alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-10-00334-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

NOE NOYOLA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Noe Noyola, was convicted of possession of cocaine. On June 18, 

2010, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. On August 31, 2010, this Court abated 

the appeal and remanded to the trial court because appointed counsel, the Honorable 

Deeanne S. Galvan, advised this Court that she no longer represented appellant and the 

record failed to indicate whether appellant was entitled to appointed counsel on appeal. 
2

At the trial court hearing, appellant appeared with retained counsel, the Honorable 

Dee Ann Torres, and stated that he did not desire to prosecute an appeal in this cause. 

At the hearing it was established that neither Ms. Galvan nor Ms. Torres filed a notice of 

appeal on behalf of appellant and that appellant has chosen not to pursue an appeal.

Based upon the evidence at the hearing that appellant does not want to pursue an 

appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in 

this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the 3rd

day of February, 2011.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2219 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

National Gallery of Art, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, National Gallery of Art, Salaries and 

Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, NATIONAL GALLERY OF 

5 ART, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Related Agencies, National Gallery of Art, SalaVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:46 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2219.IH H2219

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2219 IH

1 ries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $144,202,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Order entered February 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01276-CV

STEVEN WELLS, Appellant

V.

GLEN DALE MOTOR CO. AND TOMSIC MOTOR CO., Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-03265

ORDER

Both the clerk’s and reporter’s records in this case are overdue. By postcard dated 

November 1, 2013, we notified the court reporter that the reporter’s record was overdue. We 

directed the court reporter to file the record within thirty days. To date, the reporter’s record has 

not been filed. Also by postcard dated November 1, 2013, we notified the district clerk that the 

clerk’s record was overdue. We directed the district clerk to file the clerk’s record within thirty 

days. To date, the clerk’s record has not been filed. 

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within TEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, either the clerk’s record or written verification that appellant has 

not been found indigent and has not paid for the record. We notifiy appellant that if we receive 
verification he is not indigent and has not paid for the record, we will, without further notice, 

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

We ORDER Vielica Dobbins, official court reporter for the 134th Judicial District Court, 

to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, either: (1) the reporter’s record; (2) 

written verification that no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has 

not been found indigent and has not paid for the record. We notifiy appellant that if we receive 

verification he is not indigent and has not paid for the record, we will order the appeal submitted 

without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c) 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic tranmission, to the 

following persons:

Gary Fitzsimmons

Dallas County District Clerk

Vielica Dobbins

Official Court Reporter, 134th Judicial District Court

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
---

EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent
of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors 
ACME Communications, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statement (No. 333-86158) on Form S-8 of ACME
Communications, Inc. of our report dated April 11, 2006, except as to Note 3, which is as
of March 30, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of ACME Communications,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005, and all related financial statement
schedules as of December 31, 2005 and for the two-year period ended December 31, 2005,
which report appears in the December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K of
ACME Communications, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 30, 2007
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of NeuMedia, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 of the Company (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 22, 2011





/s/ Lisa LuceroLisa LuceroCFO, Twistbox Entertainment, Inc.(Principal Financial Officer)
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:  May                4, 2006 | /s/ William                F.                Hecht                                    |
|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                        | William                F. HechtPresidentPPL                Energy Supply, LLC                                                                                                                                                                                             |
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2355 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Foreign Military 

Financing Program for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for 

Foreign Military Financing Program for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 FOREIGN MILITARY FINANCING PROGRAM 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Foreign Military Financing Program for fiscal 

9 year 2024 may not exceed $5,962,241,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-93623), Form S-8 (File No. 333-93625) and
Form S-3 (File No. 333-65730) of Triton PCS Holdings, Inc., and its
subsidiaries of our report dated February 14, 2003, except for Note 16, as to
which the date is February 26, 2003, relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia Pennsylvania
March 24, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2011 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2011

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
    Health and Human Services, The Administration for Children and 
      Families, Social Services Block Grant for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
    Health and Human Services, The Administration for Children and 
      Families, Social Services Block Grant for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 
              AND HUMAN SERVICES, THE ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND 
              FAMILIES, SOCIAL SERVICES BLOCK GRANT FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Health and 
Human Services, The Administration for Children and Families, Social 
Services Block Grant for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$1,700,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2381 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2381

   To nullify the termination of the Fulbright exchange program with 
  regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for 
  participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

    Mr. Larsen of Washington (for himself, Mr. Beyer, and Ms. Chu) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                            Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To nullify the termination of the Fulbright exchange program with 
  regard to China and Hong Kong with respect to future exchanges for 
  participants traveling both from and to China or Hong Kong, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Fulbright Exchanges with 
China and Hong Kong Act''.

SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION.

    Section 3(i) of Executive Order 13936 (relating to the termination 
of the Fulbright exchange program with regard to China and Hong Kong 
with respect to future exchanges for participants traveling both from 
and to China or Hong Kong) is nullified and shall have no force or 
effect, and Fulbright exchanges with China and Hong Kong shall carry on 
as if such section had not been included in such Executive Order.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James C. Malone, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of The TriZetto Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                     |  |  |  |                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Date: March 28, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/    JAMES C. MALONE        
|                     |  |  |  | Name: James C. Malone         
|                     |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

[Avalanche Biotechnologies, Inc. letterhead] 

August 11, 2015 
 Linda Bain 

1035 O’Brien Drive 
 Suite A 

Menlo Park, California 94025 
 Re: CFO Compensation 

Dear Linda: 
 The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of
Avalanche Biotechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”) has determined to grant you a special bonus for your services as Chief Financial Officer of the Company (the “Special Bonus”). Subject to your continued employment with the Company
through August 11, 2016, you will be entitled to receive a one-time cash bonus of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000), less applicable withholdings, payable in a lump sum within ten (10) business days thereafter. This Special Bonus is in
addition to your base salary and annual bonus otherwise payable to you. 
 Additionally, effective August 15, 2015, the Board has determined to
increase your annual base salary to $360,000 per year. 
 We greatly appreciate your services to the Company during this transition time. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	 /s/ Mark S. Blumenkranz
  

Mark S. Blumenkranz, M.D.
 Chairman of the Board
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A1 78 9 . J EFFREY T. POW ELL v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 0 9

, J effrey Po wel l p l ed g u il ty t o co ns p i ra c y t o p o s s es s wi t h i n t en t to

d i s t r i b u t e m et ham

p h et am in e, an d t h e t ri al co u rt i m p o sed a 1 5-y ear sen t en ce. Th e

reco rd co n t ai n s n o i n d i cat i o n t h at Po wel l fi l ed a d i rect ap peal fro m hi s ju d g m en t o f

co n vi ct i o n . In 2 0 1 9

, Po wel l fi l ed s ev eral m o t i o n s ch al l en g in g t h e co n s t i t u t i o n al i t y

o f h is s en t en ce. Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed Po wel l ’ s m o t i on s i n an o rd er en t ered o n M ay

3 0

, 2 01 9

, an d Po wel l fi l ed t h i s n o t i ce o f ap p eal o n March 1 3

, 2 0 2 0

. 1 W e l ack

ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

A n o t i ce o f ap p eal m

u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry o f th e j u d gm en t o r t ri al

co u rt o rd er s o u g h t t o b e ap p eal ed

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro p er an d t i m el y fi l i n g

o f a n o t ice o f ap p eal i s an ab so l ut e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ap p el l at e ju ri s d i ct i on o n t h i s

Co u rt

. R o wl an d v

. S t a t e

, 2 6 4 Ga. 8 7 2

, 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Po wel l ’ s

n o t i ce o f ap p eal was un t i m el y fi l ed 2 8 8 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e M ay

3 0, 2 0 1 9 o rd er.

1 Po wel l ’ s no t i ce o f ap p eal d o es n ot i d en t i fy t h e t ri al co u rt o rd er h e s eek s to

a p p e a l

. Th e M ay 3 0

, 2 0 1 9 o rd er was t h e l as t t ri al co u rt o rd er en t ered i n t h i s c a s e

b efo re Po wel l fi l ed h i s n o t i ce o f ap p eal . Aft er Po wel l fi l ed h i s n ot i ce o f ap p eal , h e

fi led a “ M o t io n fo r St at u te Cl a r i f i c a t i o n ,” wh ich t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed o n Ap ri l 2,

2 0 2 0 . W e d o n o t co n s t ru e Po wel l ’ s n o t i ce o f ap p eal as s eek i ng rev i ew o f th e Ap ri l

2 o rd er b ecau s e th at o rd er d i s p o s ed o f a m o t i o n t h at h ad no t y et b een fi l ed wh en

Po wel l fi l ed h is n ot i ce o f ap p eal

. May 11, 2020C on s eq u en t l y

, we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h is u n t i m el y ap p eal

, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 05/11/2020
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

d0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

147127

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147127

COA: 307645

Genesee CC: 11

- 028599

- FH

WILLIAM JOSEPH MOODY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it i s DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### Rosetta Marketing Group, LLC, et al., Appellants, v Steven Michaelson et al., Respondents.

[966 NYS2d 671]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Melvin L. Schweitzer, J.), entered December 19, 2012, which, in this breach of contract action, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

While the parties dispute the factual assertions surrounding the negotiation and execution of the separation agreements, which contain a one-year noncompete term, as well as whether those agreements concern and supersede the parties’ earlier executed purchase agreement, which contains the disputed five-year term, the motion court correctly found that, overall, the comparative harm to the employee defendants in allowing enforcement of a five-year noncompete term is significantly greater than the harm to the employer plaintiffs. Further, plaintiffs failed to establish, a likelihood of success on the merits (see *Gilliland v Acquafredda Enters., LLC,*92 AD3d 19, 24-25 [1st Dept 2011]). Nor have plaintiffs shown that they would be irreparably harmed absent a preliminary injunction, as any harm could be compensated by money damages (see *GFI Sec., LLC v Tradition Asiel Sec., Inc.,*61 AD3d 586, 586 [1st Dept 2009]).

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Feinman, JJ.
1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-3956

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Laura A. Seger, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 30, 2003 Filed: October 6, 2003

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Laura Seger pleaded guilty to an indictment charging her with possessing with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Count I), and possessing a short-barreled shotgun in relation to the charged drug-trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924 and 2 (Count II). At sentencing, the district court 1 denied Seger’s motion for a downward departure and sentenced her to consecutive terms of 21 months’ imprisonment on Count I and 120 months’-2- imprisonment on Count II, to be followed by concurrent 3-year terms of supervised release. Seger appeals, arguing that the district court erred in denying her departure motion. We conclude that Seger’s argument is unavailing. The district court lacked the power to depart below the 10-year statutory minimum for Count II, see United States v. Villar , 184 F.3d 801, 803 (8th Cir. 1999), and we do not review the district court’s discretionary decision not to depart from the Guidelines imprisonment range for Count I, see United States v. Rice , 332 F.3d 538, 540 (8th Cir. 2003). The judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00168-CV

Dora Guzman, Norma Cadriel Hernandez, and Rubi Moreno

v.

Louis Sorola

On Appeal from the

197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-DCL-05869-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed 

in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the 

case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the 

appeal are adjudged against appellants, Dora Guzman and Rubi Moreno.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 27, 2022