alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2354 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2354

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for International 
         Military Education and Training for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for International 
         Military Education and Training for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INTERNATIONAL 
              MILITARY EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for International Military 
Education and Training for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$110,778,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ADSTAR.COM, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999 INCLUDED IN ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                            5,602,493
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       460,477
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6,199,784
<PP&E>                                              424,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                      175,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6,809,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2,443,662
<BONDS>                                           1,100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                282
<OTHER-SE>                                        3,266,028
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3,266,310
<SALES>                                             132,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,685,144
<CGS>                                               115,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,020,882
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  333,464
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,863,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,864,722)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,864,722)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (1.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (1.90)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Internet Gold-Golden Lines Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Doron Turgeman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Doron Turgeman*


Doron Turgeman


Chief Executive Officer




April 28, 2014




*           The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.





This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form 20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference
EXHIBIT
      32





CHEMBIO
      DIAGNOSTICS, INC.


SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





In
      connection with this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, each of the
      undersigned, Lawrence A. Siebert, the Chief Executive Officer, President and
      Chairman of the Company, and Richard J. Larkin, the Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            This
                Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies
                with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in this Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
                December 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
                financial
                condition and results of operations of Chembio Diagnostics, Inc.
                for the
                periods presented therein.





Date:
      March 12, 2008











/s
      /
      Lawrence A.
      Siebert


Lawrence
      A. Siebert


Chief
      Executive Officer, President and Chairman


(Principle
      Executive Officer)








/s./
      Richard J.
      Larkin


Richard
      J. Larkin


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principle
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32(d)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL ENERGY SUPPLY, LLC'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Energy Supply,
  LLC (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"),
  I, the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  hereby certify that:

| |  | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: November 9, 2004 | /s/ James E. AbelJames E. Abel
        Vice President and Treasurer
        PPL Energy Supply, LLC
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Robert Murphy, Respondent, v Tahoe Development Corp. et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[973 NYS2d 807]

*610In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Siegel, J.), dated June 28, 2012, as granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To prevail on a cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1), a plaintiff must establish that the statute was violated, and *that the*violation was a proximate cause of his or her injuries *(see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Sews. of N.Y. City,*1 NY3d 280, 287 [2003]). Here, the plaintiff established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that he was injured when one of the rungs of the wooden A-frame ladder he was using broke, causing him to fall to the ground *(see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr.,*64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

In opposition, the defendants failed to submit evidence in admissible form sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the plaintiffs actions were the sole proximate cause of his injuries *(see Gallagher v New York Post,*14 NY3d 83 [2010]; *Chabla v 72 Greenpoint, LLC,*101 AD3d 928 [2012]; *see also Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs.,*46 NY2d 1065, 1068 [1979]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240 (1) *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d at 562). Mastro, J.E, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    I, William R. Slakey, certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended June 28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements in Sections
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Handspring, Inc. for the
periods being presented.

                                              /s/ WILLIAM R. SLAKEY
                                 ----------------------------------------------
                                                 William R. Slakey
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: September 24, 2003
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F R A N C I S C O M E N D O Z A T O R R E S ; S U S A N A Z E P E D A E S Q U IV E L , a. k. a. S u s an n aC e p e d a - Q u iv il, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73986 A ge nc yN os . A 075- 771- 014

A 075- 771- 015 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F r anc i s c o M e ndoz aT orr e s and S us anaZ e pe daE s qui ve l , na t i ve s and c i t i z e ns of M exi co, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order d is m is s in g th e irap p e a l f r o m an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) d e c is io n d e n y in g th e ir 

# FI LED JU N 29 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73986 2 ap p l i cat i o n s fo r can cel l at i o n o f rem o v al . W e rev i ew d e n o v o cl ai m s o f du e p ro cess v i o l at i o n s i n rem o v alp ro ceed i n g s. Co lm e n a rv . I NS , 21 0 F . 3d96 7, 97 1 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 0 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. P e t i t i one r s ’ c l a i m tha tthe I Jvi ol a t e d the i rdue pr oc e s s r i ght s bye xhi bi t i ng b i as an di n t errup t i n g th ei r t est i m o n y fai l s b ecau se th e p ro ceed i n g s w ere n o tso f u n d am e n ta llyu n f

a irth a t th e yw e r e p r e v e n te df r o m r e a s o n ab lyp r e s e n tin g th e ir c a s e , an dth e yf

a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te p r e ju d ic e . See i d. at97 1-72 ; L at a v . I NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng pr e j udi c e f orape t i t i one rt o pr e va i lon a du e p r o c e s s c la im ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
#### Wm. M. Hibbard *v.*W. S. Watson, et al.

Invalid Execution — Constable Not Bound to Return an Invalid Execution.

There is no liability on a constable’s bond for failing to return an invalid execution.

Election of Causes.

It is error for the court to require a plaintiff to elect which of the causes of action set forth in his petition he will prosecute.

APPEAL PROM BALLARD CIRCUIT COURT.

April 2, 1875.

