alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements as of and for the nine months ended October 1, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0000317540
<NAME>                                     COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                                          24,971
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                       813
<INVENTORY>                                     41,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               158,142
<PP&E>                                         700,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                 262,891
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,086,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,425
<BONDS>                                        709,529
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,423
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,224
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,086,563
<SALES>                                        757,682
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               757,682
<CGS>                                          402,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  402,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               299,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,051
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,758
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,758
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30978]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Community Oriented Policing Services: Public Meetings With the 
President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing Discussing 
Recommendations on Topics Relating to Policing

AGENCY: Community Oriented Policing Services, Justice.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 18, 2014, President Barack Obama signed an 
Executive Order titled ``Establishment of the President's Task Force on 
21st Century Policing'' establishing the President's Task Force on 21st 
Century Policing (``Task Force''). The Task Force seeks to identify 
best practices and make recommendations to the President on how 
policing practices can promote effective crime reduction while building 
public trust and examine, among other issues, how to foster strong, 
collaborative relationships between local law enforcement and the 
communities they protect. The Task Force will be holding its first 
public teleconference.
    The meeting agenda is as follows:
    Call to Order
    Review of submitted recommendations
    Discussion

DATES: The teleconference will be held Wednesday, January 21, 2014 from 
5:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time. An opportunity will be provided to 
the public to comment.
    Accommodations requests: To request accommodation of a disability, 
please contact Jessica Drake at 202-457-7771, preferably at least 10 
days prior to the meeting, to give DOJ as much time as possible to 
process your request.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held by teleconference only. The 
teleconference number will be posted in advance of the teleconference 
at the Task Force Web site at www.cops.usdoj.gov/policingtaskforce.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Ronald L. Davis, 202-514-
4229 or [email protected].
    Address all comments concerning this notice to 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Access and Filing Addresses

    The Task Force is interested in receiving written comments 
including proposed recommendations from individuals, groups, advocacy 
organizations, and professional communities. Additional information on 
how to provide your comments will be posted to www.cops.usdoj.gov/policingtaskforce.
    Availability of Meeting Materials: The agenda and other materials 
in support of the teleconference will be available on the Task Force 
Web site at www.cops.usdoj.gov/policingtaskforce in advance of the 
teleconference.

Melanca Clark,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2014-30978 Filed 1-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-AT-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, in his capacity as an officer of MicroIslet, Inc. (the "Company"), that,
to his knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operation of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.



Dated: April 6, 2006

  /s/ James R .Gavin III
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  James R .Gavin III, M.D., Ph.D., Interim President and Chief Executive Officer
  (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated: April 6, 2006

  /s/ Kevin A. Hainley
  -------------------------------------------------
  Kevin A. Hainley, Interim Chief Financial Officer
  (Principal Financial Officer)
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2278 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, Rural Business—Cooperative Service, Rural Business Program Account for fiscal year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, Rural Business—Cooperative 

Service, Rural Business Program Account for fiscal year 

2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2278 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, RURAL 

3 BUSINESS—COOPERATIVE SERVICE, RURAL 

4 BUSINESS PROGRAM ACCOUNT FOR FISCAL 

5 YEAR 2024. 

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

7 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail8 able for US Department of Agriculture, Rural Business— 

9 Cooperative Service, Rural Business Program Account for 

10 fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $65,040,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Mark Sklarz, as Administrator of the Estate of Michael R. Crabtree, Deceased, Respondent-Appellant, v Sara Crabtree et al., Appellants-Respondents, and City of New York, Respondent.

[827 NYS2d 32]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mary Ann Brigantti-Hughes, J.), entered April 13, 2006, *261which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to liability as against the Crabtree defendants, and granted the motion of defendant City of New York insofar as it sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it, unanimously modified, on the law, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as against the Crabtree defendants denied, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered October 26, 2005, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs motion to quash nonparty subpoenas and for a protective order, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs decedent was killed in an automobile accident while riding in a vehicle operated by his wife, defendant Sara Crabtree. The contradictory statements of Mrs. Crabtree, the sole surviving witness to the accident, respecting the accident’s attendant circumstances and cause do no more than raise triable issues not amenable to resolution on a summary judgment motion *(see Carlos v Rochester Gen. Hosp.,*163 AD2d 894 [1990]). Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment as to liability as against the Crabtree defendants should have been denied. On the other hand, the City’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Although plaintiff contends that faulty lighting or signage contributed to the accident, there was no evidence to that effect *(see Cappolla v City of New York,*302 AD2d 547, 549-550 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 511 [2003]; *Michetti v City of New York,*184 AD2d 263 [1992]).

