Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices 78783 

administrative costs means those 

indirect costs for administration 

incurred by the Gulf Coast States, 

coastal political subdivisions, and 

coastal zone parishes that are allocable 

to activities authorized under the Act. 

Administrative costs may include costs 

for general management functions, 

general ledger accounting, budgeting, 

human resource services, general 

procurement services, and general legal 

services. Administrative costs do not 

include indirect costs that are identified 

specifically with, or readily assignable 

to: (1) Facilities; (2) Eligible projects, 

programs, or planning activities; or (3) 

Activities relating to grant applications, 

awards, audit requirements, or postaward management, including payments 

and collections. 

C. Reporting 

Recipients will be required to submit 

financial and performance (technical) 

reports (also known as progress reports). 

All financial reports shall be submitted 

to Office of Finance and Budget, Chief 

Financial Officer/Director of 

Administration, RESTORE in 

accordance with the award conditions. 

Electronic submission of financial 

reports is preferred via email to sepfinancialrpts@restorethegulf.gov. 

Performance reports should be 

submitted to the Deputy Director/

Director of Programs. Performance 

reports must include the status of a SEP 

that meets the requirements listed in 

this announcement, specifically, that it 

is acceptable to the applicable Gulf 

Coast State and is approved by the 

Council Chairperson. Electronic 

submission of performance reports is 

preferred via email to sepperformancerpts@restorethegulf.gov. All 

reports will be submitted on a basis 

determined by the results of an 

applicant’s risk assessment. In any 

event, reports will be submitted no less 

frequently than annually, and no more 

frequently than quarterly, unless more 

frequent reporting is deemed necessary. 

Reports must be submitted no later than 

30 days following the end of each 

period, if reporting is less than 

annually, from the start date of the 

award. The comprehensive final report 

is due 90 days after the award 

expiration. 

The Federal Funding Accountability 

and Transparency Act of 2006 includes 

a requirement for awardees of 

applicable Federal grants to report 

information about first-tier sub-awards 

and executive compensation under 

Federal assistance awards issued in FY 

2011 or later. All awardees of applicable 

grants and cooperative agreements are 

required to report to the Federal Subaward Reporting System (FSRS) 

available at www.FSRS.gov on all subawards over $25,000. 

VII. Agency Contacts 

The contact for questions about this 

announcement is Mary Pleffner. Her 

email contact information is email: 

mary.pleffner@restorethegulf.gov; 

telephone number: 813–995–2025; and 

mailing address is Gulf Coast Ecosystem 

Restoration Counsel Office, 500 Poydras 

Street, Suite 1117, New Orleans, LA 

70130. 

VIII. Other Information 

A. New Program 

This is an announcement for a new 

Federal grant program authorized by the 

Oil Spill Restoration Impact Allocation 

Component of the Resources and 

Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist 

Opportunities, and Revived Economies 

of the Gulf Coast States Act of 2012 

(RESTORE Act), specifically, 33 U.S.C. 

1321(t)(3), and 40 CFR part 1800, 

RESTORE Council’s RESTORE Act Spill 

Impact Component Planning Allocation 

(79 FR 49690, August 22, 2014). 

B. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 

Council adopts the requirements of 

the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 

as 5 U.S.C. 552. This statute sets forth 

rules for the Council regarding making 

requested materials, information, and 

records publicly available under the 

FOIA. Applications submitted in 

response to this announcement may be 

subject to requests for release under the 

FOIA. In the event that an application 

contains information or data that the 

applicant deems to be confidential 

commercial information which is 

exempt from disclosure under FOIA, 

that information should be identified, 

bracketed, and marked as Privileged, 

Confidential, Commercial or Financial 

Information. Based on these markings, 

the confidentiality of the contents of 

those pages will be protected to the 

extent permitted by law. 

C. Uniform Administrative 

Requirements, Cost Principles, and 

Audit Requirements for Federal Awards 

On December 26, 2013, OMB 

published final guidance titled Uniform 

Administrative Requirements, Cost 

Principles, and Audit Requirements for 

Federal Awards (OMB Uniform 

Guidance) (https://www.Federalregister.

gov/articles/2013/12/26/2013-30465/

uniform-administrative-requirementscost-principles-and-audit-requirementsfor-Federal-awards), which streamlines 

the language from eight existing OMB 

circulars, including Cost Principles 

(OMB Circulars A–21, A–87, A–122) 

and administrative requirements (OMB 

Circulars A–102 and A–110), into one 

consolidated set of guidance applicable 

to Federal assistance awards. The OMB 

Uniform Guidance applies to awards 

made by the RESTORE Council. 

Applicants should familiarize 

themselves with the OMB Uniform 

Guidance. Additional information on 

the substance of and transition to the 

OMB Uniform Guidance may be found 

at https://cfo.gov/cofar/. 

Will D. Spoon, 

Program Analyst. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30566 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35). 

Agency: U.S. Census Bureau. 

Title: Census Employment Inquiry. 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0139. 

Form Number(s): BC–170A, BC–170B, 

BC–170D. 

Type of Request: Extension of 

Previously Approved Collection. 

Number of Respondents: 65,000. 

Average Hours per Response: 15 

minutes. 

Burden Hours: 16,250. 

Needs and Uses: The Census Bureau 

proposed using a revised employment 

form, however based upon program 

needs we have decided not to use the 

revised form at this time. We will use 

the existing form for our recruitment 

needs in 2015 and explore revising the 

employment inquiry form in the future. 

Job applicants complete the BC–170 

(A, B, and D) before, or at the time, they 

are tested. Selecting officials will review 

the information shown on the form and 

determine the applicant’s employment 

suitability. Failure to collect this 

information could result in the hiring of 

unsuitable and/or unqualified workers. 

Information quality is an integral part 

of the pre-dissemination review of the 

information disseminated by the Census 

Bureau (fully described in the Census 

Bureau’s Information Quality 

Guidelines). Information quality is also 

integral to the information collections 

conducted by the Census Bureau and is 

incorporated into the clearance process 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

78784 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 31, 2014 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 38924 (June 

28, 2013) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’); see also Aluminum 

Extrusions From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Rescission, in Part; 

2012/2013, 79 FR 36003 (June 25, 2014) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

2See Preliminary Results, 79 FR at 36006. 

3See ‘‘Second Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an 

Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Case Briefs 

and Rebuttal Case Briefs,’’ dated July 7, 2014 and 

‘‘Second Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Granting an 

Extension of Time for Parties to Provide Rebuttal 

Briefs,’’ dated August 12, 2014. 

4The individual members of the Committee are 

Aerolite Extrusion Company; Alexandria Extrusion 

Company; Benada Aluminum of Florida, Inc.; 

William L. Bonnell Company, Inc.; Frontier 

Aluminum Corporation; Futural Industries 

Corporation; Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc.; 

Kaiser Aluminum Corporation; Profile Extrusion 

Company; Sapa Extrusions, Inc.; and Western 

Extrusions Corporation. 

Affected Public: Applicants for 

temporary jobs in office and field 

positions. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory 

to apply for temporary positions. 

Legal Authority: Title 13, United 

States Code, Section 23 a and c. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov 

.Follow the instructions to view 

Department of Commerce collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. 

Dated: December 24, 2014. 

Glenna Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30627 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[S–132–2014] 

Approval of Subzone Status, 5.11, Inc., 

Modesto and Lathrop, California 

On November 6, 2014, the Executive 

Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones 

(FTZ) Board docketed an application 

submitted by the Port of Stockton, 

California, grantee of FTZ 231, 

requesting subzone status subject to the 

existing activation limit of FTZ 231, on 

behalf of 5.11, Inc., in Modesto and 

Lathrop, California. 

The application was processed in 

accordance with the FTZ Act and 

Regulations, including notice in the 

Federal Register inviting public 

comment (79 FR 67413, 11/13/2014). 

The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the 

application and determined that it 

meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant 

to the authority delegated to the FTZ 

Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 

400.36(f)), the application to establish 

Subzone 231B is approved, subject to 

the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including Section 400.13, and further 

subject to FTZ 231’s 2,000-acre 

activation limit. 

Dated: December 23, 2014. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30719 Filed 12–30–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–967] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2012–2013 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on aluminum 

extrusions from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) is May 1, 2012, through April 

30, 2013. These final results cover 52 

companies for which an administrative 

review was initiated, and for which this 

administrative review was not rescinded 

in the Preliminary Results.1 For these 

final results, the Department examined 

two mandatory respondents and one 

voluntary respondent for which this 

review was initiated. The first 

mandatory respondent is Guangzhou 

Jangho Curtain Wall System Engineering 

Co., Ltd. and Jangho Curtain Wall Hong 

Kong Ltd. (collectively ‘‘Jangho’’); the 

second mandatory respondent is a 

single entity that the Department 

continues to find is comprised of Guang 

Ya Aluminum Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Guang Ya’’), Foshan Guangcheng 

Aluminum Co., Ltd. (‘‘Guangcheng’’), 

Kong Ah International Co., Ltd. (‘‘Kong 

Ah’’), and Guang Ya Aluminum 

Industries (Hong Kong) Ltd. (‘‘Guang Ya 

HK’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang Ya Group’’), 

Guangdong Zhongya Aluminum Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Zhongya’’), Zhongya Shaped 

Aluminum (HK) Holding Ltd. (‘‘Shaped 

Aluminum’’), and Karlton Aluminum 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Karlton’’) (collectively 

‘‘Zhongya’’), and Foshan Nanhai Xinya 

Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinya’’) (collectively ‘‘Guang 

Ya Group/Zhongya/Xinya’’). 

The Department finds for these final 

results that Jangho and the Guang Ya 

Group/Zhongya/Xinya entity failed to 

demonstrate that they were eligible for 

separate rates and thus are part of the 

PRC-wide entity. For Kromet 

International, Inc. (‘‘Kromet’’), a 

voluntary respondent in this review, the 

Department finds that Kromet did not 

make sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value during the POR. 

Furthermore, the Department finds 

that 19 of the companies under review 

(including Kromet) have established 

their eligibility for a separate rate. 

Additionally, we determine that four 

companies, Hong Kong Gree Electric 

Appliances Sales Limited (‘‘Gree’’), 

Jiuyuan Co., Ltd. (‘‘Jiuyuan’’), Shenzhen 

Hudson Technology Development Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen Hudson’’), and Skyline 

Exhibit Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Skyline’’) had no shipments. The 

Department finds that the remaining 

companies under review either failed to 

establish their eligibility for a separate 

rate or were not responsive, and, 

therefore, these companies are part of 

the PRC-wide entity. 

DATES: Effective Date: December 31, 

2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James Terpstra or Paul Stolz, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3965 or (202) 482– 

4474, respectively. 

Background 

On June 25, 2014, the Department 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review. At that time, 

we invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results.2

We granted parties an extension of time 

to submit case and rebuttal briefs.3

On August 8, 2014 we received case 

briefs from the Aluminum Extrusions 

Fair Trade Committee (‘‘Petitioner’’); 4

Zhongya; Skyline; Jangho; tenKsolar 

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (‘‘tenKsolar’’); 

Permasteelisa South China Factory and 

Permasteelisa Hong Kong Ltd. 

(collectively, ‘‘Permasteelisa’’); Taishan 

City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co. 

Ltd., and Kam Kiu Aluminium Products 

Sdn. Bhd. (collectively ‘‘Kam Kiu’’). On 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES