alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                       953
<INVENTORY>                                     26,848
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                84,161
<PP&E>                                          25,593
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,477
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           132
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,655
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,264
<SALES>                                         28,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,314
<CGS>                                           16,634
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,571
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (270)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,077
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,301
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit No. 99.1
Form 10-KSB
Viral Geneitcs, Inc.
File No. 000-26875

    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Viral  Genetics,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Haig  Keledjian,  Chief  Executive and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 30, 2003                 By:  /s/ Haig Keledjian
                                          Haig Keledjian
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Viral Genetics, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







                                     E-11
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DONALD M YEAGER,

Petitioner

v.

BEAVER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON 

PLEAS,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 92 WM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2020, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED, 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Petitioner to file a subsequent motion for credit for time served 

in the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County. It is further noted that the representation 

provided by Attorney Edward A. Knafelc, Petitioner’s guilty plea counsel, may have 

ceased as of May 2018. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 120(a)(4) (in defining the duration of an 

attorney’s representation of a criminal defendant, indicating that the attorney’s 

appointment continues through direct appeal); Commonwealth v. Olson, 218 A.3d 863 

(Pa. 2019) (stating that, when a criminal defendant does not pursue an appeal from his 

or her judgment of sentence, that judgment becomes final 30 days following its entry).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to serve this order on the President Judge of the 

Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 12234 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:10

- cv - 00252

- CAR

ABDUL RASHID ISAAC, Petitioner

- Appellant,

versus WARDEN, ATTORN EY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA, Respondents

- Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________ (March 19, 2015) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge , TJOFLAT and WILSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Case: 14-12234 Date Filed: 03/19/2015 Page: 1 of 32 Abdul Rashid Isaac, a Georgia prisoner proceeding pro se , appeals the district co urt’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief from his convictions for armed robbery, kidnapping with bodily injury, and kidnapping , which resulted in a life sentence

. We granted a certificate of appealability on the issue of whether the district court failed to comply with our decision in Clisby v.
Jones , 960 F.3d 925, 936 (11th Cir. 1992) ( en banc ) , when it did not address
Isaac’s due process claim based on Garza v. State , 670 S.E.2d 73 (Ga. 2 008)

. Isaac
argue d in the district court that , under the rule announced in Garza , the state trial
court’s failure to correctly instruct the jury on the kidna pping statute viola ted his due process rights , including the right to “fair warning that his specific contemplated conduct is forbidden , ” depriving him of a fair trial. See Garza , 670 S.E.2d at 76 (alteration and quotation marks omitted). The district court did not address that argument. Clisby requires that a district court resolve all claims for relief raised in a § 2254 petition, regardless of whether it grants or denies habeas relief. 960 F.2d at 936. Isaac therefore contends ( and the state agrees ) tha t the district court committed Clisby error when it dismissed his § 2254 petition without resolving that Garza claim

. He is correct. When a district court fails to address all of the claims in a habeas petition, we “will vacate the district court’s judgment without prejudice and remand the case for consideration of all remaining claims.” Clisby ,

Case: 14-12234 Date Filed: 03/19/2015 Page: 2 of 33 960 F.2d at 938. W e therefore vacate and remand for fur ther proceedings to include the consideration of Isaac’s Garza cl aim

. VACATED AND REMANDED. Case: 14-12234 Date Filed: 03/19/2015 Page: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sycamore
Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard J. Gaynor, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                   
|/S/    RICHARD J. GAYNOR                                           
|Richard J. Gaynor                                                  
|Chief Financial Officer, Vice President Finance and Administration,
|Assistant Secretary and Treasurer                                  
|September 26, 2007
Order entered November 23, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00612

- CV
WEIR BROTHERS CONTRACTING, LLC , Appellant

V.

TRI

- STAR CONSTRUCTION, INC., ET AL. , Appe llee s
On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 02648

O RDER
Before the Court are appellant’s November 18, 2022 motion to dismiss the appeal and November 22, 2022 motion to withdraw the dismissal mo tion and for
an extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the November 22 motion as
follows. We withdraw the November 18 dismissal motion. We extend the deadline for appellant’s opening brief to January 3, 2023

. 1
/s/ BONNIE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE

1 Ap pellant requested an extension to January 2, 2023. The Court will be closed on January 2 in observance of New Year’s Day.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 20, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 20, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24A1481. SAFEBUILT GEORGIA, INC. AS INDEMNITOR FOR THE CITY OF MILTON v. JEFFREY S. LEEPER et al .
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Yearly Report of AVVAA World Health Care Products, Inc.(the "Company") on Amendment No. 2 to Form 10-KSB forthe year ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, CharlesAustin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 
 

(2)  

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

 
 
material respect, the financial condition and result of operations of

 
the Company.

 
 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

/s/ *Charles Austin*

Name:  

Charles Austin

 
Title:  

Chief Financial Officer

 

Date:  

October 26, 2005

 

  |
RWT EX.10.1 Q2 2015 Marty6thAmendmenttoAREmploymentAgreementAug2015


EXHIBIT 10.1




SIXTH AMENDMENT TO 
AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
THIS SIXTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), is entered into as of the 5th day of August 2015 (the “Effective Date”) by and between MARTIN S. HUGHES (the “Executive”) and REDWOOD TRUST, INC., a Maryland Corporation (the “Company”). 
WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company have entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of March 31, 2009 (as subsequently amended as of March 17, 2010, February 24, 2011, May 17, 2012, December 14, 2012, and August 6, 2014, the “Employment Agreement”); and 
WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company desire to enter into this Agreement for purposes of amending the Employment Agreement as set forth herein; 
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy which is hereby acknowledged, the Executive and the Company hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows effective upon the Effective Date: 
(1) Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended, effective as of January 1, 2015, to replace the base salary amount of “$725,000” specified therein with “$750,000”.  
Except as hereby specifically amended or modified, the terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Agreement, shall remain in full force and effect. This Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in two counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of California (without regard to conflict of law principles). 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officer, and the Executive has executed this Agreement, as of the date first above written. 
 
	
							
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	REDWOOD TRUST, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	By:
	 
	/s/ Andrew Stone

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Name: Andrew Stone

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	Title: General Counsel & Secretary

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	MARTIN S. HUGHES

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	/s/ Martin S. Hughes
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              OF SWISS MEDICA, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350




Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned
officer of Swiss  Medica,  Inc. (the  "Company")  does hereby  certify,  to such
officer's knowledge, that:

      (c)   The quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
            2006 of the Company fully complies with the  requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (d)   Information  contained in the Form 10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  May 13, 2006


/s/  Bruce Fairbairn
-------------------------------
Bruce Fairbairn,
Chief Financial Officer
Order entered November 23, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00612-CV

WEIR BROTHERS CONTRACTING, LLC, Appellant

V.

TRI-STAR CONSTRUCTION, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-02648

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s November 18, 2022 motion to dismiss the 

appeal and November 22, 2022 motion to withdraw the dismissal motion and for 

an extension of time to file its brief. We GRANT the November 22 motion as 

follows. We withdraw the November 18 dismissal motion. We extend the 

deadline for appellant’s opening brief to January 3, 2023.

1

/s/ BONNIE GOLDSTEIN

JUSTICE

1 Appellant requested an extension to January 2, 2023. The Court will be closed on January 2 in 

observance of New Year’s Day.
second trial when an appellant court reverses a conviction due to an error 

in the proceedings that led to the conviction. Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 

33, 38 (1988); United States v. Tateo, 377 U.S. 463, 465 (1964); United 

States v. Ball, 163 U.S. 662, 671-72 (1896). 

Our order resolving petitioner's direct appeal concluded that 

the murder conviction must be reversed due to a trial error: The jury was 

erroneously instructed on one of the State's theories of criminal liability 

and therefore the jury's general verdict could not stand. Daniels v. State, 

Docket No. 44071 (Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part, and 

Remanding, November 29, 2006). Because our order did not expressly or 

implicitly acquit petitioner of the murder charge, the district court did not 

manifestly abuse its discretion, exercise its discretion in an arbitrary or 

capricious manner, or act without or in excess of its jurisdiction by 

denying petitioner's motion to dismiss the criminal information. See NRS 

34.160; NRS 34.320; International Game Tech. v. Dist. Ct., 122 Nev. 132, 

142, 127 P.3d 1088, 1096 (2006); see also Glover v. Dist. Ct., 125 Nev. 691, 

701, 220 P.3d 684, 692 (2009) (a writ of prohibition will issue to preclude a 

retrial that would violate the Double Jeopardy Clause). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

Gibbons 

Saitta 

'In light of this order, we deny Daniels' motion for a stay of the 

proceedings. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
3 

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge 

Gabriel L. Grasso, P.C. 

Oronoz & Ericsson 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                      5

<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Partnership's unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Sep-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                    447
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                              11
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          458
<PP&E>                                  5,038
<DEPRECIATION>                          1,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,724
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,335
<BONDS>                                   819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              1,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            3,724
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          388
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (578)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (578)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            (578)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (26.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (26.57)




</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1789. JEFFREY T. POWELL v. THE STATE.

In 2009, Jeffrey Powell pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to

distribute methamphetamine, and the trial court imposed a 15-year sentence. The

record contains no indication that Powell filed a direct appeal from his judgment of

conviction. In 2019, Powell filed several motions challenging the constitutionality

of his sentence. The trial court denied Powell’s motions in an order entered on May

30, 2019, and Powell filed this notice of appeal on March 13, 2020.

1 We lack

jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial

court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing

of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer appellate jurisdiction on this

Court. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). Powell’s

notice of appeal was untimely filed 288 days after entry of the May 30, 2019 order. 

1 Powell’s notice of appeal does not identify the trial court order he seeks to

appeal. The May 30, 2019 order was the last trial court order entered in this case

before Powell filed his notice of appeal. After Powell filed his notice of appeal, he

filed a “Motion for Statute Clarification,” which the trial court denied on April 2,

2020. We do not construe Powell’s notice of appeal as seeking review of the April

2 order because that order disposed of a motion that had not yet been filed when

Powell filed his notice of appeal.

May 11, 2020
Consequently, we lack jurisdiction over this untimely appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/11/2020