alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Anthony LAMB, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-4265.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Oct. 17, 2006.

Decided: Oct. 19, 2006.

*518Michael S. Nachmanoff, Acting Federal Public Defender, Walter B. Dalton, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Scott Walker Put-ney, Office of the United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Lamb appeals his twenty-month term of imprisonment imposed after the district court revoked his supervised release. Lamb’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), raising the argument that the sentence was not reasonable, but stating that he finds no meritorious grounds for appeal. The Government did not file an answering brief, and although advised of his right to do so, Lamb did not file a pro se supplemental brief.

In accordance with *Anders,*we have reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Pursuant to *United States v. Crudup,*461 F.3d 433, 437 (4th Cir.2006), revocation sentences are reviewed to determine whether they are “plainly unreasonable” with regard to the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2000) factors applicable to these sentences. We find that Lamb’s sentence is not plainly unreasonable because the district court sentenced Lamb within the statutory maximum and sufficiently stated a proper basis for its conclusion that Lamb should be sentenced to a lengthier sentence than one within the advisory range. We therefore affirm Lamb’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform Lamb, in writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If Lamb requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on Lamb.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    
    DECEMBER 21, 2004
  NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  CANADA
    
    000-30758
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
  8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02
    
    Results of Operations and Financial Condition On December 21, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation issued a press release providing a status update
on its and Nortel Networks Limiteds financial restatement process and other related matters. Such
press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and furnished in accordance with Item 2.02 of Form
8-K. Nortel Networks Corporation owns all of the registrants common shares and the registrant is Nortel
Networks Corporations principal direct operating subsidiary.  Item 8.01
    
    Other Events On December 21, 2004, Nortel Networks Corporation issued the press release attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1, and such press release is incorporated by reference herein (other than information
included on or linked from the registrants website, referenced in such release, which is not
incorporated by reference into this report).  Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits (c)
    
    Exhibits99.1
    
    
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on December 21, 2004.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:

/s/Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant General Counsel 
Securities
and Corporate Secretary By:

/s/
Tracy S.J. Connelly
McGilleyTracy S.J. Connelly McGilleyAssistant Secretary Dated: December 22, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on December 21, 2004.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 51193 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. CHRIS WENDELL VORHIES, also known as Lurch, also known as Chris Voerhis, also known as Chris Vorhies , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:14

- CR

- 189

- 33

Before KING, GRAVES , and COSTA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Chris Wendell Vorhies has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Vorhies has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Vorhies ’s claims of ine ffective

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 17, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-51193 Document: 00513763660 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2016No. 15

- 51193

2 assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Vorhies ’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and th e APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Case: 15-51193 Document: 00513763660 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2016
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2600 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2600

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure the equitable 
treatment of political subdivisions contributing to State expenditures 
                      under the Medicaid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2023

Mr. Langworthy (for himself, Ms. Tenney, and Mr. Williams of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure the equitable 
treatment of political subdivisions contributing to State expenditures 
                      under the Medicaid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Local Taxpayers Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. ENSURING THE EQUITABLE TREATMENT OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS 
              CONTRIBUTING TO STATE EXPENDITURES UNDER THE MEDICAID 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(cc) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396d(cc)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``if it requires'' 
        and all that follows through the period and inserting ``unless, 
        with respect to amounts received by the State attributable to 
        such increases, the State agrees to distribute to each such 
        subdivision an amount that bears the same ratio to such amounts 
        received as such contribution of such subdivision bears to such 
        non-Federal share of expenditures.''; and
            (2) in the third sentence, by striking ``, except that'' 
        and all that follows through the period and inserting a period.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to increases in the Federal medical assistance 
percentage of a State for medical assistance furnished in calendar 
quarters beginning on or after January 1, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              OF SWISS MEDICA, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350


Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned
officer of Swiss  Medica,  Inc. (the  "Company")  does hereby  certify,  to such
officer's knowledge, that:

      (a)   The quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
            30, 2005 of the Company  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
            section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   Information  contained in the Form 10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2005


By: /s/ RAGHUNATH KILAMBI
------------------------------
Raghunath Kilambi,
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gregory S. Weishar, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PharMerica Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. [Intentionally omitted] 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

DATE: February 19, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WAYNE D. PERRY, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-00001-CB-C

GRANTT CULLIVER, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to

the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation

to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that

Plaintiff’s Complaint be and is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

DONE this 5th day of April, 2010.

s/Charles R. Butler, Jr. 

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:09-cv-00001-CB-C Document 63 Filed 04/05/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32

Certification Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)


Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) the
undersigned General Partners of TASA Products Limited, a Washington limited
partnership (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of such General
Partner's knowledge and belief, that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006
(the "Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/MICHEL E. MAES                       /s/JAMES R. STEFFEY
Michel E. Maes                          James R. Steffey
Co-General Partner                      Co-General Partner
Date: 10-24-06                          Date: 10-24-06
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00623-CR

Jose Torres Jr. a/k/a Jose Torres

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2013-DCR-2036-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 22, 2014
EXHIBIT 11
                          FIRST COMMERCIAL CORPORATION
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                       Unaudited               Unaudited      
                                  Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended  
                                     September 30,           September 30,    
                                ----------------------  ----------------------
(Dollars in thousands,             1995        1994        1995        1994   
 except per share data)         ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------

Net income                      $   14,335  $   12,721  $   40,021  $   37,391
Less: Preferred stock dividend          --          --          --         129
                                ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Income applicable to
 common shares                  $   14,335  $   12,721  $   40,021  $   37,262
                                ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

Weighted average common shares
 outstanding                    23,736,718  23,788,600  23,771,094  23,988,817
Earnings per common share       $     0.60  $     0.53  $     1.68  $     1.55































                                       22
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. R AMON L OR E NZ O ME DINA - C OT A, a. k. a. R am on M edi na-C ot a, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 08- 10333 & 08- 10334 D . C. N o s . 4 : 0 1 - c r - 0 1 7 9 6 - RCC 4 : 0 6 - c r - 0 1 7 1 8 - RCC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona R a ne rC . C ol l i ns , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry10, 2011 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. I n the s e c ons ol i da t e d appe a l s , R a m on L or e nz o M e di na - C ot aappe a l s f r om hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on and 7 5-m on th sent ence for i l l egalre -e ntryaf t er depo rt at i on , i n v i ol at i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1 32 6, and from hi s r evocat i on of supervi se d 

# FI LED JAN 20 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 10333 & 08- 10334 2 r e l e a s e and 12- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d upon r e voc a t i on. P ur s ua ntt o A nder s v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 1967) , M e di na - C ot a ’ s c ouns e l ha s f i l e d abr i e f

s t a t i ng the r e a r e no gr ounds f

orr e l i e f . W e ha ve pr ovi de d the appe l l a ntw i th the opportuni tyt o f

i l e as uppl e m e nt a l br i e f . N o pr o s e br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s ua ntt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. A cc ordi ng l y, the di stri ctcourt ’ s j ud gm ent s are A FFI R M ED .
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00525

- CR

FREDDIE LEE TUBBS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 97TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTAGUE COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

- ---------

We have considered a ppellant ’ s “ Motion To Dismiss. ” The motion

complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure. Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a). No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this

motion, we grant t he motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: March 14, 2013
<PAGE>

                                 FORM 52-109FT2
                        CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

I, Phillip E. Casey, Chief Executive Officer of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation,
certify that:

1.    I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in
      Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers'
      Annual and Interim Filings) of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation, (the issuer)
      for the interim period ending September 30, 2004;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to
      be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light
      of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period
      covered by the interim filings; and

3.    Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the
      other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present
      in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
      and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented
      in the interim filings.

Date: November 8, 2004

/s/ Phillip E. Casey
-------------------------------------------
Phillip E. Casey
Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>

                                 FORM 52-109FT2
                        CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

I, Tom J. Landa, Chief Financial Officer of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation,
certify that:

1.    I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in
      Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers'
      Annual and Interim Filings) of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation, (the issuer)
      for the interim period ending September 30, 2004;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to
      be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light
      of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period
      covered by the interim filings; and

3.    Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the
      other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present
      in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
      and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented
      in the interim filings.

Date: November 8, 2004

/s/Tom J. Landa
------------------------------------------------------------
Tom J. Landa
Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary