alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 4 (Wednesday, January 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00003]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Li Ling Hamady, ACA Permit Officer, 
Division of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230. Or by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#317072704154435c584542715f42571f565e47"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e2a3a1a39287908f8b9691a28c9184cc858d94">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 19, 2014 the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. The permit was issued on December 30, 2014 to:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Joseph A. Covi........................  Permit No. 2015-015.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Nadene G. Kennedy,
Polar Coordination Specialist, Division of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-00003 Filed 1-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 244 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the exclusion 

of Medicare coverage for hearing aids and examinations therefor, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 10, 2023 

Mrs. DINGELL (for herself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. DOGGETT, Ms. KAPTUR, 

Mr. KILMER, Ms. MATSUI, and Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove 

the exclusion of Medicare coverage for hearing aids and 

examinations therefor, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Hearing Aid 

5 Coverage Act of 2023’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 244 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING MEDICARE EXCLUSION OF COVERAGE 

2 OF HEARING AIDS AND EXAMINATIONS 

3 THEREFOR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1862(a)(7) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)(7)) is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘hearing aids or examinations therefor,’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall apply to items and services furnished on 

9 or after January 1, 2024. 

10 SEC. 3. GAO STUDY AND REPORT ON HEARING AID PRO11 GRAMS. 

12 (a) STUDY.—The Comptroller General of the United 

13 States shall conduct a study of programs, including Fed14 eral programs and health insurance coverage, that provide 

15 assistance for hearing aids and related examinations for 

16 individuals with hearing loss. Such study shall include an 

17 examination of the number of individuals in the United 

18 States with hearing loss who need hearing aids, their cov19 erage under such programs, and the effectiveness of such 

20 programs in meeting such need. Such study may also ad21 dress programs that are designed to reduce or mitigate 

22 the incidence of hearing loss. 

23 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

24 date specified in section 2(b), the Comptroller General 

25 shall submit a report to Congress on the study conducted 

26 under subsection (a). Such report shall include such recVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:36 Jan 20, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H244.IH H244

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 244 IH

1 ommendations on changes in such programs, including the 

2 establishment of new programs, as would meet the needs 

3 of individuals with hearing loss. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2188 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2188

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 
    Protection Agency, Science and Technology for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Environmental 
    Protection Agency, Science and Technology for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL 
              PROTECTION AGENCY, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Environmental Protection 
Agency, Science and Technology for fiscal year 2024 may not exceed 
$717,723,000.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8486

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. CHRISTOPHER LINEBERRY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, ChiefDistrict Judge. (1:02-cr-00044-jpj-mfu-1; 1:08-cv-80045-jpjmfu)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 4, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Lineberry, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Randall Ramseyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Christopher Lineberry seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion as untimely. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United

States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Accord Bowles v.

Russell , 551 U.S. 205 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 16, 2008. The notice of appeal was filed on November 21,

2008. ∗ Because Lineberry failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

∗ For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

23 because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Horacio PATINO-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40674

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

June 20, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

*395PER CURIAM: *

Horacio Patino-Cruz (Patino) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found unlawfully in the United States after having been deported. The district court sentenced Patino to 77 months of imprisonment and two years of supervised release.

On appeal, Patino argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). The Government argues that the waiver provision in Patino’s plea agreement precludes his attack on the constitutionality of § 1326(b). We assume, *arguendo*only, that the waiver does not bar the instant appeal.

Patino’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 1326(b) is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Patino contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Patino properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Patino also argues that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and, therefore, that this condition should be vacated. The Government does not seek enforcement of the waiver as to this issue. As Patino concedes, however, this claim is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). Accordingly, this portion of the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2312 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2312

To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  State, International Commissions, Construction for fiscal year 2024.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2023

Mr. Biggs (for himself, Mr. Rosendale, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Good of Virginia, 
   Mr. Roy, and Mr. Crane) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a limitation on availability of funds for Department of 
  State, International Commissions, Construction for fiscal year 2024.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 
              INTERNATIONAL COMMISSIONS, CONSTRUCTION FOR FISCAL YEAR 
              2024.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, amounts authorized 
to be appropriated or otherwise available for Department of State, 
International Commissions, Construction for fiscal year 2024 may not 
exceed $29,400,000.
                                 <all>
```
glp_Ex10_3


		
			Exhibit 10.3
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			January 15, 2015
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
		

		
			 
		

		
			________________
		

		
			________________
		

		
			________________
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dear ________:
		

		
			 
		

		
			In recognition of your extraordinary service as a director of Global GP LLC (“GPLLC”) during [insert year], GPLLC hereby grants you, as of the date hereof, an award of $__________ (the “Award”) under the Global Partners LP First Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan).
		

		
			 
		

		
			The Award is fully vested upon grant.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Please be aware that you are responsible for the payment of any applicable taxes due as a result of the grant of the Award.  The value of the Award will be reported on a Form 1099 issued to you at the end of the year.
		

		
			 
		

		
			This Award is intended to fulfill the Plan’s purpose of promoting the interests of the Company by providing to employees, consultants and directors, such as yourself, incentive compensation awards for superior performance and encouraging you to devote your best efforts to advance the business of the Company.
		

		
			 
		

		
			As always, best wishes for a happy and healthy New Year. And, thank you!
		

		
			 
		

		
			Sincerely,
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Edward J. Faneuil
		

		
			Executive Vice President
		

		
			Global GP LLC
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						cc:

					
					
						Eric Slifka

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Daphne Foster

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Mark Romaine 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Amy J. Gould

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Matt Spencer
**Exhibit 12.1**

** **

** **

**HCC INDUSTRIES INC.**

**COMPUTATION OF RATIOOF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

**(in thousands)**

**(unaudited)**

 
|                                          |   | **For the Six Months Ended** |   |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                          |   | **September 29,**            |   | **September 30,** |   |
|                                          |   | **2001**                     |   | **2000** |   |
|                                          |   |                         |   |   |   |
| Earnings:                                     |   |                         |   |   |   |
|                                          |   |                         |   |   |   |
| Earnings before taxes and extraordinary  item |   | $                            | 3,817  |   | $ | 3,915 |   |
|                                          |   |                         |   |   |   |
| Add:   Fixed Charges*                    |   | 4,929                        |   | 5,528 |   |
|                                          |   | $                            | 8,746  |   | $ | 9,443 |   |
|                                          |   |                         |   |   |   |
|                                          |   |                         |   |   |   |
| * Fixed Charges:                              |   |                         |   |   |   |
|                                          |   |                         |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                              |   | $                            | 4,929  |   | $ | 5,528 |   |
|                                          |   | $                            | 4,929  |   | $ | 5,528 |   |
| Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges            |   | 1.77                         |   | 1.71 |   |

----

*The ratios of earnings to fixed charges werecomputed by dividing earnings by fixed charges.  For this purpose, “earnings” consist of earnings before taxes andextraordinary item plus fixed charges and “fixed charges” consist of interestexpense and amortization of debt issuance costs.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 11 , 2022

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00626

- CV

GLENN BLAIR , Appellant

V.
LATOSHA DIONNE MITCH ELL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 310th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. 2021

- 04645

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an attempted appe al from a decree of divorce signed May 3 , 20 22

. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial on May 3, 2022

. Appellant ’ s notice of appeal was filed August 19, 2022

. When appellant has filed a timely post

- judgment motion, the notice of

ap peal must be filed within 90 days after the date the judgment is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a).2

Appellant ’ s notice of appeal was not filed timely. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied whe n an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed b y Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, but
within the 15

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for
extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 95 9 S.W.2d 615, 617

– 18 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant ’ s notice of appeal was not filed
within the 15

- day period provided by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3

. On September 13, 20 22 , notification was transmitted to all parties the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of jurisdict ion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant ’ s response fails to demonstrate that this c ourt has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismiss ed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chie f Justice Christopher and Justices W ise and Hassan.
[TK  LOGO]  Thomson  Kernaghan

July  4,  2001


Mr.  Paul  Lemmon
President
eFinancial  Depot.com  Inc.
1875  Century  Park  East,  Suite  150
Century  City,  CA  90067

Dear  Paul:

Further to our most recent discussion, I am writing to underline the basic terms
under which CALP and ABFL are prepared to continue waiving FDPO's defaults under
the  debentures  issued  to  it:

     1.   The  outstanding  principal  amount  is  $3,100,000  plus  accrued
          interest.

     2.  Mandatory  repayments  will be made as follows:

         a) no repayment on the first $3,000,000 of new financing FDPO receives;
         b) on all subsequent  FDPO  financings,  CALP  will  receive  not  less
         than 20% of the net cash proceeds  received  by  FDPO;  and
         c)  such payments will be made first on behalf of interest and then  on
         behalf  of  principal.

     3.  The  penalties accrued under the Registration Rights Agreement shall be
capped  at  the  equivalent  of 1,700,000 FDPO shares. In order to receive these
shares,  CALP will convert $425,000, principal amount of the existing debentures
at  the  agreed  to  conversion  price of $0.25 per Share. Such principal amount
converted  shall  be  replaced  by a new debenture in the same principal amount.

     4.  The  balance of the debenture then outstanding (i.e., $3,100,000) shall
be  amended  to  provide  for a $1.00 floor on the conversion price. The minimum
pricing  and  volume  covenants  in  the  debenture  shall be reduced to reflect
current  reality.

     5.  CALP shall agree to not be more than 20% of the daily volume of FDPO
shares  until the  debenture  is  repaid  in  full.



                        Thompson Kernaghan & Co. Limited
         120 Adelaide Street West, Suite 1600, Toronto, Ontario MSH ITI
     Telephone (416) 860-8800  Fax (416) 367-8055  Toll Free 1-800-216-4398

                                        1
<PAGE>


Mr.  Paul  Lemmon
July  4,  2001
Page  2

     6.  CALP  will  not exercise on any default it may be entitled top prior to
October  15,  2001 provided the first interest/principal repayment has been made
by  that  time,  and  provided  all  other  defaults  have  been  cured.

     7.  Reasonable  costs  of  effecting  these  amendments  are  for  FDPO's
account.

If  you are in agreement, please sign below and return this letter so we can get
documentation  in  place.

We  will  require  that  any  waiver  or  modification be set forth in a written
agreement  signed  by  both  parties.

Yours  truly,

THOMSON  KERNAGHAN  &  CO.  LIMITED



Per:  /s/  Gregg  Badger
        Gregg  Badger
        Senior  Vice  President  &  Director

cc:  Mark  Valentine
     John  Mann
     Robert  Kubbernus

AGREED  to  this  _______  day  of  July,  2001

eFINANCIAL  DEPOT.com  INC.

Per:  /s/  Paul  Lemmon
           Paul  Lemmon
           President


                                        2
<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**STATMON
      TECHNOLOGIES CORP.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**19
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Statmon Technologies Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Geoffrey P. Talbot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Geoffrey
                P. Talbot**Geoffrey
                P. Talbot**
              **Chief
                Financial Officer**
              **February
                21, 2006**





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Statmon Technologies Corp. and will be
      retained by Statmon Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In condition with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polydex Pharmaceuticals Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John A. Luce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  

the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)  

the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

By /s/  John A. Luce                           John A. Luce,Chief Financial OfficerJune 13, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----