alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         392,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                    34,747
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               449,101
<PP&E>                                       4,832,470
<DEPRECIATION>                                 515,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,330,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,273,070
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,145,487)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,330,094
<SALES>                                        160,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,824
<CGS>                                          133,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  133,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               341,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (313,739)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (313,739)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (313,739)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 2 (Monday, January 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 220-221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ15-6-000]


City of Pasadena, California; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 17, 2014, City of Pasadena, California 
submits tariff filing per 35.28(e): City of Pasadena 2015 Transmission 
Revenue Balancing Account Adjustment Update to be effective 1/1/2015.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94d2d1c6d7dbfaf8fdfaf1c7e1e4e4fbe6e0d4f2f1e6f7baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="54121106171b3a383d3a31072124243b262014323126377a333b22">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 7, 2015.


[[Page 221]]


    Dated: December 24, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30794 Filed 1-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



(FAIRMONT LOGO)

For immediate release
    
    Exhibit No. 99.1


FAIRMONT HOTELS & RESORTS INC. ANNOUNCES
NORMAL COURSE ISSUER BID

TORONTO, October 6, 2003 Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc. (FHR) (TSX/NYSE:
FHR) announced today that it has received regulatory approval for a normal
course issuer bid effective October 8, 2003. FHR has been authorized to
purchase up to 3,900,000 of its common shares, or 5% of its estimated 79
million currently outstanding common shares, in the twelve-month period
following the bids effective date. FHR expects to purchase its common shares,
at certain times over the course of the year when it believes that the share
price is attractive and that the purchase of common shares would be an
appropriate use of corporate funds.

Purchases under the bid may commence on October 8, 2003 and will terminate on
October 7, 2004, or on such earlier date as FHR may complete its purchases
pursuant to the notice of intention to make a normal course issuer bid filed
with the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX). Purchases will be made on the open
market by FHR through the facilities of the TSX or the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) in accordance with the rules and policies of these exchanges. The
price that FHR will pay for any such shares will be the market price of such
shares on the TSX or the NYSE at the time of acquisition. Common shares
purchased under the bid will be cancelled.

FHR purchased 747,100 of its common shares at an average price of C$31.84
within the past 12 months under its previous normal course issuer bid, which
expired on October 2, 2003.

About Fairmont Hotels & Resorts Inc.

FHR is one of North Americas leading owner/operators of luxury hotels and
resorts. FHRs managed portfolio consists of 81 luxury and first-class
properties with more than 32,000 guestrooms in Canada, the United States,
Mexico, Bermuda, Barbados and the United Arab Emirates. It holds an 83.5%
controlling interest in Fairmont Hotels & Resorts (Fairmont), North Americas
largest luxury hotel management company. Fairmont manages 42 distinctive city
center and resort hotels such as The Fairmont San Francisco, The Fairmont Banff
Springs, Fairmont Le Château Frontenac and The Fairmont Scottsdale Princess.
FHR also holds a 100% interest in Delta Hotels, Canadas largest first-class
hotel management company, which manages and franchises a portfolio of 38 city
center and resort properties in Canada. In addition to hotel management, FHR
holds real estate interests in 24 properties, two large undeveloped land blocks
and an approximate 35% investment interest in Legacy Hotels Real Estate
Investment Trust, which owns 24 properties.

-30-

Contact:
    
    Emma Thompson
Executive Director Investor Relations
Tel: 416.874.2485
Email: investor@fairmont.com
Website: www.fairmont.com
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Eleanor L. Thomas, President (chief executive officer) of
the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the 'Managing
Owner'), of World Monitor Trust II--Series D ('Series D'), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) Series D's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
       2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
       hereof (the 'Annual Report'), fully complies with the requirements of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series D.

/s/ Eleanor L. Thomas
------------------------------------------------------
Eleanor L. Thomas
President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner
March 18, 2003




   The undersigned, Steven Weinreb, Chief Financial Officer of the managing
owner, the Managing Owner, of Series D, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) Series D's Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series D.

/s/ Steven Weinreb
------------------------------------------------------
Steven Weinreb
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner
March 18, 2003
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, David Morash, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Axesstel, Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 3, 2005
#### Born to Build LLC, Respondent, v 1141 Realty LLC, Appellant, et al., Respondents.

[963 NYS2d 29]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lucy Billings, J.), entered February 9, 2012, which, to the extent appealed from, denied respondent 1141 Realty LLC’s cross motion to dismiss Born to Build’s petition based on the documentary evidence, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the cross motion granted, and the petition dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

*426Petitioner failed to raise an issue of fact as to the authenticity of the operating agreement, and the motion to dismiss should have been granted. The affidavits at issue here do little more than assert that the affiants were told by Ibrahim Saleh, a former manager of 1141 Realty, that he was actually an owner, and the petition makes assertions premised only upon information and belief. Both the affidavits and the assertions are contradicted by the operating agreement *(Gould v McBride,*36 AD2d 706, 706-707 [1st Dept 1971], *affd*29 NY2d 768 [1971] [“Where, as here, the cause of action is based on documentary evidence, the authenticity of which is not disputed, a general denial, without more, will not suffice to raise an issue of fact”]; *see also First Interstate Credit Alliance v Sokol,*179 AD2d 583, 584 [1st Dept 1992] [where there were “affidavits . . . from a corporate officer who averred to the genuineness and authenticity of the documentary evidence^) (t)he unsubstantiated allegations and assertions raised by defendants were insufficient to withstand the motion”]).

Moreover here, petitioner itself submitted evidence that there were no documents in Ibrahim’s name because he used other people’s names to conceal his holdings. This being an action for dissolution, and not one for fraud, these assertions are insufficient to raise questions of fact as to the authenticity of the operating agreement.

We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur—Friedman, J.P, Sweeny, Renwick, Richter and Román, JJ.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2254 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 

of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Office of 

the Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs for fiscal 

year 2024. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. BIGGS (for himself, Mr. ROSENDALE, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. GOOD of Virginia, 

Mr. ROY, and Mr. CRANE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US 

Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food 

and Agriculture, Office of the Under Secretary for Marketing and Regulatory Programs for fiscal year 2024. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2254 IH

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR 

2 US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, NA3 TIONAL INSTITUTE OF FOOD AND AGRI4 CULTURE, OFFICE OF THE UNDER SEC5 RETARY FOR MARKETING AND REGULATORY 

6 PROGRAMS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, 

8 amounts authorized to be appropriated or otherwise avail9 able for US Department of Agriculture, National Institute 

10 of Food and Agriculture, Office of the Under Secretary 

11 for Marketing and Regulatory Programs for fiscal year 

12 2024 may not exceed $901,000. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Order filed February 8, 2019. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00953-CV

____________

IN RE STEFANI BAMBACE, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-27762

EN BANC ORDER

On October 31, 2018, relator Stefani Bambace filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus asking this court to compel the Honorable Wesley Ward, the thenpresiding judge of the 234th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his September 

17, 2018 order compelling arbitration of the action below (the “Arbitration Order”).
On November 13, 2018, a panel of this court issued an opinion denying 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See In re Bambace, No. 14-18-00953-CV, 

2018 WL 5914863, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 13, 2018, orig. 

proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.). The panel consisted of Justices Donovan, 

Wise, and Jewell. 

Judge Ward ceased to hold office on the trial court on January 1, 2019. The 

Honorable Lauren Reeder is the successor judge of the 234th District Court. The 

Honorable John Donovan ceased to hold office on this court on January 1, 2019.

This court granted relator’s motions to extend time to file motions for 

rehearing and en banc reconsideration, which relator timely filed on January 10, 

2019. The panel DENIED the motion for rehearing, but the motion for en banc 

reconsideration remains pending. Accordingly, this mandamus proceeding is still 

pending. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2 provides if a mandamus proceeding 

is pending when the trial judge that is the subject of the proceeding ceases to hold 

office, the court of appeals must abate the mandamus proceeding to allow the 

successor judge to reconsider the original judge’s decision. See Tex. R. App. P. 

7.2(b). We therefore ABATE this case until Judge Lauren Reeder has an opportunity 

to reconsider the Arbitration Order and relator has provided this court with a record 

showing the evidence and argument presented to Judge Reeder and her ruling on 

reconsideration of the Arbitration Order, or relator moves to dismiss relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

PER CURIAM1

 1 The en banc court consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher, Wise, Jewell, Bourliot, 

Zimmerer, Spain, Hassan, and Poissant. Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher, Wise, and 

Jewell dissent to the en banc court’s order of abatement and would not abate the case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CANISCO RESOURCES, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,191,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,449,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                   212,896
<INVENTORY>                                    457,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,082,362
<PP&E>                                       9,662,130
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,580,999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,389,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,982,522
<BONDS>                                     19,583,849
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,972
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,816,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,389,405
<SALES>                                     54,050,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,050,354
<CGS>                                       43,673,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               43,673,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,578,180
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,403,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,394,483
<INCOME-TAX>                                   557,794
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            836,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   836,689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of E-centives, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to theundersigned’s knowledge: 

 

(a) the Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated this 25th day of March, 2005