alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David C. Warren, certify that: 

 

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of eMergeInteractive, Inc.; 

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, thisannual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 

 

3.   Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

 

4.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a.   designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b.   (paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986); 

 

c.   evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and 

 

d.   disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a.   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 STATMON
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 19
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geoffrey Talbot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  /s/ Geoffrey P.
Talbot
 Geoffrey
P. Talbot
 Chief
Executive Officer
 April
8, 2009
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________
No. 24

- 1466

___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Aaron Olson

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________

Submitted: September 12 , 2024 Filed: September 20, 2024 [ Unpublished ]

____________

Before KELLY

, GRASZ , and STRAS , Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

When Aaron Olson pleaded guilty to child

- pornography charges, see 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(5)(B), (b)(2), he expressly waived his right to receive a sentence
reduction

. See id. § 3582(c)(2). Several years later, the district court 1 raised the

1 The Honorable C.J. Williams, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.-2- issue on its own and denied relief. His counsel, who seeks to withdraw, suggests
that he was eligible for one

. Olson makes a similar point and challenges the waiver
itself in a pro se brief

.

We conclude that the plea agreement forecloses their argument s. See United
States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the validity of a waiver de novo); United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889 –90 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that defendants can waive additional statutory rights when they plead guilty if “each term of [the] agreement” is “entered into knowingly and voluntarily” ). The district court could not have erred by denying a right that Olson had already “intentional[ly] relinquish[ed].” United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 733 (1993) (citation omitted). W e accordingly dismiss the appeal and grant counsel permission
to withdraw

.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2358 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2358

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Contribution 
           to the Clean Technology Fund for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Contribution 
           to the Clean Technology Fund for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE 
              CLEAN TECHNOLOGY FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Contribution to the Clean 
Technology Fund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
906 SARBANES OXLEY CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SS.1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David Duquette, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March
      5, 2010
            
            /s/
      David DuquetteName:  David
      DuquetteTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Company and will be retained by Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Timothy J. Wiggins,the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1) |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and

          |
|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
| ***/s/ Timothy J. Wiggins*** |   |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Timothy J. Wiggins           |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer      |   |   |
| Date: May 9, 2006            |   |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

25

----
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 26, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. First Citizens Bancorp, Sandusky, Ohio; to acquire TCNB 
Financial Corp., Dayton, Ohio, and thereby indirectly acquire Citizens 
National Bank of Southwestern Ohio, Dayton, Ohio, which will merge with 
and into Citizens Banking Company, Sandusky, Ohio.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. BB&T Corporation, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting securities of Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire Susquehanna Bank, both in Lititz, 
Pennsylvania.
    C. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Citizens Bancorp Investment, Inc., Lafayette, Tennessee; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of TraCorp, Inc., Tullahoma, 
Tennessee.
    In connection with this application, Applicant has also applied to 
merge with TraCorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Traders Bank, 
both in Tullahoma, Tennessee.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 29, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-30785 Filed 1-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
{"status":1,"message":"","data":{"url":"\/image-captcha-generate\/462899346\/1709000175","token":"5jkJQu2Clk4ODvm8CLjUD81QSkzEPCtTmreIhnv9waA","sid":"462899346"}}
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF LINDA BRYSON


                        CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

      In connection with the Annual Report of Triad Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Linda Bryson, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 30,2005                    By: /s/ Linda Bryson
                                                       -----------------
                                                          Linda Bryson
                                                          President
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE PUBLIC COMPANY
ACCOUNTING REFORM AND INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C.  1350, AS ADOPTED)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted, the
"Sarbanes-Oxley Act"), Jerome K. Thorson, the Chief Executive Officer
of 3Si Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge:

1.
The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as
Exhibit 32.01 (the "Periodic Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at
the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic
Report.

Dated: November 13, 2004

/s/ Jerome K. Thorson

Jerome K. Thorson
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2345 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2345

  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilaterial 
  Economic Assistance, Department of State, US Emergency Refugee and 
            Migration Assistance Fund for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilaterial 
  Economic Assistance, Department of State, US Emergency Refugee and 
            Migration Assistance Fund for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR BILATERIAL ECONOMIC 
              ASSISTANCE, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, US EMERGENCY REFUGEE AND 
              MIGRATION ASSISTANCE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Bilaterial Economic 
Assistance, Department of State, US Emergency Refugee and Migration 
Assistance Fund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $100,000.
                                 <all>
```
## COURT OF APPEALS SECO ND DISTRICT OF T EXAS FORT WORTH
N O

. 2

- 0 9

- 2 5 4

- C V

I N T H E I N T E R E S T O F E

. J

. C

. , A C H I L D

- - - - - - - - - - F R O M T H E 2 3 1 D I S T R I C T C O U R T O F T A R R A N T C O U N T Y S T

- - - - - - - - - - - - 

### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 1 

### A N D J U D G M E N T

- - - - - - - - - - O n O c t o b e r 6 , 2 0 0 9 , w e n o t i f i e d a p p e l l a n t t h a t t h e t r i a l c o u r t c l e r k

r e s p o n s i b l e f o r p r e p a r i n g t h e r e c o r d i n t h i s a p p e a l h a d i n f o r m e d t h i s c o u r t t h a t

a r r a n g e m e n t s h a d n o t b e e n m a d e t o p a y f o r t h e c l e r k ’ s r e c o r d a s r e q u i r e d b y
T e x a s R u l e o f A p p e l l a t e P r o c e d u r e 3 5

. 3 ( a ) ( 2 )

. S e e T e x . R

. A p p . P

. 3 5

. 3 ( a ) ( 2 )

. W e s t a t e d t h a t w e w o u l d d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l f o r w a n t o f p r o s e c u t i o n u n l e s s

a p p e l l a n t , w i t h i n f i f t e e n d a y s , m a d e a r r a n g e m e n t s t o p a y f o r t h e c l e r k ’ s r e c o r d

a n d p r o v i d e d t h i s c o u r t w i t h p r o o f o f p a y m e n t

.

1 ... S e e T e x . R

. A p p . P

. 4 7

. 4

.A p p e l l a n t s e n t a l e t t e r t o t h i s c o u r t o n O c t o b e r 1 9 , 2 0 0 9 , s t a t i n g s h e i s

i n d i g e n t a n d f o r w a r d i n g a c o p y o f a n A f f i d a v i t o f I n a b i l i t y t o P a y s h e f i l e d i n t h e

t r i a l c o u r t o n J u l y 2 2 , 2 0 0 8

. W e n o t i f i e d a p p e l l a n t o n O c t o b e r 2 0 , 2 0 0 9 , t h a t

t h e a f f i d a v i t d o e s n o t s a t i s f y t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f a n a f f i d a v i t o f i n d i g e n c e f o r

a p p e a l

. S e e T e x . R

. A p p . P

. 2 0

. 1

. W e s t a t e d t h a t a p p e l l a n t s h o u l d f i l e a n

a f f i d a v i t c o m p l y i n g w i t h T e x . R

. A p p . P

. 2 0

. 1 w i t h t h e t r i a l c o u r t b y N o v e m b e r
2 , 2 0 0 9

. A p p e l l a n t f a i l e d t o d o s o a n d h a s t h e r e f o r e f a i l e d t o m a k e

a r r a n g e m e n t s f o r p a y m e n t o f t h e c l e r k ’ s r e c o r d

. B e c a u s e a p p e l l a n t h a s n o t m a d e p a y m e n t a r r a n g e m e n t s f o r t h e c l e r k ’ s

r e c o r d , i t i s t h e o p i n i o n o f t h e c o u r t t h a t t h e a p p e a l s h o u l d b e d i s m i s s e d f o r

w a n t o f p r o s e c u t i o n . A c c o r d i n g l y , w e d i s m i s s t h e a p p e a l

. S e e T e x . R

. A p p . P

. 3 7

. 3 ( b ) , 4 2

. 3 ( b )

. A p p e l l a n t s h a l l p a y a l l c o s t s o f t h e a p p e a l , f o r w h i c h l e t e x e c u t i o n i s s u e .

P E R C U R I A M

P A N E L : G A R D N E R , W A L K E R , a n d M C C O Y , J J

. D E L I V E R E D : N o v e m b e r 1 9 , 2 0 0 9

2
#### Coleman Hardware Co. *et al. v.*Kellogg *et al.*

*(Circuit Court,*N. D. *Illinois.*

May 27, 1889.)

Patents—Sash-Balance—Infringement.

The patent granted September 18, 1883, to Warren Shumard for a “saslibalance, ” which has abrake so arranged as to be adjustable from the outside, the brake being an ordinary brake-shoe boaring on the periphery of the drum, with the pressure secured by a spring, is infringed by the use of a hand-brake, bearing on the periphery of" the drum, and adjustable from the outside; band-brakes having been well-known equivalents for spring-brakes at the time of the issue of the Shumard patent.

In Equity. On motion for injunction.

Bill to restrain infringement of a patent by the Coleman Hardware Company and others against Kellogg, Johnson *&*Bliss, impleaded with the Pullman Sash-Balance Company.

*Banning & Banning &*Payson, for complainants.

*George P. Barton,*for defendants.

Blodgett, J.

This is a motion for an injunction to restrain the infringement by defendants of a patent granted September 18, 1883, to Warren Shumard, for a sash-balance. The device covered by this patent is what is known as a “spring-balance” for a window-sash, instead of the ordinary pulley balance. The proof now before me shows that this class of devices is not new, one of the patents cited having been issued in 18b6; but the feature in tho complainants’ patent, which seems to me to be new and rueriLorious, is the brake so arranged that it is adjustable from the outside. Defendants’ patent also shows a brake adjustable from the outside, and differing only from the complainants’ in the fact that it is wrhat is known as a “ band-brake,” bearing upon the periphery of the drum, while complainants’ brake is the ordinary brake-shoe, bearing upon the periphery of the drum, and the pressure secured by a spring. There is no essential difference in the function of the two brakes, but the band-brake was a well-known equivalent for a spring-brake like the complainants’ at the time complainants’ patent was issued. I think, therefore, as at present advised from the proof before me, that the difference, so far as the brake is concerned, between complainants’ and defendants’ device is merely colorable, and that defendants infringe upon this feature of complainants’ patent, and possibly upon other features. An injunction will therefore be ordered according to the prayer of the hill.