alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Fieldstone Mortgage Investment Trust
c/o US Bank Trust NA
30 Delware Ave
Ste. 813
Wilmington, DE 19801

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year
2007 or applicable portion thereof (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and/or Trust
Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto
(the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 1, 2008

/s/ Scott Runkles
Scott Runkles
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Transfer and Servicing Agreement for FIELDSTONE 2006-3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  as Master Servicer and Trust Administrator, as applicable

2 Transfer and Servicing Agreement for FIELDSTONE 2006-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  as Master Servicer and Trust Administrator, as applicable

3 Transfer and Servicing Agreement for Fieldstone Mortgage Investment Trust,
  Series 2007-1 Mortgage-Backed Notes, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trust
  Administrator
#### In the Matter of Edward J. Hayward, Resignor.

[870 NYS2d 921]

Motion by the respondent for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor-at-law. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on June 21, 1972, under the name Edward Joseph Hayward. By decision and order of this Court dated April 5, 2004, the respondent’s application for voluntary resignation was accepted and his name was removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Upon the papers submitted in support of the motion and the papers submitted in relation thereto, it is Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further, Ordered that, effective immediately, the respondent, Edward J. Hayward, admitted as Edward Joseph Hayward, is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, subject to payment of registration fees for delinquent periods, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Edward Joseph Hayward to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Prudenti, EJ., Mastro, Rivera, Spolzino and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 BY THE
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, Ron Kalfus, Chief Financial Officer of MabCure, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (a) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
      annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                    

|By:    | /s/ Ron Kalfus                              
|------ | --------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Ron Kalfus                                  
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer                     
|       | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|Date:  | April 10, 2009                              

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2437 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2437

   To revise the boundaries of a unit of the John H. Chafee Coastal 
  Barrier Resources System in Topsail, North Carolina, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2023

