alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
906 SARBANES OXLEY CERTIFICATION




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SS.1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Companies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Duquette, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


November
      16, 2009
            
            /s/
      David DuquetteName:  David
      DuquetteTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Company and will be retained by Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    SECTION 302 SARBANES OXLEY CERTIFICATION

I, David Duquette, certify that:

1. I  have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on  Form  10-QSB  of New  Century
Companies, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Omitted;

c)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures  and presented in this report my  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit
committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.


November 19, 2004                  /s/ David Duquette
                                   ----------------------------------------
                                   Name:  David Duquette
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Accredited Members Holding Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December, 31 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 5, 2011
By
/s/ David LavigneDavid Lavigne, Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Harry West, Appellant.

[871 NYS2d 120]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J., at suppression hearing; Michael J. Obús, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered August 23, 2006, convicting defendant of robbery in the first and second degrees and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 15 years, and order, same court (Michael J. Obús, J), entered on or about September 12, 2007, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.20 motion to set aside the sentence, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that the police improperly searched a closed bag he was wearing at the time of his arrest is unpre-served and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. We reject defendant’s argument that the court “expressly decided” the closed-container issue (CPL 470.05 [2]); on the contrary, it was never litigated or fully developed in testimony, and the *484court never addressed it *(see People v Turriago,*90 NY2d 77, 83-84 [1997]). As an alternative holding, we also reject defendant’s claim on the merits because, to the extent the record permits review, it reveals that the search was proper as incident to a lawful arrest *(see People v Smith,*59 NY2d 454 [1983]; *People v Wylie,*244 AD2d 247 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 946 [1998]).

Defendant was properly adjudicated a second felony offender based upon his New Jersey conviction (NJ Stat Ann § 20.35-7). We find that resort to the New Jersey accusatory instrument is appropriate, and that such instrument establishes that the New Jersey crime involved possession of heroin and not marijuana *(see People v Williams,*7 AD3d 344, 345 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 663 [2004]; *People v Bell,*259 AD2d 429 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 922 [1999]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Consolidated
Capital Properties III 1996 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317331
<NAME> CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL PROPERTIES III
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,730
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       33
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          13,709
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                          4,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,089
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,460
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,613
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,149
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,816
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    17.04<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5                    
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           91,598
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   178,396
<ALLOWANCES>                      4,165
<INVENTORY>                     179,178
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                461,186
<PP&E>                          354,940
<DEPRECIATION>                  218,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  690,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           141,337
<BONDS>                          40,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                          1,027
<OTHER-SE>                      493,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    690,871
<SALES>                         636,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                636,853
<CGS>                           374,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   374,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                144,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    407
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                4,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 118,470
<INCOME-TAX>                     41,464
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              77,006
<DISCONTINUED>                   19,416
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     57,590
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.63
        

</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2351 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, 

International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, International Narcotics Control and 

Law Enforcement for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, INTERNATIONAL 

5 NARCOTICS CONTROL AND LAW ENFORCE6 MENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of State, International Narcotics 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2351 IH

1 Control and Law Enforcement for fiscal year 2024 may 

2 not exceed $1,391,004,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. §1350**

| 1. | The                Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December                31, 2007,                fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended                December                31, 2007,                fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition                and                results of operations of the Company for said                period. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

*A      signed original of this written statement has been provided to Cytomedix, Inc.      and will be retained by Cytomedix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
<PAGE>

================================================================================

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 6-K


                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer


                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                January 27, 2005

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346


                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                        Form 20-F [X]    Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                              Yes [ ]     No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________


================================================================================


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST


Exhibit          Description
-------          -----------

99.1             Press Release, dated January 25, 2005, regarding Hollinger Inc.
                 Provides Status Update.


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  January 27, 2005


                          HOLLINGER INC.

                          By  /s/ Peter G. White
                              ---------------------------------------
                              Name:    Peter G. White
                              Title:   Vice President, Operations and
                                       Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                         383,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,130,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   221,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,310,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,946,000
<PP&E>                                       5,033,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,709,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,285,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,214,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,583,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,205,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,030,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,285,000
<SALES>                                      2,043,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,043,000
<CGS>                                        1,066,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,586,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (559,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (559,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (559,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
Opinion issued July 31, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00418
- CR

——————————— THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appella nt

V. ROGER KEITH JOPLING , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 1352035

MEMORANDUM OPINION The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2 (a). See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a). We have not
issued a decision in the appeal

.2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown. Do not publ ish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b).
#### In the Matter of Alicia M.L., an Infant. Administration for Children’s Services et al., Respondents; Karen L., Appellant.

[961 NYS2d 807]

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Arias, J.), dated March 23, 2012, which, upon her admission that she permanently neglected the subject child, and after a dispositional hearing, terminated her parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and St. Vincent’s Services, Inc., for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly determined that the best interests of the subject child would be served by terminating the mother’s parental rights and freeing the child for adoption by her foster mother *(see*Family Ct Act § 631). A suspended judgment was not warranted in this instance, despite the mother’s recent progress and efforts to plan for the child’s future, because the child has bonded with her foster mother, who has competently and consistently provided for her specialized needs since she was three months old, and it is not in the child’s best interests to prolong the uncertainty of foster care *(see Matter of Ty-Wan Jay den H. [Lashanda Odessa V.],*95 AD3d 1324 [2012]; *Matter of Walter D.H. [Zaire L.],*91 AD3d 950, 951 [2012]; *Matter of Jonathan B. [Linda S.],*84 AD3d 1078 [2011]; *Matter of Angelica*W. *[Dorothy W.J,*80 AD3d 772, 773 [2011]).

Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court did not err in failing to appoint new counsel to represent her *(see Matter of Tajani B.,*49 AD3d 876, 877 [2008]; *Matter of Moore v McClenos,*259 AD2d 752 [1999]; *see also Matter of Biskupski v McClellan,*278 AD2d 912 [2000]; *Matter of Mooney v Mooney,*243 AD2d 840 [1997]).

Dillon, J.E, Austin, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7395

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH ALLEN CARSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00813-TLW-1; 4:16-cv-01398-TLW)

Submitted: September 29, 2020 Decided: October 2, 2020

Before KING, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Allen Carson, Appellant Pro Se. Everett E. McMillian, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Allen Carson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Carson has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED