alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Loan Covenant Modification Letter



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 May 1, 2015 

Mr. Don Allen 
 Chief Financial Officer 

Saddlebrook Resorts, Inc. 
 5700 Saddlebrook Way 

Welsey Chapel, FL 33543 
 Re: Loan made available by USAmeriBank
(“Lender”) to Saddlebrook Resorts, Inc. (“Borrower”) 
 Dear Mr. Allen: 

As part of the loan transaction referenced above, your company entered into the certain Loan Agreement dated June 6, 2014 (the “Loan
Agreement”). The Loan Agreement required, among other things, that the Borrower maintain a Minimum Debt Service Coverage Ratio as defined on page 10 of the Loan Agreement: 

Debt Service Coverage – The Borrower to maintain a minimum Fixed Charge Coverage of 1.25 to 1.00 tested quarterly on a rolling four quarters basis
beginning March 31, 2014... 
 We have agreed to modify this covenant so that it shall be tested annually at fiscal year-end (12/31). This
modification is permanent. Nothing contained herein shall waive or modify any of the other loan covenants or requirements of the Borrower set forth in the Loan Agreement or any of the other loan documents. 

 

	
	Sincerely,
	
	




	David Manno
	Vice President
	USAmeriBank
Exhibit 32.1

                        Whole Living, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      We, the undersigned officers of Whole Living, Inc. certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

..     the annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

..     the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



Date:   April 13, 2004
                                          /s/ Douglas J. Burdick
                                          ____________________________________
                                          Douglas J. Burdick
                                          Chief Executive Officer



Date:   April 13, 2004
                                          /s/ Sharmon L. Smith
                                          ____________________________________
                                          Sharmon L. Smith
                                          Chief Financial Officer
#### Iliana I. Lopez, Appellant, v Starkis V. Geraldino et al., Respondents.

[825 NYS2d 143]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated July 15, 2005, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action predicated on allegations that the plaintiff sustained a medically determined injury or impairment of a nonpermanent nature which prevented her from performing substantially all of the material acts which constituted her usual and customary daily activities for not less than 90 days during the 180 days immediately following the occurrence of the injury or impairment, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.

The defendants established, through competent expert evidence *(see Dufel v Green,*84 NY2d 795 [1995]), that the plaintiff did not sustain a “permanent loss of use of a body organ, member, function or system[, a] permanent consequential limitation of use of a body organ or member [or a] significant limitation of use of a body function or system” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). In opposition, the plaintiff *399failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Gaddy v Eyler,*79 NY2d 955 [1992]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action predicated on those categories of serious injury *(see Toussaint v Claudio,*23 AD3d 268 [2005]; *Lowell v Peters,*3 AD3d 778 [2004]; *Tornatore v Haggerty,*307 AD2d 522 [2003]).

The court erred, however, in granting that branch of the defendants’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the causes of action predicated on allegations that the plaintiff sustained “a medically determined injury or impairment of a non-permanent nature which prevented her] from performing substantially all of the material acts which constitute [d her] usual and customary daily activities for not less than [90] days during the [180] days immediately following the occurrence of the injury or impairment” (Insurance Law § 5102 [d]). The defendants did not adequately address that category of serious injury in their motion papers and, therefore, failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment as to that claim *(see Toussaint v Claudio, supra; Lowell v Peters, supra; Tornatore v Haggerty, supra; see also Volpetti v Yoon Kap,*28 AD3d 750 [2006]; *Sayers v Hot,*23 AD3d 453 [2005]; *Perez v Ali,*23 AD3d 363 [2005]). Accordingly, summary judgment should not have been granted with respect to the 90/180 category of serious injury.

The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. Adams, J.E, Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                            HUB INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Six months ended
                                                    June 30                          Year Ended December 31
                                                -----------------     ---------------------------------------------------
                                                 2003       2002       2002       2001       2000       1999      1998
                                                ------     ------     ------     ------     ------     -----     -----
                                                                       (In thousand of US dollars)
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>
EARNINGS:
   Income of consolidated group before
   income taxes                                 29,889     21,772     43,657     15,267     11,508     7,796     3,536

   Fixed charges excluding capitalized
   interest                                      2,883      5,098      7,317      7,447      1,981       632       806
                                                ------     ------     ------     ------     ------     -----     -----
TOTAL EARNINGS                                  32,772     26,870     50,974     22,714     13,489     8,428     4,342
                                                ======     ======     ======     ======     ======     =====     =====
FIXED CHARGES:
   Interest expense of consolidated group
   including capitalized interest                2,883      5,098      7,317      7,447      1,981       632       806
                                                ------     ------     ------     ------     ------     -----     -----
TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                              2,883      5,098      7,317      7,447      1,981       632       806
                                                ======     ======     ======     ======     ======     =====     =====

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES               11.37       5.27       6.97       3.05       6.81     13.34      5.39
                                                ======     ======     ======     ======     ======     =====     =====
</TABLE>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2158 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. Department 

of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Land Acquisition for fiscal 

year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 

Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Land Acquisition for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, US FISH 

5 AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, LAND ACQUISITION 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for U.S. Department of Interior, US Fish and WildVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:01 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2158.IH H2158

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2158 IH

1 life Service, Land Acquisition for fiscal year 2024 may not 

2 exceed $0. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-109177, No. 333-133555 and No. 333-141954 on Form S-8 of our report dated
April 2, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of MicroIslet,
Inc. and subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2006 (which report expresses
an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to (1)
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern as
discussed in Note 1, and (2) the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R), SHARE-BASED PAYMENT, effective January 1, 2006), appearing
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of MicroIslet, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2007.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
San Diego, California
April 10, 2008
03-13-00509-CR

 IN THE

 TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS

 THIRD DISTRICT, OF AUSTIN

TERRY ATKINS

Petitioner, 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Respondent.

 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

 TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

TO THE HONORABLE TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT 

AUSTIN:

Petitioner files this Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for 

Rehearing under Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(1). In support of this motion, Petitioner 

shows the following:

1. The Court of Appeals for the Third District of Texas in Austin rendered 

its opinion and judgment in Terry Atkins v. The State of Texas, No. 03-13-00509-

CR, on July 24, 2015. 

2. Petitioner requests an e xtension of time for a rehearing. The deadline 

for filing a Petition for Rehearing on the above styled case was August 6, 2015. 

This is Petitioner’s request for an extension of 30 days in this case.

3. Petitioner relies on the following facts as a reasonable explanation for the 

requested extension of time to have a rehearing on the opinion and judgment; 

ACCEPTED

03-13-00509-CR

6615647

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

8/24/2015 10:09:27 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/24/2015 10:09:27 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Petitioner’s counsel needs more time to research the points of law and facts 

that the panel overlooked or misapprehended the pivotal effect of a new 

precedential decision and statute and the issue of exceptional importance that calls 

out for en banc attention. 

4. The undersigned has conferred with opposing counsel, Kathryn Scales,

who indicated there was no opposition to this request. 

Therefore, Petitioner prays that this Court grant this Motion for Extension of 

Time on Filing the Motion for Rehearing.

Respectfully submitted,

 /s/Amber Vazquez Bode

Amber Vazquez Bode

SBN: 24039225

1004 West Ave.

Austin, Texas 78701

512-220-8507

512-480-0760

amberv@lawyers.com

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

As required by Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a)(5), I certify that I have conferred with 

Kathryn Scales, Assistant District Attorney who has indicated that this motion is 

unopposed, and Lisa McMinn, State Prosecuting Attorney who counsel has 

contacted but is pending response.

/s/Amber Vazquez Bode

Amber Vazquez Bode
CERTIFICATE OF

SERVICE

I certify that, on August 21, 2015, I served a copy of this motion by 

electronic filing and First Class, United States mail on the following:

The Honorable Lisa C. McMinn

State Prosecuting Attorney

P.O. Box 13046

Austin, TX 78711

The Honorable Velva L. Price

Criminal District Clerk

P.O. BOX 1748

Austin, TX 78767

Ms. Kathryn A. Scales

Assistant District Attorney 

 PO Box 1748

 Austin, TX 78767-1748

 

 /s/ Amber Vazquez Bode

Amber Vazquez Bode
Exhibit 99(b)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2003

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
  "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal
  financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

| | · | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| | · | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: May 13, 2003 | /s/ John R. BiggarJohn R. Biggar
        Executive Vice President and
        Chief Financial Officer
        PPL Corporation
|------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | · | The                Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | · | The                information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |

| Date:                August 4, 2005 | /s/ William                F.                Hecht                                   William                F. HechtPresidentPPL                Energy Supply, LLC |
|-------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### In the Matter of Charles Berkman, a Suspended Attorney.

[972 NYS2d 902]

Motion by Charles Berkman for reinstatement to the bar as an attorney and counselor-at-law. Mr. Berkman was admitted to the bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department on October 21, 1953. By decision and order on application of this Court dated October 31, 2006, the Grievance Committee for the Second, Eleventh, and Thirteenth Judicial Districts was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against Mr. Berkman and the issues raised were referred to the Honorable James A. Gowan, as Special Referee, to hear and report. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 7, 2007, the Honorable James A. Gowan was relieved as Special Referee and the matter was reassigned to David I. Berber, as Special Referee, to hear and report. By opinion and order of this Court dated September 2, 2008, as amended by decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 25, 2008, Mr. Berkman was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, commencing October 10, 2008, based on five charges of professional misconduct *(see Matter of Berkman,*55 AD3d 114 [2008]). By decision and order on motion of this Court dated November 20, 2012, Mr. Berkman’s motion for reinstatement was held in abeyance and the matter was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness to investigate and report on his current fitness to practice law.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, and upon the report of the Committee on Character and Fitness and the exhibits annexed thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that, effective immediately, Charles Berkman is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to restore the name of Charles Berkman to the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law. Eng, P.J., Mastro, Rivera, Skelos and Angiolillo, JJ., concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1227, -1240 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION (doing business as the University of Pittsburgh), Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in

case no. 08-CV-1307, Judge Arthur J. Schwab.

ON MOTION Before LINN, Circuit Judge. ORDER The parties jointly move to stay the briefing schedule in this appeal pending disposition of University of Pittsburgh v. Varian Medical Systems, Inc., 2008-1441, -1454. Both sets of appeals involve the same parties and patents. The parties state that the court's decision may affect the briefing and necessity of this appeal. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to stay the briefing schedule is granted. The appellant is directed to inform this court, within 14 days of the issuance of the mandate in 2008-1441, -1454, concerning how it believes these appeals should proceed. The crossappellant may also file a response within that time. (2) A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panels assigned to 2008-1441, -1454, to inform that panel of this related case. FOR THE COURT

Jan Horbaly FILED Clerk U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Roderick R. McKelvie, Esq. Matthew H. Poppe, Esq. s20 APR 1 3 2009 rIUHDHLY CLERK 

### APR 13 2009 Date /s/ Jan Horbalv

2009-1227, -1240 2
#### In the Matter of Dante B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[873 NYS2d 8]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on January 17, 2008, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent, upon his admission that he had committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied appellant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations *(see People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). The arresting officer heard shots fired and then saw defendant in extremely close temporal and spatial proximity to the gunfire. Defendant had a bulge in his waistband suggestive of a firearm, and was making adjustments to that area. These circumstances clearly provided reasonable suspicion, justifying a pat down of the bulge area *(see People v Sanders,*235 AD2d 507 [1997], *lv denied*89 NY2d 1015 [1997]). Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Nardelli, Sweeny and DeGrasse, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ALABAMA STATE PORT :

AUTHORITY, An Agency of the State 

of Alabama, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CA 15-0172-KD-C

CHIPPEWA LAKES, LLC, :

Defendant.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been 

no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 

636(b)(l)(B) (doc. 40) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to remand is GRANTED and this action is 

remanded to the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama. 

DONE this 12th day of August 2015.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00172-KD-C Document 41 Filed 08/12/15 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2118 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

General Services Administration, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, General Services Administration, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, GENERAL SERV5 ICES ADMINISTRATION, CIVILIAN BOARD OF 

6 CONTRACT APPEALS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Independent Agencies, General Services AdminisVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:02 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2118.IH H2118

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2118 IH

1 tration, Civilian Board of Contract Appeals for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $9,301,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB