alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Beverly Fondanarosa, Appellant, v Cary Grimm et al., Respondents.

[874 NYS2d 497]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 for grandparent visitation, the grandmother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Burke, Ct. Atty. Ref.), dated February 6, 2008, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petition for lack of standing.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In the circumstances of this case, in order to demonstrate standing to seek visitation with her grandchildren, the grand*841mother was required to show that she did everything she reasonably could to establish a relationship with the grandchildren, but that her efforts were unjustifiably frustrated by the children’s parents such that equity should intervene on her behalf *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 72; *Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E., 78*NY2d 178, 181-182 [1991]; *Matter of Kenderes v Norton,*22 AD3d 852 [2005]; *Matter of Canales v Aulet,*295 AD2d 507 [2002]).

Here, the Family Court, applying the correct standard and considering all relevant circumstances, properly found that the grandmother had not established that she had made sufficient efforts to establish a relationship with her grandchildren, or that the parents unjustifiably frustrated those efforts. Rather, the evidence established that the grandmother made only sporadic attempts to establish a relationship with the grandchildren and that the parents exercised their right and responsibility to set the parameters for any such relationship, which parameters were unacceptable to the grandmother. Under the circumstances, therefore, the Family Court properly dismissed the petition for lack of standing *(see Matter of Kenderes v Norton,*22 AD3d at 853; *cf. Matter of Agusta v Carousso,*208 AD2d 620, 621-622 [1994]). Fisher, J.E, Miller, Garni and Balkin, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000317477
<NAME>                          Eldorado Financial Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                                      US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                          1
<CASH>                                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                         0
<PP&E>                                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    0
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                             10000
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (10000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                             0
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                         0
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          318
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       (318)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   (318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          (318)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0.00



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1948 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1948

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
     Labor, Veterans Employment and Training for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
     Labor, Veterans Employment and Training for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, 
              VETERANS EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Labor, 
Veterans Employment and Training for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$256,341,000.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



---

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

Form 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer

Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or
15d-16of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of
July 31, 2003

Vitran Corporation Inc.(Name of registrant)

185 The West Mall, Suite 701, Toronto, Ontario, M9C 5L5, Canada
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

|           |  |           
|---------- |  | ----------
|Form 20-Fþ |  | Form 40-Fo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

|     |  |    
|---- |  | ---
|Yeso |  | Noþ



---

---





---



##### 



Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|                      |  |                         |  |                                                                                                     
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | VITRAN CORPORATION INC.
|                     
|Date: August 28, 2003 |  | By:                     |  | /s/ Kevin A. GlassName:  Kevin A. Glass
Title:    Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer





Exhibit Index

|        |  |                                                                        |  | 
|------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Exhibit |  | Description of Exhibit                                                
|        |  |                                                                       
|99.1    |  | 2003 Second Quarter Report                                            
|       
|99.2    |  | Vitran Reports 30
Percent Q2 Net Income Increase, Diluted EPS of $0.38
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY JOHNSON, a/k/a AJ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-95-249, CA-98-116-1)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-95-249; CA-98-

116-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00354

- CR

Patrick Todd v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 11

- CR

- 1822

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause o n appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 12, 2015
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco VILLAGOMEZ-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50376.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 16, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 23, 2006.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Criminal Division, Los An-geles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Francisco Villagomez-Castillo, Lompoc, CA, pro se.

Wayne R. Young, Esq., Santa Monica, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: T.G. NELSON, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Francisco Villagomez-Castillo appeals from his 87-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § § 846 and 841(a)(1). Villagomez-Castillo contends that the district court abused its discretion by failing to grant his motion to substitute counsel.

We dismiss Villagomez-Castillo’s appeal because his valid guilty plea waived the right to appeal antecedent defects. *See United States v. Foreman,*329 F.3d 1037, 1038 (9th Cir.2003); *see also United States v. Cardenas,*405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir. 2005) (noting that the changes in sentencing law imposed by *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing). Moreover, during his change of plea hearing, Villagomez-Castillo expressed satisfaction with counsel that he previously sought to replace.

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS
EASTLAND , TEXAS
JUDGMENT

Pedro Antonio Gomez
, * From the 244 th District Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. D

- 18

- 2212

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 2 2

- 00 2 20

- CR * February 9 , 20 2 3

The State of Texas
, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J., Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.

