alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report Fairly presents,                in                all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of the Company as of and for the period covered by the                Report. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Timothy Carnahan                           |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Timothy                Carnahan                               |   |
|   | Chief                Executive Officer,                       |   |
|   | President,                Treasurer and Chairman of the Board |   |
|   |                                                          |   |
|   | Date:                April 17, 2007                           |   |

----
Exhibit 10.1


 





FORM
OF ALLONGE TO Convertible Promissory Note


 


This Allonge to
Convertible Promissory Note (the "Allonge") is made effective as of August 7, 2015, by Intellinetics, Inc., a
Nevada corporation (the “Company”) in favor of [NAME] ("Payee").


 





RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Company
executed and delivered to Payee that certain Form of Convertible Promissory Note dated as of [DATE], in the original principle
amount of [AMOUNT] (the “Note”).


 


WHEREAS, Company
and Payee now desire to modify the terms of the Note according to the terms and conditions contained herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:


 


AGREEMENT


 


 


 


§1.Recitals. The
above Recitals are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Allonge.


 


§2.Capitalized Terms.
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Note.


 


§3.Modification of Note.
Section 2 of the Note shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


The Payee shall have the right, at
his option, at any time on or before the repayment of the Note, to convert, in whole or in part, subject to the terms and provisions
hereof, the principal amount of the Note and interest accrued (if any) through the date of conversion, into common stock of the
Company at a conversion price of [PRICE] per share. It is understood that any common stock issued on conversion of this Note will
bear a restrictive legend, and have “piggyback” registration rights.


 


§4.Allonge. The
parties agree that this Allonge shall be firmly affixed to and become an allonge to the Note.


 


§5.Effect of Modification.
Except as expressly modified herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Note remain as stated therein and interest shall continue
to accrue and all payments shall continue to be made as set forth in the Note.


 


 


 


[The remainder of the page is intentionally
left blank]


 




     


     


    

 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have caused this Allonge to be executed as of the day and year first set forth above.


 


 





	COMPANY	 
	Intellinetics, Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:		 
	Name:	Matthew L. Chretien	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	PAYEE	 
	[NAME]	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	
	Name:	[NAME]
11733.

#### MADDOX *v.*BLALOCK.

Exceptions pendente lite are not rcviewable by this court upon a final bill of exceptions which does not assign error thereon, although it assigns error on the ruling complained of and recites that exceptions pendente lite to that ruling were filed, and they were brought to this court as a part of the record material to an understanding of the errors complained of.

Decided March 8, 1921.

Trover; from city court of Albany — Judge Clayton Jones. July 10, 1920.

*Lippitt &*Burl, for plaintiff in error.

*Milner & Farlcas,*contra.

Bloodworth, J.

Counsel for the plaintiff in error, in their brief in this court, argue only as to the ruling on the demurrer, which they sought to bring to this court by a bill of exceptions which assigned error on that ruling and recited the filing of exceptions pendente lite thereto which were brought up as a part oE the record. *“*Before exceptions pendente lite can be considered by this court, error must have been originally assigned in the main bill of exceptions *upon Hie exceptions pendente lite,*and not merely *upon the judgment complained of*in the exceptions pendente lite, or such an assignment must be made, by the permission of this court, before the argument of the case here.” *Ponder*v. State, 25 *Ga. App.*768 (105 S. E. 318 (1)), and cases cited.

*Affirmed.*

*Broyles, G. J., and Lulce,*J., *concur.*
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H onor abl e J e d S . R a kof f , S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge f or ** * the S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof N e w Y ork, s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S A T Y A C H U M, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 71441 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 609- 697 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t31, 2012 ** S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B ef ore: S C H R O E D E R and G O U L D , C i rc ui tJudg es , and R A K O F F , S eni or D i stri ct Judg e. *** 

# FI LED SEP 07 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

S a ty aC hum , ac i t i z e n a nd na t i ve of C a m bodi a , s e e ks r e vi e w of the B oa r d of I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) r e je c tio n o f

h is a s y lu m , w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l, an dC o n v en t i o n A g ai n stT o rtu re rel i ef cl ai m s. T he B IA di d n oterr i n d enyi ng as ylum because C hu m ’ s app l i cat i on w as t i m e-b arred . 8 U . S . C . § 1 1 5 8 (a)(2 )(B ). T h e ci rcu m st an ces t o w h i ch C h u m p o i n t s, s uc h a s the di s s ol ut i on of hi s m a rr i a ge a nd m a i nt e na nc e of l a w f ul s t a tus , do not excuse hi s unt i m el i ness because he di d n otfi l e w i thi n a “ re as on abl e per i od ” a ft er th e s e c ir c u m s tan c e s e n d e d . 8 C .F .R . § 2 0 8 .4 ( a ) ( 5 ) ( iv ) ; s e e W a k ka r yv . H o lde r, 558 F . 3d 10 49 , 10 57 –5 8 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tC hum ha d not s h o w n h e w o u ldm o r e lik e lyth a n n o t b e s ub je c t to p e r s e c u tio n o rto rtu r e up o n h is r e turn t o C a m bodi a . I n the pa s the ha d f a c e d onl yone unf

ul f i l l e d thr e a tw i thout a c c o m p a n y in g h a r a s s m e n t, e c o n o m ic h a rm , o rm e n a c in g f o llo w - up s . See L i m v. I .N .S., 2 2 4 F .3 d9 2 9 , 9 3 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . T h e r e c o r dd e m o n s tr a te s th a t h is i nvol ve m e nti n the S a m R a i ns yP a rtyw a s f a rl e s s tha n tha tof

i ndi vi dua l s w ho w e r e tar g e te df

o rp e r s e c u tio n o rto rtu r e . T h is c o u rt la c k s ju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w d e n ia ls o f v o lu n taryd e p a rtu r e . 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 2 9 c ( f

) ; G a r c ia v . A s h c r o

ft, 3 6 8 F .3 d1 1 5 7 , 1 1 5 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . T h e p et i t i o n fo r rev i ew i s D EN I ED .
#### Toys “R” Us-Delaware, Inc., Appellant, v 44-45 Broadway Realty Co., LLC, Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 900]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered on or about January 2, 2013, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The terms of the subject lease unambiguously contradict the allegations supporting plaintiff’s claims, thereby warranting dismissal of the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) *(see 150 Broadway N.Y. Assoc., L.P. v Bodner,*14 AD3d 1, 5 [1st Dept 2004]). The lease provision requiring plaintiff tenant to pay taxes levied against its own signs affixed to defendant landlord’s building, but not with respect to signs of other tenants, does not apply to limit a separate lease provision obliging plaintiff to pay a proportionate share of real estate taxes imposed on the building, even though those real estate taxes are based on a valuation that takes into account income earned from the signs of other tenants. Furthermore, when reviewing the parties’ course of conduct, including plaintiffs consistent payment of its share of the real estate taxes for over 12 years without protest, it is clear that defendant’s construction of the relevant lease provisions comports with the parties’ intent *(see Murray Hill Mews Owners Corp. v Rio Rest. Assoc. L.P.,*92 AD3d 453 [1st Dept 2012]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels, Feinman and Clark, JJ. [Prior Case History: 38 Misc 3d 1204(A), 2013 NY Slip Op 50000(H).]
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 234 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 234

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide a burial allowance 
 for certain veterans who die at home while in receipt of hospice care 
            furnished by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 10, 2023

 Mr. Bergman (for himself, Mr. Allred, Mrs. Miller-Meeks, Mr. Ellzey, 
   Ms. Houlahan, Mr. Baird, Mr. Bacon, and Mr. Mast) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide a burial allowance 
 for certain veterans who die at home while in receipt of hospice care 
            furnished by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gerald's Law Act''.

SEC. 2. BURIAL ALLOWANCE FOR CERTAIN VETERANS WHO DIE AT HOME WHILE IN 
              RECEIPT OF HOSPICE CARE FURNISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a)(2)(A) of section 2303 of title 38, 
United States Code, as amended by section 2202 of the Johnny Isakson 
and David P. Roe, M.D. Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improvement 
Act of 2020 (Public Law 116-315; 134 Stat. 4984), is further amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``; or'' and inserting a 
        semicolon;
            (2) in clause (ii)--
                    (A) in subclause (II), by striking ``; or'' and 
                inserting a semicolon; and
                    (B) in subclause (III), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new clause:
                    ``(iii) a home or other setting at which the 
                deceased veteran was, at the time of death, receiving 
                hospice care pursuant to section 1717(a) of this title 
                if such care was directly preceded by the Secretary 
                furnishing to the veteran hospital care or nursing home 
                care as described in subclauses (I), (II), or (III) of 
                clause (ii).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of the Johnny Isakson and 
David P. Roe, M.D. Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improvement Act of 
2020 (Public Law 116-315).
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S-3 (No. 333-107487) of Hub International Limited of ourreport dated July 1, 2004, except for Note 15, as to which the date isSeptember 10, 2004, relating to the financial statements of Talbot FinancialCorporation, which appears in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of HubInternational Limited dated September 14, 2004.
Dallas, Texas
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Bryant, Appellant.

[970 NYS2d 468]

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), imposed August 23, 2010, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the resentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, EJ., Dillon, Chambers and Austin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32(b)


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


FOR PPL
CORPORATION'S 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2008





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL Corporation (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the
principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that:





·
            The
      Covered Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and·
            The
      information contained in the Covered Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











Date:  May
      2, 2008
            /s/  Paul
      A. FarrPaul
      A. Farr
              Executive
      Vice President and
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              PPL
      Corporation








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Provident Financial Group, Inc.'s 10-Q for September 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         215,073
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                20,385
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,631,035
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      5,265,159
<ALLOWANCE>                                     72,837
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,683,595
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,953,304
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,117,727
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            273,365
<LONG-TERM>                                    677,498
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                        12,702
<OTHER-SE>                                     641,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               7,683,595
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                123,142
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               23,157
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   887
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               147,186
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              54,686
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              80,510
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           66,676
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,692
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 64,631
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 46,750
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      30,660
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.01
<LOANS-NON>                                     43,414
<LOANS-PAST>                                    17,109
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 9,327
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 33,331
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                71,980
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    7,009
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,866
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               72,837
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            72,837
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ROBERT TAYLOR, #130155, :

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION 15-00081-KD-N

:

MEDICAL STAFF, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of the issues raised, and there having been no 

objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(l)(B) and dated September 14, 2015, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. It is 

ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

DONE and ORDERED this the 2nd day of November 2015.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:15-cv-00081-KD-N Document 11 Filed 11/03/15 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.2

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Genesis Technoloy Group, inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Adam Wasserman
Adam Wasserman
Chief Financial Officer
January 15, 2003
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tellabs, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report»),I, Timothy J. Wiggins, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| ***  /s/ Timothy J. Wiggins*** | * * |
|------------------------------------------|----------|
|   Timothy J. Wiggins           |
|   Chief Financial Officer      |
|   Date: August 9, 2005    |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
##### 



Exhibit 3. Certification of Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Title 18, United States Code, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Paul A. Bernards, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Masonite International
Corporation, (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 4, 2005/s/ Paul A. BernardsPaul A. Bernards
Executive Vice President andChief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.01
 
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-147975, 333-145742, 333-113899, 333-110248, 333-77068, 333-68342 and 33-46624) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-150944, 333-142745, 333-136705, 333-113914, 333-104711, 333-64552, 333-59842, 333-55822, 333-35730, 333-32460, 333-93591, 333-92159 and 333-87505) of SWK Holdings Corporation of our report (which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s sale of substantially all of its assets, as described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements) dated March 31, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.
    San Jose, California
 March 31, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRANCE KEOKI CALLEN, :

Petitioner, :

vs. : CIVIL NO. 09-0068-CG-C

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CRIMINAL NO. 06-0176-011-CG

Respondent. :

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the

issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l)(B) and dated March 24, 2009, is ADOPTED as the

opinion of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of April, 2009.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00176-CG-N Document 677 Filed 04/16/09 Page 1 of 1