alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified
(the "Report"), I, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Anthony L. HavensAnthony
      L. HavensChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      March 22, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOTITLE 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enzo Biochem, Inc., and Subsidiaries (“the Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
    and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: June 9, 2008 | By:/s/ Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.
|------------------- | ----------------------------
|                    | Elazar Rabbani, Ph.D.       
|                    | Chief Executive Officer     





---
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Daniel Patton, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 1608 C.D. 2018

:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, :

Department of Transportation, :

Bureau of Driver Licensing :

O R D E R

NOW, January 30, 2020, having considered Appellant’s application for 

reargument, the application is denied.

 

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  each of
the  undersigned  officers of New Century  Companies,  Inc. (the Company),  does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      The Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September 30,
2004  of  the  Company  fully  complies,  in all  material  respects,  with  the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 22, 2005                        /s/ David Duquette
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:  David Duquette
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                              Chief Financial Officer

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided to New Century
Companies,  Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities  Exchange Commission or
its Staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                   EXHIBIT 32.2 -- SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I, Andrew A. Campbell, certify that:

     (1) the Form 10-K of Pactiv Corporation for the period ended December 31,
         2006, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of sec.13(a)
         or sec.15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Pactiv Corporation for the period then ended.

/s/ ANDREW A. CAMPBELL
------------------------------------------------------
Andrew A. Campbell
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 1, 2007
------------------------------------------------------
Date

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Thomas A. CRUMP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark C. CHRISTIE, in his personal capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation Commission; Theodore V. Morrison, Jr., in his personal capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation Commission; Judith Williams Jagdmann, in her personal capacity as Commissioner, State Corporation Commission; Larry E. Durbin, in his personal capacity as Assistant Commissioner, Customer Service, Department of Taxation; Michael G. Fojtik, in his personal capacity as Senior Auditor, Department of Taxation, Tobacco Unit, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 07-7260.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 20, 2007.

Decided: Dec. 28, 2007.

Thomas A. Crump, Appellant Pro Se. A. Ann Berkebile, Philip Reed DeHass, State Corporation Commission of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia; Flora Townes Hezel, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas A. Crump appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *Crump v. Christie,*No. 3:07-cv-00244-JRS, 2007 WL 2301562 (E.D.Va. Aug. 7, 2007). We deny Crump’s motion to recuse judges of this court that smoke from this case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>                        
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited  financial  statements for the quarter ended December 31,
1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                       
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                    987
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                              99
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,086
<PP&E>                                  7,880
<DEPRECIATION>                          1,415
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          7,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      41
<BONDS>                                 1,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              6,172
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            7,598
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          224
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              70
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           117
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       117
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              117
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            5.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                            5.37
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION
of the Chief Executive Officer

I, Richard H. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of Prima Energy Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date herein (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                      

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard H. Lewis                 
|                                     
|Richard H. Lewis                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 12, 2003                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Prima Energy Corporation and
will be retained by Prima Energy Corporation and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Axesstel, Inc. (the
Company), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included
in such report.

Dated: March 28, 2008



/s/    H. CLARK
HICKOCKH. Clark Hickock, Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: March 28, 2008



/S/    PATRICK
GRAYPatrick Gray, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

AARON MILLER, )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION: 15-00181-KD-N

)

ROYAL OAK ENTERPRISES LLC, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 16) to which objection is made (and with consideration of the response thereto), the Report 

and Recommendation (Doc. 16) of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) 

and dated May 29, 2015, is ADOPTED as AMENDED as the opinion of this Court as follows: 

the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED with the exception of Footnote 3, on Page 7 of 

Doc. 16, which is DELETED.

DONE and ORDERED this the 12th day of August, 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:15-cv-00181-KD-N Document 19 Filed 08/12/15 Page 1 of 1
#### Martin Evans, as Guardian of the Property of Shari Perl, et al., Appellants, v Stephen H. Rosen et al., Defendants, and Dean Palin et al., Respondents, et al., Nominal Defendants.

[976 NYS2d 18]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered July 11, 2011, which, insofar as appealed from, granted the motion of defendants Dean Palin and 32 West 22nd Street LLC, to dismiss the fourth amended and supplemental complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this action alleging, inter alia, the misappropriation of real estate interests by defendant Shallo, the real estate broker for the subject properties, the court properly determined that the facts as pleaded against defendants Palin and 32 West 22nd Street LLC did not state a cause of action against them *(see*CPLR 3211 [a] [7]). In the absence of a confidential or fiduciary relationship, plaintiffs have no cause of action for imposition of a constructive trust against them *(cf. Sharp v Kosmalski,*40 NY2d 119, 121 [1976]).

*460As to the claim that Palin aided and abetted Shallo’s breach of fiduciary duties when he and Shallo, as members of 32 West 22nd Street LLC, purchased one of the properties, there were no allegations that Palin knowingly participated in the breach or provided “substantial assistance” to Shallo *(Kaufman v Cohen,*307 AD2d 113, 124-125 [1st Dept 2003]). As the motion court found, at most, the complaint alleges that Palin negotiated the purchase, knew that Shallo was an investor on the buyer side and that Shallo was a broker for the seller *(compare Yuko Ito v Suzuki,*57 AD3d 205 [1st Dept 2008]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**STATMON
      TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**19
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey Talbot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      **Geoffrey P. Talbot**


**Geoffrey
      P. Talbot**


**** **Chief Executive Officer**


**August
      15, 2005**




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
      retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







21
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DEBBIE DOMINGUEZ, as Personal )

Representative of the Estate of ) 

Mariano Izaguirre Dominguez, deceased, )

Plaintiff, ) 

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00842-KD-B

 )

KENNETH ARLIN PEEK, JR. et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER 

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues

raised and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge made under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B) and dated April 16, 2010 is ADOPTED as the opinion

of this Court. 

It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 4) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED this the 4th day of May 2010.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DUBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:09-cv-00842-KD-B Document 29 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2116 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

General Services Administration, General Activities, Government-Wide 

Policy for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, and in addition 

to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to 

be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, General Services Administration, General Activities, Government-Wide Policy for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2116 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, GENERAL SERV3 ICES ADMINISTRATION, GENERAL ACTIVI4 TIES, GOVERNMENT-WIDE POLICY FOR FIS5 CAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Independent Agencies, General Services Adminis9 tration, General Activities, Government-Wide Policy for 

10 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $60,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
JANE DOE I & II,

Appellant,

v.

REV. LUTHER LEGUIRE, REV. 

RICHARD PEAK, THE FIRST 

APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF 

LAKE CITY, FLORIDA, INC.,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5533

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 1, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Hon. William W. Blue, Judge.

Dyril L. Flanagan, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Mark D. Tinker and Charles W. Hall of Banker Lopez Gassler, P.A., St. 

Petersburg, and Cecil L. Davis, Jr., of Banker Lopez Gassler, P.A., Tallahassee, for 

Appellee Rev. Luther Leguire. Scot E. Samis of Traub, Lieberman, Straus, and 

Shrewsberry LLP, St. Petersburg, for Appellee The First Apostolic Church of Lake 

City, Florida, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:  November                3, 2006 | /s/  James                H.                Miller                                         |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             | James                H. MillerPresidentPPL                Energy Supply, LLC                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sharon Lashley, Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 162]

Appeal by the de*754fendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Braun, J.), dated April 19, 2006, which denied her motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738) on her conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon her plea of guilty, on May 10, 2005.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the resentencing provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738, §§ 1-41) and the Drug Law Reform Act of 2005 (L 2005, ch 643, § 1) violate her right to equal protection of the laws (NY Const, art I, § 11; US Const 14th Amend) and the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment *(see*NY Const, art I, § 5; US Const 8th Amend) is unpreserved for appellate review because those claims were not raised before the sentencing court on the motion for resentencing *(see People v Duke,*40 AD3d 872 [2007]), and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(cf.*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]; *People v Baumann & Sons Buses, Inc.,*6 NY3d 404, 408 [2006]; *People v Felix,*58 NY2d 156, 161 [1983]). Skelos, J.E, Miller, McCarthy and Dickerson, JJ., concur.