alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                   0000318852
<NAME>                  COLORADO WYOMING RESERVE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>            1
<CURRENCY>              U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         916,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,566
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               921,770
<PP&E>                                         713,406
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,635,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,649
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,950
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,978,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,635,176
<SALES>                                         23,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,309
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               205,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (181,238)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (181,238)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (181,238)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.20)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 26, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Jeffry Anderson and Bruce A. Anderson,*                     both of Lakota, North Dakota; each to retain voting shares of Lakota Bank Holding Company, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain voting shares State Bank of Lakota, both in Lakota, North Dakota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 6, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-00165 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 132283 & (22) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132283 COA: 268588 Genesee CC: 00-005496-FC TONEY ROY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 15, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand for an eviden tiary hearing is DENIED.

p1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
#### MMG Design, Inc., Respondent, v Michael Melnick, Appellant.

[826 NYS2d 718]

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and conversion, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Minardo, J.), dated April 27, 2006, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a judgment in his favor and against the plaintiff upon its failure to serve a reply to his counterclaim and granted the plaintiffs cross motion pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d) for leave to serve a late reply.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To successfully oppose the defendant’s motion for leave to enter a default judgment upon the plaintiffs failure to serve a timely reply to his counterclaim, the plaintiff was required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its delay in serving a reply and a potentially meritorious defense *(see Twersky v Kasaks,*24 AD3d 657, 658 [2005]; *Beizer v Funk,*5 AD3d 619 [2004]; *Bensimon v Fishman,*242 AD2d 551 [1997]). In this case, the plaintiff met its burden. Therefore, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion for leave to enter a default judgment based upon the plaintiffs failure to timely serve a reply to his counterclaim and in granting the plaintiffs cross motion for leave to serve a late reply. Schmidt, J.E, Rivera, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2008, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
      "Report"), I, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Anthony L. Havens


Anthony
      L. Havens


Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:
      September 22, 2008
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BancTec, Inc, a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2006as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, JeffreyD Cushman, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
|                                               |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey D. Cushman                                 |
| Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|                                               |
| August 14, 2006                                    |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 USC Section1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0089

IN THE MATTER OF:

H.R., 

A Youth Under the Age of 18.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 14, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 24 2023

03/24/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0089
[915 NE2d 1158, 886 NYS2d 862]

#### Keith Haywood, Appellant, v Curtis Drown, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Keith Haywood, Appellant, v Pat Smith et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

Decided September 8, 2009

*761APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Dechert LLP,*New York City *(Gary J. Mennitt*of counsel), for appellant.

*Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General,*Albany *(Robert M. Goldfarb, Barbara D. Underwood*and *Andrea Oser*of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

 Upon reargument, following remand by the Supreme Court of the United States, order in *Haywood v Drown*reversed, with costs, motion to dismiss denied and case remitted to Supreme Court, Wyoming County, for further proceedings, and order in *Haywood v Smith*modified, without costs, by denying the motion to dismiss the cause of action predicated on 42 USC § 1983 and remitting to Supreme Court, Wyoming County, for further proceedings on that cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed *(see Haywood v Drown,*556 US —, 129 S Ct 2108 [2009]).

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 191 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish the number of 

known or suspected terrorists encountered attempting to enter the United 

States on a monthly basis, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. PFLUGER (for himself, Mrs. CAMMACK, Mrs. HARSHBARGER, Mr. 

MCCAUL, and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to publish 

the number of known or suspected terrorists encountered 

attempting to enter the United States on a monthly 

basis, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PUBLICATION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOME4 LAND SECURITY OF THE NUMBER OF KNOWN 

5 OR SUSPECTED TERRORISTS ENCOUNTERED 

6 ATTEMPTING TO ENTER THE UNITED STATES. 

7 The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, not later 

8 than the fifteenth day of each month, publish the total 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 191 IH

1 number of known or suspected terrorists, and individuals 

2 whose identities are included in the Terrorist Screening 

3 Database, encountered by the Department of Homeland 

4 Security attempting to enter the United States during the 

5 immediately preceding month. Each such report shall— 

6 (1) include the aggregate such number, and 

7 such number disaggregated by geographic regions of 

8 such encounters, including distinctions relating to 

9 whether such encounters were land-, air-, or sea10 based; and 

11 (2) be published on a public-facing website of 

12 the Department. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
exv10w2



 





Exhibit 10.2




AMENDMENT NO. 2

UNITED AMERICA INDEMNITY, LTD.

AMENDED AND RESTATED

ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARDS PROGRAM




     This AMENDMENT No. 2 (the “Amendment”), effective March 31, 2007, amends the terms and
conditions of the United America Indemnity, Ltd. Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Awards
Program dated 1 January 2005, as amended (the “Program”).



     WHEREAS, the Directors of United America Indemnity, Ltd., an exempted company incorporated
with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands, desire to effect the revisions to the
Program set forth herein effective the date hereof.



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Program is hereby amended as follows:




	 	1.	 	The following shall be inserted into the second paragraph of Annex A of the
Program such that it becomes the second sentence thereof:






“Furthermore, such Performance Criteria may be supplemented by reference to per share
determinations.”




	 	2.	 	The definition of “Program Year” at subsection K of Section III, entitled
“Definition of Terms.”, of the Program is deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following:






“K. ‘Program Year’ means a performance period consisting of any consecutive period of twelve
months or less between January 1 and December 31.”




	 	3.	 	The second full paragraph of Section V., entitled “Awards for
Participants:”, subsection B, entitled “Award Opportunities:” is hereby deleted in
its entirety and replaced with the following:






“Award opportunities under the Program may be expressed as a percentage of the Base Salary,
and may range from 5% to 200%, or may be expressed as specific dollar amounts; provided,
however, that in no event shall payment in respect of an Award for a 12-month Program Year
exceed $3 million, which amount shall be prorated for any Program Year less than 12 months.”




	 	4.	 	The first complete sentence in the first full paragraph of Section VI.,
entitled “Payment of Awards”, is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:




“Except as otherwise provided in an Award, a Participant shall be entitled to receive payment
in an amount equal to his/her Award no later than March 15 of the year following the Program
Year to which payment relates.”
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

eMerge Interactive,Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-123618, 333-121589, 333-113082 and 333-111446) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-127186, 333-39896 and 333-60382) of eMerge Interactive, Inc. of our report dated February 3, 2006, with respect to the balancesheets of eMerge Interactive, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related financialstatement schedules, which report appears in the December 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K of eMerge Interactive, Inc. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP

 

March 27, 2006 

Orlando, Florida 

Certified Public Accountants
EX-31 Sarbanes-Oxley Certification.


  I, Diane Courtney, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed the report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Merrill Lynch Alternative Note Asset Trust, Series 2007-A2
    (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for ABS and their related attestation reports on assessment of
    compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
    to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of
    Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been
    included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in
    this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
    reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Central Mortgage Company as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.
    as Servicer, National City Mortgage Co. as Servicer and Wilshire Credit
    Corporation as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 26, 2008


    /s/ Diane Courtney
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-15-002]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

January 14, 2015 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

      ( print page 1434)    

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: none

2. Minutes

3. Ratification List

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 731-TA-986 and 987 (Second Review) (Ferrovanadium from China and South Africa). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on January 28, 2015.

5. Outstanding action jackets: none

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 6, 2015.

William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-00229 Filed 1-7-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### Roberto Santana, as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels, and Credits of Lourdes Fernandez, Deceased, Respondent, v Edwin De Jesus et al., Appellants.

[973 NYS2d 604]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen A. Rakower, J.), entered May 15, 2012, upon a jury verdict, awarding plaintiff, among other things, $750,000 for the decedent’s conscious pain and suffering, including pre-impact terror, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate that award and to direct a new trial on that issue, unless plaintiff stipulates, within 30 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, to a reduction of that award from $750,000 to $375,000 and to entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The evidence at trial was legally sufficient to support the jury’s verdict finding that defendants were 100% at fault for the death of plaintiff’s decedent *(see Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]). Ample evidence supported the finding that defendant Edwin De Jesus, a bus driver for defendant New *562York City Transit Authority, breached his duty to exercise due care, or see that which he should have seen through the proper use of his senses (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1146 [a]; *Sauter v Calabretta,*90 AD3d 1702, 1703 [4th Dept 2011]; *Bello v New York City Tr. Auth.,*50 AD3d 511, 512 [1st Dept 2008]).

We reject defendants’ contentions that plaintiffs experts were unqualified or that their testimony was speculative *(see Schechter v 3320 Holding LLC,*64 AD3d 446, 449-450 [1st Dept 2009]; *Seong Sil Kim v New York City Tr. Auth.,*27 AD3d 332, 334 [1st Dept 2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 714 [2006]). At best, these arguments speak to the evidence’s weight, not admissibility, and the jury here clearly found their testimony persuasive *(see Matter of Moona C. [Charlotte K.],*107 AD3d 466, 467 [1st Dept 2013]; *Rubio v New York City Tr. Auth.,*99 AD3d 532, 533 [1st Dept 2012]). It was well within the jury’s province to accept their opinions and reject that of defendants’ expert *(see Rojas v Palese,*94 AD3d 557, 558 [1st Dept 2012]; *Torricelli v Pisacano,*9 AD3d 291, 293 [1st Dept 2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 612 [2004]).

However, considering the circumstances here, such as the duration of conscious pain and suffering endured by plaintiffs decedent, including pre-impact terror, we find that the award materially deviated from reasonable compensation, and reduce it as indicated (CPLR 5501; *see Segal v City of New York,*66 AD3d 865 [2d Dept 2009]; *see also Garcia v Queens Surface Corp.,*271 AD2d 277 [1st Dept 2000]).

We have considered the parties’ remaining contentions, and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, BeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.