alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78494-78495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30506]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-82,492]


Creation Technologies Kentucky, Inc. Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Manpower, Kelly Services, and Nesco Lexington, Kentucky; 
Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on April 3, 2013, applicable to workers of Creation Technologies 
Kentucky, Inc., including on-site leased workers from Manpower and 
Kelly Services, Lexington, Kentucky. The Department's notice of 
determination was published in the Federal Register on April 30, 2013 
(78 FR 25306).
    At the request of the State Workforce Office, the Department 
reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers 
were engaged in production of electronic products.
    The company reports that workers leased from NESCO were employed 
on-site at Creation Technologies Kentucky, Inc., Lexington, Kentucky. 
The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently 
under the control of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from NESCO working on-site at 
the Lexington, Kentucky location of Creation Technologies Kentucky, 
Inc.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-82,492 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of NESCO, reporting to Creation Technologies 
Kentucky, Inc.,

[[Page 78495]]

Lexington, Kentucky, who became totally or partially separated from 
employment on or after February 21, 2012 through April 3, 2015, and 
all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on the date of certification through April 3, 2015, 
are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 
Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 16th day of December 2014.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2014-30506 Filed 12-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### Rubyanto DERMAWAN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-60691

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 13, 2006.

Haroen Calehr, Calehr & Associates, Houston, TX, for Petitioner.

Thomas Ward Hussey, Director, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Elizabeth J. Stevens, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation, Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, David B. Edwards, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Dallas, TX, Caryl G. Thompson, U.S. Immigration *&*Naturalization Service District Directors Office, New Orleans, LA, for Respondent.

*332Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Rubyanto Dermawan, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions this court to review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Dermawan argues that he demonstrated past persecution on account of his ethnicity and a well-founded fear of future persecution.

Because Dermawan does not address the BIA’s finding that his application for asylum is time-barred, he has abandoned the issue, and we will not review it. *See Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993). Likewise, he has abandoned his argument for relief under the CAT by failing to discuss the issue in his brief. *Id.*

With respect to Dermawan’s claim for withholding of removal, he testified that he was discriminated against and was the victim of crime because of his ethnicity. We conclude, however, that the BIA’s determination that Dermawan’s treatment did not rise to the level of persecution is supported by substantial evidence, and the record does not compel a contrary conclusion. *See Eduard v. Ashcroft,*379 F.3d 182, 188 (5th Cir.2004); *Ozdemir v. INS,*46 F.3d 6, 7-8 (5th Cir.1994); *Chun v. INS,*40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir.1994).

The petition for review is DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,896
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,691
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,110
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,691
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (19,179)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,179)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,179)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.007)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.007)


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Andres VELASQUEZ-GARAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41450.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 21, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Oscar Andres Velasquez-Garay pleaded guilty to having been found present in the United States following deportation. He argues on appeal that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense is unconstitutional.

Velasquez-Garay’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Velasquez-Garay contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United*
      *421
      *States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Velasquez-Garay properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Provident Financial Group, Inc.'s 10-Q for June 30, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         229,217
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   551
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,333,264
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      5,205,897
<ALLOWANCE>                                     78,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,985,035
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,705,472
<SHORT-TERM>                                   787,312
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            274,812
<LONG-TERM>                                    648,336
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        12,110
<OTHER-SE>                                     549,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               6,985,035
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                241,540
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               37,342
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   640
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               279,522
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             107,929
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             150,442
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          129,080
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   26,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,253
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                104,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 85,535
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      55,507
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,507
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.05
<LOANS-NON>                                     36,577
<LOANS-PAST>                                    20,460
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   246
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 21,769
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                66,693
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   20,532
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,801
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               78,296
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            78,296
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32(b)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  November
      4, 2008
            /s/  Paul
      A. FarrPaul
      A. Farr
              Executive
      Vice President and
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              PPL
      Corporation








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 422-423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30932]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 573

[Docket No. FDA-2014-F-2307]


Humic Products Trade Association; Filing of Food Additive 
Petition (Animal Use)

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that the 
Humic Products Trade Assn. has filed a petition proposing that the food 
additive regulations be amended to

[[Page 423]]

provide for the safe use of humate, fulvic acid and humic substances as 
a source of iron in animal feed.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the petitioner's 
request for categorical exclusion from preparing an environmental 
assessment or environmental impact statement by February 5, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. 
Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, 
Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Edwards, Center for Veterinary 
Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, 
MD 20855, 240-276-9568.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (section 409(b)(5) (21 U.S.C. 348(b)(5)), notice is given that a 
food additive petition (FAP 2290) has been filed by the Humic Products 
Trade Assn., P.O. Box 963, Spring Green, WI 53588. The petition 
proposes to amend Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in 
part 573 Food Additives Permitted in Feed and Drinking Water of Animals 
(21 CFR part 573) to provide for the safe use of humate, fulvic acid 
and humic substances as a source of iron in animal feed. The petitioner 
has requested a categorical exclusion from preparing an environmental 
assessment or environmental impact statement under 21 CFR 25.32(r).
    Interested persons may submit either electronic comments regarding 
this request for categorical exclusion to http://www.regulations.gov or 
written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (see DATES and 
ADDRESSES). It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify 
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of 
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets 
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and will 
be posted to the docket at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: December 30, 2014.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2014-30932 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
Exhibit 32.1


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code),  each
of the undersigned officers of New Century Companies,  Inc. (the Company),  does
hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
2004  of  the  Company  fully  complies,  in all  material  respects,  with  the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
and information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


November 19, 2004                  /s/ David Duquette
                                   ----------------------------------------
                                   Name:  David Duquette
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                          Financial Officer


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other  document  authenticating,   acknowledging,   or  otherwise  adopting  the
signature  that  appears in typed form  within  the  electronic  version of this
written  statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided to New Century
Companies,  Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities  Exchange Commission or
its Staff upon request.
##### 








---



##### 



SHORETEL, INC.  2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
 (Adopted by the Board of Directors on September 18, 2007)1
 1. Establishment of Plan Company Plan Board rounded down to the nearest whole share provided, provided further
 2. Purpose
 3. Administration Committee
 4. Eligibility
   
 1
    
    Share amounts herein have been adjusted to
reflect a 1-for-10 reverse stock split approved by the Board in June 2007,
following stockholder approval. - 1 -




---



##### 



except for
 5. Offering Dates
 Offering Period
  Offering Date Purchase Date
 6. Participation in this Plan
 Participant Participants
 7. Grant of Option on Enrollment provided however
 - 2 -




---



##### 



8. Purchase Price
  .
 fair market value
 The Wall Street Journal
 The Wall Street Journal
 9. Payment Of Purchase Price; Payroll Deduction Changes; Share Issuances
 provided , however
   - 3 -




---



##### 



10. Limitations on Shares to be Purchased
    - 4 -




---



##### 



11. Withdrawal
   12. Termination of Employment provided
 13. Return of Payroll Deductions
 14. Capital Changes
 15. Nonassignability
 - 5 -




---



##### 



16. Reports
 17. Notice of Disposition Notice Period
 18. No Rights to Continued Employment
 19. Equal Rights And Privileges
 20. Notices
 21. Term; Stockholder Approval
 22. Designation of Beneficiary
  - 6 -




---



##### 



23. Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares; Limitation on Sale of Shares
 24. Applicable Law
 25. Amendment or Termination
 26. Corporate Transactions
 New Purchase Date
 - 7 -




---



##### 



Corporate Transaction
 - 8 -
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132857 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132857 COA: 265107 Kent CC: 04-008733-FC SANJOHNA EVAN BRISCOE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the December 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0319 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 26, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of FullNet Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Amended Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: November 16, 2020/s/ Roger P. Baresel,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


     I, Richard Herrington, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of
     Civitas BankGroup, Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
     respect to the period covered by this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on
     Form 10-K;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
     information included in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K,
     fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
     operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
     presented in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K;


Date: December 17, 2004


                                       By: /s/ Richard Herrington
                                           ---------------------------
                                       Name:  Richard Herrington
                                       Chief Executive Officer
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549




---



FORM 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of:           March, 2004                   Commission File No.: 1-11796

MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

(Name of registrant)


1600 Britannia Road East
Mississauga, Ontario
L4W 1J2

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

PREMDOR INC.

(Former Name of Registrant)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:

Form 20-F  o
    
    Form 40-F  x


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):

Yes  o
    
    No  x


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):

Yes  o
    
    No  x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934:

Yes  o
    
    No  x


If Yes is marked, indicate the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): N/A



---



##### 



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MASONITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION



Date: March 1, 2004By:
    
    /s/ Harley UlsterName:
    
    Harley
UlsterTitle:
    
    Executive Vice-President
and Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Press Release dated March 1, 2004