alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2189 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2189

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 
 Protection Agency, Environmental Programs and Managements for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
 referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to 
 the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, Agriculture, and 
    Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 
 Protection Agency, Environmental Programs and Managements for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 
              PROTECTION AGENCY, ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS AND MANAGEMENTS 
              FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Environmental Protection 
Agency, Environmental Programs and Managements for fiscal year 2024 may 
not exceed $2,201,242,000.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Agency

          - 12 CFR Part 1291

      ( print page 77857)    

### CFR Correction

In Title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1100 to End, revised as of January 1, 2014, on page 344, in § 1291.5, in paragraphs (c)(13)(iii)(A) and (B) remove the term “951.9 of this part” and add “1291.9” in its place, and on page 345, in paragraph (c)(14)(iii), remove the term “951.8, and 951.9, respectively, of this part” and add in its place “1291.8, and 1291.9”.

[FR Doc. 2014-30469 Filed 12-24-14; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### In the Matter of Cynthia Morrow, Appellant, v County of Nassau, Respondent.

[962 NYS2d 917]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the County of Nassau Department of Assessment dated July 7, 2011, terminating the petitioner’s employment, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), entered March 21, 2012, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The agency determination under review was not made after a quasi-judicial evidentiary hearing. Thus, we review the determination under the standard set forth in CPLR 7803 (3), and consider only whether the determination was made in violation of lawful procedure, was affected by an error of law, was arbitrary and capricious, or was an abuse of discretion *(see Ward v City of Long Beach,*20 NY3d 1042 [2013]; *Matter of Halperin v City of New Rochelle,*24 AD3d 768, 770 [2005]). Under this standard, courts “examine whether the action taken by the agency has a rational basis” and will overturn that action only “where it is ‘taken without sound basis in reason’ or ‘regard to the facts’ ” *(Matter of Wooley v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.,*15 NY3d 275, 280 [2010], quoting *Matter of Peckham v Calogero,*12 NY3d 424, 431 [2009]; *see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County,*34 NY2d 222, 232 [1974]), or where it is “arbitrary and capricious” *(Matter of Deerpark Farms, LLC v Agricultural & Farmland Protection Bd. of Orange County,*70 AD3d 1037, 1038 [2010]). Moreover, “courts must defer to an administrative agency’s rational interpretation of its own regulations in its area of expertise” *(Matter of Peckham v Calogero,*12 NY3d at 431).

The petitioner failed to meet her burden of demonstrating that the determination made by the County of Nassau Department of Assessment terminating her employment lacked a rational basis or was arbitrary and capricious. The petitioner’s contention that the agency’s determination violated the doctrine of legislative equivalency *(see Matter of Torre v County of Nassau,*86 NY2d 421, 426 [1995]) is without merit, as her position was not abolished.

*962Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Skelos, J.E, Leventhal, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Erika Hildebrandt, Appellant, v Dwaine Philmore St. Elmo Lee, Respondent.

[973 NYS2d 75]

*492Order, Family Court, New York County (George L. Jurow, J.H.O.), entered on or about April 30, 2012, which, after a hearing, denied petitioner mother’s application to relocate to Texas with the parties’ minor child, and granted respondent father’s petition for modification of custody, awarding sole custody of the child to the father with visitation to the mother, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A sound and substantial basis exists in the record for the court’s determination that the child’s best interests would be served by denying the mother’s relocation application and awarding sole custody to the father with visitation to the mother *(see Matter of Tropea v Tropea,*87 NY2d 727, 740-741 [1996]; *Eschbach v Eschbach,*56 NY2d 167, 171-174 [1982]).

Although the child has indicated a preference to live with the mother, that factor is not “determinative” *(Eschbach,*56 NY2d at 173). Further, the record shows that the mother and her parents, particularly her father, have engaged in a long-standing pattern of exclusionary behavior and hostility toward the father, thereby making it unlikely that the father-child relationship would be preserved if the mother were permitted to relocate with the child to Texas *(see Matter of Rebecca B.,*204 AD2d 57, 59 [1st Dept 1994], *lv denied*84 NY2d 808 [1994]). By contrast, the record shows that the father does not harbor any animosity toward the mother and her family and would help facilitate and maintain the mother’s relationship with the child *(see Matter of Damien P.C. v Jennifer H.S.,*57 AD3d 295, 296 [1st Dept 2008], *lv denied*12 NY3d 710 [2009]).

Although the evidence shows that the mother’s life will be enhanced economically, emotionally, and educationally by the move, the educational benefit to the child, if any, will be minimal.

The court properly rejected the forensic expert’s opinion in favor of awarding custody to the mother *(see Matter of John A. v Bridget M.,*16 AD3d 324, 332 [1st Dept 2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 710 [2005]), since his report contained many deficiencies, as noted by an expert peer reviewer. Indeed, the forensic expert failed to consider, among other things, the mother’s actions in temporarily leaving the jurisdiction with the child in violation of a court order and permanently moving to Texas without notifying the court, the father or the social worker.

The court properly declined to credit the mother’s unsubstantiated allegations of the father’s sexual improprieties toward her on several occasions from 2006 to 2009 *(see Eschbach,*56 NY2d at 173).

*493We have considered the mother’s remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Saxe, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
EXHIBIT 3.(I) 9 AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF ARTICLES OF INCORORATION
(After Issuance of Stock)

1.   Name of corporation: IPVoice Communications, Inc.
2.   The articles have been amended as follows:
Article 3 is hereby amended to read as follows:

The maximum  number of shares of stock that this  corporation  is  authorized to
have outstanding at any time is 100,000,000  shares of common stock having $.001
par value per share and 10,000 shares of preferred  stock having $.001 par value
per share.  The  preferred  shares may be divided  into series and will have the
preferences,  limitations  and  relative  rights  determined  by  the  Board  of
Directors.

The number of shares of the  corporation  outstanding and entitled to vote on an
amendment to the Articles of Incorporation in 24,634,529,  that the said changes
and  amendment  have been  consented to and  approved by a majority  vote of the
stockholders of each class of stock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.

Barbara S. Will,
----------------
Barbara S. Will, President, CCO
Russell Watson
--------------
Russell Watson, Secretary
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
J. Frank Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated and will be retained by such
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


/s/ J. Frank Harrison, III


J. Frank Harrison, III
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   500
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              333
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                       (333)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (333)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (333)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (333)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
##### 



Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Philip S. Orsino, President and Chief Executive Officer of Masonite
International Corporation, (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my
knowledge: 1. The Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: May 14, 2004 /s/ Philip S. Orsino  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---



##### 



Certification of Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Robert V. Tubbesing, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Masonite
International Corporation, (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my
knowledge: 1. The Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: May 14, 2004 /s/ Robert V. Tubbesing  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Frank Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ J. Frank Harrison, III





J. Frank Harrison, III


Chairman of the Board of Directors and


Chief Executive Officer


November 8, 2002
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

CELLECTIS,

Appellant

v.

SEATTLE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE,

Appellee

______________________

2019-1664

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 106,052.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

SALVATORE J. ARRIGO, III, Arrigo, Lee & Guttman LLP, 

Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by HARRY JOEL GUTTMAN, SCOTT M. K. LEE. 

 EDWARD ANTHONY FIGG, Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & 

Manbeck, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also 

represented by SETH EDWARD COCKRUM, SHARON E. CRANE,

ROBERT DANNY HUNTINGTON. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 19-1664 Document: 33 Page: 1 Filed: 03/10/2020
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and 

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

March 10, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1664 Document: 33 Page: 2 Filed: 03/10/2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                        2,173,111
<SECURITIES>                  000
<RECEIVABLES>                 15,101
<ALLOWANCES>                  000
<INVENTORY>                   000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,210,708
<PP&E>                        5,422,973
<DEPRECIATION>                000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                7,633,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         210,068
<BONDS>                       3,882,902
<COMMON>                      000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         000
<PREFERRED>                   000
<OTHER-SE>                    3,526,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  7,633,681
<SALES>                       1,005,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,224,690
<CGS>                         000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 503,894
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              426,215
<LOSS-PROVISION>              000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            205,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>               89,314
<INCOME-TAX>                  000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           89,314
<DISCONTINUED>                000
<EXTRAORDINARY>               7,829,940
<CHANGES>                     000
<NET-INCOME>                  7,919,254
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 153.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                 153.02
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                               HCC INDUSTRIES INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                 --------------------------------
                                                                   JULY 1,               JULY 3,
                                                                    2000                  1999
                                                                 ------------        ------------
<S>                                                              <C>                 <C>
Earnings:

     Earnings (loss) before taxes                                $     1,524           $   (1,132)

     Add:  Fixed Charges*                                              2,862                2,827
                                                                 ------------        ------------
                                                                 $     4,386           $    1,695
                                                                 ============        ============

* Fixed Charges:

     Interest expense                                            $     2,862           $    2,827
                                                                 ------------        ------------
                                                                 $     2,862           $    2,827
                                                                 ============        ============
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                       1.5                 ---(1)
                                                                 ============        ============
</TABLE>

(1)      There was a deficiency of earnings to fixed charges for the three
         months ended July 3, 1999 of $1,132.

         -    The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing
              earnings by fixed charges. For this purpose, "earnings" consist of
              earnings before taxes and extraordinary item plus fixed charges
              and "fixed charges" consist of interest expense and amortization
              of debt issuance costs.


                                       13
Exhibit 10.15














Transocean Partners LLC


Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation







Effective Date:







On May 4, 2015, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Transocean Partners LLC (the "Company") approved the compensation described herein to be paid to each non-employee director of the Board (a "Non-Employee Director") for his or her service on the Board for the term commencing with the 2015 annual meeting of the Company's unitholders and ending on the day immediately prior to the 2016 annual meeting of the Company's unitholders.







Equity Compensation:







Each Non-Employee Director received phantom units with a value equal to $75,000. The number of phantom units granted was determined by dividing $75,000 by the average of the high and low sales prices of the Company's common units over the 10-day period ending May 1, as reported by The New York Stock Exchange. The phantom units vest on the earlier of May 5, 2016 or the next regular annual meeting of the Company's unitholders following May 4, 2015, subject to the Non-Employee Director's continued membership on the Board as of such date.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the phantom units will become fully vested upon the earlier occurrence of a change in control of the Company or the Non-Employee Directors' termination of service by reason of his or her death or disability.







Cash Compensation:


 



	
 


Annual Cash Retainer:

	
$75,000


	
 


Additional Annual Retainers – Committee Chairpersons:


 

	 
	
Audit Committee

	
$15,000


	
Compensation Committee

	
$10,000


	
Conflicts Committee

	
$15,000










Travel Expense Reimbursement:







Each Non-Employee Director travelling from Asia or the Americas to attend Board and/or Board committee meetings shall receive a per diem compensation rate of $2,500 per travel event.