FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals

___________

No. 00-3596

___________

Clifford Lansdown, the *

Administrator of the Estate *

of Roger Dean Lansdown, Deceased, *

 *

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 * 

Bill Chadwick, et al., * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Defendants-Appellees. * Western District of Arkansas

------------------------------------------- *

 *

John Urban and Andy Urban, *

 *

Plaintiffs-Appellants, *

 *

v. *

 * 

Baxter County, Arkansas and *

Charlie Garrison, *

 *

Defendants-Appellees. *

Submitted: May 16, 2001

Filed: August 2, 2001, 2001

___________
1

 The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

2

 The Honorable H. Franklin Waters, United States District Court Judge for

the Western District of Arkansas.

2

Before MCMILLIAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and KYLE, District Judge.1 

_________

KYLE, District Judge. 

Appellants in these consolidated cases appeal from the district court's2 adverse

grant of summary judgment in their civil rights actions. After a de novo review of the

record, we conclude that the district court's judgment was correct and should be

affirmed. See Roberson v. Hayti Police Dept., 241 F.3d 992, 994 (8th Cir. 2001).

These actions arise out of a series of events that occurred on February 8, 1997,

in Gassville, Arkansas. The district court's opinion sufficiently relates the events of that

date. We therefore set forth below only an abbreviated version of those events. 

On February 8, 1997, William Chadwick (“Chadwick”), a part-time patrol

officer for the City of Gassville, responded to a call that someone had driven a truck

through a wall at Plumlee Tire building, Roger Lansdown's (“Lansdown's”) place of

employment. While en route to Plumlee Tire, Chadwick received another call from the

dispatcher stating that he was to respond to a gas “drive off” at the Citgo station in

Gassville where a man driving a truck and wearing a ski mask had driven off without

paying for his gas, and had written “God” at the top of the clerk's charge book. Upon

Chadwick's arrival at the gas station, the clerk informed him that the person had driven

to the house across the street. The truck was visible from the gas station, and

Chadwick recognized it as belonging to Lansdown.
3

Chadwick knew Lansdown, and knew that he had a history of mental illness, as

well as a propensity for violence. Chadwick observed Lansdown as he poured gasoline

on various areas of his property and lit them on fire. Lansdown's neighbor, who had

also witnessed Lansdown's behavior that day, informed Chadwick that, about a week

earlier, Lansdown had quit taking his medication. Chadwick suspected that Lansdown

had guns in the house because a few months earlier Chadwick was at a yard sale of

Lansdown's where Lansdown had shown him a rifle and a shotgun. 

Chadwick watched as Lansdown broke the back door of his house to obtain

entry. Lansdown then turned to Chadwick and stated “Sorry, Bill.” A few moments

later, Lansdown jumped through the front window of his home–shattering the glass,

posted a page from the bible on a tree in his front lawn, and retreated back into his

home through the broken window. Next, Lansdown was observed setting fire to the

living room and heading toward the back of his house. Fearing that Lansdown was

armed, Chadwick told Lansdown's neighbor not to attempt a rescue. Chadwick then

called for assistance.

Shortly after Chadwick's call, law enforcement personnel and firefighters began

arriving at Lansdown's home, including firefighters John Urban and his son Andy

Urban. Andy Urban approached the house with his fire hose and was stopped by a

police officer who told him that he could not enter the house because there was a man

with a gun inside. After about five minutes the firefighters received permission from

the police officers to start spraying the house with water. Prior to this time, however,

a police officer had erected crime scene tape around the house, which a firefighter had

torn in half. When Andy Urban approached the house, he was forced to go under the

crime scene tape and inadvertently ripped the tape again. This angered some of the

police officers, and what happened next was aptly described by the district court as a

“turf war” between some of the firefighters and officers at the scene. At some point

during the altercation, John Urban went to help Andy and was struck by a police

officer. Both Urbans were threatened with arrest, but were never actually arrested.
3

 Because of an imminent trial date, the district court denied the Estate's

Motion to Amend its Complaint to include claims against the police officers in their

individual capacities. 

4

The altercation was quickly broken up by a sergeant with the Baxter County Sheriff's

Office.

In the meantime, Lansdown had retreated to his bedroom and was laying on his

bed face down; the other side of his house was on fire. At one point, Andy Urban

observed Lansdown through an open window and stated “you know we need to get him

out of there.” A police officer standing nearby replied, “No, let the f–ker die.” Andy

Urban did not attempt to rescue Lansdown, nor did any of the other law enforcement

personnel or firefighters attempt to extract Lansdown from the smoke-filled room. 

Thirty to forty minutes after Lansdown had started his house on fire, he was

pronounced dead from smoke and soot inhalation. The cause of death was determined

to be suicide. 

In September 1999, the Estate of Roger Lansdown filed a civil rights action

against Chadwick, Ken Hopman, the deputy sheriff of Baxter County, Baxter County,

the City of Gassville, and Charles Garrison, former sheriff of Baxter County. John and

Andy Urban filed a civil rights action against Baxter County and Charles Garrison. The

district court granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants on all claims. 

The district court determined that the Estate sued the police officers in their

official capacities only,3 that Lansdown's constitutional rights were not violated, and,

without a constitutional violation, the Estate's claims for supervisory and governmental

liability must fail. The district court concluded, and we agree, that, although the events

of that day indicated a lack of professionalism on the part of those hired to serve the

community, they did not rise to the level of constitutional violations; Lansdown “was
4

 The district court declined to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining state

law claims.

5

wholly responsible for the situation that created the danger to his life.” As for the

Urban's Fourth Amendment claims, the district court held that the Urbans had not been

seized by the police officers pursuant to an unconstitutional policy or custom of Baxter

County or the Baxter County Sheriff's Department, which is necessary to establish

supervisory or municipality liability.4 

We have carefully reviewed the record before us and find it unnecessary to

modify or to elaborate upon the district court's thorough, well-reasoned analysis. In

particular, we adopt the district court's overall assessment of this case:

[W]e feel compelled to say we are not without sympathy for Lansdown

and those surviving him. The situation was extremely unfortunate and

certain of the defendants' actions indicate carelessness, incompetence, and

an extreme lack of professionalism that one would not expect to see

exhibited by those empowered to serve and protect. In particular, the

court finds appalling the altercation (or “turf war”) that occurred between

the defendants and the firefighters and the inexcusable statement

attributed to on or more of the officers upon observing Lansdown's body

through the window.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. 

A true copy.

 ATTEST:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.