alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>
    
    <ARTICLE>                         5
           
    <S>                               <C>
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
    <PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
    <PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1999 
    <CASH>                                            0
    <SECURITIES>                                      0
    <RECEIVABLES>                                     0
    <ALLOWANCES>                                      0
    <INVENTORY>                                       0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
    <PP&E>                                            0
    <DEPRECIATION>                                    0
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    0
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
    <BONDS>                                           0
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
    <PREFERRED>                                       0
    <COMMON>                                          0
    <OTHER-SE>                                  2384819     
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      0
    <SALES>                                           0
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
    <CGS>                                             0
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
    <INCOME-TAX>                                      0
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
    <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
    <CHANGES>                                         0
    <NET-INCOME>                                      0
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                     0

    
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Roadships Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2010 and 2009  (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael Nugent

By Michael Nugent

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

May 16, 2011
/s/  Patrick Greene

By Patrick Greene

Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 16, 2011
----

----

**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATE        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.        1350)**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/  Daniel                  L. Baxter                                                           |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| Daniel                  L. BaxterChief                  Executive OfficerOctober                  19, 2007 |   |   |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2288 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2288

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
    of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Nutrition Programs 
                  Administration for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the 
     Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
    of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Nutrition Programs 
                  Administration for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE, NUTRITION 
              PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Nutrition Programs 
Administration for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $164,688,000.
                                 <all>
```
CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 EQUITY PLAN




---



##### 



CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 EQUITY PLAN
 SECTION
    
    
    
    PAGE1.
    
    
    Purpose
    
    
    12.
    
    
    Term
    
    
    13.
    
    
    Definitions
    
    
    14.
    
    
    Units Available Under Plan
    
    
    65.
    
    
    Options
    
    
    66.
    
    
    Appreciation Rights
    
    
    77.
    
    
    Restricted Units
    
    
    98.
    
    
    Phantom Units
    
    
    109.
    
    
    Performance Units and Performance Bonuses
    
    
    1110.
    
    
    Awards to Eligible Directors
    
    
    1211.
    
    
    Transferability
    
    
    1312.
    
    
    Adjustments
    
    
    1313.
    
    
    Fractional Units
    
    
    1414.
    
    
    Withholding Taxes
    
    
    1415.
    
    
    Administration of the Plan
    
    
    1416.
    
    
    Amendments and Other Matters
    
    
    1517.
    
    
    Governing Law
    
    
    16




---



##### 



CRESTWOOD MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, LP
THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 EQUITY PLAN
  Purpose
 Term
 Definitions
 Affiliate
 Appreciation Right
 Award
 Board
 Change in Control




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



Code
 Committee
 Company
 Consultant
 Date of Grant
 Deferral Period
 DER
 Eligible Director
 Employee
 Evidence of Award
 3




---



##### 



Exchange Act
 Grant Price
 Incumbent Directors
 Incumbent Crestwood Directors
 Management Objectives i.e.
  4




---



##### 



Market Value per Unit
 Option
 Option Price
 Participant
 Performance Bonus
 Performance Period
 Performance Unit
 Person
 Phantom Units
 Restricted Units
 Rule 16b-3
 Spread
 5




---



##### 



UDR
 Unit
 Voting Securities of the Company
 Units Available Under Plan
 Options
    6




---



##### 



Appreciation Rights
 7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



Restricted Units
   rd
    9




---



##### 



Phantom Units
  rd
    10




---



##### 



Performance Units and Performance Bonuses
       11




---



##### 



Awards to Eligible Directors.
    12




---



##### 



rd th
 th
  Transferability
 Adjustments
  13




---



##### 



Fractional Units
 Withholding Taxes
 Administration of the Plan
    14




---



##### 



Amendments and Other Matters
     15




---



##### 



Governing Law
 16
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Mizhirumbay-Guaman, Appellant.

[970 NYS2d 876]—

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered November 15, 2011, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Although the Rockland County pre-printed form waiver of the *669right to appeal signed by the defendant contained erroneous statements with regard to the waiver of the right to appeal *(see People v Edmunson,*109 AD3d 621 [2d Dept 2013]), the defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was valid *(see id.; People v Pelaez,*100 AD3d 803, 804 [2012], *lv denied*21 NY3d 945 [2013]). Thus, review of the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive is precluded *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257 [2011]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]). Dillon, J.E, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of BancTec, Inc, a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, BrianR. Stone, Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| / s /    Brian R. Stone       |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                              |
| Brian R. Stone                                    |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                              |
| November 15, 2004                            |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by 18 USC Section 1350has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Jaime NIETO, Petitioner v. Michael B. MUKASEY, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-60732

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 2007.

Gino Mario Mesa, Mesa *&*Yeverino, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Alberto R. Gonzales, Director, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, Caryl G. Thompson, U.S. Immigration *&*Naturalization Service District Directors Office, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

Before KING, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jaime Nieto, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions this court for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ) finding him removable, denying his application for an adjustment of status under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 245(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i), and ordering his voluntary departure or in the alternative, removal to Mexico. Nieto contends that the IJ erred in determining that his inadmissibility under INA § 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I), for which there is no waiver, rendered him ineligible to adjust his status from that of an illegal alien physically present in the United States to that of a lawful permanent resident.

We have previously upheld as reasonable the BIA’s interpretation that compliance with the requirements of § 1255(i) does not cure inadmissibility under § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I). The BIA did not act arbitrarily in determining that because Nieto was inadmissible under § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I), he was ineligible for an adjustment of status under § 1255(i). *See Mortera-Cruz v. Gonzales,*409 F.3d 246, 255-56 (5th Cir.2005). Consequently, the BIA’s decision is entitled to deference. *Id.*

PETITION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set fordt in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel MENDOZA-RENDON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10648.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 18, 2006.

Monte C. Clausen, AUSA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Ap-pellee.

Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Manuel Mendoza-Rendon appeals from the district court’s judgment imposed following a guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Mendoza-Rendon has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief. We therefore GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 10.6 2Q2015








Exhibit 10.6
Grants under 2015 Plan
SCHEDULE 3
Amendment to Executive Performance Share Award Agreement


Section 2.2(c) of the Executive Performance Share Award Agreement is amended to read as follows:


In the event of a Change in Control followed within two years by (A) a termination of the Grantee’s employment by the Company without Cause, or (B) initiation of the Good Reason Process by written notice of a Good Reason condition by the Grantee to the Company which subsequently results in a termination of the Grantee’s employment by the Grantee for Good Reason, in either case prior to the end of the Performance Period or prior to the date the Committee determines the Earned Award, the Grantee shall vest in full in the Target Award as of the date of the Grantee’s termination of employment.  In the event of a Change in Control followed within two years by (A) a termination of the Grantee’s employment by the Company without Cause, or (B) initiation of the Good Reason Process by written notice of a Good Reason condition by the Grantee to the Company which subsequently results in a termination of the Grantee’s employment by the Grantee for Good Reason, in either case after the Committee has determined the Earned Award, the Grantee shall vest in the unvested portion of the Earned Award as of the date of the Grantee’s termination of employment. For purposes of this Agreement, (1) Good Reason shall mean that Grantee has complied with the Good Reason Process following the occurrence of any of the following events or actions: (i) any material reduction in Grantee’s base salary, unless a similar reduction is made in the base salary of all similarly situated executives, (ii) any material reduction in Grantee’s authority, duties or responsibilities, (iii) any material change in the geographic location at which Grantee must perform his duties, or (iv) any material breach of any written agreement with the Company by the Company; and (2) Good Reason Process shall mean that (i) Grantee reasonably determines in good faith that a Good Reason condition has occurred, (ii) Grantee notifies the Company in writing of the first occurrence of the Good Reason condition within 60 days of the first occurrence of such condition, (iii) Grantee cooperates in good faith with the Company’s efforts, for a period not less than 30 days following such notice (the “Cure Period”) to remedy the condition, (iv) notwithstanding such efforts, the Good Reason condition continues to exist, and (v) Grantee terminates employment within 60 days after the end of the Cure Period; provided, however, if the Company cures the Good Reason condition during the Cure Period, Good Reason shall be deemed not to have occurred.
#### Juan Manuel Hernandez VALENCIA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-72567.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*116Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 17, 2006.

Martin Avila Robles, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, P.C., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, John C. Cunningham, Esq., Ann Carroll Varnon, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s opposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hoo-ton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioner’s opening brief has not demonstrated that the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) abused its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider. *See Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), *amended by*404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that court reviews BIA denials of reconsideration under abuse of discretion standard and must uphold BIA’s decision unless the decision is irrational, arbitrary, or contrary to law). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m., Tuesday, January 27, 2015.

# PLACE:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# STATUS:

The one item is open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

      ( print page 1672)    

8612 Safety Study: Integrity Management of Gas Transmission Pipelines in High Consequence Areas

# NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

The press and public may enter the NTSB Conference Center one hour prior to the meeting for set up and seating.

                        Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Rochelle Hall at (202) 314-6305 or by email at                         *Rochelle.Hall@ntsb.gov*                         by Wednesday, January 21, 2015.                    

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

                        Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also available at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Candi Bing at (202) 314-6403 or by email at                         *bingc@ntsb.gov.*

# FOR MEDIA INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Terry Williams, (202) 314-6100 or by email at                         *Terry.Williams@ntsb.gov.*

Dated: Friday, January 9, 2015.

Candi R. Bing,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-00439 Filed 1-9-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE & TIME:

 Thursday, January 15, 2015 At 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

 This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

 

Correction and Approval of Minutes for December 11, 2014

Correction and Approval of Minutes for December 17, 2014

Welcome and Opening Remarks by Chair Ann M. Ravel

2015 Meeting Dates (July-December)

Draft Advisory Opinion 2014-19: ActBlue

Draft Advisory Opinion 2014-20: Make Your Laws PAC, Inc.

Management and Administrative Matters

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

 Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shelley E. Garr,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2015-00367 Filed 1-8-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P