alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 BY THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, Dr. Amnon Gonenne, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director of MabCure, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (a) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
      annual period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                    

|By:    | /s/ Dr. Amnon Gonenne                          
|------ | -----------------------------------------------
|Name:  | Dr. Amnon Gonenne                              
|Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|       | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
|Date:  | April 10, 2009                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Kerry P. Gray, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 16, 2004

/s/ Kerry P. Gray
-----------------
Kerry P. Gray
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Homer Brown, Jr., Appellant.

Submitted June 1, 2009;

decided June 4, 2009

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Timothy E Donaher, Esq., Monroe County Public Defender, 10 N. Fitzhugh Street, Rochester, New York 14614 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001092013
<NAME> ACME COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                       716
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,741
<PP&E>                                          30,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 407,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,145
<BONDS>                                        209,665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           168
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   407,707
<SALES>                                         60,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,008
<CGS>                                           45,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (488)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (77,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (70,779)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,779)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (7.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (7.96)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") of Colorado Wyoming Reserve Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, I, Kim Fuerst, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  June 29, 2005

/s/ Kim Fuerst



Kim Fuerst



Chief Executive Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Ramos, Appellant.

[963 NYS2d 658]

*685Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (A. Kirke Bartley, Jr., J.), rendered September 11, 2009, resentencing defendant pursuant to Penal Law § 70.85 to an aggregate term of 20 years, without any period of postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered on or about July 24, 2009, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate judgment, unanimously dismissed for lack of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

A Justice of this Court denied defendant’s pro se CPL 460.15 application for leave to appeal from the denial of defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion. However, defendant, through counsel, made a second leave application, which asserted upon information and belief that no other leave application had been made. In reliance on this inaccurate statement, another Justice of this Court issued a certificate granting leave to appeal.

“Not more than one application may be made for such certificate” (CPL 460.15 [2]). Prohibitions on multiple leave applications are jurisdictional (see *People v Nelson,*55 NY2d 743, 743-744 [1981]), and we have no authority to disregard them, in the interest of justice or otherwise. The fact that the first application was made pro se while the second was made by counsel is of no consequence *(see People v Liner,*70 NY2d 945 [1988]). Accordingly, we vacate the certificate and dismiss the appeal.

Although defendant’s direct appeal from his judgment of resentence is properly before us, that appeal does not bring up for review any of defendant’s present challenges to his original conviction *(see People v Jordan,*16 NY3d 845 [2011]), and defendant has not demonstrated any basis for reversal or modification of the judgment of resentence.

Concur—Acosta, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350BY
THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

I, Ron Kalfus, Chief Financial Officer of MabCure, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (a) | The Annual Report on Form
        10-K/A-1  of the Company for the annual period ended December 31,
        2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
        (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (b) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                       

|By:    | /s/
      Ron Kalfus                         | 
|------ | -------------------------------------------- | 
|Name:  | Ron Kalfus                                   | 
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer                      | 
|       | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | 
|Date:  | March
      14, 2011                         | 

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of this Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Venture Catalyst Incorporated (the Company) for the Quarterly Period Ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin McIntosh, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



By:

/s/ KEVIN MCINTOSHKevin McIntoshSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer




Dated: November 10, 2005
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.2      Consent of Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

                    CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


TO: Bentley Communications Corp.

As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of Bentley Communications Corp. for the year
ended June 30, 2001 of our report dated October 1, 2001 and contained in the
Registration Statement No. 333-89946 of Bentley Communications Corp. Form S-8
under the Securities Act of 1933 insofar as such report relates to the financial
statements of Bentley Communications Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2001.

                                 /s/Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP
                                 ----------------------------------------
                                 Russell Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP

McLean, Virginia
October 1, 2002
#### Michael Stachowski, Respondent, v Donna Stachowski, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 416]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), dated September 28, 2005. The order denied defendant’s motion for approval of a qualified domestic relations order.

*1246It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff and defendant were married on December 5, 1975, and divorce proceedings were commenced in March 2003. On February 2, 2004, the parties entered into a separation agreement (agreement) that was incorporated but not merged into the judgment of divorce. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, defendant was to receive 50% of plaintiff’s General Motors pension plan benefits in accordance with the formula set forth in *Majauskas v Majauskas*(61 NY2d 481 [1984]) and defendant’s attorney was to prepare a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) to effectuate that entitlement. Defendant’s attorney submitted a proposed QDRO containing death benefits to which plaintiff’s attorney objected on the ground that the agreement did not provide for death benefits. Defendant’s attorney prepared a second proposed QDRO, which provided in part that benefits to defendant may commence, at her option, at any time after plaintiff has attained eligibility to retire and that benefits to defendant shall be payable for the duration of her lifetime. After plaintiffs counsel objected to the second proposed QDRO, defendant moved for approval of it.

Contrary to the contention of defendant, Supreme Court properly denied her motion. Defendant is not entitled to a separate interest to be paid over her lifetime because that right was not explicitly stated in the agreement *(see generally Kazel v Kazel,*3 NY3d 331 [2004]). Thus, the QDRO at issue deviates from the agreement as incorporated into the judgment of divorce *(see generally Olivo v Olivo,*82 NY2d 202, 210 [1993]; *Majauskas,*61 NY2d at 490-491). We note that defendant correctly concedes that she is not entitled to, and does not seek, a surviving spouse benefit. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Smith, Centra and Pine, JJ.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 26, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00767-CV

IN RE GARMIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-02833

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Whitehill, Partida-Kipness, and Pedersen, III

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III

Relator has filed a motion to dismiss its petition for writ of mandamus. Relator states that

pursuant to a Rule 11 agreement, the trial court has vacated its June 10, 2019 order that is the 

subject of the mandamus petition. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss relator’s petition 

for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.

190767F.P05

/Bill Pedersen, III/

BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
#### Lori Anis et al., Appellants, v Associated Restaurant Management Corp., Doing Business as Boathouse Restaurant, Respondent.

[609 NYS2d 51]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered February 24, 1992, which, upon a jury verdict, is in *460favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

" 'Photographs may be used to prove constructive notice of an alleged defect shown in the photographs if they are taken reasonably close to the time of the accident and there is testimony that the condition at the time of the accident was substantially as shown in the photographs’ ” *(Davis v County of Nassau,*166 AD2d 498, 499; *see also, Taylor v New York City Tr. Auth.,*48 NY2d 903). Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, the court in the instant case properly refused to admit in evidence several photographs for the purpose of proving constructive notice of the defect alleged herein, as the photographs were taken four years after the accident.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ further contention, the photographs could not be properly admitted as evidence of a dangerous condition *(cf., Saporito v City of New York,*14 NY2d 474).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Krausman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 12.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Saulo Nunes, certifythat:

 

1.  Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Gafisa S.A.;

 

2.  Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

3.  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

 

4.  Thecompany’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 

a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)  Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

d)  Disclosedin this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.  Thecompany’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

b)  Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 11, 2019
#### Morris v. Deerfield Episcopal Ret. Cmty., Inc.

Case below: 179 N.C. App. 863

No. 598P06

1. Pits’ PDR Under N.C.G.S. ¡ (COA05-1652) 7A-31

2. Def’s Conditional PDR Under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31

1. Denied 06/27/07

2. Dismissed as Moot 06/27/07