alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: D.D

, **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 203

- C V

AN OR IGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Real Part ies in Interes t ’s second motion for extension of time

within which to file the response until December 5 , 2022

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST ’S RESPONSE WILL

BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. John L. Williams

, the Real Parties in Interes t ’s

attorney, prepare the Real Parties in Interest ’ s response and forward the same to this Court on or

before December 5

, 2022

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 28 th day of November , 2022.

PER CURIAM

B efore Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
#### Al Reich, Respondent-Appellant, v Realty Quest Brokerage Corp. et al., Defendants. Jonathan Einhorn, Nonparty Appellant-Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 717]

In an action to foreclose upon a mortgage, Jonathan Einhorn appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated July 18, 2003, as granted only that branch of his motion which was for a refund of his down pay*426ment, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as determined that Jonathan Einhorn was not in default of the contract of sale and granted that branch of Jonathan Einhorn’s motion which was for a refund of Jonathan Einhorn’s down payment.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal by the nonparty, Jonathan Einhorn, the successful bidder at a foreclosure sale of the subject premises, must be dismissed on the ground that Einhorn is not aggrieved by the order appealed from *(see Matter of Meadowdale Assoc. v Planning Bd. of Town of Colonie,*70 NY2d 669 [1987]).

Further, the Supreme Court correctly determined that Einhorn was entitled to a refund of his down payment.

Appeal by the nonparty, Jonathan Einhorn, and cross appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 18, 2003. On the Court’s own motion, the parties and the nonparty appellant-respondent or their attorneys were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered dismissing the appeal, on the ground, among others, that the nonparty appellant-respondent is not aggrieved by the order. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated March 24, 2005, the branch of the motion which was to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the nonparty appellant-respondent is not aggrieved by the order was held in abeyance and referred to the panel of Justices hearing the appeal upon the argument or submission thereof.

Upon the order to show cause and the papers filed in response thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal,

Ordered that the motion is denied as academic in light of our determination of the appeal and cross appeal. Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Lifson and Dillon, JJ., concur.
|   | (1) | the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  May 16, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Thomas J. Meaney                                                                    |   |
|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   | Thomas J. MeaneyPresident (Principal Executive Officerand Principal  Financial Officer) |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Provident Financial Group, Inc.'s 10-Q for June 30, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statments.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         227,137
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                15,404
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,628,309
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      5,841,836
<ALLOWANCE>                                     80,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,492,353
<DEPOSITS>                                   5,751,349
<SHORT-TERM>                                   781,472
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            447,544
<LONG-TERM>                                    794,944
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        12,825
<OTHER-SE>                                     697,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               8,492,353
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                267,298
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               50,257
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,813
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               320,368
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             111,132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             168,943
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          151,425
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   20,950
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 106
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                146,959
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                107,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      69,281
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    69,281
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.86
<LOANS-NON>                                     55,333
<LOANS-PAST>                                    23,280
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,565
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 45,839
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                75,907
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   22,365
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,630
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               80,122
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            80,122
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### Growest, Inc., Respondent, v John S. Denelsbeck, Jr., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[967 NYS2d 863]

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered October 16, 2012. The amended order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant John S. Denelsbeck, Jr., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the amended order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Fahey, Carni and Lindley, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RHBT FINANCIAL CORPORATION FOR THE 12-MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,680,173
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            16,425,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  7,832,559
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    118,709,167
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,226,442
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             149,448,180
<DEPOSITS>                                 107,826,073
<SHORT-TERM>                                 9,105,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            603,653
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,208
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,896,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             149,448,180
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,559,099
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              443,593
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,171,709
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,174,401
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,391,492
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,056,973
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,117,428
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  430,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,098,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,149,939
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,149,939
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,388,015
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.79
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.09
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,687,985
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               812,174
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   15,732
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,226,442
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,226,442
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from Angeles
Partners X 2000  First  Quarter  10-QSB  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000317900
<NAME>                              Angeles Partners X
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                 1,143
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             80
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                 9,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                         6,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         4,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                8,726
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                            (4,672)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           4,230
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         604
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                              32
<EPS-BASIC>                                             1.72 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32(a)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  August
      1, 2008
            /s/  James
      H. MillerJames
      H. Miller
              Chairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
              PPL
      Corporation








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2359 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2359

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Contribution 
to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Contribution 
to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development for fiscal 
                               year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE 
              INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Contribution to the 
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development for fiscal year 
2024 may not exceed $0.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

                             Edgar Filing.Net, Inc.

                     CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Danny L. Pixler, the Registrant's Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Edgar Filing.Net,  Inc
     for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003;

2.   Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information included in this annual report,  fairly present in all material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     Registrant and I have:

     a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared; and

     b)   Evaluated the  effectiveness of the Registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation  Date");  and

     c)   presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
          of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation,  to the  Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent  function):

a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the  design  or  operation  of  internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  Registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  Registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any  corrective  actions with regard to  significant  deficiencies  and material
weaknesses.


Date: March 29, 2004

/s/  Danny L. Pixler
----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Robert R. Matthews, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

# FILED APR 2 22009 NANCYMAYER WHllTINGTON CLERK 

## u.s. DISTRICTCOURT'



### v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 

# 09 U'743 Secretary ofVeterans Affairs, Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court on consideration of apro se complaint and an application to proceed informapauperis. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint because it fails to meet the minimum requirements ofRule 8 ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The factual allegations ofthe complaint consist ofonly the following words: "Fraud many hundred'sjudicial review error's, failure to treat's, misdiagnosis's, treatment for disability claims compensation pain and suffering[.]" Compi. at l. The remainder ofthe one-paragraph complaint identifies the Secretary ofVeterans Affairs ("VA"), Erik K. Shinseki, and several VA offices or sub-agencies and their addresses. Id. The complaint asks for no relief. See id. Rule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement ofthe grounds upon which the court'sjurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement ofthe claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the reliefthe pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose ofthe minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants ofthe claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare aresponsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the doctrine of

### res judicata applies. 

### Brown v. 

### Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). The Complaint fails to meet the requirements ofRule 8(a). The complaint does not make clear what conduct or decision by the VA gives rise to this complaint. It does not indicate what the plaintiffwants from this lawsuit, and it does not provide the court with enough information to determine its ownjurisdiction. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice. An appropriate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Date:

### ¥/¥,~

# Unid±~i£~

- 2 -
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, Senior United States District Judge for ***

the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SATYA CHUM,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71441

Agency No. A079-609-697

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 31, 2012** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: SCHROEDER and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, Senior District

Judge.*** 

FILED

SEP 07 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Satya Chum, a citizen and native of Cambodia, seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) rejection of his asylum, withholding of removal,

and Convention Against Torture relief claims.

The BIA did not err in denying asylum because Chum’s application was

time-barred. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B). The circumstances to which Chum points,

such as the dissolution of his marriage and maintenance of lawful status, do not

excuse his untimeliness because he did not file within a “reasonable period” after

these circumstances ended. 8 C.F.R. § 208.4(a)(5)(iv); see Wakkary v. Holder, 558

F.3d 1049, 1057–58 (9th Cir. 2009).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Chum had not

shown he would more likely than not be subject to persecution or torture upon his

return to Cambodia. In the past he had faced only one unfulfilled threat without

accompanying harassment, economic harm, or menacing follow-ups. See Lim v.

I.N.S., 224 F.3d 929, 936 (9th Cir. 2000). The record demonstrates that his

involvement in the Sam Rainsy Party was far less than that of individuals who

were targeted for persecution or torture. 

This court lacks jurisdiction to review denials of voluntary departure. 

8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f); Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir. 2004). 

The petition for review is DENIED.