alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DAVID WOODS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-30263

D.C. No. 9:14-cr-00027-DLC-7

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Dana L. Christensen, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 6, 2016** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: PAEZ and BYBEE, Circuit Judges and TIGAR,

*** District Judge.

 

Defendant-Appellant David Woods appeals the district court’s denial of his

motion to dismiss the indictment on double jeopardy grounds. “We review de

FILED

JUN 17 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Jon S. Tigar, District Judge for the U.S. District Court

for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
novo a district court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the indictment on double

jeopardy grounds.” United States v. Bates, 917 F.2d 388, 392 (9th Cir. 1990). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 

First, the successive prosecution of charges in two separate venues which

“involve distinct transactions occurring at different times” does not violate the

Double Jeopardy Clause. United States v. Saccoccia, 18 F.3d 795, 799 (9th Cir.

1994). Here, no double jeopardy violation occurred because Woods’ convictions

in the Western District of New York and the District of Montana involved his

participation in two different online child pornography bulletin boards, and Woods

has not shown these boards were related in any way.

Second, even assuming that the prosecutions in Montana and New York

involved the same acts or transactions, “[a] substantive crime and a conspiracy to

commit that crime are not the same offense for double jeopardy purposes.”

Saccoccia, 18 F.3d at 798 (citing United States v. Felix, 503 U.S. 378, 389 (1992)).

 Therefore, no double jeopardy violation occurred for the additional reason that

Woods pleaded guilty to distribution of child pornography in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A) in the Western District of New York, while he pleaded

guilty to conspiracy to advertise child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§

2251(d) & (e) in the District of Montana.

AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Carl Daily, Appellant

No. 06-17-00038-CV v.

Charles McMillan, Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

15C1451). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Carl Daily, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED AUGUST 15, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      29,857,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,652,227
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,375,965
<INVENTORY>                                 39,065,503
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           110,768,630
<PP&E>                                      10,153,891
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,462,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             182,701,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,079,572
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    976,755
<COMMON>                                       142,447
<OTHER-SE>                                 158,502,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               159,621,740
<SALES>                                     84,556,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            84,556,273
<CGS>                                       57,616,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,616,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,308,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (1,231,880)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,558,631
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,647,755    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,910,876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,910,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Ronald J. Ivans,
Chief Financial Officer of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust IISeries D (Series D), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Ds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending September 26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date thereof (the Annual Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series D.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                             |  |  |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/    RONALD J. IVANS                                                       |  |  |  | 
|                                                                             |  |  |  | 
|Ronald J. Ivans Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner March 29, 2004 |  |
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 E0 05 4 . LOW E v . THE STATE.

Pu rs uan t t o Co u rt of Ap p eal s Ru l es 3 1 (i ) an d 4 0 (b ), D m y k o l Lo we’ s M OTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIM E TO FILE A PPLICATION FOR DISCRETIONARY APPEAL fro m t h e o rd er rev ok i n g pro b at i o n th at was en t ered by
t h e t ri al co urt o n Ap ri l 2 6 , 2 0 1 8 , i s h ereb y GRANTED. Lo we s h al l fi l e h i s APPLICATION FOR DISCRETIONARY APPEAL o n o r b efo re J u n e 1 3 , 2 0 1 8

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## May 29, 2018

05/29/2018
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00361-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MANUEL BENAVIDES, DECEASED

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014-CPC-55-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 10, 2015
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
  "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal
  financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

| |  | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: August 6, 2004 | /s/ John R. BiggarJohn R. Biggar
        Executive Vice President and
        Chief Financial Officer
        PPL Corporation
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**	AMENDMENT TO THE NETCORE SYSTEMS, INC.
1997 STOCK OPTION PLAN

 

	**WHEREAS,** Netcore Systems, Inc. has heretofore established the Netcore Systems, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") for the benefit of employees, officers, directors, consultants and advisors of Netcore Systems, Inc. and itssubsidiaries;

	**WHEREAS,** Netcore Systems, Inc. was acquired by Tellabs, Inc. (the "Company"; provided, however, that prior to the effective time of the merger, "Company" means Netcore Systems, Inc.) in a merger on August 30, 1999,which was accounted for as a pooling of interests;

	**WHEREAS,**the Board of Directors of the Company deems it desirable to make certain amendments to the Plan relating to the vesting of options and/or the post-employment exercise period in the event of the death, disability, or retirement ofan option holder, or a change in control of the Company; and

	**WHEREAS,** the Board of Directors of the Company has considered the recommendations and has approved this Amendment to the Plan.

	**NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,** that the Plan is hereby amended, effective June 30, 2000, as follows :
- The Plan shall hereby be amended by adding a new Section 2A to read:**
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2311 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2311

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  State, International Organizations, Contributions for International 
             Peacekeeping Activities for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  State, International Organizations, Contributions for International 
             Peacekeeping Activities for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
              INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, CONTRIBUTIONS FOR 
              INTERNATIONAL PEACEKEEPING ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of State, 
International Organizations, Contributions for International 
Peacekeeping Activities for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$562,344,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Angeles Park Communities, Ltd. 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified 
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317969
<NAME> ANGELES PARK COMMUNITIES, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                             672
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           5,970
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,652   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,362   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,850     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,870)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,362    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,087    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   696    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 246    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       145     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.57<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit
31(c)





CERTIFICATIONI,
      WILLIAM F. HECHT, certify that:1.
    I
      havereviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofPPL
      Energy Supply, LLC (the "registrant");2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material factnecessaryto
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report;3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in allmaterialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    Theregistrant'sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
  have:a.
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b.
    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual
      report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    Theregistrant'sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
      evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a.
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.Date:
      November 3, 2005
    /s/  William
      F.
      HechtWilliam
      F. Hecht
      President
      PPL
      Energy Supply, LLC
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2007,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified
      (the "Report"), the undersigned, Anthony W. Adler, as Principal Financial
      Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Anthony W. AdlerAnthony
                W. AdlerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerDate:
                December 21, 2007
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT

Appellate case name: In the Interest of S.A.W.

Appellate case number: 01-22-00320-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-46728

Trial court: 507th District Court of Harris County

The appellant’s brief was first due on June 21, 2022. When no brief had been filed by June 

28, this Court issued a late brief notice instructing that, if appellant intended to file a brief in this 

appeal, the appellant’s brief was due within 10 days of the notice. On the seventh day after the 

notice, July 5, appellant’s appointed counsel, Julie A. Ketterman, filed a motion for a 30-day 

extension of time, which this Court granted. Consequently, the deadline for the appellant’s brief 

was extended to July 21. The July 21 deadline passed without appointed counsel filing a brief or 

motion for extension of time. Without an appellant’s brief, this appeal risks dismissal for want of 

prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1), 38.6(d), 38.8(a)(1), 42.

On August 5, this Court abated the appeal for the trial court to determine whether new 

appellate counsel should be appointed to represent appellant because current appointed counsel 

has not filed the appellant’s brief. The supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order 

on abatement was due August 22. No record was filed. 

Because this appeal is from a termination of parental rights, this Court is required to dispose 

of the appeal on an accelerated basis. See TEX. ST. JUD. ADMIN. R. 6.2(a) (requiring disposition of 

appeal within 180 days of notice of appeal, so far as reasonably possible). With this requirement 

in mind, the Court orders the following: 

This appeal is reinstated, and the parties are ordered to jointly prepare a status update 

informing the Court (1) whether the trial court held a hearing or issued an order and, (2) if so, the 

result of that hearing and the trial court’s ruling. The parties’ status update is due in this Court 

within 10 days of the date of this Order.

If there was no hearing, the parties are ordered to (and shall include in their status update 

confirmation that they have):

• inform(ed) the trial court coordinator of the August 5 abatement order and of this Order; 

and

• schedule(d) a hearing within 15 days of the date of this Order. 
Both parties are responsible for informing the trial court coordinator of this Court’s orders, 

and their status report shall include the date of any newly scheduled hearing.

The trial court clerk shall file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial 

court’s order within 20 days of this Order. The court reporter shall also file a supplemental 

reporter’s record within 20 days of this Order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Sarah Beth Landau

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 8, 2022
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Youngblood, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 141] —

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Scudder, PJ., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Whalen, JJ.