alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBancTec, Inc, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for thequarter ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Brian R. Stone, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| / S /    Brian  R. Stone       |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                               |
| Brian R. Stone                                     |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |
|                                               |
| November 14, 2003                                  |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by 18 USC Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

1

----
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the month of February 2005
    
    Commission File Number: 001-15014
 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL INC.  
 (Translation of registrants name into English)
 150 King Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 1J9 
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 [Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form
20-F or Form 40-F.] Form 20-F o
    

Form 40-F þ
 [Indicate be check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.] Yes o
    
    No þ
 If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with
Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- N/A    Exhibit 99.1
    Press Release dated February 8, 2004




---



##### 



SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Sun Life Financial Inc. 
(Registrant)Date: February 8, 2005
    By   /s/ "Thomas A. Bogart"Thomas A. Bogart,Executive Vice-President and Chief Legal Officer
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report(date of earliest event reported)August 16, 2004 NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED 
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  CANADA
    
    000-30758
    
    62-12-62580(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
  8200 Dixie Road, Suite 100, Brampton, Ontario, Canada
    
    L6T 5P6(address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code (905) 863-0000.




---



##### 



Item 5.     Other Events On August 16, 2004,
Nortel Networks Corporation issued the press release attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1, and such press release is incorporated in its entirety by
reference herein. Nortel Networks Corporation owns all of the Registrants common shares and the
Registrant is Nortel Networks Corporations principal direct operating
subsidiary. Item 7.     Financial Statements,Pro FormaFinancial Information and Exhibits  (c)
    
    Exhibits.  99.1
    
    Press release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on August 16, 2004.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:
    /s/
Deborah J. NobleDeborah J. NobleCorporate Secretary By:
    /s/ Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant Secretary Dated: August 17, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX  99.1
    
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on
August 16, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2392 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2392

 To require a seven-day waiting period before the receipt of a firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

  Ms. Slotkin (for herself, Ms. Kuster, and Mr. Trone) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require a seven-day waiting period before the receipt of a firearm.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pause for Gun Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. 7-DAY WAITING PERIOD REQUIRED BEFORE THE RECEIPT OF A FIREARM.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(aa)(1) It shall be unlawful for any person, in or affecting 
interstate or foreign commerce, to transfer a firearm to a person not 
licensed under this chapter unless at least 7 calendar days have 
elapsed since the transferee most recently offered to take possession 
of the firearm.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to a temporary transfer if the 
transferor has no reason to believe that the transferee will use or 
intends to use the firearm in a crime or is prohibited from possessing 
firearms under State or Federal law, and the transfer takes place and 
the transferee's possession of the firearm is exclusively--
            ``(A) at a shooting range or in a shooting gallery or other 
        area designated for the purpose of target shooting;
            ``(B) while reasonably necessary for the purposes of 
        hunting, trapping, pest control on a farm or ranch, or fishing, 
        if the transferor--
                    ``(i) has no reason to believe that the transferee 
                intends to use the firearm in a place where it is 
                illegal; and
                    ``(ii) has reason to believe that the transferee 
                will comply with all licensing and permit requirements 
                for such hunting, trapping, pest control on a farm or 
                ranch, or fishing; or
            ``(C) while in the presence of the transferor.''.
    (b) Penalties.--Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(aa) shall be fined not 
more than $250,000, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to conduct engaged in 
after the 90-day period that begins with the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on the basis of such officers
knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 27, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Birck,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael J. Birck
Michael J. Birck
Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 4, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The certification in this Report is being furnished in accordance with SEC
Release No. 33-8212. The certification is being furnished and shall not be
deemed filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. The
certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00581-CV

ALGIERE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.

v.

MAGNOLIA HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC AND 

METRO WHITE SETTLEMENT PARTNERS, INC.

On Appeal from the

156th District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. B-19-1546-CV-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 18, 2023
Exhibit 32(a)
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 FOR PPL CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
 
 In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:
 
 ·
The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and·
The information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date:  August 5, 2010
/s/  James H. MillerJames H. Miller

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

PPL Corporation
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kainna K. Cayatano, Appellant.

[975 NYS2d 696]

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Clinton County (Ryan, J.), rendered August 2, 2012, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (two counts).

Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and waived her right to appeal. Under the terms of the plea agreement, she was sentenced to concurrent terms of five years in prison followed by two years of postrelease supervision. She now appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel’s brief, we agree. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted *(see People v Cruwys,*113 AD2d 979 [1985], *lv denied*67 NY2d 650 [1986]; *see generally People v Stokes,*95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Peters, PJ., McCarthy, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
#### State v. Borges

Case below: 183 N.C. App. - (15 May 2007)

No. 282P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-476)

Denied 08/23/07
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of iBasis, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ofer Gneezy, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: February 27, 2004                     By: /s/Ofer Gneezy
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Ofer Gneezy
                                                President and Chief Executive
                                                Officer
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        47,041,539
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,960,205
<MORTGAGE>                                   8,063,808
<REAL-ESTATE>                                7,708,748
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              74,564,908
<CASH>                                       8,618,578
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       4,267,827
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             123,288,821
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             74,560,944
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 710,032
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,907,641
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              9,915,291
<COMMON>                                     9,211,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,676,761
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               123,288,821
<PREMIUMS>                                   2,983,294
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          3,466,068
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             269,575
<OTHER-INCOME>                               7,682,833
<BENEFITS>                                   3,283,781
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    639,355
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                707,170
<INCOME-TAX>                                   165,112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            542,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   542,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel L. Cruz, Appellant.

Submitted August 31, 2009;

decided September 15, 2009

Reported below, 57 AD3d 1453.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Timothy E Donaher, Esq., Monroe County Public Defender, 10 N. Fitzhugh Street, Rochester, New York 14614 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CURTIS LEE RUCKER, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00057-KDB-DCK-1)

Submitted: July 20, 2021 Decided: July 23, 2021

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Lee Rucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Lee Rucker, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

release to home confinement under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security 

Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003(b)(2), 134 Stat. 281, 516 (2020) (“CARES Act”). The 

district court correctly concluded that it lacked the authority to grant Rucker the requested 

relief because, “under the CARES Act, the Attorney General[] has plenary control over 

[federal] inmates’ placement.” United States v. Saunders, 986 F.3d 1076, 1078 (7th Cir. 

2021). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Rucker, No. 5:18-

cr-00057-KBD-DCK-1 (W.D.N.C. June 5, 2020). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 
10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         279,266
<SECURITIES>                                 1,274,571
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,127<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                    123,886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,301,933
<PP&E>                                       1,119,578
<DEPRECIATION>                                 426,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,748,252
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          317,170
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,528
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,245,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,748,252
<SALES>                                        504,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               846,642
<CGS>                                          106,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               291,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,068
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            144,769
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   144,769
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.15<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE PRESENTED NET OF ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS IN 
THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET.  THE PROVISION FOR LOSSES ON DOUBTFUL
ACCOUNTS IS NOT REPORTED AS A SEPARATE LINE IN THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF INCOME OR STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS.
<F2>REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
----

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects the financial condition and results of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 29, 2006 |   |                                                                             |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                | By:    | /s/                Dr. Ricardo Moro                                              |   |
|                                |   | Dr.                Ricardo Moro, President and Chief                             |
|                                |   | Executive                Officer                                                 |
|                                |   |                                                                             |   |
|                                |   |                                                                             |   |
|                                | By:    | /s/                Dr. Gerald Wittenberg                                         |   |
|                                |   | Dr.                Gerald Wittenberg, Principal Financial                Officer |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Yusef Brown, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 919]

— Motion to dismiss granted. Memorandum: The matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court to vacate the judgment of conviction and dismiss the indictment either sua sponte or on application of either the District Attorney or the counsel for defendant *(see People v Matteson,*75 NY2d 745 [1989]). Present — Scudder, EJ., Smith, Centra, Fahey and Peradotto, JJ.