
|                                                    |  |                  |       |   |                    |      |    |                  |   |       |   |  |        |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Net income (loss)                                   |  | $                | (5.5  | ) |                    | (1.1 | )% |                  | $ | 15.7  |   |  | (285.5 | )%     |  | $           | 10.2 |  | 2.3  | %
|                                                    |  |                  |       |   |                    |      |    |                  |   |       |   |  |        |        |  |             |      |  |      |  



75



---

##### Table of Contents

Institutional pharmacy gross profit for the three months ended December 31, 2009, was
$64.1 million, or $6.68 per prescription dispensed, compared to $68.4 million, or $6.84 per prescription dispensed for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The institutional pharmacy gross profit margin for the three months ended
December 31, 2009, was consistent between periods despite the decline in gross profit per prescription dispensed.

The
decrease in hospital management gross profit for the three months ended December 31, 2009, of $0.8 million, was due primarily to concessions with certain hospital management contracts serviced during the period.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses represent the following costs for the periods, excluding integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges (dollars in millions):



|                                                  |  |                  |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ---- | ----------- | ------------------ | - |  | ---------------- | ---- | - |  | ----- | ------ |  | ----------- | ---- |  | ---- | -
|                                                  |  | Quarter Ended    |     
|                                                  |  | December 31,2008 |      |             | Increase(Decrease) |   |  | December 31,2009 |     
|                                                  |  | Amount           |      | % ofRevenue |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       | Amount |  | % ofRevenue |     
|Selling, general and administrative expenses:     |  |                  |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Total wages, benefits and contract labor          |  | $                | 26.1 |             | 5.4                | % |  | $                | (1.7 | ) |  | (6.5  | )%     |  | $           | 24.4 |  | 5.4  | %
|Contracted services                               |  |                  | 4.1  |             | 0.9                |   |  |                  | (0.7 | ) |  | (17.1 | )      |  |             | 3.4  |  | 0.8  |  
|Provision for doubtful accounts                   |  |                  | 6.8  |             | 1.4                |   |  |                  | (3.4 | ) |  | (50.0 | )      |  |             | 3.4  |  | 0.8  |  
|Supplies                                          |  |                  | 2.0  |             | 0.4                |   |  |                  | (0.1 | ) |  | (5.0  | )      |  |             | 1.9  |  | 0.4  |  
|Travel expenses                                   |  |                  | 1.4  |             | 0.3                |   |  |                  | (0.2 | ) |  | (14.3 | )      |  |             | 1.2  |  | 0.3  |  
|Professional fees                                 |  |                  | 2.6  |             | 0.5                |   |  |                  | (0.6 | ) |  | (23.1 | )      |  |             | 2.0  |  | 0.4  |  
|Stock-based compensation                          |  |                  | 1.4  |             | 0.3                |   |  |                  |     |   |  |      |        |  |             | 1.4  |  | 0.3  |  
|Depreciation                                      |  |                  | 2.6  |             | 0.5                |   |  |                  | (0.4 | ) |  | (15.4 | )      |  |             | 2.2  |  | 0.5  |  
|Rent                                              |  |                  | 1.4  |             | 0.3                |   |  |                  | (0.4 | ) |  | (28.6 | )      |  |             | 1.0  |  | 0.2  |  
|Maintenance                                       |  |                  | 0.7  |             | 0.2                |   |  |                  | (0.1 | ) |  | (14.3 | )      |  |             | 0.6  |  | 0.1  |  
|Other costs                                       |  |                  | 3.2  |             | 0.7                |   |  |                  | 0.7  |   |  | 21.9  |        |  |             | 3.9  |  | 0.9  |  
|                                                  |  |                  |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Total selling general and administrative expenses |  | $                | 52.3 |             | 10.9               | % |  | $                | (6.9 | ) |  | (13.2 | )%     |  | $           | 45.4 |  | 10.1 | %
|                                                  |  |                  |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       |        |  |             |      |  |      |  

Total labor costs decreased $1.7 million for the three months ended December 31,
2009, over the comparable periods as a result of managements effort to eliminate duplicate overhead positions within the pharmacy locations and reduce certain corporate overhead functions. Costs associated with contracted services decreased
$0.7 million predominantly due to lower costs associated with the IT Services Agreement. The provision for doubtful accounts decreased $3.4 million primarily as a result of improved collections from certain payer types. Other costs within selling,
general and administrative expenses declined during the three months ended December 31, 2009, a combined $1.1 million due primarily to synergies resulting from the pharmacy consolidations.



76



---

##### Table of Contents

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation expense represents the following costs for the periods as follows (dollars in millions):



|                                                                            |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | --- | ------------ | ---------------- | - | ------ | - | ------------ |  | --- | -
|                                                                            |  | Quarter Ended    |    
|                                                                            |  | December 31,2008 |     |              | December 31,2009 |  
|                                                                            |  | Amount           |     | % ofRevenues |                  |   | Amount |   | % ofRevenues | 
|Leasehold improvements                                                      |  | $                | 0.5 |              | 0.1              | % |        | $ | 0.4          |  | 0.1 | %
|Equipment and software                                                      |  |                  | 4.7 |              | 0.9              |   |        |   | 4.0          |  | 0.9 |  
|Leased equipment                                                            |  |                  |    |              |                 |   |        |   | 0.2          |  | NM  |  
|                                                                            |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Total depreciation expense                                                  |  | $                | 5.2 |              | 1.0              | % |        | $ | 4.6          |  | 1.0 | %
|                                                                            |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Depreciation expense recorded in cost of goods sold                         |  | $                | 2.6 |              | 0.5              | % |        | $ | 2.4          |  | 0.5 | %
|Depreciation expense recorded in selling, general & administrative expenses |  |                  | 2.6 |              | 0.5              |   |        |   | 2.2          |  | 0.5 |  
|                                                                            |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Total depreciation expense                                                  |  | $                | 5.2 |              | 1.0              | % |        | $ | 4.6          |  | 1.0 | %
|                                                                            |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Total capital expenditures                                                  |  | $                | 4.3 |              | 0.9              | % |        | $ | 9.3          |  | 2.1 | %
|                                                                            |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  

Depreciation expense decreased for the three months ended December 31, 2009,
compared to the three months ended December 31, 2008, due primarily to assets acquired as a result of the Pharmacy Transaction nearing the end of their weighted average useful life and the consolidation of pharmacy locations. Capital
expenditures have increased in 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 primarily as a result of the planned systems infrastructure build out.

Amortization expenses represents the following (dollars in millions):



|                             |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|---------------------------- |  | ---------------- | --- | ------------ | ---------------- | - | ------ | - | ------------ |  | --- | -
|                             |  | Quarter Ended    |    
|                             |  | December 31,2008 |     |              | December 31,2009 |  
|                             |  | Amount           |     | % ofRevenues |                  |   | Amount |   | % ofRevenues | 
|Amortization of intangibles: |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Trade names                  |  | $                | 0.3 |              | 0.1              | % |        | $ | 0.3          |  | 0.1 | %
|Non-compete agreements       |  |                  | 0.1 |              | NM               |   |        |   | 0.6          |  | 0.1 |  
|Customer relationships       |  |                  | 1.3 |              | 0.3              |   |        |   | 1.9          |  | 0.4 |  
|                             |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Total amortization expense   |  | $                | 1.7 |              | 0.4              | % |        | $ | 2.8          |  | 0.6 | %
|                             |  |                  |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  

Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to
the three months ended December 31, 2008, increased due primarily to additional amortization associated with intangibles capitalized as a result of acquisitions in the period.

Impairment of intangible assets

During the fourth quarter 2008, the
Corporation recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $14.8 million, related to finite lived customer relationships. The impairment, which related to the Institutional Pharmacy segment, was incurred when the reporting unit experienced a higher
than expected loss of licensed beds. The impairment was related to assets acquired in acquisitions by KPS during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006. Using a discounted cash flow analysis, the Corporation determined that a pre-tax
impairment charge of $14.8 million was required to write the carrying value down to the fair value, resulting in a loss per diluted share impact of $0.30.



77



---

##### Table of Contents

Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges

The following is a summary of integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges incurred by the Corporation as follows
(dollars in millions, except per share amounts):



|                                                          |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- | - | ---------------- | - | ----- | -
|                                                          |  | Quarter Ended    |      
|                                                          |  | December 31,2008 |       |   | December 31,2009 |  
|Integration costs and other charges:                      |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                            |  | $                | 0.2   |   |                  | $ | 0.2   |  
|General and administrative                                |  |                  | 0.6   |   |                  |   | 0.4   |  
|Employee costs                                            |  |                  | 0.9   |   |                  |   | 0.3   |  
|Severance costs                                           |  |                  | 1.6   |   |                  |   | 0.3   |  
|Facility costs                                            |  |                  | 5.6   |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|                                                          |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|                                                          |  |                  | 8.9   |   |                  |   | 1.3   |  
|                                                          |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Acquisition related costs:                                |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                            |  |                  |      |   |                  |   | 0.4   |  
|                                                          |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|                                                          |  |                  |      |   |                  |   | 0.4   |  
|                                                          |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Total integration, merger related costs and other charges |  | $                | 8.9   |   |                  | $ | 1.7   |  
|                                                          |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Negative effect on earnings per diluted share             |  | $                | (0.20 | ) |                  | $ | (0.03 | )
|                                                          |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  

Integration, merger, and acquisition related costs and other charges decreased for
the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the three months ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was due to the completion of the majority of the planned pharmacy consolidations during 2008. The costs incurred for the
year ended December 31, 2009, were primarily related to the planned integration of our pharmacy system platforms. Acquisition costs increased $0.4 million as a result of the acquisitions during the third and fourth quarter 2009. Effective
January 1, 2009, the accounting standards for the accounting of business combinations changed. Prior to the adoption of this accounting change, substantially all costs incurred as a result of an acquisition were capitalized as part of the
purchase price of the business combination. The new rules require such costs to be expensed and recorded as a component of the statement of operations. Acquisition related costs will increase as the Corporation consummates future acquisitions.



78



---

##### Table of Contents

Interest Expense

Interest expense represents the following costs for the periods (dollars in millions):



|                                                                |  |                  |      |   |                  |        |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ---- | - | ---------------- | ------ | ---- | -
|                                                                |  | Quarter Ended    |     
|                                                                |  | December 31,2008 |      |   | December 31,2009 |       
|                                                                |  |                 
|                                                                |  | Amount           |      |   |                  | Amount |     
|Interest expense, net:                                          |  |                  |      |   |                  |        |      |  
|Term Debt                                                       |  | $                | 3.5  |   |                  | $      | 0.9  |  
|Revolving credit facility                                       |  |                  |     |   |                  |        |     |  
|                                                                |  |                  |      |   |                  |        |      |  
|Subtotal (including commitment fees and letters of credit fees) |  |                  | 3.5  |   |                  |        | 0.9  |  
|Other:                                                          |  |                  |      |   |                  |        |      |  
|Interest expense (income)                                       |  |                  |     |   |                  |        |     |  
|Amortization of deferred financing fees                         |  |                  | 0.1  |   |                  |        | 0.1  |  
|                                                                |  |                  |      |   |                  |        |      |  
|Total interest expense, net                                     |  | $                | 3.6  |   |                  | $      | 1.0  |  
|                                                                |  |                  |      |   |                  |        |      |  
|Interest rate (excluding applicable margin):                    |  |                  |      |   |                  |        |      |  
|Average interest rate on term debt                              |  |                  | 2.95 | % |                  |        | 0.25 | %
|LIBOR1 month, at beginning of period                           |  |                  | 3.93 | % |                  |        | 0.24 | %
|LIBOR1 month, at end of period                                 |  |                  | 0.44 | % |                  |        | 0.23 | %
|LIBOR3 months, at beginning of period                          |  |                  | 4.05 | % |                  |        | 0.28 | %
|LIBOR3 months, at end of period                                |  |                  | 1.43 | % |                  |        | 0.25 | %

The decrease in interest expense was due to lower LIBOR during the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and the expiration of the interest rate swap. The margin over LIBOR was 1.00% during the three months ended December 31, 2009. Total long-term debt outstanding, including capital lease obligations, as of December 31,
2008 and 2009, was $240.0 million and $241.5 million, respectively. Due to the expiration of the interest rate swap on July 31, 2009 the Corporations $240.0 million term debt is now subject to variable interest rates. The current margin
over LIBOR is 1.0% at December 31, 2009.

Tax Provision (Benefit)

The tax provision (benefit) for the periods presented was as follows (dollars in million):



|                                                      |  |                  |       |    |                  |   |      |  
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- | -- | ---------------- | - | ---- | -
|                                                      |  | Quarter Ended    |      
|                                                      |  | December 31,2008 |       |    | December 31,2009 |  
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                  |  | $                | (4.8  | )  |                  | $ | 4.8  |  
|                                                      |  |                  |       |    |                  |   |      |  
|Provision (benefit) as a percentage of pre-tax income |  |                  | (46.0 | )% |                  |   | 31.9 | %
|                                                      |  |                  |       |    |                  |   |      |  

Our effective tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2009 was 31.9%
comprised of the 35.0% federal rate and a net benefit of 3.1% for the state rate and permanent differences and other discrete items. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2008, was a benefit of 46.0% comprised of the
35.0% federal rate and 11.0% for the state rate and permanent rate differences. The rate for the period ended December 31, 2009, was favorably impacted by a benefit of $1.2 million associated with various internal restructuring transactions
implemented in the period. Exclusive of these transactions the effective tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2009, would have been 40.1%, comprised of the 35.0% federal rate and 5.1% for the state rate and permanent rate
differences.

The state rate for the period ended December 31, 2008, was impacted by the need for valuation allowances on
losses generated by the impairments of certain finite lived intangible assets in the period. The benefit for the period was favorably impacted by a ruling obtained from the Internal Revenue Service during the period on a specific permanent item.



79



---

##### Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following compares the Corporations Statement of Cash Flows for the quarters ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 (dollars in
millions):



|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- | - | ---------------- | - | ----- | -
|                                                                                            |  | Quarter Ended    |      
|                                                                                            |  | December 31,2008 |       |   | December 31,2009 |  
|Statement of Cash Flows                                                                     |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:                                      |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                           |  | $                | (5.5  | ) |                  | $ | 10.2  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Depreciation                                                                                |  |                  | 5.2   |   |                  |   | 4.6   |  
|Amortization                                                                                |  |                  | 1.7   |   |                  |   | 2.8   |  
|Impairment charge                                                                           |  |                  | 14.8  |   |                  |   |      |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges                         |  |                  | 3.0   |   |                  |   | 0.2   |  
|Stock-based compensation                                                                    |  |                  | 1.4   |   |                  |   | 1.4   |  
|Amortization of deferred financing fees                                                     |  |                  | 0.1   |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                       |  |                  | (4.1  | ) |                  |   | 5.4   |  
|Loss (gain) on disposition of equipment                                                     |  |                  | (0.6  | ) |                  |   | 0.2   |  
|Other                                                                                       |  |                  | (0.2  | ) |                  |   | (0.1  | )
|Change in operating assets and liabilities:                                                 |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Accounts receivable, net                                                                    |  |                  | 4.3   |   |                  |   | 7.1   |  
|Inventory and other assets                                                                  |  |                  | 4.2   |   |                  |   | (2.5  | )
|Prepaids and other assets                                                                   |  |                  | (1.2  | ) |                  |   | (4.2  | )
|Accounts payable                                                                            |  |                  | (0.8  | ) |                  |   | 1.8   |  
|Salaries, wages and other compensation                                                      |  |                  | (0.7  | ) |                  |   | (4.8  | )
|Other accrued liabilities                                                                   |  |                  | 2.4   |   |                  |   | 3.2   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                                   |  |                  | 24.0  |   |                  |   | 25.4  |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:                                      |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements                                            |  |                  | (4.3  | ) |                  |   | (9.3  | )
|Acquisitions, net of cash acquired                                                          |  |                  | (21.5 | ) |                  |   | (38.8 | )
|Cash proceeds from sale of assets                                                           |  |                  | 0.3   |   |                  |   |      |  
|Other                                                                                       |  |                  |      |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                                       |  |                  | (25.5 | ) |                  |   | (48.0 | )
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:                                      |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations                                  |  |                  |      |   |                  |   | (0.2  | )
|Issuance of common stock                                                                    |  |                  | 0.2   |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|Tax benefit from stock-based compensation                                                   |  |                  |      |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                                         |  |                  | 0.2   |   |                  |   |      |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Change in cash and cash equivalents                                                         |  |                  | (1.3  | ) |                  |   | (22.6 | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                                            |  |                  | 42.6  |   |                  |   | 73.8  |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                                  |  | $                | 41.3  |   |                  | $ | 51.2  |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Supplemental information:                                                                   |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash paid for interest                                                                      |  | $                | 3.5   |   |                  | $ | 0.9   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash paid for taxes                                                                         |  | $                | 0.1   |   |                  | $ |      |  
|                                                                                            |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  



80



---

##### Table of Contents

Following Represents the Fourth Quarter 2009 Results compared to the Third Quarter 2009

Results of Operations

The following table presents selected consolidated comparative results of operations and statistical information (dollars in millions, except where indicated):



|                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------- | - | ------------------ | ----- | - | ---------------- | - | ------ | - |  | ---- | ------ |  | - | ------------ | - |  | ----- | -
|                                                                  |  | Quarter Ended     |        
|                                                                  |  | September 30,2009 |         |   | Increase(Decrease) |       |   | December 31,2009 |  
|                                                                  |  | Amount            |         |   | % ofRevenues       |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      | Amount |  |   | % ofRevenues |  
|Net revenues:                                                     |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                            |  | $                 | 447.1   |   |                    | 97.0  | % |                  | $ | (9.4   | ) |  | (2.1 | )%     |  | $ | 437.7        |   |  | 97.0  | %
|Hospital Management                                               |  |                   | 13.9    |   |                    | 3.0   |   |                  |   | (0.2   | ) |  | (1.4 | )      |  |   | 13.7         |   |  | 3.0   |  
|                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Total net revenues                                                |  |                   | 461.0   |   |                    | 100.0 |   |                  |   | (9.6   | ) |  | (2.1 | )      |  |   | 451.4        |   |  | 100.0 |  
|                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Cost of goods sold:                                               |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                            |  |                   | 382.6   |   |                    | 83.0  |   |                  |   | (9.0   | ) |  | (2.4 | )      |  |   | 373.6        |   |  | 82.8  |  
|Hospital Management                                               |  |                   | 12.2    |   |                    | 2.6   |   |                  |   | (0.3   | ) |  | (2.5 | )      |  |   | 11.9         |   |  | 2.6   |  
|                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Total cost of goods sold                                          |  |                   | 394.8   |   |                    | 85.6  |   |                  |   | (9.3   | ) |  | (2.4 | )      |  |   | 385.5        |   |  | 85.4  |  
|                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Gross profit:                                                     |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy                                            |  |                   | 64.5    |   |                    | 14.0  |   |                  |   | (0.4   | ) |  | (0.6 | )      |  |   | 64.1         |   |  | 14.2  |  
|Hospital Management                                               |  |                   | 1.7     |   |                    | 0.4   |   |                  |   | 0.1    |   |  | 5.9  |        |  |   | 1.8          |   |  | 0.4   |  
|                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Total gross profit                                                |  | $                 | 66.2    |   |                    | 14.4  | % |                  | $ | (0.3   | ) |  | (0.5 | )%     |  | $ | 65.9         |   |  | 14.6  | %
|                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Institutional Pharmacy (in whole numbers, except where indicated) |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Volume information:                                               |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Prescriptions dispensed (in thousands)                            |  |                   | 9,713   |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | (123   | ) |  | (1.3 | )%     |  |   | 9,590        |   |  |       |  
|Revenue per prescription dispensed                                |  | $                 | 46.03   |   |                    |       |   |                  | $ | (0.39  | ) |  | (0.8 | )%     |  | $ | 45.64        |   |  |       |  
|Gross profit per prescription dispensed                           |  | $                 | 6.64    |   |                    |       |   |                  | $ | 0.04   |   |  | 0.6  | %      |  | $ | 6.68         |   |  |       |  
|Institutional gross margin                                        |  |                   | 14.4    | % |                    |       |   |                  |   | 0.2    |   |  | 1.4  | %      |  |   | 14.6         | % |  |       |  
|Generic dispensing rate                                           |  |                   | 74.5    | % |                    |       |   |                  |   | 0.2    |   |  | 0.3  | %      |  |   | 74.7         | % |  |       |  
|Customer licensed beds under contract:                            |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Beginning of period                                               |  |                   | 317,358 |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | 302    |   |  | 0.1  | %      |  |   | 317,660      |   |  |       |  
|Additions                                                         |  |                   | 10,549  |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | 1,588  |   |  | 15.1 |        |  |   | 12,137       |   |  |       |  
|Losses and other                                                  |  |                   | (10,247 | ) |                    |       |   |                  |   | (1,665 | ) |  | 16.2 |        |  |   | (11,912      | ) |  |       |  
|                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|End of period                                                     |  |                   | 317,660 |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | 225    |   |  | 0.1  | %      |  |   | 317,885      |   |  |       |  
|                                                                  |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Hospital Management (in whole numbers except where indicated)     |  |                   |         |   |                    |       |   |                  |   |        |   |  |      |        |  |   |              |   |  |       |  
|Hospital management contracts serviced                            |  |                   | 85      |   |                    |       |   |                  |   | 1.0    |   |  | 1.2  | %      |  |   | 86           |   |  |       |  



81



---

##### Table of Contents

Revenues

The decrease in institutional pharmacy revenues of $9.4 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009, was the result of a rate
variance of approximately $3.7 million or a $0.39 decline per prescription dispensed and an unfavorable volume variance of approximately $5.7 million or 123,000 fewer prescriptions dispensed. The rate variance was comprised of approximately $3.0
million due to deflation on drugs dispensed between periods and $0.3 million due to the increase in the generic drug dispensing rate during the period from 74.5% to 74.7% and other concessions. The sequential decrease in revenue per script is the
result of continued revenue per script decreases in generic drugs as well as the impact of the September 2009 change in the AWP of $1.4 million and other concessions, which impacted the Corporations reimbursement from Medicaid and certain
PDPs. The volume variance of approximately $5.7 million was due to the decline in net customer licensed beds under contract.

