Skip to main content    

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

**Official websites use .gov**              A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.            

**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**              A **lock** (  LockA locked padlock) or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.            

https://www.nist.gov/itl/sed/topic-areas/measurement-uncertainty

            -  Topics  -  All Topics 
-  Advanced communications 
-  Artificial intelligence 
-  Bioscience 
-  Buildings and construction 
-  Chemistry 
-  Climate 
-  Cybersecurity 
-  Electronics 
-  Energy 
-  Environment 
-  Fire 
-  Forensic science 
-  Health 
-  Information technology 
-  Infrastructure 
-  Manufacturing 
-  Materials 
-  Mathematics and statistics 
-  Metrology 
-  Nanotechnology 
-  Neutron research 
-  Performance excellence 
-  Physics 
-  Public safety 
-  Resilience 
-  Standards 
-  Transportation 
 
            -  Publications 
            -  Labs & Major Programs  -  Laboratories    -  Communications Technology Laboratory 
  -  Engineering Laboratory 
  -  Information Technology Laboratory 
  -  Material Measurement Laboratory 
  -  Physical Measurement Laboratory 
-  User Facilities    -  NIST Center for Neutron Research 
  -  CNST NanoFab 
-  Research Test Beds 
-  Research Projects 
-  Tools & Instruments 
-  Major Programs    -  Baldrige Performance Excellence Program 
  -  CHIPS for America Initiative 
  -  Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) 
  -  Office of Advanced Manufacturing 
  -  Special Programs Office 
  -  Technology Partnerships Office 
 
            -  Services & Resources  -  Standards and Measurements    -  Calibration Services 
  -  Laboratory Accreditation (NVLAP) 
  -  Quality System 
  -  Standard Reference Materials (SRMs) 
  -  Standards.gov 
  -  Time Services 
  -  Office of Weights and Measures 
-  Software 
-  Data    -  Chemistry WebBook 
  -  National Vulnerability Database 
  -  Physical Reference Data 
  -  Standard Reference Data (SRD) 
-  Storefront 
-  License & Patents 
-  Computer Security Resource Center (CSRC) 
-  NIST Research Library 
 
            -  News & Events  -  News 
-  Events 
-  Blogs 
-  Feature Stories 
-  Awards 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Image Gallery 
-  Media Contacts 
 
            -  About NIST  -  About Us    -  Leadership 
  -  Organization Structure 
  -  Budget & Planning 
-  Contact Us 
-  Visit 
-  Careers    -  Student programs 
-  Work with NIST 
-  History    -  NIST Digital Archives 
  -  NIST Museum 
  -  NIST and the Nobel 
-  Educational Resources 
 

Information Technology Laboratory

## Statistical Engineering Division

-  Projects/Programs  Expand or Collapse    -  Cement Characteristics by Direct Phase Assessment 
  -  Critical Current Metrology for Nb3Sn 
  -  e-Statistics 
  -  Extreme Winds and Wind Effects on Structures 
  -  Radiative Decay of the Neutron 
-  How to Work With Us 
-  NIST Publications Searchable Database 
-  Staff Directory 
-  Topic Areas  Expand or Collapse    -  e-Handbook 
  -  Measurement Uncertainty 
  -  NRC Postdoctoral Associate Program 
  -  SED Consulting Program 
  -  Statistical Methods 
  -  Teaching 
  -  Other Statistics Information 
-  Products & Services  Expand or Collapse    -  e-Handbook 
  -  Statistical Metrology Short Courses 
  -  Statistical Reference Data Sets (StRD) 
  -  Statistical Software 
  -  Test Suite for Random Numbers 
-  Historical Information 

# Measurement Uncertainty

## Share

Facebook

Linkedin

Twitter

Email

"We may at once admit that any inference from the particular to the general must be attended with some degree of uncertainty, but this is not the same as to admit that such inference cannot be absolutely rigorous, for the nature and degree of the uncertainty may itself be capable of rigorous expression."

— R. A. Fisher (1966, 8th ed., p. 4) *The Design of Experiments*

## Introduction

**Measurement** is an experimental process that produces a value that can reasonably be attributed to a quantitative property of a phenomenon, body, or substance. 

This property that is the object of measurement (*measurand*) has a numerical magnitude and a reference that gives meaning to that numerical magnitude: for example, the mass of the *International Prototype Kilogram* is 1 kg. 

That process involves direct or indirect comparison with a *standard* (for example, a certified 32768 Hz quartz crystal resonator, or a primary gas mixture with 1.079 micromole of methane per mole of air). 

This comparison typically is accomplished by making the phenomenon, body, or substance of interest interact with a measuring instrument capable of producing an *indication* that is responsive to the property of interest. If the instrument has been calibrated, then the indications that it produces are meaningful in relation with a relevant standard.

The GUM defines **measurement uncertainty** as a "parameter, associated with the result of a measurement, that characterizes the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to the measurand''. The VIM defines it as a "non-negative parameter characterizing the dispersion of the quantity values being attributed to a measurand, based on the information used''.

For scalar measurands (that is, when the property of interest can be quantified by a single real number), the VIM suggests that this parameter may be, for example, a standard deviation called **standard measurement uncertainty** (or a specified multiple of it), or the half-width of an interval that includes the measurand with a stated coverage probability. (The expression *standard measurement uncertainty* is reserved for measurement uncertainty expressed as a standard deviation.)

This suggestion follows from the position that **measurement uncertainty expresses incomplete knowledge** about the measurand, and that a probability distribution over the set of possible values for the measurand is used to represent the corresponding state of knowledge about it: in these circumstances, the standard deviation aforementioned is an attribute of this probability distribution that represents its scatter over the range of possible values. 

This position is expressed in the GUM (3.3.1), where it is suggested that measurement uncertainty "reflects the lack of exact knowledge of the value of the measurand''. The corresponding state of knowledge is best described by means of a probability distribution over the set of possible values for the measurand.

This probability distribution incorporates all the information available about the measurand, and indeed *expresses how well one believes one knows the measurand's true value* (a felicitous interpretation due to Dr. Charles Ehrlich, from NIST), and fully characterizes how the degree of this belief varies over that set of possible values.

It is this distribution that imparts meaning to the parameter that is chosen to quantify measurement uncertainty. For example, the CODATA 2006 estimate of the value of the Stefan-Boltzmann constant is σ = 5.670400 x 10-8 W m-2 K-4, with corresponding standard measurement uncertainty u(σ) = 0.000040 x 10-8 W m-2 K-4. If the probability distribution that represents the state of knowledge about this constant should be Gaussian (or, *normal*) with σ as mean and u(σ) as standard deviation, then this would suggest that the probability is 68% that the constant's true value lies within u(σ) of that estimate.

When the measurand is a vector, rather than a scalar quantity, or when it is a quantity of even greater complexity (for example, a function, as in a transmittance spectrum of an optical filter), then the parameter that expresses measurement uncertainty will be a suitable generalization or analog of the standard deviation.

## 

## References

                  - Barry N. Taylor and Chris E. Kuyatt (1994).  *Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results* . NIST Technical Note 1297.
                  	
                  - *Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement*  JCGM 100:2008 (GUM 1995 with minor corrections)
                  	
                  - *Evaluation of measurement data – Supplement 1 to the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement" – Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method*  JCGM 101:2008
                  	
                  - M. R. Bottaccini (1975).  Instruments and Measurement . Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company, Columbus, Ohio.
                  

Information technologyData and informatics

## Contacts

                -  Antonio Possolo  antonio.possolo@nist.gov      (301) 975-2853   

### HEADQUARTERS

301-975-2000

Webmaster | Contact Us | Our Other Offices

TwitterFacebookLinkedInInstagramYouTubeGiphyRSS FeedMailing List

Feedback

            -  Site Privacy 
            -  Accessibility 
            -  Privacy Program 
            -  Copyrights 
            -  Vulnerability Disclosure 
            -  No Fear Act Policy 
            -  FOIA 
            -  Environmental Policy 
            -  Scientific Integrity 
            -  Information Quality Standards 
            -  Commerce.gov 
            -  Science.gov 
            -  USA.gov 
            -  Vote.gov