Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2015 / Notices 1511 

• Sanford-Orlando International 

Airport, Sanford, Florida (SFB); 

• Tampa International Airport, 

Tampa, Florida (TPA); 

• Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta 

International Airport, Atlanta, Georgia 

(ATL); 

• Honolulu International Airport, 

Honolulu, Hawaii (HNL); 

• Chicago O’Hare International 

Airport, Chicago, Illinois (ORD); 

• Baltimore/Washington International 

Thurgood Marshall Airport, Baltimore, 

Maryland (BWI); 

• Boston-Logan International Airport, 

Boston, Massachusetts (BOS); 

• Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County 

Airport, Romulus, Michigan (DTW); 

• Minneapolis-St. Paul International 

Airport, Minneapolis, Minnesota (MSP); 

• Las Vegas-McCarran International 

Airport, Las Vegas, Nevada (LAS); 

• Newark Liberty International 

Airport, Newark, New Jersey (EWR); 

• John F. Kennedy International 

Airport, Jamaica, New York (JFK); 

• Charlotte Douglas International 

Airport, Charlotte, North Carolina 

(CLT); 

• Raleigh-Durham International 

Airport, Morrisville, North Carolina 

(RDU); 

• Portland International Airport, 

Portland, Oregon (PDX); 

• Philadelphia International Airport, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (PHL); 

• San Juan-Luis Munoz Marin 

International Airport, San Juan, Puerto 

Rico (SJU); 

• Dallas Fort Worth International 

Airport, Dallas, Texas (DFW); 

• George Bush Intercontinental 

Airport, Houston, Texas (IAH); 

• San Antonio International Airport, 

San Antonio, Texas (SAT); 

• Salt Lake City International Airport, 

Salt Lake City, Utah (SLC); 

• Washington Dulles International 

Airport, Sterling, Virginia (IAD); 

• Seattle-Tacoma International 

Airport-SEATAC, Seattle, Washington 

(SEA). 

The preamble to the Global Entry final 

rule states that when CBP is ready to 

expand Global Entry to additional 

airports and has selected the airports, 

CBP will publish an announcement in 

the Federal Register and post the 

information on the Web site, http://

www.globalentry.gov. 

Expansion of Global Entry Program to 

Seven Additional Airports 

CBP is designating seven additional 

airports for Global Entry. Each of these 

airports will have Global Entry kiosks 

for the use of participants. The 

additional airports, listed alphabetically 

by state, are: 

• Ted Stevens Anchorage 

International Airport, Anchorage, 

Alaska (ANC); 

• Chicago Midway International 

Airport, Chicago, Illinois (MDW); 

• Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky 

International Airport, Hebron, Kentucky 

(CVG); 

• Cleveland Hopkins International 

Airport, Cleveland, Ohio (CLE); 

• Pittsburgh International Airport, 

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (PIT); 

• Austin-Bergstrom International 

Airport, Austin, Texas (AUS); 

• General Mitchell International 

Airport, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (MKE). 

Global Entry will become operational 

at all seven airports on or before July 13, 

2015. The exact starting dates of Global 

Entry at each airport location will be 

announced on the Web site, http://

www.globalentry.gov. 

Dated: January 7, 2015. 

John P. Wagner, 

Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of 

Field Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00256 Filed 1–9–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–14–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–5807–N–04] 

Final Fair Market Rents for the Housing 

Choice Voucher Program and 

Moderate Rehabilitation Single Room 

Occupancy Program Fiscal Year 2015; 

Revised 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Policy Development and 

Research, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice of Final Fiscal Year (FY) 

2015 Fair Market Rents (FMRs), Update. 

SUMMARY: Today’s notice updates the FY 

2015 FMRs for Seattle-Belleview, WA, 

HUD Metro FMR Area (HMFA), based 

on surveys conducted in October 2014 

by the area public housing agencies 

(PHAs). The FY 2015 FMRs for these 

areas reflect the estimated 40th 

percentile rent levels trended to April 1, 

2015. 

DATES: Effective Date: The FMRs 

published in this notice are effective on 

January 12, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

technical information on the 

methodology used to develop FMRs or 

a listing of all FMRs, please call the 

HUD USER information line at 800– 

245–2691 or access the information on 

the HUD USER Web site: http://

www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/

fmr.html. FMRs are listed at the 40th or 

50th percentile in Schedule B. For 

informational purposes, 40th percentile 

recent-mover rents for the areas with 

50th percentile FMRs will be provided 

in the HUD FY 2015 FMR 

documentation system at http://

www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/fmr/

fmrs/docsys.html&data=fmr15 and 50th 

percentile rents for all FMR areas are 

published at http://www.huduser.org/

portal/datasets/50per.html. 

Questions related to use of FMRs or 

voucher payment standards should be 

directed to the respective local HUD 

program staff. Questions on how to 

conduct FMR surveys or concerning 

further methodological explanations 

may be addressed to Marie L. Lihn or 

Peter B. Kahn, Economic and Market 

Analysis Division, Office of Economic 

Affairs, Office of Policy Development 

and Research, telephone 202–708–0590. 

Persons with hearing or speech 

impairments may access this number 

through TTY by calling the toll-free 

Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339. 

(Other than the HUD USER information 

line and TDD numbers, telephone 

numbers are not toll-free.) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FMRs 

appearing in the following table 

supersede the values found in Schedule 

B that became effective on October 1, 

2014, and were printed in the October 

3, 2014 (79 FR 59786) Federal Register 

(available from HUD at: http://

www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/fmr/

fmr2015f/FR_Published_Preamble_

FY2015F.pdf). 

The FMRs for the affected area are 

revised as follows: 

2015 Fair Market Rent Area 

FMR by number of bedrooms in unit 

0 BR 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR 4 BR 

Seattle-Belleview, WA HMFA .............................................. 972 1150 1415 2085 2506 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1512 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 7 / Monday, January 12, 2015 / Notices 

Dated: January 5, 2015. 

Katherine M. O’Regan, 

Assistant Secretary for Policy Development 

& Research. 

[FR Doc. 2015–00198 Filed 1–9–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

[FWS–R2–FHC–2014–N178; 

FVHC98120208440–XXX–FF02ETTX00] 

Texas City Y Oil Spill; Notice of Intent 

To Conduct Restoration Planning 

AGENCY: Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent. 

SUMMARY: Under the Oil Pollution Act 

(OPA), Federal and State trustees for 

natural resources are authorized to 

assess natural resource injuries resulting 

from an oil discharge or the substantial 

threat of discharge, as well those 

injuries that result from response 

activities. The trustees develop and 

implement a restoration plan to identify 

and quantify injuries to natural 

resources and the restoration required to 

compensate for those injuries. This 

notice announces the intent of the 

Federal and State trustees to conduct 

restoration planning regarding the 

discharge of oil from the Kirby Barge 

27706 resulting from the collision with 

an inbound bulk carrier, the M/V 

SUMMER WIND, an incident that 

occurred in the Houston Ship Channel 

near Texas City, Texas on March 22, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin Tuggle, Regional Director, 

Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service, ((505) 248–6911). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Texas 

City Y Oil Spill occurred on March 22, 

2014, in Galveston Bay in the vicinity of 

the Houston Ship Channel near Texas 

City, Texas, when the inbound bulk 

carrier M/V SUMMER WIND collided 

with the oil tank-barge KIRBY 27706. At 

the time of the collision, the M/V MISS 

SUSAN was towing the oil tank-barges 

KIRBY 27705 and KIRBY 27706. As a 

result of the collision, the number 2 

starboard tank of KIRBY 27706 was 

punctured discharging approximately 

168,000 gallons (4,000 barrels) of 

intermediate fuel oil (IFO–380) into 

Galveston Bay and subsequently entered 

the waters of the Gulf of Mexico 

(referred to as the ‘‘Texas City 

Incident’’). 

Pursuant to Section 1006 of the Oil 

Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA), 33 U.S.C. 

2706, Federal and State trustees for 

natural resources are authorized to (1) 

assess natural resource injuries resulting 

from a discharge of oil or the substantial 

threat of a discharge and from response 

activities, and (2) develop and 

implement a plan for restoration of such 

injured resources and their services. The 

Federal trustees are designated pursuant 

to the National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency Plan 

(NCP) (40 CFR 300.600) and Executive 

Order 12777. State trustees are 

designated by the governors of each 

State pursuant to the NCP, 40 CFR 

300.605, OPA 33 U.S.C. 2706(b)(3), 

Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. 

1321(f)(5), and the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(CERCLA; 42 U.S.C. 9607(f)(2)(B)). The 

following agencies are designated 

natural resources trustees under OPA 

and are currently acting as trustees for 

this Incident: The United States 

Department of the Interior (DOI), as 

represented by the United States Fish 

and Wildlife Service and the National 

Park Service; the National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) 

on behalf of the United States 

Department of Commerce; and the Texas 

Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), 

Texas Commission on Environmental 

Quality (TCEQ) and Texas General Land 

Office (GLO) for the State of Texas 

(collectively, the Trustees). In addition 

to acting as Trustees for this Incident 

under OPA, the State of Texas is also 

acting pursuant to its applicable state 

laws and authorities, including the 

Texas Oil Spill Prevention and 

Response Act of 1991, Tex. Nat. Res. 

Code Chapter 40. 

The Responsible Party (RP) identified 

for this Incident thus far is Kirby Inland 

Marine, LP (‘‘Kirby’’), owner of the 

M/V MISS SUSAN, KIRBY 27705 and 

KIRBY 27706. Pursuant to 15 CFR 

990.14(c), the Trustees have invited the 

RP identified above to participate in a 

cooperative Natural Resource Damage 

Assessment (NRDA) process. To date, 

the Trustees have coordinated with 

Kirby representatives on activities 

undertaken as part of the NRDAR 

process. 

The Trustees initiated the 

Preassessment Phase of the NRDA in 

accordance with 15 CFR 990.40 to 

determine if they have jurisdiction to 

pursue restoration under OPA and, if so, 

whether it is appropriate to do so. 

During the Preassessment Phase, the 

Trustees collected and analyzed the 

following: (1) Data reasonably expected 

to be necessary to make a determination 

of jurisdiction and a determination to 

conduct restoration planning, (2) 

ephemeral data, and (3) information 

needed for assessment activities as part 

of the Restoration Planning Phase. The 

collection and analysis of the data and 

information listed above continues to 

date. 

Under the NRDA regulations 

applicable to OPA, 15 CFR part 990 

(NRDA regulations), the Trustees 

prepare and issue a notice of intent to 

conduct restoration planning (notice) to 

demonstrate that conditions have been 

met that establish that the Trustees have 

jurisdiction over this matter and that 

restoration of natural resources is 

feasible and appropriate. 

Pursuant to 15 CFR 990.44, this notice 

announces that the Trustees have 

determined to proceed with restoration 

planning to fully evaluate, assess, 

quantify and develop plans for 

restoring, replacing or acquiring the 

equivalent of injured natural resources 

and services losses resulting from the 

Texas City Y Incident. The restoration 

planning process will include collection 

of information for evaluating and 

quantifying injuries, and use of that 

information to determine the need for, 

and type and scale of restoration 

actions. 

Determination of Jurisdiction 

The Trustees have made the following 

findings pursuant to 15 CFR 990.41: 

1. The Texas City Y Incident resulted 

in discharges of oil into and upon 

navigable waters of the United States, 

including the Gulf of Mexico, as well as 

adjoining shorelines, all of which 

constitute an ‘‘incident’’ within the 

meaning of 15 CFR 990.30. 

2. The discharge(s) are not permitted 

pursuant to federal, state, or local law; 

are not from a public vessel; and are not 

from an onshore facility subject to the 

Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authority Act, 

(43 U.S.C. 1651 et seq.). 

3. Natural resources under the 

trusteeship of the Trustees have been 

and continue to be injured or threatened 

as a result of discharged oil and 

associated removal efforts. The 

discharged oil is harmful to natural 

resources exposed to the oil, including 

aquatic organisms, birds, wildlife, 

vegetation, and habitats. Discharged oil 

and the response activities to address 

the discharges of oil have resulted in 

adverse effects on natural resources in 

and around the coastal waters of Texas 

and along its adjoining shorelines, and 

impaired services that those resources 

provide. The full extent of potential 

injuries is currently unknown; however 

current natural resources and resource 

services that have been impacted due to 

the discharged oil include but are not 

limited to the following: 

• Over 160 miles of shoreline 

habitats, including salt marshes, sandy 

beaches, and mangroves. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES