alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anthony KULAKOWICH v. A/S BORGESTAD.

No. 33978.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Nov. 16, 1964.

Arnold C. Grossman, Fine, Staud & Silverman, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Rawle & Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

WOOD, District Judge.

This is is a motion filed by the defendant shipowner to set aside an entry of default under Rule 55(c). A default was entered in this Court on January 3, 1964, for want of an appearance and answer. This entry occurred some four- and-one-half months after suit was filed on August 8, 1963.

The plaintiff longshoreman was injured while working on the defendant’s vessel S/S Brevik which was docked at Camden Marine Terminal on March 1, *1861963. The defendant claims that no accident was ever reported to the ship’s officers. First notice of the claim was received when suit was instituted and service was made on the Philadelphia agents who had represented the owner’s interests while the ship was in Camden several months previously.

Through a fortuitous series of events the suit documents were referred to New York City where they were shuttled to various agents of the owner. Finally, the agent for the underwriters contacted plaintiff’s counsel and requested additional time to answer the Complaint in May of 1964.

A default, as distinguished from a default judgment, may be set aside “for good cause shown.” Such a motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the Court. It is usually granted when no substantial prejudice will result to the plaintiff and the defendant, not being guilty of any gross neglect, claims the existence of a meritorious defense.1

After hearing argument on this matter we are convinced that no grave injustice will accrue to the plaintiff since his only claim of prejudice is that the passage of time may impede his discovery. Such a factor will undoubtedly work a greater hardship on the defendant since the ship claims that the injury was never reported to its officers on March 1, 1963. We further conclude that the defendant has satisfied the Court that its failure to file a responsive pleading was not attributable to any gross neglect of the shipping company. Finally, the defendant asserts that it has a possible indemnity claim against the plaintiff’s employer arising out of the stevedore’s unloading of the ship’s cargo. Therefore, we make the following:

ORDKR

And now, this 16th day of November, 1964, the defendant’s motion under Rule 55(c) to set aside the default is granted.

1

. These requirements were ably stated by our colleague, Judge Van Dusen, in Alo-pari v. O’Leary, 154 F.Supp. 78, 80 (E.D. Pa.1957).
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 11
                  CALIFORNIA BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                     Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
                                          September 30,      September 30,
                                     ------------------   -----------------
                                         1995      1994      1995      1994
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------
(In thousands, except per share data)
<S>                                    <C>       <C>      <C>        <C>
Net income                             $4,742    $3,097   $12,952    $8,293
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------

Weighted average number
  of common shares
  outstanding                          10,032     9,362    10,003     9,364
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------

Earnings per common share              $ 0.47    $ 0.33     $1.29     $0.89
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------
Fully diluted earnings per
  common share(1):
 Weighted average number of
  common shares outstanding            10,032     9,362    10,003     9,364

 Assuming exercise of stock
  options reduced by the
  number of shares which
  could have been purchased
  with the proceeds from
  exercise of such options                220       184       227       188
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------
                                       10,252     9,546    10,230     9,552
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------

Earnings per common and
 common equivalent share              $  0.46    $ 0.32    $ 1.27    $ 0.87
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------
                                       ------    ------    ------    ------

</TABLE>

--------------
(1)  This presentation is submitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(11) of
     Regulation S-K. This presentation is not required by APB Opinion
     No. 15, because it results in dilution of less than 3%.


                                      (29)
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 76451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29928]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Notice of Roundtable Discussion on Financial Access for Money 
Services Businesses (MSBs)

AGENCY: Offices of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, International 
Affairs, and Domestic Finance, U.S. Department of the Treasury 
(Treasury).

ACTION: Meeting Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Treasury is announcing a January 13, 2015 roundtable 
discussion on financial access for money services businesses (MSBs). 
Treasury is hosting the roundtable to share the U.S. Government 
perspective on issues pertaining to financial access for MSBs and to 
hear from industry.

DATES: The roundtable will be held on January 13, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. 
to 3:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

ADDRESSES: Department of the Treasury, Main Treasury Building, 1500 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20220.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Treasury is inviting various members of the 
U.S. Government, regulatory community, banking and credit union 
sectors, and MSB sector to participate. In addition, Treasury invites 
other interested parties, including industry representatives, to send 
requests to attend. Due to space restrictions, attendance will be 
limited, but all parties are invited to provide comments and/or 
questions to be raised at the roundtable.
    Requests to attend as well as comments and/or questions to be 
raised at the roundtable can be sent to [email protected]. 
Treasury will give preference in attendance to industry stakeholders on 
a first-come-first-serve basis. Parties will be contacted directly by 
email no later than Tuesday, January 6, 2015 if selected to attend the 
event.
    Requests to attend the roundtable and/or provide written comments 
or questions must be received on or before January 2, 2015. All 
statements received, including attachments and other supporting 
materials, are part of the public record and subject to public 
disclosure. You should submit only information that you wish to make 
available publicly.

Jennifer Fowler,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Terrorist Financing and Financial 
Crimes.
Melissa Koide,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Consumer Policy.
Alexia Latortue,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Development Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-29928 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
```
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    
    JANUARY 14, 2005
 NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITED    CANADA(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)
    
    000-30758(CommissionFile Number)
    
    62-12-62580(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    L6T 5P6(Zip Code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
     Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01.     Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On January 14, 2005,
Nortel Networks Corporation issued a press release (the Press
Release), attached hereto as
Exhibit 99.1, announcing that the registrant obtained a new waiver from Export Development
Canada (EDC), the terms and conditions of which are summarized in the Press Release which is incorporated by
reference herein. A copy of the letter agreement containing the
waiver to the EDC Support Facility (as defined in
the Press Release) is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.2. Nortel Networks Corporation
owns all of the registrants common shares and the registrant is Nortel Networks
Corporations principal direct operating subsidiary. Item 9.01.     Financial
Statements and Exhibits  (c)
    
    Exhibits  99.1
    
    Press Release issued by Nortel Networks Corporation on January 14, 2005.99.2
    
    Letter Agreement dated January 14, 2005 between the
registrant and EDC.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS LIMITEDBy:

/s/
Nicholas J. DeRomaNicholas J. DeRomaChief Legal OfficerBy:

/s/
Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant General Counsel 
Securities
and Corporate Secretary Dated: January 14, 2005




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release issued by
Nortel Networks Corporation on January 14, 2005.99.2
    
    Letter Agreement dated
January 14, 2005 between the registrant and EDC.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2547 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2547

 To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to extend funding 
               for special diabetes programs for Indians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2023

  Mr. Cole (for himself and Mr. Ruiz) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title III of the Public Health Service Act to extend funding 
               for special diabetes programs for Indians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Special Diabetes Program for Indians 
Reauthorization Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. EXTENDING FUNDING FOR SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAMS FOR INDIANS.

    Section 330C(c)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254c-3(c)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(E) $150,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 
                through 2028, to remain available until expended.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **STATMON
        TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **19
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to
        18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/
        Geoffrey P. Talbot
 **Geoffrey
        P. Talbot**
 ****  **Chief Financial Officer**
 **November
        14, 2007**
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will
        be
        retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  31
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DANIEL KEITH LOLLEY, #207815, : 

 Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 09-00555-CG-B 

LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL 

SERVICES, et al., : 

 Defendants. : 

ORDER 

 After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues 

raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to 

which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 

U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that 

Defendant John Doe I and John Doe II are dismissed without prejudice (Doc. 4)1; that the 

Supplement to Case Number 09-00555-CG-B (Doc. 9) is GRANTED; and that the Addendum 

and Supplement (Doc. 10) is DENIED to the extent that it seeks to add as Defendants 

Commissioner Allen, Director Golson, and Officer Carter, and GRANTED with respect to 

Defendant Louisiana Correctional Services. 

DONE and ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2010. 

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

1 As noted in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff may amend his complaint to include the identities of those 

fictious defendants who are dismissed without prejudice if plaintiff obtains that information through discovery or 

otherwise within the statute of limitations. 

Case 2:09-cv-00555-CG-B Document 17 Filed 06/09/10 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Anthony W. Adler, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  April 26, 2011





/s/ Anthony W. AdlerAnthony W. AdlerPrincipal Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2521 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act with respect to assistance for 

disadvantaged communities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2023 

Mr. RUIZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act with respect to 

assistance for disadvantaged communities, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clean Drinking Water 

5 Equity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES. 

7 Section 1452(d)(2)(A) of the Safe Drinking Water 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 300j–12(d)(2)(A)) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘35 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘40 percent’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of TeraForce Technology Corporation (the "Company"), does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as
of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.




/s/ Herman M. Frietsch
----------------------------------------
Herman M. Frietsch
Chief Executive Officer

Dated August 14, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q
pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of
the Form 10-Q.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1469 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1469

   To prohibit a mask mandate to prevent the spread of COVID-19 on a 
              military installation in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2023

Mr. Norman (for himself, Mr. Bishop of North Carolina, Mr. Duncan, Mr. 
 Good of Virginia, Ms. Greene of Georgia, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, and 
 Mr. Steube) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit a mask mandate to prevent the spread of COVID-19 on a 
              military installation in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF MASK MANDATE TO PREVENT THE SPREAD OF COVID-
              19 ON A MILITARY INSTALLATION IN THE UNITED STATES.

    The Secretary of Defense may not require that an individual wear a 
mask, in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19, on a military 
installation inside the United States.
                                 <all>
```
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2341 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral Economic 

Assistance, Economic Support Fund for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral Economic Assistance, Economic Support Fund for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 BILATERAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE, ECO5 NOMIC SUPPORT FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 

6 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Bilaterial Economic Assistance, Economic SupVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:10 Apr 20, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2341.IH H2341

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2341 IH

1 port Fund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $2,545,525,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Christopher Basile, Appellant, v Sherry Wiggs, Respondent.

[974 NYS2d 273]

In an action to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated May 9, 2012, as granted the defendant’s cross motion to consolidate two actions, both entitled *Basile v Wiggs,*pending in the same court under index Nos. 17689/10 and 9974/11, respectively, and to change the venue of the consolidated action from Kings County to Westchester County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff contends that the Supreme Court violated the doctrine of law of the case in granting the defendant’s cross motion to consolidate two actions, both entitled *Basile v Wiggs,*pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under index Nos. 17689/10 and 9974/11, respectively, and to change the venue of the consolidated action from Kings County to Westchester County, because a prior order of the same court had denied the defendant’s cross motion. However, to the extent that the court’s determination may have violated the law of the case established by the prior order of the Supreme Court, this Court is not bound by the law of the case established by that order *(see Pincus v Wells,*35 AD3d 569, 571 [2006]; *Keith v Schulman,*265 AD2d 380 [1999]; *Padela v Rosen & Weidberg,*200 AD2d 722 [1994]).

On the merits, that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was to consolidate the two actions was correctly granted, *593since common questions of law or fact exist, and the plaintiff failed to show that prejudice to a substantial right would result from consolidation (see CPLR 602 [a]; *GAM Prop. Corp. v Sorrento Lactalis, Inc.,*41 AD3d 645, 646 [2007]; *Dukhvalov v Pshierer,*15 AD3d 334 [2005]). Moreover, under the circumstances of this case, change of venue of the consolidated action from Kings County to Westchester County was proper (see *Ingenito v Wantagh Racket Sports, Inc., 47*AD3d 887, 887-888 [2008]; *Padela v Rosen & Weidberg,*200 AD2d at 724). Mastro, J.E, Leventhal, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.