1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) AL HALMANDY, et al. ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-2385 (ESH) ) BARACK OBAMA, et al. , ) (Saleh, ISN 78) ) ) Respondents. ) __________________________________________)

ORDER The Court hereby amends the Case Ma nagement Order (“CMO”) issued in In re Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litig. , Misc. No. 08-442, Dkt. No. 940 (Nov. 6, 2008) (TFH), amended by , Misc. No. 08-442, Dkt. No. 1315 (Dec. 16, 2008) (TFH), for the case before the Court involving petitioner Mohammed (ISN 570). It is hereby ORDERED that in addition to those procedures set forth in the CMO, and, where inconsistent with the provisions of the CMO, in replacement thereof, the following procedures shall govern the case of the above-named petitioner:
1. Statement of Material Facts On or before July 20, 2009, the government sh all file a numbered statement of material facts upon which it intends to rely in making its case-in-chief. The statem ent of material facts shall provide a short statement of each material fact upon which the government intends to rely in making its case-in-chief, and it shall identify all ev idence the government e xpects to elicit in support of those facts and how it intends to present the eviden ce, including the names of any2 witnesses the government intends to call. The g overnment shall not be precluded from relying on evidence not contained in its st atement of material facts to re but petitioner’s arguments on the merits.
2. Automatic Discovery The government shall produce the following auto matic discovery to the extent that it constitutes “reasonably available evidence.” “Reasonably available evidence” includes any evidence discovered by the government attorneys wh ile preparing the pet itioner’s factual return 1 and while litigating habeas corpus petitions file d by other detainees at Guantanamo Bay, as well as any evidence discovered during the ongoing review of Gu antanamo cases ordered by President Obama on January 22, 2009. See Executive Order 13,492, § 2(d) (ordering the “prompt and thorough review of the factual and le gal bases for the continued detention of all individuals currently held at Gu antanamo, and of whether their continued detention is in the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and in the interests of justice”); see also id. § 4. If the government intends to rely on any statem ents in its statement of material facts, it shall produce, to the Court and to petitioner’s co unsel, on or before July 20, 2009, the statements, in whatever form, including any:

a. audio recordings of statements; b. video recordings of statements;

c. transcripts of statements; d. contemporaneous notes taken during statements; or

1 As agreed by the government, this includes “review of all of the information included in the records of a detainee’s Combatant Status Review Tribunal (“CS RT”) and Administrative Review Board (“ARB”) proceedings, as well as additional information reasona bly available to the Department of Defense.” Government’s Motion for Clarification and Reconsider ation, 8, Misc. No. 08-442, Dkt. No. 1004 (Nov. 18, 2008) (TFH); see also England Decl. ¶¶ 5-8.3 e. records or reports of statements prepared by persons other than the persons who prepared the summaries of the statements already produced. In addition, the government shall pr oduce: (1) the identity of the speaker; (2) the content of the statement; (3) the person(s) to wh om the statement was made; (4) the date and time the statement was made or adopted; and (5) the circumstan ces under which such statement was made or adopted (including the location where the statem ent was made). If the government cannot identify the original source or any later source of information of information relied upon in its statement of material facts, it must so indicate. If the government intends to rely on a ny documents (including 302 reports) in its statement of material facts, the documents sh all be produced to the Court and petitioner’s counsel on or before July 20, 2009, and the relevant portions of the documents shall be identified (by page and paragraph number) unl ess the government intends to rely on the entire document. No other automatic discovery obliga tions shall apply at this time.
3. Declassified Versions: As soon as possible, petitioner shall inform the government of those portions of the unclassified return and attachments thereto that he seeks to have declassified. Under the heading “High Priority Items,” petitioner shall identify the items he considers most important to his ability to present his defense. By not late r than June 8, 2009, the gove rnment shall file the declassified return, and if it will not declassify any priority item, it shall provide a justification for each item it has determined not to declassify.
4. Exculpatory Evidence On or before July 20, 2009, the government sh all disclose to petitioner’s counsel all reasonably available evidence in its possession that tends to materially undermine the evidence4 that the government intends to rely on in its case-in-chief, including any evidence or information that undercuts the reliability and/or cred ibility of the government’s evidence, ( i.e. , such as evidence that casts doubt on a speak er’s credibility, evidence that undermines the reliability of a witness’s identification of the petitioner, or ev idence that indicates a statement is unreliable because it is the product of abus e, torture, or mental or physical incapacity). The term “reasonably available evidence” is defined in se ction 2 of this Order. This definition of exculpatory evidence encompasses, but is not li mited to, the exculpatory evidence required under Part I.D.1 of the CMO. On or before July 24, 2009, the government shall file a written updated certification, signed by counsel, that indicates th e scope of its search for excu lpatory evidence and the results of that search.
5. Proposed Plan On or before August 3, 2009, petitioner shall f ile a proposed plan that specifies whether petitioner intends to proceed by seeking additional discovery, by filing a traverse, or by briefing a motion for expedited judgment on the record. If petitioner seeks to move for additional di scovery pursuant to Part I.E.2 of the CMO, petitioner must confer with opposing couns el before submitting any such motion. Petitioner may elect to file a motion for e xpedited judgment on the record if petitioner believes in good faith that the factual allegatio ns against him set forth in the government’s statement of material facts, even if assumed to be true, do not, as a legal matter, justify his detention pursuant to the author ity conferred to the President by the Authorization for Use of Military Force, Pub. L. No. 107- 40, § 2(a), 115 Stat. 225, 224 (2001).5 Petitioner shall not waive his ri ght to request further discov ery if petitioner elects to proceed by first submitting a traverse or moti on for expedited judgment on the record.
6. Hearing The next status conference for petitioner Sa leh is scheduled for August 12, 2009, at 9:30

a.m. 7. Issues relating to Sectio n II of Judge Hogan’s CMO will be held in abeyance pending further order of this Court.

S O ORDERED.

/s/ ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE United States District Judge DATE: April 30, 2009