alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                    FORM 6-K


                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER

                    PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          For the month of August 2004

                             CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.
                               (Registrant's Name)

                          1155, University, Suite 1405,
                                Montreal, Quebec
                                 Canada H3B 3A7
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F

                        Form 20-F [x]   Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                              Yes [ ]    No [x]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-


<PAGE>


Filed with this Form 6-K is the following which are incorporated herein by
reference:

99.1   Press Release - August 11, 2004: Campbell Resources Announces its
       Second Quarter Results 2004


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                        CAMPBELL RESOURCES INC.



                                        /s/  Lucy Brun
                                        ----------------------------
                                        Lucy Brun
                                        Executive Vice-President and
                                        Chief Administrative Officer


DATE: August 13, 2004


<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


99.1  Press Release - August 11, 2004: Campbell Resources Announces its Second
      Quarter Results 2004
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated Capital Properties III;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of ConCap Equities, Inc., equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
EXHIBIT 99.4

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Victor A. De Jesus, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of WODFI LLC;
2.  Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;
3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing
agreement, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports; and
4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing agreement, or similar agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that agreement.

Date: April 2, 2003


                                            /s/____________________________
                                            Victor A. De Jesus
                                            Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer of World
                                            Omni Financial Corp., as
                                            Servicer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7515

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. KEITH HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:06-cr-00100-FL-2)

Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 21, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith Harris appeals a district court order denying

his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). The district court concluded Harris was not entitled to a reduction because after considering Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, Harris’ range of imprisonment remained the same, the mandatory minimum sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Harris’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### State v. Caudle

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 171

No. 433P05-2

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. 7A-31 (COA03-1576-2)

Denied 08/23/07

Tinnnons-Goodson, J. and Hudson, J., Recused
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER OF R EINSTATEMENT

Appellate case name: In the Interest of S.A.W.

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00320

- CV

Trial court case number: 2020

- 46728

Trial court: 507th District Court of Harris County

The appellant’s brief was first due on June 21, 2022. When no brief had been filed by June 28, this Court issued a late brief notice instructing that, if appellant intended to file a brief in this appeal, the appellant’s brief was due within 10 days of the notice. On the seventh day after the notice, July 5, appellant’s appointed counsel, Julie A. Ketterman, filed a motion for a 30

- day extension of time, which this Court granted. Consequently, t he d eadline for the appellant’s brief

was extend ed to July 21. The July 21 deadline passed without appointed counsel filing a brief or

motion for extension of time. Without an appellant’s brief, this appeal risks dismissal for want of prosecution. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.5(b)(1), 38.6(d), 38.8(a)(1), 42.

On August 5, this Court abated the appeal for the trial court to determine whether new appellate counsel should be appointed to represent appellant because current appointed counsel has not filed the appellant’s brief. The supplemental clerk’s record containi ng the trial court’s order on abatement was due August 22. No record was filed.

Because this appeal is from a termination of parental rights, this Court is required to dispose

of th e appeal on an accelerated basis. See T EX

. S T

. J UD

. A DMIN

. R . 6.2(a) (requ iring disposition of appeal within 180 days of notice of appeal, so far as reasonably possible). With this requirement

in mind , the Court orders the following:

Th is appeal is reinstated, and the parties are ordered to jointly prepare a status update informing the Court (1) whether the trial court held a hearing or issued an order and, (2) if so, the result of that hearing and the trial court’s ruling

. The parties’ status update is due in this Court within 10 days of the date of this Order.

If there was no hearing, the parties are ordered to (and shall include in their status update confirmation that they have) :

• inform(ed) the trial court coordinator of the August 5 abatement order and of this Order;

and

• schedule (d) a hearing within 15 days of the date of this Order

.Both parties are responsible for informing the trial court coordinator of this Court’s orders

,

and their status report shall include the date of any newly scheduled hearing

.
The trial court clerk shall f ile a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial

court’s order within 20 days of th is Order. The court reporter shall also file a supplemental reporter’s record within 20 days of th is Order

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s Sarah Beth Landau

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 8, 2022
#### Salvador Baca SANCHEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Scott P. RAWERS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-15788.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 23, 2006.

Salvador Baca Sanchez, Avenal, CA, pro se.

Robert C. Cross, Mary J. Graves, AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Salvador Baca Sanchez appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a district court’s decision to deny a § 2254 petition, *see McQuillion v. Duncan,*306 F.3d 895, 899 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

The State contends that this Court lacks jurisdiction because there is no federally protected interest in parole release in California, and thus, Sanchez has failed to state a federal claim. This contention is foreclosed. *See Sass v. Cal. Bd. of Prison Terms,*461 F.3d 1123, 1127-28 (9th Cir. 2006).

Sanchez contends that the California Board of Prison Terms’ (the “Board”) decision to deny him parole violated his due process rights. We disagree. Our independent review of the record, *see Pirtle v. Morgan,*313 F.3d 1160, 1167 (9th Cir. 2002), reveals that the denial of parole was supported by some evidence of several factors. *See Superintendent v. Hill,*472 U.S. 445, 454, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985); *see also Sass,*461 F.3d at 1128-29 (concluding that the requirements of due process are satisfied in the parole context if “some evidence” supports the Board’s decision). We also conclude that the supporting evidence had a sufficient indicia of reliability. *See Biggs v. Terhune,*334 F.3d 910, 915 (9th Cir.2003). Accordingly, the denial of parole was not contrary to, and did not involve an unreasonable application of, federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).

We deny all outstanding motions.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10802

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHELLYE LYNNE BURLISON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CR-170-ALL-G

- - - - - - - - - -

May 7, 1999

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shellye Burlison (federal prisoner #30712-077) has filed a

motion requesting leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) the

district court’s order denying her motion brought under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). This court may authorize

Burlison to proceed IFP on appeal only if she is economically

eligible and her appeal is not frivolous. Jackson v. Dallas

Police Dep’t, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). After reviewing

the record, we find no issue of arguable merit. Accordingly, we 
No. 98-10802 

-2-

deny IFP and dismiss the appeal as frivolous. See United States

v. Hatten, 167 F.3d 884, 885-87 (5th Cir. 1999); Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Railroad Retirement Board

Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold a meeting on January 15, 2015, 10:00 a.m. at the Board's meeting room on the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, Chicago, Illinois 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:

*Closed meeting notice:*

(1) Director of Programs Position

The person to contact for more information is Martha P. Rico, Secretary to the Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

Dated: January 5, 2015.

Martha P. Rico,

Secretary to the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-00060 Filed 1-5-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7905-01-P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2518 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide budget information for 

incinerators and waste-to-energy waste disposal alternatives to burn pits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2023 

Mr. RUIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide budget information for incinerators and waste-to-energy waste disposal alternatives to burn pits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Exposure 

5 to Burn Pits Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BUDGET INFORMATION FOR ALTERNATIVES TO 

7 BURN PITS. 

8 The Secretary of Defense shall include in the budget 

9 submission of the President under section 1105(a) of title 

10 31, United States Code, for fiscal year 2024 a dedicated 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2518 IH

1 budget line item for incinerators and waste-to-energy 

2 waste disposal alternatives to burn pits. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted
in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) for the purposes
of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



I, Patricia Moraes, Principal Financial
Officer of Gafisa S.A., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | · | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 29, 2022



|GAFISA S.A. |                    
|----------- | -------------------
|            |                    
|            |                    
|By:         | /s/ Patricia Moraes
|            | Name:              
|            | Title:
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Award Plan


 Exhibit 4.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN OF 
 DESIGN WITHIN REACH, INC. 
 This
Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Design Within Reach, Inc. Amended and Restated 2004 Equity Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) is made effective as of this 24th day of January, 2007 by Design Within Reach, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”). 
 A. The Corporation established the Plan to provide for grants of equity awards to
employees, directors and consultants of the Corporation and its affiliates; and 
 B. The Corporation’s Board of Directors and
stockholders have approved an amendment to the Plan to alter the definition of the term “Fair Market Value” as used in the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 
 1. Section 2.1(n) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:

  

	 	“(n)	“Fair Market Value” shall mean, as of any date, the value of Stock determined as follows: 

 (1) If the Stock is listed on any established stock exchange or a national market system, including without limitation the Nasdaq Global
Market or The Nasdaq Capital Market of The Nasdaq Stock Market, its Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for such stock (or the closing bid, if no sales were reported) as quoted on such exchange or system on the date of determination,
as reported in The Wall Street Journal or such other source as the Committee deems reliable; 
 (2) If the Stock is
regularly quoted by a recognized securities dealer but selling prices are not reported, its Fair Market Value shall be the mean of the closing bid and asked prices for the Stock on the date of determination as reported in The Wall Street
Journal or such other source as the Committee deems reliable; or 
 (3) In the absence of an established market for the
Stock, the Fair Market Value thereof shall be determined in good faith by the Committee.” 
 2. After the date of this Amendment, each
reference in the Plan to the “Plan” shall mean and refer to the Plan as amended hereby. Except as provided in this Amendment, the Plan and all related documents shall remain in full force and effect and are ratified and confirmed.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan has been executed as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	DESIGN WITHIN REACH, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John Hellmann

		 	John Hellmann, Secretary