alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (UNAUDITED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000318716
<NAME>                        NUMEX CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                  1              
<CURRENCY>                    U S DOLLARS 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         1
<CASH>                                              5,762
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       9,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                        12,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   28,420
<PP&E>                                            220,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (202,135)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     80,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,025,931
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                       170,000
<COMMON>                                        1,074,122
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,189,168)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       80,884
<SALES>                                           150,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  150,886
<CGS>                                              59,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     544,305
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                123,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (516,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (517,141)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.08)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



FORM 6-K SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 Report of Foreign Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Month of November, 2004
Commission File No. 000-24876 TELUS CORPORATION 
 (Translation of registrants name into English)
 21st Floor, 3777 Kingsway
Burnaby, British Columbia V5H 3Z7
Canada 
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F: Form 20-F   o
    
    Form 40-F   x
 Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2 (b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934: Yes   o
    
    No   x




---



##### 



EXHIBITS Exhibit No.
    
    Description1
    
    Supplemental United States GAAP Disclosures for
    the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
    2004 and 2003 (unaudited) and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the
report of the auditors thereon




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Dated:   November 30, 2004 TELUS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/   Audrey HoName:
    Audrey HoTitle:
    Vice President, Legal Services
and General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description1
    
    Supplemental United States GAAP Disclosures  for
    the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30,
    2004 and 2003 (unaudited) and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the
report of the auditors thereon
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ROBERT DESHIELDS,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 18 EAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court dated 2/29/16, 

exited 3/1/16, at No. 526 MD 2015

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2017 the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

is hereby AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.26


 


[***] INDICATES CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS
BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION


 


COMMERCIAL PRODUCT ADDENDUM


For DOXOPHOS


 


THIS COMMERCIAL
PRODUCT ADDENDUM is an addendum to that certain Master Manufacturing and Supply Agreement of the 25th of April,
2014 by and between BAXTER ONCOLOGY GMBH (“Baxter”), a German company having a place of business at Kantstrasse
2, 33790 Halle / Westphalia, Germany, and OASMIA PHARMACEUTICAL AB, a Swedish corporation, having offices at Vallongatan
1, SE 752 28 Uppsala Sweden (the “Commercial Supply Agreement”) and shall commence on the 20th day
of May, 2014 (“Commercial Product Addendum Effective Date”) and expire at the end of 19th day of
May 2019 (the “Commercial Product Addendum Term”).


 


This Commercial Product
Addendum may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute
the same instrument. Upon its execution, this Commercial Product Addendum shall become effective and shall be incorporated by reference
into the Master Manufacturing and Supply Agreement.


 


	By:	/s/ Dr. Burkhard Wichert             	 	By:	/s/ Julian Aleksov
	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:	Dr. Burkhard Wichert                  	 	Name:	Julian Aleksov
	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	VP of Manufacturing BPS             	 	Title:	CEO
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	/s/ Hans Sundin
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	Name:	Hans Sundin
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	Title:	EVP


 




     

     


    


 


EXHIBIT A to Commercial Product Addendum
for DOXOPHOS


Product and Presentation, Anticipated
Regulatory Approval Date and Applicable Confidentiality Agreement


  


	Product	 	Presentation
	DOXOPHOS	 	DOXOPHOS, ***


 


Anticipated Regulatory Approval Date for a Baxter supplied Product
(Section 8.5): December, 2018.


 


Applicable Confidentiality Agreement (Section 18.2):


 


CONFIDENTIAL


 




    	 	2	 



     


    



  


[***] INDICATES CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS
BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION


 


EXHIBIT B to Commercial Product Addendum
for DOXOPHOS


Initial Long Range Forecast, Annual Obligation
and Supply Obligation


 


The Initial Long Range Forecast is as follows:


 





	Year	 	Forecast
	***	 	***units (*** Batches)
	***	 	*** units (*** Batches)
	***	 	*** units (*** Batches)
	***	 	*** units (*** Batches)
	***	 	*** units (*** Batches)


 


The Client’s Annual Obligation and
Baxter’s Supply Obligation for each and every year in the Commercial Product Addendum Term is as follows:


 


	Contract Year	 	Client’s Annual Obligation	 	Baxter’s Supply Obligation
	***	 	***units (*** Batches)	 	***units (*** Batches)
	***	 	***units (*** Batches)	 	***units (*** Batches)
	***	 	***units (*** Batches)	 	***units (*** Batches)
	***	 	***units (*** Batches)	 	***units (*** Batches)
	***	 	***units (*** Batches)	 	***units (*** Batches)


 


CONFIDENTIAL


 




    	 	3
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the
Company) for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin McIntosh, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ KEVIN MCINTOSHKevin McIntoshSenior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)


Dated: November 8, 2006
#### Julian Edward ROCHESTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 07-6914.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 12, 2007.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2007.

*545Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant, Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Julian Edward Rochester seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rochester has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. The motions to proceed in forma pauperis and to compel rulings are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:  May                4, 2006 | /s/                John R.                Biggar                                     |
|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                        | John                R. BiggarExecutive                Vice President andChief                Financial OfficerPPL                Corporation                                                                                                                             |
Exhibit 16.1


Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 9-5
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We were previously principal accountants for EntrePort Corporation, a
Florida corporation ("Company") which at the time of our audit was known as
Dogwood Tree Capital Corp., and on October 6, 1998 we reported on the financial
statements of the Company as of October 5, 1998, December 31, 1997 and December
31, 1996 and for the periods January 1, 1998 to October 5, 1998, for the year
ended December 31, 1997 and for the period October 4, 1996 (inception) to
December 31, 1996. We have read the Company's statements included under Item 8
of its Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1999 and we
agree with such statements.

                                                     /s/ BARRY L. FRIEDMAN
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     BARRY L. FRIEDMAN
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 29, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report"), I, Krish A. Prabhu, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Krish Prabhu       
|Krish Prabhu           
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: November 7, 2006 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-• W. , -$ 2:..",§721.5-44r.:45Ertlz=5:2-P,



# cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Devin Lanford Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A •, • _ 

# 2
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Alston, Decker and Senior Judge Coleman 

THE PITTSTON COMPANY 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 2384-13-3 PER CURIAM 

 MAY 27, 2014 

FRANKLIN CALO 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Ramesh Murthy; Penn, Stuart, & Eskridge, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Paul L. Phipps; Mingkwan Emme Collins; Lee and Phipps, P.C., on 

brief), for appellee. 

 The Pittston Company appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission 

finding that Franklin Calo was entitled to wage loss benefits when he did not sustain any wage 

loss on March 18, 2013, due to his post-injury earnings that were greater than his pre-injury 

earnings. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final 

opinion. See Calo v. The Pittston Co., VWC File No. 2059223 (Nov. 20, 2013). We dispense 

with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

UNPUBLISHED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 )

VS. ) CR. NO. 06-00213-CG

 )

BUSTER L. PETAWAY, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

This matter is before the court on the United States’ Motion for Reduction of Sentence

pursuant to Rule 35(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. (Doc.109). The United States asks

the court to reduce the defendant’s sentence by an additional amount beyond that granted at

sentencing because he continued to provide substantial assistance in the investigation and

prosecution of another defendant since the date of his sentencing. Upon due consideration of

the grounds presented, the court finds that the United States’ motion is well taken and hereby

GRANTS the motion. Based upon the information presented, the court finds that a reduction of

the sentence by an additional 16 months is appropriate.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that defendant BUSTER L. PETAWAY’s sentence hereby

is amended, and his term of imprisonment is reduced from 91 months to 75 months. All other

terms and conditions of the sentence and judgment remain the same.

DONE and ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00213-CG-B Document 110 Filed 02/18/10 Page 1 of 1
2015 Q2 FES - EX 10.2




EXHIBIT 10.2
FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") is made effective as of July 30, 2015 by and between Forbes Energy Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Company"), and Charles C. Forbes an individual (the “Employee”).
WHEREAS, the parties hereto entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective  as of May 1, 2008 (the “Agreement”)
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement in order to clarify the confidentially and non-disclosure obligations of the Employee; 
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above, the parties hereby agree as follows:
		
	1.
	The following language will be added as the last paragraph of Section 11 of the Agreement:


		
	a.
	“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, or in any agreement or communication between Employer and Employee, (a) the confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations herein shall not prohibit or restrict Employee from initiating communications directly with, or responding to any inquiry from, or providing testimony before, the SEC, any other governmental agency, any self-regulatory organization or any other state or federal regulatory authority, regarding any possible securities law violations, and (b) Employer shall not enforce or threaten to enforce, any confidentiality agreement or other similar agreement, nor take or threaten to take any other action against Employee for engaging in the types of communications described in (a) above.”


		
	2.
	Except to the extent set forth herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


		
	3.
	This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, and signature pages may be delivered by facsimile, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and shall become effective upon its execution by the parties hereto.


[Signature Page Follows]

v. -




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.  
COMPANY: 
 
FORBES ENERGY SERVICES LLC  
 
 
By:    /s/ L. Melvin Cooper     
    L. Melvin Cooper, Chief Financial Officer 
 
 
EMPLOYEE: 
 
CHARLES C. FORBES 
 
 
By:    /s/ Charles C. Forbes     
    Charles C. Forbes



v. -
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Dennis, Appellant.

Submitted January 20, 2009;

decided February 11, 2009

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 6-K REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the month of October, 2004 Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc.(Translation of Registrants Name Into English) Canadian Pacific Tower,
Ste 1600, 100 Wellington Street W., Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, Canada
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.) Form 20-F o                     Form 40-F þ (Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.) Yes o                     No þ (If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-. This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant: Form S-8 No.333-13960. Page 1 of 2 Pages
Exhibits Index appears on Page 3




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
                    (Registrant)Date: October 27, 2004
    By /s/ Terence P. BadourName:
    Terence P. BadourTitle:
    Executive Vice President, Law and
Administrationand Corporate Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibits Index The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form 6-K. Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibits99.1
    
    Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. Third Quarter Earnings Rise Sharply - As a result of improved operating performance and hotel sales.