alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-40186 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus WESLEY WILLIAM WALTER, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4::95-CV-282

- - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * IT IS ORDERED that Wesley William Walter's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED. Walter has not demonstrated cause and prejudice for failing to raise new arguments in his prior motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See McCleskey v. Zant , 499 U.S. 467, 494 (1991). Nor has he shown that a fundamental miscarriage of justice would result if the new claims orNo. 96-40186 -2- previously raised claims are not heard. Id . at 495; United States v. Flores , 981 F.2d 231, 236 (5th Cir. 1993). Thus, the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing this § 2255 motion as an abuse of the procedure. Walter can present no legal points arguable on their merits, and his appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Walter that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Walter is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2227 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, 

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Salaries and Expenses for 

fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related Agencies, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 RELATED AGENCIES, ADVISORY COUNCIL ON 

5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION, SALARIES AND EX6 PENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Related Agencies, Advisory Council on Historic 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2227 IH

1 Preservation, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 

2 may not exceed $6,890,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### United States *v.*Greenman.

*(District Court, D. Connecticut.*

December 15, 1888.)

Pilots—Violation of Navigation Rules—Statutes—Repeal.

Rev. St. U. S. § 4412, empowering the board of supervising inspectors to establish such regulations to be observed by steam-vesseis, to which chapter 1, tit. 52 relates, in passing each other in the waters of the United States, as it shall from time to time deem necessary, is not repealed by act Oong. March3, 1885, adopting the revised international regulations to prevent collision at sea, and a pilot violating a rule established by such board is liable to the penalty therefor imposed by section 4413.

On Demurrer.

*George G. Sill,*U. S. Dist. Atty., for the United States.

*Hadlai A. Hull,*for defendant.

Shipman, J.

This is a demurrer to an information for a misdemeanor under section 4413 of the Revised Statutes. I am of opinion that section 4412 of the Revised Statutes is not repealed by the second section of the act of March 3, 1885, entitled “An act to adopt the revised international regulations to prevent collisions at sea,” but that the board of supervising inspectors still has power to establish such regulations to be observed by the steam-vessels, to which chapter 1, tit. 52, relates, and which are passing each other in the waters of the United States, as the board shall from time to time deem necessary for safetj'-, such regulations to be in conformity with the existing laws of the United States. Article 20 of the international regulations, and rule 22 of the rules contained in section 4233 of the Revised Statutes declare the general duty of vessels which overtake each other, and are substantially alike. By virtue of section 4412 the board of supervising inspectors established rule 8, which specifies the particular duty of the pilot of a steamer overtaking and endeavoring to pass another steamer. This rule is still in existence, and for a willful refusal, in coast waters of the United States, to observe it, the offender is liable to a penalty by virtue of section 4413 of the Revised Statutes. The demurrer is not sustained.
Order entered October 17, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00805 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 00830 - CR ROBERT RICHARDSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On App eal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F15 - 76782 - U , F17 - 18579 - U



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 15, 2018 pro se motion to extend the time to file his pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s pro se response filed no later than December 5, 2018

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 5 (Thursday, January 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 1030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00064]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than January 23, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Toby R. Kommer, Fargo, North Dakota; to acquire voting shares of 
Hatton Bancshares, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota, and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of The Farmers and Merchants National Bank of 
Hatton, Hatton, North Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 5, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-00064 Filed 1-7-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
##### 



AUDITORS CONSENT To the Board of Directors
Masonite International Corporation We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of (i) our audit
report dated February 10, 2004, except with respect to Note 18 which is as of
March 2, 2004 on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Masonite International
Corporation as at December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the Consolidated Statements
of Income, Retained Earnings and Cash Flows for the years then ended, and (ii)
our Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Difference
dated February 10, 2004, except with respect to Note 18 which is as of March 2,
2004. /s/ KPMG LLP Chartered Accountants Toronto, Canada
February 10, 2004
EXHIBIT 21.1



CURRENT SUBSIDIARIES OF TRIZETTO



|                                              |  |             
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|ENTITY NAME                                   |  | JURISDICTION
|                                              | 
|Creative Business Solutions, Inc.             |  | Texas       
|                                              | 
|Finserv Health Care Systems, Inc.             |  | New York    
|                                              | 
|Healthcare Media Enterprises, Inc.            |  | Delaware    
|                                              | 
|Healthcare Media Private Limited              |  | India       
|                                              | 
|HealthWeb, Inc.                               |  | Delaware    
|                                              | 
|Margolis Health Enterprises, Inc.             |  | California  
|                                              | 
|Novalis Corporation                           |  | Delaware    
|                                              | 
|Digital Insurance Systems Corporation         |  | Ohio        
|                                              | 
|Health Networks of America, Inc.              |  | Maryland    
|                                              | 
|Novalis Development Corporation               |  | Delaware    
|                                              | 
|Novalis Development & Licensing Corporation   |  | Indiana     
|                                              | 
|Novalis Services Corporation                  |  | Delaware    
|                                              | 
|Resource Information Management Systems, Inc. |  | Illinois    
|                                              | 
|Options Services Group, Inc.                  |  | Illinois    
|                                              | 
|Winthrop Financial Group, Inc.                |  | Illinois    
|                                              | 
|TriZetto Application Services, Inc.           |  | Colorado
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF LINDA BRYSON


                        CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

In connection with the Annual Report of Triad  Industries,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Linda
Bryson,  President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 24, 2004                     By: /s/ Linda Bryson
                                                       -----------------
                                                          Linda Bryson
                                                          President
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 22, 2015.

________________

No. 3D15-144

Lower Tribunal No. 98-31951

________________

Daquilard Ilarion,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Eric William Hendon, Judge.

Daquilard Ilarion, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Senior Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, LOGUE and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On Concession of Error
Diquilard Ilarion appeals the trial court’s denial of his amended motion to

correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure

3.800(a). The trial court’s order on Ilarion’s amended motion determined correctly

that “the sentence as to count two exceeds the statutory maximum, and should be

reduced to 5 years in state prison.” In the written corrected sentence on count two

entered July 25, 2014, however, the trial court adjudicated Ilarion a violent career

criminal (VCC) in accordance with section 775.084(4), Florida Statutes (1999).

As correctly conceded by the State, the VCC adjudication was improper as

to count two, a grand theft conviction. Ubilla v. State, 8 So. 3d 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA

2009). We reverse that adjudication and remand the case to the trial court to

remove the VCC designation from the sentence on count two. As a ministerial act,

the remand and corrected sentence will not require the personal presence of the

defendant. 

Reversed and remanded for the issuance of a corrected sentence on count

two in accordance with this opinion. 

2
Exhibit 10.3 Amendment to Note 7.7.15





AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE




THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of July 7, 2015 (the “Amendment”) to the Promissory Note referred to below is entered into by and between, McKinley Enterprise, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (the “Creditor”) and Jolley Marketing, Inc. (the “Debtor”).




WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Promissory Note on July 16, 2012 (the “Note”);




WHEREAS, the original maturity date of the Note was July 16, 2014.




WHEREAS, an amendment to the promissory note was made on November 3, 2014 to extend the 

maturity date to July 16, 2015.




WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Note to extend the maturity date thereof.




NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the receipt of good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:




MATURITY:  The maturity date of the Note is hereby extended to July 16, 2016.




EFFECTIVE DATE:  The effective date of this Amendment shall be July 7, 2015.




GENERAL PROVISIONS:




(a)

Except as amended hereby, the Note shall continue to be, and shall remain, in full force and effect. This Amendment shall not, except as otherwise provided herein, be deemed (i) to be a waiver of, or consent to, or a modification or amendment of, any other term or condition of the Note or (ii) to prejudice any right or rights which the parties may now have or may have in the future under or in connection with the Note, as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.




(b)

The terms of the Note are incorporated herein by reference and shall form a part of this Amendment as if set forth herein in their entirety.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be executed individually or by its officer thereunto duly authorized, as of the respective dates set forth below.




JOLLEY MARKETING, INC.







Date:  July 7, 2015

/s/  Steve White

By Steve White, President 










McKINLEY ENTERPRISE, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN







Date:  July 7, 2015

/s/  David Nemelka

By David Nemelka, Trustee
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 6 (Friday, January 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1407-1408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the

[[Page 1408]]

following meeting related to the transmission planning activities of 
the New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    The New York Independent System Operator, Inc. Electric System 
Planning Working Group Meeting:
January 6, 2015, 10:05 a.m.-11:25 a.m. (EST)
    The above-referenced meeting will be via teleconference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: http://www.nyiso.com/public/energy_future/nyiso_planning/nyiso_services/index.jsp
    The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters 
at issue in the following proceedings:
    Order No. 1000, Final Rule on Transmission Planning and Cost 
Allocation by Transmission Owning and Public Utilities, Order No. 1000, 
136 FERC ] 61,051 (2011), order on reh'g and clarification, Order No. 
1000-A, 139 FERC ] 61,132 (2012).
    Docket No: ER13-102, New York Independent System Operator, Inc. and 
New York Transmission Owners.
    For more information, contact James Eason, Office of Energy Market 
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-8622 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcf6ddd1d9cf92f9ddcfd3d2fcdad9cedf92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d173c30382e73183c2e32331d3b382f3e733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 5, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00160 Filed 1-8-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
April 28, 2000


               QUARTERLY REPORT TO THE LIMITED PARTNERS
                     OF DSI REALTY INCOME FUND VI


DEAR LIMITED PARTNERS:

We are pleased to enclose the Partnership's unaudited financial statements
for the period ended March 31, 2000. The following is Management's discussion
and analysis of the Partnership's financial condition and results of its
operations.

For the three month periods ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, total revenues
increased 7.9% from $700,968 to $756,157 and total expenses increased 4.8%
from $410,361 to $430,140.  As a result, net income increased 12.2% from
$290,607 for the three month period ended March 31, 1999, to $326,017 for
the same period in 2000.  The revenue increase can be attributed to an
increase in rental income as a result of higher occupancy rates.  Occupancy
levels for the Partnership's six mini-storage facilities averaged 84.6%
for the three month period ended March 31, 2000, compared to 82.7% for the
same period in 1999.  The Partnership is continuing its marketing efforts
to attract and keep new tenants in its various mini-storage facilities.
Operating expenses increased approximately $15,800 (4.7%) primarily due
to increases in yellow pages advertising costs, maintenance and repair
expense and property management fees, partially offset by a decrease in
security expenses.  Property management fees, which are based on rental
revenue, increased as a result of the increase in rental revenue. General
and administrative expenses increased approximately $4,000 (5.2%) primarily
as a result of an increase in incentive management fees.  Incentive manage-
ment fees, which are based on cash available for distribution, increased
as a result of the increase in net income.

The General Partners plan to continue their policy of funding the continuing
improvement and maintenance of Partnership properties with cash generated
from operations.  The Partnership's resources appear to be adequate to meet
its needs.  The General Partners anticipate distributions to the Limited
Partners to remain at the current level for the foreseeable future.

We are not enclosing a copy of the Partnership Form 10-Q as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission since all the information set
forth therein is contained either in this letter or in the attached
financial statements. However, if you wish to receive a copy of said
report, please send a written request to DSI Realty Income Fund VI,
P.O. Box 357, Long Beach, California 90801.

                              Very truly yours,

                              DSI Realty Income Fund VI
                              By: DSI Properties, Inc., as
                              General Partner



                              By___\s\ Robert J. Conway_______
                              ROBERT J. CONWAY, President
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Angeles Partners X (the"Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D.Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, andStephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
usro!! 29, 1930
County Attonoy &?Q :7ounty FQertllo, ';e!xaa

. Opldlor,

iii.07473 80: Ccaotable

nay-b+'ellooedto.re- - **: aelve**  **63x-0rrm0 5nlary**  as fnter- : .pmtcg ror uqccty.

. I .'I_

nxs wil1-~ttob.boa);t;b~~e.reo~lgt ai lOlli

letter;: &.iferdb 9,,1939, In u;biob~s&~ auk ac opix11&.0tt&a :

.

In the In&act ofma, bowamr, :?!a dr:ttes

**.pro** poe&to.bti ran&we& by the oonateblu unS5r the oontraot S$th t?lQ COZfliSZ~~ZlQ~l-I3 * Oowt am dutl.ee olwrlj beyond t+e-scope

1°C311s offlqlaf **a.titm** ae **oc~n~tebla.md** em sot comobteQ vltb or Jaoident.tctho ~dutiae imposed upon h¶z by virtue of **his** kalaotlon ta.tI:a offLoc ~P.oow&able.. T?k lltitatlone abeveii3entlOacjd **Ocmnot,** therfGora, /

### t&y in a33 instantocde for rcascrn i%t 'Iuch

ll~ltatlon @stnblishco

a maximum snlary ralntln,: only to the dutI09 of ?ls cffice and hn,O fro relrrtlcn **to the**  eara . servloee ocntenpltita2 lh such~ccntreot. is **CilrCfUl OXWlhStiGn**  **Gf the**  **Stfif ’**  **UtUi refleCt3**  **no prohibit!c;?**  **wci** net thu ccnstnblcren9or!q svoh servfoea no acnt~qlnbod ln tfrv oontrectZLI~C

thio bnsls ot 

### this oplnlon. ~ccoelving compensation.rcr

suoh aql-vieea 00 oontemplated

mu.& be tested by the aa*e rulos by n?iioh any other wzntrnptof enplqywnt by the CozSsnJoness* Cocrt wculd be tested. .. .. . . :

. . .Tbore ia cothing ln the propose& co&root thht 'wouldbriug t?le

employment

**05** Interpreter

v;l:thln the.:. oonatitutional

prohlbltion

e&net Q person holdingmore * 

### then one cl*iLl

otfloe ot .aaolument sinae tho eraroicre: ._ of..'t.he dutias of lnterprtttr does oot'oonstitute en' '.. *o,ft,ihen.wlthia

t*c pervltv of the Scostltutl.~n.~ ..,. :,~.

1t ‘is, . therotorg,

tha o&ion .of thla’iJepeu%t . I_. i .mentecd you ore so advised that the oonsteblixof.Eee.,?... : County:oanbe allowed cxtPi oompeneati~n b.t the Cam-.‘ '.' .&,Srpi8Sloners*

Court to aot 88 in+-preter tor the,.'jastl&'i:;.i -.r* ::.-. 'y!y$ggy!y oo~,e.'~i:,;: ..: $" y j ,. .". .;
. .. i .._. :' ::?Y _;_ . .' '.. .i,> '.Tr&ng' that.:.

this &.&f&t,,+ .,&,, your : --'I in&ry#.we ramaln , .~ .. ., .Pery truly.yinxra . :
Lloyd hrmstroti~' :.soLstsnt

..

. ._.I **.Lh:Ar;**

_-

I