alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10104.htm


    
      

      

    

    Exhibit
      10.104

    


    


    


    


    


    May
      24,
      2007

    


    


    SmarTire
      Systems Inc.

    13151
      Vanier Place, Suite 150

    Richmond,
      British Columbia

    V6V
      2J1

    


    


    Re:
      May 27 2005 $1.5 million 5% convertible debenture

    


    


    With
      respect to the $125,000 monthly payments that, under the terms of the above
      referenced convertible debenture, were scheduled to commence on September 1,
      2005, which such payment commencement date has been
      previously  extended (i) on October 21, 2005 to January 1, 2006 (ii)
      on January 3, 2006 to April 1, 2006 (iii) on April 3, 2006 to May 1, 2006,
      (iv)
      on May 1, 2006 to August 1, 2006, (v) on July 31, 2006 to November 1, 2006,
      (vi)
      on December 15, 2006 to March 31, 2007,(vii) on March 24, 2007 to May 31, 2007,
      Cornell agrees to provide SmarTire with a further extension to July 31, 2007
      to
      commence such monthly payments.

    


    


    Yours
      very truly,

    


    Cornell
      Capital Partners, LP

    


    /s/
      David Gonzalez

    David
      Gonzalez

    Managing
      Partner & General Counsel
Exhibit
        32
 
 Certification
        Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 (18
        U.S.C. 1350)
 
 Persuant
        to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) the
        undersigned General Partners of TASA Products Limited, a Washington limited
        partnership (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of such General
        Partner's knowledge and belief, that:
 
 1.
        The
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the
        "Form
        10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results
        of     operations of the Company.
 
 /s/MICHEL
                    E. MAES
                /s/JAMES
                    R. STEFFEYMichel
                    E. Maes
                James
                    R. SteffeyCo-General
                    Partner
                Co-General
                    PartnerDate:
                    10-10-07
                Date:
                    10-10-07
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**BETTY BIBBUS,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (WOOD COMPANY),** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 514 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 7th day of October, 2015, the Petition for All owance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
#### In re: Donna Marie BARNES-DUNCAN, Debtor. American Bank, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Donna Marie Barnes-Duncan, Defendant—Appellee, and Estate of Morris Battle; Farm Service Agency; Ashok Jashnani, Defendants, Timothy Branigan, Trustee.

No. 09-2152.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 3, 2010.

Decided: Nov. 2, 2010.

David William Cohen, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Scott Craig Borison, Legg Law Firm, Frederick, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

American Bank appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s determination that the lien held by American Bank against the property of Donna Marie Barnes-Duncan was void as a matter of state law. We have reviewed the briefs filed by the parties and the lower court records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *American Bank v. Barnes-Duncan,*No. 8:08-cv-01976-RWT (D.Md. Sept. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Craig Lewis, Appellant.

Submitted May 11, 2009;

decided June 4, 2009

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER15-303-000]

                    On December 31, 2014, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. ER15-303-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation into the justness and reasonableness of American Transmission Systems, Inc.'s (ATSI) 12.38 percent return on equity in conjunction with ATSI's October 31, 2014 section 205 filing proposing revisions to its with transmission formula rate and Protocols.                     *PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. et al.,*                     149 FERC ¶ 61,292 (2014).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. ER15-303-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: January 6, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-00249 Filed 1-9-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Pullen, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert W. Pullen   
|Robert W. Pullen       
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: May 11, 2010     







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00114-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.M., M.A.M., K.A.M., J.G.M.,

J.E.M., AND J.I.M.P., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the

138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-DCL-04135-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Appellee, TEXAS 

DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, is exempt from all costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 15, 2021
#### Calvin Earl BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, (P & D Lodging, Inc.), Defendant-Appellee. Calvin Earl Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Pitt Co. Schools, Defendant-Appellee. Calvin Earl Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Sam’s Club, Inc., Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 06-1805, 06-1815, 06-1816.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 19, 2006.

Calvin Earl Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*450Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Calvin E. Brown appeals from three separate actions alleging employment discrimination, which have been consolidated on appeal. In each case, the district court adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to dismiss as frivolous the action, under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915(A) (West Supp.2006), and noted that despite clear notice, Brown failed to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. Thus Brown has waived his right to appeal these orders. *Wells v. Shriners Hosp.,*109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir.1997); *United States v. Schronce,*727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir.1984). We find no reversible error in the district court’s orders in each case denying Brown’s motion to reconsider and his motion to appoint counsel. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. *See Brown v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n,*No. 4:05-cv-74-H (E.D.N.C. June 20, 2006 & July 7, 2006); *Brown v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n,*No. 4:05-ev-75-H (E.D.N.C. June 20, 2006 & July 7, 2006); *Brown v. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm’n,*No. 4:05-cv-148-H (E.D.N.C. June 20, 2006 & July 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Opinion issued April 19 , 20 2 2

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 21 - 00 644 - CV

——————————— FADI N. MOGHIEH , Appella nt

V. MIREILLE EL ETER , Appell e e On Appeal from the 333 rd District Court

Harris County , Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 20 21 - 56576
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Fadi N. Moghieh , ha s neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 5, 20.1; see also T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Co urts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial2

Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 1 5

- 91 58 (Tex. Aug. 28 , 201 5)
. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not respond
. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(b), (c). We di smiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot
. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Farris
.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Pinkney, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 560]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Renee A. White, J.), rendered on or about February 1, 2011, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making *573application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Sweeny, J.P., Renwick, Feinman and Clark, JJ.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the month of May 2004 Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. 
  Canadian Pacific Tower, Ste 1600, 100 Wellington Street W., Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, Canada 
 (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.) Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   x
 (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.) Yes   o
    
    No   x
 (If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
. This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant:  Form S-8 No.333-13960.    Page 1 of 2 Pages
Exhibits Index appears on Page 3




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
              (Registrant)Date:   May 5, 2004
    By        /s/   Sari DiamondName:
    Sari DiamondTitle:
    Assistant Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibits Index The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form 6-K. Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibits99.1
    
    Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. to Present at the Harris Nesbitt
Gerard Conference
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors meeting.

      ( print page 920)    

# TIME AND DATE:

 The meeting will be held on January 22, 2015, from 12:00 Noon to 3:00 p.m., Eastern Standard Time.

# PLACE:

 This meeting will be open to the public via conference call. Any interested person may call 1-877-422-1931, passcode 2855443940, to listen and participate in this meeting.

# STATUS:

 Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

Issued on: December 30, 2014.

Larry W. Minor, 

Associate Administrator, Office of Policy, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.

[FR Doc. 2015-00094 Filed 1-5-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For February 16, 2005 EXTENDICARE INC. (Translation of registrants name into English)
 3000 Steeles Avenue East
Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9W2(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F o
    
    Form 40-F þ
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this
Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o
    
    No þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection
with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    News Release dated February 8, 2005  Extendicare to Record US$33.6 Million Tax Benefit in 200499.2
    
    News Release dated February 16, 2005 Extendicare Inc. Declares Preferred Share Dividend Payment  TSX: EXE.PR.E




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. EXTENDICARE INC.Date: February 16, 2005
    By:
    /s/ RICHARD L. BERTRANDRichard L. BertrandSenior Vice-President andChief Financial Officer
[908 NE2d 904, 880 NYS2d 914]

#### In the Matter of Lavountae A. and Others, Infants. Monroe County Department of Human Services, Respondent; Laticia A., Appellant.

Decided May 7, 2009

*833APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender,*Rochester *(David M. Abbatoy, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellant.

*Daniel M. DeLaus, Jr., County Attorney,*Rochester *(Paul N. Humphrey*of counsel), for respondent.

*Susan B. Marris,*Manlius, *Law Guardian.*

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Family Court entered a determination of neglect based, in part, on a finding that respondent mother had a drug problem that necessitated treatment and that placed her children in imminent risk of harm. The court further observed that she had failed to follow through with two drug treatment programs despite her previous acknowledgment of a drug problem and her repeated promises to comply with treatment directives. Since the Appellate Division affirmed the neglect determination, we may disturb it only if it is not supported by sufficient proof in the record. Because we cannot say that there is no valid line of reasoning that could lead a rational factfinder to the decision reached in this case, we affirm.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Cipajrick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals *(22*NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
663 A.2d 640

#### IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD T. COSGROVE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

September 13, 1995.

ORDER

EDWARD T. COSGROVE of PEQUANNOCK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1962, having been ordered to show cause on September 11, 1995, why this Court’s Order of temporary suspension should not be continued pending the disposition of ethics proceedings against him, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the suspension of EDWARD T. COS-GROVE continue pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

*432ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he continue to comply with *Rule*1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics may transfer to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund the attorney account funds held in any financial institution by EDWARD T. COSGROVE, which funds were restrained from disbursement by this Court’s Order of August 4, 1995.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Terrance J. Lillis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of PrincipalLife Income Fundings Trust 2007-11 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicingagreement(s) in all material respects; and  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be includedin this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Citibank, N.A. and Bankers Trust Company, N.A.Date: March 27, 2008   /s/ Terrance J. Lillis   Terrance J. Lillis  Chief Financial Officer- Retirement and Investor Services