208 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2015 / Notices 

2Until July 1, 2004, these products were 

classifiable under HTSUS 0304.20.6030 (Frozen 

Catfish Fillets), 0304.20.6096 (Frozen Fish Fillets, 

NESOI), 0304.20.6043 (Frozen Freshwater Fish 

Fillets) and 0304.20.6057 (Frozen Sole Fillets). 

Until February 1, 2007, these products were 

classifiable under HTSUS 0304.20.6033 (Frozen 

Fish Fillets of the species Pangasius, including basa 

and tra). On March 2, 2011, the Department added 

two HTSUS numbers at the request of U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’): 1604.19.2000 and 

1604 19.3000. On January 30, 2012, the Department 

added eight HTSUS numbers at the request of CBP: 

0304.62.0020, 0305.59.0000, 1604.19.2100, 

1604.19.3100, 1604.19.4100, 1604.19.5100, 

1604.19.6100 and 1604.19.8100. 

3See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2011–2012, 79 FR 37714, 37715 (July 2, 

2014). 

shank, and strip fillets and portions 

thereof, whether or not breaded or 

marinated, of the species Pangasius 

Bocourti, Pangasius Hypophthalmus 

(also known as Pangasius Pangasius) 

and Pangasius Micronemus. These 

products are classifiable under tariff 

article codes 0304.29.6033, 

0304.62.0020, 0305.59.0000, 

0305.59.4000, 1604.19.2000, 

1604.19.2100, 1604.19.3000, 

1604.19.3100, 1604.19.4000, 

1604.19.4100, 1604.19.5000, 

1604.19.5100, 1604.19.6100 and 

1604.19.8100 (Frozen Fish Fillets of the 

species Pangasius including basa and 

tra) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’).2

Although the HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

scope of the order is dispositive. 

For a full description of the scope, see 

‘‘New Shipper Review of Certain Frozen 

Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic 

of Vietnam: Ministerial Error 

Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently 

with and hereby adopted by this notice 

(‘‘Ministerial Error Memo’’). 

Ministerial Errors 

Section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 

CFR 351.224(f) define a ‘‘ministerial 

error’’ as an error ‘‘in addition, 

subtraction, or other arithmetic 

function, clerical error resulting from 

inaccurate copying, duplication, or the 

like, and any similar type of 

unintentional error which the Secretary 

considers ministerial.’’ After reviewing 

the Final Rescission, the Department has 

determined that it incorrectly stated that 

the Vietnam-wide rate is 2.39 U.S. 

dollars per kilogram (‘‘kg’’). The correct 

Vietnam-wide rate is 2.11 U.S. dollars 

per kg.3 For a detailed discussion of this 

ministerial error, as well as the 

Department’s analysis, see the 

Ministerial Error Memo. 

In accordance with section 751(h) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), we are 

amending the Final Rescission of the 

new shipper review of fish fillets from 

Vietnam. The revised cash deposit 

dumping rate is detailed below. 

Amended Cash Deposit Rate for the 

New Shipper Review 

The following amended cash deposit 

requirements apply for all shipments of 

subject merchandise from Thanh Hung 

entered or withdrawn from warehouse: 

(1) For subject merchandise produced 

and exported by Thanh Hung, the cash 

deposit rate will be the Vietnam-wide 

rate (i.e., 2.11 U.S. dollars per kg); (2) for 

subject merchandise exported by Thanh 

Hung but not manufactured by Thanh 

Hung, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the Vietnam-wide rate 

(i.e., 2.11 U.S. dollars per kg); and (3) for 

subject merchandise manufactured by 

Thanh Hung, but exported by any other 

party, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the exporter. These 

cash deposit requirements shall remain 

in effect until further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this POR. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to Administrative 

Protective Order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

These amended final results are 

published in accordance with sections 

751(h) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: December 29, 2014. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30842 Filed 1–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Manufacturing Extension Partnership 

Advisory Board 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of open meeting. 

SUMMARY: The National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST) 

announces that the Manufacturing 

Extension Partnership (MEP) Advisory 

Board will hold an open meeting on 

Wednesday, January 21, 2015 from 8:00 

a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 

DATES: The meeting will be held 

Wednesday, January 21, 2015, from 8:00 

a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the NIST, 100 Bureau Drive, 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Please note 

admittance instructions in the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kari 

Reidy, Manufacturing Extension 

Partnership, National Institute of 

Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau 

Drive, Mail Stop 4800, Gaithersburg, 

MD 20899–4800, telephone number 

(301) 975–4919, email: kari.reidy@

nist.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MEP 

Advisory Board (Board) is authorized 

under section 3003(d) of the America 

COMPETES Act (Pub. L. 110–69); 

codified at 15 U.S.C. 278k(e), as 

amended, in accordance with the 

provisions of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 

App. The Board is composed of 10 

members, appointed by the Director of 

NIST. Hollings MEP is a unique 

program, consisting of centers across the 

United States and Puerto Rico with 

partnerships at the state, federal, and 

local levels. The Board provides a forum 

for input and guidance from Hollings 

MEP program stakeholders in the 

formulation and implementation of 

tools and services focused on 

supporting and growing the U.S. 

manufacturing industry, provides 

advice on MEP programs, plans, and 

policies, assesses the soundness of MEP 

plans and strategies, and assesses 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 2 / Monday, January 5, 2015 / Notices 209 

current performance against MEP 

program plans. 

Background information on the Board 

is available at http://www.nist.gov/mep/ 

about/advisory-board.cfm. 

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 

App., notice is hereby given that the 

MEP Advisory Board will hold an open 

meeting on Wednesday, January 21, 

2015 from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Eastern 

Time. This meeting will focus on 

updates from the new sub-committees 

on (1) Technology Acceleration and (2) 

Board Governance. The final agenda 

will be posted on the MEP Advisory 

Board Web site at http://www.nist.gov/

mep/about/advisory-board.cfm. 

Admittance Instructions: Anyone 

wishing to attend this meeting should 

submit their name, email address and 

phone number to Kari Reidy 

(Kari.Reidy@nist.gov or 301–975–4919) 

no later than Wednesday, January 14, 

2015, 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Non-U.S. 

citizens must submit additional 

information; please contact Ms. Reidy. 

All attendees must pre-register in order 

to be admitted to the NIST campus. 

Also, please note that under the REAL 

ID Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109–13), federal 

agencies, including NIST, can only 

accept a state-issued driver’s license or 

identification card for access to federal 

facilities if issued by states that are 

REAL ID compliant or have an 

extension. NIST also currently accepts 

other forms of federal-issued 

identification in lieu of a state-issued 

driver’s license. For detailed 

information please contact Ms. Reidy or 

visit: http://www.nist.gov/public_

affairs/visitor/. 

Individuals and representatives of 

organizations who would like to offer 

comments and suggestions related to the 

MEP Advisory Board’s business are 

invited to request a place on the agenda. 

Approximately 15 minutes will be 

reserved for public comments at the 

beginning of the meeting. Speaking 

times will be assigned on a first-come, 

first-served basis. The amount of time 

per speaker will be determined by the 

number of requests received but is likely 

to be no more than three to five minutes 

each. The exact time for public 

comments will be included in the final 

agenda that will be posted on the MEP 

Advisory Board Web site as http://

www.nist.gov/mep/about/advisoryboard.cfm. Questions from the public 

will not be considered during this 

period. Speakers who wish to expand 

upon their oral statements, those who 

had wished to speak but could not be 

accommodated on the agenda, and those 

who were unable to attend in person are 

invited to submit written statements to 

the MEP Advisory Board, National 

Institute of Standards and Technology, 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail 

Stop 4800, Gaithersburg, MD 20899– 

4800, or via fax at (301) 963–6556, or 

electronically by email to kari.reidy@

nist.gov. 

