Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 5 / Thursday, January 8, 2015 / Notices 1015 

Dated: January 2, 2015. 

Paul H. Hancock, 

Acting Forest Supervisor. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00082 Filed 1–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–P 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD 

INVESTIGATION BOARD 

Sunshine Act Meeting 

TIME AND DATE: January 15, 2015, 6:00 

p.m.–9:00 p.m. EST. 

PLACE: Hilton Meadowlands Hotel, Two 

Meadowlands Plaza, East Rutherford, 

New Jersey 07073. Diamond Court 

Ballrooms A&B. 

STATUS: Open to the public. 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The 

Chemical Safety and Hazard 

Investigation Board (CSB) will convene 

a public meeting on January 15, 2015, 

starting at 6:00 p.m. at the Hilton 

Meadowlands Hotel, Two Meadowlands 

Plaza, Diamond Court Ballrooms A&B, 

East Rutherford, New Jersey 07073. At 

the public meeting, the Board will hear 

from teams investigating the 2012 

explosion and fire at the US Ink facility 

located in East Rutherford, NJ, that 

injured seven workers. Time permitting, 

the Board may also consider a report 

into the CSB’s investigation of the 2010 

anhydrous ammonia release at Millard 

Refrigerated Services, a warehouse and 

distribution center in Theodore, 

Alabama, near Mobile, Alabama, where 

more than 130 members of the public 

sought medical attention as a result of 

an uncontrolled ammonia release. 

This public meeting is intended to 

provide the community affected by the 

US Ink explosion and other interested 

stakeholders, with an opportunity to 

consider and hear about the CSB staff’s 

findings on this matter. In addition, 

time permitting, the Board will also 

consider the staff’s presentation and 

lessons learned resulting from the 

Millard ammonia release, with 

information into how these incidents 

occurred and how similar future 

incidents can be prevented or mitigated. 

Following the staff presentation the 

Board will hear comments from the 

public. All staff presentations are 

preliminary and are intended solely to 

allow the Board to consider in a public 

forum the issues and factors involved in 

these cases. No factual analyses, 

conclusions, or findings presented by 

staff should be considered final. At the 

conclusion of the staff presentation the 

board may vote on the final product(s). 

Lastly, the Board may consider such 

other items of business as determined 

by the Chairperson. 

Additional Information 

The meeting is free and open to the 

public. If you require a translator or 

interpreter, please notify the individual 

listed below as the ‘‘Contact Person for 

Further Information,’’ at least five 

business days prior to the meeting. 

The CSB is an independent federal 

agency charged with investigating 

accidents and hazards that result, or 

may result, in the catastrophic release of 

extremely hazardous substances. The 

agency’s Board Members are appointed 

by the President and confirmed by the 

Senate. CSB investigations look into all 

aspects of chemical accidents and 

hazards, including physical causes such 

as equipment failure as well as 

inadequacies in regulations, industry 

standards, and safety management 

systems. 

Public Comment 

Members of the public are invited to 

make brief statements to the Board at 

the conclusion of the staff 

presentation(s). The time provided for 

public statements will depend upon the 

number of people who wish to speak. 

Speakers should assume that their 

presentations will be limited to five 

minutes or less, but commenters may 

submit written statements for the 

record. 

Contact Person for Further Information 

Hillary J. Cohen, Communications 

Manager, hillary.cohen@csb.gov or (202) 

446–8094. General information about 

the CSB can be found on the agency 

Web site at: www.csb.gov. 

Dated: January 5, 2015. 

Rafael Moure-Eraso, 

Chairperson. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00121 Filed 1–6–15; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6350–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–61–2014] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 82—Mobile, 

Alabama, Authorization of Production 

Activity, Airbus Americas, Inc. 

(Commercial Passenger Aircraft) 

Mobile, Alabama 

On August 21, 2014, the City of 

Mobile, Alabama, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 82, submitted a notification 

of proposed production activity to the 

Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board on 

behalf of Airbus Americas, Inc., within 

Site 1, in Mobile. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (79 FR 52630, 09/04/

2014). The FTZ Board has determined 

that no further review of the activity is 

warranted at this time. The production 

activity described in the notification is 

authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.14. 

Dated: December 26, 2014. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00111 Filed 1–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[B–62–2014] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 75—Phoenix, 

Arizona, Authorization of Production 

Activity, Orbital Sciences Corporation, 

(Satellites and Space Craft Launch 

Vehicles) Gilbert, Arizona 

On August 28, 2014, Orbital Sciences 

Corporation, operator of FTZ 75—Site 

10, submitted a notification of proposed 

production activity to the Foreign-Trade 

Zones (FTZ) Board for its facility in 

Gilbert, Arizona. 

The notification was processed in 

accordance with the regulations of the 

FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including 

notice in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (79 FR 53408, 9–9– 

2014). The FTZ Board has determined 

that no further review of the activity is 

warranted at this time. The production 

activity described in the notification is 

authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the FTZ Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.14. 

Dated: December 29, 2014. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00108 Filed 1–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–012] 

Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 

Rod From the People’s Republic of 

China: Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) and the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1016 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 5 / Thursday, January 8, 2015 / Notices 

1See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod 

From the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Final Affirmative Determination of Critical 

Circumstances, in Part, 79 FR 68860 (November 19, 

2014) (Final Determination). 

2See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod 

From the People’s Republic of China, Investigation 

Nos. 701–TA–512 and 731–TA–1248 (Final), USITC 

Publication 4509, December 2014. 

3 Id. 4 Id. 

5See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod 

From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Preliminary Determination of Critical 

Circumstances, in Part, 79 FR 53169 (September 8, 

2014) (Preliminary Determination). 

6See section 736(a)(3) of the Act. 

7See Final Determination, 79 FR at 68861. See 

also Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination and Final 

Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, 

79 FR 68858 (November 19, 2014) (CVD Final 

Determination). 

International Trade Commission (the 

ITC), the Department is issuing an 

antidumping duty order on carbon and 

certain alloy steel wire rod (steel wire 

rod) from the People’s Republic of 

China (PRC). 

DATES: Effective Date: January 8, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Smith or Brandon Custard, AD/

CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1766 or (202) 482– 

1823, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

In accordance with sections 735(d) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 

351.210(c), on November 19, 2014, the 

Department published its affirmative 

final determination of sales at less-thanfair-value in the antidumping duty 

investigation of steel wire rod from the 

PRC, and its affirmative final 

determination that critical 

circumstances exist, in part.1 On 

January 2, 2015, the ITC notified the 

Department of its final determination 

that an industry in the United States is 

materially injured within the meaning 

of section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act by 

reason of less-than-fair-value imports of 

steel wire rod from the PRC.2 The ITC 

also determined that critical 

circumstances do not exist with respect 

to imports subject to the Department’s 

critical circumstances determination, 

within the meaning of section 

735(b)(4)(A) of the Act.3

Scope of the Order 

The scope of this order covers certain 

hot-rolled products of carbon steel and 

alloy steel, in coils, of approximately 

circular cross section, less than 19.00 

mm in actual solid cross-sectional 

diameter. Specifically excluded are steel 

products possessing the above-noted 

physical characteristics and meeting the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) definitions for 

(a) stainless steel; (b) tool steel; (c) high 

nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; or (e) 

concrete reinforcing bars and rods. Also 

excluded are free cutting steel (also 

known as free machining steel) products 

(i.e., products that contain by weight 

one or more of the following elements: 

0.1 percent or more of lead, 0.05 percent 

or more of bismuth, 0.08 percent or 

more of sulfur, more than 0.04 percent 

of phosphorus, more than 0.05 percent 

of selenium, or more than 0.01 percent 

of tellurium). All products meeting the 

physical description of subject 

merchandise that are not specifically 

excluded are included in this scope. 

The products under order are 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015, 

7213.91.3020, 7213.91.3093; 

7213.91.4500, 7213.91.6000, 

7213.99.0030, 7227.20.0030, 

7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6010, 

7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030, and 

7227.90.6035 of the HTSUS. Products 

entered under subheadings 

7213.99.0090 and 7227.90.6090 of the 

HTSUS also may be included in this 

scope if they meet the physical 

description of subject merchandise 

above. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of this 

order is dispositive. 

Antidumping Duty Order 

As stated above, on January 2, 2015, 

in accordance with section 735(d) of the 

Act, the ITC notified the Department of 

its final determination in this 

investigation, in which it found material 

injury with respect to imports of steel 

wire rod from the PRC.4 Because the 

Department determined that imports of 

steel wire rod from the PRC are being 

sold at less-than-fair value, and because 

the ITC determined that such imports 

are materially injuring a U.S. industry, 

all unliquidated entries of such 

merchandise from the PRC, entered or 

withdrawn from warehouse, are subject 

to the assessment of antidumping 

duties. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

736(a)(1) of the Act, the Department will 

direct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to assess, upon further 

instruction by the Department, 

antidumping duties equal to the 

amounts listed below for all relevant 

entries of steel wire rod from the PRC. 

These antidumping duties will be 

assessed on unliquidated entries of steel 

wire rod from the PRC entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after September 8, 

2014, the date of publication of the 

Preliminary Determination.5

Continuation of Suspension of 

Liquidation 

In accordance with section 

735(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we will instruct 

CBP to continue to suspend liquidation 

on all entries of steel wire rod from the 

PRC. We will also instruct CBP to 

require cash deposits equal to the 

amounts as indicated below. These 

instructions suspending liquidation will 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Accordingly, effective on the date of 

publication of the ITC’s final affirmative 

injury determination, CBP will require, 

at the same time as importers would 

normally deposit estimated duties on 

this subject merchandise, a cash deposit 

equal to the estimated weighted-average 

antidumping duty margins listed 

below.6 For the purpose of determining 

cash deposit rates, the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

imports of subject merchandise from the 

PRC will be adjusted, as appropriate, for 

export subsidies found in the final 

determination of the companion 

countervailing duty investigation of this 

merchandise imported from the PRC.7


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 5 / Thursday, January 8, 2015 / Notices 1017 

8As explained in the Final Determination, the 

estimated weighted average dumping margin for the 

separate companies and the PRC-wide Entity will 

be adjusted for export subsidies. See Final 

Determination, 79 FR at 68861. As a result of the 

adjustment for export subsidies, the cash deposit 

rate for the separate rate companies will be 93.18 

percent and 97.24 percent for the PRC-wide entity. 

For information regarding these export subsidies, 

see CVD Final Determination and accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum at 9–10 and 

Attachment entitled ‘‘Description of Programs.’’ 

9For the reasons explained in the Preliminary 

Determination, the Department finds it appropriate 

to consider Bei Tai Iron and Steel Group Imp. and 

Exp. (Dalian) Co., Ltd. a part of Benxi Beiying Iron 

and Steel Group Imp. and Exp. Corp. Ltd. See 

Preliminary Determination, and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 9. 

10For the reasons explained in the Preliminary 

Determination, the Department did not find these 

companies eligible for a separate rate. See 

Preliminary Determination, and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 8–11. 

1See Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Order, 74 FR 25705 (May 29, 

2009). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 24670 

(May 1, 2014). 

3The petitioners in this administrative review are 

the Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill, 

Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas 

LLC. 

The weighted-average dumping 

margins are as follows: 

Exporter Producer 

Weighted-Average 

dumping margin 8

(percent) 

Rizhao Steel Wire Co., Ltd. ..................................................... Rizhao Steel Wire Co., Ltd. .................................................... 106.19 

Hunan Valin Xiangtan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. .......................... Hunan Valin Xiangtan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. .......................... 106.19 

Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. ...................... Zhangjiagang Shajing Steel Co., Ltd. ..................................... 106.19 

Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. ...................... Zhangjiagang Runzhong Steel Co., Ltd. ................................. 106.19 

Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. ...................... Zhangjiagang Hongxing Gaoxian Co., Ltd. ............................. 106.19 

Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. ...................... Zhangjiagang Rongsheng Steel-Making Co., Ltd. .................. 106.19 

Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. ...................... Jiangsu Runzhong High-Tech Co., Ltd. .................................. 106.19 

Jiangsu Shagang International Trade Co., Ltd. ...................... Zhangjiagang Hongchang Gaoxian Co., Ltd. .......................... 106.19 

PRC-wide Entity* ..................................................................... .................................................................................................. 110.25 

* The PRC-wide entity includes, among other companies, Benxi Beiying Iron and Steel Group Imp. and Exp. Corp. Ltd.,9 Tangshan Iron and 

Steel Group Co. Ltd., Angang Group International Trade Corporation, Qingdao Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Yonggang Group Co. Ltd., and 

Baotou Steel International Economic & Trading Co., Ltd.10

Critical Circumstances 

With regard to the ITC’s negative 

critical circumstances determination on 

imports of steel wire rod from the PRC, 

we will instruct CBP to lift suspension 

and refund any cash deposits made to 

secure the payment of estimated 

antidumping duties with respect to 

entries of subject merchandise entered 

or withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after June 10, 2014 

(i.e., 90 days prior to the date of 

publication of the Preliminary 

Determination), but before September 8, 

2014, (i.e., the date of the publication of 

the Preliminary Determination). 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice constitutes the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

steel wire rod from the PRC pursuant to 

section 736(a) of the Act. Interested 

parties may contact the Department’s 

Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the 

main Commerce Building, for copies of 

an updated list of antidumping duty 

orders currently in effect. 

This order is published in accordance 

with section 736(a) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.211. 

Dated: January 2, 2015. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00096 Filed 1–7–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–938] 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Rescission, in Part, of 2013 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: January 8, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Elizabeth Eastwood, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office II, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3874. 

Background 

On May 29, 2009, the Department of 

Commerce (Department) published in 

the Federal Register the countervailing 

duty order on citric acid and certain 

citrate salts, from the People’s Republic 

of China (PRC).1 On May 1, 2014, the 

Department published a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the countervailing duty order 

on citric acid and certain citrate salts 

covering the period January 1, 2013, 

through December 31, 2013.2 The 

Department received a timely request 

for a countervailing duty administrative 

review from RZBC Co. Ltd., RZBC Imp. 

& Exp. Co., Ltd., and RZBC (Juxian) Co., 

Ltd. (collectively, ‘‘RZBC’’). 

Additionally, the Department received a 

timely request for review from the 

petitioners 3 for the following 

companies: (1) Changsha Huir 

Biological-Tech Co., Ltd. (Changsha 

Huir); (2) Huangshi Xinghua 

Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Huangshi 

Xinghua); (3) Hunan Dongting 

Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Hunan 

Dongting); (4) Jiali Bio Group (Qingdao) 

Co., Ltd. (Jiali Bio Group); (5) Juxian 

Hongde Citric Acid Co., Ltd. (Juxian 

Hongde); (6) Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry 

Co. Ltd. (Laiwu Taihe); (7) Lianyungang 

Debang Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. 

(Lianyungang Debang); (8) Lianyungang 

Dongtai Food Ingredients Co., Ltd. 

(Lianyungang Dongtai); (9) Lianyungang 

Hengsheng Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. 

(Lianyungang Hengsheng); (10) 

Lianyungang Yunbo Chemical Co., Ltd. 

(Lianyungang Yunbo); (11) Lianyungang 

Zhengrong Food Additive Factory 

(Lianyungang Zhengrong); (12) Nantong 

Feiyu Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. (Nantong 

Feiyu); (13) Ningxiang Xinyang 

Chemical Co., Ltd. (Ningxiang 

Xingyang); (14) Penglai Marine Bio-Tech 

Co., Ltd. (Penglai Marine Bio-Tech); (15) 

Qingdao Fuso Refining & Processing 

Co., Ltd. (Qingdao Fuso); (16) Reephos 

Chemical Co., Ltd. (Reephos Chemical); 

(17) Rugao Jiangbei Additive Co., Ltd. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES