alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1997
<CASH>                        293,311
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 8,030
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              000
<PP&E>                        20,246,110
<DEPRECIATION>                (6,257,116)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                15,179,929
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         225,946
<BONDS>                       3,975,911
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    10,960,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  15,179,929
<SALES>                       1,566,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,744,520
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 988,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              401,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            210,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>               148,060
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           148,060
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               000
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  148,060
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 2.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                 2.87
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2280 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Rural Business—Cooperative Service, Rural Econoic Development Loans Program Account for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Rural Business—Cooperative 

Service, Rural Econoic Development Loans Program Account for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2280 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL 

3 BUSINESS—COOPERATIVE SERVICE, RURAL 

4 ECONOIC DEVELOPMENT LOANS PROGRAM 

5 ACCOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, Rural Business— 

9 Cooperative Service, Rural Econoic Development Loans 

10 Program Account for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $50,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit
32(c)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Energy Supply, LLC (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





·
    The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
    The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:
      November 3, 2005
    /s/ William
      F.
      Hecht
      William
      F. Hecht
      President
      PPL
      Energy Supply, LLC





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of iBasis, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|Date: March 14, 2008 |  | /s/OFER GNEEZYOfer Gneezy President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 14, 2008 |  | /s/RICHARD TENNANTRichard Tennant Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)      

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated CapitalProperties III (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officerof the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chieffinancial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 8989]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Please contact Franz Zichy at 202-647-5778,                         *zichyfj@state.gov*.                    

Dated: December 23, 2014.

Julie N. Zoller,

Senior Deputy Coordinator, International Communications and Information Policy, U.S. State Department.

[FR Doc. 2014-30713 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-07-P
#### In the Matter of Gary D. Cuda, Petitioner, v Michael L. Dwyer, Respondent.

[967 NYS2d 302]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department pursuant to CPLR 506 [b] [1]) to annul the determination of respondent to revoke petitioner’s pistol permit.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination revoking his pistol permit. We reject petitioner’s contention that he was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate his claims. “It is well settled that a formal hearing is not required prior to the revocation of a pistol permit [where, as here,] the licensee is given notice of the charges and has an adequate opportunity to submit proof in response” *(Matter of Dlugosz v Scarano,*255 AD2d 747, 748 [1998], *appeal dismissed*93 NY2d 847 [1999], *lv*
      *1410
      *denied*93 NY2d 809 [1999], *cert denied*528 US 1079 [2000]; *see Matter of Salem v Geraci,*27 AD3d 1175, 1176 [2006]). Petitioner’s further contention that the revocation of his permit violates the Second Amendment and the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution is without merit *(see Matter of Demyan v Monroe,*108 AD2d 1004, 1005 [1985]). In addition, the court properly denied petitioner’s request for his entire pistol permit file *(see Matter of Vale v Eidens,*290 AD2d 612, 614 [2002]).

Finally, we reject petitioner’s contention that the determination to revoke his permit was arbitrary and capricious. Respondent has broad discretion to resolve factual and credibility issues when determining whether to revoke a pistol permit, and his determination is accorded great weight *(see Matter of Manne v Main,*8 AD3d 790, 791 [2004]; *Matter of Gerard v Czajka,*307 AD2d 633, 633-634 [2003]). Further, the record establishes that, when petitioner sought to amend his permit to remove certain restrictions, he did not inform the licensing agency that he had been arrested. It is settled that “[t]he failure of [a] petitioner to report on his [or her] application a prior arrest . . . provide[s] a sufficient basis to deny the application” for a pistol permit *(Matter of DiMonda v Bristol,*219 AD2d 830, 830 [1995]). Thus, respondent properly revoked petitioner’s pistol permit on that ground *(see Matter of Cohen v Kelly,*30 AD3d 170, 170 [2006]; *Ricatto v Kelly,*303 AD2d 240, 240 [2003]). Present — Smith, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.
AO 247 (Rev. 11/11) ALSD Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________

United States of America

)

)

)

)

)

)

v.

Case No:

USM No:

Date of Original Judgment:

Date of Previous Amended Judgment:

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10

and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of months is reduced to .

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date:

Judge’s signature

Effective Date:

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

 Southern District of Alabama

TERRANCE KEOKI CALLEN 06-00176-011

09535-003

1/20/2005

Pro Se

✔

✔

12/27/2011 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade

United States District Judge

The defendant's original total offense level was derived from the Career Offender provision of the Sentencing

Guidelines, which makes him ineligible for a reduction in sentence due to the amended Guidelines for crack

cocaine offenses.

Case 2:06-cr-00176-CG-N Document 795 Filed 12/27/11 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Linda DiMeglio, Respondent, v Village of Briarcliff Manor, New York, Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[870 NYS2d 916]

-In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to vacate an arbitrator’s opinion and award dated July 31, 2006, which sustained the determination of the Village of Briarcliff Manor, New York, denying the petitioner disability benefits under General Municipal Law § 207-c, the Village of Briarcliff Manor, New York, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Adler, J.), entered July 17, 2007, as denied that branch of its motion which was to dismiss the petition insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs, as no appeal lies as of right from an order in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 *(see*CPLR 5701 [b] [1]) and leave to appeal has not been granted *(see Matter of Pace v Pleus,*306 AD2d 350 [2003]; *Matter of Young Israel of Merrick v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead,*304 AD2d 834 [2003]). Mastro, J.E, Florio, Balkin and Eng, JJ., concur.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-1497

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

RAMON RAMIREZ-BENITEZ, a/k/a SEALED DEFENDANT 12,

a/k/a EL VIEJO, a/k/a MONCHO.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on June 4, 2002 is amended

as follows:

Page 4, line 12 should be: "attorney. See infra, for more

details of the colloquy."
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Seaena, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patty Hill, Interim
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ PATTY HILL
--------------------------------------------
Patty Hill
Interim Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers

The following
statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful
misrepresentation.

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20549

Re:
Andrew Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with
the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 USC 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | (i) | this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Andrew Corporation.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated as of this 8th day of February 2007.



|                                      |  |                                                     
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ralph E. Faison                   |  | /s/ Marty R. Kittrell                               
|Ralph E. Faison                       |  | Marty R. Kittrell                                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this certification has been provided to Andrew Corporation and will be retained by Andrew
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

May 29, 2015 
 Dr. Peter Daddona 

Re: Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement  
 Dear
Pete: 
 This letter agreement (this “Amendment No. 3”) amends certain provisions of your employment letter agreement
with ZP Opco, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly named Zosano Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”), and Zosano Pharma Corporation, a Delaware corporation formerly named ZP Holdings, Inc. (“Parent”), dated May 11,
2012 (the “Original Agreement”), as amended by the letter agreements dated January 6, 2014 (“Amendment No. 1”) and January 16, 2014 (“Amendment No. 2”) among you, the Company and
Parent. The Original Agreement, as amended by Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2, is referred to herein as the “Employment Agreement.” 

You have requested that your employment status be changed from full-time to part-time. Therefore, notwithstanding Amendment No. 2,
effective June 1, 2015: (i) you will be employed on a part-time basis and will work approximately a 60% schedule (i.e., you will commit the equivalent of approximately three (3) days per week to your duties as Chief Scientific Officer
and Executive Vice President Research & Development); (ii) your annual base salary will be $206,875; and (iii) you will be entitled to twelve (12) business days of paid vacation each year. Your benefits as described in
Sections 2(b), (c), (d) and (f) of the Original Agreement will remain unchanged. 
 You acknowledge and agree that the change in
employment status from full-time to part-time and the corresponding adjustments in base salary and vacation days set forth herein shall not constitute “Good Reason” for termination of employment under the Employment Agreement. 

Except as expressly amended by this Amendment No. 3, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect and otherwise unchanged.
The Employment Agreement shall, together with this Amendment No. 3, be read and construed as a single document. This Amendment No. 3 may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument. This Amendment No. 3 shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to the conflict of laws principles thereof. 

[signature page follows] 







 Please indicate your agreement to this Amendment No. 3 by signing below and returning a copy
of this letter to the Company at your earliest convenience. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,
  

ZP OPCO, INC.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Vikram Lamba
		 	Name: Vikram Lamba
		 	Title: President and CEO


  

			
	ZOSANO PHARMA CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Vikram Lamba
		 	Name: Vikram Lamba
		 	Title: President and CEO


  

			
	Acknowledged and agreed by:
	
	 /s/ Peter Daddona

	Peter Daddona
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 5, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00165

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF K.W.F. , a Juvenile

From the 216th Judicial District Court

, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. J17

- 36

Honorable N. Keith Williams , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion issued this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF JURISDICTION without prejudice.

It is so ORDERED on June 5, 2019

.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of June, 2019

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                         444,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  945,118
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,767,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,282,907
<PP&E>                                       8,237,392
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,302,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,838,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,522,734
<BONDS>                                        426,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           47,283
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,010
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,826,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,838,398
<SALES>                                      8,799,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,799,121
<CGS>                                        5,979,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,979,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,739,910
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,048,904
<INCOME-TAX>                                   367,669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            681,235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   681,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MALCHOLM JEMAL HALE, *

 *

 Plaintiff, * CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-00462-CB-B

 *

vs. *

 *

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, *

Commissioner of Social Security,*

* 

Defendant. *

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues 

raised, and there having been no objections filed, the 

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(l)(B) and dated January 27, 2015, is ADOPTED as 

the opinion of this Court.

DONE this 18th day of February, 2015.

s/Charles R. Butler, Jr.

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:13-cv-00462-CB-B Document 30 Filed 02/18/15 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:13-cv-00462-CB-B Document 30 Filed 02/18/15 Page 2 of 2