Dated: December 22, 2014. 

Phillip Singerman, 

Associate Director for Innovation & Industry 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2014–30849 Filed 1–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Intent To Prepare an Environmental 

Impact Statement for the East Campus 

Integration Program Within the Fort 

Meade Complex, Maryland 

AGENCY: Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice of intent; notice of public 

meeting; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense 

(DoD) announces its intent to prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

as part of the environmental planning 

process for the East Campus Integration 

Program at Fort George G. Meade, 

Maryland (hereafter referred to as Fort 

Meade). The DoD proposes to develop 

operational complex and headquarters 

space at the National Security Agency’s 

(NSA) East Campus on Fort Meade for 

use by NSA and the Intelligence 

Community. The purpose of the 

Proposed Action is to provide facilities 

that are fully supportive of the 

Intelligence Community’s function and 

to continue to integrate the East Campus 

site with the NSA Main Campus. The 

need for the action is to meet mission 

requirements, both internally at the 

NSA and within the Intelligence 

Community. 

Publication of this notice begins a 

scoping process that identifies and 

determines the scope of environmental 

issues to be addressed in the EIS. This 

notice requests public participation in 

the scoping process and provides 

information on how to participate. 

DATES: There will be an open house at 

4:00 p.m. followed by a scoping meeting 

from 5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. on January 

27, 2015. Comments or questions 

regarding this EIS should be submitted 

by February 27, 2015 to ensure 

sufficient time to consider public input 

in the preparation of the Draft EIS. 

ADDRESSES: The open house and 

scoping meeting will be held at the 

Severn Community Library, 2624 

Annapolis Road, Severn, Maryland 

21144. Verbal and written comments 

will be accepted at the scoping meeting. 

You can also submit written comments 

to ‘‘East Campus Integration Program 

EIS’’ c/o HDR, 2600 Park Tower Drive, 

Suite 100, Vienna, VA 22180 or submit 

by email to ECIPEIS@hdrinc.com. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Jeffrey Williams at 301–688–2970, or 

email jdwill2@nsa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background: The NSA is a tenant DoD 

agency on Fort Meade. NSA is a hightechnology communications and data 

processing organization. In order to 

meet mission requirements, both at the 

NSA and within the Intelligence 

Community, continued integration of 

the East Campus with the NSA Main 

Campus on Fort Meade through 

development of office, operational, and 

headquarters space is needed. In 2010, 

NSA completed an EIS that addressed 

development of the East Campus, which 

is the northern part of the former Fort 

Meade golf course. The Record of 

Decision implemented the first phase of 

development identified in that EIS, 

which is currently occurring in the 

southern portion of the East Campus. 

This upcoming East Campus Integration 

Program EIS will address buildout of the 

northern portion of the East Campus. 

Proposed Action and Alternatives: 

The East Campus Integration Program 

was initiated to provide a modern office, 

operational, and headquarters complex 

to meet the growth requirements of the 

NSA and Intelligence Community. 

Development is proposed along the East 

Campus central core extending through 

the NSA Main Campus at Fort Meade. 

The Proposed Action would consist of 

the construction of approximately 

2,880,000 square feet of office, 

operational, and headquarters space 

supporting an increase of 7,200 people 

with the majority from local leases and 

government-owned buildings to the 

NSA Main Campus. The program also 

includes the demolition of 

approximately 1,900,000 square feet of 

aged buildings and infrastructure. 

Development would include associated 

infrastructure (e.g., electrical substation, 

generator capacity providing 121 

megawatts of electricity, life/safety 

generators, building heating systems, 

roads, sidewalks, storm water 

management facilities, and parking 

structures). 

Alternatives identified include four 

options for redundant emergency 

backup power generation and various 

pollution control systems, two options 

for building heating systems, four 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES