alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**STATMON
      TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**19
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey Talbot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Geoffrey P. Talbot**Geoffrey
                      P. Talbot**
                    **Chief
                      Executive Officer**
                    **February
                      14, 2007**




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
      retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 16, 2022

No. 04-22-00313-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF G.K.T., a Child

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA00800

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee’s motion for leave to file an amended brief is GRANTED. The amended brief 

was filed on September 15, 2022.

It is so ORDERED on September 16, 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
B. Thompson, Chief Financial Officer certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





Signed at
the City of Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 20th day of May,
2008.








/s/ Stephen B.
Thompson


Stephen
B. Thompson


Chief
Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 216-217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP15-279-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Neg Rate Agmt 
Filing (AEP 34154) to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/29/14.
    Accession Number: 20141229-5025.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/12/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-280-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate 
Agmt (EnCana 37663 to BP 43578) to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/29/14.
    Accession Number: 20141229-5026.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/12/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-281-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate 
Agmt (JW 34690 to QWest 43634) to be effective 1/1/2015.

[[Page 217]]

    Filed Date: 12/29/14.
    Accession Number: 20141229-5027.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/12/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-282-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Amendment to Neg 
Rate Agmt (QEP 37657-126) to be effective 12/20/2014.
    Filed Date: 12/29/14.
    Accession Number: 20141229-5028.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/12/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-283-000.
    Applicants: Ozark Gas Transmission, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Statements of 
Negotiated Rates Tariff Volume to be effective 2/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/29/14.
    Accession Number: 20141229-5029.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/12/15.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered, 
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 29, 2014.
 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30823 Filed 1-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### In the Matter of B.Z.V. Enterprise Corp., Appellant, v Meenakshi Srinivasan et al., Respondents.

[825 NYS2d 784]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, dated January 27, 2003, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for a use variance to convert an existing four-story building located in a manufacturing zoning district to a residential dwelling, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated September 17, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Local zoning boards have broad discretion and judicial review is thus limited to determining whether the zoning board’s action was illegal, arbitrary and capricious, or an abuse of discretion *(see Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead,*2 NY3d 608, 613 [2004]; *Matter of DeCaro Capital Inv. Group, LLC v Voekler,*32 AD3d 852 [2006]; *Matter of Halperin v City of New Rochelle,*24 AD3d 768, 771 [2005], *lv dismissed*7 NY3d 708 [2006]). Here, the denial by the respondent Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York (hereinafter the Board) of the petitioner’s application for a use variance had a rational basis in the record and was not arbitrary and capricious, illegal, or an abuse of discretion *(see*New York City Zoning Resolution § 72-21; *Matter of Ifrah v Utschig,*98 NY2d 304, 308-309 [2002]; *Matter of Sasso v Osgood,*86 NY2d 374, 384 [1995]; *Matter of Halperin v City of New Rochelle, supra*at 772). Further, contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the instant variance application lacked “sufficient factual similarity” to variance application number 369-01-BZ *(cf. Knight v Amelkin,*68 NY2d 975, 978 [1986]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly declined to disturb the Board’s determination. Prudenti, P.J., Krausman, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6921
FELIX BERTS OTCHERE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at A lexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-710-AM) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Felix Berts Otchere, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Otchere v. Virginia Parole Bd. , No. CA-97-710-AM (E.D. Va. May 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey Klausner, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Mandalay Digital Group, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: March 3, 2014



By:

/s/ Jeffrey KlausnerJeffrey KlausnerChief Financial Officer Principal Financial
Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 22 

To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from sending petroleum products from 

the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mrs. RODGERS of Washington (for herself, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. LATTA, Mr. 

CURTIS, Mr. JOYCE of Pennsylvania, Mr. GUTHRIE, Mr. JOHNSON of 

Ohio, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. CARTER of Georgia, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. 

RESCHENTHALER, Mr. FULCHER, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. HIGGINS of 

Louisiana, Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. DUNN of Florida, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. 

WALBERG, Mr. PENCE, Mr. BUCSHON, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. KEAN of New 

Jersey, Mr. MOYLAN, Mr. KILEY, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mrs. LESKO, Mr. MIKE

GARCIA of California, Mr. LANGWORTHY, Ms. STEFANIK, Ms. VAN

DUYNE, Mrs. SPARTZ, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Mr. 

WEBER of Texas, Mr. ISSA, Mr. BALDERSON, Ms. MALLIOTAKIS, Mr. 

STAUBER, Mr. ZINKE, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Ms. MACE, Mrs. KIGGANS

of Virginia, Mr. FALLON, and Mr. VALADAO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from sending petroleum 

products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 22 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting America’s 

3 Strategic Petroleum Reserve from China Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SALES OF PETROLEUM PROD5 UCTS FROM THE STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RE6 SERVE TO CHINA. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec8 retary of Energy shall not draw down and sell petroleum 

9 products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve— 

10 (1) to any entity that is under the ownership, 

11 control, or influence of the Chinese Communist 

12 Party; or 

13 (2) except on the condition that such petroleum 

14 products will not be exported to the People’s Repub15 lic of China. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### In re Raymond J. VONDALL; Charlotte M. Vondall, Debtors. Dwight R.J. Lindquist, Chapter 7 Trustee of the bankruptcy estate of Raymond J. Vondall and Charlotte M. Vondall, Appellee, v. Household Industrial Finance Company, Appellant.

No. 07-1952.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: May 16, 2008.

Filed: June 4, 2008.

Patrick Bernard Hennessy, Barbara Marie Ross, Best & Flanagan, Minneapolis, MN, for Appellee.

Eric D. Cook, Christina M. Weber, Wilford & Geske, Woodbury, MN, for Appellant.

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Household Industrial Finance Company (Household) appeals from a decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s1 opinion granting summary judgment in favor of Dwight Lindquist (trustee) in this Chapter 7 bankruptcy case brought by Raymond and Charlotte Vondall (debtors).

In April 2006, the trustee filed a complaint seeking to avoid Household’s purported mortgage on debtors’ homestead, under 11 U.S.C. §§ 544 and 547, asserting that Household had failed to provide, to subsequent transferees, inquiry notice or constructive notice of the mortgage under the Minnesota Recording Act. Household had recorded the mortgage, but the mortgage as recorded incorrectly identified debtors’ property. Upon review of the bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error, and its legal conclusions de novo, *see In re Vote,*276 F.3d 1024, 1026 (8th Cir.2002), we find no basis for reversal. We agree with the bankruptcy court’s well-reasoned opinion, and accordingly affirm. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Robert J. Kressel, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of NewMarket Technology, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:
      April 7, 2008
            
            
            /s/
      Philip J. RauchPhilip
      J. RauchChief
      Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SVC Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company
      ") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2004 accompanying this
      certification and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date
      hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles L. Nuzum, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company,




1.
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
       January 12, 2006







/s/
      Charles L. Nuzum


__________________


Charles
      L. Nuzum


Chief
      Financial Officer
---




EXHIBIT
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Chembio
Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009,
each of the undersigned Lawrence A. Siebert, the Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Richard J. Larkin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the
undersigneds’ knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) This
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2) The
information contained in this Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc. for the periods presented
therein.
 
 
 
 Dated:  March
5,
2010                          /s/ Lawrence A.
Siebert
 Lawrence
A. Siebert
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 Dated:  March
5,
2010                        
 /s/ Richard J.
Larkin
 Richard
J. Larkin
 Chief
Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -0XLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Triad Industries,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2004,as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Kelleher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

February 17, 2006                           /s/ Michael Kelleher
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Michael Kelleher
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Order entered February 15, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 12
- 01465
- CR KWAYLON WILLIAMS, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7 Dallas County, Texas Trial Co urt Cause No. F
- 11
- 56237 

### O RDER
The Court GRANTS court reporter Sharon Hazlewood’s February 10, 2013 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We ORDER Ms. Hazlewood, as official court reporter, to file the complete record by WEDENS DAY, MARCH 6, 2013

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Sharon Hazlewood, official court reporter, Criminal District Court No. 7, and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of Collyer Goodman, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[825 NYS2d 652]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Mark H. Dadd, A.J.], entered July 5, 2006) to review two determinations of respondent. The determinations found after two tier III hearings that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ordered that the determinations be and the same hereby are unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Centra and Pine, JJ.
Exhibit 13.1

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of ABB Ltd (the "Company") as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof (the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Fred Kindle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:



|By: |  | /s/FRED KINDLE | 
|--- |  | -------------- | 
|    |  | Name:          | 
|    |  | Title:         | 

Date:
May 27, 2005

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to ABB Ltd and will be retained by ABB Ltd and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### Suffolk P.E.T. Management, LLC, et al., Respondents, v Azad K. Anand, M.D., et al., Appellants.

[962 NYS2d 138]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered July 16, 2012, which granted plaintiffs motion to confirm the report of the Special Referee recommending that defendants’ answer be stricken for noncompliance with discovery orders and directives and that a default judgment be entered against defendants on liability, and referred the matter to a special referee to hear and report on the issue of damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion was properly granted inasmuch as the record supports the findings that defendants engaged in willful and contumacious conduct by their failure to comply with the court’s discovery orders and directives *(see*CPLR 3126 [3]; *Jones v Green,*34 AD3d 260 [1st Dept 2006]; *Hot & Tasty Corp. v IOB Realty,*270 AD2d 67 [1st Dept 2000]). There exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations made by the Special Referee *(see Matter of Continental Cas. Co. v Lecei,*65 AD3d 931 [1st Dept 2009]).

Here, while defendants produced much documentation during discovery, a forensic study of defendants’ computer hard drives revealed evidence that conflicted with defendants’ assertions that all relevant documents, including electronic information, had been produced. Many of the records that plaintiffs sought and were not provided with were material to plaintiffs’ case, and were required to be maintained by defendants, as per the parties’ contract. The evidence further shows that defendants, over a two-year period, failed to conduct timely searches for requested documents, failed to preserve material documents despite an awareness of the action and otherwise affirmatively interfered with plaintiffs’ efforts to collect discoverable material. Moreover, defendants were alerted to the potential consequences of incomplete disclosure during the several hearings conducted by the court on the discovery issues.

Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Abdus-Salaam and Gische, JJ.