alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


31.2     Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of Bentley Communications
         Corp. pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Bruce Kamm, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Bentley Communications Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:October 14, 2004


/s/ Bruce Kamm
-----------------
Bruce Kamm
Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Keydra R., a Child Alleged to be Abused and/or Neglected. Robert R., Appellant; Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Respondent.

[964 NYS2d 417]

*589Order of fact-finding, Family Court, Bronx County (Karen I. Lupuloff, J.), entered on or about January 18, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that respondent-appellant uncle had neglected and sexually abused the subject child, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order of disposition, same court and Judge, entered on or about June 3, 2011, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as abandoned.

Respondent failed to preserve his argument that he was not a person legally responsible for the subject child, and we decline to consider it *(see Matter of Sharnaza Q. [Clarence W.],*68 AD3d 436 [1st Dept 2009]).

The findings of sexual abuse and neglect were supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; *Matter of Dayanara V. [Carlos V.],*101 AD3d 411, 412 [1st Dept 2012]). There is no basis to disturb the court’s credibility determinations crediting the testimony given by the subject child and discrediting the testimony given by respondent *(see id,.).*

Concur—Andrias, J.E, Acosta, Freedman, Richter and Gische, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-7211

DONALD LEE TAYLOR, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
WILLIAM K. DAVIS, Commissioner D.O.C., professional and individual capacities; HOWARDPAINTER, Warden, Mt. Olive Correctional Complex, professional and individual capacities; GEORGE TRENT, professional and individual capacities; TONY LEMASTERS, professional andindividual capacities; KERI COLEMAN, professional and individual capacities; SUSANLANHAM, professional and individual capacities; STEVEN BERRYMAN, professional and individual capacities; DAVID JONES, professionaland individual capacities; RALPH TERRI, professional and individual capacities; WILLIAMKENNEDY, professional and individual capacities; LARRY HAMLIN, professional and individual capacities; DUSTY LEWIS, professional and individual capacities; LEO PEAK, professional and individual capacities; JOSEPH CONNELLY, professional and individual capacities; JAMES BROWN, professional and individual capacities; JOSEPH B. COY, professional and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CA-98-1181)2 Submitted: February 10, 2000 Decided: February 14, 2000
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Lee Taylor, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Leslie K. Tyree, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Donald Lee Taylor, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s report and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Davis , No. CA-98- 1181 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

JUNE 10, 2014

 WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

WD75677 William T Morrison Jr. vs. State of Missouri

WD76332 Ray Famous vs. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

WD76539 Terrance Wainwright vs. State of Missouri

WD76654 Cathy Lane vs. Dennis Newberry, et al

WD76746 Mason McNail vs. City of Richmond Heights

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

None
EXHIBIT 31.1   Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Charles Koppelman

Principal Executive Officer
##### 



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the use in this Registration Statement of
Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd. on Form F-4 of our report dated
February 14, 2004 appearing in the Prospectus, which is
part of this Registration Statement.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
Experts in such Prospectus.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, British Columbia 
June 1, 2004.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EMERGE
INTERACTIVE, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001092605
<NAME> EMERGE INTERACTIVE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      12,316,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,144,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,201,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,640,122
<PP&E>                                       2,817,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                 922,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,761,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,832,475
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    144,992
<COMMON>                                        56,372
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,689,467
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,761,713
<SALES>                                     43,783,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,783,124
<CGS>                                       43,517,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,582,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               288,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                75,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             764,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (15,605,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (15,605,706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  10,420
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (15,595,286)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (3.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.11)


</TABLE>
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 22 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from sending petroleum 

products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to China, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 22 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting America’s 

3 Strategic Petroleum Reserve from China Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON SALES OF PETROLEUM PROD5 UCTS FROM THE STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RE6 SERVE TO CHINA. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec8 retary of Energy shall not draw down and sell petroleum 

9 products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve— 

10 (1) to any entity that is under the ownership, 

11 control, or influence of the Chinese Communist 

12 Party; or 

13 (2) except on the condition that such petroleum 

14 products will not be exported to the People’s Repub15 lic of China. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 12, 

2023. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 22 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from sending 

Reserve to China, and for other purposes. petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In conditionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the“Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, GeorgeG. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 
| By                       | /s/  George G. Usher |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| George G.  Usher,        |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
| June 14,  2004           |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,443,352
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  936,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,400,407
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,837,483
<PP&E>                                       7,918,131
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,139,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,319,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,414,713
<BONDS>                                        493,104
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,010
<COMMON>                                        49,786
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,823,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,319,999
<SALES>                                      4,579,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,579,594
<CGS>                                        3,245,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,245,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,367,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (71,775)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (71,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,593)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(e)

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  FOR PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31,
  2005

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Electric Utilities
  Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
  the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"),
  I, the principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  hereby certify that:

| |  | The Covered Report fully complies with the
        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
        of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | The information contained in the Covered
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.





|Date:  May 4, 2005 | /s/ John F. SipicsJohn F. Sipics
        President 
        PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 1049

_____________________________ H ERBERT L EE B UTLER , Petitioner ,

v.
D EPARTMENT OF C ORRECTIONS , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of C ertiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

August 15, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. D ISMISSED

. M AKAR , O STERHAUS , and W INSOR , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

__ ___________________________
Herbert Lee Butler, pro se , Petitioner

.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JOSHUA E. KOHRS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2247

[ January 17, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.85 0 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge;

L.T. Case No s

. 2007CF004834A and 2010CF003627A

.

Joshua E. Kohrs, Clermont, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### RLI Ins. Co. et al., Respondents, v Turner/Santa Fe, a Joint Venture, et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[870 NYS2d 313]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered July 12, 2007, which, in a subrogation action, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant-appellant alleged tortfeasors’ motion to dismiss plaintiff insurers’ claim for “soft costs” as time-barred, and deemed plaintiffs’ bill of particulars amended to include the amount of such costs, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

While the amount of “soft costs” (delay in opening/business interruption) was still being calculated and had not yet been paid by plaintiff insurers to their injured insured, the owner of a construction site damaged by a fire, there is no dispute that defendants-appellants, subcontractors at the site allegedly responsible for the fire, were given notice, in the timely filed complaint, that soft-costs claims were being made based on the same facts for which plaintiffs had already partially paid claims *414for “hard” property damages. Although the right to subrogation arises upon payment *(see J & B Schoenfeld, Fur Merchants v Albany Ins. Co.,*109 AD2d 370, 372-373 [1985]), and payment of the soft-costs claims were not made until more than three years after the fire, i.e., after the three-year statute of limitations had run on plaintiffs’ subrogation causes of action *(see Allstate Ins. Co. v Stein,*1 NY3d 416, 420-421 [2004]), plaintiffs clearly possessed an inchoate, or contingent, right of subrogation for soft-costs claims at the time they commenced the timely action, and defendants were clearly on notice of that right (CPLR 3013; *see Foley v D’Agostino,*21 AD2d 60, 62-63 [1964]). If a third-party action is “broad enough to encompass contingent claims based on subrogation,” and if “[l]ogically, there is no difference in terms of maturity of an action based on subrogation, as opposed to indemnity,” in that both accrue upon payment or the determination of liability *(Krause v American Guar. & Liab. Ins. Co.*(22 NY2d 147, 152-153 [1968]), then logically there is no reason why a timely stand-alone action should not be broad enough to encompass a technically unripe subrogation claim as well. To hold otherwise would create the very circumstance condemned by the Court of Appeals, where “the insurer may be put in the position, on the one hand, of having to pay the insured substantial sums of money on questionable claims in order to preserve its subrogation rights, or, on the other hand, it may have to forego the opportunity to prepare what might well have proved to be an excellent case against the alleged tort-feasor” *(id.*at 155). Thus, the court properly deemed the bill of particulars amended to include the exact amount of the soft-costs claims, once determined and paid to the insured by plaintiffs *(see Sahdala v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*251 AD2d 70 [1998]; CPLR 203 [f]). Concur—Lippman, EJ., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, DeGrasse and Freedman, JJ.