alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Anthony L. Havens, as Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Anthony L. Havens
---------------------------
Anthony L. Havens
Chief Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer

Date: September 16, 2005
Exhibit 32(a)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
  "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal
  executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

| |  | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date: August 6, 2004 | /s/ William F. HechtWilliam F. Hecht
        Chairman, President and
        Chief Executive Officer
        PPL Corporation
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         577,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  958,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,733,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,324,055
<PP&E>                                       8,236,735
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,272,515
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,894,275
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,462,226
<BONDS>                                        443,124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,010
<COMMON>                                        47,283
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,826,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,894,275
<SALES>                                      5,777,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,777,979
<CGS>                                        3,975,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,975,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,178,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                606,425
<INCOME-TAX>                                   327,499
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            278,926
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   278,926
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
NO. 07-08-0317-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JUNE 29, 2009

______________________________

FREDERICK DEWAYNE STRICKLAND, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 20005-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Frederick Dwayne Strickland, was convicted of three counts of

aggravated assault and sentenced to 17 years confinement in the Institutional Division of

the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and a fine of $5,000 on each count with the

sentences to run concurrently. It is from this judgment that appellant appeals. 

Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967); In re Schulman, 252

S.W.3d 403 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008). In support of his motion to withdraw, counsel certifies
Appellant filed two requests for extensions of time to file a response to the Anders 1

brief, however, appellant never filed a response.

2

that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion, the record reflects no

reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated. Anders, 386 U.S. at 744-45. In

compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has

candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial court’s

judgment. Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the

Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file

a pro se response in this matter. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App.

1991). The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response.

Appellant has not filed a response.1

By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an appeal,

but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and made an

independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable

grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346,

102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We

have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.
Counsel shall, within five days after this opinion is handed down, send his client a 2

copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of appellant’s right to file a pro se

petition for discretionary review. See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.

3

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court’s

judgment is affirmed.2

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish.
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 
  





 
 Center for Technology Transfer 

March 6, 2009 
 Mr. Kenneth T. Mills 

Chief Executive Officer 
 ReGenX, LLC 

750 17th Street, NW 
 Washington, DC 20006 

Dear Ken: 
 Please find attached an amended Exhibit A
“Patents and Patent Applications in Patent Rights” for the License Agreement between the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania and ReGenX, LLC with an Effective Date of February 24, 2009 (the “Agreement”). The amendment
removes Penn docket #K1774 from Exhibit A in its entirety. With the exception of this single change, all other provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
  

			
	Sincerely yours,
	
	




	  

		
	Name:		Michael J. Cleare, PhD
	Title:		Associate Vice Provost for Research and Executive Director, Center for Technology Transfer
	
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
		
	Signature:		




		 	  

	Name:		Kenneth T. Mills
	Title:		Chief Executive Officer, ReGenX, LLC
	Date:		 3/9/2009


 3160 Chestnut Street, Suite 200    Philadelphia, PA 19104-6283 

Tel 215.573.4500    Fax 215.898.9519    www.ctt.upenn.edu 








 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 

 

 Exhibit A 

Patents and Patent Applications in Patent Rights 
  

							
	 Penn # 
	  	 Disclosure Title
	  	 US Patents
	  	 Foreign Patents

	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****


  

	****	CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED
PORTIONS. 










 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 

 


							
	 ****
	  	 ****
	  	 ****
	  	 ****

	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****


  

	****	CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED
PORTIONS. 










 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED 

 


							
	 ****
	  	 ****
	  	 ****
	  	 ****

	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****
	****	  	****	  	****	  	****


  

	****	CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE
COMMISSION. CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED
PORTIONS.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JEREMY JAMAAR BROWN, AIS #271578 :

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION 14-00413-KD-N

:

HARLEY GEDDES :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the 

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the 

Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated March 24, 2015, is ADOPTED

as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED 

without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to comply the Court’s order, pursuant to Rule 

41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as no other lesser sanction will suffice.

DONE and ORDERED this the 21st day of April 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:14-cv-00413-KD-N Document 14 Filed 04/21/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32(b)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2008





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I,
the principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  August
      1, 2008
            /s/  Paul
      A. FarrPaul
      A. Farr
              Executive
      Vice President and
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              PPL
      Corporation








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32
 
 Certification
Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 (18
U.S.C. 1350)
 
 Persuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) the
undersigned General Partners of TASA Products Limited, a Washington limited
partnership (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of such General
Partner's knowledge and belief, that:
 
 1. The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 /s/MICHEL
      E. MAES
              /s/JAMES
      R. STEFFEYMichel
      E. Maes
              James
      R. SteffeyCo-General
      Partner
              Co-General
      PartnerDate:
      11-5-09
              Date:
      11-5-09
<PAGE>

                                     [LOGO]

                          CALEDONIA MINING CORPORATION

                                  NEWS RELEASE

                 KIKERK LAKE PROPERTY - WINTER PROGRAM UNDERWAY

                            MARCH 26TH 2002, 9.00 AM

Caledonia Mining Corporation ("Caledonia") of Toronto (TSE: CAL) and NASDAQ
(OTCBB: CALVF) is pleased to report that it has been advised by its joint
venture partner Ashton Mining of Canada Inc. ("Ashton") that the 2002 winter
field program on the Kikerk Lake property in the north Slave craton region of
Nunavut has commenced. The program includes the collection of a mini-bulk sample
from the diamondiferous Potentilla kimberlite and the identification of new
targets for drilling.

POTENTILLA KIMBERLITE

The Potentilla kimberlite was discovered in September 2001. The discovery hole,
drilled vertically in the center of a magnetic anomaly, intersected kimberlite
breccia beneath 9.9 metres of overburden to a depth of 142.3 metres and
terminated in hypabyssal kimberlite at a depth of 184.7 metres. As announced
October 24, 2001, a 207.8 kg sample returned 230 microdiamonds and 22
macrodiamonds. The largest stone measured 2.13 x 1.94 x 0.87 mm.

The current program has two objectives: to collect a mini-bulk sample of up to
ten tonnes from Potentilla by core drilling, and to define the shape and size of
the body by delineation drilling and geophysical surveys.

TARGET GENERATION

At least one unexplained indicator mineral train is present on the Kikerk Lake
property. A detailed helicopter-borne magnetic and electromagnetic survey is now
underway over an area that includes the indicator mineral train and the
Potentilla kimberlite. Ground geophysical surveys will follow over anomalies
that the airborne investigation identifies. Any high priority targets will be
drilled before the ice breakup.

Caledonia and Ashton each hold an interest of 35 percent in the property,
Northern Empire Minerals Ltd. holds the remaining 30 percent interest.

Further information regarding Caledonia's exploration activities and operations
along with its latest financials may be found on the Corporation's website
http:/www.caledoniamining.com

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT CALEDONIA MINING CORPORATION:

<TABLE>
<S>                                               <C>                                      <C>
S.E. Hayden                                       James Johnstone                          Chris Harvey
Chairman, President and CEO                       V-P Operations and COO                   Technical Director
South Africa                                      Canada                                   Canada
Tel: (011-27-11) 447-2499                         Tel: (1-905) 607-7543                    Tel: (1-905) 607-7543
Fax: (011-27-11) 447-2554                         Fax: (1-905) 607-9806                    Fax: (1-905) 607-9806
</TABLE>

OR VISIT CALEDONIA ON THE WORLDWIDE WEB AT HTTP://WWW.CALEDONIAMINING.COM
(April 17, 2013)

#### Abdulatif Abdulayev, Appellant, v Mark Yadgarov et al., Respondents.

[964 NYS2d 545]

*878In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to certain real property, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gavrin, J.), dated November 1, 2011, as granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 and to vacate a notice of pendency filed against the subject real property.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff commenced this action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to certain real property located in Forest Hills (hereinafter the subject property). The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 and to vacate a notice of pendency filed against the subject property. The Supreme Court granted the defendants’ motion.

The Supreme Court should not have directed dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1). To the extent that the evidence submitted by the defendants constituted “documentary evidence” within the meaning of CPLR 3211 (a) (1), such evidence failed to utterly refute the allegations of the complaint and did not conclusively establish a defense as a matter of law *(see Jones v Rochdale Vil., Inc.,*96 AD3d 1014, 1017 [2012]).

However, the Supreme Court properly directed dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) and vacatur of the notice of pendency filed against the subject property. Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the allegations of the complaint were insufficient to state a cause of action to void the subject contract of sale on the ground that the plaintiff lacked a full understanding of the English language *(see Pimpinello v Swift & Co.,*253 NY 159, 163 [1930]), inasmuch as the complaint failed to adequately plead the “reasonable effort[s]” he undertook to understand the documents he executed *(Shklovskiy v Khan,*273 AD2d 371, 372 [2000]; *cf. Holcomb v TWR Express, Inc.,*11 AD3d 513, 514 [2004]; *Maines Paper & Food Serv. v Adel,*256 AD2d 760, 761-762 [1998]; *Sofio v Hughes,*162 AD2d 518, 520 [1990]).

Mastro, J.R, Rivera, Hall and Miller, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WYATT LEE RICKRODE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 75 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of July, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

PAUL LACOMBE,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 4, 2021

§

§

§

§ Court Below–Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1112018546 (N)

§ 

§

Submitted: January 26, 2021

 Decided: February 22, 2021

ORDER

On January 4, 2021, the appellant, Paul Lacombe, filed a notice of appeal from 

the Superior Court’s November 25, 2020 order denying his third motion for 

postconviction relief. Under Supreme Court Rule 6(a)(iv), a timely notice of appeal 

should have been filed on or before December 28, 2020.

1

 On January 6, 2021, the 

Senior Court Clerk issued, by certified mail, a notice directing Lacombe to show 

cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as untimely filed. Lacombe received 

the notice to show cause as evidenced by the undated return receipt that was filed 

with the Court on January 13, 2021. A timely response was due on or before January 

1 Because the thirtieth day fell on a legal holiday—December 25, 2020—the notice of appeal was 

due on or before the next business day, or December 28, 2020. Del. Supr. Ct. R. 11(a).
2

25, 2021.

2

 To date, Lacombe has not responded to the notice to show cause. 

Therefore, dismissal of the appeal is deemed unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme Court 

Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice

2

See Del. Supr. Ct. R. 11(a).
Exhibit 12
 
 Second Quarter
    
    
    First Six Months2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008Computation
of Earnings:Income before income taxes
    
    $
    20,743
    
    
    $
    26,258
    
    
    $
    32,626
    
    
    $
    19,499Add:Interest expense
    
    
    9,350
    
    
    
    9,347
    
    
    
    18,043
    
    
    
    19,167Amortization of debt
premium/discount and expenses
    
    
    615
    
    
    
    610
    
    
    
    1,218
    
    
    
    1,225Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    379
    
    
    
    334
    
    
    
    725
    
    
    
    642Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    31,087
    
    
    $
    36,549
    
    
    $
    52,612
    
    
    $
    40,533Computation of Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    9,350
    
    
    $
    9,347
    
    
    $
    18,043
    
    
    $
    19,167Capitalized interest
    
    
    (28
    )
    
    
    103
    
    
    
    51
    
    
    
    261Amortization of debt premium/discount and expenses
    
    
    615
    
    
    
    610
    
    
    
    1,218
    
    
    
    1,225Interest portion of rent expense
    
    
    379
    
    
    
    334
    
    
    
    725
    
    
    
    642Fixed charges
    
    $
    10,316
    
    
    $
    10,394
    
    
    $
    20,037
    
    
    $
    21,295Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    3.01
    
    
    
    3.52
    
    
    
    2.63
    
    
    
    1.90