Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 30, 2014 / Notices 78477 

4Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: 

http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/

rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf. 

5Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov. 

and a submission pursuant to section 

210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure filed on behalf 

of Cisco Systems, Inc. on December 19, 

2014. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into 

the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain network devices, related 

software and components thereof (II). 

The complaint names as respondents 

Arista Networks, Inc. of Santa Clara, CA. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission issue a limited exclusion 

order, cease and desist orders, and a 

bond upon respondents’ alleged 

infringing articles during the 60-day 

Presidential review period pursuant to 

19 U.S.C. 1337(j). 

Proposed respondents, other 

interested parties, and members of the 

public are invited to file comments, not 

to exceed five (5) pages in length, 

inclusive of attachments, on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments 

should address whether issuance of the 

relief specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the requested 

remedial orders would impact United 

States consumers. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, eight 

calendar days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to section 

210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to 

the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 3046’’) 

in a prominent place on the cover page 

and/or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic 

Filing Procedures 4). Persons with 

questions regarding filing should 

contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary and on EDIS.5

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: December 19, 2014. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30386 Filed 12–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–941] 

Certain Graphics Processing Chips, 

Systems on a Chip, and Products 

Containing the Same; Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

November 21, 2014, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd of the Republic of 

Korea and Samsung Austin 

Semiconductor, LLC of Austin, Texas. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain graphics processing chips, 

systems on a chip, and products 

containing the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 6,147,385 (‘‘the ’385 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. 6,173,349 (‘‘the ’349 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,056,776 (‘‘the 

’776 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 

7,804,734 (‘‘the ’734 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists or, 

alternatively, is in the process of being 

established as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

http://www.usitc.gov. The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

Authority: The authority for institution of 

this investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 

in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2014). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

78478 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 249 / Tuesday, December 30, 2014 / Notices 

International Trade Commission, on 

December 22, 2014, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain graphics 

processing chips, systems on a chip, and 

products containing the same by reason 

of infringement of one or more of claims 

1–4, 6, and 19–21 of the ’385 patent; 

claim 10 of the ’349 patent; claims 1, 2, 

4, 19, 20, and 22 of the ’776 patent; and 

claims 1–3, 7–9, 12–15, 17, and 19 of 

the ’734 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties and 

other interested persons with respect to 

the public interest in this investigation, 

as appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors set forth 

in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainants are: 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 129, 

Samsung-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, 

Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea 443– 

742. 

Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC, 

12100 Samsung Boulevard, Austin, 

TX 78754. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

NVIDIA Corporation, 701 San Tomas 

Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050. 

Biostar Microtech International Corp., 2 

Floor, No. l08–2 Min Chuan Road, 

Hsin Tien District, New Taipei, 231, 

Taiwan. 

Biostar Microtech (U.S.A.) Corp., 18551 

Gale Avenue, City of Industry, CA 

91748–1338. 

Elitegroup Computer Systems Co. Ltd., 

No. 239, Sec. 2, Ti Ding Blvd., Taipei, 

Taiwan 11493. 

Elitegroup Computer Systems, Inc., 

6851 Mowry Avenue, Newark, CA 

94560. 

EVGA Corp., 2900 Saturn Street, Suite 

B, Brea, CA 92821. 

Fuhu, Inc., 909 North Sepulveda 

Boulevard, El Segundo, CA 90245. 

Jaton Corp., 47677 Lakeview Boulevard, 

Fremont, CA 94538. 

Mad Catz, Inc., 7480 Mission Valley 

Road, San Diego, CA 92108. 

OUYA, Inc., 1316 3rd Street, Santa 

Monica, CA 90401. 

Sparkle Computer Co., Ltd., 5F.–7, No. 

79, Section l, Xı ̄nta ́iwu ̆ Rd, Sijhih 

District, New Taipei City 221, Taiwan. 

Toradex, lnc., 219 lst Avenue, Seattle, 

WA 98109. 

Wikipad, Inc., 2625 Townsgate Road, 

Suite 330, Westlake Village, CA 

91361. 

ZOTAC International (MCO) Ltd, 18–24 

Shan Mei Street, Fo Tan, Shatin, New 

Territories, Hong Kong. 

ZOTAC USA, Inc., 5793 McCully Street, 

Chino, CA 91710. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

Issued: December 23, 2014. 

By order of the Commission. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30484 Filed 12–29–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–942] 

Certain Wireless Devices, Including 

Mobile Phones and Tablets III; 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

November 24, 2014, under section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Pragmatus 

Mobile, LLC of Alexandria, Virginia. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain wireless devices, including 

mobile phones and tablets, by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 8,466,795 (‘‘the ‘795 patent’’). 

The complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainants request that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

http://www.usitc.gov. The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s electronic docket 

(EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES