alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated CapitalProperties III (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executiveofficer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of thechief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
#### Shirley Scalice, Respondent, v Monica E. Carter, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[825 NYS2d 652]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered March 20, 2006. The order granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint unless plaintiff served the summons and complaint on or before a certain date.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present—Hurlbutt, J.E, Gorski, Smith and Pine, JJ.
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
Exhibit 99(f)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
  2003

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Electric Utilities
  Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"),
  I, the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  hereby certify that:

| | · | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| | · | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: May 13, 2003 | /s/ James E. AbelJames E. AbelTreasurerPPL Electric Utilities Corporation
|------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2015 Q4 10K EX.10.17






Exhibit 10.17


AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO THE
PERRIGO COMPANY
2013 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, Perrigo Company plc (the “Company”) sponsors the Perrigo Company 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to limit the total number of shares subject to awards that may be granted to any one non-employee director of the Company in any one calendar year.
NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the amending authority reserved by the Plan sponsor pursuant to Section 15(a) of the Plan, effective as of June 10, 2015, the third sentence of subsection (b) of Section 4 of the Plan (“Shares Subject to the Plan”) is hereby amended to read as follows:
No individual Employee or consultant may be granted Awards in any one calendar year with respect to more than 400,000 Shares, and no individual non-employee director of the Company may be granted Awards in any one calendar year with respect to more than 25,000 Shares.
*    *    *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Perrigo Company plc has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 9th day of July, 2015.
PERRIGO COMPANY PLC


	
		
	By:
	/s/ Judy L. Brown




	
		
	Title:
	EVP, CFO
#### STATE EX REL. HAROLD GENE PINKERMAN v. L. F. UTECHT.1

June 9, 1950.

No. 35,243.

*Harold Gene Pinkerman, pro se.*

*J. A. A. Burnquist,*Attorney General, and *Ralph A. Stone*and *Charles E. Houston,*Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

1

 Reported in 43 N. W. (2d) 97.

Pek Curiam.

Petitioner appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The petition sets forth that on‘October 8, 1943, an information was filed in the office of the clerk of the district court of Hennepin county charging petitioner with the crime of burglary in the third degree, and that on October 12, 1943, petitioner duly entered a plea of guilty as charged. Thereafter, on October 12, 1943, an information was filed charging petitioner with three prior convictions. Specifically, the information stated that on or about Jan-*332nary 27, 1933, petitioner was duly convicted of breaking and entering in the district court of Boyd county, Lynch, Nebraska; that on or about April 17, 1935, he was duly convicted of the charge of grand larceny in the district court of Dawes county, Chadron, Nebraska; and that on or about December 13, 1937, he was duly convicted of burglary in the second degree in the district court of King county, Renton, Washington. In each instance, he was sentenced to a term of years. Petitioner duly entered a plea of guilty to the prior convictions. October 12, 1943, the district court of Hennepin county pronounced sentence and entered judgment, confining petitioner at hard labor in the state prison at Stillwater for a term of not to exceed 10 years.

The contention of petitioner is that,' because no statement appears either in the minutes of the conviction and sentence or in the judgment itself as to what substance the three prior convictions consisted of, the judgment of conviction is void upon its face and that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to pronounce and impose it. The contention is without merit. In ascertaining a jurisdictional fact, the court will pursue its inquiry through the record of the proceedings, and where the court is one of general jurisdiction habeas corpus can be invoked only where lack of jurisdiction appears *on the face of the record.*State ex rel. DuFault v. Utecht, 220 Minn. 431, 19 N. W. (2d) 706, 161 A. L. R. 1316, and cases cited therein. In the case at bar, the record discloses that the prior convictions were described in detail in the information; hence the judgment is valid.

The record also discloses that petitioner raised the question here presented in a previous application for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was discharged on February 15, 1949, and no appeal was taken to this court. The issue is now *res judicata.*State ex rel. DuFault v. Utecht, 220 Minn. 431, 19 N. W. (2d) 706, 161 A. L. R. 1316; Guy v. Utecht, 229 Minn. 58, 38 N. W. (2d) 59, certiorari denied, 338 U. S. 905, 70 S. Ct. 307, 94 L. ed.-.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         For the month of November 2004

                        Commission File Number 333-101591

                          GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION

                              5100 W. Lemon Street
                                   Suite 3100
                                 Tampa, Florida
                                      33609

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
                      under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                          Form 20-F____ Form 40-F __X__

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
                permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
     Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                Yes ____ No __X__

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
                  connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Exhibit                                   Description
-------                                   -----------
<S>               <C>
  99.1            Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004

  99.2            Financial Statements for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 prepared in
                  accordance with Canadian GAAP

  99.3            Certifications pursuant to Canadian law
</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 8, 2004

                                         GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION

                                         By:   /s/ Tom J. Landa
                                               ---------------------------------
                                         Name: Tom J. Landa
                                         Title: Vice-President, Chief Financial
                                                Officer and Secretary
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFIED WRITTEN STATEMENT ACCOMPANYING
                    ----------------------------------------

                           PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS
                           --------------------------

                          (PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350)
                          ----------------------------


The undersigned, Cody C. Ashwell, Chief Executive Officer, and Richard A.
Gartrell, Chief Financial Officer, of Javo Beverage Company, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), each hereby certify that--

The accompanying periodic report containing financial statements filed by the
Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)); and

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this certificate, which
accompanies the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the annual period
ended December 31, 2004.

Dated: March 31, 2005
                                   /s/ Cody C. Ashwell
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Cody C. Ashwell, Chief Executive Officer and
                                   Chairman of the Board

Dated: March 31, 2005
                                   /s/ Richard A. Gartrell
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Richard A. Gartrell, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Pullen, the Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert W. Pullen   
|Robert W. Pullen       
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: November 10, 2009









A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 15, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 15, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A1895. MARY SMITH d/b/a LION OF JUDAH v. THE AOK MEMORIAL

PROPERTIES, LLC.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

STANLEY HICKMAN, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:93-cr-00144-BO-3) 

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Stanley Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Stanley Hickman appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Hickman, No. 5:93-cr-00144-BO3 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 17, 2008 & entered Dec. 23, 2008). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32
 
 CHEMBIO
DIAGNOSTICS, INC.
 SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
 
 In
connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, each of the
undersigned, Lawrence A. Siebert, the Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman of the Company, and Richard J. Larkin, the Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
              This
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in this Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc. for the
      periods presented therein.
 
  Date:
March 18, 2009
 
  /s / Lawrence A.
Siebert
 Lawrence
A. Siebert
 Chief
Executive Officer, President and Chairman
 (Principle
Executive Officer)
 
 
 /s./ Richard J.
Larkin
 Richard
J. Larkin
 Chief
Financial Officer
 (Principle
Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

MARGARET TURNER MCDONALD, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-0158-CG-M

)

PROGRESSIVE SPECIALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

)

)

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

The parties having filed a Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. 13) this date, all 

claims in this cause are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Rule 

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear her or

its own costs.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of December, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00158-CG-M Document 14 Filed 12/08/15 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Chrystie A. Cottone, Respondent. Marino-Palmieri Agency, Inc., Appellant; Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 342]—

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 23, 2012, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

Claimant worked as a customer service representative for the employer and the prior owner of the business for approximately 15 years. In February 2009, approximately one year after the *1045employer took over the business, claimant resigned, citing childcare issues. Claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits was initially denied and, following a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge upheld that determination. Ultimately, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board determined that claimant left her employment for good cause and ruled that she was eligible to receive benefits. The employer now appeals.

“Whether a claimant has good cause to leave his or her employment is a factual determination to be made by the Board, and its decision will not be disturbed when supported by substantial evidence” *(Matter of Heller [Paragon Motors of Woodside, Inc.*— Commissioner *of Labor],*83 AD3d 1229, 1229 [2011] [citations omitted]; *see Matter of Grace [Astrocom Elees., Inc.*— Commissioner *of Labor],*69 AD3d 1156, 1157 [2010]). Claimant offered multiple reasons that she was dissatisfied with her employment, but the record supports the Board’s conclusion that the impetus for her resignation was an inability to arrange appropriate child care despite having made sufficient efforts in that regard. We find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that, under all of the circumstances presented here, claimant had good cause to leave her employment *(see Matter of Heller [Paragon Motors of Woodside,*Inc.— *Commissioner of Labor],*83 AD3d at 1230; *compare Matter of Denson [Commissioner of Labor],*34 AD3d 893, 893-894 [2006]).

Peters, EJ., Lahtinen, Stein and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Manakoa  Services  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each
of the undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date: November 5, 2004                        By: /s/ G. Robert Williams
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    G. Robert Williams
                                                    C.E.O.
                                                   (Principle Executive Officer)

Date: November 5, 2004                        By: /s/ James C. Katzaroff
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    James C. Katzaroff
                                                    President & Acting Treasurer
                                                   (Principle Financial Officer)



A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required  by Section  906,  has been  provided  to  Manakoa  Services
Corporation and will be retained by Manakoa Services Corporation,  and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41004 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN MANUEL GUEVARA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-49-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Manuel Guevara appeals his guilty-plea conviction for possession of more than 50 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute. Guevara argues that his conviction should be reversed because 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). This issue is foreclosed, as Guevara concedes, by United States v. Slaughter , 238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir. 2000). Guevara’s conviction is
AFFIRMED.