alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roberto Ramirez, Appellant.

[871 NYS2d 705]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered March 22, 2006, convicting him of aggravated sexual abuse in the third degree, upon a nonjury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

As a threshold matter, the defendant’s challenge to the legal *758sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction is unpre-served for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484 [2008]; *People v Gordon,*47 AD3d 833, 833-834 [2008]; *People v Colon,*43 AD3d 951 [2007]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]; *People v Hayes,*47 AD3d 835 [2008]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see People v Burgos,*18 AD3d 667 [2005]; *People v Smith,*303 AD2d 426 [2003]; *People v Best,*294 AD2d 512 [2002]). Moreover, in fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the opportunity of the trier of fact to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo, 2*NY3d 383, 410 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Rivera, J.P, Santucci, Garni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sycamore Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel E. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    DANIEL E.
SMITH               
|Daniel E. Smith                      
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|September 29, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ultrak, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Niklaus F. Zenger, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(a)      This Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

  /s/ Niklaus F. Zenger
-----------------------------

Niklaus F. Zenger
Chief Executive
Officer
August 14, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahr a Bridget M. McCormac k
David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstei n Kurtis T. Wilde r Elizabeth T. Clement,
J ustices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at t he direction of the Court.

May 29, 2018

d0521 

# Order

Clerk 

### May 29, 2018

156125

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 156 125 COA: 337839 Wayne CC: 09-006214-FC BURRELL CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the app lication for leave to appeal the May 16, 2017 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, becaus e we are not persuaded that the questions presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.
##### 



---

---

FORM 6-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of September 30, 2003

Vitran Corporation Inc.




(Name of registrant)


185 The West Mall, Suite 701, Toronto, Ontario, M9C 5L5, Canada




(Address of Principal Executive Offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F   x
    
    Form 40-F   o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

Yes   o
    
    No   x




---

---





---



##### 



Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

VITRAN
CORPORATION INC.By:
    
    /s/   Kevin A. GlassDate:   November 26, 2003
    
    Name:
    
    Kevin A. GlassTitle:
    
    Vice President Financeand Chief Financial Officer


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Vitran Announces Offering of Common Shares
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HEATHER M. EVERETT, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. :

 : CIVIL ACTION 14-0573-M

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, :

Social Security Commissioner, :

 :

Defendant. :

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that JUDGMENT be entered in favor 

of Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin and against Plaintiff Heather M. 

Everett.

DONE this 8th day of October, 2015.

s/BERT W. MILLING, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00573-M Document 23 Filed 10/08/15 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
================================================================================

                                    Form 6-K


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION



                            Report of Foreign Issuer
                      Pursuant of Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       The Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the month of February 2004                   Commission File Number: 1-14242



                        ROYAL GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
                              (Name of registrant)


                             1 Royal Gate Boulevard
                               Woodbridge, Ontario
                                     L4L 8Z7
                                 (905) 264 0701


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files of will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

                         Form 20-F [ ]     Form 40-F [X]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the SEC
pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

                               Yes [ ]     No [X]


If "YES" is marked, indicate the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A

================================================================================
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit              Description of Exhibit                           Page
-------              ----------------------                           ----
<S>                  <C>                                              <C>

                     Material Change Report

   1                 Royal Group Technologies Limited                  4

</TABLE>


<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be singed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                         ROYAL GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED




Date:  February 26, 2004                 By: /s/ Scott Bates
                                             ------------------------------
                                         Name:   Scott Bates
                                         Title:  General Counsel and
                                                 Corporate Secretary
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6934

AARON ALLEN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DAVID STUMBO, Solicitor; PENNY B. CARSON, Assist. Sol. , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 8:22

- cv - 01045

- TMC )

Submitted : March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Aaron Allen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6934 Doc: 6 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Aaron Allen appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint with

pr ejudice

. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court entered its order on July 5, 2022

. Allen filed the notice of appeal

on August 15, 2022 . Because Allen fa iled to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6934 Doc: 6 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Roger P. Baresel, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 of Fullnet Communications, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe year covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the years presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, was made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the year in which this reportwas being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the year coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal year that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 

 
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: April 2, 2007   /s/ Roger P. Baresel, President and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

          - [BAC 6735-01]

# TIME AND DATE:

 10:00 a.m., Thursday, January 15, 2015.

# PLACE:

 The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

# STATUS:

 Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                         The Commission will hear oral argument in the matter                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *Jim Walter Resources, Inc.,*                         Docket No. SE 2011-407-R (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in upholding an imminent danger order.)                    

Any person attending this oral argument who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

 Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-00084 Filed 1-5-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
##### 



News Announcement CONTACT:Richard Gaetz, President/CEO
    
    Robert RindermanSean Washchuk, VP Finance/CFO
    
    Purdy TranVitran Corporation Inc.
    
    Jaffoni & Collins Incorporated416/596-7664
    
    212/835-8500 or VVN@jcir.com
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE VITRAN EXPANDS AND EXTENDS BANK CREDIT FACILITY TORONTO, ONTARIO (January 13, 2005)  Vitran Corporation Inc. (AMX: VVN, TSX: VTN), a North
American transportation and logistics firm, today announced that it has increased its borrowing
capacity under its existing syndicated credit facilities agented with the Bank of Nova Scotia, and
extended its repayment term. (Note: all figures in this news announcement are in $U.S.) Pursuant to the amended credit agreement, borrowing capacity under the unused revolving facility
has been increased from $19 million to $35 million. Additionally, the term credit facility was
reduced from $20 million to $15 million, and the repayment period on both the revolver and term
facility was extended by 13 months to September 30, 2007. As a result Vitrans borrowing capacity
was increased from $39 million to $50 million. Vitrans total debt at September 30, 2004 was $20
million. Vitran President and Chief Executive Officer Rick Gaetz stated, We are pleased with the
long-term support and commitment we have received from Bank of Nova Scotia and the syndicate.
Increasing Vitrans borrowing capacity to $50 million has enhanced our financial capacity to pursue
opportunistic growth strategies in the U.S. regional LTL market. About Vitran Corporation Inc.
Vitran Corporation Inc. is a North American group of transportation companies offering
less-than-truckload, logistics, truckload, and freight brokerage services. To find out more about
Vitran Corporation Inc. (AMX:VVN, TSX:VTN), visit the website at www.vitran.com. Information in this news announcement relating to projected growth, improvements in productivity
and future results constitutes forward-looking statements. Actual results in future periods may
differ materially from the forward-looking statements because of a number of risks and
uncertainties, including but not limited to economic factors, demand for the Companys services,
fuel price fluctuations, the availability of employee drivers and independent contractors, risks
associated with geographic expansion, capital requirements, claims exposure and insurance costs,
competition and environmental hazards. Additional information about these and other factors that
could affect the Companys business is set forth in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K and
other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. # # #
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)   I, Terrance Heard, Chief Financial Officer of Endeavor Uranium, Inc. (the Company), have executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report). The undersigned hereby certifies that:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/  Terrance HeardTerrance Heard
Chief Financial Officer
May 1, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-31265

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RILEY D. DANTZLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

No. 3:10-CR-24-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Riley Dantzler has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dantzler has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant

portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment

that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,

the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 29, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-31265 Document: 00511678154 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2011
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      condition with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex
      Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended October 31,
      2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), I, George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








By /s/
      George G. Usher


George
      G.
      Usher,


Chief
      Executive Officer


March 21,
      2006





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
      “Exchange Act”). This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
      the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
      it
      by reference.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARGARET C. REFROE,

Plaintiff,

:

:

:

:

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 14-314-CG-M

:

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, 

LLC,

Defendant.

:

:

:

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order entered this date, it is ORDERED, 

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC’s 

Motion to Dismiss is Granted and the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED

without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief maybe 

granted.

DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of February, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cv-00314-CG-M Document 37 Filed 02/10/15 Page 1 of 1