alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief
financial officer of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 25, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information
contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 25, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    DANIEL T. CARTERDaniel T. Carter Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)




Date: December 13, 2004



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



(RUSSEL METALS LOGO) NOTICE OF ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS  Date: Wednesday, April 27, 2005Time: 4:30 p.m. (Eastern Time)Place: The Toronto Board of Trade, 1 First Canadian Place,
3rd Floor,
Toronto, Ontario BUSINESS OF THE ANNUAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS:  1.
    To receive and consider the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004 together with the report of the auditors thereon;2.
    To elect Directors;3.
    To appoint auditors and to authorize the Directors to fix their remuneration;4.
    To consider and if thought advisable, to approve, with or without variation, an ordinary
resolution approving an amendment to the Companys Share Option Plan to permit the grant of options
under such Plan, provided that the aggregate number of Common Shares reserved for issuance
under the Plan at any time shall not exceed 5% of the outstanding Common Shares of the
Company (on an undiluted basis), as described in the accompanying Management Proxy Circular;
and5.
    To transact such further or other business as may properly come before the meeting or any
postponement or adjournment thereof. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: If you are unable to be present personally at the meeting, please complete the enclosed
form of proxy and return it in the postage prepaid envelope provided. Proxies to be used at the
meeting must be deposited with the Company or with CIBC Mellon Trust Company not less than 24
hours preceding the meeting or any postponement or adjournment thereof. By Order of the Board,/s/ William M. OReillyWILLIAM M. OREILLY,SecretaryMississauga, OntarioMarch 1, 2005
 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

════════════════

NO. 13-0760 

════════════════

IN RE GREGORY LEE WEST, RELATOR

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

════════════════════════════════════════════════════

ORDER

 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed on September 24, 2013, is ABATED. 

 2. This case is abated until further order of this Court and is removed from the Court’s 

active docket. It is the parties’ responsibility to immediately notify this Court once the court of 

appeals’ decision is final. 

 Done at the City of Austin, this 30th day of September, 2013. 

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2112 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

U.S. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal 

year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, U.S. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, U.S. FEDERAL 

5 LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, SALARIES 

6 AND EXPENSES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Independent Agencies, U.S. Federal Labor RelaVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:01 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2112.IH H2112

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2112 IH

1 tions Authority, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 

2 2024 may not exceed $26,200,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy J. Wiggins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy J. Wiggins 
|Timothy J. Wiggins     
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date: May 11, 2010     







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132708 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132708 

 COA: 272893 

Berrien CC: 2006-402317-FH;

2006-411251-FH 

KYLE JACOB ENGELBERG, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0319 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 26, 2007 

 Clerk
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2251 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Native Americans Institutions Endowment Fund for fiscal 

year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Native Americans Institutions Endowment Fund for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NATIVE 

5 AMERICANS INSTITUTIONS ENDOWMENT 

6 FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, Native Americans 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2251 IH

1 Institutions Endowment Fund for fiscal year 2024 may 

2 not exceed $11,880,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dorom Yomtov, Appellant.

[961 NYS2d 775]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J.), entered on or about December 18, 2008, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly assessed 10 points under the risk factor for failing to accept responsibility. Defendant made efforts to shift blame to the child victim that evinced a lack of genuine acceptance of responsibility *(see People v Teagle,*64 AD3d 549 [2d Dept 2009]; *People v Baker,*57 AD3d 1472 [4th Dept 2008], *lv denied*12 NY3d 706 [2009]).

In any event, the record supports the court’s determination *423that, regardless of whether defendant’s correct point score should be 65 or 75, an upward departure to level two is warranted, based on the seriousness of defendant’s course of conduct toward a child and of the surrounding circumstances *{see e.g. People v Mantilla,*70 AD3d 477, 478 [2010], *lv denied*15 NY3d 706 [2010]). This egregiousness of defendant’s behavior was an “aggravating . . . factor of a kind, or to a degree, that [was] otherwise not adequately taken into account by the guidelines” *(People v Johnson,*11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]).

Concur—Friedman, J.E, Sweeny, Renwick, Richter and Román, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 3, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00324

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z. K. W., ET AL.,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 02567 The Honorable Monique Diaz, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due May 28, 2019 , but was not filed. On May 31, 2019

, the
court reporter filed a notification of late record asking for an extension of time of ten days

.

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Given the time constrains governing the disposition of this appeal, further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored. Accordingly, w e GRANT the court reporter’s requested extension and ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before June 7 , 2019

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2333 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. Agency for 

International Development, Office of the Inspector General for fiscal 

year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for U.S. 

Agency for International Development, Office of the Inspector General for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOP5 MENT, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL 

6 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for U.S. Agency for International Development, OfVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:08 Apr 20, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2333.IH H2333

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2333 IH

1 fice of the Inspector General for fiscal year 2024 may not 

2 exceed $76,600,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
MXWL EX 10.43






Exhibit 10.43






FIRST MODIFICATION TO PROMISSORY NOTE




This modification to PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Modification”) is entered into as of June 11, 2015, by and between MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“Borrower”), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Bank”).


RECITALS


WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Revolving Line of Credit Note in the maximum principal amount of $8,000,000.00, executed by Borrower and payable to the order of Bank, dated as of April 30, 2015 (the "Note"), which Note is subject to the terms and conditions of a loan agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as of December 5, 2011, as amended from time to time (the "Loan Agreement").


WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Note, and have agreed to modify the Note to reflect said changes.


NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Note shall be modified as follows:


1.    The maximum principal amount available under the Note is hereby modified to be Six Million Dollars ($6,000,000.00).


2.    The last day on which Bank will make advances under the Note is hereby modified to be July 15, 2015.


3.    The variable rate of interest applicable to the Note is hereby modified to be one percent (1.00%) above the Prime Rate in effect from time to time.


4.    The effective date of the changes set forth herein shall be June 15, 2015.  


5.    Except as expressly set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the Note remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification.  All terms defined in the Note or the Loan Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Modification.  This Modification and the Note shall be read together, as one document.


6.    Borrower certifies that as of the date of this Modification there exists no Event of Default under the Note, nor any condition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both would constitute any such Event of Default.  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Modification to be executed as of the day and year first written above.


WELLS FARGO BANK 
MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION




By:  /s/  DAVID LYLE                By:  /s/ RAZIA DAMJI                                 
DAVID LYLE, CHIEF FINANCIAL    RAZIA DAMJI, VICE PRESIDENT
OFFICER
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2273 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2273

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
  of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Housing Service, 
   Rural Housing Insurance Fund Program Account for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
  of Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Housing Service, 
   Rural Housing Insurance Fund Program Account for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, RURAL HOUSING 
              SERVICE, RURAL HOUSING INSURANCE FUND PROGRAM ACCOUNT FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Rural Development Programs, Rural Housing Service, Rural 
Housing Insurance Fund Program Account for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $1,000,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21
 List of Subsidiaries
 Name
    
    State of Incorporation or organizationMSO IP Holdings, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaMartha Stewart, Inc.
    
    ConnecticutBody & Soul Omnimedia, Inc.
    
    DelawareMSLO Productions, Inc.
    
    DelawareMSLO Productions  Home, Inc.
    
    DelawareMSLO Productions  EDF, Inc.
    
    DelawareFlour Productions, Inc.
    
    DelawareMSLO Shared IP Sub, LLC
    
    DelawareMSLO Emeril Acquisition Sub, LLC
    
    DelawareEmeril Primetime Productions, Inc.
    
    Delaware
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2135 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2135

 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
 Agencies, Office of Personnel Management, Office of Inspector General 
                     vehicles for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Oversight and Accountability

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent 
 Agencies, Office of Personnel Management, Office of Inspector General 
                     vehicles for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR INDEPENDENT 
              AGENCIES, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, OFFICE OF 
              INSPECTOR GENERAL VEHICLES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Independent Agencies, 
Office of Personnel Management, Office of Inspector General vehicles 
for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $5,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 30, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50289

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD CLARK,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CR-00626

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Clark appeals the 51-month sentence imposed

following a remand for resentencing in light of United States v.

Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). Clark pleaded guilty to possession

of child pornography. He contends that his sentence was

unreasonable in light of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). Clark contends that the district court imposed an

unreasonable sentence by failing to give appropriate

consideration to his attempts at obtaining treatment before his

incarceration and his inability to obtain treatment in prison.
No. 06-50289

-2-

Clark’s sentence was within a properly calculated advisory

guideline range and is presumed reasonable. See United States v.

Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Such a sentence is

given “great deference,” and we infer that the sentencing court

considered all the factors for a fair sentence. See United

States v. Smith, 440 F.3d 704, 707 (5th Cir. 2006). We conclude

that Clark has failed to rebut the presumption that his sentence,

which was at the bottom of the applicable range under the

Sentencing Guidelines, was reasonable. See Alonzo, 435 F.3d at

554-55. Consequently, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ophelia Brandon, Appellant.

[828 NYS2d 124]

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Rosenwasser, J.), rendered April 21, 2005, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that she had violated a condition thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of criminal contempt in the first degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that the County Court failed to comply *877with the procedure mandated by CPL 410.70 (2) before resentencing her on a violation of probation (hereinafter the VOP) is unpreserved for appellate review *(see People v Maglione,*18 AD3d 670 [2005]; *People v Kyem,*272 AD2d 136 [2000]). In any event, the claim is without merit. The court properly revoked probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment upon the defendant’s admission to violating probation by, inter alia, failing to report to her probation officer, fading to attend an outpatient alcohol and substance abuse program resulting in her being terminated from the program, and violating an order of protection. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court was not required to file a new statement under CPL 410.70 (2) when the defendant absconded from a residential treatment program to which she was admitted during the adjournment of sentencing *(see People v Gili,*300 AD2d 696 [2002]; *People v Pagan,*172 AD2d 233 [1991]). We note that the court, at the proceeding on the VOP petition, expressly advised the defendant that if she failed to comply with the new condition of probation, she would be resentenced to a term of imprisonment. Goldstein, J.P, Skelos, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### Carl Feldman et al., Respondents, v Lamparelli Construction Company, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[963 NYS2d 905]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Dillon, J.), entered June 5, 2012. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied in part the cross motion of defendants for summary judgment.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on March 1, 2013,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Present—Smith, J.P., Fahey, Peradotto, Lindley and Whalen, JJ.