alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

BULOVA TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bulova Technologies Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Stanton, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ John D. StantonJohn D. StantonPrincipal Financial Officer
May 27, 2010
EXHIBIT
32.1





SECTION
906 SARBANES OXLEY CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SS.1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Aerospace, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Duquette, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


May
      24, 2010
                
                /s/
      David DuquetteName:  David
      DuquetteTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Company and will be retained by Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT FOR THE 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HENRY JOINER, :

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL ACTION 05-0501-CG-B

CITY OF GREENSBORO, et al., :

Defendants. :

JUDGMENT

It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that plaintiff’s complaint be and is hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of November, 2005.

/s/ Callie V. S. Granade 

 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-00501-CG-B Document 10 Filed 11/29/05 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 10.20
 SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc.  SunCom Wireless Management Company, Inc.  1100 Cassatt Road  Berwyn, Pennsylvania 19312
  
  Company SunCom Original Employment Agreement 2003 Letter Agreement Existing Employment Agreement
 Notice
Deadline
 Agreement
 Notice Deadline




---



##### 



All Other Provisions Remain Effective
  SunCom Wireless Holdings, Inc.By:
    /s/ Arnold L. ChavkinArnold L. ChavkinChairman, Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors SunCom Wireless Management Company, Inc.By:
    /s/ Michael E. KalogrisName:
    Michael E. KalogrisTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer and Chairman Executive /s/ David D. ClarkDAVID D. CLARK
EXHIBIT 4(b)

                     AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AUGUST 18, 1997
            CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED NOTE PURCHASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
       NATIONAL TRANSACTION NETWORK, INC. AND INTERNATIONAL VERIFACT INC.

This  Amendment  No.  1  (the  "Amendment")  to the  parties'  August  18,  1997
Convertible  Subordinated Note Purchase  Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and
entered  into between  International  Verifact  Inc.  and  National  Transaction
Network, Inc., as of the 31st day of October, 1997.

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement,  on the terms and conditions
set forth herein;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree that the Agreement is amended as follows:

         1. Section  1.01 of the  Agreement  shall be amended by  replacing  the
reference to "$1,000,000" with "$2,000,000".

         2. Section  1.02 of the  Agreement  shall be amended by  replacing  the
reference to "$1,000,000 with "$2,000,000".

         3.  Exhibit  II of the  Agreement  shall be amended  by  replacing  the
reference  to "One  Million  Dollars  ($1,000,000)"  with "Two  Million  Dollars
($2,000,000)" in the parenthetical immediately following Section F on page 2.

This  Amendment  shall  amend,  modify  and  supersede,  to  the  extent  of any
inconsistency,  the provisions of the Agreement. All provisions of the Agreement
not so modified shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties have duly authorized their  representatives  to
make and sign this First Amendment.

NATIONAL TRANSACTION NETWORK, INC.          INTERNATIONAL VERIFACT INC.


BY:     /s/ Milton A. Alpern                BY:     /s/ L. Barry Thomson
   --------------------------------            ---------------------------------
NAME:    Milton A. Alpern                   NAME:     L. Barry Thomson
     ------------------------------              -------------------------------

TITLE:     Vice President, Finance          TITLE:     President & CEO
      -----------------------------               ------------------------------


                                             BY:     /s/ Peter H. Henry
                                                --------------------------------
                                             NAME:    Peter H. Henry
                                                  ------------------------------
                                             TITLE:     Vice President, Finance
                                                   -----------------------------
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
I, Neil L. Stenbuck, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Prima EnergyCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and wehave:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date ofthis quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data and have identifiedfor the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, includingany corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.
Date: May 10, 2004      By: /s/ Neil L. StenbuckNeil L. Stenbuck,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
25
Exhibit 31.2

                  Certification of Principal Financial Officer

I, Philip J. Rauch, as the Chief Financial Officer of NewMarket Technology, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures   and  presented  in  this  report  my  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting that occurred during the  registrant's  fourth
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: May 21, 2007                                      /s/ Philip J. Rauch

                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Philip J. Rauch
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
I, James Steffey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this 10-Q of Tasa Products Limited;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which the statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d- 15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summerize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  7-20-06


/s/James Steffey
Co-General Partner
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         880,989
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,073,407
<PP&E>                                       4,490,178
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,916,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,744,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          209,324
<BONDS>                                         33,253
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       109,601
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,357,537
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,744,243
<SALES>                                        705,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               758,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  717,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,055
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,055
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 76346]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29942]



[[Page 76346]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Customs Brokers User Fee Payment for 2015

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: General notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides notice to customs brokers that the 
annual fee of $138 that is assessed for each permit held by a broker, 
whether it may be an individual, partnership, association, or 
corporation, is due by February 27, 2015.

DATES: Payment of the 2015 Customs Broker User Fee is due by February 
27, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Barulich, Broker Management 
Branch, Office of International Trade, (202) 863-6099.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Sec.  111.96 of title 19 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR 111.96(c)), U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) assesses an annual user fee of $138 for each customs 
broker district and national permit held by an individual, partnership, 
association, or corporation. CBP regulations provide that this fee is 
payable for each calendar year in each broker district where the broker 
was issued a permit to do business by the due date which is published 
in the Federal Register annually. See 19 CFR 24.22(h) and (i)(9). 
Broker districts are defined in the General Notice entitled, 
``Geographical Boundaries of Customs Brokerage, Cartage and Lighterage 
Districts'' published in the Federal Register on September 27, 1995 (60 
FR 49971).
    As required by 19 CFR 111.96, CBP must provide notice in the 
Federal Register no later than 60 days before such due date on which 
the payment is due for each broker permit. This document notifies 
customs brokers that for calendar year 2015, the due date for payment 
of the user fee is February 27, 2015. It is anticipated that for 
subsequent years, the annual user fee for customs brokers will be due 
on the last business day of February of each year.

    Dated: December 17, 2014.
Brenda B. Smith,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2014-29942 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
2



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	3



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	4



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	5
#### In re Leo STOLLER.

No. 2006-1534.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Oct. 4, 2006.

Leo Stoller, pro se.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, CLEVENGER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

ON MOTION

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office moves to dismiss Leo Stoller’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Stoller opposes and moves for various relief. The parties also respond to this court’s order regarding appellate jurisdiction.

On July 14, 2006, the Director issued a decision sanctioning Stoller for his conduct in filing more than 1,400 extensions of time to oppose trademark applications.* The sanctions imposed included vacating recent approvals of extension requests, a two-year prohibition on filing extension requests, and a requirement that Stoller be represented by an attorney in any extension request. Stoller filed a notice of appeal with this court seeking review of the sanction decision.

The Director argues that we do not have jurisdiction over an appeal of a sanction decision by the Director. We agree. Our jurisdiction to review decisions regarding trademark cases is prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(4)(B). That statute provides, in pertinent part:

> (a) The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit shall have exclusive jurisdiction—

> (4) of an appeal from a decision of—

> (B) the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and *334Trademark Office or the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board with respect to applications for registration of marks and other proceedings as provided in section 21 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. § 1071)....

The referenced section of the Trademark Act provides:

> (1) An applicant for registration of a mark, party to an interference proceedings, party to an opposition proceeding, party to an application to register as a lawful concurrent user, party to a cancellation proceeding, a registrant who has filed an affidavit as provided in section 1058 of this title, or an applicant for renewal, who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Director or Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, may appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit____

15 U.S.C. § 1071(a)(1).

The decision in this case was not issued within a trademark opposition proceeding and does not otherwise fall within the statutory provisions cited above. Thus, this court does not have jurisdiction. As the Director argues, Stoller’s right to direct review, if any, would be pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq.).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The Director’s motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Stoller’s motions are denied.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

*

 The Director delegated the duty to impose sanctions to the General Counsel of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The General Counsel in turn delegated the duty to the Chief Administrative Trademark Judge.