alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.44

AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This AMENDMENT (this Amendment) to the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as of August 22, 2001, as amended by amendments dated
February 19, 2007 and December 31, 2008 (the Current Agreement) is between PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Tennessee corporation (the Company), and MICHAEL F. KILLEA (the Executive).

The Company and the Executive are entering into this Amendment to formally memorialize an increase in the Executives base salary,
effective as of September 1, 2008. Accordingly, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged by
the Company and the Executive, the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows:

1. Amendment to Section 4(a) of the Current Agreement.
Section 4(a) of the Current Agreement is amended as follows:

a. The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Current Agreement is
amended and restated in its entirety as follows, effective as of September 1, 2008:

During the Employment Period, the Company
(or any of its Affiliates) shall pay the Executive a minimum annual base salary (the Base Salary) of $360,000, payable in such installments (but not less often than monthly) as is generally the policy of the Company with respect
to the payment of regular compensation to its executive officers.

2. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment,
the Current Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms and provisions.

3. Counterparts and
Electronic Execution. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, and each such counterpart shall be an original instrument, but all such counterparts taken together shall be considered one and the same agreement, effective when
one or more counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to the other parties, it being understood that all parties need not sign the same counterpart. Any signed counterpart delivered by facsimile, email or similar electronic means
shall be deemed for all purposes to constitute such partys good and valid execution and delivery of this Amendment.



1 of 2



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to the Employment Agreement to be executed by their duly
authorized representatives as of the date first listed above.



|                          |  |                                
|------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|PACER INTERNATIONAL, INC.
|                          | 
|By:                       |  | /s/ Karen Rice                 
|                          |  | Karen Rice                     
|Title:                    |  | Vice President, Human Resources



|                     
|---------------------
|                     
|/s/ Michael F. Killea
|Michael F. Killea    



2 of 2
Exhibit 32b

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code

I, Morton A. Plawner, Chief Financial Officer of PSE&G
Transition Funding LLC, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual
Report of PSE&G Transition Funding LLC on Form 10-K for the year ended December
 31, 2006 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
 contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
 the financial  condition and results of operations of PSE&G Transition Funding
 LLC.

| | /s/ MORTON A. PLAWNER 
         Morton A. Plawner
         Chief Financial Officer
       March 14, 2007
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **STATMON
        TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **19
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I,
        Geoffrey Talbot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/
        Geoffrey P. Talbot
 **Geoffrey
        P. Talbot**
 ****  **Chief Executive Officer**
 **November
        14, 2007**
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
        authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
        in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
        by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will
        be
        retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
        Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  30
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Melvin Kelley, Appellant.

[869 NYS2d 783]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Roger S. Hayes, J.), rendered August 3, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sexual act in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), aggravated sexual abuse in the second degree (two counts), and attempted assault in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Danielson,*9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility and identification. Defendant’s claims that the victim fabricated the incident or confused defendant with someone else are unpersuasive. We note that there was eyewitness testimony corroborating the fact that a sexual assault occurred, and conduct by defendant evincing a consciousness of guilt.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-91-00374-CV

Rickey D. Wright and Rick’s Floor Store, Inc., Appellants

v.

John C. (Jack) Rose, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 146TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 130,430-B, HONORABLE RICK MORRIS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This Court abated this appeal in 1993 after receiving notice of a related bankruptcy.

See Tex. R. App. P. 8.1, 8.2. After the abatement, no party to this appeal sought reinstatement. See

Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. We have now been informed that the bankruptcy case related to this appeal is

closed and, therefore, have reinstated the appeal.

On October 25, 2016, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to the parties that this

appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless a status report was filed on or before

November 4, 2016, that provided reason to retain this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). To date,

no response has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Field, and Bourland

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: April 7, 2017

2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George G. Usher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

George G. Usher,

Chief Executive Officer

September 21, 2005

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 05, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 05, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0283. ANTONIO ROBLES CASTILLO v. JESSICA CARDENAS LOPEZ.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

21CVE1954
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-Q FOR PRIMA ENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000318107
<NAME> PRIMA ENERGY CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       9,801,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,898,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,369,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (43,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    866,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,010,000
<PP&E>                                      75,372,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (30,833,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              62,069,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,360,000
<BONDS>                                        240,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        87,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,291,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                62,069,000
<SALES>                                      5,799,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,178,000
<CGS>                                        3,764,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,628,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,029,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,890,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,139,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,139,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
        

</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00301-CR

EX PARTE Erica HAYWOOD

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 11, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED

On April 25, 2011, relator Erica Haywood filed an original petition for writ of habeas 

corpus in this court. However, as an intermediate court of appeals this court is not authorized to 

grant the relief requested. Pursuant to section 22.221(d) of the Texas Government Code, in civil 

matters, a court of appeals “may issue a writ of habeas corpus when it appears that the restraint 

of liberty is by virtue of an order, process, or commitment issued by a court or judge because of 

the violation of an order, judgment, or decree previously made, rendered, or entered by the court 

or judge in a civil case.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). However, in 

criminal matters, a court of appeals has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction. Watson v. State, 

96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. NM102293, in the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the 

Honorable Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardner presiding.
04-11-00301-CR

-2-

835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.). In criminal matters, the courts authorized to issue 

writs of habeas corpus are the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the 

county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (West 2005). Therefore, we dismiss 

this petition for writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit
31(f)





CERTIFICATIONI,
      PAUL A. FARR, certify that:1.
    I
      havereviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofPPL
      Electric Utilities Corporation (the "registrant");2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material factnecessaryto
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report;3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in allmaterialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    Theregistrant'sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
  have:a.
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b.
    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc.
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual
      report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    Theregistrant'sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
      evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a.
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.Date:
      November 3, 2005
    /s/  Paul
      A.
      FarrPaul
      A. Farr
      Senior
      Vice President-Financial and Controller
      PPL
      Electric Utilities
Corporation
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DEBRA JACKSON, et al., )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-00023-KD-N

)

CITY OF SELMA, ALABAMA, et al., )

Defendants. )

ORDER

This action is before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ “Motion to Substitute and Supplemental 

Response to Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. 33). The Plaintiffs represent that, pursuant to Ala. Code 

§ 43-2-172,1 Harris Huffman, Jr., Sheriff of Dallas County, Alabama, has been appointed as 

administrator of the Estate of Dwight Moorer. The Plaintiffs have attached an order (Doc. 

33-1) and letters of administration (Doc. 33-2) issued by the Probate Court of Dallas County, 

Alabama, indicating such an appointment has been made. The Plaintiffs now move the Court 

“to substitute Dallas County Sheriff Harris Huffman, Jr. as the administrator and personal 

representative of the Estate of Dwight Moorer” in place of Catherine Moorer and Denise 

Grayson. (Doc. 33 at 2).

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25 allows for substitution of parties in the event 1) “a 

party dies and the claim is not extinguished,” Rule 25(a)(1); 2) “a party becomes incompetent,” 

Rule 25(b); 3) “an interest is transferred,” Rule 25(c); or 4) “a public officer who is a party in an 

official capacity dies, resigns, or otherwise ceases to hold office while the action is pending[,]” 

Rule 25(d). The Plaintiffs’ motion implicates none of these situations. Accordingly, the 

Plaintiffs’ motion to substitute (Doc. 33) is DENIED.

However, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) (except as provided in 

 1 “In case there is no general administrator and no other fit person will administer, the court may commit 

administration to the sheriff of the county; when so committed, the administration attaches to the office, 

and the official oath and bond of such office are the security for his faithful administration.” § 43-2-172.

Case 2:14-cv-00023-KD-N Document 34 Filed 06/19/14 Page 1 of 2
2

Rule 15(a)(1), “a party may amend its pleading only with the opposing party's written consent or 

the court's leave...”), the Plaintiffs are hereby granted leave to file an amended complaint only

for the purpose of naming Sheriff Huffman as the estate’s representative in place of Catherine 

Moorer and Denise Grayson. Any further amendment must be sought in accordance with Rule 

15(a)(2).2

DONE and ORDERED this the 19th day of June 2014.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 2 As more than 21 days have elapsed since each defendant served either an answer (Doc. 5) or a motion 

to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) (Doc. 13), the time for the Plaintiffs to amend 

their complaint once as a matter of course has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B).

Case 2:14-cv-00023-KD-N Document 34 Filed 06/19/14 Page 2 of 2
Order entered April 28 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 00068

- CV

STEVEN SPIRITAS, IND IVIDUALLY AND AS TRU STEE OF

THE SPIRITAS SF 1999 TRUST, ET AL.

, Appellant s

V.

SUSAN DAVIDOFF, INDI VIDUALLY AND AS TRUS TEE OF

THE SPIRITAS SC 1999 TRUST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 08326



### O RDER

We GRANT appellants’ April 22, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to

file a reply brief. Appellants shall file their reply brief on or before May 9, 2014.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       6,106,029
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  313,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,504,662
<PP&E>                                         203,037
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,216,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,177,019
<BONDS>                                      4,120,054
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,855
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,915,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,216,239
<SALES>                                      3,950,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,950,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,482,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               241,091
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,508,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                   715,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            793,141
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   793,141
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>