alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidated Capital Properties III;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of ConCap Equities, Inc., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2209 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2209

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Gifts, Donations, and Bequests for Forest and Rangeland 
                     Research for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for US Department 
of Agriculture, Gifts, Donations, and Bequests for Forest and Rangeland 
                     Research for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR US DEPARTMENT OF 
              AGRICULTURE, GIFTS, DONATIONS, AND BEQUESTS FOR FOREST 
              AND RANGELAND RESEARCH FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for US Department of 
Agriculture, Gifts, Donations, and Bequests for Forest and Rangeland 
Research for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed $45,000.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner,
Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust II  Series D (Series D), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Ds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series D.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                            
|Maureen D. Howley                                
|Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
|March 31, 2006
Ex10.8.2new2014-12-12-PBFXDesignationofOtherGuaranteedRevolvingCreditOblig






DESIGNATION OF OTHER GUARANTEED  REVOLVING  CREDIT OBLIGATIONS


Date: December 12, 2014






To:     Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Revolving Agent
550 South Tryon Street, 6th Floor
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202
Attention: Andrew Ostrov
Email: andrew.ostrov@wellsfargo.com






Ladies and Gentlemen:


Reference is made to that certain Amended and Restated Guaranty of Collection, dated as of September 30,2014  (as amended, amended and restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time, the "Agreement;" the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among PBF Energy Company LLC, a Delaware limited liability company  (the  "Parent  Guarantor"),  to  and  in  favor  of  (i) Wells  Fargo  Bank,  National Association, as administrative agent ("Term Loan Agent") under that certain Term Loan and Security Agreement dated May 14, 2014, as amended,  restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, among PBF Logistics LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the "Borrower"), Term Loan Agent and the lenders party thereto from time to time, and (ii) Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent (the "Revolving Agent"), swingline lender and LIC issuer under that certain Revolving Credit Agreement dated May 14, 2014, as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, among the Borrower, the Revolving Agent and the lenders party thereto from time to time.


Pursuant to the definition of "Other Guaranteed Revolving Credit Obligations" in the Agreement, Parent Guarantor hereby designates outstanding Revolving Credit Obligations in the principal amount of $210,000,000 as "Other Guaranteed Revolving Credit Obligations" in accordance with and subject to the terms (including, without limitation, termination provisions) of the Agreement.






[Continue on to the next page]




























Designation of Other Guaranteed Revolving Credit Obligation











PBF ENERGY COMPANY LLC,
as Parent Guarantor




By: /s/ John E. Luke
Name:    John E. Luke
Title:    Treasurer










































































































Signature Page to Designation of Other Guaranteed  Revolving Credit Obligations
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 77472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EF15-5-000]


Southwestern Power Administration; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on December 8, 2014, the Southwestern Power 
Administration submitted a tariff filing per 300.10: 2014 RDW-14 Rate 
Schedule Filing 1 to be effective 1/1/2015, proposing a revised power 
rate that will provide revenues sufficient to satisfy cost recovery 
criteria.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1e7e4f3e2eecfcdc8cfc4f2d4d1d1ced3d5e1c7c4d3c28fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a0c0f180905242623242f193f3a3a25383e0a2c2f3829642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 7, 2015.

    Dated: December 17, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30046 Filed 12-23-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
99.8




NOMINATING
AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE




COMMITTEE
CHARTER OF




JIANGBO
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.




The Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
of Jiangbo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) shall consist of a minimum of
two (2) directors, each of which shall meet the independence requirements and
standards established from time to time by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) and any such securities exchange on which the Company’s
securities are listed or quoted for trading.  The Nominating Committee
shall meet at least once a year.




The
purpose of the Nominating Committee shall be to assist the Board in identifying
qualified individuals to become board members, in determining the composition of
the Board and in monitoring a process established to assess Board
effectiveness.




In furtherance of this purpose, the
Nominating Committee shall have the following authority and
responsibilities:




1.
            Make
      recommendations to the Board regarding the size and composition of the
      Board, establish procedures for the nomination process and screen and
      recommend candidates for election to the
Board.




2.
            To
      review with the Board from time to time the appropriate skills and
      characteristics required of Board
members.




3.
            To
      establish and administer a periodic assessment procedure relating to the
      performance of the Board as a whole and its individual
      members.




4.
            Make
      recommendations to the Board regarding corporate governance matters and
      practices, including formulating and periodically reviewing corporate
      governance guidelines to be adopted by the
  Board.




The Nominating Committee shall have the
authority to delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees as it may
deem appropriate in its sole discretion.




The Nominating Committee shall have the
authority to retain any search firm engaged to assist in identifying director
candidates, and to retain outside counsel and any other advisors as it may deem
appropriate in its sole discretion. The Nominating Committee shall have sole
authority to approve related fees and retention terms.




The Nominating Committee shall report
its actions and recommendations to the Board after each committee
meeting.




Adopted: February 27,
2010
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sycamore Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frances M. Jewels, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.





/s/    FRANCES M.
JEWELSFrances M. Jewels Chief Financial Officer, Vice President, Finance and Administration, Secretary and Treasurer




October 21, 2003
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2379 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

616 East Main Street in St. Charles, Illinois, as the ‘‘Veterans of 

the Vietnam War Memorial Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2023 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Accountability 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 616 East Main Street in St. Charles, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Veterans of the Vietnam War Memorial Post 

Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VETERANS OF THE VIETNAM WAR MEMORIAL 

4 POST OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 616 East Main Street in St. 

7 Charles, Illinois, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Veterans of the Vietnam War Memorial Post Office’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 2379 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Veterans of the Viet5 nam War Memorial Post Office’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
#### Meyerson Capital V. LLC, Appellant, v Michael Anderson, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[973 NYS2d 113]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fernando Tapia, J.), entered April 13, 2012, which granted in part defendant Michael Anderson’s (defendant) motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.

As a preliminary matter, defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment lacks a basis in law. The judgment was not entered on default, and defendant did not establish any other ground for the motion (see CPLR 5015 [a]; see *Alliance Prop. Mgt. & Dev. v Andrews Ave.*Equities, 133 AD2d 30, 33 [1st Dept 1987], *affd*70 NY2d 831 [1987]). The motion should have been denied for this reason alone.

Defendant’s sole stated defense was plaintiffs lack of standing. However, defendant, who appeared by counsel in the foreclosure action, never raised this argument, although it is based on documents submitted in that action *(see CitiMortgage, Inc. v Rosenthal,*88 AD3d 759, 760-761 [2d Dept 2011]). In any event, plaintiffs showing of standing was adequate. The record reflects the assignment of the mortgage and the note, actual delivery of *the note to*plaintiff, and recordation of the assignment *(see U.S. Bank, N.A. v Collymore,*68 AD3d 752, 754 [2d Dept 2009]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Andrias and DeGrasse, JJ.
#### Jose Abel TORRES-RUIZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 06-72228.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 11, 2006.*

Filed Oct. 17, 2006.

Kevin A. Bove, Esq., Escondido, CA, for Petitioner.

CAS-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Diego, CA, Ronald E. Le-Fevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Genevieve Holm, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Before: TASHIMA, W. FLETCHER, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner’s motion to accept his late-filed supplemental motion for stay of removal and voluntary departure is granted.

Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

GREGORY SCOTT SOURBEER,

Petitioner

v.

DENNIS E. REINAKER,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 143 MM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus 

is DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (providing that 

hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the 

filing to counsel of record.
#### Clifford Fratello, Appellant, v Dorothy Fratello, Respondent.

[966 NYS2d 517]

*668In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Bivona, J.), dated January 9, 2012, as denied his motion for a downward modification of his pendente lite child support obligation and awarded the defendant an attorney’s fee in the principal sum of $35,529.91.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for a downward modification of his pendente lite child support obligation. “ Tendente lite awards should reflect an accommodation between the reasonable needs of the moving spouse and the financial ability of the other spouse with due regard for the parties’ preseparation standard of living’ ” *(Bogannam v Bogannam,*20 AD3d 442, 442 [2005], quoting *Campanaro v Campanaro,*292 AD2d 330, 330 [2002]). Modifications of pendente lite awards should rarely be made, and then only under exigent circumstances, such as where a party is unable to meet his or her own needs, or where the interests of justice otherwise require relief (see *Truglia v Truglia,*91 AD3d 852 [2012]; *Palmeri v Palmeri,*87 AD3d 572, 573 [2011]; *Najac v Najac,*12 AD3d 579 [2004]). Any perceived inequities in pendente lite awards are best addressed via a speedy trial, at which the parties’ economic circumstances may thoroughly be explored (see *Truglia v Truglia,*91 AD3d at 852; *Palmeri v Palmeri,*87 AD3d at 573; *Najac v Najac,*12 AD3d 579 [2004]). Here, the plaintiff has not demonstrated any exigent circumstances that would warrant a modification of the pendente lite child support award.

Moreover, the Supreme Court properly directed the plaintiff to pay an attorney’s fee to the defendant *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; *Prichep v Prichep,*52 AD3d 61 [2008]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 41]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9018-7]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-
7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 12/22/2014 through 12/24/2014
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20140380, Draft EIS, USACE, CA, Sacramento River Bank 
Protection Project, Comment Period Ends: 02/27/2015, Contact: Brian 
Mulvey 916-557-7660.
EIS No. 20140381, Draft Supplement, BLM, WA, Vantage to Pomona Heights 
230 kV Transmission Line Project, Comment Period Ends: 02/17/2015, 
Contact: Roberta Estes 541-416-6728.
EIS No. 20140382, Final EIS, USACE, LA, West Shore Lake Pontchartrain 
Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction, Review Period Ends: 02/02/
2015, Contact: Sandra Stiles 504-862-1583.
EIS No. 20140383, Draft EIS, NRC, IL, Plant-Specific Supplement 54, 
License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Byron Station, Units 1 and 
2, Comment Period Ends: 02/20/2015, Contact: Lois M. James 301-415-
3306.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20140326, Draft EIS, FHWA, WI, I-94 East-West Corridor, Comment 
Period Ends: 01/27/2015, Contact: George Poirier 608-829-7500 Revision 
to FR Notice Published 11/14/2014; Extending Comment Period from 01/13/
2015 to 01/27/2015.
EIS No. 20140328, Draft Supplement, USFS, NM, North Fork Wells of Eagle 
Creek, Comment Period Ends: 01/28/2015, Contact: David M. Warnack 575-
257-4095.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 12/12/2014; Extending Comment 
Period from 01/13/2015 to 01/28/2015.

    Dated: December 29, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-30782 Filed 12-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P