alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1901 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint Items, 

Congressional Budget Office for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Joint 

Items, Congressional Budget Office for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 JOINT ITEMS, CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OF5 FICE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Joint Items, Congressional Budget Office for fis9 cal year 2024 may not exceed $50,737,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS
of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 I, Richard H. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of Prima Energy Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date herein (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Richard H. Lewis

Richard H. Lewis
Chief Executive Officer
May 10, 2004
 I, Neil L. Stenbuck, Chief Financial Officer of Prima Energy Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date herein (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Neil L. Stenbuck

Neil L. Stenbuck
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2004
 26
ALD

- 246 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 1 9

- 2362

___________ IN RE: EVARISTO SERRANO

- VARGAS , Petitioner

___________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(Related to 3

- 17

- cv - 00801 )

___________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

July 25, 2019 Before: MCKEE, SHWARTZ , and BIBAS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : August 30, 2019 )

_________ OPINION *

_________ PER CURIAM Petitioner Evaristo Serrano

- Vargas , a citizen of Mexico , is currently a detainee with the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) . His petition for review of a final order of removal is pending with this Court. In May 2018, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania ordered the immigration court to conduct a bond hearing to determine whether Serrano

- Vargas’s detention should be

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P. 5.7 does not constitute binding precedent.2

continued. The Immigration Judge (IJ) determined that the Department of Homeland Security had shown by clear and convincing evidence that Serrano

- Vargas poses a danger to the community and is a significant flight risk. The IJ found that Serrano

- Vargas was properly detained and, therefore, de clined to set bond. In October 2018, Serrano

- Vargas filed a “Motion to Enforce Prior Order ” in the District Court, arguing that the IJ had not conducted a legally sufficient individualized bond hearing in violation of Serrano

- Vargas’s due process rights

. On June 14, 2019 , Serrano

- Vargas filed a petition for a writ of mandamus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 with this Court, alleging extraordinary delay in the adjudication of his motion to enforce . Subsequently, in a memorandum and order entered July 10, 201 9 , the District Court denied the m otion to e nforce, finding that Serrano

- Vargas’s due process rights had not been violated. Accordingly, because he has obtained the relief he requested, the mandamus petition will be dismissed as moot. See Blanciak v. All egheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

- 99 (3d Cir. 1996).
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2187 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. Department 

of Interior, Office of Natural Resources Revenue for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 

Department of Interior, Office of Natural Resources Revenue for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, OFFICE OF 

5 NATURAL RESOURCES REVENUE FOR FISCAL 

6 YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Natural 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2187 IH

1 Resources Revenue for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $137,505,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 09, 2024. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 09, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24I0114. HIPPO INSURANCE SERVICES d/b/a HIPPO HOME INSURANCE et al v. ATLANTIC RESTORATION SERVICES, INC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 22A2094
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00100

- CV

Donald W. Read

v.

Timothy Verbuski §

§

§

§ From the 48th District Court

of Tarrant County (048

- 275890

- 14)

April 30 , 2015

Opinion by Justice Gabriel



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEA LS

By / s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
“Report”), I, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  September
20, 2010





/s/
      Anthony L. HavensAnthony
      L. HavensChief
      Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              OF SWISS MEDICA, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned
officer of Swiss Medica, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

      (a)   The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
            30, 2006 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
            section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated: November 15, 2006

/s/ Raghunath Kilambi
---------------------
Raghunath Kilambi,
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's  audited financial  statements for the quarter ended June 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                    848
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                              99
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          947
<PP&E>                                  7,879
<DEPRECIATION>                          1,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          7,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      69
<BONDS>                                 1,315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                              6,013
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            7,397
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          684
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        109
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           171
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       171
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                              171
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            7.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                            7.86
        

</TABLE>
#### Tanya Gonzalez, Respondent, v Riverbay Corporation et al., Appellants, and William Thomas, Respondent.

[967 NYS2d 386]

— Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered January 11, 2012, which denied the motion of defendants Riverbay Corporation and Marion Scott Real Estate, Inc. (collectively Riverbay) for leave to depose *602nonparty witnesses, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff commenced this action for personal injuries that she allegedly sustained when she was assaulted in the basement of an apartment building owned and managed by Ri verb ay. Ri verb ay served subpoenas seeking depositions and related materials from two detectives and a police officer who investigated the incident and alleged that the depositions were needed to adequately address plaintiffs claims based on alleged security failures or inadequate security measures employed by Riverbay. Neither at Supreme Court nor in this Court has any opposition to the requested relief been expressed. Accordingly, we grant the motion. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Saxe and Richter, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41046

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BRODERICK BRADSHAW,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:03-CR-58-ALL

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Broderick Bradshaw appeals his sentence imposed following

his guilty plea to use of a communication facility in committing

a drug offense. He was sentenced to 34 months of imprisonment

and one year of supervised release. Bradshaw argues for the

first time on appeal and pursuant to Blakely v. Washington, 124

S. Ct. 2531 (2004), and United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738

(2005), that his sentence is illegal. 
No. 04-41046

-2-

Bradshaw has not established plain error with regard to his

Blakely and Booker claim because he has not established that

being sentenced under a mandatory Guidelines scheme affected his

substantial rights. The record does not indicate that the

district court “would have reached a significantly different

result” under a sentencing scheme in which the Guidelines

were advisory only. See United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 

520-22 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Mar. 31, 2005)

(No. 04-9517). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1934 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, 

Wage and Hour Division, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, Salaries 

and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR 

5 DIVISION, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR FIS6 CAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1934 IH

1 Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $229,000,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**EXHIBIT 10.3**

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

(Chairman of the Board)

        THIS  AGREEMENT,  made and entered  into as of February  12,  2004,  by and between  Michael J.  Birck (the  "Executive")  andTellabs, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company");

        WITNESSETH   THAT: 

        WHEREAS,the parties desire to enter into this Agreement pertaining to the continuing employment ofthe Executive by the Company as the Chairman of the Board; 

        WHEREAS,this Agreement replaces and supersedes the employment agreement dated June 16, 2002,between the Executive and the Company; 

        NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth below, it ishereby covenanted and agreed by the Executive and the Company as follows:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolfo CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41435.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Michael L. Herman, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, Adolfo Castillo, Seago-ville, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Adolfo Castillo has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Castillo received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, J. Frank
Harrison, III, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David V. Singer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ J. Frank Harrison, III                                                           
|                                                                                     
|J. Frank Harrison, III Chairman of the
Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|November 12, 2003                                                                    



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David V. Singer                                                 
|                                                                    
|David V. Singer Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
|November 12, 2003
1 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________ No. 06-3139

________________ Richard Anthony Kaminsky, also known as Richard Anthony Kaminsky, D.O., also known as Dr. Richard Anthony Kaminsky, Appellant,

v. Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Appellee. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. [UNPUBLISHED]

________________ Submitted: May 14, 2007 Filed: June 26, 2007

________________ Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM. Dr. Richard Kaminsky appeals the district court's 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Americans with Disabilitie s Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a), and Title VII-2- of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e - 2000e-17, suit against Saint Louis University School of Medicine (SLU). Upon careful de novo review, see Ferguson v. United States , 484 F.3d 1068, 1072 (8th Cir. 2007), we find no reversible error of fact or law. Even if Dr. Kaminsky had been able to establish a prima facie case of discrimination, SLU proffered su fficient nondiscriminatory reasons for its actions that Dr. Kaminsky failed to rebut as pretextual. SeeFreeman v. Fahey , 374 F.3d 663, 666 (8th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm based upon the district court's well-reasoned and thorough order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Jorge Luis SALAZAR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 06-41350.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 2, 2008.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Guillermo Ruben Garcia, Garcia & Garcia, Laredo, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Jorge Luis Salazar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine and 100 kilograms or more of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a *747drug trafficking offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c) and 2. Salazar contends that the district court clearly erred in denying him a minor role adjustment to his offense level.

The record demonstrates that Salazar not only took care of the house where the drugs and firearms were kept, but also assisted others in weighing and packaging the drugs for distribution. Even though Salazar’s role might have been only one part of the distribution scheme, his participation was clearly “coextensive with the conduct for which he was held accountable,” *United States v. Garcia,*242 F.3d 593, 598-99 (5th Cir.2001), and not merely peripheral to the advancement of the illicit activity, *United States v. Miranda,*248 F.3d 434, 446-47 (5th Cir.2001).

Salazar’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of The TriZetto Group, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies
that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



(a) The Form 10-K
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: February 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Jeffrey H. Margolis                    
|                        |  | Jeffrey H. Margolis Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: February 14, 2005 |  | /s/ James C. Malone                        
|                        |  | James C. Malone Chief Financial Officer