alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Thomas Espie et al., Appellants, v Town of Poughkeepsie et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[824 NYS2d 729]

In an action for a judgment declaring a closing agreement for the sale of real property to be null and void, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 7, 2005, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the first, second, and third causes of action as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Unless the underlying dispute is “open to resolution through a form of proceeding for which a specific limitation period is statutorily provided” *(Solnick v Whalen, 49*NY2d 224, 229-230 [1980]), a declaratory judgment action is subject to a six-year statute of limitations *(see Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce v Pataki,*100 NY2d 801, 815 [2003], *cert denied 540 US*1017 [2003]; *Martin Goldman, LLC v Yonkers Indus. Dev. Agency,*12 AD3d 646 [2004]). In this action, the first, second, and third causes of action seek a judgment declaring that the closing agreement which the plaintiffs entered into with the defendant Town of Poughkeepsie on September 18, 1996, is void. The plaintiffs’ first, second, and third causes of action accrued on the day the closing agreement was executed, and thus the six-year limitations period expired on September 18, 2002. The plaintiffs did not commence this action until March 2005. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss the first, second, and third causes of action as time-barred.

*350The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, EJ., Schmidt, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**STATMON
      TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**19
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/**Geoffrey P. Talbot**





**Geoffrey
      P. Talbot**


****  **Chief Financial Officer**


**November
      14, 2006**




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
      retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              OF SWISS MEDICA, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350


Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned
officer of Swiss Medica, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:

      (a)   The quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
            2006 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   Information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Dated:  August 21, 2006


/s/ Raghunath Kilambi
--------------------------------------
Raghunath Kilambi,
Chief Executive Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2114 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, 

Federal Trade Commission, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Independent Agencies, Federal Trade Commission, Salaries 

and Expenses for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 INDEPENDENT AGENCIES, FEDERAL TRADE 

5 COMMISSION, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR 

6 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for Independent Agencies, Federal Trade CommisVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:36 Apr 18, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2114.IH H2114

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2114 IH

1 sion, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not 

2 exceed $309,700,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2305 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, 

Administration of Foreign Affairs, Emergencies in the Diplomatic and 

Consular Service for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, 

Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Service for 

fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2305 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ADMINISTRATION 

3 OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, EMERGENCIES IN THE 

4 DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR SERVICE FOR 

5 FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of State, Administration of Foreign 

9 Affairs, Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular 

10 Service for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $7,885,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         699,559
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,243,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,262,374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,309,147
<PP&E>                                       7,633,554
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,901,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,872,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,214,508
<BONDS>                                        370,691
<COMMON>                                        46,959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,010
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,733,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,872,821
<SALES>                                      2,560,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,560,527
<CGS>                                        1,977,662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,977,662
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               573,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,557)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JUSTIN DERON COLEMAN, :

AIS 216124,

:

Petitioner,

:

vs. CA 15-0337-WS-C

:

JUDGE BEN BROOKS, et al.,

:

Respondents.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to 

the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the report and 

recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated 

June 7, 2016 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

DONE this 8th day of July, 2016.

s/WILLIAM H. STEELE 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:15-cv-00337-WS-C Document 30 Filed 07/08/16 Page 1 of 1
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2201 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Forest Service Operations for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Operations 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST 

5 SERVICE OPERATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 

6 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:40 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2201.IH H2201

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2201 IH

1 able for US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service 

2 Operations for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6462** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. TERRI LYNN NAGY

- PHILLIPS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:12

- cr - 00037

- RBS

- DEM

- 1; 2:13

- cv - 00456

- RBS )

Submitted : May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Terri Lynn Nagy

- Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Randy Carl Stoker, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Terri Lynn Na gy - Phillips seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the court’s order denying her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court ’ s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district cou rt extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (200 7). The district court ’ s order was entered on the docket

on November 6, 2013 . The notice of appeal was filed on March 18, 2014
. * Because Nagy

- Phillips failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, w e dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).3 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2252 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2252

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
 of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Extension 
                    Activities for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
 of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Extension 
                    Activities for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 
              EXTENSION ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Extension 
Activities for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $505,692,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of James P., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[972 NYS2d 246]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about January 10, 2012, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding determination that he had committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and imposed a conditional discharge for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent and imposing a conditional discharge. The court adopted the least restrictive dispositional alternative consistent with appellant’s needs and the community’s need for protection *(see Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947 [1984]). Positive factors in appellant’s background were outweighed by the violent nature of the underlying incident, by appellant’s lack of remorse or acceptance of

*433responsibility for his conduct, and by appellant’s acknowledged history of anger management issues for which he had received counseling *(see e.g. Matter of Shariah T.,*107 AD3d 605 [1st Dept 2013]; *Matter of Mia R.,*102 AD3d 627 [1st Dept 2013]; *compare Matter of Tyttus D.,*107 AD3d 404 [1st Dept 2013]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, Saxe and Clark, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       5,560,607
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,535,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                   199,222
<INVENTORY>                                  4,979,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,724,319
<PP&E>                                      97,594,794
<DEPRECIATION>                              33,106,712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              89,957,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,583,331
<BONDS>                                     18,853,331
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,651,529
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,666,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                89,957,088
<SALES>                                     36,078,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,078,563
<CGS>                                       31,013,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,013,216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               950,359
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             476,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,750,375
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,406,391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,343,984
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,343,984
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Dune Energy, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form
10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |       |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----- |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: March 3, 2011 |  |  |  |       |  | /s/ James A. Watt                    
|                    |  |  |  | Name: |  | James A. Watt                        
|                    |  |  |  | Title |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., the Managing
Owner of World Monitor Trust II  Series D (Series D), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                              |  | 
|----------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer         |  | 
|Kenneth A. Shewer            
|Co-Chief Executive Officer   
|(Principal Executive Officer)
|March 30, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

vs. ) CRIMINAL NO. 14-00116-KD-C 

 ) 

LANCY WHITE, JR. )

ORDER

The District Court received the following directive from the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit:

Appellant’s “Opposed Amended Motion for Limited Remand...” is DENIED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL following an indicative ruling from the 

District Court that, upon remand, it would grant Appellant’s “Amended Opposed 

Motion to Properly Preserve and Catalog All Electronic, and Metadata Evidence.” 

See DE 138.1

(Order dated November 13, 2015, Appeal Number 15-12025-CC). This matter now is before the 

Court on the following:

“Defendant Lancy White, Jr.’s Motion to Reconsider his Amended Opposed 

Motion to Properly Preserve and Catalog All Electronic and Metadata Evidence; 

Reply to Government’s response Thereto; Memorandum of Law” (Doc. 143)

“Defendant Lancy White, Jr.’s Motion for Indicative Ruling From District Court’s 

Order Stating that Upon Remand it Will Grant Defendant’s Amended Opposed 

Motion to Properly Preserve and Catalog All Electronic and Metadata Evidence 

(Doc. 139)” (Doc. 145). 

“United States’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Preserve Electronic and 

Metadata Evidence” (Doc. 149). 

“Defendant Lancy White, Jr.’s Motion for Leave to Reply to Government’s 

Response to White’s Motion to Preserve Evidence; Incorporated Memorandum of 

Law” (Docs. 150, 150-1).2

 1 Footnote not in the original. The Court believes the reference to Doc. 138 may be a typographical error as the 

“Amended Opposed Motion to Properly Preserve and Catalog All Electronic, and Metadata Evidence” is Doc. 139. 2 The Court GRANTED Defendant’s motion for leave to file a reply. (Doc. 151). The attached reply (Doc. 150-1)

has been docketed as Doc. 152.

Case 1:14-cr-00116-KD-C Document 153 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for an indicative ruling (Doc. 145) is GRANTED.

Upon remand from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, and upon consideration of the United 

States’ Response and the Defendant’s Reply (Docs. 149, 152), the District Court would GRANT 

IN PART Defendant’s Amended Opposed Motion to Properly Preserve and Catalog All 

Electronic and Metadata Evidence (Doc. 139) as follows: The Saraland Police Department 

shall not delete any e-mails from the “Cindy Carmichael” Gmail account that were sent or 

received between April 1, 2013 and April 6, 2013. Defendant’s Motion to Reconsider (Doc. 

143) is MOOT. 

DONE and ORDERED this 22nd day of December 2015. 

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose 

KRISTI K. DuBOSE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:14-cr-00116-KD-C Document 153 Filed 12/22/15 Page 2 of 2