alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 8993]

Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in this matter pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) and (b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C), (b)) (“INA”), and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of State concludes that the circumstances that were the basis for the 2008 decision to maintain the designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant revocation of the designation and that the national security of the United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine—General Command.

Therefore, the Secretary of State hereby determines that the designation of the aforementioned organization as a foreign terrorist organization, pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be maintained.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: December 29, 2014.

John F. Kerry, 

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2014-30963 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
1

“An application to the court for an order shall be by motion ....” Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(b)(1). 

2

The Court recognizes that the plaintiff is proceeding without counsel. However, “both

the Supreme Court and [the Eleventh Circuit] have concluded that a defendant’s pro se status in

civil litigation generally will not excuse mistakes he makes regarding procedural rules.” Nelson

v. Barden, 145 Fed. Appx. 303, 311 n.10 (11th Cir. 2005); accord Local Rule 83.9 (“All litigants

proceeding pro se shall be bound by and comply with all local rules of this Court, and the

Federal Rules of Civil ... Procedure, unless otherwise excused from operation of the rules by

court order.”). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

PAUL POGUE, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION 05-0596-WS-C

 )

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER 

This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s motion to strike the plaintiff’s first

amended complaint. (Doc. 8). “A party may amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of

course at any time before a responsive pleading is filed .... Otherwise a party may amend the

party’s pleading only by leave or court or by written consent of the adverse party ....” Fed. R.

Civ. P. 15(a). The defendant has filed an answer, (Doc. 5), and the plaintiff has neither

submitted the defendant’s written consent to the filing of an amended complaint nor moved the

Court for an order allowing him to amend his complaint.1

 Accordingly, the defendant’s motion

to strike the amended complaint is granted. It is ordered that the amended complaint is

stricken, without prejudice to the plaintiff’s ability to seek amendment by proper channels.2

 

DONE and ORDERED this 13th day of December, 2005.

s/ WILLIAM H. STEELE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00596-KD-C Document 10 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 226-227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated.

[[Page 227]]

The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the 
Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in 
writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than January 20, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community 
Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204:
    1. New Hampshire Mutual Bancorp, Manchester, New Hampshire; to 
establish MillRiver Trust Company, and transfer the existing trust 
business from New Hampshire Mutual Bancorp's subsidiary bank, Merrimack 
County Savings Bank, both in Concord, New Hampshire, to MillRiver Trust 
Company, pursuant to sections 225.28(b)(5), (b)(6), (b)(6)(ii), 
(b)(6)(v), (b)(6)(vi), (b)(7)(i), (b)(7)(ii) and (b)(11)(iii)(A).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 30, 
2014.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2014-30815 Filed 1-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2227 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2227

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
   Agencies, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Salaries and 
                     Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
   Agencies, Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Salaries and 
                     Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RELATED AGENCIES, 
              ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION, SALARIES AND 
              EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Related Agencies, 
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Salaries and Expenses for 
fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $6,890,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Culotta, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PharMerica Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

DATE: May 25, 2011



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Culotta                              
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    
    FEBRUARY 15, 2005
 NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION    CANADA(State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)
    
    001-07260(CommissionFile Number)
    
    NOT APPLICABLE(IRS EmployerIdentification No.)8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    L6T 5P6(Zip Code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
    Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation
of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01.     Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement On February 15, 2005, the registrant issued a press release (the Press Release), attached hereto
as Exhibit 99.1, announcing that Nortel Networks Limited (the registrants principal direct
operating subsidiary) obtained a new waiver from Export Development Canada (EDC), the terms and
conditions of which are summarized in the Press Release which is incorporated by reference herein.
A copy of the letter agreement containing the waiver to the EDC Support Facility (as defined in
the Press Release) is filed herewith as Exhibit 99.2. Item 9.01     Financial Statements and Exhibits  (c)
    Exhibits  99.1
    Press Release issued by the registrant on February 15, 2005.99.2
    Letter Agreement dated February 15, 2005 between Nortel Networks Limited and EDC.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant General Counsel  Securities
and Corporate SecretaryBy:
    /s/ Tracy S.J. Connelly McGilleyTracy S.J. Connelly McGilleyAssistant Secretary Dated: February 15, 2005




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Press Release issued by the registrant on February 15, 2005.99.2
    
    
    Letter Agreement dated February 15, 2005 between Nortel Networks Limited and EDC.
R.G., Mother of W.F., S.F., I.N.,

A.N., C.N., I.G. and G.L.G.

, Minor

Children,

Appellant

,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILIES,

Appellee

.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL U NTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3470

Opinion filed November 10, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

Marci L. Goodman, Judge.

Timothy M. Beasley of The Beasley Law Firm, P.L., Pinellas Park, for Appellant.

Matthew C. Wilson, Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, for Appellee Guardian

ad Litem.

Rebecca Kapusta, General Counsel, and Dwight O. Slater, Appellate Counsel,

Children’s Legal Services, Tallahassee, for A ppellee Department of Children and

Families.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                        1,000

       

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                              21,411
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       157,035
<ALLOWANCES>                        3,226
<INVENTORY>                         150,071
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    331,193
<PP&E>                              309,363
<DEPRECIATION>                      185,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      547,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               94,174
<BONDS>                             45,080
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            685
<OTHER-SE>                          393,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        547,241
<SALES>                             345,911
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    345,911
<CGS>                               207,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       207,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    77,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    284
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  2,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     57,650
<INCOME-TAX>                        20,727
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 36,923
<DISCONTINUED>                      1,720
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        35,203
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0.39
<FN>
This financial data schedule has been restated in accordance with SFAS No. 128
(Earnings Per Share), and also to reflect the disposal of the company's network
products business.
</FN>


        

</TABLE>
#### Preston W. GRACE, Sr., Plaintiff, v. UNITED FOUNDERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Thomas H. REDMOND and Bankers Acceptance Corporation, a corporation, Third-Party Defendants.

Civ. No. 70-355.

United States District Court, W. D. Oklahoma, C. D.

Aug. 2, 1971.

John B. Dudley and Peter B. Bradford, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff.

Keith McMillin, Oklahoma City, Okl., for United Founders Life Ins. Co.

Vincent Kelley, Anderson, Ind., and Charles P. Ames, Oklahoma City, Okl., for Redmond & Bankers Acceptance Corp.

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Third-Party Defendant Redmond has filed a pleading entitled “Cross-Claim of Third-Party Defendants,” 1 in which he seeks to assert a claim against Plaintiff Grace. Independent federal jurisdictional facts under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332 are pleaded. Plaintiff Grace has moved to dismiss Third-Party Defendant Redmond’s claim against him on the grounds that (1), no claim is stated on which relief may be granted, and (2), that the claim is improper under Rule 14(a), F.R. Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A.

It is not necessary to consider Plaintiff’s first ground as it appears that Third-Party Defendant Redmond’s claim is not proper under Rule 14(a). The Rule provides in part,

> “The third-party defendant may also assert any claim against the plaintiff arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the plaintiff’s claim against the third-party plaintiff.”

Plaintiff’s suit against the Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff is for conver*9sion of Plaintiff’s corporate stock alleged to have been placed in escrow with the Defendant. Third-Party Defendant Redmond’s claim against the Plaintiff is for damages said to have resulted from the failure of a certain merger of companies to materialize. The claim of Redmond against the Plaintiff does not connect the alleged conversion with the alleged failure of the merger in any way. No showing is made that Redmond’s claim against the Plaintiff arose out of the transaction or occurrence which is the subject matter of Plaintiff’s simple conversion claim. On this record, the Court cannot conclude that Third-Party Defendant Redmond’s claim against Plaintiff Grace arises out of the conversion which is the subject matter of Plaintiff’s Complaint.2 The said claim is therefore not within Rule 14(a), is improperly made and should be dismissed.3

1

. On Motion the Court allowed an amendment so that this pleading now reads, “Counterclaim of Third-Party Defendants.” Technically it is neither a eross-claim not- a counterclaim. It is simply a claim. See 6 Federal Practice & Procedure (Wright & Miller), § 1444, p. 234, § 1458, p. 310.

2

. An analogous case is Brown v. First Nat. Bank of Wewoka, Okl., 14 F.R.D. 339 (D.C.Okl.1953).

3

. Redmond’s assertion that he proceeds against Plaintiff under Rule 13(b), F.R. Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. is without merit. He is in the case by virtue of third-party practice and therefore proceeds against Plaintiff under Rule 14, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. See 6 Federal Practice & Procedure (Wright & Miller), § 1458, p. 310.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30880]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Quantitative Imaging for Evaluation of Response to Cancer 
Therapies-Renewal.
    Date: January 30, 2015.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Room 1E030, Rockville, MD 20850, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Gerald G. Lovinger, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Research Technology and Contract Review Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Room 7W266, Bethesda, MD 20892-9750, 240-276-6385, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f5350495651585a587f525e56531151565711585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2844475e41464f4d4f684549414406464140064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/sep/sep.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 30, 2014.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-30880 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32


           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              OF SWISS MEDICA, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned
officer of Swiss Medica, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

         (a)      The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
                  September 30, 2004 of the Company fully complies with the
                  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (b)      Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 9, 2004


---------------------------
Raghu Kilambi,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
xlgroup-06.30.2015-EX_10.5






Exhibit 10.5


August 7, 2015


Mr. Stephen John Oakley Catlin
Windsong
14 Fairway Drive
Warwick, Bermuda
WK-04


Re: Amendment to Letter of Assignment


Dear Stephen:


On behalf of the XL Group plc and XL Services (Bermuda) Ltd (collectively, the “Company”), I am writing pursuant to Section 13 of the Letter of Assignment between you and the Company, which became effective on 1 May 2015 (“Letter of Assignment”), to confirm our mutual agreement to several amendments which will be effective as of the date hereof, to wit:
    
		
	1.
	Section 2(a) of the Letter of Assignment is amended to remove “USD $1,000,000” and replace it with “USD $1,300,000” with effect from 1 September 2015.




		
	2.
	Section 2(b) of the Letter of Assignment is amended to remove the final sentence of that sub-section in its entirety and replace it with the following sentence:  “Your target bonus opportunity shall be USD $2,000,000.”




This amendment letter is final and binding on all parties with respect to its subject matter.  All other provisions contained in the Letter of Assignment remain in full force and effect as if fully set forth in this letter of amendment. 


If you are in agreement with these amendments to the Letter of Assignment, please sign the agreement below and return a copy to me.  We will return a fully executed copy to you for your records.


    






Thank you for your thoughtful attention to this matter.















Very truly yours,
                            


/s/ Eileen Whelley                             
___________________________                
    
Eileen Whelley                        
Chief Human Resources Officer                
XL GROUP plc (for and on behalf of XL Group plc)




/s/ Kim Wilkerson                            
___________________________


(for and on behalf of XL Services Bermuda Ltd)


READ, ACCEPTED & AGREED
This 7th day of August 2015




/s/ Stephen John Oakley Catlin 
______________________________
Stephen John Oakley Catlin