alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of March 2004 Commission File Number 1-14916 BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES CORPORATION  BCE Place
181 Bay Street
Suite 330
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5J 2T3
(416) 359-8600
(Address of principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover
of Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F         Form 40-F.
X. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____ Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the
registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule
12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes           No .X If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date: March 29 2004 Brookfield Properties CorporationBy:
    /s/ Craig LaurieName:
    
    Craig LaurieTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President & Chief
Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT LIST

|        |      |             |  |                          
|------- | ---- | ----------- |  | -------------------------
|Exhibit |      | Description
|        |      |            
|        | 99.1 |             |  | 2003 Annual Report       
|        |      |             |  |                          
|        | 99.2 |             |  | Management Proxy Circular
|        |      |             |  |                          
|        | 99.2 |             |  | Form of Proxy
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Parker, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 872]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ethan Greenberg, J.), entered May 3, 2012, which specified and informed defendant that the court would resentence him to a term of 15 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, to the extent of directing that the proposed resentence run concurrently with an undischarged sentence, and otherwise affirmed.

Although the order is silent as to whether the proposed resentence is to run consecutively to or concurrently with defendant’s undischarged sentence imposed on another conviction, we modify to make clear that the sentences are to run concurrently. The sentences originally ran concurrently, and when a defendant is resentenced under the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738, § 23), the issue of concurrent versus consecutive sentencing may not be revisited *(People v Acevedo,*14 NY3d 828 [2010]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, Saxe and Clark, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blindspot Alert, Inc. fka
Promotions on Wheels Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Salluzzo, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
              /s/ Robert J. SalluzzoRobert
      J. SalluzzoChief
      Financial Officer




Dated: April 10,
2009





This
certification accompanies this report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Blindspot Alert, Inc. fka Promotions on
Wheels Holdings, Inc. and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: The District Court of the 1st Judicial District. County of Lewis and Clark.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. JOSEPH NAVA, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. CDC-06-149 DECISION

On February 6, 2009, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a deferred sentence for the offense of Theft, a felony, to a commitment to the Montana Department of Corrections for a term of three (3) years, with two (2) years suspended, upon all previously imposed conditions excluding the condition that the defendant completes community service, in that he previously fulfilled that *40requirement. The Department may place the defendant into an appropriate community based program, facility, or a State correctional institution with the Court’s recommendation that the defendant be considered for community placement.

On May 8, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he did not wish to proceed.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the application for review of sentence shall be waived.

Done in open Court this 8th day of May, 2009.

DATED this 21st day of May, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Richard Simonton.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF TRITON PCS HOLDINGS, INC.

The subsidiaries of Triton PCS Holdings, Inc. are as follows:

Triton PCS, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Triton PCS Holdings Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS License Company L.L.C. , a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS Equipment Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS Operating Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS Property Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton Management Company, Inc. , a Delaware corporation

Triton PCS Investment Company L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company

Triton PCS Finance Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 7 (Monday, January 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00340]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-15-003]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

Corrections to Government in the Sunshine Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

DATE:  January 12, 2015.

PLACE:  Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS:  Open to the public.
    In accordance with 19 CFR 201.35(d)(2)(i), the Commission hereby 
gives notice the correct investigation number for the meeting of 
January 12, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. is 731-TA-1153 (Review) and the correct 
title is Certain Tow-Behind Lawn Groomers and Parts Thereof from China.
    In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, 
not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the 
agenda of the following meeting. Earlier notification of this change 
was not possible.

    By order of the Commission:

    Issued: January 8, 2015.
William R. Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-00340 Filed 1-8-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.2 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Deer Consumer Products, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zongshu Nie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78m or §78o(d)); and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: September 19, 2011
By:
/s/ Zongshu NieZongshu Nie

Chief Financial Officer
 
 This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Roadships Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the periods ending December 31, 2009 and 2008 (the “Form 10-K”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael Nugent

By Michael Nugent

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



May 4, 2010
/s/  Patrick Greene

By Patrick Greene

Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



May 4, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF  2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. 1350) the undersigned General Partners of TASA ProductsLimited, a Washington limited partnership (the "Company"), dohereby certify, to the best of such General Partner's knowledgeand belief, that:

| 1.     | The Quarterly Report on for the period ended March 31, 2011  (the "Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and  Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in  all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.                                                            |

 

| /s/ MICHEL E. MAES Michel E. MaesCo-General Partner                       Date: 5-5-11 | /s/JAMES R. STEFFEYJames R. SteffeyCo-General PartnerDate: 5-5-11 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 3, 2013

s0826

Order 

Clerk

September 3, 2013

147205

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147205

COA: 308610

Wayne CC: 11-010663-FC

PATRICK OLIVER SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 23, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

RONKEVIS WILLIAMS , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No s . 4D2022

- 2873 and 4D2022

- 3329

[ January 17, 2024 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Martin S. Fein , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 15

- 014714CF10A, 16

- 009881CF10A

, and 16

- 011799CF10A

.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Virginia Jane Murphy, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anesha Worthy, Senior Assistant Attorney General , West Palm Beach for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Appellant appeals the order revoking his probation in three cases, arguing the trial court erred in failing to enter a written order specifying the conditions of probation he violated. See King v. State , 46 So. 3d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) ( “If a tri al court revokes a defendant ’ s probation, the court is required to render a written order noting the specific conditions of probation that were violated.” ). The state agrees reversal and remand is warranted. See Wright v. State , 958 So. 2d 594, 595 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ; Larangera v. State , 686 So. 2d 697, 698 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)

. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to enter an amended revocation order listing the specific conditions of probation violated. Appellant’s presence is not re quired for entry of this amended revocation order

. Smith v. State , 186 So

. 3d 596 , 597 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016).

Reversed and remanded with instructions

.

K LINGENSMITH , G ROSS and L EVINE , JJ., concur.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Hoffinger Stern & Ross, LLP, Respondent, v Philip Neuman et al., Appellants.

[973 NYS2d 200]

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis B. York, J.), entered April 11, 2012, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on its cause of action for an account stated, deemed appeal from judgment, same court and Justice, entered April 23, 2012 (CPLR 5520 [c]), and so considered, said judgment unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the judgment vacated, and plaintiffs motion denied.

In light of the strong policy of resolving disputes on the merits, and in the absence of a claim of prejudice by plaintiff, the court properly considered defendants’ opposition to plaintiffs motion, despite the fact that it was served five or six hours after the time to which the parties stipulated *(see Green v Mohamed,*275 AD2d 599 [1st Dept 2000]).

Defendants raised an issue of fact whether they objected to the March 5, 2008 invoice that is the sole basis of the account stated cause of action *(see Russo v Heller,*80 AD3d 531 [1st Dept 2011]). In correspondence throughout early March 2008, *564including a letter dated March 6, defendants refer to “the amount allegedly owed,” and, from plaintiffs responding correspondence, it appears that plaintiff understood that language as a challenge to the validity of the invoice. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 2012 NY Slip Op 30951(U).]
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Wellstone Filters, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Learned J. Hand, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Learned J. Hand

By: Learned J. Hand

Chief Executive and Financial Officer

July 20, 2009
EX-34.2
(logo) KPMG

KPMG LLP
Suite 900
10 South Broadway
St. Louis, MO 63102-1761


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Citibank, N.A.:

We have examined management's assessment, included in the accompanying
Management Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that
Citibank, N.A. (the Custodian) complied with servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i),
1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii) set forth in Item 1122(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB in connection with the
servicing of residential mortgage loans (other than loans held for its own
portfolio) for which the Custodian performs a particular servicing function
pursuant to a custodial agreement covering transactions that are serviced on the
Citilink, Mortgageserv, and Fidelity servicing platforms (the Platform), as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2007. Management is responsible for the
Custodian's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assessment about the Custodian's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Custodian's compliance with the
servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining
whether the Custodian processed those selected transactions and performed those
selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Custodian during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Custodian during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Custodian's compliance
with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assessment that the Custodian complied with certain
servicing criteria outlined in Exhibit A in the accompanying Management
Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2007 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
February 22, 2008


KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 8 (Tuesday, January 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00342]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

January 8, 2015.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, on or after the date of 
publication of this notice.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before February 12, 2015 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other 
aspect of the information collection, including suggestions for 
reducing the burden, to (1) Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for 
Treasury, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 
20503, or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ace3e5feedf3ffd9cec1c5dfdfc5c3c2ece3e1ee82e9e3fc82cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="723d3b20332d2107101f1b01011b1d1c323d3f305c373d225c151d04">[email protected]</span></a> and (2) Treasury PRA 
Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 8140, Washington, 
DC 20220, or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6a3a382b2a1e180f0b191f1813440d051c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c1c1e0d0c383e292d3f393e35622b233a">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submission may be 
obtained by emailing <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7222203332060017130107000b5c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="84d4d6c5c4f0f6e1e5f7f1f6fdaae3ebf2">[email protected]</span></a>, calling (202) 927-5331, or 
viewing the entire information collection request at www.reginfo.gov.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-0119.
    Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: Certification of Proper Cellar Treatment for Imported 
Natural Wine.
    Abstract: Under provisions of the Internal Revenue Code 26 U.S.C. 
5382(a)(3), importers of natural wine (except for natural wine produced 
and imported subject to certain international agreements or treaties) 
must certify compliance with proper cellar treatment standards. TTB 
therefore requires importers of natural wine to supply this 
certification in order to comply with that statutory requirement.
    Affected Public: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 6,600.

Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-00342 Filed 1-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>