alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 219 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to codify patients’ rights 

to hospital visitation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. VAN DREW (for himself, Mrs. MILLER-MEEKS, and Mr. HARRIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to codify 

patients’ rights to hospital visitation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Patient Left Alone 

5 Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PATIENT VISITATION RIGHTS. 

7 Section 1861 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1395x) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 219 IH

1 (1) in subsection (e)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (8), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

3 the end; 

4 (B) by redesignating paragraph (9) as 

5 paragraph (10); 

6 (C) by inserting after paragraph (8) the 

7 following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(9) has written policies and procedures regard9 ing the visitation rights of individuals receiving 

10 items and services at the institution, which shall in11 clude a description of any clinically necessary or rea12 sonable restriction or limitation that such institution 

13 may need to place on such rights and the reasons 

14 for the clinical restriction or limitation, and a re15 quirement that such institution— 

16 ‘‘(A) inform each such individual of his or 

17 her visitation rights, including any clinical re18 striction or limitation on such rights; 

19 ‘‘(B) inform each such individual of the 

20 right, subject to the individual’s consent, to re21 ceive the visitors whom the individual des22 ignates, including a spouse, another family 

23 member, or a friend, and the individual’s right 

24 to withdraw or deny such consent at any time; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 219 IH

1 ‘‘(C) may not restrict, limit, or otherwise 

2 deny visitation privileges on the basis of race, 

3 color, national origin, religion, sex, or disability; 

4 and 

5 ‘‘(D) ensure that all visitors enjoy full and 

6 equal visitation privileges consistent with this 

7 paragraph; and’’; and 

8 (D) in the matter following paragraph 

9 (10), as redesignated, by striking ‘‘paragraph 

10 (9)’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘para11 graph (10)’’ in each such place; and 

12 (2) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘(9)’’ and in13 serting ‘‘(10)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES****Exhibit 12**Coca-Cola Bottling Co. ConsolidatedEarnings to Fixed Charges(In Thousands, Except Ratios)                   **Second Quarter**  **First Half**   **2007**  **2006**  **2007**  **2006** Computation of Earnings                Income before income taxes $19,031  $15,245  $26,681  $16,619 Add:                Minority interest  1,169   1,149   1,850   1,705 Interest expense  12,372   12,180   24,507   23,735 Amortization of debtpremium/discount and expenses  644   663   1,412   1,328 Interest portion of rent expense  371   296   676   588              Earnings as adjusted $33,587  $29,533  $55,126  $43,975                               Computation of Fixed Charges:                Interest expense $12,372  $12,180  $24,507  $23,735 Capitalized interest  24   82   297   145 Amortization of debt premium/discount and expenses  644   663   1,412   1,328 Interest portion of rent expense  371   296   676   588              Fixed charges $13,411  $13,221  $26,892  $25,796                               Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  2.50   2.23   2.05   1.70
Exhibit 31.2

              CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Reitz, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Whole Living,
Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

       (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

       (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

       (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

       (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

       (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                              /s/ Robert Reitz
Date: April 6, 2006           ___________________________________
                              Robert Reitz
                              Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          32,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  225,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,168
<INVENTORY>                                    207,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               472,960
<PP&E>                                         452,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                 272,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 752,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          193,773
<BONDS>                                         38,962
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,027
<OTHER-SE>                                     490,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   752,583
<SALES>                                        476,231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               476,231
<CGS>                                          322,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  322,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                99,995
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   559
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,710
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,029
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,067
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF LINDA BRYSON


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     In connection with the Periodic Report of Triad Industries, Inc.,(the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Linda Bryson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: November 12, 2005                             By: /s/ Linda Bryson
                                                       -------------------
                                                        Linda Bryson
                                                        President
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, PAUL J. EVANSON, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of MONONGAHELA POWER
COMPANY.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: September 24, 2003                           /s/ Paul J. Evanson
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Paul J. Evanson
                                                   Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul van der Wansem, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BTU International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and 15d-15e) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 17, 2004

                           /s/ Paul van der Wansem
                           -----------------------
                           Paul van der Wansem
          President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOSEPH MCCORMICK,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00073-CR

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas 

(TC# 17-01-08135-CRR)

O R D E R

The Court received and filed the supplemental reporter’s record as requested in its order 

issued November 29, 2018. The appeal is therefore reinstated, and the Appellant’s brief is now 

due January 30, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 31

st day of December, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
COMPANY'S 3RD QUARTER 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          15,190
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,295
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,064
<INVENTORY>                                     28,216
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,166
<PP&E>                                          28,737
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,092
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 122,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,653
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   122,379
<SALES>                                         97,209
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,153
<CGS>                                           55,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (240)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,981
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,489
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 4975** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.

RODNEY T. HOFFMAN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Beckley

. Irene C. Berger , District Judge. ( 5:09

- cr - 00216

- 1 )

Submitted : February 10, 2011 Decided: March 18 , 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. R. Booth Goodwin, II, United States Attorney, Perry D. McDaniel, Special Assi stant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rodney T. Hoffman pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to one count of storage of hazardous waste wi thout a permit, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 6928(d)(2)(A) (2006). On appeal, he challenges the district court’s denial of his request for a downward departure under Application Notes 7 and 8 to the Commentary for U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2Q1.2 (2009)

. We dismiss the appeal. This court does not have jurisdiction to review the denial of a downward departure so long as the district court recognized the authority to depart. See United States v. Bayerle , 898 F.2d 28, 30

- 31 (4th Cir. 1990). “Be cause the district court’s refusal to depart downward followed its conclusion that the evidence did not support a departure, its ruling on this issue is not reviewable on appeal.” United States v. Quinn , 359 F.3d 666, 682 (4th Cir. 2004).

Because we c onclude that the district court recognized the authority to depart and found that the evidence did not support a departure, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mater ials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### In the Matter of Gold, Stewart, Kravitz, Benes, LLP, Respondent, v Janice A. Crippen, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 457]—

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm an arbitration award, Janice A. Crippen appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered June 7, 2011, which, upon an order of the same court dated April 13, 2011, granting the petition and confirming the arbitration award, is in favor of the petitioner and against her in the principal sum of $13,986.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

As a general rule, this Court does not consider an issue on a subsequent appeal which was raised or could have been raised on an earlier appeal that was dismissed for lack of prosecution, although the Court has the inherent jurisdiction to do so *(see Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.,*93 NY2d 750 [1999]; *Bray v Cox,*38 NY2d 350 [1976]). Here, Janice A. Crippen appealed from an order dated April 13, 2011, which granted a petition to confirm an arbitration award. On June 7, 2011, a judgment was subsequently entered against Crippen in the principal sum of $13,986, from which she now appeals. Thereafter, Crippen’s appeal from the order dated April 13, 2011, was dismissed by this Court for failure to prosecute. While Crippen ordinarily would be precluded from relitigating the issues which could have been raised on the prior appeal *(see Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co.,*93 NY2d 750 [1999]; *Bray v Cox,*38 NY2d 350 [1976]), under the circumstances of this case, we exercise our discretion to determine those issues on the instant appeal *(see Ravina v Hsing Hsung Chuang,*95 AD3d 1288, 1288-1289 [2012]; *Khaimova v City of New York,*95 AD3d 1280, 1281 [2012]; *Kitt v Podlofsky,*72 AD3d 1030, 1031 [2010]; *Maksuta v Galiatsatos,*62 AD3d 841, 842 [2009]).

*920The Supreme Court properly granted the petition to confirm the arbitration award at issue here. Crippen failed to timely commence an action for de novo review of the merits of the parties’ legal fee dispute following arbitration *(see*22 NYCRR 137.8). Contrary to her contention, the 30-day period in which a party aggrieved by an arbitration award in a legal fee dispute may commence an action for de novo review of that award is absolute and, thus, the Supreme Court did not have discretion to excuse her late commencement of an action for de novo review *(see*22 NYCRR 137.8; *Pruzan v*Levine, 18 Misc 3d 70, 73 [App Term, 2d Dept 2007]; *cf. Chase v Scalici,*97 AD2d 25, 27-29 [1983]).

We decline the petitioner’s request to impose sanctions against Crippen and her counsel in connection with this appeal *(see generally*22 NYCRR 130-1.1). Dillon, J.E, Dickerson, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.