alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2286 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Domestic Food Programs, Office of the Under Secretary 

for Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Domestic Food Programs, 

Office of the Under Secretary for Food, Nutrition, and 

Consumer Services for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2286 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, DOMES3 TIC FOOD PROGRAMS, OFFICE OF THE 

4 UNDER SECRETARY FOR FOOD, NUTRITION, 

5 AND CONSUMER SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 

6 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, Domestic Food 

10 Programs, Office of the Under Secretary for Food, Nutri11 tion, and Consumer Services for fiscal year 2024 may not 

12 exceed $800,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CANISCO
RESOURCES, INC.'S FORM 10Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         667,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,086,741
<ALLOWANCES>                                   501,890
<INVENTORY>                                    419,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,627,248
<PP&E>                                       5,223,562
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,497,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,901,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,746,329
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,193
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,148,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,901,406
<SALES>                                     40,018,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,018,812
<CGS>                                       32,291,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,872,942
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (90,740)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             790,918
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,154,443
<INCOME-TAX>                                   461,777
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            692,666
<DISCONTINUED>                                (48,944)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   643,722
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of
CreditRiskMonitor.com, Inc. (CRM) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence Fensterstock, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly
  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
  operations of the Company.  By: /s/ Lawrence FensterstockLawrence FensterstockChief Financial OfficerMay 15, 2006 20
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60822 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GERRY INDIANA HARRIS, also known as Gerri Harris, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:96-CR-59-B

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gerry Indiana Harris appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a consensual search. The district court did not commit clear error in finding that the Government proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Harris’ consent was voluntary. See United States v. Gonzales , 79 F.3d 413, 419 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 183 (1996); United States v. Kelley , 981 F.2d 1464, 1470 (5thNo. 96-60822 -2- Cir. 1993). The district court did not commit clear error in holding that Harris’ consent was to the search of his entire vehicle. See United States v. McSween , 53 F.3d 684, 688 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Prince Johnson, Appellant.

[971 NYS2d 347]—

*973Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated October 28, 2011, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Correction Law § 168-n (3) requires a court making a risk level determination pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA) to “render an order setting forth its determinations and the findings of fact and conclusions of law on which the determinations are based” (Correction Law § 168-n [3]). Here, the Supreme Court failed to adequately set forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law in its order. However, since the record is sufficient for this Court to make its own findings of fact and conclusions of law, remittal is not required *(see People v*Eaton, 105 AD3d 722, 722-723 [2013]; *People v Finizio,*100 AD3d 977 [2012]).

The People bear the burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, the facts supporting the assessment of points under the Guidelines issued by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders under SORA *(see*Correction Law art 6-C; Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 5 [2006]; *People v Harris,*100 AD3d 727, 727 [2012]; *People v Thompson,*95 AD3d 977, 977 [2012]). Here, the Supreme Court properly designated the defendant a level two sex offender. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, clear and convincing evidence established that he had a history of drug abuse *(see People v Palmer,*20 NY3d 373, 377-378 [2013]). Thus, the court appropriately assessed him 15 points under risk factor 11 (Drug or Alcohol Abuse). Including those 15 points, the total assessment of 80 points presumptively classified the defendant as a level two sex offender.

To the extent that the defendant established facts that might warrant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level designation *(see People v Wyatt,*89 AD3d 112, 124 [2011]), upon examining all of the circumstances relevant to the defendant’s risk of reoffense and danger to the community, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s application for a downward departure *(see People v Eaton,*105 AD3d at 723). Mastro, J.E, Skelos, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 Certification
Pursuant To
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant To
 Section
906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
   In
connection with the Yearly Report of China Yida Holding, Co. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Chen Minhua, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the results
of operations of the Company.
   /s/  Chen Minhua
 Chen
Minhua
 Chief
Executive Officer
  Dated:
March 23, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2337 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2337

  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral 
Economic Assistance, International Disaster Assistance for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral 
Economic Assistance, International Disaster Assistance for fiscal year 
                                 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR BILATERAL ECONOMIC 
              ASSISTANCE, INTERNATIONAL DISASTER ASSISTANCE FOR FISCAL 
              YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Bilaterial Economic 
Assistance, International Disaster Assistance for fiscal year 2024 may 
not exceed $3,801,034,000.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11


                                CLX ENERGY, INC.
                   Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                    Nine months                  Three months
                                   ended June 30,               ended June 30,
                                  ----------------              --------------
                                2000            1999          2000          1999
                                ----            ----          ----          ----
<S>                        <C>              <C>           <C>           <C>
Net income (loss)          $   122,575      (   71,536)       92,789    (   18,858)

Preferred stock dividends          -        (    2,747)          -             -
                            ----------       ---------     ---------     ---------

Net income (loss) applicable to
  common shareholders      $   122,575      (   74,283)       92,789    (   18,858)
                            ==========       =========     =========     =========

Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding        10,548,132       7,547,592    10,548,132    10,498,132

Common equivalent shares
  representing shares issuable
  upon exercise of outstanding
  options                      244,000             -         244,000           -
                            ----------       ---------     ---------     ---------

                            10,792,132       7,547,592    10,792,132    10,498,132
                            ==========       =========    ==========    ==========

 Net income (loss) per share
  applicable to common shareholders:
    Basic                  $      0.01      (     0.01)         0.01   (      0.00)
                            ==========       =========    ==========    ==========

    Diluted                $      0.01      (     0.01)         0.01   (      0.00)
                            ==========       =========    ==========    ==========

Stock options are not considered in the calculations for those periods with
net losses as the impact of the potential common shares (50,000 shares at
June 30, 1999) would be to decrease net loss per share.

</TABLE>














<PAGE>
#### J. M. Lewis, et al., *v.*William Richards, et al.

Attachment — Levy—Lien—Purchaser.

If a lien is created by a writ of attachment such lien is lost when returned by the sheriff without a levy.

Purchaser.

A debtor may lawfully sell his property and a purchaser may buy it before any levy is made on it or has attached to it, and if the sale is in good faith for a valuable consideration it will be upheld even though the purchaser and seller knew there were creditors seeking to collect their claims.

APPEAL FROM ROWAN CIRCUIT COURT.

November 7, 1874.

Opinion by

Judge Pryor :

The lien, if any, created by the attachment, was lost when returned by the sheriff. It never was levied on any property, and the return made by the sheriff is that it was executed on H. B. Myers. This constitutes no levy, and the lien, when the attachment was returned, ceased to exist. Nor was there any attachment or garnishee issued on the amended petition, and if there had been, the equity of Lewis was superior to that of appellee, for the reason that the latter had already purchased and paid Myers for his interest in the land. There is no such evidence in the record that would authorize the conclusion that Lewis and Myers had combined to defraud Richards Lewis. He may have known of the efforts on the part of Richards to make his debt, still this did not preclude Lewis from making his or purchasing *210Myers’s interest in the property. Richards had no lien on it, or any right to it superior to any or of the other creditors. The judgment of the court below is *reversed,*and the cause remanded with directions to dismiss appellees’ petition as against both the appellants.

*Reid & Stone, for appellants.*

*Nesbitt & Gudgell, for appellees.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

KENNY SAM PIERCE, : 

 Plaintiff, : 

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 11-0214-CG-M 

 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, : 

Acting Commissioner of 

Social Security, : 

 Defendant. : 

 

ORDER

 After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and there 

having been no objections filed, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made 

under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is adopted as the opinion of this Court. 

 It is ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED and 

that this action be REMANDED for further administrative procedures. 

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of November, 2011.

 /s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 2:11-cv-00214-CG-M Document 18 Filed 11/28/11 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2285 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service, Distance Learning, Telemedicine, 

and Broadband Program for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service, Distance Learning, Telemedicine, and Broadband Program 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2285 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL 

3 UTILITIES SERVICE, DISTANCE LEARNING, 

4 TELEMEDICINE, AND BROADBAND PROGRAM 

5 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, Rural Utilities 

9 Service, Distance Learning, Telemedicine, and Broadband 

10 Program for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

11 $29,851,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL KELLEHER


I, Michael Kelleher, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Triad Industries, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of the date within 90 days prior to filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

(6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 24, 2004                     /s/ Michael Kelleher
                                                         -----------------
                                                         Michael Kelleher
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sharon L. Wardlaw, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By                      | /s/   Sharon L. Wardlaw |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
| Sharon L. Wardlaw,      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| December 15, 2004  |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### In the Matter of Town of Orangetown et al., Appellants, v Rockland County Policemen’s Benevolent Association et al., Respondents.

[961 NYS2d 809]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Alfieri, Jr., J.), dated October 4, 2011, which denied the petition and granted the cross motion of the Rockland County Policemen’s Benevolent Association, the Town of Orangetown Policemen’s Benevolent Association, and Steven Gentile to compel arbitration.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition to permanently stay arbitration is granted, and the cross motion of the Rockland County Policemen’s Benevolent Association, the Town of Orangetown Policemen’s Benevolent Association, and Steven Gentile to compel arbitration is denied.

“ ‘Generally, under New York statutory and case law, a court may address three threshold questions on a motion to compel or to stay arbitration: (1) whether the parties made a valid agreement to arbitrate; (2) if so, whether the agreement has been complied with; and (3) whether the claim sought to be arbitrated would be time-barred if it were asserted in State court’ ” *(Da Silva*a *Savo,*35 AD3d 647, 647 [2006], quoting *Matter of Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v Luckie,*85 NY2d 193, 201-202 [1995]). Here, the claim sought to be arbitrated was time-barred under the applicable 18-month statute of limitations *(see*Town Law § 65 [3]; *Schirmer v Town of Harrison,*294 AD2d 347, 347 [2002]). Thus, the Supreme Court erred in denying the petition to permanently stay arbitration and granting the cross motion of the Rockland County Policemen’s Benevolent Association, the Town of Orangetown Policemen’s Benevolent Association, and Steven Gentile to compel arbitration.

The parties’ remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination.

Dillon, J.E, Angiolillo, Dickerson and Cohen, JJ., concur.