alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          12,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,157,911
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,245,238)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               965,530
<PP&E>                                         694,342
<DEPRECIATION>                               (199,403)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,558,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,093,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,074
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,596,488)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,558,238
<SALES>                                      3,055,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,055,856
<CGS>                                        2,459,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,459,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,625,209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             173,427
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,202,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,202,471)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,202,471)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
#### Harold Lopez, Appellant, v The Actor’s Studio, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[973 NYS2d 182]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John A. Barone, J.), entered September 18, 2012, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff testified that he was standing on two wooden beams four or five feet above the dirt floor of the basement of a building undergoing renovation, threading electrical cable through metal studs on the wall four or five feet above the beams, when he fell between the beams, striking his shoulder on one of them. He said that no one had directed him to stand on the beams but that it was necessary for him to do so to reach the studs. The president of the general contractor, defendant West Wind Enterprises, who was at the site almost daily, testified that the dirt floor was, at most, 30 inches below the beams and that a person of average height could have threaded cable through the studs on the wall from a standing position on the floor.

The conflicting testimony presents an issue of fact whether plaintiff, who was six-feet-one-inch tall, had to elevate himself to perform his task or could have done so standing on the floor, in which event Labor Law § 240 (1) would be inapplicable to his case.

In addition, an issue of fact exists whether the accident could have happened as plaintiff described it. Plaintiff testified that the two beams on which he was standing were 16 or 18 inches apart. However, the general contractor’s president stated that he measured the distance between the beams and found it to be approximately IOV2 inches. The record shows that plaintiff weighed 230 pounds at the time of the accident. Thus, a fact-finder could reasonably find that plaintiff could not have fallen between the beams.

Plaintiffs contention that the general contractor’s president’s *557testimony was not probative because he did not identify when he inspected the premises is unavailing. The president submitted an affidavit which stated that his beliefs regarding the level of the beams and how the accident occurred were based on measurements he took a few years after the accident, and also on his “personal knowledge of the construction work ongoing [at] the time of the plaintiffs alleged accident and from [his] personal knowledge of the premises upon which plaintiff alleges to have had his accident.” This was sufficient to raise a credibility issue and, accordingly, defeat summary judgment. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Acosta, Saxe, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2567 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2567

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act with respect 
      to expanding community eligibility, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2023

Mr. McGarvey (for himself, Ms. Barragan, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Evans, Mr. 
     Huffman, Mr. Kilmer, Mrs. McBath, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Payne, Ms. 
  Pettersen, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Swalwell, Mr. Tonko, Ms. Velazquez, and 
Mrs. Watson Coleman) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
            to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act with respect 
      to expanding community eligibility, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``School Meals Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY.

    (a) Multiplier.--Clause (vii) of section 11(a)(1)(F) of the Richard 
B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1759a(a)(1)(F)) is 
amended to read as follows:
                            ``(vii) Multiplier.--For each school year 
                        beginning on or after July 1, 2023, the 
                        Secretary shall use a multiplier of 2.5.''.
    (b) Threshold.--Clause (viii) of section 11(a)(1)(F) of the Richard 
B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1759a(a)(1)(F)) is 
amended to read as follows:
                            ``(viii) Threshold.--For each school year 
                        beginning on or after July 1, 2023, the 
                        threshold shall be not more than 25 percent.''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
to a local educational agency with respect to a school year beginning 
on or after July 1, 2023, for which such local educational agency 
elects to receive special assistance payments under subparagraph (F) of 
section 11(a)(1) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1759a(a)(1)).
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pheod Khan, Appellant.

[973 NYS2d 578]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated November 1, 2011 *(People v Khan,*89 AD3d 750 [2011]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 18, 2010.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Eng. P.J., Mastro, Dickerson and Hall, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-145359, 333-140134,

333-131826, 333-130585, 333-62968, 333-58982, 333-52490 and 333-47764) and Forms S-8
(Nos. 333-142864, 333-136302, 333-127705, 333-118084, 333-106673, 333-63902, 333-52488, 333-43220, 333-94817, and 333-92729) of The TriZetto Group, Inc., of our reports dated February 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of The TriZetto Group, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The TriZetto Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Orange County, California

February 14, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank

# AGENCY:

Export-Import Bank of the United States.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice is to inform the public of the withdrawal of an invalid notice published on December 30, 2014 at 79 FR 78433.

# DATES:

As of January 6, 2015 the notice published December 30, 2014 at 79 FR 78433 are withdrawn.

*Reference:*                         AP088936XX.                    

Lloyd Ellis,

Program Specialist, Office of the General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2014-30941 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE MATTER OF DELTA TOWING, )

LLC, AS OWNER OF THE M/V DELTA )

AMBER, AND DELTA MARINE SERVICE,)

INC., AS PURPORTED OWNER, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-00128-KD-M

BROKER, CHARTERER, OR PRO HAC )

VICE OWNER OF THE M/V DELTA )

AMBER, FOR EXONERATION FROM )

OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY; et al., )

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and a de novo determination of 

those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

It is ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 57, 61, 62) are GRANTED. 

Accordingly, Defendant Mike Hooks, Inc., as the Owner of the M/V Nicholas, Petition for 

Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability is DISMISSED with prejudice for lack of subject 

matter jurisdiction since the petition was untimely filed. 

DONE this the 26th day of October 2015.

s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00128-KD-M Document 86 Filed 10/26/15 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit** **23.2**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
        Form
        S-3 (No. 333-115364) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-120141)
        of Cytomedix, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2008 relating to the financial
        statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form
        10-K.
 
  /s/
        PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
        LLP
 McLean,
        Virginia
 March
        25,
        2008
(November 14, 2013)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Howard, Appellant.

[974 NYS2d 652]

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered June 7, 2010, which resentenced defendant following his conviction of the crimes of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In 2004, defendant was convicted after a trial of, among other things, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate prison term of *\2xh*to 25 years. His conviction was thereafter affirmed on appeal (21 AD3d 585 [2005], *Iv denied*5 NY3d 853 [2005]). Subsequently, defendant applied for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 and, ultimately, in the course of an appearance before County Court, defendant agreed that the original sentence for these crimes would be vacated and the court would resentence him to 9V2 years in prison to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals, principally arguing that his resentence is harsh and excessive. We disagree. “Given, among other things, defendant’s lengthy criminal record, we find no basis to conclude that *1022the court abused its discretion, nor do we find any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction in the interest of justice” *(People v Carter,*97 AD3d 852, 852 [2012], *lv denied*19 NY3d 1024 [2012] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; *see People v Reid,*85 AD3d 1394, 1395 [2011]).

Finally, inasmuch as the contentions in defendant’s pro se brief raise matters outside the subject record, they are not properly addressed herein.

Peters, EJ., Lahtinen and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00168

- CV
Dora Guzman, Norma Cadriel Hernandez, and Rubi Moreno v. Louis Sorola
On Appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- DCL

- 05869

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH CO URT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell a nts, Dora Guzman and Rubi Moreno

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. Ja nuary 27 , 2022
[Cite as State v. Constable , 2018-Ohio-2083.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

CLINTON COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2017-10-014

: D E C I S I O N - vs - 5/29/2018 : JAMES E. CONSTABLE, : Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLINTON COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT Case No. CRB 1700272

Laura Railing Gibson, 69 N. South Street, W ilmington, Ohio 45177, for plaintiff-appellee Blaise S. Underwood, 97 N. South Street, Wilmington, Ohio 45177, for defendant-appellant

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Clinton County Municipal C ourt, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, James E. Constable, has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by theClinton CA2017-10-014

- 2 - trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists four potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proc eedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constituti onal rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the tr ial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to wit hdraw as counsel is grant ed, and this a ppeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000317781
<NAME> ANCHOR PACIFIC UNDERWRITERS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,747,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  530,550
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,452,294
<PP&E>                                       2,865,548
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,190,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,744,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,744,485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        94,201
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,636,436)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,744,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,491,687
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,561,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,181
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,236,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,370
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,241,147)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,241,147)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 7, 2017

No. 04-16-00531-CV

Yvonne OCANAS,

Appellant

v.

Jose J. OCANAS,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-18248

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On March 1, 2017, this court issued an opinion and judgment granting the parties’ joint 

motion to set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and to remand to the 

trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with their settlement agreement. In our March 

1, 2017 opinion and judgment, we vacated the trial court’s judgment of June 8, 2016, and 

remanded to matter to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the settlement 

agreement. The parties have now filed a joint motion asking this court for immediate issuance of 

the mandate. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the clerk of this court to immediately issue 

the mandate. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c).

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of March, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2086 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The Judiciary, Court 

of Appeals, District Courts, and other Judiciary Activities, Court Security 

for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for The 

Judiciary, Court of Appeals, District Courts, and other 

Judiciary Activities, Court Security for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 THE JUDICIARY, COURT OF APPEALS, DIS5 TRICT COURTS, AND OTHER JUDICIARY AC6 TIVITIES, COURT SECURITY FOR FISCAL 

7 YEAR 2024. 

8 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

9 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:38 Apr 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2086.IH H2086

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2086 IH

1 able for The Judiciary, Court of Appeals, District Courts, 

2 and other Judiciary Activities, Court Security for fiscal 

3 year 2024 may not exceed $607,110,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.1


SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


BETWEEN


APOLLO GAMING HOLDINGS, L.P.


AND


AP GAMING HOLDCO, INC.




STOCK SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT dated as of May 28, 2015 (this “Agreement”), between Apollo Gaming Holdings, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Parent”), and AP Gaming Holdco, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”).


Parent hereby subscribes for and offers to purchase, and the Corporation hereby accepts such offer and agrees to issue to Parent, 4,931,529 shares of its Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, in consideration of the payment by Parent to it on or before the date hereof of cash in the amount of $77,425,000, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged.


The Corporation represents and warrants that such shares are validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.


This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but all of such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.


This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State of Delaware without regard to principles of conflict of laws.




[Signature Page Follows]





























IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date hereof


	
		
	APOLLO GAMING HOLDINGS, L.P.

	 
	 

	By:
	Apollo Gaming Holdings GP, LLC its General Partner

	 
	 

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ David  B. Sambur

	 
	Name: David  B. Sambur

	 
	Title: Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer and Secretary








































































[Signature Page to Subscription Agreement]





























IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date hereof


	
		
	AP GAMING HOLDCO, INC.

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ David  Lopez

	 
	Name: David  Lopez

	 
	Title: Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary
















































































[Signature Page to Subscription Agreement]