alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Kristen Ann Cronin, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Deutsche Alt-A Securities Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
    2007-BAR1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicer(s) and based on my knowledge and the compliance review(s)
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement(s) required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreement(s) in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, GMAC Mortgage, LLC
    f/k/a GMAC Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, GreenPoint Mortgage
    Funding, Inc. as Servicer and IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer.

    Dated:   March 27, 2008


    /s/ Kristen Ann Cronin
    Signature

    Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master
    servicer)
#### Sacqueland *et al. v.*The Meteor.

*(Circuit Court, E. D. New York.*

June 8, 1889.)

Seamen—Wages—Character of Service.

Libelant testified that be was hired by the master of a steam-yacht as mate, at $50 per month. The master testified that he was only hired as a deck-hand, at $30. There was no other mate than libelant. During the previous season he had been promoted from a deck-hand, at $30, to a mate, at $50, and as such served' until the end of the season. During the season in controversy it appeared that until about three weeks before his discharge he wore a mate's uniform when visitors were around, bought for him by the master, who explained it by saying that it was necessary to have some one to act as mate to receive guests. Letters to libelant from the master, authorizing him to employ men, and to keep the work going, were introduced. When libelant left he did not apply for mate’s wages. *Eeld,*that he was only entitled to the wages of a deck-hand.

In Admiralty. On appeal from the district court, 36 Fed. Rep. 566.

In the circuit court new evidence was introduced to show that libelant only wore a mate’s uniform when visitors were around, and that when he left he did not apply for extra wages.

*Wilcox, Adams <& Machlin,*for appellant..

*Noah Tebbetts,*for appellees.

Blatchford, J.

I think that, in view of the new proofs taken in this court, and of the whole case, the claim of Sacqueland for a mate’s wages must be disallowed, but that the claim of each of the five persons to whom the district court allowed $6.75 for board money must be allowed. As the claimant has succeeded as to the claim of Sacqueland for a mate’s wages, he must recover against Sacqueland the costs of this court; and, although the claim of Sacqueland, which is disallowed for a mate’s wages, was coupled with the allowed claims for board money, it seems equitable that costs in the district court should be allowed to those who recover for board money.
[Cite as State v. Constable, 2018-Ohio-2083.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

CLINTON COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2017-10-014 

 : D E C I S I O N 

 - vs - 5/29/2018 

 : 

JAMES E. CONSTABLE, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLINTON COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT 

Case No. CRB 1700272 

Laura Railing Gibson, 69 N. South Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for plaintiff-appellee 

Blaise S. Underwood, 97 N. South Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for defendant-appellant 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of 

the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the 

Clinton County Municipal Court, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. 

{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, James E. Constable, has filed a brief with this court 

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that 

a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the 
Clinton CA2017-10-014 

- 2 - 

trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be 

predicated; (2) lists four potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 

744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to 

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of 

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant 

on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief 

and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having 

been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to 

appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant 

requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that 

it is wholly frivolous. 

 HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Michael E. Healy, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of ShoreTel, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and;

The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
ShoreTel, Inc.

|                         |        |                                             
|------------------------ | ------ | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: November
 5, 2009 | By:    | /s/ MICHAEL
 E. HEALY                       
|                         |        |                                             
|                         | Name:  | Michael E. Healy                            
|                         | Title: | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                         |        | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
|                         |        |                                             
|                        

- 81 -

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On January 7, 2015, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *ARG Corporation,*
                     Civil Action No. 10-cv-311. In August 2010, the United States filed suit against ARG Corporation (“ARG”) and Norbert Toubes under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) for the recovery of response costs incurred at the South Bend Lathe Superfund Site (the “Site”), in South Bend, Indiana. The Consent Decree resolves ARG's and Mr. Toubes' CERCLA liability for past response costs at the Site for a total of $500,000. ARG and Mr. Toubes are required to pay $250,000 on February 1, 2015 and $250,000 on August 1, 2015. The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *ARG Corporation,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-3-09441. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: To submit comments:
Send them to:By e-mail
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: 
                    *http://www.usdoj.gov/​enrd/​Consent_​Decrees.html.*
                     We will provide a paper copy of the proposed Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ-ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611. Please enclose a check or money order for $4.25 (25 cents per page reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. Randall M. Stone, Acting Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2015-00275 Filed 1-12-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
##### 



---

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

Form 6-K

Report of Foreign Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For April 8, 2004

Extendicare Inc.(Translation of registrants name into English)

3000 Steeles Avenue East
Markham, Ontario, Canada L3R 9W2
(Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

|           |  |           
|---------- |  | ----------
|Form 20-Fo |  | Form 40-Fþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.

|     |  |    
|---- |  | ---
|Yeso |  | Noþ

If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A



---

---





---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX

|               |  |                       
|-------------- |  | ----------------------
|Exhibit Number |  | Description of Exhibit
|               |  |                       



|99.1 |  | News Release dated April 8, 2004  Extendicare to Refinance U.S. Debt
with US$125 Million Senior Subordinated Notes
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





---



##### 



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|                    |  |                  |  |                                                                                         
|------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | EXTENDICARE INC.
|                   
|                   
|Date: April 8, 2004 |  | By:              |  | /s/ MARK W. DURISHANMark W. Durishan
Vice-President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>   DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>        SEP-30-1995
<CASH> 391,510            
<SECURITIES>   0
<RECEIVABLES> 132,489      
<ALLOWANCES>       0
<INVENTORY>         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>    0
<PP&E> 2,843,690         <F1>
<DEPRECIATION> 0    <F2>    
<TOTAL-ASSETS> 3,613,070    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>    0
<BONDS>   2,843,690     <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>    0
<PREFERRED>         0
<COMMON>               0
<OTHER-SE>          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 3,727,998
<SALES>             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES> 685,295     <F4>
<CGS>               0
<TOTAL-COSTS> 704,350      <F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>     0
<INCOME-TAX>        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING> 0
<DISCONTINUED>      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>     0
<CHANGES>           0
<NET-INCOME>      (19,055)
<EPS-PRIMARY>       0
<EPS-DILUTED>       0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS  REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE
<F2>   "DEPRECIATION" IS INCLUDED IN "PP&E"
<F3> "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGE PAYABLE
<F4>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F5>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2537 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to increase the basic allowance 

for housing inside the United States for members of the uniformed services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2023 

Ms. STRICKLAND (for herself, Mr. BACON, Mr. CARBAJAL, Mr. DESJARLAIS, 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. TURNER, Ms. 

DELBENE, Mr. MOORE of Utah, Mr. KILMER, Mr. CROW, Mr. BEYER, 

Mr. PETERS, Mr. MOULTON, Ms. JACOBS, Mr. NORCROSS, and Ms. 

HOULAHAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to increase the 

basic allowance for housing inside the United States 

for members of the uniformed services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘BAH Restoration 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2537 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN BASIC ALLOWANCE FOR HOUSING IN2 SIDE THE UNITED STATES FOR MEMBERS OF 

3 THE UNIFORMED SERVICES. 

4 Paragraph (3) of section 403(b) of title 37, United 

5 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(3) The monthly amount of the basic allowance for 

7 housing for an area of the United States for a member 

8 of a uniformed service shall be the amount of the monthly 

9 cost of adequate housing in that area, as determined by 

10 the Secretary of Defense, for members of the uniformed 

11 services serving in the same pay grade and with the same 

12 dependency status as the member.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
---

EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Arthur D. Levinson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ ARTHUR D. LEVINSON                                             | 
| | ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
| |                    |                                                                    | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | Arthur D. Levinson, Ph.D.
Chief Executive Officer
October 31, 2005 | 

I, David A. Ebersman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report of Genentech, Inc. on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Genentech, Inc.





| | By:                | /s/ DAVID A. EBERSMAN                                                                    | 
| | ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                    |                                                                                          | 
| | Name:
Title:
Date: | David A. Ebersman
Senior Vice President and 
   Chief Financial Officer
October 31, 2005 | 



---
Exhibit 23.2

DeGolyer and MacNaughton

5001 Spring Valley Road

Suite 800 East

Dallas, Texas 75244

March 29, 2010

TransAtlantic Petroleum Ltd.

5910 N. Central Expressway, Suite 1755

Dallas, Texas 75206

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the use of the name DeGolyer and MacNaughton and to references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton as an
independent petroleum engineering consulting firm under the heading Part I  Item 2. Properties of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, of TransAtlantic Petroleum Ltd. (TransAtlantic) to be
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 29, 2010 (the Annual Report), including any amendments thereto, and to the inclusion of our third party letter report dated March 2, 2010, containing our opinion on
the proved reserves attributable to certain properties owned by TransAtlantic as of December 31, 2009.

We hereby further
consent to the incorporation by reference of the foregoing in Registration Statement (No. 333-162814) on Form S-8 of TransAtlantic.



Very truly yours,/S/ DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTONTexas Registered Engineering Firm F-716
Exhibit 10.82


 





AMENDMENT
NO. 1 


TO
TWINLAB CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS INC. WARRANT NO. 2015-17


 


This
Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to Twinlab Consolidated Holdings, Inc. Warrant No. 2015-17 (the “Warrant”)
is made and entered as of this 14th day of August, 2015 (the “Effective Date”) by and among TWINLAB CONSOLIDATED
HOLDINGS, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and the DAVID L. VAN ANDEL TRUST, UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT
DATED NOVEMBER 30, 1993 (the “Holder”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company issued the Warrant to the Holder on June 2, 2015; and


 


WHEREAS,
Company and Holder wish to amend the terms of the Warrant as set forth herein.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the sufficiency of which are hereby expressly acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:


 


1.       The
definition of “Exercise Price” in Section 1.1 of the Warrant is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:


 


“Exercise
Price” shall have the meaning set forth in the Preamble.


 


2.       Section
3.3.3 of the Warrant is hereby deleted in its entirety.


 


3.       Section
5.3 of the Warrant is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“Amendments
and Waivers. Any provision of this Warrant may be amended or waived, but only pursuant to a written agreement signed by the
Company and the Holder.”


 


4.       Except
as expressly modified by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Warrant shall remain in full force and effect.


 


5.       This
Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall be deemed
to be one and the same instrument. A signed, including electronically signed, copy of this Amendment delivered by facsimile, email
(for example in a .pdf, .tif or .jpeg format), or other means or electronic transmission shall be deemed to be legally binding
upon the party so delivering such signature and of the same legal force and effect as delivery of an original signature upon this
Amendment.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date written above.


 


 






	DAVID L. VAN
    ANDEL TRUST, UNDER	TWINLAB CONSOLIDATED
	TRUST AGREEMENT
    DATED 11/30/93	HOLDINGS, INC.
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/
    David L. Van Andel	 	/s/
    Thomas Tolworthy	 
	By: 	David L. Van Andel	 	By:	Thomas Tolworthy	 
	Title:	Trustee	 	Title:	CEO
<PAGE>


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We refer to amendment no. 1 to the registration statement on Form S-4
("Amendment No. 1") filed by IMAX Corporation (the "Company") under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 of our
report dated February 27, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets
of the Company as at December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the consolidated statements
of operations, cash flows and shareholders' equity (deficit) for each year in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2003 prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. We
also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Amendment No. 1.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
---------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
May 6, 2004
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE D ISTRIC T OFCO LU M BIA MA RYJANEPI ET SCH , : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 09-0390 (RMU)

: v. : Re Docume nt Nos.: 3, 7, 12

: MCKI SSAC K & MCKI SSAC K, : : Def endant. :

OR DE R G R A N TI N G TH E P LA INT IF F ’ S S E COND M OT I ON T O A M END THE C OM P L AI NT ; D E NYI NG A S M OO T THE P LA INT IF F ’ S F I R ST M OT I ON T O A M END THE C OM P L AI NT ; D E NYI NG W I T HOU T

P R EJUD I C E THE D E F E NDANT ’ S M OT I ON T O D IS M IS S For the re asons stated in the c ourt’s Memora ndum Opinion separately and
c o nt e mp o r an e o u s l y i s s u e d th i s 1 2 thd ay o f

J anu ar y, 2 0 1 0 , i ti s h e r e b y OR DE RE D that th e pla int if

f’ s se c on d mo tio n to ame nd the c omp la int

is G RA NT ED ;
and it i s F UR THER

OR DE RE D that th e pla int if

f’ s f ir st m oti on

to a me nd the c omp la int

is DENIED as m oot ; and

it i s OR DE RE D that th e de fe nd ant’ s mo tio n to dis mis s is DENIED w ithout prejudice
. SO OR DE RE D
.

RI CARDO M. URBI NA United States District J udg e