alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



---

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, DC 20549

Form 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE
ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of September 2003

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc.(Translation of Registrants Name Into English)

Canadian Pacific Tower, Ste 1600, 100 Wellington Street W., Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, Canada
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)

|           |  |           
|---------- |  | ----------
|Form 20-Fo |  | Form 40-Fþ

(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.)

|     |  |    
|---- |  | ---
|Yeso |  | Noþ

(If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-.

This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant: Form S-8 No.333-13960.



---

---

Page 1 of 2 Pages
Exhibits Index appears on Page 3





---



##### 



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

|      |  |                    |  |     |  |                                                                                
|----- |  | ------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      |  |                    |  |     |  | FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.
                         (Registrant)           
|     
|     
|Date: |  | September 30, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ Thomas C.
GriffithsName:  Thomas C. Griffiths
Title:    Assistant Secretary





---



##### 



Exhibits Index

The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form 6-K.

|            |  |                                                                 
|----------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit No. |  | Description of Exhibits                                         
|            |  |                                                                 
|99.1        |  | Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. To Release Third Quarter Earnings
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2339 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2339

  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral 
     Economic Assistance, Complex Crises Fund for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Bilateral 
     Economic Assistance, Complex Crises Fund for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR BILATERAL ECONOMIC 
              ASSISTANCE, COMPLEX CRISES FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Bilaterial Economic 
Assistance, Complex Crises Fund for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$30,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Stephanie Shamblee, Appellant, v John B. Rhea et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent.

[972 NYS2d 259]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stall-man, J.), entered March 13, 2013, which denied the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, seeking to annul the determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) terminating petitioner’s Section 8 rent subsidy, and granted NYCHA’s cross motion to dismiss the proceeding as time-barred, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Irrespective of the purported ambiguity in NYCHA’s notice of its final determination to terminate petitioner’s housing subsidy, or its alleged error in continuing to issue petitioner’s subsidy for ten months after the issuance of the notice, which petitioner alleges to have confused her and led her to believe that her subsidy had not been terminated, the evidence indicates that NYCHA eventually issued its last subsidy payment on April 1, 2010. Even if petitioner did not know of the nonpayment at that time, she had to have known by no later than the commencement of a holdover proceeding by her landlord, respondent Fulton Park 4 Associates, which was based solely on nonpayment of the subsidy. Petitioner admits that the holdover proceeding was commenced in February 2012, more than four months before she initiated the instant article 78 proceeding on July 20, 2012. Accordingly, the proceeding is time-barred *(see*CPLR 217 [1]; *90-92 Wadsworth Ave. Tenants Assn. v City of N.Y. Dept. of Hous. Preserv. & Dev.,*227 AD2d 331, 331-332 [1st Dept 1996]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Freedman and Feinman, JJ. [Prior Case History: 38 Misc 3d 1229.]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

QUAWI SMITH,

Petitioner

v.

THE PROTHONOTARY OF THE PA 

SUPREME COURT,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 82 EM 2022

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of October, 2022, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and the Application for an 

Immediate Hearing are DENIED.
#### Greenwich Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Vital Equities, LLC, Appellant, v New Amsterdam Associates et al., Respondents.

[976 NYS2d 449]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, *544J.), entered August 23, 2012, which denied plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint to substitute the name of the subrogor Vital Equities, LLC with the name Vintage Realty LLC, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and Vintage Realty LLC substituted as subrogor. Order, same court and Justice, entered November 8, 2012, which, to the extent appealable, granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion to dismiss the complaint denied. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered April 18, 2013, which denied plaintiff’s motion denominated as one to renew and reargue the November 8, 2012 order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Plaintiff subrogee’s failure to name the correct subrogor “is not fatal” to its claim since the subrogee is the real party in interest, it timely instituted this action after it paid the fire damage claims for the loss incurred at the premises, and there is no prejudice to defendants *(Continental Ins. Co. v Marx Co., 220*AD2d 343, 344 [1995]). Consequently, pursuant to the courts’ power to correct errors (CPLR 2001), plaintiffs motion should have been granted.

From the commencement of this litigation, defendants were provided with documentation identifying both Vintage Realty LLC and Vital Equities LLC as named insureds, including an insurance policy that was specifically amended to show that Vintage Realty was a named insured with respect to the damaged property. Moreover, all relevant facts, including the damage calculation to the subject property, remained unchanged.

Defendants claim that they have the right to “investigate or depose Vintage’s manager or other person’s with knowledge of Vintage’s procedures and responsibilities of maintaining the [damaged] premises,” yet they deposed the building’s superintendent who was admittedly responsible for the building’s maintenance. If defendants now need to question Vintage’s manager, it is difficult to see how this will substantially delay the litigation or cause any prejudice.

Dismissal of the complaint was improper since Greenwich is the true party in interest *(see Continental Ins. Co.,*220 AD2d at 344), and Vintage Realty LLC and Vital Equities, LLC, operating under the same managing member, are related *(see Manti v New York City Tr. Auth.,*146 AD2d 551, 552 [1st Dept 1989]). Concur — Gonzalez, *P.J., Tom,*Ren wick, Freedman and Clark, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                              OF SWISS MEDICA, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss. 1350

Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002  (subsection (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) the undersigned
officer of Swiss  Medica,  Inc. (the  "Company")  does hereby  certify,  to such
officer's knowledge, that:

      (c)   The quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
            2005 of the Company fully complies with the  requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (d)   Information  contained in the Form 10-QSB  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated:  May 13, 2005



/s/ Bruce Fairbairn
-----------------------------
Bruce Fairbairn,
Chief Financial Officer
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2270 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Watershed Rehabilitation Program for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Watershed Rehabilitation 

Program for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, WATER5 SHED REHABILITATION PROGRAM FOR FIS6 CAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, Watershed RehaVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:59 Apr 19, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2270.IH H2270

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2270 IH

1 bilitation Program for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 

2 $1,000,000. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
##### 



---

---

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of October 2003

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc.

---

(Translation of Registrants Name Into English)


Canadian Pacific Tower, Ste 1600, 100 Wellington Street W.,
Toronto, Ontario M5K 1B7, Canada

---

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)


(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)

Form 20-F o
    
    Form 40-F x


(Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this form is also thereby furnishing the information
to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.)

Yes o
    
    No x


(If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-.

This report furnished on Form 6-K shall be incorporated by reference into
each of the Registration Statements under the Securities Act of 1933 of the
registrant:
Form S-8 No.333-13960.



---

---





---



##### 



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC.(Registrant)Date:
    
    October 6, 2003
    
    By
    
    /s/     Thomas C. GriffithsName:
    
    Thomas C. GriffithsTitle:
    
    Assistant Secretary






---



##### 



Exhibits Index

The following is a list of Exhibits included as part of this Report on Form
6-K.

Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibits99.1
    
    Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. Announces Normal Course
Issuer Bid
EXHIBIT 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Roger P. Baresel, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 ofFullnet Communications, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the yearcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the years presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, wasmade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the year in whichthis report was being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the year covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal year thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 

 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 31, 2006/s/ Roger P. Baresel,
[904 NE2d 495, 876 NYS2d 341]

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michelle Rouse, Appellant.

Argued January 7, 2009;

decided February 11, 2009

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Center for Appellate Litigation,*New York City *(Peter Theis*and *Robert S. Dean*of counsel), for appellant.

*Robert T Johnson, District Attorney,*Bronx *(Jennifer Marinaccio, Joseph N. Ferdenzi*and *Stanley R. Kaplan*of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

When a defendant is accused of a felony offense, CPL 30.30 requires the People to be ready for trial within six months of the commencement of the criminal action (CPL 30.30 [1] [a]). CPL 30.30 (4) (f) excludes from the readiness time “the period *729during which the defendant is without counsel through no fault of the court; except when the defendant is proceeding as his own attorney with the permission of the court.”

The People contend that the 30-day time period from October 5, 2004 to November *4,*2004 was properly chargeable to defendant because her codefendant was “without counsel.” We disagree. Substitute counsel was appointed to codefendant at the conclusion of the October 5, 2004 calendar call, and thus codefendant had counsel during the adjournment period requested by the People. Nor does CPL 30.30 (4) (f) require the court to determine whether counsel was sufficiently familiar with the case in order for a defendant to be considered with legal representation for purposes of the statute.

Accordingly, because the People did not satisfy their statutory readiness obligation, the motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 should have been granted.

Acting Chief Judge Ciparick and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2022 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 

Education, School Improvement Program for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of Education, School Improvement Program 

for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

4 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, SCHOOL IM5 PROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 

6 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise availVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:10 Apr 15, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2022.IH H2022

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2022 IH

1 able for Department of Education, School Improvement 

2 Program for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $0. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0 17 5 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NATALIE AMANDA RICH ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 2 , 2020 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 26 2020

08/26/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0175
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

PERIODIC REPORT CERTIFICATION
of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Neil L. Stenbuck, Chief Financial Officer of Prima Energy Corporation (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date herein (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                      

|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Neil L. Stenbuck                                
|                                                    
|Neil L. Stenbuck                                    
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 12, 2003                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Prima Energy Corporation and
will be retained by Prima Energy Corporation and will be furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6251

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SHONTAYNE DWAYNE PITTMAN, a/k/a Light, a/k/a

Wayne,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, District

Judge. (CR-97-5, CA-98-113-4-F)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: May 28, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shontayne Dwayne Pittman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,

Assistant United States Attorney, Cynthia Elaine Tompkins, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Shontayne Dwayne Pittman seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Pittman,

Nos. CR-97-5; CA-98-113-4-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 29, 1999). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED