alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of BTU
International, Inc. (the "Company"), does hereby certify that to his knowledge:

         3)       the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
                  period ended September 29, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies
                  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         4)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                    /s/ Thomas P. Kealy
                                    ---------------------------------------
                                    Thomas P. Kealy
                                    Vice President, Corporate Controller
                                    and Chief Accounting Officer (principal
                                    financial and accounting officer)


Dated:  November 13, 2002
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50681 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JUAN RODRIGUEZ-VASQUEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-259-ALL
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juan Rodriguez-Vasquez appeals his conviction and 84-month sentence for aiding and abetting the importation of cocaine and aiding and abetting the possession ofcocaine with intent to distribute. Rodriguez-Vasquez argues that our pattern jury instruction on the defense of duress places a constitutionally impermissible burden on the defendant, and he asserts that the instruction violates principles ofequal protection because other circuits require a defendant raising a defense of duress to make a less onerous showing. He contends that United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 2, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50681

2 his sentence is excessive because the district court erroneously determined that hewas not entitled toa reduction in offense level for acceptanceofresponsibility. Rodriguez-Vasquez’schallenge tothe burden ofproofrequired toestablish the defense of duress is foreclosed by U nited States v. Dixon, 126 S. Ct. 2437, 2442-48 (2006). His contention that our pattern instruction on duress violates principles of equal protection fails because he does not suggest that the challenged instruction has a discriminatory purpo se. See United States v. Chavez, 281 F.3d 479, 486-87 (5th Cir. 2002). We affirm the sentencing court’s determination that Rodriguez-Vasquez was not entitled toa reduction in offense level for acceptance of responsibility. United States v. Solis, 299 F.3d 420, 458 (5th Cir. 2002). AFFIRMED.
11970.

#### Foy *v.*The State.

Decided January 25, 1921.

Accusation of larceny from house; from city court of Statesboro — Judge Proctor. October 21, 1920.

*Anderson & Jones, Deal Benfroe,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. M.*Jones, *solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

1. “ The evidence in support of the defense of alibi was not of such clear and strong probative value as to require a charge upon the law of alibi, especially in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request therefor. ” *Throckmorton*v. *State,*23 *Ga. App.*112 (3) (97 S. E. 664); *Gadlin*v. *State,*13 *Ga. App.*660 (79 S. E. 751).

2! The evidence was sufficient to authorize a finding that it excluded every *reasonable*hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., eonour.*
Exhibit 10.3


 




FIRST AMENDMENT TO COLLABORATION AGREEMENT







This First Amendment (“Amendment”) to Collaboration Agreement dated as of October 10, 2014 (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of August 4, 2015 (the "Amendment Date") by and between DISCOVERY LABORATORIES, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware having its principal place of business at 2600 Kelly Road, Suite 100, Warrington, PA 18976 USA ("Discovery Labs”), and BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE, through its Corporate Operations, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Ohio having its principal place of business at 505 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43201-2693, USA ("Battelle”).







RECITALS:







WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, Battelle and Discovery Labs have recently concluded Stage I Work pursuant to the Project Plan and have agreed on the detailed Project Plan for implementation of the Stage 2 and Stage 3 activities contemplated by the Agreement, together with related costs, which shall be shared as provided in Section 3(B) of the Agreement.







NOW THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE COVENANTS AND PROMISES CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS WITH THE INTENT TO BE LEGALLY BOUND HEREBY:








		1.	Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms as set forth in the Agreement.











		2.	In accordance with Section 3(B)(i) of the Agreement, the Project Plan Fixed Cost is revised to equal to an amount between (a) Eleven Million Dollars ($11.0M) and (b) up to Eleven Million, Eight Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($11.85M); and, accordingly, the Discovery Labs Fixed Fee as of the Amendment Date remains 50% of the Project Plan Fixed Cost, or an amount  between (a) Five Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($5.5M) and (b) up to (b) Five Million, Nine Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($5.925M) (in each case, representing 50% of the revised Project Plan Fixed Cost).











		3.	The reference to "May 31, 2016" in the defined term "Milestone Date" set forth in the first sentence of Section 3(E)(ii) of the Agreement is revised to "July 15, 2016."










Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment confirms an agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and is a material part of the consideration stated in the Agreement and the mutual promises made in connection therewith.  The provisions of Section 9(H) - (K) of the Agreement shall apply to this Amendment mutatis mutandi.







[Signatures appear on the next page]


 









2




In Witness Whereof, the Parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Date.







	
Battelle Memorial Institute


	
Corporate Operations

	 	
Discovery Laboratories, Inc.


	 	 	 	 	 
	
By:

	                      	 	
By:

	                     
	
Name: 

	                       	 	
Name: 

	                     
	
Title:

	                    	 	
Title:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6849
BILLY JAMES SIMS, a/k/a Rico, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARVIN BROWN, former narcotics lieutenant "on behalf of" Rock Hill law center, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-96-3650-3-19BC) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 17, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy James Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Donna Seegars Givens, WOODS & GIVENS, L.L.P., Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sims v. Brown , No. CA-96-3650-3-19BC (D.S.C. May 30, 1997). Additionally, we deny Appellant’s motion to supplement the record on appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             35,247
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       9,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   44,464
<PP&E>                                            356,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                    205,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    195,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              95,696
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           40,542
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                         1,340
<OTHER-SE>                                         58,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      195,653
<SALES>                                            45,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   46,184
<CGS>                                              24,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      24,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  1,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (41,814)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (41,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (41,814)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (   .01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (   .01)
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alexander Screahben, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 52]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Troy K. Webber, J., on motion; Richard Lee Price, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered December 10, 2004, convicting defendant of two counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two consecutive terms of 12V2 years concurrent with two concurrent terms of one year, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility.

The motion court properly granted the People’s motion to consolidate the three indictments. The court properly permitted consolidation on the ground of overlapping evidence, pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (b). In all three knifepoint robberies, committed within a three-week period, defendant and one or two accomplices accosted lone young men on the same subway platform at the same time of night. While not identical, these highly similar incidents involved a sufficiently unique modus operandi so that the evidence of each was admissible as to the others (see *People v Beam,*57 NY2d 241, 250-253 [1982]).

The court also correctly determined that the robberies were properly joined as legally similar pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (c), and that defendant failed to make a sufficient showing for a discretionary severance pursuant to CPL 200.20 (3). There was no material variance in the quantity of proof, the evidence was easily segregable in the minds of the jurors, and defendant failed to make a convincing showing that he had important testimony to. give concerning some counts and a strong need to refrain from testifying as to others *(see People v Lane,*56 NY2d 1, 8-9 [1982]; *People v Streitferdt,*169 AD2d 171, 176 [1991], *lv denied*78 NY2d 1015 [1991]; *People v Ndeye,*159 AD2d 397 [1990], *lv denied*76 NY2d 793 [1990]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000

       

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                              31,295
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       201,237
<ALLOWANCES>                        3,648
<INVENTORY>                         166,609
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    401,984
<PP&E>                              334,088
<DEPRECIATION>                      201,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      631,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               117,382
<BONDS>                             40,423
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            685
<OTHER-SE>                          455,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        631,229
<SALES>                             766,007
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    766,007
<CGS>                               445,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       445,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    169,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    806
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  5,183
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     146,566
<INCOME-TAX>                        52,764
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 93,802
<DISCONTINUED>                      3,405
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        90,397
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.99
<FN>
This financial data schedule has been restated in accordance with SFAS No. 128
(Earnings Per Share).
</FN>


        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2018 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Office of the National 

Coordinator for Health Information Technology for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the 

Secretary, Office of the National Coordinator for Health 

Information Technology for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2018 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, OFFICE OF 

4 THE NATIONAL COORDINATOR FOR HEALTH 

5 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Of10 fice of the Secretary, Office of the National Coordinator 

11 for Health Information Technology for fiscal year 2024 

12 may not exceed $60,367,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofTellabs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Timothy J. Wiggins, the Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| *** /s/ Timothy J. Wiggins*** | * * |
|------------------------------------|----------|
|  Timothy J. Wiggins           |
|  Chief Financial  Officer     |
|  Date: November 8,  2005      |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

23

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION
of the Chief Executive Officer

I, Richard H. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of Prima Energy Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date herein (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                 

|                                      |  | 
|------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Richard H. Lewis                  |  | 
|                                      |  | 
|Richard H. Lewis                      |  | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|August 12, 2003                       |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Prima Energy Corporation and
will be retained by Prima Energy Corporation and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2118 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2118

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
 Agencies, General Services Administration, Civilian Board of Contract 
                     Appeals for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
 Agencies, General Services Administration, Civilian Board of Contract 
                     Appeals for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, CIVILIAN BOARD 
              OF CONTRACT APPEALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
General Services Administration, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals for 
fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $9,301,000.
                                 <all>
```
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1019 

CA 13-01922 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF ATLAS HENRIETTA, LLC, ATLAS 

INCOME HOUSING, INC. AND ATLAS CORNHILL, INC., 

PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, 

V ORDER

TOWN OF HENRIETTA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AND 

TOWN OF HENRIETTA, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN, LLP, ROCHESTER (REUBEN ORTENBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

DANIEL J. MASTRELLA, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTSRESPONDENTS.

 

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court,

Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered April 9, 2013 in a CPLR

article 78 proceeding and a declaratory judgment action. The

judgment, among other things, denied the first, second and fourth

causes of action and dismissed the third cause of action. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit  32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Mason Hill Holdings,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for  the  quarter  ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned  Geoffrey Eiten, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of  Mason  Hill  Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  April  7,  2004

                                      /s/Geoffrey  Eiten
                                      Chief  Executive  Officer

                                      /s/Geoffrey  Eiten
                                      Chief  Financial  Officer