alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                 FORM 52-109FT2
                        CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

I, Phillip E. Casey, Chief Executive Officer of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation,
certify that:

1.    I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in
      Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers'
      Annual and Interim Filings) of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation, (the issuer)
      for the interim period ending June 30, 2004;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to
      be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light
      of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period
      covered by the interim filings; and

3.    Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the
      other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present
      in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
      and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented
      in the interim filings.

Date: August 4, 2004

        "Phillip Casey"
----------------------------------------
Phillip Casey
Chief Executive Officer and President

<PAGE>

                                 FORM 52-109FT2
                        CERTIFICATION OF INTERIM FILINGS

I, Tom Landa, Chief Financial Officer of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation, certify
that:

1.    I have reviewed the interim filings (as this term is defined in
      Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers'
      Annual and Interim Filings) of Gerdau Ameristeel Corporation, (the issuer)
      for the interim period ending June 30, 2004;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the interim filings do not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to
      be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light
      of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period
      covered by the interim filings; and

3.    Based on my knowledge, the interim financial statements together with the
      other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present
      in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
      and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented
      in the interim filings.

Date: August 4, 2004

        "Tom Landa"
----------------------------------
Tom Landa
Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
EXHIBIT 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer of ACME Communications, Inc. (the Company) hereby
certify that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350:

(i) the annual report on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003 of the
Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March [12], 2004

| | /s/ Jamie Kellner
| | -----------------

| | Jamie Kellner
| | -------------

| | Chirman and Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------

| | /s/ Thomas D. Allen
| | -------------------

| | Thomas D. Allen
| | ---------------

| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

E-centives, Inc.: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-69276 and No. 333-58244) on Form S-8 of E-centives, Inc. of our report dated June 29,2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of E-centives, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss, and cash flows forthe year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-KSB of E-centives, Inc. 

 

Our report dated June 29, 2004, indicates that the Company is dependent upon its principal shareholder for continued funding. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

March 29, 2005
#### April Pearse, Plaintiff, v Valerie Delehanty, Defendant. Parker Waichman LLP Nonparty Appellant; Grace & Grace, Nonparty Respondent.

[964 NYS2d 557]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, nonparty Parker Waichman LLP the plaintiffs former counsel, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered September 23, 2011, which, upon granting the motion of nonparty Grace & Grace, the plaintiffs current counsel, for a determination of the allocation of legal fees to be paid to Grace & Grace and Parker Waichman LLP awarded Grace & Grace 90% of the net contingency fee following settlement of this action and Parker Waichman LLP 10% of the net contingency fee in the action.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, by increasing the award to Parker Waichman LLP to 20% of the net contingency fee in the action and reducing the award to Grace & Grace to 80% of the net contingency fee in the action; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff, while operating a motor vehicle, was injured when an automobile operated by the defendant’s decedent (hereinafter the decedent) struck her vehicle. Parker Waichman LLP the plaintiff’s former counsel, commenced this action on the plaintiff’s behalf, investigated other possible claims on the plaintiff’s behalf, and obtained a settlement offer from the decedent’s insurer in the sum of $100,000. After the offer was rejected, Grace & Grace, the plaintiffs current counsel, represented the plaintiff at a nonjury trial on the issue of damages, won a significant award, and resolved an outstanding lien in favor of the plaintiff.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in awarding 90% of the net contingency fee in the action to the plaintiffs current counsel *(see Hinds v Kilgallen,*83 AD3d 781, 782 [2011]; *Brown v Governele,*29 AD3d 617, 618 [2006]; *Podbielski v KMO 361 Realty Assoc.,*6 AD3d 597 [2004]). While the plaintiff’s current counsel performed significant work in securing the ultimate award and in reducing the lien amount *1024owed by the plaintiff, other work performed by the plaintiffs current counsel was duplicative of the work performed by the plaintiffs former counsel, or was of no value *(see Hinds v Kilgallen,*83 AD3d at 783; *Reyes v Wootos Realty, Inc.,*37 AD3d 276 [2007]; *cf. Kottl v Carey,*85 AD3d 870, 872 [2011]). Considering the amount of time spent by the plaintiffs former and current counsel on this action, the nature of the work performed, and their relative contributions *(see Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co.,*73 NY2d 454, 458 [1989]; *Brown v Governele,*29 AD3d at 618; *Podbielski v KMO 361 Realty Assoc.,*6 AD3d 597 [2004]), we modify the order appealed from so as to award 20% of the net contingency fee in the action to the plaintiffs former counsel and 80% of the net contingency fee in the action to the plaintiffs current counsel.

Hall, J.E, Roman, Sgroi and Cohen, JJ., concur.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-19-00418-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Trial Court Nos. 1604557, 1604567

Before Bassel, Birdwell, and Womack, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE EDWIN HORTON WITHERSPOON
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: November 18, 2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JOHN CHARLIE PEARSON,et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

vs. ) Civil Action No.: 05-0056-BH-C

)

LINDEN LUMBER COMPANY, )

INC., )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED,

ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendant Linden Lumber Company, Inc.’s motion

for attorney’s fees and expenses (Doc. 70) be and the same hereby is DENIED.

DONE this 13th day of April, 2006.

 

s/ W. B. Hand

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00056-BH-C Document 84 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.1

 


	

    	
SEE REVERSE   SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS COMMON STOCK INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE   STATE OF DELAWARE THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of FULLY PAID AND   NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.01 PAR VALUE, OF CARE CAPITAL PROPERTIES,   INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation bythe holder hereof in   person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed.   This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the   Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has   caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly   authorized officers. Dated: COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: WELLS FARGO BANK,   N.A. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR AMERICAN FINANCIAL   PRINTING INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CORPORATE   SECRETARY CCP CUSIP 141624 10 6 
    




 









 


	

    	
The following   abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,   shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to   applicable laws or regulations: UTMA – Custodian TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN – as   tenants in common – as tenants by entireties (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform   Transfers to Minors Act – as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not   as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though   not in the above list. For value received hereby sell, assign, and transfer   unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE   (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF   ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate,   and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the   said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of   substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT   MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN   EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.   SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION   (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER   AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.   MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM   (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT   ACCEPTABLE.
Exhibit 10.2

GRAPHIC

January 25,
2002

Ralph
Faison
President & CEO
Celiant Corporation
40 Technology Drive
Warren, NJ 07059

Re:
Amendment of Lucent/Celiant Supply Agreement

Dear
Ralph:

This
letter serves to summarize the requested and agreed upon changes to our supply agreement. Together, our companies will amend the existing supply agreement to reflect the following
modifications:



If
you are in agreement with this letter and the amendments to be made to our supply agreement, please so indicate in the space provided below and return the same to me.

|Sincerely,                                          |  | CONFIDENTIAL       
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|/s/ Mike Iandolo                                    |  |                    
|Mike Iandolo
Vice President
Wireless Networks Group |  |                    
|Agreed to this 25 day of January, 2002              |  |                    
|By:                                                 |  | CELIANT CORPORATION
|By:                                                 |  | /s/ Ralph E. Faison
|Name:                                               |  | Ralph E. Faison    
|Title:                                              |  | President & CEO    

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**STATMON
      TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**19
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey Talbot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/**Geoffrey P. Talbot**





**Geoffrey
      P. Talbot**


****  **Chief Executive Officer**


**November
      14, 2006**




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
      retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32


            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE & FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CLX
Energy, Inc. for the quarter ended in March 31, 2004, I, E. J. Henderson,
President and Chief Financial Officer of CLX Energy, Inc., hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  such  Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB of CLX Energy, Inc. for the quarter
     ended  March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  the  information  contained  in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of CLX
     Energy,  Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CLX
     Energy,  Inc.

                                   /s/ E.J. Henderson
                                   -------------------------------
                                   E.J. Henderson, President &
                                   Chief Financial Officer


Date:  May 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to CLX Energy, Inc. and will be retained by CLX Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Timothy J. Wiggins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|                                                                  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Timothy J. Wiggins                                            | 
|                                                                  | 
|Timothy J. Wiggins
Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 6, 2003 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The certification in this Report is being furnished in accordance with SEC
Release No. 33-8212. The certification is being furnished and shall not be
deemed filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. The
certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by
specific reference in such filing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-19-0000582

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

VICKRAM JAISINGANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE ALA WAI PLAZA

SKYRISE CONDOMINIUM, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE ASSOCIATION

OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF THE ALA WAI PLAZA SKYRISE CONDOMINIUM;

AARON M. CHANEY, INC.; LUM YIP KEE, LTD.,

Defendants/Cross-Claim Defendants/Cross-Claim Plaintiffs/

Appellees, and TERRI MORRISSETTEE; Defendant/Cross-Claim

Defendant-Appellee, and MALIA, LTD., Defendant/Cross-Claim

Plaintiff/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee, and

BUSINESS INVESTMENT, LTD.; DANIEL, MANN, JOHNSON & MENDENHALL;

HAWAII DREDGING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendants/Cross-Claim

Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-20; MARY DOES 1-20;

DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-20; AND DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20, Defendants

(CIVIL NO. 78341)

AND

VICKRAM JAISINGANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

THOMAS CARNEY, Defendant-Appellee

(CIVIL NO. 85-3896)

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

ORDER

DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Chan and Hiraoka, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that we lack

jurisdiction over this appeal by self-represented PlaintiffAppellant Vickram Jaisingane (Jaisingane). Jaisingane purports

to appeal from Jaisingane v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Ala Wai

Plaza Skyrise, Civil No. 78341, Circuit Court of the First

Circuit, State of Hawai#i. The Hawai#i Supreme Court affirmed the

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000582

21-JUL-2020

09:47 AM
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

disposition of Civil No. 78341 by a memorandum opinion filed in

supreme court case No. 12314 on April 4, 1988. We lack appellate

jurisdiction. See Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a);

Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(a)(1) .

Jaisingane also purports to appeal from Jaisingane v.

Carney, Civil No. 85-3896, Circuit Court of the First Circuit,

State of Hawai#i. Civil No. 85-3896 was dismissed by stipulation

on November 4, 1988, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(b) of the Hawai#i

Rules of Civil Procedure. We lack appellate jurisdiction. See

HRS § 641-1(a); HRAP Rule 4(a)(1).

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that case number

CAAP-19-0000582 is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 21, 2020.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Associate Judge

/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan

Associate Judge

/s/ Keith H. Hiraoka

Associate Judge

2
#### In the Matter of Wilda C., Appellant, v Miguel R., Respondent.

[975 NYS2d 333]

Appeals from order, Family Court, New York County (Jane Eearl, J.), entered on or about February 14, 2013, which dismissed two petitions seeking to modify custody on the ground of lack of jurisdiction pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 76-a, held in abeyance, the motion by assigned counsel to be relieved denied without prejudice to renewal, and counsel is directed to communicate with appellant forthwith concerning any issues she may wish to raise, her right to communicate with this Court directly raising any issue she believes to be meritorious, and the possibility of the assignment of new counsel if this Court finds any argument warranting consideration on the merits, consistent with *People v Saunders*(52 AD2d 833 [1st Dept 1976]), and instructing appellant that she has 60 days from the date of this order to file a pro se supplemental brief, and to cause a complete record to be filed or explain the inability to do so.

Counsel has provided a copy of a letter sent to appellant, and proof of service of the brief seeking to be relieved, but the letter does not meet the requirements of *People v Saunders,*which are applicable in Family Court matters (see *Matter of Perez v Perez,*78 AD3d 433 [1st Dept 2010]). Moreover, the father’s moving papers and appellant’s opposition papers have not been provided to the Court as part of the original record, possibly because those papers were filed under a different docket number. A full record is generally needed in order to assess whether any nonfrivolous issues may be raised. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Friedman, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132546 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132546 COA: 271933 Allegan CC: 05-014294-FH SCOTT BRIAN PATRICK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 2, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2007

Clerk