alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7KH +RQRUDEOH %HUQLFH %RXLH 'RQDOG 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 'LVWULFW

-XGJH IRU WKH :HVWHUQ 'LVWULFW RI 7HQQHVVHH VLWWLQJ E\ GHVLJQDWLRQ



5(&200(1'(' )25 )8//7(;7 38%/,&$7,21

3XUVXDQW WR 6L[WK &LUFXLW 5XOH 

(/(&7521,& &,7$7,21  )(' $SS 3 WK &LU

)LOH 1DPH DS

	

		

	








1,7('

	7$7(6 2)

0(5,&$

	






(//, $//(<

	















 !"#$%&'(!
)*'!+	'"'!,*'%*-'.%'$%'(!

"'!%),*'%*-'$!)'.-/0"'1!2*)3')")+

'(!	.'(!%),*'%*-'$(*"'*)-*))"'*

44567"%#	%!'!%(*!$

,*'%*-'8.+3!	.")8,#'',*'%*-'8.+3!

	.9&*''!+:8.#0;;

,!-*+!+")+*#!+:8.)!4;

<!$%!:	
1")+=
1*%-.*'8.+3!6,1,

,*'%*-'8.+3!







 
  !))!'(  "0#% 		
	 

,		>1!2*)3')!)'.-/0$% !##!!

; 
 







? 

  ,!$!)+")' !

!)'!)-!$%&'@! "%"'!+*'%*3.*#'0'-("%3!$-) *%*)3''#*-!)!+$*%!"%&+!"#!%*)A*#"'*'(! .9'")'*A!-("%3!$'(!$'$$*%!"%&+!"#!%*)A*#"'*)$"'!%) ,*'%*-'$ !)'.-/06 ")+'#!)$*%!"%&(* !+*)*)'!%'"'!5
	BB4;;DFE")+4;D"ED;E(*	(!@"!)'!)-!+'"'!%&'(!"'!%),*'%*-'$!)'.-/09"!$$!)!#!A!#.)+!%
		=B;-)-#.*)'("')!$'(!$*%!"%&") *##!3"# !&*".'&"'*- %*)-9!*)3!)'!)-!+*)!)'.-/0(!@'(!	.'(!%),*'%*-'$(*''(*%'(! %!A*.!)'!)-!$%&'(!"<!-".!$!2-."9#!!%%%&"+!!)'!)-! @! A"-"'! (!% !)'!)-%!&")+ '(! -"! ' '(! %! !%!!)'!)-*)3

"##!0@"*)A#A!+*)"-)

$*%!"%& $%& 3.) +!"#!% ")+ *)'!%'"'!-&&!%-!''(!'*&!+*'%*-'-.%''(!-.%'("+9!!)$$*-!")+'(! %!-.'*)'("')"9.%3#"%0*)!)'.-/0@"")*##!3"".#'@!" ) %(*9*'!+.)+!%("' @!" ) @" '(! 9"* $!)(")-!&!)'"'(!+*'%*-'-.%' !*)$.-(")*##!3"#$*%!"&!&9!%$'(!-) *%"-0)" *+!-)'*).!+'9!#*!A!'("''(*##!3"#  (. '(! *.! 9!-"&! $*%!"%&$%&"#*-!)!++!"#!%@"
 
 


$*'@"$%!!!"9#!'(!)'(!!)(")-!&!)'" #*!+6*$)''(!!)(")-!&!)'+*+)'" #0

(!
)*'!+	'"'!(")@-)-!+!+'("'*'@"*)!%%%*)

'(* -"! ")+ '(! +!$!)! "--! ' '("' -)-!*)  ##*)-#.+*)3'(!+*'%*-'-.%'")+'(*-.%'%*3*)"##0"-'!+.)+!%'(!&*" %!(!)*)'("''(!$*%!"%&*)G.!'*)@"*##!3"#
)'!"+'(! "%'*!)@-)-!+!'("''(!@!" )*)G.!'*)*"%*)-"#"()*/"A"@!" )@(*-(*)'*##!3"# !% ! 9.' * #!3"# ' 9.0  #)3 " *' @"&").$"-'.%!+ % *& %'!+ 9!$%! '(! 9") "3"*)' .-(@!" )5
	B4;;DAED;E6	
 ; + ;C; D;CCED'( *% 44CE D3%")+$"'(!% %A**) !%&*' !*) $ !&*".'&"'*- @!" )#"@$.##0 !!+)+"'!$!)"-'&!)'$%*&!)'%#-'E(.")0%!$!%!)-!*).% %*% *)*)+!-#"%*)3'("'*' * .)#"@$.# $% " !%) ' '%")$!% % ! " !&*".'&"'*- "".#' @!" ) * A"-"'!+ ' '(! !2'!)' *' **)-)*'!)'@*'('(* *)*)

(!%!$%! '(! !)'!)-! *) 9'( -"! "%! A"-"'!+ ")+

'(!!-"!"%!%!&")+!+''(!%! !-'*A!+*'%*-'-.%'$%%!!)'!)-*)3-)*'!)'@*'('(* *)*)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Materialise NV 

Leuven, Belgium 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-197236) of our report dated April 28, 2016,relating to the consolidated financial statements of Materialise NV which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. 

BDO Bedrijfsrevisoren Burg.CVBA 

On behalf of it, 

Bert Kegels 

/s/ Bert Kegels 

Zaventem, Belgium 

April 28, 2016
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief
financial officer of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 25, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 25, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    DANIEL T. CARTERDaniel T. Carter Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)




Date: May 5, 2005



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32(d)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2005

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Energy Supply,
  LLC (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"),
  I, the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  hereby certify that:

| |  | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  May 4, 2005 | /s/ James E. AbelJames E. Abel
        Vice President and Treasurer
        PPL Energy Supply, LLC
|------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       72,942
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      6,061
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          17,125
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         5,153
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   3,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,571
<COMMON>                                         5,482
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       16,859
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              9,246
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  31,587
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        363
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            40,000
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               9,180
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  23,441
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  104,571
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       38,029
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             2,157
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                       9,008
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      12,248
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          7,832
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,135
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   9,967
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,942
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,458
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        266
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    3,192
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         1,829
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           3,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathaniel Flagg, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 875]

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered February 24, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [b]), defendant contends that County Court erred in failing to rule on his applications to be adjudicated a youthful offender. Defendant, an apparently eligible youth *(see*CPL 720.10 [2]), pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain that included a promised sentence and a waiver of the right to appeal, but there was no mention during the plea proceedings whether he would be afforded youthful offender treatment. At sentencing, defense counsel made several applications for youthful offender treatment but, without expressly ruling on them, the court imposed a sentence that was incompatible with youthful offender treatment.

“Upon conviction of an eligible youth, the court must order a [presentence] investigation of the defendant. After receipt of a written report of the investigation and at the time of pronouncing sentence the court must determine whether or not the eligible youth is a youthful offender” (CPL 720.20 [1]). A sentencing court must determine whether to grant youthful offender treatment with respect to every defendant who is eligible for it because, inter alia, “[t]he judgment of a court as to which young people have a real likelihood of turning their lives around is just too valuable, both to the offender and to the community, to be sacrificed in plea bargaining” *(People v Rudolph,*21 NY3d 497, 501 [2013]). “[W]e cannot deem the court’s failure to rule on the . . . [applications] as . . . denial[s] thereof’ *(People v Spratley,*96 AD3d 1420, 1421 [2012], *following remittal*103 AD3d 1211 [2012], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1020 [2013]; *see People v Ingram,*18 NY3d 948, 949 [2012]; *People v Chattley,*89 AD3d 1557, 1558 [2011]). Furthermore, even if the court had denied *1439the applications, there is no information in this record from which we could ascertain whether the court properly did so in the exercise of its discretion, or whether it improperly acceded to the prosecutor’s plea conditions. We therefore hold the case and remit the matter to County Court to make and state for the record *“a*determination of whether defendant is a youthful offender” (Rudolph, 21 NY3d at 503). Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GU ST AV O M c KENZI E, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. E D M U N D G . B R O W N , J r . , W a r de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 56135 D . C . N o . C V -0 5 -0 2 4 0 4 -C JC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C orm a c J . C a rne y , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C alifo rn ia state p riso n erG u stav o M cK en zie ap p ea ls fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s or de rde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on pur s ua nt t o 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED APR16 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 56135 2 M cK enzi e c on t ends thathi s r i gh tt o a fa i r and i m part i alj ury w as vi ol at ed w hen the prosecut or exerc i se d a peremp t ory c hal l enge t o excuse an A fr i can-A m er i can j uror. W e r evi ew M cK enzi e’ s c l ai m un der B at son v. Kentucky , 467 U . S . 79 ( 1986) , de novo be c aus e the s t a t e c ourt ’ s us e of the s t anda r d l a i d out i n P eople v . W

heeler , 22 C al . 3d 25 8, 28 0 (19 78 ), do es no tsat i sf y c on st i tut i on al r e q u ir e m e n ts . Se e W

ade v . T e rhune , 2 0 2 F .3 d1 1 9 0 , 1 1 9 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . M cK enzi e has fa i l ed t o est abl i sh thatthe t ot al i ty of r el evantfa ct s “ gi ves r i se t o an in f e r e n c e ” o f

p u rp o s e f

u l d is c r im in a tio n b yth e p r o s e c u to r . See J oh nson v. Ca lifo rn ia , 54 5 U . S . 16 2, 16 8 (20 05 ). AF F I RME D.
<PAGE>
================================================================================


                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                        PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          For the month of October 2004

                        Commission File Number 333-101591


                          GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION

                              5100 W. Lemon Street
                                   Suite 3100
                                 Tampa, Florida
                                      33609


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                       Form 20-F [ ]         Form 40-F [X]

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ___________

     Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in
paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ___________

     Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in
this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes [ ]          No [X]

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-_____________


================================================================================

<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT LIST

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Exhibit        Description
     -------        -----------
     <C>            <S>
      99.1          Material Change Report dated October 12, 2004
</TABLE>



<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date:  October 12, 2004

                                          GERDAU AMERISTEEL CORPORATION


                                          By: /s/ Tom J. Landa
                                              ----------------------------------
                                          Name:  Tom J. Landa
                                          Title: Vice-President, Finance, Chief
                                                 Financial Officer and Secretary
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended April 1, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Krish A. Prabhu, theChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposesof 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| *** *** | ***/s/  Krish Prabhu*** | *** *** |
|--------------|-------------------------|--------------|
|         | Krish Prabhu            |
|         | Chief Executive Officer |
|         | Date: May 10, 2005 |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-140630 on Form S-8of our report dated September 27, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements ofShoreTel, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includesexplanatory paragraphs regarding the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsNo. 123 (revised 2004), *Share Based Payment*and the restatement discussed in Note 2), appearing inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of ShoreTel, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2007./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
UNITED STATES  
  
               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION  
  
                     Washington, D.C. 20549  
  
                            FORM 10-Q/A  
  
  
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the   
Securities Exchange Act of 1934  
  
For the quarterly period ended       August 31, 1996  
  
Commission file Number     0-15435 
  
                   HIA, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter.)  
  
   New York                   	16-1028783    
(State or other jurisdiction of    (I.R.S. Employer  
incorporation or organization)     Identification No.)  
  
4275 Forest Street		80216
Denver, CO
(Address of principal executive offices      (Zip Code)  
  
Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  
(303) 394-6040
  
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant(1) has filed 
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months 
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to 
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing 
requirements for the past 90 days.  
  
  
                         YES [X]        NO [ ]  
  
     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the 
issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practical 
date:  
  
     Common Stock, $.01 Par Value - 10,443,394 shares as of  
August 31, 1996



  
                                                                HIA, INC.
  
                                                           SIGNATURES  
  
  
     Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934, the registrant has duly cause this report to be signed on its 
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.  
  
  
  
  
                                   HIA, INC.              
                                   Registrant  
December 31, 1996                                
Date                                      Alan Bergold             
                                             Cheif Financial Officer
                                             Vice President
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges McClanahan, Haley and Senior Judge Willis

CHRISTOPHER D. GRAY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0398-10-2 PER CURIAM JULY 27, 2010 COFFEEWOOD CORRECTIONAL CENTER/ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Michael L. Ritchie; Ritchie Law Firm, P.L.C., on brief), for appellant.

(Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II, Attorney General; Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Deputy Attorney General; Peter R. Messitt, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Scott John Fitzgerald, Senior Assistant Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

Christopher D. Gray appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission

finding that Gray did not meet his burden in es tablishing the causal c onnection between his low

back injury and the compensable work acciden t. We have reviewed the record and the

commission’s opinion and fi nd that this appeal is without meri t. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Gray v. Coffeewood Correctional

Center , VWC File No. 233-13-98 (Feb. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument and

summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the Court and argument w ould not aid the decisional process. See Code

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.