Post-note of issue discovery was properly denied defendant Crabtree Motors in light of the absence of unusual or unanticipated circumstances warranting such relief *(see*22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; *Bojkovic v JLT Assoc.,*278 AD2d 46 [2000]; *Karr v Brant Lake Camp,*265 AD2d 184 [1999]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 78948]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30571]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 23, 2014.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, on or after the date of 
publication of this notice.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before January 30, 2015 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other 
aspect of the information collection, including suggestions for 
reducing the burden, to (1) Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for 
Treasury, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 
20503, or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#216e6873607e7254434c485252484e4f616e6c630f646e710f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="551a1c07140a062037383c26263c3a3b151a18177b101a057b323a23">[email protected]</span></a> and (2) Treasury PRA 
Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Suite 8141, Washington, 
DC 20220, or email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ce9e9c8f8ebabcabafbdbbbcb7e0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="207072616054524541535552590e474f56">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submission(s) may be 
obtained by emailing <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e3b3b1a2a3979186829096919acd848c95"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96c6c4d7d6e2e4f3f7e5e3e4efb8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>, calling (202) 622-1295, or 
viewing the entire information collection request at www.reginfo.gov.

Departmental Offices

    OMB Number: 1505-0228.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Small Business Lending Fund (SBLF) Supplemental Reports.
    Form: TD F 102.3A, TD F 102.4.
    Abstract: Once accepted into the SBLF program, the participating 
bank is required to submit a Supplemental Report each quarter. The 
Supplemental Report is used to determine the institution's small 
business lending baseline and allows Treasury to assess the change in 
the small business lending for the previous quarter.
    Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 4,032.

Brenda Simms,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-30571 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Abatement Order filed November 10, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00482

- CV

____________ KEN BIGHAM AND TRACY HOLLISTER , Appellant s

V.

SOUTHEAST TEXAS ENVI RONMENTAL LLC, ET AL , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007

- 55020



### ABATEMENT ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due July 13, 2016

. See Tex. R. App. P.
35.1. The record was not filed. On July 22, 2016 , this court ordered the court reporter , Michelle Tucker
, to file the record within 30 days. When the court reporter failed to file the record as ordered, on September 2, 2016 this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 30 days, and instructed the court reporter that if therecord was not filed, the court would order the trial court to conduct a hearing to

determine the reason for failure to file the record.

The record has not been filed with th e court. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely as ordered, we issue the following order. We direct the judge of the 80th District Court to conduct a hearing at which
Michelle Tucker , appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall participate (a) to determine the reason for failure to file the record; (b) to establish a date certain when
the reporter’s record will be filed, and (c) to make findings as to whether Tucker should be held in contempt of court for failing to file the reporter’s record timely as
ordered. We order the court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record,
of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record sh all be filed with the clerk of this court by December 12, 2016

. The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s
active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and re commendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the record prior to the date set f

or the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM
----

----

|   | (1) | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |                                                            |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  May      15, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Thomas      J. Meaney                                  |   |
|                               |   | Thomas      J. MeaneyPresident      and Chief Financial Officer |   |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sharmalee Gales, Appellant.

[870 NYS2d 911]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J), entered on or about September 19, 2006, and order, same court and Justice, entered March 9, 2007, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Gonzalez, Sweeny, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2355 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2355

   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Foreign 
            Military Financing Program for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Foreign 
            Military Financing Program for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR FOREIGN MILITARY 
              FINANCING PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Foreign Military 
Financing Program for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $5,962,241,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Antonio DIMAS-SALGADO, also known as Vicente Dimas, also known as Vicente Dimas Salgado, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-20748

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 25, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Antonio Dimas-Salgado appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry into the United States. He argues that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Appren-di v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almen-darez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Dimas-Salgado contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *AlmendarezTorres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Dimas-Salgado properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Because Dimas-Salgado has shown no error in the judgment of the district court, that judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6649
DION WYVIS COLEMAN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-96-458-2) Submitted: May 12, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dion Wyvis Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Coleman v. Angelone , No. CA-96-458-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED