alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2**Certifications**I, James A. Kitchens, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of MDI, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Dated: November 9, 2006 By  /s/ James A. Kitchens    James A. Kitchens    Chief Financial Officer
exv4w1



 










	CERTIFICATE CUSIP No. 871628 10 3

















 





SYNTHESIS
ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.




     The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be
construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:








	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TEN COM

	 	—
	 	as tenants in common
	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT                       Custodian,
                    

	 	 
	TEN ENT

	 	—
	 	as tenants by the entireties
	 	(Cust)          
     
            (Minor)    	 	 
	JT TEN

	 	—
	 	as joint tenants with right	 		 	
 
	 	 	 	 	of survivorship and not as 
	 

	 	 	 	tenants in common
	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
Act
 
 

(State)
	 	 









Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.




For value
received,                                              
                                                      
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto




	 	 	 
	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
	 	 
	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	 	 
	 


	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 


	 	 






	 	 	 
	 
	(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 
	 
	 	 
	 
	 

	 	Shares
	 

of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Attorney
	 

to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Dated                                                             
	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	NOTICE:

	 	 

THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST
CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE
FACE OF
THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT
ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHAT
SOEVER.
	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED:

	 	 

THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKHOLDERS,
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS
WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE [ILLIGBLE] [ILLIGBLE], PURSUANT TO S F
C RULE [ILLIGBLE]
	 	 






KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS LOST, STOLEN, MUTILATED OR DESTROYED, THE
CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT
CERTIFICATE.
EXHIBIT 23

<PAGE>


           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




Biocurex, Inc.
7080 River Road, Suite 215
Richmond, British Columbia V6X 1X5


     We consent to the  incorporation by reference of our report dated March 29,
2011 which is  included  in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
December 21, 2011 of BioCurex,  Inc. in the Company's  Registration Statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to the Company's Stock Bonus Plan.


/s/ Manning Elliott, LLP

Manning Elliot LLP

Vancouver, British Columbia
July 24, 2012

<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Office of The TriZetto Group, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



|(a) |  | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) |  | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: March 31, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|-------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                    
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                    
|Date: March 31, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|                    
|                     |  |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | 



This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
##### 



FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of November 2004 Commission File Number 1-14916 BROOKFIELD PROPERTIES CORPORATION 
 (Translation of registrants name into English)
  BCE Place
181 Bay Street
Suite 330
Toronto, Ontario
Canada M5J 2T3
(416) 359-8600 (Address of principal executive offices)
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F. Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   þ
 Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Yes   o
    
    No   þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-




---



##### 



DOCUMENTS FILED AS PART OF THIS FORM 6-K See the Exhibit Index to this Form 6-K. SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date:   November 17, 2004 Brookfield Properties CorporationBy:
    /s/   Craig LaurieName:
    Craig LaurieTitle:
    Senior Vice President &Chief
Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT LIST  Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release dated November 17, 2004
ex102.htm










 


                           HCI VIOCARE


 







NOTICE OF STOCK AWARD GRANT


 







NOTICE OF STOCK AWARD GRANT:




NIKOLAOS KARDARAS,  you  have  been  granted  a stock  award  of the Common Stock (the "Common Stock") of HCi Viocare, as follows:




 




	
Grant Number:

	
0001

	  
	  	  	  
	
Date of Grant:

	
May 28, 2015

	  
	 	 	 
	
Vesting Commencement Date:

	
See Vesting Schedule below

	  
	  	  	  
	
Total Number of Award Shares Granted:

	
100,000 shares in one installment

	  
	 	 	 
	
Term/Expiration Date:

	
n/a

	  







 




	
  

	
VESTING SCHEDULE: This Award may be issued, in whole or in part, in accordance with the following schedule:









   


Stock Award is fully vested on date of grant.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2510 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2510

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the credit for the 
             adoption of special needs children refundable.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2023

    Mr. Nunn of Iowa (for himself and Mr. Davis of North Carolina) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make the credit for the 
             adoption of special needs children refundable.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADOPTION CREDIT FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN MADE REFUNDABLE.

    (a) In General.--Section 23 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (j) and by 
inserting after subsection (h) the following new subsection:
    ``(i) Portion of Credit Related to Special Needs Children Made 
Refundable.--
            ``(1) In general.--So much of the credit allowed under this 
        section for any taxable year (determined without regard to this 
        subsection and subsection (c)) as does not exceed the special 
        needs adoption expenses for such taxable year shall be treated 
        as a credit allowed under subpart C (and not allowed under this 
        section).
            ``(2) Special needs adoption expenses.--For purposes of 
        this subsection, the term `special needs adoption expenses' 
        means, with respect to any taxpayer for any taxable year, the 
        aggregate amount of qualified adoption expenses with respect to 
        adoptions of children with special needs which is taken into 
        account in determining the credit allowed under this section to 
        such taxpayer for such taxable year (determined without regard 
        to this subsection, subsection (b)(2), and subsection (c)).''.
    (b) Coordination With Carryforward of Non-Refundable Portion.--
Section 23(c)(1) of such Code is amended by striking ``under subsection 
(a)'' and inserting ``under this section (determined after application 
of subsection (i))''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the later of the date of the 
enactment of this Act or December 31, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Gregory S. Weishar, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PharMerica Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

DATE: May 25, 2011



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Gregory S. Weishar              
|Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### In the Matter of Unique Jaleel S., a Child Alleged to be Abandoned. Vernon S., Appellant; Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children, Respondent.

[825 NYS2d 219]

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Allen G. Alpert, J.), entered on or about October 31, 2005, which, after a fact-finding determination that respondent father had abandoned the child, terminated his parental rights and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The hearing court found that during the six-month abandonment period, respondent made only two “minimal” contacts with the agency, by way of letter, which did not seek visitation or ask about the child’s welfare. Such a finding is sufficient to support the conclusion of abandonment, especially where, as here, there is no evidence of any ongoing efforts by respondent to keep in contact with the child since the child’s entry into foster care in 2003 *(Matter of Stephen Sidney W.,*283 AD2d 153, 154 [2001]; *Matter of Oneka O.,*249 AD2d 233 [1998]).

The court’s findings regarding the best interests of the child were supported by a preponderance of the evidence, highlighting the positive environment provided by the foster family and its desire to adopt the child, which was in furtherance of the goal of finding a permanent home for this child *(see Matter of Taaliyah Simone S.D.,*28 AD3d 371 [2006]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
<PAGE>
================================================================================

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                    FORM 6-K

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer
                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the month of: August 2004                    Commission File Number: 0-27400


                            CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.
                            -------------------------
                              (Name of Registrant)


                                2255 MARKHAM ROAD
                                TORONTO, ONTARIO
                                 CANADA M1B 2W3
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:


                 Form 20-F  [ ]                  Form 40-F   [X]


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                   Yes  [ ]                         No   [X]


If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A

================================================================================
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                    CINRAM INTERNATIONAL INC.



Date: August 13, 2004               By: /s/ Lewis Ritchie
                                        --------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Lewis Ritchie
                                    Title: Executive Vice-President Finance
                                           and Administration, Chief
                                           Financial Officer and Secretary

<PAGE>
                                     EXHIBIT

Exhibit         Description of Exhibit
-------         ----------------------

   1            Second Quarter Report to Shareholders
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

 

I, Paul R. Arena, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)the Annual Report, Amendment No. 1, on Form 10-K/A of Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2018 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. 

 

 

 

 

 

*/s/ Paul R. Arena* 

Paul R. Arena 

President and CEO 

 

July 26, 2019 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. and will be retained by Parallax Health Sciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Team, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ted W. Owen, Senior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|/S/    TED W.
OWEN                                           
|Ted W. Owen Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

April 8, 2009
#### In the Matter of Lavountae A. and Others, Infants. Monroe County Department of Human Services, Respondent; Laticia A., Appellant.

Submitted March 9, 2009;

decided March 26, 2009

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Timothy E Donaher, Esq., Monroe County Public Defender, 10 N. Fitzhugh Street, Rochester, New York 14614 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
#### Laura GONZALEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WEEKS MARINE, INC. and Atlantic Sounding Co. Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 05-41148

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 20, 2006.

*575Anthony G. Buzbee, Buzbee Law Firm, Galveston, TX, Aaron Ivan Vela, Law Offices of Aaron I Vela, Edinburg, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Frank Edward Perez, Perez *&*Piette, Brownsville, TX, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The plaintiff, Laura Gonzalez, sued the defendants in state court under the Jones Act alleging that she was a seaman injured while serving on a vessel. Generally, a proper Jones Act claim is not removable to federal court. *Lackey v. Atlantic Rich-field Co.,*990 F.2d 202, 206-07 (5th Cir. 1993). The defendants removed, alleging fraudulent pleading of the plaintiff’s Jones Act status. The plaintiff filed a motion to remand, alleging that the boat on which the plaintiff was working should be classified as a “vessel” under the Jones Act, barring removal. The district court denied the motion. Nearly one year later, the plaintiff filed a motion to reconsider, making the same argument bolstered by intervening Supreme Court case law. The district court reconsidered the motion and granted it, remanding the case to state court.

The defendants raise two objections on appeal. First, they contend that while the initial motion to remand was timely filed, the motion to reconsider was a “second motion to remand” and fell outside the thirty day filing requirement. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). This objection has no merit. The motion to reconsider alleged the same basis for remand as the initial motion, and does not constitute a “second motion.” In addition, the defendants have waived this objection by failing to object below to the timeliness of either the motion to remand or the motion to reconsider. *See In Re Digicon Marine, Inc.,*966 F.2d 158, 160 (5th Cir.1992).

The second objection raised by the defendants is that the plaintiff waived her objection to removal by actively participating in the case after removal. See *Johnson v. Odeco Oil & Gas Co.,*864 F.2d 40 (5th Cir.1989). However, the *Johnson*opinion makes clear that this waiver can occur only when the plaintiff “fails to object to the removal” of the action. *Id.*at 42. Because the plaintiff timely objected *576here, this argument is unavailing. We therefore AFFIRM.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.