alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1


<S>                                  <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                         OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         169,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               264,568
<PP&E>                                          33,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 329,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          671,532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    251,828
<COMMON>                                        69,467
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,333,803)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   329,024
<SALES>                                        100,529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,529
<CGS>                                           80,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,833,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,079,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,739,868)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,739,868)
<DISCONTINUED>                              (1,956,982)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,696,850)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.08)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of E-centives, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSBfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

(a) the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; 

and 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Dated this 29th day of March, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30353]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than January 16, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Michael G. Lewis, individually and as trustee of the W. W. Pete 
Archbold Trust, Ossian, Indiana, to individually and together as a 
group acting in concert with the W.W. Pete Archbold Trust, David Lewis, 
Gary Lewis, Tonya Lewis, Barbara Gehring, Kent Gehring, and Diane 
Scheumann, all of Ossian, Indiana; to acquire 10 percent of the voting 
shares of Ossian Financial Services, Inc., and thereby indirectly 
acquire control of Ossian State Bank, both of Ossian, Indiana.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Guadalupe Alonzo Cantu, individually and as trustee for Allysa 
Nichole Cantu, Alexis C. Cantu, GAC 2004 GRAT No. 1, YRC 2004 GRAT No. 
1, Alexis C. Cantu UGTM, and Allysa Nichole Cantu UGTM; Yolanda R. 
Cantu, individually and as trustee for Alexis Cantu; Elvia Cantu Saenz, 
individually and as trustee of the Alonzo Cantu 2011 Exempt Family 
Trust; Jesus A. Saenz, individually; Elida F. Cantu, individually; and 
Victor Haddad, individually, and as trustee of the Alonzo Cantu 2005 
Exempt Family Trust and the Yolanda R. Cantu 2005 Exempt Family Trust; 
all of McAllen, Texas; Samuel David Deanda, Jr., individually and as 
trustee of the Yolanda R. Cantu 2011 Exempt Family Trust, and Vivian 
Deanda, individually, both of Mission, Texas; Cantu Ventures, Ltd., 
Cantu Management, LLC, Alycan, Ltd., all of McAllen, Texas; 
collectively a group acting in concert to retain voting shares of Lone 
Star National Bancshares-Texas, Inc., McAllen, Texas, and thereby, 
indirectly retain voting shares of Lone Star National Bank, Pharr, 
Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 22, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-30353 Filed 12-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1931 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1931

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
Labor, State Unemployment Insurance and Employment Service Operations, 
              Program Administration for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
Labor, State Unemployment Insurance and Employment Service Operations, 
              Program Administration for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
              STATE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICE 
              OPERATIONS, PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Labor, 
State Unemployment Insurance and Employment Service Operations, Program 
Administration for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $108,674,000.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

KELVIN L. BLEVINS, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0392-CG-M

 :

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of :

Social Security, :

 :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and there having been no

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the

Equal Access to Justice Act be and is hereby GRANTED and that Plaintiff’s attorney be and is

hereby AWARDED an EAJA attorney’s fee in the amount of $1,375.00.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of June, 2006.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00392-CG-M Document 16 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
PRIMA ENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      17,239,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,244,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,448,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (45,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,950,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,668,000
<PP&E>                                     107,383,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (46,346,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              91,962,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,382,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       134,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  72,673,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                91,962,000
<SALES>                                     30,390,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,022,000
<CGS>                                        9,576,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,409,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,484,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,920,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,564,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,564,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

###### National Endowment for the Arts

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meetings of the Federal Advisory Committee on International Exhibitions (FACIE) Panel will be held by teleconference from the National Endowment for the Arts, Constitution Center, 400 7th St. SW., Washington, DC, 20506 as follows (all meetings are Eastern time and ending times are approximate):

*Federal Advisory Committee on International Exhibitions*                         (application review): This meeting will be by teleconference and will be closed.                    

# DATES:

January 29, 2015—2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506;                         *plowitzk@arts.gov,*                         or call 202/682-5691.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of title 5, United States Code.

Dated: January 6, 2015.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 2015-00141 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



Certification by David C. Warren Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) by eMerge Interactive,
Inc. (Registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Registrant.



/s/    DAVID C. WARRENDavid C. WarrenPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)March 24, 2005
ALI L. PERKINS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 1788

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval C ounty.

Waddell A. Wallace , Judge

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Steven L. Seliger , Assistant Public Defender, and

Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee

, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross , Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JUNE 30, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

No. 06-14599

_________________________

D.C. Docket No. 05-22510-CV-UUB

LEO C. HOLLINGSWORTH, 

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA,

Bill McCollum, 

SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Walter A. McNeil, 

 Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------------

 Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Florida

--------------------------

BEFORE BLACK, BARKETT and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

On December 30, 2008, this Court granted Appellees’ motion to stay this

appeal pending the Supreme Court’s disposition of Jimenez v. Quarterman, S.Ct.

Docket No. 07-6984.
On January 13, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Jimenez. See 

Jimenez v. Quarterman, _ U.S. _, 129 S.Ct. 681 (2009). The Court held that, 

...[W]here a state court grants a criminal defendant the right to file an

out-of-time direct appeal during state collateral review, but before the

defendant has first sought federal habeas relief, his judgment is not yet “final”

for purposes of [28 U.S.C.] § 2244(d)(1)(A). In such a case, “the date on

which the judgment became final by the conclusion of direct review or the

expiration of the time for seeking such review” must reflect the conclusion of

the out-of-time direct appeal, or the expiration of the time for seeking review

of that appeal. 

Id., 129 S. Ct. at 686–87. Direct review of the out-of-time appeal concludes when

the Supreme Court affirms a conviction on the merits on direct review or denies a

petition for a writ of certiorari, or, if the prisoner elects not to pursue certiorari

review, when the time for seeking certiorari expires. Id. at 685–86.

On February 24, 2009, Appellees filed a motion to remand for further

proceedings in light of Jimenez v. Quarterman. Because Appellees concede in their

motion that, under Jimenez v. Quarterman, Appellant’s petition is not time-barred, the

motion is construed as a confession of error.

Appellant objects to Appellees’ motion to the extent that Appelleessuggest that

2
the district court, rather than this Court, should decide whether, in the light of

Jimenez v. Quarterman, the petition is time-barred; this objection is construed as a

motion to vacate the district court’s dismissal order before remanding for further

proceedings.

Appellant’s motion to vacate the district court’s dismissal order is GRANTED. 

The July 17, 2006, order granting review of the magistrate’s supplemental order to

show cause and dismissing Appellant’s petition astime-barred is herebyVACATED.

Appellees’ motion for remand for further proceedings in light of Jimenez v.

Quarterman is also GRANTED.

Appellant has asked this Court to publish its decision on the instant motions. 

Appellant’s motion for publication is GRANTED.

3
----

|                        |   |                         |   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                        |   |                         |   |   |
|  October      30, 2008 |   | /s/      Michael Sweet       |   |   |
|                        |   |                         |   |   |
|                        |   | Michael      Sweet           |   |   |
|                        |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |   |
|                        |   |                         |   |   |

----
<PAGE>
================================================================================

                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer


                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                  May 12, 2004

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346


                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                         Form 20-F [X]   Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                               Yes [ ]   No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

================================================================================


<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST



Exhibit          Description
-------          ------------
99.1             Press Release, dated May 11, 2004 regarding Hollinger Inc.
                 Retraction Price of Retractable Common Shares.


<PAGE>



                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date:  May 12, 2004

                                       HOLLINGER INC.


                                       By  /s/ Peter G. White
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:   Peter G. White
                                           Title:  Co-Chief Operating Officer
                                                   and Secretary
#### Jennifer Cornier et al., Respondents, v Daniel A. Massanova, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 729]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated March 21, 2006, as denied that branch of his motion which was to stay all proceedings in the action pursuant to CPLR 2201 during the pendency of a criminal prosecution.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to stay all proceedings in the action pursuant to CPLR 2201 during the pendency of the criminal prosecution is granted.

Under the circumstances, the court should have granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was for a stay of the proceedings in this action pending completion of a related criminal prosecution *(see Britt v International Bus Servs.,*255 AD2d 143 [1998]; *Zonghetti v Jeromack,*150 AD2d 561, 563 [1989]; *DeSiervi v Liverzani,*136 AD2d 527 [1988]). Adams, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.