alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of VLOV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Yushan Zheng, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and
for the periods indicated.




/s/ Yushan ZhengYushan
      Zheng
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                April
      15, 2010




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00288]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Bone Mass Regulation.
    Date: January 14, 2015.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 
2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Alicja L. Markowska, Ph.D., DSC, Scientific 
Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69b97849d99818597b6989f97d8989f9ed8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b464a5940445c584a6b45424a05454243054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 7, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-00288 Filed 1-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors 

XM Satellite RadioHoldings Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements Nos. 333-47570, 333-93529, 333-89132, 333-85804, 333-102966, 333-106824, 333-102964, 333-121417, 333-121415 and 333-114178 on Forms S-3; No. 333-115323-01 on Form S-4; and Nos. 333-92049, 333-65022, 333-65020, 333-97611 and333-106827 on Form S-8 of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 4, 2005 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 andthe related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, the related consolidated financial statement schedule, management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report onForm 10-K of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

McLean, VA 

March 4, 2005
Exhibit
32(a)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2008





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the
principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  May
      2, 2008
            /s/  James
      H. MillerJames
      H. Miller
              Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
              PPL
      Corporation








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Crandale WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-7006.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 20, 2006.

Michael Crandale Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Blaise Hamilton, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael Crandale Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *United States v. Williams*No. 2:95-cr-00009-H (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2006). We dispense *468with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION 

I, Marvin Tseu, Chief Executive Officer of Axesstel, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Axesstel, Inc.; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.    The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5.    The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: July 17, 2006
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130469 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130469 COA: 266539 Mecosta CC: 03-005144-FH PAUL EUGENE NASEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 22, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0619 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-75232) of LTWC Corporation and the related prospectus,
(Form S-8 No. 333-89053) pertaining to the 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan, the 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and the 1999 Stock Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-310902) pertaining to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1999
Stock Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-42566) pertaining to the Infinity Logistics Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-67750) pertaining to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1999 Stock Plan and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-70106) pertaining to the 1999 Stock Plan, of our report dated February 20, 2001, (except for the second paragraph of Note 1, as to
which the date is April 20, 2001) with respect to the financial statements of LTWC Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2000 included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Palo
Alto, California
April 11, 2003

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11



Computation of Earnings Per Share for the Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30,
1998 and 1997:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
                                                       Quarter Ended June 30,     Six Months Ended June 30,
                                                            1998      1997                1998     1997
                                                           ------    ------              ------   ------
<S>                                                       <C>      <C>                 <C>      <C>
 Net income*
                                                           $3,875   $ 2,743             $ 7,120  $ 5,044
 
Earnings per common share:
     Basic                                                 $  .31   $   .22             $   .56  $   .41
     Diluted                                               $  .29   $   .21             $   .53  $   .39
 
Shares outstanding (average):
     Common shares                                         13,717    13,235              13,665   13,261
     Treasury shares                                       (1,028)     (863)             (1,001)    (879)
                                                          -------   -------             -------  -------
Common shares  basic (average)                             12,689    12,372              12,664   12,382
Options:  common equivalents                                  677       710                 708      695
Warrants: common equivalents                                   18        --                  19       --
                                                          -------   -------             -------  -------
Common shares  diluted (average)                           13,384    13,082              13,391   13,077
                                                          =======   =======             =======  =======
 
</TABLE>
*Note:  The Company did not have any outstanding preferred stock for the periods
        ending June 30, 1997 through 1998.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-109177 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 6, 2006, relating to the
financial statements of MicroIslet, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to MicroIslet, Inc.'s
ability to continue as a going concern discussed in Note 1), appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of MicroIslet, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2005.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Diego, California

April 6, 2006


                                      -1-
#### In the Matter of Brenda Benjamin, Appellant, v Leonard F. Eddy, Sr., Respondent.

[964 NYS2d 55]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Lewis County (Charles C. Merrell, J), entered May 15, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Present—Smith, J.P, Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer of The TriZetto Group, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a) The Form
10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  | /s/ Jeffrey H. Margolis
|                     |  | Jeffrey H. Margolis    
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  | /s/ James C. Malone    
|                     |  | James C. Malone        
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin DUNN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-10184.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

Roger L. McRoberts, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Benjamin Dunn, Plainview, TX, pro se.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender has moved for leave to withdraw from representation of Benjamin Dunn and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Dunn has not responded to counsel’s motion and brief. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Gustavo Peralta et al., Respondents, v All Weather Tire Sales & Service, Inc., et al., Defendants, Danilo Mendez, Appellant, and Falken Tire Corp. et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs. Rosemary Peralta, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant. (And Additional Third-Party Actions.)

[873 NYS2d 111]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Danilo Mendez and the third-party defendant Rosemary Peralta appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated August 31, 2007, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to enforce a written settlement agreement dated June 7, 2004.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Stipulations of settlement are judicially favored, will not lightly be set aside, and “are to be enforced with rigor and without a searching examination into their substance” as long as they are “clear, final and the product of mutual accord” *(Bonnette v Long Is. Coll. Hosp.,*3 NY3d 281, 286 [2004]; *see Cooper v Hempstead Gen. Hosp., 2*AD3d 566 [2003]). To be enforceable, stipulations of settlement must conform to the requirements of CPLR 2104 *(see DeVita v Macy’s E., Inc.,*36 AD3d 751 [2007]; *Marpe v Dolmetsch,*256 AD2d 914 [1998]; *Conlon v Concord Pools,*170 AD2d 754 [1991]). “Pursuant to CPLR 2104, a stipulation of settlement is not enforceable unless it is made in open court, reduced to a court order and entered, or contained in a writing subscribed by the parties or their attorneys” *(Starr v Rogers,*44 AD3d 646, 647 [2007]; *see Bonnette v Long Is. Coll. Hosp.,*3 NY3d at 285; *Matter of Dolgin Eldert Corp.,*31 NY2d 1, 8-9 [1972]).

Applying these principles to the matter at bar, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to enforce a written stipulation of settlement resolving this action. Contrary to the contention of the appellants, Danilo Mendez and Rosemary Peralta, there was no evidence of a mutual mistake requiring rescission or reformation of the *823stipulation (see *George Backer Mgt. Corp. v Acme Quilting Co.,*46 NY2d 211, 219 [1978]; *Mahon v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*303 AD2d 725 [2003]; *Lacoparra v Bellino,*296 AD2d 480, 481 [2002]; *Radish Pharm. v Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Greater N.Y.,*114 AD2d 439 [1985]). Nor is there any merit to the appellants’ further contention that their counsel had no legal authority to execute the stipulation on their behalf (see *Hallock v State of New York,*64 NY2d 224, 231-232 [1984]; *Bubeck v Main Urology Assoc.,*275 AD2d 909, 910 [2000]; *Chattin v Rlock Oil Co.,*270 AD2d 852, 852-853 [2000]). Mastro, J.E, Florio, Balkin and Eng, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1





STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


19 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey Talbot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Geoffrey P. Talbot/s/Geoffrey P. TalbotChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 22, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# foli-0H2S'C& 14thCOURTOFAPPEALS 

## CauseNo. 1371576 j MAR 3J2015 Glenn Lloyd Kingham

v. State Ex Parte Motion to Withdraw as Counsel The undersigned counsel, Melissa Martin, moves the Court to grant her permission to withdraw from the above-styled cause. 

### This Court appointed counsel to represent Mr. Kingham on appeal from his conviction on November 7, 2013. Mr. Kingham's conviction was affirmed by the 

### Fourteenth Court ofAppeals on December 23, 2014 and the mandate has issued. For the above reason, counsel asks the Court for permission to withdraw. Respectfully submitted, ALEXANDER BUNIN Chief, Harris County Public Defender's Office N 

# Inthe230-fScT?SAPRI^ Harris County



# tim^i/iAdAi*-

V? 'IT ¥ W Chris Daniel District Clerk MAR 2 5 2Q15

•u'n'ia County, Texas MELISSA MARTIN Assistant Public Defender TX, Bar No. 24002532 

### 1201 Franklin St., 13th Fl. Houston, TX 77002 email: melissa.martin@pdo.hctx.net 713/274-6709 Fax 713/437-4319Cause No. 1371576 Glenn Lloyd Kingham In the 230th District Court

v. State Harris County Texas 

# N 

# JK
Order 

# « K Having considered the .abtTve-fnDtion to withdraw as counsel, the Court finds that the motion should b^GEANTEDyDENIED. It is so ordered. Done in Houston, Texas on March 25, 2015. 

### PresidingJudgeHAR2, ? 2015

i;?sK c