alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




     HOLLINGER INC. STATEMENT ON RULING BY DELAWARE CHANCERY COURT DECISION





Toronto, Canada, February 26, 2004 - Hollinger Inc. (TSX: HLG.C; HLG.PR.B;
HLG.PR.C) issued the following statement in response to a ruling issued today by
Vice Chancellor Leo E. Strine, Jr. in Delaware Chancery Court:

"Hollinger Inc. and Lord Black respectfully disagree with Vice Chancellor
Strine's view of the facts and equities in his decision. They nonetheless
recognize that the decision points the way to a realization of full value for
shareholders of both Hollinger Inc. and Hollinger International Inc. through the
active pursuit of the strategic process being conducted for International by
Lazard LLC. Both Hollinger Inc. and Lord Black look forward to the prompt and
effective pursuit of Lazard's work, and to the presentation to International and
Hollinger of a course producing value superior to that presented by the
Barclays' tender offer for Hollinger and proposed bid for International."

Hollinger's principal asset is its approximately 72.4% voting and 30.0% equity
interest in Hollinger International Inc. Hollinger International is a global
newspaper publisher with English-language newspapers in the United States, Great
Britain, and Israel. Its assets include The Daily Telegraph, The Sunday
Telegraph and The Spectator and Apollo magazines in Great Britain, the Chicago
Sun-Times and a large number of community newspapers in the Chicago area, The
Jerusalem Post and The International Jerusalem Post in Israel, a portfolio of
new media investments and a variety of other assets.

Media Contact:

Jim Badenhausen
646-805-2006
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) for the Quarterly Period Ended December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin McIntosh, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



By:

/S/ KEVIN MCINTOSHKevin McIntoshSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer




Dated: February 14, 2005
#### In the Matter of Fernando Collado et al., Appellants, v NYC DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION et al., Respondents.

[869 NYS2d 919]

In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of-claim upon the City of New York, the.petitioners appeal (1) from an order of the Supreme Court,- Kings County (Hinds-Radix, J.), dated February 4, 2008, which denied the petition, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated June 12, 2008, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated February 4, 2008 is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated June 12, 2008, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated June 12, 2008 is reversed insofar *625as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and, upon reargument, the order dated February 4, 2008 is vacated and the petition is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the appellants.

Pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), a court may, as a matter of discretion, extend the time for a petitioner to serve a notice of claim against a municipal corporation *(see Matter of Felice v Eastport/South Manor Cent. School Dist.,*50 AD3d 138, 143 [2008]). The court must consider all relevant circumstances.

Under the particular circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court, upon reargument, improvidently exercised its discretion in adhering to the original determination denying the petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim *(see Matter of Vasquez v City of Newburgh,*35 AD3d 621, 623 [2006]; *Gibbs v City of New York,*22 AD3d 717, 718 [2005]; *Ayala v City of New York,*189 AD2d 632, 633 [1993]).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the petitioners’ remaining contentions. Skelos, J.R, Fisher, Miller and Garni, JJ., concur.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41042

Summary Calendar

BEVERLY ANN MARTIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

UT HEALTH CENTER,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(6:97-CV-527)

July 20, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Plaintiff, Beverly Ann Martin, sued the Defendant, UT

Health Center, alleging sex discrimination in violation of Title

VII. The district court granted the Defendant’s Motion for

Dismissal because the Plaintiff did not file a timely charge with

the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), as required

by 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1). Title VII requires the aggrieved
party to file a complaint with the EEOC within three hundred days

after the alleged unlawful employment practice occurred. See 42

U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1). The plaintiff failed to file a complaint

with the EEOC within the three hundred day jurisdictional window.

Consequently, the district did not err by ordering dismissal.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Cactus Ventures, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Diane S. Button, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Diane S. Button Diane S. Button Chief Executive Officer Date: March 2, 2011
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE TRIZETTO GROUP, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               STATE OR OTHER
                                                               JURISDICTION OF
ENTITY NAME                                                    INCORPORATION
--------------------------------------------------------       ---------------
<S>                                                            <C>
Creative Business Solutions, Inc.                              Texas

Finserv Health Care Systems, Inc.                              New York

Healthcare Media Enterprises, Inc.                             Delaware
  - Healthcare Media Private Ltd.                              India

HealthWeb, Inc.                                                Delaware

Margolis Health Enterprises, Inc.                              California

Novalis Corporation                                            Delaware
 - Digital Insurance Systems Corporation                       Ohio
 - Health Networks of America, Inc.                            Maryland
 - Novalis Development Corporation                             Delaware
 - Novalis Development & Licensing Corporation                 Indiana
 - Novalis Services Corporation                                Delaware

TriZetto Application Services, Inc. (f/k/a
Croghan & Associates, Inc.)                                    Colorado
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
B. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





Signed at
the City of Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 14th day of August,
2008.








/s/ Stephen B.
Thompson


Stephen
B. Thompson


Chief
Financial Officer
! " #$%&'

#(+,-,,-+,	+$,$#	,

.


//////////"//////////

#

"0
















$"
(1

#(1


*2 0
1


!
 "0

2 0
1

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#30 .


 .

.
4 
 !"" .
  
#$

%&'
 .

003"0
03"
)"
 
*
"


.."

" )"
5 
*6)

*7

0


)6.
#

"

$00""3 " #$

%88 9."

" .09: .
3*6"
0
"
.#;%4


.
"

""
.#$%&''&9.

<
..
6
33*)*
9

IT IS ORDERED..
0"1

-(+- ;	(,-.


="3
 "*603"
"


03"0
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  0."is reduced to 

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

-<
3".
7"
3
9**3"".
> 0

 ".**
0



IT IS SO ORDERED



1

Judge’s signature

-


1

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

OTTO DAVION THOMPSON 06-00176-002

09552-003

03-29-2007

04-13-2012 Pro Se

✔

✔

151 121 months

03-29-2007

03-27-2015

11-01-2015 United States District Judge

Callie V.S. Granade 

U.S. District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. 

Government, ou=Federal Judiciary, 

email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, c=US 

Date: 2015.03.26 10:24:26 -06'00'

Case 2:06-cr-00176-CG-N Document 970 Filed 03/27/15 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 248 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 248

    To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to exclude certain 
 populations of the lesser prairie chicken from the authority of such 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2023

  Mr. Estes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to exclude certain 
 populations of the lesser prairie chicken from the authority of such 
                      Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Local Management of the 
Lesser Prairie Chicken Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN POPULATIONS OF LESSER PRAIRIE CHICKEN 
              UNDER ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF 1973.

    (a) Exclusion of Certain Populations of Lesser Prairie Chicken.--
Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)) 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``The Secretary shall by 
        regulation'' and inserting ``Except as provided in paragraph 
        (4), the Secretary shall by regulation''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) Applicability to Lesser Prairie Chicken.--The Secretary may 
not make a determination under this subsection that any population of 
the lesser prairie chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) in Kansas, 
Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, or New Mexico is threatened or 
endangered.''.
    (b) Delisting of Certain Populations of Lesser Prairie Chicken.--
Not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this section, 
the Secretary of the Interior shall remove each population of the 
lesser prairie chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) in Kansas, 
Oklahoma, Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico from the lists of threatened 
species and endangered species that are published pursuant to the 
Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00131]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Sunshine Act Meetings: January 2015

TIME AND DATES: All meetings are held at 2:00 p.m., Wednesday, January 
7; Tuesday, January 13; Wednesday, January 14; Thursday, January 15; 
Tuesday, January 20; Wednesday, January 21; Thursday, January 22; 
Tuesday, January 27; Wednesday, January 28; Thursday, January 29.

PLACE: Board Agenda Room, No. 11820, 1099 14th St. NW., Washington, DC 
20570.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Pursuant to Sec.  102.139(a) of the Board's 
Rules and Regulations, the Board or a panel thereof will consider ``the 
issuance of a subpoena, the Board's participation in a civil action or 
proceeding or an arbitration, or the initiation, conduct, or 
disposition . . . of particular representation or unfair labor practice 
proceedings under section 8, 9, or 10 of the [National Labor Relations] 
Act, or any court proceedings collateral or ancillary thereto.'' See 
also 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Henry Breiteneicher, Associate 
Executive Secretary, (202) 273-2917.

