alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1


                           STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

         I, Geoffrey P. Talbot, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 of Statmon Technologies Corp., Inc.

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

                  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: February 14, 2005

         /s/ Geoffrey P. Talbot
      -----------------------------
           GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
         Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**STATMON
      TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**19
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Geoffrey P. Talbot**Geoffrey
                        P. Talbot**
                      **Chief
                          Financial Officer****February
                        14, 2007**




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
      retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 09, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 09, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24I0114. HIPPO INSURANCE SERVICES d/b/a HIPPO HOME INSURANCE et al v. 

ATLANTIC RESTORATION SERVICES, INC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

22A2094
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rene Villa, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 442]

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Holder, J.), rendered June 28, 2010, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his challenge to the adequacy of the procedure used to adjudicate him a persistent violent felony offender *(see People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273, 281-282 [1992]; *People v Huggins,*105 AD3d 760, 761 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1005 [2013]; *People v Haynes,*70 AD3d 718, 718-719 [2010]). Eng, P.J., Rivera, Hall and Lott, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of John J. Murphy, Appellant-Respondent, v City of New York et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[827 NYS2d 46]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered May 24, 2006, granting the petition only to the extent of remanding to respondent Board of Trustees for a name-clearing hearing, but otherwise denying petitioner’s application challenging his forced retirement, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner is not entitled to a trial pursuant to CPLR 7804 (h) on the issue of whether his departure from the New York City Employees’ Retirement System was coerced. Even accepting his version of the facts (i.e., that respondent Stark had told him he would be fired if he did not retire), petitioner’s retirement would not be deemed involuntary *(see e.g. Matter of De Marco v McLaughlin,*49 NY2d 941 [1980], *affg*69 AD2d 882 [1979]). We *320note this case is not about petitioner’s pension, which was not in jeopardy even if he had been fired for misconduct because he was an honorably discharged war veteran *(see Matter of Rapp v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys.,*42 NY2d 1, 6 [1977]).

Nor was petitioner entitled to a pretermination hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 (1) (b) or (c). Even if, arguendo, he was “removed” from a position he held by permanent appointment, he was not entitled to this statutory protection by reason of his status as an independent officer *(see e.g. Matter of O’Day v Yeager,*308 NY 580, 585 [1955]; *Matter of Nolan v Tully,*52 AD2d 295, 298-299 [1976], *lv denied*40 NY2d 803 [1976]; *O’Neill v City of Auburn,*23 F3d 685, 689-690 [2d Cir 1994]).

However, petitioner is entitled to a name-clearing hearing *(see Matter of Swinton v Safir,*93 NY2d 758 [1999]). Respondents concede that the element of dissemination has been satisfied. Petitioner has sufficiently alleged that the report prepared by respondents Green and Department of Investigation contains inaccuracies *(see e.g. id.*at 764; *Brandt v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., Third Supervisory Dist.,*820 F2d 41, 43-44 [2d Cir 1987]). The report’s conclusions are stigmatizing, as they arguably accuse petitioner of immorality *(see Swinton,*93 NY2d at 763). Regardless whether petitioner resigned or was fired, he has satisfied the requirement of loss of employment *(see Abramson v Pataki,*278 F3d 93, 101 [2d Cir 2002]).

The issue whether respondents violated their duties under the City Charter by disclosing the investigative report is best addressed in the separate civil lawsuit petitioner has brought. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Nardelli, Gonzalez, Catterson and Kavanagh, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2250 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Research 

and Education Activities for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food 

and Agriculture, Research and Education Activities for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2250 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NA3 TIONAL INSTITUTE OF FOOD AND AGRI4 CULTURE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION AC5 TIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, National Institute 

9 of Food and Agriculture, Research and Education Activi10 ties for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $927,649,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q FOR PRIMA ENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000318107
<NAME> PRIMA ENERGY CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,823,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,321,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,078,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (43,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    957,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,214,000
<PP&E>                                      80,727,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (32,393,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,073,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,080,000
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,758,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,073,000
<SALES>                                     10,856,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,615,000
<CGS>                                        7,268,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,725,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,913,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,305,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,608,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,608,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .95
        

</TABLE>
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2494 

AN ACT 

To make the assault of a law enforcement officer a 

deportable offense, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2494 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Our Law en3 forcement with Immigration Control and Enforcement Act 

4 of 2023’’ or the ‘‘POLICE Act of 2023’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ASSAULT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. 

6 Section 237(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 

9 ‘‘(G) ASSAULT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OF10 FICER.— 

11 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Any alien who has 

12 been convicted of, who admits having com13 mitted, or who admits committing acts 

14 which constitute the essential elements of, 

15 any offense involving assault of a law en16 forcement officer is deportable. 

17 ‘‘(ii) CIRCUMSTANCES.—The cir18 cumstances referred to in clause (i) are 

19 that the law enforcement officer was as20 saulted— 

21 ‘‘(I) while he or she was engaged 

22 in the performance of his or her offi23 cial duties; 

24 ‘‘(II) because of the performance 

25 of his or her official duties; or 
3 

•HR 2494 EH

1 ‘‘(III) because of his or her sta2 tus as a law enforcement officer. 

3 ‘‘(iii) DEFINITIONS.—In this subpara4 graph— 

5 ‘‘(I) the term ‘assault’ has the 

6 meaning given that term in the juris7 diction where the act occurred; and 

8 ‘‘(II) the term ‘law enforcement 

9 officer’ is a person authorized by 

10 law— 

11 ‘‘(aa) to apprehend, arrest, 

12 or prosecute an individual for 

13 any criminal violation of law; or 

14 ‘‘(bb) to be a firefighter or 

15 other first responder.’’. 

16 SEC. 3. REPORT ON ALIENS DEPORTED FOR ASSAULTING A 

17 LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER. 

18 On an annual basis, the Secretary of Homeland Secu19 rity shall submit to Congress and make publicly available 

20 on the website of the Department of Homeland Security 

21 a report on the number of aliens who were deported during 
4 

•HR 2494 EH

1 the previous year under section 237(a)(2)(G) of the Immi2 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(2)(G)). 

Passed the House of Representatives May 17, 2023. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2494 

AN ACT 

To make the assault of a law enforcement officer 

a deportable offense, and for other purposes.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
PharMerica Corporation (the Corporation) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory S. Weishar, Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of
the Corporation.



|                                                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    GREGORY S.
WEISHAR                                               
|Gregory S. Weishar Chief Executive Officer and Director February 4,
2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ROBERTSON MARCELIN, *

Petitioner, *

vs. * CA 06-0790-CG-C

ALBERTO GONZALES, etc., *

et al.,

*

Respondents.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed

relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B)

and dated January 18, 2007 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of February, 2007.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00790-CG-C Document 17 Filed 02/01/07 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

LINDA C. MATEY,

 Respondent

 v.

JOHN G. MATEY,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 549 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF MATERIALISE NV



|                                   |  |                              
|---------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Name                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|Materialise France SAS             |  | France                       
|Materialise GmbH                   |  | Germany                      
|Materialise Japan K.K.             |  | Japan                        
|Materialise Czech Republic SRO     |  | The Czech Republic           
|Materialise USA, LLC               |  | USA  Michigan               
|Materialise UK Limited             |  | UK                           
|OBL SAS                            |  | France                       
|Materialise Austria GmbH           |  | Austria                      
|Mobelife NV                        |  | Belgium                      
|Marcam.                            |  | Germany                      
|Materialise Malaysia SDN. Bhd.     |  | Malaysia                     
|Materialise Ukraine LLC            |  | Ukraine                      
|RapidFit NV                        |  | Belgium                      
|RapidFit Inc.                      |  | USA  Michigan               
|Materialise SA.                    |  | Poland                       
|Meridian Technique Ltd.            |  | United Kingdom               
|Orthoview LLC                      |  | USA  Delaware               
|OrthoView Holdings Ltd.            |  | United Kingdom               
|Meridian (Corporate Trustees) Ltd. |  | United Kingdom               
|OrthoView Ltd.                     |  | United Kingdom               
|Materialise Colombia               |  | Colombia                     
|RSPRINT NV                         |  | Belgium                      
|Materialise Shanghai Co. Ltd.      |  | China
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Plasticon International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James N. Turek, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that: 

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

|   | /s/ James N. Turek |
|--------|--------------------|

| --------------------------- |
|-----------------------------|

|   | James N. Turek, |
|--------|-----------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                            Report of Foreign Issuer

                      Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                    For the financial year ended May 31, 2004

                             Lorus Therapeutics Inc.
                             -----------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                    2 Meridian Road, Toronto, Ontario M9W 4Z7
                    -----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


                       [Indicate by check mark whether the
                      registrant files or will file annual
                      reports under cover Form 20-F or Form
                                     40-F.]

                       Form 20-F _______ Form 40-F __ X__

                [Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by
            furnishing the information contained in this Form is also
                    thereby furnishing the information to the
                   Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under
                      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                            Yes ________ No ____X___


               [If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number
     assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- _____

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                                     Lorus Therapeutics Inc.


Date: November 17, 2003                            By: /s/ Shane Ellis
      -----------------                                ----------------
                                                   Shane Ellis
                                                   Vice President, Legal Affairs
                                                   Corporate Secretary
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 14, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00473-CV

JUDITH WRIGHT PATTERSON, Appellant

V.

ETHEL LOUISE WILLIAMS, RICK HARRIS, WILLIAM F. WILSON, NORMA 

WILSON, DIANE STIEBENS, KATHERINE HARPER, ANDREA ATKINS, 

ROBERTA LYTLE, THOMAS WILSON, WILLIAM WILSON, JR., CAROL JO 

VAN HORN WELLWOOD, DONNA VAN HORN COBB, WILLIAM E. 

WILLIAMS, REBECCA WILSON AND DAVID TOWNSEND, Appellees

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-16669

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 10, 2012. The notice of appeal 

was filed May 10, 2012. To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the 

$175.00 appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil 
2

cases unless indigent); Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing 

indigence); see also; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. ' 51.207. 

On July 3, 2012, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee on or 

before July 18, 2012, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid the 

appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply 

with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Boyce, and McCally.