alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2120 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2120

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
Agencies, Allowances and Office Staff for Former Presidents for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
Agencies, Allowances and Office Staff for Former Presidents for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, ALLOWANCES AND OFFICE STAFF FOR FORMER 
              PRESIDENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
Allowances and Office Staff for Former Presidents for fiscal year 2024 
may not exceed $4,796,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001091973
<NAME>                      TRITON PCS HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000
<CURRENCY>                              USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                       1
<CASH>                          186,251
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                    30,829
<ALLOWANCES>                      1,765
<INVENTORY>                      15,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                239,358
<PP&E>                          454,929
<DEPRECIATION>                   33,065
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  979,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           104,689
<BONDS>                         504,636
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            94,203
<PREFERRED>                           5
<COMMON>                            619
<OTHER-SE>                      186,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    979,797
<SALES>                          24,405
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                133,231
<CGS>                            44,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   107,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                150,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  2,758
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               41,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (149,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>            (149,360)
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                   (149,360)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (9.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                     (9.79)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    11,342,200,000
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                  45,300,000
<MORTGAGE>                               2,128,200,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                               64,600,000
<TOTAL-INVEST>                          14,626,400,000
<CASH>                                      12,400,000
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         348,500,000
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                   1,149,500,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          22,048,400,000
<POLICY-LOSSES>                         13,410,900,000
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                             361,600,000
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                      278,200,000
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                            647,900,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      242,100,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       900,000
<OTHER-SE>                               2,151,400,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            22,048,400,000
<PREMIUMS>                                 492,300,000
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        548,700,000
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                          17,500,000
<OTHER-INCOME>                             352,900,000
<BENEFITS>                                 765,300,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 51,700,000
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                       303,100,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            223,500,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                79,500,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        137,400,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             (3,400,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               134,000,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.44
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Sharon L. Wardlaw, Chief FinancialOfficer of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”) do hereby certifythat:

 

(1)           Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10–Q of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended October 31, 2003;

 

(2)           Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

(3)           Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects, thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;

 

(4)           TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-14 and 15d–14) for the Company and we have:

 

(a)           designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report was being prepared;

 

(b)           evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           disclosedin this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theCompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

(5)           TheCompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of theCompany’s board of directors:

 

(a)           allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely 

 

----

 

affect the Company’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 

Dated:  December 15, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/  Sharon L. Wardlaw      |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|
|   | Chief  Financial Officer         |
|   | Polydex  Pharmaceuticals Limited |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2061 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2061

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Operations Support for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Operations Support for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF 
              TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, OPERATIONS SUPPORT 
              FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Treasury, 
Internal Revenue Service, Operations Support for fiscal year 2024 may 
not exceed $3,724,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
HEB Grocery Company, s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 27, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00152

- CV

Mary BARRERA

, Appellant

v.

HEB GROCERY COMPANY, LP

,

Appe llee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 14809

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED.

Time is extended to August 25, 2015.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |  |                       |  |  |  |                            
| |  | --------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------
| |  | Dated: March 14, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Charles Koppelman      
| |  |                       |  |  |  | Charles Koppelman          
| |  |                       |  |  |  | Principal Executive Officer
| |  |                       | 
| |  | Dated: March 14, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Allison Jacques        
| |  |                       |  |  |  | Allison Jacques            
| |  |                       |  |  |  | Principal Financial Officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Daryl L. Davis

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 01032

- CR

Trial court case number: 753744A

Trial court: 179th District Court of Harris County

It is ordered tha t the motion for rehearing is DENIED

. Jurisdiction to grant post

conviction habeas corpus relief on a final felony conviction rests exclusively with the Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals. Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for

the Eighth District , 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 20 1 3).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acti ng individually  Acting for the Court

D ate: March 13, 2014
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1984 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Institute 

of Environmental Health Sciences for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health National Institute of Environmental 

Health Sciences for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1984 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NA4 TIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL 

5 HEALTH SCIENCES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Na9 tional Institutes of Health National Institute of Environ10 mental Health Sciences for fiscal year 2024 may not ex11 ceed $774,707,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
12028.

#### Felder *v.*The State.

Decided March 8, 1921.

Accusation of possession of intoxicating liquor; from city court of Houston county — Judge Biley. November 1, 1920.

*A. C. Riley Jr., Fmmett Houser,*for plaintiff in error.

*Robert F. Brown, solicitor,*contra.

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, which contained only the usual general grounds.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                         304,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,268,471
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,989,409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,607,444
<PP&E>                                       9,310,324
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,763,632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,447,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,799,075
<BONDS>                                        501,981
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,010
<COMMON>                                        48,852
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,538,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,447,900
<SALES>                                      6,197,926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,197,926
<CGS>                                        4,389,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,389,648
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,348,021
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                405,170
<INCOME-TAX>                                   201,690
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            203,480
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   203,480
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Mark S. Tanner, Appellant, v Deborah Tanner, Respondent.

[826 NYS2d 503]

Mercure, J.P.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Delaware County (Becker, J.), entered January 12, 2006, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, for visitation with the parties’ child.

The parties are the parents of Lucas (born in 1999). They resided together with the child until he was approximately three years old. Since that time, the child has resided with respondent, the mother. Petitioner, an inmate in the Broome County *1103jail when this proceeding was commenced, asserts that the parties separated pursuant to an agreement in 2004 but there has been no judicial declaration of the parties’ respective custody and visitation rights. In this proceeding, commenced pro se, he seeks visitation with Lucas. Family Court dismissed the petition without a hearing, noting that petitioner was incarcerated when the parties were married and is again incarcerated, and rejecting as insufficient petitioner’s allegation that continuing his loving relationship with his son was in the child’s best interest. Petitioner appeals, arguing that Family Court erred in dismissing the petition without a hearing. We agree.

“Visitation by a noncustodial parent is presumed to be in the child’s best interest and should be denied only in exceptional situations, such as where substantial [proof] reveals that visitation would be detrimental to the welfare of the child” *(Matter of Frierson v Goldston,*9 AD3d 612, 614 [2004] [citation omitted]; *see Matter of Edward S. v Moon,*7 AD3d 834, 836 [2004]; *Matter of Hadsell v Hadsell,*249 AD2d 853, 853 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 809 [1998]). This presumption favoring visitation exists even where the parent is incarcerated *(see Matter of Williams v Tillman,*289 AD2d 885, 885 [2001]; *Matter of Rogowski v Rogowski,*251 AD2d 827, 827 [1998]). In light of the presumption favoring visitation, lack of any prior order regarding custody and visitation, petitioner’s allegations that he formerly resided and had a meaningful relationship with the child, and the lack of sufficient information before Family Court to permit a comprehensive, independent review of the child’s best interest, we agree with petitioner that the court erred in dismissing the petition without a hearing *(see Matter of Frierson v Goldston, supra*at 614; *Matter of Davies v Davies,*223 AD2d 884, 886-887 [1996]; *Matter of Damien X.,*217 AD2d 762, 763-764 [1995]; *cf. Matter of Melissa FF.,*285 AD2d 682, 683 [2001]; *Matter of Hadsell v Hadsell, supra*at 854). Accordingly, we remit this matter to Family Court for a full evidentiary hearing to determine the best interest of the child.

Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Family Court of Delaware County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: JUAN CARLOS REYES.

 

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-12-00261-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20050C17647-CC7-1)

O R D E R

The Court has received and filed the supplemental clerk=s record requested in this Court=s 

order issued February 14, 2013. The appeal is therefore reinstated and the Appellee=s brief is 

due May 15, 2013.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2nd day of May, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.