This court has considered Pedro Antonio Gomez ’s motion for voluntary

dismissal of this appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto GUZMAN-OLIVER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50743.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Oct. 25, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kimberly S. Keller, The Keller Group, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Counsel appointed to represent Alberto Guzman-Oliver (Guzman) has moved for *662leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Guzman has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no unwaived and nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Lew Nussberg, Respondent, v Gary Tatintsian et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[975 NYS2d 9]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered May 2, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiffs motion to preclude the lay testimony of certain witnesses on the identification and authenticity of the art works in question, and sua sponte granted plaintiff summary judgment for breach of contract under a 2009 consignment agreement, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

This action involves a series of 98 works from the Russian Suprematist school of art. Flaintiff consigned these works to defendants in 2009 pursuant to a series of written agreements. The defendants sold the works in Russia and have not paid plaintiff. Flaintiff sued for conversion, seeking return of the works, and defendants were permitted by this Court (90 AD3d 563 [1st Dept 2011]) to interpose the defense that the works that they accepted on consignment were forgeries.

The motion court correctly determined that expert testimony is required to identify and authenticate the works of art; specifically, the testimony of an expert who viewed the consigned works before they left the United States in 2009 and who can testify that they were forgeries when they left and were forgeries on their return. This is consistent with how art work and forgeries are identified, authenticated and detected *(see e.g. Thome v Alexander & Louisa Calder Found.,*70 AD3d 88, 99 [1st Dept 2009], *lv denied*15 NY3d 703 [2010]).

The motion court also properly granted plaintiff summary judgment for defendants’ breach of the 2009 consignment agreement. Plaintiff initially brought an action sounding in conversion, since he wanted the works returned. Defendants have stated that that is impossible, as the works have already been *442sold. Plaintiff is therefore due $2.6 million dollars under the 2009 consignment agreement, to be offset by any works from the 2009 consignment that are proven to have been fraudulent both in 2009 and again today. Although plaintiff did not move for the relief granted, defendants were plainly on notice of this claim *(see Weinstock v Handler,*254 AD2d 165, 166 [1st Dept 1998]). Concur — Tom, J.E, Andrias, Friedman, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.2


STATMON
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


19
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Geoffrey P. Talbot/s/Geoffrey P.
      Talbot
                    Chief Financial
      OfficerAugust
      18, 2010




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered December 5, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-17-01064-CV SM ARCHITECTS, PLLC AND R OGER STEPHENS, Appellants

V. AMX VETERAN SPECIALTY SERVICES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-11230



### ORDER Before Chief Justice Wright, Jus tice Francis, and Justice Stodd art Before the Court are appellants’ September 13, 2017 motion to s tay, September 14, 2017 motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, and th e parties’ letter briefs addressing this Court’s jurisdiction over th e appeal. In its October 31, 2017 order, the trial court granted a stay of the arbitration proceeding. Accordingly, we DENY appellants’ motion to stay as moot. On November 17, 2017, appellants filed a timely amended notice of appeal clarifying that they are appealing the trial court’ s order signed on October 31, 201 7. Accordingly, we DENY as

moot appellants’ motion for an ext ension of time t o file a notice of appeal.The issue of the Court’s jurisd iction is deferred to the submis sions panel. We instruct the parties to address in their briefs on the merits both the trial court’s juri sdiction to enter the October 31, 2017 order and this C ourt’s jurisdic tion over the a ppeal. Appellants’ brief on the merits is due December 27, 2017

.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Ex 10.294 - Endo___RRA_Counterpart_re__7_25_2022_Notes


Exhibit 10.294


Counterpart to Registration Rights Agreement
July 9, 2015
The undersigned hereby absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably agrees as a Guarantor, as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 6, 2014 by and among Endo Finance LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Endo Finco Inc., a Delaware corporation, the Guarantors party thereto, RBC Capital Markets, LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., relating to the 7.25% Senior Notes due 2022, to be bound by the terms and provisions of such Registration Rights Agreement.









Exhibit 10.294




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this counterpart as of the date first written above.




	
			
	 	ISHIRINI LIMITED (TO BE RENAMED ENDO FINANCE III LIMITED)

	 
	 	as a Guaranteeing Subsidiary






	
		
	By:
	/s/ Orla Dunlea

	Name:
	Orla Dunlea

	Title:
	Director









[Signature Page to Registration Rights Agreement Counterpart - 7.25% Senior Notes due 2022]
SCWC

- 19

- 0000491

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I, Petitioner and Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellant,

vs.

TIANA F.M. SAGAPOLUTELE

- SILVA, Respondent and Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 19

- 0000491; 1DTA

- 18

- 01227)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Wong, assigned by reason of vacancy) Petitioner and Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellant, State

of Hawai ‘ i’s application for writ of certiorari filed on
August 13, 2020, is hereby accepted, and will be scheduled for
oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate
clerk regarding sche duling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ‘ i, September 16, 2020.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Paul B.K. Wong Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-19-0000491 16-SEP-2020 12:12 PM
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2362 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2362

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Contribution 
         to the African Development Bank for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Contribution 
         to the African Development Bank for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR CONTRIBUTION TO THE 
              AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Contribution to the 
African Development Bank for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0.
                                 <all>
```