alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[971 NYS2d 440]

#### In the Matter of Desmond J. Connell (Admitted as Desmond Joseph Connell), an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

September 24, 2013

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Jorge Dopico, Chief Counsel, Departmental Disciplinary Committee,*New York City *(Raymond Vallejo*of counsel), for petitioner.

*Lawrence R. DiGiansante,*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Respondent Desmond J. Connell was admitted to the practice *253of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on February 6, 1995. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained his principal place of business within the First Judicial Department.

On October 13, 2011, in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, respondent pleaded guilty to grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35), a class D felony, and scheme to defraud in the first degree (Penal Law § 190.65 [1] [b]), a class E felony. Respondent admitted during his plea allocution that between July 1, 2005 and November 30, 2007, he acted in concert with others operating a scheme to defraud insurance carriers by filing no-fault insurance claims for reimbursement under false and fraudulent pretenses, which caused a loss to numerous insurance carriers in excess of $1,000. In the course of the scheme and theft, respondent used a network of attorneys that relied on steering activities, which resulted in losses to insurance carriers in excess of $3,000. On May 9, 2013, respondent was sentenced to a conditional discharge and three years’ probation, and restitution in the amount of $75,000.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee now seeks an order, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys on the ground that he was automatically disbarred as of the date of his conviction of a felony as defined by Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (e). Respondent’s counsel was served with this motion but neither counsel or respondent has appeared or submitted a response to this petition.

Respondent’s conviction of the class D felony of grand larceny in the third degree, and the class E felony of scheme to defraud in the first degree constitutes grounds for his automatic disbarment (M*atter of Harris,*109 AD3d 136 [1st Dept 2013]; *Matter of Lurie,*207 AD2d 48 [1st Dept 1995]). The automatic disbarment occurs at the time of conviction when respondent entered his guilty plea *(Matter of Sheinbaum,*47 AD3d 49 [1st Dept 2007]).

Accordingly, the Disciplinary Committee’s petition, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) and (b), should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective nunc pro tunc to October 13, 2011.

*254Friedman, J.E, Acosta, Feinman, Gische and Clark, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred, and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, nunc pro tunc to October 13, 2011.
ex103.htm


Exhibit 10.3



 


UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE




 




	
U.S. $100,000.00

	
May 22, 2015














FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Eos Petro, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Issuer”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Plethora Enterprises, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (the “Payee”), at such place as the Payee shall direct in writing, the principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), with interest at 10.00% on the unpaid balance.  All references to Dollars herein are to lawful currency of the United States of America.







All unpaid principal of this Note and accrued interest shall be due and payable on January 1, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). This Note may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without penalty.







In any action at law or in equity to enforce or construe any provisions or rights under this Note, the unsuccessful party or parties to such litigation, as determined by a court pursuant to a final offer, judgment or decree, shall pay to the successful party or parties all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by such successful party.







This Note and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of the State of California, or of any other state.







 

 







Eos Petro, Inc.


A Nevada corporation












By: /s/ Nikolas Konstant


    Nicholas Konstant


    Its: Chief Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2591 

To adjust the minimum rate of basic pay for members of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2023 

Mr. MIKE GARCIA of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To adjust the minimum rate of basic pay for members of 

the Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Raising the Annual 

5 Income of Servicemembers by Enhancing Minimum Base 

6 Pay Act’’ or the ‘‘RAISE Minimum Base Pay Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. MINIMUM RATE OF BASIC PAY FOR A MEMBER OF 

8 THE ARMED FORCES. 

9 Not later than 30 days after the enactment of this 

10 Act, the rate of basic pay for a member of the Armed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2591 IH

1 Forces under section 203 of title 37, United States Code, 

2 shall equal or exceed $31,200. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Patrick Greene, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this annual report of Roadships Holdings, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The other small business issuer's certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.





/s/  Patrick Greene


By Patrick Greene


Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


May 16, 2011