[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 583-585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Release No. 34-73973; File No. SR-ISE-2014-43]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange, 
LLC; Order Instituting Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or 
Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change Amending its Information Barrier 
Rules

December 31, 2014.

I. Introduction

    On September 15, 2014, International Securities Exchange, LLC 
(``Exchange'' or ``ISE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change amending its information barrier 
rules. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the 
Federal Register on October 6, 2014.\3\ On November 17, 2014, the 
Commission extended the time period in which to either approve the 
Proposal, disapprove the Proposal, or institute proceedings to 
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change to 
January 2, 2015.\4\ The Commission received one comment letter 
regarding the proposed rule change \5\ and one response letter from 
ISE.\6\ This order institutes proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of 
the Act \7\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed 
rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73261 (September 30, 
2014), 79 FR 60226 (``Notice'').
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 73614 (November 17, 
2014), 79 FR 69547 (November 21, 2014).
    \5\ See Letter from John Kinahan, Chief Executive Officer, Group 
One Trading, L.P., dated October 27, 2014 (``Group One Letter'').
    \6\ See Letter from Michael J. Simon, Secretary and General 
Counsel, International Securities Exchange, LLC, dated November 14, 
2014 (``ISE Response Letter'').
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 584]]

II. Description of the Proposal

    The Exchange proposes to amend ISE Rules 810 (Limitations on 
Dealings) and 717 (Limitations on Orders) governing information 
barriers. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 810 to 
permit information to flow to a member's Electronic Access Member 
(``EAM'') unit, which handles the customer/agency side of the business, 
from its affiliated Primary Market Maker (``PMM'') and/or Competitive 
Market Maker (``CMM'') (jointly, ``market makers'') unit. As amended, 
ISE Rule 810 will allow EAMs to know where, and at what price, their 
affiliated market makers are either quoting or have orders on the order 
book \8\ and to use that information to influence routing decisions. 
The Exchange represents that it currently provides guidance to its 
members that ISE Rule 810 is to be interpreted as a two-way information 
barrier between the EAM unit and its affiliated market maker unit.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ According to ISE Rule 805(b)(1)(ii), market makers may only 
have orders on the order book in option classes to which they are 
not appointed.
    \9\ See Notice, supra note 3, 79 FR at 60226.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend ISE Rule 717, Supplementary 
Material .06 to specify that the orders of a EAM unit and its 
affiliated PMM and/or CMM unit may interact within one second without 
violating the ISE Rule 717(d) and (e) order exposure requirements when 
the firm can demonstrate that: (1) The customer order was marketable 
when routed; (2) the EAM was not handling the affiliated market maker 
quote/order; and (3) the affiliated market maker quote/order was in 
existence at the time the customer order(s) were entered into the ISE 
system. In combination, the proposed amendments to ISE Rules 810 and 
717 will make it possible for an EAM to route a customer order to the 
ISE to immediately interact with the quote or an order of an affiliated 
market maker, but only subject to the conditions stated above.

III. Comment Letter and ISE's Response

    As noted above, the Commission received one comment letter \10\ 
opposing the proposed rule change.\11\ The commenter asserts that the 
proposed one-way information barrier would introduce a conflict of 
interest which could result in EAMs routing orders based on self-
interest as opposed to the customer's interest.\12\ The commenter 
disagrees with the Exchange's premise that the proposal would not 
compromise market integrity or cause customer harm.\13\ The commenter 
also indicates that although other exchanges may interpret their rules 
to permit the sharing of information between the various units of a 
firm, such sharing only weakens a customer's chance of best execution.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Group One Letter, supra note 5.
    \11\ See ISE Response Letter, supra note 6.
    \12\ See Group One Letter at 1, supra note 5.
    \13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The commenter believes there are two specific scenarios where a 
costumer may be harmed under this proposed rule change. First, the 
commenter states that EAMs could route customer orders to an affiliated 
market maker's quote at an exchange's best bid or offer rather than to 
an exchange with a better fill rate or price improvement mechanism.\14\ 
Second, the commenter argues that an EAM holding a large customer order 
that could influence the price in the underlying could opt to route 
away from the quote of its affiliated market maker to avoid the 
potential risk of the trade and deprive the customer of a fill they 
were otherwise entitled to.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Id.
    \15\ Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The commenter indicates that these routing scenarios are not ``mere 
conjecture'' as broker-dealers ``openly admit'' that numerous factors 
are built into routing decisions that are primarily beneficial to 
broker-dealers.\16\ The commenter also notes that there are litigation 
and academic studies that suggest that routing decisions are negatively 
impacted by conflicts of interest. The commenter believes that the 
erosion of information barriers would increase the likelihood that 
customer orders are routed based on the firm's best interest as opposed 
to duty of best execution owed to the customer.\17\ The commenter 
concludes that two-way information barriers are the ``only way to truly 
guard customer interests and protect against the misuse of material 
non-public information,'' and a shift to a one-way information barrier 
would not provide any benefits EAM customers.\18\ The commenter also 
believes that exchange rules should be written and interpreted in a way 
that prevents conflicts of interest from ever arising, and a two-way 
information barrier takes the potential conflict of interest out of the 
equation.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Id.
    \17\ Id.
    \18\ Id.
    \19\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ISE responds that the commenter did not raise any new issues 
and its concerns were addressed in the Notice. \20\ The ISE states that 
nothing in the proposed rule change would relieve members of their best 
execution obligation to obtain the most favorable terms reasonably 
available for customer orders.\21\ The Exchange notes that, as a 
national securities exchange, it has a comprehensive surveillance 
program to monitor member compliance with applicable securities and 
regulations, including best execution.\22\ ISE also represents that it 
would continue to monitor for abnormalities in interaction rates 
between members, and investigate and take appropriate regulatory action 
against members that fail to comply with their best execution 
obligations.\23\ ISE believes that its surveillance tools will allow it 
to fulfill its regulatory responsibilities.\24\ ISE also suggests that 
the filing is a competitive imperative as other options exchanges 
currently interpret their information barrier rules to be one way 
barriers that permit members to make routing decisions based on the 
quotes and orders of affiliated business units.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See ISE Response Letter at 1, supra note 6.
    \21\ Id.
    \22\ Id.
    \23\ Id.
    \24\ Id.
    \25\ Id. at 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove SR-ISE-
2014-43 and Grounds for Disapproval Under Consideration

    The Commission is instituting proceedings pursuant to Section 
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \26\ to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be approved or disapproved.\27\ Institution of such 
proceedings is appropriate at this time in view of the legal and policy 
issues that are raised by the proposal and are discussed below. 
Institution of proceedings does not indicate that the Commission has 
reached any conclusions with respect to any of the issues involved. 
Rather, as described in greater detail below, the Commission seeks and 
encourages interested persons to comment on the proposal, including the 
comments received and the Exchange's response, and provide the 
Commission with additional comment to inform the Commission's analysis 
whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \27\ Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act provides that proceedings to 
determine whether to disapprove a proposed rule change must be 
concluded within 180 days of the date of publication of notice of 
the filing of the proposed rule change. The time for conclusion of 
the proceedings may be extended for up to an additional 60 days if 
the Commission finds good cause for such extension and publishes its 
reasons for so finding or if the self-regulatory organization 
consents to the extension.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 585]]

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act, the Commission is 
providing notice of the grounds for disapproval under consideration. 
The Commission is instituting proceedings to allow for additional 
analysis of, and input from, commenters with regard to the proposed 
rule change's consistency with Section 6 of the Act, and in particular 
Sections 6(b)(5).\28\ Section 6(b)(5) requires that the rules of an 
exchange be designed, among other things, to prevent fraudulent and 
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism 
of a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, 
to protect investors and the public interest; and are not designed to 
permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or 
dealers.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Procedure: Request for Written Comments

    The Commission requests that interested persons provide written 
submissions of their views, data and arguments with respect to the 
concerns identified above, as well as any others they may have with the 
proposal. In particular, the Commission invites the written views of 
interested persons concerning whether the proposed rule change is 
inconsistent with Section 6 or any other provision, of the Act, or the 
rules and regulations thereunder. Although there do not appear to be 
any issues relevant to approval or disapproval that would be 
facilitated by an oral presentation of views, data, and arguments, the 
Commission will consider, pursuant to Rule 19b-4, any request for an 
opportunity to make an oral presentation.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ Section 19(b) (2) of the Act, as amended by the Securities 
Act Amendments of 1975, Pub. L. 94-29 (June 4, 1975), grants the 
Commission flexibility to determine what type of proceeding--either 
oral or notice and opportunity for written comments--is appropriate 
for consideration of a particular proposal by a self-regulatory 
organization. See Securities Act Amendments of 1975, Senate Comm. on 
Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs, S. Rep. No. 75, 94th Cong., 1st 
Sess. 30 (1975).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments regarding whether the proposed rule change should be approved 
or disapproved by January 27, 2015. Any person who wishes to file a 
rebuttal to any other person's submission must file that rebuttal by 
February 10, 2015.
    Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

    <bullet> Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
    <bullet> Send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9eecebf2fbb3fdf1f3f3fbf0eaeddeedfbfdb0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa888f969fd7999597979f948e89ba899f99d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>. Please include 
File Number SR-ISE-2014-43 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

    <bullet> Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2014-43. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make publicly available. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2014-43 and should be 
submitted on or before January 27, 2015. If comments are received, any 
rebuttal comments should be submitted by February 10, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30979 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>