Opinion by

Judge Cofer:

The record of the case in which the execution against Woolfork issued, shows that no judgment was ever rendered in that case, and consequently that the original execution was void; and it results that the replevy bond taken under it was, at any rate, invalid as a statutory bond, and no execution could lawfully issue upon it. As the execution placed in the hands of Watson issued on that bond, and was consequently invalid, the failure to return it did not subject the constable or his sureties to the statutory liability imposed on constables for failing to return executions.

When ruled to elect which of the causes of action set forth in the petition1 as amended he would prosecute, the appellant elected to proceéd for the failure to return the execution, and from that time forward, that was the only cause of action in the petition; and as it *462was sufficiently answered by the allegation that the execution was invalid, and the answer was sustained by the record, the petition as to that branch of the case was properly dismissed.

*W. P.*Bishop, *for appellant. E. I.*Bullock, *for appellees.*

But the appellant excepted to- the order requiring him to elect which of the causes of action he would prosecute, and the judgment should be reversed if the rule to elect was improperly made.

Both causes of action arose out of alleged violations of Watson's bond, and we are unable to discover anjr reason why they could not be united in the same petition. A recovery upon one would be a satisfaction of the other; but on the face of the petition both were good, and neither should have been stricken out; but the plaintiff should have been allowed to go to trial on both, and to prove both if he could, and recover the highest amount to which he would be entitled on either cause of action made out by the evidence'; and if he failed to prove more than one cause of action, he should have been allowed to recover on that.

The order requiring the appellant to elect which of the causes of action he would prosecute, is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial upon the cause of action set up in the amended petition.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony GREEN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-1723.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

June 12, 2006.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Aug. 23, 2006.

John G. McKenzie, Office of the United States Attorney, Rockford, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert A. Handelsman, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, and Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Anthony Green was convicted by a jury of armed bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d); possession of a firearm during and in relation to the robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); and possession of a firearm by a felon, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Relying on the Sentencing Guidelines, the district court treated Green as a career offender and imposed a sentence of 384 months’ imprisonment. In *United States v. Green,*No. 04-1723 (7th Cir. Oct. 11, 2005) (unpublished order), we ordered a limited remand of Green’s sentence in accordance with *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005), so that the district court could determine whether it believed the sentence remains appropriate now that *Booker*has relegated the Sentencing Guidelines to advisory status. In all other respects, we affirmed the judgment of the district court.

The district court has replied that, now knowing that the Guidelines are not mandatory, it would reimpose the same sentence. We invited both parties to offer their views about the reasonableness of Green’s sentence. The government filed a statement urging us to find the sentence reasonable and affirm. Green’s counsel filed a statement explaining that the record affords him no basis to argue that Green’s sentence is unreasonable.

We therefore Affirm the sentence issued by the district court.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2328 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the CongressionalExecutive Commission on the People’s Republic of China, Salaries and 

Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the 

Congressional-Executive Commission on the People’s Republic of China, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2328 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 THE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMIS3 SION ON THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, 

4 SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 

5 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for the Congressional-Executive Commission on the 

9 People’s Republic of China, Salaries and Expenses for fis10 cal year 2024 may not exceed $0. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.5 Amendment to Note 8.1.15





AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE




THIS AMENDMENT, dated as of August 1, 2015 (the “Amendment”) to the Promissory Note referred to below is entered into by and between, Serenity Services, Inc. (the “Creditor”) and Jolley Marketing, Inc. (the “Debtor”).




WHEREAS, the parties entered into the Promissory Note on August 6, 2013 (the “Note”);




WHEREAS, the original maturity date of the Note was August 6, 2015.




WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend the Note to extend the maturity date thereof.




NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the receipt of good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:




MATURITY:  The maturity date of the Note is hereby extended to August 6, 2016.




EFFECTIVE DATE:  The effective date of this Amendment shall be August 1, 2015.




GENERAL PROVISIONS:




(a)

Except as amended hereby, the Note shall continue to be, and shall remain, in full force and effect. This Amendment shall not, except as otherwise provided herein, be deemed (i) to be a waiver of, or consent to, or a modification or amendment of, any other term or condition of the Note or (ii) to prejudice any right or rights which the parties may now have or may have in the future under or in connection with the Note, as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.




(b)

The terms of the Note are incorporated herein by reference and shall form a part of this Amendment as if set forth herein in their entirety.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be executed individually or by its officer thereunto duly authorized, as of the respective dates set forth below.




JOLLEY MARKETING, INC.







Date:  August 1, 2015

/s/  Steve White

By Steve White, President 










Serenity Services, Inc.







Date:  August 1, 2015

/s/  Ben Peay

By Ben Peay, President
**Exhibit 23.1**











Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
      Form
      S-8 (File No. 333-120141) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-115364) of Cytomedix,
      Inc. of our report dated February 23, 2007 ( except
      as
      to the fifth paragraph of our report and Notes 2, 3, 11, 12, 13 and 14, which
      are as of November 13, 2007) ,
      with
      respect to the balance sheets of Cytomedix, Inc. as of December 31, 2006
      and 2005, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and
      cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
      December 31, 2006, and our report dated February 23, 2007 on
      management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
      reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control
      over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which appear on pages 23,
      55 and 56 in this 2006 annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, on Form 10-K/A
      for the year ended December 31, 2006.





/s/
      L J
      Soldinger Associates, LLC





Deer
      Park, Illinois


November
      14, 200 7