alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 226 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a pilot program 

to promote and encourage collaboration between the Department of Veterans Affairs and nonprofit organizations and institutions of higher learning that provide administrative assistance to veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2023 

Mr. WITTMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out 

a pilot program to promote and encourage collaboration 

between the Department of Veterans Affairs and nonprofit organizations and institutions of higher learning 

that provide administrative assistance to veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Collaboration 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 226 IH

1 SEC. 2. PILOT PROGRAM ON COLLABORATION WITH NON2 PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

4 shall carry out a two-year pilot program to promote and 

5 encourage collaboration between the Department of Vet6 erans Affairs and nonprofit organizations and institutions 

7 of higher learning. In carrying out the pilot program, the 

8 Secretary shall emphasize collaboration with— 

9 (1) veterans service organizations that provide 

10 personnel with appropriate credentials to assist vet11 erans in filing claims and appeals with the Depart12 ment for disability compensation; and 

13 (2) educational institutions that provide pro 

14 bono legal assistance to veterans. 

15 (b) METRICS.—The Secretary shall establish metrics 

16 to determine which organizations and institutions provide 

17 the best service to veterans and seek to encourage such 

18 organizations and institutions to participate in the pilot 

19 program. 

20 (c) LOCATION.—The Secretary shall carry out the 

21 pilot program in States with the highest veteran popu22 lations, as determined by the Secretary. 

23 (d) USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA.—In carrying out the 

24 pilot program, the Secretary shall use social media to pro25 mote the collaboration efforts carried out under the pilot 

26 program and to notify veterans of such collaborations. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 226 IH

1 Quarterly reports will be provided to members of the Vet2 erans’ Affairs Committee that document the reach of the 

3 social media efforts and the number of veterans who use 

4 the program. 

5 (e) REPORTS.—Not later than 30 days after the end 

6 of a fiscal quarter, the Secretary shall submit to the Com7 mittees on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the House 

8 of Representatives a report on the pilot program, including 

9 the use of social media under subsection (d) and the num10 ber of veterans who receive administrative assistance from 

11 organizations and institutions through the program. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2026 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 

Education, Student Financial Assistance for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Education, Student Financial Assistance for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, STUDENT FI5 NANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:12 Apr 15, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2026.IH H2026

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2026 IH

1 able for Department of Education, Student Financial As2 sistance for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,071,970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,552,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                   199,222
<INVENTORY>                                  4,144,519
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,505,815
<PP&E>                                      95,519,240
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,698,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              83,615,112
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,312,076
<BONDS>                                     20,157,718
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,641,062
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,280,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                83,615,112
<SALES>                                     22,776,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,776,074
<CGS>                                       21,080,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,080,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               515,505
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               124,222
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             455,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                830,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                   307,328
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            523,290
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   523,290
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2040 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2040

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
 Agencies, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
 Agencies, Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RELATED AGENCIES, 
              FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Related Agencies, Federal 
Mine Safety and Health Review Commission for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $17,184,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Scott C. Weaver, Appellant.

Submitted February 17, 2009;

decided February 19, 2009

Motion by National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al. for leave to file a brief amici curiae on the appeal herein granted and the proposed brief is accepted as filed.
null

2011-01-06

582.35706

eng - Argued: 2011-01-06. Docket number: 5-09-0615
! " #$%&'

#()*+**+)*	)$*$#	*

,


----------"----------

#

".
















$"
(/

#(/


01 .
/


!
 ".

1 .
/

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

#2. ,


 ,

,
3 
 !"" ,
  
#$

%&'
 ,

..2".
.2"
4"
 
0
"


,,"

" 4"
5 
064

07

.


46,
#

"

$..""2 " #$

%88 9,"

" ,.9: ,
206"
.
"
,#;%3


,
"

""
,#$%&''&9,

<
,,
6
22040
9

IT IS ORDERED,,
."/

+()+ ;	(*+,


="2
 "06.2"
"


.2".
(as reflected in 

the last judgment issued)  .,"is reduced to 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

+<
2",
7"
2
9002"",
> .

 ",00
.



IT IS SO ORDERED



/

Judge’s signature

+


/

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

JESSE ANDRE HEARD 12-000068-001

16600-043

02/21/2013

Pro Se

✔

✔

12/01/2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 Application of Amendment 782 would result in a new total offense level of 34, with a criminal history category of IV, and

a revised guideline range of 240 (statutory mandatory minimum) to 262 months. Although the defendants guideline

range would subsequently be lowered by application of the amendment, at the time of sentencing, Heard received a

sentence (240 months) which fell outside of the advisory guideline range. Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A), and

Application Note 3, the Court may grant a comparable reduction outside of the guideline range only if the defendant

provided substantial assistance to authorities. As the defendant's reduction was granted pursuant to 3553(a)(1), a

comparable reduction is not permitted. Therefore, the defendant would not benefit from a recalculation of the guidelines.

Callie V.S. Granade U.S. 

District Judge

Digitally signed by Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge 

DN: cn=Callie V.S. Granade U.S. District Judge, o=U.S. Government, 

ou=Federal Judiciary, email=efile_granade@alsd.uscourts.gov, 

c=US 

Date: 2014.12.01 16:08:40 -06'00'

Case 1:12-cr-00068-CG-B Document 467 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30835 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AMOS J. CONDE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 92-CR-451

- - - - - - - - - -

February 24, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Amos J. Conde, Jr., federal prisoner # 23213-034, appeals

the district court’s denial of his motion for modification of the

imposed term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Conde

argues that his offense level should be reduced two levels under

Amendment 515 to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, his fine exceeds his ability

to pay, and he should receive credit for time that he spent under

house arrest prior to sentencing. Because Amendment 515 is not

listed as retroactive in § 1B1.10(c) of the Guidelines, Conde’s 
No. 96-30835

- 2 -

claim concerning Amendment 515 is not cognizable under

§ 3582(c)(2). See United States v. Miller, 903 F.2d 341, 349

(5th Cir. 1990). There is no authority to modify Conde’s fine or

to credit him with time spent under house arrest under 

§ 3582(c). See United States v. Lopez, 26 F.3d 512, 515 (5th

Cir. 1994).

Conde’s appeal is without arguable merit and is thus

frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. Conde is cautioned that any future frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. Conde is cautioned further to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
N O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### NO. CAAP-19-0000582

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
O F THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
VICKRAM JAISINGANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE ALA WAI PLAZA SKYRISE CONDOMINIUM, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ASSOCIATION O F APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE ALA WAI PLAZA SKYRISE CONDOMINIUM;

AARON M. CHANEY, INC.; LUM YIP KEE, LTD., Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants/Cross-Claim Plaintiffs/ Appellees, and TERRI MORRISSETTEE; Defendant/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee, and MALIA, LTD., Defendant/Cross-Claim Plaintiff/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee, and BUSINESS INVESTMENT, LTD.; DANIEL, MANN, JOHNSON & MENDENHALL; HAWAII DREDGING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-20; MARY DOES 1-20; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-20; AND DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20, Defendants ( CIVIL NO. 78341)
AND VICKRAM JAISINGANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THOMAS CARNEY, Defendant-Appellee

(CIVIL NO. 85-3896)
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Chan and Hiraoka, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that we lackjurisdiction over this appeal by self-represented PlaintiffAppellant Vickram Jaisingane ( Jaisingane ). Jaisingane purports to appeal from Jaisingane v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Ala Wai Plaza Skyrise, Civil No. 78341, Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai # i. The Hawai # i Supreme Court affirmed the Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-19-0000582 21-JUL-2020 09:47 AMN O T F O RP U B L IC A T IO NIN W E S T ' S H AWA I # I RE P O R T S A N D P A C IF IC RE P O R T E R



### disposition of Civil No. 78341 by a memorandum opinion filed in supreme court case No. 12314 on April 4, 1988. We lack appellate jurisdiction. See Hawaii Revised Statutes ( HRS ) § 641-1(a); Hawai # i Rules of Appellate Procedure ( HRAP ) Rule 4(a)(1) .

Jaisingane also purports to appeal from Jaisingane v. Carney, Civil No. 85-3896, Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawai # i. Civil No. 85-3896 was dismissed by stipulation on November 4, 1988, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(b) of the Hawai # i Rules of Civil Procedure. We lack appellate jurisdiction. See HRS § 641-1(a); HRAP Rule 4(a)(1).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that case number CAAP-19-0000582 is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, July 21, 2020. /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge /s/ Keith H. Hiraoka Associate Judge

2
EXHIBIT 32


<PAGE>




                                  CERTIFICATION

     In connection  with the Annual Report of Biocurex,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K/A for the year ending  December 31, 2010 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  Dr.  Ricardo  Moro,  the  Principal
Executive  Officer  and Gladys  Chan,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that to the  best  of  their
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:   July 3, 2012                By:/s/ Ricardo Moro
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Dr. Ricardo Moro - Principal Executive
                                                          Officer

Date:   July 3, 2012                By:/s/ Gladys Chan
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Gladys Chan - Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>
FILED

January 26, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

APRIL 1997 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) C.C.A. No. 03C01-9612-CR-00454

)

Appellant, ) KNOX COUNTY

)

VS. ) HON. RICHARD BAUMGARTNER,

) JUDGE

JAMES DAVID SHROPSHIRE, ) (Assault,Aggravated Sexual Battery)

) 

Appellee. )

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

JOHN KNOX WALKUP KENNETH F. IRVINE, JR.

Attorney General and Reporter 550 Main Avenue

Chattanooga, TN 37402 NationsBank Center

 Suite 775

MICHAEL J. FAHEY, II Knoxville, TN 37901 

Assistant Attorney General 

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

RANDALL E. NICHOLS

District Attorney General

WILLIAM H. CRABTREE

CHARME JOHNSON

Assistant District Attorney General

City-County Building

Knoxville, TN 37902

OPINION FILED: 

REVERSED AND REMANDED

CHRIS CRAFT, 

SPECIAL JUDGE
2

O P I N I O N

The State of Tennessee appeals from the decision of the trial judge

dismissing convictions for assault and aggravated sexual battery due to insufficiency

of the presentment. We reverse, reinstate the convictions and remand for further

proceedings. 

Appellee, James David Shropshire, was tried in September, 1995 on a three

count presentment for Rape of a Child (Count I) and Aggravated Sexual Battery

(Counts II and III). He was acquitted of Count II and the jury deadlocked on Counts

I and III. Upon retrial in March 1996, Mr. Shropshire was convicted of assault as

included in Count I and Aggravated Sexual Battery as charged in Count III. Prior to a

hearing on the Motion for New Trial, the trial judge dismissed the convictions due to

the release of State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-CC-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App.,

Nashville, June 20, 1996), because the presentment failed to allege a culpable mental

state, an essential element of each offense. The Tennessee Supreme Court has since

reversed the holding of the Court of Criminal Appeals in Hill, holding instead that the

required mental state may be inferred from the nature of the criminal conduct alleged,

and does not have to be alleged in the charging instrument. State v. Roger Dale Hill,

No. 01-S-01-9701-CC-00005 (Jackson, November 3, 1997). 

Having examined Counts I and III and found them sufficient to provide adequate

notice to both the defendant and the trial court of each offenses alleged, we therefore

find that the dismissal of the presentment was not proper, reinstate the convictions,

and remand to the trial court for a hearing on the Motion for New Trial and any further

required proceedings.

The judgment of the trial court is REVERSED AND REMANDED.

 

CHRIS CRAFT, SPECIAL JUDGE
3

CONCUR:

 

JERRY L. SMITH, JUDGE

 

JOE RILEY, JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice Concerning Submissions Made During Federal Government 
Closures

    Take notice that the Commission is adopting the following practice 
with respect to submittals to the Commission during Federal government 
closures.
    Effective December 22, 2014, the Commission will not accept 
submittals--either in electronic format submitted through ``FERC 
Online'' (including through eFiling and eTariff) or in hardcopy 
format--when the Commission is closed at the direction of the Office of 
Personnel Management or Presidential Executive Order closing Federal 
government offices in Washington, DC.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ On December 6, 2014, President Barack Obama issued an 
Executive Order closing executive departments and agencies of the 
government on Friday, December 26, 2014. The above-described 
practice will be in effect that day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At such time as the Commission reopens, it will again accept 
submittals both in electronic format through ``FERC Online'' (including 
through eFiling and eTariff) and in hardcopy format.

    Dated: December 22, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30583 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., Respondent, v Northstar Agri Industries, LLC, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[963 NYS2d 117]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered January 7, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant-appellant Northstar

*550Agri Industries, LLC’s (Northstar) motion to dismiss plaintiff Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.’s (Oppenheimer) unjust enrichment claim pursuant to CPLR 3211, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Oppenheimer seeks to recover a finder’s fee for having introduced Northstar to an investment firm, PICO Holdings, Inc. (PICO), which ultimately invested in Northstar’s canola processing facility. Northstar contends that the claim is barred by the statute of frauds *(see*General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [10]).

The only agreement in the record to which Northstar had subscribed is the confidentiality & nondisclosure agreement (NDA), which it executed with Oppenheimer. The stated “Purpose” of the NDA was to “facilitate ongoing business dealings between [Northstar] and Oppenheimer associated with the development of a Canola Processing facility in Northwest Minnesota.” The agreement required that the parties keep “all information disclosed by one party to the other in any manner related to the Purpose” confidential. Such terms, “by reasonable implication,” evince Northstar’s employment of Oppenheimer to perform services related to the canola processing facility. Thus, Northstar’s obligation to provide reasonable compensation for the alleged services is implied *(see Morris Cohon & Co. v Russell,*23 NY2d 569, 575-576 [1969]; *Davis & Marnber v Adrienne Vittadini, Inc.,*212 AD2d 424 [1st Dept 1995]).

We note that, in addition to the NDA, the parties submitted an unsigned finder’s fee agreement that Oppenheimer had sent Northstar and accompanying emails referencing a prior “verbal agreement,” as well as Northstar’s pleadings and its CEO’s deposition testimony in related actions in North Dakota state court and New York federal court admitting that it had engaged Oppenheimer for its services, that it signed the NDA, and that Oppenheimer had introduced Northstar to PICO. The pleadings and testimony also acknowledge Northstar’s understanding and expectation that Oppenheimer would be compensated for its services pursuant to industry practice.

Northstar’s contention that it owes no finder’s fee because the transaction it ultimately entered into with PICO was not the one initially contemplated by parties is unavailing. The transaction still involves development of the canola processing facility, and “the change in the ‘set-up’ for the final transaction would not alone preclude recovery of a commission” *(Simon v Electrospace Corp.,*28 NY2d 136, 141 [1971]). Its contention that the NDA had terminated in April 2010, before the December 2010 Northstar/PICO transaction, was not properly *551raised before the motion court *(see Azzopardi v American Blower Corp.,*192 AD2d 453, 454 [1st Dept 1993]) and, in any event, is unavailing.

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam, Manzanet-Daniels and Clark, JJ.