Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 2015 / Notices 29 

2See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web 

site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. 

3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties 

should specify that they are requesting a review of 

entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to 

the extent possible, include the names of such 

exporters in their request. 

4See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; 

Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 

39263 (July 6, 2011). 

Note that, for any party the 

Department was unable to locate in 

prior segments, the Department will not 

accept a request for an administrative 

review of that party absent new 

information as to the party’s location. 

Moreover, if the interested party who 

files a request for review is unable to 

locate the producer or exporter for 

which it requested the review, the 

interested party must provide an 

explanation of the attempts it made to 

locate the producer or exporter at the 

same time it files its request for review, 

in order for the Secretary to determine 

if the interested party’s attempts were 

reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.303(f)(3)(ii). 

As explained in Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of 

Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 

(October 24, 2011) the Department 

clarified its practice with respect to the 

collection of final antidumping duties 

on imports of merchandise where 

intermediate firms are involved. The 

public should be aware of this 

clarification in determining whether to 

request an administrative review of 

merchandise subject to antidumping 

findings and orders.2

Further, as explained in Antidumping 

Proceedings: Announcement of Change 

in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings and Conditional Review of 

the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME 

Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 

65963 (November 4, 2013), the 

Department clarified its practice with 

regard to the conditional review of the 

non-market economy (NME) entity in 

administrative reviews of antidumping 

duty orders. The Department will no 

longer consider the NME entity as an 

exporter conditionally subject to 

administrative reviews. Accordingly, 

the NME entity will not be under review 

unless the Department specifically 

receives a request for, or self-initiates, a 

review of the NME entity.3 In 

administrative reviews of antidumping 

duty orders on merchandise from NME 

countries where a review of the NME 

entity has not been initiated, but where 

an individual exporter for which a 

review was initiated does not qualify for 

a separate rate, the Department will 

issue a final decision indicating that the 

company in question is part of the NME 

entity. However, in that situation, 

because no review of the NME entity 

was conducted, the NME entity’s entries 

were not subject to the review and the 

rate for the NME entity is not subject to 

change as a result of that review 

(although the rate for the individual 

exporter may change as a function of the 

finding that the exporter is part of the 

NME entity). 

Following initiation of an 

antidumping administrative review 

when there is no review requested of the 

NME entity, the Department will 

instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all 

exporters not named in the initiation 

notice, including those that were 

suspended at the NME entity rate. 

All requests must be filed 

electronically in Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘IA 

ACCESS’’) on the IA ACCESS Web site 

at http://iaaccess.trade.gov.4 Further, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), 

a copy of each request must be served 

on the petitioner and each exporter or 

producer specified in the request. 

The Department will publish in the 

Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation 

of Administrative Review of 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation’’ for requests received by 

the last day of January 2015. If the 

Department does not receive, by the last 

day of January 2015, a request for 

review of entries covered by an order, 

finding, or suspended investigation 

listed in this notice and for the period 

identified above, the Department will 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping or 

countervailing duties on those entries at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or 

bond for) estimated antidumping or 

countervailing duties required on those 

entries at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption and to continue to collect 

the cash deposit previously ordered. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: December 23, 2014. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30759 Filed 12–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Open Meeting of the Information 

Security and Privacy Advisory Board 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Information Security and 

Privacy Advisory Board (ISPAB) will 

meet Wednesday, February 11, 2015, 

from 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. Eastern 

Time, Thursday, February 12, 2015, 

from 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. Eastern 

Time, and Friday, February 13, 2015, 

from 8:30 a.m. until 12 p.m. Eastern 

Time. All sessions will be open to the 

public. 

DATES: The meeting will be held on 

Wednesday, February 11, 2015, from 

8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. Eastern Time, 

Thursday, February 12, 2015, from 8:30 

a.m. until 5 p.m. Eastern Time, and 

Friday, February 13, 2015, from 8:30 

a.m. until 12 p.m. Eastern Time. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place 

at the United States Access Board 

Conference Room, 1331 F Street NW., 

Suite 800, Washington, DC, 20004. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Annie Sokol, Information Technology 

Laboratory, National Institute of 

Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau 

Drive, Stop 8930, Gaithersburg, MD 

20899–8930, telephone: (301) 975–2006, 

or by email at: annie.sokol@nist.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 

as amended, 5 U.S.C. App., notice is 

hereby given that the Information 

Security and Privacy Advisory Board 

(ISPAB) will meet Wednesday, February 

11, 2015, from 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time, Thursday, February 12, 

2015, from 8:30 a.m. until 5 p.m. 

Eastern Time, and Friday, February 13, 

2015, from 8:30 a.m. until 12 p.m. 

Eastern Time. All sessions will be open 

to the public. The ISPAB is authorized 

by 15 U.S.C. 278g–4, as amended, and 

advises the National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST), and 

the Director of the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) on 

information security and privacy issues 

pertaining to Federal government 

information systems, including 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
30 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 1 / Friday, January 2, 2015 / Notices 

thorough review of proposed standards 

and guidelines developed by NIST. 

Details regarding the ISPAB’s activities 

are available at http://csrc.nist.gov/

groups/SMA/ispab/index.html. 

The agenda is expected to include the 

following items: 

• Updates on OMB Circular No. A– 

130 Revised, Management of Federal 

Information Resources, 

• Updates from the U.S. Digital 

Service Team, 

• Discussion on Continuous 

Monitoring and Continuous Diagnostics 

and Mitigation (CDM), 

• Discussion and Presentation on 

drones and privacy, 

• Updates on NIST Privacy 

Engineering Objectives and Risk Model 

Discussion draft, 

• Updates on Cybersecurity 

Framework—Improving Critical 

Infrastructure Cybersecurity, Executive 

Order 13636, 

• Updates on Legislation, Federal 

Information Security Management Act, 

• Presentation from U.S. Department 

of Justice Cybersecurity Unit, 

• Presentation from National Security 

Agency (NSA) Privacy Officer, 

• Updates from U.S. Chief 

Technology Officer, 

• Updates on NIST Cryptographic 

Standards and Guidelines Development 

Process, and 

• Updates on NIST Computer 

Security Division. 

Note that agenda items may change 

without notice. The final agenda will be 

posted on the Web site indicated above. 

Seating will be available for the public 

and media. No registration is required to 

attend this meeting. 

Public Participation: The ISPAB 

agenda will include a period of time, 

not to exceed thirty minutes, for oral 

comments from the public (Friday, 

February 13, 2015, between 10 a.m. and 

10:30 a.m.). Speakers will be selected on 

a first-come, first-served basis. Each 

speaker will be limited to five minutes. 

Questions from the public will not be 

considered during this period. Members 

of the public who are interested in 

speaking are requested to contact Annie 

Sokol at the contact information 

indicated in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

notice. 

Speakers who wish to expand upon 

their oral statements, those who had 

wished to speak but could not be 

accommodated on the agenda, and those 

who were unable to attend in person are 

invited to submit written statements. In 

addition, written statements are invited 

and may be submitted to the ISPAB at 

any time. All written statements should 

be directed to the ISPAB Secretariat, 

Information Technology Laboratory, 100 

Bureau Drive, Stop 8930, National 

Institute of Standards and Technology, 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899–8930. 

Dated: December 23, 2014. 

Willie E. May, 

Acting Director. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30780 Filed 12–31–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XD625 

Fisheries Off West Coast States; 

Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; 

Application for an Exempted Fishing 

Permit 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; receipt of EFP 

applications; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: NMFS announces the receipt 

of exempted fishing permit (EFP) 

applications, and is considering 

issuance of EFPs for vessels 

participating in the EFP fisheries. The 

EFPs are necessary to allow activities 

that are otherwise prohibited by Federal 

regulations. The EFPs will be effective 

no earlier than April 1, 2015, and will 

be for a minimum duration of two years 

unless there is a need to extend the EFP 

to collect more information or the need 

for the EFP no longer exists because 

appropriate regulations have been 

implemented. These EFPs can be 

terminated earlier under terms and 

conditions of the EFPs and other 

applicable laws. 

DATES: Comments must be received no 

later than 5 p.m., local time on January 

17, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by 0648–XD625, by any one 

of the following methods: 

• Email: GroundfishEMEFP@

noaa.gov. 

• FAX: 206–526–6736, Attn: Steve 

Freese. 

• Mail: William W. Stelle, Regional 

Administrator, West Coast Region, 

NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., 

Seattle, WA 98115–0070, Attn: Steve 

Freese. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

view copies of the Electronic 

Monitoring EFP applications, visit the 

Pacific Council Web site at 

www.pcouncil.org and browse the ‘‘June 

2014 Briefing Book’’ and the ‘‘Trawl 

Catch Share Program Electronic 

Monitoring’’; or contact Steve Freese 

(West Coast Region, NMFS), phone 206– 

526–6113, fax: 206–526–6736. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

action is authorized by the Pacific Coast 

Groundfish Fishery Management Plan 

(FMP) and the Magnuson-Stevens 

Fishery Conservation and Management 

Act provisions at 50 CFR 600.745, 

which states that EFPs may be used to 

authorize fishing activities that would 

otherwise be prohibited. At the June 

2014 Pacific Fishery Management 

Council (Council) meeting in Garden 

Grove, California, the Council 

considered applications for four revised 

EFPs from: (1) The California Risk Pool; 

(2) Michele Longo Eder; (3) Peter 

Leipzig; and (4) Heather Mann and 

Brent Paine. An opportunity for public 

testimony was provided during the June 

2014 Council meeting. For more details 

on these EFP applications and to view 

copies of the applications, see the 

Pacific Council’s Web site at 

www.pcouncil.org and browse the ‘‘June 

2014 Briefing Book’’. The Council 

recommended that NMFS consider 

issuing the following EFPs, and that 

those EFPs be used to test EM in the 

fisheries in a limited capacity with some 

additional permit conditions for 

possible use in 2015 and beyond. 

California Risk Pool EFP 

The California Risk Pool (which 

includes the Fort Bragg Groundfish 

Association, the Half Moon Bay 

Groundfish Marketing Association, and 

the Central California Seafood 

Marketing Association) submitted an 

application for an EFP, along with their 

collaborators: The Environmental 

Defense Fund (EDF); and The Nature 

Conservancy. Seven vessels will 

participate in this EFP: Three from the 

fixed gear sector and four from the trawl 

sector. Sarah McTee of the 

Environmental Defense Fund and Lisa 

Damrosch of the Half Moon Bay 

Groundfish Marketing Association are 

the points of contact for this EFP. 

Fixed Gear EFP 

The applicants participating in this 

EFP are trawl-permitted, fixed gear 

fishermen (Bob Eder, John Corbin and 

Burton C. Parker, Sr.) using pots or 

longlines. The primary purpose of the 

EFP is to test monitoring catch and 

discard via an EM system without 100 

percent observers coverage as currently 

required by law. Michele Longo Eder is 

the point of contact for this EFP. 

Peter Leipzig EFP 

The fishermen that would participate 

in this EFP are bottom trawl fishermen. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES