alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 3 (Tuesday, January 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 514-515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30882]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, NIAID Clinical Trial Implementation 
Cooperative Agreement (U01).
    Date: January 22, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Room 3G62A, 5601 Fisher 
Lane, Rockville, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).

[[Page 515]]

    Contact Person: Eleazar Cohen, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 5601 
Fisher Lane, National Institutes of Health, NIAID, Rockville, MD 
20852, 240-669-5881, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#26434517115166484f4e08414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="debbbdefe9a99eb0b7b6f0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

     Dated: December 30, 2014.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-30882 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Olegario ESQUIVEL-HUERTA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41459.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 20, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Olegario Esquivel-Huerta appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for being unlawfully present in the United States after deportation following an aggravated *383felony conviction. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and he contends that his challenge is not barred by the appeal-waiver provision in his plea agreement. The Government seeks enforcement of the waiver provision. We assume, *arguendo*only, that the waiver does not bar the instant appeal.

Esquivel-Huerta’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Esquivel-Huerta contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garzo-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Esquivel-Huerta properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Marek Goreczny, Respondent, v 16 Court Street Owner LLC et al., Appellants.

[973 NYS2d 54]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered October 19, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), and denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim as predicated on Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-1.21 (b) (3) (iv) and (4) (ii), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly granted with respect to plaintiffs Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiffs deposition is uncontradicted insofar as he testified that he was injured when the unsecured ladder upon which he was working moved, causing him to fall. Accordingly, plaintiff made a prima facie showing of liability under the statute *(see Panek v County of Albany,*99 NY2d 452, 458 [2003]). That plaintiff might have chosen to use the wrong type of ladder is immaterial since a worker’s comparative negligence is irrelevant to a Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action *(see Mata v Park Here Garage Corp.,*71 *466AD3d 423 [1st Dept 2010]). Defendants have failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether plaintiffs conduct was the sole proximate cause of the accident *(see Cuentas v Sephora USA, Inc.,*102 AD3d 504 [1st Dept 2013]; *see also Ervin v Consolidated Edison of N.Y.,*93 AD3d 485 [1st Dept 2012]). We are also unpersuaded by defendants’ argument that plaintiffs motion should have been denied because he was the only witness to the accident. The fact that a plaintiff is the only witness to an accident does not bar summary judgment where his or her testimony concerning the manner in which the accident occurred is neither inconsistent with nor contradicted by his own account provided elsewhere or other evidence *(see Klein v City of New York,*222 AD2d 351 [1995], *affd*89 NY2d 833 [1996]).

In light of the grant of plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on liability, we need not reach defendants’ arguments regarding his Labor Law § 241 (6) claims *(see Auriemma v Biltmore Theatre, LLC,*82 AD3d 1, 11-12 [1st Dept 2011]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias and DeGrasse, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, January 29, 2015 10:30 a.m. to January 30, 2015, 04:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 26, 2014, 79FR70537.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the date and start time to be held on January 29, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: December 30, 2014.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2014-30883 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
----

Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In condition with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the "Company")for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George G. Usher, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company. 

By /s/ George G. Usher        George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer June 14, 2007 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

Report of Independent Accountants on Schedule of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

To the Directors of
GlobeNet Communications Group Limited


Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report
dated February 16, 2000 appearing in Item 8 of this Form 10-K also included an
audit of the Schedule of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts included as Exhibit
99.2 to this Form 10-K. In our opinion, the Schedule of Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial
statements.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants


Toronto, Canada
February 16, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 8994]

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 7012 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2014 (Div. K, P.L. 113-76) (SFOAA), E.O. 12163, as amended by E.O. 13346, and Delegation of Authority 245-1, I hereby determine that targeted assistance to Zimbabwe for health, good governance, education, leadership, family planning, agriculture and food security, poverty reduction, livelihoods, and macroeconomic growth including anti-corruption efforts, helping victims of trafficking, and combatting trafficking, as well as the continuation of assistance that would have a significant adverse effect on vulnerable populations if suspended, are in the national interest of the United States and thereby waive, with respect to Zimbabwe, the application of section 7012 of the SFOAA for such assistance.

                    This determination shall be reported to Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: November 24, 2014.

Heather Higginbottom,

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.

[FR Doc. 2014-30962 Filed 1-5-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief financial officer of Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc. (the "Company"), does
hereby certify that [to the undersigned's knowledge]:

      1)    the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form
            10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
            condition and results of operations of the Company.


  /s/ DANIEL T. CARTER
-------------------------
     Daniel Carter
 Chief Financial Officer

December 13, 2002
#### Lourdes C. NAPISA, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 2008-3039.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 12, 2007.

Lourdes C. Napisa, pro se.

*273Before RADER, SCHALL, and, PROST, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*ORDER*

The court treats Lourdes C. Napisa’s correspondence concerning the timeliness of her petition for review as a motion for reconsideration of the court’s previous rejection of her petition for review as untimely.

On June 20, 2007, the Merit Systems Protection Board issued a final decision in *Napisa v. Office of Personnel Mgmt,*No. SF-0831-06-0870-I-1, 106 M.S.P.R. 249 (2007) specifying that its decision was final and that any petition for review must be received by this court within 60 calendar days of receipt of the Board’s decision. The Board’s records reflect that Napisa received the Board’s decision on July 16, 2007. Napisa’s petition seeking review of the Board’s decision was received by the court on September 19, 2007 and rejected because it was five days late. On October 24, 2007, Napisa resubmitted her petition for review with a letter.

A petition for review of a Board decision must be filed within 60 days of receipt of the decision. *See*5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1). The 60-day filing period is “statutory, mandatory, [and] jurisdictional.” *Monzo v. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration,*735 F.2d 1335, 1336 (Fed. Cir.1984). Because Napisa’s petition for review was received on September 19, five days late, this court must dismiss Napisa’s petition as untimely.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is denied. The petition for review is dismissed as untimely.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

(3) All pending motions are moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2054 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2054

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  Treasury, Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled 
   Asset Relief Program, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  Treasury, Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled 
   Asset Relief Program, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF 
              TREASURY, OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR THE 
              TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM, SALARIES AND EXPENSES FOR 
              FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of Treasury, 
Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief 
Program, Salaries and Expenses for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$16,000,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99(f)

CERTIFICATE REGARDING 

PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION'S 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PPL  Electric Utilities Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended  June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  hereof (the "Covered Report"), I, the principal financial officer  of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that:

-  The Covered Report fully complies with the requirements            of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,            as amended; and       -  The information contained in the Covered Report fairly            presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results            of operations of the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate as of    this 13th day of August, 2002.        /s/ James E. Abel                                   James E. Abel  Treasurer  PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
### IN THE CO URT OF CR IMINAL APPEALS OF T ENN ESSEE

AT NASHVILL E

Feb ru ary 22 , 20 12 Ses si on

STATE OF TENNESS EE v . LAVON DOUGLAS ROBERT SON

A p p e a l f r o m t h e C i r c u i t C o u r t f o r L a w r e n c e C o u n t y

N o

. 2 7 9 9 3 J i m T

. H a m i l t o n , J u d g e

N o

. M 2 0 1 1

- 0 0 8 6 8

- C C A

- R 3

- C D

- F i l e d J a n u a r y 7

, 2 0 1 3

J A M E S C U R W O O D W IT T

, J R

. , J

. , c o n c u r r i n g

.

R e s p e c t f u l l y

, I w o u l d n o t e n g a g e i n a n a n a l y s i s o f s t a n d i n g r e l a t i v e t o t h e d i r t

r o a d l e a d i n g f

r o m t h e p u b l i c r o a d t o t h e d e f e n d a n t ’ s b u i l d i n g

.

F i r s t

, t h e d e f

e n d a n t a p p a r e n t l y h e l d s o m e f o r m o f t e n a n c y i n t h e l a n d t h a t

a l l o w e d h i m t o p l a c e a s t r u c t u r e t h e r e a n d t o o c c u p y t h e s a m e

. A s s u c h

, h e i m p l i e d l y

, a t

l e a s t

, h e l d a n e a s e m e n t o f i n g r e s s a n d e g r e s s o v e r t h e d i r t r o a d

. S e e

, e

. g

. , C e l l c o P a r t h e r s h i p

v

. S h e l b y C o u n t y

, 1 7 2 S

. W

. 3 d 5 7 4

, 5 9 1

- 9 2 ( T e n n

. C t

. A p p

. 2 0 0 5 )

.

S e c o n d

, e v e n i f w e a s s u m e t h a t t h e l e g a l f o r m o f t h e d e f

e n d a n t ’ s o c c u p a n c y

w a s m e r e l y a l i c e n s e

, w e s h o u l d n o t c r e a t e

, f o r t h e p u r p o s e s o f a p p l y i n g t h e k n o c k

- a n d

- t a l k

r u l e

, a n i s s u e o f a n a l y z i n g i n g r e s s a l o n g t h e n u a n c e s o f p r o p e r t y l a w

. T h i s i s e s p e c i a l l y t r u e

w h e n

, a s h e r e

, t h e c o n t r a b a n d w a s l o c a t e d a t t h e s t r u c t u r e s i t e a n d n o t a l o n g t h e r o a d

. T h e

d o c t r i n e o f k n o c k a n d t a l k i s p r e d i c a t e d u p o n t h e n o t i o n t h a t

[ a ] s i d e w a l k

, p a t h w a y o r s i m i l a r p a s s a g e w a y l e a d i n g f r o m a

p u b l i c [ w a y ] t o t h e f

r o n t d o o r o f a d w e l l i n g r e p r e s e n t s a n

i m p l i e d i n v i t a t i o n t o t h e g e n e r a l p u b l i c t o u s e t h e w a l k w a y f o r

t h e p u r p o s e o f p u r s u i n g l e g i t i m a t e s o c i a l o r b u s i n e s s i n t e r e s t s

w i t h t h o s e w h o r e s i d e w i t h i n g t h e r e s i d e n c e

.

S t a t e v

. H

a r r i s

, 9 1 9 S

. W

. 2 d 6 1 9

, 6 2 3 ( T e n n

. C r i m

. A p p

. 1 9 9 5 )

. I n a n a l y z i n g k n o c k

- a n d

- t a l k

e l e m e n t s

, w e s h o u l d r e s t r i c t o u r c o n c e r n w i t h t h e r i g h t

- o f

- w a y t o w h e t h e r t h e i m p l i e d

i n v i t a t i o n h a s b e e n r e v o k e d o r c o u n t e r m a n d e d b y t h e u s e o f s i g n s a n d / o r i m p e d i m e n t s

. T od o o t h e r w i s e w o u l d e n s n a r e i n v e s t i g a t i n g l a w e n f o r c e m e n t o f

f i c e r s i n a q u a g m i r e o f p r o p e r t y

l a w d e t e r m i n a t i o n s

.

J A M E S C U R W O O D W I T T

, J R

. , J U D G E

-2-