    Dated: January 6, 2015.
William B. Cowen,
Solicitor.
[FR Doc. 2015-00131 Filed 1-6-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7545-01-P
```
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000839

06-MAR-2018

11:34 AM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre Rand, Also Known as Frank Rushan, Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 155]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered December 8, 2004, convicting him of kidnapping in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant claims that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he abducted the victim by either secreting or holding her in a place where she was not likely to be found or by using or threatening to use deadly force *(see*Penal Law § 135.00 [2]). The defendant’s legal insufficiency claim is not preserved for appellate review to the extent it is premised upon whether there was legally sufficient evidence to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he abducted the victim by using or threatening to use deadly force *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Hawkins,*11 NY3d 484 [2008]; *People v Payne,*3 NY3d 266, 280 [2004]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see People v Thibodeau,*267 AD2d 952 [1999]; *People v Salimi,*159 AD2d 658 [1990]).

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent *759review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo,*2 NY3d 383, 410 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant was afforded meaningful representation *(see People v Henry,*95 NY2d 563 [2000]; *People v Hobot,*84 NY2d 1021 [1995]; *People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137 [1981]; *People v Acevedo,*44 AD3d 168, 173 [2007]; *People v Dolan,*2 AD3d 745 [2003]; *People v Groonell,*256 AD2d 356, 357 [1998]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions raised in points II and III of his brief are not preserved for appellate review. Rivera, J.P, Santucci, Garni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Numbers 333-93933, 333-111037, 333-105425, and 333-105424 of Civitas BankGroup,
Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Number 333-107352 of Civitas
BankGroup, Inc. on Form S-3 of our report dated March 1, 2002, incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Civitas BankGroup, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2003.




                                           /s/ Heathcott & Mullaly, P.C.

Brentwood, Tennessee
March 30, 2004
.-.. 

I. 

OFFICE OF THE AT’YOF;b!E” GE:I<Ei?AL OF. TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

~*cl”ER SELLERS~ . 

ArlvRr.%I GWGRAL : 
I 

. 

wo thinlc Ltties tha lntontion or tlls L0Pielaturc . 

in the p~oaage of thin bill urmudlng ktiolo 2968 do aoconglish -.’ 

ho thinm . FSEST. to renuire the ~votei?s e~tltZc% t.o usrtil?- 

.: 

.batek of~ej;efiptio~ to se&m &II sxenption certificate CGoh year; 

en% SXXBiD, to mquulre that books oontainln~ ox-e?n$io~, ocrtifioatos be rvrnish~% to each votin& precinot within t3w City limits. 

The. clear import of the lust smtenoe i%ZH. ’ Tj. Xo. 3k4, y?hich 

ccya that “oaxtificetes of ermption 4or e&oh preuinot L?~LE~Z bo 

a~~bore% comeoutively, beginning at Ko. 1” is tG mquim 

Warate books for cjcch. precinct. In other lords t&ore sholla% 

be i’v.rr~ir&~e% to ckoh prcc:aot a sejakate book of oxe@.ion 

Wrtkfi&.tes uunbort?a oonoeo~utivuly, bo&ming with Xv. 1. 
. 

i.: 

. . 

.- 

fion; Coo. Ii. Eheppar&, po.g 3 . 

.: I 

,
#### Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc. v. Strickland

Case below: 181 N.C. App. 610

No. 118A07

Def’s Motion to Withdraw Appeal (COA06-20)

Allowed 06/27/07
EX-10.1


    Exhibit
      10.1

    


    May
      22,
      2007

    


    
 

    OSI
      Restaurant Partners, Inc.

    2202
      North Westshore Blvd., 5th
      Floor

    Tampa,
      Florida 33607

    Attention:
      Dirk A. Montgomery

    


    


    
      	 	
              Re:

            	
              Credit
                Agreement dated as of October 12, 2006 between OSI Restaurant Partners,
                Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as amended (the “Credit
                Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the
                meanings given in the Credit
                Agreement.

            


    

    


    Ladies
      and Gentlemen:

    


    On
      March
      14, 2007, Wachovia Bank, National Association agreed to amend and restate the
      definition of “Termination Date” contained in Section 1.01 of the Credit
      Agreement to May 30, 2007. The purpose of this letter is to confirm a further
      agreement of Wachovia Bank, National Association to amend and restate the
      definition of “Termination Date” contained in Section 1.01 of the Credit
      Agreement as follows: “Termination
      Date” means June 30, 2007.

    


    Nothing
      contained herein shall waive, annul, vary or affect any provision, condition,
      covenant or agreement contained in the Credit Agreement, except as set forth
      above, nor affect or impair any rights, powers or remedies under the Credit
      Agreement. The Borrower and Guarantors shall pay all expenses of the Bank
      including reasonable fees and disbursements of special counsel for the Bank
      in
      connection with the preparation of this letter.

    


    


                         Very
      truly yours,

    


     

                                           WACHOVIA
      BANK, NATIONAL
      ASSOCIATION

    


    


                                            By:
/s/
      Lynn E. Culbreath________________
      (SEAL)

                                          Lynn
      E. Culbreath, Senior Vice
      President
## NO. 12

- 22

- 00239

- CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

NORMAN YOES ,
RELAT OR §
§
§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Norman Yoes, acting pro se, filed this original proceeding in which he seeks a writ

c ompelling Respondent, Gregg County Distr ict Clerk Trey Hattaway, to provide him with file

marked copies of various documents. 1 A district clerk is not a judge over which this Court has mandamus jurisdiction; nor does the record demonstrate that issuance of a writ of mandamus against Respondent is necessary to protect this Court ’ s jurisdiction

. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221(a) , (b) (West Supp. 2020) (writ power) ; see also In re Dotson , No. 12

- 20

- 00205

- CV, 2020 WL 5552626 (Tex. App.

— Tyler Sept. 16, 2020, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.) ( dismissing mandamus proceeding against district clerk for want of jurisdiction ); In re Vargas , No. 01

- 12

- 00351

- CV, 2012 WL 1454550, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] A pr. 26, 2012, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op) ( same )

. Because this Court lacks jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief under th e circumstances of this case, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction

. All pending motion s are overruled as moot

. Opinion delivered September 2 2 , 2022. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 Ja nelle Marie Avritt is the Real P arty in Interest. The Gregg County website reflects th at a judgment was entered in the parties ’ divo rce proceeding in December 2021

.

## COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER 2 2 , 2022
NO. 1 2

- 22

- 00239

- CV

NORMAN YOES , Relator V.

TREY HATTAWAY , Respondent

O RIGINAL P ROCEEDING
ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for wr it of mandamus filed by
Norman Yoes ; who is the relato r in appellate cause number 12

- 22

- 00239

- CV and a party in trial

c o urt cause number 2021

- 1097

- DR , formerly pending on the docket of the 307th Judicial District Court of Gregg County , Texas. Said petitio n for writ of mandamus having been filed herein on September 1, 2022 , and the same having been duly considered, because it is the op inion of this Court that it lacks jurisdiction, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction

. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.