alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
.

5 -

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  May10, 1939

Honorable Henry **Hull** Ohairman, Suboommittee, Approprlationm House of Repreaentatlvse Austin, Texae Dear Sir: OQfnion Ho. o-736’ BeI Conlltltution House Bill l8 This im% reply 

### to OOMtitutioMlity ~oia veadr as rollowot i

OAR ACTmaking appro on armories iromMar past due rsi*t Au@at Sl,~lWZ, the State of Texas, on taking 

### erreot ng leare aontraote tant~Osner&il of the r*aay.m

e.namaacandamountmto h 1, 193R, tb Awat S, or the ~Stat* or Taxas. to the fmte subjrot, t bet-en tha’~Adjutant l?eneral the ,property leased or rented Guard of Texas; ,.It would be 8 faota and olrbtistanoee o? eaoh lght Ofthe prohibitlon oontalned in statutes to determine whether or not ing one, oreating a legal obligation the State. It so happene that one of them olaims, that Is the Port Worth Cavalry Club, for $l,VlO.OO hae already been passed on by the Supreme Court of thie State. Judge Orltz, whorendered the opinion, held~that auoh olaia waevoid. If the other claim are ldentiaal to ,thie ‘one they are all **void** and, in that event, the bill would be ufloonet~tutional. 83 S.W. {S) 660.,

Honorable HenryHull, Nay 19, 1939, page I:

Tour8 very truly AlTORNEYGENEFUL

OFTEXAS

APFROVRD
Chalrmn.
#### One Twelve, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Sirius XM Radio Inc., Respondent.

[961 NYS2d 916]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered April 16, 2012, which granted defendant’s mo*490tion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the motion court that plaintiffs are not entitled to additional performance-based compensation under the unambiguous agreement between plaintiffs and defendant’s predecessor, Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. Looking solely to the plain language used by the parties within the four corners of the agreement *(see Kass v Kass,*91 NY2d 554, 566 [1998]), the disputed term “Sirius subscribers,” by which plaintiffs’ performance-based compensation was measured, did not include subscribers to XM Radio, a wholly owned subsidiary which defendant acquired by merger, even though the merger had been anticipated within the agreement.

Concur—Gonzalez, EJ., Mazzarelli, Renwick, Richter and Gische, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elbert J. Welch, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 925]

Appeal from an order of the Niagara County Court (Robert C. Noonan, A.J.), dated July 12, 2011. The order denied the application of defendant to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his application for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46. Contrary to defendant’s contentions in his main and pro se supplemental briefs, we conclude that County Court properly considered the relevant facts and circumstances in determining that “[t]he evidence of the defendant’s rehabilitation does not outweigh his criminal history, institutional record, and pattern of successive reoffenses while on parole” *(People v Cabrera,*103 AD3d 748, 748-749 [2013]). Thus, the court did not abuse its discretion in determining that “substantial justice dictate[d] that the application should be denied” (L 2004, ch 738, § 23; *see e.g. People v Milland,*103 AD3d 669, 670 [2013], *lv denied*21 NY3d 1017 [2013]; *People v Benitez-Fernandez,*96 AD3d 1665, 1666 [2012]). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions in his pro se supplemental brief and conclude that none warrants reversal or modification of the order. Present — Smith, J.P., Garni, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in 

the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the 

citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computergenerated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of 

Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-41561

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JADE RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE METROPOLITAN COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

Felicia Blea-Rivera, Metropolitan Court Judge

Raúl Torrez, Attorney General

Santa Fe, NM

Van Snow, Acting Deputy Solicitor General

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellant

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender

Santa Fe, NM

for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BOGARDUS, Judge.

{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 

proposed summary disposition. Appellant has filed a notice with this Court informing us 

that they will not be filing a memorandum in opposition. No memorandum opposing the 

proposed disposition has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, 

we rely on the reasoning contained in our notice of proposed disposition. AFFIRMED.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge

SHAMMARA H. HENDERSON, Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,535,586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  102,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      52,495,535
<DEPRECIATION>                            (32,559,858)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,096,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     36,163,103
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,096,286
<SALES>                                     11,276,346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,745,040
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,868,510
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,746,329
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,130,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,130,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code


     Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, H.
Charles Wilson, III, the Corporate Controller and Chief Financial Officer of AM
Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     The Company's Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report for the period ended June 29,
     2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 19, 2002                   /s/ H. Charles Wilson, III
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          H. Charles Wilson, III,
                                          Corporate Controller and
                                          Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MICHAEL C. HEIL AND MARY 

KATHERINE HEIL, H/W

v.

DIOCESE OF SCRANTON, BISHOP 

JAMES TIMLIN AND BISHOP JOSEPH 

BAMBERA

PETITION OF: DIOCESE OF 

SCRANTON AND BISHOP JOSEPH 

BAMBERA

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 120 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2019, the Application for Extraordinary 

Relief is DENIED.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES/OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of iBasis, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ofer Gneezy, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code, that this Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                        By:          /s/ Ofer Gneezy
                                           ------------------------------------
                                                        Ofer Gneezy
                                               President and Chief Executive
                                                           Officer
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: March 26, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

                        Whole Living, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned officer of Whole Living, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..    the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
     December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..    the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



Date: April 1, 2005


                                    /s/ Douglas Burdick
                                    ____________________________________
                                    Douglas J. Burdick
                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                    Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Colin K. Benner, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of EuroZinc Mining Corporation;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  April 5, 2005



/s/ Colin K. Benner



Colin K. Benner, Vice-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 246 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 246

    To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the Administrator of the 
    Environmental Protection Agency from imposing a fee on certain 
                   facilities for methane emissions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2023

  Mr. Estes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Clean Air Act to prohibit the Administrator of the 
    Environmental Protection Agency from imposing a fee on certain 
                   facilities for methane emissions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marginal Well Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. METHANE EMISSIONS AND WASTE REDUCTION INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR 
              PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS.

    Section 136(d) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7436(d)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``section,'' and inserting ``section:'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (9) as 
        subparagraphs (A) through (I), respectively;
            (3) by striking ``the term'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) The term''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) The term `applicable facility' does not include a 
        facility that produces less than 15 barrels of oil per day and 
        less than 90 thousand cubic feet of natural gas per day.''.
                                 <all>
```
RESN.2015.06.30-EX10.1






Exhibit 10.1


Amendment No. One to Lease 
Resonant 


This Amendment dated May 5, 2015 is by and between SeaBreeze I Venture TIC ("Lessor") and Resonant, Inc. (''Lessee"). Lessor and Lessee entered into a Lease Agreement dated November 11, 2013 (the "Lease") for the premises known as Suite 306 at 111 Anza Boulevard, Burlingame, California. 
Such Lease is hereby amended as follows:


Premises: Suite 306, consisting of approximately 1,759 square feet 


Lease Term: One (1) Year-November 24, 2015 to November 30, 2016 


Base Rent 
Schedule:     Year 1:         $2.80 per square foot         $4,925.00 per month 


Base Year:     Per Paragraph 4 of the Lease, the Base Year shall be 2016. 


Security 
Deposit:     Per existing lease agreement, Landlord shall retain Security Deposit 




All other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain unchanged. 


AGREED & ACCEPTED: 


	
			
	LESSOR
	 
	LESSEE

	SeaBreeze I Venture TIC
	 
	Resonant, Inc.

	/s/ Phillip Raiser
	 
	/s/ Terry Lingren

	Phillip Raiser, Agent
	 
	Terry Lingren

	Date: 5/19/15
	 
	Date: 5/19/15
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2240 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Agriculture Buildings and Facilities for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Buildings and 

Facilities for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, AGRI5 CULTURE BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES FOR 

6 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture BuildVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:56 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2240.IH H2240

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2240 IH

1 ings and Facilities for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $59,967,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1953 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Primary Health Care for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration Primary Health 

Care for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1953 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES 

4 ADMINISTRATION PRIMARY HEALTH CARE 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of Health and Human Services, 

9 Health Resources and Services Administration Primary 

10 Health Care for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $1,626,522,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-284-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.403: Environmental 
Filing 2014 to be effective 2/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 12/29/14.
    Accession Number: 20141229-5162.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/12/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP01-74-008.
    Applicants: Dominion Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Petition of Dominion Transmission, Inc. to Modify Term 
of Gathering and Products Extraction Settlement and Requesting 
Expedited Action.
    Filed Date: 12/29/14.
    Accession Number: 20141229-5184.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/12/15.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on or 
before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: December 30, 2014.
 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30948 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 8, 2018

No. 04-18-00632-CV

Andrea PEREZ,

Appellant

v.

Santos SPARKMAN,

Appellee

From the County Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CV-0246

Honorable Robin V. Dwyer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On August 16, 2018, the County Court at Law of Guadalupe County, Texas signed an 

Eviction Final Judgment against appellant, Andrea Perez, awarding appellee, Santos Sparkman,

possession of a residence located at 125 Dandelion Trail, San Marcos, Guadalupe County, Texas. 

The county court also set supersedeas bond in the amount of $5,000. See TEX. PROP. CODE §

24.007 (West Supp. 2017). The judgment further ordered the trial court clerk to issue a writ of 

possession after the expiration of six (6) days from the signing of the judgment. On August 22, 

2018, appellant filed a Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal 

Bond in lieu of posting the supersedeas bond. 

On September 6, 2018, appellant filed, in conjunction with her notice of appeal, a “Plea 

for Emergency Stay and Review of Excessive Supersedeas Bond,” requesting this court: (1) to 

stay the writ of possession set to issue on September 7, 2018 and (2) to review the county court’s 

setting of supersedeas bond in the amount of $5,000. See TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4. Appellant argues

she “is unemployed and is the primary caregiver to the party’s three year old son and unable to 

post a superseadeas bond in the amount of $5,000.” We ultimately granted the “Plea for 

Emergency Stay and Review of Excessive Supersedeas Bond” to the extent that we ordered the 

writ of possession not to issue until further order of this court. See TEX. PROP. CODE § 24.007; 

TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4. At this time, a copy of the clerk’s record and reporter’s record have been 

filed. We therefore ORDER appellee, Santos Sparkman, to file a response to appellant’s 

challenge to the amount of superseadeas bond ordered by the county court on or before October 

18, 2018.
_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court