alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James N. Fairbairn,  Chief Financial Officer of Quincy Energy Corp. (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
1. The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, of the Company for the year ended April, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:

August 12, 2005



/s/ James N. Fairbairn

James N. Fairbairn

Chief Financial Officer
#### Trust for the Certificate Holders of the Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors, Inc. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1999-C1, by and through Orix Capital Markets, LLC as Master Servicer and Special Servicer, Appellant, v Love Funding Corporation, Respondent.

Submitted August 3, 2009;

decided August 27, 2009

Motion by Loan Syndications & Trading Association, Inc. for leave to file a brief amicus curiae on consideration of the certified question herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
John W. Combs, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

The
Annual Report on Form 10-K of ShoreTel, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
ShoreTel, Inc.

|                          |        |                                        
|------------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: September 10, 2009 | By:    | /s/
 JOHN W. COMBS                     
|                          |        |                                        
|                          | Name:  | John W. Combs                          
|                          | Title: | Chairman, President and Chief Executive
|                          |        | Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

ROBERT LONG AND NICOLE LONG, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-872 ) BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON FKA ) THE BANK OF NEW YORK as Trustee ) or the Certificate Holders CWALT, INC., ) Alternative Loan Trust 2006-OA17, ) Mortgage Passthrough Certificates, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 24, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Kemba Johnson Lewis, Judge. Mark P. Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, LLC, Tampa (withdrew after briefing); and Latasha Scott of Lord Scott, PLLC, Tampa (withdrew after briefing), for Appellants. Robert and Nicole Long, pro se. Joseph T. Kohn and Benjamin B. Brown of Quarles & Brady LLP, Naples, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.- 2 -

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.a.1  


 
 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM    
    


        We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-92229) pertaining to the 1993
Stock Option Plan and the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-138697) pertaining to the 2006 Stock Option Plan
of Biovail Corporation, of our report dated March 19, 2007, except for note 3, as to which the date is May 22, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Biovail Corporation, and our report dated March 19, 2007, except for the effects of the material weaknesses described in the sixth paragraph, as to which the date is
May 22, 2007, with respect to Biovail Corporation management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Biovail Corporation, included in the amended Annual Report (Form 20-F/A) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 



	Toronto, Canada	 	/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
	May 22, 2007	 	Chartered Accountants

Licensed Public Accountants













QuickLinks


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
| (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Anthony L. Havens       |   |   |
| Anthony                L. Havens           |        |        |
|  Chief              Executive Officer |        |
|                                       |   |
| Date:                December 18, 2006     |        |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Antonio GONZALEZ-MONGUIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05—40234

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 2006.

Paula Camille Offenhauser, James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

*394PER CURIAM: *

Juan Antonio Gonzalez-Monguia (Gonzalez) pleaded guilty to being found in the United States unlawfully after deportation. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326. He was sentenced to 68 months of imprisonment, to be served consecutively to a six-month term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation of supervised release on an alien-smuggling offense. The district court also imposed a three-year term of supervised release.

Gonzalez’s constitutional challenge to § 1326 is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Gonzalez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Gonzalez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Gonzalez argues that the district court erred by ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release. This claim is not ripe for review on direct appeal. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). The claim is dismissed. *See id.*at 1102.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

         This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from
         GoThink.Com,  Incorporated  and subsidiary  December 31, 1999 financial
         statements  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
         financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                         0001092455
<NAME>                        GoThink.Com Incorporated

<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999

<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00

<CASH>                                         319
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               319
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          40,327
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       191,960
<OTHER-SE>                                     (231,968)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   319
<SALES>                                        116,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,617
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  571,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (570,090)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,025,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,025,339)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                666,977
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (358,362)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)



</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2509 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to submit a report on helicopter 

and rotorcraft noise in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2023 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to submit a report 

on helicopter and rotorcraft noise in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECOMMENDATIONS ON REDUCING HELI4 COPTER NOISE IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUM5 BIA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

7 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transpor8 tation, in consultation with all relevant operators and enti9 ties, shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and 

10 Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2509 IH

1 Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of 

2 the Senate a report containing recommendations to reduce 

3 helicopter and rotorcraft noise in the District of Columbia. 

4 (b) CONTENTS.—The report required under sub5 section (a) shall include recommendations on, at least— 

6 (1) altitude; 

7 (2) the number of flights; 

8 (3) flight paths; 

9 (4) time of day of flights; 

10 (5) types of aircraft; 

11 (6) operating procedures; and 

12 (7) pilot training. 

13 (c) RELEVANT OPERATORS AND ENTITIES DE14 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘relevant operators and 

15 entities’’ means— 

16 (1) the head of any agency or department of 

17 the Federal Government that flies a helicopter or 

18 rotorcraft over the District of Columbia; 

19 (2) the Chief of Police of the Metropolitan Po20 lice Department of the District of Columbia; 

21 (3) any medical helicopter or rotorcraft oper22 ator that routinely flies a helicopter or rotorcraft 

23 over the District of Columbia; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 2509 IH

1 (4) any other operator that routinely flies a hel2 icopter or rotorcraft over the District of Columbia. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, we have determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________
No. 98-50125 Summary Calendar

_________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GILBERTO MONTANA-ROMERO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(DR-97-CR-235-1)

November 27, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Court-appointed counsel for Gilberto Montana-Romero has filed

a motion to withdraw and a brief as required b y Anders v.

California
, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in this appeal of a conviction and

sentence for illegal re-entry, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § § 1326(a)

and (b). Montana-Romero was given an opportunity to file a

response to the motion, and he has not responded. Our independent

review of the brief and record discloses n o nonfrivolous issue.-2-

Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

H:\SHARED\OPCLERK\NPOP\98-50125
**EXHIBIT 15.1**








October
      31, 2007








The
      Board of Directors and Stockholders of Genentech, Inc.





We
      are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
      pertaining to the Genentech, Inc. Tax Reduction Investment Plan, the 2004 Equity
      Incentive Plan, the 1999 Stock Plan, the 1996 Stock Option/Stock Incentive
      Plan,
      the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1990 Stock Option/Stock Incentive Plan, and
      the
      1991 Employee Stock Plan, the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-37072)
      related to the resale of common shares deliverable upon the exchange of Liquid
      Yield Option Notes, and in the related Prospectuses, as applicable, contained
      in
      such Registration Statements of our report dated October 29, 2007, relating
      to
      the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of Genentech,
      Inc. that are included in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
      2007.





Very
                truly yours,/s/ Ernst
                & Young LLP





Palo
      Alto, California
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) for the Quarterly Period Ended September
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Donald Speer, II, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



By:

/s/ L. DONALD SPEER, IIL. Donald Speer, II Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer




Dated: November
15, 2004
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT RENNIE TR

ULY C O WAN, a

n individual, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. W ILLIAM M O RR IS AGENC Y, INC ., De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 12-55149 D.C . No. 5:08-c v-00917-VAPR NB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 25, 2014 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, TALLM AN, a nd NGUYEN, C i rc u it Judge s. R e nnie Truly

C owa n a ppe a l s pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r de ny ing he r m otion to se a l the e ntire re c ord in he r e m ploy m e nt disc rim i nation a

nd re ta lia tion a c tion. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w for an a buse o f disc re tion, Oline r v . K ontrabe c k i , 745 F.3d 1024, 1025 (9th C ir. 2014),



# FIL ED JUL 2 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).and we a ffirm .

The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

de ny i ng C owa

n’ s m otion to se a l the e ntire re c ord in he r c a se be c a use C o wan fa ile d to e sta

blish c om pe lling re a s ons to do so. Se e id. at 1026 (a pply ing the “ c om

p e lling re a sons” sta

nda rd to re que s t to se a l the e ntire re c ord of the distric t c ourt proc e e dings, inc luding the c ourt’ s opinion); Pintos v . Pac . C re ditors Ass’n , 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th C ir. 2010) (disc ussing the“ c o m pe lling re a sons” sta

nda rd and e xpla ining tha

t a c ourt m ay not re ly on hy pothe s is or c onje c ture in ruling on a m o tion to se a l); K

amak ana v . C ity & C ounty of Honolulu , 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th C ir. 2006) (“ The m e re fa c t that the produc tion of re c ords m ay le a d to a litiga nt’ s e m ba rra ssm e nt, inc rim ination, or e xposure to furthe r litiga tion will not, without m

ore , c om pe l the c ourt to se a l its re c ords.” ). W e do not c onside r C owa n’ s c ha lle nge to thedistric t c ourt’ s e ntry of a ve xatious litiga

nt orde r a ga inst he r be c a

use C o wan fa ile d to filea tim e l y notic e of a ppe a l from

the e ntry of judgm e nt a

nd the ve xatious litiga

nt orde r. Se e Fe d . R . App. P. 4(a )(1)(A) (e sta

blishing the

tim e for filing a

notic e of a

p pe a l). AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 5 5 1 4 9 2
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Martin Bajic, President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of Mabcure Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       

|By:    | /s/Martin Bajic                             
|------ | --------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Martin Bajic                                
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer       
|       | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|Date:  | April 14, 2008                              

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 7, 202 2

No. 04

- 21

- 00470

- CV

Lakshmana VISWANATH

, Appellant

v.

THE CITY OF LAREDO

, Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CVK001492D1 Honorable Joe Lopez , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by January 21, 2022. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. Appellant is therefore ORDERED to file, no later than February 17, 2022 , her brief and a written response reasonably explaining: (1) her failure to timely file a brief, and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails to timely file a brief and the written respons e by February 17, 2022

, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 38.8(a); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant fails to comply with court order)

.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of February, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court