alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         354,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,334,989
<ALLOWANCES>                                   199,222
<INVENTORY>                                  5,329,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,882,022
<PP&E>                                      95,758,974
<DEPRECIATION>                              28,507,771
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              80,269,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,185,076
<BONDS>                                     16,400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,642,810
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,966,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                80,269,787
<SALES>                                     22,703,652
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,703,652
<CGS>                                       22,051,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,051,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               902,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             389,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (603,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (613,621)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32


<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Annual Report of Whispering Oaks International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Dr.
Ricardo Moro, President and Chief Executive Officer and Dr. Gerald Wittenberg,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of the Company.

Date:  June 29, 2005
                                  By:  /s/ Dr. Ricardo Moro
                                      ----------------------------------
                                      Dr. Ricardo Moro, President and Chief
                                      Executive Officer


                                  By: /s/ Dr. Gerald Wittenberg
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Dr. Gerald Wittenberg, Principal Financial
                                      Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

KELVIN L. BLEVINS, :

 :

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0392-CG-M

 :

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of :

Social Security, :

 :

Defendant. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Plaintiff's Motion for an Award of

Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act be and is hereby GRANTED and that

Plaintiff’s attorney be and is hereby AWARDED an EAJA attorney’s fee in the amount of

$1,375.00.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of June, 2006.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00392-CG-M Document 17 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Jose Miguel FERROFINO-CASTRO and Carla Ferrofino-Castro, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 05-77413, 06-70597.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 17, 2006.

Estela Richeda, Law Offices of Estela S. Richeda, Pasadena, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC, District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Robyn-Marie Lyon Monteleone, Esq., USLA, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Civil *&*Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*117Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s motion for summary denial of these petitions for review is granted. *See Ferrofino-Castro v. Ashcroft,*111 Fed. Appx. 952 (9th Cir.2004) (unpublished disposition); *compare, Nunes v. Ashcroft,*375 F.3d 805, 809-10 (9th Cir.2003) (holding that petitioners cannot attack the same Board of Immigration Appeals’s order through a habeas petition where that order was previously upheld in a petition for review).

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C.
20549
 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
    
    DECEMBER 21, 2004
  NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  CANADA
    
    001-07260
    
    NOT APPLICABLE(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
  8200 DIXIE ROAD, SUITE 100, BRAMPTON, ONTARIO, CANADA
    L6T 5P6(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  Registrants telephone number, including area code
    
    905-863-0000
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the
filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02
    
    Results of Operations and Financial Condition On December 21, 2004, the registrant issued a press release providing a status update on its and
Nortel Networks Limiteds financial restatement process and other related matters. Such press
release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and furnished in accordance with Item 2.02 of Form 8-K.  Item 8.01
    
    Other Events On December 21, 2004, the registrant issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1, and
such press release is incorporated by reference herein (other than information included on or
linked from the registrants website, referenced in such release, which is not incorporated by
reference into this report).  Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits (c)
    
    Exhibits99.1
    
    
    Press Release issued by the registrant on December 21, 2004.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized. NORTEL NETWORKS CORPORATIONBy:

/s/
Gordon A. DaviesGordon A. DaviesAssistant General Counsel 
Securities
and Corporate Secretary By:

/s/
Tracy S.J. Connelly
McGilleyTracy S.J. Connelly McGilleyAssistant Secretary Dated: December 22, 2004




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release issued by the registrant on December 21, 2004.
Exhibit 32.2




Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
officer of Mandalay Media, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 of the
Company (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
February 16, 2010




/s/
      Russell BurkeRussell
      BurkeChief
      Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal
      Financial Officer)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2308 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, 

Administration of Foreign Affairs, Payment to the American Institute 

in Taiwan for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of State, Administration of Foreign Affairs, 

Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan for fiscal 

year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2308 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, ADMINISTRATION 

3 OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, PAYMENT TO THE 

4 AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN FOR FIS5 CAL YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for Department of State, Administration of Foreign 

9 Affairs, Payment to the American Institute in Taiwan for 

10 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $31,963,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000316297
<NAME> SUPER 8 MOTELS NORTHWEST 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         571,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,857
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     42,093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               629,203
<PP&E>                                       5,990,342
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,050,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,621,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          220,344
<BONDS>                                      1,926,001
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,475,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,621,765
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,524
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  199,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               207,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,044
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                128,215
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            128,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   128,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    21.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    21.37
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3(Nos. 333-119796, 333-117346 and 333-111121) and on Form S-8No. 333-128206 of (i) our report dated June 11, 2007relating to the consolidated financial statements of iBasis, Inc. andsubsidiaries (which report expressed an unqualified opinion and includesexplanatory paragraphs relating to (a) the Company’s adoption of Statementof Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment” and (b) theCompany’s restatement of its 2005 and 2004 financial statements) and (ii) ourreport dated June 11, 2007 relating to management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of iBasis, Inc. and subsidiaries forthe year ended December 31, 2006.
| /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP |        |
|------------------------------------|--------|
| Boston, Massachusetts              |   |
| June 11, 2007                 |   |

 

----
# ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 24-0105
JEROMY ARCHER,

Petitioner,
v. ORDER MONTANA EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, GALLATIN COUNTY, HON. JOHN C. BROWN, Presiding,

Respondent. 

# FILED FEB 2 3 2024 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana Petitioner Jeromy Archer seeks a writ of supervisory control over the Montana Eighteenth Judicial District Court in Cause No. DR-22-468C to vacate that court's December 14, 2023 Findings ofFact, Conclusions ofLaw and Order, and Interim Parenting Plan. Archer maintainsthe District Court erred in failingto comply with § 3-5-126,MCA, in issuing its findings and conclusions, and it closed this case without issuing a Final Parenting Plan. Havingreviewedthe Petitionandthechallenged Order,thisCourtdeemsit appropriate to obtain a summary response. Therefore, in accordance with M. R. App. P. 14(7), IT IS ORDERED that the Eighteenth Judicial District Court and the named parties in Cause No. DR-22-468C are granted to and including March 25, 2024, to prepare, file, and serve responsesto the petition for writ ofsupervisory control. The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for Petitioner, all counsel ofrecord in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court Cause No. DR-22- 468C, and to the Honorable John C. Brown,presiding District Judge. DATED this day ofFebruary, 2024. For the Court, By C4 .00,: "

..

Justice 02/23/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0105
EXHIBIT 31.2

                           STATMON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Geoffrey P. Talbot, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 of Statmon Technologies Corp., Inc.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 12, 2004

-----------------------------------------
         GEOFFREY P. TALBOT
         Chief Financial Officer
#### Dulce Castillo, Appellant, v Wil-Cor Realty Co., Inc., Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 578]—

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), dated May 25, 2012, which granted the *864defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell as a result of a defect in a parking lot of premises owned by the defendant and leased to the plaintiffs employer, which is not a party to this action. The plaintiff commenced this action, and the defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, contending that, as an out-of-possession landlord, it could not be held liable for the plaintiffs injuries. The Supreme Court granted the defendant’s motion.

“An out-of-possession landlord’s duty to repair a dangerous condition on leased premises is imposed by statute or regulation, by contract, or by a course of conduct” *(Mercer v Hellas Glass Works Corp.,*87 AD3d 987, 988 [2011]; *see Lugo v Austin-Forest Assoc.,*99 AD3d 865 [2012]; *Goggins v Nidoj Realty Corp.,*93 AD3d 757, 758 [2012]; *Alnashmi v Certified Analytical Group, Inc.,*89 AD3d 10 [2011]). Here, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it was an out-of-possession landlord, that it was not contractually obligated to maintain the subject parking lot, that it did not endeavor to maintain the subject parking lot, and that it did not owe the plaintiff a duty by virtue of any applicable statute or regulation *(see Lugo v Austin-Forest Assoc.,*99 AD3d 865 [2012]; *Goggins v Nidoj Realty Corp.,*93 AD3d at 758; *Sciammarella v Manorville Postal Assoc., 87*AD3d 530 [2011]).

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). The fact that the plaintiffs expert was not disclosed until seven months after the filing of the note of issue, and his affidavit was submitted only in response to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, does not, in and of itself, render the disclosure untimely *(see Rivers v Birnbaum,*102 AD3d 26, 39 [2012]). However, the expert’s opinion, as set forth in the affidavit, was speculative, conclusory, and insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Mejia v Era Realty Co.,*69 AD3d 816 [2010]; *Banks v Freeport Union Free School Dist.,*302 AD2d 341 [2003]).

The plaintiffs contention that the defendant’s motion was premature, raised for the first time on appeal, is not properly before this Court *(see Panteleon v Amaya,*85 AD3d 993 [2011]). Dillon, J.E, Dickerson, Austin and Miller, JJ., concur.
#### Keeney *v.*Roberts.

*(Circuit Court, D. California.*

July 19, 1886.)*1*

Removal of Causes—Act of 1876—Time of Removal.

Under the removal act of 1875 a case cannot be removed after the term at which it could have been first tried in the state court, and where counsel do not take the objection it is the duty of the court to do so.

Before Sawyer, Circuit Judge.

1

Thia opinion was not published at the time of its delivery because of failure to receive a copy of it. It is published at this time on account of its citation in Austin v. Gagan, *ante,*626.

Sawyer, J.

This suit was commenced in the superior court of the state December 27, 1881. The answer was filed, and the case put at issue, and was ready for trial, May 2, 1882. The petition for removal to this court was not filed till January 25, 1884—nearly two years after it could have been tried. Not less than half a dozen terms of the superior court passed at which it could have been tried. The application for removal was too late, and the removal at that time was not authorized by the act of 1875, under which the petition was filed. *MacNaughton*v. *Railroad Co.,*10 Sawy. 113, 114, 19 Fed. Rep. 881; *Car Co.*v. *Speck,*113 U. S. 86, 87, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 374; *Gregory*v. *Hartley,*113 U. S. 745. 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 743. The court should take the objection, if counsel do not. *Williams*v. *Nottawa,*104 U. S. 209—211; *Farmington*v. *Pillsbury,*114 U. S. 144, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 807. The petition and record do not show a proper case for removal, and no order for removal wasin fact *630made. The case is still pending in the state court, and liable, at anytime, to be properly called up and tried. As the state court is not obliged to let go its hold, till a proper case for a removal, under the statute, has been presented in the record, and as it has never done so, in fact, it has jurisdiction to proceed, at any time, and try the case. *Gregory*v. *Hartley,*113 U. S. 745, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 743. The case must be remanded to the state court, at the cost of petitioner, and it is so ordered.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee v. Roger Talbot HAMMARLUND, II, Appellant.

No. 05-3043.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 6, 2006.

Roy Wallace McLeese, III, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

A.J. Kramer, Federal Public Defender, Mary Manning Petras, Federal Public Defender, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal, and the affidavit in support thereof, it is

ORDERED that the motion be granted, and this case is hereby dismissed.

The Clerk is directed to transmit forthwith to the district court a certified copy of this order in lieu of formal mandate.