alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00012]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Intent To Grant Partially Exclusive Patent License; 
Vann Technology, LLC

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy. The Department 
of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Vann 
Technology, LLC. a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive license to 
practice in the United States, the Government-owned invention described 
below: U.S. Patent 6,902,316 (Navy Case 85003): Issued June 7, 2005, 
entitled ``NON-INVASIVE CORROSION SENSOR''.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file 
written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later 
than January 26, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with Naval Surface 
Warfare Center, Crane Division, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, 
Crane, IN 47522-5001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface 
Warfare Center, Crane Division, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, 
Crane, IN 47522-5001, telephone 812-854-4100.

    Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404

    Dated: December 29, 2014.
N.A. Hagerty-Ford,
Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, Federal Register 
Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-00012 Filed 1-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
11890.

#### Parsons *et al. v.*The State.

Decided December 16, 1920.

Indictment for larceny from house; from Whitfield superior court — Judge Tarver. October 7, 1920.

*M. B. Huíanles,*for plaintiff in error.

*Joseph M. Lang, solicitor-general,*contra.

Luke, J.

A theft of chickens was charged in the indictment; the prosecutrix swore that the chickens found in the possession of the defendants on the night of the theft were her chickens, and there was evidence that the defendants admitted stealing the chickens. It was therefore . not error to overrule the motion for a new trial,- the only ground relied upon being that the evidence did not authorize the verdict of guilty.

*Judgment a'jjirmed.*

*Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., conem.*
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 9, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-01111-CV

PAMBULA ALLISON, Appellant

V.

ISIDRO SAENZ AND MARIA M. MAGANA SAENZ, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-04184-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright

Opinion by Justice Boatright

Appellant’s brief is overdue. By postcard dated January 12, 2018, we directed appellant to 

file the brief within ten days and cautioned her that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the 

appeal without further notice. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, however, appellant has not 

complied or otherwise corresponded with the Court. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. Id., 

42.3(b),(c).

171111F.P05

/Jason Boatright/

JASON BOATRIGHT

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

PAMBULA ALLISON, Appellant

No. 05-17-01111-CV V.

ISIDRO SAENZ AND MARIA M. 

MAGANA SAENZ, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 1, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-04184-A.

Opinion delivered by Justice Boatright, 

Justices Lang-Miers and Myers 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered this 9th day of February, 2018.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2233 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2233

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Executive Operations, Office of the Chief Economist for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Executive Operations, Office of the Chief Economist for 
                           fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, EXECUTIVE OPERATIONS, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF 
              ECONOMIST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Executive Operations, Office of the Chief Economist for 
fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $21,286,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

       In connection with the accompanying annual
report on Form 10-KSB of Global General
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2007, I, Joseph K. Petter,
President of the Company hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:

       1. Such annual report on Form 10-KSB for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       2. The information contained in such annual
report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: August 15, 2008

/s/ Joseph K. Petter
Joseph K. Petter, President (Principal executive and
financial officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00388-CR

EX PARTE Jose Alexis SANCHEZ DUBON

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10374CR

Honorable Roland Andrade, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 18, 2023

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is granted, and this appeal 

is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### Frank Rio, Appellant, v Lori Lynn Rio, Respondent.

[973 NYS2d 921]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (MacKenzie, J.), dated March 25, 2011, as amended November 21, 2011, as denied that branch of his motion which was for a determination that a post-nuptial agreement dated September 22, 2009, was void, and denied, as academic, that branch of his motion which was for a determination that an agreement dated March 11, 2005, was valid.

Motion by the respondent, inter alia, to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the right of direct appeal from the order terminated upon entry of a judgment entered December 28, 2011. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated May 30, 2012, that branch of the motion which was to dismiss the appeal from the order was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the argument of the appeal, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent.

The appeal from the order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the judgment in the action *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see Rio v Rio,*110 AD3d 1051 [2013] [decided herewith]). Mastro, J.P., Austin, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
ex104.htm


 


Exhibit 10.4




 


UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE


 




	
U.S. $350,000.00

	
July 13, 2015














FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Eos Petro, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Issuer”), hereby promises to pay to the order of Plethora Enterprises, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (the “Payee”), at such place as the Payee shall direct in writing, the principal sum of Three Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($350,000.00), with interest at 10.00% on the unpaid balance.  All references to Dollars herein are to lawful currency of the United States of America.







All unpaid principal of this Note and accrued interest shall be due and payable on January 1, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). This Note may be prepaid at any time in whole or in part without penalty.







In any action at law or in equity to enforce or construe any provisions or rights under this Note, the unsuccessful party or parties to such litigation, as determined by a court pursuant to a final offer, judgment or decree, shall pay to the successful party or parties all costs, expenses and reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by such successful party.







This Note and all actions arising out of or in connection with this Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflicts of law provisions of the State of California, or of any other state.







 

 







Eos Petro, Inc.


A Nevada corporation












By: /s/ Nikolas Konstant


    Nicholas Konstant


    Its: Chief Financial Officer
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|           Dated: May 15, 2009 |   |  /s/ George R.      Quist                              |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |   |  George R.      Quist                                  |
|                                              |   |  Chairman of the      Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----
Order entered April 7, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00036-CV

JOHN C. GOLFIS, ET AL., Appellants

V.

EDWARD “LANNY” HOULLION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

GENERAL PARTNER OF HOULLION FAMILY, L, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-13053

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ April 4, 2016 third motion for an extension of time to file a brief. 

Appellees shall file a brief by MAY 2, 2016. We caution appellees that no further extension of 

time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Samuel Blunt, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 641]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered April 26, 2011, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first and third degrees, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 13 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant’s request for an instruction on the affirmative defense of entrapment. There was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to de*636fendant, that the police actively induced or encouraged him commit the crime, or that any police conduct, including their use of a confidential informant who was defendant’s childhood friend, created a substantial risk that defendant would commit the crime although not otherwise disposed to do so (see Penal Law § 40.05; *People v Brown,*82 NY2d 869, 871-872 [1993]; *People v Butts,*72 NY2d 746, 750 [1988]). The record demonstrates that the police merely afforded defendant the opportunity to commit the crime, that he was disposed to commit it, and that he engaged in salesman-like behavior. Defendant’s own testimony tended to negate the elements of the entrapment defense.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s pro se claims.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Feinman and Gische, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of Chuma Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending November 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Jordan Shapiro, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





|    |                                                                                                                                       
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.





|                     |     |                                         | 
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------- | 
|                     |     |                                         | 
|Date: March 17, 2015 | By: | */s/ Jordan Shapiro*                    | 
|                     |     | Jordan Shapiro, Chief Executive Officer | 
|                     |     |                                         | 









|
|
|
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Websafety, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Williams, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Rowland W. Day II.Rowland W. Day IIChief Financial Officer




Dated: April 14, 2011





This certification accompanies this report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to WebSafety, Inc. fka Blindspot Alert, In. and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                           STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Geoffrey P. Talbot, certify that:

      1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of  Statmon
Technologies Corp Inc.

      2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            (b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

      5. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I have  disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All  significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses  in the
design or  operation  of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are
reasonably  likely to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: September 24, 2004

    /s/ GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
--------------------------------------
        GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
     Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marcellus Pierce, Appellant.

Submitted April 20, 2009;

decided April 30, 2009

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and David C. Schopp, Esq., the Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., 237 Main Street, Suite 1602, Buffalo, New York 14203 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
  "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"),
  I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  hereby certify that:

| |  | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: November 9, 2004 | /s/ William F. HechtWilliam F. Hecht
        Chairman, President and
        Chief Executive Officer
        PPL Corporation
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.