The decrease in hospital management revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2009, of $0.2 million was due primarily to concessions with certain hospital management contracts serviced in the period, despite an increase in the
number of hospital contracts serviced between periods.

Cost of Goods Sold

Institutional pharmacy cost of goods sold decreased $9.0 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to a reduction in drug purchases as a result of less prescriptions being dispensed. Drug spend as a percentage of revenues increased 92 bps but was partially offset by an improvement in
rebates of 42 bps during the comparable periods. Other costs included within cost of goods sold as a percent of revenues improved a combined 73 bps, predominately as a result of operational efficiencies.

Hospital management cost of goods sold decreased $0.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the respective
prior period due to an increase in the number of hospital contracts serviced between periods.

Gross Profit and Operating Expenses

Gross profit and other operating expenses were the following for the periods presented (dollars in millions):



|                                                                    |  |                   |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---- | ----------- | ------------------ | - |  | ---------------- | ---- | - |  | ----- | ------ |  | ----------- | ---- |  | ---- | -
|                                                                    |  | Quarter Ended     |     
|                                                                    |  | September 30,2009 |      |             | Increase(Decrease) |   |  | December 31,2009 |     
|                                                                    |  | Amount            |      | % ofRevenue |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       | Amount |  | % ofRevenue |     
|Gross profit and operating expenses:                                |  |                   |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Total gross profit                                                  |  | $                 | 66.2 |             | 14.4               | % |  | $                | (0.3 | ) |  | (0.5  | )%     |  | $           | 65.9 |  | 14.6 | %
|Selling, general and administrative expenses                        |  |                   | 44.1 |             | 9.6                |   |  |                  | 1.3  |   |  | 2.9   |        |  |             | 45.4 |  | 10.1 |  
|Amortization expense                                                |  |                   | 2.5  |             | 0.5                |   |  |                  | 0.3  |   |  | 12.0  |        |  |             | 2.8  |  | 0.6  |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |                   | 0.9  |             | 0.2                |   |  |                  | 0.8  |   |  | 88.9  |        |  |             | 1.7  |  | 0.4  |  
|Interest expense, net                                               |  |                   | 1.9  |             | 0.4                |   |  |                  | (0.9 | ) |  | (47.4 | )      |  |             | 1.0  |  | 0.2  |  
|                                                                    |  |                   |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Income before provision for income taxes                            |  |                   | 16.8 |             | 3.7                |   |  |                  | (1.8 | ) |  | (10.7 | )      |  |             | 15.0 |  | 3.3  |  
|Provision for income taxes                                          |  |                   | 2.2  |             | 0.5                |   |  |                  | 2.6  |   |  | 118.2 |        |  |             | 4.8  |  | 1.0  |  
|                                                                    |  |                   |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Net income                                                          |  | $                 | 14.6 |             | 3.2                | % |  | $                | (4.4 | ) |  | (30.1 | )%     |  | $           | 10.2 |  | 2.3  | %
|                                                                    |  |                   |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |       |        |  |             |      |  |      |  



82



---

##### Table of Contents

Institutional pharmacy gross profit for the three months ended December 31, 2009, was
$64.1 million, or $6.68 per prescription dispensed, compared to $64.5 million, or $6.64 per prescription dispensed for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The institutional pharmacy gross profit margin for the three months ended
December 31, 2009, improved 20 bps to 14.6%, from 14.4% due primarily to the incremental increase in the generic dispensing rate from 74.5% to 74.7%.

The increase in hospital management gross profit for the three months ended December 31, 2009, of $0.1 million, was due primarily to an increase in the number of hospital contracts serviced between
periods.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses represent the following costs for the periods excluding integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges (dollars in millions):



|                                                  |  |                   |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |      |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---- | ----------- | ------------------ | - |  | ---------------- | ---- | - |  | ---- | ------ |  | ----------- | ---- |  | ---- | -
|                                                  |  | Quarter Ended     |     
|                                                  |  | September 30,2009 |      |             | Increase(Decrease) |   |  | December 31,2009 |     
|                                                  |  | Amount            |      | % ofRevenue |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |      | Amount |  | % ofRevenue |     
|Selling, general and administrative expenses:     |  |                   |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |      |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Total wages, benefits and contract labor          |  | $                 | 24.7 |             | 5.4                | % |  | $                | (0.3 | ) |  | (1.2 | )%     |  | $           | 24.4 |  | 5.4  | %
|Contracted services                               |  |                   | 3.5  |             | 0.8                |   |  |                  | (0.1 | ) |  | (2.9 | )      |  |             | 3.4  |  | 0.8  |  
|Provision for doubtful accounts                   |  |                   | 2.5  |             | 0.5                |   |  |                  | 0.9  |   |  | 36.0 |        |  |             | 3.4  |  | 0.8  |  
|Supplies                                          |  |                   | 1.7  |             | 0.4                |   |  |                  | 0.2  |   |  | 11.8 |        |  |             | 1.9  |  | 0.4  |  
|Travel expenses                                   |  |                   | 1.2  |             | 0.3                |   |  |                  |     |   |  |     |        |  |             | 1.2  |  | 0.3  |  
|Professional fees                                 |  |                   | 2.2  |             | 0.5                |   |  |                  | (0.2 | ) |  | (9.1 | )      |  |             | 2.0  |  | 0.4  |  
|Stock-based compensation                          |  |                   | 1.3  |             | 0.3                |   |  |                  | 0.1  |   |  | 7.7  |        |  |             | 1.4  |  | 0.3  |  
|Depreciation                                      |  |                   | 2.0  |             | 0.4                |   |  |                  | 0.2  |   |  | 10.0 |        |  |             | 2.2  |  | 0.5  |  
|Rent                                              |  |                   | 1.0  |             | 0.2                |   |  |                  |     |   |  |     |        |  |             | 1.0  |  | 0.2  |  
|Maintenance                                       |  |                   | 0.6  |             | 0.1                |   |  |                  |     |   |  |     |        |  |             | 0.6  |  | 0.1  |  
|Other costs                                       |  |                   | 3.4  |             | 0.7                |   |  |                  | 0.5  |   |  | 14.7 |        |  |             | 3.9  |  | 0.9  |  
|                                                  |  |                   |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |      |        |  |             |      |  |      |  
|Total selling general and administrative expenses |  | $                 | 44.1 |             | 9.6                | % |  | $                | 1.3  |   |  | 2.9  | %      |  | $           | 45.4 |  | 10.1 | %
|                                                  |  |                   |      |             |                    |   |  |                  |      |   |  |      |        |  |             |      |  |      |  

Total labor costs decreased $0.3 million for the three months ended December 31,
2009, over the prior period due to the forfeiture of employees paid time off in the period. The provision for doubtful accounts increased $0.9 million primarily as a result of delayed payments from certain payer types, including Medicaid and
PDPs. Other costs within selling, general and administrative expenses increased during the three months ended December 31, 2009, a combined $0.7 million.



83



---

##### Table of Contents

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation expense represents the following costs for the periods (dollars in millions):



|                                                                            |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | --- | ------------ | ---------------- | - | ------ | - | ------------ |  | --- | -
|                                                                            |  | Quarter Ended     |    
|                                                                            |  | September 30,2009 |     |              | December 31,2009 |  
|                                                                            |  | Amount            |     | % ofRevenues |                  |   | Amount |   | % ofRevenues | 
|Leasehold improvements                                                      |  | $                 | 0.4 |              | 0.1              | % |        | $ | 0.4          |  | 0.1 | %
|Equipment and software                                                      |  |                   | 4.0 |              | 0.9              |   |        |   | 4.0          |  | 0.9 |  
|Leased equipment                                                            |  |                   | 0.1 |              | NM               |   |        |   | 0.2          |  | NM  |  
|                                                                            |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Total depreciation expense                                                  |  | $                 | 4.5 |              | 1.0              | % |        | $ | 4.6          |  | 1.0 | %
|                                                                            |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Depreciation expense recorded in cost of goods sold                         |  | $                 | 2.5 |              | 0.6              | % |        | $ | 2.4          |  | 0.5 | %
|Depreciation expense recorded in selling, general & administrative expenses |  |                   | 2.0 |              | 0.4              |   |        |   | 2.2          |  | 0.5 |  
|                                                                            |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Total depreciation expense                                                  |  | $                 | 4.5 |              | 1.0              | % |        | $ | 4.6          |  | 1.0 | %
|                                                                            |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Total capital expenditures                                                  |  | $                 | 5.8 |              | 1.3              | % |        | $ | 9.3          |  | 2.1 | %
|                                                                            |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  

Depreciation expense increased for the three months ended December 31, 2009,
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009, due primarily to assets acquired as a result of the acquisition in the third quarter. Capital expenditures have increased in three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2009, due to purchases associated with the systems infrastructure build out.

Amortization
expense represents the following costs for the periods (dollars in millions):



|                             |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|---------------------------- |  | ----------------- | --- | ------------ | ---------------- | - | ------ | - | ------------ |  | --- | -
|                             |  | Quarter Ended     |    
|                             |  | September 30,2009 |     |              | December 31,2009 |  
|                             |  | Amount            |     | % ofRevenues |                  |   | Amount |   | % ofRevenues | 
|Amortization of intangibles: |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Trade names                  |  | $                 | 0.4 |              | 0.1              | % |        | $ | 0.3          |  | 0.1 | %
|Non-compete agreements       |  |                   | 0.3 |              | NM               |   |        |   | 0.6          |  | 0.1 |  
|Customer relationships       |  |                   | 1.8 |              | 0.4              |   |        |   | 1.9          |  | 0.4 |  
|                             |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  
|Total amortization expense   |  | $                 | 2.5 |              | 0.5              | % |        | $ | 2.8          |  | 0.6 | %
|                             |  |                   |     |              |                  |   |        |   |              |  |     |  

Amortization expense for the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2009, increased due to the acquisition in the third quarter of 2009.



84



---

##### Table of Contents

Integration, Merger and Acquisition Related Costs and Other Charges

The following is a summary of integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges incurred by the Corporation (dollars in
millions, except per share amounts):



|                                                                          |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ----- | - | ---------------- | - | ----- | -
|                                                                          |  | Quarter Ended     |      
|                                                                          |  | September 30,2009 |       |   | December 31,2009 |  
|Integration costs and other charges:                                      |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                                            |  | $                 |      |   |                  | $ | 0.2   |  
|General and administrative                                                |  |                   | 0.1   |   |                  |   | 0.4   |  
|Employee costs                                                            |  |                   | 0.2   |   |                  |   | 0.3   |  
|Severance costs                                                           |  |                   |      |   |                  |   | 0.3   |  
|Facility costs                                                            |  |                   | 0.1   |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|                                                                          |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|                                                                          |  |                   | 0.4   |   |                  |   | 1.3   |  
|                                                                          |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Acquisition related costs:                                                |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                                            |  |                   | 0.5   |   |                  |   | 0.4   |  
|                                                                          |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|                                                                          |  |                   | 0.5   |   |                  |   | 0.4   |  
|                                                                          |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Total integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  | $                 | 0.9   |   |                  | $ | 1.7   |  
|                                                                          |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Negative effect on earnings per diluted share                             |  | $                 | (0.02 | ) |                  | $ | (0.03 | )
|                                                                          |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  

Integration, merger, and acquisition related costs and other charges increased for
the three months ended December 31, 2009, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009, due to costs incurred as a result of the planned integration of our pharmacy system platforms and acquisitions in the third and fourth quarter
of 2009.

Interest Expense

Interest expense represents the following costs for the periods (dollars in millions):



|                                                                |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---- | - | ---------------- | - | ---- | -
|                                                                |  | Quarter Ended     |     
|                                                                |  | September 30,2009 |      |   | December 31,2009 |  
|Interest expense, net:                                          |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  
|Term Debt                                                       |  | $                 | 1.7  |   |                  | $ | 0.9  |  
|Revolving credit facility                                       |  |                   |     |   |                  |   |     |  
|                                                                |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  
|Subtotal (including commitment fees and letters of credit fees) |  |                   | 1.7  |   |                  |   | 0.9  |  
|Other:                                                          |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  
|Interest expense (income)                                       |  |                   |     |   |                  |   |     |  
|Amortization of deferred financing fees                         |  |                   | 0.2  |   |                  |   | 0.1  |  
|                                                                |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  
|Total interest expense, net                                     |  | $                 | 1.9  |   |                  | $ | 1.0  |  
|                                                                |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  
|Interest rate (excluding applicable margin):                    |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  
|Average interest rate on variable term debt                     |  |                   | 0.42 | % |                  |   | 0.25 | %
|LIBOR1 month, at beginning of period                           |  |                   | 0.30 | % |                  |   | 0.24 | %
|LIBOR1 month, at end of period                                 |  |                   | 0.24 | % |                  |   | 0.23 | %
|LIBOR3 months, at beginning of period                          |  |                   | 0.59 | % |                  |   | 0.28 | %
|LIBOR3 months, at end of period                                |  |                   | 0.28 | % |                  |   | 0.25 | %



85



---

##### Table of Contents

The decrease in interest expense was due to lower LIBOR, and the expiration of the interest
rate swap. The margin over LIBOR was 1.00% during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2009.

Tax Provision

The tax provision for the periods presented was as follows (dollars in million):



|                                            |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  
|------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---- | - | ---------------- | - | ---- | -
|                                            |  | Quarter Ended     |     
|                                            |  | September 30,2009 |      |   | December 31,2009 |  
|Provision for income taxes                  |  | $                 | 2.2  |   |                  | $ | 4.8  |  
|                                            |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  
|Provision as a percentage of pre-tax income |  |                   | 13.1 | % |                  |   | 31.9 | %
|                                            |  |                   |      |   |                  |   |      |  

The increase in the provision as a percentage of pre-tax income for the three months
ended December 31, 2009, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009, is due to tax benefits recorded in the third quarter related to the adoption of an internal restructuring plan. During the three month period ended
September 30, 2009, the Corporation recorded a tax benefit of $4.5 million ($0.15 earnings per diluted share) related to its internal restructuring plan. The benefits related to a determination that it is more likely than not that it will be
able to realize certain historic net operating loss carryforwards for which a valuation allowance had previously been provided. Excluding this one-time benefit, the provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2009, would
have been $6.7 million (39.7% of pre-tax income).

During the three months ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation
recorded tax benefits of $1.2 million ($0.04 earnings per diluted share, as a result of internal restructuring activities. The benefit related in part to a determination that is more likely than not that the Corporation will be able to realize the
benefits of certain deferred tax assets for which a valuation allowance had previously been provided. Excluding this one time benefit, the provision for income taxes for the three months ended December 31, 2009, would have been $6.0 million
(40.1% of pre-tax income).



86



---

##### Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following compares the Corporations Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2009 (dollars in millions):



|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ----- | - | ---------------- | - | ----- | -
|                                                                                            |  | Quarter Ended     |      
|                                                                                            |  | September 30,2009 |       |   | December 31,2009 |  
|Statement of Cash Flows                                                                     |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:                                      |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Net income                                                                                  |  | $                 | 14.6  |   |                  | $ | 10.2  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Depreciation                                                                                |  |                   | 4.5   |   |                  |   | 4.6   |  
|Amortization                                                                                |  |                   | 2.5   |   |                  |   | 2.8   |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges                         |  |                   |      |   |                  |   | 0.2   |  
|Stock-based compensation                                                                    |  |                   | 1.3   |   |                  |   | 1.4   |  
|Amortization of deferred financing fees                                                     |  |                   | 0.1   |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                       |  |                   | 2.7   |   |                  |   | 5.4   |  
|Loss (gain) on disposition of equipment                                                     |  |                   |      |   |                  |   | 0.2   |  
|Other                                                                                       |  |                   | (0.1  | ) |                  |   | (0.1  | )
|Change in operating assets and liabilities:                                                 |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Accounts receivable                                                                         |  |                   | (4.5  | ) |                  |   | 7.1   |  
|Inventory and other assets                                                                  |  |                   | (2.4  | ) |                  |   | (2.5  | )
|Prepaids and other assets                                                                   |  |                   | (5.3  | ) |                  |   | (4.2  | )
|Accounts payable                                                                            |  |                   | 4.8   |   |                  |   | 1.8   |  
|Salaries, wages and other compensation                                                      |  |                   | 1.0   |   |                  |   | (4.8  | )
|Other accrued liabilities                                                                   |  |                   | (2.3  | ) |                  |   | 3.2   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                                   |  |                   | 16.9  |   |                  |   | 25.4  |  
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:                                      |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements                                            |  |                   | (5.8  | ) |                  |   | (9.3  | )
|Acquisitions, net of cash acquired                                                          |  |                   | (15.9 | ) |                  |   | (38.8 | )
|Other                                                                                       |  |                   |      |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                                       |  |                   | (21.7 | ) |                  |   | (48.0 | )
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:                                      |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations                                  |  |                   | (0.1  | ) |                  |   | (0.2  | )
|Issuance of common stock                                                                    |  |                   | 1.0   |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|Tax benefit from stock-based compensation                                                   |  |                   |      |   |                  |   | 0.1   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Net cash provided by financing activities                                                   |  |                   | 0.9   |   |                  |   |      |  
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Change in cash and cash equivalents                                                         |  |                   | (3.9  | ) |                  |   | (22.6 | )
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                                            |  |                   | 77.7  |   |                  |   | 73.8  |  
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                                  |  | $                 | 73.8  |   |                  | $ | 51.2  |  
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Supplemental information:                                                                   |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash paid for interest                                                                      |  | $                 | 3.8   |   |                  | $ | 0.9   |  
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|Cash paid for taxes                                                                         |  | $                 | 0.2   |   |                  | $ |      |  
|                                                                                            |  |                   |       |   |                  |   |       |  



87



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

On July 31, 2007, the Corporation entered into the Credit Agreement consisting of a $275.0 million term loan facility and
a $150.0 million revolving credit facility. The Corporation borrowed $275.0 million under the term loan portion of the Credit Agreement and an additional $20.0 million under the revolving credit portion of the Credit Agreement on July 31, 2007,
to refinance the initial financings entered into by PharMerica LTC and KPS to finance their respective cash distributions, to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Pharmacy Transaction and for working capital and other general
corporate purposes. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate equal to, at the Corporations option, a base rate plus a margin between 0.0% and 0.75% per annum, or an adjusted LIBO rate plus a margin between
0.625% and 1.75% per annum, in each case depending on the leverage ratio of the Corporation. The base rate is the higher of the prime lending rate announced by JPMorgan in New York from time to time and the federal funds rate published by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York plus 0.50%. As of December 31, 2009, borrowing under the Credit Agreement bore interest at a rate of 1.2% per annum based upon the one month and the three month adjusted LIBO rate.

Based upon the amount of variable rate debt outstanding as of December 31, 2009, a 100 basis point change in interest rates would
affect the Corporations future pre-tax earnings by approximately $2.4 million on an annual basis. The estimated change to the Corporations interest expense is determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on
the Corporations borrowing cost and debt balances. These analyses do not consider the effects, if any, of the potential changes in the Corporations credit ratings or leverage and the overall level of economic activity of the Corporation.
Further, in the event of a change of significant magnitude, the Corporations management would expect to take actions intended to further mitigate its exposure to such change.



88



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements



|                                                                                                      |  |    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm                                               |  | F-2
|Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and
2009            |  | F-3
|Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2009                                          |  | F-4
|Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and
2009            |  | F-5
|Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the years ended December 
31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 |  | F-6
|Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009       |  | F-7



F-1



---

##### Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

PharMerica Corporation

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements
listed in the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PharMerica Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and 2009, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Corporations management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Corporations internal control over financial reporting based on
our audits, which were integrated audits in 2008 and 2009. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements
included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.

A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

As described in Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
under Item 9A, management has excluded the West Virginia Acquisition and Integrity Pharmacy Services Acquisition from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 because they were acquired by the
Corporation in a purchase business combination during 2009. We have also excluded the West Virginia Acquisition and Integrity Pharmacy Services Acquisition from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. The West Virginia Acquisition
and Integrity Pharmacy Services Acquisition are wholly-owned subsidiaries whose total combined assets and total combined revenues represent 10.0% and less than 1.0%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Louisville, Kentucky

February 4, 2010



F-2



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009

(In millions,
except share and per share amounts)



|                                                                                 |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|                                                                                 |  | 2007 |            |   | 2008 |   | 2009      
|Revenues                                                                         |  | $    | 1,217.8    |   |      | $ | 1,947.3    |  | $ | 1,841.2   
|Cost of goods sold                                                               |  |      | 1,044.0    |   |      |   | 1,662.7    |  |   | 1,568.9   
|                                                                                 |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Gross profit                                                                     |  |      | 173.8      |   |      |   | 284.6      |  |   | 272.3     
|Selling, general and administrative expenses                                     |  |      | 169.3      |   |      |   | 214.1      |  |   | 187.6     
|Amortization expense                                                             |  |      | 5.0        |   |      |   | 6.5        |  |   | 9.0       
|Impairment of intangible assets (See Note 4)                                     |  |      |           |   |      |   | 14.8       |  |   |          
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges (See Note 8) |  |      | 29.8       |   |      |   | 26.7       |  |   | 5.2       
|                                                                                 |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Operating income (loss)                                                          |  |      | (30.3      | ) |      |   | 22.5       |  |   | 70.5      
|Interest expense, net                                                            |  |      | 7.2        |   |      |   | 14.2       |  |   | 9.4       
|                                                                                 |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Income (loss) before income taxes                                                |  |      | (37.5      | ) |      |   | 8.3        |  |   | 61.1      
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                             |  |      | (13.4      | ) |      |   | 3.3        |  |   | 18.9      
|                                                                                 |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Net income (loss)                                                                |  | $    | (24.1      | ) |      | $ | 5.0        |  | $ | 42.2      
|                                                                                 |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Earnings (loss) per common share:                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Basic                                                                            |  | $    | (1.13      | ) |      | $ | 0.17       |  | $ | 1.39      
|Diluted                                                                          |  | $    | (1.13      | ) |      | $ | 0.17       |  | $ | 1.39      
|                                                                                 |  |      |           
|Shares used in computing earnings (loss) per common share:                       |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Basic                                                                            |  |      | 21,331,995 |   |      |   | 30,095,582 |  |   | 30,266,272
|Diluted                                                                          |  |      | 21,331,995 |   |      |   | 30,190,893 |  |   | 30,402,768

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



F-3



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31, 2008 and 2009

(In millions, except share and per
share amounts)



|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | -
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  | 2008 |       |   | 2009 |  
|ASSETS                                                                                                                                                                                 |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Current assets:                                                                                                                                                                        |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                                                              |  | $    | 41.3  |   |      | $ | 51.2  |  
|Accounts receivable, net                                                                                                                                                               |  |      | 219.3 |   |      |   | 215.3 |  
|Inventory                                                                                                                                                                              |  |      | 73.4  |   |      |   | 79.8  |  
|Deferred tax assets                                                                                                                                                                    |  |      | 24.9  |   |      |   | 39.8  |  
|Prepaids and other assets                                                                                                                                                              |  |      | 16.7  |   |      |   | 23.6  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      | 375.6 |   |      |   | 409.7 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Equipment and leasehold improvements                                                                                                                                                   |  |      | 97.1  |   |      |   | 119.6 |  
|Accumulated depreciation                                                                                                                                                               |  |      | (43.1 | ) |      |   | (59.0 | )
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      | 54.0  |   |      |   | 60.6  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Deferred tax assets, net                                                                                                                                                               |  |      | 59.4  |   |      |   | 21.0  |  
|Goodwill                                                                                                                                                                               |  |      | 113.7 |   |      |   | 140.1 |  
|Intangible assets, net                                                                                                                                                                 |  |      | 73.4  |   |      |   | 90.8  |  
|Other                                                                                                                                                                                  |  |      | 3.1   |   |      |   | 2.1   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  | $    | 679.2 |   |      | $ | 724.3 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY                                                                                                                                                   |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Current liabilities:                                                                                                                                                                   |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Accounts payable                                                                                                                                                                       |  | $    | 54.4  |   |      | $ | 59.6  |  
|Salaries, wages and other compensation                                                                                                                                                 |  |      | 36.3  |   |      |   | 30.9  |  
|Other accrued liabilities                                                                                                                                                              |  |      | 12.6  |   |      |   | 6.4   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      | 103.3 |   |      |   | 96.9  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Long-term debt                                                                                                                                                                         |  |      | 240.0 |   |      |   | 240.0 |  
|Other long term liabilities                                                                                                                                                            |  |      | 16.1  |   |      |   | 16.5  |  
|Commitments and contingencies (See Note 6)                                                                                                                                             |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Stockholders equity:                                                                                                                                                                  |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 1,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued, December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2009                                                  |  |      |      |   |      |   |      |  
|Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 175,000,000 shares authorized; 30,477,558 shares and 30,619,830 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively. |  |      | 0.3   |   |      |   | 0.3   |  
|Capital in excess of par value                                                                                                                                                         |  |      | 338.7 |   |      |   | 344.8 |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive loss                                                                                                                                                   |  |      | (2.8  | ) |      |   |      |  
|Retained (deficit) earnings                                                                                                                                                            |  |      | (16.4 | ) |      |   | 25.8  |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      | 319.8 |   |      |   | 370.9 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  | $    | 679.2 |   |      | $ | 724.3 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



F-4



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009

(In millions)



|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ----- | -
|                                                                                                   |  | 2007 |        |   | 2008 |   |       | 2009 | 
|Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities:                                             |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                                  |  | $    | (24.1  | ) |      | $ | 5.0   |      |  | $ | 42.2  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Depreciation                                                                                       |  |      | 15.2   |   |      |   | 22.0  |      |  |   | 18.0  |  
|Amortization                                                                                       |  |      | 5.0    |   |      |   | 6.5   |      |  |   | 9.0   |  
|Impairment charge                                                                                  |  |      |       |   |      |   | 14.8  |      |  |   |      |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges                                |  |      | 7.2    |   |      |   | 4.5   |      |  |   | 0.4   |  
|Stock-based compensation                                                                           |  |      | 1.5    |   |      |   | 4.9   |      |  |   | 4.6   |  
|Amortization of deferred financing fees                                                            |  |      | 0.2    |   |      |   | 0.4   |      |  |   | 0.4   |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                                              |  |      | (13.4  | ) |      |   | 2.8   |      |  |   | 19.7  |  
|Loss on disposition of equipment                                                                   |  |      | 0.1    |   |      |   | 0.2   |      |  |   | 0.3   |  
|Other                                                                                              |  |      | (0.9   | ) |      |   | (0.5  | )    |  |   | (0.3  | )
|Change in operating assets and liabilities:                                                        |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Accounts receivable, net                                                                           |  |      | 14.0   |   |      |   | (4.4  | )    |  |   | 11.3  |  
|Inventory and other assets                                                                         |  |      | 1.1    |   |      |   | 4.2   |      |  |   | (2.4  | )
|Prepaids and other assets                                                                          |  |      | (3.3   | ) |      |   | 3.3   |      |  |   | (6.2  | )
|Accounts payable                                                                                   |  |      | 23.1   |   |      |   | 1.1   |      |  |   | (1.2  | )
|Salaries, wages and other compensation                                                             |  |      | 9.3    |   |      |   | (2.3  | )    |  |   | (9.8  | )
|Other accrued liabilities                                                                          |  |      | 1.3    |   |      |   | 3.2   |      |  |   | (1.0  | )
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                                          |  |      | 36.3   |   |      |   | 65.7  |      |  |   | 85.0  |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities:                                             |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements                                                   |  |      | (16.7  | ) |      |   | (22.1 | )    |  |   | (21.6 | )
|Acquisitions, net of cash acquired                                                                 |  |      | (5.6   | ) |      |   | (25.9 | )    |  |   | (54.7 | )
|Cash proceeds from sale of assets                                                                  |  |      |       |   |      |   | 0.6   |      |  |   | 0.1   |  
|Other                                                                                              |  |      | 0.3    |   |      |   |      |      |  |   | 0.1   |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                                              |  |      | (22.0  | ) |      |   | (47.4 | )    |  |   | (76.1 | )
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities:                                             |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Net contributions from Former Parent                                                               |  |      | 14.0   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Proceeds from long-term revolving credit facility                                                  |  |      | 20.0   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Repayments of long-term revolving credit facility                                                  |  |      | (20.0  | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Proceeds from long-term debt                                                                       |  |      | 275.0  |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations                                         |  |      | (25.0  | ) |      |   | (10.0 | )    |  |   | (0.6  | )
|Proceeds from Spin-co loans                                                                        |  |      | 125.0  |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Repayments of Spin-co loans                                                                        |  |      | (250.0 | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Payment of debt issuance costs                                                                     |  |      | (2.0   | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Dividends                                                                                          |  |      | (125.0 | ) |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Cash contributions received from minority shareholders                                             |  |      | 2.0    |   |      |   | 0.1   |      |  |   |      |  
|Issuance of common stock                                                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   | 0.9   |      |  |   | 1.4   |  
|Tax benefit from stock-based compensation                                                          |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |      |  |   | 0.2   |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities                                                |  |      | 14.0   |   |      |   | (9.0  | )    |  |   | 1.0   |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Change in cash and cash equivalents                                                                |  |      | 28.3   |   |      |   | 9.3   |      |  |   | 9.9   |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period                                                   |  |      | 3.7    |   |      |   | 32.0  |      |  |   | 41.3  |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of period                                                         |  | $    | 32.0   |   |      | $ | 41.3  |      |  | $ | 51.2  |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Supplemental information:                                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Transfers of property and equipment from Former Parent                                             |  | $    | 4.9    |   |      | $ |      |      |  | $ |      |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Cash paid for interest                                                                             |  | $    | 5.4    |   |      | $ | 14.6  |      |  | $ | 11.2  |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Cash paid for taxes                                                                                |  | $    | 1.4    |   |      | $ | 1.5   |      |  | $ | 1.6   |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities:                                                      |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Fair value of assets acquired                                                                      |  | $    | 438.1  |   |      | $ | (1.7  | )    |  | $ | (1.5  | )
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Fair value of liabilities assumed or incurred                                                      |  | $    | 178.8  |   |      | $ | (1.0  | )    |  | $ |      |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Capital lease obligations                                                                          |  | $    |       |   |      | $ |      |      |  | $ | 1.8   |  
|                                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



F-5



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009

(In millions,
except share amounts)



|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | - | ---------------------------- | ------ | --- | ------------------------------------------ | - | ----- | ------------------------- |  | - | ----- | - |  | - | ----- | - |  | - | ------ | -
|                                                                                                        |  | Common Stock |   | Capital inExcess ofPar Value |        |     | AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss) |   |       | Retained(Deficit)Earnings |  |   | Total |  
|                                                                                                        |  | Shares       |   |                              | Amount |     |                                            |   |      
|Balance at December 31, 2006                                                                            |  | 10           |   |                              | $      |    |                                            | $ | 133.7 |                           |  | $ |      |   |  | $ | 64.6  |   |  | $ | 198.3  |  
|Comprehensive loss:                                                                                     |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Net loss                                                                                                |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   | (24.1 | ) |  |   | (24.1  | )
|Change in fair value of interest rate swap, net                                                         |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   | (2.6  | ) |  |   |      |   |  |   | (2.6   | )
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Total comprehensive loss                                                                                |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   | (2.6  | ) |  |   | (24.1 | ) |  |   | (26.7  | )
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Net transfers from Former Parent                                                                        |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 9.7   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 9.7    |  
|Dividend to Former Parent                                                                               |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | (63.1 | )                         |  |   |      |   |  |   | (61.9 | ) |  |   | (125.0 | )
|Cancellation of common stock                                                                            |  | (10          | ) |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Stock issuancespin-off from Former Parent                                                              |  | 15,000,000   |   |                              |        | 0.2 |                                            |   | (0.2  | )                         |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Stock issuancepurchase of business                                                                     |  | 15,000,000   |   |                              |        | 0.1 |                                            |   | 251.3 |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 251.4  |  
|Grant and forfeiture of non-vested restricted stock                                                     |  | 360,612      |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Stock-based compensationrestricted stock                                                               |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 0.4   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 0.4    |  
|Stock-based compensationstock options                                                                  |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 1.1   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 1.1    |  
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance at December 31, 2007                                                                            |  | 30,360,612   |   |                              | $      | 0.3 |                                            | $ | 332.9 |                           |  | $ | (2.6  | ) |  | $ | (21.4 | ) |  | $ | 309.2  |  
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Comprehensive income:                                                                                   |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Net income                                                                                              |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   | 5.0   |   |  |   | 5.0    |  
|Change in fair value of interest rate swap, net                                                         |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   | (0.2  | ) |  |   |      |   |  |   | (0.2   | )
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Total comprehensive income                                                                              |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   | (0.2  | ) |  |   | 5.0   |   |  |   | 4.8    |  
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Grant and forfeiture of non-vested restricted stock                                                     |  | 49,068       |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 0.1   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 0.1    |  
|Exercise of stock options                                                                               |  | 67,878       |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 0.8   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 0.8    |  
|Stock-based compensationrestricted stock                                                               |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 2.3   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 2.3    |  
|Stock-based compensationstock options                                                                  |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 2.6   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 2.6    |  
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance at December 31, 2008                                                                            |  | 30,477,558   |   |                              | $      | 0.3 |                                            | $ | 338.7 |                           |  | $ | (2.8  | ) |  | $ | (16.4 | ) |  | $ | 319.8  |  
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Comprehensive income:                                                                                   |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Net income                                                                                              |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   | 42.2  |   |  |   | 42.2   |  
|Change in fair value of interest rate swap, net                                                         |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   | 2.8   |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 2.8    |  
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Total comprehensive income                                                                              |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   | 2.8   |   |  |   | 42.2  |   |  |   | 45.0   |  
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Grant and forfeiture of non-vested restricted stock                                                     |  | 34,964       |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   |      |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Exercise of stock options                                                                               |  | 107,308      |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 1.4   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 1.4    |  
|Stock-based compensationrestricted stock                                                               |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 2.5   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 2.5    |  
|Stock-based compensationstock options                                                                  |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 2.1   |                           |  |   |      |   |  |   |      |   |  |   | 2.1    |  
|Income tax benefit in connection with the issuance of common stock under stock-based compensation plans |  |             |   |                              |        |    |                                            |   | 0.1   |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   | 0.1    |  
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  
|Balance at December 31, 2009                                                                            |  | 30,619,830   |   |                              | $      | 0.3 |                                            | $ | 344.8 |                           |  | $ |      |   |  | $ | 25.8  |   |  | $ | 370.9  |  
|                                                                                                        |  |              |   |                              |        |     |                                            |   |       |                           |  |   |       |   |  |   |       |   |  |   |        |  

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements



F-6



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009

NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) is an institutional pharmacy services company that services healthcare facilities and
provides management pharmacy services to hospitals. The Corporation is the second largest institutional pharmacy services company in the United States, operating 98 institutional pharmacies in 41 states. The Corporations customers are
typically institutional healthcare providers, such as nursing centers, assisted living facilities, hospitals and other long-term alternative care settings and generally the primary source of supply of pharmaceuticals to its customers. The
Corporation also provides pharmacy management services to 86 hospitals in the United States.

Pharmacy Transaction

The Corporation, formerly known as Safari Holding Corporation, was formed on October 23, 2006, by Kindred Healthcare, Inc.
(Kindred or Former Parent) and AmerisourceBergen Corporation (AmerisourceBergen) for the purpose of consummating the transactions contemplated by the Master Transaction Agreement dated October 25, 2006, as
amended (the Master Agreement). Pursuant to the Master Agreement, Kindred and AmerisourceBergen, through a series of transactions (collectively, the Pharmacy Transaction), spun-off and combined their respective institutional
pharmacy businesses, Kindred Pharmacy Services (KPS) and PharMerica Long-Term Care (PharMerica LTC), into a new, stand-alone, publicly traded company. The Pharmacy Transaction was consummated on July 31, 2007 (the
Closing Date).

The shares of common stock of the Corporation were registered with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Commission) on Form S-4/S-1, which was declared effective by the Commission on July 17, 2007 (the Form S-4/S-1).

On August 1, 2007, the Corporations common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol PMC. Under the terms of the Pharmacy Transaction, on the Closing Date,
each of KPS and PharMerica LTC borrowed $125.0 million as mutually agreed upon by Kindred and AmerisourceBergen and used such proceeds to fund a one-time, tax-free cash distribution in that amount to their respective parent companies. Following the
cash distributions, Kindred spun off to its stockholders all of the outstanding stock of KPS and AmerisourceBergen spun off to its stockholders all of the outstanding stock of PharMerica LTC. Immediately thereafter, separate wholly owned
subsidiaries of the Corporation were merged with and into KPS and PharMerica LTC with KPS and PharMerica LTC as the surviving entities of the mergers, and, as a result, KPS and PharMerica LTC became wholly owned subsidiaries of the Corporation. In
the mergers, each Kindred stockholder received approximately 0.366 shares of the Corporations common stock in respect of each share of Kindred common stock held on the record date and each AmerisourceBergen stockholder received approximately
0.083 shares of the Corporations common stock in respect of each share of AmerisourceBergen common stock held on the record date. Immediately following such spin-offs and mergers, the stockholders of Kindred and AmerisourceBergen each owned
50% of the outstanding common stock of the Corporation. The shares of the Corporations common stock held by Kindred and AmerisourceBergen prior to the Pharmacy Transaction were cancelled, and neither retained any ownership of the outstanding
shares of common stock of the Corporation.



F-7



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



For accounting purposes, the Pharmacy Transaction was treated as an acquisition by KPS
of PharMerica LTC with KPS being considered the accounting acquirer. As a result, the accompanying financial statements include only certain accounts and results of operations representing the institutional pharmacy business of Kindred on a
carve-out basis. Because KPS was determined to be the acquirer for accounting purposes, the historical financial statements of KPS became the historical financial statements of the Corporation. Accordingly, the financial statements of
the Corporation prior to the Pharmacy Transaction reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of KPS, which during the historical periods presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, was a wholly owned
subsidiary of Kindred. Following the Pharmacy Transaction, the financial statements reflect the financial position, results of operation and cash flows of the Corporation. The results of operations of PharMerica LTC are included in the results of
operations of the Corporation beginning August 1, 2007.

Prior to the closing of the Pharmacy Transaction, the
Corporation had no assets or liabilities and conducted no business activity. Prior to the closing of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporations business was operated as two separate businesses within two different public companies, Kindred and
AmerisourceBergen.

Principles of Consolidation; Parent Allocations

For all periods prior to the Pharmacy Transaction, the accompanying consolidated financial statements present the historical results of
KPSs operations during each respective period. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements include allocations of certain expenses, as well as assets and liabilities, historically maintained by Kindred and not recorded in the accounts
of KPS. Prior to the Pharmacy Transaction, Kindred corporate expenses were allocated based upon either the identification of specific costs or as a percentage of KPS revenues, where applicable. Allocated costs may not necessarily be indicative of
the costs that would have been incurred by KPS if it had operated as a separate entity. All inter-company transactions have been eliminated.

Reclassifications

For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation has reclassified $27.9 million
from Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges to provision for doubtful accounts, a component of Selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of operations. The $27.9 million increase in the
allowance for doubtful accounts is related to the acquired receivables of PharMerica LTC as of July 31, 2007, and is unrelated to the accounts receivable and revenue of KPS. This reclassification has no impact on the Corporations total
assets, liabilities, stockholders equity, net income (loss) or cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Use of
Estimates

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP which require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Significant estimates are involved in collectibility of accounts receivable, revenue recognition, inventory valuation, supplier rebates, the valuation of long-lived assets and goodwill, accounting for income taxes and stock based
compensation. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates.



F-8



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



Potential risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the
Corporation, include, but are not necessarily limited to, such factors as overall economic, financial and business conditions; delays and reductions in reimbursement by the government and other payers to the Corporation and/or its customers; the
overall financial condition of the Corporations customers; the effect of new government regulations, executive orders and/or legislative initiatives, including those relating to reimbursement and drug pricing policies and changes in the
interpretation and application of such policies; efforts by payers to control costs; the outcome of litigation; the outcome of audit, compliance, administrative or investigatory reviews, including governmental/ regulatory inquiries; other contingent
liabilities; changes in international economic and political conditions; changes in interest rates; changes in the valuation of the Corporations financial instruments; changes in tax laws and regulations; access to capital and financing; the
demand for the Corporations products and services; pricing and other competitive factors in the industry; changes in manufacturers rebate programs; shifts in demand for generic drug equivalents; changes in insurance claims experience and
related assumptions; variations in costs or expenses; and changes in accounting rules and standards.

Non-Controlling Interests in
Consolidated Entities

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all assets, liabilities, revenues, and
expenses of less-than-100% owned entities that the Corporation controls. Accordingly, the Corporation recorded non-controlling interests in the earnings and equity of such entities. The Corporation records adjustments to non-controlling interests
for the allocable portion of income or loss to which the non-controlling interest holders are entitled based upon their portion of certain subsidiaries that they own. For the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 non-controlling interests were
$1.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and recorded in cost of goods sold in our consolidated statements of operations.

On July 9, 2008, the Corporation purchased the 49.0% non-controlling interest held by a third-party.

Cash and Cash
Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and cash equivalents with original maturities of three
months or less. The Corporation places its cash in financial institutions that are federally insured. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Corporation did not hold a material amount of funds in cash equivalent money market accounts. Management
believes it effectively safeguards cash assets given current economic conditions.

Derivative Instruments

The Corporation had an interest rate swap to manage interest rate risk that matured on July 31, 2009. The Corporation prohibits the use
of derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Changes in the fair value of derivatives deemed to be eligible for hedge accounting are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) exclusive of ineffective amounts which
are reported in interest expense.



F-9



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based upon assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such
assumptions, the Corporation follows a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2: Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that
are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the
reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of
the following three valuation techniques:



| | A. | Market approach: Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B. | Cost approach: Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | C. | Income approach: Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based upon market expectations (including present value techniques,
option-pricing and excess earnings models).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial assets and liabilities disclosed at fair value at
December 31, 2008 and 2009 are set forth in the table below (dollars in millions):



|                                |  |                   |      |   |         |   |         |  |   |         |   |  |                    |      |   |  |  
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---- | - | ------- | - | ------- |  | - | ------- | - |  | ------------------ | ---- | - |  | -
|As of December 31, 2009         |  | Asset/(Liability) |      |   | Level 1 |   | Level 2 |  |   | Level 3 |   |  | ValuationTechnique
|Deferred Compensation Plan      |  | $                 | (2.9 | ) |         | $ |        |  | $ | (2.9    | ) |  | $                  |     |   |  | A
|Contingent Consideration        |  | $                 | (1.7 | ) |         | $ |        |  | $ |        |   |  | $                  | (1.7 | ) |  | C
|                                |  |                   |      |   |        
|As of December 31, 2008         |  | Asset/(Liability) |      |   | Level 1 |   | Level 2 |  |   | Level 3 |   |  | ValuationTechnique
|Derivative Financial Instrument |  | $                 | (4.9 | ) |         | $ |        |  | $ | (4.9    | ) |  | $                  |     |   |  | C
|Deferred Compensation Plan      |  | $                 | (1.4 | ) |         | $ |        |  | $ | (1.4    | ) |  | $                  |     |   |  | A

The deferred compensation plan represents an unfunded obligation associated with the
deferred compensation plan offered to eligible employees and Board members of the Corporation. The fair value of the liability associated with the deferred compensation plan is derived using pricing and other relevant information for similar assets
or liabilities generated by market transactions. The contingent consideration represents a future earn-out associated with our acquisition of an institutional pharmacy in West Virginia (West Virginia Acquisition). The fair value of the
liability associated with the contingent consideration is derived using the income approach with unobservable inputs, which include future gross profit forecast and present value assumptions, which there is little or no market data. There was no
change in the fair value of the Level 3 liability at December 31, 2009. The derivative financial instrument represented an interest rate swap. The interest rate swaps fair value was derived using a pricing model predicated upon observable
market inputs. The interest rate swap expired on July 31, 2009.



F-10



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets for cash
and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Corporations debt approximates fair value due to the terms of the interest being set
at variable market interest rates.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable primarily consist of amounts due from Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs) under Medicare Part D, institutional
healthcare providers, the respective state Medicaid programs, third party insurance companies, and private payers. The Corporations ability to collect outstanding receivables is critical to its results of operations and cash flows. To provide
for accounts receivable that could become uncollectible in the future, the Corporation establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce the carrying value of such receivables to the extent it is probable that a portion or all of a particular
account will not be collected.

The Corporation has an established process to determine the adequacy of the allowance for
doubtful accounts, which relies on analytical tools, specific identification, and benchmarks to arrive at a reasonable allowance. No single statistic or measurement determines the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In evaluating the
collectibility of accounts receivable, the Corporation considers a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to, the impact of changes in the regulatory and payer environment, historical trends, the financial viability of the payer,
contractual reimbursement terms and other factors that may impact ultimate reimbursement. Accounts receivable are written off after collection efforts have been completed in accordance with the Corporations policies.

The Corporations accounts receivable accounts and summarized aging categories are as follows (dollars in millions):



|                                   |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- | - | ---------------- | - | ----- | -
|                                   |  | December 31,2008 |       |   | December 31,2009 |  
|Institutional healthcare providers |  | $                | 148.0 |   |                  | $ | 138.7 |  
|Medicare Part D                    |  |                  | 59.5  |   |                  |   | 60.2  |  
|Private payor and other            |  |                  | 35.9  |   |                  |   | 34.5  |  
|Insured                            |  |                  | 10.4  |   |                  |   | 9.7   |  
|Medicaid                           |  |                  | 9.4   |   |                  |   | 10.9  |  
|Medicare                           |  |                  | 2.6   |   |                  |   | 1.5   |  
|Allowance for doubtful accounts    |  |                  | (46.5 | ) |                  |   | (40.2 | )
|                                   |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|                                   |  | $                | 219.3 |   |                  | $ | 215.3 |  
|                                   |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|0 to 60 days                       |  |                  | 64.1  | % |                  |   | 64.9  | %
|61 to 120 days                     |  |                  | 18.1  | % |                  |   | 17.1  | %
|Over 120 days                      |  |                  | 17.8  | % |                  |   | 18.0  | %
|                                   |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  
|                                   |  |                  | 100.0 | % |                  |   | 100.0 | %
|                                   |  |                  |       |   |                  |   |       |  



F-11



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



The following is a summary of activity in the Corporations allowance for doubtful
accounts (dollars in millions):



|                                 |  |                  |      |                        |   |                             |  |            |      |  |               |       |   |  |   |     
|-------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ---- | ---------------------- | - | --------------------------- |  | ---------- | ---- |  | ------------- | ----- | - |  | - | ----
|                                 |  | BeginningBalance |      | Acquisitions/Transfers |   | Charges toCosts andExpenses |  | Write-offs |      |  | EndingBalance
|Allowance for doubtful accounts: |  |                  |      |                        |   |                             |  |            |      |  |               |       |   |  |   |     
|Year Ended December 31, 2007     |  | $                | 16.6 |                        | $ | 25.7                        |  | $          | 44.1 |  | $             | (43.0 | ) |  | $ | 43.4
|Year Ended December 31, 2008     |  | $                | 43.4 |                        | $ | 0.3                         |  | $          | 24.7 |  | $             | (21.9 | ) |  | $ | 46.5
|Year Ended December 31, 2009     |  | $                | 46.5 |                        | $ | 3.5                         |  | $          | 16.6 |  | $             | (26.4 | ) |  | $ | 40.2

The allowance for doubtful accounts for 2009 included a transfer of reserves on
contractual adjustments into the allowance for doubtful accounts during the period. The reclassification did not impact the provision for bad debt for the current period.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, the Corporation performed a comprehensive assessment of the allowance for doubtful accounts estimation methodologies and reserve levels in light of its
expectations around the ultimate collection of its accounts receivable balances. As noted above, the Corporation considered recent industry trends, changes in reimbursement sources and procedures, age of receivables and recent collection history. In
connection with that comprehensive assessment of allowance for doubtful accounts, included in amounts charged to costs and expenses was a change in accounting estimate to increase the allowance for doubtful accounts by $27.9 million, resulting in a
loss per share impact of $0.84.

The change in accounting estimate of $27.9 million representing an increase in the allowance
for doubtful accounts is related to the acquired receivables of PharMerica LTC as of July 31, 2007, and is unrelated to the accounts receivable and revenue of KPS. This amount was charged to provision for doubtful accounts, as a component of
selling, general and administrative expenses, however, the related revenue had never been recorded in the accounts of either the Corporation or its predecessor entity, KPS.

Concentration of Credit Risk

For the year ended December 31, 2009,
the Corporation derived approximately 13.0% of its revenues from a single customer, including all payer sources associated with the residents of its long-term care facilities.

Deferred Financing Fees

The Corporation capitalizes deferred financing
fees related to acquiring or issuing new debt instruments. These expenditures include bank fees and premiums, legal costs, and filing fees. The Corporation amortizes these deferred financing fees using the straight-line method.

Inventory

Inventory is
located at the Corporations institutional pharmacy locations. Inventory consists solely of finished products (primarily prescription drugs) and is valued at the lower of first-in, first-out cost (FIFO) or market. Physical inventories are
performed on a quarterly basis at all pharmacy sites. Cost of goods sold is recorded based upon the actual results of the physical inventory counts, and is estimated when a physical inventory is not performed in a particular month. Historically, no
significant adjustments have resulted from reconciliations with the quarterly physical inventories.



F-12



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



Equipment and leasehold improvements

Equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at cost at the acquisition date and are depreciated using the straight-line method over
their estimated useful lives as follows (in years):



|                       |  |                      
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------
|                       |  | EstimatedUseful Lives
|Leasehold improvements |  | 1-5                  
|Equipment and software |  | 3-10                 
|Leased equipment       |  | 1-5                  

Expenditures for maintenance, repairs and renewals of minor items are expensed as
incurred and included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Major rebuilds and improvements are capitalized. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, maintenance and repairs were approximately $5.2 million, $7.3 million,
and $6.4 million, respectively.

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is assessed by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the estimated future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by
the asset. If estimated future undiscounted net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset or group of assets, the asset is considered impaired and an expense is recorded in an amount required to reduce the carrying amount of the
asset to its then fair value. The Corporation did not record impairment charges on equipment and leasehold improvements for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 or 2009.

The Corporations equipment and leasehold improvements are further described in Note 3.

Capitalization of Internal Software Costs

The Corporation capitalizes the costs incurred during the application development stage, which include costs to design the software configuration and interfaces, coding, installation, and testing. Costs
incurred during the preliminary project along with post-implementation stages of internal use computer software are expensed as incurred. Capitalized development costs are amortized over various periods up to three years and are subject to
impairment evaluations. Costs incurred to maintain existing software development are expensed as incurred. The capitalization and ongoing assessment of recoverability of development costs requires judgment by management with respect to certain
external factors, including, but not limited to, technological and economic feasibility and estimated economic life. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Corporation capitalized software development costs of $1.6 million and $2.5
million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, net capitalized software costs totaled $7.5 million and $6.9 million, respectively.

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill represents the excess purchase price of an acquired entity over the
net amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are reviewed by the Corporation at least annually for impairment, each of which are reviewed separately for impairment. The
Corporations business is comprised of two reporting units, institutional pharmacy and hospital management, each of which are reviewed separately for impairment. The Corporation performed its annual impairment tests for goodwill recorded as of
December 31, 2009, and did not incur an impairment charge.



F-13



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



The Corporations finite lived intangible assets are comprised primarily of trade
names, customer relationship assets and non-compete agreements originating from business acquisitions. Finite lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the agreements ranging from 5 to 20 years. For impairment
review, intangible assets are reviewed on a specific pharmacy basis or as a group of pharmacies depending on the intangible assets under review. The Corporations goodwill and intangible assets are further described in Note 4.

During the fourth quarter 2008, the Corporation recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $14.8 million, related to finite lived
customer relationships. The impairment, which related to the Institutional Pharmacy segment, was incurred when the reporting unit experienced a higher than expected loss of licensed beds. The impairment was related to intangible assets acquired in
acquisitions by KPS during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006. In addition, these asset groups were assessed for recoverability and management determined the finite lived customer relationship assets to be impaired, but no other assets
within the asset groups were deemed to be impaired. Using an undiscounted cash flow analysis, the Corporation determined that a pre-tax impairment charge of $14.8 million was required to write the carrying value down to the fair value resulting
in a loss per diluted share impact of $0.30. The Corporation recognized the impairment as a permanent write-down of the cost basis and accumulated amortization of the affected assets.

Self-Insured Employee Health Benefits

The Corporation is self-insured for
employee health benefits. The Corporations self-insurance for employee health benefits includes a stop-loss policy to limit the maximum potential liability of the Corporation for both individual and aggregate claims per year. The
Corporation records a monthly expense for self-insurance based on historical claims data and inputs from third-party administrators. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Corporation had approximately $2.6 million and $1.5 million,
respectively, recorded as a liability for self-insured employee health benefits.

In September 2008, the Corporation recorded a
benefit of a $2.1 million refund as a result of over charges on the self-insured employee health benefits of which approximately $1.2 million related to charges from August 2007 through December 2007.

Supplier Rebates

The
Corporation receives rebates on purchases from its vendors and suppliers. The Corporation generally accounts for these rebates and other incentives received from its vendors and suppliers, relating to the purchase or distribution of inventory, as a
reduction of cost of goods sold and inventory. The Corporation considers these rebates to represent product discounts, and as a result, the rebates are capitalized as a reduction of product cost and relieved through cost of goods sold upon the sale
of the related inventory. For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, rebates were $31.7 million, $50.6 million, and $49.5 million, respectively, and recorded as a reduction of cost of goods sold in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations. Rebates for the year ended December 31, 2007, included $3.1 million related to the change in estimate more fully described below. The Corporation had approximately $2.9 million, $2.8 million, and $3.0 million, of
rebates capitalized in inventory as of December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.



F-14



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



Upon completion of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation refined the methods of
estimating rebates received from its vendors and suppliers. The change in estimate is driven primarily by managements experience in the industry and known facts and assumptions from the Pharmacy Transaction. The effect of the change in
accounting estimate on the Corporations operating results was income of $3.1 million, or $0.09, per diluted share for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Delivery expenses

The Corporation incurred expenses totaling approximately
$40.2 million, $61.9 million and $55.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, to deliver products sold to its customers. Delivery expenses are reported as a component of cost of goods sold in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

On July 31, 2007, the Corporation entered into an interest rate swap agreement, which the Corporation designated as a cash flow hedge.
The swap expired on July 31, 2009. The Corporation recognizes all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. Depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in
the fair value of the derivative are either offset against the change in fair value of assets and liabilities through earnings or recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the hedged item is recognized into earnings. The
ineffective portion of a derivatives change in fair value, if any, is immediately recognized into earnings.

The changes
in the fair value of the interest rate swap for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, resulted in comprehensive income (loss) of $(2.6) million, $(0.2) million and $2.8 million, net of income taxes, respectively.

Stock Based Compensation

The Corporation recognizes compensation expense based on the grant date fair value. The following table summarizes stock compensation of the Corporation for the periods presented (dollars in millions, except per share amounts):



|                                              |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ----- | -
|                                              |  | Years Ended December 31, |      
|                                              |  | 2007                     |       |   | 2008 |   |       | 2009 | 
|Nonvested stock and stock option expense      |  | $                        | 1.5   |   |      | $ | 4.9   |      |  | $ | 4.6   |  
|Income tax benefit                            |  | $                        | 0.5   |   |      | $ | 1.9   |      |  | $ | 1.8   |  
|Negative effect on earnings per diluted share |  | $                        | (0.05 | ) |      | $ | (0.10 | )    |  | $ | (0.09 | )

Stock based compensation is more fully described in Note 9.



F-15



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 1ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)



Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Corporation
accrues for probable tax obligations as required by facts and circumstances in the various regulatory environments. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are more fully described in Note 10.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Management reviewed the most recently issued accounting pronouncements as of December 31, 2009, and determined that none were applicable to the Corporation.

Subsequent Events

The
Corporation has evaluated all of the subsequent events through the date of this filing. The Corporation does not believe there are any material subsequent events which require disclosure.

NOTE 2ACQUISITIONS

2009
Acquisitions

Integrity Pharmacy Services Acquisition

On December 31, 2009, the Corporation through a wholly-owned subsidiary, acquired all of the membership interests in Integrity Pharmacy
Services, LLC (IPS), and Integrity Medical Supplies, LLC (IMS and together with IPS, Integrity), for $38.0 million in cash plus $3.3 million to pay off outstanding promissory notes to the sellers. The
Corporations primary purpose in acquiring Integrity was to increase the Corporations market share in certain regions.

The acquisition of Integrity has been accounted for as a business combination using the acquisition method of accounting. The total purchase price of Integrity was allocated to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based upon
their fair values on December 31, 2009. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. For tax purposes, the transaction was considered an asset
acquisition, therefore, the amount of goodwill recorded in the transaction of $11.6 million will be tax deductible to the Corporation. The Corporation believes the resulting amount of goodwill reflects its expectations of the synergistic benefits of
being able to fully integrate the Integrity business into its existing institutional pharmacy locations.

Except for
identifiable intangible assets, and equipment and leasehold improvements, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were valued at their respective carrying amounts recorded by Integrity as the Corporation believes that their carrying value
amounts approximate their fair value at the acquisition date.



F-16



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 2ACQUISITIONS (Continued)



The purchase price of Integrity is considered preliminary. The terms of the securities
purchase agreement state that an amount of $4.8 million be placed in escrow, comprised of a $3.8 million as a Receivables Holdback and a $1.0 million as an Indemnity Holdback. The Receivables Holdback will remain in escrow
until the closing receivables acquired are paid or are released to the sellers pursuant to the terms of the agreement. The Indemnity Holdback will be used to satisfy payments required to be made by the sellers, if any, pursuant to the
indemnification obligations defined within the purchase agreement. Any escrow amounts that are not ultimately distributed to the sellers will be a reduction of the excess purchase price assigned to goodwill. The terms of the purchase agreement also
states that a working capital adjustment shall be made subsequent to the acquisition date by either the seller or the Corporation, to the extent the target net working capital amounts (as defined by the agreement) were not met at the closing. The
working capital will continue to change as the buyers and sellers have yet to agree to the final working capital amounts and will settle the working capital amount in fiscal year 2010. Therefore, because of the working capital adjustments and the
holdbacks, the purchase price is considered preliminary.

The preliminary purchase price allocation was as follows (dollars in
millions):



|                                     |  |   |      |  
|------------------------------------ |  | - | ---- | -
|Current assets, net of cash acquired |  | $ | 9.8  |  
|Equipment and leasehold improvements |  |   | 1.2  |  
|Identifiable intangible assets       |  |   | 20.6 |  
|Goodwill                             |  |   | 11.6 |  
|                                     |  |   |      |  
|Total assets                         |  |   | 43.2 |  
|Current liabilities                  |  |   | (4.4 | )
|                                     |  |   |      |  
|Purchase price, net of cash acquired |  | $ | 38.8 |  
|                                     |  |   |      |  

The following are the fair values of the equipment and leasehold improvements of
Integrity acquired at the date of acquisition (dollars in millions):



|                                                    |  |            |     |                              |    
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | --- | ---------------------------- | ---
|                                                    |  | Fair Value |     | Weighted AverageUseful Lives
|Leasehold improvements                              |  | $          | 0.3 |                              | 7.0
|Equipment and software                              |  |            | 0.9 |                              | 4.0
|                                                    |  |            |     |                              |    
|Total equipment and leasehold improvements acquired |  | $          | 1.2 |                              | 5.1
|                                                    |  |            |     |                              |    

The following are the fair values of the identifiable intangible assets of Integrity
acquired at the date of acquisition (dollars in millions):



|                                              |  |            |      |                              |     
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | ---- | ---------------------------- | ----
|                                              |  | Fair Value |      | Weighted AverageUseful Lives
|Non-competition agreement                     |  | $          | 0.2  |                              | 5.0 
|Customer relationships                        |  |            | 20.4 |                              | 15.0
|                                              |  |            |      |                              |     
|Total identifiable intangible assets acquired |  | $          | 20.6 |                              | 14.9
|                                              |  |            |      |                              |     



F-17



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 2ACQUISITIONS (Continued)



West Virginia Acquisition

On August 10, 2009, the Corporation acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of an institutional pharmacy business
providing medications, pharmacy and medical supplies and services to residents of long-term care facilities mostly in West Virginia. The Corporation paid $15.9 million in cash for the business, with an additional amount not to exceed $10.0 million
in the form of contingent consideration to be paid at the end of a three year period based upon the cumulative achievement of certain financial performance measures. The transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, in
which the preliminary purchase price was allocated based upon the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the difference recorded as goodwill. As a result of the acquisition the Company recorded $4.4 million as finite lived
intangible assets and $12.6 million of goodwill. The contingent consideration was recorded at fair value at the acquisition date in the amount of $1.7 million. The contingent consideration will be adjusted to fair value through earnings until the
final amount is determined.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation has incurred $1.0 million of
acquisition related costs, which have been classified as a component of integration, merger, acquisition related costs and other charges. Prior to January 1, 2009, costs associated with acquisitions were capitalized as a part of the respective
purchase price.

2008 Acquisitions

On November 1, 2008, the Corporation acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of an institutional pharmacy business providing medications, pharmacy, and medical supplies and services
to residents of long-term care facilities for $21.5 million in cash. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase, in which the purchase price was allocated based upon the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed with the
difference recorded as goodwill. As a result of the acquisition the Corporation recorded $17.2 million as a finite lived intangible customer relationship and $2.0 million as goodwill.

On July 9, 2008, the Corporation purchased the 49.0% non-controlling interest held by a third-party in the Corporations joint
ventures. The Corporation paid approximately $4.4 million in cash for the non-controlling interest share of the joint ventures. The amount paid for the non-controlling interest share of the joint ventures approximates fair value and resulted in the
recognition of $0.2 million in goodwill as a result of the transaction, of which approximately $0.1 million included professional fees capitalized as part of the purchase price.

2007 Acquisitions

On the Closing Date, the Corporation completed
the Pharmacy Transaction. As discussed in Note 1, the Pharmacy Transaction was accounted for as an acquisition by KPS of PharMerica LTC. In the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation issued 30.0 million shares of common stock, of which Kindred
and AmerisourceBergen stockholders each received 15.0 million shares. The aggregate purchase price was $436.4 million, comprised primarily of the 15.0 million shares of common stock of the Corporation issued to AmerisourceBergen
stockholders, with a fair value of $251.4 million, and the assumption of long-term debt related to the dividend payment to AmerisourceBergen of $125.0 million before the Pharmacy Transaction. The fair value of the common stock issued by the
Corporation was calculated using the opening stock price on August 1, 2007. The total purchase price of PharMerica LTC was allocated to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based upon their estimated fair values as of the Closing
Date. The excess of the purchase price



F-18



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 2ACQUISITIONS (Continued)



over the estimated fair values of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. For tax purposes, the assets acquired were recorded by the Corporation under the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code at the respective assets carryover basis. The results of operations of PharMerica LTC were included in the results of operations of the Corporation beginning August 1, 2007.

The following are the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisition (dollars in
millions):



|                                                                                                              |  |   |      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | -----
|Fair value of 15.0 million shares at $16.76 per share issued to PharMerica LTC                                |  | $ | 251.4
|Fair value of the liabilities assumed:                                                                        |  |   |      
|Current liabilities                                                                                           |  |   | 32.6 
|Capital lease obligations                                                                                     |  |   | 0.1  
|Deferred tax liabilities                                                                                      |  |   | 14.0 
|Long-term liabilities                                                                                         |  |   | 7.1  
|PharMerica LTC debt borrowing to fund cash distribution to parent in connection with the Pharmacy Transaction |  |   | 125.0
|                                                                                                              |  |   |      
|Total fair value of liabilities assumed                                                                       |  |   | 178.8
|                                                                                                              |  |   |      
|Total fair value of liabilities assumed and shares issued                                                     |  |   | 430.2
|Legal, advisory and other acquisition costs incurred by KPS                                                   |  |   | 7.9  
|                                                                                                              |  |   |      
|Total purchase price                                                                                          |  | $ | 438.1
|                                                                                                              |  |   |      
|The allocation of the purchase price was as follows:                                                          |  |   |      
|Current assets                                                                                                |  | $ | 242.3
|Equipment and leasehold improvements                                                                          |  |   | 32.8 
|Identifiable intangible assets                                                                                |  |   | 44.5 
|Other assets                                                                                                  |  |   | 52.3 
|Goodwill                                                                                                      |  |   | 66.2 
|                                                                                                              |  |   |      
|                                                                                                              |  | $ | 438.1
|                                                                                                              |  |   |      

The following are the fair values of the equipment and leasehold improvements of
PharMerica LTC acquired at the date of acquisition (dollars in millions):



|                                                    |  |            |      |                              |    
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | ---- | ---------------------------- | ---
|                                                    |  | Fair Value |      | Weighted AverageUseful Lives
|Leasehold improvements                              |  | $          | 4.1  |                              | 0.8
|Equipment and software                              |  |            | 28.0 |                              | 3.7
|Leased equipment                                    |  |            | 0.7  |                              | 1.3
|                                                    |  |            |      |                              |    
|Total equipment and leasehold improvements acquired |  | $          | 32.8 |                              | 2.5
|                                                    |  |            |      |                              |    



F-19



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 2ACQUISITIONS (Continued)



The following are the fair values of the identifiable intangible assets of PharMerica
LTC acquired at the date of acquisition (dollars in millions):



|                                              |  |            |      |                              |     
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------- | ---- | ---------------------------- | ----
|                                              |  | Fair Value |      | Weighted AverageUseful Lives
|Trade namePharMerica                         |  | $          | 27.6 |                              | 20.0
|Trade nameMedMate                            |  |            | 0.3  |                              | 20.0
|Non-competition agreement                     |  |            | 0.2  |                              | 5.0 
|Customer relationships                        |  |            | 16.4 |                              | 15.0
|                                              |  |            |      |                              |     
|Total identifiable intangible assets acquired |  | $          | 44.5 |                              | 17.6
|                                              |  |            |      |                              |     

Other

The total amount of goodwill expected to be deductible for tax purposes from the acquisitions of the Corporation is $102.3 million as of December 31, 2009. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
further described in Note 10.

Pro forma

The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of operations or financial condition of the Corporation that
would have been reported had the acquisitions been completed as of the date or for the periods presented, and should not be taken as representative of the future consolidated results of operations or financial condition of the Corporation.

The unaudited pro forma effect of the 2008 Acquisitions, Integrity and West Virginia acquisition assuming the acquisition
occurred on January 1, 2008, excluding the impairment charge and integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, would be as follows (dollars in millions, except per share
amounts):



|                           |  |                                 |         |      |   |        
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ------- | ---- | - | -------
|                           |  | For the years endedDecember 31,
|                           |  | 2008                            |         | 2009
|Revenues                   |  | $                               | 2,052.1 |      | $ | 1,917.9
|Net income                 |  | $                               | 33.0    |      | $ | 47.0   
|Earnings per common share: |  |                                 |         |      |   |        
|Basic                      |  | $                               | 1.10    |      | $ | 1.54   
|Diluted                    |  | $                               | 1.10    |      | $ | 1.54   



F-20



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 3EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS (Continued)



Equipment and leasehold improvements consist of the following as of December 31,
(dollars in millions):



|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | -
|                                           |  | 2008 |       |   | 2009 |  
|Leasehold improvements                     |  | $    | 8.9   |   |      | $ | 11.6  |  
|Equipment and software                     |  |      | 83.2  |   |      |   | 95.3  |  
|Leased equipment                           |  |      | 0.7   |   |      |   | 2.6   |  
|Construction in progress                   |  |      | 4.3   |   |      |   | 10.1  |  
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|                                           |  |      | 97.1  |   |      |   | 119.6 |  
|Accumulated depreciation                   |  |      | (43.1 | ) |      |   | (59.0 | )
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Total equipment and leasehold improvements |  | $    | 54.0  |   |      | $ | 60.6  |  
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |       |  



|                                      |  |                            |       |   |           |   |       |           |  |   |                            |   |  |           |       |   |           |   |       |                            |  |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- | - | --------- | - | ----- | --------- |  | - | -------------------------- | - |  | --------- | ----- | - | --------- | - | ----- | -------------------------- |  | - | ---- | - |  | - | ----- | -
|                                      |  | Balance atDecember 31,2007 |       |   | Additions |   |       | Disposals |  |   | Balance atDecember 31,2008 |   |  | Additions |       |   | Disposals |   |       | Balance atDecember 31,2009 | 
|Equipment and leasehold improvements: |  |                            |       |   |           |   |       |           |  |   |                            |   |  |           |       |   |           |   |       |                            |  |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Leasehold improvements                |  | $                          | 9.0   |   |           | $ | 2.1   |           |  | $ | (2.2                       | ) |  | $         | 8.9   |   |           | $ | 3.5   |                            |  | $ | (0.8 | ) |  | $ | 11.6  |  
|Equipment and software                |  |                            | 76.5  |   |           |   | 17.9  |           |  |   | (11.2                      | ) |  |           | 83.2  |   |           |   | 14.1  |                            |  |   | (2.0 | ) |  |   | 95.3  |  
|Leased equipment                      |  |                            | 0.7   |   |           |   |      |           |  |   |                           |   |  |           | 0.7   |   |           |   | 1.9   |                            |  |   |     |   |  |   | 2.6   |  
|Construction in progress              |  |                            | 1.2   |   |           |   | 3.2   |           |  |   | (0.1                       | ) |  |           | 4.3   |   |           |   | 5.8   |                            |  |   |     |   |  |   | 10.1  |  
|                                      |  |                            |       |   |           |   |       |           |  |   |                            |   |  |           |       |   |           |   |       |                            |  |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Sub Total                             |  |                            | 87.4  |   |           |   | 23.2  |           |  |   | (13.5                      | ) |  |           | 97.1  |   |           |   | 25.3  |                            |  |   | (2.8 | ) |  |   | 119.6 |  
|Accumulated depreciation              |  |                            | (30.0 | ) |           |   | (22.0 | )         |  |   | 8.9                        |   |  |           | (43.1 | ) |           |   | (18.0 | )                          |  |   | 2.1  |   |  |   | (59.0 | )
|                                      |  |                            |       |   |           |   |       |           |  |   |                            |   |  |           |       |   |           |   |       |                            |  |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Total                                 |  | $                          | 57.4  |   |           | $ | 1.2   |           |  | $ | (4.6                       | ) |  | $         | 54.0  |   |           | $ | 7.3   |                            |  | $ | (0.7 | ) |  | $ | 60.6  |  
|                                      |  |                            |       |   |           |   |       |           |  |   |                            |   |  |           |       |   |           |   |       |                            |  |   |      |   |  |   |       |  

Fixed asset additions include approximately $2.4 million of assets acquired as a
result of the 2009 Acquisitions. Depreciation expense totaled approximately $15.6 million, $22.0 million, and $18.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.

Total estimated depreciation expense for the Corporations equipment and leasehold improvements for the next five years and thereafter
are as follows (dollars in millions):



|                         |  |   |     
|------------------------ |  | - | ----
|Year Ending December 31, |  |  
|2010                     |  | $ | 16.9
|2011                     |  |   | 12.3
|2012                     |  |   | 8.5 
|2013                     |  |   | 4.9 
|2014                     |  |   | 3.0 
|Thereafter               |  |   | 15.0
|                         |  |   |     
|Total                    |  | $ | 60.6
|                         |  |   |     



F-21



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 4GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES



The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the two
years ended December 31, 2009 (dollars in millions):



|                                                                       |  |   |      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | -----
|Balance at December 31, 2007                                           |  | $ | 111.3
|Purchase adjustments to Goodwill recorded from acquisitions            |  |   | 0.7  
|Goodwill acquired from 2008 acquisitions                               |  |   | 1.7  
|                                                                       |  |   |      
|Balance at December 31, 2008                                           |  |   | 113.7
|                                                                       |  |   |      
|Release of escrow deposit from 2008 acquisition                        |  |   | 0.5  
|Tax related and other adjustments associated with Pharmacy Transaction |  |   | 1.7  
|Goodwill acquired from 2009 acquisitions                               |  |   | 24.2 
|                                                                       |  |   |      
|Balance at December 31, 2009                                           |  | $ | 140.1
|                                                                       |  |   |      

The changes in goodwill relate to prior acquisitions and the acquisitions of the
current year. The Corporation does not have any accumulated impairments that reduce the gross value of goodwill.

The
following table presents the components of the Corporations intangible assets at December 31 (dollars in millions):



|                               |  |                             |       |   |           |   |      |            |  |   |                             |   |  |           |       |   |                             |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------------- | ----- | - | --------- | - | ---- | ---------- |  | - | --------------------------- | - |  | --------- | ----- | - | --------------------------- | - | ---- | - |  | - | ----- | -
|Finite Lived Intangible Assets |  | Balance atDecember 31, 2007 |       |   | Additions |   |      | Impairment |  |   | Balance atDecember 31, 2008 |   |  | Additions |       |   | Balance atDecember 31, 2009 |  
|Customer relationships         |  | $                           | 57.4  |   |           | $ | 17.2 |            |  | $ | (21.5                       | ) |  | $         | 53.1  |   |                             | $ | 23.5 |   |  | $ | 76.6  |  
|Trade name                     |  |                             | 27.9  |   |           |   |     |            |  |   |                            |   |  |           | 27.9  |   |                             |   | 0.6  |   |  |   | 28.5  |  
|Non-compete agreement          |  |                             | 2.4   |   |           |   |     |            |  |   |                            |   |  |           | 2.4   |   |                             |   | 2.3  |   |  |   | 4.7   |  
|                               |  |                             |       |   |           |   |      |            |  |   |                             |   |  |           |       |   |                             |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Sub Total                      |  |                             | 87.7  |   |           |   | 17.2 |            |  |   | (21.5                       | ) |  |           | 83.4  |   |                             |   | 26.4 |   |  |   | 109.8 |  
|Accumulated amortization       |  |                             | (10.2 | ) |           |   | (6.5 | )          |  |   | 6.7                         |   |  |           | (10.0 | ) |                             |   | (9.0 | ) |  |   | (19.0 | )
|                               |  |                             |       |   |           |   |      |            |  |   |                             |   |  |           |       |   |                             |   |      |   |  |   |       |  
|Net intangible assets          |  | $                           | 77.5  |   |           | $ | 10.7 |            |  | $ | (14.8                       | ) |  | $         | 73.4  |   |                             | $ | 17.4 |   |  | $ | 90.8  |  
|                               |  |                             |       |   |           |   |      |            |  |   |                             |   |  |           |       |   |                             |   |      |   |  |   |       |  

Intangible assets included $25.0 million of assets acquired as a result of the 2009
Acquisitions. Amortization expense relating to finite lived intangible assets was approximately $5.0 million, $6.5 million and $9.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively.

During the fourth quarter 2008, the Corporation recorded a pre-tax impairment charge of $14.8 million, related to finite lived customer
relationships. The impairment, which related to the Institutional Pharmacy segment, was incurred when the reporting unit experienced a higher than expected loss of licensed beds. The impairment was related to intangible assets acquired in
acquisitions by KPS during the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006. These asset groups were assessed for recoverability and management determined the finite lived customer relationship assets to be impaired, but no other assets within the
asset groups were deemed to be impaired. Using an undiscounted cash flow analysis, the Corporation determined the pre-tax impairment charge of $14.8 million was required to write the carrying value down to the fair value, resulting in a loss
per diluted share impact of $0.30. The Corporation recognized the impairment as a permanent write-down of the cost basis and accumulated amortization of the affected assets.



F-22



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 4GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES (Continued)



Total estimated amortization expense for the Corporations finite lived intangible
assets for the next five years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in millions):



|                         |  |   |     
|------------------------ |  | - | ----
|Year Ending December 31, |  |  
|2010                     |  | $ | 8.5 
|2011                     |  |   | 7.0 
|2012                     |  |   | 6.6 
|2013                     |  |   | 6.5 
|2014                     |  |   | 6.5 
|Thereafter               |  |   | 55.7
|                         |  |   |     
|                         |  | $ | 90.8
|                         |  |   |     

NOTE 5CREDIT AGREEMENT

On the Closing Date, the Corporation entered into a credit agreement among the Corporation, the Lenders named therein, and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, N.A. (JPMorgan), as Administrative Agent (the Credit Agreement). The Credit Agreement consists of a $275.0 million term loan facility and a $150.0 million revolving credit facility. The Corporation borrowed $275.0
million under the term loan portion of the Credit Agreement and an additional $20.0 million under the revolving credit portion of the Credit Agreement on the Closing Date to refinance the initial financings entered into by KPS and PharMerica LTC, to
finance their respective cash distributions, to pay fees and expenses incurred in connection with the Pharmacy Transaction and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. Indebtedness under the Credit Agreement matures on July 31,
2012, at which time the commitment of the Lenders to make revolving loans also shall expire. There is no scheduled amortization under the term loan facility but the term loans are subject to certain prepayment obligations relating to asset sales,
casualty losses and the incurrence by the Corporation of certain indebtedness.

Prior to the Pharmacy Transaction, KPS and
PharMerica LTC each entered into a financing arrangement for daylight loans (Spin-Co Loans). The Spin-Co Loans were provided by a syndicate of lenders arranged by J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (JPMorgan) pursuant to a
commitment letter that KPS, PharMerica LTC, and the Corporation entered into with JPMorgan and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. on May 31, 2007. KPS and PharMerica LTC each obtained a $125.0 million loan under the Spin-Co Loans, for a total of $250.0
million, subject to certain adjustments for changes in working capital. The initial financings were funded immediately prior to closing of the Pharmacy Transaction.

The proceeds of the initial financings were used by KPS and PharMerica LTC to make the Kindred cash distribution and AmerisourceBergen cash distribution, respectively, prior to consummation of the
Pharmacy Transaction. The amounts of the distributions to Kindred and AmerisourceBergen were in the amounts of the indebtedness incurred by KPS and PharMerica LTC, respectively. The Spin-Co Loans were paid by the Corporation on July 31, 2007
with proceeds from the Credit Agreement.



F-23



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 5CREDIT AGREEMENT (Continued)



The table below summarizes the term debt and revolving credit facility of the
Corporation (dollars in millions):



|                                                                                                                    |  |                  |       |                  |   |      
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- | ---------------- | - | -----
|                                                                                                                    |  | December 31,2008 |       | December 31,2009
|2007 Credit Agreement:                                                                                              |  |                  |       |                  |   |      
|Term Debtpayable to lenders at LIBOR plus applicable margin (1.24% as of December 31, 2009), matures July 31,
2012 |  | $                | 240.0 |                  | $ | 240.0
|Revolving Credit Facility payable to lenders, interest at LIBOR plus applicable margin, matures July 31,
2012       |  |                  |      |                  |   |     
|                                                                                                                    |  |                  |       |                  |   |      
|Long-term debt                                                                                                      |  | $                | 240.0 |                  | $ | 240.0
|                                                                                                                    |  |                  |       |                  |   |      

Maturities of the Corporations long-term debt are as follows for the years
indicated (dollars in millions):



|                         |  |   |      
|------------------------ |  | - | -----
|Year Ending December 31, |  |  
|2010                     |  | $ |     
|2011                     |  |   |     
|2012                     |  |   | 240.0
|                         |  |   |      
|Total                    |  | $ | 240.0
|                         |  |   |      

The Credit Agreement provides for the issuance of letters of credit which, when
issued, reduce availability under the revolving credit facility. The aggregate amount of letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2009 was $2.3 million. After giving effect to the letters of credit, total availability under the
revolving credit facility was $147.7 million as of December 31, 2009. The revolving credit facility contains a $50.0 million accordion feature, which permits the Corporation to increase the size of the credit facility, up to an aggregate of
$200.0 million, subject to securing additional commitments from existing or new lenders.

Borrowings under the Credit
Agreement bear interest at a floating rate equal to, at our option, a base rate plus a margin between 0.0% and 0.75% per annum, or an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin between 0.625% and 1.75% per annum, in each case depending on the
leverage ratio of the Corporation. The base rate is the higher of the prime lending rate announced by JPMorgan in New York from time to time and the federal funds rate published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York plus 0.50%. The Credit
Agreement also provides for letter of credit participation fees between 0.625% and 1.75%, letter of credit fronting fees of 0.125%, and a commitment fee payable on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility, which shall accrue at a rate per
annum ranging from 0.125% to 0.250%, in each case depending on the leverage ratio of the Corporation.

The obligations of the
Corporation under and related to the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of its assets. Those obligations are guaranteed by many of the Corporations wholly owned subsidiaries and the obligations of the guarantors are secured by
substantially all of their assets. The foregoing includes a pledge of all of the equity interests of substantially all of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries and a portion of the equity interests of any future foreign subsidiaries. The
Credit Agreement also contains financial and non-financial affirmative and negative covenants, representations, warranties, and events of default that are customary to facilities of this nature.



F-24



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 5CREDIT AGREEMENT (Continued)



Covenants

The Credit Agreement requires the Corporation to satisfy a fixed charge coverage ratio and a leverage ratio. The minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, which is tested quarterly on a trailing four quarter
basis, can be no less than: 2.25:1.00 during the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009; and 2.50:1.00 thereafter. The maximum total leverage coverage ratio, which also is tested quarterly, cannot exceed 3.50:1.00 during the
period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009; and 3.00:1.00 thereafter. The maximum total leverage coverage ratio is not tested when at any time it is less than 2.00:1.00, or both S&P and Moodys shall have in effect corporate
credit ratings for the Corporation that are investment grade. Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the covenant requirements have become more restrictive, however, the Corporation remains compliant and has been compliant since the
consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction. In addition, capital expenditures (other than those funded with proceeds of asset sales or insurance) are restricted in any fiscal year to 3.0% of revenues.

The financial covenant requirements as defined by the Corporations Credit Agreement are as follows:



|                  |  |                                   |  |                                     |  |                      |  
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | -------------------- | -
|                  |  | Minimum FixedCharge CoverageRatio |  | Maximum TotalLeverageCoverage Ratio |  | Capital Expenditures |  
|December 31, 2007 |  | 2.57                              |  | 2.99                                |  | 1.40                 | %
|December 31, 2008 |  | 3.67                              |  | 1.99                                |  | 1.13                 | %
|December 31, 2009 |  | 5.09                              |  | 1.88                                |  | 1.17                 | %

In addition, the Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative
covenants, which among other things, limit the Corporations ability to incur additional debt, create liens, pay dividends, effect transactions with the Corporations affiliates, sell assets, pay subordinated debt, merge, consolidate,
enter into acquisitions, and effect sale leaseback transactions.

Deferred Financing Fees

The Corporation capitalized a total of $2.0 million in deferred financing fees associated with the Credit Agreement and recorded them as
other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The Corporation amortizes the financing fees under the straight-line method. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had $1.0 million of unamortized deferred financing fees.

NOTE 6COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Action and Regulatory

The Corporation is involved in certain legal
actions and regulatory investigations arising in the ordinary course of business. None of these legal proceedings are, in the opinion of management, expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or liquidity of the Corporation.

Effective October 1, 2007, CMS promulgated new rules under the Deficit
Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) changing the federal upper payment limit for Medicaid reimbursement from 150% of the lowest published price for a drug (which is usually the average wholesale price) to 250% of the lowest average manufacturer
price or AMP. Although the use of an AMP benchmark would have reduced Medicaid reimbursement rates for certain



F-25



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 6COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)



generic pharmaceuticals, it did not take effect due to a December 19, 2007 federal district court injunction against CMS prohibiting the agency from implementing the rule. The outcome of the
AMP litigation is uncertain, and there can be no assurance that changes in reimbursement formula under the DRA or future legislation or regulation will not have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.

Average wholesale price, or AWP, is a pricing benchmark published by First DataBank, Inc. in its Blue Book, which provides drug databases,
content integration software, and drug reference products. AWP has been widely used to calculate the majority of the Medicaid, Medicare Part A and Medicare Part D drug reimbursements payable to pharmacy providers. In 2005, several pension funds
brought an action against First DataBank and another healthcare provider alleging collusion to set AWPs for branded drugs.

On
March 30, 2009, the Court approved the settlement of the litigation. Pursuant to the settlement, First DataBank: (i) adjusted its reporting of Blue Book AWP for those prescription drugs (approximately 1,400 National Drug Codes, or NDCs in
number) identified in the plaintiffs previously filed complaint by reducing the mark-up factor utilized in connection with the calculation of the Blue Book AWP data field to 1.20 times the Wholesale Acquisition Cost, or WAC, or direct price
for those prescription drugs that are on a mark-up basis; and (ii) established a centralized data repository to facilitate reasonable access to discoverable material from First DataBank concerning its drug price reporting practices. The price
adjustment required under the provisions of the settlement agreement occurred on September 26, 2009.

Independent of the
settlement and on the same schedule as the Blue Book AWP adjustment noted above, First DataBank has applied the same 1.20 markup factor to all other NDCs, whose Blue Book AWP is set based upon a markup to WAC or direct price in excess of 1.20 times
WAC. First DataBank will also independently discontinue publishing the Blue Book AWP data field for all drugs no later than two years following the date that the Blue Book AWP adjustments noted above are implemented.

The Corporation and the vast preponderance of the Corporations PDPs, third party insurance companies and its Medicare Part A
customers have voluntarily agreed to adjust reimbursement so that pricing could not increase or decrease as a result of the changes to AWP; however, the state Medicaid programs have been unwilling to remain price neutral and accordingly the
Corporation is being reimbursed based on the adjusted AWP.

Acquisitions

The Corporation has historically acquired the assets of businesses with prior operating histories. Acquired companies may have unknown or
contingent liabilities, including liabilities for failure to comply with healthcare laws and regulations, medical, and general professional liabilities, workers compensation liabilities, previous tax liabilities, and unacceptable business practices.
Although the Corporation institutes policies designed to conform practices to its standards following completion of acquisitions, there can be no assurance the Corporation will not become liable for past activities that may later be asserted to be
improper by private plaintiffs or government agencies.

Although the Corporation generally seeks to obtain indemnification
from prospective sellers covering such matters, there can be no assurance that any such matter will be covered by indemnification, or if covered, that such indemnification will be adequate to cover potential losses and fines. In the ordinary course
of business, the



F-26



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 6COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)



Corporation enters into contracts containing standard indemnification provisions and indemnifications specific to a transaction such as business acquisitions and disposals of an operating
facility. These indemnifications may cover claims against employment-related matters, governmental regulations, environmental issues, tax matters, as well as customer, third party payer, supplier, and contractual relationships. Obligations under
these indemnities generally would be initiated by a breach of the terms of the contract or by a third party claim or event.

Prime Vendor
Agreement

At the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation entered into a Prime Vendor Agreement (the
Prime Vendor Agreement), with AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (ABDC), a wholly owned subsidiary of AmerisourceBergen, the Corporations former 50% stockholder and former parent of PharMerica LTC. Pursuant to this
agreement, the Corporation has agreed to purchase at least 95% of the Corporations prescription pharmaceutical drugs from ABDC and to participate in its generic formulary purchase program for a period of five years following the Closing Date.
In addition, ABDC will support the distribution of pharmaceuticals that the Corporation purchases directly from manufacturers and provide inventory management support and packaging services. Unless either party provides certain notice of
termination, the agreement will continue on a month-to-month basis upon expiration of the initial five year term. The agreement may be terminated by either party for cause during the initial five year term, and by either party with or without cause
thereafter upon 90 days notice. Also under the provisions of the agreement, the Corporation may not undertake any merger, change of ownership, change in control or other transaction without the consent of ABDC unless certain conditions are met.

Information Technology Services Agreement

At the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation entered into an Information Technology Services Agreement with Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc. (KHOI), a wholly owned
subsidiary of Kindred, the Corporations former 50% stockholder (the IT Services Agreement). Pursuant to this agreement, KHOI is the Corporations exclusive provider of certain information services and support related to
information technology infrastructure and financial systems for a period of five years, ending on July 31, 2012. The services provided by KHOI include business services necessary to operate, manage, and support certain financial applications
the Corporation uses, including enabling and/or supporting technology infrastructure and technology procurement services to support certain business functions. Such services include, among other matters, functions for financial management, systems,
and payroll. The Corporation will support internally all other operating systems, including functions for order entry, pharmacy dispensing, clinical consulting, billing and collections, electronic medication management, sales and marketing, medical
records management, human resources, internal and external customer call center support, and general business systems.

Except
for certain services that will be provided at cost, KHOI will provide such services to the Corporation at its cost plus 10%, which will be the actual costs and expenses incurred in providing these services, including certain overhead costs and per
hour costs of the KHOI employees providing the services. The initial term of the agreement is five years. The agreement will automatically renew for successive one-year periods after the expiration of the initial five year term, absent 120 days
prior written notice of termination as provided for in the agreement. The IT Services Agreement may be terminated by either party for cause and, in certain circumstances, by the Corporation in the event that KHOI undergoes a change of control to one
of the



F-27



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 6COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)



Corporations competitors. Following termination of the IT Services Agreement, KHOI must provide termination and expiration assistance for up to 180 days. The Corporation has incurred $7.3
million, $17.3 million, and $11.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009, respectively, under the IT Services Agreement.

Employment Agreements

The Corporation has entered into employment agreements with certain of its executive
officers. During the employment period, each of the executive officers will be eligible to (i) participate in any short-term and long-term incentive programs established or maintained by the Corporation, (ii) participate in all incentive,
savings and retirement plans and programs of the Corporation, (iii) participate, along with their dependents, in all welfare benefit plans and programs provided by the Corporation, and (iv) receive four weeks of paid vacation per calendar
year.

The type of compensation due to each of the executive officers in the event of the termination of their employment
period varies depending on the nature of the termination. The employment agreements do not entitle the executive officers to any additional payment or benefits solely upon the occurrence of a change in control but do provide additional payments or
benefits or both upon a termination of employment in connection with a change in control. Additionally, the vesting of certain equity based grants made to certain executive officers accelerate upon the occurrence of a change in control.

Leases

The Corporation
leases real estate properties, buildings, vehicles, and equipment under cancelable and non-cancelable leases. The leases expire at various times and have various renewal options. Certain leases that meet the lease capitalization criteria have been
recorded as an asset and liability at the net present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the lease. Interest rates used in computing the net present value of the lease payments are based on the Corporations incremental
borrowing rate at the inception of the lease. The Corporation recorded the following lease expense for the years ended December 31 (dollars in millions):



|                                                            |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |   |     
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- | ---- | - | ---- |  | - | ----
|                                                            |  | 2007 |      | 2008 |   | 2009
|Pharmacy locations and administrative offices lease expense |  | $    | 10.7 |      | $ | 16.4 |  | $ | 13.9
|Office equipment lease expense                              |  |      | 3.3  |      |   | 5.7  |  |   | 2.8 
|                                                            |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |   |     
|Total lease expense                                         |  | $    | 14.0 |      | $ | 22.1 |  | $ | 16.7
|                                                            |  |      |      |      |   |      |  |   |     



F-28



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 6COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)



Future minimum lease payments for those leases having an initial or remaining
non-cancelable lease term in excess of one year are as follows for the years indicated (dollars in millions):



|                                          |  |                  |      |                          |   |      |       |  |   |     
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ---- | ------------------------ | - | ---- | ----- |  | - | ----
|Year Ending December 31,                  |  | Operating Leases |      | Capital LeaseObligations |   |      | Total
|2010                                      |  | $                | 13.2 |                          | $ | 0.6  |       |  | $ | 13.8
|2011                                      |  |                  | 8.7  |                          |   | 0.6  |       |  |   | 9.3 
|2012                                      |  |                  | 6.4  |                          |   | 0.2  |       |  |   | 6.6 
|2013                                      |  |                  | 5.1  |                          |   |     |       |  |   | 5.1 
|2014                                      |  |                  | 4.4  |                          |   |     |       |  |   | 4.4 
|Thereafter                                |  |                  | 5.7  |                          |   |     |       |  |   | 5.7 
|                                          |  |                  |      |                          |   |      |       |  |   |     
|Total                                     |  | $                | 43.5 |                          | $ | 1.4  |       |  | $ | 44.9
|                                          |  |                  |      |                          |   |      |       |  |   |     
|Less: interest portion                    |  |                  |      |                          |   | (0.1 | )     |  |   |     
|                                          |  |                  |      |                          |   |      |       |  |   |     
|Long-term obligations under capital lease |  |                  |      |                          | $ | 1.3  |       |  |   |     
|                                          |  |                  |      |                          |   |      |       |  |   |     

NOTE 7REVENUES

The Corporation recognizes revenues at the time services are provided or products are delivered. A significant portion of these revenues are
billed to PDPs under Medicare Part D, the state Medicaid programs, long-term care institutions, third party insurance companies, and private payers. Some claims are electronically adjudicated through online processing at the point the prescription
is dispensed such that the Corporations operating system is automatically updated with the actual amount to be reimbursed. As a result, revenues and the associated receivables are based upon the actual reimbursement to be received by the
Corporation. For claims that are adjudicated on-line and are rejected or otherwise denied upon submission, the Corporation provides contractual allowances based upon historical trends, contractual reimbursement terms and other factors which may
impact ultimate reimbursement. Amounts are adjusted to actual reimbursed amounts upon cash receipt.

Under the Medicare Part D
benefit, payment is determined in accordance with the agreements the Corporation has negotiated with the Medicare Part D Plans. The remainder of the Corporations billings are paid or reimbursed by individual residents, long-term care
facilities (including revenues for residents funded under Medicare Part A), and other third party payers, including Medicaid and private insurers.

The Medicaid and Medicare programs are highly regulated. The failure, even if inadvertent, of the Corporation and/or client facilities to comply with applicable reimbursement regulations could adversely
affect the Corporations reimbursement under these programs and the Corporations ability to continue to participate in these programs. In addition, failure to comply with these regulations could subject the Corporation to other penalties.

As noted, the Corporation obtains reimbursement for drugs it provides to enrollees of a given Part D Plan in accordance with
the terms of the agreement negotiated between it and that Part D Plan. The Corporation has entered into such agreements with nearly all Part D Plan sponsors under which it will provide drugs and associated services to their enrollees. The
Corporation in the ordinary course of business has ongoing discussions with Part D Plans and may, as appropriate, renegotiate agreements.



F-29



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 7REVENUES (Continued)



The Corporations hospital pharmacy management revenues represent contractually
defined management fees and the reimbursement of costs associated with the direct operations of hospital pharmacies, which are primarily comprised of personnel costs.

A summary of revenues by payer type for the years ended December 31, are as follows (dollars in millions):



|                                   |  |        |         |              |       |   |        |      |              |  |       |        |  |              |         |  |       |  
|---------------------------------- |  | ------ | ------- | ------------ | ----- | - | ------ | ---- | ------------ |  | ----- | ------ |  | ------------ | ------- |  | ----- | -
|                                   |  | 2007   |         |              | 2008  |   |        | 2009 |             
|                                   |  | Amount |         | % ofRevenues |       |   | Amount |      | % ofRevenues |  |       | Amount |  | % ofRevenues |        
|Medicare Part D                    |  | $      | 550.2   |              | 45.2  | % |        | $    | 885.8        |  | 45.5  | %      |  | $            | 852.6   |  | 46.3  | %
|Institutional healthcare providers |  |        | 369.3   |              | 30.3  |   |        |      | 577.2        |  | 29.7  |        |  |              | 545.6   |  | 29.6  |  
|Medicaid                           |  |        | 108.8   |              | 8.9   |   |        |      | 181.1        |  | 9.3   |        |  |              | 165.8   |  | 9.0   |  
|Private and other                  |  |        | 77.7    |              | 6.4   |   |        |      | 133.2        |  | 6.8   |        |  |              | 122.4   |  | 6.6   |  
|Insured                            |  |        | 46.8    |              | 3.8   |   |        |      | 101.4        |  | 5.2   |        |  |              | 91.5    |  | 5.0   |  
|Medicare                           |  |        | 10.2    |              | 0.9   |   |        |      | 10.1         |  | 0.5   |        |  |              | 6.8     |  | 0.4   |  
|Hospital management fees           |  |        | 54.8    |              | 4.5   |   |        |      | 58.5         |  | 3.0   |        |  |              | 56.5    |  | 3.1   |  
|                                   |  |        |         |              |       |   |        |      |              |  |       |        |  |              |         |  |       |  
|Total                              |  | $      | 1,217.8 |              | 100.0 | % |        | $    | 1,947.3      |  | 100.0 | %      |  | $            | 1,841.2 |  | 100.0 | %
|                                   |  |        |         |              |       |   |        |      |              |  |       |        |  |              |         |  |       |  

Co-payments for the Corporations services can be applicable under Medicare Part
D, the state Medicaid programs, and certain third party payers and are typically not collected at the time products are delivered or services are provided. Co-payments under the Medicaid programs and third party plans are generally billed to the
responsible party as part of the Corporations normal billing procedures and are subject to the Corporations normal collection procedures.

Under Medicare Part D, co-payments related to institutional residents who are both Medicare and Medicaid eligible (dual eligible) are due from the responsible party for up to the first thirty
days of a beneficiarys stay in a skilled nursing facility, subsequent to which the PDPs are responsible for reimbursement.

Under certain circumstances, including state-mandated return policies under various Medicaid programs, the Corporation accepts returns of medications and issues a credit memorandum to the applicable payer. Product returns are processed in
the period in which the return is accepted by the Corporation. A reserve has been established for such returns based on historical information.



F-30



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 8INTEGRATION, MERGER AND ACQUISITION RELATED COSTS AND OTHER CHARGES



The following is a summary of integration, merger and acquisition related costs and
other charges incurred by the Corporation (dollars in millions):



|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | ---- |  | - | ----- | -
|                                                                          |  | Years Ended December 31, |      
|                                                                          |  | 2007                     |       |   | 2008 |   |       | 2009 | 
|Integration costs and other charges:                                      |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                                            |  | $                        | 1.1   |   |      | $ | 1.7   |      |  | $ | 0.2   |  
|General and administrative                                                |  |                          | 0.6   |   |      |   | 3.2   |      |  |   | 0.8   |  
|Employee costs                                                            |  |                          | 0.6   |   |      |   | 7.2   |      |  |   | 1.5   |  
|Severance costs                                                           |  |                          | 1.1   |   |      |   | 5.3   |      |  |   | 0.9   |  
|Facility costs                                                            |  |                          | 2.6   |   |      |   | 9.3   |      |  |   | 0.8   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                          |  |                          | 6.0   |   |      |   | 26.7  |      |  |   | 4.2   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Merger related costs:                                                     |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                                            |  |                          | 8.0   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|General and administrative                                                |  |                          | 5.4   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Employee costs                                                            |  |                          | 7.6   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Severance costs                                                           |  |                          | 2.0   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Facility costs                                                            |  |                          | 0.7   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|Other costs                                                               |  |                          | 0.1   |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                          |  |                          | 23.8  |   |      |   |      |      |  |   |      |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Acquisition related costs:                                                |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Professional and advisory fees                                            |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   | 1.0   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |      |   |      |   |      |      |  |   | 1.0   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Total integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  | $                        | 29.8  |   |      | $ | 26.7  |      |  | $ | 5.2   |  
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  
|Negative effect on earnings per diluted share                             |  | $                        | (0.90 | ) |      | $ | (0.53 | )    |  | $ | (0.10 | )
|                                                                          |  |                          |       |   |      |   |       |      |  |   |       |  

The Corporation incurred integration, merger, and acquisition related costs and other
charges during the year ended December 31, 2009, related to the consolidation of pharmacies within a similar location and costs to convert data and integrate systems. In fiscal year 2009, we began the integration of our pharmacy operating
systems. The Corporation expects to continue to incur costs related to the integration of its pharmacy operating systems during fiscal 2010.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, the Corporation incurred costs of $1.0 million for acquisition related costs. Effective January 1, 2009, the accounting standards for the accounting of
business combinations changed, prior to the adoption of this accounting change, substantially all costs incurred as a result of an acquisition were capitalized as part of the purchase price of the business combination.



F-31



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 9COMMON STOCK, PREFERRED STOCK, STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS



Common Stock

Holders of the Corporations common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters on which stockholders may vote. There are no preemptive, conversion, redemption or
sinking fund provisions applicable to our common stock. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in the assets available for distribution, subject to any prior rights of any
holders of preferred stock then outstanding. Delaware law prohibits the Corporation from paying any dividends unless it has capital surplus or net profits available for this purpose. In addition, the Corporations Credit Agreement imposes
restrictions on its ability to pay dividends.

As a part of the Pharmacy Transaction, the Corporation issued 30 million
shares of common stock. In the Pharmacy Transaction, each Kindred stockholder received approximately 0.366 shares of the Corporations common stock in respect of each share of Kindred common stock held on the record date and each
AmerisourceBergen stockholder received approximately 0.083 shares of the Corporations common stock in respect of each share of AmerisourceBergen common stock held on the record date. Immediately following the Pharmacy Transaction, the
stockholders of Kindred and AmerisourceBergen each owned 50% of the outstanding common stock of the Corporation. The shares of the Corporations common stock held by Kindred and AmerisourceBergen prior to the Pharmacy Transaction were
cancelled, and neither retained any ownership of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Corporation.

The historical
common stock of the Corporation was cancelled on the Closing Date of the Pharmacy Transaction and reclassified as capital in excess of par value.

Preferred Stock

The certificate of incorporation authorizes the issuance of an aggregate of 1.0 million
shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2009, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

Our board of
directors may, from time to time, direct the issue of shares of preferred stock in series and may, at the time of issuance, determine the designation, powers, rights, preferences and limitations of each series. Satisfaction of any dividend
preferences of outstanding preferred stock would reduce the amount of funds available for the payment of dividends on our shares of common stock. Holders of preferred stock may be entitled to receive a preference payment in the event of any
liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our company before any payment is made to the holders of our common stock. Under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock may render more difficult or tend to discourage a merger, tender offer
or proxy contest, the assumption of control by a holder of a large block of our companys securities or the removal of incumbent management. The board of directors may issue shares of preferred stock with voting and conversion rights that could
adversely affect the holders of shares of our common stock. Specifically, our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board to adopt a rights plan without stockholder approval. This could delay or prevent a change in control of us or the removal
of existing management.

Amended and Restated 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan

On July 12, 2007, the Corporation adopted the PharMerica Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as amended and restated the
Omnibus Plan) under which the Corporation is authorized to grant equity-based and



F-32



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 9COMMON STOCK, PREFERRED STOCK, STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS (Continued)



other awards to its employees, officers, directors, and consultants. The Corporation has reserved 3,800,000 shares of its common stock for awards to be granted under the Omnibus Plan plus 534,642
shares reserved for substitute equity awards for employees of KPS and PharMerica LTC whose awards were cancelled or forfeited upon the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction. The Corporations Compensation Committee administers the Omnibus
Plan and has the authority to determine the recipient of the awards, the types of awards, the number of shares covered, and the terms and conditions of the awards. The Omnibus Plan allows for grants of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, deferred shares, performance awards, including cash bonus awards, and other stock-based awards. The Compensation Committee establishes long-term and short-term
incentive programs under the Omnibus Plan. On July 24, 2008, the Corporations stockholders approved an amendment to the Omnibus Plan to provide the Compensation Committee with increased flexibility to use non-GAAP measures to measure
performance, including the ability to exclude from the performance measures certain items or charges related to an event or occurrence that the Compensation Committee determines should be excluded in accordance with the performance criteria of
performance awards granted pursuant to the Omnibus Plan. In connection with the Corporations 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the stockholders of the Corporation approved and adopted the amended and restated Omnibus Plan to preserve
preferential tax treatment as qualified performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code.

The
stock options granted under the Omnibus Plan to replace options granted by Kindred or AmerisourceBergen that were cancelled or forfeited upon the consummation of the Pharmacy Transaction have the same basic terms, conditions, and vesting schedule of
the awards granted to them by Kindred and AmerisourceBergen. In addition, unvested restricted shares of Kindred and AmerisourceBergen common stock held by our named executive officers who were formerly KPS or PharMerica LTC employees were replaced
with restricted shares of the Corporations common stock, which have the same basic terms, conditions, and vesting schedule as applied to the forfeited Kindred or AmerisourceBergen restricted shares.

Stock options granted to officers and employees under the Omnibus Plan generally vest in four equal annual installments and have a term of
seven years. The restricted stock granted to officers and employees under the Omnibus Plan generally vest in full upon the three-year anniversary of the date of grant. The restricted stock grant to members of the board of directors vest in three
equal annual installments. The restricted stock units granted to officers and employees under the Omnibus Plan generally vest in two equal annual installments. The performance share units granted under the Omnibus Plan vest based upon the
achievement of a target amount of the Corporations earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges, impairment of intangible assets, and any changes in
accounting principles, which reinforces the importance of achieving the Corporations profitability objectives. The performance is generally measured over a three-year period.

As of December 31, 2009, total shares available for grants of stock based awards pursuant to the Omnibus Plan were 1,443,127 shares.



F-33



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 9COMMON STOCK, PREFERRED STOCK, STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS (Continued)



Stock-Based Compensation Expense

The following is a summary of stock-based compensation incurred by the Corporation (dollars in millions):



|                                     |  |                          |     |      |   |      |  |   |    
|------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------ | --- | ---- | - | ---- |  | - | ---
|                                     |  | Years Ended December 31,
|                                     |  | 2007                     |     | 2008 |   | 2009
|Stock option compensation expense    |  | $                        | 1.1 |      | $ | 2.6  |  | $ | 2.1
|Nonvested stock compensation expense |  |                          | 0.4 |      |   | 2.3  |  |   | 2.5
|                                     |  |                          |     |      |   |      |  |   |    
|Total Stock Compensation Expense     |  | $                        | 1.5 |      | $ | 4.9  |  | $ | 4.6
|                                     |  |                          |     |      |   |      |  |   |    

As of December 31, 2009, there was $10.0 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to the Corporations stock compensation arrangements. Total unrecognized compensation cost will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures. The Corporation expects to recognize that cost over weighted
average periods ranging from fewer than 1.0  1.61 years depending on the type of award granted.

Total estimated
compensation expense for the Corporations stock options, restricted stock units and restricted stock awards for the next five years and thereafter are as follows (dollars in millions):



|                         |  |   |     
|------------------------ |  | - | ----
|Year Ending December 31, |  |  
|2010                     |  | $ | 5.7 
|2011                     |  |   | 3.3 
|2012                     |  |   | 0.9 
|2013                     |  |   | 0.1 
|2014                     |  |   |    
|Thereafter               |  |   |    
|                         |  |   |     
|Total                    |  | $ | 10.0
|                         |  |   |     

The following weighted average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
options granted using the Black-Scholes Merton option-pricing model:



|                                                                                               |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | - | --------- | ---- |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                               |  | 2007 |           |   | 2008 |   |           | 2009 | 
|Expected volatility (range)                                                                    |  |      | 33.3-45.0 | % |      |   | 33.3-41.7 | %    |  |   | 36.36-41.07 | %
|Risk free interest rate (range)                                                                |  |      | 4.55-4.98 | % |      |   | 1.53-2.45 | %    |  |   | 0.75-2.09   | %
|Expected dividends                                                                             |  |      |          |   |      |   |          |      |  |   |            |  
|Average expected term (years)                                                                  |  |      | 0.3-5.0   |   |      |   | 2.0-5.0   |      |  |   | 2.0-5.0     |  
|Fair value per share of stock options granted based on the Black-Sholes-Merton model (dollars) |  | $    | 5.82      |   |      | $ | 4.67      |      |  | $ | 4.40        |  
|Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year (in millions)                   |  | $    | 6.2       |   |      | $ | 1.5       |      |  | $ | 2.5         |  



F-34



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 9COMMON STOCK, PREFERRED STOCK, STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS (Continued)



Expected Volatility

Volatility is a measure of the tendency of investment returns to vary around a long-term average rate. Historical volatility is an appropriate starting point for setting this assumption. Companies should
also consider how future experience may differ from the past. This may require using other factors to adjust historical volatility, such as implied volatility, peer-group volatility and the range and mean-reversion of volatility estimates over
various historical periods. The peer-group utilized consisted of fourteen companies in 2009, in the same or similar industries as the Corporation. In addition, if a best estimate cannot be made, management should use the mid-point in the range of
reasonable estimates for volatility. The Corporation estimates the volatility of its common stock in conjunction with the Corporations annual grant and volatility is calculated utilizing the historical volatility of the Corporations and
its peer-group. To the extent material grants are made subsequent to the Corporations annual grant, the volatility calculation is updated through the most recent grant date of the awards.

Risk-Free Interest Rate

The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the estimated life of the option.

Expected Dividends

The Corporation has never paid any cash dividends on its common stock and does not
anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, it uses an expected dividend yield of zero.

Expected Term

The Corporation calculated an expected term using managements estimate and expectation of option exercises. The
majority of the Corporations stock options are on a graded-vesting schedule. The Corporation is permitted to estimate the value of awards with graded vesting by treating each vesting tranche as a separate award. Alternatively, the award may be
valued as a single award. Management has determined to value each tranche of the awards separately utilizing a multiple fair value method.



F-35



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 9COMMON STOCK, PREFERRED STOCK, STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS (Continued)



Stock Option Activity

The following table summarizes option activity for the periods presented:



|                                                                           |  |                 |   |  |                                          |       |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | - |  | ---------------------------------------- | ----- | ----------------------------- | --------- | -------------------------------------- | - | ---
|                                                                           |  | Number ofShares |   |  | Weighted-Average ExercisePrice Per Share |       | Weighted-AverageRemainingTerm |           | Aggregate IntrinsicValue (in millions)
|Outstanding shares at December 31, 2006                                    |  | 127,787         |   |  | $                                        | 21.56 |                               | 6.0 years |                                        |   |    
|Cancellation of nonvested stock options under former Parents Omnibus Plan |  | (127,787        | ) |  |                                          | 21.56 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Effect of Pharmacy Transaction on options                                  |  | 479,302         |   |  |                                          | 12.73 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Granted                                                                    |  | 1,072,695       |   |  |                                          | 16.31 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Exercised                                                                  |  |                |   |  |                                          |      |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Canceled                                                                   |  | (281,614        | ) |  |                                          | 15.09 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|                                                                           |  |                 |   |  |                                          |       |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Outstanding shares at December 31, 2007                                    |  | 1,270,383       |   |  | $                                        | 15.23 |                               | 6.8 years |                                        |   |    
|                                                                           |  |                 |   |  |                                          |       |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Granted                                                                    |  | 324,507         |   |  |                                          | 15.65 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Exercised                                                                  |  | (67,878         | ) |  |                                          | 13.28 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Canceled                                                                   |  | (194,363        | ) |  |                                          | 14.88 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|                                                                           |  |                 |   |  |                                          |       |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Outstanding shares at December 31, 2008                                    |  | 1,332,649       |   |  | $                                        | 15.47 |                               | 5.7 years |                                        | $ | 0.9
|                                                                           |  |                 |   |  |                                          |       |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Granted                                                                    |  | 567,633         |   |  |                                          | 15.18 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Exercised                                                                  |  | (107,308        | ) |  |                                          | 12.69 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Canceled                                                                   |  | (59,649         | ) |  |                                          | 14.63 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|                                                                           |  |                 |   |  |                                          |       |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Outstanding shares at December 31, 2009                                    |  | 1,733,325       |   |  | $                                        | 15.60 |                               | 5.2 years |                                        | $ | 1.0
|                                                                           |  |                 |   |  |                                          |       |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Exercisable shares at December 31, 2009                                    |  | 659,669         |   |  | $                                        | 15.58 |                               | 4.6 years |                                        | $ | 0.4
|                                                                           |  |                 |   |  |                                          |       |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|Expired shares during 2009                                                 |  | 4,627           |   |  | $                                        | 12.50 |                               |           |                                        |   |    
|                                                                           |  |                 |   |  |                                          |       |                               |           |                                        |   |    

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2009, was $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively. The Corporation did not have any stock options exercised during 2007. Cash received from stock option exercises during the year ended December 31, 2009, was $1.4
million.



F-36



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 9COMMON STOCK, PREFERRED STOCK, STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS (Continued)



Nonvested Shares

The following table summarizes nonvested share activity for the periods presented:



|                                                                    |  |                 |   |  |                                      |      
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | - |  | ------------------------------------ | -----
|                                                                    |  | Number ofShares |   |  | Weighted-AverageGrant Date FairValue
|Outstanding shares at December 31, 2006                             |  | 28,961          |   |  | $                                    | 26.04
|Cancellation of nonvested shares under former Parents Omnibus Plan |  | (28,961         | ) |  |                                      | 26.04
|Effect of Pharmacy Transaction on nonvested shares and units        |  | 55,340          |   |  |                                      | 6.66 
|GrantedRestricted Stock                                            |  | 356,938         |   |  |                                      | 16.31
|GrantedPerformance Share Units                                     |  | 8,950           |   |  |                                      | 16.31
|Forfeited                                                           |  | (51,666         | ) |  |                                      | 12.71
|Vested                                                              |  | (8,658          | ) |  |                                      | 14.18
|                                                                    |  |                 |   |  |                                      |      
|Outstanding shares at December 31, 2007                             |  | 360,904         |   |  | $                                    | 15.13
|                                                                    |  |                 |   |  |                                      |      
|GrantedRestricted Stock                                            |  | 72,548          |   |  |                                      | 18.40
|GrantedPerformance Share Units                                     |  | 68,275          |   |  |                                      | 15.17
|Forfeited                                                           |  | (33,578         | ) |  |                                      | 12.84
|Vested                                                              |  | (125,558        | ) |  |                                      | 16.23
|                                                                    |  |                 |   |  |                                      |      
|Outstanding shares at December 31, 2008                             |  | 342,591         |   |  | $                                    | 15.93
|                                                                    |  |                 |   |  |                                      |      
|GrantedRestricted Stock                                            |  | 35,633          |   |  |                                      | 17.96
|GrantedRestricted Stock Units                                      |  | 99,332          |   |  |                                      | 15.06
|GrantedPerformance Share Units                                     |  | 152,580         |   |  |                                      | 15.16
|Forfeited                                                           |  | (11,533         | ) |  |                                      | 14.52
|Vested                                                              |  | (84,201         | ) |  |                                      | 14.34
|                                                                    |  |                 |   |  |                                      |      
|Outstanding shares at December 31, 2009                             |  | 534,402         |   |  | $                                    | 15.98
|                                                                    |  |                 |   |  |                                      |      

On November 17, 2009, the Company granted 99,332 awards of Restricted Stock
Units (RSUs) under the Omnibus Plan to the Corporations named executive officers as an additional incentive and retention component to the recipients compensation packages. The RSUs vest 50% on each of the first and second
anniversaries of grant date, and will be paid in shares of the Companys common stock (net of required tax withholdings), and will receive dividend equivalents (if any) during the vesting period in the form of additional RSUs.

The total fair value of shares vested for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, was $2.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively.

Based upon the achievement of the performance criteria at the end of the performance cycle for the performance share units
issued to date, the Corporation may issue no shares or a maximum of 412,564 shares.



F-37



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 9COMMON STOCK, PREFERRED STOCK, STOCK BASED COMPENSATION AND OTHER BENEFITS (Continued)



401K Plan

The Corporation sponsors a defined contribution retirement plan for all eligible employees, as defined in the plan document. The plan is qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Contributions to the plan are based upon employee contributions and the Corporations matching contributions. The Corporations matching contributions to the plan were $2.3 million, $5.9 million and $5.3 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Plans

The Corporation maintains a deferred compensation plan for certain management and highly compensated employees. Under the plan, a participant
may elect to defer up to 50% of such participants annual base salary and up to 100% of such participants annual short-term incentive program cash bonus into the plan during each plan year. In addition, the Corporation may, in its sole
discretion, make discretionary contributions to a participants account.

The Corporation also maintains a deferred
compensation plan for the directors of the Corporation. The directors of the Corporation may elect to defer up to 100% of their cash fees and their stock fees in any one year. If a director elects to defer his/her restricted stock grant, the stock
will be deferred as it vests until the participant elects for the deferred compensation to be a taxable event.

As of
December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Corporation had $1.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively, recognized as a long-term liability related to the deferred compensation plans in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 10INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes is based upon the Corporations estimate of annual taxable income or loss for each respective accounting period. The following table summarizes our provision for income taxes for the periods presented
(dollars in millions):



|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |  |   |      |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ---- |  | - | ---- | -
|                                           |  | 2007 |       |   | 2008 |   | 2009 | 
|Current provision:                         |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |  |   |      |  
|Federal                                    |  | $    |      |   |      | $ |     |  | $ | 0.2  |  
|State                                      |  |      |      |   |      |   | 0.5  |  |   | 0.5  |  
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |  |   |      |  
|Total                                      |  |      |      |   |      |   | 0.5  |  |   | 0.7  |  
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |  |   |      |  
|Deferred provision (benefit):              |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |  |   |      |  
|Federal                                    |  |      | (11.7 | ) |      |   | 2.6  |  |   | 21.9 |  
|State                                      |  |      | (1.7  | ) |      |   | 0.2  |  |   | (3.7 | )
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |  |   |      |  
|Total                                      |  |      | (13.4 | ) |      |   | 2.8  |  |   | 18.2 |  
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |  |   |      |  
|Total provision (benefit) for income taxes |  | $    | (13.4 | ) |      | $ | 3.3  |  | $ | 18.9 |  
|                                           |  |      |       |   |      |   |      |  |   |      |  



F-38



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 10INCOME TAXES (Continued)



A reconciliation of the Corporations effective tax rate and the U.S. statutory
rate is as follows for the years ended December 31:



|                                                    |  |       |    |  |      |   |  |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- | -- |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | -
|                                                    |  | 2007  |    |  | 2008 |   |  | 2009 |  
|U.S. statutory rate applied to pretax income (loss) |  | (35.0 | )% |  | 35.0 | % |  | 35.0 | %
|Differential arising from:                          |  |       |    |  |      |   |  |      |  
|State taxes                                         |  | (3.6  | )  |  | 5.6  |   |  | 4.5  |  
|Valuation Allowance                                 |  |      |    |  |     |   |  | (7.9 | )
|Other                                               |  | 2.9   |    |  | (0.9 | ) |  | (0.7 | )
|                                                    |  |       |    |  |      |   |  |      |  
|Effective tax rate                                  |  | (35.7 | )% |  | 39.7 | % |  | 30.9 | %
|                                                    |  |       |    |  |      |   |  |      |  

The Corporations 2009 effective tax rate reflects non-recurring income tax
benefits of $5.7 million ($0.19 earnings per diluted share) resulting primarily from the release of valuation allowances related to the adoption of an internal legal entity restructuring plan. Pursuant to the restructuring plan, the Corporation
believes that it is more likely than not that it will be able to realize certain historic state net operating loss carryforwards for which a valuation allowance had previously been provided. The restructuring plan is expected to be completed by
December 31, 2010. Excluding the one-time benefits associated with the Corporations legal entity restructuring activities, the provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2009 would have been $24.6 million (40.2% of
income).

The income tax provision for periods prior to July 31, 2007, was the responsibility of Kindred. The benefit
from net operating losses originating prior to that date are included in the deferred provision (benefit) as they are carryforward tax assets available for use in future years. The Corporation is precluded from carrying back losses to periods prior
to the Pharmacy Transaction under the terms of the Tax Matters Agreement.

The Corporation derives a current federal and state
income tax benefit from the impact of deductions associated with the amortization of tax-deductible goodwill acquired through business combinations. The tax basis of the Corporations tax deductible goodwill was approximately $120.4 million and
$113.9 million at December 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively. The future tax benefits of the tax-deductible goodwill are included in the Corporations deferred tax assets.

The Corporation recognizes an asset or liability for the deferred tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets
and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. These temporary differences will result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years when the reported amounts of the assets are recovered or liabilities are settled. The
Corporation also recognizes as deferred tax assets the future tax benefits from net operating and capital loss carryforwards. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation has tax benefits from federal net operating loss carryforwards of $15.1
million and tax benefits from state net operating loss carryforwards of $11.3 million. The net operating losses have carryforward periods ranging from 1 to 20 years depending on the taxing jurisdiction.

A valuation allowance is provided for the Corporations deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of
the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Corporation recognized net deferred tax assets totaling $84.3 million at December 31, 2008 and $60.8 million at December 31, 2009, net of valuation allowances of $10.3 million and $1.7
million, respectively.



F-39



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 10INCOME TAXES (Continued)



Current deferred income taxes consisted of (dollars in millions):



|                                |  |                   |      |                   |             |   |        |  |   |             |   |  |   |  
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---- | ----------------- | ----------- | - | ------ |  | - | ----------- | - |  | - | -
|                                |  | December 31, 2008 |      | December 31, 2009
|                                |  | Assets            |      |                   | Liabilities |   | Assets |  |   | Liabilities
|Accrued expenses                |  | $                 | 3.5  |                   |             | $ |       |  | $ | 6.3         |   |  | $ | 
|Accrued rebates                 |  |                   | 1.4  |                   |             |   |       |  |   |            |   |  |   | 
|Allowance for doubtful accounts |  |                   | 20.7 |                   |             |   |       |  |   | 13.5        |   |  |   | 
|Net operating losses            |  |                   |     |                   |             |   |       |  |   | 17.6        |   |  |   | 
|Other                           |  |                   | 2.3  |                   |             |   |       |  |   | 3.0         |   |  |   | 
|Valuation allowance             |  |                   | (3.0 | )                 |             |   |       |  |   | (0.6        | ) |  |   | 
|                                |  |                   |      |                   |             |   |        |  |   |             |   |  |   |  
|Total current deferred taxes    |  | $                 | 24.9 |                   |             | $ |       |  | $ | 39.8        |   |  | $ | 
|                                |  |                   |      |                   |             |   |        |  |   |             |   |  |   |  

Noncurrent deferred income taxes consisted of (dollars in millions):



|                                |  |                   |      |                   |             |   |        |  |   |             |   |  |   |    
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ---- | ----------------- | ----------- | - | ------ |  | - | ----------- | - |  | - | ---
|                                |  | December 31, 2008 |      | December 31, 2009
|                                |  | Assets            |      |                   | Liabilities |   | Assets |  |   | Liabilities
|Accelerated depreciation        |  | $                 |     |                   |             | $ | 1.9    |  | $ |            |   |  | $ | 5.8
|Stock-based compensation        |  |                   | 2.6  |                   |             |   |       |  |   | 2.6         |   |  |   |   
|Goodwill and intangibles        |  |                   | 24.7 |                   |             |   |       |  |   | 13.7        |   |  |   |   
|Net operating losses            |  |                   | 36.9 |                   |             |   |       |  |   | 8.8         |   |  |   |   
|Other                           |  |                   | 4.4  |                   |             |   |       |  |   | 3.9         |   |  |   | 1.1
|Valuation allowances            |  |                   | (7.3 | )                 |             |   |       |  |   | (1.1        | ) |  |   |   
|                                |  |                   |      |                   |             |   |        |  |   |             |   |  |   |    
|Total noncurrent deferred taxes |  | $                 | 61.3 |                   |             | $ | 1.9    |  | $ | 27.9        |   |  | $ | 6.9
|                                |  |                   |      |                   |             |   |        |  |   |             |   |  |   |    
|Noncurrent deferred taxes, net  |  | $                 | 59.4 |                   |             |   |        |  | $ | 21.0        |   |  |   |    
|                                |  |                   |      |                   |             |   |        |  |   |             |   |  |   |    

As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, the Corporation had $2.4 million and $1.7
million, respectively, recorded as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits for U.S. Federal and State tax jurisdictions. The net decrease of $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 was primarily due to statute of limitations
expirations in certain states. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2009 that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $1.6 million.

It is the Corporations policy to accrue interest and penalties related to liabilities for income tax contingencies in the provision
for income taxes. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions as it has sufficient net operating losses to offset any liability that potentially could be asserted by a tax
authority related to its uncertain tax positions.

The federal statute of limitations remains open for tax years 2006 through
2008. State jurisdictions generally have statutes of limitations ranging from three to five years. The Corporation is no longer subject to state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2005. The state income tax impact
of federal income tax changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification of IRS settlement to the states. Kindred and AmerisourceBergen are responsible for any taxes that relate to
periods before the 2007 Pharmacy Transaction. The Corporation is responsible for all taxes that relate to post-merger periods.



F-40



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 11EARNINGS PER SHARE



The following table sets forth the computation of basic and earnings (loss) per diluted
share for the years ended December 31, (dollars in millions, except share and per share amounts):



|                                                                            |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|                                                                            |  | 2007 |            |   | 2008 |   | 2009      
|Numerator:                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Numerator for basic and earnings per diluted sharenet income (loss)        |  | $    | (24.1      | ) |      | $ | 5.0        |  | $ | 42.2      
|                                                                            |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Denominator:                                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Denominator for basic earnings per shareweighted average shares            |  |      | 21,331,995 |   |      |   | 30,095,582 |  |   | 30,266,272
|Effective of dilutive securities:                                           |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Employee stock options                                                      |  |      | 2,789      |   |      |   | 45,285     |  |   | 47,845    
|Employee restricted shares                                                  |  |      | 9,186      |   |      |   | 50,026     |  |   | 84,173    
|Employee performance share units                                            |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   | 4,478     
|                                                                            |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Denominator for earnings per diluted shareadjusted weighted average shares |  |      | 21,343,970 |   |      |   | 30,190,893 |  |   | 30,402,768
|                                                                            |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Basic earnings (loss) per share                                             |  | $    | (1.13      | ) |      | $ | 0.17       |  | $ | 1.39      
|                                                                            |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           
|Earnings (loss) per diluted share                                           |  | $    | (1.13      | ) |      | $ | 0.17       |  | $ | 1.39      
|                                                                            |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |           

Stock options and restricted shares granted by the Corporation are treated as
potential common shares outstanding in computing earnings per diluted share. Performance share units are treated as potential common shares outstanding in computing earnings per diluted share as they are probable to vest.

The earnings (loss) per diluted share shown above for the year ended December 31, 2007 does not include the effects of potential common
shares because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive due to the net loss for the period.

NOTE 12BUSINESS SEGMENT DATA

The Corporation operates two business segments: institutional pharmacies and hospital pharmacy management. Institutional
pharmacies provide pharmacy services to nursing centers and other healthcare providers and the hospital pharmacy management business provides management services to substantially all of Kindreds hospitals. For business segment reporting
purposes, the Corporation defines segment operating income as earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent. Segment operating income reported for each of the Corporations business segments excludes the allocation
of corporate overhead.



F-41



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 12BUSINESS SEGMENT DATA (Continued)



The Corporation identifies its segments in accordance with the aggregation provisions.
This information is consistent with information used by the Corporation in managing its business. The segments are shown below as follows (dollars in millions):



|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                    |  | Year Ended December 31, |        
|                                                                    |  | 2007                    |         |   | 2008 |   |         | 2009 | 
|Revenues:                                                           |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Institutional pharmacies                                            |  | $                       | 1,163.0 |   |      | $ | 1,888.8 |      |  | $ | 1,784.7 |  
|Hospital pharmacy management                                        |  |                         | 54.8    |   |      |   | 58.5    |      |  |   | 56.5    |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|                                                                    |  | $                       | 1,217.8 |   |      | $ | 1,947.3 |      |  | $ | 1,841.2 |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Net income:                                                         |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Segment operating income:                                           |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Institutional pharmacies                                            |  | $                       | 33.7    |   |      | $ | 105.6   |      |  | $ | 113.3   |  
|Hospital pharmacy management                                        |  |                         | 8.4     |   |      |   | 9.0     |      |  |   | 6.1     |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Segment operating income                                            |  |                         | 42.1    |   |      |   | 114.6   |      |  |   | 119.4   |  
|Allocated Kindred corporate services                                |  |                         | (8.4    | ) |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|Rent                                                                |  |                         | (14.0   | ) |      |   | (22.1   | )    |  |   | (16.7   | )
|Depreciation and amortization                                       |  |                         | (20.2   | ) |      |   | (28.5   | )    |  |   | (27.0   | )
|Impairment of intangible assets                                     |  |                         |        |   |      |   | (14.8   | )    |  |   |        |  
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |                         | (29.8   | ) |      |   | (26.7   | )    |  |   | (5.2    | )
|Interest expense, net                                               |  |                         | (7.2    | ) |      |   | (14.2   | )    |  |   | (9.4    | )
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Income (loss) before income taxes                                   |  |                         | (37.5   | ) |      |   | 8.3     |      |  |   | 61.1    |  
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                |  |                         | (13.4   | ) |      |   | 3.3     |      |  |   | 18.9    |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Net income (loss)                                                   |  | $                       | (24.1   | ) |      | $ | 5.0     |      |  | $ | 42.2    |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Rent:                                                               |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Institutional pharmacies                                            |  | $                       | 14.0    |   |      | $ | 22.0    |      |  | $ | 16.6    |  
|Hospital pharmacy management                                        |  |                         |        |   |      |   | 0.1     |      |  |   | 0.1     |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|                                                                    |  | $                       | 14.0    |   |      | $ | 22.1    |      |  | $ | 16.7    |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Depreciation and amortization:                                      |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Institutional pharmacies                                            |  | $                       | 20.6    |   |      | $ | 28.4    |      |  | $ | 27.0    |  
|Hospital pharmacy management                                        |  |                         |        |   |      |   | 0.1     |      |  |   |        |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|                                                                    |  | $                       | 20.6    |   |      | $ | 28.5    |      |  | $ | 27.0    |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Capital expenditures, excluding acquisitions:                       |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|Institutional pharmacies                                            |  | $                       | 16.7    |   |      | $ | 22.1    |      |  | $ | 21.6    |  
|Hospital pharmacy management                                        |  |                         |        |   |      |   |        |      |  |   |        |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  
|                                                                    |  | $                       | 16.7    |   |      | $ | 22.1    |      |  | $ | 21.6    |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |         |  



F-42



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009



NOTE 12BUSINESS SEGMENT DATA (Continued)



|                             |  |                  |       |                  |   |      
|---------------------------- |  | ---------------- | ----- | ---------------- | - | -----
|                             |  | December 31,2008 |       | December 31,2009
|Assets:                      |  |                  |       |                  |   |      
|Institutional pharmacies     |  | $                | 671.4 |                  | $ | 716.1
|Hospital pharmacy management |  |                  | 7.8   |                  |   | 8.2  
|                             |  |                  |       |                  |   |      
|                             |  | $                | 679.2 |                  | $ | 724.3
|                             |  |                  |       |                  |   |      
|Goodwill:                    |  |                  |       |                  |   |      
|Institutional pharmacies     |  | $                | 113.7 |                  | $ | 140.1
|Hospital pharmacy management |  |                  |      |                  |   |     
|                             |  |                  |       |                  |   |      
|                             |  | $                | 113.7 |                  | $ | 140.1
|                             |  |                  |       |                  |   |      



F-43



---

##### Table of Contents

PHARMERICA CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008



NOTE 13UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION



The quarterly interim financial information shown below has been prepared by the
Corporations management and is unaudited. It should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements appearing herein (dollars in millions, except per share amounts).



|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------- | ----- | ------ | ------------- | ----- |  | ------ | ----- |  | ----- | ----- | ------ |  | ----- | ----- | ------ | - | ----- |  | - | ----- |  | - | -----
|                                                                    |  | 2008 Quarters |       |        | 2009 Quarters
|                                                                    |  | First         |       | Second |               | Third |  | Fourth |       |  | First |       | Second |  | Third |       | Fourth
|Net revenues:                                                       |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Institutional pharmacy revenues                                     |  | $             | 480.2 |        | $             | 471.3 |  | $      | 471.6 |  | $     | 465.7 |        |  | $     | 453.4 |        | $ | 446.5 |  | $ | 447.1 |  | $ | 437.7
|Hospital management revenues                                        |  |               | 14.9  |        |               | 15.0  |  |        | 14.6  |  |       | 14.0  |        |  |       | 14.8  |        |   | 14.1  |  |   | 13.9  |  |   | 13.7 
|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Total revenues                                                      |  |               | 495.1 |        |               | 486.3 |  |        | 486.2 |  |       | 479.7 |        |  |       | 468.2 |        |   | 460.6 |  |   | 461.0 |  |   | 451.4
|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Cost of goods sold:                                                 |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Institutional pharmacy                                              |  |               | 410.5 |        |               | 403.4 |  |        | 404.1 |  |       | 397.3 |        |  |       | 384.8 |        |   | 379.9 |  |   | 382.6 |  |   | 373.6
|Hospital management                                                 |  |               | 12.1  |        |               | 12.1  |  |        | 11.8  |  |       | 11.4  |        |  |       | 12.0  |        |   | 11.9  |  |   | 12.2  |  |   | 11.9 
|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Total cost of goods sold                                            |  |               | 422.6 |        |               | 415.5 |  |        | 415.9 |  |       | 408.7 |        |  |       | 396.8 |        |   | 391.8 |  |   | 394.8 |  |   | 385.5
|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Gross profit:                                                       |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Institutional pharmacy                                              |  |               | 69.7  |        |               | 67.9  |  |        | 67.5  |  |       | 68.4  |        |  |       | 68.6  |        |   | 66.6  |  |   | 64.5  |  |   | 64.1 
|Hospital management                                                 |  |               | 2.8   |        |               | 2.9   |  |        | 2.8   |  |       | 2.6   |        |  |       | 2.8   |        |   | 2.2   |  |   | 1.7   |  |   | 1.8  
|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Total gross profit                                                  |  |               | 72.5  |        |               | 70.8  |  |        | 70.3  |  |       | 71.0  |        |  |       | 71.4  |        |   | 68.8  |  |   | 66.2  |  |   | 65.9 
|Selling, general and administrative                                 |  |               | 57.3  |        |               | 54.0  |  |        | 50.5  |  |       | 52.3  |        |  |       | 50.9  |        |   | 47.2  |  |   | 44.1  |  |   | 45.4 
|Amortization expense                                                |  |               | 1.6   |        |               | 1.6   |  |        | 1.6   |  |       | 1.7   |        |  |       | 1.8   |        |   | 1.9   |  |   | 2.5   |  |   | 2.8  
|Impairment of intangible assets                                     |  |               |      |        |               |      |  |        |      |  |       | 14.8  |        |  |       |      |        |   |      |  |   |      |  |   |     
|Integration, merger and acquisition related costs and other charges |  |               | 4.1   |        |               | 6.6   |  |        | 7.1   |  |       | 8.9   |        |  |       | 2.0   |        |   | 0.6   |  |   | 0.9   |  |   | 1.7  
|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Operating income (loss)                                             |  |               | 9.5   |        |               | 8.6   |  |        | 11.1  |  |       | (6.7  | )      |  |       | 16.7  |        |   | 19.1  |  |   | 18.7  |  |   | 16.0 
|Interest expense, net                                               |  |               | 3.7   |        |               | 3.5   |  |        | 3.4   |  |       | 3.6   |        |  |       | 3.2   |        |   | 3.3   |  |   | 1.9   |  |   | 1.0  
|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Income (loss) before income taxes                                   |  |               | 5.8   |        |               | 5.1   |  |        | 7.7   |  |       | (10.3 | )      |  |       | 13.5  |        |   | 15.8  |  |   | 16.8  |  |   | 15.0 
|Provision (benefit) for income taxes                                |  |               | 2.5   |        |               | 2.2   |  |        | 3.4   |  |       | (4.8  | )      |  |       | 5.3   |        |   | 6.6   |  |   | 2.2   |  |   | 4.8  
|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Net income (loss)                                                   |  | $             | 3.3   |        | $             | 2.9   |  | $      | 4.3   |  | $     | (5.5  | )      |  | $     | 8.2   |        | $ | 9.2   |  | $ | 14.6  |  | $ | 10.2 
|                                                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Earnings (loss) per common share                                    |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Basic                                                               |  | $             | 0.11  |        | $             | 0.10  |  | $      | 0.14  |  | $     | (0.18 | )      |  | $     | 0.27  |        | $ | 0.30  |  | $ | 0.48  |  | $ | 0.34 
|Diluted                                                             |  | $             | 0.11  |        | $             | 0.10  |  | $      | 0.14  |  | $     | (0.18 | )      |  | $     | 0.27  |        | $ | 0.30  |  | $ | 0.48  |  | $ | 0.33 
|Shares used in computing earnings (loss) per common share:          |  |               |       |        |               |       |  |        |       |  |       |       |        |  |       |       |        |   |       |  |   |       |  |   |      
|Basic                                                               |  |               | 30.1  |        |               | 30.1  |  |        | 30.1  |  |       | 30.1  |        |  |       | 30.2  |        |   | 30.2  |  |   | 30.3  |  |   | 30.3 
|Diluted (1)                                                         |  |               | 30.1  |        |               | 30.2  |  |        | 30.4  |  |       | 30.1  |        |  |       | 30.3  |        |   | 30.4  |  |   | 30.5  |  |   | 30.5 



|(1) | The sum of the four quarters of 2009 do not equal the full year diluted amount due to the tax rate matters.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



F-44



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure
Controls and Procedures

The Corporation has carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including the Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. The Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are designed so that information required to be
disclosed in the Corporations reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms. The
Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are also intended to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Corporations management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or
overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives, and management necessarily is required to use its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, the Corporations
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Corporation files and submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
as and when required.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31,
2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.

Managements Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that:



| | (i) | pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation;
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Corporation; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (iii) | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporations assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



89



---

##### Table of Contents

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2009. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

Based upon our assessment and those criteria, management has concluded that the Corporation maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.

We have excluded the West Virginia Acquisition and Integrity
Pharmacy Services Acquisition from the assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 because they were acquired by the Corporation in business combinations during 2009. The West Virginia Acquisition and
Integrity Pharmacy Services Acquisition combined assets and revenues represent approximately 10.0% and less than 1.0%, respectively, of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The Company continues to integrate new acquisitions into corporate processes. No potential internal control changes due to new acquisitions
would be considered material to, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, who also audited our
consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as stated in their report which appears with our accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.



90



---

##### Table of Contents

PART III



|Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|-------- | ------------------------------------------------------

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from the Corporations definitive proxy statement to be filed no later than 120 days after December 31, 2009. We refer
to this proxy statement as the 2010 Proxy Statement.



|Item 11. | Executive Compensation
|-------- | ----------------------

Incorporated herein by reference from the Corporations 2010 Proxy Statement.



|Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Incorporated herein by reference from the Corporations 2010 Proxy Statement.



|Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
|-------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

Incorporated herein by reference from the Corporations 2010 Proxy Statement.



|Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
|-------- | ---------------------------------------

Incorporated herein by reference from the Corporations 2010 Proxy Statement.



91



---

##### Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits

(a)

(1) All Financial Statements

Consolidated financial statements filed as part of this report are listed under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

No schedules are required because either
the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits



|            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|----------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|2.1         |  | Master Transaction Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2006, by and among AmerisourceBergen Corporation, PharMerica, Inc., Kindred Healthcare, Inc., Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc.,
Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc., Safari Holding Corporation, Hippo Merger Corporation and Rhino Merger Corporation (1)               
|            | 
|2.2         |  | Amendment No. 1 to Master Transaction Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2007, by and among AmerisourceBergen Corporation, PharMerica, Inc., Kindred Healthcare, Inc., Kindred Pharmacy
Services, Inc., Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc., Safari Holding Corporation, Hippo Merger Corporation and Rhino Merger Corporation (2)
|            | 
|3.1         |  | Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (3)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|            | 
|3.2         |  | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant (3)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|            | 
|4.1         |  | Specimen Common Stock Certificate of the Registrant (2)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|            | 
|10.1        |  | Transition Services Agreement  Kindred Healthcare, Inc. (4)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|            | 
|10.2        |  | Transition Services Agreement  AmerisourceBergen Corp. (4)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|            | 
|10.3        |  | Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2006, by and among AmerisourceBergen Corporation, PharMerica, Inc., Kindred Healthcare, Inc., Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc. and
Safari Holding Corporation (1)                                                                                                              
|            | 
|10.4#       |  | Prime Vendor Agreement (4)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|            | 
|10.5        |  | Pharmacy Services Agreement dated as of July 1, 2006 between PharMerica, Inc. and Ceres Strategies, Inc. (5)                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|            | 
|10.6        |  | Master Pharmacy Provider Agreement dated as of July 1, 2004 by and among Kindred Healthcare Operating, Inc., Kindred Hospitals East L.L.C., Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C., Kindred
Hospitals Limited Partnership, THC  Seattle, Inc., THC  Chicago, Inc., and Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc. (5)                         
|            | 
|10.7        |  | Corporate Integrity Agreement dated as of March 29, 2005 between PharMerica, Inc., PharMerica Drug Systems, Inc., their subsidiaries and the Office of Inspector General of the
United States Department of Health and Human Services (2)                                                                                    
|            | 
|10.8        |  | Employment Agreement dated January 14, 2007 between Gregory S. Weishar, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Kindred Healthcare, Inc. and Safari Holding Corporation (1)
                                                                                                                                                         



92



---

##### Table of Contents

|            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|----------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|10.9        |  | Amended and Restated PharMerica Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (15)                                                                                                                                                                         
|            | 
|10.10       |  | Corporate Integrity Agreement Modifications dated as of June 26, 2007 between PharMerica, Inc., PharMerica Drug Systems, Inc., their subsidiaries and the Office of Inspector General
of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (5)
|            | 
|10.11       |  | Commitment Letter dated as of May 31, 2007 among JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., PharMerica, Inc., Kindred Pharmacy Services, Inc. and Safari Holding
Corporation (5)                                                         
|            | 
|10.12       |  | Employment Agreement dated July 11, 2007 between Michael Culotta and Safari Holding Corporation (5)                                                                                                                                                  
|            | 
|10.13       |  | Employment Agreement dated July 11, 2007 between Mark McCullough and Safari Holding Corporation (5)                                                                                                                                                  
|            | 
|10.14       |  | Employment Agreement dated July 11, 2007 between Richard Toole and Safari Holding Corporation (5)                                                                                                                                                    
|            | 
|10.15       |  | Employment Agreement dated July 11, 2007 between Anthony Hernandez and Safari Holding Corporation (5)                                                                                                                                                
|            | 
|10.16       |  | Form CEO Restricted Share Award Agreement (6)                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|            | 
|10.17       |  | Form CEO Stock Option Award Agreement (6)                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|            | 
|10.18       |  | Form Founders Grant Agreement (6)                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|            | 
|10.19       |  | Form McKay Founders Grant Award Agreement (6)                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|            | 
|10.20       |  | Form Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (6)                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|            | 
|10.21       |  | Employment Agreement dated July 31, 2007 between Robert McKay and PharMerica Corporation (3)                                                                                                                                                         
|            | 
|10.22       |  | Credit Agreement dated July 31, 2007 between PharMerica Corporation, the Lenders named therein, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (3)                                                                                            
|            | 
|10.23       |  | Guarantee and Collateral Agreement dated July 31, 2007 between PharMerica Corporation, Its Subsidiaries Party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Collateral Agent
(3)                                                                         
|            | 
|10.24       |  | Patent and Trademark Security Agreement dated July 31, 2007 between PharMerica Corporation, the Subsidiaries party hereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Collateral Agent (3)                                                                     
|            | 
|10.25       |  | Employment Agreement dated August 7, 2007 between Thomas Caneris and PharMerica Corporation (3)                                                                                                                                                      
|            | 
|10.26       |  | Form Performance Share Award Agreement (3)                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|            | 
|10.27       |  | Form Long-Term Cash Award Agreement (3)                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|            | 
|10.28       |  | Form Director Restricted Share Award Agreement (3)                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|            | 
|10.29       |  | Form Director Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement  (13)                                                                                                                                                                                       
|            | 
|10.30       |  | Form of Substitution NQSO Agreement for AmerisourceBergen 2001 Grants (3)                                                                                                                                                                            
|            | 
|10.31       |  | Form of Substitution NQSO Agreement for AmerisourceBergen 2002 Grants (3)                                                                                                                                                                            
|            | 
|10.32       |  | Form of Substitution NQSO Agreement for Kindred Grants (3)                                                                                                                                                                                           
|            | 
|10.33       |  | Form of Substitution ISO Agreement for Kindred Grants (3)                                                                                                                                                                                            
|            | 
|10.34       |  | Form of Transferring Employee (Kindred) Restricted Share Award Agreement (3)                                                                                                                                                                         



93



---

##### Table of Contents

|            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|----------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.35       |  | IT Services Agreement (4)                                                                                                                                                                         
|            | 
|10.36       |  | Trademark License Agreement (4)                                                                                                                                                                   
|            | 
|10.37       |  | Separation of Employment Agreement and General Release, dated September 21, 2007 (4)                                                                                                             
|            | 
|10.38       |  | Summary of 2007 Short Term Incentive Program (4)                                                                                                                                                 
|            | 
|10.39       |  | Summary of Director Compensation Program (4)                                                                                                                                                     
|            | 
|10.40       |  | Amendment No. 1 to Letter Agreement with Gregory S. Weishar, dated November 13, 2007 (12)                                                                                                        
|            | 
|10.41       |  | Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2007 between Janice D. Rutkowski and the Corporation (6)                                                                                                    
|            | 
|10.42       |  | Summary of 2008 Long Term Incentive Program (8)                                                                                                                                                  
|            | 
|10.43       |  | Summary of 2008 Short Term Incentive Program (8)                                                                                                                                                 
|            | 
|10.44       |  | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Award Agreement (8)                                                                                                                                           
|            | 
|10.45       |  | Separation of Employment Agreement and General Release dated June 27, 2008 (9)                                                                                                                   
|            | 
|10.46       |  | Separation of Employment Agreement and General Release dated July 25, 2008 (10)                                                                                                                  
|            | 
|10.47       |  | Employment Agreement dated March 31, 2008 between John Kernaghan and PharMerica Corporation (11)                                                                                                 
|            | 
|10.48       |  | First Amendment to the PharMerica Corporation 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (11)                                                                                                                   
|            | 
|10.49       |  | Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (adjusted EBITDA and adjusted ROIC) (14)                                                                                                               
|            | 
|10.50       |  | Summary of 2009 Long-Term Incentive Program (16)                                                                                                                                                 
|            | 
|10.51       |  | Summary of 2009 Short-Term Incentive Program (16)                                                                                                                                                
|            | 
|10.52       |  | Employment Agreement dated April 20, 2009 between William Monast and PharMerica Corporation (15)                                                                                                 
|            | 
|10.53       |  | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement                                                                                                                                                    
|            | 
|21.1        |  | Subsidiaries of the Registrant (13)                                                                                                                                                               
|            | 
|21.2        |  | Subsidiaries of the Registrant                                                                                                                                                                    
|            | 
|23.1        |  | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP                                                                                                                                                             
|            | 
|31.1        |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|            | 
|31.2        |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|            | 
|32.1        |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                        
|            | 
|32.2        |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                         



|(1) | Filed with Amendment No. 1 to the Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-4/S-1 (Reg. No. 333-142940) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 24, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



94



---

##### Table of Contents

|(2) | Filed with Amendment No. 2 to the Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-4/S-1 (Reg. No. 333-142940) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 27, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Filed with the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 31, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Filed with the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(5) | Filed with Amendment No. 3 to the Corporations Registration Statement on Form S-4/S-1 (Reg. No. 333-142940) filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 13, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(6) | Filed with the Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2007, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(7) | Filed with Amendment No. 1 to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(8) | Filed with the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2008, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(9) | Filed with the Corporations current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2008.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(10) | Filed with the Corporations current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 25, 2008.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(11) | Filed with the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 30, 2008, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(12) | Filed with the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2008, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(13) | Filed with the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 5, 2009, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(14) | Filed with the Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2009, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(15) | Filed with the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2009, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(16) | Filed with the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 30, 2009, and incorporated herein by
reference.
|---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|# | Application has been made to the Securities and Exchange Commission to seek confidential treatment of certain provisions. Omitted material for which confidential
treatment has been requested has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------



95



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



| |  |                        |  |                        |  |     |  |                                                        
| |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
| |  |                        |  | PHARMERICA CORPORATION
| |  |                        |  |                       
| |  | Date: February 4, 2010 |  |                        |  | By: |  | /S/    GREGORY S.
WEISHAR                              
| |  |                        |  |                        |  |     |  | Gregory S. Weishar Chief Executive Officer and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                                                     |  |                                                    |  |                 
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|Signature                                            |  | Title                                              |  | Date            
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    GREGORY S.
WEISHAR (Gregory S. Weishar)       |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director               |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    MICHAEL J.
CULOTTA (Michael J. Culotta)       |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    BERARD E.
TOMASSETTI (Berard E. Tomassetti)   |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    FRANK E.
COLLINS (Frank E. Collins)           |  | Director                                           |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    W. ROBERT DAHL
JR. (W. Robert Dahl Jr.)       |  | Director                                           |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    DR. THOMAS P. GERRITY (Dr. Thomas P. Gerrity) |  | Director                                           |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    THOMAS P. MAC
MAHON (Thomas P. Mac Mahon)     |  | Director                                           |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    DANIEL N.
MENDELSON (Daniel N. Mendelson)     |  | Director                                           |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    DR. ROBERT A. OAKLEY (Dr. Robert A. Oakley)   |  | Director                                           |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    MARJORIE W.
DORR (Marjorie W. Dorr)           |  | Director                                           |  | February 4, 2010
|                                                     |  |                                                   
|/S/    GEOFFREY
MEYERS (Geoffrey Meyers)             |  | Director                                           |  | February 4, 2010



96



---

##### Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX



|            |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|----------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                                       
|10.53       |  | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement                                                                                                                                                     
|            | 
|21.2        |  | Subsidiaries of the Registrant                                                                                                                                                                    
|            | 
|23.1        |  | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP                                                                                                                                                             
|            | 
|31.1        |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|            | 
|31.2        |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|            | 
|32.1        |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                        
|            | 
|32.2        |  | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                         



97