alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 4, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00334

- CV

Paule tte BARIBEAU

, Appellant

v.

HILL COUNTRY PARTNERS, L.P., Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CI

- 08378 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due November 1, 2018; however, the court granted an extension of time until December 3, 2018. Appellant has filed an unopposed second motion for

extension of time to file the brief.

We grant the motion and order appellant’s brief due January 3, 2018. Counsel is advised that no further extensions of time will be granted absent a motion, filed before the brief is due, that (1) demonstrates extraordinary circumstances justifying further delay, (2) advises the

court of the efforts counsel has expended in preparing the brief, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance that the brief will be completed and filed by the requested extended

deadline. The court does not generally consider a heavy work schedule to be an extraordinary

circumstance.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of December, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

Notice is hereby given that, on December 8, 2014, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.* (“the Act”), IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (“IMS Global”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, CODE—Open University of Japan, Chiba, Japan; Fulton County Schools, Atlanta, GA; Qualcomm Incorporated, San Diego, CA; Scholastic Inc., New York, NY; and TurnItIn, Oakland, CA, have been added as parties to this venture.

Also, Scientia, Cambridge, United Kingdom, has withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and IMS Global intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

On April 7, 2000, IMS Global filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the **Federal Register** pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283).

The last notification was filed with the Department on September 18, 2014. A notice was published in the **Federal Register** pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 9, 2014 (79 FR 61098).

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2014-30788 Filed 1-2-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2325 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the Commission 

for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for the 

Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage 

Abroad, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 THE COMMISSION FOR THE PRESERVATION 

5 OF AMERICA’S HERITAGE ABROAD, SALARIES 

6 AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for the Commission for the Preservation of America’s 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2325 IH

1 Heritage Abroad, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $642,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

SANGERNETTA MASON, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 10-0069-CG-M

ASPLUNDH, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation

to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED

that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. 

DONE and ORDERED this 27th day of May, 2010.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:10-cv-00069-CG-M Document 8 Filed 05/27/10 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


Deloitte & Touche LLP
BCE Place
181 Bay Street, Suite 1400
Toronto, ON M5J 2V1
Canada

Tel: (416) 601 6150
Fax: (416) 601 6151
www.deloitte.ca
                                                    [DELOITTE & TOUCHE ("LOGO")]



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement and
the related Prospectus of Brookfield Properties Corporation on Form S-8 of our
report dated February 4, 2003, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of
Brookfield Properties Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002.



[DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP ("SIGNATURE")]

Chartered Accountants

Toronto, Ontario
February 24, 2004






---------
Deloitte
Touche
Tohmatsu
---------
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-50196

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN JOSE GUARDIOLA-BARRIOS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-2337-1

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Jose Guardiola-Barrios has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Guardiola-Barrios has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-50196 Document: 00512473838 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-50196

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-50196 Document: 00512473838 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2318 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2318

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
          Programs, The Asia Foundation for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Related 
          Programs, The Asia Foundation for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR RELATED PROGRAMS, 
              THE ASIA FOUNDATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Related Programs, The 
Asia Foundation for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $17,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6849

BILLY JAMES SIMS, a/k/a Rico,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN BROWN, former narcotics lieutenant "on

behalf of" Rock Hill law center,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-96-3650-3-19BC)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 17, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy James Sims, Appellant Pro Se. Donna Seegars Givens, WOODS &

GIVENS, L.L.P., Lexington, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s

recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Sims v. Brown, No. CA-96-

3650-3-19BC (D.S.C. May 30, 1997). Additionally, we deny Appellant’s motion to supplement the record on appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dayna Donovan, Appellant.

[871 NYS2d 349]

Appeals by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered June 8, 2006, convicting her of endangering the welfare of a child under indictment No. 612/05, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) from an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered June 8, 2006, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court (Wong, J.) under Superior Court information No. 1790/04 upon a finding that she had violated conditions thereof, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her prior conviction of burglary in the third degree.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.