Mr. Murphy (for himself and Mr. Rouzer) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To revise the boundaries of a unit of the John H. Chafee Coastal 
  Barrier Resources System in Topsail, North Carolina, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTION TO MAP.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall make such corrections 
to the map described in subsection (b) as are necessary to exclude lots 
from unit L06 of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System in 
North Topsail Beach, North Carolina, that were serviced by 
infrastructure, as described in subsection (c), installed along North 
Carolina Highway 210 and New River Inlet Road as of the date of 
enactment of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.).
    (b) Maps Described.--The map referred to in subsection (a) is a map 
that--
            (1) is included in a set of maps as part of the John H. 
        Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System entitled ``John H. 
        Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System'' and dated December 
        21, 2018; and
            (2) relates to unit L06 of the John H. Chafee Coastal 
        Barrier Resources System.
    (c) Infrastructure Described.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the 
        infrastructure referred to in subsection (a) is infrastructure 
        that meets the criteria described in section 4(g)(1)(B) of the 
        Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(g)(1)(B)).
            (2) Inclusion.--For purposes of paragraph (1), North 
        Carolina Highway 210 and New River Inlet Road shall be 
        considered to meet the criteria described in section 
        4(g)(1)(B)(i) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 
        3503(g)(1)(B)(i)).
                                 <all>
```
#### David L. LANG, Plaintiff-Appellant v. John W. SNOW, Secretary, United States Treasury, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-10401

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 21, 2007.

David L. Lang, North Richland Hills, TX, pro se.

Charles O. Dobbs, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Proceeding pro se on appeal, Plaintiff-Appellant David L. Lang asks us to reverse the district court’s summary-judgment dismissal of Lang’s employment discrimination and retaliation action against his employer. Lang has asserted that the adverse employment action taken against him was grounded in racial discrimination and retaliation for his prior complaints, contending that the reasons proffered by his employer—including but not limited to an incident involving his telling an inappropriate “joke” with sexual innuendo from the podium in a public meeting—was pretext. In response to the employer’s motion for summary judgment, the district court explicated, at length and in considerable detail, the law relative to Lang’s complaints and its application to the largely-uncontested material facts, concluding that Lang had failed to establish a *prima facie*case of the discrimination he alleged and, alternatively, that even if he had made out such a *prima facie*case, he had failed to establish that the legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons advanced by his employer for the actions taken were pretextual.

We have reviewed the record on appeal and the law applicable thereto as set forth in the appellate briefs of the parties and the rulings of the district court. As a result of our review, we are convinced that the district court properly granted the government’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing Lang’s action with prejudice. Consequently, for the reasons set forth by the district court in its Memorandum Opinion and Order signed February 1, 2007, the summary judgment of that court is, in all respects, AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-12-00244-CV

_________________

IN RE COMMITMENT OF WILLIAM CYRUS SCOTT

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 435th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11-10-10849-CV

________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Volumes 1 and 2 of the reporter’s record, due September 10, 2012, have not been 

filed. Heather Deiss is responsible for preparing, certifying, and timely filing the 

reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(b). On September 24, 2012, we informed the 

court reporter that the record must be filed within thirty days or the matter would be 

referred for an enforcement order. The court reporter failed to file the record by the due 

date.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the appeal be ABATED and the cause 

REMANDED to the trial court for a hearing to determine why the reporter’s record has 
2

not been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(1). The trial court shall determine why the 

court reporter did not timely file the record, and may make such orders as shall be 

necessary to ensure the reporter’s record is promptly filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c) 

(“The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate 

record is timely filed.”). A reporter’s record shall be made of the hearing and, together 

with a supplemental clerk’s record containing any findings or orders of the trial court, 

shall be filed with the Court of Appeals by November 26, 2012.

ORDER ENTERED October 25, 2012. 

PER CURIAM

Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2470 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize additional grant 

activities for Hispanic-serving institutions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2023 

Mr. RUIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to authorize 

additional grant activities for Hispanic-serving institutions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accessing Higher Edu5 cation Opportunities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZED GRANT ACTIVITIES. 

7 Subsection (b) of section 503 of the Higher Edu8 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1101b(b)) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2470 IH

1 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (7) through 

2 (16) as paragraphs (9) through (18), respectively; 

3 and 

4 (2) by inserting after paragraph (6) the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(7) Student support programs (which may in7 clude counseling, mentoring, and other support serv8 ices) designed to facilitate the successful advance9 ment of students from four-year institutions to 

10 postbaccalaureate doctoral degree granting programs 

11 that prepare students for health care occupations as 

12 such occupations are described in the most recent 

13 edition of the Occupational Outlook Handbook pub14 lished by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 

15 ‘‘(8) Developing or expanding access to dual or 

16 concurrent enrollment programs and early college 

17 high school programs.’’. 

18 SEC. 3. FUNDING. 

19 (a) AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

20 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out part A of 

21 title V of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

22 1101 et seq.), as amended by this Act, $107,795,000 for 

23 the first fiscal year starting after the date of the enact24 ment of this Act. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 2470 IH

1 (b) ADDITIONAL EXTENSIONS NOT PERMITTED.— 

2 Section 422 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 

3 U.S.C. 1226a) shall not apply to further extend the dura4 tion of the authority under subsection (a). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2175 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2175

     To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 
   Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and 
      Enforcement, Regulation and Technology for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 
   Department of Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and 
      Enforcement, Regulation and Technology for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 
              INTERIOR, OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND 
              ENFORCEMENT, REGULATION AND TECHNOLOGY FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for U.S. Department of 
Interior, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 
Regulation and Technology for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$115,804,000.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BancTec, Inc, a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, J.Coley Clark, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ J. Coley Clark                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| J. Coley Clark                         |   |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |   |

 

November 14, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 USC Section1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
#### In the Matter of Chris Thompson Jr., Petitioner, v Daniel F. Martuscello Jr., as Superintendent of Coxsackie Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[963 NYS2d 456]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

As the result of an investigation, correction officials obtained confidential information indicating that petitioner had cut another inmate in the center yard of Coxsackie Correctional Facility on January 5, 2011. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with assaulting an inmate, possessing a weapon, engaging in violent conduct and fighting. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charges, and the determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

*1219We confirm. The misbehavior report and related documentation, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing and the confidential testimony considered by the Hearing Officer in camera, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Acosta v*Fischer, 98 AD3d 1170, 1171 [2012]; *Matter of Cruz v Fischer,*94 AD3d 1296, 1297 [2012]). Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, the Hearing Officer undertook an independent assessment of the credibility of the confidential informant by conducting a detailed interview with the correction officer who questioned this individual *(see Matter of Brown v Bezio,*76 AD3d 741, 742 [2010]; *Matter of Berry v Portuondo,*6 AD3d 848, 849 [2004]). We also find no merit to petitioner’s claim that the misbehavior report failed to comply with the particularity requirements of 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 (c) inasmuch as it set forth the date and location of the attack, identified the victim and specified the disciplinary rule violations, thereby providing petitioner with adequate notice to enable him to prepare a defense *(see Matter of Brisman v Fischer,*92 AD3d 1060, 1061 [2012], *lv denied*20 NY3d 852 [2012]; *Matter of Hernandez v Selsky,*9 AD3d 662, 663 [2004], *appeal dismissed, Iv denied*3 NY3d 698 [2004]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions either have not been preserved for our review or are lacking in merit.

Mercure, J.P, Stein, Spain and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Efer Eliud CAVAZOS-SOTO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-40343.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, For Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, For Defendant-Appellant.

*653Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Efer Eliud Cavazos-Soto (Cavazos) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being present in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1826. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Cavazos’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Cavazos contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Cavazos properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
| **Exhibit 99.1** |
|------------------|

** **

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BancTec, Inc,a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter endingSeptember 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), I, Craig D. Crisman, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

/s/ Craig D. Crisman

 

Craig D. Crisman

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

November 14, 2002

 

 

 

21

----
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of January 2005
    
    Commission File Number:   001-15014
 Sun Life Financial Inc.  
 (Translation of registrants name into English)
 150 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 1J9 
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 [Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.] Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 [Indicate be check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.] Yes   o
    
    No   þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-N/A    Exhibit99.1
    
    Dividend Press Release




---



##### 



SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Sun Life Financial Inc. 
     (Registrant)Date:   January 27, 2005
    By:
    /s/   Thomas A. BogartThomas A. Bogart,Executive Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer