alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State v. Pergram , 2016-Ohio-3398.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2015-12-215

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 6/13/2016 : TAMMY MICHELLE PERGRAM, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2014-07-1159

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Michael Greer, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-appelleeScott N. Blauvelt, 315 South Monument Avenue, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for defendantappellant

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶ 2} Counsel for defendant-appellant, Tammy Pergram, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1)Butler CA2015-12-215

- 2 - indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2245 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Office of the Under Secretary for Research, Education, 

and Economics for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Office of the Under Secretary for Research, Education, and Economics for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2245 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, OFFICE 

3 OF THE UNDER SECRETARY FOR RESEARCH, 

4 EDUCATION, AND ECONOMICS FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, Office of the 

9 Under Secretary for Research, Education, and Economics 

10 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $800,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2192 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2192

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 
  Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
the Committees on Natural Resources, Transportation and Infrastructure, 
  Agriculture, and Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 
  Protection Agency, Office of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 
              PROTECTION AGENCY, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Environmental Protection 
Agency, Office of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$41,489,000.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael J. Culotta, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PharMerica Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b. [Intentionally omitted] 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

DATE: February 19, 2008
EXHIBIT 10.20

AGREEMENT

This
Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into effective as of December 15, 2000 (the "Effective
Date") by and between Preview Systems, Inc., with an office at 1195 W. Fremont Ave., Suite 2001, Sunnyvale, CA 94087 ("PSI") and Sony Marketing (Japan), Inc.,
with an office at 4-10-18 Tanakawa, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan ("SMOJ").

Background.

Agreement.

In consideration of the mutual promises set forth in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

1

---





2

---



AGREED
AND ACCEPTED, EFFECTIVE AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE:

|                             |  |                     
|---------------------------- |  | --------------------
|SONY MARKETING (JAPAN), INC. |  | REVIEW SYSTEMS, INC.
|By:                          |  | By:                 
|Name:                        |  | Name:               
|Title:                       |  | Title:              

3

---

QuickLinks
**AMENDMENT TO THE SALIX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN

 

	**WHEREAS,** Salix Technologies, Inc. has heretofore established the Salix Technologies, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan (the "Plan") for the benefit of eligible executives and key personnel of Salix Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries;

	**WHEREAS,** Salix Technologies, Inc. was acquired by Oriole Merger Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tellabs, Inc. ("Sub"), and Sub was merged with and into Salix Technologies, Inc. (Tellabs, Inc. shall be known as the "Company"; provided, however, that prior to the effective time of the merger, "Company" means Salix Technologies, Inc.);

	**WHEREAS,**the Board of Directors of the Company deems it desirable to make certain amendments to the Plan relating to the vesting of options and stock appreciation rights ("SARs") and/or the post-employment exercise period in theevent of the death, disability, or retirement of an option or SAR holder, or a change in control of the Company; and

	**WHEREAS,** the Board of Directors of the Company has considered the recommendations and has approved this Amendment to the Plan.

	**NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,** that the Plan is hereby amended, effective June 30, 2000, as follows :
- Under Section 2 of the Plan, the following definition of "Change in Control" shall be added:**
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jeffrey Dee Steadman, * From the 350th District

 Court of Taylor County,

 Trial Court No. 8299-D.

Vs. No. 11-13-00034-CR * February 19, 2015

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
| (c)   | The                quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007                of the                Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(b) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (d)   | Information                contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  Raghunath Kilambi                                            |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Raghunath                  Kilambi,Chief                  Financial Officer  |   |

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           STATMON TEHCNOLOGIES CORP.

         I, Geoffrey P. Talbot, certify that:

      1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of  Statmon
Technologies Corp., Inc.

      2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            (b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

      5. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I have  disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All  significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses  in the
design or  operation  of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are
reasonably  likely to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: September 24, 2004

    /s/ GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
--------------------------------------
        GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
     Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of Javo Beverage Company, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Cody C.
Ashwell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/
      Cody C. AshwellCody
      C. Ashwell
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              March
      19, 2008





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Javo Beverage Company, Inc. and will be retained by Javo Beverage Company, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
#### Carolyn Thomas French, Appellant, v Alfred L. Schiavo et al., Respondents.

[870 NYS2d 339]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John E.H. Stackhouse, J.), entered December 28, 2007, in plaintiffs favor, bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered on or about June 29, 2007, which, upon a jury verdict awarding plaintiff, inter alia, $94,000 for past medical expenses, $176,000 for past lost earnings, and $3,100,000 for future lost earnings, denied plaintiffs motion, inter alia, to increase the award for past medical expenses, pursuant to stipulation, to $166,371.63, and granted defendants’ motion for a collateral source offset to the extent of reducing the award for past medical expenses from $94,000 to $38,559, reducing the award for past lost earnings from $176,000 to $0, and reducing the award for future lost earnings from $3,100,000 to $1,133,016, unanimously modified, on the law, to vacate the collateral source offset, reinstate the jury awards for past medical expenses and past and future lost earnings, and increase the award for past medical expenses to $166,371.63, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The parties’ stipulation to the fair and reasonable value of past medical expenses in the amount of $166,371.63 should be enforced *(see Sanfilippo v City of New York,*272 AD2d 201 [2000], *lv dismissed*95 NY2d 887 [2000]).

*476Despite being allowed to conduct , additional discovery following the first trial of this action *(see 9*AD3d 279 [2004]), defendants failed to conduct discovery on collateral source issues at any time before the jury returned its verdict after the second trial, and they should not have been allowed to conduct posttrial collateral source discovery *(see Firmes v Chase Manhattan Auto. Fin. Corp.,*50 AD3d 18, 37-38 [2008], *lv denied*11 NY3d 705 [2008]). In any event, despite plaintiffs compliance with their discovery demands, defendants failed to carry their burden of demonstrating “with reasonable certainty” that plaintiffs past medical expenses and past and future lost earnings were or would be replaced from collateral sources (CPLR 4545 [c]; *see generally Oden v Chemung County Indus. Dev. Agency,*87 NY2d 81 [1995]).

We have not considered plaintiffs remaining argument, which is not properly before us. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
#### Leonard E. Riedl Construction, Inc., Respondent, v Michael Homeyer et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[963 NYS2d 893]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered December 20, 2011. The order awarded attorney’s fees to plaintiff.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

*1391Same memorandum as in *Leonard E. Riedl Constr., Inc. v Homeyer*(105 AD3d 1391 [2013]).

Present—Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1
------------

                    Certification Pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tomahawk  Industries,  Inc. (Company)
on Form 10-QSB  (Report) for the quarter  ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof. I, Glenn A. Little, Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Glenn A. Little
-------------------

Glenn A. Little
Chief Executive and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 18, 2003
       ---------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2496 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2496

     To provide interim appropriations for the Coast Guard Retired 
  Serviceman's Family Protection and Survivor Benefits Plans for each 
      fiscal year after fiscal year 2022, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2023

 Mr. Green of Tennessee (for himself and Mr. Van Orden) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide interim appropriations for the Coast Guard Retired 
  Serviceman's Family Protection and Survivor Benefits Plans for each 
      fiscal year after fiscal year 2022, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Gold Star Spouses Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. INTERIM APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE COAST GUARD RETIRED SERVICEMAN'S 
              FAMILY PROTECTION AND SURVIVOR BENEFITS PLANS.

    (a) In General.--There are hereby appropriated, out of any money in 
the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for each fiscal year after 
fiscal year 2022, such sums as necessary for payment of the Coast Guard 
Retired Serviceman's Family Protection and Survivor Benefits Plans, as 
are described in the provision regarding Coast Guard retired pay in 
title II of division F of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 
(Public Law 116-260), at a rate for operations and under the terms and 
conditions provided by the most recent law making full-year 
appropriations for such Coast Guard Retired Serviceman's Family 
Protection and Survivor Benefits Plans.
    (b) Effect of Enactment of Subsequent Appropriations.--If an 
appropriation for such Coast Guard Retired Serviceman's Family 
Protection and Survivor Benefits Plans, or a general appropriation bill 
providing appropriations for the Coast Guard without provision for such 
Coast Guard Retired Serviceman's Family Protection and Survivor 
Benefits Plans, is enacted into law on any date after the date of the 
enactment of this Act that provides for appropriations during a fiscal 
year following the expenditure of funds during such fiscal year 
pursuant to this Act--
            (1) such expenditure shall be charged to such appropriation 
        (if any); and
            (2) appropriations made available for such fiscal year 
        pursuant to this Act shall not be available after the date of 
        enactment of such appropriation or general appropriation bill.
                                 <all>
```
#### Narayan Prasad NATH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 05-16557.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Nov. 3, 2006.

Christopher J. Stender, Esq., Stender & Pope, PC, Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Cynthia M. Parsons, USPX — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: HUG, MERRITT,* and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Gilbert Stroud Merritt, Jr., Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

ORDER

The mandate issued October 17, 2006, is hereby recalled. The memorandum disposition filed August 24, 2006, is hereby withdrawn. An authored opinion shall be filed simultaneously with this order.