In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]; *People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless accord great deference to the jury’s opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor *(see People v Mateo, 2*NY3d 383, 410 [2004], *cert denied*542 US 946 [2004]; *People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Romero,*7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

Further, although the jury acquitted the defendant of burglary in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and *641other related charges, the jury verdict was not repugnant as a matter of law *(see People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1 [1981]). We further note that, under the circumstances, the jury was permitted to accept or reject portions of the complainant’s testimony and portions of the defendant’s own testimony *(cf. People v Roman,*217 AD2d 431, 432 [1995]; *People v Green,*113 AD2d 713, 715 [1985]). In any event, it is possible that the jury exercised mercy, which is not a ground for reversal where the verdict is not repugnant as a matter of law *(see People v Rayam,*94 NY2d 557 [2000]; *People v Tucker,*55 NY2d 1, 7 [1981]; *People v Martinez,*201 AD2d 671, 672 [1994]; *People v Montgomery,*116 AD2d 669, 670 [1986]).

In light of our determination, the defendant’s contention that a reversal of the judgment rendered under indictment No. 612/05 would require reversal of the amended judgment rendered under Superior Court information No. 1790/04, is academic *(see People v Wilkins,*176 AD2d 976, 978 [1991]). Prudenti, EJ., Dillon, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE JAMES POWELL,

AIS # 00151747

)

)

)

Petitioner, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0064-CG-N

)

WANDA LIGHTNER, Warden,

Mobile Community Based Facility/

Community Work Center,

)

)

)

)

Respondent. )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having 

been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 

made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated April 20, 2015, is ADOPTED as the 

opinion of this Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Petitioner’s petition for habeas corpus 

relief (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust his state 

court remedies and that the Petitioner is not entitled to a Certificate of 

Appealability or to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED this 27th day of May, 2015.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:14-cv-00064-CG-N Document 23 Filed 05/27/15 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roy B. Highsmith, Appellant.

[967 NYS2d 864]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present — Scudder, P.J., Smith, Centra, Lindley and Valentino, JJ.
----

|   | 1.     | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010, (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | and    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   | 2.     | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                 |

| /s/ Paul O. Koether     |
|-------------------------|
| Paul O. Koether         |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Bryan P. Healey     |
| Bryan P. Healey         |
| Chief Financial Officer |

----
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1982 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health 

and Human Services, National Institutes of Health Eunice Kennedy 

Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1982 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERV3 ICES, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH EU4 NICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTI5 TUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVEL6 OPMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Department of Health and Human Services, Na10 tional Institutes of Health Eunice Kennedy Shriver Na11 tional Institute of Child Health and Human Development 

12 for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $1,506,458,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 USC SS.1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Composite Technology Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-QSB (Report) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof. I, Benton H
Wilcoxon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Benton H Wilcoxon
-----------------------
Benton H Wilcoxon
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 14, 2003
       ---------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Composite Technology Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-QSB (Report) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof. I, Brent N.
Robbins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Brent N. Robbins
-----------------------
Brent N. Robbins
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 14, 2003
       ---------------
Exhibit 10.10


 





EXTENSION NOTICE


 


 


Date: July 20, 2015


 


 


Signature Bank


261 Madison Avenue,


New York, New York 10016


Attention: Cliff Broder, Group
Director and Senior Vice President


Fax: (646) 822-1359


 


Dear Mr. Broder:


 


In accordance with
the terms of paragraph 2(b) of the Escrow Deposit Agreement dated June 9, 2015, by and among Realco International, Inc. (the "Company"),
Signature Bank (the "Escrow Agent") and [__________] ("Placement Agent"), the Company and Placement
Agent hereby notifies the Escrow Agent that the Termination Date has been extended to August 17, 2015, the Final Termination Date.


 


 


 


 


[remainder of page intentionally blank]


 


 


 


 


 




    	 	1	 



     


    

 


Very truly yours,


 


Realco International, Inc.


 


By: /s/ Jay M. Lasky                   


Name: Jay M. Lasky


Title: CEO


 


[___________]


 


By:                                 


Name: 


Title: 


 


 


[Signature Page to Realco Escrow Extension
Notice]


 


 


 


 


 


 


 








    	 	2
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **6598**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JOHNNY LEE GORE, a/k/a Manager , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. C. Weston Houck , Senior District Judge. ( 4:01

- cr
- 00627

- CWH

- 9 )

Submi t ted : May 23, 2013 Decided: May 30, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Johnny Lee Gore, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina; Susan Zalkin Hitt , Assistant United States Attorney, Colum bia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Johnny Lee Gore see ks to appeal the district court’ s order denying his motion to recuse or disqualify. This court
may exercise jurisdicti on only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) ; Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The

order Gore seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED