alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wanda WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pat H. WATTS, Jr., etc.; et al., Defendants, Pat H. Watts, Jr., individually and in Official Capacity as Chancery Judge in the Sixteenth Chancery Court District, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-60103.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

Wanda Alexander Williams, Law Offices of Wanda Williams, Pascagoula, MS, pro se.

Royce Cole, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Wanda Williams has appealed the district court’s judgment dismissing her complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In her complaint, Williams named the following defendants: Pat H. Watts, Chancery Judge of Jackson County, Mississippi; Mike Byrd, Sheriff of Jackson County, Mississippi; Judson Locke, Deputy Sheriff of Jackson County Sheriffs Department; and Luther Kuykendall, Deputy Sheriff of Jackson County Sheriffs Department. Williams is an attorney who filed the instant pro se § 1983 complaint as a result of her arrest and sentence for contempt of court. The district court dismissed Williams’s complaint, pursuant to Fed. R.Crv.P. 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted based upon the doctrine of absolute judicial immunity.

Williams contends that the district court erred in holding that Chancery Judge Watts was entitled to judicial immunity and in granting his motion to dismiss. A district court’s ruling on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion for failure to state a claim is subject to de novo review. *Scanlan v. Texas A & M University,*343 F.3d 533, 536 (5th Cir.2003). Judicial officers are entitled to absolute immunity from damages in § 1983 actions arising out of all acts performed in the exercise of their judicial functions. *Krueger v. Reimer,*66 F.3d 75, 77 (5th Cir.1995). However, a judge has no immunity for actions taken outside of his judicial capacity, or for actions that are judicial in nature, but occur in complete absence of all jurisdiction. *Malina v. Gonzales,*994 F.2d 1121, 1124 (5th Cir. *4131993). Williams has failed to show a lack of immunity. *See id.; Mireles v. Waco,*502 U.S. 9, 12-13, 112 S.Ct. 286, 116 L.Ed.2d 9 (1991). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1885 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Chief Administrative 

Officer for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for House 

of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses of the Office 

of the Chief Administrative Officer for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SALARIES 

5 AND EXPENSES OF THE OFFICE OF THE 

6 CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER FOR FIS7 CAL YEAR 2024. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

9 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:11 Apr 14, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1885.IH H1885

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1885 IH

1 able for House of Representatives, Salaries and Expenses 

2 of the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer for fiscal 

3 year 2024 may not exceed $148,058,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2303 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2303

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
    State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Protection of Foreign 
              Missions and Officials for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
    State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, Protection of Foreign 
              Missions and Officials for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
              ADMINISTRATION OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, PROTECTION OF FOREIGN 
              MISSIONS AND OFFICIALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of State, 
Administration of Foreign Affairs, Protection of Foreign Missions and 
Officials for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $30,890,000.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2





SELECTICA, INC.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Selectica, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd Spartz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: July 29, 2011


/s/ TODD SPARTZTodd SpartzChief Financial Officer
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 10-KSB of Global General
      Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007,
      I, Joseph K. Petter, President of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      Such
      annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007,
      fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in such annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
      ending December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   September
      25, 2008




/s/
                Joseph K. Petter


Joseph
      K.
      Petter, President (Principal executive and financial officer)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION
of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Neil L. Stenbuck, Chief Financial Officer of Prima Energy Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date herein (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                 

|                                                     |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Neil L. Stenbuck                                 |  | 
|                                                     |  | 
|Neil L. Stenbuck                                     |  | 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|August 12, 2003                                      |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Prima Energy Corporation and
will be retained by Prima Energy Corporation and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       73,089
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      6,003
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          19,809
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         5,416
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   3,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,607
<COMMON>                                         5,443
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       16,652
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              6,823
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  28,918
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        363
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            40,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              14,965
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  23,361
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  107,607
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       16,226
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               267
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       5,635
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       6,974
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          1,970
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,163
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   3,133
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         1,824
<NET-INCOME>                                       416
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        261
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      155
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,215
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         (4,922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                        16,461,423
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 23,045
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              16,745,751
<PP&E>                        11,911,100
<DEPRECIATION>                (6,646,005)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                22,010,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         319,158
<BONDS>                       3,907,073
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    17,774,011
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  22,010,846
<SALES>                       477,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              643,017
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 309,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              207,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            102,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>               25,680
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           25,680
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               7,829,940
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  7,855,620
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 151.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                 151.79
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1985 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Institute 

on Aging for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Institute on Aging for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1985 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NA4 TIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Na9 tional Institutes of Health National Institute on Aging for 

10 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $3,083,410,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2384 

To lower energy costs by ending judicial review for legacy projects and 

providing jurisdiction to the United States Court of Appeals for the 

District of Columbia Circuit, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mrs. MILLER of West Virginia (for herself, Mr. RESCHENTHALER, and Mr. 

MOONEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To lower energy costs by ending judicial review for legacy 

projects and providing jurisdiction to the United States 

Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Complete American 

5 Pipelines Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LEGACY PROJECTS. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for any 

8 project that, prior to January 1, 2018, has been granted 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2384 IH

1 a certificate of public convenience and necessity by the 

2 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to sec3 tion 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717f(c)), and 

4 where such certificate of public convenience and necessity 

5 is still in effect— 

6 (1) such project shall be constructed expedi7 tiously in the location and form specified in such 

8 certificate of public convenience and necessity or any 

9 amendment or authorization issued pursuant there10 to, and consistent with other applicable permits; 

11 (2) such certificate of public convenience and 

12 necessity and any amendment, extension of time, or 

13 other authorization issued pursuant to or related 

14 thereto, and any order or action of a Federal agency 

15 or State administrative agency acting pursuant to 

16 Federal law for such project that is required to com17 plete construction of such project, issued prior to or 

18 subsequent to the enactment of this section, shall 

19 not be subject to judicial review in any court, and 

20 any action (including any action pending in a court 

21 as of the date of enactment of this section) seeking 

22 judicial review of such an agency order or action 

23 shall not be filed or maintained in any court and 

24 shall be promptly dismissed; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 2384 IH

1 (3) the United States Court of Appeals for the 

2 District of Columbia Circuit shall have original and 

3 exclusive jurisdiction over any claim alleging the in4 validity of this section or that an action is beyond 

5 the scope of authority conferred by this section. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2038 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

Corporation for National and Community Service, Office of Inspector 

General for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, Corporation for National and Community 

Service, Office of Inspector General for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, CORPORATION FOR NA5 TIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE, OFFICE 

6 OF INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR FISCAL YEAR 

7 2024. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

9 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:27 Apr 17, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2038.IH H2038

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2038 IH

1 able for Related Agencies, Corporation for National and 

2 Community Service, Office of Inspector General for fiscal 

3 year 2024 may not exceed $5,750,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Myra JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL NUTRITION CENTER INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-60923.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 14, 2006.

Myra Jones, Brazoria, TX, pro se.

Elizabeth B. Shirley, Burr & Forman, Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before REAVLEY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mrya Jones seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal following the district court’s judgment granting the defendant’s summary-judgment motion and dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) complaint. In her complaint, Jones alleged that she was fired because of her religious beliefs and practices.

*344This court may authorize Jones to proceed IFP on appeal if she is unable to pay the costs of the appeal and the appeal is taken in good faith, *ie.,*the appeal presents nonfrivolous issues. Fed. R.App. P. 24(a)(1); *see Holmes v. Hardy,*852 F.2d 151, 153 (5th Cir.1988).

Jones has failed to demonstrate that her appeal would involve nonfrivolous issues. The summary-judgment evidence showed that General Nutrition Centers, Inc., had articulated a legitimate nondiscriminatory basis for Jones’s termination and she had not borne her burden of establishing that the articulated reason was pretextual. *Threadgill v. Prudential Sec. Group, Inc.,*145 F.3d 286, 292 (5th Cir.1998); *McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 802-03, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). Jones’s motion for IFP is therefore denied and her appeal dismissed. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. NJ15-5-000]

Take notice that on December 15, 2014, City of Anaheim, California submits tariff filing per 35.28(e): City of Anaheim 2015 Transmission Revenue Balancing Account Adjustment Update to be effective 1/1/2015.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at *http://www.ferc.gov.* Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.

This filing is accessible on-line at *http://www.ferc.gov,* using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,* or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

*Comment Date:* 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 5, 2015.

Dated: December 24, 2014.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014-30793 Filed 1-2-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P