alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roy H. Gaines, Jr., Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 266]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robbins, J.), rendered August 6, 2012, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, as a felony, and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered because the Supreme Court allegedly misinformed him of the potential sentence that he would receive if he pleaded guilty is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Murray,*15 NY3d 725 [2010] ; *cf. People v McAlpin,*17 NY3d 936 [2011]; *People v Louree,*8 NY3d 541 [2007]). In any event, an objective reading of the plea agreement demonstrates that its terms were complied with, and the defendant’s misinterpretation of the agreement or his disappointment with his sentence does not suffice as a reason for vacating his plea of guilty *(see People v Cataldo,*39 NY2d 578, 579-580 [1976]; *People v Philpot,*99 AD3d 1025 [2012]; *People v Rodriguez,*98 AD3d 693 [2012]; *1100
      *People v Hulsey,*244 AD2d 358, 359 [1997]; *People v Welch,*129 AD2d 752 [1987]).

The defendant’s claim that he was deprived of the right to the effective assistance of counsel is based, in part, on matter appearing on the record and, in part, on matter outside the record, and thus constitutes a “ ‘mixed claim[ ]’ ” of ineffective assistance *(People v Maxwell,*89 AD3d 1108, 1109 [2011], quoting *People v Evans,*16 NY3d 571, 575 n 2 [2011], *cert denied*565 US —, 132 S Ct 325 [2011]). In this case, it is not evident from the matter appearing on the record that the defendant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel *(cf. People v Crump,*53 NY2d 824 [1981]; *People v Brown,*45 NY2d 852 [1978]). Since the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the claim in its entirety *(see People v Freeman,*93 AD3d 805 [2012]; *People v Maxwell,*89 AD3d at 1109; *People v Rohlehr,*87 AD3d 603, 604 [2011]; *People v Haynes,*70 AD3d 718 [2010]; *People v Moran,*57 AD3d 1010 [2008]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mastro, J.P., Balkin, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

KIMBERLY E. SWINDOLL, )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION 15-0327-KD-M

 )

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(1)(B), and dated January 27, 2016, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED and that this 

action be DISMISSED. 

DONE and ORDERED this 19th day of February 2016.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00327-KD-M Document 15 Filed 02/19/16 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2223 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

National Endowment for the Arts for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, National Endowment for the Arts for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, NATIONAL ENDOWMENT 

5 FOR THE ARTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:47 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2223.IH H2223

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2223 IH

1 able for Related Agencies, National Endowment for the 

2 Arts for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jeffrey S. Ward, Chief Financial Officerof Anchor Pacific Underwriters, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

| (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)                   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                        |

Dated:   November 21, 2002

|   | /s/ Jeffrey S. Ward     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                         |
|   | Jeffrey S. Ward         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
#### In re: Mohammad Nawaz RAJA, Debtor. Mohammad Nawaz Raja, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Indymac Federal Bank, FSB, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 10-1035.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Nov. 30, 2010.

Decided: Dec. 3, 2010.

*868Mohammad Nawaz Raja, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Patrick Burns, Cunningham & Associates, P.L.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Nawaz Raja appeals the district court’s orders: (1) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting the Ap-pellee’s motion for relief from stay and, (2) denying his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Raja v. IndyMac Fed. Bank,*No. 1:09-cv-00654-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 2009; Nov. 24, 2009; December 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
##### 



| |                
| | ---------------
| | (MASONITE LOGO)

INTERIM REPORT REQUEST  2004

Many shareholders may not wish to receive interim
(quarterly) financial statements of Masonite International
Corporation by mail, as they will have already accessed this
information through the press release announcement of quarterly
results from our Internet site at http://www.masonite.com.

If you wish to receive interim financial
statements by mail this year, simply complete and return this
request in the enclosed envelope. Your name will then be
included on the supplemental mailing list.

That list will be cleared each year and you will
receive a new request form. Continued receipt requires
completion and return of the request each year.

If you do not return this request, interim
financial statements will not be mailed to you.




Cusip: 575384

I am a shareholder of Masonite International
Corporation.

I wish to receive interim financial statements in
2004.










Name
(Please Print)











Address
(Please Print)


|          |  |  |             | 
|--------- |  |  | ----------- | 
|          |  |  |             | 
|          |  |  |            
|          |  |  | Postal Code
|          |  |  |             | 
|          |  |  |            
|Signature |  |  | Date        | 

IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE INTERIM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS BY MAIL, COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS REQUEST, TOGETHER
WITH YOUR PROXY OR VOTING INSTRUCTION FORM IN THE ENVELOPE
PROVIDED, or to Computershare Trust
Company of Canada, 100 University Avenue, 9th Floor,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2Y1.
---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Hiner, President and Treasurer of Crown Oil and Gas
Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

| | (a) | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
      year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                          



|By:    | /s/ John Hiner                                                     
|------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Name:  | John Hiner                                                         
|Title: | President and Treasurer                                            
|       | (Principal Executive Officer and
      Principal Financial Officer)
|Date:  | April 15, 2009                                                     

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. SHAUN LER TSWAN, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10156

D.C . No. 1:08-c r-00166-LJO M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Lawre nc e J. O’ Ne ill, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 10, 2015 ** B e fore : FARRIS, WARDLAW , a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Sha un Le rtswa

n a ppe a ls from the distric t

c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s the t wo-y e ar se nte nc e im

pose d upon re voc ation of supervise d re le a se . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# F IL ED MAR 18 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Le rtswa n c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt proc e dura lly e rre d by fa iling to c onside r the 18 U.S.C . § 3583(e ) se nte nc ing fa c tors, inste a d ba sing these nte nc e e xc lusive ly

on a prom ise m a de to him by

the c ourt a

t a n e arlie r se nte nc ing he aring. He a lso a rgue s tha t the distric t c ourt e rre d by fa iling to e xpla in the e xte nt of its upwa rd va rian c e from

the Guide line s ra

nge e x c e pt by

re fe re n c e to tha

t prom ise . B e c a use De fe nda

nt did not raise the se obje c t ions be fore the distric t c ourt, we re vie w for pla in e rror. Se eUnite d State s v . Vale nc ia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010). C ontra ry to Le rtswa

n’ s a rgum e nt, the re c ord re fle c ts tha t the distric t c o urt c onside re d the pa rtie s ’ argum e nts a

nd the sta tutory se nte nc ing fa c tors be fore im posing se nte nc e . The c ourt im pose d se nte nc e on the ba sis of Le rtswa n’ s bre a c h of the c ourt’ s trust, a pe rm issiblese nte nc ing fa c t or, a nd its e xpla

nation of the s e nte n c e wa s le ga lly

suffic ie nt. Se eUnite d State s v . C arty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th C ir. 2008) (e n ba

nc ) (“ The distric t c ourt ne e d not tic k off e a c h of the § 3553(a ) fa c tors to show tha t it ha s c onside re d the m .” ); Unite d State s v . Simtob , 485 F.3d 1058, 1062 (9th C ir. 2007) (a t a re voc ation se nte nc ing, thec ourt m ay sa nc tion the v iola t or for his bre a c h of trust). Le rtswa n ne xt c o nte nds tha

t his se nte n c e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble . The distric t c o urt did not a

buse its disc re tion in im

posing Le rtswa

n’ s se nte nc e . Se e C arty , 520 F.3d a

t 993. These nte nc e is substa ntive ly re a sona ble in light of the

1 4 - 1 0 1 5 6 2se c t ion 3583(e ) se nte n c ing fa c tors a nd the tota lity

of c irc um s ta

nc e s, inc luding Le rtswa n ’ s viola tion history . Se eC

arty , 520 F.3d a

t 993; Simtob , 485 F.3d a t 1062-63. AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 1 0 1 5 6 3
EXHIBIT
32.2





STATMON
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


19
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/ Geoffrey P. TalbotGeoffrey
      P. TalbotChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      27, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,   Shmuel  Shneibalg,   President,   Chief  Executive  Officer,
Secretary,  and Director of Global General  Technologies,  Inc. (the "Company"),
certifies,  under the  standards  set forth and  solely for the  purposes  of 18
U.S.C.  1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002,  that, to his  knowledge,  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 30, 2006



/s/ Shmuel Shneibalg
Shmuel Shneibalg
President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and Director
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of William Coke, Appellant, v Green Haven Correctional Facility et al., Respondents.

Submitted January 5, 2009;

decided February 12, 2009

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Chief Judge Lippman taking no part.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

GREGORY MOBLEY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CA 16-0046-CG-C

)

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, 

Acting Commissioner of Social 

Security,

)

)

)

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all issues raised, and there having been 

no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated August 18, 2016 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this 

Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2016.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:16-cv-00046-CG-C Document 17 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 1
#### State v. Webb

Case below: 172 N.C. App. 594

No. 450P05

1. AG’s Motion for Temporary Stay (COA04-103)

2. AG’s Petition for Writ of Supersedeas

3. AG’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Allowed 360 N.C. 77

Stay dissolved 12/19/06

2. Denied 12/19/06

3. See Special Order Page 162
From: The District Court of the 4th Judicial District. County of Missoula.

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. GUY CULLIGAN, Defendant,

CAUSE NO. DC-03-07 DECISION

On June 30, 2009, the defendant was sentenced for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence as follows: Count IV: Five (5) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of Criminal Possession of *81Dangerous Drugs, a felony; and Count VII: Five (5) years in the Montana State Prison for the offense of Bail Jumping, a felony. Counts IV and VII shall run concurrently with each other.

On November 12, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The defendant was present and was represented by Bert Certain. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).

The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.

Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.

Done in open Court this 12th day of November, 2009.

DATED this 25th day of November, 2009.

Chairperson, Hon. Stewart Stadler, Member, Hon. Blair Jones and Member, Hon. Richard Simonton.
EX-35.1
CMLTI 07-OPX1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the
"Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby certify
that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period from and including
January 1, 2007 through and including December 31, 2007 and of the Servicer's
performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in
all material respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
22nd day of February 2008.



By: /s/ Jeanne M. Bader
Name: Jeanne M. Bader
Title: Senior Vice President
Director of Loan Administration
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Culotta, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of PharMerica Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

DATE: April 29, 2008



/s/    MICHAEL J.
CULOTTAExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### State v. McGee

Case below: 182 N.C. App. 348

No. 194P07

Def’s PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 (COA06-830)

Denied 10/11/07
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION OF OFFICERS
                              OF SWISS MEDICA, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officers of Swiss Medica, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify,
to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (a)   The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
            2004 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  August 11, 2004


/s/ Raghunath Kilambi
---------------------------------------------------
Raghunath Kilambi
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer