alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 267-268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30888]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY

National Nanotechnology Coordination Office

ACTION: Notice of Public Webinar.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO), on 
behalf of the Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology (NSET) 
Subcommittee of the Committee on Technology, National Science and 
Technology Council (NSTC), will hold a series of webinars focusing on 
the experiences, successes, and challenges for small- and medium-sized 
businesses working in nanotechnology and on issues of interest to the 
business community. The first webinar in the series will be held 
Thursday, January 15, 2015.

DATES: The NNCO will hold multiple webinars between the publication of 
this Notice and December 31, 2015. The first webinar will be held on 
Thursday, January 15, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: These free, web-based events are open to the public. For 
current information about the webinars, please visit www.nano.gov/SMEwebinars2015.
    Submitting Questions: Questions of interest to the small- and 
medium-sized business community may be submitted to 
[email protected] beginning one week prior to the event through the 
close of the webinar. During the question-and-answer segment of the 
webinars, submitted questions will be considered in the order received 
and may be posted on the NNI Web site (www.nano.gov). A moderator will 
identify relevant questions and pose them to the panelists. Due to time 
constraints, not all questions may be addressed during the webinar. The 
moderator reserves the right to group similar questions and to skip 
questions, as appropriate.
    Registration: Registration for the webinar is required and is on a 
first-come, first-served basis. Registration

[[Page 268]]

will open approximately two weeks prior to each event and will be 
capped at 200 participants. Individuals planning to attend the webinar 
can find registration information at www.nano.gov/SMEwebinars2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Marlowe Newman, 703-292-7128, 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A list of Frequently Asked Question for the 
business community can be found at https://www.nano.gov/bizfaqs. 
Additional information on Federal funding, infrastructure, and business 
development can be found at https://www.nano.gov/collaborationsandfunding.

Cristin Dorgelo,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2014-30888 Filed 12-31-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-F5-P
```
|   | Exhibit                32.1 |
|--------|-----------------------------|

| Dated:                November 12, 2007 |                                                                          |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | /s/                J. Collier Sparks                                          |
|                                    | J.                Collier Sparks                                              |
|                                    | President                and Chief Executive Officer                          |
| Dated:                November 12, 2007 |                                                                          |
|                                    | /s/                Michael Sweet                                              |
|                                    | Michael                Sweet                                                  |
|                                    | Senior                Vice President - Chief Financial                Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification set forth below is hereby
made solely for the purposes of satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and may not be relied
upon or used for any other purposes.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Abeona Therapeutics Inc. and will be retained by Abeona Therapeutics Inc. and furnished
to the SEC or its staff upon its request.



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company
Accounting Reform and Investor Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), Steven H. Rouhandeh,
Executive Chairman of Abeona Therapeutics Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that to his knowledge the report on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company for the period specified.



Signed at the City of Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 14th day
of August, 2015.



|/s/ Steven H. Rouhandeh     | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Steven H. Rouhandeh         | 
|Executive Chairman          | 
|Principal Executive Officer |
ACCEPTED

03-14-00140-CR I

3697835 I

IHIKUCOURI Ol-APPEALS

AUSTIN. 'EXAS!

1/8/2015 1:34:52 PMi

JEFFREY D.KYLg

CLERK!

January 8, 2015

FILED IN

3rd COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

1/8/2015 1:34:52 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

Clerk

Jeffrey D. Kyle

Third Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: Frank Howard McMarion v. State of Texas

Nos. 03-14-00140-CR, 03-14-00141 -CR, 03-14-00142-CR,

03-14-00143-CR, 03-14-00144-CR, 03-14-00145-CR

Dear Mr. Kyle:

I'm sending this letter in order to certify my compliance with Tex. R. App. Proc. 48.4. On

December 29, 2014,1 mailed Mr. McMarion a copy of the opinion and judgments, along

with notifying him about his right to file a petition for discretionary review within 30 days

of the issuance of the opinion. I've enclosed a copy of the return receipt on the certified

letter that was mailed to Mr. McMarion.

Please let me know if you need any further information from me.

Sincerely,

Chris Perri

1504 West Avenue, Austin, Texas, 78701

Office Tel. (512) 474 4892 | Fax (512) 474 8252

chris@chrisperrilaw.com I www.chrisperrilaw.com
H Complete items 1,2, and 3. Also complete

item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. • Print your name and address on the reverse

so that we can return the card to you.

h Attachthiscard to the back of the maiipiece,

or on the front ifspace permits.

1. Article Addressed to:

rfNanik u C. ) of Delivery

D. Isdelivery addressdifferent forfri item 1? • Yes

IfYES, enter deliveryaddress below: • No

3. Service Typo

StCertified Mail3 • Priority Mail Express/"

• Registered • Return Receipt for Merchandise

D Insured Mail D Collect en Delivery

4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) D Yes

2. Article Number

(Transfer from service label) 7D14 Efl7D DDDE 245S 73E2

j PSForm 3811, July 2013 Domestic Return Receipt
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2220 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

National Gallery of Art, Repair, Restoration and Renovation of Buildings 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, National Gallery of Art, Repair, Restoration and Renovation of Buildings for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, NATIONAL GALLERY OF 

5 ART, REPAIR, RESTORATION AND RENOVA6 TION OF BUILDINGS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Related Agencies, National Gallery of Art, Repair, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2220 IH

1 Restoration and Renovation of Buildings for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $24,081,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of EXCO Resources, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge,
that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2009 |  | /s/ DOUGLAS H. MILLER                
|                     |  | Douglas H. Miller                    
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                     | 
|                     |  | /s/ STEPHEN F. SMITH                 
|                     |  | Stephen F. Smith                     
|                     |  | President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the
Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.



65
#### Brandon G. Lisi, Appellant, v Diane K. Kanca et al., Respondents.

[961 NYS2d 592]

In an action to recover damages for prima facie tort, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), dated May 24, 2011, which granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7). Affording the complaint a liberal construction, accepting all facts as alleged in the complaint to be true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference as required on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7), the complaint fails to state a cause of action alleging prima facie tort for statements made by the defendants during prior litigation involving the parties. The complaint fails to adequately plead that the statements were motivated solely by “disinterested malevolence” *(Lancaster v Town of E. Hampton,*54 AD3d 906, 908 [2008]). Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the allegations in the complaint reveal that the statements made by the defendants were material and pertinent to their motion for an award of sanctions against him, which was made in the prior litigation *(see generally Matter of Fagan,*58 AD3d 260 [2008]; see *also Wilson v Erra,*94 AD3d 756, 756-757 [2012]; *Kilkenny v Law Off. of Cushner & Garvey, LLP,*76 AD3d 512, 513 [2010]). Accordingly, the complaint fails to state a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, and that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) was properly granted.

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the plaintiff’s remaining contention.

Eng, EJ., Dickerson, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-106654, 333-7366 and 33-25333 of Nortel Networks Corporation on Form S-8 of our reportdated June 25, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of the NortelNetworks Long-Term Investment Plan for the year ended December 31, 2003.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Nashville, Tennessee
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jeffrey B. Davis, Chief Executive Officer certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that
(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





Signed at
the City of Dallas, in the State of Texas, this 14th day of November,
2008.





/s/ Jeffrey B.
Davis


Jeffrey
B. Davis


Chief
Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q FOR PRIMA ENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,233,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,332,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,895,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (43,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    728,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,480,000
<PP&E>                                      84,824,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (33,993,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,864,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,143,000
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,009,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,864,000
<SALES>                                     15,545,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,592,000
<CGS>                                       10,439,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,528,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,516,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,658,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,858,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,858,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, L. Donald Speer, II,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



|                   |  |  |  |    
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---
|                  
|Date: May 13, 2003 |  |  |  | By:
|                   |  |  |  |    



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Venture Catalyst Incorporated and will be retained by Venture Catalyst Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,447,255
<SECURITIES>                                 1,200,033
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,937,540
<ALLOWANCES>                               (2,287,820)
<INVENTORY>                                 42,397,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           107,932,967
<PP&E>                                      23,630,043
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,264,793)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             198,921,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,970,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    976,755
<COMMON>                                       149,781
<OTHER-SE>                                 132,918,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               198,921,618
<SALES>                                    100,992,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           100,992,211
<CGS>                                       67,969,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               67,969,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,095,580
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,875,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,430,668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (697,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  300,055
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (397,747)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (397,747)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
#### Rodica PELCARU, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 07-70971.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 2007 *.

Filed Dec. 21, 2007.

*959Jerry Shapiro, Law Offices of Fuire & Shapiro, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James A. Hunolt, Esq., Kristin K. Edison, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: GOODWIN, REINHARDT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

This is a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying petitioner’s “Request for Sua Sponte Reconsideration.”

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Specifically, the regulations provide that an alien may only file one motion to reopen and one motion to reconsider. 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2), (c)(2). Here, a review of the record indicates that this was the third such motion filed by petitioner. Thus, the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied petitioner’s motion as numerically barred. *See Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft,*383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), *amended by*404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that BIA denials of motions to reopen or reconsider are reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied in part.

Furthermore, to the extent that petitioner seeks review of the Agency’s denial of petitioner’s request for *sua sponte*reconsideration, this court lacks jurisdiction over this petition for review. *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002). Therefore, this petition for review is dismissed in part.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.