alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32(e)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
2008





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Electric Utilities
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Covered Report"), I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  November
      4, 2008
            /s/  David
      G. DeCampliDavid
      G. DeCampli
              President
              PPL
      Electric Utilities Corporation








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000318245                      
<NAME>                        Associated Medical Devices, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4248
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       44094
<OTHER-SE>                                     (48342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0723 IN THE MATTER OF: W.J.B., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 29 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 21 2024

02/21/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0723
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus REYES-OLVERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41116

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern Dis*600trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael L. Herman, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesus Reyes-Olvera (Reyes) appeals the 24-month sentence he received upon his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry by an alien. Reyes contends that the district court erred by characterizing his state felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance as an “aggravated felony’ for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C). Relief on this issue is not available in light of circuit precedent. *See United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez,*130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir.1997). Reyes argues that this circuit’s precedent is inconsistent with *Jerome v. United States,*318 U.S. 101, 63 S.Ct. 483, 87 L.Ed. 640 (1943). Having preceded *Hinojosa-Lopez, Jerome*is not “an intervening Supreme Court case explicitly or implicitly overruling that prior precedent.” *See United States v. Short,*181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir.1999).

Reyes also makes a constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b), but it is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Reyes contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almen-darez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Reyes properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Un ited S tates Co urt o f Ap pea ls For the First C ircuit

_________________

___ Nos. 00-2077, 00-2078 STANLEY A. RODOWICZ, MARGARET STEVENS, AND JAMES LEMON,

Plaintiffs, Appellees, Cross-Appellants,
v. MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

____________________ ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court, issued February 4, 2002, should be amended as follows: p 3, fn 2: underline "I" p 9, line 6: change "its jury instructions" to "his jury

instructions" p 10, fn 7: insert space after "§"
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Darwin Charles BROWN, Ralph Whitmore and M. Thomas Kent, Defendants.

Crim. No. 785-64.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

Nov. 6, 1964.

See also 36 F.R.D. 204.

Barbara Lindemann, Asst. U. S. Atty. for the District of Columbia, Washing*208ton, D. C., for the Government.

Thomas Wadden, Jr., Peter R. Taft, Gary Bellow, and Marshall I. Stewart, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

These are motions by defendants to consolidate Counts 2 to 10 of the indictment with Count 1, and to dismiss Counts 2 to 10 as separate counts.

The indictment charges a series of fraudulent sales of securities in violation of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a). Each count charges the mailing of a different letter in connection with the perpetration of an alleged fraudulent sale. The defendants claim that the Act proscribes only a course of conduct and not individual fraudulent transactions and that, therefore, the separate counts are in effect repetitious.

While cases may be found in support of the proposition that, unlike offenses under the Mail Fraud statute, separate mailings do not constitute separate offenses in connection with violations of the Securities Act, many of them are district court decisions. While this Court has great respect for decisions of other district courts, nevertheless, it must yield to the authority of courts of appeals.

There seems to be a difference of opinion between the Second and Tenth Circuits, the Second Circuit holding that only a course of conduct is proscribed by the statute, thereby constituting a single offense. This was held in United States v. Cashin, 281 F.2d 669. On the other hand, the Tenth Circuit, in Palmer v. United States, 229 F.2d 861, 867, holds the following:

> “Is is well settled that each separate use of the mails in the execution of a scheme to defraud constitutes a separate offense. * * * The same rule applies to the use of the mails in a scheme to defraud in the sale of securities.”

This Court will follow the Tenth Circuit.

Actually what is before the Court here is a matter of not much more significance than a debate over the proper method of drawing legal documents, because it is inconceivable to the Court that if the defendants are convicted on all of the counts they would receive consecutive sentences. It is reasonable to assume that concurrent sentences would be imposed.

It is conceivable that the Government might be prejudiced if it is not permitted to set out separate counts. The defendants are not prejudiced by the present form of the indictment.

The motions to consolidate the counts are denied.
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 

AMENDMENT TO 
 PETCO
ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC. 
 2006 SENIOR EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE AWARD PLAN 

THIS AMENDMENT is made effective September 21, 2011, to amend the 2006 Senior Executive Incentive Award Plan (the “Plan”) of
PETCO Animal Supplies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”). Unless otherwise defined herein, each capitalized term used herein shall have the meaning afforded such term under the Plan. 

WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has determined that it is in the best interests of the Corporation and its stockholders to increase the number
of shares of Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan by 7,000,000 shares; and 
 WHEREAS, subject to stockholder approval as may
be required by law and pursuant to the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Corporation has the authority to amend the Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

Section 2.1(b) of the Plan shall be amended by replacing it in its entirety with the following language: 

(b) Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 11.3, the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock which may be
issued upon exercise of Options or rights or upon any such Award under the Plan shall be eighty-five million (85,000,000) plus any number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock available for issuance under the PETCO Animal Supplies, Inc.
2006 Key Management Incentive Award Plan; provided, however, that, with respect to Incentive Stock Options, in no event shall the aggregate number of shares of the Company’s Common Stock which may be issued upon exercise of Incentive Stock
Options exceed eighty-five million (85,000,000).” 
  

			
	PETCO ANIMAL SUPPLIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Darragh J. Davis

	Name:	 	 Darragh J. Davis

	Title:	 	 VP, Corporate Secretary
<PAGE>
================================================================================

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 6-K

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                                February 16, 2005

                         Commission File Number: 0-22346


                                 HOLLINGER INC.
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                                10 TORONTO STREET
                            TORONTO, ONTARIO M5C 2B7
                                     CANADA
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.


                 Form 20-F [X]                    Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                 Yes [ ]                                 No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

================================================================================
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST


Exhibit     Description
-------     -----------

99.1        Press Release, dated February 15, 2005, regarding Hollinger Inc.
            Update on Proposed Share Consolidation and Privatization.


<PAGE>



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  February 16, 2005

                                       HOLLINGER INC.

                                       By   /s/ Peter G. White
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:   Peter G. White
                                            Title:  Vice President, Operations
                                                    and Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners X 1999 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000317900
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS X
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,549
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      257
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           9,139
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          8,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,129)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,882
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,052
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,529
<EPS-BASIC>                                   134.44<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





STATMON
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


19
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Geoffrey P. TalbotGeoffrey
      P. TalbotChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      27, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Sahm, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 820]

Appeal from a judgment of the Oneida County Court (Barry M. Donalty, J), rendered May 2, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of sexual abuse in the first degree.

*1294It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [3]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal *(see generally People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence *(see id.*at 255; *see generally People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; *People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]).

We reject defendant’s further contention that his plea of guilty was not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered. “ ‘Here, defendant’s belated and conclusory allegations of innocence in support of the motion [to withdraw the plea] are belied by the plea colloquy’ ” *(People v Nelson,*66 AD3d 1430, 1430 [2009], *lv denied*14 NY3d 772 [2010]), as is defendant’s conclusory and unsupported allegation made in his pro se supplemental brief that his attention deficit hyperactivity disorder rendered him unable to understand the proceedings *(see People v Brooks,*89 AD3d 747, 747-748 [2011], *lv denied*18 NY3d 955 [2012]). Moreover, the requirements of the Sex Offender Registration Act are collateral consequences of a guilty plea *(see People v Magliocco,*101 AD3d 1724, 1724 [2012]), and the potential termination of parental rights with respect to biological children is not an automatic consequence of being convicted of a sex offense or having to register as a sex offender *(see generally Matter of Afton C. [James C.],*17 NY3d 1, 10-11 [2011]). Thus, County Court was not required to advise defendant of those matters at the time of the plea. Present — Scudder, RJ., Smith, Fahey, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Daryl K. Miller, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 479]

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (Weber, J.), imposed August 1, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid *(see People v Bradshaw,*18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; *People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 257 [2006]; *People v DeSimone,*80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, EJ., Rivera, Leventhal and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plasticon International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James N. Turek, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that: 

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 
|   | /s/ James N. Turek |  
---------------------------

 
 

James N. Turek,

 
 

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL GORDON, )

 Plaintiff, )

 ) 

v. )

 ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-211-KD-B

BRANDON CULPEPPER, in his individual )

capacity, and CITY OF SELMA, )

ALABAMA, a municipal corporation, )

 Defendants. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order issued on this date regarding Defendants’ Motion for 

Summary Judgment, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 

JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants Brandon Culpepper and the City of 

Selma and against Plaintiff Michael Gordon. 

DONE and ORDERED this the 7th day of April 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-00211-KD-B Document 28 Filed 04/07/15 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0403 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIAM HOMER MCCLELLAN ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file Appellant’s opening brief and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is given an extension of time until March 7 , 2024, to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 29 2024

01/29/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0403