alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 24**

 

## **POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

We, the undersigned officers and directors ofChemtura Corporation hereby constitute and appoint Robert L. Wood, Karen R.Osar and Barry J. Shainman and each of them serverally, our true and lawfulattorneys or attorney, with full power to them and each of them to execute forus, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, and to file with theSecurities and Exchange Commission the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ChemturaCorporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and any and allamendments thereto.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have signed this Power of Attorney in thecapacities indicated on January 24, 2006.

 

 
|                                 |   |                        |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
| Robert L. Wood                       |   | Karen R. Osar               |
| Principal Executive Officer          |   | Principal Financial Officer |
| Chairman of the Board                |   | Executive Vice President    |
| President, Chief Executive Officer   |   | Chief Financial Officer     |
| And Director                         |   |                        |
|                                 |   |                        |
|                                 |   |                        |
| Michael F. Vagnini                   |   | Nigel D. T. Andrews         |
| Principal Accounting Officer         |   | Director                    |
| Senior Vice President and Controller |   |                        |
|                                 |   |                        |
|                                 |   |                        |
| James W. Crownover                   |   | Robert A. Fox               |
| Director                             |   | Director                    |
|                                 |   |                        |
|                                 |   |                        |
| Martin M. Hale                       |   | Roger L. Headrick           |
| Director                             |   | Director                    |
|                                 |   |                        |
|                                 |   |                        |
| Leo I. Higdon, Jr.                   |   | Mack G. Nichols             |
| Director                             |   | Director                    |
|                                 |   |                        |
|                                 |   |                        |
| C. A. Piccolo                        |   | Jay D. Proops               |
| Director                             |   | Director                    |
|                                 |   |                        |
|                                 |   |                        |
| Bruce F. Wesson                      |   |                        |
| Director                             |   |                        |

 

----
IN THE MATTER OF THE 

APPLICATION TO RESIGN FROM 

THE PRACTICE OF LAW OF 

PETER WOODBURY RAND 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

OF MARYLAND 

Misc. Docket AG No. 69 

September Term, 2018 

ORDER 

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Application to Resign from the Practice of Law of 

Peter Woodbury Rand and the response of Bar Counsel thereto, it is this 3rd day of April, 

2019; 

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the resignation of Peter 

Woodbury Rand from the Bar of the State of Maryland is hereby accepted; and it is further 

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name Peter Woodbury Rand 

from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client 

Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State. 

/s/ Clayton Greene Jr. 

Senior Judge
H. R. 2379 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty-four 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 616 East 

Main Street in St. Charles, Illinois, as the ‘‘Veterans of the Vietnam War Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. VETERANS OF THE VIETNAM WAR MEMORIAL POST 

OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 616 East Main Street in St. Charles, Illinois, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Veterans of the Vietnam 

War Memorial Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Veterans of the Vietnam War Memorial Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
his or her capacity as an officer of MicroIslet, Inc. (the "Company"), that, to
his or knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Dated: March 28, 2003

/s/ JOHN F. STEEL IV
------------------------
John F. Steel IV,
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: March 28, 2003

/s/ WILLIAM KACHIOFF
------------------------
William Kachioff,
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy BLANKENSHIP, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 07-7233.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 20, 2007.

Decided Dec. 27, 2007.

*563Roy Blankenship, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel David Marsh, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roy Blankenship seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appeal-able unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Blankenship has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

ALBERT J. SMITH, § 

 § No. 284, 2014 

Defendant Below, § 

 Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court of 

 § the State of Delaware in and

 v. § for New Castle County 

 § 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff Below, § Cr. ID No. 0312008370 

Appellee. § 

 

Submitted: June 10, 2014 

Decided: June 27, 2014 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, BERGER and RIDGELY, Justices. 

O R D E R 

This 27th day of June 2014, it appears to the Court that: 

(1) On May 29, 2014, the Court received Albert J. Smith’s notice 

of appeal from the Superior Court’s order dated April 23, 2014 and docketed 

April 24, 2014 summarily dismissing his third motion for postconviction 

relief. Under Supreme Court Rule 6(a)(iii), Smith’s notice of appeal should 

have been filed on or before May 26, 2014.1

 

1

See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iii) (providing that an appeal from a proceeding for 

postconviction relief must be filed within thirty days after entry upon the docket of the 

judgment or order). 
2 

(2) On May 30, 2014, the Clerk issued a notice under Supreme 

Court Rule 29(b) directing Smith to show cause why the appeal should not 

be dismissed as untimely filed.2

 In response to the notice, Smith asserts that 

the appeal should be accepted as timely filed on May 29, 2014, because he 

did not receive the Superior Court’s order of April 23, 2014 until April 30, 

2014, “which is less than the 30 day time period.” 

(3) Under Delaware law, “[t]ime is a jurisdictional requirement.”3

 

A notice of appeal must be received by the Office of the Clerk of this Court 

within the applicable time period to be effective.4 An untimely appeal 

cannot be considered unless the appellant can demonstrate that the failure to 

file a timely notice of appeal is attributable to court-related personnel.5

 

(4) In this case, contrary to Smith’s assertions, the notice of appeal 

was not received by the Clerk within thirty days after entry upon the docket 

of the April 23, 2014 order. Moreover, there is nothing to reflect that 

Smith’s failure to timely file the notice of appeal is attributable in any way 

to court personnel. Consequently, this case does not fall within the 

 

2

See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 29(b) (governing involuntary dismissal upon notice of the Court). 

3 Carr v. State, 554 A.2d 778, 779 (Del. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 829 (1989). 

4

 Del. Supr. Ct. R. 10(a). 

5

Bey v. State, 402 A.2d 362, 363 (Del. 1979). 
3 

exception to the general rule that mandates the timely filing of a notice of 

appeal. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 

6 and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 

 /s/ Henry duPont Ridgely

 Justice
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2210 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Management of National Forest Lands for Subsistence 

Uses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Management of National 

Forest Lands for Subsistence Uses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, MAN5 AGEMENT OF NATIONAL FOREST LANDS FOR 

6 SUBSISTENCE USES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, Management of 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2210 IH

1 National Forest Lands for Subsistence Uses for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $1,099,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 504-505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30939]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS14-11]


Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104 (b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: Federal Reserve Board--International Square location, 
1850 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    Date: January 14, 2015.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Reports

Chairman
Executive Director
Delegated State Compliance Reviews
Financial Report
Appraisal Subcommittee Advisory Committee

Action and Discussion Items

November 12, 2014 minutes--Open Session
Alaska Compliance Review
AMC Registration and Supervision (discussion only)


[[Page 505]]


    How to Attend and Observe an ASC meeting:
    If you plan to attend the meeting in person, we ask that you notify 
the Federal Reserve Board via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94f5e4e4e6f5fde7f5f8b9e5e1f1e7e0fdfbfae7d4f2e6f6baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5332232321323a20323f7e22263620273a3c3d20133521317d343c25">[email protected]</span></a>, 
requesting a return meeting registration email. The Federal Reserve Law 
Enforcement Unit will then send an email message with a web link where 
you may provide your date of birth and social security number through 
their encrypted system. You may register until close of business 
January 9, 2015. You will also be asked to provide identifying 
information, including a valid government-issued photo ID, before being 
admitted to the meeting. Alternatively, you can contact Kevin Wilson at 
202-452-2362 for other registration options. The meeting space is 
intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will 
not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: December 31, 2014.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-30939 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In the Matter of Lee S., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent. Joseph Sluzar, as Broome County Attorney, Respondent; Lee S., Appellant.

[872 NYS2d 730]

Kavanagh, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Pines, J.), entered March 24, 2008, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 3, to adjudicate respondent a juvenile delinquent.

After forcibly stealing a bicycle, respondent was charged with conduct which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery in the third degree. Respondent thereafter admitted to committing the crime of petit larceny in full satisfaction of the petition and was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent. Following a dispositional hearing, which extended over two days and concluded on March 3, 2008, Family Court ordered respondent placed in the care and custody of the Broome County Department of Social Services for a period of one year. This appeal by respondent ensued.

Respondent correctly contends that Family Court failed to comply with the requirements of Family Ct Act § 321.3 (1) (c) *(see Matter of Travis TT.,*47 AD3d 1112, 1113 [2008]; *Matter of Robert OO.,*34 AD3d 1074, 1075 [2006]). At the time of his admission, Family Court merely instructed respondent that the court would “still have the authority to enter a new dispositional order which . . . could include placing [him] outside [of] the *1089home.” Respondent was not made aware of any other possible specific dispositional orders, “nor was he ever told the exact nature of [his] placement [outside of the home] or its possible duration” *(Matter of Herbert RR.,*214 AD2d 891, 892 [1995]; *see*Family Ct Act § 321.3 [1] [c]; *Matter of Robert OO.,*34 AD3d at 1075; *Matter of Timothy M.,*225 AD2d 915 [1996]). Insofar as the provisions of Family Ct Act § 321.3 (1) cannot be waived *(see Matter of Travis TT., 47*AD3d at 1113; *Matter of Robert OO.,*34 AD3d at 1075), Family Court’s order must be reversed and, since respondent’s placement period has not expired, the matter is remitted to Family Court for further proceedings.

Peters, J.P, Lahtinen and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Family Court of Broome County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
----

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended                March                31, 2007, (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act                of 1934,                as amended; |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Paul O. Koether                   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Paul                O. Koether                       |   |
| Chairman                                             |   |
|                                                 |   |
|                                                 |   |
| /s/                Bryan P. Healey                   |   |
| Bryan                P. Healey                       |   |
| Chief                Financial Officer and Secretary |   |

----
Exhibit
      32(d)


CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR
      PPL
      ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Energy Supply, LLC
      (the
      "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"),
      I,
      the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      hereby certify that:





·
            The
                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and·
            The
                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                of
                the Company.











Date:  November
                1, 2007
            /s/  Paul
                A. FarrPaul
                A. Farr
              Executive
                Vice President
              PPL
                Energy Supply, LLC








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-44337) pertaining to the Employee Stock Purchase
Plan of CTC Communications Group, Inc. (as successor to CTC Communications
Corp.), the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-17613) pertaining to
the 1996 Stock Option Plan of CTC Communications Group, Inc., the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-68767) pertaining to the 1998
Incentive Plan, the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the Employee Stock Purchase
Plan of CTC Communications Group, Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-93735) pertaining to the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan for Non-
Employee Directors, the 1998 Incentive Plan and the 1993 Stock Option Plan
of CTC Communications Group, Inc., of our report dated May 18, 2000, except
for Note 2, as to which the date is June 26, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of CTC Communications
Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended March 31, 2000.

Boston, Massachusetts
June 26, 2000

                                   /s/    Ernst & Young LLP
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2014 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, The Administration for Children and Families, 

Payments for Foster Care and Permanency for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, The Administration for Children and Families, Payments for Foster 

Care and Permanency for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2014 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, THE ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN 

4 AND FAMILIES, PAYMENTS FOR FOSTER 

5 CARE AND PERMANENCY FOR FISCAL YEAR 

6 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Health and Human Services, The 

10 Administration for Children and Families, Payments for 

11 Foster Care and Permanency for fiscal year 2024 may not 

12 exceed $6,035,000,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS